Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-093 ... RESOLUTION NO. 90-93 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY NORTH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 3 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN I BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 5 i 6 7 8 WHEREAS, staff has duly noticed the initial determination and presented the initial study and environmental analysis concerning the potential for negative impacts due to the proposed Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for 9 the Central City North Redevelopment Project (Ordinance No. ) (the 10 11 12 13 14 "Plan Amendment") to the Common Council for its determination. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino Do Hereby Find and Resolve As Follows: Section 1. This Negative Declaration is certified to be noticed and prepared according to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality 15 Act (Pub1 ic Resource Code Section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"). 16 Section 2. An Initial Study was prepared by the Planning Department 17 and was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee who determined that the 18 Plan Amendment would not have a significant effect on the environment and, 19 therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted. 20 21 Section 3. The proposed Negative Declaration received a public review periOd and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed in compliance with 22 CEQA and local regulations. 23 Section 4. The Negative Declaration is approved as an adequate 24 environmental review for the proposed Plan Amendment. 25 Section 5. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of 26 the City of San Bernardino that it does hereby find that the Plan Amendment 27 will not have a significant effect on the environment and that this Negative 28 Declaration be adopted. Section 6. The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of 2 Determination of the Negative Declaration with the Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with CEQA in preparing the 3 41 Negative Declaration. 5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the G Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a reqular 7 meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of March, 1990, by the following 8 9 vote, to wit: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN 10 ESTRADA II REI LL Y 12 FLORES 13 MAUDSLEY 14 MINOR 15 POPE-LUDLAM 16 I MI LLER 17 18 1/1/ 19 1/1/ 20 1/1/ 21 1/1/ 22 1/1/ 23 1/1/ 24 1/1/ 25 /1// 26 1/1/ 27 28 2 nOH ~ ~ ~ --'L --'L --'L ~/l$~W Cfty Cl erk 2 , . RESOLUTION. ..ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY NORTH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. I 2 3 4 of The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this March . 1990. )/ day --:../ 5 ./0--"7./:? /> ///'/ 6 7 Approved as to form and legal content: 8 JAMES F. PENMAN, 9 City Att~rneY 10 By:a .~ ) 1/ - 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2770H I 3 ~Ltf\,\ I" I ~t. CITY OF SAL'!' BERNARDI:iO,~". 1\;: ~1I~r:t\l!", ~f: PLA..../NING DEPARTMEN'tI'" [) II ." " ft'. :'oI011CEOFDETERMINA119~1',~a..PM 3: 29 NEGATIVE DECLARA'lI""',N.c"J\.,,,:.... .' ' ! '.L'~""A H1\0>1~ ..,..fHIrt '. FROM .. ~ ~ 10 CITY OF WI BIR'INDNO JCIO NORTH D STlli5ET WI .-aNO. CA_. _ OFFICE OF PIJIoINNQ .,., AESENlCH ,..00 TENTH STREET. ROOM , 2'1 s..c...-mO.CA _~ ~ ~ OF THE eONlD OF SUPElMSOP.S 3115 NORlH AAAOWHEAD AWNJe WI BEFlNNlDlNO. CA _15 PRCUECT: Central City North Redevelopment Area , PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCAl1ON: An Amendment to the City's Redevelopment Plan to allow RDA to set aside 20% of the tax increment generated in this project area for low and moderate housing in accordance with State legislation 33334.6. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: N/A CONTACT PERSON J Deborah Woldruff, Associate Planner X Redevelopment Commission This is to aJ\'ise that the _ Development Review C"ummin".. _ PtanningC"ummission _ Mayor and Council approved the above described l'roje.! un March 19, 1990and made the fullo~ing determinations : 1. TIIa=' prola='ct wilL X will nOL hava=' a si!!Dliio:ant et'te.:t on the en'liironmenL ... X This ~egative Declaration was prepar..d for thi.:; project persuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. ~litigation measures were. X were not malia=' a condition of approval of the projecL THIS IS TO CERTlFY THAT THE INmAl STUDY WITH CCMME/IITS AND RESPONSES IF APPUCABLE AND A RECORD OF PROJECT APPROVAl IS AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBUC AT : CIlY OFSAL'i B~'iARDIXO PLANNING DEPARlME.'iT 300 NOR1H '0' SlREET ,- SA.'!' BER.'lARDCliO. CA. (71~)3lU.SOS7 .. ~qA" 'tJ-tL/(JrY) -f~~~ SECRETARY E~~1RO~~IE~TALR~WCOMMnncE l