HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-06-2020 Final Agenda PacketCITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AGENDA
FOR THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND MAYOR
AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 2020
5:30 PM – CLOSED SESSION 7:00 PM – OPEN SESSION
WEB-CONFERENCE • VIA ZOOM • SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410 • WWW.SBCITY.ORG
IMPORTANT COVID-19 NOTICE
IN AN EFFORT TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENT THE SPREAD OF
COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) AND TO ENABLE APPROPRIATE SOCIAL DISTANCING,
THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL NOT BE OPEN TO PUBLIC
ATTENDANCE.
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ENCOURAGES THE PUBLIC TO VIEW THIS MAYOR
& CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON TELEVISION OR ONLINE. THE MEETING IS
BROADCAST LIVE ON TIME WARNER CHANNEL 3 OR CHARTER SPECTRUM
CHANNEL 3 AND LIVE STREAMED ONLINE AT
http://sanbernardinocityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=2891
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO COMMENT ON MATTERS BEFORE THE
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS:
(1) COMMENTS AND CONTACT INFORMATION CAN BE EMAILED
TO publiccomments@SBCity.Org BY 4:30 P.M. THE DAY OF THE SCHEDULED
MEETING TO BE INCLUDED IN THE WRITTEN RECORD****;
(2) CALLING 909-384-5128, LEAVING A RECORDED MESSAGE, BY 4:30 P.M. THE DAY
OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING, NOT TO EXCEED THREE MINUTES, WHICH WILL
THEN BE PLAYED DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION OF THE AGENDA
(3) IF YOU WISH TO MAKE A COMMENT DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING A REQUEST
TO SPEAK CAN BE EMAILED TO publiccomments@SBCity.Org AND AT THE TIME OF
THE REQUESTED AGENDA ITEM, THE CITY CLERK WILL PLACE A PHONE CALL TO
THE COMMENTER AND ALLOW THEM TO SPEAK TO THE MAYOR & COUNCIL VIA
SPEAKER PHONE DURING THE LIVE MEETING FOR UP TO THREE MINUTES.
PLEASE INDICATE ON WHICH ITEM YOU WISH TO SPEAK AND INCLUDE YOUR
NAME & PHONE NUMBER.
***ITEMS THAT ARE SUBMITTED TO BE PART OF THE MEETING RECORD CAN BE
FOUND USING THE LINK BELOW – SELECT THE CURRENT YEAR AND MEETING
DATE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT
909-384-5002.
http://edocs.sbcity.org/weblinkcc/Browse.aspx?startid=112
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 2 Printed 5/1/2020
Theodore Sanchez John Valdivia James Mulvihill
MAYOR PRO-TEM, W ARD 1 MAYOR COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 7
Sandra Ibarra
Teri Ledoux
COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 2 CITY MANAGER
Juan Figueroa Sonia Carvalho
COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 3
CITY ATTORNEY
Fred Shorett Genoveva Rocha
COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 4 ACTING CITY CLERK
Henry Nickel
COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 5
Bessine L. Richard
COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 6
Welcome to a meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino.
o Please contact the City Clerk’s Office (909) 384-5002 two working days prior to the meeting for any
requests for reasonable accommodation to include interpreters.
CALL TO ORDER
Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived
Mayor Pro-Tem, Ward 1 Theodore Sanchez
Council Member, Ward 2 Sandra Ibarra
Council Member, Ward 3 Juan Figueroa
Council Member, Ward 4 Fred Shorett
Council Member, Ward 5 Henry Nickel
Council Member, Ward 6 Bessine L. Richard
Council Member, Ward 7 James Mulvihill
Mayor John Valdivia
Acting City Clerk Genoveva Rocha
City Attorney Sonia Carvalho
City Manager Teri Ledoux
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 3 Printed 5/1/2020
5:30 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT
CLOSED SESSION
(A) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and (d)(1)):
i. Gary Saenz and Georgeann Hanna v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San
Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS2003802
ii. SB Pharma Holdings, Inc. dba The Row House v. City of San Bernardino, San
Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1914576
iii. Ashe Society SB, LLC v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino Superior
Court Case No. CIVDS1911952
iv. EEL Holdings, Inc., LLC v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1906467
v. Kostadinos Kahros, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1830325
vi. Washington, LLC, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1905710
vii. Washington, LLC, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al ., San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1922151
viii. KP Investment Group, LLC v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1909577
(B) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(d)(2)): five cases - tort claims filed by Mirna Cisneros (dated February
12, 2020), Karen Cervantes (dated February 12, 2020), Don Smith (dated March
31, 2020), Jackie Aboud (dated April 27, 2020), and Andrea Miller (dated April
29, 2020).
(C) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT - City Clerk
(D) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT - City Manager - Council will discuss process for
future appointment of City Manager
(E) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS - Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.8:
Property Address: Four (4) parcels, approximately 0.56 acres, of vacant real
property located at 562 and 578 N. Mt. Vernon Aven ue and
1316 W. Spruce Street, APNs 0138-114-09 to -11 and
0138-114-18
Agency Negotiator: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Edward C. Adams and Jeanne M. Adams
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Purchase
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 4 Printed 5/1/2020
7:00 P.M.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation for National Public Works Week - May 17, 2020 through May 23,
2020
PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS LISTED AND NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
STAFF REPORTS
2. Receive a Report on the County of San Bernardino's COVID-19 Homeless
Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning and Provide Direction to Staff
Accordingly
Recommendation
Receive a report on the County of San Bernardino's COVID -19 Homeless
Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning and provide direction to Cit y staff
accordingly.
3. Consider Initiating an Annexation of the Remaining Unincorporated Island of
Land Abutting the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area.
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution No. 2020-87 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, declaring its intention to annex a 26-acre area containing six
parcels in the unincorporated County that is totally-surrounded by the City of San
Bernardino, and direct the City Manager to submit the Resolution to the Executive
Officer of LAFCO.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities District 2019-1
(Maintenance Services) for Tax Zone No. 3, PM 19814, Adoption of
Resolutions for Annexing into the Community Facilities District, and First
Reading of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Levying Special Taxes for
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California:
1. Hold a Public Hearing; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-89 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 5 Printed 5/1/2020
electors the question of levying a special tax within the are proposed to be
annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services)
(Annexation No. 2); and
3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and
4. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-90 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Fac ilities
District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and
5. Introduce Ordinance No. MC-1536 of the Mayor and City Council of the City
of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying
special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2020-21 to pay the annual
costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, a reserve fund for
capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San
Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services);
and
6. Schedule the final reading and adoption of Ordinance No MC -1536 for May
20, 2020.
5. Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments
Recommendation
That the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino , California, conduct a
Public Hearing regarding fee adjustments for various City Departments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San B ernardino,
California, approve the commercial and payroll disbursements for April 2020.
7. Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino ,
California accept and file the Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports for both
February and March 2020.
8. Independent Investigation Status Update
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, receive and file a status update requested by the City Council on the
independent investigation into the allegations of harassment made by current and
former City employees against Mayor John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino.
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 6 Printed 5/1/2020
9. A Resolution Awarding a Professional Services Agreement for Auditing
Services Beginning Fiscal Year 2019/20
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 2020-88 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Rogers,
Anderson, Malody & Scott (RAMS) of San Bernardino, California, as the City’s
external auditors, in an amount not-to exceed $283,500 for a three-year term with a
two-year option to extend.
10. Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Violations
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, conduct a final reading of and adopt Ordinance MC-1535, amending
Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code, pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits.
11. Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked Police
Vehicles
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 2020-74 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20
adopted budget and issue a Purchase Order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed
$90,000.
12. Resolution to Ratify the Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of
the Corporation for National and Community Service's Retired and Senior
Volunteer Program - FY 2020/21
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 2020-75 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year two of
the Corporation for National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer
Program, accepting the grant award in the amount of $54,809 and appropriating the
grant funds for the period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021.
13. 2ND Reading of Ordinance of MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan Amendment
19-01 – I. E. Hub Center Project
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, accept for final reading and adopt Ordinance No. MC-1532 approving
Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood
Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Residential to
Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total
of approximately 15.39 acres located at 1066 N. Tippecanoe Avenue.
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 7 Printed 5/1/2020
14. Subordination of a Deed of Trust in Connection with a Refinancing of the
Senior Mortgage Relating to Real Property at 6803 N. Shannon Lane, San
Bernardino, California
Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-76 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino , approving a Subordination of
a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to
real property located at 6803 N. Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California.
15. Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in Connection with a
Refinancing of Senior Mortgage Relating to 756 West 8TH Street, San
Bernardino, California
Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-77 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, to approve a Subordin ation
of a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating
to real property located at 756 West 8th Street, San Bernardino, California.
16. Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports - Previously Formed
Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-72, initiating proceedings to levy and collect
assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in Assessmen t Districts pursuant to the
Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, appointing the Engineer
of Record, and ordering the preparation of Engineer’s Reports.
17. Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement 16 -
1001477 with SBCTA Related to the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct Replacement
Project
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California adopt Resolution 2020-78 to approve Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative
Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA) for roles and responsibilities for the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project
(“Project) to increase San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and
City Developer Impact Fees (DIF) by a total of $10,127,219, for a new SBCTA
share of $16,165,535 and DIF share funding of $9,747,979, to cover project funding
shortfalls based on the final bid price for the Design Build contract and updated
funding contributions from Federal and State sources; and to authorize the City
Manager to sign and execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement.
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 8 Printed 5/1/2020
18. Cooperative Agreement with the City of Rialto for Pepper Avenue
Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project (SS20-010)
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-80, approving the Cooperative Agreement
with the City of Rialto FOR Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to
Mill Street Project (SS20-010) (“Project”).
19. Resolution Approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 with the San
Bernardino County Transportation Commission (Authority) for Phase II of the
San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution 2020-81, approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20-
1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Phase II of
the San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project.
20. Award of a Construction Contract for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-82:
1. Approving a total project budget for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment
Project (“Project”) in the amount of $241,000, to include construction contract
in the amount of $209,500, project contingencies in the amount of $21,500 ,
and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $10,000; and
2. Approving the award of a construction contract with Pacific Play Systems, Inc.
of Carlsbad, California, in the amount of $209,500 to perform the construction
of the Project; and
3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget
to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the
Project; and
4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents, and expend
contingency amounts, if necessary, in support of the Project.
21. Award of Construction Contract for Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to
School Project
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-83:
1. Approving Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to School Project (SS17-001)
Project (“Project”) infrastructure component expenditures in a total amount of
$1,671,000, which includes a construction contract in the amount of $1,469,645,
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 9 Printed 5/1/2020
project contingencies in the amount of $147,355, and engineering and inspection
budgets in the amount of $54,000; and
2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with Hillcrest Contracting Inc. of
Corona, California, in the amount of $1,469,645 to perform construction of th e
project; and
3. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to expend the contingency fund, if
necessary, to complete the project; and
4. Authorizing the Director of Finance to record any necessary budget adjustments
to support the project.
22. Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for Storm Drain Upgrades
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution 2020-84:
1. Approving total project budgets in the amount of $1,06 0,000 for Storm Drain
Repairs at Various Locations (CIP Project SD04 -24 and CIP Project SD19-003)
to include a construction contract in the amount $849,730 , project contingencies
in the amount of $170,270 and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount
of $40,000 (collectively; and
2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with TRYCO General
Engineering of Rimforest, California in the amount of $849,730; and
3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to
allocate $574,380 in Storm Drain Fund No. 248 to the Project; and
4. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if
necessary, to complete the project.
23. Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH Street
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, authorize staff to proceed with an investigation and analysis for the
proposed street vacation of portions of 4th Street.
24. Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement 17-1001639 with San Bernardino
Transportation Authority (SBCTA)
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-85, approving Amendment No. 1 to License
Agreement 17-1001639 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA).
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 10 Printed 5/1/2020
25. Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment No. 1 Budget of the Senior
Nutrition Program Grant to the County of San Bernardino Department of
Aging and Adult Services
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution No. 2020-86 of the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino,
California, ratifying the submittal of Amendment No. 1 budget of the Senior Nutrition
Program Grant to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult
Services (DAAS) pursuant to County Contract No. 19 -372; accept the additional
funding OTO (One-Time Only), amend the award in the amount of $47,213 for a
total budget of $387,213; appropriate grant revenue expenditures, and issue
change orders to purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American Meat Companies, dba
Merit Day and Hollandia Dairy, Inc. for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30,
2020.
ITEMS TO BE REFERRED TO COMMITTEE
REPORTS ON CONFERENCES/MEETINGS ATTENDED
ADJOURNMENT
The next joint regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council
Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on Wednesday,
May 20, 2020 in the Council Chamber located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino,
California 92401. Closed Session will begin at 5:30 p.m. and Open Session will begin at 7:00
p.m.
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING AGENDA
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk for the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby
certify that the agenda for the May 6, 2020 Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council and
the Mayor and City Council acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency was
posted on the City’s bulletin board located at 201 North “E” Street, San Bernardino, California,
at the San Bernardino Public Library located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California,
and on the City’s website sbcity.org on Friday, May 1, 2020.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
___________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020
Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 11 Printed 5/1/2020
NOTICE:
The Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor
Agency to the Redevelopment Agency may refer any item raised by the public to staff,
or to any commission, board, bureau, or committee for appropriate action or have the
item placed on the next agenda of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City
Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. However, no
other action shall be taken nor discussion held by the M ayor and City Council and the
Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency
on any item which does not appear on the agenda unless the action is otherwise
authorized in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 54954.2 of the
Government Code.
Public comments will not be received on any item on the agenda when a public hearing
has been conducted and closed.
Page 1
Staff Report
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
Subject: San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Plan
Recommendation
Receive a report on the County of San Bernardino's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning and provide direction to City staff accordingly.
Background
On March 13, 2020, the City Manager, in accordance with Se ction 2.46.090.A.1 of the
San Bernardino Municipal Code, issued Proclamation No. 2020 -01 declaring the
existence of a local emergency relating to the worldwide spread of respiratory illness
due to the novel coronavirus known as COVID-19. On March 18, 2020, the Mayor and
City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-51, ratifying the proclamation and declaring
the existence of a local emergency. County, state, and federal governments have also
declared the existence of emergency conditions in connection with the global pandemic.
COVID-19 has been determined to be of particular threat to vulnerable populations,
including the homeless. As such, and as required by the State, the County of San
Bernardino is securing hotels/motels in the County to provide individual room sheltering
for certain populations. Some motels are being secured for homeless individuals over
65, non-symptomatic, more susceptible while other rooms are being secured for those
who are COVID-19 positive while they recover.
At present, the City has asserted that hotel and motel owners are not permitted to enter
into such agreements with the County due to zoning restrictions and business licensing
requirements imposed in accordance with the City’s powers as a charter city. However,
the County secured its first contract with the Sure Stay Motel on Hospitality Lane last
month without advance notice to the City. Staff reached out to the County with
concerns regarding the placement of these individuals on Hospitality Lane and made it
clear that the City had several concerns about the plan to relocate homeless individuals
from across the County to hotels within the City’s incorporated boundaries.
When no agreement could be reached with the County, staff sent a cease and desist
letter to the motel owner making them aware that the intended use of the Hotel was not
allowed. Hotels are permitted for hospitality and hotel use , not to be used as a social
services facility or as a homeless shelter. The use is a violation of the City’s General
2
Packet Pg. 12
6712
Page 2
Plan, Zoning Code, and business license restrictions.
The County has acknowledged the importance of working with the City in its efforts and
the City stands ready to work with the County in a manner that does not
disproportionately disrupt the residents of our City. The County has assured staff that
they are working to secure rooms in other cities in the County. However, as of this
writing, we have not received confirmation of locations secured outside the City of San
Bernardino.
In addition to securing hotel/motel rooms for homeless individuals, the County is also
seeking to secure rooms for essential workers such as: health care professionals; law
enforcement; first responders; and other county workers in need of isolation who may
be impacted by COVID-19. The County is also seeking additional sites for COVID-19
testing and previously requested use of the Carousel Mall parking lot; however, they
have since found other locations that better suit their needs.
In a good faith effort to work with the County, staff drafted a cooperation agreement
between the City and the County that, if approved by both parties, would allow the
County to fulfill its obligation in collaboration with the City to contract with hotels and
motels in the city’s jurisdiction for emergency lodging for homeless individuals and
families; contract with hotels and motels in the City’s jurisdiction for emergency lodging
for County essential workers; and allow the County, at no fee, use of the City’s Carousel
Mall parking lot property for the purpose of operating a testing site.
Discussion
A draft cooperation agreement was sent to County Chief Executive Officer Gary
McBride on April 14, 2020, for review (Attachment 1). Following a review of the
proposed agreement, Mr. McBride conveyed that at th is time the County is not entering
into such agreements with individual cities in the County. In place of an agreement, the
County has committed to following the guidelines outlined in their COVID-19 Homeless
Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning document (Attachment 2) including an
informal commitment to all jurisdictions in the County as follows:
The City would be indemnified similar to the hotel. This would be included
in the hotel agreement.
The County will ensure that all program participant s who exit the program
for any reason are immediately transported to the referring community at
no cost to the City.
In the event that a program participant leaves the hotel for any reason and
is not immediately transported to the referring community the City may
immediately contact the County, which will promptly provide transportation
to the Program participant to the referring community.
Hotel shall assure that all outside lighting is operational and all
landscaping is maintained in good condition in accordance with City
standards.
Hotel and/or County shall provide security guard services 24 hours per
day.
2
Packet Pg. 13
6712
Page 3
Daily accounting of occupancy/vacancy and the location of where the
program participants reside from.
Program participant is required to sign an agreement outlining specific
codes of conduct.
While this informal agreement addresses many of the City’s concerns, the draft
cooperative agreement would make the terms more specific to the City of San
Bernardino and allow the governing bodies of both agencies to participate and agree to
the terms.
Specifically, the County’s planning document does not address:
The City’s zoning restrictions - the City asserts that hotel and motel owners are
not permitted to enter into such agreements with the County due to the zoning
and business licensing restrictions traditionally imposed by the City. The draft
cooperation agreement indicates that the City would waive those restrictions as
an emergency measure and enables the use of hotel and motel facilities for
those purposes under certain terms and conditions, all of which are designed to
protect the public safety, health, and welfare of the City and its residents.
Approval from the City Manager prior to utilizing any new hotel or motel for
temporary emergency lodging which includes:
o A copy of a security plan for the new hotel or motel at the time of making a
request.
o A copy of the proposed agreement with the hotel or motel owner/operator
at the time of making the request and a copy of the fully executed
agreement within one business day following execution.
o A cap the total number of rooms within the City for temporary emergency
lodging at fifty (50) rooms (it should be noted that the County requested
150 in the City of San Bernardino).
o That temporary emergency lodging is not permitted for walk-ins to the
motels or hotels in the City.
o That priority use of rooms is given to homeless persons originally located
within the City in coordination with the City’s ESG Outreach Lead and the
City’s District Commanders.
o That logs are maintained a log of the each individual.
o Occupancy is limited to a maximum 14-day term and assistance is
provided by the County to hotels and motels with relocation upon
termination of the term.
o Provide all individuals with free transportation from the hotel or motel at
the conclusion of the stay and in the event the program participant leaves
the hotel for any reason and is not immediately transported to the referring
community the City may immediately contact the County, which will
promptly provide transportation to the Program participant to the referring
community.
2
Packet Pg. 14
6712
Page 4
o Hotel shall assure that all outside lighting is operational and all
landscaping is maintained in good condition in accordance with City
standards.
The proposed agreement also included provisions related to the County’s use of hotel
rooms for its essential workers. Unlike where the County acquires hotel rooms in the
City for homeless individuals from across the County as a social service, the Cit y has
expressed no concerns with the County’s use of County funds to acquire hotel rooms
for its own employees.
In the proposed agreement, the City offered the use of the Carousel Mall parking lot for
use as a regular COVID-19 testing site at no cost to the County. At this time, the San
Bernardino County Department of Public Health has advised that they do not have a
need for an additional testing location within the City as they will be using Arroyo Valley
High School as a regular testing location in o ur area when the National Orange Show
facility is not available. The City will continue to work with the County to facilitate the
expansion of testing in our area and provide for additional testing sites as needed.
2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
Providing direction to staff regarding the County of San Bernardino's COVID -19
Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning aligns with Key Target No. 3
Improved Quality of Life.
Fiscal Impact
Outside of the allocation of staff time, there is no fisca l impact associated with the
consideration of COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, receive a report on the County of San Bernardi no's COVID-19 Homeless
Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning and provide direction to City staff
accordingly.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Draft Cooperation Agreement between the City and County of San
Bernardino regarding Hotel/Motel Homeless Emergency Res ponse
Planning and use of the Carousel Mall as a testing site.
Attachment 2 County of San Bernardino’s COVID-19 Response Planning
document for all jurisdictions in the County.
Ward(s): All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
No previous Council Action.
2
Packet Pg. 15
- 1 -
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AND THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO REGARDING THE SHELTERING OF THE
HOMELESS AND OF DISASTER WORKERS DURING
THE PENDENCY OF THE EMERGENCY CAUSED BY
THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
This COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) by and between the CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, a charter city and municipal corporation (“City”) and the COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) is made and
entered into as of April ___, 2020 (“Effective Date”). City and County are sometimes
individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
1. Recitals
1.1 WHEREAS, both the City and the County, in addition to the state and federal
governments, have declared the existence of emergency conditions in connection with the global
pandemic caused by COVID-19; and
1.2 WHEREAS, COVID-19 is a particular threat to vulnerable populations, including
the homeless; and
1.3 WHEREAS, the City and County agree that the temporary housing of homeless
populations during the emergency will help reduce the spread of COVID-19 and, therefore,
lessen the burden on healthcare facilities countywide; and
1.4 WHEREAS, the County desires to enter into agreements with hotel and motel
owners within the City to provide temporary lodging units for homeless individuals and families;
and
1.5 WHEREAS, at present, such hotel and motel owners are not permitted to enter
into such agreements due to the zoning restrictions and business licensing restrictions
traditionally imposed by the City; and
1.6 WHEREAS, the City desires to waive these restrictions and enable the use of
hotel and motel facilities under certain terms and conditions, defined herein, designed to protect
the public safety, health, and welfare of the City and its residents; and
1.7 WHEREAS, the County also desires to provide shelter in hotels and motels for
essential county employees, such as health care professionals, law enforcement, first responders,
and other county workers in need of isolation; and
1.8 WHEREAS, the City also desires to waive any restrictions in place which might
prevent the use of hotels and motels for essential county employees under the terms and
conditions defined herein; and
2.a
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 2 -
1.9 WHEREAS, the County desires to utilize the City-owned outdoor parking area
surrounding the Carousel Mall for the purposes of a COVID-19 testing site and the City desires
to permit such use under the terms and conditions defined herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants
hereinafter contained and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
2. Terms of Agreement
2.1 Incorporation of Recitals. The Parties hereby affirm the facts set forth in the
Recitals above. Said Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference.
2.2 City Commitments. City hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Within one working day following the Effective Date, the City Manager,
acting as the Director of Emergency Services, shall issue an executive order under which : (1) the
City shall temporarily waive limitations applicable to hotel and motel operators within the City
in order to permit hotel and motel operators to provide temporary emergency lodging units to
homeless individuals and families under contract with the County and under the terms set forth
herein; and (2) the City shall temporarily waive any limitations applicable to hotel and motel
operators within the City in order to permit hotel and motel operators to provide temporary
emergency lodging to essential County workers who need such rooms for self-isolation purposes
during the emergency.
(b) Enter into a right-of-entry agreement with the County to permit the
County to use the open parking area surrounding the Carousel Mall for a term and on dates to be
determined by the Parties and on terms not more favorable to the City than those contained in the
City’s template Right of Entry Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.
(c) Utilize additional Emergency Solutions Grant Program funds under the
CARES Act to address homeless concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic in consultation, as
needed, with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2.3 County’s Commitments. County hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Temporary Shelter for Homeless Individuals: For all hotels and motels to
be used for the temporary emergency lodging of homeless persons and families under this
Agreement, the County shall do the following:
(i) Seek approval from the City Manager prior to utilizing any new
hotel or motel for temporary emergency lodging. Provide the City Manager with a copy of a
security plan for the new hotel or motel at the time of making a request. Provide a copy of the
proposed agreement with the hotel or motel owner/operator at the time of making the request.
Provide a copy of the fully executed agreement with the hotel or motel owner/operator within
one business day following execution.
2.a
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 3 -
(ii) Cap the total number of rooms within the City for temporary
emergency lodging at fifty (50) rooms.
(iii) Provide temporary emergency lodging only for those homeless
individuals and families transported to the hotels and motels by the County. Temporary
emergency lodging shall not be permitted for walk-ins to the motels or hotels in the City.
Prioritize the use of rooms within the City for homeless persons originally located within the
City. Coordinate with the City’s ESG Outreach Lead and the City’s District Commanders in
identifying individuals for priority lodging.
(iv) Maintain a log of the first and last name of each individual checked
in, the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) number for each individual, the
location where they were picked up from, the name of the County agency that placed them in the
hotel or motel, the name of the hotel or motel in which they are lodged, the date lodging
commenced, the check-out date, the number of adults and children in their room, the daily
amount paid for their stay, and the location to which they were relocated at the end of the term.
For any individuals originally located out of the City, maintain a log of any efforts made to
identify hotel or motel options within the original jurisdiction. For each individual served, the
County shall require a form of identification. If an individual does not have a form of
identification, the County shall work with the individual to obtain one.
(v) Limit occupancy to a maximum 14-day term and provide
assistance to hotels and motels with relocation upon termination of the term. Provide all
individuals with free transportation from the hotel or motel at the conclusion of the stay.
(vi) All individuals placed by the County in motels shall be subject to
an eligibility intake using, for example, the Vulnerability Index - Service Prioritization Decision
Assistance Tool (VI-SPADT) and shall be entered in the HMIS before placement in lodging. All
individuals shall be case managed by the County or an organization contracting with the County
for such service. County shall provide wrap-around services at all hotels and motels used for
temporary emergency lodging, including: (1) mental health services, including priority
referrals/placement in the County’s Crisis Residential Treatment Facilities (CRT) and Crisis
Stabilization Units (CSU); (2) referrals and placement in County drug and alcohol rehabilitation;
(3) connection to mental health services at the County mental health clinics; (4) housing
navigation services provided by the County or agencies contracting with the County for such
services; and (5) priority consideration for placement if affordable housing, especially new
housing developed by the County or Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino. The
County shall provide the City with a report noting all individuals that received wrap around
services.
(vii) Ensure the hotel and motel operators transmit the transient lodging
tax based on the room rental paid on behalf of the individuals for the temporary emergency
lodging.
(viii) Attempt, in conjunction with the City and local nonprofits, to
identify permanent supportive housing or other longer-term solutions for all individuals housed
in temporary emergency lodging, ideally at locations in their home jurisdictions. Priority shall
2.a
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 4 -
be given to placing families and larger households into County permanent housing projects that
are currently or soon-to-be built. In the event permanent supportive housing or another longer-
term solution is not identified prior to the conclusion of the maximum 14-day term, County shall
transport the individuals to the location where they were picked up. In instances where the
individuals leave the hotel or motel site prior to the end of their term, the County shall make
reasonable efforts to find the individuals and relocate the individuals to the location where they
were picked up and return them. If the County is unable to locate the individuals, the County
shall notify the City.
(b) Temporary Shelter for Essential Workers: For all hotels and motels to be
used for the temporary emergency lodging of essential County workers under this Agreement,
the County shall do the following:
(i) Provide the City Manager with a list of hotel or motel used for
such temporary emergency lodging. Provide a copy of the fully executed agreement with the
hotel or motel owner/operator within one business day following execution.
(ii) Ensure the hotel and motel operators transmit the transient lodging
tax based on the room rental paid on behalf of the individuals for the temporary emergency
lodging.
(c) Carousel Mall Testing Site: Enter into a right-of-entry agreement with the
City to permit the County to use the open parking area surrounding the Carousel Mall for a term
and on dates to be determined by the Parties and on terms not more favorable to the City than
those contained in the City’s template Right of Entry Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.
2.4 Financial Participation. Neither Party shall pay the other any sums under this
Agreement.
2.5 Term and Termination. This Agreement shall remain in effect until the earlier to
occur of: (1) its termination by either Party; or (2) fourteen (14) days following the date on
which the City Council adopts a resolution terminating the City’s state of emergency. Either
Party may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason upon giving the other Party
fourteen days’ advance written notice.
2.6 Insurance Requirements. The Parties shall each maintain adequate insurance
coverage for the activities contemplated herein for the duration of this Agreement.
3. Miscellaneous Terms
3.1 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent
of the Parties by an instrument in writing signed by both Parties.
3.2 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have
participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be
construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any
term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not
work days. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of
2.a
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 5 -
reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this
Agreement.
3.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire and integrated
agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior and
contemporaneous oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements.
3.4 Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties.
(a) Formal notices, demands and communications between Parties shall be
deemed sufficiently given if: (i) by commercial overnight delivery; (ii) b y messenger service for
immediate personal delivery; or (iii) by electronic transmittal, including electronic mail and/or
fax transmissions, subject to written verification of receipt by the receiving party. Such written
notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses
as either Party may from time to time designate by written notice to the other Party.
All notices, demands and communications shall be sent, as follows:
TO CITY: TO COUNTY:
City of San Bernardino
Attn: City Manager
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
County of San Bernardino
Attn: Chief Executive Officer
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92415
Copy to: Copy to:
City of San Bernardino
Attn: City Attorney
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
County of San Bernardino
Attn: County Counsel
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92415
(b) Notices shall be deemed effective upon receipt or with respect to
electronic transmission, upon receipt of written verification from the receiving party.
3.5 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall
constitute an original.
3.6 Laws and Regulations. Each Party shall keep itself fully informed of and in
compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting
the performance of this Agreement, and shall give all notices required by law. Each Party shall
be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with this Agreement. If
either Party performs any of its obligations hereunder knowing that its actions are contrary to
such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the other, the violating
Party shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom.
2.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 6 -
3.7 Approvals. Approvals required by Parties, or any officers, agents or employees
thereof, shall not be unreasonably withheld and approval or disapproval shall be given within a
reasonable time.
3.8 Mutual Cooperation; Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall
cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated
hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the
conditions of this Agreement.
3.9 Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement and the performance of the Parties
obligations hereunder are for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City and the County. No
person or entity who or which is not a signatory to this Agreement shall be deemed to be
benefited or intended to be benefited by any provision hereof, and no such person or entity shall
acquire any rights or causes of action against either the City or the County hereunder as a result
of a Party’s performance or non-performance of its obligations under this Agreement.
3.10 Relationship of Parties. The Parties agree and intend that the City and the County
are independent contracting entities and do not intend by this Agreement to create any
partnership, joint venture, or similar business arrangement, relationship or association between
them.
3.11 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
California without regard to conflicts of laws principles. This Agreement shall be deemed to
have been made in the County of San Bernardino, California, regardless of the order of the
signatures of the Parties affixed hereto. Any litigation or other legal proceedings which arise
under or in connection with this Agreement shall be conducted in a federal or state court located
within or for San Bernardino County, California. The Parties consent to the personal jurisdiction
and venue in federal or state court located within the County of San Bernardino, California, and
hereby waive any defenses or objections thereto including defenses based on the doctrine of
forum non conveniens.
3.12 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non-
defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
Either Parties’ consent or approval of any act by the other Party requiring its consent or approval
shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary its consent to or approval of any subsequent
act of the other Party. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not
be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
3.13 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies
expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are
cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not
preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the
same default or any other default by the other Party.
3.14 Legal Counsel. Each Party acknowledges that: (i) it has read this Agreement; (ii)
it has had the opportunity to have this Agreement explained to it by legal counsel of its choice;
(iii) it is aware of the content and legal effect of this Agreement; and (iv) it is not relying on any
2.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 7 -
representations made by the other Party or any of the employees, agents, representatives, or
attorneys of the other Party, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement.
3.15 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses,
paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by
a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or
sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to
carry out the intent of the parties hereunder.
3.16 Binding Effect. The terms of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and
shall be binding upon, each of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns.
3.17 Authorized Representatives. The person or persons executing this Agreement on
behalf the City and County warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this
Agreement on behalf of that Party and that they have the authority to bind that Party to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
2.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 8 -
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AND THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO REGARDING THE SHELTERING OF THE
HOMELESS AND OF DISASTER WORKERS DURING
THE PENDENCY OF THE EMERGENCY CAUSED BY
THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be entered
into as of the date set forth above.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By: __________________________________
Teri Ledoux, City Manager
Date: ___________
By: __________________________________
Gary McBride, Chief Executive Officer
Date: ___________
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
By:______________________________________
City Attorney
By: __________________________________
Michelle Blakemore, County Counsel
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By:______________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, Acting City Clerk
By:______________________________________
Lynna Monell, Clerk of the Board
2.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
- 9 -
EXHIBIT A
TEMPLATE RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
2.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 1 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
1. Purpose And Scope
The purpose of this document is to describe the Unsheltered Homeless Emergency
Response Plan by the County of San Bernardino in response to the coronavirus (COVID-
19) statewide epidemic and to define the interactions, roles, and responsibilities for the
coordination of services between county departments, hotel/motel operators, and
homeless service providers.
In response to Executive Order (E.O.) N-32-20, the State of California has authorized
new funding and has identified current funding to respond to the threat of COVID-19
among our homeless population. The E.O. identifies the Homeless Emergency Aid
Program (HEAP) funding and the Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention
(HHAP) program funding as resources intended to provide programs and facilities to
combat homelessness. As part of the order, emergency legislation created additional
funding and resources to protect the safety of homeless populations, reduce the spread of
COVID-19 among the homeless populations and provide safe beds as the virus continues
to spread.
The E.O. provides suspension to Health and Safety Code section 50214, to allow local
jurisdictions to expend HEAP and HHAP funds to prepare and address the impacts of
COVID-19, which includes the expansion of shelter and housing services capacity. The
order also suspends Division 13, commencing with section 21000, of the Public
Resources Code and Regulations in relation to the previous directed funding.
2. References
2.1.Regulations
2.1.1. Federal Guidance
CDC – Interim Guidance for Homeless Shelters
CDC – Interim Guidance for Homeless Service Providers to Plan and
Respond to Coronavirus Disease 2019
CDC – Cleaning and Disinfection Recommendations
CDC – Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection Recommendations
CDC – People Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness
EPA – Information on Disinfectants and Water/Wastewater
HUD – Eligible ESG Program Costs for Infectious Disease Preparedness
HUD – Infectious Disease Toolkit for Continuums of Care: Preventing &
Managing the Spread of Infectious Disease for People Experiencing
Homelessness
2.b
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 2 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
HUD – Infectious Disease Toolkit for Continuums of Care: Preventing &
Managing the Spread of Infectious Disease with Encampments
HUD – Specific Considerations for Public Health Authorities to Limit
Infection Risk Among People Experiencing Homelessness
NIDA – COVID-19 Advice for Social Anxiety Disorders
2.1.2. State Guidance
State of California Executive Order N-32-20
State of California Executive Order N-33-20
State of California Health & Safety Code Section 50214
State of California Public Resources Code and Regulations, Division 13,
Section 21000
BCSA – Guidance for Homeless Assistance Providers on Novel
Coronavirus (COVID-19)
CDPH – Guidance Documents: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
CDPH – Use of Personal Protective Equipment during COVID-19
Outbreak
2.1.3. Local Guidance
SBCDPH – Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
LACDPH – Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Assessment Tool for
Homeless Shelters
LACDPH – Guidance for Homeless Shelters
LACDPH – Infection Prevention Basics for Homeless Shelters
LACDPH – People Experiencing Homelessness FAQ
2.2.Other Emergency Operation Plans
2.2.1. 2018/2019 DEOP Essential Functions
3. Definitions
Emergency Operations Center (EOC) - Coordinates with the county’s disaster
response expenses for recovery from state and federal governments.
Office of Emergency Services (OES) – Division of the San Bernardino County Fire
Department responsible for countywide emergency planning, mitigation, response
and recovery activities. The OES works with all county departments and 24 cities,
and many non-government organizations
2.b
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 3 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP) – Established by statute to provide
localities with flexible block grant funds to address their immediate homelessness
challenges, such as emergency housing vouchers, rapid rehousing, emergency shelter
construction, and the provision of temporary shelter, among other activities
Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HHAP) - One-time block grant that
provides local jurisdictions with funds to support regional coordination and expand or
develop local capacity to address their immediate homelessness challenges.
4. Concept of Operations
The County of San Bernardino and the regional homeless Continuum of Care (CoC) are
working together to address the needs of homeless individuals affected by the COVID-19
outbreak.
COVID-19 is particularly dangerous for those experiencing homelessness. Individuals
without stable housing not only face greater difficulty taking preventative actions, but
they are often in poorer health than other residents. For the past several years, the County,
cities and members of the CoC have been working tirelessly to reduce and prevent
homelessness; however, despite targeted efforts the number of homeless persons
continues to rise throughout the region.
The goal of this plan is to identify at minimum 300 hotel/motel rooms throughout the
region in multiple jurisdictions as quickly as possible to contain the spread of COVID-19
in the unsheltered community. The purpose of these facilities is to protect the community
by limiting the community’s exposure to populations that are generally at higher risk of
transmitting the virus, not to put the community at risk.
One of the County’s and CoC’s top priorities since the COVID-19 outbreak has been to
identify sites to house unsheltered homeless persons meeting high risk priorities and
quarantine unsheltered homeless persons who are well but have been identified by
medical doctors as being extremely at-risk, vulnerable to the virus or COVID-19 positive.
This model aims to keep these individuals out of shelters and encampments and lower the
risk of exposure to other members of the homeless population to slow the virus’ spread.
Units have been prioritized for individuals/households who meet two or more of the
following criteria:
2.b
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 4 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
Unsheltered persons who are non-symptomatic and present healthy that meet the
following high-risk criteria:
o Persons aged 65 years and older
o Persons of any age who have an underlying health condition such as:
Heart disease
Chronic lung disease or moderate to severe asthma
Immunocompromised
Underlying medical conditions that are not well controlled: diabetes,
renal failure, or liver disease
o Pregnant women
Unsheltered persons meeting the above criteria who are exposed, but asymptomatic
requiring isolation
Unsheltered persons meeting the criteria under section 1 who are symptomatic
awaiting test results requiring isolation
Unsheltered persons meeting the criteria under section 1 who are positive for
COVID-19 but do not require hospitalization
Special accommodations will be made for members of unsheltered families meeting
the criteria under section 1
5. Engagement of Services
High-risk unsheltered persons will be identified in part through the Homeless
Coordinated Entry System (CES) and through the Sheriff’s Homeless Outreach and
Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) team. CES will provide referrals from community
partners and the HOPE team will make contact with the unsheltered persons. In addition,
the HOPE team will identify previously contacted high-risk unsheltered persons and
navigate them to the appropriate location.
All referrals will have completed the CES assessment forms and appropriate
documentation. Each client entered into a hotel/motel room will be connected with a
case manager through one of our current HEAP or Homeless Partnership homeless
service providers. On site food and security will be engaged to ensure comfort during the
duration of their stay. Clients will be notified to not allow access to their rooms by others
during their stay.
2.b
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 5 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
Persons meeting the requirements of the hotel/motel use, may contact CES through
Inland Empire United Way at 2-1-1 or the Sheriff’s HOPE team at 1-844-811-
HOPE(4673).
6. Admission Agreement
Unsheltered homeless persons referred to the hotel/motel will be told to remain in their
rooms during the duration of the COVID-19 stay in place order from the State. Each
person will sign an admission agreement noting the following:
They will take care of their room (no damages)
Alcohol, substance use, weapons, or other illegal activity on the property is not
permitted
Unregistered guests in the room are not allowed
They acknowledge that they will be a good neighbor and avoid upsetting their
neighbors by engaging in loud or disruptive activities (loud TV/music, late night loud
noise, etc.)
They will maintain a clean room and allow housekeeping staff access as needed
They will allow the County of San Bernardino and partnering homeless services
provider staff and partners to meet them onsite or in their room
They will remove all their personal items from their room prior to check out and agree
to vacate the premises voluntarily upon the ending of the stay period or upon the
rescinding of the Governor’s Executive Order
7. Case Management Plan
Homeless individuals in lodging may have access to or may receive assistance in the
following service areas:
• Checking in / out of lodging; aid in completing necessary paper work
• Resource packets that may contain the following information:
o Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Instructions on preventing the
spread of coronavirus (COVID-19),
o Contact information for a case manager, and others, e.g., security
o Instructions on how to access medical services from their managed care plan
o How to access mental health services
o A crisis and support line
• When appropriate, linkages to benefits as needed
• Daily wellness telephone checks by health care or other industry professionals,
2.b
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 6 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
• Regularly scheduled onsite visits by participating providers
• When appropriate, assistance in storing, organizing, disposing of personal
belongings
• Assistance in arranging for onsite, offsite, fostering of personal pets
• If not provided with lodging, assistance with procuring, ordering, or arranging for
delivery of food items, meals, or other nutrition
• Some managed care plans may offer/coordinate pharmacy services; assistance in
procuring, ordering, or arranging for delivery of prescription medications
• Homeless requiring treatment for mental health issues or substance abuse will be
assessed to determine specialized offsite services and housing
• Hygiene kits and/or supplies needed to maintain stability
8. Outreach Plan
The Sheriff’s HOPE Team received comprehensive training on best practices to keep
themselves safe and to ensure that people they encounter with flu-like symptoms get the
right medical care. The County of San Bernardino Department of Behavioral Health
(DBH) Homeless Outreach Support Team (HOST) has also received similar training.
Outreach teams that are currently working with the HOPE and HOST teams will continue
to support those teams. In addition, they will pass along information regarding COVID-
19 and how to reduce the chances of contracting the virus to the unsheltered homeless
they encounter.
Other homeless service providers outside of HOPE and HOST are referring unsheltered
homeless they engage through the Coordinated Entry System to ensure they receive
information about COVID-19 and how to reduce their chances of catching the virus
9. Staffing Plan
• Off-site homeless services providers and DBH staff will call each person placed in
the hotel/motel rooms for daily wellness checks
• Rotating staff will be on site 1-2 times per week to follow-up on client needs, such
as access to mainstream services
• The Sheriff HOPE team will screen and transport homeless individual to lodging
location
• DBH staff will assist in the transport of homeless individuals requiring medical
isolation or quarantine services
2.b
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 7 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
• Homeless services providers and/or DBH staff will meet individuals and assist
them in checking in, completing paperwork and settling in their rooms
• Staff will follow CDC safety guidelines
10. Food Plan
Meal services are being organized through County of San Bernardino Human Services in
conjunction with Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP) and Molina Healthcare. IEHP and
Molina Healthcare will provide meals for persons identified as members and the County
of San Bernardino will cover the cost for non-members.
Provision of Food Services:
Up to a 14 day food package can be sent out in two separate deliveries (7 days of food
in each delivery)
Food order for each client may be able to be extended past 14 days or cancelled upon
request as needed
Food packages come in two forms:
o Packages needing refrigeration (if the hotel/motel has a refrigerator this option
will be utilized)
o Packages of non-perishables (it is anticipated that these will be utilized at a
faster rate than the refrigeration packages)
Food packages may be customized if needed:
o Diabetic
o Low sodium
o Vegetarian
11. Decommission Plan
The use of this facility for the unsheltered homeless and medically stable COVID-19
patients will be secured for three (3) months and will terminate upon the rescinding of the
order. Once the State order has been lifted, those homeless individuals that have not been
connected to permanent housing will be diverted to the appropriate homeless services
provider and returned to where they were originally staying as identified by the outreach
team.
Homeless Relocation Plan:
• The Sheriff’s HOPE team will coordinate transportation services with the HOST team
• Transportation will be provided through groups or cohorts to the appropriate
destinations
2.b
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 8 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
• It is anticipated that up to 50 persons will be transported per day with a scaling back of
hotel/motel services
The rooms will be professionally cleaned prior to assuming regular business use and the
hotel property will be returned to its previous condition at the end of the occupancy
agreement term.
Tenancy rights will be waived by the client upon the admission agreement and language
will be entered into the occupancy agreement noting weekly stays for tenants that will be
renewable on an as needed basis. In addition, it will be expected that the hotel/motel in
conjunction with County services and support will meet the following criteria which
affords exception to the 30 day rule:
• The hotel/motel keeps a right of access and control of the room; and
• The hotel/motel has facilities to safeguard personal property; and
• The hotel/motel provides central telephone service; and
• The hotel/motel provides maid, mail, and room services; and
• Food service is in or adjacent to the premises of the hotel/motel.
12. Security Plan
Security will be provided 24/7 at the hotel/motel and on premises of the facility. Security
will be designated to the lobby and will be continuously roaming the grounds of the
facility. All food will be brought into the hotel/motel regularly and personnel will be
isolated. The temporary residents will be encouraged to remain in their room and avoid
accessing any of the residential or commercial service areas.
13. Informing Providers and Community
The Department of Public Health (DPH), has notified all its employees, partners, and
providers about best practices to prevent and prepare for a COVID-19 outbreak. The
County of San Bernardino has worked with DPH to develop and administer training
specifically for support providers providing housekeeping services at these isolation
locations.
DPH has launched a robust, comprehensive COVID-19 web portal (sbcovid19.com)
aimed at providing key guidance for the residents of the county. It includes program
guidance and tools from DPH and CDC, as well as infectious disease preparedness
guidance for different communities/agencies.
2.b
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
San Bernardino County
COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1
Page #: Page 9 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020
14. Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities for the COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response include:
I. Preparing Housing Inventory – Economic Development Department primary
point of contact (POC)
a) Develop an inventory of motel/hotel providers
i) Locations, number of rooms, cost, etc.
ii) Communicate intent to cities
iii) Engage the motel/hotel providers for potential leasing/contract
development
iv) Develop motel/hotel provider messaging
II. COVID-19 Education – HS and OHS
a) Prepare educational materials for motel/hotel providers
i) Information and precautionary measures needed for employees in
engaging the homeless
ii) Appropriate sanitation
iii) Development of materials and printing
III. Communication with Local Jurisdictions – DEO and Government and Legislative
Affairs
a) Develop messaging plan
b) Determine main POC
c) Provide CEO and AEO with details of city/town concerns
IV. Public Health Response
a) Actions needed to secure the health and safety of the homeless population
and/or priority populations
b) Personal Protective Equipment
V. Provider Care Coordination – KEYS, DBH, and OHS
a) Develop strategy for public health response with homeless services
VI. Engaging in an Immediate Response
a) Engage a motel/hotel provider to acquire at minimum 50 rooms to start
moving unsheltered individuals or families into rooms to shelter in place
b) Engage a homeless service provider to provide case management for each
client and provide access to mainstream resources, if available, food, hygiene
products, etc.
2.b
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency
Page 1
Staff Report
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director
Subject: Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area
Containing 6 Parcels
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution No. 2020-87 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, declaring its intention to annex a 26-acre area containing six
parcels in the unincorporated County that is totally-surrounded by the City of San
Bernardino, and direct the City Manager to submit the Resolution to the Executive
Officer of LAFCO.
Background
In March 2013, the City of San Bernardino approved the Spring Tr ails Specific Plan
(SP10-01), which included a variety of underlying entitlements. The Specific Plan
approvals included the adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -34 that certified the Final
Environmental Impact Report, the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring an d Reporting
Plan, the adoption of a General Plan Amendment No. GPA-02-09 (including the pre-
annexation of the Specific Plan area), the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15576,
and the approval of a Development Agreement.
In March 2015, Montecito Equities, Ltd., (Developer) filed a Landowner Petition for
annexation with the San Bernardino County Local Area Formation Commission
(“LAFCO”). Since that time, the Applicant has been working with LAFCO seeking
approval of the annexation of the area known as S pring Trails into the City of San
Bernardino (Note: Additional details of the annexation proceedings are provided in both
Attachments 1 and 2).
At the January 15, 2020 meeting, the Mayor and City Council considered the
annexation of the remaining unincorporated island of land abutting the Spring Trails
Specific Plan Project area. Subsequent to discussion on the matter, the City Council
tabled the item to an unspecified date.
On March 18, 2020, the Mayor and City Council discussed this item in Closed Session
centered on a threat of litigation. Based on City Council direction, this item is now back
before the Mayor and City Council for consideration.
3
Packet Pg. 34
6695
Page 2
Discussion
On October 16, 2019, LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 3091 approving the annexation
of the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area (LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the
City of San Bernardino, subject to certain conditions of approval. During the processing
of the annexation, there was a 26 -acre area including 6 parcels that was removed from
the annexation that created an unincorporated island surrounded by the City of San
Bernardino. This area was removed because the registered voters occupying the six
single-family residences located within the Project area had vocally opposed the Spring
Trails Specific Plan Project, and it was unlikely that the annexation of the entire area
including the island would be successful. As a result, the annexation continued without
the unincorporated island area (See Attachment 2, Location Map - Remaining
Unincorporated Island).
With respect to the above mentioned conditions of approval, LAFCO imposed the
Condition of Approval No. 4 that states the following:
The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of the
totally-surrounded island within one year of the Commission’s approval of
LAFCO 3188A (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B). A resolution by
the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall be submitted to the
Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the City’s commitment to fulfilling this
requirement prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion for
LAFCO 3188A. A status report shall be provided to the Commission at
the six month date outlining the progress of the City of San Bernardino in
fulfilling its obligation. Failure on the part of the City of San Bernardino to
fulfill its commitment to annex the totally-surrounded island shall require
that the next annexation proposed to the City of San Bernardino, either by
the City through resolution or by property owner/registered voter petition to
include a condition requiring the initiation of annexation of the totally -
surrounded island. Said condition of approval shall be deemed completed
upon the issuance of the Certificate of Filing for said island.
The above Condition of Approval No. 4 imposed by LAFCO holds the Certificate of
Completion for LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A (Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area)
on hold until (a) the City of San Bernardino Mayor and City Council adopts a resolution
identifying its commitment to annex the 26-acre unincorporated island area at some
time in the future, and (b) the City of San Bernardino submits a copy of the adopted
resolution to the Executive Officer of LAFCO. In essence, Condition of Approval No. 4
places a hold of Montecito Equities, Ltd., (Developer) the ability to proceed with the
construction of the project until after the City Council adopts a resolution confirming its
intent to annex the unincorporated island area into the City a sometime in the future.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
The adoption of a Resolution committing to the annexation of the remaining
unincorporated island area is consistent with Key Target No 1: Secure a long-term
revenue source. Specifically, the area considered for annexa tion is within the City’s
sphere of influence and has been anticipated for development as identified in the City’s
3
Packet Pg. 35
6695
Page 3
comprehensive General Plan. Future in-fill development, such as that proposed as part
of the Spring Trails project, will be a catalyst to en courage new development in the city
that will generate additional revenue.
Fiscal Impact
The adoption of the Resolution committing to the future annexation of the remaining
unincorporated island does not require the expenditure of any General Fund reve nue at
this time.
Conclusion
On October 16, 2019, LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 3091 approving the annexation
of the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area (LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the
City of San Bernardino, subject to certain conditions of approval. A condition of
approval was included as part of Resolution No. 3091, which requires that the Mayor
and the City Council of the City of San Bernardino adopt a resolution confirming its
intent to annex the unincorporated island area into the City a sometime in the future.
It is, therefore, staff’s recommendation that the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020 -87, declaring its intention to
annex a 26-acre area containing six parcels in the unincorporated County that is totally-
surrounded by the City of San Bernardino, and direct the City Manager to submit the
Resolution to the Executive Officer of LAFCO.
Attachments
Attachment 1 November 18, 2019 Letter from Gresham Savage
Attachment 2 Location Map - Remaining Unincorporated Island
Attachment 3 August 21, 2019, LAFCO Agenda Packet
Attachment 4 October 16, 2019, LAFCO Agenda Packet
Ward: 5
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
March 2013 The Mayor and Common Council approved the Spring T rails
Specific Plan and all other underlying entitlement for the project.
3
Packet Pg. 36
Resolution No. 2020-87
RESOLUTION 2020-87
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REGARDING THE
SPRING TRAILS SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT TO THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, in March 2013, the City of San Bernardino (“City”) approved the Spring
Trails Specific Plan Project (SP10-01) that included a variety of underlying entitlements,
including the adoption of Resolution No. 2013-34 that certified the Final Environmental Impact
Report, the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the adoption of a General
Plan Amendment No. GPA-02-09 (including the pre-annexation of the Specific Plan area), the
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15576, and the approval of a Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, in March 2015, the applicant, Montecito Equities, Ltd., filed a Landowner
Petition for annexation with the San Bernardino County Local Area Formation Commission
(“LAFCO”). Since that time, the applicant has been working with LAFCO seeking approval of
the annexation of the area known as the Spring Trails into the City of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, on October 16, 2019, LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 3291 approving the
annexation of the Project (LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the City, subject to certain
conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the annexation resulted in the creation of a twenty-six (26)-acre totally-
surrounded island area comprised of six (6) parcels (“Island Territory”), depicted in that map
entitled “Location Map – Remaining Unincorporated Island,” attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval in LAFCO’s Resolution No. 3291 was
that the City initiate annexation of the Island Territory within one (1) year of LAFCO’s approval
of LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A; and
WHEREAS, presently the six (6) parcels of the Island Territory remain a part of
unincorporated County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to proceed to adopt this Resolution of
Intention to initiate the annexation of the Island Territory to the City and to describe the Island
Territory proposed to be annexed.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
3.a
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Resolution 5.6.20AA (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Resolution No. 2020-87
SECTION 2. The proceedings for annexation are initiated by this City Council pursuant
to the authorization provisions contained in the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of 2000 (Gov. Code § 56000 et seq.).
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby determines that the public convenience and
necessity requires that the Island Territory be added to the City and it declares its intention to
annex the Island Territory to the City.
A description of the Island Territory is as follows:
All that property within the Island Territory proposed to be annexed to the City,
as such property is shown on the map entitled “Location Map – Remaining
Unincorporated Island,” attached hereto and a copy of which is on file in the
Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for public inspection.
SECTION 4. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that
CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this day of , 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
__________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
__________________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
3.a
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Resolution 5.6.20AA (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Resolution No. 2020-87
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-XXX, adopted at a regular meeting held on the day of
, 2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this day of
, 2020.
______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
3.a
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Resolution 5.6.20AA (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
SAN BERNARDINO 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 San Bernardino, California 92408
SAN DIEGO 401 West A Street, Suite 925 San Diego, California 92101
RIVERSIDE Mission Inn Plaza Riverside, California 92501 (By Appointment Only)
GreshamSavage.com
M681-000 -- 3770661.1
Mark.Ostoich@GreshamSavage.com ∙ San Bernardino Office
(909) 890‐4499 ∙ fax (909) 890‐9690
November 18, 2019
VIA E‐MAIL ‐ Ledoux_Te@sbcity.org
AND HAND DELIVERED
Teri Ledoux, City Manager
City of San Bernardino
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Re: Spring Trails Specific Plan Project (SP10‐01)
Dear Teri:
As you know, we represent Montecito Equities, Ltd., the owner and developer of the
Spring Trails Specific Plan Project (SP10‐01), approved by the City of San Bernardino
in March 2013. The Specific Plan approvals, which are final and fully‐vested, include
adoption of Resolution No. 2013‐34; certification of the Final Environmental Impact
Report; adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan; adoption of
General Plan Amendment No. GPA 02‐09 (including pre‐annexation of the Specific
Plan area); approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15576; and approval of a
Development Agreement (collectively, the “Specific Plan Approvals”).
On October 16, 2019, the San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation
Commission adopted Resolution No. 3091 approving the annexation of the Project
(LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the City, subject to certain conditions of
approval. The annexation resulted in the creation of a 26‐acre totally‐surrounded
island area comprised of six parcels. Although the six parcels receive the bulk of these
municipal services from the City (except for fire), they will remain a part of
unincorporated County of San Bernardino (the “Island Area”), until eventually
annexed into the City.
With respect to the Island Area, the conditions of approval imposed by LAFCO in
Resolution No. 3091 included Condition No. 4, which provides as follows:
The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of
the totally‐surrounded island within one year of the Commissionʹs
approval of LAFCO 3188A (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B).
3.b
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Teri Ledoux, City Manager
City of San Bernardino
November 18, 2019
Page 2
M681-000 -- 3770661.1
A resolution by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall
be submitted to the Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the Cityʹs
commitment to fulfilling this requirement prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Completion for LAFCO 3188A. A status report shall be
provided to the Commission at the six month date outlining the
progress of the City of San Bernardino in fulfilling its obligation.
Failure on the part of the City of San Bernardino to fulfill its
commitment to annex the totally‐surrounded island shall require that
the next annexation proposed to the City of San Bernardino, either by
the City through resolution or by property owner/registered voter
petition, to include a condition requiring the initiation of annexation
of the totally‐surrounded island. Said condition of approval shall be
deemed completed upon the issuance of the Certificate of Filing for
said island.
In effect, LAFCO Condition No. 4 holds the Certificate of Completion for annexation
of the Project in abeyance unless and until (i) the City Council adopts a resolution
“outlining the City’s commitment” to annex the Island Area at some point in the
future and (ii) provides the adopted resolution to LAFCO’s Executive Officer.
Therefore, the annexation will not be complete and Montecito will not be permitted to
move forward with construction of the Project in accordance with the Specific Plan
Approvals until after the City Council adopts a resolution confirming its intent to
annex the Island Area into the City at some future date.
The purpose of this letter is to formally request that the City Council consider the
future annexation of the Island Area and adoption of a resolution evidencing its
commitment to do so, as required under Condition No. 4, at a future hearing.
Brief Project and Annexation History
As noted above, the Project has long been included as part of the City’s Sphere of
Influence, and was originally entitled by the City in March 2013. Following the
March 4, 2013 approval of the Project, the Mayor and Common Council considered a
resolution to initiate the annexation of the Project, including the Island Area; however,
the Common Council ultimately voted not to initiate annexation at its hearing held on
November 3, 2014. The Common Council did so despite the fact that the Specific Plan
Approvals, including Resolution 2013‐34 and the Project Development Agreement,
expressly require the City to initiate annexation of the Project territory and that failure
to initiate annexation would constitute a breach of these approvals.
3.b
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Teri Ledoux, City Manager
City of San Bernardino
November 18, 2019
Page 3
M681-000 -- 3770661.1
As a result of the City’s failure to comply with its obligations under the Development
Agreement and Resolution No. 2013‐34 to initiate annexation of the Project territory,
Montecito filed a Landowner Petition for annexation with LAFCO in March 2015. The
application was based on an analysis that concluded that the annexation territory,
with less than 12 registered voters, was considered “uninhabited” under the LAFCO
regulations. Because the land owned by Montecito, the petitioning landowner,
comprised most of the assessed value within the annexation territory, the proposed
annexation of the Project territory as an “uninhabited” territory was assured of
success.
After the City’s approval of the Project, the voter registration within the Project area
suspiciously increased from eight registered voters to sixteen registered voters
between April 2013 and June 2015.1 The result of this increase was to convert the
annexation from an “uninhabited” territory to an “inhabited” territory. The voter
registration increase was significant, because when inhabited territory is annexed, an
election must be held and votes are cast on a per voter basis. Because the registered
voters allegedly occupying the six single‐family residences located within the Project
territory had vocally opposed the Project, it was unlikely that annexation of the Project
and surrounding area would be successful. For this reason and in order to further the
Project consistent with the Specific Plan Approvals, Montecito was forced to reduce
the annexation territory to include solely the Specific Plan Area. Accordingly, the six
non‐Project parcels comprising the Island Area were removed from the Project
annexation territory.2
As a result of the removal of the Island Area from the Project, the reorganization
before LAFCO is considered an “island” annexation. Section 56744 of the Cortese‐
Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (“Act”) provides that
territory cannot be annexed if, as a result of the annexation, unincorporated territory is
1 Based upon our analysis of the voter registration activity, three of the newly registered voters
reside at an address assigned to vacant land; one of the newly registered voters has listed an
address that is outside the annexation area (however, it is depicted by the Registrar of Voters as
being within the annexation territory); and the voter registration count doubled for one
residence, thereby increasing the registered voters for the particular residence from two to four.
These suspicious activities were promptly reported to the Registrar of Voters; however, the
Registrar declined to investigate and deferred the matter to the District Attorney’s Office.
Ultimately, no action was taken to address these voter registration changes within the Project
territory.
2 As noted above, the parcels comprising the Island Area receive all municipal services from the
City, except for fire which is provided by the County Fire Department to all areas of the City.
3.b
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.b
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
3.c
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 2 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
1170 West Third Street, Unit 150, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490
(909) 388-0480 Fax (909) 388-0481
lafco@lafco.sbcounty.gov
www.sbclafco.org
DATE: AUGUST 14, 2019
FROM: SAMUEL MARTINEZ, Executive Officer
MICHAEL TUERPE, Project Manager
JEFFERY LUM, LAFCO GIS/Database Analyst
ROBERT ALDRICH, Consultant
TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SUBJECT: Agenda Item #8: LAFCO 3188A -- Reorganization to include Annexation
to the City of San Bernardino and to the San Bernardino County Fire
Protection District Zone FP-5 San Bernardino, and Detachment from
County Service Area 70 (Spring Trails Specific Plan)
INITIATED BY:
Property Owner Petition – Montecito Equities, Ltd., landowner
BACKGROUND:
The reorganization proposal is an annexation to the City of San Bernardino (hereafter the
“City”) and to Zone FP-5 San Bernardino1 of the San Bernardino County Fire Protection
District, and detachment from County Service Area 70. The proposal encompasses
approximately 350 acres and is generally located north of the Verdemont neighborhood, east
of the community of Devore and northeasterly of the I-215 Freeway. The area is bordered
by parcel lines on the north and east, a combination of parcel lines and the centerline of
West Meyers Road (existing City of San Bernardino boundary) on the south, and parcel lines
(portion of existing City boundary) on the west, within the City’s existing sphere of influence.
A vicinity map is included as Attachment #1 to this report. The map below (Figure 1)
provides a general location of the area to be annexed into the City.
For over 20 years, the Local Agency Formation Commission and its staff have been involved
in discussions with the City and/or the landowner regarding the delivery of services for a
development proposal within the annexation area known as the Spring Trails Specific Plan ,
or its predecessor—Martin Ranch.
1 The proposal area is already within the San Bernardino County Protection District and its Zone FP -5.
The annexation into “Zone FP-5 San Bernardino” would isolate the special tax revenues of Zone FP-5 to
the service area of the City.
3.d
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
2
Fig. 1 – Vicinity Map
Sphere of Influence Expansion (LAFCO 2808)
In 1996, the Commission reviewed and considered
a sphere of influence expansion proposal, LAFCO
2808, which was initiated by the property owner to
include the proposal area (known then as Martin
Ranch) into the City’s sphere of influence (see
Figure 2). The Commission approved the sphere
expansion proposal noting that future development
would logically be served by the City and that the
City should assume the primary role in developing
the land use and service plans for the area. It was
outlined at that time that the approval of the sphere
expansion was simply to allow the landowner and
the City to move forward in completing the pre-
zoning, general plan amendment, and a
comprehensive Environmental Impact Report for
the project.
Fig. 2 – LAFCO 2808
3.d
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
3
Project History
This primer box provides a history of the project since its inception in 1996.
The Spring Trails Specific Plan (or Martin Ranch) is a project that the City of San Bernardino
has extensively reviewed, evaluated, and ultimately approved (and/or adopted) after years of
processing. The Martin Ranch project was first submitted to the City in 1996. In 1998, a
Notice of Preparation (NOP) was issued for the project; however, the ensuing Draft
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was rejected by the City’s Planning Department.
In December 2002, the application for the General Plan Amendment (GPA 02-09) and
Tentative Tract Map (15576) was filed with the City. A revised Draft EIR was released in
2002. In October 2003, a major fire burned through the project site requiring preparation of a
new Draft EIR. In 2004, a new NOP reflecting the revised project was issued by the City. It
included a general plan amendment and pre-zoning for the project site and the adjacent
unincorporated (island) area which designated the area as Planned Residential
Development, the establishment of a Hillside Management Overlay District to allow lot size
averaging, and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the project site into approximately 359
lots. However, the 2004 Draft EIR, which addressed traffic, access, as well as other issues,
was never circulated for public review.
In 2005, the project was again revised to pre-zone the project site to Residential Low and the
adjacent unincorporated (island) area to Residential Estate. A new Draft EIR was not
released until 2006 when the City released a completed Draft EIR. Significant issues were
again raised, and the City opted to prepare a revised Draft EIR to address concerns related
to noise, air quality, biological resources, geotechnical issues and fire safety.
In 2007, another fire on the site required further changes to the project. A new NOP was
released for public review in 2009 along with an Initial Study. In March 2010, the application
for the Specific Plan (SP 10-01) was filed with the City. Due to significant technical issues ,
the revised Draft EIR was not released until July 2011. Applications for a Development
Agreement (DA 11-01) and a Development Code Amendment (DCA 12-10) were filed with
the City in October 2011 and October 2012, respectively.
In November 2012, the City’s Planning Commission hel d a public hearing to consider the
component actions for the Spring Trails Specific Plan (except for the Development
Agreement portion of the project which was continued at the request of the property owner)
but recommended denial of all the actions. In January 2013, the City’s Planning
Commission held another public hearing to consider the Development Agreement, and it
also recommended denial of the proposed Development Agreement.
Finally, on February 19, 2013, the City Council reviewed and considered the Final EIR, the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding
Considerations and the recommendations of the City’s Planning Commission related to the
Spring Trails Specific Plan, the General Plan Amendment, the Development Code
Amendment, Tentative Tract Map 15576 to subdivide the project site into 304 single -family
residential lots and the project’s Development Agreement. The City Council reversed the
Planning Commission’s recommendations and approved and/or adopted all actions related
to the Spring Trails Specific Plan.
3.d
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
4
Prior Proposal (LAFCO 3188)
In March 2015, the property owner—Montecito Equities, Ltd—submitted a property owner
petition including the application materials for the proposed reorganization to the City (see
Attachment #2). The applicant not only requested the annexation of its properties but also
included the adjacent unincorporated area totaling approximately 376 acres (see Figure 3).
It should be noted that the City (and the applicant)
included the adjacent unincorporated area as part of
its proposal to prevent the creation of a totally-
surrounded unincorporated island territory within the
City. This is why the adjacent 26-acre unincorporated
area was included in the City’s environmental
assessment for the project.
However, during the circulation of the Notice of Filing
for LAFCO 3188, the Registrar of Voters (ROV)
certified on July 2, 2015 that there were 16 registered
voters within the reorganization area (see Attachment
#3). That changed the annexation proposal from
being (initially) an “uninhabited” annexation (less than
12 registered voters) to an “inhabited” annexation
which allows for registered voter protest. This also
meant likely termination due to registered voter
protest—primarily from within the unincorporated
island area. As a result, the applicant requested that
LAFCO suspend the processing of its application
proposal pending the outcome of the voter registration
verification process by the ROV.
Current Proposal (LAFCO 3188A)
After almost a year, there still was no resolution from
the ROV on the applicant’s request for verification of
registered voters within the annexation area. This
prompted the applicant to submit a revised application
proposal that removed the adjacent unincorporated
area from its proposal boundary (see Attachment #4).
Figure 4 illustrates the applicant’s revised boundary
that excludes the adjacent unincorporated area.
Hence, the current proposal, LAFCO 3188A, creates
a totally-surrounded island territory within the City.
The reason for the delay in processing this proposal
since the time it was re-initiated by the applicant was
Fig. 3 – LAFCO 3188
LAFCO
3188
Fig. 4 – LAFCO 3188A
LAFCO
3188A
3.d
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
5
due to the modifications that had to be incorporated into the Plan for Service and Fiscal Impact
Analysis to reflect the change in fire service between the City and County Fire, as well as the
property tax transfer process between the County and the City.
Property Tax Transfer Process
In May 2017, both the County and the City were scheduled to approve their respective
property tax transfer resolutions; however, the City ended up not agreeing to the exchange
and took no action on its property tax transfer resolution at that time. This prompted the
dispute resolution process outlined in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(e) that
requires mediation and/or arbitration.
As the Commission is fully aware, the tax sharing formula in San Bernardino County
(between the County and cities) is calculated in the same manner as all other annexations.
However, because of the City’s unique property tax exchange process with County Fire
through its fire reorganization, the City raised questions on whether an alternative formula
was appropriate. The County and the City jointly retained a third-party consultant (David
Taussig and Associates) to perform an independent financial analysis of the property tax
revenues. That process took several months to get underway and was finally completed in
June 2018. Negotiations continued until all parties agreed.
The City adopted its property tax resolution on March 20, 2019, and the County, likewise,
adopted its property tax resolution on May 21, 2019, determining the amount of property tax
revenues to be exchanged among the County, the City, and County Fire.
BOUNDARIES:
The proposal, as submitted by the applicant, includes the annexation of properties solely
associated with the Spring Trails Specific Plan and does not include the adjacent
unincorporated area that, should LAFCO 3188A be approved by the Commission, will
become a totally-surrounded island within the City of San Bernardino. In staff’s view, the
Commission has the following options to address the island area:
3.d
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
6
Option 1
Option 1 is to approve the proposal, LAFCO 3188A,
as submitted by the applicant. This would leave an
unincorporated area totally surrounded by the City.
Clearly, it would be LAFCO staff’s preference not to
create an island. Therefore, if the Commission
chooses option 1, LAFCO staff would recommend
that the Commission make certain determinations
related to the creation of the island, and as a
condition of approval require the City to initiate a new
reorganization to annex the island area as a separate
proposal (see Figure 5).
Option 2
The Commission could modify the proposal by
expanding LAFCO 3188A to include the
unincorporated (island) area adjacent to the proposal
area, which would be the exact same area as the
prior proposal – LAFCO 3188 (see Figure 6).
As outlined in the earlier discussion related to the
prior proposal (LAFCO 3188) on pages 4 and 5, the
inclusion of the island area would change the
annexation proposal from being an uninhabited
annexation to an inhabited annexation since there
would be at least 12 registered voters within the
modified proposal.
From the beginning of the City’s consideration of the
Spring Trails project, many have expressed
opposition to the project. Since most of the
registered voters are from within the island portion of
the modified area, the probability of termination of the
expanded proposal would be highly likely.
Based on the options outlined above, LAFCO staff
recommends the Commission choose Option 1.
Although not an ideal boundary, it is LAFCO staff’s position that the imposition of the Condition
of Approval related to the island area as well as the Determination related to the creation of
the island, allows a mechanism for the Spring Trails Specific Plan, which is an easily
identifiable boundary for service delivery, to be annexed into the City of San Bernardino for the
services it requires.
A detailed comparison of the two options follows on the next two pages.
Fig. 6 – Option 2
Fig. 5 – Option 1
3.d
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
7
Option 1
Applicant’s Proposal Boundary, as Submitted to LAFCO
Proposal Boundary and Description:
A reorganization of 350 acres to include annexation
of only the Spring Trails Specific Plan (shown in red).
Pros:
The Commission identified the City as the
logical service provider for the area by
expanding the City’s sphere of influence in
1996.
Reorganization area will benefit from the
extension of City services.
No other agency can logically provide
municipal-level services to this area.
Proposal has 100% landowner consent,
allowing for the waiver of protest and
eliminating the possibility of termination.
Cons:
Applicant’s proposal boundary creates an unincorporated island (completely
surrounded by the City, shown in yellow) which is prohibited under Government Code
§56744, unless certain determinations can be made (see Discussion below).
The landowners and registered voters of the island (being outside the reorganization
area) would lack a process to overturn the Commission’s action.
Discussion:
Although an island of unincorporated area is being created, the Commission has the
statutory ability to waive the restrictions of creating an island (§56744) if it finds that
the restrictions would be detrimental to the orderly development of the community
and that the areas enclosed by the annexation cannot be reasonably annexed to
another city or incorporate as a city. A determination pursuant to §56375 has been
included in the Commission’s draft resolution and in the Recommendation portion of
this report.
A condition of approval is being recommended that would require the City to initiate a
separate reorganization to annex the island within one year of completion of LAFCO
3188A, and undergo standard protest proceedings on said island. The condition is
included in the Commission’s draft resolution and in the Recommendation portion of
this report.
Fig. 7 – Option 1
3.d
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
8
Option 2
Expanded Proposal Boundary
Expanded Boundary and Description:
An expanded reorganization area of 376 acres to
include annexation of the Spring Trails Specific Plan
(350 acres) and adjacent 26-acre unincorporated
area.
Pros:
The Commission identified the City as the
logical service provider to the area by
expanding the City’s sphere of influence in
1996.
Environmental Assessment already includes
the adjacent 26-acre unincorporated area.
Spring Trails Specific Plan area will benefit
from the extension of City services.
No other agency can logically provide
municipal-level services to this area.
Expanded boundary will not create an island.
The proposal would include a protest proceeding whereby island landowners and
registered voters could submit a protest to oppose the reorganization in order to
overturn the Commission’s action.
Cons:
Registered voter opposition within the expanded boundary would likely result in
sufficient protest to terminate the reorganization.
Without annexation to the City, the project—which requires municipal services—most
likely would not be able to develop.
Discussion:
This option is available to the Commission should it choose not to make a
determination to waive the restrictions of creating an island.
The Commission would have to continue the item in order to provide proper noticing.
The Spring Trails project and reorganization would be decided by the registered
voters within the reorganization area (not the landowners).
Fig. 8 – Option 2
3.d
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
9
The remainder of this report contains the following information:
Land Use
o County designations and City land use/pre-zone designations
o Spring Trails Specific Plan
o Constraints: fire hazard, fault zone, circulation, high wind areas, flood and drainage
Service Issues and Effects on Other Local Governments
Environmental Considerations
Waiver of Protest Proceedings
Conclusion
Recommendations
Determinations
Attachment Listing
LAND USE:
The reorganization area is predominantly vacant with the exception of an existing single-
family residence on one of the parcels (see Figure 9). The area is surrounded by a
combination of National Forest boundary and vacant lands to the east; a combination of
residential development including Meyers Road to the south; a combination of residential
development, vacant lands, and the National Forest boundary to the west; and the National
Forest boundary to the north.
Fig. 9 – Aerial Map
3.d
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
10
County Land Use Designations:
The County’s current land use designations for the reorganization area are: RL-5 (Rural
Living, 5 acres minimum), which provides sites for rural residential uses and incidental
agricultural uses; and RC (Resource Conservation), which provides sites for open space and
recreational activities, and single-family homes on large parcels.
City’s Land Use/Pre-zone Designation(s):
The City of San Bernardino has assigned the reorganization area as Spring Trails Specific
Plan District and has been pre-zoned the area as “Specific Plan No. 10-01, Spring Trails”
under its Special Purpose Zones through the City’s consideration of Ordinance No. MC-
1386, which was adopted on March 5, 2013. The underlying Spring Trails Specific Plan
zoning designations within the reorganization area are Residential (Estate), Open Space,
and Parks, which will take effect upon completion of the annexation process.
The Spring Trails Specific Plan zone designations are the pre-zoning for the proposal area
as required by Government Code §56375(a)(7). Pursuant to the provisions of Government
Code §56375(e), these zoning designations shall remain in effect for a period of two (2)
years following annexation unless specific actions are taken by the City Council at a public
hearing.
The Spring Trails Specific Plan
The Spring Trails Specific Plan (Included as Attachment #5), is a proposed development
within the 350-acre annexation area that was approved by the City Council of the City of San
Bernardino in February 2013. At that time the Specific Plan was approved by the City, it
contemplated development of 307 new single-family residential lots on approximately 242
acres and the remainder area for open space, parks, slopes, and other uses (see Figure 10).
3.d
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
11
Fig. 10 – Original Development Plan Fig. 11 – Current Development Plan
However, since the City’s approval of the Specific Plan, the land area to be developed and
the total number of residential lots have been reduced. Through subsequent analysis of the
geology and soils within the Specific Plan area, it has been determined by the landowner that
it is only feasible to construct 215 residential lots, and the land area to be developed has
been significantly reduced from 242 acres to 199 acres (see Figure 11). The Current
Development Plan configuration is also included as part of Attachment #1.
Constraints
Development of the Spring Trails Specific Plan includes a number of challenges that the
Commission should be aware of given the location of the project. Below is a summary of
some, but not all, of the constraints associated with the Spring Trails Specific Plan.
The Spring Trails is on the northern edge of the City in the foothills of the San Bernardino
Mountains. The area is generally bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest on three
sides and the elevation of the site ranges from approximately 2,010 feet above sea level at
its southern boundary to approximately 3,540 feet at the northern boundary. The topography
of the site varies from steep (over 30% slopes) in the north and southeast portions of the site
to gentle (0–15% slopes) in the central portion of the site. The site slopes to the southwest at
approximately 10 to 15%.
3.d
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
12
Fire Hazard
Because the San Bernardino National Forest is
adjacent to the project site, with steep slopes and
high winds, the Spring Trails Specific Plan area is
at risk from wildland fires (see Figure 12). The
Foothill Fire Zone Overlay District identifies three
fire zones with different degrees of hazard based
on slope, type of fuel, and natural barriers.
Approximately one third of the site is in Fire Zone
A (Extreme Hazard with slopes 30% or greater),
one third of the site is in Fire Zone B (High Hazard
with slopes of 15–30%), and the remaining third is
in Fire Zone C (Moderate Hazard with slopes of
0–15%). As noted in the Spring Trails Specific
Plan, areas in the Foothill Fire Zones are required
to be developed with proper building separation,
landscaping, and building materials; adequate
emergency access and evacuation routes; and
sufficient water resources.
The recommended preventative measures are incorporated in the Specific Plan as
standards for fuel modification zones, setbacks, landscaping methods/materials, construction
materials/methods, and building protection systems. The Mitigation Monitoring Program for
the Specific Plan also outlines mitigation measures on fire safety.
Fault Zone
The site includes three traces of the San Andreas
Fault zone, which runs in a general east–west
direction (see Figure 13). As noted in the Spring
Trails Specific Plan, the southern portion of the
site is traversed by two faults: the main trace of
the San Andreas Fault and a secondary trace just
north of the main trace. The fault zone of the main
trace ranges from approximately 50 feet to 150
feet wide and the fault zone of the secondary
trace is approximately 40 feet wide.
The Spring Trails Specific Plan has been
designed to comply with the requirements of the
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, which
prevents the construction of buildings within 50
feet of active faults. Setbacks and additional fault
studies are included as mitigation measures in the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Spring
Trails Specific Plan.
Fig. 13 – Earthquake Faults
Fig. 12 – Topography (Fire Zones)
3.d
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
13
Circulation
Spring Trails require two points of access that directly connect to collector roads and avoid
existing neighborhoods. The primary access road to Spring Trails will be through the
southeast corner of the project site via a street extending from Little League Drive to the
project site. Secondary access to Spring Trails will be via a street extending from the
western edge of the project site to a frontage road along the I-215 Freeway. The secondary
access road is designed to restrict non-resident access onto Meyers Road. The Mitigation
Monitoring Program outlines mitigation measures to address wildlife corridors.
High Wind Areas
The City of San Bernardino experiences periods of high velocity winds, especially in the
Cajon Pass and at the bottoms of canyons. Spring Trails is included in the City’s designated
High Wind Area, which has certain building standards. Development will be required to
comply with the building standards for this area. The Mitigation Monitoring Program for the
Specific Plan outlines development guidelines for high wind areas.
Flooding and Drainage
Because Spring Trails sits on an alluvial plain on the slopes of the San Bernardino
Mountains, flooding and drainage are also critical factors. Spring Trails is designed to avoid
grading or construction of residences in the flood plains.
These are just some of the constraints associated with the Spring Trails Specific Plan.
LAFCO staff emphasizes the importance of the mitigation measures being implemented to
minimize or reduce the impacts. These mitigation measures must be implemented by the
City to allow development of the project. However, the Commission has no direct
responsibility in implementing these mitigation measures.
3.d
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
14
SERVICE ISSUES AND EFFECTS ON OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
In every consideration for jurisdictional change, the Commission is required to look at the
existing and proposed service providers within an area. Due to the vacant nature of the
lands currently, government service requirements are minimal – primarily law enforcement
and fire protection. The current service providers within the reorganization area include the
California Highway Patrol for law enforcement along existing roadways in unincorporated
areas, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, its Valley
Service Zone, and its Zone FP-5, and County Service Area 70 (unincorporated, multi-
function entity). In addition, the regional independent special districts, Inland Empire
Resource Conservation District and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District
(State Water Contractor), overlay the reorganization area.
Plan for Service:
The City of San Bernardino has provided a “Plan for Service” for this proposal as required by
law and Commission policy. The Plan includes a Fiscal Impact Analysis outlining its ability to
provide its range of services and ongoing maintenance and operation to the area given the
anticipated revenues and expenditures associated with the project. Also included with the
materials for review is the Development Agreement approved by the City and the applicant,
outlining land use assumptions, financing and service requirements for the reorganization
area. The City of San Bernardino’s certified Plan for Service and Fiscal Impact Analysis and
its Municipal Water Department’s certification of the Plan for Service are included as
Attachment #6 to this report. In general, the Plan identifies the following:
Water Service:
Water service will be provided by the City’s Municipal Water Department, as outlined
in its Plan for Service. Current storage facilities nearest to Spring Trails is the Meyers
Canyon Reservoir, but is not adequate for buildout of Spring Trails. Therefore, water
will be supplied to Spring Trails by a combination of expanding and improving the
offsite water systems and the provision of onsite reservoirs and transmission lines.
The City’s Municipal Water Department outlines the need for the developer to enter
into an agreement with Department and provide its share of funding to construct the
infrastructure necessary to serve the new pressure zones. In addition, the developer
must enter into a developer-installed agreement and provide a performance bond to
install the required transmission and distribution mains for construction.
Sewer Service:
There is no sewage collection system within the area at the present time. The Sewer
Capacity Study concludes that the City’s existing sewer system has the capacity to
accommodate the project. The City’s wastewater collection system has transferred
from the City’s Public Works to the City’s Municipal Water Department.
3.d
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
15
Spring Trails would connect to the existing 10-inch main located on Little League
Drive. The only offsite improvement that may be required is in North Little League
Drive, which may be upgraded from an 8-inch to a 10-inch main.
Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Response:
In 2016, the City of San Bernardino was annexed into the San Bernardino County
Fire Protection District (County Fire), its Valley Service Zone, and its Zone FP -5 for
fire protection and emergency medical response services. The area being annexed
is already within the boundaries of County Fire; therefore, fire protection and
emergency medical response services will continue to be provided by County Fire
and its Valley Service Zone. No change in actual service provider will occur upon
completion of the annexation.
The entire LAFCO 3188A is currently designated as State Responsibility Area (SRA)
lands. This designation would be removed upon annexation to the City and the
financial burden for fire protection becomes a responsibility of the City.
Fire stations and equipment of the City have since been transferred to County Fire
through the City’s fire reorganization. The closest fire station is Station 232 (6065
Palm Avenue) located approximately two miles away from the project site. Water
facilities for fire protection will meet water flow demands for the project.
As a result of the County Fire reorganizations, one of the conditions that was agreed
upon was to account for the special tax generated from within the different areas
being annexed into County Fire by creating subzones of County Fire’s Service Zone
FP-5. In the case for the City, Zone FP-5 San Bernardino was created to isolate said
funding generated from the City. Therefore, LAFCO 3188A includes annexation to
Zone FP-5 San Bernardino as part of the overall reorganization in order to isolate the
funding generated from reorganization area within the City of San Bernardino.
Law Enforcement:
Law enforcement responsibilities will shift from the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s
Department to the City of San Bernardino Police Department. The area is served by
a main police station located at 710 North D Street, and four designated geographical
patrol districts. The project area is within the City’s patrol beat B1 in the Northwest
Patrol District.
Park and Recreation:
Regional park and recreation services are currently provided by the County Regional
Parks system. The closest regional park is Glen Helen Regional Park, which has
various recreation activities. Due to the primarily vacant nature of the reorganization
area, local park amenities are not currently provided.
The City of San Bernardino has a variety of parks and recreation facilities. The
closest City park is the Al Guhin Park located approximately 1.3 miles from the
3.d
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
16
proposal area. The Spring Trails project plans to develop neighborhood parks,
natural open space, as well as pedestrian/equestrian trails.
Solid Waste
Solid waste services are currently provided by Burrtec Industries within the
reorganization area and within the City of San Bernardino (by contract). No change
in service provider will occur through the annexation.
Schools
The area is within the San Bernardino City Unified School District (SBCUSD). Upon
annexation, SBCUSD will continue to be the school district with North Verdemont
Elementary School, Chavez Middle School, and Cajon High School.
As required by Commission policy and State law, the Plan for Service submitted by the City
of San Bernardino and its Municipal Water Department show that the extension of the City’s
services to the reorganization area are required to provide the level of service anticipated by
the Spring Trails Specific Plan. Such service extensions will exceed current service levels
provided through the County as the area is primarily vacant at the present time.
3.d
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
17
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The City’s processing of the Spring Trails Specific Plan project included the preparation and
certification of an Environmental Impact Report that was finalized by the City in 2013.
LAFCO’s Environmental Consultant, Tom Dodson and Associates, has reviewed the City’s
Complete Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which includes the Draft EIR and the
Final EIR, and indicated that the City’s environmental documents are adequate for the
Commission’s use as a responsible agency for LAFCO 3188A. Copies of the City’s
Complete Final EIR and all associated documents, were provided to Commissioners on July
22, 2019. Mr. Dodson has indicated in his letter to the Commission, included as Attachment
#9 to this report, the actions that are appropriate for the review of LAFCO 3188A, which are:
Certify that the Commission, its staff, and its Environmental Consultant have
individually reviewed and considered the environmental assessment for the Spring
Trails Specific Plan prepared by the City of San Bernardino;
Determine that the Complete Final EIR is adequate for the Commission’s use in
making its decision related to LAFCO 3188A;
Determine that the Commission does not intend to adopt alternatives or additional
mitigation measures for the project; that the mitigation measures identified in the
City’s environmental documents for the Spring Trails project are the responsibility of
the City and others, not the Commission;
Adopt the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations as presented
by Mr. Dodson, which are the conclusions made regarding the significance of a
project in light of the impacts and mitigation measures that have been identified . A
copy of this Statement is included as a part of Attachment #9 to this report; and,
Direct the Executive Officer to file the Notice of Determination within five days and
find that no further Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees are required by the
Commission’s approval since the City, as lead agency, has paid said fees.
WAIVER OF PROTEST PROCEEDINGS:
The reorganization area is legally uninhabited (as determined by the Registrar of Voters
office) and LAFCO staff verified that the study area possesses 100% landowner consent to
the annexation. Therefore, if the Commission approves LAFCO 3188A and none of the
affected agencies have submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest proceedings, staff
is recommending that protest proceedings be waived. The actions would include direction to
the Executive Officer to complete the reorganization following completion of the mandatory
reconsideration period of 30-days.
3.d
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
18
CONCLUSION:
In the mid-90s, the applicant already began planning the development of its landholdings
that encompass the Spring Trails Specific Plan area. This began by a request to LAFCO for
expansion of the City’s sphere of influence in 1996. The first development project was
originally called “Martin Ranch”. As noted in the History Section of this report, the prior
Martin Ranch and the current Spring Trails Specific Plan has been in the making for more
than 20 years with numerous changes to the project description and multiple Draft EIRs
prepared and revised since its inception. The final project approved and/or adopted by the
City of San Bernardino, which is the Spring Trails Specific Plan, requires a broad range and
level of municipal services that are only available through the City of San Bernardino.
The reorganization area will benefit from the extension of the City’s services as well as the
continuation of fire protection and emergency medical response services from the San
Bernardino County Fire Protection District and its Valley Service Zone based upon the
anticipated development of 215 (current configuration) single-family residences, open space,
parks, and other public facilities.
The Spring Trails Specific Plan was approved and adopted by the City with certain
guidelines, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures. Therefore, the Commission’s
approval of LAFCO 3188A assumes that the City will adhere to the parameters that have
been imposed on the Spring Trails Specific Plan and the mitigation measures outlined in the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Spring Trails Specific Plan.
However, approval of this proposal calls into question the issue related to the adjacent
unincorporated area that will become totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. This
report provides for options for addressing the creation of said island territory. Staff
recommendations are to:
Include a determination required by Government Code Section 56375(m), which can
be applied to this proposal; and,
Include a condition that requires the City to initiate the totally-surrounded island area
within one year of the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A.
For all these reasons, and those outlined throughout the staff report , staff recommends
approval of LAFCO 3188A.
However, should the Commission choose Option 2 (to expand the proposal) then the
Commission would have to continue the item in order to provide proper noticing.
3.d
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
19
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Commission approve LAFCO 3188A by taking the following
actions:
1. With respect to the environmental review:
a. Certify that the Complete Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and other
related environmental documents prepared by the City of San Bernardino for
the Spring Trails Specific Plan have been independently reviewed and
considered by the Commission, its staff and its Environmental Consultant;
b. Determine that the Complete Final EIR for the project prepared by the City is
adequate for the Commission’s use as a California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Responsible Agency for its determination related to LAFCO 3188A.
c. Determine that the Commission does not intend to adopt alternatives or
additional mitigation measures for the Spring Trails Specific Plan, and that the
mitigation measures identified for the project are the responsibility of the City
and others, not the Commission;
d. Adopt the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations as
presented by the Commission’s Environmental Consultant and attached to the
staff report; and,
e. Direct the Executive Officer to file the Notice of Determination within five days ,
and find that no further Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees are required
by the Commission’s approval since the City, as CEQA Lead Agency, has paid
said fees.
2. Approve LAFCO 3188A, with the following determination: The Commission
determines that approval of LAFCO 3188A will create an unincorporated island
completely surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. Since the inclusion of the
island area would likely terminate the annexation proposal due to the number of
registered voters within said island, the Commission determines, pursuant to the
provision of Government Code Section 56375(m), to waive the restrictions on the
creation of a totally-surrounded island contained within Government Code Section
56744 because it would be detrimental to the orderly development of the community,
and it further determines that the area to be surrounded by the City of San Bernardino
cannot reasonably be annexed to another city or incorporated as a new city.
3. Approve LAFCO 3188A with the following conditions:
a. The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of the
totally-surrounded island within one year of the Commission’s approval of
LAFCO 3188A and process under standard protest proceedings. A resolution
by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall be submitted to the
Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the City’s commitment to fulfilling this
3.d
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
20
requirement prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion for LAFCO
3188A. A status report shall be provided to the Commission at the six month
date outlining the progress of the City of San Bernardino in fulfilling its
obligation. Failure on the part of the City of San Bernardino to fulfill its
commitment to annex the totally-surrounded island shall require that the next
annexation proposed to the City of San Bernardino, either by the City through
resolution or by property owner/registered voter petition, include a condition
requiring the initiation of annexation of the totally-surrounded island. Said
condition of approval shall be deemed completed upon the issuance of the
Certificate of Filing for said island.
b. The standard LAFCO terms and conditions that include, but are not limited to,
the “hold harmless” clause for potential litigation costs by the applicant and the
continuation of fees, charges, and/or assessments currently authorized by the
annexing agency, and the identification that the transfer of utility accounts will
occur within 90 days of the recording of the Certificate of Completion.
3. Waive protest proceedings, as permitted by Government Code Section 56662(d),
with 100% landowner consent to the reorganization; and,
4. Adopt LAFCO Resolution No. 3291 setting forth the Commission’s determinations,
terms, and conditions of approval concerning LAFCO 3188A.
3.d
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
21
DETERMINATIONS:
The following determinations are required to be provided by Commission policy and
Government Code Section 56668 for any changes of organization/reorganization proposal:
1. The reorganization proposal is legally uninhabited containing four (4) registered
voters within the reorganization area as certified by the Registrar of Voters as of July
22, 2019.
2. The County Assessor’s Office has determined that the total assessed value of land
and improvements within the reorganization area is $1,978,576 (land--$1,876,890;
improvements--$101,686) as of August 9, 2019.
3. The reorganization area is within the sphere of influence of the City of San
Bernardino.
4. Legal advertisement of the Commission’s consideration has been provided through
publication in The Sun, a newspaper of general circulation within the reorganization
area. As required by State law, individual notice was provided to affected and
interested agencies, County departments, and those individual and agencies having
requested such notice.
5. In accordance with State law and adopted Commission policies, LAFCO has provided
individual notice to:
landowners (2) and registered voters (4) within the reorganization area
(totaling 6 notices); and,
landowners (84) and registered voters (96) surrounding the reorganization
area (totaling 180 notices).
Included as Attachment #7 to this report is a comment letter received by LAFCO staff
from an area resident prior to the publication of the report. The letter outlines
concerns related to the project such as fire safety (e.g. housing densities, slope
issues, and previous fires in the area, etc.), issues regarding the access roads (e.g.
roads built on fault lines, vehicle trips per day, etc.), and issues related to services
from the City as well as utilities across fault lines.
Comments from landowners and registered voters and any affected local agency in
support or opposition will be reviewed and considered by the Commission in making
its determination.
6. The City of San Bernardino adopted the Spring Trails Specific Plan (SP #10-01)
along with a General Plan Amendment (GPA #02-09) and a Development Code
Amendment (DCA #12-10), which pre-zoned the reorganization area as Spring Trails
Specific Plan with the following underlying specific plan zone designations:
Residential (Estate), Open Space, and Parks. These pre-zone/specific plan zone
3.d
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
22
designations are consistent with the City’s General Plan and are generally compatible
with surrounding land uses within the City and in the County.
Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 56375(e), these pre-zone
designations shall remain in effect for two years following annexation unless specific
actions are taken by the City Council.
7. The Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG) adopted its 2016-2040
Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP-SCS)
pursuant to Government Code Section 65080. LAFCO 3188A is in close proximity
with the I-215 Freeway, which is part of the RTP-SCS’s highway improvement
(expansion/rehabilitation) program adding high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes
between the I-210 and the I-15 Freeways for completion by 2035.
8. The City of San Bernardino adopted an updated Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
(LHMP) in October 2016 (Resolution No. 2016-209), which was developed by County
Fire, the City’s fire service provider. Said LHMP includes the Spring Trails project as
one its potential residential development. County Fire also has its Multi-Jurisdictional
Hazard Mitigation Plan that was approved by FEMA in July 2017.
Information contained in the Safety Element of the City’s General Plan related to
Urban and Wildland Fires is included as Attachment #8.
9. As a CEQA responsible agency, the Commission’s Environmental Consultant, Tom
Dodson of Tom Dodson and Associates, has reviewed the City’s environmental
documents for the reorganization proposal and has indicated that the City’s
environmental assessment for the Spring Trails Specific Plan are adequate for the
Commission’s use as CEQA responsible agency. Copies of the City’s Complete Final
EIR and all associated documents were provided to Commission members on July
22, 2019 and are also included (as web links) as part of Attachment #9 to this report
(Environmental Documents Related to the City of San Bernardino’s Approval of the
Spring Trails Specific Plan). Mr. Dodson has prepared his recommended actions for
LAFCO 3188A, which are outlined in the narrative portion of the Environmental
Considerations section (page 17 of the staff report).
Attachment #9 also includes the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding
Considerations that has been prepared for the Commission’s use in addressing this
project.
10. The reorganization area is presently served by the following public agencies:
County of San Bernardino
Inland Empire Resource Conservation District
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District
San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, its Valley Service Zone, and its Zone
FP-5 (fire protection and emergency medical response)
County Service Area 70 (multi-function unincorporated County-wide)
3.d
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
23
The area will be detached from County Service Area 70 and its sphere of influence
reduced as a function of the reorganization. None of the other agencies are affected
by this proposal as they are regional in nature.
11. A plan was prepared for the extension of services to the reorganization area, as
required by law. The Plan for Service and the Fiscal Impact Analysis, as certified by
the City and its Municipal Water Department, indicates that the City can maintain
and/or improve the level and range of services currently available in the area. A copy
of this plan is included as a part of Attachment #6 to this report.
The Plan for Service and Fiscal Impact Analysis have been reviewed and compared
with the standards established by the Commission and the factors contained within
Government Code Section 56668. The Commission finds that the Plan for Service
and the Fiscal Impact Analysis conform to those adopted standards and
requirements.
The Plan indicates that the revenues to be provided through the transfer of property
tax revenues and existing and potential financing mechanisms are anticipated to be
sufficient to provide for the infrastructure and ongoing maintenance and operation of
the services to be provided from the City of San Bernardino and its Municipal Water
Department as well as the services from the San Bernardino County Fire Protection
District and its Valley Service Zone. A copy of the Plan for Service is included as a
part of Attachment #6 to this report.
12. The reorganization proposal complies with Commission policies and directives and
State law that indicate the preference for areas proposed for urban intensity
development to be included within a City so that the full range of municipal services
can be planned, funded, extended, and maintained.
However, approval of this proposal will create an island of unincorporated territory
that will be totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino.
13. The reorganization area can benefit from the availability and extension of municipal-
level services from the City of San Bernardino and its Municipal Water Department,
as evidenced by the Plan for Service certified by the City.
14. This proposal will have an effect on the City of San Bernardino’s ability to achieve its
fair share of the regional housing needs as it proposes to build the addition of 215
single-family residential units.
15. With respect to environmental justice, which is the fair treatment of people of all
races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the location of public facilities and the
provision of public services, the following demographic and income profile was
generated using ESRI’s Community Analyst for the City of San Bernardino and the
reorganization and adjacent unincorporated areas (2019 data):
3.d
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
August 14, 2019
24
Demographic and Income
Comparison
City of
San Bernardino
(%)
Reorganization
Area and
Adjacent
Unincorporated
Area (%)
Race and Ethnicity
•African American Alone 13.5 % 7.0 %
•American Indian Alone 1.3 % 0.9 %
•Asian Alone 4.2 % 4.3 %
•Pacific Islander Alone 0.4 % 0.3 %
•Hispanic Origin (Any Race)68.3 % 37.9 %
Median Household Income $43,515 $104,564
Through future development, the reorganization area will benefit from the extension
of services and facilities from the City and, at the same time, the approval of the
reorganization proposal will not result in the unfair treatment of any person based on
race, culture or income.
16. The County of San Bernardino (for itself and acting on behalf of the San Bernardino
County Fire Protection District) and the City of San Bernardino have successfully
negotiated a transfer of property tax revenues that will be implemented upon
completion of this reorganization. This fulfills the requirements of Section 99 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code.
17. The maps and legal descriptions, as revised, are in substantial compliance with
LAFCO and State standards through certification by the County Surveyor's Office.
SM/
Attachments:
1.Vicinity Map, Reorganization Map, and Current Development Plan Configuration
2.Applicant’s Landowner Petition and Application Documents
3.ROV Certification of Registered Voters within LAFCO 3188 Dated July 2, 2015
4.Letter from Applicant Dated June 22, 2016 Regarding Resubmittal of Application
5.Spring Trails Specific Plan and Recorded Development Agreement
6.City of San Bernardino’s Certified Plan for Service/Fiscal Impact Analysis,
Certification from the City’s Municipal Water Department
7.Comment Letter Received Prior to Staff Report Publication
8.Safety Element Portion of the City’s General Plan related to Urban and Wildland Fires
9.Letter from Tom Dodson and Associates and Facts, Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and Environmental Documents Related to the City of San
Bernardino’s Approval of the Spring Trails Specific Plan
10.Draft Resolution No. 3291 for LAFCO 3188A
3.d
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
1170 West Third Street, Unit 150, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490
(909) 388-0480 • Fax (909) 388-0481
lafco@lafco.sbcounty.gov
www.sbclafco.org
DATE: OCTOBER 8, 2019
FROM: SAMUEL MARTINEZ, Executive Officer
TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #9: LAFCO 3188A -- Reorganization to include
Annexation to the City of San Bernardino and to the San Bernardino
County Fire Protection District Zone FP-5 San Bernardino, and
Detachment from County Service Area 70 (Spring Trails Specific
Plan)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
This item was continued from the Commission’s August 21, 2019 hearing at the request
of the property owner (with concurrence from the City) to allow the property owner and
the City enough time to evaluate and consider the proposed condition(s) that LAFCO
staff is recommending.
No change has occurred since then; therefore, staff’s recommendations remain the
same for LAFCO 3188A. For reference, the original staff report for LAFCO 3188A,
dated August 14, 2019, is included as Attachment #1 and includes the links to each
attachment.
However, the Commission—as part of its motion at the August Hearing—requested that
staff provide a discussion regarding access to and from the project site in order to
provide for a better understanding of the issues related to traffic (circulation) as well as
fire safety.
Circulation
The Spring Trails project will have two main access points. The primary access road
(dash line with pink highlight), which provides the main access to and from Spring Trails
project, is a 2-way undivided road that extends from North Little League Drive to the
Spring Trails project at the southeastern section of the project site. From North Little
League Drive (also a 2-way undivided road), access to the I-215 Freeway can be
3.e
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
October 8, 2019
2
reached from either Palm Avenue (via West Little League Drive or Kendall Avenue) or
Devore Road/Glen Helen Parkway (via Kendall Avenue and Cajon Boulevard).
The secondary access road (dash line with orange highlight), which is intended as an
alternative street for local traffic to access arterial streets outside the project, is also a
2-way undivided road that runs along the western boundary of the Spring Trails project.
It will connect to North Little League Drive via Frontage Road. From North Little League
Drive, access to the freeway is the same as the primary access road.
Fig. 1 – Circulation Map
3.e
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
October 8, 2019
3
It should be noted that the intersection of Meyers Road and the secondary access road will
be constructed in such a way that either prevents or discourages access to Meyers Road.
All necessary public streets, both on-site and off-site (including the extension of North Little
League Drive), will be improved by the developer. Other necessary off-site improvements,
such as the Palm Avenue/I-215 Freeway and Glen Helen Parkway improvements, are part
of the City’s Master Facility Plan and will be funded through developer impact fees.
Fire Safety (Hazards)
As identified in the original staff report, no change in actual service provider will occur upon
completion of the annexation since the City of San Bernardino was annexed into the San
Bernardino County Fire Protection District (County Fire) and its Valley Service Zone. The
area proposed for annexation is already within the boundaries of County Fire.
The closest fire station is Station #232 located on 6065 Palm Avenue, which is
approximately 2.1 miles away from the project site. The next closest fire station is Station
#2 located in Devore (1511 Devore Road), which is approximately 4.2 miles away from the
project site.
The Spring Trails project evaluated response times for a number of stations using
time/distance calculations from the different fire stations to the project site via Meyers
Road. Below are the drive times for the two stations nearest the project site:
Station MPH Miles Time
1.Station #232 45 0.78 01:02
25 0.16 00:23
35 0.43 00:44
35 0.70 01:12
Meyers 2.07 03.21
Ranch 3.31 05:29
Farthest 3.74 06:13
2. Station #2 45 2.35 03:08
35 1.38 02:22
Meyers 3.75 05:30
Ranch 4.97 07:38
Farthest 5.40 08:22
Based on the calculations identified in the Spring Trails Fire Protection Plan, Station #232
can reach the farthest portion of the site in 6m 13s and Station #2 can get to the farthest
portion of the site in 8m 22s.
3.e
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
October 8, 2019
4
LAFCO staff also prepared its own analysis of the drive times from both stations to the
farthest portion of the project site using the primary access road and based on actual speed
limits. Staff’s analysis indicates that Station #232 can reach the farthest portion of the site
in 7m 12s, and Station #2 can get to the farthest portion of the site in 11m 42s.
Fig. 2 – Drive Times
3.e
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
October 8, 2019
5
The Spring Trails Fire Protection Plan outlines a number of mitigation measures including
fuel modification zones, vegetation management guidelines, planting maintenance and
spacing guidelines, as well as infrastructure/structural construction features and
requirements.
COMMENTS RECEIVED:
At the August 21, 2019 hearing, the Commission received oral comments. All written
comments received prior to and at the August 21 hearing can be accessed on the LAFCO
website:
•Comments received prior to the August 21, 2019 hearing:
http://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/LAFCO/AgendaNotices/20190821/Item_08_Att1.pdf
•Comments received at the August 21, 2019 hearing:
http://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/LAFCO/AgendaNotices/20190821/Item_08_Att3.pdf
Since then, additional comments have been received, which are included as Attachment #2
to the staff report. Overall, approximately 80 written comments have been received from
landowners, registered voters, and other individuals, including one from a council member
of the City of San Bernardino, Mr. Henry Nickel, and one from a non-profit organization.
Most of the comments came from residents who live in the Verdemont area within the City
of San Bernardino as well as residents from the unincorporated Devore community.
Approximately 10 (unverified) letters opposing the project came from the island area itself.
Most of the comments relate to fire, high wind, and earthquake issues including limited
accessibility during an emergency. School traffic was also cited in some of the letters.
Other comments relate to the City’s inability to provide code inspections/enforcement,
reduced services and slow response times, and issues related to road repair and
maintenance.
CONCLUSION:
As outlined in the original staff report, the Spring Trails Specific Plan requires a broad
range and level of municipal services that are only available through the City of San
Bernardino. The project would benefit from the extension of the City’s services as well
as the continuation of fire protection and emergency medical response services from
County Fire and its Valley Service Zone based upon the anticipated development of 215
(current configuration) single-family residences, open space, parks, and other public
facilities.
The Spring Trails Specific Plan was approved and adopted by the City with certain
guidelines, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures. Therefore, the
Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A assumes that the City will adhere to the
parameters that have been imposed on the Spring Trails Specific Plan and the
3.e
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
October 8, 2019
6
mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Spring Trails
Specific Plan.
However, as noted in the August 14, 2019 staff report, approval of this proposal calls
into question the issue related to the adjacent unincorporated area that will become
totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. This report provides for options for
addressing the creation of said island territory. Staff recommendations are to:
•Include a determination required by Government Code Section 56375(m), which
can be applied to this proposal; and,
•Include a condition that requires the City to initiate the totally-surrounded island
area within one year of the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A.
For all these reasons, and those outlined throughout this staff report and the original
staff report dated August 14, 2019, staff recommends approval of LAFCO 3188A.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Commission approve LAFCO 3188A by taking the
following actions:
1.With respect to the environmental review:
a.Certify that the Complete Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and
other related environmental documents prepared by the City of San
Bernardino for the Spring Trails Specific Plan have been independently
reviewed and considered by the Commission, its staff and its
Environmental Consultant;
b.Determine that the Complete Final EIR for the project prepared by the City
is adequate for the Commission’s use as a California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Responsible Agency for its determination related to
LAFCO 3188A.
c.Determine that the Commission does not intend to adopt alternatives or
additional mitigation measures for the Spring Trails Specific Plan, and that
the mitigation measures identified for the project are the responsibility of
the City and others, not the Commission;
d.Adopt the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations as
presented by the Commission’s Environmental Consultant and attached to
the staff report (Attachment #3); and,
3.e
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
October 8, 2019
7
e.Direct the Executive Officer to file the Notice of Determination within five
days, and find that no further Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees
are required by the Commission’s approval since the City, as CEQA Lead
Agency, has paid said fees.
2.Approve LAFCO 3188A, with the following determination: The Commission
determines that approval of LAFCO 3188A will create an unincorporated island
completely surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. Since the inclusion of the
island area would likely terminate the annexation proposal due to the number of
registered voters within said island, the Commission determines, pursuant to the
provision of Government Code Section 56375(m), to waive the restrictions on the
creation of a totally-surrounded island contained within Government Code
Section 56744 because it would be detrimental to the orderly development of the
community, and it further determines that the area to be surrounded by the City
of San Bernardino cannot reasonably be annexed to another city or incorporated
as a new city.
3.Approve LAFCO 3188A with the following conditions:
a.The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of the
totally-surrounded island within one year of the Commission’s approval of
LAFCO 3188A and process under standard protest proceedings. A
resolution by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall be
submitted to the Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the City’s
commitment to fulfilling this requirement prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Completion for LAFCO 3188A. A status report shall be
provided to the Commission at the six-month date outlining the progress of
the City of San Bernardino in fulfilling its obligation. Failure on the part of
the City of San Bernardino to fulfill its commitment to annex the totally-
surrounded island shall require that the next annexation proposed to the
City of San Bernardino, either by the City through resolution or by property
owner/registered voter petition, include a condition requiring the initiation
of annexation of the totally-surrounded island. Said condition of approval
shall be deemed completed upon the issuance of the Certificate of Filing
for said island.
b.The standard LAFCO terms and conditions that include, but are not limited
to, the “hold harmless” clause for potential litigation costs by the applicant
and the continuation of fees, charges, and/or assessments currently
authorized by the annexing agency, and the identification that the transfer
of utility accounts will occur within 90 days of the recording of the
Certificate of Completion.
4.Waive protest proceedings, as permitted by Government Code Section 56662(d),
with 100% landowner consent to the reorganization; and,
3.e
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A
City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP)
October 8, 2019
8
5.Adopt LAFCO Resolution No. 3291 (Attachment #4) setting forth the
Commission’s determinations, terms, and conditions of approval concerning
LAFCO 3188A.
Attachments:
1.Original Staff Report for LAFCO 3188A Dated August 14, 2019
2.Letters Received After the August 21, 2019 Hearing
3.Letter from Tom Dodson and Associates and Facts, Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and Environmental Documents Related to the City of
San Bernardino’s Approval of the Spring Trails Specific Plan
4.Draft Resolution No. 3291
3.e
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels)
Page 1
Public Hearing
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
District 2019-1
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California:
1. Hold a Public Hearing; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-89 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified
electors the question of levying a special tax within the are proposed to be
annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services)
(Annexation No. 2); and
3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and
4. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-90 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Facilities
District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and
5. Introduce Ordinance No. MC-1536 of the Mayor and City Council of the City
of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying
special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2020 -21 to pay the annual
costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, a reserve fund for
capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San
Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services);
and
6. Schedule the final reading and adoption of Ordinance No MC -1536 for May
20, 2020.
Background
On April 1, 2020, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -57, a
Resolution of Intention to annex territory into Community Facilities District No. 2019 -1
4
Packet Pg. 86
6688
Page 2
(Maintenance Services) of the City of San Bernardino (the “Resolution of Intention”),
pursuant to the provisions of the “Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”. A
public hearing was set for May 6, 2020 on the proposed annexation of the said territ ory
into the community facilities district. As required by the Resolution of Intention, a
boundary map was recorded on October 29, 2019, at 2:47 p.m. in Book 89 Page 4,
Document No. 2019-0389012 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities
Districts with the San Bernardino County Recorder.
The Resolution of Intention was adopted by the Mayor and City Council in response to a
petition filed by the property owner of approximately 56 gross acres of vacant industrial
property within the City, requesting that the City assist them in annexing their properties
into CFD No. 2019-1 under the Mello-Roos Act. The State legislature enacted the Mello-
Roos Act in 1982 to assist public agencies in financing certain public improvements by
either issuing tax exempt securities that are repaid by annual levy of special taxes, or to
provide for the financing of on-going public services. The landowner requested the City
annex into CFD No. 2019-1 to levy a special tax to cover the costs associated with the
maintenance of public improvements. The public facilities and services proposed to be
financed within the territory to be annexed to the District are the following:
1. Maintenance of median landscaping and other public improvements installed
within the public rights-of-way; and
2. City and County costs associated with the setting, levying and collection of the
special tax, and in the administration of the District including the contract
administration and for the collection of reserve funds.
The area proposed within Annexation No. 2 is approximately 56 gross acres of vacant
industrial property within PM 19814. The proposed area to be annexed into the CFD
will be included in Tax Zone 3 and is located south of East Orange Show Road
bordered by Waterman Avenue to the east. The proposed development is
approximately 1,065,000 square feet of industrial high cube logistics warehouse
building.
The proposed total maximum tax rate for Tax Zone 3 is $608 per acre for FY 2020/21.
Public Property and homeowner’s association property are exempt from the special tax.
The maximum annual tax rate is proposed to escalate each year at the greater of
Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 2%. The property owners have agreed to initiate and
conduct the CFD annexation proceedings pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act of 1982. The
property owners have submitted a “Consent and Waiver” form on file in the City Clerk’s
Office to initiate and conduct proceedings pursuant to the Mello -Roos Act in 1982, for
the annexation into the CFD and consenting to the s hortening of election time
requirements, waiving analysis and arguments, and waiving all notice requirements
relating to the conduct of the election.
On April 1, 2020, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -57, a
Resolution of Intention to annex territory into Community Facilities District No. 2019-1
(Maintenance Services) of the City of San Bernardino (the “Resolution of Intention”),
4
Packet Pg. 87
6688
Page 3
pursuant to the provisions of the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”.
In order to annex property to CFD No. 2019-1 pursuant to the provisions of California
Government Code Section 53311 et seq., the City must adopt a series of three
statutorily required Resolutions and an Ordinance which are summarized below:
Resolution declaring City intent to annex territory to Community Facilities District
No. 2019-1 including the boundary of the area to be annexed and the rate and
method of apportionment of special taxes within the annexation area (the special
tax applies only to properties within the annexation area), adopted October 16,
2019.
Resolution calling an election to submit to the qualified electors the question of
levying a special tax within the area proposed to be annexed to the District.
Resolution declaring the results of the election and directing the recording of the
notice of special tax lien.
Amend the Ordinance and order the levy and collection of special taxes in the
District.
With the adoption of the Resolutions and the first reading of the amended Ordinance,
the second reading of the amended Ordinance would be scheduled for May 20, 2020.
Discussion
The Resolution of Intention called for a public hearing is to be held on May 6, 2020 on
the issue of the annexation of territory into CFD No. 2019-1. Under the Mello-Roos Act,
the Mayor and City Council must hold a public hearing and consider any protests
against the formation of the CFD. If the owners of one half or more of the land within
the proposed boundaries of the CFD file written protests against the establishment of
the CFD, the Mayor and City Council may not create the CFD. If a majority protest is
not filed, the Mayor and City Council may adopt the resolution establishing the CFD.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-178 on July 17, 2019 established CFD 2019-1,
pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 53325.1. After a CFD is
formed, the Mello-Roos Act requires that for any annexations into the CFD an election
be held on the question of whether the proposed special taxes should be levied. The
election requires a two-thirds vote in favor of levying the special tax. The landowners
filed waivers with respect to the conduct of the election pursuant to Government Code
Sections 53326(a) and 53327(b), meaning that the time limits and procedural
requirements for conducting an election under the Mello-Roos Act do not have to be
followed. Accordingly, City staff has already mailed the election ballots to the
landowners and required the ballots to be returned by the close of the public hearing . If
the Mayor and City Council adopt Resolution No. 2020-89, it may immediately proceed
to the opening of the ballots and adopt Resolution No. 2020 -90, declaring the results of
the election.
4
Packet Pg. 88
6688
Page 4
2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals
Formation of this CFD is consistent with Key Target No 4a: Secure a long-term revenue
source. Funding from district assessments will create sustainable financial support for
ongoing maintenance of landscape and infrastructure associated with the district
location.
Fiscal Impact
No General Fund impact. The individual property owners in the CFD will be responsible
for annual payments of special taxes. It is estimated, upon full completion of the
development, there will be an annual collection of special tax revenues of approximately
$33,789 to be used to pay for maintenance costs within the development.
On June 1 of each year, every taxable unit for which a building permit has been issued
within the boundaries of the CFD, will be subject to the special tax for the ensuing Fiscal
Year. If the anticipated costs of maintaining the facilities in any given Fiscal Year, prior
to build-out of the project, exceeds the special tax revenues available from parcels for
which building permits have been issued, then the special tax may also be applied to
property within recorded final subdivision maps, as well as other undeveloped property
within the boundaries of the CFD.
All costs associated with annexation into the CFD have been borne by the Developer.
By annexing into the CFD, the costs of maintaining improvements located within the
development will be financed through special taxes levied on the parcels within CFD
No. 2019-1 and not through the City’s General Fund.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California:
1. Hold a Public Hearing; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-89 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified
electors the question of levying a special tax within the are proposed to be
annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services)
(Annexation No. 2); and
3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and
4. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-90 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Facilities
District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and
5. Introduce Ordinance No. MC-1536 of the Mayor and City Council of the City
of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying
special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2020 -21 to pay the annual
costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, a reserve fund for
capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San
4
Packet Pg. 89
6688
Page 5
Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services);
and
6. Schedule the final reading and adoption of Ordinance No MC -1536 for May
20, 2020.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2020-89; Exhibit A - Description of Services; Exhibit B -
Rate and Method of Apportionment
Attachment 2 Project Map
Attachment 3 Resolution No. 2020-90; Exhibit A - Description of Services; Exhibit B -
Parcel List
Attachment 4 Certificate of Election Results
Attachment 5 Ordinance No. MC-1536
Attachment 6 Ordinance MC-1522
Attachment 7 Petition
Attachment 8 Recorded Map
Attachment 9 PowerPoint
Ward: ALL
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
June 5, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-81, a
Resolution of Intention to form Community Facilities District No.
2019-1 (Maintenance Services) of the City of San Bernardino (the
“Resolution of Intention”), pursuant to the provisions of the “Mello -
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”.
July 17, 2019 Resolution No. 2019-178 was adopted establishing Community
Facilities District No. 2019-1; Resolution No. 2019-179 was
adopted declaring election results for Community Facilities District
No. 2019-1; and first reading of Ordinance No. MC-1522 levying
special taxes to be collected during FY 2019-20 to pay annual costs
of maintenance, services and expenses with respect to Community
Facilities District No. 2019-1.
August 7, 2019 Final reading of Ordinance No. MC-1522 levying special taxes to be
collected during FY 2019-20 to pay annual costs of maintenance,
services and expenses with respect to Community Facilities District
No. 2019-1.
April 1, 2020 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-57, a
Resolution of Intention to annex territory into Community Facil ities
District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) of the City of San
Bernardino (the “Resolution of Intention”), pursuant to the
provisions of the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”.
4
Packet Pg. 90
Resolution No. 2020-89
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CALLING
AN ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS THE QUESTION OF LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX
WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1
(MAINTENANCE SERVICES) (ANNEXATION NO. 2)
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San
Bernardino (the “City”), adopted its Resolution No. 2019-081, (the “Resolution of Intention”) (i)
declaring its intention to establish Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance
Services) (the “CFD No. 2019-1”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
(the “Act”), commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the
“Government Code”), (ii) proposing to levy a special taxes within CFD No. 2019-1 pursuant to
the terms of the Act to fund the cost of providing maintenance services (the “Services”)
described in Exhibit A hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council set a public hearing for July 17, 2019 after which the
Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-081 forming the CFD No. 2019-1 and calling a special
election at which the questions of levying a special tax and establishing an appropriations limit
with respect to the CFD No. 2019-1 were submitted to the qualified electors within the CFD No.
2019-1; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-081
declaring the results of the special election and finding that more than two-thirds (2/3) of all
votes cast at the special election were cast in favor of the proposition presented, and such
proposition passed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Article 3.5 (commencing with Section
53339) of Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code as amended (the
"Act"), to annex territory into an existing community facilities district by complying with the
procedures set forth in said Article 3.5; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on April 1, 2020 duly adopted Resolution No. 2020-57
(the “Resolution of Intention”) declaring its intention to annex certain territory to CFD No. 2019-
1 (Maintenance Services) and to levy a special tax within that territory to pay for certain services
and setting a time and place for the public hearing on the proposed annexation for May 6, 2020;
and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is identified in a map entitled
"Annexation Map No. 2 Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services)" a
copy of which was recorded, on April 8, 2020, in Book 89 of Maps of Assessment and
Community Facilities Districts at Page 14, in the office of the San Bernardino County Recorder;
and
4.a
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
Resolution No. 2020-89
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act and the Resolution of Intention, a noticed public
hearing was convened by the City Council on May 6, 2020, not earlier than the hour of 7:00 p.m.
at the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street,
San Bernardino, California, 92418, relative to the proposed annexation of said territory to CFD
No. 2019-1. At the hearing, the testimony of all interested persons for or against the annexation
of the territory or the levying of the special taxes will be heard. If and to the extent participation
in the May 6, 2020 meeting must occur by teleconference, videoconference, or other electronic
means authorized by the Ralph M. Brown Act or an Executive Order of the Governor of
California, the means and methods for participating the meeting shall be posted on the Agenda
for said meeting, which shall be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting on the City of San
Bernardino (www.sbcity.org), and outside of the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F.
Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California, 92418. A copy of the
Agenda will be made available upon request to the San Bernardino City Clerk's office at 909-
384-5002; and
WHEREAS, written protests have not been filed by fifty percent (50%) or more of the
registered voters residing within the CFD No 2019-1, or by fifty percent (50%) or more of the
registered voters residing within the territory to be annexed, or by the owners of one-half (1/2) or
more of the area within the CFD No. 2019-1, or by the owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that there are fewer than twelve registered
voters residing in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD No. 2019-1 and that the
qualified electors in such territory are the landowners; and
WHEREAS, on the basis of all of the foregoing, the City Council has determined at this
time to call an election to authorize the annexation of territory to the CFD No. 2019-1 and the
levying of a special tax as described in Exhibit A hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a written instrument from each landowner in
the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD No. 2019-1 consenting to the shortening of
election time requirements, waiving analysis and arguments, and waiving all notice requirements
relating to the conduct of the election; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has concurred in the election date set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ACTING EX OFFICIO AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERANRDINO, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Conformation of Finding in Resolution of Intention. The City Council
reconfirms all of its findings and determinations as set forth in the Resolution of Intention.
4.a
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
Resolution No. 2020-89
SECTION 3. Findings Regarding Protests. The City Council finds and determines that
written protests to the proposed annexation of territory to the CFD No. 2019-1 and the levy of
the special tax within such territory are insufficient in number and in amount under the Act, and
the City Council hereby further orders and determines that all such protests are hereby overruled.
SECTION 4. Findings Regarding Prior Proceedings. The City Council finds and
determines that all prior proceedings had and taken by the City Council with respect to the
annexation of territory to CFD No. 2019-1 are valid and in conformity with the requirements of
the Act.
SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 6. Levy of Special Tax. As stated in the Resolution of Intention, except
where funds are otherwise available, subject to the approval of the qualified electors of territory
proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs of the
Services (including incidental expenses as described in the Resolution of Intention), secured by
recordation of a continuing lien against all nonexempt real property in CFD No. 2019-1, will be
levied annually in CFD No. 2019-1. The rate and method of apportionment, and manner of
collection of the special tax are specified in Exhibit A hereto.
SECTION 7. Apportionment of Tax. The special tax as apportioned to each parcel is
based on the cost of making the Services available to each parcel, or other reasonable basis, and
is not based on or upon the ownership of real property.
SECTION 8. Tax Roll Preparation. The office of the Public Works Director, 201 North
“E” Street, San Bernardino, California 92418, is hereby designated as the office that will be
responsible for annually preparing a current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor’s
parcel number and that will be responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to
Government Code section 53340.2. The Public Works Director may cause these functions to be
performed by his or her deputies, assistants, or other designated agents.
SECTION 9. Accountability Measures. Pursuant to Section 50075.1 of the California
Government Code, the City shall create a separate account into which tax proceeds will be
deposited; and the Public Works Director annually shall file a report with the City Council that
will state (a) the amount of funds collected and expended and (b) the status of the Services
financed in CFD No. 2019-1.
SECTION 10. Special Election; Voting Procedures. The City Council hereby submits
the questions of levying the special tax within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
qualified electors, in accordance with and subject to the Act. The special election shall be held
on May 6, 2020, and shall be conducted as follows:
4.a
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
Resolution No. 2020-89
(a) Qualified Electors. The City Council hereby determines that the Services are
necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of development occurring
within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1. Because fewer than twelve registered voters resided
within the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1 on April 7, 2020 (a date within
the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing on the territory proposed to be annexed to
CFD No. 2019-1), the qualified electors shall be the landowners within territory proposed to be
annexed, and each landowner who was the owner of record at the close of the hearing shall have
one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that such landowner owns within the territory
proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1.
(b) Consolidation of Elections; Combination of Propositions on Ballot. The
election on the question of levying the special tax and establishing an appropriations limit for
CFD No. 2019-1 shall be consolidated, and the two proportions shall be combined into a single
ballot proposition for submission to the voters, as authorized by Government Code Section
53353.5.
(c) Mail Ballot Election. Pursuant to Government Code section 53327.5, the
election shall be conducted as a mail ballot election. The City Council hereby ratifies the City
Clerk’s delivery of a ballot to each landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed to
CFD No. 2019-1. The City Council hereby ratifies the form of the ballot, which is attached
hereto as Exhibit B.
(d) Return of Ballots. The City Clerk shall accept the ballots of the landowners
up to 7:00 p.m. on May 6, 2020. The City Clerk shall have available ballots that may be marked
at the City Clerk’s office on the election day by voters. Once all qualified electors have voted,
the City Clerk may close the election.
(e) Canvass of Election. The City Clerk shall commence the canvass of the
returns of the special election as soon as the election is closed (on May 6, 2020, or when all
qualified electors have voted) at the City Clerk’s office. At the conclusion of the canvass, the
City Clerk shall declare the results of the election.
(f) Declaration of Results. The City Council shall declare the results of the
special election following the completion of the canvass of the returns and shall cause to be
inserted into its minutes a statement of the results of the special election as ascertained by the
canvass of the returns.
SECTION 11. Filing of Resolution and Map with City Clerk. The City Council hereby
directs the City Clerk to file a copy of this resolution and the annexation map of the boundaries
of CFD No. 2019-1 in her office.
SECTION 12. Effect. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption.
4.a
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
Resolution No. 2020-89
APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, this 6th day of May 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
4.a
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
Resolution No. 2020-89
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-____, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of May
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of
__________, 2020.
____________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
4.a
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES
The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019-1, as provided by
Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing
and/or replacing landscaped areas (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right-of-ways,
public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar landscaped areas officially dedicated for public
use. These services including the following:
(a) maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which
maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street
lights and traffic signals; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and
standards; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or
adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities;
maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures
situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or
recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and
(b) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage
and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, infiltration
basins, flood control channels, fossil fuel filters, and similar facilities. Maintenance services may include but
is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality improvements,
fossil fuel filters within the public right-of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other
pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and outlets; erosion repairs; and
cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance, servicing; or both of the water
quality basin improvements within flood control channel improvements; and
(c) public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD No.
2019-1; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD No. 2019-1; and any
portions adjacent to the properties within CFD No. 2019-1.
In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may
be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in Exhibit B to this resolution of
intention.
The above services shall be limited to those provided within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1 or for the
benefit of the properties within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1, as the boundary is expanded from time
to time by anticipated annexations, and said services may be financed by proceeds of the special tax of
CFD No. 2019-1 only to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of CFD No.
2019-1 before CFD No. 2019-1 was created.
4.b
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2A Exhibit A - Description of Services (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
EXHIBIT B
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
A Special Tax (the “Special Tax”) shall be levied on and collected from each Assessor’s Parcel (defined
below) in Community Facilities District No. 2019‐1 (Maintenance Services) (the “CFD No. 2019‐1” or
“CFD”; defined below), in each Fiscal Year, (defined below), commencing in the Fiscal Year beginning July
1, 2019, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, acting in its capacity
as the legislative body of CFD No. 2019‐1, by applying the rate and method of apportionment set forth
below. All of the real property in CFD No. 2019‐1, unless exempted by law or by the provisions herein,
shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided herein.
A. DEFINITIONS
“Acre” or “Acreage” means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on any Assessor’s Parcel
Map, or if the land area is not shown on the Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area as shown on the
applicable Final Map, or if the area is not shown on the applicable Final Map, the land area shall be
calculated by the Administrator.
“Administrative Expenses” means the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the
formation, annexation, and administration of CFD No. 2019‐1 including, but not limited to: the costs
of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether
by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs to the City, CFD No. 2019‐1, or any designee thereof
associated with fulfilling the CFD No. 2019‐1 disclosure requirements; the costs associated with
responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2019‐1 or
any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; and the City's annual administration fees
including payment of a proportional share of salaries and benefits of any City employees and City
overhead whose duties are related to the administration and third party expenses. Administrative
Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2019‐1 for any
other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2019‐1, including attorney's fees and other costs related to
commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes.
“Administrator” means the City Manager of the City of San Bernardino, or his or her designee.
“Approved Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property that are included in a Final
Map that was recorded prior to the March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being
levied, and that have not been issued a building permit on or prior to the March 1 preceding the Fiscal
year in which the special tax is being levied.
“Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel of land that is identifiable by an Assessor’s Parcel Number
by the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino.
“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by
Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means that identification number assigned to a parcel by the County
Assessor of the County.
4.c
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
“Building Square Footage” or “BSF” means the floor area square footage reflected on the original
construction building permit issued for construction of a building of Non‐Residential Property and any
Building Square Footage subsequently added to a building of such Taxable Property after issuance of
a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building.
“Calendar Year” means the period commencing January 1 of any year and ending the following
December 31.
“CFD” or “CFD No. 2019‐1” means the City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019‐
1 (Maintenance Services).
“City” means the City of San Bernardino.
“Contingent Special Tax B Requirement” means that amount required in any Fiscal Year, if the POA
is unable to maintain the Service(s) to: (i) pay the costs of Services incurred or otherwise payable in
the Calendar Year commencing in such Fiscal Year; (ii) fund an operating reserve for the costs
of Services as determined by the Administrator; less a credit for funds available to reduce the annual
Special Tax B (Contingent) levy as determined by the Administrator.
“County” means the County of San Bernardino.
“Developed Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property for which a building permit
for new construction has been issued on or prior to March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the
Special Tax is being levied.
“Exempt Property” means all Assessors’ Parcels designated as being exempt from the Special Tax as
provided for in Section G.
“Final Map” means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map, or lot line
adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.)
or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual
lots for which building permits may be issued without further subdivision.
“Fiscal Year” means the period from and including July 1st of any year to and including the following
June 30th.
“Land Use Category” or “LUC” means any of the categories contained in Section B hereof to which an
Assessor’s Parcel is assigned consistent with the land use approvals that have been received or
proposed for the Assessor’s Parcel as of March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is
being levied.
“Maximum Special Tax” means either Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B
(Contingent), as applicable.
“Maximum Special Tax A” means the Maximum Special Tax A, as determined in accordance with
Section C below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property
within CFD No. 2019‐1.
4.c
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
“Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)” means the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent), as
determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's
Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2019‐1.
“Multi‐Family Residential Property” means any Assessor’s Parcel of residential property that consists
of a building or buildings comprised of attached Residential Units sharing at least one common wall
with another unit.
“Non‐Residential Property” or “NR” means all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property for which a
building permit(s) was issued for a non‐residential use. The Administrator shall make the
determination if an Assessor’s Parcel is Non‐Residential Property.
“Property Owner’s Association” or “POA” means the property owner’s association or homeowner’s
association established to maintain certain landscaping within a Tax Zone.
“Proportionately” means for Taxable Property that is: (i) Developed Property, that the ratio of the
actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Developed Property
with the same Tax Zone, (ii) Approved Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the
Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Approved Property with the same Tax Zone, and
(iii) Undeveloped Property that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy per acre to the Maximum
Special Tax per acre is the same for all Parcels of Undeveloped Property with the same Tax Zone.
“Residential Unit” or "RU" means a residential unit that is used or intended to be used as a domicile
by one or more persons, as determined by the Administrator.
“Residential Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property upon which completed
Residential Units have been constructed or for which building permits have been or may be issued for
purposes of constructing one or more Residential Units.
“Service(s)” means services permitted under the Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
including, without limitation, those services authorized to be funded by CFD No. 2019‐1 as set forth
in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time the CFD was formed.
“Single Family Residential Property” means any residential property other than Multi‐Family
Residential Property on an Assessor’s Parcel.
“Special Tax(es)” means the Special Tax A and/or Special Tax B (Contingent) to be levied in each Fiscal
Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property.
“Special Tax A” means the annual special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel
of Taxable Property to fund the Special Tax A Requirement.
"Special Tax A Requirement" means for each Tax Zone, that amount to be collected in any Fiscal Year
to pay for certain costs as required to meet the needs for such Tax Zone of CFD No. 2019‐1 in both
the current Fiscal Year and the next Fiscal Year. The costs to be covered shall be the direct costs for
maintenance services including but not limited to (i) maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways,
streets, roads and open space, (ii) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements, (iii)
public street sweeping, (iv) fund an operating reserve for the costs of Services as determined by the
Administrator, and (v) Administrative Expenses. Under no circumstances shall the Special Tax A
Requirement include funds for Bonds.
4.c
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
“Special Tax B (Contingent)” means the Special Tax B (Contingent) to be levied in each Fiscal Year on
each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property to fund the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement, if
required.
"Taxable Property" means all Assessor’s Parcels within CFD No. 2019‐1, which are not Exempt
Property.
“Taxable Unit” means a Residential Unit, Building Square Footage, or an Acre.
"Tax Zone" means a mutually exclusive geographic area, within which particular Special Tax rates may
be levied pursuant to this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. Appendix C identifies
the Tax Zone in CFD No. 2019‐1 at formation; additional Tax Zones may be created when property is
annexed into the CFD.
"Tax Zone 1" means the specific geographic area identified on the CFD Boundary Map as Tax Zone 1.
"Tract(s)" means an area of land; i) within a subdivision identified by a particular tract number on a
Final Map, ii) identified within a Parcel Map; or iii) identified within lot line adjustment approved for
subdivision.
“Undeveloped Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed
Property or Approved Property.
B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES
For each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2019‐1 shall be classified
as Developed Property, Approved Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy
of Special Taxes as determined pursuant to Sections C and D below. Assessor’s Parcels of Developed
Property and Approved Property shall be classified as either Residential Property or Non‐Residential
Property. Residential Property shall be further classified as Single Family Residential Property or
Multi‐Family Residential Property and the number of Residential Units shall be determined by the
Administrator.
C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
For purposes of determining the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Assessor’s Parcels of Developed
Property and Approved Property which are classified as Residential Property, all such Assessor’s
Parcels shall be assigned the number of Residential Unit(s) constructed or to be constructed thereon
as specified in or shown on the building permit(s) issued or Final Map as determined by the
Administrator. For Parcels of undeveloped property zoned for development of single family attached
or multi‐family units, the number of Residential Units shall be determined by referencing the
condominium plan, apartment plan, site plan or other development plan, or by assigning the
maximum allowable units permitted based on the underlying zoning for the Parcel. Once a single
family attached or multi‐family building or buildings have been built on an Assessor's Parcel, the
Administrator shall determine the actual number of Residential Units contained within the building
or buildings, and the Special Tax A levied against the Parcel in the next Fiscal Year shall be calculated
by multiplying the actual number of Residential Units by the Maximum Special Tax per Residential
Unit identified for the Tract below or as included in Appendix A as each Annexation occurs.
For purposes of determining the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Assessor’s Parcels of Developed
Property and Approved Property which are classified as Non‐Residential Property, all such Assessor’s
4.c
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
Parcels shall be assigned the number of Building Square Footage or Acres as shown on the Final Map
as determined by the Administrator. Once the Administrator determines the actual number of
Building Square Footage or Acres for the Assessor’s Parcels, the Special Tax A levied against the
Assessor’s Parcel in the next Fiscal Year shall be calculated by multiplying the number of Building
Square Footage or Acres by the Maximum Special Tax per Taxable Unit identified for the Tax Zone
below or as included in Appendix A as each Annexation occurs.
1. Special Tax A
a. Developed Property
(i) Maximum Special Tax A
The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property shall be specific
to each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1,
the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax
A for the Tax Zones annexed and included in Appendix A. The Maximum Special Tax A for
Developed Property for Fiscal Year 2019‐2020 within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 1 below:
TABLE 1
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A RATES
DEVELOPED PROPERTY
Tax
Zone Tract Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax A
1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential Property RU $961
(ii) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax A for Developed
Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items)
for Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the
preceding Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.
(iii) Multiple Land Use Categories
In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one
Land Use Category. The Maximum Special Tax A that can be levied on an Assessor's Parcel
shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax A that can be levied for each Land Use Category
located on that Assessor's Parcel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains more than one land
use, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based
on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the
site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The Administrator's allocation to each type of
property shall be final.
b. Approved Property
The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor’s Parcel of Approved Property shall be specific to
each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate
and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax A for the
Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A. The Maximum Special Tax A for Approved property
Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 2 below:
4.c
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
TABLE 2
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A RATES
APPROVED PROPERTY
Tax
Zone Tract Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax A
1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential RU $961
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax A for Approved Property
shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los Angeles
‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii)
by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.
c. Undeveloped Property
The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor’s Parcel of Undeveloped Property shall be specific
to each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the
rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax A for
the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A. The Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped
Property for Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 3 below:
TABLE 3
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A RATES
UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Tax Zone Tracts Taxable Unit Maximum Special Tax A
1 TR 17170 Acre $4,338
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property
shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los Angeles
‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii)
by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.
2. Special Tax B (Contingent)
The City Council shall levy Special Tax B (Contingent) only in the event the POA defaults in its bligation
to maintain the Contingent Services, which default shall be deemed to have occurred, as determined
by the Administrator, in each of the following circumstances:
(a) The POA files for bankruptcy;
(b) The POA is dissolved;
(c) The POA ceases to levy annual assessments for the Contingent Services; or
(d) The POA fails to provide the Contingent Services at the same level as the City provides similar
services and maintains similar improvements throughout the City and within ninety (90) days
after written notice from the City, or such longer period permitted by the City Manager, fails
to remedy the deficiency to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Council.
a. Developed Property
(i) Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)
4.c
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property is
shown in Table 4 and shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional
property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate and method adopted for the annexed
property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Tax Zones annexed
and included in Appendix A. The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Fiscal Year 2019‐20
within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 4 below:
TABLE 4
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B (CONTINGENT) RATES
DEVELOPED PROPERTY
Tax
Zone Tract Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum Special
Tax B (Contingent)
1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential Property RU $0
(ii) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for
Developed Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index
(All Items) for Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of
the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.
(iii) Multiple Land Use Categories
In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one
Land Use Category. The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) that can be levied on an
Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) that can be
levied for each Land Use Category located on that Assessor's Parcel. For an Assessor's Parcel
that contains more than one land use, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated
to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as
determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The
Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final.
b. Approved Property
The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property is shown
in Table 5 and shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional property is
annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect
the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.
The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within the Tax Zone is identified
in Table 5 below:
TABLE 5
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B (CONTINGENT) RATES
APPROVED PROPERTY
Tax
Zone Tract Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum Special
Tax B (Contingent)
1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential Property RU $0
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Approved
Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for
4.c
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding
Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.
c. Undeveloped Property
The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property is shown
in Table 6 and shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional property is
annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect
the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.
The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within the Tax Zone is identified
in Table 6 below:
TABLE 6
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B (CONTINGENT) RATES
UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Tax Zone
Tracts Taxable Unit
Maximum Special
Tax B (Contingent)
1 TR 17170 Acre $0
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Undeveloped
Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los
Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year,
or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.
D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX
1. Special Tax A
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2019‐20 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine
the Special Tax A Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax A on all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable
Property until the aggregate amount of Special Tax A equals the Special Tax A Requirement for each
Tax Zone. The Special Tax A shall be levied for each Fiscal Year as follows:
First: The Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed
Property within each Tax Zone up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax to satisfy the Special
Tax A Requirement for such Tax Zone;
Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement for a Tax Zone
after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each
Parcel of Approved Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax A for
Approved Property;
Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement for a Tax Zone
after the first two steps has been completed, the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on all
Assessor’s Parcels of Undeveloped Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum Special
Tax A for Undeveloped Property.
2. Special Tax B (Contingent)
Commencing with Fiscal Year in which Special Tax B (Contingent) is authorized to be levied and for
each following Fiscal Year, the City Council shall determine the Contingent Special Tax B (Contingent)
Requirement for each Tax Zone, if any, and shall levy the Special Tax on all Assessor’s Parcels of
4.c
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
Taxable Property within such Tax Zone until the aggregate amount of Special Tax B (Contingent) equals
the Special Tax B ( Contingent) Requirement for such Tax Zone. The Special Tax B (Contingent) Shall
be levied for each Fiscal Year as follows:
First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed
Property for a Tax Zone up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) to satisfy
the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement;
Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement after
the first step has been completed, the Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied Proportionately on
each Parcel of Approved Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B
(Contingent) for Approved Property;
Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement after
the first two steps has been completed, the Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied Proportionately
on all Assessor’s Parcels of Undeveloped Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum
Special Tax B (Contingent) for Undeveloped Property.
E. FUTURE ANNEXATIONS
It is anticipated that additional properties will be annexed to CFD No. 2019‐1 from time to time. As
each annexation is proposed, an analysis will be prepared to determine the annual cost for providing
Services. Based on this analysis, the property to be annexed, pursuant to California Government Code
section 53339 et seq. will be assigned to the appropriate Maximum Special Tax rate for the Tax Zone
when annexed and included in Appendix A.
F. DURATION OF SPECIAL TAX
For each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax A shall be levied as long as the Services are being provided.
For each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied as long as the Contingent Services
are being provided.
G. EXEMPTIONS
The City shall classify as Exempt Property within CFD No. 2019‐1, any Assessor’s Parcels; (i) which are
owned by, irrevocably offered for dedication, encumbered by or restricted in use by any public entity;
(ii) with public or utility easements making impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set
forth in the easement; (iii) which are privately owned but are encumbered by or restricted solely for
public uses; or (iv) which is in use in the performance of a public function as determined by the
Administrator.
H. APPEALS
Any property owner claiming that the amount or application of the Special Taxes are not correct may
file a written notice of appeal with the City not later than twelve months after having paid the first
installment of the Special Tax that is disputed. A representative(s) of CFD No. 2019‐1 shall promptly
review the appeal, and if necessary, meet with the property owner, consider written and oral evidence
regarding the amount of the Special Tax, and rule on the appeal. If the representative’s decision
requires that the Special Tax for an Assessor’s Parcel be modified or changed in favor of the property
owner, a cash refund shall not be made, but an adjustment shall be made to the Special Tax on that
Assessor’s Parcel in the subsequent Fiscal Year(s).
4.c
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
I. MANNER OF COLLECTION
The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem
property taxes, provided, however, that CFD No. 2019‐1 may collect the Special Tax at a different time
or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations.
4.c
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
APPENDIX A
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)
COST ESTIMATE
Special Tax A Services ‐ The estimate breaks down the costs of providing one year's maintenance
services for Fiscal Year 2019‐20. These services are being funded by the levy of Special Tax A for
Community Facilities District No. 2019‐1.
TAX ZONE 3
PM 19814
Item Description Estimated Cost
1 Landscaping $27,031
2 Reserves $4,055
3 Admin $2,703
Total $33,789.25
Special Tax B Contingent Services – There are no services being funded by the levy of Special Tax
B (Contingent) for Community Facilities District No. 2019‐1. However, additional Tax Zones may
have Special Tax B Contingent Services being provided.
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAXES ASSIGNED TO EACH TAX ZONE
Tax
Zone
Fiscal
Year
Included
Tract/
APN
No. of
Taxable
Units
Land Use
Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax
A
Maximum
Special Tax B
(Contingent) Subdivider
3 2019‐20 PM 19814 56 Commercial Acre $608 $0 GSW #4 Development
APPROVED AND UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
The Maximum Special Tax for Tax Zone 3 for Approved Property and Undeveloped Property for
Fiscal Year 2020‐21 is $608 per acre.
4.c
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
TAX ZONE SUMMARY
Annexation
Tax
Zone
Tract
APN
Fiscal
Year
Maximum
Special Tax A
Maximum
Special Tax B
Subdivider
Original 1 17170 2019‐20 $961 / RU $0 / RU Santiago Communities, Inc.
1 2 17329 2019‐20 $473 / RU $0 / RU JEC Enterprises, Inc.
2 3 PM 19814 2020‐21 $608 / Acre $0 / Acre GWS #4 Development, LLC
3 4 0266‐041‐39 2019‐20 $1,136/ Acre $0/ Acre
Devore Storage Facility,
LLC
ESCALATION OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAXES
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2021 the Maximum Special Tax shall increase by i) the
percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange
County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent
(2.0%), whichever is greater.
4.c
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
APPENDIX B
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)
DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES
The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019‐1, as provided by
Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing
and/or replacing landscaped areas (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right‐of‐ways,
public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar landscaped areas officially dedicated for public
use. These services including the following:
(a) maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which
maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street
lights and traffic signals; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and
standards; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or
adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities;
maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures
situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or
recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and
(b) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage
and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, infiltration
basins, flood control channels, fossil fuel filters, and similar facilities. Maintenance services may include
but is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality
improvements, fossil fuel filters within the public right‐of‐way including the removal of petroleum
hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and
outlets; erosion repairs; and cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance,
servicing; or both of the water quality basin improvements within flood control channel improvements;
and
(c) public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD No.
2019‐1; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD No. 2019‐1; and any
portions adjacent to the properties within CFD No. 2019‐1; and
In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may
be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in the Rate and Method of
Apportionment.
The above services shall be limited to those provided within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019‐1 or for the
benefit of the properties within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019‐1, as the boundary is expanded from time
to time by anticipated annexations, and said services may be financed by proceeds of the special tax of
CFD No. 2019‐1 only to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of CFD No.
2019‐1 before CFD No. 2019‐1 was created.
4.c
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
APPENDIX C
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES AND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA BOUNDARIES
4.c
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
PROJECT MAP CFD NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 2 - TAX ZONE 3 4.dPacket Pg. 112Attachment: PW. Annexation No. 2- Attachment 1 - Project Map (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No.
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
DECLARING ELECTION RESULTS FOR COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE
SERVICES) (ANNEXATION NO. 2)
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council (the "City Council") of the City of San
Bernardino (the "City") has heretofore conducted proceedings for the area proposed to be
annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (the "CFD No.
2019-1") of the City of San Bernardino, including conducting a public hearing pursuant to
Section 53339.5 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said public hearing, the City Council adopted a
resolution calling a special election for May 6, 2020, and submitting to the qualified electors of
the territory to be annexed to the CFD No. 2019-1 the question of levying special taxes on
parcels of taxable property therein for the purpose of providing certain services which are
necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of the development of said
real property as provided in the form of special election ballot; and
WHEREAS, a Certificate of Election Results, attached thereto as Exhibit A, dated May
6, 2020, executed by the City Clerk (or, in the absence of the City Clerk, the Acting City Clerk –
in either case, the “Clerk”), has been filed with this Council, certifying that a completed ballot
has been returned to the Clerk for each landowner-voter(s) eligible to cast a ballot in said special
election, with all votes cast as “Yes” votes in favor of the ballot measure, and further certifying
on said basis that the special mailed-ballot election was closed; and
WHEREAS, this Council has received, reviewed and hereby accepts the Clerk’s
Certificate of Election Results and wishes by this resolution to declare the results of the special
mailed-ballot election;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO:
SECTION 1. Recitals. This Council finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are
true and correct.
SECTION 2. Ballot Measure. This Council hereby finds, determines and declares that
the ballot measure submitted to the qualified electors of the territory to be annexed to CFD No.
2019-1 has been passed and approved by those qualified electors in accordance with Sections
53328 and 53329 of the Government Code.
SECTION 3. Annexation. This Council hereby finds, determines and declares that
pursuant to Section 53339.8 of the Government Code, the City Council is authorized to
determine that the territory to be annexed has been added to and become a part of the CFD No.
4.e
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 3 - Reso Election Results [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
Resolution 2020-90
2019-1 with full legal effect, and the City Council is also authorized, pursuant to said Section
53339.8, to annually levy special taxes within the territory to be annexed to pay the costs of the
services to be provided by the CFD No. 2019-1 as specified in Resolution No. 2020-57 adopted
by the City Council on April 1, 2020. The boundaries of the territory annexed are shown on the
map entitled, "Annexation Map No. 2 Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance
Services)" a copy of which was recorded, on April 8, 2020, in Book 89 of Maps of Assessment
and Community Facilities Districts at Page 14, in the office of the San Bernardino County
Recorder.
SECTION 4. Notice of Special Tax Lien. Pursuant to Section 53339.8 of the
Government Code and Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Clerk shall
cause to be filed with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino an amendment of
the notice of special tax lien and a map of the amended boundaries of the CFD No. 2019-1
including the annexed territory.
SECTION 5. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 6. Effect. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption.
APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, this 6th day of May 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
4.e
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 3 - Reso Election Results [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
Resolution 2020-90
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-____, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of May
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUERO _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of
__________, 2020.
______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
4.e
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 3 - Reso Election Results [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES
The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019-1, as provided by
Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing
and/or replacing landscaped areas (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right-of-ways,
public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar landscaped areas officially dedicated for public
use. These services including the following:
(a) maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which
maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street
lights and traffic signals; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and
standards; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or
adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities;
maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures
situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or
recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and
(b) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage
and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, infiltration
basins, flood control channels, fossil fuel filters, and similar facilities. Maintenance services may include but
is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality improvements,
fossil fuel filters within the public right-of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other
pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and outlets; erosion repairs; and
cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance, servicing; or both of the water
quality basin improvements within flood control channel improvements; and
(c) public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD No.
2019-1; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD No. 2019-1; and any
portions adjacent to the properties within CFD No. 2019-1.
In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may
be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in Exhibit B to this resolution of
intention.
The above services shall be limited to those provided within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1 or for the
benefit of the properties within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1, as the boundary is expanded from time
to time by anticipated annexations, and said services may be financed by proceeds of the special tax of
CFD No. 2019-1 only to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of CFD No.
2019-1 before CFD No. 2019-1 was created.
4.f
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5A Exhibit A - Description of Services (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to
EXHIBIT B
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)
SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
(Effective as of May 6, 2020)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
Annexation Owner Assessor's Parcel Numbers
Original Formation Cauffman Family Trust 4/20/98 0142-041-43
Cauffman Family Trust 5/4/11 0142-041-46
1 17329, LLC 0348-111-52, 0261-031-10, -11,
and 0261-062-11 thru -14
2 GWS #4 Development, LLC 0141-431-24
3 Devore Storage Facility, LLC 0266-041-39
4.g
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5B Exhibit B - Parcel List (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)
ANNEXATION NO. 2
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION RESULTS
I, the undersigned, being the City Clerk or the Acting City Clerk, as the case
may be, hereby certify:
In connection with the special mailed-ballot election called by the City Council
(the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”) on this same date in the
proceedings of the City Council for the annexation of territory to the above-entitled community
facilities district, I personally received (a) a signed and dated waiver and consent form and (b) a
signed, dated and marked election ballot(s) on behalf of the owner(s) listed below, the entity
named as the sole landowner of the land within the boundary of the above-entitled community
facilities district in the Certificate Regarding Registered Voters and Landowners, dated October
22, 2019, and on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City in connection with the City Council
actions on that date. Copies of the completed waiver and consent form and the completed ballot
received by me and on file in my office are attached hereto.
Following such receipt, I have personally, and in the presence of all persons
present, reviewed the ballot to confirm that it is properly marked and signed, and I hereby certify
the result of that count to be that the ballot was cast in favor of the measure.
Based upon the foregoing, all votes that were cast having been cast “Yes”, in
favor of the ballot measure, the measure has therefore passed.
Landowner
Qualified
Landowner Votes Votes Cast YES NO
GSW #4 Development, LLC 61.74 62
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on ____________, 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC
Acting City Clerk
City of San Bernardino
By:
(Attach completed copies of Waiver/Consent and Ballot)
4.h
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 4 - Certificate [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community
Ordinance No. MC-1536
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1536
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. MC-1522
AND LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES TO BE COLLECTED
DURING FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 TO PAY THE ANNUAL
COSTS OF THE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, WATER QUALITY
IMPROVEMENTS, GRAFFITI, STREETS, STREET
SWEEPING, PARKS AND TRAIL MAINTENANCE, A
RESERVE FUND FOR CAPITAL REPLACEMENT, AND
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES WITH RESPECT TO CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino has heretofore
adopted Resolution No. 2019-81, stating that a community facilities district to be known as "City
of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services), County of
San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Community Facilities District"), is proposed to be
established under the provisions of Chapter 2,5 (commencing with Section 53311) of Part 1 of
Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, commonly known as the "Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"), and fixing the time and place for a public
hearing on the formation of the Community Facilities District; and
WHEREAS, notice was published and mailed to the owners of the property in the
Community Facilities District as required by law relative to the intention of the City Council to
establish the Community Facilities District and the levy of the special taxes therein to provide
certain services, and of the time and place of said public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2020, at the time and place specified in said published and
mailed notice, the City Council opened and held a public hearing as required by law relative to
the formation of the Community Facilities District, the levy of the special taxes therein and the
provision of services by the Community Facilities District; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters
pertaining to the formation of the Community Facilities District, the levy of the special taxes and
the provision of services therein were heard, and a full and fair hearing was held; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, the City Council adopted resolutions entitled
"Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Bernardino Establishing Calling An Election
for the Purpose of Submitting the Question of the Levy of the Proposed Special Tax to the
Qualified Electors of the Proposed Community Facilities District; Authorizing the Levy of
Special Taxes; and Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the Proposed Community Facilities
District" (the "Resolution of Formation") which resolution established the Community Facilities
District, authorized the levy of a special tax within the District, and called an election within the
District on the proposition of levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriat ions limit
within the District; and
4.i
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community
Ordinance No. MC-1536
WHEREAS, an election was held within the Community Facilities District in which the
sole eligible landowner elector approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote
required by the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. It is necessary that the City Council of the City of San
Bernardino levy special taxes pursuant to Sections 53340 of the Government Code to provide
and finance the costs of certain types of services, and related costs within the Community
Facilities District, including (i) the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting, water
quality improvements, graffiti, streets, street sweeping, and park maintenance, (ii) a reserve fund
for capital replacement, and (iii) administrative expenses, all as more completely described in
Exhibit "A" to Resolution No. 2019-81, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. Levy of Special Taxes. Special taxes shall be and are hereby levied for
the Fiscal Year 2020-2021, and each Fiscal Year thereafter, on all parcels of real property within
the District which are subject to taxation, which are identified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and
in the amount set forth for each such parcel in said Exhibit "B." Pursuant to said Section 53340,
such special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes
are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale, and Lien
priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes.
SECTION 3. Transmittal to County. The City Clerk shall immediately following
adoption of this ordinance transmit a copy hereof to the Board of Supervisors and the County
Auditor of the County of San Bernardino together with a request that the special taxes as levied
hereby be collected on the tax bills for the parcels identified in Exhibit "B" hereto, along with the
ordinary ad valorem property taxes to be levied on and collected from the owners of said parcels.
SECTION 4. Authorization to Publish Ordinance. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance
and the City Clerk shall attest thereto and shall, within fifteen days of its adoption, cause it or a
summary of it to be published in a newspaper circulated in the City of San Bernardino.
SECTION 5. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity
will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment)
and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA
Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for
resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days following
its adoption.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the City Clerk this 20th day of May, 2020.
4.i
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community
Ordinance No. MC-1536
___________________________
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
__________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
__________________________________
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
4.i
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community
Ordinance No. MC-1536
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Ordinance No. MC-1536, introduced by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, at a regular meeting held the 6th day of May, 2020. Ordinance No. MC-1536 was
approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting held the 20th day of May, 2020 by the
following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of May, 2020.
______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
4.i
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community
4.j
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.j
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities
4.kPacket Pg. 132Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 7 - Recorded Map [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on
Public Hearing
CFD No. 2019-1 Annexation No. 2:
PM 19814
Presented by Alex Qishta, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer
4.l
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx
Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1
Discussion
•The Property Owner, GWS #4 Development, LLC, has requested the City assist them in annexing territory into CFD No. 2019 -1 to cover the costs associated with the maintenance of Public Improvements.
•The area proposed within Annexation No. 2 includes one parcel APN 0141-431-24 within PM 19814. This proposed development is to include approximately 1,065,000 square feet of industrial high cube logistics warehouse building.
•The proposed maximum annual tax of $608 per acre will be included in CFD No. 2019-1 as Tax Zone 3. The maximum annual tax is proposed to escalate at the greater of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 2%.
4.l
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx
Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1
Discussion (Cont.)
•The services, which may be funded with proceeds of the
special tax include:
•All costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing
and/or replacing landscaped areas in public street right-of-way’s, public
landscaping, open spaces and other similar landscaped areas
officially dedicated for public use.
•In addition to the costs of the forgoing services, proceeds of the
special tax may be expended to pay administrative expenses and for
the collection of reserve funds.
4.l
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx
Project Location 4.l
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx
Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1
Fiscal Impact
•It is anticipated that at build-out the total Special Tax revenues
to pay for maintenance costs will be approximately $33,789. All
costs associated with the annexation is borne by the
Developer. There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General
Fund.
4.l
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx
Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1
Recommended Action
1. CITY COUNCIL INITIATE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) ("CFD NO. 2019-1" OR "CFD") BY TAKING THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:
A. HOLD PUBLIC HEARING,
B. ADOPT A RESOLUTION CALLING THE ELECTION,
C. HOLD A SPECIAL LANDOWNER ELECTION AND CANVASS THE ELECTION,
D. ADOPT A RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL LANDOWNER ELECTION;
AND
2. UPON APPROVAL OF THE PRECEDING RESOLUTIONS, INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. MC-
1522 AND LEVYING AND APPORTIONING THE SPECIAL TAX IN CFD NO. 2019-1 (AS IT NOW EXISTS AND WILL EXIST IN THE
FUTURE); AND
3. SCHEDULE THE FINAL READING AND ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED ORDINANCE FOR MAY 20, 2020.
4.l
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx
Questions?
4.l
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx
Page 1
Public Hearing
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
Subject: Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Departments
Recommendation
That the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, conduct a
Public Hearing regarding fee adjustments for various City Departments.
Background
In November 2014, as the City was drafting what would eventually b ecome the “Plan of
Adjustment” to exit bankruptcy, the City simultaneously began a review of its User Fees.
The last time User Fees were updated in a comprehensive manner was in 2008
(building and safety fees) and 2009 (other various departmental fees). User Fees are
charges to customers that receive a specific benefit (for example: plan reviews, facility
rentals, recreation classes, etc.) versus services that are of broad benefit to the entire
community (for example: police services). As required by Article XIIIC, Section 1 of the
State Constitution, User Fees charged cannot exceed the reasonable estimated cost to
provide the services.
Preparing a comprehensive review of the City’s User Fees required a specialized
financial study to properly evaluate staff time and other costs required to perform the
various city services. Accordingly, the City contracted with Revenue and Cost
Specialists (RCS) in November 2014 to prepare a cost allocation plan and cost of
services study to determine if the City was adequately covering its allowable costs.
With a high level of turnover in the Finance Department during the years ensuing the
bankruptcy filing (since 2014 there have been five (5) interim and/or permanent Finance
Directors) the study unfortunately stalled. After a series of stops and starts, the contract
with RCS was amended in November of 2016 and a draft study was completed in
October 2018; however, staffing turnover within all City departments caused delays,
resulting in an outdated study.
In December 2019, the City amended the agreement with RCS to update the
information and since that time city staff and RCS have worked diligently together to
complete this study. If approved, the recommendations are conservatively expected to
generate approximately $967,400 in additional revenue in Fiscal Year 2020/21.
5
Packet Pg. 140
6719
Page 2
Discussion
The purpose of this study is to determine if the City is adequately covering its costs for
specific government services or products provided directly to the payer and not provided
to those not charged; these fees are categorized as “User Fees”. Over one -hundred
and sixty (160) fees have been evaluated.
Attachment 1, prepared by City staff , summarizes in one document the consultant’s
findings as well as adjustments recommended by staff. A lso included on Attachment 1
is the consultant’s calculation of possible additional revenue and City staff’s revenue
projections for FY 2020/21.
Some things to keep in mind when reviewing the fee adjustment recommendations
(Attachment 1):
It is important to remember that the consultant’s primary responsibility is to
determine the costs of providing specific services. But the City must determine the
appropriate level of cost recovery. For certain programs, significant increases to
achieve 100% cost recovery are not feasible, for example Animal Control, and Parks
and Recreation programs. Determining the level of cost recovery in these areas is
not strictly a mathematical calculation. Rather, cost recovery levels in these areas
reflect a municipality’s specific situation: demographics, public safety, market
conditions and community values and priorities.
Within the departmental sections of this report, where applicable, this is discussed in
greater detail. Staff strived to find a balance between c ost recovery and
subsidization of programs however Council input on these decisions is encouraged.
The study conducted by RCS utilized FY 2019/20 salary and benefit data in
estimating costs. However, the consultant based revenue projections on levels of
activity occurring in FY 2018/19. City staff has adjusted these projections in a
conservative manner given the economic downturn that is currently occurring. The
economic impacts of shutdowns related to COVID -19 are not fully known; with this in
mind, and the fact that fees will not be effective until late July, staff has lowered the
consultant’s projections in most cases by 20%.
User Fees can only capture the City’s cost to provide specific services. Because of
budget reductions through the years, operating costs in many areas are low and
therefore close to 100% cost recovery. Should the City enhance services that are
funded with fees, the improvements could be captured in a future fee update. For
example, the addition of staffing in Community and Economic Development could
improve service to the development community and in turn the costs could be
captured in updated fees.
Included with Attachment 1 is a comparison of select fees with surrounding or similar
agencies. For development related fees, comparisons were made based on
hypothetical projects. Caution should be used when comparisons are made to other
agencies as only the cost to provide the service can be charged. There are many
5
Packet Pg. 141
6719
Page 3
reasons why comparisons can vary widely among agencies i ncluding: population,
staffing levels, technology, operating budget, agency policy decisions, and age of an
agency’s most current study. Within Attachment 1, the comparison is labeled as
Exhibit “E”.
Attachment 2 is the service cost study prepared by RCS to evaluate staff time and other
costs required to perform the various services.
Preparation of this study required the input of staff throughout all City departments.
Staff provided RCS with estimates of time required to perform tasks, and numerous
meetings and interviews between City staff and the consultants were conducted to
get the most accurate information possible.
RCS evaluated the cost of services and cost recovery at both the individual level and
the program level. In most cases, staff time and materials dedicated to a specific
individual service were reviewed. RCS developed a cost allocation plan to calculate
the average fully burdened rate of all budget positions. The rate includes general
city overhead as well as departmental overhead.
In some instances, a programmatic approach to evaluate costs versus recovery was
used. With this approach, the total program costs and the total program revenue
from the aggregated related fees to a specific program are evaluated. This method
of evaluating costs is particularly useful in areas such as building and safety, where
there are a myriad of fees calculations based on valuation schedules and type of
structure.
While the majority of fees are recommended to be raised, there are also down ward
adjustments to fees. This is a result of changes in process over the past ten years
since the last study was completed. Changes in technology, laws, staffing levels
and deployment, etc. over the years contribute to the realignment of costs.
Penalties charged for parking violations set forth in the City of San Bernardino’s
Municipal Code or in the California Vehicle Code are not included in this study and
are covered under Resolution 2013-188.
Development Impact Fees (DIF) are not considered User Fees and are established
and administered under other legal requirements; therefore , they are not included in
this study.
Fees by Department:
Extensive detail is provided in Attachments 1 & 2 for the User Fees that were reviewed.
In the departmental sections below items that require additional explanation are
discussed, for instance fees without a recommendation of 100% cost recovery.
5
Packet Pg. 142
6719
Page 4
Department
Estimated
Additional
Revenue
FY 2020-21
Library 500$
City Manager 6,000$
Finance 14,500$
City Attorney 16,800$
Parks & Recreation 23,600$
City Clerk 24,200$
Police 63,100$
Animal Control 80,000$
Public Works 355,100$
Community & Economic Development 383,600$
Total 967,400$
Estimated Additional Fee Revenue by Department
Library
Similar to Animal Control and Parks and Recreation, the Library cannot be fully
sustained with fees. Current fees cover approximately 2.3% of operational costs.
Operating a public library can be considered a service that provides economic, cultural
“quality of life” benefits to the community and offers some residents an opportunity to
have access to materials they otherwise could not afford. Raising fees too sharply may
cause a decrease in participation. The Library Board recently approved a fee schedule
that has been incorporated into this study.
Parks and Recreation
Included in Attachment 1 is Exhibit “C” which provides a detailed listing of various Parks
and Recreation fees along with recommendations for increases. Similar to the Library,
Parks and Recreation User Fees cover approximately 4% of total Parks and Recreation
costs (not including grant funded programs). The current fee structure takes into
account affordability for its citizenry and the general benefits for the City at large in
having Parks and Recreation amenities and programs available to its residents. In
some cases fees were doubled, which sounds extreme, but many of the fees are in the
$1 to $3 range. Fees were adjusted with this same structure in mind, with the goal of
keeping up with inflation rather than achieving 100% cost recovery and making
participation in the programs cost prohibitive.
Police Department
Police Services are considered a public-benefit service. However, there are fees that
cover services for specific customers. For example, providing a copy of a police report,
or processing a 2nd hand dealer/pawnshop license. In those cases 100% cost recovery
has been recommended.
In the case of the Alarm Permit program, there is a balance between cost recovery and
the desire to modify behavior. 100% cost recovery would have almost quadrupled the
5
Packet Pg. 143
6719
Page 5
annual residential alarm permit fee. Staff is recommending keeping the annual permit
fee at a lower rate than recommended by RCS, and instead increasing fees for
responses to false alarms. Permit holders will not be charged for false alarm fees until
the 3rd incident within a 12 month period and fees after the 2nd offense are considerably
lower for permit holders compared to non-permitted alarm owners. Attachment 1 details
the specifics.
The San Bernardino Police Department provides police services for various events and
venues throughout the year. The department charges a straight overtime rate, plus a
4.95% benefit rate for police services. This rate recovers the labor costs but does not
recover the overhead costs associated with the labor. Police department staff
conducted a detailed analysis of costs related to proving this service as well as
comparing practices with other law enforcement agencies in the area. Accordingly, a
recommendation has also been included in the study to assess a 20% overhead rate to
actual officer’s overtime rate.
Animal Control
Animal Control is considered a public safety function augmented by User Fees. Based
on the FY 2019/20 adopted budget, fees pay for about 12% of the operation’s cost.
100% cost recovery would not be feasible. There is a balance to recovering costs but
encouraging compliance and adoptions. Comparisons to surrounding agencies are
useful when reviewing fees in this particular area because residents have many pet
adoption options. Additionally, if fees are too prohibitive, then compliance may drop,
and public safety could be impacted.
The Police Department recently completed a comprehensive study of fees and
comparisons to surrounding agencies. The study is included with Attachment 1 and is
labeled as Exhibit “D”. Staff recommends implementing the results of the Police
Departments study. Because the level to subsidize Animal Control operations is a
policy decision, the consultants did not recommend specific fees but provided guidance
in developing fee proposals.
Public Works
Public Works is a large operation with many divisions that serve the public at large
(street maintenance, parks maintenance) as well as City departments (fleet and facilities
management). Engineering and Cemetery are funded in part with User Fees. 100%
cost recovery has been recommended for fees in both these areas. These fees have
lagged behind costs over the past ten years since the last study was completed.
Community and Economic Development (CED)
Building and Safety Fees are based in part on the valuation of a project. It is common
practice for cities to utilize the International Building Code’s (IBC) schedule of building
construction values when calculating fees. While the City utilizes this schedule, it hasn’t
updated the version in use since 2008. Staff recommendation is to update this
schedule semi-annually when updated versions are released. Fully burdened hourly
rates for staff were also updated. Because there are numerous combinations of fees in
the Building and Safety division based on various schedules, both the current and
5
Packet Pg. 144
6719
Page 6
proposed fee tables have been included as separate Exhibits “A” & “B” to Attachment 1.
RCS has also included these updated schedules in their report (appendices C & D).
Recognizing their importance as stakeholders in the City’s economic development, the
CED Director reached out to the Baldy View Chapter of the Building Industry
Association for comment and input. The City has received some input from members of
the development community that indicates fees higher than proposed would be
acceptable in return for enhanced service. As discussed earlier in this report, the City
can only capture its actual costs. Should the City make a determination to enhance
service delivery within the Building and Safety division, the fee study should be updated
to reflect these changes.
Also included in the fee study is the creation of a General Plan Maintenance Fee of 2%
to be assessed on all Community Development Fees. The purposed of the fee is to set
aside funds for maintenance and updating of the General Plan. The revenue generated
from this fee, estimated at $40,000 in FY 2020/21, is to be segregated from General
Fund operating revenues. Fees collected from the existing Technology fee of 2% are to
also be segregated from General Fund operating revenues.
Next Steps
Staff will return to the Mayor and City Council on May 20, 2020 with resolutions
incorporating fee recommendations approved by the Mayor and Council at the May 6,
2020 meeting.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
Approving the recommended fee adjustments aligns with Key Target No.1 Financial
Stability by covering, to the extent allowable and feasible, the City’s costs for providing
various services.
Fiscal Impact
The financial impact to the City is an increase of $967,400 in revenue to the General
Fund in FY 2020/21.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino
California hold a public hearing to consider adjustments to various City fees, and direct
staff to prepare the necessary resolutions to effectuate the approved recommendations
of the fee study.
Attachments
Attachment 1 City Review and Summary of Consultant Study
Attachment 2 RCS Cost of Service Study
Ward: All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
Resolution 2009-161 Amending Resolution 2009-122 (Master Fee Resolution)
5
Packet Pg. 145
6719
Page 7
Resolution 2009-122 Establishing a Master Fee Resolution
Resolution 2008-277 Updating Building Permit and Plan Review Fees
5
Packet Pg. 146
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0005CD‐BLDG+SAFETYBUILDING ISSUANCE FEE To process an application for a building permit. This is not a plan check or inspection.$40 ‐ 1st permit$10 ‐ each additional permit on the same applicaƟon$60 ‐ 1st permit$10 ‐ each additional permit on the same application↑64.8% 100.0% $ 108,500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 86,800 Building Issuance Fee is a flat fee based on time, not valuation. A large portion of these fees collected will be for residential projects which are expected to be impacted by COVID‐19 shutdown. Lowered estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation of August 1, 2020S‐0010CD‐BLDG+SAFETYBUILDING PLAN CHECK To review plans for construcƟon.75% of building fee for SFD and duplex buildings95% of building fee for commercial, industrial and multi‐family buildings$94.15 per hour for plan review of small projects75% of building fee for SFD and duplex buildings95% of building fee for commercial, industrial and mulƟ‐family buildings$122.37 per hour for plan review of small projects↑71.4% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ See Exhibit A for detail on current fees and Exhibit B for detail on proposed fees. Building Plan Check Fees are based on a percentage of the Building Permit Fee. Building Permit Fees are based in large part on project valuation. Hourly rates have been updated. Additionally, the ICC table used for building valuation data will be updated twice a year. These two changes will increase fees but with project values varying widely, and the current economic situation, it would not be prudent to increase revenue A & BS‐0020CD‐BLDG+SAFETYBUILDING INSPECTION To inspect building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical construction to insure that it is in conformance with approved plans and the various construction codes.Various Fees per the Building Codes IBC valuation schedule from2006. Hourly rate $94.45Updated IBC schedule to 2020 and update annually. Hourly rate $118.33↑101.8% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ See Exhibit A for detail on current fees and Exhibit B for detail on proposed fees. Building Permit fees are based in large part on project valuation. Hourly rates have been updated. Additionally, the ICC table used for building valuation data will be updated twice a year. These two changes will increase fees but with project values varying widely, and the current economic situation, it would not be prudent to increase revenue projections at this point. A & B1 of 385.aPacket Pg. 147Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0022CD‐BLDG+SAFETYSPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTIONTo perform a special inspection at the request of the applicant.$380 Minimum for the 1st 4 hours plus $95 for each additional hour$595 for the 1st 4 hours plus $105 for each add'l hour↑63.6% 100.0% $ 6,500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 5,800 Increased cost may offset some activity while still generating additional revenue. Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0025CD‐BLDG+SAFETYCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYTo review a construction project to insure that it has received all required inspections and met all conditions of approval, including those conditions of other $475.08 ‐ as a separate application (of which $100 was for Fire Review)$133.62 ‐ if included on the building permit (Deleted as All Fire)$500↑74.7% 100.0% $ 3,800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 3,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0030CD‐LAND DEV.TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYTo issue a Temporary C.of O. good for one (1) month.$467.34 $500↑93.1% 100.0% $ 300 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0201CD‐PLANNINGAMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS‐ADM.REV.To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Development Services Director.$583 $575↓101.4% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. Fee revenue from reduction is estimated to be less than $100S‐0203CD‐PLANNINGAMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS‐PLN.COMM.To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Planning Commission.$2,550 $4,070 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑62.6% 100.0% $ 3,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 2,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.2 of 385.aPacket Pg. 148Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0205CD‐PLANNINGAMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS‐D/ERCTo review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Development/Environmental Review Committee.$822 $2,890↑28.5% 100.0% $ 3,500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 2,800 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0208CD‐PLANNINGANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT‐ADM.REV.To review an application for the placement of an antenna or other telecommunication device that requires Director Review according to the $2,938 Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using a CUP or a development permit.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using a CUP or a development permit. No revenue being collected currently.S‐0211CD‐PLANNINGAPPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCILTo appeal a project to the Mayor and Council that was denied by the Planning Commission.$177 ‐ Non‐Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery)$1,766 ‐ All others$2,850 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $285 ‐Non Applicant, City Resident↑62.0% 100.0% $ 1,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 900 Cost recovery didn't include overhead previously. Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0213CD‐PLANNINGAPPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONTo appeal a project to the Planning Commission that was denied by the D/ERC or the Community Development Director.$278 ‐ Non‐Applicant, City Resident (10%)$2,772 ‐ All others$4,295 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $430 ‐Non‐Applicant City Staff↑64.5% 100.0% $ 3,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 2,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0216CD‐PLANNINGCUP‐MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOLTo prepare a conditional use permit for a minor use or for the sale of alcohol in an existing building.$3,605 $4,625 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑78.0% 100.0% $ 10,200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 8,100 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.3 of 385.aPacket Pg. 149Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0217CD‐PLANNINGCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To review a request for a conditional use permit for conditional uses.$7,133 ‐ CUP for Commercial/Industrial (#10; $71,330)$2,809 ‐ CUP for Condo, PRD, HMOD (#30; $84,270)$5,555 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑70.0% 100.0% $ 66,600 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 53,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0219CD‐PLANNINGCUP REVISION To review a request to modify an existing conditional use permit.$2,113 $3,780 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑55.9% 100.0% $ 8,300 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 6,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0222CD‐PLANNINGDESIGN REVIEW To review the design of a proposed development.Full Consultant Cost Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included with Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit or Temporary Use PermitDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included with Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit or Temporary Use Permit. Not currently collecting this fee.S‐0224CD‐PLANNINGDEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENTTo prepare or amend a development agreement which sets out the City's and the developer's obligations for a proposed development. Typically used where a developer prefers to construct an improvement in‐lieu of paying development impact fees.Direct Cost Recovery Fee Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit as determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0227CD‐PLANNINGDEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND.To process a request to amend the development code or the zoning map at the request of, and for the benefit of, a developer.$6,960 plus full consultant cost$9,925 plus any consultant cost including 10% contract administrative overhead, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑70.1% 100.0% $ 14,800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 11,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.4 of 385.aPacket Pg. 150Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0230CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐DIRECTOR REVIEWTo review a development that can be approved by the Community Development Director.$1,000 $ 1,965.00 ↑50.9% 100.0% $ 48,300 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 38,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0233CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐D/ERC REVIEW To review a development that can be approved by the Development/Environmental Review Committee.$6,438 0 to 5 Acres ‐ $6,810 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as esƟmated by City Staff.> than 5 Acres ‐ $11,905 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.↑75.7% 100.0% $ 31,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 24,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0235CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWTo review the following types of projects: 12 or more residential units, a cell tower taller than 75 feet, a conditional use permit, tentative tract map where the development requires a Planning Commission public hearing.$6,720 ‐ 0 to 5 Acres (#10; $67,200)$6,720 ‐ Greater than 5 Acres (#5, $33,600)0 to 5 Acres ‐ $8,040 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as esƟmated by City Staff.> than 5 Acres ‐ $15,455 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.↑63.9% 100.0% $ 56,800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 45,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0238CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEWTo review a residential project in a commercial zone where a Public Hearing by the Mayor & Council is required for approval.$7,288 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is no longer used.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends fee be deleted as it is no longer used and revenue is not collectedS‐0241CD‐PLANNINGENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDYTo review a proposed development and determine that it has no impact on the environment or that the impact can be mitigated and the mitigation monitored.$3,273 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit ↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increased5 of 385.aPacket Pg. 151Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0244CD‐PLANNINGENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTTo prepare an environmental impact report on a proposed development to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant costActual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit ↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0246CD‐PLANNINGEXTENSION OF TIME To process a time extension for a permit that requires the review of the Development/Environmental Review Committee or Planning Commission or Mayor $3,922 ‐ CUP & Development Permit (#2; $7,844)$4,768 ‐ Tentative Tract Map (#10; $47,680)$1,860 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↓248.8% 100.0% $ (33,200) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (33,200)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0251CD‐PLANNINGFENCE/WALL PERMIT To review plans and inspect a fence or wall that is not part of another application.$56 $60↑90.8% 100.0% $ 700 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 500 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0257CD‐PLANNINGGENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP)To review and process an application to make an amendment to the City's General Plan text or map at the request of, and for the benefit of, a developer. Only additional costs as always done in conjunction with Dev.Code Amend. or other primary applicationDirect Cost Recovery Fee ($1,500 Deposit treated as actual cost)$3,570 plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑42.0% 100.0% $ 8,300 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 6,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.6 of 385.aPacket Pg. 152Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0259CD‐PLANNINGHISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTTo prepare a report on whether an existing building has historic significance and, if so, how changes to the building can be made that preserve its historic significance.Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($815 deposit plus consultant cost)Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0262CD‐PLANNINGHOME OCCUPATION PERMITTo review a request to operate a business in a residential zone to insure that can be operated safely and that it will not impact neighbors.$268 $145↓186.5% 100.0% $ (37,300) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (37,300)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0264CD‐PLANNINGLETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSISTTo prepare a letter at the request of a realtor or lender confirming that a particular use of a property is permitted by the Zoning Code and/or in conformance with the City's General Plan. Also known as a rebuild letter.$450 $245↓182.7% 100.0% $ (10,200) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (10,200)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0266CD‐PLANNINGPLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTTo review a lot line application to check for building setbacks, zoning, general plan conformance and development standards. See S‐0454 for the Public Works Engineering review.$477 $1.255↑38.0% 100.0% $ 7,800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 6,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.7 of 385.aPacket Pg. 153Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0268CD‐PLANNINGMINOR EXCEPTION Staff approval of a minor variance (exception) to the Zoning Ordinance based on criteria that establishes the minimal impact of the variance.$288 ‐ Concurrent with another applicaƟon$268 ‐ Owner‐Occupied single‐family residence$792 ‐ Other105↓280.0% 100.0% $ (700) FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0270CD‐PLANNINGMISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEWDirect Cost Recovery Fee ($245 Deposit) plus Full Consultant Cost ($327 Deposit)Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.S‐0271CD‐PLANNINGMINOR MODIFICATION/REVISIONTo review a request to make a minor change, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, in a development's use permit or conditions of approval where the change can be approved $561 $380 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↓148.1% 100.0% $ (1,800) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (1,800)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0273CD‐PLANNINGPHASING PLAN REVIEW To review a phasing plan.$823 ‐ If not part of original project review$514 ‐ D/ERC review applicaƟon (DP)$536 ‐ Planning Comm.Application (CUP/DP/SUB)Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.S‐0275CD‐PLANNINGPLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATIONTo prepare an interpretation of the General Plan at the request of a developer where the interpretation is required for a particular $1,119 Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.8 of 385.aPacket Pg. 154Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0277CD‐PLANNINGPUBLIC CONVENIENCE/ NECESSITY LETTERTo make a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) determination as may be required by the State of California for the issuance of an Alcoholic Beverage Control License.$636 $2,740 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑23.2% 100.0% $ 31,600 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 25,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0279CD‐PLANNINGPRE‐APPLICATION REVIEW‐D/ERC REVIEWTo review a proposed project by the Development/Environmental Review Committee at the request of a developer before he/she submits a formal application.$2,424 $3,440↑70.5% 100.0% $ 25,400 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 20,300 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0280CD‐PLANNINGRECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM.To process a request for the Planning Commission to reconsider a previously denied development in‐lieu of appealing to the Mayor and Common Council.$506 $2,670 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑18.9% 100.0% $ 2,200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 1,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0282CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PERMIT‐REGULAR To review a proposed sign for compliance with the Sign Ordinance.$182 $80↓221.2% 100.0% $ (10,000) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (10,000)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0283CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PERMIT‐REQUIRING CUPTo review and approve a sign permit subject to a conditional use permit which restricts the use in perpetuity to the approved uses.$3,858 Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate processes.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate processes.9 of 385.aPacket Pg. 155Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0284CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PERMIT‐TEMPORARY To review a request to hang a temporary sign or banner to insure that it meets the requirements of the Sign Ordinance which limits its use to 60‐days.$111 $80↓134.9% 100.0% $ (1,400) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (1,400)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0286CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PROGRAM To review a signage program for a commercial development.$610 10 or less tenant spaces ‐ $490Greater than 10 tenant spaces ‐ Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑124.5% 100.0% $ (1,200) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (1,200)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0288CD‐PLANNINGSPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENTTo prepare or amend a specific plan which regulates land use in a specific area of the City in a more detailed manner that the City‐wide Zoning Ordinance at the request of a developer or as a condition to approving a development.Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant costActual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0291CD‐PLANNINGTEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMITTo review an application for a temporary use permit such as a pumpkin lot, parking lot sale, etc. or for a special event.$82.86 ‐ Temporary Use Permit (#55; $4,557)$420 ‐ Special Event Permit (Director Review) (#22; $9,240)$730 ‐ Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review)$315 Temporary Use Permit; $1,230‐ Special Events Permit (Director Review) $0 ‐ Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) ‐ Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not used.↑31.1% 100.0% $ 30,500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 24,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.10 of 385.aPacket Pg. 156Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0293CD‐PLANNINGTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP To process an application for the subdivision of land into four or fewer lots for residential, commercial or industrial development.$4,262 plus $65 per parcel$5,170 plus the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff.↑86.2% 100.0% $ 7,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 5,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0295CD‐PLANNINGTENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD)To process a proposed tract map (5 or more lots) to assure that it complies with City requirements and standards.$7,561 plus $65 per lot or dwelling unit$6,850 plus $25 per lot and the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff.↓118.4% 100.0% $ (6,600) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (6,600)Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0297CD‐PLANNINGTENTATIVE MAP REVISION‐TRACT/PARCELTo process a request to revise a previously approved tentative parcel or tract map.$2,113 $4,125plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑51.2% 100.0% $ 6,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0301CD‐PLANNINGTREE REMOVAL PERMIT To process an application for removing 5 or more, 3" or greater diameter trunk, mature trees.$506 $180↓227.3% 100.0% $ (600) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (600)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0303CD‐PLANNINGVARIANCE‐REGULAR To process an application for a variance from the Zoning Code$322 ‐ Single‐family residence (12% Recovery)$2,724 ‐ All others$2,065 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $250 Single Family Residence↑131.9% 100.0% $ (700) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (700)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0304CD‐PLANNINGVARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATIONTo process a variance that is submitted as part of another application. This represents the incremental cost of $910 $990 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑91.8% 100.0% $ 200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 200 No change to RCS estimate, increase minimal.11 of 385.aPacket Pg. 157Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0306CD‐PLANNINGVESTING TENTATIVE MAP To process an application for vesting rights in a tentative map.Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost"Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit ↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0308CD‐PLANNINGZONING FORM To prepare a written verification of zoning at the request of an applicant.$22 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S‐0264.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S‐0264.S‐0309CD‐PLANNINGZONING VERIFICATION REVIEWTo verify that an applicant for a City business license will be operating in the correct zone for that business.$37 $55↑68.0% 100.0% $ 31,300 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 25,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0315CD‐PLANNINGGENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCETo recover a portion of the cost of the periodic update to the City's General Plan which benefits all development in the City.None 2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major general plan updates that are required every 10 to 15 years.NEW 0.0% 100.0% $ 50,000 NEW/SURCHARGE $ 40,000 To develop set‐aside fund for general plan update every 15 to 20 years/ Note: special purpose reserve, not for general budget useS‐0322CDTECHNOLOGY MAINTENANCE AND UPGRADESTo recover a portion of the cost of upgrading the permit system which is estimated at $700,0002% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major permit system upgrades and 2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major permit system upgrades and maintenance‐‐0.0% 100.0% $ ‐ SURCHARGE $ ‐ To develop set‐aside fund for upgrading and maintaining permit system. Note: special purpose reserve, not for general budget useS‐0326CDARCHIVE FEES To cover the cost of archiving current development materials*$1.00 per permit or application * $2.00/sheet for Plans * $0.25 /page *$1.25 per permit or application * $3.15/sheet for Plans * $0.35/page Documents‐‐70.0% 100.0% $ 2,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 1,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.12 of 385.aPacket Pg. 158Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0441PW‐LAND DEV.FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEWTo perform a final map check on a development and record the documents. Includes a Reversion to Acreage as a single lot Final Map. Confirm conformity with State Subdivision Map Act & City Ordinances.$2,210 ‐ Base Fee $55 ‐ Per Lot Fee $135 ‐ Each additional Review $404 ‐ Final Map ConƟnuance $97 ‐ Certificate of Correction per Hour$5,195 ‐ Base Fee $275 ‐ Per Lot Fee $270 ‐ Each additional Review $0 ‐ Final Map Continuance ‐ Staff recommends deleting as not used. $185 ‐ Certificate of Correction per Hour↑42.1% 100.0% $ 3,400 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 2,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0445PW‐LAND DEV.ON‐SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKPlan check on‐site precise site plans for conformance with City Ordinances for paved parking areas, ADA accessibility, drainage, NPDES stds, sewer utilities, on‐site lighting, wall locations/elevations, trash enclosures and accessible paths of travel.2% of engineer's cost estimate for on‐site improvements$3,585 ‐ 1st Sheet, plus$1,515‐ Each Additional Sheet, plus $265 ‐ if the project is over $25K in estimated cost $605 ‐ Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)↑100.6% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Change in methodology should not impact overall revenue, just more equitable distribution of charges13 of 385.aPacket Pg. 159Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0447PW‐LAND DEV.GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE To review a grading plan for compliance with City Ordinances and State Codes. Review grading bonds if required. Review drainage and erosion control measures to be used.Cubic Yards: <= 50 ‐ No Fee 51 to 100 ‐ $15.00 101 to 1,000 ‐ $22.50 1,001 to 10,000 ‐ $30.00 10,001 to 100,000 ‐ $30.00 plus $15.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 ‐ $165.00 plus $9.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up ‐ $255.00 plus $4.50 for each 10K CY > 200,000$390 for all plans with more than 50 Cubic Yards↑41.5% 100.0% $ 1,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0452CD‐LAND DEV.REVIEW‐CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCETo review a lot to determine if it is in conformity with the State Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinances, If it is, issue a Certificate of Compliance which allows future construction permits on $828 $1,370↑60.3% 100.0% $ 500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0453PW‐LAND DEV.REVIEW‐LOT MERGER To process an application to merge multiple lots into one new lot.$828 $1,300↑63.6% 100.0% $ 8,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 6,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0454PW‐LAND DEV.REVIEW‐LOT LINE ADJSTMTTo review the adjustment of the lot line between two parcels.$414 ‐ SFR Occupancy (#3; $1,242)$828 ‐ Com'l/Ind'l (#3; $2,484)$1,590↑39.1% 100.0% $ 5,800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.14 of 385.aPacket Pg. 160Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0463PW‐LAND DEV.ON‐SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONTo provide field inspection of on‐site improvements including sewers, storm drains, parking areas, accessibility per ADA requirements, curbs, planters, Water Quality Control Plan features, erosion controls and finish grade.3% of Estimated Construction CostFee Based on Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost: $0 to $1 Million ‐ 3.4% of estimated cost with a $1,045 minimumGreater than $1 Million ‐ $34,000 plus 1.7% of the estimated cost over $1 Million↑93.1% 100.0% $ 14,900 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 11,900 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0467PW‐LAND DEV.ON‐SITE GRADING INSPECTIONTo perform field inspection of on‐site grading, erosion control devices and drainage/storm drain features of stand alone rough grading.Cubic Yards: <= 50 ‐ No Fee51 to 100 ‐ $150.00101 to 1,000 ‐ $225.001,001 to 10,000 ‐ $300.0010,001 to 100,000 ‐ $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000100,001 to 200,000 ‐ $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000200,001 and up ‐ $300.00 plus $100.00 for Cubic Yards: 1 to 1,000 ‐ $225 1,001 to 10,000 ‐ $340 10,001 to 100,000 ‐ $340 plus $115 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 ‐ $1,375 plus $55 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up ‐ $1,870 plus $10 for each 10K CY > 200,000↑82.6% 100.0% $ 3,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 2,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0471PW‐LAND DEV.HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEWTo review a hydraulic/hydrology study prepared by a developer's engineer to determine the impact of a development on the ground water and the storm drainage Actual Time:$487 ‐ for the first 3 hours$100 ‐ for each add'l hour$825↑71.0% 100.0% $ 12,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 9,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0472PW‐LAND DEV.ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG.To make a finding that a proposed development is not on or near a known fault line.None $940NEW 0.0% 100.0% $ 900 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.15 of 385.aPacket Pg. 161Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0480PW‐STORMWATER MGTFEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEWTo perform a FEMA plan review of a project located within floodplain designations Zone "A", "AE", or "shaded X".None $940 plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.NEW 0.0% 100.0% $ 3,800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 3,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0481PW‐STRMWTR MGMTREV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLNTo review the storm water run‐off pollution plan for a project over 1 acre in size to insure that the run‐off meets the requirements of NPDES. To inspect the site during construction to insure that the conditions of the plan are being met.$410 ‐ Commercial & Residential Projects (#57; $23,370)$265 ‐ Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects (#56; $14,840)$405 ‐ Commercial & ResidenƟal Projects$615 ‐ Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects↑66.3% 100.0% $ 19,500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 15,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0488PW‐STRMWTR MGMTREVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANSTo review the Stormwater Pollution Plan for run‐off after a development is completed. This review occurs before the grading and/or building permits are issued. Includes three plan reviews.$80 ‐ Non‐Categorical (#450; $36,000) $365 ‐ Categorical without Conditions of Concern (#75; $27,375)$1,130 ‐ Categorical with Conditions of Concern (#75; $84,750) $99 ‐ per hour for reviews after the third review (#1; $99)$155 ‐ Non‐Categorical$1,440 ‐ Categorical $120 ‐ per hour for reviews after the third review↑52.0% 100.0% $ 137,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 109,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0489CD‐WSTWTR MGMTREV‐EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLANTo review the erosion and waste management control plan for a construction site.$75 $180↑41.1% 100.0% $ 5,900 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.16 of 385.aPacket Pg. 162Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0490CD‐STRMWTR MGTNPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONTo inspect a construction site to mitigate hazardous run‐off.$98 ‐ Less than 10 Acres$179 ‐ 10 Acres or More$140↑70.5% 100.0% $ 8,500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 6,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0495PW‐STRMWTR MGMTNPDES BUSINESS INSPECTIONTo review a business for hazardous discharge into the sewer or storm drainage system.$143 $175↑81.7% 100.0% $ 7,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 5,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0501PW‐ENGINEERINGBASIC PERMIT FEE See note in "Suggested Fee" below$45.00 ‐ Engineering Permit$53.00 ‐ Blanket Permit$43.00 ‐ Permit ExtensionEngineering Permit ‐ This fee is included with each permitBlanket Permit ‐ see S‐0523Permit Extension ‐ see S‐0560DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this fee, it is included with each permitBlanket Permit ‐ see S‐0523Permit Extension ‐ see S‐0560S‐0503PW‐ENGINEERINGPERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMITTo review a request for a permanent encroachment into the public right‐of‐way.$670.00 ‐ Initial Permit ($625 for the encroachment permit and $45 for the basic permit ‐ both to be combined into one fee.)$150.00 ‐ Annual $1,515 ‐ IniƟal Permit $340 ‐ Annual Renewal↑44.2% 100.0% $ 4,200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 3,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0505PW‐ENGINEERINGTEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMITTo process a request for a temporary encroachment into the public right‐of‐way.$25.00 ‐ No Lane Closure (#100; $2,500)$136.00 ‐ Lane Closure: First Day (#2,400; $326,400) $60.00 ‐ Lane Closure: Each Additional Day (#9,600; $576,000) $70.00 ‐ Trash Bin, 1st week $28.00 ‐ Trash Bin, each add'l week$160 ‐ No Lane Closure ‐ Parking Only$175 ‐ Lane Closure: First Day $25 ‐ Lane Closure: Each AddiƟonal Day $100 ‐ Trash Bin, 1st week $25 ‐ Trash Bin, each add'l week↑130.6% 100.0% $ 105,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 84,000 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.17 of 385.aPacket Pg. 163Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0507PW‐ENGINEERINGLANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATIONSee note in "Suggested Fee" below$286.00 Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the excavation permit.DELETE 0.0% 100.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the excavation permit.S‐0509PW‐ENGINEERINGSPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENTTo process a request to hold a special event in the public right‐of‐way.$545.00 ‐ With a Lane Closure (#4; $2,180)$559.00 ‐ With a Street Closure (#8; $4,472)$347.00 ‐ With a Road Closure (1st day) **$302.00 ‐ Each Additional Day (#4, $1,208)(**Note: Staff recommends combining the fees for a street and a road as they take the same effort. Also, each of the above fees, except the "additional day" fee, include the $45 basic fee $925 ‐ Lane Closure$1,495 ‐ Street/Road Closure, 1st day $1,040 ‐ Street/Road Closure, each add'l day↑39.7% 100.0% $ 12,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 9,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0511PW‐ENGINEERINGOVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMITTo process a permit for an oversize/overload transport through the City. This fee is controlled by the State.$17.00 ‐ One Day (State‐Mandated Fee is $16) (#600; $10,200)$95.00 ‐ Annual Permit (State‐Mandated Fee is $90) (#3; $285)$16 ‐ One Day Permit$90 ‐ Annual Permit(Note: City may only charge the State‐Mandated fee. There is no provision for a technology surcharge.)‐‐54.1% 100.0% $ ‐ LEGAL LIMITS $ ‐ Limited by State and/or Federal regulations/lawS‐0513PW‐ENGINEERINGHAULING PERMIT To process a request to haul construction supplies/debris either into or out of the City.$438.00 ‐ First Day (#6; $2,628) (Includes S‐501 Basic Fee)$100.00 ‐ Each Additional Day (#24; $2,400)$650 ‐ First Day$285 ‐ Each Additional Day↑46.9% 100.0% $ 7,600 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 5,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.18 of 385.aPacket Pg. 164Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0515PW‐ENGINEERINGEXCAVATION PERMIT See note in "Suggested Fee" below$150.00 ‐ Per day Staff Recommends Deleting This ServiceDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff Recommends Deleting This ServiceS‐0517PW‐ENGINEERINGTRAFFIC STUDY REPORT To review a developer's traffic study to ensure compliance with City standards.$719.00 ‐ Basic Review (#12; $8,628) $80.00 ‐ Extended Review per Hour (#0; $0)Actual Consultant charge (currently $1,440 for a basic review) plus 10% overhead for City contract administration and review.↑53.2% 100.0% $ 8,700 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 6,900 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0518PW‐ENGINEERINGOFF‐SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKTo review grading plans for off‐site improvements. Three plan checks are included with the original off‐site improvement plan check. Fourth and subsequent plan checks are charged an additional plan check fee.$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost with a $50 minimum$3,585 ‐ 1st Sheet, plus$1,515‐ Each Additional Sheet, plus $265 ‐ if the project is over $25K in estimated cost $605 ‐ Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)↑93.9% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Methodology Change won't impact revenues significantlyS‐0520PW‐ENGINEERINGREVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANSTo review changes to approved plans due to changes to conditions or other reasons.$137.00 $210 for the 1st hour plus $150 for each additional hour↑64.9% 100.0% $ 400 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 400 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.19 of 385.aPacket Pg. 165Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0521PW‐ENGINEERINGOFF‐SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTIONTo inspect off‐site construction to insure that it complies with the City's standards & conditions as well as the approved plans, if applicable.$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost$240 ‐ Driveway & Sidewalk ReplacementOther Fees based on Estimated Construction Cost: $0 to $175,000 ‐ $630 plus 12.4% of the Cost over $15,000 $175,001 to $750,000 ‐ $20,470 plus 3.4% of the Cost over $175,000Greater than $750,000 ‐ $40,020 plus 1.1% of the ↑97.0% 100.0% $ 4,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 3,200 Change in methodology should not impact overall revenue, just more equitable distribution of charges. Because based on project valuation, % of recovery varies year to year but on average is 100%S‐0523PW‐ENGINEERINGANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMITTo issue an annual blanket permit to utilities in advance of emergency work to avoid delaying the work. To inspect the work as it occurs. The cost of the permit and inspection are deducted from an initial deposit as required.$53.00 ‐ Permit Issuance$73.00 ‐ Inspection Per Location$130 for the initial blanket permit annually plus $105 per day for inspection per location after the first day/location deducted from an initial annual deposit of $5,500. Deposit balance can be carried forward to a new year but a new initial blanket permit is required and the deposit balance must be restored to $5,500.↑53.4% 100.0% $ 800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 800 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0529PW‐ENGINEERINGBOND RELEASE INSPECTION ‐ PWTo perform an inspection to confirm that all issues covered by the bond are satisfied so that the City can release the bond.$45.00 ‐ Issuance$59.00 ‐ Inspection$230↑45.1% 100.0% $ 600 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 600 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.20 of 385.aPacket Pg. 166Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0531PW‐REAL PROPERYSTREET NAME CHANGE To change the name of a street at the request of a private party or group.$1,345.00 Plus the Cost of Street SignsActual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including new street signage, charged against an initial deposit determined ↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0533PW‐REAL PROPERTYSTREET/ALLEY VACATION To process a request to terminate the City's interest (easement) in an alley or street.$1,000.00 ‐ Deposit$1,000.00 ‐ Balance Due Prior to Processing$1,840 plus initial deposit for noticing and publishing as determined by staff↑54.3% 100.0% $ 1,700 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 1,300 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0535PW‐REAL PROPERTYDEDICATION OF RIGHT‐OF‐WAYTo legally accept the ownership of property (right‐of‐way) at the request of a private party.$315.00 ‐ If Legal and Map are Provided$800.00 ‐ If City Prepares Legal & MapIf Legal and Map are Provided ‐ $920 If City Prepares Legal & Map ‐ Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑34.2% 100.0% $ 6,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0537PW‐REAL PROPERTYPRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUESTTo process the request of a private party to annex their property to the City.$14,750.00 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $17,000.↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increased21 of 385.aPacket Pg. 167Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0539PW‐REAL PROPERTYCITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSINGTo process a City property lease.$2,100.00 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $5,500.↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0542PW‐ENGINEERINGENGINEERING LETTER See note in "Suggested Fee" below$100.00 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided.S‐0560PW‐ENGINEERINGPERMIT EXTENSION To review a request for a permit extension to determine if there are reasons to deny it.$43.00 $80 each↑52.7% 100.0% $ 7,700 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 6,000 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0565PW‐ENGINEERINGRE‐INSPECTION To re‐inspect due to failure to have work ready on the initial inspection or because more inspections were required than covered by the initial permit. This inspection is during normal working hours.$59.00 $105 per hour with a one‐hour minimum↑84.9% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0567PW‐ENGINEERINGAFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTIONTo perform an inspection at the request of a developer outside of normal working hours.$369.00 ‐ 4 hr. minimum $92.45 ‐ each additional hourEmployee's current hourly rated at time and 1/2 (overtime rate) plus 20% overhead with a four hour minimum↑57.9% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ 40,000 City estimate based on past level of inspections22 of 385.aPacket Pg. 168Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0571PW‐ENGINEERINGASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST.To perform the legal requirements to establish an assessment district or a Community Facilities District usually in a new development at the request of the developer.$5,900 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0602POLICECONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITTo process a request to authorize carrying a concealed weapon.$400 ‐ IniƟal$325 ‐ RenewalThe general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only issues permits to retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff recommends deleting this DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ The general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only issues permits to retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is not being used.S‐0609POLICERECORDS CHECK LETTER To prepare a one‐page document on departmental letterhead that gives the result of researching local $25 ‐ With Record$20 ‐ Without Record$40↑59.5% 100.0% $ 200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 200 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0611POLICE2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP LICENSETo license a second‐hand dealer or pawnshop.$475 ‐ IniƟal$126 ‐ Renewal$480 ‐Initial $135 renewal‐‐95.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0613POLICELIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSINGTo roll a set of fingerprints using the digital "Live Scan" equipment instead of the "old" ink on cards. Service is provided to the public on Wednesday from 1 to 5 PM.$2 ‐ Live Scan Processing Fee (Note: Staff is charging $15 plus the DOJ fee.)$15 ‐ Fingerprint card(Note: Applicants for City jobs are not charged the Live Scan fee or the DOJ fee.)$20 plus applicable DOJ/FBI fee (currently $33)↑74.1% 100.0% $ 1,200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 900 Minimal revenue increase, no increase in revenue projections23 of 385.aPacket Pg. 169Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0616POLICEFIX‐IT TICKET SIGN‐OFF To review vehicle repairs when a ticket has been issued to the vehicle owner for a problem such as $20 $25↑83.1% 100.0% $ 400 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 400 Council in 2009 stopped collection of fee. Suggest reinstatement‐need estimate from PD of what revenue would be generated with reinstatementS‐0618POLICEPOLICE SERVICES FOR SPECIAL EVENTSWhen the Police Department is asked to provide law enforcement services at special eventsOvertime rate of police personnel providing service per number of hours plus overhead rate of 4.95%Officer's current hourly rate at times & 1/2 (overtime rate) plus 20% overhead with four (4) hour minimum↑85.0% 100.0% $ 500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 51,600 City estimate based on past events, reduced by 60% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.CITY ANALYSISPOLICECASSETTE TAPE REPRODUCTIONCassette Tape Reproduction $ 60.00 Staff recommends deletion; no longer usedDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ $ ‐ CITY ANALYSISPOLICETRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTPhoto copies of traffic accident reports $0.15 per copy $0.25 per copy ↑0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ 100% cost recovery not possible with copies for public, would be out of line with City Clerk fees for photo copies.CITY ANALYSISPOLICECAD INCIDENT PRINTOUT Printout from CAD system $ 30.00 $ 30.00 ‐‐0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ $ ‐ No change recommendedCITY ANALYSISPOLICEDISPATCH TAPE REPRODUCTIONRequests for copies of dispatch recordings $ 80.00 $ 80.00 ‐‐0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ $ ‐ No change recommendedCITY ANALYSISPOLICERECORDED INVESTIGATIVE EVIDENCErequests for copies of audio recordings $ 19.00 $ 19.00 ‐‐0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ $ ‐ No change recommended24 of 385.aPacket Pg. 170Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleCITY ANALYSISPOLICEPHOTOGRAPHS Copies of investigation photos 5x7 $29.25; 8x10 $33; Photos on CD $47; Photos requiring lab assistance $53 $52 for CD, $0.25/per copy from laserfiche. Any special requests will be actual costs plus 10% administrative fee.‐‐100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ $ ‐ Restructuring of fees should not impact overall revenue, just updated to reflect changes with technologyCITY ANALYSISPOLICEVIDEO TAPE REPRODUCTIONVideo Tape reproductionsStaff recommends deletion; no longer usedDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ $ ‐ CITY ANALYSISPOLICECOMPUTER LOCATION ACTIVITY PRINTOUTComputer Location Activity Printout$75 $75 ‐‐100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ $ ‐ No change recommendedALARM SYSTEMS‐0621POLICETo encourage the proper maintenance of alarm systems by charging the alarm owner for wasted police time spent responding to false alarms.$25/$50/$10 ‐ Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income Resident) $25 ‐ Alarm Sys.Installation $10 ‐ Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarms in 12‐month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or panic: Reg./LIR]: [$75/$10]/[$200/$20] ‐ 1st thru 4th Non‐Permitted [$90/$10]/[$250/$20] ‐ 5th & 6th [$90/$20]/[$300/$40] ‐ 7th thru 9th[$175/$20]/[$350/$40] ‐ 10th & SubsequentConsultant Recommendation: $96 ‐ Annual Alarm Permit ($75‐City plus $21‐Alarm Vendor)$25 ‐ Alarm Sys.Installation$10 ‐ Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:$256 ‐ All False Alarms without a Permit ($200‐City plus $56‐Alarm Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12 month period with a Permit. (Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial response or between intrusion and panic/robbery response.) $ 10,000 Conservatively estimated revenue, unknown how changes will affect behaviourCity Staff Recommendation: $30 ‐ Annual Alarm Permit $15 Annual Alarm Permit Low Income; $25 ‐ Alarm Sys.Installation$10 ‐ Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:With Permit: $0 charge 1st and 2nd; $100 3rd, $200 4th, $300 5th and above. Without Permit: $200 1st, $250 2nd; $350 3rd, $400 4th and above.25 of 385.aPacket Pg. 171Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0655CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTBIENNEAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTIONTo perform an exterior property maintenance inspection every two years of all single family rental properties to insure that the property is properly maintained.$100 per owner of SFR rentals$180 per SFR rentalStaff recommends increasing the inspections to every year and including an interior inspection.↑55.2% 100.0% $ 83,500 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 20,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 75% due to expected implementation date of August 1, 2020, economic downturn and sufficient staffingS‐0657CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTNOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASETo process the release of a Notice of Pendency that was previously filed with the property's deed to guarantee payment of a judgement against the property. The Notice makes it impossible to sell the property or get $180 for the first four units$160 base fee plus $7.45 for each unit inspected (over four)$165 plus $8.50 for any unit over four‐‐109.3% 100.0% $ (1,500) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (1,500)Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0640ANIMAL CONTROLANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESTo protect public health by requiring rabies vaccinations of dogs. To remove dead animals that could be infected. To care for animals that are brought to the animal shelter until adopted or reclaimed.Various Fees to cover licensing, boarding and miscellaneous servicesSee Exhibit D. City Recommendation. Animal Control services are considered a public safety function. Fees, rather than attempting for full cost recovery, are to encourage compliance. Only 20% to 30% of dogs are licensed. Increasing these fees by an unreasonable amount discourages compliance. The Police Department completed an analysis that looked at cost and comparable fees from surrounding agencies. It is recommended that the fees in the study be adopted.↑17.5% 20.0% $ 100,000 PUBLIC SAFETY/LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 80,000 See Exhibit D. City Recommendation. Animal Control services are considered a public safety function. Fees, rather than attempting for full cost recovery, are to encourage compliance. Only 20% to 30% of dogs are licensed. Increasing these fees by an unreasonable amount discourages compliance. The Police Department completed an analysis that looked at cost and comparable fees from surrounding agencies. It is recommended that the fees in the study be adopted.D26 of 385.aPacket Pg. 172Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0659CD‐CODE ENFORCMENTABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGETo include the cost to initially process a lien against property that has failed to comply with a demand to abate a code violation and the cost to release the lien. This charge would be payable before release.$115 per lien $130 per lien↑87.0% 100.0% $ 800 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 800 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0662CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTLIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGETo respond to a request for a demand letter regarding the status or release of a lien and/or abatement costs imposed.$95 $185↑51.2% 100.0% $ 51,100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 40,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0664CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTDUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE To prepare a duplicate release of a lien at the request of the property owner due to the loss of the original release.$28 $15↓169.4% 100.0% $ (300) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (300)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐0666CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTWEED ABATEMENT CHARGESTo recover the full cost of weed abatement on lots and partial lots where the owner has failed to abate the weeds prior to the City's deadline. Process involves multiple inspections & noticing. Preparation of Lien Resolution and the discing of lot.$375 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing$515 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing↑73.1% 100.0% $ 100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Currently contract with County Fire, updated fee if City resumes27 of 385.aPacket Pg. 173Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6000RECREATIONAQUATICS SERVICES Providing a 10 week summer session to the community at the various community pools. Pools are also available for rental by the schools for 3 weeks before that.See Appendix CIn addition, the City has received $39,750 from a Kaiser Grant.See appendix C Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in dff↑13.4% 25.0% $ 14,000 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 11,200 See Exhibit C. Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. CS‐6060RECREATIONYOUTH SPORTS Providing youth sports to the community.Resident ‐ $30 per childNon‐Resident ‐ $33 per child Resident ‐ $45 per child Non‐Resident ‐ $50 per child↑30.2% 75.0% $ 1,500 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 1,200 Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. S‐6070RECREATIONADULT SPORTS Providing adult sports programs to the community.Soccer: Resident ‐ $300 per team Non‐Resident Team ‐ $350 per teamBasketball ‐ Charging direct staff and program costSoccer: Resident ‐ $375 per team Non‐Resident Team ‐ $425 per teamBasketball ‐ Charging direct staff and program cost‐‐24.1% 45.0% $ 4,000 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 3,200 Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. S‐6100RECREATIONCOMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALSProviding Community Center programs and rental of Community Center facilities.See Appendix CSee Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering ↑0.3% 2.0% $ 4,000 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 3,200 See Exhibit C. Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. See C28 of 385.aPacket Pg. 174Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6130RECREATIONBALLFIELD RENTAL/USE Maintenance and rentals of ballfields to the community.Reservation ‐ $10 per hour for first hour and $5 per hour thereafterTournament Use: $120 per field per day without lights $180 per field per day with lightsPreparation ‐ $25 per field upon requestLighting ‐ $20 per hour for first hour and $10 per hour thereafterLocal Sports Groups do not pay for use of the fields or lights.Reservation ‐ $10 per hourTournament Use ‐ $120 per field per dayLighting ‐ $20 per hour for first hour and $15 per hour thereafterPreparation ‐ determined by the needs of the eventLocal Sports Groups: Field Use ‐ No Charge Lighting ‐ No Charge↑3.6% 10.0% $ 2,000 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 1,600 Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. S‐6700LIBRARYLIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENTProcessing the replacement of a lost library card.$1 per card $1 per card‐‐21.3% 21.3% $ 500 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ ‐ Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council. Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board 29 of 385.aPacket Pg. 175Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6710LIBRARYINTER‐LIBRARY LOAN REQUESTProcessing a request to borrow a library item from another library.$3 per item $3 per item‐‐0.3% 0.3% $ 200 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ ‐ Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council. Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board S‐6720LIBRARYLIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICEProviding library research services, primarily obituaries, on request$20 per hour $20 per hour‐‐20.2% 22.0% $ 10 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ ‐ Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council. Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board 30 of 385.aPacket Pg. 176Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6730LIBRARYREPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LSProcessing and replacing lost and damaged library materials.Lost Items: Magazines ‐ $1 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost Other items ‐ $5 processing fee plus $40 replacement costDamaged Items ‐ $3‐$5Missing Barcode ‐ $1Missing or Damaged Book cover ‐ $5Lost Items: Magazines ‐ $5 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost Other items ‐ $10 processing fee plus $40 replacement costDamaged Items ‐ $3‐$5Missing Barcode ‐ $10Missing or Damaged Book cover ‐ $10↑17.7% 35.0% $ 25 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ ‐ Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council. Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board S‐6740LIBRARYLIBRARY ROOM RENTAL Rental of meetings rooms at the Library.Bing Wong Auditorium ‐ $25 per hour (4 hour minimum)Kellogg Room A or B ‐ $25 per hour for eachStudy Room ‐ $15 per hour (waived with student ID)Projector ‐ $5 per dayVCR and Monitor ‐ $10 per dayDigital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium ‐ $30Computer/Internet Technical Support ‐ $20 per hourPortable Public Address S$5d($50Bing Wong Auditorium: Non‐Profit ‐ $25/hr For Profit ‐ $50/hr (4 hr min)Kellogg Room A or B ‐ Non‐Profit ‐ $25/hr for each For Profit ‐ $50/hr for eachStudy Room ‐ $15 per hour (waived with student ID)Projector ‐ $5 per dayVCR and Monitor ‐ $10 per dayDigital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium ‐ $30Computer/Internet Technical Support ‐ $20 per hourPortable Public Address S$5d($50↑14.5% 100.0% $ 700 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 500 Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council. Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board approval, must go to Council. Reduced RCS estimate for downturn in economy and il idfA131 of 385.aPacket Pg. 177Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐7000CEMETERYCEMETERY INTERMENT Interment of a casket or urn at the Cemetery.Adult: Single ‐ $600 Double ‐ $850Child: Single ‐ $350 Double ‐ $650Baby ‐ $150CremaƟon ‐ $200For many sites, the City has a contractual obligation to provide the interment at the fee that was in place when the contract was signed.Single ‐ $2,295Double ‐ $2,590CremaƟon ‐ $915↑27.5% 100.0% $ 14,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 11,200 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐7010PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY DISINTERMENT Disinterment of a casket or urn on request.Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) ‐$1,500Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) ‐ $1,200Baby/Child Disinterment (Shipped Out) ‐ $800Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) ‐$5,545Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) ‐ $3,820↑31.4% 100.0% $ 50 FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. .S‐7020PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY MARKER SETTINGSInstallation of grave marker settings.Single ‐ $140Double ‐ $200Marker InscripƟon: 4 digits ‐ $50 Month, Day, Year ‐ $100 Name and years ‐ $130Single ‐ $595Double ‐ $565Marker Inscription ‐ Actual costs↑40.9% 100.0% $ 100 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 100 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. S‐7030PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATIONInstallation of a flower vase at a grave site.$30 per vase. No installation fee$95 per installation and vase↑30.9% 100.0% $ 30 FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall minor additional revenue generation. S‐7040PW‐CEMETERYREMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKERRemove or replace a cemetery marker on request.None Single ‐ $420 per markerDouble ‐ $735 per marker↑0.0% 100.0% $ 230 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 200 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. 32 of 385.aPacket Pg. 178Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐7050PW‐CEMETERYGRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFERProcessing a request to transfer ownership of a grave site.$50 per transfer $125 per transfer↑39.4% 100.0% $ 200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 200 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. S‐7100PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY SERVICES Maintenance and operation of the Cemetery.Grave Spaces: Adult ‐ $1,200 Public Guardian ‐ $800 Child ‐ $800 Baby ‐ $200 CremaƟon ‐ $400Burial Vault ‐ $445plus fees for Concrete Bell Liners and re‐sale of concrete vaults to mortuaries.Grave Spaces: Adult ‐ $1,950 Public Guardian ‐ $1,950 Child ‐ $1,950 Baby ‐ $1,000 CremaƟon ‐ $1,300Burial Vault/Bell Liners ‐ Actual cost plus 10%↑0.0% 100.0% $ 5,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,000 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐7250PW‐PARK MAINTENANCEREPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGERepair of damage to City property by a member of the public.Actual Costs Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increased. Additionally, finding responsible parties is difficultS‐7260RECREATIONPARK RENTAL/RESERVATIONRental of a City Park See Appendix CSee Appendix C↑77.8% 100.0% $ ‐ PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ ‐ See Exhibit C. Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable. Demand may decrease with higher fees so no new net C33 of 385.aPacket Pg. 179Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐7270RECREATIONFISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCEMaintenance of the Fiscallini baseball field for use by the CSUSB Baseball team and SB Youth Baseball.Field ‐ $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lightsClub House ‐ $88.60 per dayCSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in‐kind maintenance services.SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field.Field ‐ $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lightsClub House ‐ $200 per dayCSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in‐kind maintenance services.SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field.↑84.0% 100.0% $ 3,200 PUBLIC SERVICE/ COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION $ 3,200 Major source of revenue is contract with Cal State San BernardinoS‐8000CITY CLERKDOCUMENT REPRODUCTIONProviding copies of public documents under the terms of the State Public Records First Page ‐ $0.35Each additional page ‐ $0.15First five copies ‐ No ChargeEach additional copy ‐ $0.25 per copyFPPC Copies ‐ $0.10 per ‐30.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Change in structure but no net change in revenue.S‐8020CITY CLERKELECTRONIC FILE COPY Providing copies of public records in an electronic format under the terms of the State Public Records Act.None $10 per disk if a disk is requestedNEW 0.0% 100.0% $ 1,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 1,000 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐8040CITY ATTORNEYADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSINGProcessing of administrative penalties for municipal code violations.None Recover the fully allocated actual costs at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.↑0.0% 100.0% $ 5,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8050CITY ATTORNEYACP DEMAND LETTER Processing an Administrative Civil Penalty demand letter.$31.84 per letter $65 per letter↑48.0% 100.0% $ 5,900 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.34 of 385.aPacket Pg. 180Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8060CITY ATTORNEYLIEN RELEASE Processing the release of a lien.None $65 plus any County feesNEW 48.6% 100.0% $ 10,200 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 8,100 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8300FINANCENEW BUSINESS REGISTRATIONProcessing the registration information for a new business in the City.None $40 per applicationDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deletion, fee hasn't been collected since it was determined not allowable in 2012S‐8310FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION RENEWALProcessing the renewal of a business registration. This is not for the processing of the business tax renewal but rather for the updating of business registration None $15 per renewalDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $ ‐ DELETE $ ‐ Staff recommends deletion, fee hasn't been collected since it was determined not allowable in 2012S‐8320FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESSProcessing of a lien on a property due to non‐payment of business registration fees and taxes.$125 per lien (City receives $104 of the fee and the County receives $21)$90 per lien plus any County processing fees↑0.0% 100.0% $ (18,300) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (18,300)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐8330FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTERProcessing a demand letter for a business registration lien.$11 per letter $10 per letter↓117.1% 100.0% $ (100) FULL COST RECOVERY $ (100)Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here. S‐8340FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASEProcessing the release of a business registration lien.None $35 per release plus any County processing feesNEW 104.7% 100.0% $ 39,400 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 31,500 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8350FINANCEDUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATEProviding a duplicate of a business registration certificate on request.$0.50 per certificate $10 per certificate↑4.8% 100.0% $ 400 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 400 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.35 of 385.aPacket Pg. 181Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8360CITY CLERKPASSPORT PROCESSING Processing passport applications for the public.$25 per application plus $15 per photograph$35 per application plus $15 per photographThe application fee is set by the federal government.↑39.0% 100.0% $ 29,100 LEGAL LIMITS $ 23,200 Limited by State and/or Federal regulations/law. Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8370CITY CLERKNOTARY PUBLIC Providing Notary Public fees to the public.$10 per document $15 per document.This fee is set by the State.↑30.3% 100.0% $ ‐ LEGAL LIMITS $ ‐ Limited by State and/or Federal regulations/lawS‐8380CITY CLERKRECORDS COMPILATION Creating or compiling records that do not currently exist as a public record on request.Actual Costs Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel needed plus any outside costs.↑67.3% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred. Fee did not previously include overhead. Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐8390CITY CLERKCANDIDATE FILING Processing a filing for a candidate for a local office.$25 per candidateThis is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228)No change‐‐n/a n/a $ ‐ LEGAL LIMIT $ ‐ No change, legal limit for fee36 of 385.aPacket Pg. 182Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8400CITY CLERKINITIATIVE FILING Processing a local initiative.$200 per applicationFee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition.This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)).No change‐‐n/a n/a $ ‐ LEGAL LIMIT $ ‐ No change, legal limit for feeS‐8410CITY CLERKWEDDING CEREMONY Providing a wedding ceremony on request.$65 per ceremony $70 per ceremony↑90.9% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ ALMOST AT FULL RECOVERY, ADDITIONAL REVENUE IS NEGLIGIBLES‐8500CITY MANAGERFILM PERMIT Processing a film permit for filming within the City.$63 per permit $250 per permit↑25.3% 100.0% $ 5,600 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 4,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8500CITY MANAGER/& PUBLIC WORKSSTREET BANNER INSTALL Review request for street banner, if approved install and remove$200 per banner $410 per permit↑48.7% 100.0% $ 2,000 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 1,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.37 of 385.aPacket Pg. 183Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/ DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓) No Change (‐‐)CURRENT RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY PROJECTION INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8600FINANCENSF CHECK PROCESSING Processing a check returned due to insufficient funds.$26 per NSF Check Consultant recommendation: $65 per NSF check. City recommendation $30 first returned check; $65 each subsequent returned check in 12 month period↑40.2% 100.0% $ 3,600 FULL COST RECOVERY $ 1,000 Compared to surrounding jurisdiction's (and what is allowed for business/non‐government agencies to charge) staff has lowered recommendation but added a higher tier for repeat offendersS‐9000FINANCEOTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICESTo cover the cost for services requested for which there is no fee establishedHourly rate of city staff involved in providing servicesFully burdened hourly rate of staff involved in providing service plus any materials cost↑100.0% 100.0% $ ‐ FULL COST RECOVERY $ ‐ No revenue projection included because of nature of fee, unable to determine $ 1,325,045 $ 1,007,400 $ (50,000) $ (40,000) $ 1,275,045 $ 967,400 Net Revenue Increase:Reserved for General Plan Maintenance38 of 385.aPacket Pg. 184Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
SCHEDULE OF FEES
Building & Safety Division,
Community Development Department
300 North D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418
Ph: (909) 384-5071 Fax: (909) 384-5080
Website: www.sbcity.org
I. Plan Review and Building Permits Fees
The plan review and building permit fees applicable to building construction projects in the City of San
Bernardino are provided in the following tables. These fees are collected to cover the costs of the plan review
and building inspection services provided as part of the building permit process.
These fees do not include Development Impact Fees, School Fees, Engineering Division Fees, Planning
Division Fees, Water Department Fees, Health Department Fees, or other fees collected for other purposes,
unless noted otherwise.
A. Determining Plan Review Fees
In order to determine the Plan Review Fee for a project the following procedure should be followed:
1.Plan Review Deposit (all except 1 and 2 family dwellings):
a.) Identify the Construction Cost Factor in Table 2 based on the building’s occupancy group
(use) and type of construction, then multiply this factor by the square footage of the use. The
result is the valuation of the construction. If the building contains mixed uses, compute the
valuation of each distinct use and add the valuations together to get the total valuation of the
building.
b.) Find the appropriate valuation range in the left-hand column of Table 3 that corresponds to
the total valuation. Select the appropriate column (residential or commercial) to determine
the plan review deposit fee.
2.Total Plan Review Fees:
The Total Plan Review Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable:
Total = Plan Review Deposit + Expeditious Plan Review + E/P/M Plan Review + Energy
Plan Review + Fire Plan Review + Accessibility Plan Review + Zoning Review
3.Hourly Plan Review Rate
The hourly rate for in-house plan review is $94.15. When expeditious review is requested by the
applicant and performed by an outside vendor, any plan review billed hourly shall be at the
vendor’s prevailing hourly rate, which is typically higher than the City rate.
4.One & Two Family Residential Construction – Plan Review
Plan reviews of new single-family and duplex residential construction, additions or alteration
thereto, will be performed at the hourly rate. Repetitive tract housing units will be billed at one
hour. The plan review deposit for new 1 & 2 family dwellings is equal to 5 hours. The deposit
for additions is equal to 3 hours.
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 2
B. Determining Building Permit Fees
1. Single-family Residential Construction
A. Additions
- Additions without a bath or kitchen: $1.39 per sq. ft.
- Additions with a bath or kitchen: $1.54 per sq. ft.
- Minimum fee for additions: $300
- Maximum fee for additions up to 1200 sq. ft.: $1166
- The fee for additions over 1200 sq. ft. is as indicated in Table 1B
B. New Single-family Tract Homes (constructed in phases of five or more homes)
- Refer to Table 1A
C. New Single-family Infill or Custom Homes
- Refer to Table 1B
2. Commercial, Industrial, and Multifamily
Basic Building Permit Fee:
The basic building permit fee is listed in the 2nd column of Table 3.
Total Building Permit Fee:
The Total Building Permit Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable:
Total = Basic Building Permit Fee + Issuance Fees + Elec/Plbg/Mech Permit Fees +
Certificate of Occupancy Fee + SMIP Fee* + Cultural Development Impact Fee + Archive
Fee + Technology Fee (*SMIP = Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Fees)
BUILDING VALUATION DATA
The Community Development Department uses the following cost factors (dollars per square foot) to
determine project valuation under Section 304.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted by the City
of San Bernardino. Plan check and building permit fees for occupancies other than single-family residences
are based on value of the project per Section 304. Valuation of a project is determined by the Building
Official. The cost factors contained in Table 2 are used to calculate building valuation, which in turn is used
to determine permit and plan check fees in Table 3. Valuation may or may not have a resemblance to actual
square foot cost of a project. In most cases the costs indicated are below market rates compared to a bid,
contract price, assessed value or sales price. The use of these cost factors by the City simply assures
consistency and uniformity in the amount of fees collected for projects of similar size, construction, and
occupancy.
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 3
Table 1A Building Permit Fees ‐Tract Homes
Square Feet Insp. Time(hr) Permit Fee Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.) Permit Fee
to 1200 4.77 $451
1300 4.94 $467
1400 5.11 $483
1500 5.28 $499
1600 5.45 $515 4600 10.51 $ 993
1700 5.62 $531 4700 10.68 $1,009
1800 5.78 $546 4800 10.85 $1,025
1900 5.95 $562 4900 11.02 $1,041
2000 6.12 $578 5000 11.18 $1,056
2100 6.29 $594 5100 11.35 $1,072
2200 6.46 $610 5200 11.52 $1,088
2300 6.63 $626 5300 11.69 $1,104
2400 6.80 $642 5400 11.86 $1,120
2500 6.97 $658 5500 12.03 $1,136
2600 7.13 $673 5600 12.2 $1,152
2700 7.30 $689 5700 12.37 $1,168
2800 7.47 $706 5800 12.53 $1,183
2900 7.64 $722 5900 12.7 $1,200
3000 7.81 $738 6000 12.87 $1,216
3100 7.98 $754 6100 13.04 $1,232
3200 8.15 $770 6200 13.21 $1,248
3300 8.32 $786 6300 13.38 $1,264
3400 8.48 $801 6400 13.55 $1,280
3500 8.65 $817 6500 13.71 $1,295
3600 8.82 $833 6600 13.88 $1,311
3700 8.99 $849 6700 14.05 $1,327
3800 9.16 $865 6800 14.22 $1,343
3900 9.33 $881 6900 14.39 $1,359
4000 9.50 $897 7000 14.56 $1,375
4100 9.66 $912 7100 14.73 $1,391
4200 9.83 $928 7200 14.9 $1,407
4300 10.00 $945 7300 15.06 $1,422
4400 10.17 $961 7400 15.23 $1,438
4500 10.34 $977 7500 15.4 $1,455
Notes: 1. The indicated fees include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees.
2. The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees.
3. The indicated fees include a standard 2‐car garage.
4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula: $1455 + (size‐7500)/100 X 15.94 .
5. This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more.
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 4
Table 1B Building Permit Fees ‐Infill Homes
Square Feet Insp. Time(hr) Permit Fee Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.) Permit Fee.
to 1200 12.35 $1,166
1300 12.65 $1,195
1400 12.95 $1,223
1500 13.25 $1,251
1600 13.55 $1,280 4600 22.50 $2,125
1700 13.84 $1,307 4700 22.80 $2,153
1800 14.14 $1,336 4800 23.10 $2,182
1900 14.44 $1,364 4900 23.40 $2,210
2000 14.74 $1,392 5000 23.69 $2,238
2100 15.04 $1,421 5100 23.99 $2,266
2200 15.34 $1,449 5200 24.29 $2,294
2300 15.64 $1,477 5300 24.59 $2,323
2400 15.93 $1,505 5400 24.89 $2,351
2500 16.23 $1,533 5500 25.19 $2,379
2600 16.53 $1,561 5600 25.49 $2,408
2700 16.83 $1,590 5700 25.78 $2,435
2800 17.13 $1,618 5800 26.08 $2,463
2900 17.43 $1,646 5900 26.38 $2,492
3000 17.72 $1,674 6000 26.68 $2,520
3100 18.02 $1,702 6100 26.98 $2,548
3200 18.32 $1,730 6200 27.28 $2,577
3300 18.62 $1,759 6300 27.58 $2,605
3400 18.92 $1,787 6400 27.87 $2,632
3500 19.22 $1,815 6500 28.17 $2,661
3600 19.52 $1,844 6600 28.47 $2,689
3700 19.81 $1,871 6700 28.77 $2,717
3800 20.11 $1,899 6800 29.07 $2,746
3900 20.41 $1,928 6900 29.37 $2,774
4000 20.71 $1,956 7000 29.66 $2,801
4100 21.01 $1,984 7100 29.96 $2,830
4200 21.31 $2,013 7200 30.26 $2,858
4300 21.61 $2,041 7300 30.56 $2,886
4400 21.90 $2,068 7400 30.86 $2,915
4500 22.20 $2,097 7500 31.16 $2,943
Notes: 1. The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees.
2. The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees.
3. The indicated fees include a standard 2‐car garage.
4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula: $2943 + (size‐7500)/100 X 28.19 .
5. This table applies to infill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less.
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Table 2 Building Construction Valuations
(Construction costs per square foot ($))
Occupancy Classification (2006 IBC)
Type of Construction
IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB
A-1 Assembly, theaters, with stage
196.11 189.78 185.37 177.60 167.20 162.27 171.92 152.56 146.94
A
-1 Assembly, theaters, w thout stage i 177.62 171.29 166.88 159.10 148.75 143.82 153.43 134.10 128.49
A-2 Assembly, nightclubs 149.94 145.74 142.04 136.49 128.53 124.91 131.71 116.50 112.58
A-2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet halls 148.94 144.74 140.04 135.49 126.53 123.91 130.71 114.50 111.58
A-3 Assembly, churches 180.72 174.39 169.98 162.21 151.82 146.89 156.54 137.18 131.57
A
m
-3 Assembly, general, community halls, libraries,
useums
1
52.81 146.48 141.07 134.30 122.33 118.97 128.63 108.26 103.65
A-4 Assembly, arenas 176.62 170.29 164.88 158.10 146.75 142.82 152.43 132.10 127.49
B Business 154.16 148.70 144.00 137.27 125.07 120.41 131.97 109.81 105.37
E Educational 166.52 160.91 156.34 149.52 140.14 132.98 144.59 123.34 118.69
F-1 Factory and industrial, moderate hazard 92.68 88.42 83.70 80.93 72.45 69.29 77.68 59.67 56.50
F-2 Factory and industrial, low hazard 91.68 87.42 83.70 79.93 72.45 68.29 76.68 59.67 55.50
H-1 High Hazard, explosives
86.84 82.58 78.86 75.09 67.79 63.63 71.84 55.02 N.P.
H234 High Hazard 86.84 82.58 78.86 75.09 67.79 63.63 71.84 55.02 50.85
H-5 HPM 154.16 148.70 144.00 137.27 125.07 120.41 131.97 109.81 105.37
I-1 Institutional, supervised environment 152.30 147.08 143.14 137.34 128.24 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54
I-2 Institutional, hospitals 256.26 250.80 246.11 239.38 226.55 N.P. 234.08 211.31 N.P.
I-2 Institutional, nursing homes 179.18 173.72 169.02 162.30 150.51 N.P. 157.00 135.27 N.P.
I-3 Institutional, restrained 1
74.99 169.52 164.83 158.10 147.16 141.52 152.80 131.92 125.48
I
-4 Institutional, day care facilities 152.30 147.08 143.14 137.34 128.24 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54
M Mercantile 111.44 107.24 102.53 97.99 89.62 87.00 93.21 77.59 74.67
R-1 Residential, hotels 154.24 149.02 145.08 139.28 129.95 126.44 140.32 117.80 113.25
R-2 Residential, multiple family 129.33 124.11 120.17 114.37 105.16 101.65 115.53 93.01 88.46
R-3 Residential, one- and two-family 122.11 118.76 115.86 112.68 108.62 105.77 110.77 101.74 95.91
R-4 Residential, care/assisted l ving facilities i 152.30 147.08 143.14 137.34 128.24 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54
S-1 Storage, moderate hazard 85.84 81.58 76.86 74.09 65.79 62.63 70.84 53.02 49.85
S-2 Storage, low hazard 84.84 80.58 76.86 73.09 65.79 61.63 69.84 53.02 48.85
U Utility, miscellaneous 65.15 61.60 57.92 55.03 49.70 46.33 51.94 39.23 37
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 5
.34
Notes: (Source: Building Safety Journal Jan‐Feb 2008)
a. Private Garages use Utility, miscellaneous
b. Unfinished basements (all use group) = $15.00 per sq. ft.
c. For shell only buildings deduct 20 percent.
d. N.P. = not permitted
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Table 2 (continued) Other Costs UNIT CONSTRUCTION COST
BLOCK WALLS: - 4’ high
- 5’ high
- 6’ high
- other
$30.00 /ln. ft.
$37.00 /ln. ft.
$44.00 /ln. ft.
$7.35 /sq. ft.
DEMOLITION: (valuation = contract price) (valuation = contract price)
DRYWALL $18.00 / sheet
FIREPLACE $3000.00 ea.
PATIOS, PORCHES $19.55 /sq. ft.
PATIO SLAB ONLY WITH FOOTING $6.45 /sq. ft
PATIO COVER ONLY $13.10 /sq. ft.
REROOFING (1 square = 100 sq. ft.)
- Built-up
- Composition Shingles
- Shake or Tile
- Resheathing
$210.00 /square
$165.00 /square
$320.00 /square
$ 96.00/square
SIGNS: (by valuation)
SIDING, EXTERIOR $3.00/sq. ft.
STUCCO : $4.44 /sq. ft.
SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS – GUNITE (valuation = contract price)
- MANUFACTURED ABOVE-GROUND POOL/SPA $125/$75
TENANT IMPROVEMENT (Use 30% of cost per square foot ) 30%
WINDOW CHANGE OUTS (per window) $370.00 ea.
* Deduct 20 % for shell only buildings. ** Use 30% for tenant improvements.
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 6
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 7
TABLE 3 Plan Review and Building Permit Fees
Commercial, Industrial, and Multifamily Residential Occupancies
Note: The following table provides basic permit and plan review fees based on valuation for commercial, industrial, and
multifamily residential occupancies. Additional fees for permit issuance, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, development
impacts, sewer capacity, schools, etc may apply.
TOTAL
VALUATION ($)
Bldg.
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
TOTAL
VALUATION ($)
Bldg.
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review Fee
Sub
Total
1.00 - 500 60.00 14.25 74.25
501 - 600 60.00 16.15 76.15
601 - 700 60.00 18.05 78.05
701 - 800 60.00 19.95 79.95
801 - 900 60.00 21.85 81.85
901 - 1,000 60.00 23.75 83.75
1,001 - 1,100 60.00 25.65 85.65 30,001 – 31,000 291.00 276.45 567.45
1,101 - 1,200 60.00 27.55 87.55 31,001 – 32,000 297.50 282.63 580.13
1,201 - 1,300 60.00 29.45 89.45 32,001 – 33,000 304.00 288.80 592.80
1,301 - 1,400 60.00 31.35 91.35 33,001 – 34,000 310.50 294.98 605.48
1,401 - 1,500 60.00 33.25 93.25 34,001 – 35,000 317.00 301.15 618.15
1,501 - 1,600 60.00 35.15 95.15 35,001 – 36,000 323.50 307.33 630.83
1,601 - 1,700 60.00 37.05 97.05 36,001 – 37,000 330.00 313.50 643.50
1,701 - 1,800 60.00 38.95 98.95 37,001 – 38,000 336.50 319.68 656.18
1,801 - 1,900 60.00 40.85 100.85 38,001 – 39,000 343.00 325.85 668.85
1,901 - 2,000 60.00 42.75 102.75 39,001 – 40,000 349.50 332.50 682.00
40,001 – 41,000 356.00 338.20 694.20
41,001 – 42,000 362.50 344.38 706.88
2,001 - 3,000 60.00 51.30 111.30 42,001 – 43,000 369.00 350.55 719.55
3,001 – 4,000 63.00 59.85 122.85 43,001 – 44,000 375.50 356.73 732.23
4,001 – 5,000 72.00 68.40 140.40 44,001 – 45,000 382.00 362.90 744.90
5,001 – 6,000 81.00 76.95 157.95 45,001 – 46,000 388.50 369.08 757.58
6,001 – 7,000 90.00 85.50 175.50 46,001 – 47,000 395.00 375.25 770.25
7,001 – 8,000 99.00 94.05 193.05 47,001 – 48,000 401.50 381.43 782.93
8,001 – 9,000 108.00 102.60 210.60 48,001 – 49,000 408.50 387.60 796.10
9,001 – 10,000 117.00 111.15 228.15 49,001 – 50,000 414.50 393.78 808.28
10,001 – 11,000 126.00 119.70 245.70 50,001 – 51,000 419.50 398.05 817.55
11,001 – 12,000 135.00 128.25 263.25 51,001 – 52,000 423.00 402.33 825.33
12,001 – 13,000 144.00 136.80 280.80 52,001 – 53,000 428.00 406.60 834.60
13,001 – 14,000 153.00 145.35 298.35 53,001 – 54,000 432.50 410.88 843.38
14,001 – 15,000 162.00 153.90 315.90 54,001 – 55,000 437.00 415.15 852.15
15,001 – 16,000 171.00 162.45 333.45 55,001 – 56,000 441.50 419.43 860.93
16,001 – 17,000 180.00 171.00 351.00 56,001 – 57,000 446.00 423.70 869.70
17,001 – 18,000 189.00 179.55 368.55 57,001 – 58,000 450.50 427.98 878.48
18,001 – 19,000 198.00 188.10 386.10 58,001 – 59,000 455.00 432.25 887.25
19,001 – 20,000 207.00 196.65 403.65 59,001 – 60,000 459.50 436.53 896.03
20,001 – 21,000 216.00 205.20 421.20 60,001 – 61,000 464.00 440.80 904.80
21,001 – 22,000 225.00 213.75 438.75 61,001 – 62,000 468.50 445.08 913.58
22,001 – 23,000 234.00 222.30 456.30 62,001 – 63,000 473.00 449.35 922.35
23,001 – 24,000 243.00 230.85 473.85 63,001 – 64,000 477.50 453.63 931.13
24,001 – 25,000 252.00 239.45 491.45 64,001 – 65,000 482.00 457.90 939.90
25,001 – 26,000 258.00 245.10 503.10 65,001 – 66,000 486.50 462.18 948.68
26,001 – 27,000 265.00 251.75 516.75 66,001 – 67,000 491.00 466.45 957.45
27,001 – 28,000 271.00 257.45 528.45 67,001 – 68,000 495.50 470.73 966.23
28,001 – 29,000 278.00 264.10 542.10 68,001 – 69,000 500.00 475.00 975.00
29,001 – 30,000 284.00 269.80 553.80 69,001 – 70,000 504.50 479.28 983.78
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 8
TOTAL
VALUATION ($)
Bldg.
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
TOTAL
VALUATION ($)
Bldg.
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review Fee
Sub
Total
70,001 – 71,000 509.00 483.55 992.55 120,001 – 121,000 713.00 677.35 1390.35
71,001 – 72,000 513.50 487.83 1001.33 121,001 – 122,000 716.50 680.68 1397.18
72,001 – 73,000 518.00 492.10 1010.10 122,001 – 123,000 720.00 684.00 1404.00
73,001 – 74,000 522.40 496.38 1018.78 123,001 – 124,000 723.50 687.33 1410.83
74,001 – 75,000 527.00 500.65 1027.65 124,001 – 125,000 727.00 690.65 1417.65
75,001 – 76,000 531.50 504.93 1036.43 125,001 – 126,000 730.50 693.98 1424.48
76,001 – 77,000 536.00 509.20 1045.20 126,001 – 127,000 734.00 697.30 1431.30
77,001 – 78,000 540.40 513.38 1053.78 127.001 – 128,000 737.50 700.63 1438.13
78,001 – 79,000 545.00 517.75 1062.75 128,001 – 129,000 741.00 703.95 1444.95
79,001 – 80,000 549.50 522.03 1071.53 129,001 – 130,000 744.50 707.28 1451.78
80,001 – 81,000 554.00 526.50 1080.50 130,001 – 131,000 748.00 710.60 1458.60
81,001 – 82,000 558.50 530.58 1089.08 131,001 – 132,000 751.50 713.93 1465.43
82,001 – 83,000 563.00 534.85 1097.85 132,001 – 133,000 755.00 717.25 1472.25
83,001 – 84,000 567.50 539.13 1106.63 133,001 – 134,000 758.50 720.58 1479.08
84,001 – 85,000 572.00 543.40 1115.40 134,001 – 135,000 762.00 723.90 1485.90
85,001 – 86,000 576.00 547.68 1123.68 135,001 – 136,000 765.50 727.23 1492.73
86,001 – 87,000 581.00 551.95 1132.95 136,001 – 137,000 769.00 730.55 1499.55
87,001 – 88,000 585.00 556.23 1141.23 137,001 – 138,000 772.50 733.88 1506.38
88,001 – 89,000 590.00 560.50 1150.50 138,001 – 139,000 776.00 737.20 1513.20
89,001 – 90,000 594.50 564.78 1159.28 139,001 – 140,000 779.50 740.53 1520.03
90,001 – 91,000 599.00 569.05 1168.05 140,001 – 141,000 783.00 743.85 1526.85
91,001 – 92,000 603.50 573.33 1176.83 141,001 – 142,000 786.50 747.18 1533.68
92,001 – 93,000 608.50 577.60 1186.10 142,001 – 143,000 790.00 750.50 1540.50
93,001 – 94,000 612.50 581.88 1194.38 143,001 – 144,000 793.50 753.83 1547.33
94,001 – 95,000 617.00 586.15 1203.15 144,001 – 145,000 797.00 757.15 1554.15
95,001 – 96,000 621.50 590.43 1211.93 145,001 – 146,000 800.50 760.98 1560.98
96,001 – 97,000 626.00 594.70 1220.70 146,001 – 147,000 804.00 763.80 1567.80
97,001 – 98,000 630.50 598.98 1229.48 147,001 – 148,000 807.50 767.13 1574.63
98,001 – 99,000 635.00 603.25 1238.25 148,001 - 149,000 811.00 770.45 1581.45
99,001 – 100,000 639.50 607.53 1247.03 149,001 – 150,000 814.50 773.78 1588.28
100,001 – 101,000 643.00 610.85 1253.85 150,001 – 151,000 818.00 777.10 1595.10
101,001 – 102,000 646.50 614.18 1260.68 151,001 –152.,000 821.50 780.43 1601.93
102,001 – 102,000 650.00 617.50 1267.50 152,001 – 153,000 825.00 783.75 1608.75
103,001 – 104,000 653.50 620.83 1274.33 153,001 – 154,000 828.50 787.08 1615.58
104,001 – 105,000 657.00 624.15 1281.15 154,001 – 155,000 832.00 790.40 1622.40
105,001 – 106,000 660.50 627.48 1287.98 155,001 – 156,000 835.50 793.73 1629.23
106,001 – 107,000 664.00 630.80 1294.80 156,001 – 157,000 839.00 797.05 1636.05
107,001 – 108,000 667.50 634.11 1301.61 157,001 – 158,000 842.50 800.38 1642.88
108,001 – 109,000 671.00 637.45 1308.45 158,001 – 159,000 846.00 803.70 1649.70
109,001 – 110,000 674.50 640.78 1315.28 159,001 – 160,000 849.50 807.03 1656.53
110,001 – 111,000 678.00 644.10 1322.10 160,001 – 161,000 853.00 810.35 1663.35
111,001 – 112,000 681.50 647.43 1328.93 161,001 – 162,000 856.50 813.68 1670.18
112,001 – 113,000 685.00 650.75 1335.75 162,001 – 163,000 860.00 817.00 1677.00
113,001 – 114,000 688.50 654.08 1342.58 163,001 – 164,000 863.50 820.33 1683.83
114,001 – 115,000 692.00 657.40 1349.40 164,001 – 165,000 867.00 823.65 1690.65
115,001 – 116,000 695.50 660.73 1356.23 165,001 – 166,000 870.50 826.98 1697.48
116,001 – 117,000 699.00 664.05 1363.05 166,001 – 167,000 874.00 830.30 1704.30
117,001 – 118,000 702.50 667.38 1369.88 167,001 – 168,000 877.50 833.63 1711.13
118,001 – 119,000 706.00 670.70 1376.70 168,001 – 169,000 881.00 836.95 1717.95
119,001 – 120,000 709.50 674.03 1383.53 169,001 – 170,000 884.50 840.28 1774.78
For higher valuations use the formulas below.
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Building Permit Fees:
For valuation ranges beyond the scope of the above table the following formulas can be used to determine the basic building
permit fee :
Where the valuation (V) is between $100,000.00 and $500,000.00 -- $639.50 for first $100,000.00 and $3.50 per 1,000.00
thereafter, or
Building Permit Fee = $639.50 + ( )( 3.50 ) _V-100,000_
1000
Where the valuation (V) is between $500,000.00 thru $1,000,000.00 – $2,039.50 for first $500,000.00 and $3.00 per 1,000.00
thereafter, or
Building Permit Fee = $2039.50 + ( )( 3.00 ) _V-500,000_
1000
Where the valuation (V) is $1,000,000,00 or greater – $3,539.50 for first $1,000,000.00 and $2.00 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or
Building Permit Fee = $3539.50 + ( )( 2.00 )
_V-1,000,000_
1000
Plan Review Fees:
For valuation ranges beyond the scope of this table the Plan Review Fee shall be as follows:
Commercial/Industrial and Multifamily Residential: 95% of the calculated building permit fee
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 9
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 10
Table 4 ELECTRICAL FEES
Single-family Residential Rewire (plus service)
Apartments, condominiums per sq. ft. (plus service)
Commercial buildings per sq. ft. (plus service)
Electrical Service : Up to 200 amps
200 amps to 1000 amps
1000 amps and over
Subpanels
Temporary Power Poles
Meter pole
Each extension pole (no meter)
Unit Schedule
Receptacles, lights, switches-first 20, each
After 20, each
Range/oven, washer/dryer, a/c unit, evaporative cooler, each
Electrical Signs (for electrical work – does not include the sign structure)
Additional branch circuit within same sign
Meter Reset
When issued in conjunction with other work
Each additional meter on same building or lot
Minimum Fee
Solar Energy Systems
Private Swimming Pools
Power Apparatus (motors, generators, transformer, industrial
heating, cooling or cooking equipment, etc.)
- Up to 1 hp
- Over 1 to 10 hp
- Over 10 to 50 hp
- Over 50 to 100 hp
- Over 100 hp
Carnivals and Circuses
- Generators and Electrically Driven Rides
- Mechanically Driven Rides, Walk-thru attractions w/elec. lighting
- System of area booth lighting
$.056
$.050
$.015
$30.50
$62.15
$124.30
18.20
$23.50
$ 12.30
$ 1.10
$ .73
$ 4.75
$24.60
$ 4.75
$40.00
$11.00
$10.00
$60.00
No Charge
$49.50
$ 4.75
$12.30
$24.60
$49.50
$74.50
$23.50
$ 7.25
$ 7.25
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 11
Table 5 Plumbing Fees
Plumbing fixture, each
Gas meter reset (gauge test required)
Gas meter reset (when issued in conjunction w/other work)
Gas meter-each additional meter on same building or lot
House sewer, each
Cesspool
Private Sewage Disposal System
Demo Septic/Pit
Water heater, each
Repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping
Gas piping system of 1 to 5 outlets
Each additional outlet over 5, per outlet
Industrial Waste, pretreatment interceptor, except kitchen
type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps.
Water Piping installation, alteration or repair
Drainage/vent Piping
Lawn Sprinkler System on any one meter
Rainwater systems-per drain (inside building)
Minimum Fee
Solar Energy Systems
$ 9.80
$40.00
$11.00
$10.00
$24.65
$37.25
$74.50
$22.00
$12.30
$ 4.75
$ 6.15
$ 1.10
$19.90
$ 4.75
$4.75
$ 14.80
$9.80
$60.00
No Charge
Table 6 Mechanical Fees
FAU to 100,000 BTU
FAU over 100,000 BTU
A/C unit up to 3 tons
A/C unit over 3 tons up to 15 tons
Twin-pack (new or replacement, includes gas or electric)
Wall heater, floor furnace, suspended heater
Evaporative cooler
Bath exhaust fan
Grease hood and duct systems
Duct alter
Air-handling unit HVAC
$14.80
$18.20
$14.80
$27.15
$29.60
$14.80
$10.65
$ 7.25
$10.65
$10.65
$10.65
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 12
Table 7 Mobile Home Park Fees
Installation/Set-up
Earthquake Bracing Systems
Accessory Buildings (Cabanas, Ramadas, Patios, Blockwalls, Garages,
Awnings, Carports, Porches, etc.)
- Without Standard Plans
- With Standard Plans
Fees For Constr./Alteration of Mobilehome Park Facilities
- For Each Lot
- Electrical Fee: Park Service
- Street Lights
- Unit Substation/Secondary Distribution Transformer
- Alter/Replace Service or Transformer
- Mobilehome Lot Service
- Alter/repair/replace lot service
Plan Review Fees (not charged to HCD Standard Plans)
Plumbing Fees
Park Drain System
Private Sewage Disposal or Water Treatment System
Lot Drain Inlet
Alter/Repair of Drainage/Vent Piping
Park Water System
Water Service Outlets (water meters)
Fire Hydrant or Riser
Water Conditioner
Plumbing Fixtures/Equipment (alter/repair/replace)
Park Gas Piping System
LPG or Natural Gas Tank of 60 gal. or more
Mobilehome Lot Gas Outlet Riser
Gas Distribution Equipment (alter/repair/replace)
Miscellaneous Equipment (each installation)
$196
$196
Based on valuation
$196
$ 5.75
$14.00
$ 3.00
$10.50
$10.50
$7.00
$7.00
Based on valuation
$14.00
$14.00
$ 7.00
$ 7.00
$ 7.00
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 7.00
$ 7.00
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 7.00
Table 8 Miscellaneous Fees
Permit Issuance Fees (to be included on all permits)
Supplemental Issuance Fee
Minimum Permit Fee
Inspections – Hourly
Reinspection Fee
Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours
Zoning Consistency Review Fee (Bldg. Permits, Demo, etc)
Certificate of Occupancy
(if included on building permit)
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) Fees:
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fees are imposed by the State of
California and provide funding for seismic monitoring and instrumentation
throughout the State.
Technology Fee
Archive Fees
- Per Permit or Application
- Plans
- Documents
$40.00
$10.00
$60.00
$94.45
$94.45
$188.90 + $94.45/hr. beyond 2 hr
$54.00
$475.08
$133.62
Residential = .0001 x Valuation
Com/Ind. = .00021 x Valuation
(including hotels)
2% of plan review & permit fees
$1.00
$2.00/sheet
$ .25/page
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 13
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 1 04/2020
Community & Economic Development Department • Building & Safety Division
Office: 201 North E Street, 3rd Floor
Mail: 290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
P: (909) 384-5357 F: (909) 384-5155
www.sbcity.org
SCHEDULE OF FEES – BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION
Plan Review and Building Permit Fees
The plan review and building permit fees applicable to building construction projects in the City of San Bernardino
are provided in the following tables. These fees are collected to cover the costs of the plan review and building
inspection services provided as part of the building process.
These fees do not include Development Impact Fees, School Fees, Engineering Division Fees, Planning Division Fees,
Water Department Fees, Health Department Fees, or other fees collected for other purposes unless noted
otherwise.
A.Determining Plan Review Fees
In order to determine the Plan Review Fee for a project the following procedure should be followed:
1.Plan Review Fee (all except 1 and 2 family dwellings):
a.Identify the Construction Cost Factor in Table 2 based on the building’s occupancy group (use) and type
of construction, then multiply this factor by the square footage of the use. The result is the valuation of
the construction. If the building contains mixed uses, compute the valuation of each distinct use and
add the valuations together to get the total valuation of the building.
b.Find the appropriate valuation range in the column of Table 3 that corresponds to the total valuation.
Select the appropriate column to determine the plan review fee.
2.Total Plan Review Fees:
The Total Plan Review Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable:
Total = Plan Review Fee + Expeditious Plan Review + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Plan Review +
Energy Plan Review + Fire Plan Review + Accessibility Plan Review + Zoning Review
3.Hourly Plan Review Rate
The hourly rate for in-house plan review is $122.37. When expeditious review is requested by the applicant
and performed by an outside vendor, any plan review billed hourly shall be at the vendor’s prevailing hourly
rate, which is typically higher than the City rate.
4.One and Two-Family Residential Construction – Plan Review
Plan reviews of new single-family and duplex residential construction, additions or alteration thereto, will be
performed at the hourly rate. Repetitive tract housing units will be billed at one hour. The plan review fee
for new 1 & 2 family dwellings and for each model of a tract is equal to 5 hours. The fee for additions is
equal to 3 hours.
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 2 04/2020
B.Determining Building Permit Fees
1.Single-Family Residential Construction
a.Additions
-Additions without a bath or kitchen:$1.74 per sq. ft.
-Additions with a bath or kitchen:$1.92 per sq. ft.
-Minimum fee for additions:$375.00
-Maximum fee for additions up to 1,200 square feet: $1,459.00
-Fees for additions over 1,200 square feet:As indicated in Table 1B
b.New Single-Family Tract Homes (constructed in phases of five or more homes)
-Refer to Table 1A
c.New Single-Family In-Fill or Custom Homes
-Refer to Table 1B
2.Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Family
Basic Building Permit Fee:
-The basic building permit fee is listed in the 2nd column of Table 3
Total Building Permit Fee:
-The Total Building Permit Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable:
Total = Basic Building Permit Fee + Issuance Fees + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Permit Fees +
Certificate of Occupancy Fee + SMIP Fee* + Cultural Development Impact Fee + Archive Fee +
Technology Fee + General Plan Update Surcharge
(*SMIP = Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Fees)
BUILDING VALUATION DATA
The Community & Economic Development Department uses the following cost factors (dollars per square foot) to
determine project valuation under Section 304.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted by the City of San
Bernardino. Plan check and building permit fees for occupancies other than single-family residences are based on
value of the project per Section 304. Valuation of a project is determined by the Building Official. The cost factors
contained in Table 2 are used to calculate building valuation, which in turn is used to determine permit and plan
check fees in Table 3. Valuation may or may not have a resemblance to actual square foot cost of a project. In most
cases the costs indicated are below market rates compared to a bid, contract price, assessed value or sales price.
The use of these cost factors by the City simply assures consistency and uniformity in the amount of fees collected
for projects of similar size, construction, and occupancy.
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 3 04/2020
Table 1A Building Permit Fees (Tract Homes)
Square Feet Inspector Time
(hou r) Permit Fee Square Feet Inspector Time
(hour) Permit Fee
to 1,200 4.77 $564 4,400 10.21 $1,208
1,300 4.94 $585 4,500 10.38 $1,228
1,400 5.11 $605 4,600 10.55 $1,248
1,500 5.28 $625 4,700 10.72 $1,268
1,600 5.45 $645 4,800 10.89 $1,289
1,700 5.62 $665 4,900 11.06 $1,309
1,800 5.79 $685 5,000 11.23 $1,329
1,900 5.96 $705 5,100 11.40 $1,349
2,000 6.13 $725 5,200 11.57 $1,369
2,100 6.30 $745 5,300 11.74 $1,389
2,200 6.47 $766 5,400 11.91 $1,409
2,300 6.64 $786 5,500 12.08 $1,429
2,400 6.81 $806 5,600 12.25 $1,450
2,500 6.98 $826 5,700 12.42 $1,470
2,600 7.15 $846 5,800 12.59 $1,490
2,700 7.32 $866 5,900 12.76 $1,510
2,800 7.49 $886 6,000 12.93 $1,530
2,900 7.66 $906 6,100 13.10 $1,550
3,000 7.83 $927 6,200 13.27 $1,570
3,100 8.00 $947 6,300 13.44 $1,590
3,200 8.17 $967 6,400 13.61 $1,610
3,300 8.34 $987 6,500 13.78 $1,631
3,400 8.51 $1,007 6,600 13.95 $1,651
3,500 8.68 $1,027 6,700 14.12 $1,671
3,600 8.85 $1,047 6,800 14.29 $1,691
3,700 9.02 $1,067 6,900 14.46 $1,711
3,800 9.19 $1,087 7,000 14.63 $1,731
3,900 9.36 $1,108 7,100 14.80 $1,751
4,000 9.53 $1,128 7,200 14.97 $1,771
4,100 9.70 $1,148 7,300 15.14 $1,792
4,200 9.87 $1,168 7,400 15.31 $1,812
4,300 10.04 $1,188 7,500 15.48 $1,832
Notes: 1. The indicated fees include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees
2.The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees
3.The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage
4.For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $1,832.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X 19.72
5.This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more.
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 4 04/2020
Table 1B Building Permit Fees (In-Fill Homes)
Square Feet Inspector Time
(hou r) Permit Fee Square Feet Inspector Time
(hour) Permit Fee.
to 1,200 12.35 $1,461 4,400 21.95 $2,597
1,300 12.65 $1,497 4,500 22.25 $2,633
1,400 12.95 $1,532 4,600 22.55 $2,668
1,500 13.25 $1,568 4,700 22.85 $2,704
1,600 13.55 $1,603 4,800 23.15 $2,739
1,700 13.85 $1,639 4,900 23.45 $2,775
1,800 14.15 $1,674 5,000 23.75 $2,810
1,900 14.45 $1,710 5,100 24.05 $2,846
2,000 14.75 $1,745 5,200 24.35 $2,881
2,100 15.05 $1,781 5,300 24.65 $2,917
2,200 15.35 $1,816 5,400 24.95 $2,952
2,300 15.65 $1,852 5,500 25.25 $2,998
2,400 15.95 $1,887 5,600 25.55 $3,023
2,500 16.25 $1,923 5,700 25.85 $3,059
2,600 16.55 $1,958 5,800 26.15 $3,094
2,700 16.85 $1,994 5,900 26.45 $3,130
2,800 17.15 $2,029 6,000 26.75 $3,165
2,900 17.45 $2,065 6,100 27.05 $3,201
3,000 17.75 $2,100 6,200 27.35 $3,236
3,100 18.05 $2,136 6,300 27.65 $3,272
3,200 18.35 $2,171 6,400 27.95 $3,307
3,300 18.65 $2,207 6,500 28.25 $3,343
3,400 18.95 $2,242 6,600 28.55 $3,378
3,500 19.25 $2,278 6,700 28.85 $3,414
3,600 19.55 $2,313 6,800 29.15 $3,449
3,700 19.85 $2,349 6,900 29.45 $3,485
3,800 20.15 $2,384 7,000 29.75 $3,520
3,900 20.45 $2,420 7,100 30.05 $3,556
4,000 20.75 $2,455 7,200 30.35 $3,591
4,100 21.05 $2,491 7,300 30.65 $3,627
4,200 21.35 $2,526 7,400 30.95 $3,662
4,300 21.65 $2,562 7,500 31.25 $3,698
Notes: 1. The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees
2.The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees
3.The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage
4.For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $3,698.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X $35.50
5.This table applies to in-fill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less.
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 5 04/2020
Table 2: Building Construction Valuations
( Construction costs per square foot [$] )
Occupancy Classification
(2006 IBC)
Type of Construction
IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB
A-1 Assembly, Theaters, with Stage 247.86 239.47 233.25 223.81 210.17 204.10 216.62 195.46 188.40
A-1 Assembly, Theaters, without
Stage 227.10 218.71 212.49 203.05 189.41 183.34 195.86 174.70 167.65
A-2 Assembly, Nightclubs 191.96 186.56 182.12 174.70 164.94 160.39 168.64 149.29 144.33
A-2 Assembly, Restaurants, Bars,
Banquet Halls 190.96 185.56 180.12 173.70 162.94 159.39 167.64 147.29 143.33
A-3 Assembly, Churches 229.69 221.30 215.08 205.64 192.37 187.27 198.45 177.66 170.60
A-3 Assembly, General, Community
Halls, Libraries, Museums 192.20 183.81 176.59 168.15 153.51 148.44 160.96 138.80 132.75
A-4 Assembly, Arenas 226.10 217.71 210.49 202.05 187.41 182.34 194.86 172.70 166.65
B Business 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08
E Educational 209.90 202.64 196.82 188.34 175.49 166.60 181.86 153.45 148.75
F-1 Factory and Industrial,
Moderate Hazard 117.60 112.19 105.97 101.84 91.54 87.26 97.61 75.29 70.95
F-2 Factory and Industrial,
Low Hazard 116.60 111.19 105.97 100.84 91.54 86.26 96.61 75.29 69.95
H-1 High Hazard, Explosives 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 N.P.
H-2/3/4 High Hazard 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 63.56
H-5 HPM 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08
I-1 Institutional, Supervised
Environment 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33
I-2 Institutional, Hospitals 335.53 328.23 321.81 312.65 296.45 N.P. 305.67 276.99 N.P.
I-2 Institutional, Nursing Homes 233.12 225.82 219.40 210.24 195.51 N.P. 203.26 176.05 N.P.
I-3 Institutional, Restrained 227.71 220.41 213.99 204.83 190.84 183.78 197.85 171.37 163.02
I-4 Institutional, Day Care Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33
M Mercantile 142.95 137.54 132.11 125.68 115.38 111.83 119.62 99.73 95.77
R-1 Residential, Hotels 199.70 192.92 186.99 179.78 164.90 160.43 179.93 148.60 143.96
R-2 Residential, Multiple-Family 167.27 160.49 154.56 147.35 133.71 129.23 147.50 117.40 112.76
R-3 Residential, One and
Two-Family 155.84 151.61 147.83 144.09 138.94 135.27 141.72 130.04 122.46
R-4 Residential, Care/Assisted Living
Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33
S-1 Storage, Moderate Hazard 108.99 103.58 97.35 93.22 83.14 78.87 88.99 66.89 62.56
S-2 Storage, Low Hazard 107.99 102.58 97.35 92.22 83.14 77.87 87.99 66.89 61.56
U Utility, Miscellaneous 84.66 79.81 74.65 71.30 64.01 59.80 68.04 50.69 48.30
Notes: 1. Private Garages use Utility, Miscellaneous
2.Unfinished basements (Group R-3) = $22.45 per square foot
3.For shell only buildings deduct 20%
4.N.P. = Not Permitted
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 6 04/2020
Table 2: Building Construction Costs (Continued)
Other Costs
( Unit Construction Cost )
Block Walls:
-4’ high $33.00 (per Lineal Foot)
-5’ high $40.70 (per Lineal Foot)
-6’ high $48.40 (per Lineal Foot)
-Other $8.10 (per Square Foot)
Demolition (Valuation = Contract Price) (Valuation = Contract Price)
Drywall $19.80 (per Sheet)
Fireplace $3,300.00 (Each)
Patios/Porches $21.50 (per Square Foot)
Patio Slab Only with Footing $7.10 (per Square Foot)
Patio Cover Only $14.40 (per Square Foot)
Reroofing (1 Square = 100 Square Foot):
-Built-up $230.00 (per Square)
-Composition Shingles $180.00 (per Square)
-Shake or Tile $350 (per Square)
-Resheathing $107.00 (per Square)
Signs (by Valuation)
Siding, Exterior $3.30 (per Square Foot)
Stucco $4.88 (per Square Foot)
Swimming Pools and Spas – Gunite (Valuation = Contract Price)
Manufactured Above-Ground Pool $140
Spa $85
Tenant Improvement (Use 30% of Cost per Square Foot) 30%
Window Change-Outs $405.00 (per Window)
Notes: 1. Deduct 20% for shell only buildings.
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 7 04/2020
Table 3 Plan Review and Building Permit Fees
Commercial, Industrial, and Multifamily Residential Occupancies
Note: The following table provides basic permit and plan review fees based on valuation for commercial, industrial, and multifamily residential
occupancies. Additional fees for permit issuance, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, development impacts, sewer capac ity, schools, etc. may apply.
TOTAL VALUATION
($)
Building
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
TOTAL VALUATION
($)
Building
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
1 – 500 60.00 30.00 90.00
501 – 600 60.00 30.00 90.00
601 – 700 60.00 30.00 90.00
701 – 800 60.00 30.00 90.00
801 – 900 60.00 30.00 90.00
901 – 1,000 60.00 30.00 90.00
1,001 – 1,100 60.00 60.00 120.00 20,001 – 21,000 270.61 266.71 537.32
1,101 – 1,200 60.00 60.00 120.00 21,001 – 22,000 281.89 277.82 559.71
1,201 – 1,300 60.00 60.00 120.00 22,001 – 23,000 293.16 288.93 582.09
1,301 – 1,400 60.00 60.00 120.00 23,001 – 24,000 304.44 300.04 604.48
1,401 – 1,500 60.00 60.00 120.00 24,001 – 25,000 315.71 311.22 626.93
1,501 – 1,600 60.00 60.00 120.00 25,001 – 26,000 323.23 318.56 641.79
1,601 – 1,700 60.00 60.00 120.00 26,001 – 27,000 332.00 327.21 659.21
1,701 – 1,800 60.00 60.00 120.00 27,001 – 28,000 339.52 334.62 674.14
1,801 – 1,900 60.00 60.00 120.00 28,001 – 29,000 348.29 343.26 691.55
1,901 – 2,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 29,001 – 30,000 355.80 350.67 706.47
30,001 – 31,000 364.57 359.31 723.88
31,001 – 32,000 372.72 367.34 740.06
2,001 – 3,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 32,001 – 33,000 380.86 375.36 756.22
3,001 – 4,000 78.93 77.79 156.72 33,001 – 34,000 389.00 383.40 772.40
4,001 – 5,000 90.20 88.90 179.10 34,001 – 35,000 397.15 391.42 788.57
5,001 – 6,000 101.48 100.01 201.49 35,001 – 36,000 405.29 399.45 804.74
6,001 – 7,000 112.75 111.13 223.88 36,001 – 37,000 413.43 407.47 820.90
7,001 – 8,000 124.03 122.24 246.27 37,001 – 38,000 421.58 415.50 837.08
8,001 – 9,000 135.31 133.35 268.66 38,001 – 39,000 429.72 423.52 853.24
9,001 – 10,000 146.58 144.47 291.05 39,001 – 40,000 437.86 432.16 870.02
10,001 – 11,000 157.86 155.58 313.44 40,001 – 41,000 446.01 439.54 885.58
11,001 – 12,000 169.13 166.69 335.82 41,001 – 42,000 454.15 447.60 901.75
12,001 – 13,000 180.41 177.80 358.21 42,001 – 43,000 462.30 455.62 917.92
13,001 – 14,000 191.68 188.92 380.60 43,001 – 44,000 470.44 463.65 934.09
14,001 – 15,000 202.96 200.03 402.99 44,001 – 45,000 478.58 471.67 950.25
15,001 – 16,000 214.23 211.14 425.37 45,001 – 46,000 486.73 479.71 966.44
16,001 – 17,000 225.51 222.25 447.76 46,001 – 47,000 494.87 487.73 982.60
17,001 – 18,000 236.79 233.37 470.16 47,001 – 48,000 503.01 495.76 998.77
18,001 – 19,000 248.06 244.48 492.54 48,001 – 49,000 511.78 503.78 1015.56
19,001 – 20,000 259.34 255.59 514.93 49,001 – 50,000 519.30 511.81 1031.11
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 8 04/2020
TOTAL VALUATION
($)
Building
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
TOTAL VALUATION
($)
Building
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
50,001 – 51,000 525.56 517.36 1042.92 90,001 – 91,000 750.45 739.61 1490.06
51,001 – 52,000 529.95 522.92 1052.87 91,001 – 92,000 756.08 745.18 1501.26
52,001 – 53,000 536.21 528.47 1064.68 92,001 – 93,000 762.35 750.73 1513.08
53,001 – 54,000 541.85 534.03 1075.88 93,001 – 94,000 767.36 756.29 1523.65
54,001 – 55,000 547.49 539.58 1087.07 94,001 – 95,000 773.00 761.84 1534.84
55,001 – 56,000 553.13 545.15 1098.28 95,001 – 96,000 778.64 767.40 1546.04
56,001 – 57,000 558.76 550.70 1109.46 96,001 – 97,000 784.27 772.95 1557.22
57,001 – 58,000 564.40 556.26 1120.66 97,001 – 98,000 789.91 778.51 1568.42
58,001 – 59,000 570.04 561.81 1131.85 98,001 – 99,000 795.55 784.06 1579.61
59,001 – 60,000 575.68 567.37 1143.05 99,001 – 100,000 801.19 789.63 1590.82
60,001 – 61,000 581.31 572.92 1154.23 100,001 – 101,000 805.57 793.94 1599.51
61,001 – 62,000 586.95 578.49 1165.44 101,001 – 102,000 809.96 798.27 1608.23
62,001 – 63,000 592.59 584.04 1176.63 102,001 – 103,000 814.34 802.59 1616.93
63,001 – 64,000 598.23 589.60 1187.83 103,001 – 104,000 818.73 806.91 1625.64
64,001 – 65,000 603.87 595.15 1199.02 104,001 – 105,000 823.11 811.23 1634.34
65,001 – 66,000 609.50 600.71 1210.21 105,001 – 106,000 827.50 815.56 1643.06
66,001 – 67,000 615.14 606.26 1221.40 106,001 – 107,000 831.88 819.87 1651.75
67,001 – 68,000 620.78 611.82 1232.60 107,001 – 108,000 836.27 824.17 1660.44
68,001 – 69,000 626.42 617.37 1243.79 108,001 – 109,000 840.65 828.52 1669.17
69,001 – 70,000 632.05 622.94 1254.99 109,001 – 110,000 845.04 832.84 1677.88
70,001 – 71,000 637.69 628.49 1266.18 110,001 – 111,000 849.42 837.16 1686.58
71,001 – 72,000 643.33 634.05 1277.38 111,001 – 112,000 853.81 841.49 1695.30
72,001 – 73,000 648.97 639.60 1288.57 112,001 – 113,000 858.19 845.80 1703.99
73,001 – 74,000 654.48 645.16 1299.64 113,001 – 114,000 862.57 850.13 1712.70
74,001 – 75,000 660.24 650.71 1310.95 114,001 – 115,000 866.96 854.45 1721.41
75,001 – 76,000 665.88 656.27 1322.15 115,001 – 116,000 871.34 858.77 1730.11
76,001 – 77,000 671.52 661.82 1333.34 116,001 – 117,000 875.73 863.09 1738.82
77,001 – 78,000 677.03 667.26 1344.29 117,001 – 118,000 880.11 867.42 1747.53
78,001 – 79,000 682.79 672.94 1355.73 118,001 – 119,000 884.50 871.73 1756.23
79,001 – 80,000 688.43 678.50 1366.93 119,001 – 120,000 888.88 876.06 1764.94
80,001 – 81,000 694.07 684.31 1378.38 120,001 – 121,000 893.27 880.38 1773.65
81,001 – 82,000 699.71 689.61 1389.32 121,001 – 122,000 897.65 884.70 1782.35
82,001 – 83,000 705.34 695.16 1400.50 122,001 – 123,000 902.04 889.02 1791.06
83,001 – 84,000 710.98 700.73 1411.71 123,001 – 124,000 906.42 893.35 1799.77
84,001 – 85,000 716.62 706.28 1422.90 124,001 – 125,000 910.81 897.66 1808.47
85,001 – 86,000 721.63 711.84 1433.47 125,001 – 126,000 915.19 901.99 1817.18
86,001 – 87,000 727.90 717.39 1445.29 126,001 – 127,000 919.58 906.30 1825.88
87,001 – 88,000 732.91 722.95 1455.86 127.001 – 128,000 923.96 910.63 1834.59
88,001 – 89,000 739.17 728.50 1467.67 128,001 – 129,000 928.35 914.95 1843.30
89,001 – 90,000 744.81 734.06 1478.87 129,001 – 130,000 932.73 919.28 1852.01
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 9 04/2020
TOTAL VALUATION
($)
Building
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
TOTAL VALUATION
($)
Building
Permit
Fee
Plan
Review
Fee
Sub
Total
130,001 – 131,000 937.12 923.59 1860.71 150,001 – 151,000 1024.82 1010.02 2034.84
131,001 – 132,000 941.50 927.92 1869.42 151,001 – 152,000 1029.20 1014.35 2043.55
132,001 – 133,000 945.89 932.23 1878.12 152,001 – 153,000 1033.59 1018.67 2052.26
133,001 – 134,000 950.27 936.56 1886.83 153,001 – 154,000 1037.97 1023.00 2060.97
134,001 – 135,000 954.66 940.88 1895.54 154,001 – 155,000 1042.36 1027.31 2069.67
135,001 – 136,000 959.04 945.21 1904.25 155,001 – 156,000 1046.74 1031.64 2078.38
136,001 – 137,000 963.43 949.52 1912.95 156,001 – 157,000 1051.13 1035.95 2087.08
137,001 – 138,000 967.81 953.85 1921.66 157,001 – 158,000 1055.51 1040.28 2095.79
138,001 – 139,000 972.20 958.16 1930.36 158,001 – 159,000 1059.90 1044.60 2104.50
139,001 – 140,000 976.58 962.49 1939.07 159,001 – 160,000 1064.28 1048.92 2113.20
140,001 – 141,000 980.97 966.81 1947.78 160,001 – 161,000 1068.27 1053.24 2121.91
141,001 – 142,000 985.35 971.14 1956.49 161,001 – 162,000 1073.05 1057.57 2130.62
142,001 – 143,000 989.74 975.45 1965.19 162,001 – 163,000 1077.44 1061.88 2139.32
143,001 – 144,000 994.12 979.78 1973.90 163,001 – 164,000 1081.82 1066.21 2148.03
144,001 – 145,000 998.51 984.09 1982.60 164,001 – 165,000 1086.21 1070.53 2156.74
145,001 – 146,000 1002.89 989.07 1991.96 165,001 – 166,000 1090.59 1074.85 2165.44
146,001 – 147,000 1007.28 992.74 2000.02 166,001 – 167,000 1094.98 1079.17 2174.15
147,001 – 148,000 1011.66 997.07 2008.73 167,001 – 168,000 1099.36 1083.50 2182.86
148,001 – 149,000 1016.05 1001.38 2017.43 168,001 – 169,000 1103.75 1087.81 2191.56
149,001 – 150,000 1020.43 1005.71 2026.14 169,001 – 170,000 1108.13 1092.14 2200.27
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
For valuation ranges beyond the scope of the above table the following formulas can be used to determine the
basic building permit fee:
Where the valuation (V) is between $170,001.00 and $500,000.00 – $1108.13 for first $170,000.00 and $4.40 per
1,000.00 thereafter, or
Building Permit Fee = $1108.13 + ( V-170,000 )( 4.40 )
1000
Where the valuation (V) is between $500,000.00 and $1,000,000.00 – $2,560.13 for first $500,000.00 and $3.75 per
1,000.00 thereafter, or
Building Permit Fee = $2560.13 + ( V-500,000 )( 3.75 )
1000
Where the valuation (V) is $1,000,000,00 or greater – $4,435.13 for first $1,000,000.00 and $2.50 per 1,000.00
thereafter, or
Building Permit Fee = $4435.13 + ( V-1,000,000 )( 2.50 )
1000
PLAN REVIEW FEES
For valuation ranges beyond the scope of this table the Plan Review Fee shall be as follows:
Commercial/Industrial and Multiple-Family Residential: 95% of the calculated Building Permit Fee
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 10 04/2020
Table 4: Electrical Fees
Single-family Residential Rewire (Plus Service) $0.070
Apartments, Condominiums per Square Foot (Plus Service) $0.063
Commercial Buildings per Square Foot (Plus Service) $0.019
Electrical Service:
-Up to 200 amps $38.21
-200 Amps to 1000 Amps $77.86
-1000 Amps and Over $155.73
Subpanels $22.80
Temporary Power Poles:
-Meter Pole $29.44
-Each Extension Pole (no Meter)$15.79
Unit Schedule:
-Receptacles, Lights, Switches - First 20 (Each)$1.38
-After 20 (Each)$0.91
Range/Oven, Washer/Dryer, A/C Unit, Evaporative Cooler $5.95 (Each)
Electrical Signs (for Electrical Work – Does not Include the Sign Structure) $30.82
-Additional Branch Circuit within Same Sign $5.95
Meter Reset $51.11
-When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work $13.78
-Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot $12.53
Minimum Fee $60.00
Solar Energy Systems No Charge
Private Swimming Pools $62.00
Power Apparatus (Motors, Generators, Transformer, Industrial Heating, Cooling, or
Cooking Equipment, etc.)
-Up to 1 hp $5.95
-Over 1 to 10 hp $15.40
-Over 10 to 50 hp $30.10
-Over 50 to 100 hp $62.00
-Over 100 hp $93.25
Carnivals and Circuses:
-Generators and Electrically Driven Rides $29.50
-Mechanically Driven Rides, Walk-Thru Attractions with Electrical Lighting $9.00
-System of Area Booth Lighting $9.00
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 11 04/2020
Table 5: Plumbing Fees
Plumbing Fixture $12.25 (Each)
Gas Meter Reset (Gauge Test Required) $50.00
Gas Meter Reset (When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work) $14.00
Gas Meter - Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot $12.50
House Sewer $30.90 (Each)
Cesspool $46.65
Private Sewage Disposal System $93.35
Demo Septic/Pit $27.55
Water Heater $15.40 (Each)
Repair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping $5.95
Gas Piping System:
-1 to 5 Outlets $7.70
-Each Additional Outlet Over 5 $1.40 (per Outlet)
Industrial Waste, Pretreatment Interceptor, Except Kitchen Type Grease
Interceptors Functioning as Fixture Traps. $24.95
Water Piping Installation, Alteration or Repair $5.95
Drainage/Vent Piping $5.95
Lawn Sprinkler System on any one Meter $18.55
Rainwater Systems - per Drain (Inside Building) $12.30
Minimum Fee $60.00
Solar Energy Systems No Charge
Table 6: Mechanical Fees
FAU:
-Up to 100,000 BTU $18.55
-Over 100,000 BTU $22.80
A/C Unit:
-Up to 3 Tons $18.55
-Between 3 - 15 Tons $34.00
Twin-Pack (New or Replacement, Includes Gas or Electric) $37.10
Wall Heater, Floor Furnace, or Suspended Heater $18.55
Evaporative Cooler $13.35
Bath Exhaust Fan $9.10
Grease Hood and Duct Systems $13.35
Duct Alteration $13.35
Air-Handling Unit HVAC $13.35
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 12 04/2020
Table 7: Mobile Home Park Fees
Installation/Set-up $245.00
Earthquake Bracing Systems $245.00
Accessory Buildings (Cabanas, Ramadas, Patios, Block Walls, Garages, Awnings,
Carports, Porches, etc.):
-Without Standard Plans (Based on Valuation)
-With Standard Plans $245.00
Fees for Construction/Alteration of Mobile Home Park Facilities:
-For Each Lot $7.20
-Electrical Fee: Park Service $17.50
-Street Lights $3.75
-Unit Substation/Secondary Distribution Transformer $13.15
-Alter/Replace Service or Transformer $13.15
-Mobile Home Lot Service $8.75
-Alter/Repair/Replace lot service $8.75
Plan Review Fees (not Charged to HCD Standard Plans) (Based on Valuation)
Plumbing Fees:
Park Drain System $17.50
-Private Sewage Disposal or Water Treatment System $17.50
-Lot Drain Inlet $8.75
-Alter/Repair of Drainage/Vent Piping $8.75
-Park Water System $8.75
-Water Service Outlets (Water Meters)$5.30
-Fire Hydrant or Riser $5.30
-Water Conditioner $5.30
-Plumbing Fixtures/Equipment (Alter/Repair/Replace)$5.30
Park Gas Piping System $8.75
LPG or Natural Gas Tank of 60 Gallon or More $8.75
Mobile Home Lot Gas Outlet Riser $5.30
Gas Distribution Equipment (Alter/Repair/Replace) $5.30
Miscellaneous Equipment (Each Installation) $8.75
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 13 04/2020
Table 8: Miscellaneous Fees
Permit Issuance Fees (to be Included on all Permits) $60.00
Supplemental Issuance Fee $15.00
Minimum Permit Fee $60.00
Inspections $118.35 (per Hour)
Reinspection Fee $118.35
Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours $236.70 + 118.35 (per Hour)
Beyond 2 Hours
Zoning Consistency Review Fee (Build ing Permits, Demo, etc.) $55.00
Certificate of Occupancy $500.00
(if Included on Building Permit) $167.40
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) Fees: Residential = .0001 x Valuation
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fees are imposed by the State of
California and provide funding for seismic monitoring and instrumentation throughout
the State.
Commercial/Industrial = .00021 x
Valuation
(Including Hotels)
Technology Fee 2% of Plan Review & Permit Fees
Archive Fees:
-Per Permit or Application $1.25
-Plans $3.15 (per Sheet)
-Documents $0.35 (per Page)
PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
PROPOSED
Detail of Recreation Fees
1
Aquatics Fees
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Jerry Lewis Swim Center
Daily Admission
Ages 2-7 $1 $2
Ages 8-17 $1.50 $3.00
Adults $3 $5
Ages 60 or older $1.50 $3.00
Family Season Swim Pass
1-6 members $55
7-12 members $75
1-6 people – Year 1 $60
1-6 people – Year 2 $65
1-6 people – Year 3 $70
Commercial Season Swim Pass
15-25 employees $200 $300
26-50 employees $300 $400
15-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $10 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $12 Delete Fee
Adults $30 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $12 Delete Fee
25-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $15 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $20 Delete Fee
Adults $45 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $20 Delete Fee
Swim Classes $40 $40
Exhibit C 5.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
PROPOSED
Detail of Recreation Fees
2
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Community Pools
Daily Admission
Ages 2-7 $0.50 $1.00
Ages 8-17 $1 $2.00
Adults $2 $3.00
Ages 60 or older $1 $2
Family Season Swim Pass
1-6 members $45
7-12 members $65
1-6 people – Year 1 $60
1-6 people – Year 2 $65
1-6 people – Year 3 $70
Commercial Season Swim Pass
15-25 employees $175 $200
26-50 employees $250 $300
15-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $5 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $10 Delete Fee
Adults $20 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $10 Delete Fee
25-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $7 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $15 Delete Fee
Adults $30 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $15 Delete Fee
Swim Pass Reissue $5 $5
Exhibit C 5.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
PROPOSED
Detail of Recreation Fees
3
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Facility/Park Rentals
Community Center Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min)
Two or more Rooms $100/first 2 hrs + $40/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min)
Assembly Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min)
Gymnasium $90.50/hr + $28/add’l hr $90/hr (2 hr min)
Shower Room $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min)
Kitchen $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min)
FDR Bowl (2 hr min) $130/hr + $60/add’l hr $130/hr (2 hr min)
Seccombe Lake Pavilion $55/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $55/hr (2 hr min)
La Plaza Gazebo $40/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $40/hr (2 hr min)
Wading Pools $36.50 per hour Delete Fee
Concessions Stands $100 per use Delete Fee
Perris Hill Crafter $75/month $75/month
Perris Hill Park Stage $25/hr + $8/add’l hr $25/hr (2 hr min)
Tennis Court Tournament $10/hr + $5/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min)
(per court/day)
Jerry Lewis Swim Center $92/hr + $46/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min)
(2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards
All Other Pools $25/hr $25/hr (2 hr min)
(2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards
Group Picnic Reservations (use fee per use)
Size of Group
Up to 50 $25 $35
51-99 $35 $35
100-199 $75 $75
200-399 $100 $100
Exhibit C 5.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
PROPOSED
Detail of Recreation Fees
4
Current Fee Proposed Fee
400-699 $200 $200
700 and up $350 $350
Picnic Shelter $30 per day $40 per day
Picnic Shelter Utility Access $25 per day $35 per day
Parks/Parking Lots for Fundraising/ Special Events (not subject to resident or non-resident use
cost adjustment) $200 per day $200 per day
Fees for Equipment and/or Service:
Bleacher (up to 4 sets) $465 per occasion $465 per occasion
Trash Receptacles $2.50 each per occasion $2.50 each per occasion
Picnic Tables $10 each per occasion $10 each per occasion
Stage Trailer $250 per occasion $250 per occasion
Folding Chairs $1.50 each per occasion $1.50 each per occasion
Folding Tables $8 each per occasion $8 each per occasion
Bunting $50 per day $50 per day
Banners $40 each per week $40 each per week
Curtain Dividers $15 each per occasion $15 each per occasion
Kiosk Sign $25 each per occasion $25 each per occasion
Choral Risers $100 set per occasion $100 set per occasion
Adult Drop-In Basketball $2 per session $2 per session
Ballfield base rental $25 per set $25 per set
Exhibit C 5.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
PROPOSED
Detail of Recreation Fees
5
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Facilities/Parks Rental Refundable Damage Bond & Clean-Up Deposit
Number of People
Fewer than 50 $75 $75
50 – 100 $650 $650
101 – 200 $1,250 $1,050
201 - 500 $1,750 $1,750
501 - 1,000 $3,500 $3,500
1,001+ $8,000 $8,000
Exhibit C 5.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Fee Type Current Fee Recommended Fee $
Increase Reason for Change
1 Year Altered $20 $24 $4 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
2 Year Altered $30 $42 $12 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
3 Year Altered $40 $54 $14 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
1 Year Altered $10 $12 $12 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
2 Year Altered $15 $24 $9 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
3 Year Altered $20 $36 $16 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
1 Year $75 $96 $21
Adopt SBC License Fee/The increased cost
encourages responsible pet ownership and is
intended to reduce the stray population
2 Year City does not offer 2 year unaltered
3 Year City does not offer 3 year unaltered
Aviary $50 $60 $10 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Cat Fancier $25 $30 $5 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Circus $150 $200 $50 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Grooming $100 $250 $150 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
Pet Shop $150 $236 $86 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
Petting Zoo $100 $263 $163 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative
Analysis
Field Service Charge $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $83.90.
Owner Surrender $25 + 3 Days
Boarding $30 + 3 Days Boarding $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $70.40.
Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $44.41
Livestock $50 $65 $15 Increase to meet inflation of cost for service
Failure to renew within
30 days of expiration $20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis
Failure to license a
new dog within 30
days of ownership
$20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis
Failure to license a
dog within 30 days of
moving to SBC
$20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis
SENIOR CITIZEN 60+
UNALTERED DOG
MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES & PERMITS
GENERAL FINE
ANIMAL LICENSE PENALTY
Schedule of Proposed Animal Control Fees Exhibit D 5.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments)
Fee Type Current Fee Recommended Fee $
Increase Reason for Change
Dog or Cat $30 $35 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $86.81
Horse $250 $315 $65 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Rabbit $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Hamster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Guinea Pig $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Snake $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Goat $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Chicken $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Rooster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Duck $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Turtle $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Tortoise $20 $26 $6 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Pig $40 $52 $12 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
1st $40 1st $60 1st $20
2nd $80 2nd $120 2nd $40
All Other Offenses
$60 X Total # of
Offenses
3rd and All Other Offenses $240 3rd $60
1st $80 1st $80
2nd $160 2nd $160
All Other
Offenses $70 x
Total # of
All Other Offenses $70 x Total # of
Offenses
Small Animals $30 + $2 Daily
Board $40 + $3 Daily Board $11 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $77.57
Medium Livestock $50 + $10 Daily
Board $70 + $15 Daily Board $25 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $207.32
Large Livestock $150 + $20
Daily Board $250 $100 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $366.31
Dog/Cat $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $30.40
Quarantine Board $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $34.79
Small Animal $2 $3 $1 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services
Medium Animal $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $34.79
Large $20 $30 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $52.35
ANIMAL ADOPTION FEE
APPREHENSION FEE
BOARDING FEE
Field Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $103.52
Unaltered No
Change
Schedule of Proposed Animal Control Fees Exhibit D 5.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments)
Fee Type Current Fee Recommended Fee $
Increase Reason for Change
Field Service Charge $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $83.90.
Owner Surrender $55 $60 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $70.40
Litters not weaned $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $70.40
Litters weaned $30 $60 $30 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $70.40
Euthanasia $25 $35 $10 Comparative Analysis
Bordatell/Da2PPV $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $24.22
FVRCP $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $24.22
With Adoption $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $26.59
Public Walk-In $20 $25 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $26.59
Rabies Vac. Dep.$12 $12 No
Change
Cat Trap $50 Deposit with
full refund Same deposit with $15 fee $15 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $24.41
Skunk Trap $100 Deposit
with full refund Same deposit with $15 fee $15 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $24.41
Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $44.41
Vet Treatment $90 $120 $30 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total
Service Cost to the City of $153.28
Spay/Neuter $55 $55 No
Change
MICROCHIP IDENTIFICATION FEE
FIELD SERVICE FEE
OWNER SURRENDER FEE
VACCINATION FEE
Schedule of Proposed Animal Control Fees Exhibit D 5.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
POLICE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
FROM: Eric McBride, Interim Chief of Police
Francisco Hernandez, Captain
SUBJECT: Animal Control Fees
DATE: April 14, 2020
COPIES: Rita Conrad, City Manager’s Office
Recommendation
Review and discuss raising fees related to animal licensing, animal field services, and
animal shelter services.
Background
The San Bernardino City Animal Shelter has provided services to the citizens of San
Bernardino for over 50 years. While the cost of goods, services, employee salaries,
staffing needs, and investment in maintaining the shelter has continued to increase,
animal license and service fees have not increased since May 18, 2009 (Resolution
2009-122). An increase in fees will help offset the rising cost of animal control
operations.
The last two years have produced an average intake of over 7,500 animals annually that
require equipment, materials, and staff resources provided by the City. During the year
2018, the City sold 4,930 animal licenses. A comparative analysis of licensing fees
between the City, the County of Riverside, and County of San Bernardino, shows that
the City would see an increase in revenue generated from licensing by bringing current
fees in line with San Bernardino County. Cost analysis of animal service fees also
reveals that the City should increase numerous fees to assist in recovering some of the
City’s cost for providing services.
Discussion
Traditionally fees for service have been determined by calculating the actual cost to
provide a service and setting fees at a rate that attempts to recover the cost of those
services. There are several reasons complete cost recovery is not an option when
considering animal services. One factor is that a large portion of animal services
provided may be unbillable. For example, there are no field service fees collected for
picking up a stray dog if an owner does not respond to collect the dog. Additionally,
Exhibit D
5.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 2 of 9
raising fees to cover actual costs would likely result in greater noncompliance, which
could negate any benefit to revenue from fee increases.
Many factors support the need to increase animal service fees from the last established
fees in 2009. The animal control budget has increased from $1,167,700 in FY09/10 to
the current budget of $2,563,200 for FY2019/2020. The increase reflects a 120%
change. Revenue has also decreased significantly since FY09/210 from $1,189,939.62,
to $678,300.00 in FY19/20 for a revenue decrease of 43%. This decrease was
influenced by the loss of contract city revenue and a reduction in the number of animal
licenses sold and fees collected. The number of employees budgeted for animal control
has increased from 15 in FY09/10 to 24 full-time staff and seven part-time staff in
FY19/20. Finally, the California Consumer Price Index has shown a 26% increase in the
cost of goods and services between 2009 and 2019. Table 1 illustrates the above-
mentioned factors.
Table 1
ANIMAL CONTROL COST FACTORS
FY09/10 Actual FY19/20 Adopted % Change
Budget $1,167,700 $2,563,200 +120%
Revenue $1,189,939.62 $678,300 -43%
# of Staff 15 31 +106%
California
Consumer Price
Index
April 2009=222.896 April 2019=280.275 Inflation 26%
Compounded to the annual expense to operate the shelter and provide animal services
are the unfunded costs involved in much-needed shelter repair and upgrades required to
bring the shelter closer to safe and modern standards. Staff compared city fees to
Riverside and San Bernardino County to determine the impact increasing animal license
fees would have on animal service-related revenue. Both counties have different titles
and services offered under various fees, so only licensing fees were compared in the
below table.
Table 2 illustrates the costs of various license fees and the difference in revenue that
would be generated by adopting either San Bernardino or Riverside County Animal
licensing fees. Riverside County recently increased fees in 2016 and is currently
reviewing its fees to achieve better cost recovery. Riverside determines fee increases
based on cost analysis and comparative analysis. San Bernardino County reviews and
considers fee adjustment annually and last increased fees in 2016-2017. San
Bernardino County uses a cost analysis to determine fee increases. Only validated
licensing information was used for the year 2018.
5.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 3 of 9
Table 2
2018
Lic
Sold
SB
City
Lic
Fees
Riv
Lic
Fees
SB
County
(SBC)
Lic Fees
SB City
Fee
Revenue
Riv County
Fee
Revenue
SB
County
(SBC)
Fee
Revenue
1 Year
Altered
1266 $20 $17 $24 $25,320 $21,522 $30,384
2 Year
Altered
133 $30 $34 $42 $3,990 $4,522 $5,586
3 Year
Altered
699 $40 $49 $54 $27,960 $34,251 $37,746
1 Year
Senior
Altered
676 $10 $12 $12 $6,760 $8,112 $8,112
2 Year
Senior
Altered
90 $15 $24 $24 $1,350 $2,160 $2,160
3 Year
Senior
Altered
788 $20 $36 $36 $15,760 $28,368 $28,368
1 Year
Unaltered
265 $75 $100 $96 $56,925.
0
$75,900 $72,864
2 Year
Unaltered
1 $150 $200 $192 $150.00 $20 $192
3 Year
Unaltered
2 $225 $300 $288 $675.00 $900 $864
Total $138,890 $175,935 $186,276
%
Increase
$37,045
(27%)
$47,386
(34%)
Adopting Riverside’s licensing fees would have produced an increase in annual licensing
revenue of $37,045 (27%), while San Bernardino County fees would have provided an
increase of $47,386 (34%) during the year 2018.
During FY18/19, the actual revenue generated by animal control was $391,033.49,
which accounted for 18.7% of the animal control budget. The total expenditure for
FY18/19 was $2,083,903.57, which left a gap of $1,692,870.80 to be covered by the City
from the general fund. Raising fees will increase revenue and help reduce the gap
between revenue and expenses to operate animal control and shelter services.
5.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 4 of 9
Methodology
Staff’s recommendations are based on comparison with San Bernardino and Riverside
County Fees, as well as cost analysis of the recommended fees involving an increase.
Cost analysis, consistent to those used in 2009 for the previous fee increase, was used
for many of the fees to determine the actual cost to the City for providing
services. Animal service employees with a combined total of 34 years of experience
working for the City providing animal control and shelter services were interviewed and
helped to identify the amount of time and resources required for each service. Table 3
illustrates the current fees, recommended fees, and method used to suggest the
recommended fees.
Table 3
Recommended Fees
Fee Type Current
Fee
Rec.
Fee
$ Increase Reason for Change
1 Year Altered $20 $24 $4 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
2 Year Altered $30 $42 $12 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
3 Year Altered $40 $54 $14 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
SENIOR CITIZEN
60+
Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
1 Year Altered $10 $12 $12 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
2 Year Altered $15 $24 $9 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
3 Year Altered $20 $36 $16 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
UNALTERED
DOG
1 Year $75 $96 $21 Adopt SBC License Fee/The
increased cost encourages
responsible pet ownership
and is intended to reduce the
stray population
2 Year City does not offer 2 year
unaltered
3 Year City does not offer 3 year
unaltered
MISCELLANEOUS
LICENSES &
5.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 5 of 9
PERMITS
Aviary $50 $60 $10 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Cat Fancier $25 $30 $5 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Circus $150 $200 $50 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Grooming $100 $250 $150 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
Pet Shop $150 $236 $86 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
Petting Zoo $100 $263 $163 Adopt SBC License
Fee/Comparative Analysis
GENERAL FINE
Field Service
Charge
$50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $83.90.
Owner Surrender $25 + 3
Days
Boarding
$30 + 3
Days
Boarding
$5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $70.40.
Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $44.41
Livestock $50 $65 $15 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for service
ANIMAL LICENSE
PENALTY
Failure to renew
within 30 days of
expiration
$20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis
Failure to license
a new dog within
30 days of
ownership
$20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis
Failure to license
a dog within 30
days of moving to
SBC
$20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis
ANIMAL
ADOPTION FEE
Dog or Cat $30 $35 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $86.81
Horse $250 $315 $65 Increase to meet inflation of
5.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 6 of 9
cost for services
Rabbit $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Hamster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Guinea Pig $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Snake $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Goat $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Chicken $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Rooster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Duck $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Turtle $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Tortoise $20 $26 $6 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Pig $40 $52 $12 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Apprehension
Fee
Field 1st $40
2nd $80
All Other
Offenses
$60 X
Total # of
Offenses
1st $60
2nd $120
3rd and All
Other
Offenses
$240
1st $20
2nd $40
3rd $60
Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $103.52
Unaltered 1st $80
2nd $160
All Other
Offenses
$70 x
Total # of
Offenses
1st $80
2nd $160
All Other
Offenses
$70 x
Total #
of
Offenses
No
Change
Small Animals $30 + $2
Daily
Board
$40 + $3
Daily
Board
$11 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $77.57
Medium Livestock $50 +
$10 Daily
Board
$70 +
$15
Daily
$25 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $207.32
5.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 7 of 9
Board
Large Livestock $150 +
$20 Daily
Board
$250 $100 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $366.31
BOARDING FEE
Dog/Cat $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $30.40
Quarantine Board $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $34.79
Small Animal $2 $3 $1 Increase to meet inflation of
cost for services
Medium Animal $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $34.79
Large $20 $30 $10 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $52.35
FIELD SERVICE
FEE
Field Service
Charge
$50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $83.90.
OWNER
SURRENDER FEE
Owner Surrender $55 $60 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $70.40
Litters not
weaned
$50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $70.40
Litters weaned $30 $60 $30 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $70.40
Euthanasia $25 $35 $10 Comparative Analysis
VACCINATION
FEE
Bordatell/Da2PPV $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $24.22
FVRCP $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $24.22
5.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 8 of 9
MICROCHIP
IDENTIFICATION
FEE
With Adoption $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $26.59
Public Walk-In $20 $25 $5 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $26.59
Rabies Vac. Dep. $12 $12 No
Change
Cat Trap $50
Deposit
with full
refund
Same
deposit
with $15
fee
$15 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $24.41
Skunk Trap $100
Deposit
with full
refund
Same
deposit
with $15
fee
$15 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $24.41
Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $44.41
Vet Treatment $90 $120 $30 Increase Based on Cost
Analysis with a Total Service
Cost to the City of $153.28
Spay/Neuter $55 $55 No
Change
Staff added the recommended fees to the revenue generated from FY 2018/19. A
percentage rate of 34% was added to licensing fees based on information gained from
table 2. Table 4 illustrates an increase in fee generated revenue by $104,645.66 with
the addition of the recommended fees.
Table 4
Fee Description
FY2018/19
Actual Revenue
With
Recommended
Fees
Revenue
Increase
4320 Animal Licenses $130,220.00 $174,494.80 $44,274.80
4352 Miscellaneous
Licenses & Permits
$1,710.00 Unknown
4410 General Fine $7,473.00 $8,967.60 $1,494.60
4430 Animal License
Penalty
$10,400.00 $13,000.00 $2,600.00
4756 Animal Adoption Fee $46,521.00 $54,276.05 $7,755.05
4757 Contracted Shelter $71,968.36 N/A
5.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Page 9 of 9
Fee
4758 Animal Alteration Fee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
4759 Apprehension Fee $23,400.00 $35,100.00 $11,700.00
4760 Boarding Fee $29,803.00 $44,704.50 $14,901.50
4761 Field Service Fee $1,550.00 $1,860.00 $310.00
4763 Owner Release Fee $9,400.13 $10,340.14 $940.01
4764 Vaccination Fee $26,100.00 $39,150.00 $13,050.00
4765 Microchip
Identification Fee
$23,090.00 $30,709.70 $7,619.70
Total Revenue Increase $104,645.66
2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The request to increase animal control fees aligns with Goal No. 1: Financial Stability.
Implement, maintain, and update a fiscal accountability plan.
Fiscal Impact
Adopting the recommended fees has the potential to generate approximately $100,000
in additional revenue based on the previous year’s budget report.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino raise
current fees to increase revenue and offset the cost of animal control operations.
5.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments
Comparisons of Fees to Other CitiesExhibit EFee Title DepartmentCurrent Proposed Riverside Ontario Fontana Redlands Rialto VictorvilleTemporary Enroachment Permit PW$25-$136 $25-$175 $163-$651 $700 $98 $330 NA NAOff‐Site Improvement Plan Check ($100K) PW$4,045 $3,850 $4,452 $4,650 $4,465 $1,391+$555/sht $1,570+$800/sht $4,900Off‐Site Improvement Inspection ($100K)PW$4,045 $11,170 $2,531+$108/hr $5,450 $4,290 $84+$126/cu.yd. NA $4,000NPDES Business InspectionPW$143 $175 NA NA NA $83 NA NANPDES Construction InspectionPW$98-$179 $140 NA $451 $1,500 $257 $4,964 NATraffic Study ReportPW$719 $1,320 $380-$1,519 VARIES $1,410 NA $3,465 $723Review of Water Quality Mgmt Plans PW$80-$1,130 $155-$1,440 $3,151 NA NA $806+$199/lot $3,545 $667Conditional Use Permit (Commercial) CED$7,133 $5,555 $8,615 $2,869 $1,220 $7,778 $3,109 $2,454Tentative Parcel Map CED$4,262+$65/pcl $5,170 $8,125 $3,544 $6,535+$100/ac $6,514 $2,706 $1,227Pre Application Review D/ERC Review CED$2,424 $3,440 $1,712 $1,356 $1,000 $332 NA $0Zoning Verification Review CED$450 $245 $219 $77 $300 $1,068 $182 NAAquatics Parks/Rec$1 $1 NA NA $0-$5 NA $1.20-$5.10 NAYouth Sports Parks/Rec$30 $45 $50 $30 $70 $55 tennis $52-$110 $63Adult Sports (per team) Parks/Rec$300 $300 $310=$370 $52-$305 $60-$350 $50 tennis $377-$520 $390Park Rental Reservation ‐shelter Parks/Rec$30 $40 $85 NA $50-$100 NA $15-$45/hr:field $45-$60/dayAlarm Systems PD$25/$50/$10 - Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income Resident) $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation $10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarms in 12-month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or panic: Reg./LIR]: [$75/$10]/[$200/$20] - 1st thru 4th Non-Permitted [$90/$10]/[$250/$20] - 5th & 6th [$90/$20]/[$300/$40] - 7th thru 9th[$175/$20]/[$350/$40] - 10th & SubsequentConsultant Recommendation: $96 - Annual Alarm Permit ($75-City plus $21-Alarm Vendor)$25 - Alarm Sys.Installation$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:$256 - All False Alarms without a Permit ($200-City plus $56-Alarm Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12 month period with a Permit. (Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial response or between intrusion and panic/robbery response.) City Staff Recommendation: $30 - Annual Alarm Permit $15 Annual Alarm Permit Low Income; $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:With Permit: $0 charge 1st and 2nd; $100 3rd, $200 4th, $300 %the and above. Without Permit: $200 1st, $250 2nd; $350 3rd, $400 4th and above.$16 - One-time Permit Fee Residential / Commercial 1st response No charge Warning2nd response No charge $3503rd response $100 $4004th response $150 $4505th response $200 $5006th+ response $250 $500 $50 - One-time Permit Fee (Commercial) $25 - One time Permit Fee (Residential) 1st response No fine, Alarm Card Issued2nd response No fine, Alarm Card Issued3rd response $75 / $504th response $100 / $755th response $150 / $1006th+ response $200 / $100 Alarm Permit and Response RevokedPermit Fee: N/A False Alarm Charge: Up to $350N/A $25.90 - One-time Permit Fee (Commercial) $19.40 - One time Permit Fee (Residential) 1st response No fine2nd response No fine3rd response $97.40/ $1304th response $130 / $1955th response $162.50 / $260.10N/ANSF Check Processing FIN$26 per NSF CheckConsultant recommendation: $65 per NSF check. City recommendation $30 first returned check; $65 each subsequent returned check in 12 month period$25 per NSF Check. $35 for additional $25 per NSF Check $25.00 per check/$35.00 second check w/in 6 month$43 per NSF Check$25 per NSF Check plus bank charges.N/ASan Bernardino5.aPacket Pg. 228Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
Comparisons of Fees to Other CitiesExhibit EComparison of Fees for Various ProjectsResidentialproject descriptionCurrent ProposedRiversideOntarioFontanaRedlandsRialto Victorville500 sq. ft. addition (new family room and bathroom) $71,000 Valuation :: V‐ Building Plan Check$282.45 $367.11 $225.00 $632.60 $402.00 included (R1) $357.18 Building Permit$810.00 $1,020.00 $594.50 $790.75 $706.00 $574.65 (R2) $549.50Total$1,092.45 $1,387.11 $819.50 $1,423.35 $1,108.00 $574.65 $0.00 $906.682,500 sq. ft. new Custom SFD (4 bd. 3 bath, 2‐car garage) $361,000 Valuation Building Plan Check$470.75 $611.85 $375.00 $1,964.28 $1,072.00 included (R1) $1,041.30 Building Permit$1,573.00 $1,983.00 $1,629.50 $2,455.35 $1,317.00 $4,679.00 (R2) $1,602.00Total$2,043.75 $2,594.85 $2,004.50 $4,419.63 $2,389.00 $4,679.00 $0.00 $2,643.30Non‐residential1,000 sq. ft. office/retail tenant improvement $46,000 Valuation :: II‐B, M Building Plan Check$598.98 $901.99 $552.83 $482.68 $1,206.00 included (R1) $269.43 Building Permit$670.50 $975.19 $492.00 $603.35 $429.00 $4,839.00 (R2) $414.50Total$1,269.48 $1,877.18 $1,044.83 $1,086.03 $1,635.00 $4,839.00 $0.00 $683.935,000 sq. ft. restaurant TI in existing building $420,000 Valuation :: IIA‐B Categorical Exemption$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350.00 $0.00 $325.10 $122.71 Precise Plan of Design ‐ Staff$1,000.00 $1,965.00 $3,560.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,367.60 $2,454.18 Building Plan Check$993.23 $1,513.24 $927.46 $2,228.60 $536.00 included (R1) $1,155.05 Building Permit$1,085.50 $1,652.88 $1,804.50 $2,785.75 $799.00 $9,574.00 (R2) $1,777.00Total$3,078.73 $5,131.12 $6,291.96 $5,014.35 $1,685.00 $9,574.00 $2,692.70$5,508.94100,000 sq. ft. new industrial warehouse/distribution building with a value of $8,584,000. :: I‐B, S Negative Declaration$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,127.00 $2,400.00 actual cost $1,521.90 $1,227.08 Precise Plan of Design ‐ DRC$6,438.00 $6,810.00 $3,560.00 $5,611.00 $6,700.00 $0.00 $2,367.60 $2,454.18 Zone Change$0.00 $0.00 $6,868.00 $3,334.00 $6,075.00 $3,797.00 $4,410.00 $1,840.63 General Plan Amendment$1,500.00 $3,570.00 $9,933.00 $7,500.00 $6,600.00 $6,068.00 $3,920.50$1,840.63 Tentative Tract Map $7,626.00 $6,875.00 $10,516.00 $5,091.00 $1,800.00 $12,493.00 $5,684.90 $1,859.03 Master Sign Program $610.00 $490.00 $919.00 $1,225.00 $1,525.00 $1,542.00 $0.00 $613.54 Conditional Use Permit$7,133.00 $5,555.00 $8,615.00 $2,869.00 $4,710.00 $6,712.00 $3,109.10$2,454.18 Grading Plan Check/Inspection$0.00 $0.00 $2,197.00 $0.00 $96.00 $191.55 $195.00 $0.00 Building Plan Check$16,962.73 $26,439.34 $16,204.55 $26,632.28 $2,011.00 included (R1) $12,180.68 Building Permit$17,895.50 $27,890.88 $18,764.50 $33,290.35 $3,647.00 $22,453.00 (R2)$18,739.50Total$58,165.23 $77,630.22 $77,577.05 $86,679.63 $35,564.00 $53,256.55 $21,209.00 $43,209.45San Bernardino5.aPacket Pg. 229Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public
SERVICE COST UPDATE
for the
City of San Bernardino, CA
As of April 29, 2020
Publication Date: April 29, 2020
Copyright, 2020 by Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or copied in
any form or by any means — graphic, electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording,
taping or information storage and retrieval systems — without written permission of:
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C
Fullerton, California 92831
(714) 992-9020
Attachment 2
5.b
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
5.b
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
5.b
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
5.b
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC (RCS) has prepared two reports for the City. The first report
was a Total-Cost Cost Allocation Plan that allocated general City overhead and indirect services
to the departments providing services to the public. The City has already received that report.
This report uses the fully-burdened hourly rate of positions to identify the cost of services that
those positions perform. In addition to staff cost, the cost of services also includes any required
contractual or professional services. The cost of each service is compared to the revenue received
for that service and the following is a summary of that match-up:
RCS identified fee and potential fee services that currently generate a little over $6.1
Million in revenues but cost the City more than $16 Million.
The Summary Schedule below, shows how the City is using $10 Million in tax dollars to
cover the shortfall in fees.
Some of the subsidies are for quality-of-life services such as recreation programs and
library services. Charging the full-cost of these services would price them out of the
market.
RCS suggests about $1.3 Million in fee increases to eliminate or reduce the taxpayer
subsidy for services that only benefit a few individuals.
The suggested fee changes are listed in Appendix B and the detail for those changes are
found in Appendix A.
Several services require additional narrative which is found following the Summary
Schedule below.
5.b
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
As of April 29, 2020
POSSIBLE
TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW
REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE
S-0005 BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE $200,000 $308,500 ($108,500) 64.8% 100.0% $108,500
S-0010 BUILDING PLAN CHECK $520,537 $729,304 ($208,767)71.4% 100.0% $0 *
S-0020 BUILDING INSPECTION $872,800 $857,500 $15,300 101.8% 100.0% $0 *
S-0022 SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION $22,800 $35,821 ($13,021) 63.7% 100.0% $6,500 &
S-0025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY $11,252 $15,065 ($3,813) 74.7% 100.0% $3,800
S-0030 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY $3,739 $4,017 ($278) 93.1% 100.0% $300
S-0201 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV. $2,332 $2,300 $32 101.4% 100.0% $0
S-0203 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM. $5,100 $8,142 ($3,042) 62.6% 100.0% $3,000
S-0205 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC $2,466 $8,666 ($6,200) 28.5% 100.0% $3,500 &
S-0208 ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV. $0 $0 $0 0.0%100.0% $0 X
S-0211 APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL $1,766 $2,848 ($1,082)62.0% 100.0% $1,100
S-0213 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION $5,544 $8,592 ($3,048) 64.5% 100.0% $3,000
S-0216 CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL $36,050 $46,250 ($10,200) 78.0% 100.0% $10,200
S-0217 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $155,600 $222,164 ($66,564) 70.0% 100.0% $66,600
S-0219 CUP REVISION $10,565 $18,895 ($8,330) 55.9% 100.0% $8,300
S-0222 DESIGN REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0224 DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0%$0 HR
S-0227 DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND. $34,800 $49,616 ($14,816) 70.1% 100.0% $14,800
S-0230 DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW $50,000 $98,276 ($48,276) 50.9% 100.0% $48,300
S-0233 DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW $96,570 $127,603 ($31,033) 75.7% 100.0% $31,000
S-0235 DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW $100,800 $157,643 ($56,843) 63.9% 100.0% $56,800
S-0238 DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0241 ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0%$0 HR
S-0244 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR
S-0246 EXTENSION OF TIME $55,524 $22,318 $33,206 248.8% 100.0% ($33,200)
S-0251 FENCE/WALL PERMIT $6,720 $7,404 ($684) 90.8% 100.0% $700
S-0257 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP) $6,000 $14,290 ($8,290) 42.0% 100.0% $8,300
S-0259 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0%$0 HR
S-0262 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $80,400 $43,107 $37,293 186.5% 100.0% ($37,300)
S-0264 LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST $22,500 $12,313 $10,187 182.7% 100.0% ($10,200)
S-0266 PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $4,770 $12,566 ($7,796) 38.0% 100.0% $7,800
S-0268 MINOR EXCEPTION $1,152 $410 $742 281.0% 100.0% ($700) X
S-0270 MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0271 MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION $5,610 $3,787 $1,823 148.1% 100.0% ($1,800)
S-0273 PHASING PLAN REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0275 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0277 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER $9,540 $41,105 ($31,565) 23.2% 100.0% $31,600
S-0279 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW $60,600 $85,962 ($25,362) 70.5% 100.0% $25,400
S-0280 RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM. $506 $2,671 ($2,165) 18.9% 100.0% $2,200
S-0282 SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR $18,200 $8,226 $9,974 221.3% 100.0% ($10,000)
S-0283 SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0284 SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY $5,550 $4,113 $1,437 134.9%100.0% ($1,400)
S-0286 SIGN PROGRAM $6,100 $4,901 $1,199 124.5% 100.0% ($1,200)
S-0288 SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR
S-0291 TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $13,797 $44,316 ($30,519) 31.1% 100.0% $30,500
S-0293 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP $44,570 $51,719 ($7,149) 86.2% 100.0% $7,100
5.b
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
As of April 29, 2020
POSSIBLE
TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW
REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE
S-0295 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD) $42,680 $36,047 $6,633 118.4% 100.0% ($6,600)
S-0297 TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL $6,339 $12,371 ($6,032) 51.2% 100.0% $6,000
S-0301 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT $1,012 $365 $647 277.3% 100.0%($600)
S-0303 VARIANCE-REGULAR $2,724 $2,065 $659 131.9% 100.0% ($700)
S-0304 VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION $1,820 $1,982 ($162) 91.8% 100.0% $200
S-0306 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR
S-0308 ZONING FORM $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0309 ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW $66,600 $97,938 ($31,338) 68.0% 100.0% $31,300
S-0315 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $50,000 *
S-0322 TECHNOLOGY FEE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0
S-0326 ARCHIVE FEES $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $2,000
S-0441 FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW $2,497 $5,926 ($3,429) 42.1% 100.0% $3,400
S-0445 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK $134,733 $133,868 $865 100.7% 100.0% $0
S-0447 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE $804 $1,939 ($1,135) 41.5%100.0% $1,100
S-0452 REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE $828 $1,372 ($544) 60.4% 100.0% $500
S-0453 REVIEW-LOT MERGER $14,076 $22,138 ($8,062) 63.6% 100.0% $8,100
S-0454 REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT $3,726 $9,527 ($5,801) 39.1% 100.0% $5,800
S-0463 ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION $202,100 $216,999 ($14,899) 93.1% 100.0% $14,900
S-0467 ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION $14,853 $17,978 ($3,125) 82.6% 100.0% $3,100
S-0471 HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW $29,350 $41,350 ($12,000) 71.0% 100.0% $12,000
S-0472 ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG. $0 $939 ($939) 0.0% 100.0% $900
S-0480 FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW $0 $3,758 ($3,758) 0.0% 100.0% $3,800
S-0481 REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN $38,210 $57,664 ($19,454) 66.3% 100.0% $19,500
S-0488 REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS $148,224 $285,257 ($137,033) 52.0% 100.0% $137,000
S-0489 REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN $4,125 $10,028 ($5,903) 41.1% 100.0% $5,900
S-0490 NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION $20,316 $28,803 ($8,487) 70.5% 100.0% $8,500
S-0495 NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION $31,603 $38,699 ($7,096) 81.7% 100.0% $7,100
S-0501 BASIC PERMIT FEE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0503 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT $3,350 $7,574 ($4,224) 44.2% 100.0% $4,200
S-0505 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT $904,998 $693,133 $211,865 130.6% 100.0% $105,000 &
S-0507 LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0
S-0509 SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT $7,860 $19,812 ($11,952) 39.7% 100.0% $12,000
S-0511 OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT $17,234 $32,150 ($14,916) 53.6% 100.0% $0 **
S-0513 HAULING PERMIT $6,704 $14,292 ($7,588) 46.9% 100.0% $7,600
S-0515 EXCAVATION PERMIT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0517 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT $7,190 $15,912 ($8,722) 45.2% 100.0% $8,700
S-0518 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK $321,389 $342,265 ($20,876) 93.9% 100.0% $0
S-0520 REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS $685 $1,056 ($371) 64.9% 100.0% $400
S-0521 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION $188,000 $191,976 ($3,976) 97.9% 100.0% $4,000
S-0523 ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT $882 $1,654 ($772)53.3% 100.0% $800
S-0529 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW $520 $1,154 ($634) 45.1% 100.0% $600
S-0531 STREET NAME CHANGE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR
S-0533 STREET/ALLEY VACATION $2,000 $3,685 ($1,685) 54.3% 100.0% $1,700
S-0535 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY $3,150 $9,212 ($6,062) 34.2% 100.0% $6,100
S-0537 PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR
S-0539 CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR
5.b
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
As of April 29, 2020
POSSIBLE
TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW
REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE
S-0542 ENGINEERING LETTER $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0560 PERMIT EXTENSION $8,600 $16,306 ($7,706) 52.7% 100.0% $7,700
S-0565 RE-INSPECTION $90 $106 ($16) 84.9% 100.0% $0
S-0567 AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0
S-0571 ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST. $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR
S-0602 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0609 RECORDS CHECK LETTER $250 $420 ($170) 59.5% 100.0%$200
S-0611 2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION $853 $889 ($36) 0.0% 100.0% $0 X
S-0613 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING $3,450 $4,653 ($1,203) 74.2% 100.0% $1,200
S-0616 FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF $2,000 $2,408 ($408) 83.1%100.0% $400
S-0618 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $500
S-0621 ALARM SYSTEM $238,890 $538,810 ($299,920) 44.3% 100.0% $100,000 *
S-0640 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES $615,196 $3,519,650 ($2,904,454) 17.5% 50.0% $100,000 *
S-0655 BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION $103,000 $186,533 ($83,533) 55.2% 100.0% $83,500
S-0657 NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE $18,037 $16,498 $1,539 109.3% 100.0% ($1,500)
S-0659 ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE $5,520 $6,348 ($828) 87.0% 100.0% $800
S-0662 LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE $53,675 $104,802 ($51,127) 51.2% 100.0% $51,100
S-0664 DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE $840 $496 $344 169.4% 100.0% ($300)
S-0666 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES $375 $513 ($138) 73.1% 100.0% $100
S-6000 AQUATICS SERVICES $94,350 $702,761 ($608,411) 13.4% 25.0% $14,000 *
S-6060 YOUTH SPORTS $10,756 $35,599 ($24,843) 30.2% 75.0% $1,500 *
S-6070 ADULT SPORTS $21,460 $89,215 ($67,755) 24.1% 45.0% $4,000 *
S-6100 COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS $13,000 $3,819,489 ($3,806,489) 0.3% 2.0% $4,000 *
S-6130 BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE $9,500 $261,502 ($252,002) 3.6% 10.0% $2,000 *
S-6700 LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT $4,000 $18,800 ($14,800) 21.3% 50.0% $500
S-6710 INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST $135 $41,171 ($41,036) 0.3% 1.0% $200
S-6720 LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE $80 $396 ($316) 20.2% 22.0% $10
S-6730 REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS $125 $706 ($581) 17.7% 35.0% $25
S-6740 LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL $5,260 $36,160 ($30,900) 14.6% 100.0% $700
S-7000 CEMETERY INTERMENT $15,550 $56,615 ($41,065) 27.5% 100.0% $14,000 &
S-7010 CEMETERY DISINTERMENT $1,200 $3,822 ($2,622) 31.4% 100.0% $50 &
S-7020 CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS $2,440 $5,972 ($3,532) 40.9% 100.0% $100 &
S-7030 CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION $210 $680 ($470) 30.9% 100.0% $30 &
S-7040 REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER $0 $2,834 ($2,834) 0.0% 100.0% $230 &
S-7050 GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER $150 $381 ($231) 39.4% 100.0% $200
S-7100 CEMETERY SERVICES $0 $182,961 ($182,961) 0.0% 100.0% $5,000 &
S-7220 STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE $4,000 $8,219 ($4,219) 48.7% 100.0% $2,000 &
S-7250 REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $0 $92,617 ($92,617) 0.0% 100.0% $0
S-7260 PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION $28,000 $35,983 ($7,983)77.8% 100.0% $0
S-7270 FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE $17,000 $20,243 ($3,243) 84.0% 100.0% $3,200
S-8000 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION $408 $141,105 ($140,697) 0.3% 100.0% $0
S-8020 ELECTRONIC FILE COPY $0 $3,344 ($3,344) 0.0% 100.0% $1,000 &
S-8040 ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING $0 $591,843 ($591,843) 0.0% 100.0% $5,000 &
S-8050 ACP DEMAND LETTER $5,604 $11,537 ($5,933) 48.6% 100.0% $5,900 &
S-8060 LIEN RELEASE $0 $10,154 ($10,154) 0.0% 100.0% $10,200 &
S-8320 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS $124,800 $106,548 $18,252 117.1% 100.0% ($18,300)
5.b
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
As of April 29, 2020
POSSIBLE
TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW
REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE
S-8330 BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER $2,640 $2,522 $118 104.7% 100.0% ($100)
S-8340 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE $0 $39,432 ($39,432) 0.0% 100.0% $39,400
S-8350 DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE $18 $378 ($360) 4.8% 100.0% $400
S-8360 PASSPORT PROCESSING $35,000 $64,110 ($29,110) 54.6% 55.0% $29,100 **
S-8370 NOTARY PUBLIC $15 $33 ($18) 45.5% 50.0% $0 **
S-8380 RECORDS COMPILATION $70 $104 ($34) 67.3% 100.0% $0
S-8390 CANDIDATE FILING $725 $21,333 ($20,608) 0.0% 5.0% $0 **
S-8400 INITIATIVE FILING $0 $1,525 ($1,525) 0.0% 15.0% $0 **
S-8410 WEDDING CEREMONY $260 $286 ($26) 90.9% 100.0% $0
S-8500 FILM PERMIT $1,890 $7,458 ($5,568) 25.3% 100.0% $5,600
S-8600 NSF CHECK PROCESSING $2,392 $5,957 ($3,565) 40.2%100.0% $3,600 **
S-9000 OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0
TOTALS $6,156,656 $16,243,525 ($10,086,869) 37.9% 46.1% $1,325,045
Key to Symbols:
* - See text for discussion
** - Fee is limited by State/Federal Code
& - Demand will decline as user is required to pay full cost.
x - Staff recommends deleting the service as it is not used.
HR - The service is charged based on the hourly rate of staff plus other costs.
5.b
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Service Narrative
The above Summary Schedule indicated for several services that the reader should “See text for
discussion.” That discussion follows:
S-0010 :: Building Plan Check; and, S-0020 :: Building Inspection. RCS updated the fee
schedule (Appendix D) based on the current staff salaries. The Building & Safety Division of
Community Development has been understaffed for a number of years. The understaffing may
have “balanced the books” for the Division but one has to wonder if the quality of work suffered
as a result. The additional revenue from the new fees should be used by the City to restore
staffing levels so that the development community can continue to receive excellent service on a
timely basis.
S-0315 :: General Plan Maintenance. California Law requires that cities periodically update their
General Plan. Development can be challenged in a city where the General Plan is out of date. For
this reason, RCS suggests that development services cover 50% of the cost. Residents also
benefit from an updated General Plan, so there is logic in the balance of the cost being borne by
the local taxpayers. The suggested 2% surcharge on all Community Development fees would
begin the process of recovering development’s 50% share of the cost. Staff must insure that the
monies collected are properly reserved for the intended purpose.
S-0621 :: Alarm System. The “system” is comprised of alarm permits and Police response to
false alarms. Ideally, the permit revenue would recover the cost of the “free” false alarms for
permit holders and the false alarm charge would recover the rest of the Police response.
Currently, the City’s mix of fees recovers only about 50% of the cost with the taxpayer footing
the bill for the rest. The suggested fee changes would begin the process of reducing the
taxpayers’ burden but the City uses a 3rd-party vendor that gets 22% of City revenues for
permits and false alarms. Consequently, the City may wish to link fee increases to a reduction in
the vendor’s fee.
S-0640 :: Animal Control Services. Animal Control services are a public safety function and
RCS generally recommends that taxpayers subsidize 50% of the cost to recognize this fact. At
present, only 20% to 30% of dogs are licensed and the service is only recovering about 17% of
the total cost or 35% of its share of costs. A significant increase in these fees would discourage
compliance. Additional license checkers might improve compliance and generate additional
revenue but that additional revenue would only pay their costs, not generate new revenue. Same
with charges for dropping off stray or owner surrender animals, if fees are too high, compliance
will go down and jeopardize public safety. The Police Department has completed an analysis that
looked at cost and comparable fees from surrounding agencies. It is suggested that the City
Council consider adopting the fees in that study.
S-6000 to S-6740 :: Recreation & Library Services. We’re now in the area of services that
improve the quality of life in the community. RCS strongly recommends that the department be
responsible for setting program fees based on what the market will bear. The limiting factor for
that policy should be the amount of tax monies that the City can afford for quality of life issues
and the effectiveness of the department head getting the best program for those monies.
Additional information on the nature of the costs and the suggested fees is found in Appendix E.
5.b
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
APPENDICES
A - REVENUE & COST SHEET FOR EACH SERVICE
B - COMPARISON OF CURRENT FEE TO SUGGESTED FEE
C - CURRENT BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
D - PROPOSED BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
E - RECREATION DETAIL
F - AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE
5.b
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
5.b
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
APPENDIX A
DETAIL REVENUE & COST SHEETS
A - 1
5.b
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
INDEX
REF# SERVICE PAGE
S-0005 BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE A-6
S-0010 BUILDING PLAN CHECK A-8
S-0020 BUILDING INSPECTION A-10
S-0022 SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION A-12
S-0025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY A-14
S-0030 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY A-16
S-0201 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV. A-18
S-0203 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM. A-20
S-0205 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC A-22
S-0208 ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV. A-24
S-0211 APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL A-26
S-0213 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A-28
S-0216 CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL A-30
S-0217 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A-32
S-0219 CUP REVISION A-34
S-0222 DESIGN REVIEW A-36
S-0224 DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT A-38
S-0227 DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND. A-40
S-0230 DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW A-42
S-0233 DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW A-44
S-0235 DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW A-46
S-0238 DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW A-48
S-0241 ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY A-50
S-0244 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT A-52
S-0246 EXTENSION OF TIME A-54
S-0251 FENCE/WALL PERMIT A-56
S-0257 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP) A-58
S-0259 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT A-60
S-0262 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT A-62
S-0264 LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST A-64
S-0266 PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A-66
S-0268 MINOR EXCEPTION A-68
S-0270 MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW A-70
S-0271 MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION A-72
S-0273 PHASING PLAN REVIEW A-74
S-0275 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION A-76
S-0277 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER A-78
S-0279 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW A-80
A - 2
5.b
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
INDEX
REF# SERVICE PAGE
S-0280 RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM. A-82
S-0282 SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR A-84
S-0283 SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP A-86
S-0284 SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY A-88
S-0286 SIGN PROGRAM A-90
S-0288 SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT A-92
S-0291 TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT A-94
S-0293 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP A-96
S-0295 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD) A-98
S-0297 TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL A-100
S-0301 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT A-102
S-0303 VARIANCE-REGULAR A-104
S-0304 VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION A-106
S-0306 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP A-108
S-0308 ZONING FORM A-110
S-0309 ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW A-112
S-0315 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE A-114
S-0322 TECHNOLOGY FEE A-116
S-0326 ARCHIVE FEES A-118
S-0441 FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW A-120
S-0445 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK A-122
S-0447 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE A-124
S-0452 REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE A-126
S-0453 REVIEW-LOT MERGER A-128
S-0454 REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT A-130
S-0463 ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION A-132
S-0467 ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION A-134
S-0471 HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW A-136
S-0472 ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG. A-138
S-0480 FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW A-140
S-0481 REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN A-142
S-0488 REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS A-144
S-0489 REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN A-146
S-0490 NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION A-148
S-0495 NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION A-150
S-0501 BASIC PERMIT FEE A-152
S-0503 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT A-154
S-0505 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT A-156
A - 3
5.b
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
INDEX
REF# SERVICE PAGE
S-0507 LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION A-158
S-0509 SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT A-160
S-0511 OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT A-162
S-0513 HAULING PERMIT A-164
S-0515 EXCAVATION PERMIT A-166
S-0517 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT A-168
S-0518 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK A-170
S-0520 REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS A-172
S-0521 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION A-174
S-0523 ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT A-176
S-0529 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW A-178
S-0531 STREET NAME CHANGE A-180
S-0533 STREET/ALLEY VACATION A-182
S-0535 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY A-184
S-0537 PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST A-186
S-0539 CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING A-188
S-0542 ENGINEERING LETTER A-190
S-0560 PERMIT EXTENSION A-192
S-0565 RE-INSPECTION A-194
S-0567 AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION A-196
S-0571 ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST. A-198
S-0602 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT A-200
S-0609 RECORDS CHECK LETTER A-202
S-0611 2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION A-204
S-0613 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING A-206
S-0616 FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF A-208
S-0618 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE A-210
S-0621 ALARM SYSTEM A-212
S-0640 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES A-214
S-0655 BIENNEAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION A-216
S-0657 NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE A-218
S-0659 ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE A-220
S-0662 LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE A-222
S-0664 DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE A-224
S-0666 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES A-226
S-6000 AQUATICS SERVICES A-228
S-6060 YOUTH SPORTS A-230
S-6070 ADULT SPORTS A-232
A - 4
5.b
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
INDEX
REF# SERVICE PAGE
S-6100 COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS A-234
S-6130 BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE A-236
S-6700 LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT A-238
S-6710 INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST A-240
S-6720 LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE A-242
S-6730 REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS A-244
S-6740 LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL A-246
S-7000 CEMETERY INTERMENT A-248
S-7010 CEMETERY DISINTERMENT A-250
S-7020 CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS A-252
S-7030 CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION A-254
S-7040 REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER A-256
S-7050 GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER A-258
S-7100 CEMETERY SERVICES A-260
S-7220 STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE A-262
S-7250 REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE A-264
S-7260 PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION A-266
S-7270 FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE A-268
S-8000 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION A-270
S-8020 ELECTRONIC FILE COPY A-272
S-8040 ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING A-274
S-8050 ACP DEMAND LETTER A-276
S-8060 LIEN RELEASE A-278
S-8320 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS A-280
S-8330 BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER A-282
S-8340 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE A-284
S-8350 DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE A-286
S-8360 PASSPORT PROCESSING A-288
S-8370 NOTARY PUBLIC A-290
S-8380 RECORDS COMPILATION A-292
S-8390 CANDIDATE FILING A-294
S-8400 INITIATIVE FILING A-296
S-8410 WEDDING CEREMONY A-298
S-8500 FILM PERMIT A-300
S-8600 NSF CHECK PROCESSING A-302
S-9000 OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES A-304
A - 5
5.b
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0005BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE
APPLICATIONCD-BLDG+SAFETY
To process an application for a building permit. This is not a plan check or inspection.
$40 - 1st permit
$10 - each additional permit on the same application
$60 - 1st permit
$10 - each additional permit on the same application
100%
$40.00
$61.70
$(21.70)
5,000
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 64.83%
$(108,500)
$308,500
$200,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 6
5.b
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE S-0005
5,000
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.75 $61.70 5,000 $308,500
$308,500 $61.70 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$308,500 0.75TOTALS $61.70
A - 7
5.b
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0010BUILDING PLAN CHECK
APPLICATIONCD-BLDG+SAFETY
To review plans for construction.
Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C
Hourly Rate - $94.15
Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D
Hourly Rate - $122.37
100%
$897.48
$1,257.42
$(359.94)
580
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 71.37%
$(208,767)
$729,304
$520,537
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 8
5.b
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BUILDING PLAN CHECK S-0010
580
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL 0.70 $130.13 580 $75,475
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY SR.PLANS EXAMINER 2.80 $342.85 580 $198,853
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 4.93 $405.13 580 $234,975
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY Contract Svcs 0.00 $379.31 580 $220,000
$729,304 $1,257.42 8.43TYPE SUBTOTAL
$729,304 8.43TOTALS $1,257.42
A - 9
5.b
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0020BUILDING INSPECTION
PERMITCD-BLDG+SAFETY
To inspect building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical construction to insure that it is in conformance with
approved plans and the various construction codes.
Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C
Hourly Rate - $94.45
Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D
Hourly Rate - $118.33
100%
$349.12
$343.00
$6.12
2,500
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 101.78%
$15,300
$857,500
$872,800
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 10
5.b
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BUILDING INSPECTION S-0020
2,500
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL 0.32 $60.38 2,500 $150,950
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 1.81 $191.04 2,500 $477,600
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CONST.INSP.II 0.49 $58.04 2,500 $145,100
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 50% Of 1 Position 0.33 $33.54 2,500 $83,850
$857,500 $343.00 2.95TYPE SUBTOTAL
$857,500 2.95TOTALS $343.00
A - 11
5.b
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0022SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION
INSPECTIONCD-BLDG+SAFETY
To perform a special inspection at the request of the applicant.
$380 Minimum for the 1st 4 hours plus $95 for each additional hour
$595 for the 1st 4 hours plus $105 for each add'l hour
100%
$380.00
$597.02
$(217.02)
60
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.65%
$(13,021)
$35,821
$22,800
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 12
5.b
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION S-0022
60
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $39.43 60 $2,366
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL 0.50 $93.13 60 $5,588
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 4.00 $423.32 60 $25,399
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 60 $2,468
$35,821 $597.01 5.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$35,821 5.50TOTALS $597.02
A - 13
5.b
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0025CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
PERMITCD-BLDG+SAFETY
To review a construction project to insure that it has received all required inspections and met all conditions of
approval, including those conditions of other Divisions.
$475.08 - as a separate application (of which $100 was for Fire Review)
$133.62 - if included on the building permit (Deleted as All Fire)
$500
100%
$375.07
$502.17
$(127.10)
30
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 74.69%
$(3,813)
$15,065
$11,252
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 14
5.b
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY S-0025
30
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $78.85 30 $2,366
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 4.00 $423.32 30 $12,700
$15,065 $502.17 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$15,065 5.00TOTALS $502.17
A - 15
5.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0030TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
REQUESTCD-LAND DEV.
To issue a Temporary C.of O. good for one (1) month.
$467.34
$500
100%
$467.38
$502.13
$(34.75)
8
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 93.08%
$(278)
$4,017
$3,739
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 16
5.b
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY S-0030
8
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $78.85 8 $631
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 4.00 $423.32 8 $3,387
$4,017 $502.17 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$4,017 5.00TOTALS $502.13
A - 17
5.b
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0201AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV.
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the
Development Services Director.
$583
$575
100%
$583.00
$575.00
$8.00
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 101.39%
$32
$2,300
$2,332
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 18
5.b
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV.S-0201
4
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 4 $165
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 4 $155
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 1.00 $187.36 4 $749
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 3.00 $307.68 4 $1,231
$2,300 $574.89 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,300 5.00TOTALS $575.00
A - 19
5.b
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0203AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM.
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the
Planning Commission.
$2,550
$4,070 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$2,550.00
$4,071.00
$(1,521.00)
2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.64%
$(3,042)
$8,142
$5,100
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 20
5.b
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM.S-0203
2
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 2 $628
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 2 $620
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 2 $1,499
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 20.00 $2,051.20 2 $4,102
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 2 $734
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 2 $478
$8,142 $4,071.14 33.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$8,142 33.50TOTALS $4,071.00
A - 21
5.b
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0205AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the
Development/Environmental Review Committee.
$822
$2,890
100%
$822.00
$2,888.67
$(2,066.67)
3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 28.46%
$(6,200)
$8,666
$2,466
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 22
5.b
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC S-0205
3
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 3 $123
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 3 $471
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 3 $929
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 3 $2,248
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 3 $3,077
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 3 $1,101
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 3 $717
$8,666 $2,888.66 23.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$8,666 23.00TOTALS $2,888.67
A - 23
5.b
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0208ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV.
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review an application for the placement of an antenna or other telecommunication device that requires
Director Review according to the municipal code.
$2,938
Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using a CUP or a development permit.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 24
5.b
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV.S-0208
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 25
5.b
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0211APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To appeal a project to the Mayor and Council that was denied by the Planning Commission.
$177 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery)
$1,766 - All others
$285 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery)
$2,850 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$1,766.00
$2,848.00
$(1,082.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.01%
$(1,082)
$2,848
$1,766
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 26
5.b
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL S-0211
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 1 $628
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 2.00 $154.88 1 $155
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 1 $749
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 8.00 $820.48 1 $820
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.50 $275.22 1 $275
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.50 $179.16 1 $179
$2,848 $2,847.85 19.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,848 19.50TOTALS $2,848.00
A - 27
5.b
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0213APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To appeal a project to the Planning Commission that was denied by the D/ERC or the Community Development
Director.
$278 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%)
$2,772 - All others
$430 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%)
$4,295 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$2,772.00
$4,296.00
$(1,524.00)
2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 64.53%
$(3,048)
$8,592
$5,544
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 28
5.b
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION S-0213
2
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 4.00 $1,255.08 2 $2,510
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 2.00 $154.88 2 $310
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 2 $1,499
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 16.00 $1,640.96 2 $3,282
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.50 $275.22 2 $550
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.50 $179.16 2 $358
$8,592 $4,295.87 29.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$8,592 29.50TOTALS $4,296.00
A - 29
5.b
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0216CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare a conditional use permit for a minor use or for the sale of alcohol in an existing building.
$3,605
$4,625 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$3,605.00
$4,625.00
$(1,020.00)
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 77.95%
$(10,200)
$46,250
$36,050
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 30
5.b
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL S-0216
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 10 $3,138
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 10 $3,098
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 8.00 $1,498.88 10 $14,989
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 24.00 $2,461.44 10 $24,614
$46,250 $4,624.98 37.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$46,250 37.50TOTALS $4,625.00
A - 31
5.b
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0217CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request for a conditional use permit for conditional uses.
$7,133 - CUP for Commercial/Industrial (#10; $71,330)
$2,809 - CUP for Condo, PRD, HMOD (#30; $84,270)
$5,555 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$3,890.00
$5,554.10
$(1,664.10)
40
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.04%
$(66,564)
$222,164
$155,600
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 32
5.b
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S-0217
40
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 40 $1,645
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 40 $25,102
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 40 $12,390
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 8.00 $1,498.88 40 $59,955
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 30.00 $3,076.80 40 $123,072
$222,164 $5,554.11 44.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$222,164 44.50TOTALS $5,554.10
A - 33
5.b
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0219CUP REVISION
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request to modify an existing conditional use permit.
$2,113
$3,780 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$2,113.00
$3,779.00
$(1,666.00)
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.91%
$(8,330)
$18,895
$10,565
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 34
5.b
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CUP REVISION S-0219
5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 5 $206
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 5 $3,138
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 5 $1,549
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 5 $3,747
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 20.00 $2,051.20 5 $10,256
$18,895 $3,779.07 30.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$18,895 30.50TOTALS $3,779.00
A - 35
5.b
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0222DESIGN REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review the design of a proposed development.
Full Consultant Cost
Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included with Conditional Use Permit, Development
Permit or Temporary Use Permit
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 36
5.b
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DESIGN REVIEW S-0222
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 37
5.b
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0224DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare or amend a development agreement which sets out the City's and the developer's obligations for a
proposed development. Typically used where a developer prefers to construct an improvement in-lieu of paying
development impact fees.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit as determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 38
5.b
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT S-0224
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 39
5.b
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0227DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND.
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process a request to amend the development code or the zoning map at the request of, and for the benefit of,
a developer.
$6,960 plus full consultant cost
$9,925 plus any consultant cost including 10% contract administrative overhead, plus the estimated cost of noticing
and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$6,960.00
$9,923.20
$(2,963.20)
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.14%
$(14,816)
$49,616
$34,800
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 40
5.b
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND.S-0227
5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 5 $206
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 10.00 $3,137.70 5 $15,689
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 6.00 $464.64 5 $2,323
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 16.00 $2,997.76 5 $14,989
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 32.00 $3,281.92 5 $16,410
$49,616 $9,923.15 64.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$49,616 64.50TOTALS $9,923.20
A - 41
5.b
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0230DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a development that can be approved by the Community Development Director.
$1,000
$1,965
100%
$1,000.00
$1,965.52
$(965.52)
50
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 50.88%
$(48,276)
$98,276
$50,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 42
5.b
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW S-0230
50
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 50 $2,057
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 50 $7,845
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $77.44 50 $3,872
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 50 $18,736
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 50 $51,280
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.00 $183.48 50 $9,174
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 0.50 $59.72 50 $2,986
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 0.50 $46.54 50 $2,327
$98,276 $1,965.52 16.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$98,276 16.00TOTALS $1,965.52
A - 43
5.b
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0233DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a development that can be approved by the Development/Environmental Review Committee.
$6,438
0 to 5 Acres - $6,810 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.
> than 5 Acres - $11,905 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.
100%
$6,438.00
$8,506.87
$(2,068.87)
15
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 75.68%
$(31,033)
$127,603
$96,570
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 44
5.b
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW S-0233
15
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.0 To 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 10 $411
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 10 $3,138
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 10 $3,098
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 10 $7,494
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 30.00 $3,076.80 10 $30,768
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 8.00 $1,467.84 10 $14,678
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 10 $4,778
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 4.00 $372.28 10 $3,723
$68,088 $6,808.78 55.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Greater Than 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 5 $206
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 5 $3,138
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 5 $1,549
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 10.00 $1,873.60 5 $9,368
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 60.00 $6,153.60 5 $30,768
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 5 $9,174
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 5 $2,986
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 5.00 $465.35 5 $2,327
$59,515 $11,902.98 96.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$127,603 152.00TOTALS $8,506.87
A - 45
5.b
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0235DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review the following types of projects: 12 or more residential units, a cell tower taller than 75 feet, a
conditional use permit, tentative tract map where the development requires a Planning Commission public
hearing.
$6,720 - 0 to 5 Acres (#10; $67,200)
$6,720 - Greater than 5 Acres (#5, $33,600)
0 to 5 Acres - $8,040 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.
> than 5 Acres - $15,455 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.
100%
$6,720.00
$10,509.53
$(3,789.53)
15
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.94%
$(56,843)
$157,643
$100,800
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 46
5.b
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW S-0235
15
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.0 To 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 10 $411
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $77.44 10 $774
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 8.00 $1,498.88 10 $14,989
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 40.00 $4,102.40 10 $41,024
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 8.00 $1,467.84 10 $14,678
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 10 $4,778
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 4.00 $372.28 10 $3,723
$80,377 $8,037.73 65.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Greater Than 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 5 $206
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 5 $3,138
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 5 $1,549
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 18.00 $3,372.48 5 $16,862
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 80.00 $8,204.80 5 $41,024
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 5 $9,174
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 5 $2,986
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 5.00 $465.35 5 $2,327
$77,265 $15,453.06 124.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$157,643 190.00TOTALS $10,509.53
A - 47
5.b
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0238DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a residential project in a commercial zone where a Public Hearing by the Mayor & Council is required
for approval.
$7,288
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is no longer used.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 48
5.b
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW S-0238
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 49
5.b
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0241ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a proposed development and determine that it has no impact on the environment or that the impact
can be mitigated and the mitigation monitored.
$3,273
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 50
5.b
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY S-0241
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 51
5.b
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0244ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare an environmental impact report on a proposed development to comply with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 52
5.b
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT S-0244
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 53
5.b
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0246EXTENSION OF TIME
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process a time extension for a permit that requires the review of the Development/Environmental Review
Committee or Planning Commission or Mayor and Council.
$3,922 - CUP & Development Permit (#2; $7,844)
$4,768 - Tentative Tract Map (#10; $47,680)
$1,860 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$4,627.00
$1,859.83
$2,767.17
12
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 248.79%
$33,206
$22,318
$55,524
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 54
5.b
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
EXTENSION OF TIME S-0246
12
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 12 $494
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 12 $3,765
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 12 $3,717
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 12 $4,497
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 8.00 $820.48 12 $9,846
$22,318 $1,859.86 15.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$22,318 15.50TOTALS $1,859.83
A - 55
5.b
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0251FENCE/WALL PERMIT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review plans and inspect a fence or wall that is not part of another application.
$56
$60
100%
$56.00
$61.70
$(5.70)
120
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 90.76%
$(684)
$7,404
$6,720
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 56
5.b
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
FENCE/WALL PERMIT S-0251
120
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.75 $61.70 120 $7,404
$7,404 $61.70 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$7,404 0.75TOTALS $61.70
A - 57
5.b
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0257GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP)
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review and process an application to make an amendment to the City's General Plan text or map at the
request of, and for the benefit of, a developer. Only additional costs as always done in conjunction with
Dev.Code Amend. or other primary application.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($1,500 Deposit treated as actual cost)
$3,570 plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing
& publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
100%
$1,500.00
$3,572.50
$(2,072.50)
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.99%
$(8,290)
$14,290
$6,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 58
5.b
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP)S-0257
4
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 4 $165
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 5.00 $1,568.85 4 $6,275
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 5.00 $936.80 4 $3,747
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 4 $4,102
$14,290 $3,572.38 20.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$14,290 20.50TOTALS $3,572.50
A - 59
5.b
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0259HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare a report on whether an existing building has historic significance and, if so, how changes to the
building can be made that preserve its historic significance.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($815 deposit plus consultant cost)
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 60
5.b
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT S-0259
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 61
5.b
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0262HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request to operate a business in a residential zone to insure that can be operated safely and that it
will not impact neighbors.
$268
$145
100%
$268.00
$143.69
$124.31
300
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 186.51%
$37,293
$43,107
$80,400
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 62
5.b
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT S-0262
300
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 300 $12,339
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.00 $102.56 300 $30,768
$43,107 $143.69 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$43,107 1.50TOTALS $143.69
A - 63
5.b
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0264LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare a letter at the request of a realtor or lender confirming that a particular use of a property is permitted
by the Zoning Code and/or in conformance with the City's General Plan. Also known as a rebuild letter.
$450
$245
100%
$450.00
$246.26
$203.74
50
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 182.73%
$10,187
$12,313
$22,500
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 64
5.b
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST S-0264
50
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 50 $2,057
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 2.00 $205.12 50 $10,256
$12,313 $246.25 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$12,313 2.50TOTALS $246.26
A - 65
5.b
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0266PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a lot line application to check for building setbacks, zoning, general plan conformance and
development standards. See S-0454 for the Public Works Engineering review.
$477
$1,255
100%
$477.00
$1,256.60
$(779.60)
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 37.96%
$(7,796)
$12,566
$4,770
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 66
5.b
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT S-0266
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY SR.PLANS EXAMINER 1.00 $122.37 10 $1,224
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 0.50 $93.68 10 $937
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 10 $4,102
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 3.00 $550.44 10 $5,504
$12,566 $1,256.58 9.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$12,566 9.50TOTALS $1,256.60
A - 67
5.b
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0268MINOR EXCEPTION
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
Staff approval of a minor variance (exception) to the Zoning Ordinance based on criteria that establishes the
minimal impact of the variance.
$288 - Concurrent with another application
$268 - Owner-Occupied single-family residence
$792 - Other
$105
100%
$288.00
$102.50
$185.50
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 280.98%
$742
$410
$1,152
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 68
5.b
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
MINOR EXCEPTION S-0268
4
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.00 $102.56 4 $410
$410 $102.56 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$410 1.00TOTALS $102.50
A - 69
5.b
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0270MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($245 Deposit) plus Full Consultant Cost ($327 Deposit)
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 70
5.b
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW S-0270
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 71
5.b
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0271MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request to make a minor change, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, in a development's use permit
or conditions of approval where the change can be approved administratively.
$561
$380 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$561.00
$378.70
$182.30
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 148.14%
$1,823
$3,787
$5,610
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 72
5.b
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION S-0271
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 0.50 $93.68 10 $937
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 2.00 $205.12 10 $2,051
$3,787 $378.65 3.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,787 3.50TOTALS $378.70
A - 73
5.b
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0273PHASING PLAN REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a phasing plan.
$823 - If not part of original project review
$514 - D/ERC review application (DP)
$536 - Planning Comm.Application (CUP/DP/SUB)
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 74
5.b
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PHASING PLAN REVIEW S-0273
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 75
5.b
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0275PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare an interpretation of the General Plan at the request of a developer where the interpretation is required
for a particular development.
$1,119
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 76
5.b
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION S-0275
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 77
5.b
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0277PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To make a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) determination as may be required by the State of California
for the issuance of an Alcoholic Beverage Control License.
$636
$2,740 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$636.00
$2,740.33
$(2,104.33)
15
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 23.21%
$(31,565)
$41,105
$9,540
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 78
5.b
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER S-0277
15
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 15 $617
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 15 $2,353
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 15 $581
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 1.00 $187.36 15 $2,810
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 15 $6,154
POL-GEN.INVESTIG.SERGEANT 10.00 $1,906.00 15 $28,590
$41,105 $2,740.34 16.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$41,105 16.50TOTALS $2,740.33
A - 79
5.b
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0279PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a proposed project by the Development/Environmental Review Committee at the request of a
developer before he/she submits a formal application.
$2,424
$3,440
100%
$2,424.00
$3,438.48
$(1,014.48)
25
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.50%
$(25,362)
$85,962
$60,600
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 80
5.b
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW S-0279
25
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 25 $1,028
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 25 $968
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 25 $9,368
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 8.00 $820.48 25 $20,512
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 6.00 $1,100.88 25 $27,522
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 25 $14,930
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 5.00 $465.35 25 $11,634
$85,962 $3,438.48 27.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$85,962 27.00TOTALS $3,438.48
A - 81
5.b
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0280RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM.
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process a request for the Planning Commission to reconsider a previously denied development in-lieu of
appealing to the Mayor and Common Council.
$506
$2,670 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$506.00
$2,671.00
$(2,165.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 18.94%
$(2,165)
$2,671
$506
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 82
5.b
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM.S-0280
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 1 $314
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 1 $310
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 1 $375
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 1 $1,026
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 1 $367
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 1 $239
$2,671 $2,670.82 21.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,671 21.50TOTALS $2,671.00
A - 83
5.b
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0282SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a proposed sign for compliance with the Sign Ordinance.
$182
$80
100%
$182.00
$82.26
$99.74
100
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 221.25%
$9,974
$8,226
$18,200
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 84
5.b
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR S-0282
100
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 1.00 $82.26 100 $8,226
$8,226 $82.26 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$8,226 1.00TOTALS $82.26
A - 85
5.b
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0283SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review and approve a sign permit subject to a conditional use permit which restricts the use in perpetuity to
the approved uses.
$3,858
Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate processes.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 86
5.b
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP S-0283
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 87
5.b
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0284SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a request to hang a temporary sign or banner to insure that it meets the requirements of the Sign
Ordinance which limits its use to 60-days.
$111
$80
100%
$111.00
$82.26
$28.74
50
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 134.94%
$1,437
$4,113
$5,550
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 88
5.b
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY S-0284
50
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 1.00 $82.26 50 $4,113
$4,113 $82.26 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$4,113 1.00TOTALS $82.26
A - 89
5.b
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0286SIGN PROGRAM
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review a signage program for a commercial development.
$610
10 or less tenant spaces - $490
Greater than 10 tenant spaces - Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant
costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
100%
$610.00
$490.10
$119.90
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 124.46%
$1,199
$4,901
$6,100
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 90
5.b
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SIGN PROGRAM S-0286
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 10 $4,102
$4,901 $490.09 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$4,901 5.00TOTALS $490.10
A - 91
5.b
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0288SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare or amend a specific plan which regulates land use in a specific area of the City in a more detailed
manner that the City-wide Zoning Ordinance at the request of a developer or as a condition to approving a
development.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 92
5.b
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT S-0288
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 93
5.b
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0291TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To review an application for a temporary use permit such as a pumpkin lot, parking lot sale, etc. or for a special
event.
$82.86 - Temporary Use Permit (#55; $4,557)
$420 - Special Event Permit (Director Review) (#22; $9,240)
$730 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review)
$315 - Temporary Use Permit
$1,230 - Special Event Permit (Director Review)
$0 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) - Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not
used.
100%
$179.18
$575.53
$(396.35)
77
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 31.13%
$(30,519)
$44,316
$13,797
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 94
5.b
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT S-0291
77
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Temporary 0.50 $41.13 55 $2,262
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.50 $153.84 55 $8,461
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.00 $119.44 55 $6,569
$17,293 $314.41 3.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Spcl.Event-Director 0.50 $41.13 22 $905
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 22 $3,452
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 22 $9,025
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 22 $5,255
POL-GEN.INVESTIG.SERGEANT 2.00 $381.20 22 $8,386
$27,023 $1,228.34 9.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$44,316 12.00TOTALS $575.53
A - 95
5.b
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0293TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process an application for the subdivision of land into four or fewer lots for residential, commercial or
industrial development.
$4,262 plus $65 per parcel
(NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 3 parcels per Tentative Parcel Map.)
$5,170 plus the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$4,457.00
$5,171.90
$(714.90)
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 86.18%
$(7,149)
$51,719
$44,570
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 96
5.b
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP S-0293
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 10 $7,494
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 6.00 $615.36 10 $6,154
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 10 $18,348
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 10.00 $1,194.40 10 $11,944
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 7.50 $698.03 10 $6,980
$51,719 $5,171.88 38.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$51,719 38.50TOTALS $5,171.90
A - 97
5.b
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0295TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD)
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process a proposed tract map (5 or more lots) to assure that it complies with City requirements and standards.
$7,561 plus $65 per lot or dwelling unit
(NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 15 lots per Tentative Tract Map.)
$6,850 plus $25 per lot and the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$8,536.00
$7,209.40
$1,326.60
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 118.40%
$6,633
$36,047
$42,680
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 98
5.b
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD)S-0295
5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Base Fee 0.50 $41.13 5 $206
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 5 $784
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 5 $194
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 5.00 $936.80 5 $4,684
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 20.00 $2,051.20 5 $10,256
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 5 $9,174
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 15.00 $1,791.60 5 $8,958
$34,256 $6,851.14 51.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III Per Lot 0.20 $23.89 75 $1,792
$1,792 $23.89 0.20TYPE SUBTOTAL
$36,047 51.70TOTALS $7,209.40
A - 99
5.b
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0297TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process a request to revise a previously approved tentative parcel or tract map.
$2,113
$4,125 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$2,113.00
$4,123.67
$(2,010.67)
3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.24%
$(6,032)
$12,371
$6,339
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 100
5.b
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL S-0297
3
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 3 $123
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 3 $471
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 3 $116
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 3 $2,248
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 3 $3,077
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 5.00 $917.40 3 $2,752
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 10.00 $1,194.40 3 $3,583
$12,371 $4,123.58 30.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$12,371 30.50TOTALS $4,123.67
A - 101
5.b
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0301TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process an application for removing 5 or more, 3" or greater diameter trunk, mature trees.
$506
$180
100%
$506.00
$182.50
$323.50
2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 277.26%
$647
$365
$1,012
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 102
5.b
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT S-0301
2
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 2 $77
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.00 $102.56 2 $205
$365 $182.41 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$365 2.00TOTALS $182.50
A - 103
5.b
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0303VARIANCE-REGULAR
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process an application for a variance from the Zoning Code
$322 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery)
$2,724 - All others
$250 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery)
$2,065 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$2,724.00
$2,065.00
$659.00
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 131.91%
$659
$2,065
$2,724
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 104
5.b
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
VARIANCE-REGULAR S-0303
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 1 $314
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 1 $310
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 1 $375
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 1 $1,026
$2,065 $2,064.98 17.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,065 17.50TOTALS $2,065.00
A - 105
5.b
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0304VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process a variance that is submitted as part of another application. This represents the incremental cost of
processing the variance.
$910
$990 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.
100%
$910.00
$991.00
$(81.00)
2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 91.83%
$(162)
$1,982
$1,820
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 106
5.b
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION S-0304
2
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82
C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 2 $628
C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 2 $77
C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 1.00 $187.36 2 $375
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 2 $820
$1,982 $991.22 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,982 7.00TOTALS $991.00
A - 107
5.b
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0306VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To process an application for vesting rights in a tentative map.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost
"Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead and all
other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 108
5.b
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP S-0306
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 109
5.b
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0308ZONING FORM
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To prepare a written verification of zoning at the request of an applicant.
$22
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S-0264.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 110
5.b
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ZONING FORM S-0308
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 111
5.b
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0309ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING
To verify that an applicant for a City business license will be operating in the correct zone for that business.
$37
$55
100%
$37.00
$54.41
$(17.41)
1,800
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 68.00%
$(31,338)
$97,938
$66,600
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 112
5.b
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW S-0309
1,800
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.25 $20.57 1,800 $37,026
C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 0.33 $33.84 1,800 $60,912
$97,938 $54.41 0.58TYPE SUBTOTAL
$97,938 0.58TOTALS $54.41
A - 113
5.b
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0315GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
NACD-PLANNING
To recover a portion of the cost of the periodic update to the City's General Plan which benefits all development
in the City.
None
2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be
reserved for the major general plan updates that are required every 10 to 15 years.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 114
5.b
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE S-0315
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 115
5.b
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0322TECHNOLOGY FEE
DEVLMNT SVCSCD-PLANNING
To recover the cost of upgrading the permit system which is estimated to cost $700,000. This fee will recover the
cost in seven to ten years.
2% of Plan Review & Permit Fees
2% charged against all Development Department Fees
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 116
5.b
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TECHNOLOGY FEE S-0322
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 117
5.b
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0326ARCHIVE FEES
VARIOUSCOMM.DEVELOPMENT
To cover the cost of archiving current development materials.
$1.00 - Per Permit or Application
$2.00/sheet - Plans
$0.25/page - Documents
$1.25 - Per Permit or Application
$3.15/sheet - Plans
$0.35/page - Documents
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 118
5.b
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ARCHIVE FEES S-0326
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 119
5.b
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0441FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW
MAPCD-LAND DEV.
To perform a final map check on a development and record the documents. Includes a Reversion to Acreage as
a single lot Final Map. Confirm conformity with State Subdivision Map Act & City Ordinances.
$2,210 - Base Fee
$55 - Per Lot Fee
$135 - Each additional Review
$404 - Final Map Continuance
$97 - Certificate of Correction per Hour
$5,195 - Base Fee
$275 - Per Lot Fee
$270 - Each additional Review
$0 - Final Map Continuance - Staff recommends deleting as not used.
$185 - Certificate of Correction per Hour
100%
$2,497.00
$5,926.00
$(3,429.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.14%
$(3,429)
$5,926
$2,497
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 120
5.b
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW S-0441
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Base 10.00 $1,834.80 1 $1,835
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 20.00 $2,388.80 1 $2,389
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 10.00 $930.70 1 $931
$5,195 $5,195.43 40.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Per Lot 1.00 $183.48 1 $183
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 1.00 $93.07 1 $93
$277 $276.55 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Per Add'l Review 0.50 $91.74 1 $92
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.50 $179.16 1 $179
$271 $270.90 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Per Hour 1.00 $183.48 1 $183
$183 $183.48 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$5,926 45.50TOTALS $5,926.00
A - 121
5.b
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0445ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK
PLAN SETCD-LAND DEV.
Plan check on-site precise site plans for conformance with City Ordinances for paved parking areas, ADA
accessibility, drainage, NPDES stds, sewer utilities, on-site lighting, wall locations/elevations, trash enclosures
and accessible paths of travel.
2% of engineer's cost estimate for on-site improvements
$3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus
$1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus
$265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost
$605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four
(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)
100%
$134,733.00
$133,868.00
$865.00
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 100.65%
$865
$133,868
$134,733
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 122
5.b
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK S-0445
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Minimum 1.00 $82.26 1 $82
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 1 $367
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 1 $478
$927 $926.98 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 405.25 $74,355.27 1 $74,355
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 490.50 $58,585.32 1 $58,585
$132,941 $132,940.59 895.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$133,868 902.75TOTALS $133,868.00
A - 123
5.b
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0447GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE
CUBIC YARDSCD-LAND DEV.
To review a grading plan for compliance with City Ordinances and State Codes. Review grading bonds if
required. Review drainage and erosion control measures to be used.
Cubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee
51 to 100 - $15.00
101 to 1,000 - $22.50
1,001 to 10,000 - $30.00
10,001 to 100,000 - $30.00 plus $15.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000
100,001 to 200,000 - $165.00 plus $9.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000
200,001 and up - $255.00 plus $4.50 for each 10K CY > 200,000
$390 for all plans with more than 50 Cubic Yards
100%
$160.80
$387.80
$(227.00)
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.46%
$(1,135)
$1,939
$804
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 124
5.b
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE S-0447
5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 5 $206
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 0.75 $137.61 5 $688
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.75 $209.02 5 $1,045
$1,939 $387.76 3.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,939 3.00TOTALS $387.80
A - 125
5.b
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0452REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
CERTIFICATECD-LAND DEV.
To review a lot to determine if it is in conformity with the State Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinances, If it is,
issue a Certificate of Compliance which allows future construction permits on the lot.
$828
$1,370
100%
$828.00
$1,372.00
$(544.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 60.35%
$(544)
$1,372
$828
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 126
5.b
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE S-0452
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 4.00 $733.92 1 $734
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 1 $597
$1,372 $1,372.25 9.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,372 9.50TOTALS $1,372.00
A - 127
5.b
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0453REVIEW-LOT MERGER
APPLICATIONCD-LAND DEV.
To process an application to merge multiple lots into one new lot.
$828
$1,300
100%
$828.00
$1,302.24
$(474.24)
17
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.58%
$(8,062)
$22,138
$14,076
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 128
5.b
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REVIEW-LOT MERGER S-0453
17
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 17 $699
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 17 $6,238
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 2.00 $186.14 17 $3,164
C.DEV-LAND DEV Consultant (6hrs) 0.00 $708.00 17 $12,036
$22,138 $1,302.23 4.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$22,138 4.50TOTALS $1,302.24
A - 129
5.b
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0454REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT
APPLICATIONCD-LAND DEV.
To review the adjustment of the lot line between two parcels.
$414 - SFR Occupancy (#3; $1,242)
$828 - Com'l/Ind'l (#3; $2,484)
$1,590
100%
$621.00
$1,587.83
$(966.83)
6
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.11%
$(5,801)
$9,527
$3,726
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 130
5.b
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT S-0454
6
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 6 $247
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 5.50 $1,009.14 6 $6,055
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.50 $537.48 6 $3,225
$9,527 $1,587.75 10.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$9,527 10.50TOTALS $1,587.83
A - 131
5.b
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0463ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
PROJECTCD-LAND DEV.
To provide field inspecion of on-site improvements including sewers, storm drains, parking areas, accessibility
per ADA requirements, curbs, planters, Water Quality Control Plan features, erosion controls and finish grade.
3% of Estimated Construction Cost
Fee Based on Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost:
$0 to $1 Million - 3.4% of estimated cost with a $1,045 minimum
Greater than $1 MIllion - $34,000 plus 1.7% of the estimated cost over $1 Million
100%
$202,100.00
$216,999.00
$(14,899.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 93.13%
$(14,899)
$216,999
$202,100
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 132
5.b
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION S-0463
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II Minimum 6.00 $531.90 1 $532
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.00 $183.48 1 $183
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 1 $239
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 1.00 $93.07 1 $93
$1,047 $1,047.33 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II 1,471.50 $130,448.48 1 $130,448
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 81.05 $14,871.05 1 $14,871
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 81.75 $9,764.22 1 $9,764
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 654.00 $60,867.78 1 $60,868
$215,952 $215,951.53 2,288.30TYPE SUBTOTAL
$216,999 2,298.30TOTALS $216,999.00
A - 133
5.b
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0467ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION
CD-LAND DEV.
To perform field inspection of on-site grading, erosion control devices and drainage/storm drain features of stand
alone rough grading.
Cubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee
51 to 100 - $150.00
101 to 1,000 - $225.00
1,001 to 10,000 - $300.00
10,001 to 100,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000
100,001 to 200,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000
200,001 and up - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 200,000
Cubic Yards:
1 to 1,000 - $225
1,001 to 10,000 - $340
10,001 to 100,000 - $340 plus $115.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000
100,001 to 200,000 - $1,375 plus $55 for each 10K CY > 100,000
200,001 and up - $1,870 plus $10 for each 10K CY > 200,000
100%
$14,853.00
$17,978.00
$(3,125.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 82.62%
$(3,125)
$17,978
$14,853
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 134
5.b
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION S-0467
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II Minimum 2.00 $177.30 1 $177
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 0.50 $46.54 1 $47
$224 $223.84 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II 114.45 $10,145.99 1 $10,146
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 81.75 $7,608.47 1 $7,608
$17,754 $17,754.46 196.20TYPE SUBTOTAL
$17,978 198.70TOTALS $17,978.00
A - 135
5.b
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0471HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW
STUDYCD-LAND DEV.
To review a hydraulic/hydrology study prepared by a developer's engineer to determine the impact of a
development on the ground water and the storm drainage system.
Actual Time:
$487 - for the first 3 hours
$100 - for each add'l hour
$825
100%
$587.00
$827.00
$(240.00)
50
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.98%
$(12,000)
$41,350
$29,350
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 136
5.b
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW S-0471
50
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 4.00 $733.92 50 $36,696
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 1.00 $93.07 50 $4,654
$41,350 $826.99 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$41,350 5.00TOTALS $827.00
A - 137
5.b
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0472ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG.
STUDYCD-LAND DEV.
To make a finding that a proposed development is not on or near a known fault line.
None
$940
100%
$0.00
$939.00
$(939.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(939)
$939
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 138
5.b
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG.S-0472
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ADMIN SR.MGMT.ANALYST 0.50 $53.60 1 $54
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 1 $367
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 1 $478
$939 $939.45 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$939 7.00TOTALS $939.00
A - 139
5.b
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0480FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW
APPLICATIONCD-STORMWATER MGT
To perform a FEMA plan review of a project located within floodplain designations Zone "A", "AE", or "shaded X".
None
$940 plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$939.50
$(939.50)
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(3,758)
$3,758
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 140
5.b
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW S-0480
4
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ADMIN SR.MGMT.ANALYST 0.50 $53.60 4 $214
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 4 $165
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 4 $1,468
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 4 $1,911
$3,758 $939.45 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,758 7.00TOTALS $939.50
A - 141
5.b
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0481REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN
PLANCD-STRMWTR MGMT
To review the stormwater run-off pollution plan for a project over 1 acre in size to insure that the run-off meets
the requirements of NPDES. To inspect the site during construction to insure that the conditions of the plan are
being met.
$410 - Commercial & Residential Projects (#57; $23,370)
$265 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects (#56; $14,840)
$405 - Commercial & Residential Projects
$615 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects
100%
$338.14
$510.30
$(172.16)
113
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 66.26%
$(19,454)
$57,664
$38,210
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 142
5.b
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN S-0481
113
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ADMIN EXEC.ASSISTANT Com'l/Res'l 0.50 $27.22 57 $1,552
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD 3.00 $338.37 57 $19,287
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 57 $2,344
$23,183 $406.72 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-ADMIN EXEC.ASSISTANT Industrial/Linear 0.50 $27.22 56 $1,524
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD 3.00 $338.37 56 $18,949
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 2.50 $250.15 56 $14,008
$34,481 $615.74 6.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$57,664 10.00TOTALS $510.30
A - 143
5.b
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0488REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS
PLANCD-STRMWTR MGMT
To review the Stormwater Pollution Plan for run-off after a development is completed. This review occurs before
the grading and/or building permits are issued. Includes three plan reviews.
$80 - Non-Categorical (#450; $36,000)
$365 - Categorical without Conditions of Concern (#75; $27,375)
$1,130 - Categorical with Conditions of Concern (#75; $84,750)
$99 - per hour for reviews after the third review (#1; $99)
$155 - Non-Categorical
$1,440 - Categorical
$120 - per hour for reviews after the third review
100%
$246.63
$474.64
$(228.01)
601
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.96%
$(137,033)
$285,257
$148,224
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 144
5.b
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS S-0488
601
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD Non-Categorical 1.00 $112.79 450 $50,756
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 450 $18,509
$69,264 $153.92 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD Categorical 7.00 $789.53 150 $118,430
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 150 $6,170
C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.00 $183.48 150 $27,522
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 150 $35,832
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 2.00 $186.14 150 $27,921
$215,874 $1,439.16 12.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.00 $119.44 1 $119
$119 $119.44 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$285,257 15.00TOTALS $474.64
A - 145
5.b
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0489REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN
PLANCD-WSTWTR MGMT
To review the erosion and waste management control plan for a construction site.
$75
$180
100%
$75.00
$182.33
$(107.33)
55
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.13%
$(5,903)
$10,028
$4,125
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 146
5.b
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN S-0489
55
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 1.00 $100.06 55 $5,503
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 1.00 $82.26 55 $4,524
$10,028 $182.32 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$10,028 2.00TOTALS $182.33
A - 147
5.b
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0490NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
SITECD-STRMWTR MGT
To inspect a construction site to mitigate hazardous run-off.
$98 - Less than 10 Acres (#200; $19,600)
$179 - 10 Acres or More (#4; $716)
$140
100%
$99.59
$141.19
$(41.60)
204
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.53%
$(8,487)
$28,803
$20,316
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 148
5.b
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION S-0490
204
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 1.00 $100.06 204 $20,412
C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 204 $8,391
$28,803 $141.19 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$28,803 1.50TOTALS $141.19
A - 149
5.b
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0495NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION
BUSINESSCD-STRMWTR MGMT
To review a business for hazardous discharge into the sewer or storm drainage system.
$143
$175
100%
$143.00
$175.11
$(32.11)
221
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 81.66%
$(7,096)
$38,699
$31,603
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 150
5.b
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION S-0495
221
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 1.75 $175.11 221 $38,699
$38,699 $175.11 1.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$38,699 1.75TOTALS $175.11
A - 151
5.b
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0501BASIC PERMIT FEE
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
See note in "Suggested Fee" below
$45.00 - Engineering Permit
$53.00 - Blanket Permit
$43.00 - Permit Extension
Engineering Permit - This fee is included with each permit so it does not need to be charged separately and should
be deleted
Blanket Permit - covered by S-0523, so this fee should be deleted
Permit Extension - covered by S-0560, so this fee should be deleted
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 152
5.b
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BASIC PERMIT FEE S-0501
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 153
5.b
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0503PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
To review a request for a permanent encroachment into the public right-of-way.
$670.00 - Initial Permit ($625 for the encroachment permit and $45 for the basic permit - both to be combined
into one fee.)
$150.00 - Annual Renewal
$1,515 - Initial Permit
$340 - Annual Renewal
100%
$670.00
$1,514.80
$(844.80)
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 44.23%
$(4,224)
$7,574
$3,350
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 154
5.b
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S-0503
5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 3.00 $711.78 5 $3,559
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 5 $531
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 1.00 $131.28 5 $656
PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR 5.00 $565.65 5 $2,828
$7,574 $1,514.81 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$7,574 10.00TOTALS $1,514.80
A - 155
5.b
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0505TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
To process a request for a temporary encroachment into the public right-of-way.
$25.00 - No Lane Closure (#100; $2,500)
$136.00 - Lane Closure: First Day (#2,400; $326,400)
$60.00 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day (#9,600; $576,000)
$70.00 - Trash Bin, 1st week
$28.00 - Trash Bin, each add'l week
$160 - No Lane Closure - Parking Only
$175 - Lane Closure: First Day
$25 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day
$100 - Trash Bin, 1st week
$25 - Trash Bin, each add'l week
100%
$74.78
$57.27
$17.51
12,102
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 130.57%
$211,865
$693,133
$904,998
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 156
5.b
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S-0505
12,102
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 0.50 $53.05 100 $5,305
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 0.25 $32.82 100 $3,282
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Parking Only 0.75 $73.06 100 $7,306
$15,893 $158.93 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 0.50 $53.05 2,400 $127,320
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Lane Closure-1st Day 0.75 $73.06 2,400 $175,344
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 0.33 $49.90 2,400 $119,760
$422,424 $176.01 1.58TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Closure-Ea.Add'l Day 0.25 $26.53 9,600 $254,688
$254,688 $26.53 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 0.50 $53.05 1 $53
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Trash Bin-1st Week 0.50 $48.71 1 $49
$102 $101.76 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Tr.Bin-Add'l Wk. 0.25 $26.53 1 $27
$27 $26.53 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$693,133 4.58TOTALS $57.27
A - 157
5.b
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0507LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
See note in "Suggested Fee" below
$286.00
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the
excavation permit.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 158
5.b
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION S-0507
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 159
5.b
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0509SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
To process a request to hold a special event in the public right-of-way.
$545.00 - With a Lane Closure (#4; $2,180)
$559.00 - With a Street Closure (#8; $4,472)
$347.00 - With a Road Closure (1st day) **
$302.00 - Each Additional Day of a Street/Road Closure (#4, $1,208)
(**Note: Staff recomends combining the fees for a street and a road as they take the same effort. Also, each of
the above fees, except the "additional day" fee, include the $45 basic fee from S-0501.)
$925 - Lane Closure
$1,495 - Street/Road Closure, 1st day
$1,040 - Street/Road Closure, each add''l day
100%
$491.25
$1,238.25
$(747.00)
16
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.67%
$(11,952)
$19,812
$7,860
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 160
5.b
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT S-0509
16
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Lane 0.75 $73.06 4 $292
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC 6.00 $852.12 4 $3,408
$3,701 $925.18 6.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 0.10 $23.73 8 $190
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Street/Road 0.75 $73.06 8 $584
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC 6.00 $852.12 8 $6,817
PW-GAS TX-ST.MTC MAINTENANCE WORKER I 8.00 $544.32 8 $4,355
$11,946 $1,493.23 14.85TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC Add'l Days 3.50 $497.07 4 $1,988
PW-GAS TX-ST.MTC MAINTENANCE WORKER I 8.00 $544.32 4 $2,177
$4,166 $1,041.39 11.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$19,812 33.10TOTALS $1,238.25
A - 161
5.b
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0511OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
To process a permit for an oversize/overload transport through the City. This fee is controlled by the State.
$17.00 - One Day (State-Mandated Fee is $16) (#997; $16,949)
$95.00 - Annual Permit (State-Mandated Fee is $90) (#3; $285)
$16 - One Day Permit
$90 - Annual Permit
(Note: City may only charge the State-Mandated fee. There is no provision for a technology surcharge.)
100%
$17.23
$32.15
$(14.92)
1,000
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 53.60%
$(14,916)
$32,150
$17,234
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 162
5.b
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT S-0511
1,000
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 0.33 $32.15 1,000 $32,150
$32,150 $32.15 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL
$32,150 0.33TOTALS $32.15
A - 163
5.b
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0513HAULING PERMIT
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
To process a request to haul construction supplies/debris either into or out of the City.
$438.00 - First Day (#8; $3,504) (Includes S-501 Basic Fee)
$100.00 - Each Additional Day (#32; $3,200)
$650 - First Day
$285 - Each Additional Day
100%
$167.60
$357.30
$(189.70)
40
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 46.91%
$(7,588)
$14,292
$6,704
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 164
5.b
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
HAULING PERMIT S-0513
40
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 1st Day 0.75 $73.06 8 $584
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1.00 $151.20 8 $1,210
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC 3.00 $426.06 8 $3,408
$5,203 $650.32 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC Add'l Day 2.00 $284.04 32 $9,089
$9,089 $284.04 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$14,292 6.75TOTALS $357.30
A - 165
5.b
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0515EXCAVATION PERMIT
PERMITPW-ENGINEERING
See note in "Suggested Fee" below
$150.00 - Per day
Staff Recommends Deleting This Service
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 166
5.b
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
EXCAVATION PERMIT S-0515
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 167
5.b
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0517TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT
REPORTPW-ENGINEERING
To review a developer's traffic study to ensure compliance with City standards.
$719.00 - Basic Review (#10; $7,190)
$80.00 - Extended Review per Hour (#0; $0)
Actual Consultant charge (currently $1,440 for a basic review) plus 10% overhead for City contract administration
and review.
100%
$719.00
$1,591.20
$(872.20)
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.19%
$(8,722)
$15,912
$7,190
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 168
5.b
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT S-0517
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1.00 $151.20 10 $1,512
PW-TRAFFIC ENG Consultant 0.00 $1,440.00 10 $14,400
$15,912 $1,591.20 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$15,912 1.00TOTALS $1,591.20
A - 169
5.b
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0518OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK
SHEETPW-ENGINEERING
To review grading plans for off-site improvements. Three plan checks are included with the original off-site
improvement plan check. Fourth and subsequent plan checks are charged an additional plan check fee.
$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost with a $50 minimum
$3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus
$1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus
$265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost
$605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four
(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)
100%
$2,114.40
$2,251.74
$(137.34)
152
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 93.90%
$(20,876)
$342,265
$321,389
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 170
5.b
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK S-0518
152
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1st Sheet 16.00 $2,429.28 50 $121,464
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 1.00 $97.41 50 $4,871
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 7.00 $1,058.40 50 $52,920
$179,255 $3,585.09 24.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Add'l Sheet 7.00 $1,062.81 100 $106,281
PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 3.00 $453.60 100 $45,360
$151,641 $1,516.41 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Over $25K 2.50 $265.25 40 $10,610
$10,610 $265.25 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Add'l P.Ck.-Min. 4.00 $607.32 1 $607
$607 $607.32 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Ea.Add'l Hour 1.00 $151.83 1 $152
$152 $151.83 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$342,265 41.50TOTALS $2,251.74
A - 171
5.b
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0520REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS
REVIEWPW-ENGINEERING
To review changes to approved plans due to changes to conditions or other reasons.
$137.00
$210 for the 1st hour plus $150 for each additional hour
100%
$137.00
$211.20
$(74.20)
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 64.87%
$(371)
$1,056
$685
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 172
5.b
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS S-0520
5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 0.25 $59.32 5 $297
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1.00 $151.83 5 $759
$1,056 $211.15 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,056 1.25TOTALS $211.20
A - 173
5.b
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0521OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION
PROJECTPW-ENGINEERING
To inspect off-site construction to insure that it complies with the City's standards & conditions as well as the
approved plans, if applicable.
$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost
$240 - Driveway & Sidewalk Replacement
Other Fees based on Estimated Construction Cost:
$0 to $175,000 - $630 plus 12.4% of the Cost over $15,000
$175,001 to $750,000 - $20,470 plus 3.4% of the Cost over $175,000
Greater than $750,000 - $40,020 plus 1.1% of the Cost over $750,000
100%
$1,566.67
$1,599.80
$(33.13)
120
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 97.93%
$(3,976)
$191,976
$188,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 174
5.b
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION S-0521
120
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 20 $2,122
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 0.25 $37.96 20 $759
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Basic D/W, S/W Repl. 1.00 $97.41 20 $1,948
$4,829 $241.47 2.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 5.00 $530.50 60 $31,830
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Base 1.00 $97.41 60 $5,845
$37,675 $627.91 6.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 20.41 $2,165.10 40 $86,604
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 8.18 $1,073.21 40 $42,928
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 2.00 $303.66 40 $12,146
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 2.00 $194.82 40 $7,793
$149,472 $3,736.79 32.58TYPE SUBTOTAL
$191,976 40.83TOTALS $1,599.80
A - 175
5.b
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0523ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT
LOCATIONPW-ENGINEERING
To issue an annual blanket permit to utilities in advance of emergency work to avoid delaying the work. To
inspect the work as it occurs. The cost of the permit and inspection are deducted from an initial deposit as
required.
$53.00 - Permit Issuance (#7; $371)
$73.00 - Inspection Per Location (#7; $511)
$130 for the initial blanket permit annually plus $105 per day for inspection per location after the first day/location
deducted from an initial annual deposit of $5,500. Deposit balance can be carried forward to a new year but a new
initial blanket permit is required and the deposit balance must be restored to $5,500.
100%
$63.00
$118.14
$(55.14)
14
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 53.33%
$(772)
$1,654
$882
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 176
5.b
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT S-0523
14
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Blanket Permit 0.25 $32.82 7 $230
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 1.00 $97.41 7 $682
$912 $130.23 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Per Day Per Location 1.00 $106.10 7 $743
$743 $106.10 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,654 2.25TOTALS $118.14
A - 177
5.b
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0529BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW
BONDPW-ENGINEERING
To perform an inspection to confirm that all issues covered by the bond are satisfied so that the City can release
the bond.
$45.00 - Issuance
$59.00 - Inspection
$230
100%
$104.00
$230.80
$(126.80)
5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.06%
$(634)
$1,154
$520
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 178
5.b
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW S-0529
5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 5 $531
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 0.50 $75.92 5 $380
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 0.50 $48.71 5 $244
$1,154 $230.73 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,154 2.00TOTALS $230.80
A - 179
5.b
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0531STREET NAME CHANGE
NAMEPW-REAL PROPERY
To change the name of a street at the request of a private party or group.
$1,345.00 Plus the Cost of Street Signs
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs, including new street signage, charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 180
5.b
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
STREET NAME CHANGE S-0531
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 181
5.b
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0533STREET/ALLEY VACATION
VACATIONPW-REAL PROPERTY
To process a request to terminate the City's interest (easement) in an alley or street.
$1,000.00 - Deposit
$1,000.00 - Balance Due Prior to Processing
$1,840 plus a deposit for noticing and publishing determined by staff
100%
$1,000.00
$1,842.50
$(842.50)
2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 54.27%
$(1,685)
$3,685
$2,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 182
5.b
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
STREET/ALLEY VACATION S-0533
2
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 3.00 $711.78 2 $1,424
PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR 4.00 $452.52 2 $905
PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP SPE 8.00 $678.00 2 $1,356
$3,685 $1,842.30 15.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,685 15.00TOTALS $1,842.50
A - 183
5.b
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0535DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
EACHPW-REAL PROPERTY
To legally accept the ownership of property (right-of-way) at the request of a private party.
$315.00 - If Legal and Map are Provided (#10; $3,150)
$800.00 - If City Prepares Legal & Map
If Legal and Map are Provided - $920
If City Prepares Legal & Map - Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant
costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
100%
$315.00
$921.20
$(606.20)
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 34.19%
$(6,062)
$9,212
$3,150
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 184
5.b
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY S-0535
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 1.50 $355.89 10 $3,559
PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR 2.00 $226.26 10 $2,263
PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP SPE 4.00 $339.00 10 $3,390
$9,212 $921.15 7.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$9,212 7.50TOTALS $921.20
A - 185
5.b
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0537PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST
REQUESTPW-REAL PROPERTY
To process the request of a private party to annex their property to the City.
$14,750.00
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $17,000.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 186
5.b
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST S-0537
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 187
5.b
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0539CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING
LEASEPW-REAL PROPERTY
To process a City property lease.
$2,100.00
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $5,500.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 188
5.b
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING S-0539
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 189
5.b
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0542ENGINEERING LETTER
LETTERPW-ENGINEERING
See note in "Suggested Fee" below
$100.00
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 190
5.b
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ENGINEERING LETTER S-0542
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 191
5.b
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0560PERMIT EXTENSION
REQUESTPW-ENGINEERING
To review a request for a permit extension to determine if there are reasons to deny it.
$43.00
$80 each
100%
$43.00
$81.53
$(38.53)
200
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 52.74%
$(7,706)
$16,306
$8,600
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 192
5.b
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PERMIT EXTENSION S-0560
200
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 0.25 $32.82 200 $6,564
PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 0.50 $48.71 200 $9,742
$16,306 $81.53 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$16,306 0.75TOTALS $81.53
A - 193
5.b
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0565RE-INSPECTION
HOURPW-ENGINEERING
To re-inspect due to failure to have work ready on the initial inspection or because more inspections were
required than covered by the initial permit. This inspection is during normal working hours.
$90 ($45 permit fee + $45 reinspection fee)
$105 per hour with a one-hour minimum
100%
$90.00
$106.00
$(16.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 84.91%
$(16)
$106
$90
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 194
5.b
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
RE-INSPECTION S-0565
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 1 $106
$106 $106.10 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$106 1.00TOTALS $106.00
A - 195
5.b
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0567AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION
INSPECTIONPW-ENGINEERING
To perform an inspection at the request of a developer outside of normal working hours.
$369.00 - 4 hr. minimum
$92.45 - each additional hour
Employee's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead with a four (4) hour minimum
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 196
5.b
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION S-0567
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 197
5.b
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0571ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST.
DISTRICTPW-ENGINEERING
To perform the legal requirements to establish an assessment district or a Community Facilities District usually in
a new development at the request of the developer.
$5,900
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract
administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 198
5.b
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST.S-0571
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 199
5.b
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0602CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT
PERMITPOLICE
To process a request to authorize carrying a concealed weapon.
$400 - Initial
$325 - Renewal
The general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only
issues permits to retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is not
being used.
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 200
5.b
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT S-0602
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 201
5.b
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0609RECORDS CHECK LETTER
LETTERPOLICE
To prepare a one-page document on departmental letterhead that gives the result of researching local records.
$25 - With Record
$20 - Without Record
$40
100%
$25.00
$42.00
$(17.00)
10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 59.52%
$(170)
$420
$250
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 202
5.b
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
RECORDS CHECK LETTER S-0609
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POL-RECORDS LIEUTENANT 0.08 $22.37 10 $224
POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS TECH .II 0.32 $19.62 10 $196
$420 $41.99 0.40TYPE SUBTOTAL
$420 0.40TOTALS $42.00
A - 203
5.b
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-06112ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION
LICENSEPOLICE
To process an application for the DOJ Secondhand Dealer and Pawnbroker Unit which conducts a background
check and provides the City with the background check results and a license number. A renewal updates the
information.
$475 - Initial (#1; $475)
$126 - Renewal (#3; $378)
$480 - Initial
$135 - Renewal
100%
$213.25
$222.25
$(9.00)
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 95.95%
$(36)
$889
$853
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 204
5.b
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION S-0611
4
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POL-RECORDS LIEUTENANT 0.25 $69.90 1 $70
POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS SUPVSR Initial 1.25 $110.71 1 $111
POL-RECORDS Init.DOJ Bkgrnd,Ck 0.00 $300.00 1 $300
$481 $480.61 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
POL-RECORDS LIEUTENANT 0.17 $47.53 3 $143
POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS SUPVSR Renewal 1.00 $88.57 3 $266
$408 $136.10 1.17TYPE SUBTOTAL
$889 2.67TOTALS $222.25
A - 205
5.b
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0613LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING
PERSONPOLICE
To roll a set of fingerprints using the digital "Live Scan" equipment instead of the "old" ink on cards. Service is
provided to the public on Wednesday from 1 to 5 PM.
$2 - Live Scan Processing Fee (Note: Staff is charging $15 plus the DOJ fee.)
$15 - Fingerprint card
(Note: Applicants for City jobs are not charged the Live Scan fee or the DOJ fee.)
$20 plus applicable DOJ/FBI fee (currently $33)
100%
$15.00
$20.23
$(5.23)
230
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 74.15%
$(1,203)
$4,653
$3,450
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 206
5.b
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING S-0613
230
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS TECH .II 0.33 $20.23 230 $4,653
$4,653 $20.23 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL
$4,653 0.33TOTALS $20.23
A - 207
5.b
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0616FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF
TICKETPOLICE
To review vehicle repairs when a ticket has been issued to the vehicle owner for a problem such as defective
lights.
$20
$25
100%
$20.00
$24.08
$(4.08)
100
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 83.06%
$(408)
$2,408
$2,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 208
5.b
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF S-0616
100
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POL-TRAFFIC POLICE OFFICER 0.17 $24.08 100 $2,408
$2,408 $24.08 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,408 0.17TOTALS $24.08
A - 209
5.b
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0618SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE
HOURPOLICE
To provide City Police Officers on overtime at the request of a special event.
Officer's hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus Medicare and Workers' Comp. Insurance
Officer's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead with a four (4) hour minimum
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 210
5.b
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE S-0618
0
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 211
5.b
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0621ALARM SYSTEM
VARIOUSPOLICE
To encourage the proper maintenance of alarm systems by charging the alarm owner for wasted police time
spent responding to false alarms.
$25/$50/$10 - Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income Resident)
$25 - Alarm Sys.Installation
$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.
False Alarms in 12-month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or panic: Reg./LIR]:
[$75/$10]/[$200/$20] - 1st thru 4th Non-Permitted
[$90/$10]/[$250/$20] - 5th & 6th
[$90/$20]/[$300/$40] - 7th thru 9th
[$175/$20]/[$350/$40] - 10th & Subsequent
$96 - Annual Alarm Permit ($75-City plus $21-Alarm Vendor)
$25 - Alarm Sys.Installation
$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.
False Alarm Charge:
$256 - All False Alarms without a Permit ($200-City plus $56-Alarm Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12
month period with a Permit.
(Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial response or between intrusion and panic/robbery
response.)
100%
$52.24
$117.82
$(65.58)
4,573
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 44.34%
$(299,920)
$538,810
$238,890
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 212
5.b
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ALARM SYSTEM S-0621
4,573
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POL-ADMIN ADMIN ANALYST II 0.02 $1.84 4,573 $8,414
POL-ADMIN 3rd Party Admin. 0.00 $3.78 4,573 $17,286
POL-PTRL.FLD.SVCS POLICE OFFICER Two For 15 Min. Avg. 0.50 $76.36 4,573 $349,194
POL-DISPATCH PD DISPATCHER II 0.17 $15.27 4,573 $69,830
$444,724 $97.25 0.69TYPE SUBTOTAL
POL-ADMIN ADMIN ANALYST II Administration 0.11 $11.59 5,072 $58,784
POL-ADMIN 3rd Party Admin. 0.00 $6.96 5,072 $35,301
$94,086 $18.55 0.11TYPE SUBTOTAL
$538,810 0.80TOTALS $117.82
A - 213
5.b
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0640ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
VARIOUSPOLICE-ANIMAL CONT'L
To protect public health by requiring rabies vaccinations of dogs. To remove dead animals that could be infected.
To care for animals that are brought to the animal shelter until adopted or reclaimed.
Various Fees to cover licensing, boarding and miscellaneous services
To recognize the Public Health importance of animal control, we suggest that 50% of the cost should come from
the general taxpayer. The Police Department has prepared a study that will move the City in that direction.
50%
$123.04
$703.93
$(580.89)
5,000
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.48%
$(2,904,454)
$3,519,650
$615,196
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 214
5.b
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES S-0640
5,000
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POL-AN.CTRL-ADM A/S KENNEL SUPVSR 0.33 $29.62 5,000 $148,100
POL-AN.CTRL-ADM A/S OFFICE SUPVSR 0.33 $29.62 5,000 $148,100
POL-AN.CTRL-ADM SR.CUST.SVC.REP/DSPTCH 1.31 $121.04 5,000 $605,200
POL-AN.CTRL-ADM A/S ATTENDANT 2.62 $227.70 5,000 $1,138,500
POL-AN.CTRL-ADM SR.OFFICE ASSIST. 0.33 $26.92 5,000 $134,600
POL-AN.CTRL-ADM OVERTIME 0.05 $1.78 5,000 $8,900
POL-AN.CTRL-ADM PART TIME SALARIES 1.60 $45.94 5,000 $229,700
POL-AN.CTRL-FLD.SV.ANIMAL CTRL OFFICER 2.62 $192.85 5,000 $964,250
POL-AN.CTRL-FLD.SV.PART TIME SALARIES 1.60 $28.46 5,000 $142,300
$3,519,650 $703.93 10.77TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,519,650 10.77TOTALS $703.93
A - 215
5.b
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0655BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION
SFD RENTALCD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
To perform an exterior property maintenance inspection every two years of all single family rental properties to
insure that the property is properly maintained.
$100 per owner of SFR rentals
$180 per SFR rental
Staff recommends increasing the inspections to every year and including an interior inspection.
100%
$100.00
$181.10
$(81.10)
1,030
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.22%
$(83,533)
$186,533
$103,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 216
5.b
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION S-0655
1,030
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR 0.25 $42.24 1,030 $43,507
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III Annualized Cost 1.00 $105.79 1,030 $108,964
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.50 $33.07 1,030 $34,062
$186,533 $181.10 1.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$186,533 1.75TOTALS $181.10
A - 217
5.b
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0657NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE
NOTICECD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
To process the release of a Notice of Pendency that was previously filed with the property's deed to guarantee
payment of a judgement against the property. The Notice makes it impossible to sell the property or get a
mortgage on it.
$180 for the first four units
$180 base fee plus $7.45 for each unit inspected (over four)
$165 plus $8.50 for any unit over four
100%
$180.37
$164.98
$15.39
100
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 109.33%
$1,539
$16,498
$18,037
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 218
5.b
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE S-0657
100
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR Base 0.25 $42.24 100 $4,224
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III 1.00 $105.79 100 $10,579
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.25 $16.53 100 $1,653
$16,456 $164.56 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III Add'l Units 0.08 $8.46 5 $42
$42 $8.46 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL
$16,498 1.58TOTALS $164.98
A - 219
5.b
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0659ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE
LIENCD-CODE ENFORCMENT
To include the cost to initially process a lien against property that has failed to comply with a demand to abate a
code violation and the cost to release the lien. This charge would be payable before release.
$115 per lien
$130 per lien
100%
$115.00
$132.25
$(17.25)
48
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 86.96%
$(828)
$6,348
$5,520
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 220
5.b
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE S-0659
48
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 2.00 $132.26 48 $6,348
$6,348 $132.26 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$6,348 2.00TOTALS $132.25
A - 221
5.b
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0662LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE
LETTERCD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
To respond to a request for a demand letter regarding the status or release of a lien and/or abatement costs
imposed.
$95
$185
100%
$95.00
$185.49
$(90.49)
565
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.22%
$(51,127)
$104,802
$53,675
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 222
5.b
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE S-0662
565
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR 1.00 $168.96 565 $95,462
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.25 $16.53 565 $9,339
$104,802 $185.49 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$104,802 1.25TOTALS $185.49
A - 223
5.b
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0664DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE
LIEN RELEASECD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
To prepare a duplicate release of a lien at the request of the property owner due to the loss of the original
release.
$28
$15
100%
$28.00
$16.53
$11.47
30
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 169.35%
$344
$496
$840
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 224
5.b
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE S-0664
30
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.25 $16.53 30 $496
$496 $16.53 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$496 0.25TOTALS $16.53
A - 225
5.b
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-0666WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
LOTCD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
To recover the full cost of weed abatement on lots and partial lots where the owner has failed to abate the weeds
prior to the City's deadline. Process involves multiple inspections & noticing. Preparation of Lien Resolution and
the discing of lot.
$375 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing
$515 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing
100%
$375.00
$513.00
$(138.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 73.10%
$(138)
$513
$375
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 226
5.b
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES S-0666
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR 0.50 $84.48 1 $84
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III 2.00 $211.58 1 $212
C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF WEED ABATE.COORD 2.00 $216.80 1 $217
$513 $512.86 4.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$513 4.50TOTALS $513.00
A - 227
5.b
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6000AQUATICS SERVICES
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION
Providing a 10 week summer session to the community at the various community pools. Pools are also available
for rental by the schools for 3 weeks before that.
See Appendix C
In addition, the City has received $39,750 from a Kaiser Grant.
See Appendix C
25%
$94,350.00
$702,761.00
$(608,411.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 13.43%
$(608,411)
$702,761
$94,350
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 228
5.b
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
AQUATICS SERVICES S-6000
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-ADMIN COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR 40% Of Mitch 654.00 $96,281.88 1 $96,282
PR+C-AQUATICS PART TIME SALARIES $181,866 18,000.00 $441,540.00 1 $441,540
PR+C-AQUATICS Supplies/Op Exp 0.00 $59,050.00 1 $59,050
PR+C-AQUATICS Prof Svcs 0.00 $35,800.00 1 $35,800
PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 70% 1,144.50 $70,089.18 1 $70,089
$702,761 $702,761.06 19,798.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$702,761 19,798.50TOTALS $702,761.00
A - 229
5.b
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6060YOUTH SPORTS
PARTICIPANT Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION
Providing youth sports to the community.
Resident - $30 per child
Non-Resident - $33 per child
Resident - $45 per child
Non-Resident - $50 per child
75%
$29.63
$98.07
$(68.44)
363
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 30.21%
$(24,843)
$35,599
$10,756
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 230
5.b
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
YOUTH SPORTS S-6060
363
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-YOUTH SPORTS PART TIME SALARIES $23,912 5.27 $71.90 363 $26,100
PR+C-YOUTH SPORTS Supplies & Equipment 0.00 $26.17 363 $9,500
$35,599 $98.07 5.27TYPE SUBTOTAL
$35,599 5.27TOTALS $98.07
A - 231
5.b
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6070ADULT SPORTS
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION
Providing adult sports programs to the community.
Soccer:
Resident - $300 per team
Non-Resident Team - $350 per team
Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost
Soccer:
Resident - $375 per team
Non-Resident Team - $425 per team
Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost
45%
$21,460.00
$89,215.00
$(67,755.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 24.05%
$(67,755)
$89,215
$21,460
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 232
5.b
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ADULT SPORTS S-6070
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-SPORTS PART TIME SALARIES $15,516 1,000.00 $49,990.00 1 $49,990
PR+C-SPORTS Suppl/Print/Prof Svc 0.00 $19,200.00 1 $19,200
PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 20% 327.00 $20,025.48 1 $20,025
$89,215 $89,215.48 1,327.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$89,215 1,327.00TOTALS $89,215.00
A - 233
5.b
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6100COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION
Providing Community Center programs and rental of Community Center facilities.
Se Appendix C
See Appendix C
2%
$13,000.00
$3,819,489.00
$(3,806,489.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.34%
$(3,806,489)
$3,819,489
$13,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 234
5.b
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS S-6100
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-ADMIN COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR 45% Of Cynthia 735.75 $108,317.12 1 $108,317
PR+C-ADMIN Building Expenses 0.00 $1,764,000.00 1 $1,764,000
PR+C REC/CMTY PROG COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 100% Of 4 6,540.00 $417,448.20 1 $417,448
PR+C REC/CMTY PROG COMM SVCS CENTER SUPERVIS 100% 1,635.00 $155,063.40 1 $155,063
PR+C REC/CMTY PROG PART TIME SALARIES $265,565 22,000.00 $654,280.00 1 $654,280
PR+C REC/CMTY PROG Facility Maint/Repl 0.00 $709,879.86 1 $709,880
PR+C REC/CMTY PROG Prof/Contract Svcs 0.00 $10,500.00 1 $10,500
$3,819,489 $3,819,488.58 30,910.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,819,489 30,910.75TOTALS $3,819,489.00
A - 235
5.b
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6130BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION
Maintenance and rentals of ballfields to the community.
Reservation - $10 per hour for first hour and $5 per hour thereafter
Tournament Use:
$120 per field per day without lights
$180 per field per day with lights
Preparation - $25 per field upon request
Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $10 per hour thereafter
Local Sports Groups do not pay for use of the fields or lights.
Reservation - $10 per hour
Tournament Use - $120 per field per day
Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $15 per hour thereafter
Preparation - determined by the needs of the event
Local Sports Groups:
Field Use - No Charge
Lighting - No Charge
10%
$9,500.00
$261,502.00
$(252,002.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 3.63%
$(252,002)
$261,502
$9,500
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 236
5.b
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE S-6130
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-ADMIN COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR 25% Of Mitch 408.75 $60,176.18 1 $60,176
PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR I 6 Wk/Yr Of 1 196.20 $20,952.20 1 $20,952
PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II 3 Wk/Yr Of 1 229.92 $25,518.82 1 $25,519
PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK MAINT SUPERVISO 2 Months/Year 272.55 $34,248.63 1 $34,249
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 2 Mo/Yr Of 2 545.45 $31,843.37 1 $31,843
PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 10% 163.50 $10,012.74 1 $10,013
PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.PART TIME SALARIES $15,515 1,000.00 $39,150.00 1 $39,150
PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.Suppl/Rental/Prof 0.00 $39,600.00 1 $39,600
$261,502 $261,501.94 2,816.37TYPE SUBTOTAL
$261,502 2,816.37TOTALS $261,502.00
A - 237
5.b
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6700LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT
CARD Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY
Processing the replacement of a lost library card.
$1 per card
$1 per card (Staff Recommendation)
50%
$1.00
$4.70
$(3.70)
4,000
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 21.28%
$(14,800)
$18,800
$4,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 238
5.b
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT S-6700
4,000
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS PART TIME SALARIES 0.08 $4.70 4,000 $18,800
$18,800 $4.70 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL
$18,800 0.08TOTALS $4.70
A - 239
5.b
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6710INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST
ITEM Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY
Processinga request to borrow a library item from another library.
$3 per item
$3 per item
1%
$0.77
$235.26
$(234.49)
175
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.33%
$(41,036)
$41,171
$135
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 240
5.b
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST S-6710
175
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS LIBRARIAN II Loaned Out 2.00 $235.26 130 $30,584
$30,584 $235.26 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS LIBRARIAN II Received In 2.00 $235.26 45 $10,587
$10,587 $235.26 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$41,171 4.00TOTALS $235.26
A - 241
5.b
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6720LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE
REQUEST Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY
Providing library research services, primarily obituaries, on request
$20 per hour
$20 per hour
22%
$20.00
$99.00
$(79.00)
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 20.20%
$(316)
$396
$80
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 242
5.b
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE S-6720
4
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN 0.75 $98.90 4 $396
$396 $98.90 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL
$396 0.75TOTALS $99.00
A - 243
5.b
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6730REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS
ITEM Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY
Processing and prelacing lost and damaged library materials.
Lost Items:
Magazines - $1 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost
Other items - $5 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost
Damaged Items - $3-$5
Missing Barcode - $1
Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $5
Lost Items:
Magazines - $5 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost
Other items - $10 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost
Damaged Items - $3-$5
Missing Barcode - $10
Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $10
35%
$5.00
$28.24
$(23.24)
25
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.71%
$(581)
$706
$125
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 244
5.b
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS S-6730
25
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
LIB-SUPPORT SERVICESLIBRARY TECHNICIAN II 0.17 $13.57 25 $339
LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS PART TIME SALARIES 0.25 $14.68 25 $367
$706 $28.25 0.42TYPE SUBTOTAL
$706 0.42TOTALS $28.24
A - 245
5.b
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-6740LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL
RENTAL Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY
Rental of meetings rooms at the Library.
Bing Wong Auditorium - $25 per hour (4 hour minimum)
Kellogg Room A or B - $25 per hour for each
Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID)
Projector - $5 per day
VCR and Monitor - $10 per day
Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30
Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour
Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit)
Bing Wong Auditorium: Non-Profit - $25/hr For Profit - $50/hr (4 hr min)
Kellogg Room A or B - Non-Profit - $25/hr for each For Profit - $50/hr for each
Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID)
Projector - $5 per day
VCR and Monitor - $10 per day
Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30
Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour
Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit)
100%
$21.74
$149.42
$(127.68)
242
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 14.55%
$(30,900)
$36,160
$5,260
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 246
5.b
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL S-6740
242
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
LIB-ADMINISTRATION LIBRARY ADMIN TECH/WEBMAS 0.17 $19.15 242 $4,634
LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS Facility Replacement 0.00 $84.42 242 $20,430
LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS Facility Maintenance 0.00 $45.85 242 $11,096
$36,160 $149.42 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL
$36,160 0.17TOTALS $149.42
A - 247
5.b
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7000CEMETERY INTERMENT
INTERMENT Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY
Interment of a casket or urn at the Cemetery.
Adult: Single - $600 Double - $850
Child: Single - $350 Double - $650
Baby - $150
Cremation - $200
For many sites, the City has a contractual obligation to provide the interment at the fee that was in place when
the contract was signed.
Single - $2,295
Double - $2,590
Cremation - $915
100%
$501.61
$1,826.29
$(1,324.68)
31
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 27.47%
$(41,065)
$56,615
$15,550
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 248
5.b
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CEMETERY INTERMENT S-7000
31
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II Single 4.00 $443.96 12 $5,328
PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR Single 7.00 $825.86 12 $9,910
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Single 4.00 $233.52 12 $2,802
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 7.25 $614.15 12 $7,370
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Single 7.00 $174.72 12 $2,097
$27,507 $2,292.21 29.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II Double 4.50 $499.46 7 $3,496
PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR Double 8.50 $1,002.83 7 $7,020
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Double 4.50 $262.71 7 $1,839
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 7.25 $614.15 7 $4,299
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Double 8.50 $212.16 7 $1,485
$18,139 $2,591.31 33.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Cremation 3.00 $175.14 12 $2,102
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 7.25 $614.15 12 $7,370
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Cremation 5.00 $124.80 12 $1,498
$10,969 $914.09 15.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$56,615 77.75TOTALS $1,826.29
A - 249
5.b
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7010CEMETERY DISINTERMENT
DISNTERMENT Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY
Disinterment of a casket or urn on request.
Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) -$1,500
Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $1,200
Baby/Child Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $800
Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) - $5,545
Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $3,820
100%
$1,200.00
$3,822.00
$(2,622.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 31.40%
$(2,622)
$3,822
$1,200
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 250
5.b
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CEMETERY DISINTERMENT S-7010
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II 6.00 $665.94 1 $666
PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR 6.00 $707.88 1 $708
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 6.00 $350.28 1 $350
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 23.00 $1,948.33 1 $1,948
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES 6.00 $149.76 1 $150
$3,822 $3,822.19 47.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,822 47.00TOTALS $3,822.00
A - 251
5.b
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7020CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS
MARKER Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY
Installation of grave marker settings.
Single - $140
Double - $200
Marker Inscription:
4 digits - $50
Month, Day, Year - $100
Name and years - $130
Single - $335
Double - $595
Marker Inscription - Actual costs
100%
$143.53
$351.29
$(207.76)
17
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 40.86%
$(3,532)
$5,972
$2,440
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 252
5.b
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS S-7020
17
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Single 2.00 $116.76 16 $1,868
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Single 2.00 $169.42 16 $2,711
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Single 2.00 $49.92 16 $799
$5,378 $336.10 6.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Double 6.00 $350.28 1 $350
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Double 2.00 $169.42 1 $169
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Double 3.00 $74.88 1 $75
$595 $594.58 11.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$5,972 17.00TOTALS $351.29
A - 253
5.b
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7030CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION
INSTALLATION Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY
Installation of a flower vase at a grave site.
$30 per vase. No installation fee
$95 per installation and vase
100%
$30.00
$97.14
$(67.14)
7
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 30.88%
$(470)
$680
$210
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 254
5.b
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION S-7030
7
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $84.71 7 $593
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES 0.50 $12.48 7 $87
$680 $97.19 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$680 1.50TOTALS $97.14
A - 255
5.b
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7040REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER
MARKER Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY
Remove or replace a cemetery marker on request.
None
Single - $420 per marker
Double - $735 per marker
100%
$0.00
$472.33
$(472.33)
6
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(2,834)
$2,834
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 256
5.b
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER S-7040
6
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Single 3.00 $175.14 5 $876
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Single 2.00 $169.42 5 $847
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Single 3.00 $74.88 5 $374
$2,097 $419.44 8.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Double 8.00 $467.04 1 $467
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Double 2.00 $169.42 1 $169
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Double 4.00 $99.84 1 $100
$736 $736.30 14.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,834 22.00TOTALS $472.33
A - 257
5.b
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7050GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER
TRANSFER Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY
Processing a request to transfer ownership of a grave site.
$50 per transfer
$125 per transfer
100%
$50.00
$127.00
$(77.00)
3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.37%
$(231)
$381
$150
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 258
5.b
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER S-7050
3
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.50 $127.07 3 $381
$381 $127.07 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$381 1.50TOTALS $127.00
A - 259
5.b
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7100CEMETERY SERVICES
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY
Maintenance and operation of the Cemetery.
Grave Spaces:
Adult - $1,200
Public Guardian - $800
Child - $800
Baby - $200
Cremation - $400
Burial Vault - $445
plus fees for Concrete Bell Liners and re-sale of concrete vaults to mortuaries.
Grave Spaces:
Adult - $1,950
Public Guardian - $1,950
Child - $1,950
Baby - $1,000
Cremation - $1,300
Burial Vault/Bell Liners - Actual cost plus 10%
100%
$0.00
$182,961.00
$(182,961.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(182,961)
$182,961
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 260
5.b
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CEMETERY SERVICES S-7100
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Remainder Of Time 716.62 $60,704.88 1 $60,705
PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Remainder Of $34,929 1,733.00 $43,255.68 1 $43,256
PR+C-CEMETERY Suppl/Prof/Contract 0.00 $79,000.00 1 $79,000
$182,961 $182,960.56 2,449.62TYPE SUBTOTAL
$182,961 2,449.62TOTALS $182,961.00
A - 261
5.b
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7220STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE
BANNERPW-
To review a request for a street banner. If approved, install the banner and remove it when the time period has
ended.
$200
$410
100%
$200.00
$410.95
$(210.95)
20
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 48.67%
$(4,219)
$8,219
$4,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 262
5.b
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE S-7220
20
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.MGR-COMM+CMTY RELADMIN ASST TO THE CITY MG 1.50 $93.23 20 $1,865
PW-GAS TX-T/S MTC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN 2.50 $317.70 20 $6,354
$8,219 $410.93 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$8,219 4.00TOTALS $410.95
A - 263
5.b
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7250REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentPARK MAINTENANCE
Repair of damage to City property by a member of the public.
Actual Costs
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
100%
$0.00
$92,617.00
$(92,617.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(92,617)
$92,617
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 264
5.b
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE S-7250
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR 10 Hr/Week 500.00 $58,990.00 1 $58,990
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 24 Hr/Mo Of 2 576.00 $33,626.88 1 $33,627
$92,617 $92,616.88 1,076.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$92,617 1,076.00TOTALS $92,617.00
A - 265
5.b
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7260PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentPARK MAINTENANCE
Rental of a City Park
See Appendix C
See Appendix C
100%
$28,000.00
$35,983.00
$(7,983.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 77.81%
$(7,983)
$35,983
$28,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 266
5.b
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION S-7260
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-ADMIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 5% 81.75 $7,323.98 1 $7,324
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 4.5 Hr/Weekend Of 2 490.91 $28,659.33 1 $28,659
$35,983 $35,983.31 572.66TYPE SUBTOTAL
$35,983 572.66TOTALS $35,983.00
A - 267
5.b
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-7270FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE
N/A Resident/Non-ResidentPARK MAINTENANCE
Maintnenace of the Fiscallini baseball field for use by the CSUSB Baseball team and SB Youth Baseball.
Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights
Club House - $88.60 per day
CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind maintenance services.
SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to
the field.
Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights
Club House - $200 per day
CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind maintenance services.
SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to
the field.
100%
$17,000.00
$20,243.00
$(3,243.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 83.98%
$(3,243)
$20,243
$17,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 268
5.b
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE S-7270
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK MAINT SUPERVISO 10 Days/Year 80.00 $10,052.80 1 $10,053
PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 10 Day/Year Of 2 174.55 $10,190.23 1 $10,190
$20,243 $20,243.03 254.55TYPE SUBTOTAL
$20,243 254.55TOTALS $20,243.00
A - 269
5.b
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8000DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION
COPY Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY
Providing copies of public documents under the terms of the State Public Records Act.
First Page - $0.35
Each additional page - $0.15
First five copies - No Charge
Each additional copy - $0.25 per copy
FPPC Copies - $0.10 per copy
100%
$0.35
$121.12
$(120.77)
1,165
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.29%
$(140,697)
$141,105
$408
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 270
5.b
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION S-8000
1,165
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-REC.MGMT RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST 0.01 $1.04 1,165 $1,212
CITY ATTORNEY DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY IV 17% Of 1 - PRA 0.24 $51.82 1,165 $60,370
CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL SECRETARY I 0.01 $0.83 1,165 $967
CITY ATTORNEY OFFICE ASSISTANT 3 Hr/Day - PRA 1.04 $67.43 1,165 $78,556
$141,105 $121.12 1.30TYPE SUBTOTAL
$141,105 1.30TOTALS $121.12
A - 271
5.b
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8020ELECTRONIC FILE COPY
DISK Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY
Providig copies of public records in an electronic format under the terms of the State Public Records Act.
None
$10 per disk
100%
$0.00
$22.29
$(22.29)
150
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(3,344)
$3,344
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 272
5.b
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ELECTRONIC FILE COPY S-8020
150
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 0.17 $22.29 150 $3,344
$3,344 $22.29 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL
$3,344 0.17TOTALS $22.29
A - 273
5.b
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8040ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING
VIOLATION Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY
Processing of administrative penalties for municipal code violations.
None
Recover the fully allocated actual costs at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.
100%
$0.00
$1,060.65
$(1,060.65)
558
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(591,843)
$591,843
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 274
5.b
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING S-8040
558
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST I 100% 2.91 $343.87 558 $191,879
CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II Remainder Of 2 5.47 $716.78 558 $399,963
$591,843 $1,060.65 8.37TYPE SUBTOTAL
$591,843 8.37TOTALS $1,060.65
A - 275
5.b
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8050ACP DEMAND LETTER
LETTER Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY
Processing an Administrative Civil Penalty demand letter.
$31.84 per letter
$65 per letter
100%
$31.84
$65.55
$(33.71)
176
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 48.57%
$(5,933)
$11,537
$5,604
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 276
5.b
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
ACP DEMAND LETTER S-8050
176
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 0.50 $65.55 176 $11,537
$11,537 $65.55 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL
$11,537 0.50TOTALS $65.55
A - 277
5.b
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8060LIEN RELEASE
RELEASE Resident/BusinessCITY ATTORNEY
Processing the release of a lien.
None
$65 plus any County fees
100%
$0.00
$63.46
$(63.46)
160
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(10,154)
$10,154
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 278
5.b
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
LIEN RELEASE S-8060
160
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 0.17 $22.29 160 $3,566
CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 60 Min/Week 0.31 $41.17 160 $6,587
$10,154 $63.46 0.48TYPE SUBTOTAL
$10,154 0.48TOTALS $63.46
A - 279
5.b
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8320BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS
LIEN BusinessCITY CLERK
Processing of a lien on a property due to non-payment of business registration fees and taxes.
$125 per lien (City receives $104 of the fee and the County receives $21)
$90 per lien plus any County processing fees
100%
$104.00
$88.79
$15.21
1,200
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 117.13%
$18,252
$106,548
$124,800
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 280
5.b
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS S-8320
1,200
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 50% Of 1 0.68 $88.79 1,200 $106,548
$106,548 $88.79 0.68TYPE SUBTOTAL
$106,548 0.68TOTALS $88.79
A - 281
5.b
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8330BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER
LETTER BusinessCITY CLERK
Processing a demand letter for a business registration lien.
$11 per letter
$10 per letter
100%
$11.00
$10.51
$0.49
240
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 104.68%
$118
$2,522
$2,640
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 282
5.b
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER S-8330
240
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 0.08 $10.51 240 $2,522
$2,522 $10.51 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL
$2,522 0.08TOTALS $10.51
A - 283
5.b
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8340BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE
RELEASE BusinessCITY CLERK
Processing the release of a business registration lien.
None
$35 per release plus any County processing fees
100%
$0.00
$32.86
$(32.86)
1,200
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(39,432)
$39,432
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 284
5.b
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE S-8340
1,200
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 0.25 $32.86 1,200 $39,432
$39,432 $32.86 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL
$39,432 0.25TOTALS $32.86
A - 285
5.b
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8350DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE
CERTIFICATE BusinessCITY CLERK
Providing a duplicate of a business registration certificate on request.
$0.50 per certificate
$10 per certificate
100%
$0.50
$10.50
$(10.00)
36
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 4.76%
$(360)
$378
$18
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 286
5.b
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE S-8350
36
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 0.08 $10.51 36 $378
$378 $10.51 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL
$378 0.08TOTALS $10.50
A - 287
5.b
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8360PASSPORT PROCESSING
APPLICATION Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK
Processing passport applications for the public.
$35 per application plus $15 per photograph
$35 per application plus $15 per photograph
The application fee is set by the federal government.
55%
$35.00
$64.11
$(29.11)
1,000
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 54.59%
$(29,110)
$64,110
$35,000
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 288
5.b
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
PASSPORT PROCESSING S-8360
1,000
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-PASSPORT Supplies 0.00 $1.50 1,000 $1,500
C.CLK-REC.MGMT SR CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 50% 0.81 $62.61 1,000 $62,610
$64,110 $64.11 0.81TYPE SUBTOTAL
$64,110 0.81TOTALS $64.11
A - 289
5.b
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8370NOTARY PUBLIC
DOCUMENT Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK
Providing Notary Public fees to the public.
$15 per document
$15 per document.
This fee is set by the State.
50%
$15.00
$33.00
$(18.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.45%
$(18)
$33
$15
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 290
5.b
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
NOTARY PUBLIC S-8370
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-ADMIN.DEPUTY CITY CLERK 0.33 $33.21 1 $33
$33 $33.21 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL
$33 0.33TOTALS $33.00
A - 291
5.b
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8380RECORDS COMPILATION
REQUEST Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK
Creating or compiling records that do not currently exist as a public record on request.
Actual Costs
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel needed plus any outside costs.
100%
$70.00
$104.00
$(34.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 67.31%
$(34)
$104
$70
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 292
5.b
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
RECORDS COMPILATION S-8380
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-REC.MGMT RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST 1.00 $104.20 1 $104
$104 $104.20 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$104 1.00TOTALS $104.00
A - 293
5.b
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8390CANDIDATE FILING
CANDIDATE ResidentCITY CLERK
Processing a filing for a candidate for a local office.
$25 per candidate
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228)
$25 per candidate
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228)
5%
$25.00
$735.62
$(710.62)
29
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 3.40%
$(20,608)
$21,333
$725
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 294
5.b
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CANDIDATE FILING S-8390
29
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-ADMIN.CITY CLERK 2.00 $433.74 29 $12,578
C.CLK-ADMIN.DEPUTY CITY CLERK 3.00 $301.89 29 $8,755
$21,333 $735.63 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$21,333 5.00TOTALS $735.62
A - 295
5.b
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8400INITIATIVE FILING
INITIATIVE Resident/BusinessCITY CLERK
Processing a local initiative.
$200 per application
Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official
certifies the sufficiency of the petition.
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)).
$200 per application
Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official
certifies the sufficiency of the petition.
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)).
15%
$0.00
$1,525.00
$(1,525.00)
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$(1,525)
$1,525
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 296
5.b
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
INITIATIVE FILING S-8400
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-ADMIN.CITY CLERK 1.00 $216.87 1 $217
C.CLK-ADMIN.CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK 4.00 $489.20 1 $489
C.CLK-ADMIN.DEPUTY CITY CLERK 4.00 $402.52 1 $403
C.CLK-REC.MGMT RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST 4.00 $416.80 1 $417
$1,525 $1,525.39 13.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$1,525 13.00TOTALS $1,525.00
A - 297
5.b
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8410WEDDING CEREMONY
CEREMONY Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK
Providing a weddig a ceremony on request.
$65 per ceremony
$70 per ceremony
100%
$65.00
$71.50
$(6.50)
4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 90.91%
$(26)
$286
$260
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 298
5.b
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
WEDDING CEREMONY S-8410
4
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.CLK-ADMIN.CITY CLERK 0.33 $71.57 4 $286
$286 $71.57 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL
$286 0.33TOTALS $71.50
A - 299
5.b
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8500FILM PERMIT
APPLICATION BusinessCITY MANAGER
Processing a film permit for filming within the City.
$63 per permit
$250 per permit
100%
$63.00
$248.60
$(185.60)
30
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 25.34%
$(5,568)
$7,458
$1,890
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 300
5.b
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
FILM PERMIT S-8500
30
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
C.MGR-COMM+CMTY RELADMIN ASST TO THE CITY MG 4.00 $248.60 30 $7,458
$7,458 $248.60 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$7,458 4.00TOTALS $248.60
A - 301
5.b
Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-8600NSF CHECK PROCESSING
NSF CHECK Developer/Resident/BusinessFINANCE
Processing a check returned due to insufficient funds.
$26 per NSF Check
$65 per NSF check
(According to Government Code section 6157 (b), a city may charge a "reasonable charge for the returned check,
not to exceed the actual costs incurred by the public agency" in order to recover its processing and collection
costs.)
100%
$26.00
$64.75
$(38.75)
92
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 40.15%
$(3,565)
$5,957
$2,392
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 302
5.b
Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
NSF CHECK PROCESSING S-8600
92
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
FIN-ADMIN EXEC ASST TO DIRECTOR 0.50 $51.63 92 $4,750
FIN-ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTANT III 0.08 $11.87 92 $1,092
FIN-ACCOUNTING Bank Charge 0.00 $1.25 92 $115
$5,957 $64.75 0.58TYPE SUBTOTAL
$5,957 0.58TOTALS $64.75
A - 303
5.b
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
S-9000OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES
VARIOUSALL
This is a service charge for all services that should be charged for, but for which no fee was established.
None
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
$0
$0
$0
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
April 30, 2020
A - 304
5.b
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
April 29, 2020
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES S-9000
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
$0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL
$0 0.00TOTALS $0.00
A - 305
5.b
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
A - 306
5.b
Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
APPENDIX B
CURRENT FEE COMPARED TO SUGGESTED FEE
B - 1
5.b
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
B - 2
5.b
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0005 BUILDING ISSUANCE FEEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$60 - 1st permit
$10 - each additional permit on the same application
$40 - 1st permit
$10 - each additional permit on the same application
S-0010 BUILDING PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D
Hourly Rate - $122.37
Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C
Hourly Rate - $94.15
S-0020 BUILDING INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D
Hourly Rate - $118.33
Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C
Hourly Rate - $94.45
S-0022 SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$595 for the 1st 4 hours plus $105 for each add'l hour$380 Minimum for the 1st 4 hours plus $95 for each additional hour
S-0025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$500$475.08 - as a separate application (of which $100 was for Fire
Review)
$133.62 - if included on the building permit (Deleted as All Fire)
S-0030 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$500$467.34
April 30, 2020
2
B - 3
5.b
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0201 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV.REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$575$583
S-0203 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM.REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,070 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$2,550
S-0205 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERCREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,890$822
S-0208 ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV.REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using
a CUP or a development permit.
$2,938
S-0211 APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCILREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$285 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery)
$2,850 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City staff.
$177 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery)
$1,766 - All others
S-0213 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$430 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%)
$4,295 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City staff.
$278 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%)
$2,772 - All others
April 30, 2020
3
B - 4
5.b
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0216 CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOLREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,625 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$3,605
S-0217 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,555 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$7,133 - CUP for Commercial/Industrial (#10; $71,330)
$2,809 - CUP for Condo, PRD, HMOD (#30; $84,270)
S-0219 CUP REVISIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,780 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$2,113
S-0222 DESIGN REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included
with Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit or Temporary
Use Permit
Full Consultant Cost
S-0224 DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit as
determined by staff.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee
S-0227 DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND.REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$9,925 plus any consultant cost including 10% contract
administrative overhead, plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City staff.
$6,960 plus full consultant cost
April 30, 2020
4
B - 5
5.b
Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0230 DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,965$1,000
S-0233 DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
0 to 5 Acres - $6,810 plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City Staff.
> than 5 Acres - $11,905 plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City Staff.
$6,438
S-0235 DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
0 to 5 Acres - $8,040 plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City Staff.
> than 5 Acres - $15,455 plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City Staff.
$6,720 - 0 to 5 Acres (#10; $67,200)
$6,720 - Greater than 5 Acres (#5, $33,600)
S-0238 DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is no longer used.$7,288
S-0241 ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDYREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing,
charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
$3,273
S-0244 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing,
charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost
April 30, 2020
5
B - 6
5.b
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0246 EXTENSION OF TIMEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,860 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$3,922 - CUP & Development Permit (#2; $7,844)
$4,768 - Tentative Tract Map (#10; $47,680)
S-0251 FENCE/WALL PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$60$56
S-0257 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP)REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,570 plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing,
charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($1,500 Deposit treated as actual cost)
S-0259 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($815 deposit plus consultant cost)
S-0262 HOME OCCUPATION PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$145$268
S-0264 LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSISTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$245$450
April 30, 2020
6
B - 7
5.b
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0266 PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,255$477
S-0268 MINOR EXCEPTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$105$288 - Concurrent with another application
$268 - Owner-Occupied single-family residence
$792 - Other
S-0270 MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($245 Deposit) plus Full Consultant Cost
($327 Deposit)
S-0271 MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$380 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$561
S-0273 PHASING PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being
performed.
$823 - If not part of original project review
$514 - D/ERC review application (DP)
$536 - Planning Comm.Application (CUP/DP/SUB)
S-0275 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being
performed.
$1,119
April 30, 2020
7
B - 8
5.b
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0277 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,740 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$636
S-0279 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,440$2,424
S-0280 RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM.REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,670 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$506
S-0282 SIGN PERMIT-REGULARREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$80$182
S-0283 SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUPREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate
processes.
$3,858
S-0284 SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARYREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$80$111
April 30, 2020
8
B - 9
5.b
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0286 SIGN PROGRAMREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
10 or less tenant spaces - $490
Greater than 10 tenant spaces - Actual Cost based on the
"Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs
including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs
charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
$610
S-0288 SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing,
charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost
S-0291 TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$315 - Temporary Use Permit
$1,230 - Special Event Permit (Director Review)
$0 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) -
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not used.
$82.86 - Temporary Use Permit (#55; $4,557)
$420 - Special Event Permit (Director Review) (#22; $9,240)
$730 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review)
S-0293 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,170 plus the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$4,262 plus $65 per parcel
(NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 3 parcels per Tentative
Parcel Map.)
S-0295 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD)REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$6,850 plus $25 per lot and the estimated cost of noticing &
publishing as estimated by City staff.
$7,561 plus $65 per lot or dwelling unit
(NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 15 lots per Tentative
Tract Map.)
April 30, 2020
9
B - 10
5.b
Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0297 TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCELREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,125 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$2,113
S-0301 TREE REMOVAL PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$180$506
S-0303 VARIANCE-REGULARREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$250 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery)
$2,065 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and
publishing as estimated by City staff.
$322 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery)
$2,724 - All others
S-0304 VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$990 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as
estimated by City staff.
$910
S-0306 VESTING TENTATIVE MAPREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
"Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs
including 10% City administrative overhead and all other costs,
including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost
S-0308 ZONING FORMREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S-0264.$22
April 30, 2020
10
B - 11
5.b
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0309 ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$55$37
S-0315 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the
cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the
major general plan updates that are required every 10 to 15 years.
None
S-0322 TECHNOLOGY FEEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
2% charged against all Development Department Fees2% of Plan Review & Permit Fees
S-0326 ARCHIVE FEESREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1.25 - Per Permit or Application
$3.15/sheet - Plans
$0.35/page - Documents
$1.00 - Per Permit or Application
$2.00/sheet - Plans
$0.25/page - Documents
S-0441 FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,195 - Base Fee
$275 - Per Lot Fee
$270 - Each additional Review
$0 - Final Map Continuance - Staff recommends deleting as
not used.
$185 - Certificate of Correction per Hour
$2,210 - Base Fee
$55 - Per Lot Fee
$135 - Each additional Review
$404 - Final Map Continuance
$97 - Certificate of Correction per Hour
April 30, 2020
11
B - 12
5.b
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0445 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus
$1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus
$265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost
$605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for
each hour over four
(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)
2% of engineer's cost estimate for on-site improvements
S-0447 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$390 for all plans with more than 50 Cubic YardsCubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee
51 to 100 - $15.00
101 to 1,000 - $22.50
1,001 to 10,000 - $30.00
10,001 to 100,000 - $30.00 plus $15.00 for each 10K CY >
10,000
100,001 to 200,000 - $165.00 plus $9.00 for each 10K CY >
100,000
200,001 and up - $255.00 plus $4.50 for each 10K CY >
200,000
S-0452 REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,370$828
S-0453 REVIEW-LOT MERGERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,300$828
S-0454 REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,590$414 - SFR Occupancy (#3; $1,242)
$828 - Com'l/Ind'l (#3; $2,484)
April 30, 2020
12
B - 13
5.b
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0463 ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Fee Based on Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost:
$0 to $1 Million - 3.4% of estimated cost with a $1,045
minimum
Greater than $1 MIllion - $34,000 plus 1.7% of the estimated cost
over $1 Million
3% of Estimated Construction Cost
S-0467 ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Cubic Yards:
1 to 1,000 - $225
1,001 to 10,000 - $340
10,001 to 100,000 - $340 plus $115.00 for each 10K CY >
10,000
100,001 to 200,000 - $1,375 plus $55 for each 10K CY > 100,000
200,001 and up - $1,870 plus $10 for each 10K CY > 200,000
Cubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee
51 to 100 - $150.00
101 to 1,000 - $225.00
1,001 to 10,000 - $300.00
10,001 to 100,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY >
10,000
100,001 to 200,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY >
100,000
200,001 and up - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY >
200,000
S-0471 HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$825Actual Time:
$487 - for the first 3 hours
$100 - for each add'l hour
S-0472 ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG.REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$940None
S-0480 FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$940 plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative
overhead charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
None
April 30, 2020
13
B - 14
5.b
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0481 REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLNREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$405 - Commercial & Residential Projects
$615 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects
$410 - Commercial & Residential Projects (#57; $23,370)
$265 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects (#56; $14,840)
S-0488 REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$155 - Non-Categorical
$1,440 - Categorical
$120 - per hour for reviews after the third review
$80 - Non-Categorical (#450; $36,000)
$365 - Categorical without Conditions of Concern (#75; $27,375)
$1,130 - Categorical with Conditions of Concern (#75; $84,750)
$99 - per hour for reviews after the third review (#1; $99)
S-0489 REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLANREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$180$75
S-0490 NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$140 $98 - Less than 10 Acres (#200; $19,600)
$179 - 10 Acres or More (#4; $716)
S-0495 NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$175$143
S-0501 BASIC PERMIT FEEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Engineering Permit - This fee is included with each permit so it
does not need to be charged separately and should be deleted
Blanket Permit - covered by S-0523, so this fee should be deleted
Permit Extension - covered by S-0560, so this fee should be
deleted
$45.00 - Engineering Permit
$53.00 - Blanket Permit
$43.00 - Permit Extension
April 30, 2020
14
B - 15
5.b
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0503 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,515 - Initial Permit
$340 - Annual Renewal
$670.00 - Initial Permit ($625 for the encroachment permit and $45
for the basic permit - both to be combined into one fee.)
$150.00 - Annual Renewal
S-0505 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$160 - No Lane Closure - Parking Only
$175 - Lane Closure: First Day
$25 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day
$100 - Trash Bin, 1st week
$25 - Trash Bin, each add'l week
$25.00 - No Lane Closure (#100; $2,500)
$136.00 - Lane Closure: First Day (#2,400; $326,400)
$60.00 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day (#9,600; $576,000)
$70.00 - Trash Bin, 1st week
$28.00 - Trash Bin, each add'l week
S-0507 LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of
reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the excavation
permit.
$286.00
S-0509 SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$925 - Lane Closure
$1,495 - Street/Road Closure, 1st day
$1,040 - Street/Road Closure, each add''l day
$545.00 - With a Lane Closure (#4; $2,180)
$559.00 - With a Street Closure (#8; $4,472)
$347.00 - With a Road Closure (1st day) **
$302.00 - Each Additional Day of a Street/Road Closure (#4,
$1,208)
(**Note: Staff recomends combining the fees for a street and a road
as they take the same effort. Also, each of the above fees, except
the "additional day" fee, include the $45 basic fee from S-0501.)
S-0511 OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$16 - One Day Permit
$90 - Annual Permit
(Note: City may only charge the State-Mandated fee. There is no
provision for a technology surcharge.)
$17.00 - One Day (State-Mandated Fee is $16) (#997; $16,949)
$95.00 - Annual Permit (State-Mandated Fee is $90) (#3; $285)
April 30, 2020
15
B - 16
5.b
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0513 HAULING PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$650 - First Day
$285 - Each Additional Day
$438.00 - First Day (#8; $3,504) (Includes S-501 Basic Fee)
$100.00 - Each Additional Day (#32; $3,200)
S-0515 EXCAVATION PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff Recommends Deleting This Service$150.00 - Per day
S-0517 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Consultant charge (currently $1,440 for a basic review) plus
10% overhead for City contract administration and review.
$719.00 - Basic Review (#10; $7,190)
$80.00 - Extended Review per Hour (#0; $0)
S-0518 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus
$1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus
$265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost
$605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for
each hour over four
(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)
$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost with a $50 minimum
S-0520 REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$210 for the 1st hour plus $150 for each additional hour$137.00
April 30, 2020
16
B - 17
5.b
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0521 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$240 - Driveway & Sidewalk Replacement
Other Fees based on Estimated Construction Cost:
$0 to $175,000 - $630 plus 12.4% of the Cost over
$15,000
$175,001 to $750,000 - $20,470 plus 3.4% of the Cost over
$175,000
Greater than $750,000 - $40,020 plus 1.1% of the Cost over
$750,000
$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost
S-0523 ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$130 for the initial blanket permit annually plus $105 per day for
inspection per location after the first day/location deducted from an
initial annual deposit of $5,500. Deposit balance can be carried
forward to a new year but a new initial blanket permit is required
and the deposit balance must be restored to $5,500.
$53.00 - Permit Issuance (#7; $371)
$73.00 - Inspection Per Location (#7; $511)
S-0529 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PWREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$230$45.00 - Issuance
$59.00 - Inspection
S-0531 STREET NAME CHANGEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs, including new street signage, charged
against an initial deposit determined by staff.
$1,345.00 Plus the Cost of Street Signs
S-0533 STREET/ALLEY VACATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,840 plus a deposit for noticing and publishing determined by
staff
$1,000.00 - Deposit
$1,000.00 - Balance Due Prior to Processing
April 30, 2020
17
B - 18
5.b
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0535 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAYREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
If Legal and Map are Provided - $920
If City Prepares Legal & Map - Actual Cost based on the
"Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs
including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs
charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.
$315.00 - If Legal and Map are Provided (#10; $3,150)
$800.00 - If City Prepares Legal & Map
S-0537 PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUESTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of
$17,000.
$14,750.00
S-0539 CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of
$5,500.
$2,100.00
S-0542 ENGINEERING LETTERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided.$100.00
S-0560 PERMIT EXTENSIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$80 each$43.00
S-0565 RE-INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$105 per hour with a one-hour minimum$90 ($45 permit fee + $45 reinspection fee)
April 30, 2020
18
B - 19
5.b
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0567 AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Employee's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead
with a four (4) hour minimum
$369.00 - 4 hr. minimum
$92.45 - each additional hour
S-0571 ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST.REF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff
plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative
overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit
determined by staff.
$5,900
S-0602 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
The general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the
Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only issues permits to
retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff
recommends deleting this fee as it is not being used.
$400 - Initial
$325 - Renewal
S-0609 RECORDS CHECK LETTERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$40$25 - With Record
$20 - Without Record
S-0611 2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$480 - Initial
$135 - Renewal
$475 - Initial (#1; $475)
$126 - Renewal (#3; $378)
April 30, 2020
19
B - 20
5.b
Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0613 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 plus applicable DOJ/FBI fee (currently $33) $2 - Live Scan Processing Fee (Note: Staff is charging $15 plus
the DOJ fee.)
$15 - Fingerprint card
(Note: Applicants for City jobs are not charged the Live Scan fee or
the DOJ fee.)
S-0616 FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFFREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$25$20
S-0618 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Officer's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead with
a four (4) hour minimum
Officer's hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus Medicare and Workers'
Comp. Insurance
S-0621 ALARM SYSTEMREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$96 - Annual Alarm Permit ($75-City plus $21-Alarm Vendor)
$25 - Alarm Sys.Installation
$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.
False Alarm Charge:
$256 - All False Alarms without a Permit ($200-City plus $56-Alarm
Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12 month period with a
Permit.
(Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial
response or between intrusion and panic/robbery response.)
$25/$50/$10 - Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income
Resident)
$25 - Alarm Sys.Installation
$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.
False Alarms in 12-month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or
panic: Reg./LIR]:
[$75/$10]/[$200/$20] - 1st thru 4th Non-Permitted
[$90/$10]/[$250/$20] - 5th & 6th
[$90/$20]/[$300/$40] - 7th thru 9th
[$175/$20]/[$350/$40] - 10th & Subsequent
S-0640 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
To recognize the Public Health importance of animal control, we
suggest that 50% of the cost should come from the general
taxpayer. The Police Department has prepared a study that will
move the City in that direction.
Various Fees to cover licensing, boarding and miscellaneous
services
April 30, 2020
20
B - 21
5.b
Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0655 BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$180 per SFR rental
Staff recommends increasing the inspections to every year and
including an interior inspection.
$100 per owner of SFR rentals
S-0657 NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$165 plus $8.50 for any unit over four$180 for the first four units
$180 base fee plus $7.45 for each unit inspected (over four)
S-0659 ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$130 per lien$115 per lien
S-0662 LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$185$95
S-0664 DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$15$28
S-0666 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGESREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$515 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing$375 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing
April 30, 2020
21
B - 22
5.b
Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-6000 AQUATICS SERVICESREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix CSee Appendix C
In addition, the City has received $39,750 from a Kaiser Grant.
S-6060 YOUTH SPORTSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Resident - $45 per child
Non-Resident - $50 per child
Resident - $30 per child
Non-Resident - $33 per child
S-6070 ADULT SPORTSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Soccer:
Resident - $375 per team
Non-Resident Team - $425 per team
Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost
Soccer:
Resident - $300 per team
Non-Resident Team - $350 per team
Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost
S-6100 COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix CSe Appendix C
S-6130 BALLFIELD RENTAL/USEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Reservation - $10 per hour
Tournament Use - $120 per field per day
Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $15 per hour thereafter
Preparation - determined by the needs of the event
Local Sports Groups:
Field Use - No Charge
Lighting - No Charge
Reservation - $10 per hour for first hour and $5 per hour thereafter
Tournament Use:
$120 per field per day without lights
$180 per field per day with lights
Preparation - $25 per field upon request
Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $10 per hour thereafter
Local Sports Groups do not pay for use of the fields or lights.
April 30, 2020
22
B - 23
5.b
Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-6700 LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1 per card (Staff Recommendation)$1 per card
S-6710 INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUESTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3 per item$3 per item
S-6720 LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per hour$20 per hour
S-6730 REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Lost Items:
Magazines - $5 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost
Other items - $10 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost
Damaged Items - $3-$5
Missing Barcode - $10
Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $10
Lost Items:
Magazines - $1 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost
Other items - $5 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost
Damaged Items - $3-$5
Missing Barcode - $1
Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $5
S-6740 LIBRARY ROOM RENTALREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Bing Wong Auditorium: Non-Profit - $25/hr For Profit - $50/hr (4 hr
min)
Kellogg Room A or B - Non-Profit - $25/hr for each For Profit -
$50/hr for each
Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID)
Projector - $5 per day
VCR and Monitor - $10 per day
Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30
Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour
Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit)
Bing Wong Auditorium - $25 per hour (4 hour minimum)
Kellogg Room A or B - $25 per hour for each
Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID)
Projector - $5 per day
VCR and Monitor - $10 per day
Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30
Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour
Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit)
April 30, 2020
23
B - 24
5.b
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-7000 CEMETERY INTERMENTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Single - $2,295
Double - $2,590
Cremation - $915
Adult: Single - $600 Double - $850
Child: Single - $350 Double - $650
Baby - $150
Cremation - $200
For many sites, the City has a contractual obligation to provide the
interment at the fee that was in place when the contract was
signed.
S-7010 CEMETERY DISINTERMENTREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) - $5,545
Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $3,820
Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) -$1,500
Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $1,200
Baby/Child Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $800
S-7020 CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Single - $335
Double - $595
Marker Inscription - Actual costs
Single - $140
Double - $200
Marker Inscription:
4 digits - $50
Month, Day, Year - $100
Name and years - $130
S-7030 CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per installation and vase$30 per vase. No installation fee
S-7040 REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Single - $420 per marker
Double - $735 per marker
None
April 30, 2020
24
B - 25
5.b
Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-7050 GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$125 per transfer$50 per transfer
S-7100 CEMETERY SERVICESREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Grave Spaces:
Adult - $1,950
Public Guardian - $1,950
Child - $1,950
Baby - $1,000
Cremation - $1,300
Burial Vault/Bell Liners - Actual cost plus 10%
Grave Spaces:
Adult - $1,200
Public Guardian - $800
Child - $800
Baby - $200
Cremation - $400
Burial Vault - $445
plus fees for Concrete Bell Liners and re-sale of concrete vaults to
mortuaries.
S-7220 STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$410$200
S-7250 REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved
plus any outside costs.
Actual Costs
S-7260 PARK RENTAL/RESERVATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix CSee Appendix C
April 30, 2020
25
B - 26
5.b
Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-7270 FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights
Club House - $200 per day
CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind
maintenance services.
SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay
$6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field.
Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights
Club House - $88.60 per day
CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind
maintenance services.
SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay
$6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field.
S-8000 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
First five copies - No Charge
Each additional copy - $0.25 per copy
FPPC Copies - $0.10 per copy
First Page - $0.35
Each additional page - $0.15
S-8020 ELECTRONIC FILE COPYREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per diskNone
S-8040 ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Recover the fully allocated actual costs at the discretion of the
Hearing Officer.
None
S-8050 ACP DEMAND LETTERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$65 per letter$31.84 per letter
S-8060 LIEN RELEASEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$65 plus any County feesNone
April 30, 2020
26
B - 27
5.b
Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-8320 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESSREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$90 per lien plus any County processing fees$125 per lien (City receives $104 of the fee and the County
receives $21)
S-8330 BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTERREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per letter$11 per letter
S-8340 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$35 per release plus any County processing feesNone
S-8350 DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATEREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per certificate$0.50 per certificate
S-8360 PASSPORT PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$35 per application plus $15 per photograph
The application fee is set by the federal government.
$35 per application plus $15 per photograph
April 30, 2020
27
B - 28
5.b
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-8370 NOTARY PUBLICREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 per document.
This fee is set by the State.
$15 per document
S-8380 RECORDS COMPILATIONREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel needed plus
any outside costs.
Actual Costs
S-8390 CANDIDATE FILINGREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$25 per candidate
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code
section 10228)
$25 per candidate
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code
section 10228)
S-8400 INITIATIVE FILINGREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$200 per application
Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of
filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the
sufficiency of the petition.
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code
section 9202(b)).
$200 per application
Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of
filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the
sufficiency of the petition.
This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code
section 9202(b)).
April 30, 2020
28
B - 29
5.b
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
As of April 29, 2020
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-8410 WEDDING CEREMONYREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$70 per ceremony$65 per ceremony
S-8500 FILM PERMITREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$250 per permit$63 per permit
S-8600 NSF CHECK PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$65 per NSF check
(According to Government Code section 6157 (b), a city may
charge a "reasonable charge for the returned check, not to exceed
the actual costs incurred by the public agency" in order to recover
its processing and collection costs.)
$26 per NSF Check
S-9000 OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICESREF #:TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staffNone
April 30, 2020
29
B - 30
5.b
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
APPENDIX C
CURRENT BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
C - 1
5.b
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
C - 2
5.b
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
1.
valuation of the construction.
2.
3.
4.
C - 3
5.b
Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
2
1.
2.
nd
C - 4
5.b
Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
3
Table 1A Building Permit Fees Tract Homes
Square Feet Insp. Time(hr)Permit Fee Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.)Permit Fee
to 1200 4.77 $451
1300 4.94 $467
1400 5.11 $483
1500 5.28 $499
1600 5.45 $515 4600 10.51 $ 993
1700 5.62 $531 4700 10.68 $1,009
1800 5.78 $546 4800 10.85 $1,025
1900 5.95 $562 4900 11.02 $1,041
2000 6.12 $578 5000 11.18 $1,056
2100 6.29 $594 5100 11.35 $1,072
2200 6.46 $610 5200 11.52 $1,088
2300 6.63 $626 5300 11.69 $1,104
2400 6.80 $642 5400 11.86 $1,120
2500 6.97 $658 5500 12.03 $1,136
2600 7.13 $673 5600 12.2 $1,152
2700 7.30 $689 5700 12.37 $1,168
2800 7.47 $706 5800 12.53 $1,183
2900 7.64 $722 5900 12.7 $1,200
3000 7.81 $738 6000 12.87 $1,216
3100 7.98 $754 6100 13.04 $1,232
3200 8.15 $770 6200 13.21 $1,248
3300 8.32 $786 6300 13.38 $1,264
3400 8.48 $801 6400 13.55 $1,280
3500 8.65 $817 6500 13.71 $1,295
3600 8.82 $833 6600 13.88 $1,311
3700 8.99 $849 6700 14.05 $1,327
3800 9.16 $865 6800 14.22 $1,343
3900 9.33 $881 6900 14.39 $1,359
4000 9.50 $897 7000 14.56 $1,375
4100 9.66 $912 7100 14.73 $1,391
4200 9.83 $928 7200 14.9 $1,407
4300 10.00 $945 7300 15.06 $1,422
4400 10.17 $961 7400 15.23 $1,438
4500 10.34 $977 7500 15.4 $1,455
Notes: 1. The indicated fees include building, electrical,plumbing and mechanical inspection fees.
2. The indicated fees do not includeplan review, issuance or other applicable fees.
3. The indicated fees include a standard 2 car garage.
4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula: $1455 + (size 7500)/100 X 15.94 .
5. This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more.
C - 5
5.b
Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
4
Table 1B Building Permit Fees Infill Homes
Square Feet Insp. Time(hr)Permit Fee Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.)Permit Fee.
to 1200 12.35 $1,166
1300 12.65 $1,195
1400 12.95 $1,223
1500 13.25 $1,251
1600 13.55 $1,280 4600 22.50 $2,125
1700 13.84 $1,307 4700 22.80 $2,153
1800 14.14 $1,336 4800 23.10 $2,182
1900 14.44 $1,364 4900 23.40 $2,210
2000 14.74 $1,392 5000 23.69 $2,238
2100 15.04 $1,421 5100 23.99 $2,266
2200 15.34 $1,449 5200 24.29 $2,294
2300 15.64 $1,477 5300 24.59 $2,323
2400 15.93 $1,505 5400 24.89 $2,351
2500 16.23 $1,533 5500 25.19 $2,379
2600 16.53 $1,561 5600 25.49 $2,408
2700 16.83 $1,590 5700 25.78 $2,435
2800 17.13 $1,618 5800 26.08 $2,463
2900 17.43 $1,646 5900 26.38 $2,492
3000 17.72 $1,674 6000 26.68 $2,520
3100 18.02 $1,702 6100 26.98 $2,548
3200 18.32 $1,730 6200 27.28 $2,577
3300 18.62 $1,759 6300 27.58 $2,605
3400 18.92 $1,787 6400 27.87 $2,632
3500 19.22 $1,815 6500 28.17 $2,661
3600 19.52 $1,844 6600 28.47 $2,689
3700 19.81 $1,871 6700 28.77 $2,717
3800 20.11 $1,899 6800 29.07 $2,746
3900 20.41 $1,928 6900 29.37 $2,774
4000 20.71 $1,956 7000 29.66 $2,801
4100 21.01 $1,984 7100 29.96 $2,830
4200 21.31 $2,013 7200 30.26 $2,858
4300 21.61 $2,041 7300 30.56 $2,886
4400 21.90 $2,068 7400 30.86 $2,915
4500 22.20 $2,097 7500 31.16 $2,943
Notes: 1. The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees.
2. The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees.
3. The indicated fees include a standard 2 cargarage.
4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula: $2943 + (size 7500)/100 X 28.19 .
5. This table applies to infill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less.
C - 6
5.b
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Occupancy Classification (2006 IBC)
5C - 7
5.b
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
FIREPLACE
30%
6C - 8
5.b
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
7
Commercial, Industrial, and Mu
1.00 - 500 60.00 14.25 74.25
501 - 600 60.00 16.15 76.15
601 - 700 60.00 18.05 78.05
701 - 800 60.00 19.95 79.95
801 - 900 60.00 21.85 81.85
901 - 1,000 60.00 23.75 83.75
1,001 - 1,100 60.00 25.65 85.65 30,001 – 31,000 291.00 276.45 567.45
1,101 - 1,200 60.00 27.55 87.55 31,001 – 32,000 297.50 282.63 580.13
1,201 - 1,300 60.00 29.45 89.45 32,001 – 33,000 304.00 288.80 592.80
1,301 - 1,400 60.00 31.35 91.35 33,001 – 34,000 310.50 294.98 605.48
1,401 - 1,500 60.00 33.25 93.25 34,001 – 35,000 317.00 301.15 618.15
1,501 - 1,600 60.00 35.15 95.15 35,001 – 36,000 323.50 307.33 630.83
1,601 - 1,700 60.00 37.05 97.05 36,001 – 37,000 330.00 313.50 643.50
1,701 - 1,800 60.00 38.95 98.95 37,001 – 38,000 336.50 319.68 656.18
1,801 - 1,900 60.00 40.85 100.85 38,001 – 39,000 343.00 325.85 668.85
1,901 - 2,000 60.00 42.75 102.75 39,001 – 40,000 349.50 332.50 682.00
40,001 – 41,000 356.00 338.20 694.20
41,001 – 42,000 362.50 344.38 706.88
2,001 - 3,000 60.00 51.30 111.30 42,001 – 43,000 369.00 350.55 719.55
3,001 – 4,000 63.00 59.85 122.85 43,001 – 44,000 375.50 356.73 732.23
4,001 – 5,000 72.00 68.40 140.40 44,001 – 45,000 382.00 362.90 744.90
5,001 – 6,000 81.00 76.95 157.95 45,001 – 46,000 388.50 369.08 757.58
6,001 – 7,000 90.00 85.50 175.50 46,001 – 47,000 395.00 375.25 770.25
7,001 – 8,000 99.00 94.05 193.05 47,001 – 48,000 401.50 381.43 782.93
8,001 – 9,000 108.00 102.60 210.60 48,001 – 49,000 408.50 387.60 796.10
9,001 – 10,000 117.00 111.15 228.15 49,001 – 50,000 414.50 393.78 808.28
10,001 – 11,000 126.00 119.70 245.70 50,001 – 51,000 419.50 398.05 817.55
11,001 – 12,000 135.00 128.25 263.25 51,001 – 52,000 423.00 402.33 825.33
12,001 – 13,000 144.00 136.80 280.80 52,001 – 53,000 428.00 406.60 834.60
13,001 – 14,000 153.00 145.35 298.35 53,001 – 54,000 432.50 410.88 843.38
14,001 – 15,000 162.00 153.90 315.90 54,001 – 55,000 437.00 415.15 852.15
15,001 – 16,000 171.00 162.45 333.45 55,001 – 56,000 441.50 419.43 860.93
16,001 – 17,000 180.00 171.00 351.00 56,001 – 57,000 446.00 423.70 869.70
17,001 – 18,000 189.00 179.55 368.55 57,001 – 58,000 450.50 427.98 878.48
18,001 – 19,000 198.00 188.10 386.10 58,001 – 59,000 455.00 432.25 887.25
19,001 – 20,000 207.00 196.65 403.65 59,001 – 60,000 459.50 436.53 896.03
20,001 – 21,000 216.00 205.20 421.20 60,001 – 61,000 464.00 440.80 904.80
21,001 – 22,000 225.00 213.75 438.75 61,001 – 62,000 468.50 445.08 913.58
22,001 – 23,000 234.00 222.30 456.30 62,001 – 63,000 473.00 449.35 922.35
23,001 – 24,000 243.00 230.85 473.85 63,001 – 64,000 477.50 453.63 931.13
24,001 – 25,000 252.00 239.45 491.45 64,001 – 65,000 482.00 457.90 939.90
25,001 – 26,000 258.00 245.10 503.10 65,001 – 66,000 486.50 462.18 948.68
26,001 – 27,000 265.00 251.75 516.75 66,001 – 67,000 491.00 466.45 957.45
27,001 – 28,000 271.00 257.45 528.45 67,001 – 68,000 495.50 470.73 966.23
28,001 – 29,000 278.00 264.10 542.10 68,001 – 69,000 500.00 475.00 975.00
29,001 – 30,000 284.00 269.80 553.80 69,001 – 70,000 504.50 479.28 983.78
C - 9
5.b
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
8
70,001 – 71,000 509.00 483.55 992.55 120,001 – 121,000 713.00 677.35 1390.35
71,001 – 72,000 513.50 487.83 1001.33 121,001 – 122,000 716.50 680.68 1397.18
72,001 – 73,000 518.00 492.10 1010.10 122,001 – 123,000 720.00 684.00 1404.00
73,001 – 74,000 522.40 496.38 1018.78 123,001 – 124,000 723.50 687.33 1410.83
74,001 – 75,000 527.00 500.65 1027.65 124,001 – 125,000 727.00 690.65 1417.65
75,001 – 76,000 531.50 504.93 1036.43 125,001 – 126,000 730.50 693.98 1424.48
76,001 – 77,000 536.00 509.20 1045.20 126,001 – 127,000 734.00 697.30 1431.30
77,001 – 78,000 540.40 513.38 1053.78 127.001 – 128,000 737.50 700.63 1438.13
78,001 – 79,000 545.00 517.75 1062.75 128,001 – 129,000 741.00 703.95 1444.95
79,001 – 80,000 549.50 522.03 1071.53 129,001 – 130,000 744.50 707.28 1451.78
80,001 – 81,000 554.00 526.50 1080.50 130,001 – 131,000 748.00 710.60 1458.60
81,001 – 82,000 558.50 530.58 1089.08 131,001 – 132,000 751.50 713.93 1465.43
82,001 – 83,000 563.00 534.85 1097.85 132,001 – 133,000 755.00 717.25 1472.25
83,001 – 84,000 567.50 539.13 1106.63 133,001 – 134,000 758.50 720.58 1479.08
84,001 – 85,000 572.00 543.40 1115.40 134,001 – 135,000 762.00 723.90 1485.90
85,001 – 86,000 576.00 547.68 1123.68 135,001 – 136,000 765.50 727.23 1492.73
86,001 – 87,000 581.00 551.95 1132.95 136,001 – 137,000 769.00 730.55 1499.55
87,001 – 88,000 585.00 556.23 1141.23 137,001 – 138,000 772.50 733.88 1506.38
88,001 – 89,000 590.00 560.50 1150.50 138,001 – 139,000 776.00 737.20 1513.20
89,001 – 90,000 594.50 564.78 1159.28 139,001 – 140,000 779.50 740.53 1520.03
90,001 – 91,000 599.00 569.05 1168.05 140,001 – 141,000 783.00 743.85 1526.85
91,001 – 92,000 603.50 573.33 1176.83 141,001 – 142,000 786.50 747.18 1533.68
92,001 – 93,000 608.50 577.60 1186.10 142,001 – 143,000 790.00 750.50 1540.50
93,001 – 94,000 612.50 581.88 1194.38 143,001 – 144,000 793.50 753.83 1547.33
94,001 – 95,000 617.00 586.15 1203.15 144,001 – 145,000 797.00 757.15 1554.15
95,001 – 96,000 621.50 590.43 1211.93 145,001 – 146,000 800.50 760.98 1560.98
96,001 – 97,000 626.00 594.70 1220.70 146,001 – 147,000 804.00 763.80 1567.80
97,001 – 98,000 630.50 598.98 1229.48 147,001 – 148,000 807.50 767.13 1574.63
98,001 – 99,000 635.00 603.25 1238.25 148,001 - 149,000 811.00 770.45 1581.45
99,001 – 100,000 639.50 607.53 1247.03 149,001 – 150,000 814.50 773.78 1588.28
100,001 – 101,000 643.00 610.85 1253.85 150,001 – 151,000 818.00 777.10 1595.10
101,001 – 102,000 646.50 614.18 1260.68 151,001 –152.,000 821.50 780.43 1601.93
102,001 – 102,000 650.00 617.50 1267.50 152,001 – 153,000 825.00 783.75 1608.75
103,001 – 104,000 653.50 620.83 1274.33 153,001 – 154,000 828.50 787.08 1615.58
104,001 – 105,000 657.00 624.15 1281.15 154,001 – 155,000 832.00 790.40 1622.40
105,001 – 106,000 660.50 627.48 1287.98 155,001 – 156,000 835.50 793.73 1629.23
106,001 – 107,000 664.00 630.80 1294.80 156,001 – 157,000 839.00 797.05 1636.05
107,001 – 108,000 667.50 634.11 1301.61 157,001 – 158,000 842.50 800.38 1642.88
108,001 – 109,000 671.00 637.45 1308.45 158,001 – 159,000 846.00 803.70 1649.70
109,001 – 110,000 674.50 640.78 1315.28 159,001 – 160,000 849.50 807.03 1656.53
110,001 – 111,000 678.00 644.10 1322.10 160,001 – 161,000 853.00 810.35 1663.35
111,001 – 112,000 681.50 647.43 1328.93 161,001 – 162,000 856.50 813.68 1670.18
112,001 – 113,000 685.00 650.75 1335.75 162,001 – 163,000 860.00 817.00 1677.00
113,001 – 114,000 688.50 654.08 1342.58 163,001 – 164,000 863.50 820.33 1683.83
114,001 – 115,000 692.00 657.40 1349.40 164,001 – 165,000 867.00 823.65 1690.65
115,001 – 116,000 695.50 660.73 1356.23 165,001 – 166,000 870.50 826.98 1697.48
116,001 – 117,000 699.00 664.05 1363.05 166,001 – 167,000 874.00 830.30 1704.30
117,001 – 118,000 702.50 667.38 1369.88 167,001 – 168,000 877.50 833.63 1711.13
118,001 – 119,000 706.00 670.70 1376.70 168,001 – 169,000 881.00 836.95 1717.95
119,001 – 120,000 709.50 674.03 1383.53 169,001 – 170,000 884.50 840.28 1774.78
C - 10
5.b
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
3.50
_V-100,000_
1000
$
3.00
_V-500,000_
1000
$
2.00
_V-1,000,000_
1000
9C - 11
5.b
Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
10
Solar Energy Systems
- Up to 1 hp
- Over 100 hp
$.056
$.050
$.015
$30.50
$62.15
$124.30
18.20
$23.50
$ 12.30
$ 1.10
$ .73
$ 4.75
$24.60
$ 4.75
$40.00
$11.00
$10.00
$60.00
$49.50
$ 4.75
$12.30
$24.60
$49.50
$74.50
$23.50
$ 7.25
$ 7.25
C - 12
5.b
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
11
Cesspool
Solar Energy Systems
$ 9.80
$40.00
$11.00
$10.00
$24.65
$37.25
$74.50
$22.00
$12.30
$ 4.75
$ 6.15
$ 1.10
$19.90
$ 4.75
$4.75
$ 14.80
$9.80
$60.00
$14.80
$18.20
$14.80
$27.15
$29.60
$14.80
$10.65
$ 7.25
$10.65
$10.65
$10.65
C - 13
5.b
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
12
Accessory Buildings
$196
$196
$196
$ 5.75
$14.00
$ 3.00
$10.50
$10.50
$7.00
$7.00
$14.00
$14.00
$ 7.00
$ 7.00
$ 7.00
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 7.00
$ 7.00
$ 4.25
$ 4.25
$ 7.00
Plans
$40.00
$10.00
$60.00
$94.45
$94.45
$54.00
$475.08
$133.62
$1.00
C - 14
5.b
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
13C - 15
5.b
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
C - 16
5.b
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
APPENDIX D
PROPOSED BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
D - 1
5.b
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
D - 2
5.b
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 1 04/2020
Community & Economic Development Department •Building & Safety Division
201 North E Street, 3rd Floor
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
(909) 384-5357 (909) 384-5155
www.sbcity.org
The plan review and building permit fees applicable to building construction projects in the City of San Bernardino
are provided in the following tables. These fees are collected to cover the costs of the plan review and building
inspection services provided as part of the building process.
These fees Development Impact Fees, School Fees, Engineering Division Fees, Planning Division Fees,
Water Department Fees, Health Department Fees, or other fees collected for other purposes unless noted
otherwise.
In order to determine the for a project the following procedure should be followed:
(all except 1 and 2 family dwellings):
Identify the Construction Cost Factor in Table 2 based on the building’s occupancy group (use) and type
of construction, then multiply this factor by the square footage of the use. The result is the
If the building contains , compute the valuation of each distinct use and
add the valuations together to get the of the building.
Find the appropriate valuation range in the column of Table 3 that corresponds to the
Select the appropriate column to determine the plan review fee.
The Total Plan Review Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable:
= Plan Review Fee + Expeditious Plan Review + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Plan Review +
Energy Plan Review + Fire Plan Review + Accessibility Plan Review + Zoning Review
The hourly rate for in-house plan review is $122.37. When expeditious review is requested by the applicant
and performed by an outside vendor, any plan review billed hourly shall be at the vendor’s prevailing hourly
rate, which is typically higher than the City rate.
Plan reviews of new single-family and duplex residential construction, additions or alteration thereto, will be
performed at the hourly rate. Repetitive tract housing units will be billed at one hour. The plan review fee
for new 1 & 2 family dwellings and for each model of a tract is equal to 5 hours. The fee for additions is
equal to 3 hours.
D - 3
5.b
Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 2 04/2020
Additions without a bath or kitchen: $1.74 per sq. ft.
Additions with a bath or kitchen: $1.92 per sq. ft.
Minimum fee for additions: $375.00
Maximum fee for additions up to 1,200 square feet: $1,459.00
Fees for additions over 1,200 square feet: As indicated in Table 1B
Refer to Table 1A
Refer to Table 1B
The basic building permit fee is listed in the 2nd column of Table 3
The Total Building Permit Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable:
= Basic Building Permit Fee + Issuance Fees + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Permit Fees +
Certificate of Occupancy Fee + SMIP Fee* + Cultural Development Impact Fee + Archive Fee +
Technology Fee + General Plan Update Surcharge
(*SMIP = Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Fees
The Community & Economic Development Department uses the following cost factors (dollars per square foot) to
determine project valuation under Section 304.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted by the City of San
Bernardino. Plan check and building permit fees for occupancies other than single-family residences are based on
value of the project per Section 304. Valuation of a project is determined by the Building Official. The cost factors
contained in Table 2 are used to calculate building valuation, which in turn is used to determine permit and plan
check fees in Table 3. Valuation may or may not have a resemblance to actual square foot cost of a project. In most
cases the costs indicated are below market rates compared to a bid, contract price, assessed value or sales price.
The use of these cost factors by the City simply assures consistency and uniformity in the amount of fees collected
for projects of similar size, construction, and occupancy.
D - 4
5.b
Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 3 04/2020
to 1,200 4.77 $564 4,400 10.21 $1,208
1,300 4.94 $585 4,500 10.38 $1,228
1,400 5.11 $605 4,600 10.55 $1,248
1,500 5.28 $625 4,700 10.72 $1,268
1,600 5.45 $645 4,800 10.89 $1,289
1,700 5.62 $665 4,900 11.06 $1,309
1,800 5.79 $685 5,000 11.23 $1,329
1,900 5.96 $705 5,100 11.40 $1,349
2,000 6.13 $725 5,200 11.57 $1,369
2,100 6.30 $745 5,300 11.74 $1,389
2,200 6.47 $766 5,400 11.91 $1,409
2,300 6.64 $786 5,500 12.08 $1,429
2,400 6.81 $806 5,600 12.25 $1,450
2,500 6.98 $826 5,700 12.42 $1,470
2,600 7.15 $846 5,800 12.59 $1,490
2,700 7.32 $866 5,900 12.76 $1,510
2,800 7.49 $886 6,000 12.93 $1,530
2,900 7.66 $906 6,100 13.10 $1,550
3,000 7.83 $927 6,200 13.27 $1,570
3,100 8.00 $947 6,300 13.44 $1,590
3,200 8.17 $967 6,400 13.61 $1,610
3,300 8.34 $987 6,500 13.78 $1,631
3,400 8.51 $1,007 6,600 13.95 $1,651
3,500 8.68 $1,027 6,700 14.12 $1,671
3,600 8.85 $1,047 6,800 14.29 $1,691
3,700 9.02 $1,067 6,900 14.46 $1,711
3,800 9.19 $1,087 7,000 14.63 $1,731
3,900 9.36 $1,108 7,100 14.80 $1,751
4,000 9.53 $1,128 7,200 14.97 $1,771
4,100 9.70 $1,148 7,300 15.14 $1,792
4,200 9.87 $1,168 7,400 15.31 $1,812
4,300 10.04 $1,188 7,500 15.48 $1,832
The indicated fees include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees
The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees
The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage
For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $1,832.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X 19.72
This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more.
D - 5
5.b
Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 4 04/2020
to 1,200 12.35 $1,461 4,400 21.95 $2,597
1,300 12.65 $1,497 4,500 22.25 $2,633
1,400 12.95 $1,532 4,600 22.55 $2,668
1,500 13.25 $1,568 4,700 22.85 $2,704
1,600 13.55 $1,603 4,800 23.15 $2,739
1,700 13.85 $1,639 4,900 23.45 $2,775
1,800 14.15 $1,674 5,000 23.75 $2,810
1,900 14.45 $1,710 5,100 24.05 $2,846
2,000 14.75 $1,745 5,200 24.35 $2,881
2,100 15.05 $1,781 5,300 24.65 $2,917
2,200 15.35 $1,816 5,400 24.95 $2,952
2,300 15.65 $1,852 5,500 25.25 $2,998
2,400 15.95 $1,887 5,600 25.55 $3,023
2,500 16.25 $1,923 5,700 25.85 $3,059
2,600 16.55 $1,958 5,800 26.15 $3,094
2,700 16.85 $1,994 5,900 26.45 $3,130
2,800 17.15 $2,029 6,000 26.75 $3,165
2,900 17.45 $2,065 6,100 27.05 $3,201
3,000 17.75 $2,100 6,200 27.35 $3,236
3,100 18.05 $2,136 6,300 27.65 $3,272
3,200 18.35 $2,171 6,400 27.95 $3,307
3,300 18.65 $2,207 6,500 28.25 $3,343
3,400 18.95 $2,242 6,600 28.55 $3,378
3,500 19.25 $2,278 6,700 28.85 $3,414
3,600 19.55 $2,313 6,800 29.15 $3,449
3,700 19.85 $2,349 6,900 29.45 $3,485
3,800 20.15 $2,384 7,000 29.75 $3,520
3,900 20.45 $2,420 7,100 30.05 $3,556
4,000 20.75 $2,455 7,200 30.35 $3,591
4,100 21.05 $2,491 7,300 30.65 $3,627
4,200 21.35 $2,526 7,400 30.95 $3,662
4,300 21.65 $2,562 7,500 31.25 $3,698
The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees
The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees
The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage
For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $3,698.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X $35.50
This table applies to in-fill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less.
D - 6
5.b
Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 5 04/2020
Construction costs per square foot [$]
Assembly, Theaters, with Stage 247.86 239.47 233.25 223.81 210.17 204.10 216.62 195.46 188.40
Assembly, Theaters, without
Stage 227.10 218.71 212.49 203.05 189.41 183.34 195.86 174.70 167.65
Assembly, Nightclubs 191.96 186.56 182.12 174.70 164.94 160.39 168.64 149.29 144.33
Assembly, Restaurants, Bars,
Banquet Halls 190.96 185.56 180.12 173.70 162.94 159.39 167.64 147.29 143.33
Assembly, Churches 229.69 221.30 215.08 205.64 192.37 187.27 198.45 177.66 170.60
Assembly, General, Community
Halls, Libraries, Museums 192.20 183.81 176.59 168.15 153.51 148.44 160.96 138.80 132.75
Assembly, Arenas 226.10 217.71 210.49 202.05 187.41 182.34 194.86 172.70 166.65
Business 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08
Educational 209.90 202.64 196.82 188.34 175.49 166.60 181.86 153.45 148.75
Factory and Industrial,
Moderate Hazard 117.60 112.19 105.97 101.84 91.54 87.26 97.61 75.29 70.95
Factory and Industrial,
Low Hazard 116.60 111.19 105.97 100.84 91.54 86.26 96.61 75.29 69.95
High Hazard, Explosives 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 N.P.
High Hazard 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 63.56
HPM 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08
Institutional, Supervised
Environment 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33
Institutional, Hospitals 335.53 328.23 321.81 312.65 296.45 N.P. 305.67 276.99 N.P.
Institutional, Nursing Homes 233.12 225.82 219.40 210.24 195.51 N.P. 203.26 176.05 N.P.
Institutional, Restrained 227.71 220.41 213.99 204.83 190.84 183.78 197.85 171.37 163.02
Institutional, Day Care Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33
Mercantile 142.95 137.54 132.11 125.68 115.38 111.83 119.62 99.73 95.77
Residential, Hotels 199.70 192.92 186.99 179.78 164.90 160.43 179.93 148.60 143.96
Residential, Multiple-Family 167.27 160.49 154.56 147.35 133.71 129.23 147.50 117.40 112.76
Residential, One and
Two-Family 155.84 151.61 147.83 144.09 138.94 135.27 141.72 130.04 122.46
Residential, Care/Assisted Living
Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33
Storage, Moderate Hazard 108.99 103.58 97.35 93.22 83.14 78.87 88.99 66.89 62.56
Storage, Low Hazard 107.99 102.58 97.35 92.22 83.14 77.87 87.99 66.89 61.56
Utility, Miscellaneous 84.66 79.81 74.65 71.30 64.01 59.80 68.04 50.69 48.30
Private Garages use Utility, Miscellaneous
Unfinished basements (Group R-3) = $22.45 per square foot
For shell only buildings deduct 20%
N.P. = Not Permitted
D - 7
5.b
Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 6 04/2020
Unit Construction Cost
Block Walls:
4’ high
5’ high
6’ high
Other
Demolition Valuation Contract Price
Drywall
Fireplace
Patios/Porches
Patio Slab Only with Footing
Patio Cover Only
Reroofing 1 Square 100 Square Foot :
Built-up
Composition Shingles
Shake or Tile
Resheathing
Signs
Siding, Exterior
Stucco
Swimming Pools and Spas –Gunite
Manufactured Above-Ground Pool
Spa
Tenant Improvement Use 30% of Cost per Square Foot
Window Change-Outs
Deduct 20% for shell only buildings.
D - 8
5.b
Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 7 04/2020
The following table provides basic permit and plan review fees based on valuation for commercial, industrial, and multifamily residential
occupancies. Additional fees for permit issuance, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, development impacts, sewer capacity, schools, etc. may apply.
1 –500 60.00 30.00 90.00
501 –600 60.00 30.00 90.00
601 –700 60.00 30.00 90.00
701 –800 60.00 30.00 90.00
801 –900 60.00 30.00 90.00
901 –1,000 60.00 30.00 90.00
1,001 –1,100 60.00 60.00 120.00 20,001 –21,000 270.61 266.71 537.32
1,101 –1,200 60.00 60.00 120.00 21,001 –22,000 281.89 277.82 559.71
1,201 –1,300 60.00 60.00 120.00 22,001 –23,000 293.16 288.93 582.09
1,301 –1,400 60.00 60.00 120.00 23,001 –24,000 304.44 300.04 604.48
1,401 –1,500 60.00 60.00 120.00 24,001 –25,000 315.71 311.22 626.93
1,501 –1,600 60.00 60.00 120.00 25,001 –26,000 323.23 318.56 641.79
1,601 –1,700 60.00 60.00 120.00 26,001 –27,000 332.00 327.21 659.21
1,701 –1,800 60.00 60.00 120.00 27,001 –28,000 339.52 334.62 674.14
1,801 –1,900 60.00 60.00 120.00 28,001 –29,000 348.29 343.26 691.55
1,901 –2,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 29,001 –30,000 355.80 350.67 706.47
30,001 –31,000 364.57 359.31 723.88
31,001 –32,000 372.72 367.34 740.06
2,001 –3,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 32,001 –33,000 380.86 375.36 756.22
3,001 –4,000 78.93 77.79 156.72 33,001 –34,000 389.00 383.40 772.40
4,001 –5,000 90.20 88.90 179.10 34,001 –35,000 397.15 391.42 788.57
5,001 –6,000 101.48 100.01 201.49 35,001 –36,000 405.29 399.45 804.74
6,001 –7,000 112.75 111.13 223.88 36,001 –37,000 413.43 407.47 820.90
7,001 –8,000 124.03 122.24 246.27 37,001 –38,000 421.58 415.50 837.08
8,001 –9,000 135.31 133.35 268.66 38,001 –39,000 429.72 423.52 853.24
9,001 –10,000 146.58 144.47 291.05 39,001 –40,000 437.86 432.16 870.02
10,001 –11,000 157.86 155.58 313.44 40,001 –41,000 446.01 439.54 885.58
11,001 –12,000 169.13 166.69 335.82 41,001 –42,000 454.15 447.60 901.75
12,001 –13,000 180.41 177.80 358.21 42,001 –43,000 462.30 455.62 917.92
13,001 –14,000 191.68 188.92 380.60 43,001 –44,000 470.44 463.65 934.09
14,001 –15,000 202.96 200.03 402.99 44,001 –45,000 478.58 471.67 950.25
15,001 –16,000 214.23 211.14 425.37 45,001 –46,000 486.73 479.71 966.44
16,001 –17,000 225.51 222.25 447.76 46,001 –47,000 494.87 487.73 982.60
17,001 –18,000 236.79 233.37 470.16 47,001 –48,000 503.01 495.76 998.77
18,001 –19,000 248.06 244.48 492.54 48,001 –49,000 511.78 503.78 1015.56
19,001 –20,000 259.34 255.59 514.93 49,001 –50,000 519.30 511.81 1031.11
D - 9
5.b
Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 8 04/2020
50,001 –51,000 525.56 517.36 1042.92 90,001 –91,000 750.45 739.61 1490.06
51,001 –52,000 529.95 522.92 1052.87 91,001 –92,000 756.08 745.18 1501.26
52,001 –53,000 536.21 528.47 1064.68 92,001 –93,000 762.35 750.73 1513.08
53,001 –54,000 541.85 534.03 1075.88 93,001 –94,000 767.36 756.29 1523.65
54,001 –55,000 547.49 539.58 1087.07 94,001 –95,000 773.00 761.84 1534.84
55,001 –56,000 553.13 545.15 1098.28 95,001 –96,000 778.64 767.40 1546.04
56,001 –57,000 558.76 550.70 1109.46 96,001 –97,000 784.27 772.95 1557.22
57,001 –58,000 564.40 556.26 1120.66 97,001 –98,000 789.91 778.51 1568.42
58,001 –59,000 570.04 561.81 1131.85 98,001 –99,000 795.55 784.06 1579.61
59,001 –60,000 575.68 567.37 1143.05 99,001 –100,000 801.19 789.63 1590.82
60,001 –61,000 581.31 572.92 1154.23 100,001 –101,000 805.57 793.94 1599.51
61,001 –62,000 586.95 578.49 1165.44 101,001 –102,000 809.96 798.27 1608.23
62,001 –63,000 592.59 584.04 1176.63 102,001 –103,000 814.34 802.59 1616.93
63,001 –64,000 598.23 589.60 1187.83 103,001 –104,000 818.73 806.91 1625.64
64,001 –65,000 603.87 595.15 1199.02 104,001 –105,000 823.11 811.23 1634.34
65,001 –66,000 609.50 600.71 1210.21 105,001 –106,000 827.50 815.56 1643.06
66,001 –67,000 615.14 606.26 1221.40 106,001 –107,000 831.88 819.87 1651.75
67,001 –68,000 620.78 611.82 1232.60 107,001 –108,000 836.27 824.17 1660.44
68,001 –69,000 626.42 617.37 1243.79 108,001 –109,000 840.65 828.52 1669.17
69,001 –70,000 632.05 622.94 1254.99 109,001 –110,000 845.04 832.84 1677.88
70,001 –71,000 637.69 628.49 1266.18 110,001 –111,000 849.42 837.16 1686.58
71,001 –72,000 643.33 634.05 1277.38 111,001 –112,000 853.81 841.49 1695.30
72,001 –73,000 648.97 639.60 1288.57 112,001 –113,000 858.19 845.80 1703.99
73,001 –74,000 654.48 645.16 1299.64 113,001 –114,000 862.57 850.13 1712.70
74,001 –75,000 660.24 650.71 1310.95 114,001 –115,000 866.96 854.45 1721.41
75,001 –76,000 665.88 656.27 1322.15 115,001 –116,000 871.34 858.77 1730.11
76,001 –77,000 671.52 661.82 1333.34 116,001 –117,000 875.73 863.09 1738.82
77,001 –78,000 677.03 667.26 1344.29 117,001 –118,000 880.11 867.42 1747.53
78,001 –79,000 682.79 672.94 1355.73 118,001 –119,000 884.50 871.73 1756.23
79,001 –80,000 688.43 678.50 1366.93 119,001 –120,000 888.88 876.06 1764.94
80,001 –81,000 694.07 684.31 1378.38 120,001 –121,000 893.27 880.38 1773.65
81,001 –82,000 699.71 689.61 1389.32 121,001 –122,000 897.65 884.70 1782.35
82,001 –83,000 705.34 695.16 1400.50 122,001 –123,000 902.04 889.02 1791.06
83,001 –84,000 710.98 700.73 1411.71 123,001 –124,000 906.42 893.35 1799.77
84,001 –85,000 716.62 706.28 1422.90 124,001 –125,000 910.81 897.66 1808.47
85,001 –86,000 721.63 711.84 1433.47 125,001 –126,000 915.19 901.99 1817.18
86,001 –87,000 727.90 717.39 1445.29 126,001 –127,000 919.58 906.30 1825.88
87,001 –88,000 732.91 722.95 1455.86 127.001 –128,000 923.96 910.63 1834.59
88,001 –89,000 739.17 728.50 1467.67 128,001 –129,000 928.35 914.95 1843.30
89,001 –90,000 744.81 734.06 1478.87 129,001 –130,000 932.73 919.28 1852.01
D - 10
5.b
Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 9 04/2020
130,001 –131,000 937.12 923.59 1860.71 150,001 –151,000 1024.82 1010.02 2034.84
131,001 –132,000 941.50 927.92 1869.42 151,001 –152,000 1029.20 1014.35 2043.55
132,001 –133,000 945.89 932.23 1878.12 152,001 –153,000 1033.59 1018.67 2052.26
133,001 –134,000 950.27 936.56 1886.83 153,001 –154,000 1037.97 1023.00 2060.97
134,001 –135,000 954.66 940.88 1895.54 154,001 –155,000 1042.36 1027.31 2069.67
135,001 –136,000 959.04 945.21 1904.25 155,001 –156,000 1046.74 1031.64 2078.38
136,001 –137,000 963.43 949.52 1912.95 156,001 –157,000 1051.13 1035.95 2087.08
137,001 –138,000 967.81 953.85 1921.66 157,001 –158,000 1055.51 1040.28 2095.79
138,001 –139,000 972.20 958.16 1930.36 158,001 –159,000 1059.90 1044.60 2104.50
139,001 –140,000 976.58 962.49 1939.07 159,001 –160,000 1064.28 1048.92 2113.20
140,001 –141,000 980.97 966.81 1947.78 160,001 –161,000 1068.27 1053.24 2121.91
141,001 –142,000 985.35 971.14 1956.49 161,001 –162,000 1073.05 1057.57 2130.62
142,001 –143,000 989.74 975.45 1965.19 162,001 –163,000 1077.44 1061.88 2139.32
143,001 –144,000 994.12 979.78 1973.90 163,001 –164,000 1081.82 1066.21 2148.03
144,001 –145,000 998.51 984.09 1982.60 164,001 –165,000 1086.21 1070.53 2156.74
145,001 –146,000 1002.89 989.07 1991.96 165,001 –166,000 1090.59 1074.85 2165.44
146,001 –147,000 1007.28 992.74 2000.02 166,001 –167,000 1094.98 1079.17 2174.15
147,001 –148,000 1011.66 997.07 2008.73 167,001 –168,000 1099.36 1083.50 2182.86
148,001 –149,000 1016.05 1001.38 2017.43 168,001 –169,000 1103.75 1087.81 2191.56
149,001 –150,000 1020.43 1005.71 2026.14 169,001 –170,000 1108.13 1092.14 2200.27
For valuation ranges beyond the scope of the above table the following formulas can be used to determine the
basic building permit fee:
– $1108.13 for first $170,000.00 and $4.40 per
1,000.00 thereafter, or
V-170,000
1000
$– $2,560.13 for first $500,000.00 and $3.75 per
1,000.00 thereafter, or
V-500,000
1000
$– $4,435.13 for first $1,000,000.00 and $2.50 per 1,000.00
thereafter, or
V-1,000,000
1000
For valuation ranges beyond the scope of this table the Plan Review Fee shall be as follows:
D - 11
5.b
Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 10 04/2020
Single-family Residential Rewire Plus Service
Apartments, Condominiums per Square Foot Plus Service
Commercial Buildings per Square Foot Plus Service
Electrical Service:
Up to 200 amps
200 Amps to 1000 Amps
1000 Amps and Over
Subpanels
Temporary Power Poles:
Meter Pole
Each Extension Pole no Meter
Unit Schedule:
Receptacles, Lights, Switches - First 20 Each
After 20 Each
Range/Oven, Washer/Dryer, A/C Unit, Evaporative Cooler
Electrical Signs for Electrical Work –Does not Include the Sign Structure
Additional Branch Circuit within Same Sign
Meter Reset
When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work
Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot
Minimum Fee
Solar Energy Systems
Private Swimming Pools
Power Apparatus Motors,Generators, Transformer, Industrial Heating, Cooling,or
Cooking Equipment, etc.
Up to 1 hp
Over 1 to 10 hp
Over 10 to 50 hp
Over 50 to 100 hp
Over 100 hp
Carnivals and Circuses:
Generators and Electrically Driven Rides
Mechanically Driven Rides, Walk-Thru Attractions with Electrical Lighting
System of Area Booth Lighting
D - 12
5.b
Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 11 04/2020
Plumbing Fixture
Gas Meter Reset Gauge Test Required
Gas Meter Reset When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work
Gas Meter - Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot
House Sewer
Cesspool
Private Sewage Disposal System
Demo Septic Pit
Water Heater
Repair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping
Gas Piping System:
1 to 5 Outlets
Each Additional Outlet Over 5
Industrial Waste, Pretreatment Interceptor, Except Kitchen Type Grease
Interceptors Functioning as Fixture Traps.
Water Piping Installation, Alteration or Repair
Drainage Vent Piping
Lawn Sprinkler System on any one Meter
Rainwater Systems - per Drain Inside Building
Minimum Fee
Solar Energy Systems
FAU:
Up to 100,000 BTU
Over 100,000 BTU
A/C Unit:
Up to 3 Tons
Between 3 - 15 Tons
Twin-Pack New or Replacement, Includes Gas or Electric
Wall Heater, Floor Furnace, or Suspended Heater
Evaporative Cooler
Bath Exhaust Fan
Grease Hood and Duct Systems
Duct Alteration
Air-Handling Unit HVAC
D - 13
5.b
Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 12 04/2020
Installation Set-up
Earthquake Bracing Systems
Accessory Buildings Cabanas, Ramadas, Patios, Block Walls, Garages, Awnings,
Carports, Porches, etc.:
Without Standard Plans
With Standard Plans
Fees for Construction Alteration of Mobile Home Park Facilities:
For Each Lot
Electrical Fee: Park Service
Street Lights
Unit Substation/Secondary Distribution Transformer
Alter/Replace Service or Transformer
Mobile Home Lot Service
Alter/Repair Replace lot service
Plan Review Fees not Charged to HCD Standard Plans
Plumbing Fees:
Park Drain System
Private Sewage Disposal or Water Treatment System
Lot Drain Inlet
Alter Repair of Drainage Vent Piping
Park Water System
Water Service Outlets Water Meters
Fire Hydrant or Riser
Water Conditioner
Plumbing Fixtures Equipment Alter Repair Replace
Park Gas Piping System
LPG or Natural Gas Tank of 60 Gallon or More
Mobile Home Lot Gas Outlet Riser
Gas Distribution Equipment Alter Repair Replace
Miscellaneous Equipment Each Installation
D - 14
5.b
Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 13 04/2020
Supplemental Issuance Fee
Minimum Permit Fee
Inspections
Reinspection Fee
Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours
Zoning Consistency Review Fee Building Permits, Demo, etc.
Certificate of Occupancy
if Included on Building Permit
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fees are imposed by the State of
California and provide funding for seismic monitoring and instrumentation throughout
the State.
Technology Fee
Archive Fees:
Per Permit or Application
Plans
Documents
D - 15
5.b
Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
D - 16
5.b
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
APPENDIX E
DETAIL OF RECREATION SERVICES
E - 1
5.b
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
E - 2
5.b
Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINODETAIL OF RECREATION SERVICESAs of April 29, 2020DIRECT/DIRECT COSTSDIRECT FACIL/FIELD TOTALPROGRAM FULL TIME FACILITY/ INDIRECT TOTAL COST COST COSTREF # SERVICE COST COST TOTAL FIELD COST COSTS COSTS REVENUES RECOVERY RECOVERY RECOVERYT-600 Aquatics Services $293,266 $81,774 $375,040 $0 $300,763 $675,803 $94,350 25.2% 25.2% 14.0%T-606 Youth Sports $35,588 $11 $35,599 $0 $0 $35,599 $10,756 30.2% 30.2% 30.2%T-607 Adult Sports $36,128 $11,832 $47,960 $0 $37,700 $85,660 $21,460 44.7% 44.7% 25.1%T-610 Comm. Center Programs/Rentals $300,231 $331,594 $631,825 $2,473,880 $589,990 $3,695,695 $13,000 2.1% 0.4% 0.4%SUBTOTAL - PROGRAMS $665,213 $425,211 $1,090,424 $2,473,880 $928,453 $4,492,757 $139,566 12.8% 3.9% 3.1%T-613 Ballfield Rental/Use $56,527 $31,764 $88,291 $51,097 $103,125 $242,513 $9,500 10.8% 6.8% 3.9%T-726 Park Rental/Reservation $0 $3,258 $3,258 $12,980 $18,277 $34,515 $28,000 859.4% 172.4% 81.1%T-727 Fiscallini Field Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $9,182 $9,614 $18,796 $17,000 N/A 185.1% 90.4%SUBTOTAL - RENTALS $56,527 $35,022 $91,549 $73,259 $131,016 $295,824 $54,500 59.5% 33.1% 18.4%TAX-023 Center For Individual Development $126,371 $83,446 $209,817 $0 $176,596 $386,413 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%TAX-024 Senior Center Services $772,238 $360,273 $1,132,511 $0 $563,150 $1,695,661 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%TAX-025 City Special Events $87,861 $61,062 $148,923 $0 $178,065 $326,988 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%SUBTOTAL - TAX SUPPORTED $986,470 $504,781 $1,491,251 $0 $917,811 $2,409,062 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%GRAND TOTAL $1,708,210 $965,014 $2,673,224 $2,547,139 $1,977,280 $7,197,643 $194,066 7.3% 3.7% 2.7%PROGRAM COSTS ARE PART TIME COSTS (INCLUDING BENEFITS) AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSESFULL TIME COSTS ARE SALARIES, BENEFITS, AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSESINDIRECT COSTS INCLUDES CITY AND DEPT O/H, AND OTHER DEPARTMENTSE - 35.bPacket Pg. 612Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing
Detail of Recreation Fees
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Aquatics Fees
Jerry Lewis Swim Center
Daily Admission
Ages 2-7 $1 $2
Ages 8-17 $1.50 $3.00
Adults $3 $5
Ages 60 or older $1.50 $3.00
Family Season Swim Pass
1-6 members $55
7-12 members $75
1-6 people – Year 1 $60
1-6 people – Year 2 $65
1-6 people – Year 3 $70
Commercial Season Swim Pass
15-25 employees $200 $300
26-50 employees $300 $400
15-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $10 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $12 Delete Fee
Adults $30 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $12 Delete Fee
25-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $15 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $20 Delete Fee
Adults $45 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $20 Delete Fee
Swim Classes $40 $40
E - 4
5.b
Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Detail of Recreation Fees
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Community Pools
Daily Admission
Ages 2-7 $0.50 $1.00
Ages 8-17 $1 $2.00
Adults $2 $3.00
Ages 60 or older $1 $2
Family Season Swim Pass
1-6 members $45
7-12 members $65
1-6 people – Year 1 $60
1-6 people – Year 2 $65
1-6 people – Year 3 $70
Commercial Season Swim Pass
15-25 employees $175 $200
26-50 employees $250 $300
15-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $5 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $10 Delete Fee
Adults $20 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $10 Delete Fee
25-EntryPunch Card
Ages 2-7 $7 Delete Fee
Ages 8-17 $15 Delete Fee
Adults $30 Delete Fee
Ages 60 and older $15 Delete Fee
Swim Pass Reissue $5 $5
E - 5
5.b
Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Detail of Recreation Fees
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Facility/Park Rentals
Community Center Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min)
Two or more Rooms $100/first 2 hrs + $40/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min)
Assembly Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min)
Gymnasium $90.50/hr + $28/add’l hr $90/hr (2 hr min)
Shower Room $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min)
Kitchen $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min)
FDR Bowl (2 hr min) $130/hr + $60/add’l hr $130/hr (2 hr min)
Seccombe Lake Pavilion $55/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $55/hr (2 hr min)
La Plaza Gazebo $40/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $40/hr (2 hr min)
Wading Pools $36.50 per hour Delete Fee
Concessions Stands $100 per use Delete Fee
Perris Hill Crafter $75/month $75/month
Perris Hill Park Stage $25/hr + $8/add’l hr $25/hr (2 hr min)
Tennis Court Tournament $10/hr + $5/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min)
(per court/day)
Jerry Lewis Swim Center $92/hr + $46/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min)
(2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards
All Other Pools $25/hr $25/hr (2 hr min)
(2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards
Group Picnic Reservations (use fee per use)
Size of Group
Up to 50 $25 $35
51-99 $35 $35
100-199 $75 $75
200-399 $100 $100
E - 6
5.b
Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Detail of Recreation Fees
Current Fee Proposed Fee
400-699 $200 $200
700 and up $350 $350
Picnic Shelter $30 per day $40 per day
Picnic Shelter Utility Access $25 per day $35 per day
Parks/Parking Lots for Fundraising/ Special Events (not subject to resident or non-resident use
cost adjustment) $200 per day $200 per day
Fees for Equipment and/or Service:
Bleacher (up to 4 sets) $465 per occasion $465 per occasion
Trash Receptacles $2.50 each per occasion $2.50 each per occasion
Picnic Tables $10 each per occasion $10 each per occasion
Stage Trailer $250 per occasion $250 per occasion
Folding Chairs $1.50 each per occasion $1.50 each per occasion
Folding Tables $8 each per occasion $8 each per occasion
Bunting $50 per day $50 per day
Banners $40 each per week $40 each per week
Curtain Dividers $15 each per occasion $15 each per occasion
Kiosk Sign $25 each per occasion $25 each per occasion
Choral Risers $100 set per occasion $100 set per occasion
Adult Drop-In Basketball $2 per session $2 per session
Ballfield base rental $25 per set $25 per set
E - 7
5.b
Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Detail of Recreation Fees
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Facilities/Parks Rental Refundable Damage Bond & Clean-Up Deposit
Number of People
Fewer than 50 $75 $75
50 – 100 $650 $650
101 – 200 $1,250 $1,050
201 - 500 $1,750 $1,750
501 - 1,000 $3,500 $3,500
1,001+ $8,000 $8,000
E - 8
5.b
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
APPENDIX F
FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATES
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
1) The Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate (FBHR) includes the all of the employee’s fringe benefits plus a
share of the accoun ng ac vity’s overheads and opera ng expenses.
2) Many City employees are assigned to mul ple accoun ng ac vi es. Because each ac vity will
have its own overhead alloca on and opera ng expenses, the same posi on will have a
different FBHR in the different ac vi es. The FBHRs in this appendix are an average of all their
rates.
3) If a service in Appendix A refers to an hourly rate for an employee, that is the rate to use not the
rate in this Appendix.
4) These FBHRs are based on a Full-Cost Cost Alloca on Plan and are, therefore, NOT the FBHRs to
use for State and Federal Grant programs.
F - 1
5.b
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
F - 2
5.b
Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE
POSITION AVG.FBHR
A/S ATTENDANT $87.04
A/S KENNEL SUPVSR $90.59
A/S OFFICE SUPVSR $90.59
ACCOUNTANT II $64.00
ACCOUNTANT III $148.32
ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT $78.59
ACCOUNTING MANAGER $231.74
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $94.57
ADMIN ANALYST I $118.37
ADMIN ANALYST II $104.27
ADMIN ASST TO CITY COUNCIL $59.42
ADMIN ASST TO THE CITY MGR $53.46
ADMIN SVCS SUPVSR $84.41
ADMIN.ANALYST II $72.69
ADMIN.ASSIST.$65.31
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $77.51
ADMINSTRATIVE ANALYST $106.20
ANIMAL CTRL MGR $156.29
ANIMAL CTRL OFFICER $73.72
ASSET FORFEIT.ANALYST $77.08
ASSIST.CHIEF OF POLICE $339.73
ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR $102.56
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER $277.73
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MGR $133.12
ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR $53.45
ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR $113.13
ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP SPEC $84.75
BLDG INSPECT.II $118.33
BLDG MAINT DIV MANAGER $98.85
BUDGET OFFICER $92.75
BUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/REP $131.43
BUSINESS REGISTRATION INSP $120.75
CDBG COORDINATOR $71.65
CDBG PROGRAM ASSISTANT $43.89
CHIEF ASST CITY ATTORNEY $344.74
F - 3
5.b
Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE
POSITION AVG.FBHR
CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL $186.25
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK $115.59
CHIEF OF POLICE $421.01
CITY ATTORNEY $353.71
CITY ATTY INVESTIG. SUPV. $151.86
CITY CLERK $204.99
CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW $237.26
CITY MANAGER $378.28
CITY TREASURER $42.90
CIVIL SVC BOARD CHIEF EXAMINER $125.03
CODE ENF.DIV.MGR $168.96
CODE ENF.OFF.II/III $104.58
COM.DEV.TECH.$82.26
COMM REC PROGRAM COORD $63.31
COMM SVCS CENTER SUPERVISOR $91.72
COMM.POLICING SPCLST $87.02
COMM.SVCS.OFF. I $66.50
COMM.SVCS.OFF. II $64.64
COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR $147.22
CONST.INSP.II $104.36
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER $131.28
COORDINATOR OF VOLUNTEERS $54.09
COUNCIL ADMIN SUPERVISOR $78.38
CRIM.OMVEST.OFF.$91.48
CRIME ANALY.SUP.ASST $56.01
CRIME ANALYST $88.97
CRIMINAL INV.OFF.$86.49
CUSTODIAN $36.09
CUSTOMER SVC REP $66.13
DEPT ACCOUNTING TECH $59.43
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY I $176.39
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY II $167.81
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY III $176.39
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY IV $219.07
DEPUTY CITY CLERK $99.80
F - 4
5.b
Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE
POSITION AVG.FBHR
DEPUTY CITY TREASURER $68.24
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HOUSING $129.03
DETECTIVE/CORP'L $174.42
DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL.$297.59
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES $190.25
DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION $326.49
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $180.64
ECON DEVELOP ANALYST $93.78
ECON DEVELOP MANAGER $162.15
ELECTRICIAN I $98.74
ENGIN'G ASSIST III $119.44
ENGIN'G ASST I/II $96.69
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE $151.83
ENVIRON PROJECT SPECIALIST $66.09
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT $86.79
FACILITIES MAINT MECHANIC $53.57
FACILITIES MAINT SUPV $61.48
FINANCE DIRECTOR $271.15
FINANCIAL ANALYST $131.51
FOOD SERVICE SUPERVISOR II $99.02
FORENSICS SPEC II $97.15
FORENSICS SPEC III $107.17
HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR $106.86
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST $84.24
HUMAN RESOURCES TECH $49.02
HVAC MECHANIC $65.41
IEMG BROADCAST ENG COORD $156.11
IT ANALYST II $98.60
IW FIELD INSPECTOR $91.35
LANDSCAPE INSPECTION SUPV $150.23
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR I $106.79
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II $110.99
LEAD CUSTODIAN $41.62
LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER $98.45
LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR $117.98
F - 5
5.b
Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE
POSITION AVG.FBHR
LEAD PARK MAINT SUPERVISOR $125.66
LEGAL ADMIN ASSISTANT $117.99
LEGAL SECRETARY I $83.47
LEGAL SECRETARY II $92.24
LIBRARIAN II $117.63
LIBRARY ADMIN TECH/WEBMASTER $114.41
LIBRARY CIRCULATION SUPV. $122.62
LIBRARY DIRECTOR $242.91
LIBRARY NETWORK ADMIN $136.60
LIBRARY NETWORK ASSISTANT $100.00
LIBRARY PROGRAM COORD $116.67
LIBRARY TECHNICIAN II $88.90
LIEUTENANT $252.22
LITERACY PROGRAM COORD. $129.87
MAINT SUPERVISOR $143.69
MAINTENANCE WORKER I $72.12
MAINTENANCE WORKER II $68.64
MANAGER OF COMMUNICATIONS $157.18
MAYOR'S CHIEF OF STAFF $130.39
NPDES COORD $112.79
NPDES INSPECTOR $100.06
OFFICE ASSISTANT $64.61
OPER & MAINT DIV MANAGER $178.31
PARK MAINT DIVISION MANAGER $191.31
PARKS MAINT WORKER II $91.95
PAYROLL MANAGER $91.04
PAYROLL TECHNICIAN $45.43
PD DISPATCH.SUPVSR $114.84
PD DISPATCHER I $75.79
PD DISPATCHER II $90.72
PD P+T TECH.$158.34
PD RECORDS SUPVSR $88.57
PD RECORDS TECH .II $61.30
PD RECORDS TECH.I $47.00
PD TRANSCRIBER $60.04
F - 6
5.b
Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE
POSITION AVG.FBHR
PKG.ENFORCMT.OFF.$58.29
PLANNING MGR $187.36
PLUMBER $56.44
POL.FLT.MTC.EXPDITOR $63.40
POLICE CAPTAIN $298.94
POLICE OFFICER $153.80
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT $156.57
PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER $172.97
PROC/CONT SUPP SVCS DIR $84.28
PROGRAM MANAGER $84.44
PROP.EVID+SUPL.SUPV $96.22
PROP+EVID.TECH I $68.62
PROP+EVID.TECH II $92.27
RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST $103.32
RECREATION THERAPIST $86.48
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ANALYST $111.52
SENIOR MGMT ANALYST $101.86
SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT $66.74
SERGEANT $201.96
SR CUSTOMER SERVICE REP $72.04
SR DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $212.85
SR FINANCIAL SPECIALIST $96.73
SR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST $95.26
SR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH $55.03
SR.ADMIN.ASSIST.$46.49
SR.CIVIL ENGINEER $183.48
SR.CUST.SVC.REP/DSPTCH $92.54
SR.MGMT.ANALYST $107.20
SR.OFF.ASSIST.$64.87
SR.PLANS EXAMINER $122.37
SR.WHSE/DEL.DRVR $32.10
STREET SIGNAL/LIGHT SUPV $169.03
SURVEY TECHNICIAN I $84.24
TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN $131.87
TRAFFIC ENGINEER $151.20
F - 7
5.b
Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE
POSITION AVG.FBHR
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC. $135.23
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN I $109.53
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN II $127.08
TRAFFIC SYS & OPER ANALYST $130.20
TREASURY ASSISTANT $52.94
TREE TRIMMER ASSISTANT $65.84
TREE TRIMMER I $60.37
TREE TRIMMER II $77.11
WEED ABATE.COORD $108.40
F - 8
5.b
Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Paul Espinoza, Finance Director
Subject: Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, approve the commercial and payroll disbursements for April 2020.
Background
Completed commercial and payroll disbursement registers are submitted to the Mayor
and City Council for approval. This happens on a regular basis, typically every meeting
for the most recently completed disbursement registers.
The detailed warrant registers are available on the City Website, an d are updated weekly
by the Finance Department. The registers may be accessed by copying the following link
into an internet browser: <http://sbcity.org/cityhall/finance/warrant_register.asp>
Discussion
Gross Payroll
Bi-Weekly for April 16, 2020 $2,342,828.22
Monthly for April 15, 2020 11,666.69
Total Payroll Demands: $2,354,494.91
The following check registers are being presented for approval:
April 9, 2020 2019/20 (Register #42)$2,534,396.10
April 9, 2020 2019/20 (Register #43)18,000.00
Total commercial check demands:$2,552,396.10
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
Approval of the noted check and EFT registers for commercial and payroll
disbursements align with Key Target No. 1: Financial Stability by creating a framework
for spending decisions.
Fiscal Impact
Amounts noted in the disbursement registers have no further fiscal impact. Amounts
were paid consistent with existing budget authorization and no further budgetary impact
is required.
6
Packet Pg. 626
6696
Page 2
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of th e City of San Bernardino,
California, approve the commercial and payroll disbursements for April 2020.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Payroll checks for April 2020
Attachment 2 Commercial checks for Register #42
Attachment 3 Commercial checks for Register #43
Ward: All
6
Packet Pg. 627
6.a
Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: FN. Payroll Summary Report ATTACHMENT#1 (6696 : Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements)
6.a
Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: FN. Payroll Summary Report ATTACHMENT#1 (6696 : Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements)
6.b
Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.b
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of
6.c
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #43 ATTACHMENT#3 (6696 : Approval of
6.c
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #43 ATTACHMENT#3 (6696 : Approval of
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Paul Espinoza, Finance Director
Subject: Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino ,
California accept and file the Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports for both February
and March 2020.
Background
The City’s Statement of Investment Policy requires that a monthly Investment Portfolio
Report be prepared and submitted to the Mayor and City Council. The Director of
Finance will prepare, review, and present the City’s Investment Portfolio Report and
confirm that the portfolio is in compliance with the City’s Investment Policy.
Discussion
The February Investment Portfolio Report provides a synopsis of investment activity for
the City’s investment portfolio for the month ended February 29, 2020.
The March Investment Portfolio Report provides a synopsis of investment activity for the
City’s investment portfolio for the month ended March 31, 2020.
As of November 6, 2019, the City’s Investment Portfolio is in full compliance with the
California Government Code Section 53601, and there is sufficient cash flow from a
combination of liquid and maturing securities, bank deposits, and income to meet the
City’s expenditure requirements.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
The acceptance and filing of the attached Investment Portfolio R eport aligns with Key
Target No. 1: Financial Stability by Implementing and maintaining and updating a fiscal
accountability plan
Fiscal Impact
None
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
7
Packet Pg. 646
6697
Page 2
California accept and file the Monthly Investment Portfolio Report for February and
March 2020.
Attachments
Attachment 1 February 2020 Investment Portfolio Management Summary Report
Attachment 2 March 2020 Investment Portfolio Management Summary Report
Ward: All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: None
7
Packet Pg. 647
7.a
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.a
Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
7.b
Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
Subject: Independent Investigation Status Update
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, receive and file a status update requested by the City Council on the
independent investigation into the allegations of harassment made by current and
former City employees against Mayor John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino.
Background
The City retained an independent investigator on February 20, 2020, to investigate the
allegations of harassment made by current and former City employees against Mayor
John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino. When such allegations are made,
conducting a thorough investigation is critical. The California Fair Employment and
Housing Act (“FEHA”) imposes an affirmative legal obligation on employers to take all
reasonable steps necessary to prevent discrimination and harassment from occurring in
the workplace (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (k)). Satisfying this obligation requires
employers to investigate complaints of discrimination or harassment. The Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has also imposed a duty upon
employers to investigate complaints of harassment. (EEOC: Policy Guidance on Sexual
Harassment, 8 FEP Case. Manual (BNA), at 405:6685, n. 7, 405:6699, Section E
(1990).)
Discussion
The independent investigator engaged by the City to handle this case has worked
diligently to identify and interview witnesses and review the available evidence. The
investigator has made significant progress with this investigation despite numerous
challenges. To date, the investigator has only had the opportunity to interview one of
the individuals who made complaints against Mayor Valdivia. While, the remaining
complainants have been invited to participate in the investigation, they have refused to
be interviewed by the investigator, even with their attorney present. Consequently, the
investigator must rely on the claims themselves, news articles, statements made during
press conferences, and verbal accounts by the complainants’ attorney to determine
what the complainants are alleging.
The investigator has interviewed other staff members in the Office of the Mayor, the
Office of the City Council, the Office of the City Manager, and the Human Resources
8
Packet Pg. 668
6713
Page 2
Department. The investigator is currently working to schedule an interview of one
remaining party. Based upon the information received in this interview and any
additional claims that are filed, the investigator may request interviews with additional
parties. Once these steps are complete, the investigator will prepare rep orts regarding
the various claims. The City will continue to provide the investigator with any
information required to complete the investigation as quickly as possible, but also afford
the investigator the time reasonably needed to complete a thorough an d independent
investigation. Once this process is completed, the findings will be published to the City
Council.
Fiscal Impact
The cost incurred by the City in association with the engagement of an independent
investigator and outside special counsel handling the investigation through April 30,
2020 is $51,762.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, receive and file a status update requested by the City Council on the
independent investigation into the allegations of harassment made by current and
former City employees against Mayor John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino.
Attachments
None
Ward: All
8
Packet Pg. 669
Page 1
Staff Report
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Paul Espinoza, Finance Director
Subject: Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors
for Beginning FY 2019/20
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 2020-88 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Rogers, Anderson, Malody &
Scott (RAMS) of San Bernardino, California, as the City’s external auditors, in an
amount not-to exceed $283,500 for a three-year term with a two-year option to extend.
Background
Annually, the City issues various audited financial and compliance reports. They are
published not only to meet various federal, state, and other regulatory requirements, but
also to report to the Mayor and City Council and the public on the City’s annual financial
status. The City’s auditors are required, by auditing standards, to perform the audit to
obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements prepared by
management are free from material misstatement and to report on the results of the
audit in the Independent Auditor’s Report.
In addition, Assembly Bill (AB) 1345 was introduced in 2013 to address the length of
time that audit services can be provided by the same audit team. Beginning with FY
2013/14, local governments can only use the same audit team for six consecutive
years, after which time a new audit team with the same firm, or a different audit firm, will
be required to complete the audit.
To ensure qualified audit services are reasonably priced, the Finance Department has
historically issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for audit services every four to six
years. The City’s current auditors, The Pun Group LLP, have performed six consecutive
audits dating back to FY 2013/14. Although staff has been pleased with the services
provided by the Pun Group, based on the length of time with the Pun Group and the
requirements directed by Assembly Bill 1345 Local Government Audits, staff feels it is
fiscally prudent to switch auditors at this time. Under AB -1345 section 12410.6(b) a
local agency shall not employ a public accounting firm to provide audit services to a
local agency for six consecutive fiscal years.
9
Packet Pg. 670
6701
Page 2
Discussion
An RFP was issued on February 26, 2020 for auditing services beginning with the audit
of FY 2019/20.
Evaluation and Selection
The City was fortunate to have six qualified firms respond to the City’s R FP. Proposals
were received from the following firms:
1 Brown Armstrong Bakersfield, CA
2 Eadie and Payne LLP Riverside, CA
3 Lance, Soll and Lunghard, LLP Brea, CA
4 The Pun Group LLP Santa Ana, CA
5 Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP (RAMS) San Bernardino, CA
6 White Nelson Diehl Evans LLP (WNDE) Irvine, CA
Proposals were reviewed by a team consisting of the Deputy Director of Finance,
Accounting Manager, and Accountant III. Each firm was evaluated based on their
proposed cost, the size of their firm, and experience with cities comparable to the City of
San Bernardino in both size and services provided.
Staff was unanimous in its selection of the top three firms consisting of RAMS, WNDE,
and the Pun Group (consisting of a different audit team to comply with AB 1345). These
firms were invited to participate in Zoom interviews on April 7, 2020. Staff also
conducted reference checks of the top three firms, with all references coming back with
positive marks.
After a lengthy review and interview process, RAMS was selected based on their ability
to provide professional guidance, qualified staff, price, and experience auditing
comparable cities. The agreement is for an amount not -to-exceed $283,500 to cover
required professional auditing services. A detail by fiscal year is shown below:
2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
Entering into a new contract for auditing services at a reasonable price is consistent
with Key Target No. 1: Financial Stability. The new audit contract will provide significant
savings, which will allow the City to operate in a fiscally responsible and business -like
manner.
Fiscal Impact
The current contract price for all services is $184,500. The approximately $93,000 of
9
Packet Pg. 671
6701
Page 3
savings will be included in the City’s budget beginning with the FY 2020/21 (for the FY
2019/20 audit).
Conclusion
Adopt Resolution 2020-88 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Rogers, Anderson, Malody &
Scott (RAMS) of San Bernardino, California, as the City’s external auditors, in an
amount not-to exceed $283,500 for a three-year term with a two-year option to extend.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Professional Services Agreement between the City of San
Bernardino and Rogers, Anderson, Malody, & Scott LLP
Ward: All
9
Packet Pg. 672
Resolution No. 2020-88
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-88
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND
ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY & SCOTT, LLP FOR
THE PROVISION OF FINANCIAL AUDITING SERVICES
WHEREAS, in compliance with AB 1345 and in the interests of being fiscally prudent,
City staff released a request for proposals for audit services; and
WHEREAS, the City received proposals from six qualified firms; and
WHEREAS, following a lengthy review and interview process, City staff recommended
the selection of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the
Professional Services Agreement with Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP, a copy of which
is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”.
SECTION 2. The Finance department is hereby authorized to issue a Purchase Order to
Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP for Financial Auditing Services for an amount not to
exceed $90,800 for the Fiscal Year 2019-20 and Fiscal Year 2020-21 financial audits, and an
amount not to exceed $101,900 for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 financial audit.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
9.a
Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: FN Audit Services Reso (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors for Beginning FY 2019/20)
Resolution No. 2020-88
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
9.a
Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: FN Audit Services Reso (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors for Beginning FY 2019/20)
Resolution No. 2020-88
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
9.a
Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: FN Audit Services Reso (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors for Beginning FY 2019/20)
9.b
Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
9.b
Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Eric McBride, Acting Chief of Police
Subject: Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for
Fireworks Violations
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, conduct a final reading of and adopt Ordinance MC-1535, amending
Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code, pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits.
Background
Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code regulate fireworks sales,
designate certain restrictions on the possession and discharge of fireworks, and
establish penalties for violations of fireworks regulations. Chapter 9.93 of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code establishes the Administrative Civil Penalties program and
sets a $1,000 maximum daily penalty per violation of the Municipal Code.
During the July 17, 2019 Mayor and City Council meeting, it was directed that the
Legislative Review Committee explore modifying the Municipal Code to increase fines
and penalties for fireworks violations in the City of San Bernardino.
Legislative Review Committee Action
On September 11, 2019, the Legislative Review Committee convened to discuss
fireworks violations and to provide direction to staff. Following public comment and
Committee member discussion, a majority of the Committee voted to direct staff to
place an item on the agenda for a future meeting of the Mayor and City Council
Members to:
Consider amending the Municipal Code to adopt an enhanced penalty structure
for fireworks violations; and
Consider establishing a fund consisting of fines collected from fireworks
violations to be used to pay a reward in the amount of $250 to any individual
providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil
prosecution of any person violating the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code
related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks.
10
Packet Pg. 692
6700
Page 2
Council Direction
During the November 6, 2019 meeting, the Mayor and City Council unanimously
accepted the recommendations provided in the Fireworks Permitting and Penalties for
Fireworks Violations staff report. That report outlined a proposed structure for increased
administrative civil penalties for fireworks violations as well as the establishment of a
reward fund for individuals providing information leading to the identification and
successful criminal or civil prosecution of any person violating any fireworks -related
Municipal Code. City staff were directed to draft a proposed ordinance modifying
Chapters 8.60, 8.61, and 9.93 of the Municipal Code according to the terms provided in
the staff report and to bring the proposed ordinance back to the Mayor and City Council
for further consideration.
On April 15, 2020, staff returned to a meeting of the Mayor and City Council for the
Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Violations
amending Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits. The item
was unanimously approved by the Mayor and City Council.
Discussion
Existing Penalties for Fireworks Violations
As currently established, Section 8.60.150 of the Municipal Code makes it an infraction
or a misdemeanor to violate any provision of Chapter 8.60 of the Municipal Code
relating to the sale, possession, and discharge of safe and sane fireworks. Section
8.61.030 of the Municipal Code makes it a misdemeanor to violate any provision of
Chapter 8.61 of the Code relating to the possession and discharge of dangerous
fireworks. Anyone convicted of an infraction is subject to a fine not to exceed $100 for a
first violation, $200 for a second violation within one year, and $500 for any subsequent
violation within one year (Municipal Code Section 1.12.010). Anyone convicted of a
misdemeanor violation is subject to imprisonment in the County Jail for not more than
six months and/or a fine not to exceed $1,000 (Municipal Code Section 1.12.010).
In addition to criminal fines and the potential for imprisonment as o utlined above,
fireworks violations are also currently subject to an Administrative Civil Penalty of
$1,000 per violation (Municipal Code Sections 8.60.150, 8.61.030, and 9.93.020). Each
fireworks violation may be subject to criminal penalties, civil penalties, or both.
Comparison of Fireworks Violation Penalties Throughout the Region
The proposed increase to administrative civil penalties fines for fireworks violations is
premised upon staff research and analysis of various penalties for fireworks violati ons in
the region. Staff evaluated current fireworks regulations and penalties in use by the
County of San Bernardino, 23 incorporated cities within the County of San Bernardino,
and the City of Riverside. Of the 25 jurisdictions evaluated, eight permit so me form of
lawful possession and discharge of safe and sane fireworks (Adelanto, Barstow, Chino,
Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Needles, and Rialto), and all impose some form of
penalty structure for fireworks violations.
10
Packet Pg. 693
6700
Page 3
Most of the jurisdictions evaluated establish criminal penalties for fireworks violations as
either an infraction punishable by a fine up to $500, or as a misdemeanor punishable by
a fine up to $1,000 and/or six months in County Jail. These criminal penalties are on par
with the criminal penalties authorized by the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code, as
well as state provisions for infraction and misdemeanor crimes. Given the relative
uniformity in criminal penalties among the jurisdictions researched and the
determination that the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code is consistent with those
penalties, staff recommends no changes to the criminal penalty structure.
Most of the jurisdictions evaluated also allow for some form of civil penalty in addition to
any criminal penalties assessed. For dangerous fireworks violations, civil penalties
range from $100 for a first violation on the low end of the spectrum to $10,000 for a third
violation within one year on the high end of the spectrum.
The cities of Fontana and Grand Terrace impose the highest civil penalties for
dangerous fireworks violations among the evaluated cities: $2,500 for a first offense,
$5,000 for a second offense within one year, and $10,000 for each subsequent offense
within one year. However, these same cities provide for a much lower penalty structure
for violations related to safe and sane fireworks: $250 for the first offense, $500 for the
second offense within one year, and $750 for each subsequent violation within one
year.
The City of Montclair imposes the highe st penalties for safe and sane fireworks
violations: $1,000 for the first offense, $2,500 for the second offense within 36 months,
and $5,000 for each subsequent offense within 36 months. There is no distinction in the
Montclair penalty structure differentiating safe and sane fireworks violations and
dangerous fireworks violations.
In contrast to these three example cities, the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code
provides for a $1,000 civil penalty for any fireworks-related violation, regardless of
severity, type of fireworks involved, or number of occurrences within a given time frame.
Proposed Municipal Code Modifications
In the Fireworks Permitting and Penalties for Fireworks Violations staff report presented
to the Mayor and City Council during the November 6, 2019 meeting, staff
recommended:
The adoption of the highest regional administrative civil penalty fines for
dangerous fireworks violations currently in use by the Cities of Fontana and
Grand Terrace;
The adoption of the highest regional administrative civil penalty fines for safe and
sane violations currently in use by the City of Montclair;
The adoption of a 36-month time frame for escalating penalties in the case of
repeat violations; and
10
Packet Pg. 694
6700
Page 4
The creation of a reward fund consisting of fines collected from fireworks
violations to be used to pay a reward in the amount of $250 to any individual
providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil
prosecution of any person violating the City of San Bernardi no Municipal Code
related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks.
The Mayor and City Council accepted each of the foregoing recommendations as
presented.
In an effort to enhance public safety through the deterrence of unlawful sales ,
possession, and discharge of fireworks while remaining consistent with regional
standards, and in accordance with the direction of the Mayor and City Council,
Ordinance MC-1535 will:
Amend Section 8.60.150(B) of the Municipal Code to reflect the follo wing civil
penalties for violations of Chapter 8.60 regarding the sale and use of safe and
sane fireworks:
o $1,000 for the first offense,
o $2,500 for the second offense within 36 months, and
o $5,000 for each subsequent offense within 36 months.
Amend Section 8.61.030(B) of the Municipal Code to reflect the following civil
penalties for violations of Chapter 8.61 regarding dangerous fireworks:
o $2,500 for the first offense,
o $5,000 for the second offense within 36 months, and
o $10,000 for each subsequent offense within 36 months.
Amend Section 9.93.020(E) of the Municipal Code to allow for a civil penalty
greater than $1,000 per violation of Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code.
Add Section 8.60.155 to the Municipal Cod e authorizing the City Manager to
create a reward fund consisting of fines collected from fireworks violations to be
used to pay a reward in the amount of $250 to any individual providing
information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil
prosecution of any person violating the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code
related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
The recommended action aligns with Key Target No. 3c: Improved Quality of Life:
constantly evaluate public safety service delivery models to enhance the quality of
service. Enhancing the penalties associated with the unlawful sales, possession, and
discharge of fireworks and creating a reward fund to encourage the assistance of the
public in the identification and successful prosecution of individuals who unlawfully sell,
possess, and discharge fireworks will serve to deter unlawful fireworks activity and
improve public safety.
10
Packet Pg. 695
6700
Page 5
Fiscal Impact
Administrative Civil Penalties citations generate revenue in the form of fines. The total
amount of fines varies and is dependent upon a variety of factors including the level of
enforcement, the number of Administrative Civil Penalties citations issued, the type of
violation, the number of violations committed, and the ability of the City to collect the
fines. The amount of fines collected is anticipated to increase under the proposed
enhanced penalty structure.
The proposed ordinance authorizes the City Manager to establish a special reward fund
consisting of fines collected from fireworks violations to pay rewards in the amount of up
to $250 to individuals providing information leading to the identification and successful
criminal or civil prosecution of any person violating any Municipal Code provision related
to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks. The number of rewards paid
from this fund will vary depending on a number of factors including: the number of
violations, the willingness of members of the p ublic to report violations, and the ability of
City staff to cite and successfully prosecute violators. However, staff anticipates that
fines collected for fireworks violations will be in a sufficient amount to cover the cost of
the reward program.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, conduct a final reading of and adopt MC-1535 amending Chapters 8.60 and
8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code,
pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Proposed Ordinance MC-1535
Ward: All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
04-15-2020 Mayor and City Council approved the Introduction and First
Reading of Ordinance MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Violations
amending Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of
Title 9 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code pertaining to the use
of fireworks within city limits.
11-06-2019 Mayor and City Council approved a motion to accept the
recommendations provided in the Fireworks Permitting and
Penalties for Fireworks Violations Staff Report.
10
Packet Pg. 696
Ordinance No. MC-1535
ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8.60 AND
8.61 OF TITLE 8 AND CHAPTER 9.93 OF TITLE 9
OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE,
PERTAINING TO THE USE OF FIREWORKS
WITHIN CITY LIMITS
WHEREAS, “safe and sane fireworks” are defined as any fireworks which do not come
within the definition of “dangerous fireworks” or “exempt fireworks” by the California Health
and Safety Code Section 12529; and
WHEREAS, during the Fourth of July celebrations, the City of San Bernardino
experiences numerous fires caused by both “safe and sane” fireworks and the use of illegal
“dangerous” fireworks; and
WHEREAS, the use of “safe and sane” fireworks outside the permitted firework zone
has caused the ignition of multiple fires; and
WHEREAS, the use of illegal “dangerous” fireworks has sparked fires throughout the
City; and
WHEREAS, fire crews respond to numerous fires caused by both “safe and sane” and
illegal “dangerous” fireworks throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department receives numerous calls related to the use of illegal
fireworks in the days leading up to, including, and after July 4 each year; and
WHEREAS, in the days leading up to and including July 4, 2019, an estimated 1,500
pounds of illegal fireworks were seized in the City by law enforcement personnel; and
WHEREAS, in order to address this serious issue, City staff has sought ways to deter the
possession and lighting of illegal fireworks in the City, including by increasing penalties; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public health, safety, and welfare
will be served by: (1) increasing the maximum penalties for the use and possession of safe and
sane fireworks outside of the permitted zone; (2) increasing the penalties for the use and
possession of dangerous fireworks; and (3) establishing a reward for the information leading to
the identification and successful prosecution of violators.
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference. This Ordinance is enacted in accordance with the City’s police powers and in
accordance with the City’s powers as a charter city.
10.a
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks
Ordinance No. MC-1535
SECTION 2. Section 8.60.150 B. of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to
read as follows:
“B. In addition to any other penalties provided by law, any person, organization, group
association, etc. violating any provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to an Administrative
Civil Penalty of:
1. One-thousand dollars ($1,000) for the first offense; and
2. Two-thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for the second offense within
36 months; and
3. Five-thousand dollars ($5,000) for each subsequent offense within 36
months.”
SECTION 3. Section 8.61.030 B. of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to
read as follows:
“B. In addition to any other penalties provided by law, any person, organization, group or
association, etc. violating any provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to an Administrative
Civil Penalty of:
1. Two-thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for the first offense; and
2. Five-thousand dollars ($5,000) for the second offense within 36 months;
and
3. Ten-thousand dollars ($10,000) for each subsequent offense within 36
months.”
SECTION 4. Amending section 9.93.020 E. of the San Bernardino Municipal Code to
read as follows:
“E. Administrative Civil Penalties for violations of any provision of the Municipal Code shall
be assessed at a daily rate determined by the Enforcement Officer, or by the Administrative
Hearing Officer pursuant to the criteria listed in Section 9.93.040 of this Chapter. The maximum
rate shall be $1,000 per violation per day unless a different amount is set elsewhere in this
Municipal Code. The maximum amount of Administrative Civil Penalties shall not exceed
$100,000 per parcel or structure for any related series of violations.”
SECTION 5. Adding Section 8.60.155 to the San Bernardino Municipal Code to read as
follows:
“8.60.155 Reward Fund
The City Manager may establish a special fund consisting of fines collected from firework
violations to pay rewards in the amount of no more than two-hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to
individuals providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil
10.a
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks
Ordinance No. MC-1535
prosecution of any person violating this Municipal Code related to the unlawful possession, sale,
or discharge of fireworks.”
SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be
unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each
section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
be declared unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance shall not be affected.
SECTION 7. Certification. City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall certify to the
adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation
and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under section 36933 of the
Government Code of the State of California.
SECTION 8. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity
will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment)
and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA
Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for
resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the City Clerk this _____th day of ________, 2020
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
__________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
_________________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
10.a
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks
Ordinance No. MC-1535
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Roch, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Ordinance No. MC-________, introduced by the Mayor and City Council of the City of
San Bernardino, California, at a regular meeting held the ______ day of _________, 2020.
Ordinance No. MC-________ was approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting held ____
day of __________, 2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this _______ day of
__________, 2020.
______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
10.a
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Eric McBride, Acting Chief of Police
Subject: Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for
Unmarked Police Vehicles
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 2020-74 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget
and issue a Purchase Order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $90,000.
Background
On October 1, 2017, the City of San Bernardino entered into a Community Credit Fund
Restricted Grant Agreement with San Manuel. Phase II of the grant agreement requires
the grantee to use approximately 20-30% of the grant each year to purchase equipment
intended to support the San Bernardino Police Department patrol and investigation
functions affecting the defined area. The Department has recently re -established special
investigative units with a mission to reduce violent crime, narcotics, and vice activity.
These units require unmarked police vehicles to accomplish those missions. The
Department historically purchased unmarked police vehicles from Carmax due to the
trade-in value offered and a wide range of vehicles to choose from.
Discussion
The San Bernardino Police Department has recently re -established special investigative
units. These teams are responsible for investigating narcotics activity, vice -related
activity, and apprehending violent criminals with the intent to reduce crime throughout
the City. The newly established Vice Team’s mission is to investigate and reduce the
occurrence of illegal gambling, prostitution, and human trafficking.
The special investigative teams have conducted numerous operations and have made
arrests that impact the defined area in the San Manuel grant agreement. Additionally,
the Vice Team will reduce the frequency of prostitution and human trafficking that
affects the surrounding community. San Manuel Public Safety representatives have
advised that a reduction in vice related crimes may have a significant impact
considering the new hotel scheduled to open to accommodate San Manuel Casino
guests.
The Department's special investigative teams utilize used, unmarked police vehicles to
11
Packet Pg. 701
6693
Page 2
investigate and apprehend criminals. These vehicles must be non -uniform, indistinct,
and have the appropriate emergency equipment installed.
The Department has explored purchasing used vehicles from multiple vendors and has
found Carmax to be the most responsive when it comes to inventory, certification,
warranty, and cost. Carmax allows the Department to select from an inventory
nationwide that is immediately available for purchase to be shipped to their Ontario,
California location.
The City currently has an open contract with West Coast Lights and Sirens and $25,000
will be used to install emergency equipment in the unmarked vehicles.
Staff is requesting to use San Manuel Grant Agreement funds to purch ase four (4) used
vehicles in an amount not to exceed $22,500, per vehicle, and install emergency
equipment to be used by special investigative units.
2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The request to amend the FY 2019/20 budget and issue a purchase or der to Carmax
aligns with Key Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life by constantly evaluating public
safety service delivery models to enhance the quality of service.
Fiscal Impact
To fund the purchase of the unmarked patrol vehicles would entail a budg et amendment
to the FY 2019-20 adopted budget by transferring $115,000 from account number 001 -
210-8652*5015 (over time) to account number 001 -210-8652*5701 (vehicles) to cover
the total cost of all vehicles and equipment needed.
FINANCIAL
IMPACT
Account Number Current
Fiscal
Year
Next
Fiscal
Year
Total
Cost
Ongoing
Cost
Account Balance 001-210-8652*5015 $278,229 0 $115,000 0
Cost 001-210-8652*5701 $115,000 0 $115,000 0
Budget Adjustment: Yes
For Fiscal Year: 2019-2020
Conclusion
Adopt Resolution 2020-74 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget
and issue a Purchase Order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $90,000.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-74
Ward: All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
11
Packet Pg. 702
6693
Page 3
February 6, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2019 -20 authorizing
the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Vendor
Service Agreement with WCLS increasing the total to $528,280 for
FY2018-2019 with one single-year renewal through 6/30/20.
August 1, 2018 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2018 -221 authorizing
the issuance of a Purchase Order to West Coast Lights & Sirens in
the amount of $253,280 and the execution of a Vendor Service
Agreement for the purchase and installation of safety equipment on
new police vehicles.
August 17, 2015 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-182,
authorizing the transfer of funds and issuance of a purchase order
to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $55,000.
May 19, 2014 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014-143,
authorizing the transfer of funds and issuance of a purchase order
to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $55,000.
11
Packet Pg. 703
Resolution No. 2020-74
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-74
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO
AMEND THE FY2019/20 ADOPTED BUDGET AND ISSUE
A PURCHASE ORDER TO CARMAX IN AN AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $90,000
WHEREAS, the City is required to spend 20 to 30% of the San Manuel Grant
Agreement each year; and
WHEREAS, the City requires unmarked police vehicles to investigate and reduce the
occurrence of crimes related to violence, narcotics, prostitution, and illegal gambling; and
WHEREAS, Carmax has proven to be the best source to purchase a variety of used
vehicles for this purpose.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to amend the FY2019/20
Adopted Budget transferring $115,000 from account number 001-210-8652*5015 to account
number 001-210-8652*5701 and to issue a purchase order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed
$90,000 pursuant to San Bernardino Municipal Code 3.04.010.B.3.
SECTION 3. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
11.a
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: PD-PO for Unmarked Vehicles-Reso [Revision 1] (6693 : Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked
Resolution No. 2020-74
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
11.a
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: PD-PO for Unmarked Vehicles-Reso [Revision 1] (6693 : Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked
Resolution No. 2020-74
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
11.a
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: PD-PO for Unmarked Vehicles-Reso [Revision 1] (6693 : Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Jim Tickemyer, Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Director
Subject: Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for
Year Two of RSVP
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 2020-75 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year two of the Corporation
for National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting
the grant award in the amount of $54,809 and appropriating the grant funds for the
period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021.
Background
The City has participated in the federally funded Retired and Senior Volunteer Program
(RSVP) for 46 years. The second year of a three year grant cycle (2019 -2022) from the
Corporation for National and Community Service will end March 31, 2021. During the
most recent program year, 178 participants contributed over 70,000 volunteer hours.
This grant will enable the City to continue providing services that enable individuals
ages 55 years and older to put their skills and life experience to work for their
communities. The RSVP volunteers contribute up to 40 hours per week providing
services in supporting senior centers, senior lunch programs, local hospitals, and
disaster preparedness with the California Highway Patrol and the San Bernardino
County Sheriff’s Department.
Discussion
The RSVP program provides funds for one full-time RSVP manager, and one part-time
staff person who organize and direct the Work Plans of the volunteer program. The two
RSVP staff members recruit volunteers, select work sites, make site visits, and prepare
reports to meet grant requirements. RSVP volunteers perform service activities and
provide transportation to seniors. They also participate with local law enforcement as
Citizens on Patrol (COP) volunteers. RSVP volunteers do not receive pay, but they can
request up to $30 per quarter as reimbursement for their transportation expenses, which
is paid through grant funds. The RSVP grant program allows the City of San Bernardino
to provide many volunteer service opportunities for the benefit of the community.
12
Packet Pg. 707
6694
Page 2
2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The Retired Senior and Volunteer Program (RSVP) aligns with the Key Target No. 2:
Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community by building a culture that attracts,
retains and motivates the highest quality of volunteers for the program and Key Target
No. 3: Improved Quality of Life, which allows volunteers to stay active and engaged in
their communities through their services.
Fiscal Impact
The City provides matching funds for the RSVP program in the amount of $69,457 of
reportable expenses (and up to $104,210 for non -cash in-kind services) for a portion of
the salaries and fringe benefits for one full-time program manager and a part-time staff
person, as well as some program costs including off ice supplies, telephone, printing and
volunteer support. This grant match funding is budgeted in Account No. 001 -380-0502.
The City also provides an in-kind contribution in the amount of $917 for the cost of
utilities (phone included) for the program’s office space.
Conclusion
Adopt Resolution 2020-75 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year two of the Corporation
for National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting
the grant award in the amount of $54,809 and appropriating the grant funds for the
period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-75; Exhibit “A” 2020-2021 2nd Year RSVP Grant
Attachment 2 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application
Attachment 3 2020-2021 RSVP Notification Letter of Grant Award
Attachment 4 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Budget
Attachment 5 Exhibit B - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Budget Narratives
Ward: All
Synopses of Previous Council Actions:
March 20, 2019 Adopted: Resolution No. 2019-42 of the Mayor and City Council of
the City of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a
grant application for year one of three of the National and
Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program,
accepting and appropriating the grant funds in the amount of
$47,309 and allocating matching funds of $69,748 for the program
for the period of April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020.
June 20, 2018 Adopted: Resolution No. 2018-175 Resolution of the Mayor and
City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the
submission of a grant application for year three of the National and
Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program,
accepting and appropriating the grant funds in the amount of
12
Packet Pg. 708
6694
Page 3
$47,310 and allocating matching funds for the program for the
period of April 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019.
June 7, 2017 Adopted: Resolution No. 2017-102 of the Mayor and City Council of
San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant
application for year two of the National and Community Service's
Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting and appropriating
the grant funds in the amount of $47,310 and allocating matching
funds for the program for the Period of April 1, 2017 through March
31, 2018.
12
Packet Pg. 709
Resolution No. 2020-75
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-75
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
RATIFY THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION
FOR YEAR TWO OF THE CORPORATION FOR
NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE’S RETIRED
AND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM, ACCEPT THE
GRANT AWARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,809 AND
APPROPRIATE THE GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PERIOD
OF APRIL 1, 2020 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2021
WHEREAS, the City has participated in the federally funded Retired and Senior
Volunteer Program for 46 years; and
WHEREAS, individuals ages 55 years and older provide services at various locations
and organizations; and
WHEREAS, the 178 individual volunteers contributed over 70,000 hours of time at
various locations and organizations in FY 2019-20.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby
ratify the submission of a grant application for Year Two of the Corporation of National and
Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) in the total amount of
$124,556; and,
SECTION 2. That the Mayor and City Council accept the grand award in the amount of
$54,809 and authorize the Director of Finance or his/her designee to appropriate that amount for
the continued operation of the RSVP; and,
SECTION 3. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize the Director of Finance
or his/her designee to appropriate $69,747 in matching funds (cash and in-kind) to the continued
operation of the RSVP program; and
SECTION 4. That the appropriation of the grant award and matching funds, together
totaling $124,556, are for the operation of RSVP from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021.
SECTION 5. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
12.a
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2.RESOLUTION (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of
Resolution No. 2020-75
SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
12.a
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2.RESOLUTION (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of
Resolution No. 2020-75
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
12.a
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2.RESOLUTION (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of
12.b
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.b
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.c
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 3 - Notification Letter of Grant Award (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.c
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 3 - Notification Letter of Grant Award (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.d
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 4 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Budget (6694 : Resolution to Ratify
12.e
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 5.Budget Narrative (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant
12.e
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 5.Budget Narrative (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant
12.e
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 5.Budget Narrative (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director
Subject: 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
Amendment 19-01
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, accept for final reading and adopt Ordinance No. MC-1532 approving
Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood
Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Residential to
Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total of
approximately 15.39 acres located at 1066 N. Tippecanoe Avenue.
Background
On April 1, 2020, the Mayor and City Council conducted a public hearing on Specific
Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood
Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Residential to
Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total of
approximately 15.39 acres.
2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 aligns with Key Target No. 3: Improved Quality of
Life. The proposed development will create an economic benefit to an otherwise vacant
and underutilized parcel and has been designed to achieve visual interest and a clean,
landscaped industrial site.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, accept for final reading and adopt Ordinance No. MC-1532 approving
Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood
Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Resi dential to
Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total of
approximately 15.39 acres located at 1066 N. Tippecanoe Avenue.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Ordinance MC-1532; Exhibit A - Zoning Map Amendment
13
Packet Pg. 738
6674
Page 2
Ward: 1
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
April 1, 2020 Mayor and City Council introduced Ordinance No. MC-1532.
13
Packet Pg. 739
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
1
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 19-01 CHANGING THE WATERMAN + BASELINE
NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE ZONE
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL TO EMPLOYMENT OF THREE (3)
PARCELS (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 AND 24) CONTAINING A TOTAL OF
APPROXIMATELY 15.39 ACRES LOCATED AT 1066 N. TIPPECANOE
AVENUE, PURSUANT TO AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPART REPORT
WHEREAS, together, Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and Development Permit Type-P
19-06 constitute the I. E. Hub Center Project (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2016, the Mayor and City Council certified the Final
Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2015081086), adopted the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program, and approved the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation
Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 is a request to change the Waterman +
Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood
Residential to Employment of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres;
and
WHEREAS, Development Permit Type-P 19-06 is a request to allow the development,
establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility with an office/shop building
containing approximately 7,000 square feet, along with the construction of the required on-site
and off-site improvements, on a project site containing approximately 15.39 acres; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”; Public
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), Section 21067, and State CEQA Guidelines (California Code
of Regulations, § 15000 et seq.), Section 15367, the City of San Bernardino is the lead agency
for the Project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of Section 15164(b) (Addendum to an EIR) of
CEQA, the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department
accepted the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared by Kimley-Horn on
behalf of and submitted by the applicant for the Project; and
WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of San
Bernardino held a duly-noticed public hearing to consider public testimony and the staff report,
and adopted Resolution No. 2020-013 recommending the adoption of the Addendum to the Final
Environmental Impact Report, and the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and
Development Permit Type-P 19-06 to the Mayor and City Council; and
WHEREAS, notice of the April 1, 2020 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's
consideration of this proposed Ordinance was published in The Sun newspaper on March 21,
13.a
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
2
2020, and was mailed to property owners within a 500 foot radius of the project site in
accordance with Development Code Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals); and
WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearing conducted by the Mayor and City
Council, and no additional information submitted to the City Council, has produced substantial
new information requiring substantial revisions that would trigger recirculation of the Addendum
to the Final Environmental Impact Report or additional environmental review under State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15164; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 19.52 (Hearing and Appeals) and
Chapter 19.74 (Zoning Map Amendments) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the
Mayor and City Council have the authority to take action on Specific Plan Amendment 19-01.
NOW THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. In accordance
with Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR), as the decision-making body for the project, the
Mayor and City Council have reviewed and considered the information contained in the
administrative record for Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and Development Permit Type-P 19-
06, and the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2015081086) certified on December 19,
2016 in conjunction with the approval of the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood
Transformation Specific Plan. Based upon the facts and information contained in the
administrative record and the previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report, including
all written and oral evidence presented to the Mayor and City Council, the Mayor and City
Council find as follows:
(1) The environmental impacts of this project were previously analyzed in the Final
Environmental Impact Report certified on December 19, 2016 in conjunction with the approval
of the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan and within the
Addendum for the approval for Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and Development Permit Type-
P 19-06; and
(2) The certified Final Environmental Impact Report and the Addendum contains a
complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the project; and
(3) The certified Final Environmental Impact Report and the Addendum was
completed in compliance with CEQA and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder; and
(4) The certified Final Environmental Impact Report and the Addendum reflects the
independent judgment of the Mayor and City Council; and
(5) The proposed project will introduce no new significant environmental impacts
beyond those previously analyzed in the certified Final Environmental Impact Report, and all
13.a
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
3
mitigation measures previously adopted with the Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program
and the Addendum are incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 3. Finding of Facts – Specific Plan Amendment 19-01
Finding No. 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan
changed the General Plan Land Use Designations and the Zoning District
Classifications of the properties contained within an area comprised of
approximately 710 acres in order to establish the land use policies and
development standards to facilitate the maximum build out of up to 4,341
residential units and approximately 3,570,448 square feet of non-
residential uses, and the future construction of the associated
transportation/mobility and infrastructure improvements. The primary
purpose of the Specific Plan is to provide a vision and implementation
program for the future development of vacant or underutilized properties
within Specific Plan boundaries. This Specific Plan also contains a
comprehensive set of goals, objectives, strategies and guidelines to be
used by the City to support, attract and facilitate new development and
revitalization projects.
Additionally, the City of San Bernardino General Plan includes primary
goals and policies to guide future development within the City.
Accordingly, the Specific Plan provides a detailed explanation of the
Specific Plan’s relationship to the City’s General Plan, including a
comparison of goals, objectives and policies.
Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of
three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the
Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to
accommodate the development, establishment, and operation of a truck
and trailer storage facility.
The Neighborhood Residential Land Use Zone of the Specific Plan allows
for single-family residential and multi-family residential developments
which is consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Designations of
Single-Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. The
Employment Land Use Zone of the Specific Plan allows for multi-family
residential and light industrial developments which is consistent with the
City’s General Plan Land Use Designations of Multi-Family Residential
and Industrial. With the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01,
proposed Employment Land Use Zone for the subject 15.39 areas will be
consistent with the City’s General Plan.
Finding No. 2: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
13.a
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
4
Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan
established a land use and development framework, identified needed
transportation and infrastructure improvements, and serves as a marketing
tool for attracting developers to key sites and for boosting economic
development. The Specific Plan is intended to encourage residential and
neighborhood-serving commercial establishments on major corridors such
as Baseline Avenue and Waterman Avenue, direct the creation of
employment generating uses to the southern portion of the project area
closer to the Civic Center and Downtown, and protect and enhance the
existing residential neighborhoods. The Specific Plan is not detrimental to
the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in
that the primary purpose of the Specific Plan is to provide a vision and
implementation program for the future development of vacant or under-
utilized properties within Specific Plan boundaries and contains a
comprehensive set of goals, objectives, strategies and guidelines to be
used by the City to support, attract and facilitate new development and
revitalization projects and will enhance the physical and visual qualities of
the project area thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the surrounding
neighborhood, while preserving the environmental environs.
Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of
three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the
Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan from
Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to transform a vacant
and underutilized site with the development, establishment, and operation
of a truck and trailer storage facility which would not be detrimental to the
public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
Finding No. 3: The subject properties are physically suitable for the requested land use
designations and the anticipated land use developments..
Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan
changed the General Plan Land Use Designations and the Zoning District
Classifications of the properties contained within an area comprised of
approximately 710 acres in order to establish the new Land Use Districts
and Design Guidelines maintains an appropriate balance of land uses by
providing for the revitalization of existing under-utilized properties.
Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of
three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the
Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to
transform a vacant and underutilized site with the development,
establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility in which
the project site is physically suitable for the requested land use designation
and the proposed land use development with the approval of Specific Plan
Amendment 19-01.
13.a
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
5
Finding No. 4: The proposed plan shall ensure development of desirable character which
will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the
surrounding neighborhood.
Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan is
intended to encourage residential and neighborhood-serving commercial
establishments on major corridors such as Baseline Avenue and Waterman
Avenue, direct the creation of employment generating uses to the southern
portion of the project area closer to the Civic Center and Downtown, and
protect and enhance the existing residential neighborhoods. The land use
plan accommodates an increase in existing residential uses from an
estimated 2,049 units to approximately 4,341 units, an increase in
commercial uses from approximately 2,366,385 square feet to
approximately 3,570,448 square feet, and establishes six (6) distinct
districts to guide future development of key parcels throughout the project
area.
Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of
three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the
Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to
transform a vacant and underutilized site with the development,
establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility which is
a development of desirable character which will be compatible with
existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood with
the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01.
Finding No. 5: The proposed plan will contribute to a balance of land uses so that local
residents may work and shop in the community in which they live.
Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan
creates employment generating uses to the southern portion of the project
area closer to the Civic Center and Downtown, and protects and enhances
through the accommodation of increased residential uses from an
estimated 2,049 units to approximately 4,341 units and increased
commercial uses from approximately 2,366,385 square feet to
approximately 3,570,448 square feet.
Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of
three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the
Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to
transform a vacant and underutilized site with the development,
establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility which
contributes to a balance of land use with the approval of Specific Plan
Amendment 19-01.
SECTION 4. Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 to change of the Waterman + Baseline
Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone of three (3) parcels containing a
total of approximately 15.39 acres (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) from Neighborhood
13.a
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
6
Residential to Employment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, is
hereby approved.
SECTION 5. Notice of Determination: The Planning Division of the Community and
Economic Development Department is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the
County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino within five (5) working days of final project
approval certifying the City’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act in
approving the Project.
SECTION 6. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or
phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid
or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or
effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or
more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional,
invalid, or ineffective.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days
after the date of its adoption.
SECTION 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall
certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general
circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under Section 36933
of the Government Code of the State of California.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the City Clerk this ___ day of _________, 2020.
13.a
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532
7
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and
City Council of the City of San Bernardino at a _______________________ meeting thereof,
held on the _____ day of ______________, 2020, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ
IBARRA
FIGUEROA
SHORETT
NICKEL
RICHARD
MULVIHILL
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
The foregoing Ordinance is hereby approved this _____ day of __________________, 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
By:____________________
13.a
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
Not to scale
EXHIBIT 6: Proposed Specific Plan Land Use Plan
I.E. Hub Center Project, City of San Bernardino
Source: Waterman + Baseline Specific Plan “Figure 4.1 - Proposed Land Use Plan” 2016, Kimley-Horn 2019
13.b
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance.Exhibit A (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director
Subject: Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust
Related to 6803 N. Shannon Lane
Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-76 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Rede velopment
Agency of the City of San Bernardino, approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in
connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real property located at
6803 N. Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California.
Background
On October 17, 1994, the Community Development Commission of the City of San
Bernardino (“Commission”) approved Resolution 5409, establishing the Mortgage
Assistance Program, subsequently renamed the Homebuyer Assistance Program,
which made available a limited number of deferred payment (principal and interest)
second mortgages. This Program was designed to provide income -qualified families
with down payment/closing cost monies necessary to secure financing towards the
purchase of single-family detached homes in the City and provided an additional
avenue for the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino (“Agency”)
to ensure the availability of affordable housing to income -qualified home buyers in the
community.
On January 9, 2012, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2012-12
confirming that the City of San Bernardino would serve as the Successor Agency to the
former Agency, in accordance with AB1X 26. On January 23, 2012, the Mayor and City
Council adopted Resolution 2012-19 further confirming that the City would serve as the
Successor Housing Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency and perform the
housing functions previously performed by the Agency.
Discussion
The Homebuyer Assistance Program allows program participants to refinance th eir
mortgage only to lower the interest rate and/or term. Should the homeowner request to
“cash out” the property’s equity the subordination request would be denied and the
Agency loan would become due.
14
Packet Pg. 748
6703
Page 2
The property owner for the property located at 68 03 N. Shannon Lane received down
payment assistance and is now requesting to refinance their existing first mortgage. The
property owner of the property listed above has submitted a subordination request to
Successor Housing Agency staff and the application has been reviewed and approved.
To proceed with the refinancing, the new lender and title company require the Agency’s
deed of trust to be expressly subordinated to the new first deed of trust. Therefore, staff
requests that the City Manager, or her designee, be authorized to sign and cause to be
recorded the subordination agreement and associated documents which will allow the
property owner to refinance their first mortgage.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
Adoption of the attached resolution aligns with Key Strategic Target No. 3: Improved
Quality of Life. Refinancing supports homeownership and sustains neighborhoods
throughout the City.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund since the staff processing the request is
funded by the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS).
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of San Bernardino, adopt Resolution No. 2020-76, approving a Subordination of
a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real
property located at 6803 N. Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2020-76
Attachment 2 Subordination Agreement for 6803 N. Shannon Lane
Ward 5
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
January 23, 2012 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2012 -19 further
confirming that the City would serve as the “Succ essor Housing
Agency” to the former Redevelopment Agency and perform the
housing functions previously performed by the Agency.
14
Packet Pg. 749
Resolution No. 2020-76
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-76
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY TO
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO APPROVING THE SUBORDINATION OF A
DEED OF TRUST IN CONNECTION WITH A
REFINANCING OF THE SENIOR MORTGAGE
RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6803
NORTH SHANNON LANE, SAN BERNARDINO,
CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, on January 9, 2012, the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, (“Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2012-12 confirming that the City of
San Bernardino would serve as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”)
of the City of San Bernardino (“Successor Agency”) effective February 1, 2012, pursuant to
AB1X 26 (The Redevelopment Agency Dissolution Act); and
WHEREAS on January 23, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-19
providing for the City to serve as the Successor Housing Agency and perform the housing
functions previously performed by the Agency; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34181(c) of AB1X26 the
Oversight Board is to direct the transfer of housing responsibilities, including all rights, powers,
duties, obligations and assets, to the Successor Housing Agency; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34176(e)(1) of AB1484 the
restrictions on the use of real property such as affordability covenants entered into by the Agency
are considered a housing asset; and
WHEREAS, a Deed of Trust affecting real property located at 6803 North Shannon
Lane, San Bernardino, California (“Property”) exists as of July 9, 2008, and recorded on
September 8, 2008, as Instrument Number 2008-0408213 in the Official Records of the County
of San Bernardino (“Deed of Trust”); and
WHEREAS, the terms of the Deed of Trust allow the Trustor to obtain the release of the
security interest of the First Mortgage Lender in the Property for the purpose of a third -party
lender which refinances the purchase money mortgage of the First Mortgage Lender; and
WHEREAS, an escrow has been opened on the Property affected by the Deed of Trust
on which owner(s) (Eryka Villegas Crossley) request the subordination so that they can proceed
on a refinance and a clear lenders title policy can be provided to the new lender of the Property;
and
WHEREAS, the Successor Housing Agency desires to confirm that the Deed of Trust is
a housing asset and/or housing function, and desires to authorize Successor Housing Agency
14.a
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of
Resolution No. 2020-76
staff to transfer all rights and interest in the Deed of Trust to the City in its capacity as the
Successor Housing Agency; and
WHEREAS, Successor Housing Agency staff desires to cause to be signed and recorded
a subordination agreement for the purposes of causing the new third-party lender to have a
security interest in the Property senior to that of the Successor Housing Agency; and
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34176, the Successor Housing
Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino does hereby find and
determine that the Deed of Trust is a housing asset and hereby authorizes the City Manager or
his/her designee, to execute the Subordination Agreement (attached and incorporated herein as
Exhibit “A”) and do all such acts and things necessary to cause it to be recorded with the San
Bernardino County Recorder.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
14.a
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of
Resolution No. 2020-76
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho , City Attorney
14.a
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of
Resolution No. 2020-76
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
14.a
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of
1
When recorded mail to:
City of San Bernardino, acting in its
capacity as the Successor Housing Agency
to the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of San Bernardino
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Owner Name: Eryka Villegas Crossley
6803 N Shannon Lane
San Bernardino, CA 92407
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE.
Form of
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND OF LOWER
PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY
INSTRUMENT.
This AGREEMENT, made this day of March, 2020, by (Eryka Villegas Crossley), Owner of the land
hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the City of San Bernardino, acting in its capacity as
the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino , present owner and
holder of the Deed of Trust and Note;
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Owner(s) did on July 9, 2008, execute a Deed of Trust to Orange Coast Title Company, a
California Corporation, as trustee, covering:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The land herein after referred to is situated in the City of San Bernardino, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows:
LOT 25 OF TRACT NO. 16795, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 315 PAGES 43 THROUGH
46 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, AS RECORDED IN THE COUNTY RECORDERS OF SAID COUNTY.
to secure a Note in the sum of $80,980 dated July 9, 2008 in favor of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San
Bernardino first hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Beneficiary", which Deed of Trust was
recorded September 8, 2008, as Instrument No. 2008-0408213, Official Records of said county;
WHEREAS, all rights and obligations of the Beneficiary have since been transferred to the City of San
Bernardino as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino
(“Successor Beneficiary”) pursuant to Mayor and Common Council Resolution No. 2012-19 dated January 23,
2012;
WHEREAS, Owner has executed, or is about to execute, a Deed of Trust and Note in the sum of not to exceed
$238,500, dated ________________________, in favor of loanDepot, LLC ,
hereinafter referred to as “Lender,” payable with interest and upon the terms and conditions described therein, which
Deed of Trust is to be recorded concurrently herewith; and
14.b
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 6803 Shannon Ln.Attachment 2 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust
2
WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to obtaining said loan that said Deed of Trust last above mentioned
shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge upon the land herein before described, prior and
superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned; and
WHEREAS, lender is willing to make said loan provided the Deed of Trust securing the same is a lien or
charge upon the above described property prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust f irst above
mentioned and provided that Successor Beneficiary will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or
charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor of Lender; and
WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender make such loan to Owner; and
Successor Beneficiary is willing that the Deed of Trust securing the same shall, when recorded, constitute a lien or
charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior a nd superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first
above mentioned.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties hereto and other
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, and in order to
induce Lender to make the loan above referred to, it is hereby declared, understood and agreed as follows:
1. That said Deed of Trust securing said Note in favor of Lender, and any renewals or extensions thereof,
shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge on the property therein described, prior
and superior to the lien or charge or the Deed of Trust first above mentioned.
2. That Lender would not make its loan above described without this Subordination Agreement.
3. That this Agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the subordination of the lien
or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor
of the lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would affect the
priority between the Deeds of Trust hereinbefore specifically described, any prior agreement as to such
subordination including, but not limited to, those provisions, if any, contained in t he Deed of Trust first
above mentioned, which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to another Deed or
Deeds of Trust or to another mortgage or mortgages.
Successor Beneficiary declares, agrees and acknowledges that:
(a) Lender in making disbursements pursuant to any such agreement is under no obligation or duty to, nor
has Lender represented that it will, see to the application of such proceeds by the person or persons to
whom Lender disburses such proceeds and any application or use of such proceeds for purposes other
than those provided for in such agreement or agreements shall not defeat the subordination herein
made in whole or in part;
(b) Successor Beneficiary intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien
or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned in favor of the lien or charge upon said land of
the Deed of Trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands t hat in reliance upon, and in
consideration of, this waiver, relinquishment and subordination specific loans and advances are being
and will be make and, as part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and
will be entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver,
relinquishment and subordination; and
(c) An endorsement has been placed upon the Note secured by the Deed of Trust first above mentioned
that said Deed of Trust has by this i nstrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the Deed of
Trust in favor or Lender above referred to.
14.b
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 6803 Shannon Ln.Attachment 2 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust
3
NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE
PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN A
PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES THAN IMPROVEMENT
OF THE LAND.
City of San Bernardino, acting as the Successor Housing Agency
to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
Teri Ledoux, City Manager Owner
City of San Bernardino
Owner
(ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED)
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION OF THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT,
THE PARTIES CONSULT WITH THEIR ATTORNEYS WITH RESPECT THERETO.
14.b
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 6803 Shannon Ln.Attachment 2 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director
Subject: Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of
Senior Mortgage - 756 West 8TH Street
Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-77 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San
Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of San Bernardino, to approve a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in
connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real property located at
756 West 8th Street, San Bernardino, California.
Background
The City of San Bernardino (“City”) is an entitlement jurisdiction that receives HOME
Investment Partnerships Program Funds (“HOME”) from the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). HOME funds are used to create a variety of
affordable housing opportunities for eligible households whose income does not exceed
80% of Area Median Income.
On September 19, 2016, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2016 -200,
establishing the Infill Housing Development Program (“Program”) and ent ered into an
agreement with Housing Partners I (“HPI”) for the development of three (3) affordable
housing units to be sold to income eligible, first-time home buyers.
On June 21, 2017, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2017 -116
authorizing the execution of a HOME Program Loan Agreement with Neighborhood
Partnership Housing Services (“NPHS”) to implement the Modular Housing Component
of the Program.
Discussion
The Program provides income eligible home buyers with acquisition financing to
purchase a home constructed under the Program. The acquisition financing is a
deferred loan at zero interest and has a program term of up to 15 years. The
homeowner is required to occupy the home as their primary residence during the
Program term, after which time the loan will be forgiven. Should the homeowner sell,
transfer, or no longer occupy the home as their primary residence, the Program loan will
become due and payable. The Program allows participants to refinance their mortgage
15
Packet Pg. 757
6704
Page 2
only to lower the interest rate and/or term. Should the homeowner request “cash out” of
the property’s equity, the subordination request will be denied and the Program loan will
become immediately due.
The property owner for the property located at 756 W 8 th Street who received
acquisition financing is now requesting to refinance their existing first mortgage. The
property owner of the property listed above has submitted a subordination request to
City and the application has been reviewed and approved. To proceed with the
refinancing, the new lender and title company require the City’s deed of trust to be
expressly subordinated to the new first deed of trust. Therefore, staff requests that the
City Manager, or her designee, be authorized to sign and cause to be record ed the
subordination agreement and associated documents which will allow the property owner
to refinance their first mortgage.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
Adoption of the attached resolution aligns with Key Strategic Target No. 3: Improved
Quality of Life. Refinancing supports homeownership and sustains neighborhoods
throughout the City.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund since the staff processing this request is
funded by Federal grant funds.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino adopt
the Resolution No. 2020-77, approving the Subordination of a Deed of Trust in
connection with a refinancing of the senior mortgage relating to real property located at
756 West 8th Street, San Bernardino, California.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2020-77
Attachment 2 Subordination Agreement for 756 W 8th Street
Ward: 1
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
September 19, 2016 Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2016-200,
establishing the Infill Housing Development Program
(“Program”) and entered into an agreement with Housing
Partners I (“HPI”) for the development of three (3) affordable
housing units to be sold to income eligible, first-time
homebuyers.
June 21, 2017 Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2017-116
authorizing the execution of a HOME Program Loan
Agreement with Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services
(“NPHS”) to implement the Modular Housing Component of
15
Packet Pg. 758
6704
Page 3
the Program.
15
Packet Pg. 759
Resolution No. 2020-77
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-77
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE SUBORDINATION OF A DEED OF
TRUST IN CONNECTION WITH A REFINANCING OF
THE SENIOR MORTGAGE RELATING TO REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 756 WEST 8TH STREET, SAN
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the City has received HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds from
the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) pursuant to the
Cranston-Gonzales National Housing Act of 1990 (“HOME Funds”). The HOME funds must be
used by the City in accordance with 24 C.F.R. Part 92; and
WHEREAS, On September 19, 2016, the Mayor and Common Council approved
Resolution 2016-200, establishing the Infill Housing Development Program (“Program”) and
entered into an agreement with Housing Partners I (“HPI”) for the development of three (3)
affordable housing units to be sold to income eligible, first-time homebuyers; and
WHEREAS, On June 21, 2017, the Mayor and Common Council approved Resolution
2017-116 authorizing the execution of a HOME Program Loan Agreement with Neighborhood
Partnership Housing Services (“NPHS”) to implement the Modular Housing Component of the
Program; and
WHEREAS, a Deed of Trust affecting real property located at 756 West 8th Street, San
Bernardino, California (“Property”) exists as of February 26, 2019, and recorded on April 15,
2019, as Instrument Number 2019-0116256 in the Official Records of the County of San
Bernardino (“Deed of Trust”); and
WHEREAS, the terms of the Deed of Trust allow the Trustor to obtain the release of the
security interest of the First Mortgage Lender in the Property for the purpose of a third-party
lender which refinances the purchase money mortgage of the First Mortgage Lender; and
WHEREAS, an escrow has been opened on the Property affected by the Deed of Trust
on which owner(s) (Linda Catalan) request the subordination so that they can proceed on a
refinance and a clear lenders title policy can be provided to the new lender of the Property; and
WHEREAS, City staff desires to cause to be signed and recorded a subordination
agreement for the purposes of causing the new third-party lender to have a security interest in the
Property senior to that of the City; and
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
15.a
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 756 W 8th Street.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust
Resolution No. 2020-77
SECTION 2. The City does hereby find and determine that the Deed of Trust is a
housing asset and hereby authorizes the City Manager or his/her designee, to execute the
Subordination Agreement (attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”) and do all such acts
and things necessary to cause it to be recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
15.a
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 756 W 8th Street.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust
Resolution No. 2020-77
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
15.a
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 756 W 8th Street.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust
1
When recorded mail to:
City of San Bernardino,
Attn: Housing Division
290 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Owner Name: Linda Catalan
756 West 8th Street
San Bernardino, CA 92404
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE.
Form of
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND OF LOWER
PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY
INSTRUMENT.
This AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of April, 2020, by (Linda Catalan), Owner of the land hereinafter
described and hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the City of San Bernardino, present owner and holder of the
Deed of Trust and Note;
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Owner(s) did on February 26, 2019, execute a Deed of Trust to Lawyers Title Company, a
California Corporation, as trustee, covering:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The land herein after referred to is situated in the City of San Bernardino, County
of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows:
THE EAST 49.72 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 58, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 1 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY
to secure a Note in the sum of $48,000 dated February 26, 2019 in favor of the City of San Bernardino first
hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Beneficiary", whi ch Deed of Trust was recorded April 15, 2019,
as Instrument No. 2019-0116256, Official Records of said county;
WHEREAS, Owner has executed, or is about to execute, a Deed of Trust and Note in the sum of not to
exceed $184,891, dated ________________________, in favor of Nationstar Mortgage LLC dba Mr. Cooper,
hereinafter referred to as “Lender,” payable with interest and upon the terms and conditions described therein, which
Deed of Trust is to be recorded concurrently herewith; and
WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to obtaining said loan that said Deed of Trust last above mentioned
shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge upon the land herein before de scribed, prior and
superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned; and
WHEREAS, lender is willing to make said loan provided the Deed of Trust securing the same is a lien or
charge upon the above described property prior and sup erior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above
mentioned and provided that Successor Beneficiary will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or
charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor of Lender; and
WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender make such loan to Owner; and
Successor Beneficiary is willing that the Deed of Trust securing the same shall, when recorded, constitute a lien or
15.b
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 756 W 8th Street.Attachment 2 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of
2
charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first
above mentioned.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties hereto and other
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, and in order to
induce Lender to make the loan above referred to, it is hereby declared, understood and agreed as follows:
1. That said Deed of Trust securing said Note in favor of Le nder, and any renewals or extensions thereof,
shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge on the property therein described, prior
and superior to the lien or charge or the Deed of Trust first above mentioned.
2. That Lender would not make its loan above described without this Subordination Agreement.
3. That this Agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the subordination of the lien
or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Dee d of Trust in favor
of the lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would affect the
priority between the Deeds of Trust hereinbefore specifically described, any prior agreement as to such
subordination including, but not limited to, those provisions, if any, contained in the Deed of Trust first
above mentioned, which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to another Deed or
Deeds of Trust or to another mortgage or mortgages.
Beneficiary declares, agrees and acknowledges that:
(a) Lender in making disbursements pursuant to any such agreement is under no obligation or duty to, nor
has Lender represented that it will, see to the application of such proceeds by the person or persons to
whom Lender disburses such proceeds and any application or use of such proceeds for purposes other
than those provided for in such agreement or agreements shall not defeat the subordination herein
made in whole or in part;
(b) Beneficiary intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge
of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned in favor of the lien or charge upon said land of the Deed of
Trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance upon, and in consi deration
of, this waiver, relinquishment and subordination specific loans and ad vances are being and will be
made and, as part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be
entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver,
relinquishment and subordination; and
(c) An endorsement has been placed upon the Note secured by the Deed of Trust first above mentioned
that said Deed of Trust has by this instrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the Deed of
Trust in favor or Lender above referred to.
15.b
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 756 W 8th Street.Attachment 2 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of
3
NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE
PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN A
PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES THAN IMPROVEMENT
OF THE LAND.
City of San Bernardino
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
Teri Ledoux, City Manager Owner
City of San Bernardino
Owner
(ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED)
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION OF THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT,
THE PARTIES CONSULT WITH THEIR ATTORNEYS WITH RESPECT THERETO.
15.b
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 756 W 8th Street.Attachment 2 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-72, initiating proceedings to levy and collect
assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in Assessment Districts pursuant to the
Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, appointing the Engineer of
Record, and ordering the preparation of Engineer’s Reports.
Background
The City Council previously formed Landscape & Lighting and Street & D rainage
Maintenance Districts as a condition of approval for private development projects. The
assessment engineer's report that establishes the amount of an annual assessment in
each of the districts must be updated annually and approved by the Mayor and City
Council, following a public hearing, in order to levy the annual assessment(s).
The first step in processing annual assessments is for the Mayor and City Council to
adopt a resolution assigning an Engineer of Record to perform the updates to the
engineering reports and to initiate the proceedings for the annual assessment process.
Discussion
Development projects are approved subject to conditions of approval that require the
formation of maintenance districts to recover the costs of annual maintenanc e of public
improvements constructed as a result of the development project.
The assessment of an annual fee upon properties within the District provides the
revenue to offset the cost of maintenance of the public improvements necessary to
serve the development.
California Streets and Highways Code §22620 et. seq. with respect to Landscape and
Lighting Districts and Government Code §53750 et. seq. with respect to Street and
Drainage Maintenance Districts require that the assessment engineer's report for e ach
of the districts be updated and approved by the legislative body prior to the levy of any
annual assessment on properties within an assessment district. The engineering reports
set forth the “Maximum Allowable Assessment” for each parcel. The City has formed
16
Packet Pg. 766
6671
Page 2
sixty nine (69) such assessment districts.
The tentative schedule for the annual update of the assessment districts , which is
prepared based on information provided by the San Bernardino County Auditor -
Controller-Recorder’s office, is as follows:
May 6, 2020: Mayor and City Council direction of preparation of an assessment
engineer’s report describing any new improvements or any substantial changes in the
existing improvements in the existing assessment districts.
May 20, 2020: Mayor and City Council (1) preliminarily approving the engineering
reports for the existing assessment districts and directing the filing of such reports with
the City Clerk, and (2) setting the date for the public hearing at 7:00 PM on Wednesday,
July 1, 2020, in the City of San Bernardino Council Chamber, 555 W 6th Street, San
Bernardino, CA 92410 pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Sections
22552 and 22553 and Government Code Section 53753.5 to consider the levy of
annual assessments upon real property.
July 15, 2020: Mayor and City Council public hearing and approval of the levy of
assessments upon real property within each of the Districts for fiscal year 2020 -2021.
July 17, 2020: Deadline for submission of preliminary notice of assessments to San
Bernardino County.
August 10, 2020: Deadline for submission of final notice of assessments to San
Bernardino County.
August 31, 2020: Last day for submission of corrections to San Bernardino County.
2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals
This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1a: Financial Stability - Secure a long-
term revenue source. Updating the assessment engineering reports and initiating the
annual assessment levy process will ensure that special districts are levied and
managed properly so that the ongoing costs of district maintenance are supported
through FY 2020/21.
Fiscal Impact
No general fund fiscal impact associated with adoption of Resolution 2020 -72. The
assessment on properties within the assessment districts provide revenue to off set the
cost of maintenance of public improvements that serve the development projects , and
also fund administrative costs related to the annual levy process.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-72, initiating proceedings to levy and collect
assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in Assessment Districts pursuant to the
16
Packet Pg. 767
6671
Page 3
Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, appointing the Engineer of
Record and ordering the preparation of Engineer’s Reports.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-72
Ward: All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
June 5, 2019 The Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2019 -87
through 2019-148 declaring its intention to levy and collect
assessments for FY 2019/20 within various assessment districts
within the City of San Bernardino, approving engineer’s reports for
each assessment district and providing notice of the time and place
of hearing on proposed assessments in each assessment district.
August 7, 2019 The Mayor and City Council held Public Hearings and adopted
765Resolution Nos. 2019-190 through 2019-251 of the Mayor and
City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, confirming
the diagram and assessment for FY2019/20, within various
assessment districts in the City of San Bernardino.
16
Packet Pg. 768
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-72
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 IN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,
APPOINTING THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ENGINEER’S REPORTS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino (the “City Council”) has
previously determined that the public interest, convenience, and necessity require the installation,
construction, and maintenance of public landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift
stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention basin and storm drains
and appurtenant facilities within the City of San Bernardino (the “City”) as authorized by the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15
of the Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) and has established the following assessment
districts (the “Assessment Districts”) within the City: Assessment District No. 951 Zone 1 and
Zone 2 (Wagonwheel Road Area), Assessment District No. 952 Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 2A and
Zone 3 (State College Area), Assessment District No. 953 (16th Street), Assessment District No.
956 (Carnegie Drive Area), Assessment District No. 959 Zone 1 (Shandin Hills), Assessment
District No. 962 (Pine Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 963 (Allen Street), Assessment
District No. 968 (Airport Drive), Assessment District No. 974 (Rialto Avenue between
Eucalyptus and Pepper), Assessment District No. 975 (Pepper and Mill Area), Assessment
District No. 976 (Pine and Belmont), Assessment District No. 981 (Meridian and Randall
Avenue), Assessment District No. 982 (Piedmont Drive Area), Assessment District No. 986
(Rialto and Macy Area), Assessment District No. 989 (Mill and Macy Area), Assessment District
No. 991 (Verdemont and Olive Area), Assessment District No. 993 (Cajon and June Area),
Assessment District No. 997 (Chestnut Area), Assessment District No. 1001 (Pennsylvania and
Birch Area), Assessment District No. 1002 (North “H” Street Area), Assessment District No.
1005 (Cajon and Pepper Linden Area), Assessment District No. 1007 (Pepper and Randall Area),
Assessment District No. 1012 (Mill/Burney Area), Assessment District No. 1016 (Coulston
Area), Assessment District No. 1017 (Kendall and Pine Area), Assessment District No. 1019
(Northpark and Mountain Area), Assessment District No. 1020 (Mill Street and Dallas Avenue
Area), Assessment District No. 1022 Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 3 (San Bernardino International
Airport/Alliance-California), Assessment District No. 1023 (Elm Avenue and Coulston Street
Area), Assessment District No. 1024 (Inland Center Drive and Riverwalk Drive Area),
Assessment District No. 1025 (Palm Avenue and Washington Avenue Area), Assessment
District No. 1027 (Waterman Avenue and Washington Street Area), Assessment District No.
1028 (Ohio Avenue and Walnut Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1029 (California Street
and 16th Street Area), Assessment District No. 1030 (Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue Area),
Assessment District No. 1031 (Irvington Avenue and Olive Avenue Area), Assessment District
No. 1032 (Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive), Assessment District No. 1035, Zone 1 and Zone
2 (Palm Avenue and Meyers Road), Assessment District No. 1036 (Northpark Boulevard and
Campus Parkway), Assessment District No. 1037 (Belmont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue),
Assessment District No. 1038 (Orange Show Road and Arrowhead Avenue), Assessment District
16.a
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports)
Resolution No. 2020-72
-2-
No. 1039 (Irvington Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1040 (Arcacia
Avenue and Hill Drive Area), Assessment District No. 1041 (Magnolia Avenue and Ohio
Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1042 (Shandin Hills Drive and Shady Creek Drive),
Assessment District No. 1043, Zone 1 and Zone 2 (Palm Avenue and Irvington Avenue Area),
Assessment District No. 1045 (Waterman Avenue and Orange Show Road Area), Assessment
District No. 1046 (Northpark Boulevard and Northstar Avenue Area), Assessment District No.
1047 (Ohio Avenue and Pine Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1048 (Eucalyptus Avenue
and Randall Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1050 (Pepper Avenue and Rialto Avenue
Area), Assessment District No. 1052 (Belmont Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area), Assessment
District No. 1054 (Campus Parkway and Valles Drive Area), Assessment District No. 1055 (Pine
Avenue and Redwood Street Area), Assessment District No. 1056 (Magnolia Avenue and
Garfield Street Area), Assessment District No. 1057 (Cajon Boulevard and University Parkway
Area), Assessment District No. 1059 (Orange Show Road and Tippecanoe Avenue Area),
Assessment District No. 1060 (Chiquita Lane and Date Street Area), Assessment District No.
1063 (Central Avenue and Lena Road Area), Assessment District No. 1064 (Cajon Boulevard
and Glen Helen Parkway Area), and Assessment District No. 1068 (Tippecanoe Avenue and
Central Avenue Area); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public interest, convenience, and
necessity require the continued levy of assessments within the Assessment Districts for the
purpose of installing, constructing, operating, and maintaining public landscaping, landscaping
and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention
basin and storm drains and appurtenant facilities authorized by the Act.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby initiates proceedings pursuant to the Act to levy
and collect annual assessments within the Assessment Districts for the maintenance, servicing
and operating of public landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping
and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention basin and storm drains and appurtenant
facilities during Fiscal Year 2020/21.
SECTION 2. The maintenance to be performed consists of the furnishing of services
and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of public
landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and
landscaping, detention basin and storm drains.
SECTION 3. The proceedings for the annual levy of the assessments are to be
conducted pursuant to the Act.
SECTION 4. Spicer Consulting Group, LLC is hereby appointed as Engineer of Record
for the purpose of preparing the written report provided for in Section 22567 of the Streets and
Highways Code with respect to the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 for each of the
Assessment Districts, and is hereby directed to prepare and file such reports with the City Clerk.
16.a
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports)
Resolution No. 2020-72
-3-
SECTION 5. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
16.a
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports)
Resolution No. 2020-72
-4-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
16.a
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports)
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agree
W/SBCTA for Mt. Vernon Viaduct Replacement
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California adopt Resolution 2020-78 to approve Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative
Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA) for roles and responsibilities for the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project (“Project) to
increase San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and City Developer
Impact Fees (DIF) by a total of $10,127,219, for a new SBCTA share of $16,165,535
and DIF share funding of $9,747,979, to cover project funding shortfalls based on the
final bid price for the Design Build contract and updated funding contributions from
Federal and State sources; and to authorize the City Manager to sign and execute
Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement.
Background
Replacement of the Mt. Vernon Bridge, which was built in 1934, has been a high priority
for the City for more than 18 years. In 1997, Ca ltrans inspectors determined that the
bridge has a sufficiency rating less than 50 out of a possible 100 and is considered to
be structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. Over the last 16+ years a number of
short-term remedies have been implemented to address the impacts of deterioration.
Over the same time period, the City, the San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA), BNSF Railroad (BNSF), and CalTrans, have been working in
partnership to develop a replacement strategy for the bridge and secure funding to
support the project.
In June 2016, the Mayor and City Council entered into Cooperative Agreement No. 16 -
1001477 with SBCTA. The agreement establishes SBCTA as the lead agency on the
Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project (“Project”) and provides for project funding through Federal
Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds, public share funding through San Bernardino’s
Measure I Arterial funds, and the City’s local share to be funded through Developer
Impact Fees (DIF). This agreement was first amended on October 26, 2018,
(Amendment No. 1) to address the project becoming a design -build project and to clarify
roles and responsibilities for the Right-of-Way and design build phases. Amendment
No. 1 also increased the project cost and funding, therefore i ncreasing the public and
17
Packet Pg. 773
6494
Page 2
City shared costs after project buy-downs to approximately $15.8 million, including a
$29.5 million contribution from BNSF.
Discussion
The Project has now received proposals for the design-build contract and the costs from
the lowest responsible, responsive proposer were significantly higher than the
engineer’s estimate, creating a funding shortfall. SBCTA staff has been working with the
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to obtain additional project funding
and options to address this shortfall of over $90 million. Through Caltrans delivering
additional HBP funds and eliminating deferred reimbursement, the project funding
shortfall was able to be reduced to just over $10 million.
The $10 million Project funding shortfall was proposed to be funded through an increase
in the public and local share contributions. The required public share is funded by the
City’s equitable share of Measure I Valley Arterial Sub-program funds and the local
share is funded through the City’s Regional Circulation Development Impact Fee (DIF)
funds. The additional Project funding requirements from the public share and the local
share are shown in the table below.
Fund Total Updated
Funding Required
2016
Commitment
From City
Additional
Funding
Needs
DIF $ 9,747,979 $ 5,959,760 $ 3,788,219
Arterial Funs $ 16,165,535 $ 9,826,535 $ 6,339,000
Totals $ 25,913,514 $ 15,786,295 $ 10,127,219
The City and SBCTA have discussed the options for funding the public share shortfall
through an advance of up to five years of the City’s allocation of Measure I Arterial
Funds. Staff presented this option to the Mayor and City Council at a Special Meeting
on April 8, 2020. At that time, the Mayor and City Council directed staff to submit a
request to SBCTA to leverage up to five years of Measure I Arterial Funds to support
the City’s full public share of the increased Project Costs, and return to a future meeting
for consideration of an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement.
SBCTA has provided Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 in
response to that request. Amendment No. 2 revises the funding table in Attachment A to
the Cooperative Agreement to reflect the increased project cost and the increased
funding contributions from the various parties.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1d: Minimize Risk and Litigation
Exposure. Replacement of the Mt. Vernon Bridge will eliminate a critically outdated
asset and replace it with bridge infrastructure that meets current community needs and
will be constructed with the latest safety features. The new bridge will provide a long -
term transportation feature for the City and more effectively support the north and south
bound travel of residents and businesses in the area.
17
Packet Pg. 774
6494
Page 3
Fiscal Impact
There is no General Fund Impact. The additional public share of funding in the amount
of $6,339,000 will be met by leveraging up to five years of Measure I Major -
Street/Arterial Sub-program revenue in advance through SBCTA. Additional local share
requirements of $3,788,219 will be programed through future fiscal year DIF funds.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California adopt Resolution 2020-78 approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative
Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA) for roles and responsibilities for the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project (“Project) to
increase San Bernardino County Transportation Auth ority (SBCTA) and City Developer
Impact Fees (DIF) by a total of $10,127,219, for a new SBCTA share of $16,165,535
and DIF share funding of $9,747,979, to cover project funding shortfalls based on the
final bid price for the Design Build contract and updated funding contributions from
Federal and State sources; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute
Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-78; Exhibit “A” - Amendment No.2 to Cooperative
Agreement No. 16-1001477
Attachment 2 Location Map
Wards: 1 & 3
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
April 8, 2020
The Mayor and City Council directed staff to submit a request to the San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to leverage up to five years of the City’s
allocation of Measure I Major Street/Arterial Sub -program revenue, in advance, to
support additional funding requirements of the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project.
September 18, 2018
Adopted Resolution No. 2018-257, approving Contract No. 16-1001477-01, Amended
and Restated Cooperative Agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA) for the Development of the Mount Vernon Avenue Grade Separation
over the BNSF Railway Intermodal Yard Project (SS04-12).
June 20, 2018
Adopted Resolution No. 2018-164 approving Contract No. 16-1001477-01, Cooperative
Agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for the
development of the Mount Vernon Avenue Grade Separation over the BNSF Railway
Intermodal Yard Project (SSO4-12). Note: Contract approved in error. Not executed by
SBCTA.
June 6, 2016
17
Packet Pg. 775
6494
Page 4
Adopted Resolution No. 2016-109 approving Contract No. 16-1001477, Cooperative
Agreement with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) for the
development of the Mount Vernon Avenue Grade Separation over the BNSF Railway
Intermodal Yard Project (SSO4-12).
May 16, 2016
Adopted Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) designating SANBAG as Lead Agency
for environmental clearance, design, right-of-way acquisition and construction of the Mt.
Vernon Avenue Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad (SS04-12).
February 16, 2016
Mayor and Common Council authorized staff to develop a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG)
designating SANBAG as Lead Agency for environmental clearance, design, right -of-way
acquisition and construction of the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad
(SS04-12).
March 1, 2010
Resolution No. 2010-036 adopted approving Amendment No. 5 to Services Agreement
with LAN Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Avenue
Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad.
October 20, 2008
Resolution No. 2008-405 adopted approving Amendment No. 4 to Services Agreement
with LAN Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Avenue
Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad.
September 17, 2007
Resolution No. 2007-382 adopted approving Amendment No. 3 to Agreement with LAN
Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Viaduct over BNSF
Railroad.
December 20, 2004
Resolution No. 2004-399 adopted approving Amendment No. 2 to Agreement with LAN
Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Viaduct o ver BNSF
Railroad and Resolution No. 2004-400 adopted approving Amendment No. 1 with Jones
& Stokes for additional environmental services for the Mt. Vernon viaduct over the
BNSF Railroad.
March 15, 2004
Resolution No. 2004-73 authorizing execution of Professional Services Agreement with
LAN Engineering Corporation for the Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Ave.
Viaduct over the BNSF railroad in the amount of $49,000.
December 1, 2003
Adopted resolution approving Professional Environmental Services Agre ement with
17
Packet Pg. 776
6494
Page 5
Myra L. Frank and Associates for environmental services related to the Mt. Vernon
Bridge Project.
17
Packet Pg. 777
Resolution No. 2020-78
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-78
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT NO. 16-1001477 (AGREEMENT) WITH THE
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY (SBCTA) FOR ROLES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE MT. VERNON AVENUE
VIADUCT PROJECT (PROJECT) TO INCREASE SBCTA
AND CITY DEVELOPER IMPACT FEES (DIF) BY A
TOTAL OF $10,127,219 FOR A NEW SBCTA SHARE OF
$16,165,535 AND DIF SHARE FUNDING OF $9,747,979 TO
COVER PROJECT FUNDING SHORTFALLS BASED ON
FINAL BID PROICE FOR THE DESIGN BUILD
CONTRACT AND UPDATED FUNDING CONTRIBUTIONS
FROM FEDERAL AND STATE SOURCES; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the replacement of the Mt Vernon Avenue bridge has been a high priority
transportation project for the City for over 18 years; and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2016, the Mayor and City Council entered into Cooperative
Agreement No. 16-1001477 (Agreement) with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA), establishing SBCTA as the lead agency on the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct Project
(“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement delineates roles, and provides for project funding through
Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds, public share funding through San Bernardino’s
Measure I Arterial funds, and the City’s local share funding through Developer Impact Fees
(DIF); and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement, effective October 26, 2018, added in
the design-build phase of work, clarified right of way activities, and revised the funding table in
Attachment A to the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Project has now received proposals for the design-build contract and the
costs from the lowest responsible, responsive proposer were significantly higher than the
engineer’s estimate, creating a funding shortfall; and
WHEREAS, the City and SBCTA have worked with the California Department of
Transportation, to obtain additional project funding, but there is still a shortfall of $10,127,219 to
fully fund the project; and
17.a
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01Resolution [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment
Resolution No. 2020-78
WHEREAS, the City and SBCTA agree to provide additional funding of $10,127,219 to
fully fund the project and reflect these added funding contributions in a revised funding table as
part of Amendment No. 2 to this Agreement.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sign and execute
Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to increase SBCTA and City developer impact fees (DIF) by
a total of $10,127,219, a copy of which is attached as exhibit “A” and incorporated herein.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule th at CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the by the Mayor and City Council and signed by the
Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
_________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
__________________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
17.a
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01Resolution [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment
Resolution No. 2020-78
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of
Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______, 2020 by the
following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
17.a
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01Resolution [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment
16-1001477-02 Page 1 of 4
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 16-1001477
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE, PRELIMINARY DESIGN, RIGHT-OF-WAY
(ROW), AND DESIGN-BUILD PHASES FOR THE MOUNT VERNON AVENUE
VIADUCT OVER BNSF RAILWAY INTERMODAL YARD IN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO
THIS Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment”) to COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 16-1001477
(“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority ( “SBCTA”) and the City of SAN BERNARDINO (“CITY”). SBCTA
and CITY may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties”.
WHEREAS, the Parties consider the PROJECT to be a high priority and are willing to
participate in funding the PROJECT pursuant to the provisions of Measure I 2010-2040
Expenditure Plan and the SBCTA Nexus Study (“Nexus Study”) prepared by the SBCTA and
approved by the SBCTA Board of Directors on November 6, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Agreement in 2016 to delineate roles,
responsibilities, and funding commitments relative to the Environmental Clearance, Design and
Right-of-Way (ROW) phases of the PROJECT before delivery of the PROJECT through design-
build method was contemplated or authorized; and
WHEREAS, the Parties amended the Agreement on October 26, 2018, to add in the
design-build phase of work, clarify right of way activities, and revise the funding table in
Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsible, responsive proposer’s costs significantly exceeded
the engineer’s estimate and planned funding specified in Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, Parties have worked with the California Department of Transportation, to
obtain additional project funding, but there is still a shortfall of $10,127,219 to fully fund the
project; and
17.b
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to
16-1001477-02 Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to provide additional funding of $10,127,219 to fully fund
the project and reflect these added funding contributions in a revised funding table as part of an
amendment to this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual
promises herein, the Parties agree to amend Agreement as follows:
1. Section 1, item G shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:
G. To contribute towards the cost of Environmental Clearance, Preliminary Design, ROW, and
Design-Build phases of PROJECT and any financing costs associated with the delivery of
these phases of PROJECT in an amount not to exceed $16,165,535 (the Public Share
amount) as shown in Attachment A. The actual cost of a specific phase may ultimately vary
from the estimates provided in Attachment A, however, under no circumstance is the total
combined SBCTA contribution to exceed $16,165,535 without an amendment to this
Agreement.
2. Section II, article A, is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:
A. To reimburse SBCTA for its share of the actual costs incurred estimated at $9,747,979
towards the Environmental Clearance, Preliminary Design, ROW and Design-Build phases
of the PROJECT and any financing costs associated with the delivery of these phases of the
PROJECT, which includes $2,000,000 towards Project Management, as shown in
Attachment A. If payment is not made within sixty (60) days of the invoice date, SBCTA
will withhold CITY’s Measure I Local Street Program pass through funds in the invoice
amount. As CITY makes payments toward the current amount due, the withheld pass
through funds will be released to CITY. The actual cost of a specific phase may ultimately
vary from the estimates provided in Attachment A, however, under no circumstance is the
total combined CITY contribution to exceed $9,747,979 (the Development Share amount)
without an amendment to this Agreement.
3. All other conditions of the Agreement and its Amendment 1 remain in full force and effect
except as amended above.
(Signature page to follow)
17.b
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to
16-1001477-02 Page 3 of 4
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 16-1001477
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
By: ____________________________ By:___________________
Darcy McNaboe Teri Ledoux
President, Board of Directors City Manager
Date:___________________ Date:___________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST
By:_____________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC
By:_____________________ Acting City Clerk
Julianna K. Tillquist
General Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CONCURRENCE:
By:_____________________ By:_____________________
Jeffery Hill Sonia /R. Carvalho
Procurement Manager City Attorney
17.b
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to
Contract No. 16-1001477-02
Attachment A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The CITY of San Bernardino and SBCTA propose to remove and replace the existing Mount
Vernon Avenue Viaduct Bridge over the BNSF Railway Intermodal Yard. It is intended that
SBCTA serves as the lead for the Environmental Clearance, Preliminary Design, ROW and
Design-Build phases of the work.
PROJECT FUNDING TABLE
Public Share: 67.6%
Nexus Development Impact Fee Share (“DIF”, “Development Share” or “Local Share”): 32.4%
PHASE TOTAL
BEFORE PROJECT BUY
DOWN INCLUDING PROJECT BUY DOWNS
SBCTA
SHARE
(Public)
CITY
SHARE
(DIF)
Federal HBP
BUY
DOWN1
Prop
1B/BNSF
Contribution2
SBCTA
SHARE
(Public)3
CITY
SHARE
(DIF)4
ENVIRONMENTAL
CLEARANCE AND
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN
$7,819,638 $5,265,244 $2,523,579 $6,895,445 $893,378 $20,831 $9,984
RIGHT OF WAY $72,060,000 $48,712,560 $23,347,440 $58,571,448 $13,488,552 $0 $0
DESIGN-BUILD $147,865,353 $99,956,979 $47,908,374 $105,411,914 $18,570,740 $16,144,705 $7,737,994
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT5
$2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
TOTAL $229,744,991 $153,955,614 $75,789,377 $170,878,807 $32,952,670 $16,165,535 $9,747,979
*Numbers may not add exactly due to rounding
Notes
1 Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds are capped at $170,878,807. State Proposition 1B Bond funds in
the amount of $3,452,670 will provide a portion of the required HBP match funds .
2 BNSF Contribution is estimated at $29.5 million. BNSF Contribution is expected to provide HBP match of
11.47% and, depending on the terms of agreements to be developed with the State on the use of HBP funds, may be
used for Financing Costs and, lastly, Project Management costs. Any BNSF Contribution remaining after funding
all other eligible costs will buy down the cost of the Design-Build Phase before application of the HBP Share.
3 Public Share is from the CITY share of Measure I Major Street Program – Arterial Subprogram funds.
4 A deposit of $905,891 from the CITY Development Share has been received to date under Agreement 16-1001477.
5 Depending on terms of agreements to be developed with the State on the use of HBP funds, BNSF contribution
may be applied to Project Management costs after meeting all HBP match requirements for the PROJECT.
17.b
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
NTS
MOUNT VERNON AVENU VIADUCT
17.c
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: 19169 [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agree W/SBCTA for Mt. Vernon Viaduct
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of
Rialto for Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-80, approving the Cooperative Agreement with
the City of Rialto FOR Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street
Project (SS20-010) (“Project”).
Background
The City of Rialto (“Rialto”) and the City of San Bernardino (“City”) share jurisdiction of
several streets located where the cities border each other. The segment of Pepper
Avenue between Baseline Road and Mill Street is an example of one of these areas of
shared roadway jurisdiction. At this location the City owns the east half of the street
and Rialto owns the west half.
Rialto previously approached the City and proposed a joint project for FY 2019/20 to
rehabilitate Pepper Avenue from Baseline Road to Mill Street . The Pepper Avenue
Rehabilitation Project (“Project”) is included in the City’s approved FY 2019/20 Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) as CIP SS20-010. $200,000 in Measure I Pass Through funds
was established to support the design of project in FY 2019/20 (Fund 129 -160-8713-
5504).
This segment of Pepper Avenue was previously identified in the City’s approved
Pavement Management Analysis as having a remaining service life of 2 years and in
need of immediate rehabilitation.
Discussion
Staff negotiated the proposed Cooperative Agreement with Rialto to delineate the
roles, responsibilities, and contributions of both Rialt o and the City with regard to the
Project. The full project cost is estimated at $6,008,002. Full project cost estimates for
each city are shown below.
City of San Bernardino Share $3,389,503
City of Rialto Share $2,618,519
18
Packet Pg. 786
6665
Page 2
Total Estimated Project Costs $6,008,022
The City is the lead agency on this project and will invoice Rialto for the cost of the
environmental clearance, design, utility relocation, construction engineering,
construction, inspection, and City overhead. All work will be c ompleted within the
existing street right -of-way. The City will approve the plans and issue a no fee permit
for the work. Any changes (change orders) will be subject to review and approval by
both cities.
Conducting cooperative projects on streets of shared jurisdiction is more efficient for
planning and construction timing, and more cost effective as the agencies share in the
cost of design and expense of contractor mobilization. Cooperative projects also reduce
the inconveniences experienced by the traveling public and adjacent
businesses/residents.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
This project aligns with Key Target No. 1c: Create a framework for spending decisions,
and Key Target 1d: Minimize risk and litigation exposure. By partnering with the City of
Rialto in this Project, the City is able to take advantage of shared costs for design,
inspection and construction mobilization costs. The completion of the Project will also
minimize litigation exposure by addressing deferred maintenance issues and providing
a safe and compliant path of travel for vehicles and pedestrians along this section of
roadway.
Fiscal Impact
No General Fund impact. Measure I funding in the amount of $200,000 has been
approved for Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street in the FY
2019/20 Project in #account 129-160-8713-5504 and is available for design. Funding
for the construction portion of the project will be addressed in future fiscal year CIP
planning documents.
The City will perform the work and invoice Rialto for its fair share of the cost of the
project within the City limits of Rialto.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-80, approving the Cooperative Agreement with
the City of Rialto FOR Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street
Project (SS20-010).
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-80; Exhibit ‘A’- Cooperative Agreement for Pepper
Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project
Attachment 2 Location Map
Ward: 3, 6
18
Packet Pg. 787
6665
Page 3
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
June 19, 2019 Adopted Resolution No. 2019-168 approving Capital Improvement
Program FY 2019/2020
18
Packet Pg. 788
Resolution No. 2020-80
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-80
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF RIALTO FOR PEPPER AVENUE
REHABILITATION FROM BASELINE ROAD TO MILL
STREET PROJECT (SS20-010) (“PROJECT”)
WHEREAS, the City of Rialto and the City of San Bernardino share jurisdiction of
several streets; and
WHEREAS, conducting cooperative projects on streets of shared jurisdiction is more
efficient and cost effective as compared to separate projects issued by each jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, Pepper Avenue is a shared street between the City of San Bernardino and
the City of Rialto and is was identified in the City’s approved Pavement Management Analysis
(PMA) as having a remaining service life of 2 years and in need of immediate rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS, the City limit line runs through the center of the roadway, with the westerly
portion in the City of Rialto and easterly portion in the City of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, staff negotiated a cooperative agreement with the City of Rialto delineating
the roles, responsibilities, and contributions of both the City of Rialto and the City of San
Bernardino with regard to the Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street
Project. San Bernardino will contribute the entire share of funding, estimated to be $3,200,000,
for the Pepper Avenue rehabilitation within San Bernardino jurisdictional areas.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Manager or her designee is hereby authorized and directed to
execute on behalf of the City a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Rialto for Pepper
Avenue Rehabilitation Project in accordance with Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
18.a
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: PW.Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepperavenue-Attachment 1-Resolution [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative
Resolution No. 2020-80
SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho , City Attorney
18.a
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: PW.Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepperavenue-Attachment 1-Resolution [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative
Resolution No. 2020-80
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
18.a
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: PW.Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepperavenue-Attachment 1-Resolution [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 1 of 10
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AND
CITY OF RIALTO
FOR THE
PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
This AGREEMENT is entered into this _______ day of ___________, 2020, in the State of California,
by and between the City of San Bernardino, hereinafter called SAN BERNARDINO, and the City of
Rialto, hereinafter called RIALTO.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO (SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO are also each
referred to herein as “Party” and collectively referred to herein as “Parties”) desire to cooperate and
jointly participate in a pavement rehabilitation project on Pepper Avenue, from Baseline Road south to
Mill Street (hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT”); and
WHEREAS, the PROJECT is located at the boundary of the incorporated area of SAN
BERNARDINO and the incorporated area of RIALTO; and
WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code section 1807 authorizes two adjacent cities,
if authorized by their governing bodies, to enter into a mutual agreement for the improvement and
maintenance of the street which constitutes the boundary line between the two adjacent cities, and
authorizes, pursuant to such agreement, the cities to expend funds available for the improvement and
maintenance of that boundary street; and
WHEREAS, the legislative bodies of SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO determine that the
PROJECT is necessary for the more efficient maintenance, construction, or repair of the boundary
street; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that SAN BERNARDINO’s share of PROJECT costs will be funded
from SAN BERNARDINO’s local funds and RIALTO’s share of PROJECT costs will be funded from
RIALTO’s local funds; and
WHEREAS, the total PROJECT cost is estimated to be $ 6,008,022; and
WHEREAS, SAN BERNARDINO’s share of PROJECT cost is estimated at $3,389,503 and
RIALTO’s share of PROJECT cost is estimated to be $2,618,519, as more particularly set forth in
Exhibit “B”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the above-described costs are proportioned based on the work to be performed in
each PARTY’s jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO desire to set forth the responsibilities and
obligations of each as they pertain to such participation, and to the design, construction, and funding of
the PROJECT.
18.b
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 2 of 10
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED as follows:
SECTION I
SAN BERNARDINO AGREES TO:
1. Act as the Lead Agency in the design, construction, construction engineering, inspection, and
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance (Public Resources Code section 21000 et
seq.) of the PROJECT. Design work shall include traffic counts and analysis to determine the
appropriate traffic index for Pepper Avenue; geotechnical analysis and pavement design
recommendations; pavement rehabilitation design; evaluation and design of accessibility
improvements; and evaluation and design of traffic striping, pavement markings, and traffic signs to
improve safety and traffic flow.
2. Provide geotechnical analysis and recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bid
documents for the PROJECT to RIALTO, for RIALTO’s review and approval.
3. Construct the PROJECT by contract in accordance with the plans and specifications of SAN
BERNARDINO, which have been reviewed and approved by RIALTO, to the satisfaction of and
subject to concurrence of RIALTO.
4. Arrange for relocation of all utilities which interfere with construction of the PROJECT within the
entire PROJECT limits, subject to paragraph 3.9 below.
5. Obtain a no-cost permit from RIALTO for work performed within RIALTO’s right-of-way.
6. Advertise, award, and administer the construction of the PROJECT, in accordance with the
provisions of the California Public Contract Code applicable to cities and require contractors to
comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including Labor Code sections 1720 et seq. and
1770 et seq. that concern the payment of prevailing wages. San Bernardino shall indemnify, defend
(with counsel reasonably approved by RIALTO), and hold harmless RIALTO and its officers,
employees, volunteers, and agents from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or
liability arising out of SAN BERNARDINO’s obligations set forth in this paragraph.
7. SAN BERNARDINO shall require all contractors and vendors working on the PROJECT to have
appropriate and adequate insurance coverage for the mutual protection and benefit of the Parties.
Except for Workers’ Compensation, Errors and Omissions and Professional Liability policies, SAN
BERNARDINO shall require and ensure that all SAN BERNARDINO contractors/subcontractors for
the PROJECT shall have insurance policies that contain endorsements naming RIALTO and its
officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds with respect to liabilities arising
out of the performance of services hereunder. The additional insured endorsements shall not limit
the scope of coverage for RIALTO to vicarious liability but shall allow coverage for RIALTO to the
full extent provided by the policy. Such additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as
Additional Insured (Form B) endorsement form ISO, CG 2010.11 85.
8. Provide adequate inspection of all items of work performed under the construction contract(s) with
SAN BERNARDINO’s contractors or subcontractors for the PROJECT and maintain adequate
records of inspection and materials testing for review by RIALTO. SAN BERNARDINO shall
provide copies of any records of inspection and materials testing to RIALTO within ten (10) days of
18.b
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 3 of 10
SAN BERNARDINO’s receipt of written demand from RIALTO for such records. This shall be
included as a PROJECT cost.
9. Periodically submit to RIALTO invoices for Rialto’s proportionate share of PROJECT costs.
Invoices shall include itemized accounting of actual Project costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO
and a detailed statement of RIALTO’S proportionate share of those costs.
10. Upon PROJECT completion, calculate actual SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO PROJECT share
percentages based on the final contract work and cost, which shall include any changes made
within SAN BERNARDINO and/or RIALTO as provided in this Agreement.
11. Pay its proportionate share of the actual PROJECT cost. The actual PROJECT cost shall include
the cost of PROJECT preliminary engineering, design, survey, CEQA compliance, utility relocation
work, construction, construction engineering, inspection, and SAN BERNARDINO overhead costs
which will be based on PROJECT related staff hours billed at the fully burdened rate. SAN
BERNARDINO’s proportionate share of the PROJECT cost is estimated to be $3,389,503. SAN
BERNARDINO shall be responsible for the sum of $3,389,503, plus its share of any PROJECT cost
increases pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. San Bernardino will track staff charges and will
use fully burdened rate to estimate in-house charges for overhead cost.
12. Upon PROJECT completion and the capture of all PROJECT expenses, submit to RIALTO an
itemized accounting of actual PROJECT costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO and, if said costs
exceed the amount paid by RIALTO pursuant to paragraph 9 and Section II paragraph 3, an invoice
for the remainder of RIALTO’s share of the actual PROJECT costs, up to the amount set forth in
Section II paragraph 4 hereof, as provided herein. Said invoice shall set forth all actual PROJECT
costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO, together with adequate documentation of said expenditures
and a copy of the overall SAN BERNARDINO/RIALTO percentage share calculation spreadsheet.
If the actual PROJECT costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO are less than the amount paid by
RIALTO pursuant to paragraphs 9 and Section II paragraph 3, then SAN BERNARDINO shall
refund RIALTO the difference within thirty (30) days after issuance of the itemized accounting.
SECTION II
RIALTO AGREES TO:
1. Review and approve the plans and specifications of the PROJECT.
2. Provide a no-cost permit to SAN BERNARDINO for its work in RIALTO’s right-of-way.
3. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the invoice from SAN BERNARDINO pursuant to Section I
paragraph 9 above, pay to SAN BERNARDINO the invoiced amount.
4. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the itemized accounting and invoice from SAN
BERNARDINO pursuant to Section I paragraph 12 above, pay to SAN BERNARDINO the
remainder of its share of the actual PROJECT costs based on the RIALTO percentage calculated
pursuant to Section I paragraph 10. The PROJECT costs shall include the cost of PROJECT
design, CEQA compliance, utility relocation work, construction, construction engineering, inspection
and SAN BERNARDINO overhead costs. RIALTO’s share of PROJECT costs is currently
estimated to be $2,618,519 and shall not exceed $2,880,371 (10% increase over the PROJECT
cost estimate) absent a written amendment to this Agreement.
18.b
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 4 of 10
SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
1. After SAN BERNARDINO’s and RIALTO’s acceptance of completed PROJECT, RIALTO shall be
responsible for performing any and all work (including, but not limited to, maintenance) for the
PROJECT limits that are in RIALTO’s incorporated area and SAN BERNARDINO shall be
responsible for performing any and all work (including, but not limited to, maintenance) for the
PROJECT limits that are in SAN BERNARDINO’s incorporated area.
2. Neither RIALTO nor any officer or employee of RIALTO shall be responsible for any damage or
liability occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of SAN BERNARDINO under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the
responsibility of SAN BERNARDINO under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, SAN BERNARDINO shall fully indemnify, defend
and hold RIALTO harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code
section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of SAN BERNARDINO
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the
responsibility of SAN BERNARDINO under this Agreement.
3. Neither SAN BERNARDINO nor any officer or employee of SAN BERNARDINO shall be
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of
RIALTO under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined
to be the responsibility of RIALTO under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, RIALTO shall fully indemnify, defend and hold SAN
BERNARDINO harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code
section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of RIALTO under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the
responsibility of RIALTO under this Agreement.
4. RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO are authorized self-insured public entities for purposes of
Professional Liability, Automobile Liability, General Liability and Worker’s Compensation, and
warrant that through their respective programs of self-insurance they have adequate coverage or
resources to protect against liabilities arising out of RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO’s
performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this Agreement.
5. The Parties acknowledge that actual PROJECT costs may ultimately exceed current estimates of
PROJECT costs. Any additional PROJECT costs resulting from increased bid prices, increased
engineering costs, change orders, or arising from unforeseen site conditions, including utility
relocation (but not from requested additional work by RIALTO or SAN BERNARDINO, which is
addressed in paragraph 8 below) over the estimated total of the PROJECT’s cost of $6,008,022
(which is the sum of $2,618,519 from RIALTO and $3,389,503 from SAN BERNARDINO) shall be
borne by each PARTY based upon where the work is required (i.e. whether the work is required in
RIALTO’s or SAN BERNARDINO’s jurisdiction) up to the amounts set forth in Section I paragraph
11 and Section II paragraph 4, respectively.
6. If either RIALTO or SAN BERNARDINO requests additional work that is beyond the scope of the
original PROJECT, and not considered by all Parties to be a necessary part of the PROJECT, said
18.b
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 5 of 10
work, if approved by both Parties pursuant to paragraph 17 will be paid solely by the agency
requesting the work.
7. In the case wherein one of the Parties owns a utility that needs to be relocated for the PROJECT
and that PARTY does not have prior rights for that utility, it will be the sole responsibility of that
PARTY to relocate the utility at that PARTY’s cost. This shall not be included as a PROJECT cost.
In the case that a utility relocation is determined to be a PROJECT cost based on that utility having
prior rights, the relocation of the utility will be included as a PROJECT cost for which RIALTO and
SAN BERNARDINO will be responsible for funding the work located within their respective
boundaries.
8. As design progresses, if it is found by SAN BERNARDINO’s Director of Public Works, or the
Director’s designee, that a cost overrun of 10% or more of the estimated total of the PROJECT
costs will occur, SAN BERNARDINO shall provide RIALTO notice of this fact and SAN
BERNARDINO and RIALTO shall endeavor to agree upon an alternative course of action,
including amending the cost estimates. If, after thirty (30) days of SAN BERNARDINO’s notice, an
alternative course of action is not mutually agreed upon in writing between RIALTO and SAN
BERNARDINO, this Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent.
9. SAN BERNARDINO shall notify RIALTO of the bids received and the amounts thereof. In the
event that either PARTY intends to cancel this Agreement based upon the bids or amount thereof,
said PARTY shall notify the other PARTY at a reasonable time prior to the awarding of a contract
to construct the PROJECT to avoid any detrimental reliance by either PARTY, contractor or
potential contractor.
10. If after opening bids for the PROJECT, it is found that the responsive and responsible low bid
amount is 110% of or less than the construction cost shown in Exhibit B, SAN BERNARDINO may
award the contract.
11. If, upon opening of bids, it is found that the responsive and responsible low bid amount is greater
than 110% of the construction cost shown in Exhibit B or an Amended Exhibit B pursuant to
paragraph 10 of the Agreement, SAN BERNARDINO shall not award the contract unless: 1) SAN
BERNARDINO receives written permission from RIALTO’s City Engineer or designee, to proceed
with the award; and 2) RIALTO’s City Council approves the award of the construction contract. If
the above described conditions are not met, RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO shall endeavor to
agree upon an alternative course of action, including re-bidding of the PROJECT. If, after thirty
(30) days of the bid opening, an alternative course of action is not mutually agreed upon in writing,
this Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent.
12. In the event that change orders are required during the course of the PROJECT, said change
orders must be in form and substance as set forth in “Exhibit C”, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, and approved by both RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO.
Contract Change Order forms will be delivered by email and must be returned within five (5)
business days. RIALTO shall not unreasonably withhold approval of change orders. If a RIALTO
disapproved or modified change order is later found to cause an additional cost to the PROJECT,
then RIALTO shall be responsible for any additional costs, awards, judgments or settlements
associated with the disapproved or modified change order.
13. This Agreement may be cancelled upon thirty (30) days advance written notice of either PARTY,
provided however, that neither PARTY may cancel this Agreement after SAN BERNARDINO
awards a contract to construct the PROJECT. In the event of cancellation as provided herein,
18.b
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 6 of 10
including termination pursuant to paragraphs 10, 11 and 13 above, all PROJECT expenses
occurred prior to the effective date of cancellation/termination shall be paid by the Parties in the
same proportion to their contribution for the PROJECT. The PARTIES recognize and agree that
the provisions governing utility relocation and construction are dependent upon the PARTIES first
satisfying CEQA. As provided in this paragraph, the Agreement may be cancelled with or without
cause, before, during and after CEQA review/approval.
14. Except as provided in paragraph 15, and except for the PARTIES’ operation, maintenance and
indemnification obligations contained herein which shall survive termination, this Agreement shall
terminate upon completion of the PROJECT and payment of final billing by RIALTO for its share of
the PROJECT costs or refund by SAN BERNARDINO pursuant to Section I paragraph 12.
15. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the PARTIES with respect to subject matter
hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. No supplement,
modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and
signed by both PARTIES.
16. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Any action or proceeding
between SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO concerning the interpretation or enforcement of this
Agreement, or which arises out of or is in any way connected with this Agreement or the
PROJECT, shall be instituted and tried in the appropriate state court, located in the County of San
Bernardino, California.
17. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.
18. Since the PARTIES or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the
language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly
for or against any PARTY. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be
deemed RIALTO business days. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for
convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope,
content, or intent of this Agreement.
19. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the
same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or
performed by a PARTY shall give the other PARTY any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or
otherwise.
20. If a court of competent jurisdiction declares any portion of this Agreement invalid, illegal, or
otherwise unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect, unless the
purpose of this Agreement is frustrated.
21. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
22. This Agreement will be effective on the date signed by both PARTIES and shall conclude upon
satisfaction of the terms identified in paragraph 16 or June 30, 2021 (whichever occurs first).
23. The Recitals are incorporated into the body of this Agreement.
18.b
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 7 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year
first-above written.
CITY OF RIALTO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By: By:
Deborah Robertson, Mayor John Valdivia, Mayor
ATTEST:
By: Barbara McGee, City Clerk By: Genoveva Rocha, CMC,
Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
By: By:
Eric S. Vail, City Attorney Sonia Carvalho , City Attorney
18.b
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 8 of 10
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project consists of pavement rehabilitation of Pepper Avenue from Baseline Road to Mill
Street. Accessibility improvement will be installed or upgraded as part of the project.
18.b
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 9 of 10
EXHIBIT B
ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COSTS
FOR CITY OF RIALTO/CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PEPPER AVENUE REHABILIATION PROJECT
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO
SHARE
CITY OF RIALTO
SHARE
Construction $5,224,367 $2,947,394 $2,276,973
All Other Costs such as
design, survey, CEQA
compliance, construction
engineering, inspection
and City overhead
$ 783,655 442,109 $341,546
TOTAL $6,008,022 $3,389,503 $2,618,519
18.b
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
PEPPER AVENUE STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT C
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER REVIEW/APPROVAL
PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT :
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONTRACT NO. ______
Proposed Contract Change Order No. has been reviewed in accordance with the existing agreements with
the City of San Bernardino and City of Rialto for the above project and the following shall apply:
DATE OF CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTION: ____/____/____
APPROVED for Implementation with 100% Participation by CITY OF RIALTO
APPROVED Subject to Comments/Revisions Accompanying This Document
APPROVED With Limited Funding Participation by CITY OF RIALTO
______% of Actual Cost to be Funded by CITY OF RIALTO
CITY OF RIALTO Participation Not to Exceed $ _________________________
DISAPPROVED -Not Acceptable to CITY OF RIALTO
Note: Approval under any of the above conditions shall in no case be construed as agreement to
increase the total financial participation beyond that prescribed in the existing CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO and CITY OF RIALTO agreement without a separate amendment to said agreement. Net
increases in costs deriving from this and previously approved Contract Change Orders shall not cause
the total construction costs to exceed the sum of the authorized contract total and contingency amounts.
Comments, as follows and/or attached, are conditions of the above action? YES NO
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
SIGNED: _______________________________________________
TITLE: _________________________________________________
Distribution:
Signed Original Returned to Resident Engineer
Signed Original for CITY OF RIALTO File
18.b
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for
LOCATION MAP
18.c
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: PW.Pepper Ave Location Maps [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative
18.c
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: PW.Pepper Ave Location Maps [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative
PEPPER AVENUE REHABILITATION
FROM BASELINE ROAD TO MILL STREET
NTS
18.c
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: PW.Pepper Ave Location Maps [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement with SBCTA
Metrolink Accessibility Phase II
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution 2020-81, approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20-
1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Phase II of the
San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project.
Background
On September 26, 2013, former Governor Brown signed legislation creating the Active
Transportation Program (ATP) in the Department of Transportation (Senate Bill 99,
Chapter 359 and Assembly Bill 101, Chapter 354). The ATP provides federal and state
funding for various categories of transportation improvement projects, and is
administered by the Division of Local Assistance, Office of Active Transportation and
Special Programs.
The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) was awarded ATP
funding for the Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project (“Project”). The City
partnered with SBCTA in Phase I of the project by waiving permit fees associated with
the project. SBCTA is ready to begin Phase II of the project and is requesting that the
City enter into a Cooperative Agreement to waive permit fees for Phase II of the Project.
Discussion
The existing non-motorized network consists of a number of disconnected facilities.
Barriers include, disconnected bike lanes, lack of way-finding signs, substandard
sidewalks and pedestrian crossings, etc. The Project eliminates these gaps by providing
an interconnected network of bike lanes, sidewalks, crossings, and improving existing
highway railroad crossings and other related infrastructure which are safe, easy to
navigate, convenient, and attractive. The Project plans to implement a well -connected
network of active transportation facilities that foster a positive transit experience. It aims
to build successful bicycle facilities with well-signed route-finding along the facility itself,
and regional way-finding to nearby destinations. The stations are surrounded by
commercial, residential and industrial uses, and serve as commuter stations and local
bus transfer center for a large amount of users.
19
Packet Pg. 805
6667
Page 2
Approximately $192,000 was spent in San Bernardino in the first phase of the Project to
improve access around the Metrolink Station at 3rd Street and Metrolink Way. Phase 1
was completed in March 2019. Approximately $181,500 will be spent in Phase II of the
Project to improve access and mobility around the San Bernardino Metrolink Station as
indicated on Attachment B to the cooperative agreement.
SBCTA is requesting that the attached Cooperative Agreement No. 20 -1002318
establishing the responsibilities of the Commission and the City, be approved by the
City. There will be no cost to the City except that the City agrees to waive permit fees
(including street cut, encroachment and lane closure fees), plan check fees and staff
cost for research, coordination and meeting attendance. The City will not be responsible
for permits required from other agencies.
Construction of the Project is expected to start in early late January 2021 and be
completed by June 2021.
2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals
This project is consistent with Key Target No 1d : Minimize risk and litigation exposure
and 1e: Create an asset management plan. This project will enhance travel path safety
for the non-motoring public and contribute to clean and attractive non -motorized
infrastructure network designed to support long term economic growth.
Fiscal Impact
There is no additional fiscal impact associated with this agreement. Any staff time
related to permit item inspection work will absorbed in FY 2020/21 operating budgets.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution 2020-81, approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20-
1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Phase II of the
San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-81: Exhibit “A” - Cooperative Agreement No. 20-
1002318
Ward: 1
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
12/21/2015 Resolution 2015-286 approved Cooperative Agreement No. 15 -
1001132 with SBCTA for Phase I of the San Bernardino Metrolink
Station Accessibility Improvement Project.
19
Packet Pg. 806
Resolution No. 2020-81
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-81
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 20-
1002318 WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (AUTHORITY) FOR
PHASE II OF THE SAN BERNARDINO METROLINK
STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, this Cooperative Agreement is made and entered into by and between the
San Bernardino Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and the City of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to enter into this agreement to delineate roles,
responsibilities relative to project managements, planning, PS & E and construction activities of
the project; and
WHEREAS, San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project Phase
II is funded by Active Transportation Program Cycle 4; and
WHEREAS, the project will install bike lanes from the end of the Mt. Vernon Bridge
viaduct to Ramona – Alessandro Elementary School and Santa Fe Depot; and
WHEREAS, the project will bear no cost to the City and will be completely funded by
the Active Transportation Funded allocated to San Bernardino.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf
of the City, the Memorandum of Understanding No. 20-1002318 with the San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority for phase II of the San Bernardino Metrolink Station
Accessibility Project, attached herein as Exhibit “A”.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
19.a
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement -20-1002318_Metrolink Phase II - Resolution [Revision 2] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive
Resolution No. 2020-81
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
19.a
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement -20-1002318_Metrolink Phase II - Resolution [Revision 2] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive
Resolution No. 2020-81
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
19.a
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement -20-1002318_Metrolink Phase II - Resolution [Revision 2] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 1 of 10
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 20-1002318
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FOR
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL; PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE
(PS&E); RIGHT OF WAY (ROW); AND CONSTRUCTION FOR PHASE-II OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO METROLINK STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
I. PARTIES AND TERM
A. THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) is made and entered into by
and between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (“SBCTA”) and the
City of San Bernardino (“CITY”). SBCTA and CITY may be referred to individually as
a “PARTY” and collectively as “PARTIES”.
B. On February 12, 2016, SBCTA and the City of San Bernardino executed Cooperative
Agreement 15-1001132 for Phase I of the Metrolinlk Station Accessibility Improvement
Project. Construction for Phase I was completed in March 2019.
C. THIS AGREEMENT is for Phase II of the Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvements
and shall terminate upon completion of SBCTA’s management of the planning,
environmental, PS&E, ROW and construction phases, or December 31, 2026, whichever
is earlier in time, except that the indemnification provisions shall remain in effect until
terminated or modified, in writing, by mutual agreement. Should any claims arising out
of this Agreement be asserted against one of the Parties, the Parties agree to extend the
fixed termination date of this Agreement, until such time as the claims are settled,
dismissed or paid.
II. RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Phase I and Phase II improvements in the City of San Bernardino are
depicted in Attachment B.“PHASE I” consists of the Active Transportation Program
Cycle 1;”PHASE II” is the Active Transportation Program Cycle 4. ”; and
B. WHEREAS, SBCTA has completed PHASE I and proposes to construct PHASE II,
which includes location-specific improvements to various facilities within the City of San
Bernardino (“PROJECT”); and
C. WHEREAS, the Parties wish to enter into this Agreement to delineate roles,
responsibilities, and funding commitments relative to the Project Management, Planning,
Environmental, PS&E, ROW and Construction activities of the PROJECT; and
19.b
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 2 of 10
D. WHEREAS, the CITY has requested SBCTA to complete the implementation of the
PROJECT, including project management, engineering design, construction, procurement
and management of contractors, and coordination with other cities and agencies; and
E. WHEREAS, the CITY is the PROJECT owner and this AGREEMENT does not transfer
ownership; as such, the CITY retains all legal responsibilities associated with ownership,
operation and maintenance of the existing and future improvements; and
F. WHEREAS, SBCTA is the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency
for the PROJECT and The State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Lead Agency for the PROJECT.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree to the following:
III. SBCTA RESPONSIBILITIES:
SBCTA agrees:
A. To be the lead agency for Project Management, Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW,
and Construction work and to diligently undertake and complete, the Planning,
Environmental, ROW, PS&E, and Construction work on PROJECT, in cluding the
selection and retention of consultants and contractors. SBCTA shall also serve as the lead
agency for managing the PHASE II PROJECT budget and corresponding contracts.
Performance of services under these consultant and/or contractor contracts shall be
subject to the technical direction of SBCTA’s Director of Project Delivery, or his
designee, with input and consultation from CITY.
B. To contribute towards the Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW, and Construction
phases of the PHASE II PROJECT, an estimated $6,131,664 for Phase II. The actual cost
of a specific phase may ultimately vary and cause the total project cost to change from
the estimate provided in Attachment A. The total project costs remaining after
contributions other participating cities, exclusive of the CITY-provided services specified
in Part IV of this AGREEMENT, is to be borne solely by SBCTA.
C. To execute appropriate agreements with other cities and agencies to facilitate and
coordinate the completion of the PROJECT.
D. To certify the California Environmental Quality Act Notice of Exemption (CEQA NOE)
and coordinate with Caltrans to certify the National Environmental Policy Act
Categorical Exclusion (NEPA CE).
E. To designate a Project Manager to represent SBCTA through whom all communications
between the Parties shall be channeled.
F. To provide CITY with a proposed project schedule to complete the PROJECT.
G. To include CITY in Project Development Team (PDT) meetings and related
communications on PROJECT progress as well as to provide CITY with copies of PDT
meeting minutes and action items.
H. To perform the design and construction in accordance with State and Federal standards
and practices.
19.b
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 3 of 10
I. To include CITY in design decisions that could impact CITY’s general plans and
aesthetic considerations.
J. To make all PROJECT work performed by SBCTA available for review and comment by
the CITY. The CITY shall transmit all review comments to SBCTA within 20 working
days after the submittal is received by the CITY. If comments are not provided by the
20th working day, SBCTA will deem the submittals approved by the CITY and shall
notify the CITY of its intention to move forward with PROJECT execution. The CITY
agrees the submittals may be in the form of plans, specifications, estimates, reports,
studies, environmental documents or other PROJECT-related submittals requiring the
CITY to review and comment. SBCTA and CITY shall review all comments received
regarding the PROJECT and mutually agree upon comments which shall be incorporated
into the PROJECT.
K. To apply for encroachment permits authorizing entry of SBCTA and its consultants and
contractors onto CITY right of way to perform investigative activities, including
surveying and geotechnical borings, and construction activities required by the
PROJECT; and to receive encroachment permits from the CITY at no cost to SBCTA.
L. To obtain, all necessary PROJECT permits, agreements and/or approvals from
appropriate agencies; all necessary PROJECT permits, agreements, and/or approvals
from the CITY shall be provided at no cost to SBCTA. All mitigation, monitoring, and/or
remedial action required by said permits and/or agreements obtained from agencies other
than the CITY shall constitute part of the PROJECT cost.
M. To identify the utilities within the PROJECT area and coordinate with the utility
companies to determine their location, and if necessary their relocation.
N. To provide written notice to CITY upon SBCTA’s determination that the Project is
substantially completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. For the purposes
of this Agreement, “substantially completed” shall mean that the PROJECT can be
reasonably used for its intended purposes, notwithstanding that certain nonmaterial work
remains to be completed, it being understood that SBCTA shall promptly pursue the
completion of such nonmaterial work.
O. Upon completion of construction of PROJECT, SBCTA shall deliver to CITY a complete
set of redline “as-built” plans of the PROJECT.
IV. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES:
CITY agrees:
A. To designate a responsible staff member that will be CITY’s representative in attending
the PDT meetings, receiving day-to-day communication and reviewing the PROJECT
documents.
B. To distribute PROJECT submittals for review and comment the CITY’s Public Works
Department.
19.b
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 4 of 10
C. To distribute PROJECT submittals for review and comment by CITY.
D. To review and comment, at no cost to the PROJECT, on all PROJECT work performed
by SBCTA. CITY shall transmit all review comments to SBCTA within 20 working days
after the submittal is received by CITY. If comments are not provided by the 20th
working day, SBCTA will deem the submittals approved by CITY and shall notify CITY
of its intention to move forward with PROJECT execution. CITY agrees the submittals
may be in the form of plans, specifications, estimates, reports, studies, environmental
documents or other PROJECT-related submittals requiring CITY review and comment.
SBCTA and CITY shall review all comments received regarding the PROJECT and
mutually agree to which comments shall be incorporated into the PROJECT.
E. To provide encroachment permits authorizing entry of SBCTA and its consultants and
contractors onto CITY right of way to perform investigative activities, including
surveying and geotechnical borings, and construction activities required by the PROJECT
at no cost to the PROJECT. If encroachment permits are necessary, the CITY agrees to
facilitate coordination with adjacent properties, residences, and businesses impacted.
F. To provide all City permits and waive City fees required to construct the PROJECT.
SBCTA/contractor(s) shall obtain and pay the fees for all other non-City permits required
for the construction of the PROJECT.
G. To prepare CITY staff reports for city council consideration and SBCTA agrees to
provide supporting documentation for the staff reports.
H. CITY agrees to exempt SBCTA from plan check fees for submittal reviews.
I. CITY agrees it will issue zero fee encroachment, traffic control, and street cut permits or
other permits required by the CITY to perform investigative activities required by the
PROJECT.
J. CITY agrees to provide at no cost to the PROJECT existing improvement plans, and
standard plans and specifications.
K. CITY agrees to provide SBCTA copies of the franchise/utility agreements for the utilities
in the PROJECT area for the purposes of determining prior rights and estimating utility
relocation costs.
L. CITY agrees it will invoke its franchise/utility agreements and have its prior rights
imposed on utilities if it is determined utilities are in conflict with the PROJECT and
require relocation. CITY will formally inform the utilities of CITY’s prior rights and
request the relocation of utilities pursuant to the franchise/utility agreements.
19.b
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 5 of 10
M. To accept in writing the PROJECT within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice
from SBCTA that the PROJECT is substantially completed as described by Paragraph
“N” in Section III, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
Withholding or delaying acceptance because of nonmaterial work remaining to be
completing shall be deemed unreasonable.
V. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES:
A. The scope of the PROJECT is depicted in Attachment B “Conceptual Layout”. The
scope of Phase II improvements is an “estimate” of improvements and is subject to
change. To adhere to available funding limits for Phase II, as shown in Attachment A,
certain improvements in Phase II may be eliminated.
B. CITY agrees SBCTA is completing project management, environmental, PS&E, ROW,
construction management, procurement and oversight of a construction contractor to
complete the PROJECT. SBCTA will complete these tasks using SBCTA staff or
contracted services.
C. Neither CITY nor any officer, director, employee or agent thereof is responsible for any
injury, damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted to
be done by SBCTA under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to SBCTA under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant
to Government Code Section 895.4, SBCTA shall fully defend, indemnify and save
harmless CITY its officers, directors, employees or agents from all claims, suits or
actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as
defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by SBCTA under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to SBCTA under this AGREEMENT.
D. Neither SBCTA nor any officer, director, employee or agent thereof is responsible for
any injury, damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted
to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to CITY under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant
to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save
harmless SBCTA its officers, directors, employees or agents from all claims, suits or
actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as
defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this AGREEMENT.
E. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect through completion and closeout of
the PROJECT or on December 31, 2026 whichever is earlier in time. Should any claims
arising out of PROJECT be asserted against one of the PARTIES, the PARTIES agree to
extend the fixed termination date of this Agreement, until such time as the claims are
settled, dismissed or paid.
F. CITY is an authorized self-insured public entity for purposes of Professional Liability,
General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers’ Compensation and warrants that
19.b
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 6 of 10
through its program of self-insurance, it has adequate coverage or resources to protect
against liabilities arising out of the performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of
this AGREEMENT.
G. SBCTA is a public entity with Professional Liability, General Liability and Automobile
Liability policies of $10,000,000 each and Workers’ Compensation insurance coverage in
the statutory limits, to protect against liabilities arising out of the performance of the
terms, conditions or obligations of this AGREEMENT.
H. All PARTIES hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this AGREEMENT
on behalf of said PARTIES and that, by so executing this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES
hereto are formally bound to this AGREEMENT.
I. Except on subjects preempted by Federal law, this AGREEMENT shall be governed and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. All PARTIES agree to
follow all local, state, county and federal laws and ordinances with respect to
performance under this AGREEMENT.
J. The PARTIES agree that each PARTY and any authorized representative, designated in
writing to the PARTIES, and upon reasonable notice, shall have the right during normal
business hours to examine all PARTIES’ financial books and records with respect to this
AGREEMENT. The PARTIES agree to retain their books and records for a period of
five (5) years from the later of: (a) the date on which this AGREEMENT terminates; or
(b) the date on which such book or record was created.
K. If any clause or provision of this AGREEMENT is illegal, invalid or unenforceable under
applicable present or future laws, then it is the intention of the PARTIES that the
remainder of this AGREEMENT shall not be affected but shall remain in full force and
effect.
L. This AGREEMENT can be amended with a written amendment when agreed upon and
duly authorized and executed by both PARTIES.
M. In the event of litigation arising from this AGREEMENT, each PARTY to this
AGREEMENT shall bear its own costs, including attorney(s) fees. This paragraph shall
not apply to the costs or attorney(s) fees relative to paragraphs C and D of this Section.
N. This AGREEMENT may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an
original.
O. Any notice required or authorized to be given hereunder or any other communications
between the PARTIES provided for under the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be in
writing, unless otherwise provided for herein, and shall be served personally or by
reputable courier or by email addressed to the relevant party at the address/fax number
stated below.
P. Notice given under or regarding this AGREEMENT shall be deemed given (a) upon
actual delivery, if delivery is personally made; or (b) upon delivery into the United States
Mail if delivery is by postage paid certified mail (return receipt requested), email or
private courier including overnight delivery services. Notice shall be sent to the
19.b
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 7 of 10
respective Party at the address indicated below or to any other address as a Party may
designate from time to time by a notice given in accordance with this paragraph.
a. If to CITY:
City of San Bernardino
300 North “D” Street, 3rd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Attention: Public Works Director
Email:
b. If to SBCTA:
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
1170 West 3rd Street, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92410
Attention: Paula Beauchamp
Director of Project Delivery and Toll Operations
Email: pbeauchamp@gosbcta.com
Q. The Recitals stated above are true and correct and are incorporated by this reference
into the AGREEMENT.
R. Attachments A and B are attached to and incorporated into this AGREEMENT.
19.b
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 8 of 10
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 20-1002318
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
By: ____________________________
Raymond W. Wolfe
Executive Director
Date:___________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
PROCEDURE:
By:_____________________
Julianna K. Tillquist
General Counsel
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By:_____________________________
John Valdivia
Mayor
Date:___________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
PROCEDURE:
By:_____________________
Sonia Carvalho
City Attorney
19.b
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 9 of 10
ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT FUNDING TABLE
Table 1. Phase II Costs for San Bernardino Metrolink Station
Fund Amount
City of San Bernardino
ATP Local Contribution for Design and
Construction
$0
Project Management Cost
(and other City incurred cost)
$0
Total City Contribution $0
ATP Phase II Project Funding allocated to
San Bernardino
$181,500
Total Cost $181,500
19.b
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318
Page 10 of 10
ATTACHMENT B
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT
19.b
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Award a Construction Contract for Al Guhin Park Playground
Equipment
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-82:
1. Approving a total project budget for Al Guhin Park Playground E quipment
Project (“Project”) in the amount of $241,000, to include construction contract
in the amount of $209,500, project contingencies in the amount of $21,500 ,
and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $10,000; and
2. Approving the award of a construction contract with Pacific Play Systems, Inc.
of Carlsbad, California, in the amount of $209,500 to perform the construction
of the Project; and
3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget
to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the
Project; and
4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents, and expend
contingency amounts, if necessary, in support of the Project.
Background
Al Guhin Park, located at 3664 Little League Drive, is a 28 acre open space park. The
park amenities currently available include two basketball courts, picnic tables/shelters,
an amphitheater and restrooms.
Staff previously identified this park as a candidate for the addition of a play area to
enhance the recreation options for families with children in the area. Addition of
playground equipment to this location will provide new playground amenities to
according to the park’s needs.
On June 19, 2019, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution No. 2019-168
adopting the City’s Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/20. The budget
20
Packet Pg. 820
6683
Page 2
included Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) PR 19 -001 project for Al Guhin Park
Playground Equipment and established $134,700 in Parkland DIF (Fund 268) funds to
support the project. Currently, there is $132,796.40 available in the Parkland DIF fund.
Staff recently solicited construction bids, identified additional funding needs, and is
recommending that the Mayor and City Council approve the award of a construction
contract to Pacific Play Systems, Inc., of Carlbad, California. Additionally, staff is
requesting that the Mayor and City Council authorize a total project budget of $241,000 ,
which includes construction, contingency, and staff time costs.
If approved, construction work will commence in June 2020 and be completed by
August 2020
Discussion
Project 13381, to provide new playground equipment at Al Guhin Park, was advertised
for public bidding on February 20, 2020 and February 27, 2020 in the San Bernardino
County Sun Newspaper, F. W. Dodge, Construction Bid Board, High Desert Plan Room,
San Diego Daily Transcript, Sub-Hub Online Plan Room, Reed Construction Data, Bid
America Online, Construction Bid Source, Bid Ocean, the City’s websites, and the San
Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce.
Sealed bids were received and opened on March 25, 2020. The City received four (4)
bids as follows:
Bidder City Base Bid
Pacific Play Systems, Inc. Carlsbad $ 209,500.00
Micon Construction, Inc. Placentia $ 257,573.00
R.E. Schultz, Inc. Orange $ 293,300.00
** BNC Construction, Inc. Artesia $ 207,800.00
** BNC Construction bid is considered non-responsive as they did not follow direction provided in Addendum No. 2
The bid solicitation resulted in a construction bid amount for the project that is higher
than staff had originally anticipated. The difference can be attributed to the increases in
material costs that have occurred since the time staff submitted project estimates for
budgeting purposes. Staff has reviewed all bid packages and confirmed that Pacific
Play Systems, Inc. of Carlsbad, California, is the lowest most responsible and
responsive bidder, with a total bid amount of $209,500.
In addition to construction costs, staff anticipates the need fo r a construction
contingency to provide for any unforeseen work that is related to the project, and
estimated staff costs required to support engineering inspections of the project. At this
time, the estimated full project cost is at $241,000, which includes the lowest responsive
construction bid, project contingencies, and engineering inspections. The breakdown of
the total project costs are as follows:
20
Packet Pg. 821
6683
Page 3
Estimated Project Cost Amount
Construction Bid $ 209,500
Construction Contingency $ 21,500
Engineering and Inspections $ 10,000
Total Project Costs $ 241,000
The total project costs exceed the current Project budget amount of $133,539
appropriated in Parkland DIF Fund (268). Additional funding in the amount of $107,461
is needed to move forward with the project. Because this improvement project will
expand the recreational facility options for the community, staff is recommending
Quimby Act Parkland funds be used to support the remaining budget needs of the
Project.
If awarded by the Mayor and City Council, construction work to rehabilitate the parking
lots is anticipated to begin in June 2020 and is anticipated to be completed by
September 2020.
2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals
This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1c - Create a framework for spending
decisions and 1e - Create an asset management plan. Use of Quimby Act Parkland DIF
for this Project aligns with the intended use of the fees in serving to improve park
facilities to meet growing community needs. Completion of this project will provide a
new recreational feature, improving an existing neighborhood and community park, and
enhancing the value of the Al Guhin Park as a City asset.
Fiscal Impact
No General Fund impact. Parkland DIF funding in the amount of $13 4,700 was
previously approved by the Mayor and City Council for the Al Guhin Park Playground
Equipment (account 268-160-7899-5504) and $132,796.40 remains available for this
project. An additional $108,203.60 to cover the full cost of the project is availa ble from
Quimby Act Parkland DIF (Fund 269).
Funding Source Amount
Fund 268 CIP FY 19/20 Available Funds $132,796.40
Fund 269 Requested Allocation $108,203.60
Total Available Project Funding $241,000.00
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-82:
1. Approving a total project budget for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment
Project (“Project”) in the amount of $241,000, to include construction contract
in the amount of $209,500, project contingencies in the amount of $21,500 ,
20
Packet Pg. 822
6683
Page 4
and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $10,000; and
2. Approving the award of a construction contract with Pacific Play Systems, Inc.
of Carlsbad, California, in the amount of $209,500 to perform the construction
of the Project; and
3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget
to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the
Project; and
4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents, and expend
contingency amounts, if necessary, in support of the Project.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-82; Exhibit “A” - Agreement
Attachment 2 Bid Tabulation for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment
Attachment 3 Lowest Bid Form for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment
Attachment 4 Location Map
Ward: 5
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
June 19, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-168,
approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2019/2020.
20
Packet Pg. 823
Resolution No. 2020-82
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-82
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET FOR AL
GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT PROJECT
(“PROJECT”) IN THE AMOUNT OF $241,000, TO
INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $209,500, PROJECT CONTINGENCIES IN
THE AMOUNT OF $21,500, AND ENGINEERING AND
INSPECTION BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000;
AND APPROVING THE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT WITH PACIFIC PLAY SYSTEMS, INC. OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $209,500
TO PERFORM THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT;
AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO
AMEND THE FY 2019/20 ADOPTED BUDGET TO
ALLOCATE $108,203.60 IN THE QUIMBY ACT
PARKLAND FUND (FUND 269) TO THE PROJECT; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
ALL DOCUMENTS, AND EXPEND CONTINGENCY
AMOUNTS, IF NECESSARY, IN SUPPORT OF THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino owns, operates and is responsible for the
maintenance of a number of municipal park facilities, including Al Guhin Park; and
WHEREAS, Al Guhin Park, located at 3664 Little League Drive, does not currently
have a playground area or playground equipment to meet the community’s needs; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution No. 2019 -168 adopting
the City’s Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/20, which included Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) PR 19-001 project for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment and
established $134,700 in Parkland DIF (Fund 268) funds to support the project; and
WHEREAS, staff has administered a competitive bid process to secure a construction
contract to perform the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project No. 13381; and
WHEREAS, the City received four (4) bids on March 25, 2020, Pacific Play Systems,
Inc., 3288 Grey Hawk Ct, Carlsbad, California, 92010 has been determined to be the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City now wishes to enter into a construction agreement with Pacific
Play Systems, Inc. to provide playground equipment replacement at Al Guhin Park; and
WHEREAS, the total project costs of $241,000 exceed the Parkland DIF funding
allocated for the project; and
20.a
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction
Resolution No. 2020-82
WHEREAS, the Project meets the criteria for use of Quimby Act Parkland DIF funds
and there are adequate funds available, through this fund, to support the additional Project budget
needs.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The Director of Finance is authorized to amend the Fiscal Year 2019-2020
CIP to reflect a total project amount of $241,000 for the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment
Project.
SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a construction
agreement following the City’s standard terms approved by the City Attorney with Pacific Play
Systems, Inc., in the amount of $209,500 with a contingency in the amount of $21,500 for the Al
Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project No. 13381.
SECTION 4. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to execute all
documents in support of the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project No. 13381 on behalf
of the City.
SECTION 5. The Director of Finance is authorized to amend Program Year 2019/2020
Budget to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the Project.
SECTION 6. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 7. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
20.a
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction
Resolution No. 2020-82
Attest:
__________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
__________________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
20.a
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction
Resolution No. 2020-82
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of
Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______, 2020 by the
following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
20.a
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction
A G R E EM E N T
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
THIS AGREEMENT is made and concluded this _____ day of _______________, 20___, between
the City of San Bernardino (owner and hereinafter "CITY"), and Pacific Play Systems, Inc. _(hereinafter
"CONTRACTOR").
1. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be
made and performed by the CITY, and under the conditions expressed in the bond as deposited with the
CITY, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CONTRACTOR agrees with the CITY, at the
CONTRACTOR's own proper cost and expense in the Special Provisions to be furnished by the CITY, to
furnish all materials, tools and equipment and perform all the work necessary to complete in good
workmanlike and substantial manner the
AL GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
Project No. 13381
in strict conformity with Plans and Special Provisions No. 13381 , and also in accordance with Standard
Specifications for Public Works/Construction, latest edition in effect on the first day of the advertised
“Notice Inviting Sealed Bids” for this project, on file in the Office of the City Engineer, Public Works
Department, City of San Bernardino, which said Plans and Special Provisions and Standard Specifications
are hereby especially referred to and by such reference made a part hereof.
1. The CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices as set forth in the Bid Schedule as
full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this
agreement; also for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid or from any
unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work
and for all risks of every description connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in
consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, and for well and faithfully completing the
work and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Plans and Special Provisions, and
requirements of the Engineer under them.
2. The CONTRACTOR herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors,
administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no
discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on the basis of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, or ancestry in the performance of this contract, nor
shall the CONTRACTOR or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any
such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection of
subcontractors, vendees, or employees in the performance of this
A-1
20.b
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6683 : Award a Construction
AGREEMENT: AL GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
Project No. 13381
contract. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a material breach of This
contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as recipient deems
appropriate.
4. CITY hereby promises and agrees with the said CONTRACTOR to employ, and does hereby
employ the said CONTRACTOR to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and
conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at
the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions above set forth; and the same parties for themselves, their
heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants
herein contained.
5. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any
conflict between the terms of this instrument and the bid of said CONTRACTOR, then this instrument shall
control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of said terms of said bid conflicting
herewith.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of these presents have executed this contract in four (4)
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original in the year and day first above mentioned.
CONTRACTOR CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
NAME OF FIRM:
Pacific Play Systems, Inc. . BY: ________________________________
TERI LEDOUX,
City Manager
BY: _______________________________
TITLE: ATTEST:
MAILING ADDRESS:
3288 Grey Hawk Ct. _______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC,
Acting City Clerk
__Carlsbad, California, 92010____________
PHONE NO.: ( 760) 599-7355_________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST: _______________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
____________________________________
Secretary
NOTE: Secretary of the Owner should attest. If Contractor is a corporation, Secretary should attest.
A-2
20.b
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6683 : Award a Construction
20.c
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.02 Attachmen 2.-Bid Tabulation (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
20.d
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
LOCATION MAP
AL GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
Ward 5 – 3664 Little League Drive
20.e
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.04.Attachment 4.Location Map (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for Al
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Award Construction Contract for ATP Safe Route to Schools
Project at Three Locations
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-83:
1. Approving Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to School Project (SS17-001)
Project (“Project”) infrastructure component expenditures in a total amount of
$1,671,000, which includes a construction contract in the amount of $1,469,645,
project contingencies in the amount of $147,355, and engineering and inspection
budgets in the amount of $54,000; and
2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with Hillcrest Contracting Inc. of
Corona, California, in the amount of $1,469,645 to perform construction of the
project; and
3. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to expend the contingency fund, if
necessary, to complete the project; and
4. Authorizing the Director of Finance to record any necessary budget adjustments
to support the project.
Background
Cycle 2 of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) commenced on March 26, 2015,
upon the adoption of the program guidelines by the California Transportation
Commission (CTC). ATP is funded from various federal and state funds appropriated in
the annual Budget Act. A total of $359 million in fundin g were available over three
years (Fiscal Years 2016/17-2018/19) under MAP-21.
In 2016, the City was awarded, and accepted, ATP Cycle 2 grant funding (Project
ATPL-5033(053)) in the amount of $2,093,000 for Safe Route to School (SRTS)
improvements. Following performance of a needs analysis, three locations were
selected and approved for construction of improvements. These locations are described
below and identified as Location 1, Location 2 and Location 3 (attached):
21
Packet Pg. 873
6684
Page 2
Location 1 - This location is in the general vicinity of 48th Street and Western
Avenue. The work consists of widening 48th Street, Magnolia Avenue and
Reservoir Drive and improving the streets with curb & gutter, sidewalk, and ADA
ramps.
Location 2 - This location is in the vicinity of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue.
The work consists of widening Pepper Avenue, Randall Avenue and Meridian
Avenue and improving the streets with curb & gutter, sidewalk, and ADA ramps.
Location 3 - This location is in the vicinity of Pacific Street and Perris Hill Park
Road. The work consists of removing an old, cracked asphalt sidewalk on the
west side of Perris Hill Park Road and replacing it with new concrete sidewalk,
curb & gutter and ADA ramp.
The project is included in the current adopted FY 2019/20 Ca pital Improvement Plan
(CIP) as CIP Project No. SS17-001 - ATP Cycle 2-Safe Routes to Schools (“Project”)
with estimated project budgets in a total amount of $2,195,000 established.
The funding awarded is allocated to two categories of work: non -infrastructure
components and infrastructure components. Non -Infrastructure component consists of
coordinating with the project schools and performing public outreach activities. The
infrastructure component includes preparing a detailed need analysis and constru cting
sidewalk, curb & gutter, ADA ramps and street lights in the vicinity of the school
locations above.
The City recently received authorization from CalTrans to move forward with the
infrastructure components of the Project. Staff recently solicited construction bids for
the project and evaluated the bid results. Staff is now recommending that the Mayor
and City Council approve the award of a construction contract to Hillcrest Contracting
Co., Int’l Inc. for the construction of Project No. 13288 and a pprove the expenditure of
$1,671,000 for the infrastructure component of the project. If approved, construction
work will commence in July 2020 and be completed by December 2020 .
Discussion
On December 5, 2019, Caltrans provided the City with form E76, authorizing the City to
proceed with expenditure of $1,671,000 awarded for the infrastructure component of
the project (see Attachments 4 and 5).
Staff advertised Project 13288 to provide construction for sidewalk gap closure for
public bidding on March 5, 2020 and March 12, 2020. Advertisements were published in
the San Bernardino County Sun Newspaper, F. W. Dodge, Construction Bid Board,
High Desert Plan Room, San Diego Daily Transcript, Sub-Hub Online Plan Room, Reed
Construction Data, Bid America Online, Construction Bid Source, Bid Ocean, the City’s
websites, and at the San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce. Plans and
specifications were also posted on the City website.
21
Packet Pg. 874
6684
Page 3
Sealed bids were received and opened on April 26, 2020. The City received four bi ds as
follows:
Bidder City Base Bid
Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Corona $1,469,645.00
All American Asphalt Corona $1,499,049.00
Horizon Construction, Inc. Orange $1,805,915.00
Leonida Builders, Inc. Santa Clarita $1,974,499.70
Staff has reviewed all bid packages and confirmed that Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. of
Corona, California, is the lowest most responsible and responsive bidder, with a total
base bid amount of $1,469,645.
In addition to construction costs, staff anticipates the need for a construction
contingency to provide for any unforeseen work that is related to the project, and
estimated staff costs required to support engineering inspections of the project. At this
time, the estimated infrastructure component of the project cost is at $1,671,000, which
includes the lowest responsive construction bid, project contingencies, and engineering
inspections. The breakdown of the total project costs are as follows:
Amount
Bid $ 1,469,645
Construction Contingency $ 147,355
Engineering and Inspection $ 54,000
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1,671,000
2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals
This project is consistent with Key Target No 2d: Minimize risk and litigation exposure
by constructing safe, contiguous and well planned paths of travel for students and
pedestrians near school sites.
Fiscal Impact
There is no General Fund Impact. Funding in the amount of $2,195,000 was previously
approved by the Mayor and City Council for the ATP Cycle 2 - Safe Routes to School
Project in Federal Grant Programs account #123-160-8604-5504. The table below
shows the funding sources allocated, expenditures to date, and available funding
remaining for the project.
Funding Source Amount
Fund 123-ATP Grant Funding (A) $ 2,195,000
Project Expenses to Date
PS&E & Project Management $ 187,840
Non-infrastructure Component $ 63,944
21
Packet Pg. 875
6684
Page 4
Total Expenses (B) $ 251,784
Total Project Funding (A) $ 2,195,000
Total Expenses (B) $ 251,784
Remaining Project Funding $ 1,943,216
The ATP funding requires no local match by the City. The City will be invoicing Caltrans
for all costs relating to the design and construction of the project.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-83:
1. Approving Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to School Project (SS17-001)
Project (“Project”) infrastructure component expenditures in a total amount of
$1,671,000, which includes a construction contract in the amoun t of $1,469,645,
project contingencies in the amount of $147,355, and engineering and inspection
budgets in the amount of $54,000; and
2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with Hillcrest Contracting Inc. of
Corona, California, in the amount of $1,469,645 to perform construction of the
project; and
3. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to expend the contingency fund, if
necessary, to complete the project; and
4. Authorizing the Director of Finance to record any necessary budget adjust ments
to support the project.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-83; Exhibit “A” - Agreement
Attachment 2 Bid Tabulation
Attachment 3 Hillcrest Proposal
Attachment 4 Caltrans Authorization (E76)
Attachment 5 California Department of Transportation Approval
Attachment 6 Location Map
Wards: 2, 3, 4
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
September 6, 2016 Resolution Awarding Agreement for ATP Cycle 2 - Safe
Routes to School Project at 3 Locations.
June 19, 2019 The Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-
168 approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2019/2020.
21
Packet Pg. 876
6684
Page 5
February 9, 2020 The Mayor and City Council Awarded Professional Service
Agreement for ATP Cycle 2 - Safe Routes to School Project
at 3 Locations- Non-Infrastructure Component.
21
Packet Pg. 877
Resolution No. 2020-83
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-83
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE-SAFE ROUTES
TO SCHOOL PROJECT (SS17-001) PROJECT
(“PROJECT”) INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT
EXPENDITURES IN A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1,671,000,
WHICH INCLUDES A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,469,645, PROJECT
CONTINGENCIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $147,355, AND
ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION BUDGETS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $54,000; AND APPROVING THE AWARD OF
A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH HILLCREST
CONTRACTING INC. OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,469,645 TO PERFORM
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE,
TO EXPEND THE CONTINGENCY FUND, IF
NECESSARY, TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT; AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO
RECORD ANY NECESSARY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO
SUPPORT THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, On February 8, 2016 City received ATP Cycle 2 Grant approval from the
California Department of Transportation in total amount of; and
WHEREAS, On September 6, 2016, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution
No. 2016-190 accepting the Active Transportation Program Cycle 2 Grant in the Amount
of $2,093,00 for Project ATPL-5033(053) and directing that the project be added to the Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, On December 5, 2019, Caltrans issued their form E76, authorizing the City
to proceed to the construction (infrastructure component) of the project; and
WHEREAS, staff has administered a competitive bid process to secure a construction
contract to perform the Sidewalk Gap Closure – Safe Route to School (Project); and
WHEREAS, the City received 4 bids on March 26, 2020, and Hillcrest Contracting, Inc.
of San Bernardino, California, has been determined to be the lowest responsive, responsible
bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City now wishes to enter into a Construction Contract with Hillcrest
Contracting, Inc. to complete the Project.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
21.a
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution (6684 :
Resolution No. 2020-83
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a construction
agreement following the City’s standard terms approved by the City Attorney with Hillcrest
Contracting, Inc. located at 1467 Circle City Drive, Corona, California 92879 in the amount of
$1,469,645, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein.
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or her designee, is hereby authorized to execute all
documents in support of the Project on behalf of the City.
SECTION 4. The Director of Finance is authorized to record any revenue or
expenditure budget adjustments necessary to support the Project.
SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020.
______________________________
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
21.a
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution (6684 :
Resolution No. 2020-83
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
21.a
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution (6684 :
A G R E EM E N T
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
THIS AGREEMENT is made and concluded this _____ day of _______________, 20___, between
the City of San Bernardino (owner and hereinafter "CITY"), and Hillcrest Contracting Inc. _(hereinafter
"CONTRACTOR").
1. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be
made and performed by the CITY, and under the conditions expressed in the bond as deposited with the
CITY, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CONTRACTOR agrees with the CITY, at the
CONTRACTOR's own proper cost and expense in the Special Provisions to be furnished by the CITY, to
furnish all materials, tools and equipment and perform all the work necessary to complete in good
workmanlike and substantial manner the
SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE - SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Project No. 13288
in strict conformity with Plans and Special Provisions No. 13288 , and also in accordance with Standard
Specifications for Public Works/Construction, latest edition in effect on the first day of the advertised
“Notice Inviting Sealed Bids” for this project, on file in the Office of the City Engineer, Public Works
Department, City of San Bernardino, which said Plans and Special Provisions and Standard Specifications
are hereby especially referred to and by such reference made a part hereof.
1. The CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices as set forth in the Bid Schedule as
full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this
agreement; also for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid or from any
unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work
and for all risks of every description connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in
consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, and for well and faithfully completing the
work and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Plans and Special Provisions, and
requirements of the Engineer under them.
2. The CONTRACTOR herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors,
administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no
discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on the basis of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, or ancestry in the performance of this contract, nor
shall the CONTRACTOR or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any
such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection of
subcontractors, vendees, or employees in the performance of this
A-1
21.b
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement
AGREEMENT: SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE - SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Project No. 13288
contract. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a material breach of This
contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as recipient deems
appropriate.
4. CITY hereby promises and agrees with the said CONTRACTOR to employ, and does hereby
employ the said CONTRACTOR to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and
conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at
the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions above set forth; and the same parties for themselves, their
heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants
herein contained.
5. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any
conflict between the terms of this instrument and the bid of said CONTRACTOR, then this instrument shall
control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of said terms of said bid conflicting
herewith.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of these presents have executed this contract in four (4)
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original in the year and day first above mentioned.
CONTRACTOR CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
NAME OF FIRM:
Hillcrest Contracting Inc. . BY: ________________________________
TERI LEDOUX,
City Manager
BY: _______________________________
TITLE: ATTEST:
MAILING ADDRESS:
1467 Circle City Drive _______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC,
Acting City Clerk
__Corona, California, 92879____________
PHONE NO.: ( 951) 273-9600_________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST: _______________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
____________________________________
Secretary
NOTE: Secretary of the Owner should attest. If Contractor is a corporation, Secretary should attest.
A-2
21.b
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement
21.c
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.02.Attachment 2-Bid Tabulation (6684 :
21.d
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
21.d
Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award
AMENDMENT MODIFICATION SUMMARY - (E-76)FEDERAL AID PROGRAMCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDLA LOCATOR:08-SBD-0-SBDPROJECT LOCATION:PREFIX:ATPLINTERSECTIONS OF PEPPER AVENUE AND RANDALL AVENUE, 48TH STREET AAND WESTERN AVENUE, AND PACIFIC STREET AND PERRIS HILLPROJECT NO:5033(053)TYPE OF WORK:SEQ NO:3CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK, ADA-COMPLIANT CURB RAMPS,PREV AUTH / AGREE DATES:STATE PROJ NO:0816000185L-NFED RR NO'S:PE:AGENCY:SAN BERNARDINOPUC CODES:R/W:ROUTE:PROJ OVERSIGHT:ASSUMED/LOCAL ADMINCON:DISASTER NO:ENV STATUS / DT: 05/04/2018SPR:TIP DATARW STATUS / DT:1 10/04/2019MCS:MPO:SCAGINV RTE:OTH:FSTIP YR:19/20BEG MP:STIP REF:209-5000-4549END MP:FSTIP ID NO:20151502BRIDGE NO:PROG CODELINE NOIMPV TYPEFUNC SYSURBAN AREAURB/RURALDEMO IDZ3011015Z3011115Z3013028Z3013117FUNDING SUMMARYPHASEPROJECT COSTFEDERAL COSTAC COST PEPE PREV. OBLIGATION$358,000.00$358,000.00$0.00PE THIS REQUEST$0.00$0.00$0.00PE SUBTOTAL$358,000.00$358,000.00$0.00 R/WRW PREV. OBLIGATION$0.00$0.00$0.00RW THIS REQUEST$0.00$0.00$0.00RW SUBTOTAL$0.00$0.00$0.00 CONCON PREV. OBLIGATION$0.00$0.00$0.00CON THIS REQUEST$1,671,000.00$1,671,000.00$0.00CON SUBTOTAL$1,671,000.00$1,671,000.00$0.00 OTHOTH PREV. OBLIGATION$0.00$0.00$0.00OTH THIS REQUEST$0.00$0.00$0.00OTH SUBTOTAL$0.00$0.00$0.00TOTAL:$0.00$2,029,000.00$2,029,000.00STATE REMARKS07/12/2017This a request for preliminary engineering funding by applying toll credits to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping, Class II Bike lane on Meridian Ave. between BeldenSt. and Randall Ave., and outreach; scope change to include bike lane approved by CTC on 06-26-2017. Cycle 2 ATP Statewide component project awarded by the CTC on 10/22/15. ATP ID ATP02-08-094S.Programmed as an infrastructure and non-infrastructure project for $2,153,000 of ATP funding. $143,000 of FY 16-17 federal TAP funding allocated at the 12/08/16 CTC meeting for PA&ED.07/19/2017This a request for preliminary engineering funding to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping, Class II Bike lane on Meridian Ave. between Belden St. and RandallAvenue, and outreach in City of San Bernardino using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 12/8/2016 as part of the State'sAlternative Transportation Program (ATP) and programmed for FY 16-17 in amendment number 10 of SCAG's 2017 FTIP approved on 06/19/2017. Scope change to include bike lane was approved by CTC on06-26-2017. Federal funding is capped at $143,000 for preliminary engineering with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with M301 urbanTAP funds at 100% on a lump sum reimbursement basis up to the federal amounts shown for preliminary engineering. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.07/23/2017This is a request for preliminary engineering funding for project approval and environmental documents (PA&ED) for the San Bernardino City Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School projectto construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and PacificHill Park Road, and construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of San Bernardino using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated bythe California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 12/08/16 and programmed for FY 16-17 in Amendment #10 approved on21.ePacket Pg. 963Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to
6/19/17 to SCAG's 2017 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at $143,000 for preliminary engineering for PA&ED with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds.Reimburse with Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a pro rata reimbursement basis up to the federal amount shown for preliminary engineering for PA&ED. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.06/20/2018Sequence # 2 is a request for Preliminary Engineering to performed PS&E for the City of San Bernardino Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School project to construct curb and gutter,sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and constructClass II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of San Bernardino using ATP funds that will be allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for theJune meeting. Programmed for FY 17-18 in Amendment #16 approved on 01/23/2018 to SCAG's 2017 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at $358,000 for all phases of work with a maximum reimbursement ratio of100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a pro rata reimbursement basis up to the federal amount shown for preliminary engineering for PA&ED.Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.08/02/2018Sequence #2 is a request for additional preliminary engineering funding to prepare plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalkstriping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue fromBelden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of San Bernardino as the San Bernardino City Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School project using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)funds allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 6/28/18 and programmed for FY 17-18 in Amendment #16 approved on 3/07/18 to SCAG's 2017 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at$215,000 for preliminary engineering for PS&E with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with additional Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a prorata reimbursement basis up to the increased federal amount shown for preliminary engineering for PS&E. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.01/27/2020Sequence #3 is a request for construction and construction engineering funding to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue andRandall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of SanBernardino as the San Bernardino City Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School project using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated by the California TransportationCommission (CTC) on 12/05/19 and programmed for FY 19-20 in Amendment #15 approved on 11/25/19 to SCAG's 2019 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at $1,671,000 for construction with a maximumreimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with additional Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a pro rata reimbursement basis up to the federal amounts shown forconstruction and construction. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.01/29/2020Sequence #3 is a request for construction and construction engineering funding to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue andRandall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and to construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City ofSan Bernardino using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 12/05/19 and programmed for FY 19-20 in Amendment #15 approved on11/25/19 to SCAG's 2019 FTIP. Funding for preliminary engineering was previously obligated. The original NEPA determination approved on 5/04/18 was re-validated on 9/13/19. Federal funding is limited to$1,671,000 for construction with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a lump sum reimbursement basis upthe federal amounts shown for construction and construction engineering. PPNO 08-1183A.FEDERAL REMARKSAUTHORIZATIONAUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH REQUEST:CONPREPARED IN FADS BY:HAGOS, ESAYASON2020-02-03123-4567FOR:CONSTRUCTION & CENG.REVIEWED IN FADS BY:LOUIE, PATRICKON2020-02-06653-7349DOCUMENT TYPE:AMODSUBMITTED IN FADS BY:LOUIE, PATRICKON2020-02-06FOR CALTRANSPROCESSED IN FADS BY:SIGNATURE, NOT_REQUIREDON2020-02-06FOR FHWAE-76 AUTHORIZED DATE IN FMIS BY:JIYOUNG AHNON2020-02-12 19:43:24.0SIGNATURE HISTORY FOR PROJECT NUMBER 5033(053) AS OF 02/24/2020FHWA FMIS SIGNATURE HISTORYMOD #SIGNED BYSIGNED ON2JERILYNN FOGLE02/10/2020JERILYNN FOGLE02/10/2020JIYOUNG AHN02/12/20201JERILYNN FOGLE08/07/2018ZYLKIA MARTIN-YAMBO08/08/2018JIYOUNG AHN08/11/20180JERILYNN FOGLE08/14/2017ZYLKIA MARTIN-YAMBO08/14/2017MARY CUNNINGHAM08/15/201721.ePacket Pg. 964Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to
FHWA FMIS 3.0 SIGNATURE HISTORYCALTRANS SIGNATURE HISTORYDOCUMENT TYPESIGNED BYSIGNED ONAMEND/MODLOUIE, PATRICK02/06/202021.ePacket Pg. 965Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to
21.f
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 :
21.f
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 :
21.f
Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 :
21.fPacket Pg. 969Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-
21.f
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 :
21.g
Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School..06.Attachment 6-Location Map (6684 :
21.g
Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School..06.Attachment 6-Location Map (6684 :
21.g
Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School..06.Attachment 6-Location Map (6684 :
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for Storm Drain
Upgrades
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution 2020-84:
1. Approving total project budgets in the amount of $1,060,000 for Stor m Drain
Repairs at Various Locations (CIP Project SD04 -24 and CIP Project SD19-003)
to include a construction contract in the amount $849,730, project contingencies
in the amount of $170,270 and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount
of $40,000 (collectively; and
2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with TRYCO General
Engineering of Rimforest, California in the amount of $849,730; and
3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to
allocate $574,380 in Storm Drain Fund No. 248 to the Project; and
4. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if
necessary, to complete the project.
Background
The Public Works Department is responsible for the repair and maintenance of th e
City’s storm drain system. Due to the age of the system, and years of deferred
maintenance, several areas of the system have been identified where repairs and
improvements to the infrastructure are necessary to restore effective storm water
conveyance.
The Mayor and City Council previously approved two capital improvement plan (CIP)
projects to begin addressing this work. These projects focused on improving the
condition of storm water infrastructure at intersections that experience flooding during
storm events. CIP Project No. SD19-003 (Storm Drain Annual Upgrades) was approved
with an initial budget amount of $500,000 to address storm drain system improvements
at 12 intersection locations throughout the City. CIP SD04 -24 (Waterman and Baseline)
22
Packet Pg. 974
6685
Page 2
was approved with an initial budget amount of $100,000 to address the storm drain
infrastructure repair needs at the intersection of N. Waterman Avenue and E. Baseline
Street. Both projects were funded through Storm Drain Fund No. 248.
Discussion
Staff advertised construction bid Project 13351 (to provide storm drain repairs at various
locations) on March 2, 2020, and March 20, 2020 in the San Bernardino County Sun
Newspaper, F. W. Dodge, Construction Bid Board, High Desert Plan Room, San Diego
Daily Transcript, Sub-Hub Online Plan Room, Reed Construction Data, Bid America
Online, Construction Bid Source, Bid Ocean, the City’s websites, and the San
Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce. The single bid solicitation included both of the
previously approved CIP projects for a total of 13 locations as follows:
CIP SD04-24
Intersection of N. Waterman Avenue and E. Baseline Street
CIP SD19-003
Sierra Way between 2nd and 3rd Streets
Lugo Avenue between 2nd and 3rd Streets
Intersection of W. Marshall Boulevard and North “E” Street
Intersection of North “G” Street and W. Highland Avenue
Intersection of North “G” Street and W. 7th Street
Intersection of E. Baseline Street and Bobbitt Drive (860 Baseline Street)
Intersection of Pacific Street and Garden Drive
Pacific Street between Perris Hill Park Road and Garden Drive
Intersection of N. Rancho Avenue and W. Mill Street
Intersection of Arden Avenue and E. Lynwood Drive
Intersection of E. Jane Street and Rogers Lane
Intersection of E. Citrus Street and Palm Ave
Sealed bids were received and opened on March 26, 2020. The City received the
following four (4) bids:
Bidder City Base Bid
TRYCO General Engineering Rimforest $ 849,730
Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. Baldwin Park $ 1,619,283
Wright Construction Engineering Corp San Marcos $ 1,634,960
Kirtley Construction, Inc. dba TK Construction San Bernardino $ 1,966,915
The bid solicitation resulted in a base bid amount for the construction work that is higher
in price than staff had originally expected. The difference can be attributed to increases
in material costs that have occurred since the time staff submitted project estimates for
budgeting purposes. At this time, staff has reviewed all bid packages and confirmed that
TRYCO General Engineering of Rimforest, California, is the lowest responsible and
responsive bidder, with a total bid amount of $849,730.
22
Packet Pg. 975
6685
Page 3
In addition to construction costs, staff anticipates the need for a construction
contingency to provide for any unforeseen work that is related to the project. The
contingency amount of $170,270 is higher than would normally be requested due to the
multiple project locations. An additional $40,000 is also required to support staff time for
engineering inspections of the project.
The estimated full project cost is at $1,060,000, which includes the lowest responsive
construction bid, project contingencies, and engineering inspections. The breakdown of
the total project costs are as follows:
Amount
Bid $ 849,730
Construction Contingency $ 170,270
Engineering and Inspections $ 40,000
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1,060,000
The total cost for these projects exceed the remaining project budgets available in each
project. While initial budgets were established for both CIP SD04-24 and CIP SD19-003,
a portion of those budgets have been expended to prepare plans and specs for bidding
purposes. Additional funding in the amount of $574,380 is needed from Storm Drain
Fund (248) to fully fund the projects. The table below shows th e current budget
remaining and additional funding allocation required to fully fund each of the projects .
Storm Drain Fund 248 Project Funds
Remaining
Project Funds
Needed
Total Project
Cost
CIP 19-003 - Storm Drain
Annual Upgrades
$ 390,000 $ 535,000 $ 925,000
CIP 04-24 Waterman and
Baseline Box Culvert
Repair
$ 95,620 $ 39,380 $ 135,000
Totals $ 488,947 $ 574,380 $ 1,060,000
Staff is recommending that the Mayor and City Council award a bid to TRYCO General
Engineering of Rimforest, California to perform storm drain system repairs, and
authorize the use of Storm Drain Fund No. 248 fund balance to support the full cost of
the projects. If approved, work is anticipated to begin in June , 2020, and be completed
by October 2020.
2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals
This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1e: Create and asset management plan.
Approval of these projects will allow staff to address issues caused by deferred
maintenance in the City’s storm drain system, and will improve th e system’s long term
functionality at the project locations.
22
Packet Pg. 976
6685
Page 4
Fiscal Impact
There is no General Fund impact associated with this item . Additional project funding is
available in amount of $574,380 through Storm Drain Fund No. 248 fund balance for
budget adjustments as follows:
CIP 04-24 Waterman and Baseline 248-160-8671-5504 $ 39,380
CIP 19-003 Storm Drain Annual Repairs 248-160-8672-5504 $ 535,000
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution 2020-84:
1. Approving total project budgets in the amount of $1,060,000 for Storm Drain
Repairs at Various Locations (CIP Project SD04 -24 and CIP Project SD19-003)
to include a construction contract in the amount $849,730, project contingencies
in the amount of $170,270 and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount
of $40,000 (collectively; and
2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with TRYCO General
Engineering of Rimforest, California in the amount of $849,730; and
3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to
allocate an additional $574,380 in Storm Drain Fund No. 248 to the Project; and
4. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if
necessary, to complete the project.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-84; Exhibit “A” - Agreement
Attachment 2 Bid Tabulation for Storm Drain Repair
Attachment 3 Lowest Bid Form for Storm Drain Repair
Attachment 4 Location Map
Ward: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
June 19, 2019 The Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2019-168
approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2019/20 , which
included both CIP SD04-24 and SD19-003.
22
Packet Pg. 977
Resolution No. 2020-84
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-84
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING TOTAL PROJECT BUDGETS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $1,060,000 FOR STORM DRAIN REPAIRS
AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS (CIP PROJECT SD04-24 AND
CIP PROJECT SD19-003) TO INCLUDE A
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT $849,730,
PROJECT CONTINGENCIES IN THE AMOUNT OF
$170,270 AND ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION
BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000
COLLECTIVELY; APPROVING THE AWARD OF A
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH TRYCO GENERAL
ENGINEERING OF LAKE ARROWHEAD, CALIFORNIA
IN THE AMOUNT OF $849,730; AUTHORIZING THE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO AMEND THE FY 2019/20
ADOPTED BUDGET TO ALLOCATE $574,380 IN STORM
DRAIN FUND NO. 248 TO THE PROJECT; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO
EXPEND THE CONTINGENCY FUND, IF NECESSARY,
TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino Public Works Department is responsible for the
repair and maintenance of the citywide storm drain system; and
WHEREAS, several locations have been identified where repairs and improvements to
storm drain the infrastructure are necessary to restore effective storm water conveyance; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council previously approved Resolution No. 2019-168
adopting the City’s Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/20 which included CIP
Project SD04-24 for Waterman and Baseline, and SD19-003 for Storm Drain Annual Upgrades
to improve the condition of storm water infrastructure at various locations; and
WHEREAS, staff has administered a competitive bid process to secure a construction
contract to perform the Storm Drain Repairs at Various Locations (Project 13351); and
WHEREAS, of the four bids received by the City, TRYCO General Engineering, 1025
Mecham Drive, Lake Arrowhead, California, 92352 has been determined to be the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City now wishes to enter into a construction agreement with TRYCO
General Engineering to provide storm drain repairs at various locations Citywide; and
WHEREAS, the total project costs of $1,060,000 are well above the Storm Drain
funding allocated for the project.
22.a
Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a
Resolution No. 2020-84
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a construction
agreement following the City’s standard terms approved by the City Attorney with TRYCO
General Engineering in the amount of $849,730 with a contingency in the amount of $170,270
for the Storm Drain Repair at Various Locations and attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
SECTION 3. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to execute all
documents in support of the Storm Drain Repair at Various Locations Project 13351 on behalf of
the City.
SECTION 4. The Director of Finance is authorized to amend the Fiscal Year 2019-2020
CIP SD04-24 and CIP SC19-003 to fully fund the respective projects through Storm Drain Fund
No. 248.
SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
__________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
22.a
Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a
Resolution No. 2020-84
Approved as to form:
__________________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
22.a
Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a
Resolution No. 2020-84
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of
Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______, 2020 by the
following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
22.a
Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a
A G R E EM E N T
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
THIS AGREEMENT is made and concluded this _____ day of _______________, 20___, between
the City of San Bernardino (owner and hereinafter "CITY"), and TRYCO General Engineering
_(hereinafter "CONTRACTOR").
1. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be
made and performed by the CITY, and under the conditions expressed in the bond as deposited with the
CITY, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CONTRACTOR agrees with the CITY, at the
CONTRACTOR's own proper cost and expense in the Special Provisions to be furnished by the CITY, to
furnish all materials, tools and equipment and perform all the work necessary to complete in good
workmanlike and substantial manner the
STORM DRAIN REPAIR AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Project No. 13351
in strict conformity with Plans and Special Provisions No. 13351 , and also in accordance with Standard
Specifications for Public Works/Construction, latest edition in effect on the first day of the advertised
“Notice Inviting Sealed Bids” for this project, on file in the Office of the City Engineer, Public Works
Department, City of San Bernardino, which said Plans and Special Provisions and Standard Specifications
are hereby especially referred to and by such reference made a part hereof.
1. The CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices as set forth in the Bid Schedule as
full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this
agreement; also for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid or from any
unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work
and for all risks of every description connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in
consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, and for well and faithfully completing the
work and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Plans and Special Provisions, and
requirements of the Engineer under them.
2. The CONTRACTOR herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors,
administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no
discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on the basis of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, or ancestry in the performance of this contract, nor
shall the CONTRACTOR or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any
such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection of
subcontractors, vendees, or employees in the performance of this
A-1
22.b
Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6685 : Resolution Approving a
AGREEMENT: STORM DRAIN REPAIR AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Project No. 13351
contract. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a material breach of This
contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as recipient deems
appropriate.
4. CITY hereby promises and agrees with the said CONTRACTOR to employ, and does hereby
employ the said CONTRACTOR to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and
conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at
the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions above set forth; and the same parties for themselves, their
heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants
herein contained.
5. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any
conflict between the terms of this instrument and the bid of said CONTRACTOR, then this instrument shall
control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of said terms of said bid conflicting
herewith.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of these presents have executed this contract in four (4)
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original in the year and day first above mentioned.
CONTRACTOR CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
NAME OF FIRM:
TRYCO General Engineering. . BY: _______________
TERI LEDOUX,
City Manager
BY: _______________________________
TITLE: ATTEST:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PO Box 391. _______________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC,
Acting City Clerk
_Rimforest, California, 92378____________
PHONE NO.: (909) 337-3336_________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST: _______________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
____________________________________
Secretary
NOTE: Secretary of the Owner should attest. If Contractor is a corporation, Secretary should attest.
A-2
22.b
Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.c
Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.c
Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction
22.d
Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.d
Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a
22.e
Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
22.e
Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of
4TH Street
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, authorize staff to proceed with an investigation and analysis for the proposed
street vacation of portions of 4th Street.
Background
Streets and Highways Code (SHC) section 8312, gives a city legislative body the power
to vacate all or part of a street and sets forth the procedures by which the power to
vacate may be executed. The requested street vacation would be conducted under the
General Vacation Procedures outlined in SHC sections 8320 through 8325. First, a
legislative body may initiate proceedings either on its own initiative or upon a petition or
request of an interested person or persons. The initiation of proceedings starts with
fixing the date, hour and place of the hearing, followed by publishing and posting of
notices prior to the hearing. After the hearing, if the legislative body finds that the street
described in the notice of hearing or petition is unnecessary for present or prospective
public use, the legislative body may adopt a resolution vacating the street. The street
vacation is then recorded with the County Recorder’s office.
As part of the Mt. Vernon Bridge Replacement P roject, both the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway have requested the
City initiate the vacation of 4th Street between the intersections of Cabrera Avenue and
Mt. Vernon Avenue to assist with the comple tion of the Project and, in connection
therewith, to facilitate the expansion of their maintenance yard and operation.
Discussion
If authorization is given to proceed, an investigation and analysis will begin and all City
Departments, County Fire, utilities, and affected property owners will be notified of the
proposal and will be provided an opportunity to comment on any conflicts and/or
potential issues or concerns.
Future actions by the City will consist of:
23
Packet Pg. 1041
6687
Page 2
Resolution of Intention by the Mayor and City Council setting a Public Hearing
pursuant to Streets and Highway Code Section 8320
Publication of Notices of Vacation pursuant to Streets and Highways Code
Sections 8322 & 8323
Public Hearing and Resolution of Vacation pursuant to Streets a nd Highways
Code Section 8324
Recordation of the Resolution of Vacation pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code Section 8325
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1d: Minimize risk and litigation exposure.
By performing a comprehensive property investigation and analysis for this vacation
request, the City ensures all stakeholders with interest in the property to be vacated will
be identified, notified, and allowed to provide comments through a Public H earing prior
to any possible vacation of the street segment . The process also provides an important
opportunity for utility agencies to acknowledge any existing infrastructure that may be
impacted.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, authorize staff to proceed with an investigation and analysis for the proposed
street vacation of portions of 4th Street.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Legal Descriptions
Attachment 2 Plat Maps
Ward: 1
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: None
23
Packet Pg. 1042
4675 MacArthur Ct.
Suite 400
Newport Beach
California 92660
phone 949.526.8460
fax 949.526.8499
www.bkf.com
April 2, 2020
BKF Job No: 20147089.10
Page 1 of 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT A
4TH STREET ABANDONMENT
Real property situate in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, described as follows:
Being a portion of 4th Street as it currently exists and is partially shown on that “Plat of the Santa
Fe Tract,” filed on July 19, 1902 in Book 15 of Maps at Page 49, being also an 82.50 foot wide
strip centered on the southerly line of lots 10 through 30 of Block 24, Rancho San Bernardino as
per map recorded in Book 7 of Maps at Page 2, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the easterly line of Cabrera Avenue and the northerly line of
4th Street;
Thence along said northerly line, North 89°38'18" East, 1,366.62 feet to an angle point in the
southerly line of the lands described in that certain Special Warranty Deed to BNSF Railway
Company, filed on June 7, 2013 as Document No. 2013-0254474;
Thence along said southerly line the following eight (8) courses:
1) North 0°18'37" West, 6.68 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave north,
having a radius of 958.74 feet, from said point a radial line bears North 6°59'34" West;
2) Easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 8°35'42", an arc length of
143.82 feet;
3) North 74°44'46" East, 61.00 feet;
4) North 0°18'37" West, 0.39 feet;
5) North 89°41'04" East, 1.46 feet;
6) North 74°44'46" East, 91.74 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave
Northwest, having a radius of 78.75 feet, from said point a radial line bears
North 14°09'39" West;
7) Northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 76°04'37", an arc length of
104.56 feet to the westerly line of Mt. Vernon Avenue;
Thence along the southerly extension of said westerly line South 0°18'37" East, 232.37 feet to the
intersection with the southerly line of 4th Street;
Thence along said southerly line South 89°38'18" West, 1,716.51 feet to the intersection with the
southerly extension of the easterly line of Cabrera Avenue;
Thence along said southerly extension North 0°23'29" West, 82.50 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 157,817 square feet or 3.623 acres, more or less.
As shown on plat attached hereto and by this reference made part hereof.
For: BKF Engineers
_________________________
Davis Thresh, P.L.S. No. 6868
_________________________
Dated
23.a
Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: PW. Authorization to Vacate 4th Street - Legal Description (6687 : Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH
MT. VERNON AVE.KINGMAN ST.
4TH ST.
5TH ST.HARRINGTON AVE.ROBERDS AVE.WESTERN AVE.CABRERA AVE.1"=250'BASIS OF BEARINGS
LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
S
YEV
R
U
RONAEDL
CEN S
LID
AINROFIACFO
E
T
T
A
LS 23.b
Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: PW. Authorization to Vacate 4th Street - Plat (6687 : Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH Street)
MT. VERNON AVE.KINGMAN ST.
4TH ST.1"=80'SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
DOC. NO. 2013-0254474
4TH S
T.
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
DOC. NO. 2013-0254474
23.b
Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: PW. Authorization to Vacate 4th Street - Plat (6687 : Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH Street)
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works
Subject: Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement 17-1001639 with
SBCTA
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-85, approving Amendment No. 1 to License
Agreement 17-1001639 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA).
Background
The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) constructed the “First Mile” of
the Redlands rail line extension between the existing San Bernardino Santa Fe Depot
and “D” Street in the San Bernardino Associated Government (SANBAG) right-of-way.
On December 19, 2005, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2005 -421
approving a license agreement between the City and SANBAG to operate and maintain
drainage improvements within SANBAG right-of-way that was installed during the “First
Mile” project.
On January 1, 2017, SANBAG changed its name to San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority (SBCTA).
On July 19, 2017, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 17 -1001639
approving new agreement between City and SBCTA reflecting the City’s approved
actual construction railroad track layout and implementation of SBCTA $1,200 annual
administrative fee.
Discussion
License Agreement 17-1001639 with SBCTA needs to be amended to reflect follo wing
changes:
Updated Licensee’s (City) contact information under Basic License Provisions.
Updated description of the Premises to reflect more accurate information
regarding mile post location and affected area.
nclusion of storm drain improvement plans as an exhibit to the Amendment.
24
Packet Pg. 1046
6702
Page 2
2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The request for the Amendment No. 1 to SBCTA Agreement aligns with Key Target No .
1e: Create an asset management plan. The storm drain construction project that the
Amendment supports will be a valuable asset to the City.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of this item.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-85, approving Amendment No. 1 to License
Agreement 17-1001639 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA).
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-85 Approving First Amendment; Exhibit “A”-
Amendment No. 1
Ward: 1
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
7/10/2000 Mayor and City Council allocated $150,000 for Metrolink at grade crossing
at 2nd, 3rd, “E”, and “G” Streets, and $50,000 for “E” Street widening at
Metrolink in the 2000/01 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
11/20/2000 Resolution No. 2000-325 adopted approving Construction and
Maintenance Agreement for the Redlands Subdivision “First Mile” Track
Construction and Inland Empire Maintenance Facility.
12/06/2004 Resolution No. 2004-374 adopted authorizing the execution of
Amendment No. 1 to Construction and Maintenance Agreement between
the City of San Bernardino and the Southern California Regional Rail
authority (SCRRA) to construct the Redlands Subdivision “First Mile”
Improvements.
12/19/2005 Resolution No. 2005-421 adopted authorizing the execution of a License
Agreement with SANBAG for the operation and maintenance for storm
drain installed in the Redlands Subdivision “First Mile” railroad right-of-
way.
7/19/2017 Resolution No. 17-1001639 adopted authorizing the execu tion of a
License Agreement with SBCTA adopting new layout and SBCTA
Administrative Fee.
24
Packet Pg. 1047
Resolution No. 2020-85
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-85
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LICENSE
AGREEMENT 17-1001639 WITH SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SBCTA)
WHEREAS, The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) constructed the
“First Mile” of the Redland rail line extension between the existing San Bernardino Santa Fe
Depot and “D” Street in the San Bernardino Associated Government (SANBAG) right-of-way;
and
WHEREAS, On December 19, 2005, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution
2005-421 approving a license agreement between the CITY and SANBAG to operate and
maintain drainage improvements within SANBAG right-of-way that was installed during “First
Mile” project; and
WHEREAS, On January 1, 2017, SANBAG changed its name to San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority (SBCTA); and
WHEREAS, On July 19, 2017, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 17-
1001639 approving new agreement between City and SBCTA reflecting City approved actual
construction railroad track layout and implementation of SBCTA $1,200 annual administrative
fee; and
WHEREAS, License Agreement 17-1001639 with SBCTA needs to be amended to
update Licensee’s (City) contact information under Basic License Provisions, and Description of
the Premises to reflect more accurate information regarding mile post location and affected area
and to include storm drain improvement plans.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute First Amendment
to License Agreement 17-1001639 with SBCTA, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit “A” and
incorporated herein.
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or her designee, is hereby authorized to execute all
documents in support of the Project on behalf of the City.
SECTION 4. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
24.a
Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution [Revision 1] (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
Resolution No. 2020-85
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020.
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
24.a
Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution [Revision 1] (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
Resolution No. 2020-85
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
24.a
Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution [Revision 1] (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1127 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1129 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1132 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1133 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1134 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1135 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1136 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1137 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1138 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1139 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
24.b
Packet Pg. 1140 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to
Page 1
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager
By:Jim Tickemyer, Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Director
Subject: Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 - Budget
of Senior Nutrition Program Grant
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution No. 2020-86 of the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino,
California, ratifying the submittal of Amendment No. 1 budget of the Senior Nutrition
Program Grant to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult
Services (DAAS) pursuant to County Contract No. 19-372; accept the additional funding
OTO (One-Time Only), amend the award in the amount of $47,213 for a tota l budget of
$387,213; appropriate grant revenue expenditures, and issue change orders to
purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American Meat Companies , dba Merit Day and
Hollandia Dairy, Inc. for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020.
Background
The City of San Bernardino provides a senior nutrition program for seniors in the City,
60 years of age and older. During FY 2018/19, the Senior Nutrition Program served
over 53,446 meals for a daily average of approximately 250 individual clients served at
six (6) nutrition sites (5th Street Senior Center, Perris Hill Senior Center, Hernandez
Community Center, Lytle Creek Community Center, New Hope Family Life Center, and
Highland Senior Center).
The Senior Nutrition Program is supported by funding received from the County of San
Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) and is in the first year of a
3-Year Contract (No. 19-372) for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022 in the
amount of $1,020,000. On January 30, 2020, the City was awarded additional funding in
the amount of $47,213 and was required to submit an amended budget as a result of
this Amendment No. 1 award. A signed copy of the amended budget (Amendment No.
1 OTO (One-Time-Only), totaling $387,213 in grant revenue, was recei ved from County
officials on April 20, 2020. The Senior Nutrition Program is expected to serve 51,500
total meals at six nutrition sites at the approved rate of $7.22, per meal.
The grant with the amendment requires a match of 11.11%, or a minimum of $43 ,020
from the Senior Nutrition - General Fund FY 2019/20 adopted budget. The additional
amended funds from the County in the amount of $47,213 will be used to cover
25
Packet Pg. 1141
6711
Page 2
shortages in food and consumables, personnel increases due to the State Minimum
Wage increase effective January 1, 2020, and the purchase of a food warmer as a
result of the County’s mandate to provide meal services at three delivery sites on
Fridays that were otherwise not receiving those services. The total amended budget is
now $584,056. Staff is seeking Mayor and City Council authority to amend the FY
2019/20 budget by increasing the County Senior Nutrition Grant award by $47,213
(Personnel - 123-380-0513-5011-5034 = $34,303, Other Equipment - 123-380-0513-
5704 = $5,000; Raw Food - 123-380-0513-5114 = $6,510; Small Tools & Equip. - 123-
380-0513-5112 = $1,400).
In conformance with the provisions of the grant, the proposed action is to accept the
Grant Award Amendment No. 1 to the Senior Nutrition Program 2019 -2020 Grant for a
total grant revenue budget of $387,213, issue change orders to the annual purchase
orders for the food vendors, and approve the City’s total cash and in -kind contribution of
$196,843. These proposed actions will allow the Senior Nutrition Program to continue to
deliver nutritional services to the City’s senior population, especially during these
challenging times of the Coronavirus Pandemic.
2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals
This program aligns with the Key Target No. 2. Focused, Aligned Leadership and
Unified Community; and Key Target No. 3. Improved Quality of Life, by providing a
resource that will allow for the well-being of participants through a planned and
balanced program; which enables engagement, collaboration and alignment with other
entities.
Fiscal Impact
The amount of grant funding available to the City from the County for FY 2019/20 will
increase from $340,000 to $387,213.
Acceptance of the grant would entail an amendment to the FY 2019/20 budget by
increasing the County Senior Nutrition grant award by $47,213.
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,
California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-86, ratifying the submittal of Amendment No. 1
budget of the Senior Nutrition Program Grant to the County of Sa n Bernardino
Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) pursuant to County Contract No. 19 -
372; accept the additional funding OTO (One-Time Only), amend the award in the
amount of $47,213 for a total budget of $387,213; appropriate grant revenue
expenditures, and issue change orders to purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American
Meat Companies, dba Merit Day and Hollandia Dairy, Inc. for the period July 1, 2019
through June 30, 2020.
Attachments
Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-86; Exhibit “A”- County Contract 19-312
Attachment 2 County Contract No. 19-372
Attachment 3 Additional Funding Budget Submittal Request
25
Packet Pg. 1142
6711
Page 3
Attachment 4 Amendment No. 1 County Approved Budget and Award
Attachment 5 FY 2019/20 Amended Program Budget Detail Sheet
Ward: All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:
August 7, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-265,
approving the execution of County Contract No. 19-372 including of
accepting Year One of a Three-Year Grant Allocation in the amount
of up to $340,000 with the County of San Bernardino Department of
Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) for the Senior Nutrition Program.
25
Packet Pg. 1143
Resolution No. 2020-86
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-86
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
RATIFYING THE SUBMITTAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1
BUDGET OF THE SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM
GRANT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES
(DAAS) PURSUANT TO COUNTY CONTRACT NO. 19-372;
ACCEPTING THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING OTO (ONE-
TIME ONLY) AMENDED AWARD IN THE AMOUNT OF
$47,213 FOR A TOTAL BUDGET OF $387,213;
APPROPRIATING GRANT REVENUE EXPENDITURES,
AND ISSUING CHANGE ORDERS TO PURCHASE
ORDERS TO SYSCO FOODS, AMERICAN MEAT
COMPANIES DBA MERIT DAY, AND HOLLANDIA
DAIRY, INC. FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH
JUNE 30, 2020
WHEREAS, on August 7, 2019, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No.
2019-265, approving the execution of County Contract No. 19-372, for the three (3) year grant
cycle in the amount of $1,020,000 for the contract term of July 1, 2019 through June 3 0, 2022;
and
WHEREAS, on January 30, 2020, the City of San Bernardino submitted a grant budget
for County of San Bernardino Amendment No. 1 to the County of San Bernardino Department of
Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) for additional One-Time-Only (OTO) funding for Year One
of the Senior Nutrition Program; and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2020, the Department of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services received from County officials a signed copy of Amendment No. 1 budget, totaling
$387,213 in grant revenue.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby ratify
the submittal of Amendment No. 1 budget to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging
and Adult Services for additional funding for Year One of the Senior Nutrition Program grant
pursuant to County Contract No. 19-372.
SECTION 2. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby accept
County Amendment No. 1 additional OTO grant award of $47,213 for a total budget of $387,213
for the first year contract term of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, and authorize the Director
of Finance, or designee, to appropriate that amount for the continued operation of the Senior
Nutrition Program pursuant to the FY 2019/20 Amended Program Budget Detail Sheet; and to
25.a
Packet Pg. 1144 Attachment: PR. Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No.1.RESOLUTION (6711 : Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 -
Resolution No. 2020-86
issue change orders to annual purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American Meat Companies dba
Merit Day, and Hollandia Diary, Inc. for food services and consumable supplies.
SECTION 3. The appropriation of the grant award and matching funds, together totaling
$584,056, are for the operation of the Senior Nutrition Program from July 1, 2019 through June
30, 2020.
SECTION 4. The Director of Finance, or designee, is directed to adjust the existing
budget appropriations amongst the Parks and Recreation accounts to accurately reflect the grant
match budget consistent with the adopted staff report.
SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested
by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020.
___________________________
John Valdivia, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:
__________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
__________________________________
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
25.a
Packet Pg. 1145 Attachment: PR. Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No.1.RESOLUTION (6711 : Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 -
Resolution No. 2020-86
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true
copy of Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______,
2020 by the following vote:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______
RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______
MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of
____________ 2020.
___________________________________
Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk
25.a
Packet Pg. 1146 Attachment: PR. Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No.1.RESOLUTION (6711 : Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 -
25.b
Packet Pg. 1147 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1148 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1149 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1150 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1151 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1152 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1153 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1154 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1155 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1156 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1157 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1158 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1159 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1160 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1161 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1162 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1163 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1164 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1165 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1166 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1167 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1168 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1169 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1170 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1171 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1172 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1173 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1174 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1175 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1176 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1177 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1178 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1179 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1180 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1181 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1182 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1183 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1184 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1185 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1186 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1187 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1188 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1189 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1190 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1191 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1192 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1193 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1194 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1195 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1196 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1197 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1198 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1199 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1200 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1201 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1202 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1203 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1204 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1205 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1206 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1207 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1208 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1209 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1210 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1211 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1212 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1213 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1214 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1216 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1217 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1218 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1219 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1220 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1221 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1222 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1223 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1224 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1225 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1226 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.b
Packet Pg. 1227 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution
25.c
Packet Pg. 1228 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 3 - Additional Funding Budget Submittal Request (6711 :
25.c
Packet Pg. 1229 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 3 - Additional Funding Budget Submittal Request (6711 :
25.d
Packet Pg. 1230 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 4 - Amendment No.1 County Approved Budget & Award (6711
25.d
Packet Pg. 1231 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 4 - Amendment No.1 County Approved Budget & Award (6711
ATTACHMENT 5 Schedule
"H"
Account Number Description
FY2020-21
BUDGET
ESTIMATES MATCH TOTAL
Grant Name:123-380-0513 001-380-0514
Salaries
5011 Salaries perm/fulltime 64,212 64,212
5013 Automobile allowance -
5014 Salaries temp/parttime 195,312 55,715 251,027
5015 Overtime -
Total: Salaries 259,524 55,715 315,239
Benefits
5026 PERS retirement 4,334 4,334
5027 Health and life insurance 9,060 9,060
5028 Unemployment insurance 779 779
5029 Medicare 3,762 3,762
5034 CalPERS Unfunded Liability 18,900 18,900
Total: Benefits 17,935 18,900 36,835
Total: Salaries & benefits 277,459 74,615 352,074
Maintenance and Operations
5111 Material and supplies 5,000 5,000
5112 Small tools & equip (consumables)15,500 15,500
5114 Raw foods 68,629 74,146 142,775
5122 Dues and subscriptions -
5131 Mileage -
5132 Meetings and conferences -
5133 Education and training -
5150 Utilities 46,582 46,582
5172 Equipment maintenance 2,300 2,300
5174 Printing charges -
5175 Postage -
5176 Copy machine charges -
5181 Other operating expense 6,000 6,000
5186 Civic and promotional -
5193 Grant match -
Total: Maintenance and Operations 97,429 120,728 218,157
Contract Services
5502 Professional/contractual services -
5505 Other professional services 12,325 1,500 13,825
Total: Contractual Services 12,325 1,500 13,825
Internal Service Charges
5601 Garage charges - -
5602 Workers compensation - -
5603 Liability -
5604 IT charges in-house -
5605 Telephone support -
5606 Electric -
5612 Fleet charges - fuel -
Total: Internal Service Charges - - -
Capital Outlay
5703 Communications equipment -
Total: Capital Outlay - - -
Credit/billables
5910 Credit - federal and state program funding -
Total: Credit/billables - - -
Total: Non-Personnel Expenses 109,754 122,228 231,982
Grant Total 387,213 196,843 584,056
Revised 2-3-20
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation
PROJECT #: 0513 Sr. Nutrition Grant 2019-20 AMENDED
4/23/2020
25.e
Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 5 - 2019-20 AMENDED-SNP Amended OTO