Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-06-2020 Final Agenda PacketCITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE HOUSING AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 2020 5:30 PM – CLOSED SESSION 7:00 PM – OPEN SESSION WEB-CONFERENCE • VIA ZOOM • SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410 • WWW.SBCITY.ORG IMPORTANT COVID-19 NOTICE IN AN EFFORT TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENT THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) AND TO ENABLE APPROPRIATE SOCIAL DISTANCING, THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL NOT BE OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE. THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ENCOURAGES THE PUBLIC TO VIEW THIS MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON TELEVISION OR ONLINE. THE MEETING IS BROADCAST LIVE ON TIME WARNER CHANNEL 3 OR CHARTER SPECTRUM CHANNEL 3 AND LIVE STREAMED ONLINE AT http://sanbernardinocityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=2891 MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO COMMENT ON MATTERS BEFORE THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS: (1) COMMENTS AND CONTACT INFORMATION CAN BE EMAILED TO publiccomments@SBCity.Org BY 4:30 P.M. THE DAY OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING TO BE INCLUDED IN THE WRITTEN RECORD****; (2) CALLING 909-384-5128, LEAVING A RECORDED MESSAGE, BY 4:30 P.M. THE DAY OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING, NOT TO EXCEED THREE MINUTES, WHICH WILL THEN BE PLAYED DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION OF THE AGENDA (3) IF YOU WISH TO MAKE A COMMENT DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING A REQUEST TO SPEAK CAN BE EMAILED TO publiccomments@SBCity.Org AND AT THE TIME OF THE REQUESTED AGENDA ITEM, THE CITY CLERK WILL PLACE A PHONE CALL TO THE COMMENTER AND ALLOW THEM TO SPEAK TO THE MAYOR & COUNCIL VIA SPEAKER PHONE DURING THE LIVE MEETING FOR UP TO THREE MINUTES. PLEASE INDICATE ON WHICH ITEM YOU WISH TO SPEAK AND INCLUDE YOUR NAME & PHONE NUMBER. ***ITEMS THAT ARE SUBMITTED TO BE PART OF THE MEETING RECORD CAN BE FOUND USING THE LINK BELOW – SELECT THE CURRENT YEAR AND MEETING DATE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT 909-384-5002. http://edocs.sbcity.org/weblinkcc/Browse.aspx?startid=112 Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 2 Printed 5/1/2020 Theodore Sanchez John Valdivia James Mulvihill MAYOR PRO-TEM, W ARD 1 MAYOR COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 7 Sandra Ibarra Teri Ledoux COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 2 CITY MANAGER Juan Figueroa Sonia Carvalho COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 3 CITY ATTORNEY Fred Shorett Genoveva Rocha COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 4 ACTING CITY CLERK Henry Nickel COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 5 Bessine L. Richard COUNCIL MEMBER, W ARD 6 Welcome to a meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino. o Please contact the City Clerk’s Office (909) 384-5002 two working days prior to the meeting for any requests for reasonable accommodation to include interpreters. CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived Mayor Pro-Tem, Ward 1 Theodore Sanchez    Council Member, Ward 2 Sandra Ibarra    Council Member, Ward 3 Juan Figueroa    Council Member, Ward 4 Fred Shorett    Council Member, Ward 5 Henry Nickel    Council Member, Ward 6 Bessine L. Richard    Council Member, Ward 7 James Mulvihill    Mayor John Valdivia    Acting City Clerk Genoveva Rocha    City Attorney Sonia Carvalho    City Manager Teri Ledoux    Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 3 Printed 5/1/2020 5:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED SESSION (A) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and (d)(1)): i. Gary Saenz and Georgeann Hanna v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS2003802 ii. SB Pharma Holdings, Inc. dba The Row House v. City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1914576 iii. Ashe Society SB, LLC v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1911952 iv. EEL Holdings, Inc., LLC v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1906467 v. Kostadinos Kahros, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1830325 vi. Washington, LLC, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1905710 vii. Washington, LLC, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al ., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1922151 viii. KP Investment Group, LLC v. City of San Bernardino, et al., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1909577 (B) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)): five cases - tort claims filed by Mirna Cisneros (dated February 12, 2020), Karen Cervantes (dated February 12, 2020), Don Smith (dated March 31, 2020), Jackie Aboud (dated April 27, 2020), and Andrea Miller (dated April 29, 2020). (C) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT - City Clerk (D) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT - City Manager - Council will discuss process for future appointment of City Manager (E) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8: Property Address: Four (4) parcels, approximately 0.56 acres, of vacant real property located at 562 and 578 N. Mt. Vernon Aven ue and 1316 W. Spruce Street, APNs 0138-114-09 to -11 and 0138-114-18 Agency Negotiator: Teri Ledoux, City Manager Negotiating Party: Edward C. Adams and Jeanne M. Adams Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Purchase Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 4 Printed 5/1/2020 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation for National Public Works Week - May 17, 2020 through May 23, 2020 PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS LISTED AND NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA STAFF REPORTS 2. Receive a Report on the County of San Bernardino's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning and Provide Direction to Staff Accordingly Recommendation Receive a report on the County of San Bernardino's COVID -19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning and provide direction to Cit y staff accordingly. 3. Consider Initiating an Annexation of the Remaining Unincorporated Island of Land Abutting the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area. Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. 2020-87 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring its intention to annex a 26-acre area containing six parcels in the unincorporated County that is totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino, and direct the City Manager to submit the Resolution to the Executive Officer of LAFCO. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities District 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) for Tax Zone No. 3, PM 19814, Adoption of Resolutions for Annexing into the Community Facilities District, and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Levying Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2020-21 Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Hold a Public Hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-89 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 5 Printed 5/1/2020 electors the question of levying a special tax within the are proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and 3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-90 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Fac ilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and 5. Introduce Ordinance No. MC-1536 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2020-21 to pay the annual costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, a reserve fund for capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services); and 6. Schedule the final reading and adoption of Ordinance No MC -1536 for May 20, 2020. 5. Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments Recommendation That the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino , California, conduct a Public Hearing regarding fee adjustments for various City Departments. CONSENT CALENDAR 6. Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San B ernardino, California, approve the commercial and payroll disbursements for April 2020. 7. Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino , California accept and file the Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports for both February and March 2020. 8. Independent Investigation Status Update Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, receive and file a status update requested by the City Council on the independent investigation into the allegations of harassment made by current and former City employees against Mayor John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino. Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 6 Printed 5/1/2020 9. A Resolution Awarding a Professional Services Agreement for Auditing Services Beginning Fiscal Year 2019/20 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2020-88 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott (RAMS) of San Bernardino, California, as the City’s external auditors, in an amount not-to exceed $283,500 for a three-year term with a two-year option to extend. 10. Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Violations Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, conduct a final reading of and adopt Ordinance MC-1535, amending Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits. 11. Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked Police Vehicles Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2020-74 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget and issue a Purchase Order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $90,000. 12. Resolution to Ratify the Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of the Corporation for National and Community Service's Retired and Senior Volunteer Program - FY 2020/21 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2020-75 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year two of the Corporation for National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting the grant award in the amount of $54,809 and appropriating the grant funds for the period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. 13. 2ND Reading of Ordinance of MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 – I. E. Hub Center Project Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, accept for final reading and adopt Ordinance No. MC-1532 approving Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Residential to Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres located at 1066 N. Tippecanoe Avenue. Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 7 Printed 5/1/2020 14. Subordination of a Deed of Trust in Connection with a Refinancing of the Senior Mortgage Relating to Real Property at 6803 N. Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California Recommendation Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-76 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino , approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real property located at 6803 N. Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California. 15. Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in Connection with a Refinancing of Senior Mortgage Relating to 756 West 8TH Street, San Bernardino, California Recommendation Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-77 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, to approve a Subordin ation of a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real property located at 756 West 8th Street, San Bernardino, California. 16. Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports - Previously Formed Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-72, initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in Assessmen t Districts pursuant to the Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, appointing the Engineer of Record, and ordering the preparation of Engineer’s Reports. 17. Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement 16 - 1001477 with SBCTA Related to the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct Replacement Project Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution 2020-78 to approve Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for roles and responsibilities for the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project (“Project) to increase San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and City Developer Impact Fees (DIF) by a total of $10,127,219, for a new SBCTA share of $16,165,535 and DIF share funding of $9,747,979, to cover project funding shortfalls based on the final bid price for the Design Build contract and updated funding contributions from Federal and State sources; and to authorize the City Manager to sign and execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement. Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 8 Printed 5/1/2020 18. Cooperative Agreement with the City of Rialto for Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project (SS20-010) Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-80, approving the Cooperative Agreement with the City of Rialto FOR Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project (SS20-010) (“Project”). 19. Resolution Approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission (Authority) for Phase II of the San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution 2020-81, approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20- 1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Phase II of the San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project. 20. Award of a Construction Contract for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-82: 1. Approving a total project budget for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project (“Project”) in the amount of $241,000, to include construction contract in the amount of $209,500, project contingencies in the amount of $21,500 , and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $10,000; and 2. Approving the award of a construction contract with Pacific Play Systems, Inc. of Carlsbad, California, in the amount of $209,500 to perform the construction of the Project; and 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the Project; and 4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents, and expend contingency amounts, if necessary, in support of the Project. 21. Award of Construction Contract for Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to School Project Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-83: 1. Approving Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to School Project (SS17-001) Project (“Project”) infrastructure component expenditures in a total amount of $1,671,000, which includes a construction contract in the amount of $1,469,645, Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 9 Printed 5/1/2020 project contingencies in the amount of $147,355, and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $54,000; and 2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with Hillcrest Contracting Inc. of Corona, California, in the amount of $1,469,645 to perform construction of th e project; and 3. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project; and 4. Authorizing the Director of Finance to record any necessary budget adjustments to support the project. 22. Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for Storm Drain Upgrades Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution 2020-84: 1. Approving total project budgets in the amount of $1,06 0,000 for Storm Drain Repairs at Various Locations (CIP Project SD04 -24 and CIP Project SD19-003) to include a construction contract in the amount $849,730 , project contingencies in the amount of $170,270 and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $40,000 (collectively; and 2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with TRYCO General Engineering of Rimforest, California in the amount of $849,730; and 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to allocate $574,380 in Storm Drain Fund No. 248 to the Project; and 4. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. 23. Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH Street Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize staff to proceed with an investigation and analysis for the proposed street vacation of portions of 4th Street. 24. Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement 17-1001639 with San Bernardino Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-85, approving Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement 17-1001639 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 10 Printed 5/1/2020 25. Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment No. 1 Budget of the Senior Nutrition Program Grant to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. 2020-86 of the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submittal of Amendment No. 1 budget of the Senior Nutrition Program Grant to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) pursuant to County Contract No. 19 -372; accept the additional funding OTO (One-Time Only), amend the award in the amount of $47,213 for a total budget of $387,213; appropriate grant revenue expenditures, and issue change orders to purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American Meat Companies, dba Merit Day and Hollandia Dairy, Inc. for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. ITEMS TO BE REFERRED TO COMMITTEE REPORTS ON CONFERENCES/MEETINGS ATTENDED ADJOURNMENT The next joint regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 in the Council Chamber located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California 92401. Closed Session will begin at 5:30 p.m. and Open Session will begin at 7:00 p.m. CERTIFICATION OF POSTING AGENDA I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk for the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby certify that the agenda for the May 6, 2020 Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency was posted on the City’s bulletin board located at 201 North “E” Street, San Bernardino, California, at the San Bernardino Public Library located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California, and on the City’s website sbcity.org on Friday, May 1, 2020. I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ___________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Regular Meeting Agenda May 6, 2020 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 11 Printed 5/1/2020 NOTICE: The Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency may refer any item raised by the public to staff, or to any commission, board, bureau, or committee for appropriate action or have the item placed on the next agenda of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. However, no other action shall be taken nor discussion held by the M ayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency on any item which does not appear on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 54954.2 of the Government Code. Public comments will not be received on any item on the agenda when a public hearing has been conducted and closed. Page 1 Staff Report City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager Subject: San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Plan Recommendation Receive a report on the County of San Bernardino's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning and provide direction to City staff accordingly. Background On March 13, 2020, the City Manager, in accordance with Se ction 2.46.090.A.1 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, issued Proclamation No. 2020 -01 declaring the existence of a local emergency relating to the worldwide spread of respiratory illness due to the novel coronavirus known as COVID-19. On March 18, 2020, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-51, ratifying the proclamation and declaring the existence of a local emergency. County, state, and federal governments have also declared the existence of emergency conditions in connection with the global pandemic. COVID-19 has been determined to be of particular threat to vulnerable populations, including the homeless. As such, and as required by the State, the County of San Bernardino is securing hotels/motels in the County to provide individual room sheltering for certain populations. Some motels are being secured for homeless individuals over 65, non-symptomatic, more susceptible while other rooms are being secured for those who are COVID-19 positive while they recover. At present, the City has asserted that hotel and motel owners are not permitted to enter into such agreements with the County due to zoning restrictions and business licensing requirements imposed in accordance with the City’s powers as a charter city. However, the County secured its first contract with the Sure Stay Motel on Hospitality Lane last month without advance notice to the City. Staff reached out to the County with concerns regarding the placement of these individuals on Hospitality Lane and made it clear that the City had several concerns about the plan to relocate homeless individuals from across the County to hotels within the City’s incorporated boundaries. When no agreement could be reached with the County, staff sent a cease and desist letter to the motel owner making them aware that the intended use of the Hotel was not allowed. Hotels are permitted for hospitality and hotel use , not to be used as a social services facility or as a homeless shelter. The use is a violation of the City’s General 2 Packet Pg. 12 6712 Page 2 Plan, Zoning Code, and business license restrictions. The County has acknowledged the importance of working with the City in its efforts and the City stands ready to work with the County in a manner that does not disproportionately disrupt the residents of our City. The County has assured staff that they are working to secure rooms in other cities in the County. However, as of this writing, we have not received confirmation of locations secured outside the City of San Bernardino. In addition to securing hotel/motel rooms for homeless individuals, the County is also seeking to secure rooms for essential workers such as: health care professionals; law enforcement; first responders; and other county workers in need of isolation who may be impacted by COVID-19. The County is also seeking additional sites for COVID-19 testing and previously requested use of the Carousel Mall parking lot; however, they have since found other locations that better suit their needs. In a good faith effort to work with the County, staff drafted a cooperation agreement between the City and the County that, if approved by both parties, would allow the County to fulfill its obligation in collaboration with the City to contract with hotels and motels in the city’s jurisdiction for emergency lodging for homeless individuals and families; contract with hotels and motels in the City’s jurisdiction for emergency lodging for County essential workers; and allow the County, at no fee, use of the City’s Carousel Mall parking lot property for the purpose of operating a testing site. Discussion A draft cooperation agreement was sent to County Chief Executive Officer Gary McBride on April 14, 2020, for review (Attachment 1). Following a review of the proposed agreement, Mr. McBride conveyed that at th is time the County is not entering into such agreements with individual cities in the County. In place of an agreement, the County has committed to following the guidelines outlined in their COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning document (Attachment 2) including an informal commitment to all jurisdictions in the County as follows: The City would be indemnified similar to the hotel. This would be included in the hotel agreement. The County will ensure that all program participant s who exit the program for any reason are immediately transported to the referring community at no cost to the City. In the event that a program participant leaves the hotel for any reason and is not immediately transported to the referring community the City may immediately contact the County, which will promptly provide transportation to the Program participant to the referring community. Hotel shall assure that all outside lighting is operational and all landscaping is maintained in good condition in accordance with City standards. Hotel and/or County shall provide security guard services 24 hours per day. 2 Packet Pg. 13 6712 Page 3 Daily accounting of occupancy/vacancy and the location of where the program participants reside from. Program participant is required to sign an agreement outlining specific codes of conduct. While this informal agreement addresses many of the City’s concerns, the draft cooperative agreement would make the terms more specific to the City of San Bernardino and allow the governing bodies of both agencies to participate and agree to the terms. Specifically, the County’s planning document does not address: The City’s zoning restrictions - the City asserts that hotel and motel owners are not permitted to enter into such agreements with the County due to the zoning and business licensing restrictions traditionally imposed by the City. The draft cooperation agreement indicates that the City would waive those restrictions as an emergency measure and enables the use of hotel and motel facilities for those purposes under certain terms and conditions, all of which are designed to protect the public safety, health, and welfare of the City and its residents. Approval from the City Manager prior to utilizing any new hotel or motel for temporary emergency lodging which includes: o A copy of a security plan for the new hotel or motel at the time of making a request. o A copy of the proposed agreement with the hotel or motel owner/operator at the time of making the request and a copy of the fully executed agreement within one business day following execution. o A cap the total number of rooms within the City for temporary emergency lodging at fifty (50) rooms (it should be noted that the County requested 150 in the City of San Bernardino). o That temporary emergency lodging is not permitted for walk-ins to the motels or hotels in the City. o That priority use of rooms is given to homeless persons originally located within the City in coordination with the City’s ESG Outreach Lead and the City’s District Commanders. o That logs are maintained a log of the each individual. o Occupancy is limited to a maximum 14-day term and assistance is provided by the County to hotels and motels with relocation upon termination of the term. o Provide all individuals with free transportation from the hotel or motel at the conclusion of the stay and in the event the program participant leaves the hotel for any reason and is not immediately transported to the referring community the City may immediately contact the County, which will promptly provide transportation to the Program participant to the referring community. 2 Packet Pg. 14 6712 Page 4 o Hotel shall assure that all outside lighting is operational and all landscaping is maintained in good condition in accordance with City standards. The proposed agreement also included provisions related to the County’s use of hotel rooms for its essential workers. Unlike where the County acquires hotel rooms in the City for homeless individuals from across the County as a social service, the Cit y has expressed no concerns with the County’s use of County funds to acquire hotel rooms for its own employees. In the proposed agreement, the City offered the use of the Carousel Mall parking lot for use as a regular COVID-19 testing site at no cost to the County. At this time, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health has advised that they do not have a need for an additional testing location within the City as they will be using Arroyo Valley High School as a regular testing location in o ur area when the National Orange Show facility is not available. The City will continue to work with the County to facilitate the expansion of testing in our area and provide for additional testing sites as needed. 2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Providing direction to staff regarding the County of San Bernardino's COVID -19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning aligns with Key Target No. 3 Improved Quality of Life. Fiscal Impact Outside of the allocation of staff time, there is no fisca l impact associated with the consideration of COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, receive a report on the County of San Bernardi no's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning and provide direction to City staff accordingly. Attachments Attachment 1 Draft Cooperation Agreement between the City and County of San Bernardino regarding Hotel/Motel Homeless Emergency Res ponse Planning and use of the Carousel Mall as a testing site. Attachment 2 County of San Bernardino’s COVID-19 Response Planning document for all jurisdictions in the County. Ward(s): All Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: No previous Council Action. 2 Packet Pg. 15 - 1 - COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO REGARDING THE SHELTERING OF THE HOMELESS AND OF DISASTER WORKERS DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC This COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) by and between the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a charter city and municipal corporation (“City”) and the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) is made and entered into as of April ___, 2020 (“Effective Date”). City and County are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” 1. Recitals 1.1 WHEREAS, both the City and the County, in addition to the state and federal governments, have declared the existence of emergency conditions in connection with the global pandemic caused by COVID-19; and 1.2 WHEREAS, COVID-19 is a particular threat to vulnerable populations, including the homeless; and 1.3 WHEREAS, the City and County agree that the temporary housing of homeless populations during the emergency will help reduce the spread of COVID-19 and, therefore, lessen the burden on healthcare facilities countywide; and 1.4 WHEREAS, the County desires to enter into agreements with hotel and motel owners within the City to provide temporary lodging units for homeless individuals and families; and 1.5 WHEREAS, at present, such hotel and motel owners are not permitted to enter into such agreements due to the zoning restrictions and business licensing restrictions traditionally imposed by the City; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the City desires to waive these restrictions and enable the use of hotel and motel facilities under certain terms and conditions, defined herein, designed to protect the public safety, health, and welfare of the City and its residents; and 1.7 WHEREAS, the County also desires to provide shelter in hotels and motels for essential county employees, such as health care professionals, law enforcement, first responders, and other county workers in need of isolation; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the City also desires to waive any restrictions in place which might prevent the use of hotels and motels for essential county employees under the terms and conditions defined herein; and 2.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 2 - 1.9 WHEREAS, the County desires to utilize the City-owned outdoor parking area surrounding the Carousel Mall for the purposes of a COVID-19 testing site and the City desires to permit such use under the terms and conditions defined herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 2. Terms of Agreement 2.1 Incorporation of Recitals. The Parties hereby affirm the facts set forth in the Recitals above. Said Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. 2.2 City Commitments. City hereby agrees to do the following: (a) Within one working day following the Effective Date, the City Manager, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, shall issue an executive order under which : (1) the City shall temporarily waive limitations applicable to hotel and motel operators within the City in order to permit hotel and motel operators to provide temporary emergency lodging units to homeless individuals and families under contract with the County and under the terms set forth herein; and (2) the City shall temporarily waive any limitations applicable to hotel and motel operators within the City in order to permit hotel and motel operators to provide temporary emergency lodging to essential County workers who need such rooms for self-isolation purposes during the emergency. (b) Enter into a right-of-entry agreement with the County to permit the County to use the open parking area surrounding the Carousel Mall for a term and on dates to be determined by the Parties and on terms not more favorable to the City than those contained in the City’s template Right of Entry Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. (c) Utilize additional Emergency Solutions Grant Program funds under the CARES Act to address homeless concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic in consultation, as needed, with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2.3 County’s Commitments. County hereby agrees to do the following: (a) Temporary Shelter for Homeless Individuals: For all hotels and motels to be used for the temporary emergency lodging of homeless persons and families under this Agreement, the County shall do the following: (i) Seek approval from the City Manager prior to utilizing any new hotel or motel for temporary emergency lodging. Provide the City Manager with a copy of a security plan for the new hotel or motel at the time of making a request. Provide a copy of the proposed agreement with the hotel or motel owner/operator at the time of making the request. Provide a copy of the fully executed agreement with the hotel or motel owner/operator within one business day following execution. 2.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 3 - (ii) Cap the total number of rooms within the City for temporary emergency lodging at fifty (50) rooms. (iii) Provide temporary emergency lodging only for those homeless individuals and families transported to the hotels and motels by the County. Temporary emergency lodging shall not be permitted for walk-ins to the motels or hotels in the City. Prioritize the use of rooms within the City for homeless persons originally located within the City. Coordinate with the City’s ESG Outreach Lead and the City’s District Commanders in identifying individuals for priority lodging. (iv) Maintain a log of the first and last name of each individual checked in, the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) number for each individual, the location where they were picked up from, the name of the County agency that placed them in the hotel or motel, the name of the hotel or motel in which they are lodged, the date lodging commenced, the check-out date, the number of adults and children in their room, the daily amount paid for their stay, and the location to which they were relocated at the end of the term. For any individuals originally located out of the City, maintain a log of any efforts made to identify hotel or motel options within the original jurisdiction. For each individual served, the County shall require a form of identification. If an individual does not have a form of identification, the County shall work with the individual to obtain one. (v) Limit occupancy to a maximum 14-day term and provide assistance to hotels and motels with relocation upon termination of the term. Provide all individuals with free transportation from the hotel or motel at the conclusion of the stay. (vi) All individuals placed by the County in motels shall be subject to an eligibility intake using, for example, the Vulnerability Index - Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (VI-SPADT) and shall be entered in the HMIS before placement in lodging. All individuals shall be case managed by the County or an organization contracting with the County for such service. County shall provide wrap-around services at all hotels and motels used for temporary emergency lodging, including: (1) mental health services, including priority referrals/placement in the County’s Crisis Residential Treatment Facilities (CRT) and Crisis Stabilization Units (CSU); (2) referrals and placement in County drug and alcohol rehabilitation; (3) connection to mental health services at the County mental health clinics; (4) housing navigation services provided by the County or agencies contracting with the County for such services; and (5) priority consideration for placement if affordable housing, especially new housing developed by the County or Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino. The County shall provide the City with a report noting all individuals that received wrap around services. (vii) Ensure the hotel and motel operators transmit the transient lodging tax based on the room rental paid on behalf of the individuals for the temporary emergency lodging. (viii) Attempt, in conjunction with the City and local nonprofits, to identify permanent supportive housing or other longer-term solutions for all individuals housed in temporary emergency lodging, ideally at locations in their home jurisdictions. Priority shall 2.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 4 - be given to placing families and larger households into County permanent housing projects that are currently or soon-to-be built. In the event permanent supportive housing or another longer- term solution is not identified prior to the conclusion of the maximum 14-day term, County shall transport the individuals to the location where they were picked up. In instances where the individuals leave the hotel or motel site prior to the end of their term, the County shall make reasonable efforts to find the individuals and relocate the individuals to the location where they were picked up and return them. If the County is unable to locate the individuals, the County shall notify the City. (b) Temporary Shelter for Essential Workers: For all hotels and motels to be used for the temporary emergency lodging of essential County workers under this Agreement, the County shall do the following: (i) Provide the City Manager with a list of hotel or motel used for such temporary emergency lodging. Provide a copy of the fully executed agreement with the hotel or motel owner/operator within one business day following execution. (ii) Ensure the hotel and motel operators transmit the transient lodging tax based on the room rental paid on behalf of the individuals for the temporary emergency lodging. (c) Carousel Mall Testing Site: Enter into a right-of-entry agreement with the City to permit the County to use the open parking area surrounding the Carousel Mall for a term and on dates to be determined by the Parties and on terms not more favorable to the City than those contained in the City’s template Right of Entry Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2.4 Financial Participation. Neither Party shall pay the other any sums under this Agreement. 2.5 Term and Termination. This Agreement shall remain in effect until the earlier to occur of: (1) its termination by either Party; or (2) fourteen (14) days following the date on which the City Council adopts a resolution terminating the City’s state of emergency. Either Party may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason upon giving the other Party fourteen days’ advance written notice. 2.6 Insurance Requirements. The Parties shall each maintain adequate insurance coverage for the activities contemplated herein for the duration of this Agreement. 3. Miscellaneous Terms 3.1 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the Parties by an instrument in writing signed by both Parties. 3.2 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of 2.a Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 5 - reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire and integrated agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. 3.4 Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties. (a) Formal notices, demands and communications between Parties shall be deemed sufficiently given if: (i) by commercial overnight delivery; (ii) b y messenger service for immediate personal delivery; or (iii) by electronic transmittal, including electronic mail and/or fax transmissions, subject to written verification of receipt by the receiving party. Such written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either Party may from time to time designate by written notice to the other Party. All notices, demands and communications shall be sent, as follows: TO CITY: TO COUNTY: City of San Bernardino Attn: City Manager 290 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 County of San Bernardino Attn: Chief Executive Officer 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 Copy to: Copy to: City of San Bernardino Attn: City Attorney 290 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 County of San Bernardino Attn: County Counsel 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 (b) Notices shall be deemed effective upon receipt or with respect to electronic transmission, upon receipt of written verification from the receiving party. 3.5 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.6 Laws and Regulations. Each Party shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of this Agreement, and shall give all notices required by law. Each Party shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with this Agreement. If either Party performs any of its obligations hereunder knowing that its actions are contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the other, the violating Party shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. 2.a Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 6 - 3.7 Approvals. Approvals required by Parties, or any officers, agents or employees thereof, shall not be unreasonably withheld and approval or disapproval shall be given within a reasonable time. 3.8 Mutual Cooperation; Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. 3.9 Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement and the performance of the Parties obligations hereunder are for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City and the County. No person or entity who or which is not a signatory to this Agreement shall be deemed to be benefited or intended to be benefited by any provision hereof, and no such person or entity shall acquire any rights or causes of action against either the City or the County hereunder as a result of a Party’s performance or non-performance of its obligations under this Agreement. 3.10 Relationship of Parties. The Parties agree and intend that the City and the County are independent contracting entities and do not intend by this Agreement to create any partnership, joint venture, or similar business arrangement, relationship or association between them. 3.11 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to conflicts of laws principles. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been made in the County of San Bernardino, California, regardless of the order of the signatures of the Parties affixed hereto. Any litigation or other legal proceedings which arise under or in connection with this Agreement shall be conducted in a federal or state court located within or for San Bernardino County, California. The Parties consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue in federal or state court located within the County of San Bernardino, California, and hereby waive any defenses or objections thereto including defenses based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. 3.12 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non- defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Either Parties’ consent or approval of any act by the other Party requiring its consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary its consent to or approval of any subsequent act of the other Party. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 3.13 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party. 3.14 Legal Counsel. Each Party acknowledges that: (i) it has read this Agreement; (ii) it has had the opportunity to have this Agreement explained to it by legal counsel of its choice; (iii) it is aware of the content and legal effect of this Agreement; and (iv) it is not relying on any 2.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 7 - representations made by the other Party or any of the employees, agents, representatives, or attorneys of the other Party, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. 3.15 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 3.16 Binding Effect. The terms of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. 3.17 Authorized Representatives. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf the City and County warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of that Party and that they have the authority to bind that Party to the performance of its obligations hereunder. SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE 2.a Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 8 - SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO REGARDING THE SHELTERING OF THE HOMELESS AND OF DISASTER WORKERS DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be entered into as of the date set forth above. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: __________________________________ Teri Ledoux, City Manager Date: ___________ By: __________________________________ Gary McBride, Chief Executive Officer Date: ___________ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: By:______________________________________ City Attorney By: __________________________________ Michelle Blakemore, County Counsel ATTEST: ATTEST: By:______________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, Acting City Clerk By:______________________________________ Lynna Monell, Clerk of the Board 2.a Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San - 9 - EXHIBIT A TEMPLATE RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT 2.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Draft San Bernardino - Cooperative Agreement with County re Homeless Sheltering During COVID-19 Pandemic-c1 (3) (6712 : San San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 1 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020 1. Purpose And Scope The purpose of this document is to describe the Unsheltered Homeless Emergency Response Plan by the County of San Bernardino in response to the coronavirus (COVID- 19) statewide epidemic and to define the interactions, roles, and responsibilities for the coordination of services between county departments, hotel/motel operators, and homeless service providers. In response to Executive Order (E.O.) N-32-20, the State of California has authorized new funding and has identified current funding to respond to the threat of COVID-19 among our homeless population. The E.O. identifies the Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP) funding and the Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HHAP) program funding as resources intended to provide programs and facilities to combat homelessness. As part of the order, emergency legislation created additional funding and resources to protect the safety of homeless populations, reduce the spread of COVID-19 among the homeless populations and provide safe beds as the virus continues to spread. The E.O. provides suspension to Health and Safety Code section 50214, to allow local jurisdictions to expend HEAP and HHAP funds to prepare and address the impacts of COVID-19, which includes the expansion of shelter and housing services capacity. The order also suspends Division 13, commencing with section 21000, of the Public Resources Code and Regulations in relation to the previous directed funding. 2. References 2.1.Regulations 2.1.1. Federal Guidance  CDC – Interim Guidance for Homeless Shelters  CDC – Interim Guidance for Homeless Service Providers to Plan and Respond to Coronavirus Disease 2019  CDC – Cleaning and Disinfection Recommendations  CDC – Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection Recommendations  CDC – People Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness  EPA – Information on Disinfectants and Water/Wastewater  HUD – Eligible ESG Program Costs for Infectious Disease Preparedness  HUD – Infectious Disease Toolkit for Continuums of Care: Preventing & Managing the Spread of Infectious Disease for People Experiencing Homelessness 2.b Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 2 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020  HUD – Infectious Disease Toolkit for Continuums of Care: Preventing & Managing the Spread of Infectious Disease with Encampments  HUD – Specific Considerations for Public Health Authorities to Limit Infection Risk Among People Experiencing Homelessness  NIDA – COVID-19 Advice for Social Anxiety Disorders 2.1.2. State Guidance  State of California Executive Order N-32-20  State of California Executive Order N-33-20  State of California Health & Safety Code Section 50214  State of California Public Resources Code and Regulations, Division 13, Section 21000  BCSA – Guidance for Homeless Assistance Providers on Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)  CDPH – Guidance Documents: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)  CDPH – Use of Personal Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Outbreak 2.1.3. Local Guidance  SBCDPH – Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)  LACDPH – Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Assessment Tool for Homeless Shelters  LACDPH – Guidance for Homeless Shelters  LACDPH – Infection Prevention Basics for Homeless Shelters  LACDPH – People Experiencing Homelessness FAQ 2.2.Other Emergency Operation Plans 2.2.1. 2018/2019 DEOP Essential Functions 3. Definitions  Emergency Operations Center (EOC) - Coordinates with the county’s disaster response expenses for recovery from state and federal governments.  Office of Emergency Services (OES) – Division of the San Bernardino County Fire Department responsible for countywide emergency planning, mitigation, response and recovery activities. The OES works with all county departments and 24 cities, and many non-government organizations 2.b Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 3 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020  Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP) – Established by statute to provide localities with flexible block grant funds to address their immediate homelessness challenges, such as emergency housing vouchers, rapid rehousing, emergency shelter construction, and the provision of temporary shelter, among other activities  Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HHAP) - One-time block grant that provides local jurisdictions with funds to support regional coordination and expand or develop local capacity to address their immediate homelessness challenges. 4. Concept of Operations The County of San Bernardino and the regional homeless Continuum of Care (CoC) are working together to address the needs of homeless individuals affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. COVID-19 is particularly dangerous for those experiencing homelessness. Individuals without stable housing not only face greater difficulty taking preventative actions, but they are often in poorer health than other residents. For the past several years, the County, cities and members of the CoC have been working tirelessly to reduce and prevent homelessness; however, despite targeted efforts the number of homeless persons continues to rise throughout the region. The goal of this plan is to identify at minimum 300 hotel/motel rooms throughout the region in multiple jurisdictions as quickly as possible to contain the spread of COVID-19 in the unsheltered community. The purpose of these facilities is to protect the community by limiting the community’s exposure to populations that are generally at higher risk of transmitting the virus, not to put the community at risk. One of the County’s and CoC’s top priorities since the COVID-19 outbreak has been to identify sites to house unsheltered homeless persons meeting high risk priorities and quarantine unsheltered homeless persons who are well but have been identified by medical doctors as being extremely at-risk, vulnerable to the virus or COVID-19 positive. This model aims to keep these individuals out of shelters and encampments and lower the risk of exposure to other members of the homeless population to slow the virus’ spread. Units have been prioritized for individuals/households who meet two or more of the following criteria: 2.b Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 4 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020  Unsheltered persons who are non-symptomatic and present healthy that meet the following high-risk criteria: o Persons aged 65 years and older o Persons of any age who have an underlying health condition such as:  Heart disease  Chronic lung disease or moderate to severe asthma  Immunocompromised  Underlying medical conditions that are not well controlled: diabetes, renal failure, or liver disease o Pregnant women  Unsheltered persons meeting the above criteria who are exposed, but asymptomatic requiring isolation  Unsheltered persons meeting the criteria under section 1 who are symptomatic awaiting test results requiring isolation  Unsheltered persons meeting the criteria under section 1 who are positive for COVID-19 but do not require hospitalization  Special accommodations will be made for members of unsheltered families meeting the criteria under section 1 5. Engagement of Services High-risk unsheltered persons will be identified in part through the Homeless Coordinated Entry System (CES) and through the Sheriff’s Homeless Outreach and Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) team. CES will provide referrals from community partners and the HOPE team will make contact with the unsheltered persons. In addition, the HOPE team will identify previously contacted high-risk unsheltered persons and navigate them to the appropriate location. All referrals will have completed the CES assessment forms and appropriate documentation. Each client entered into a hotel/motel room will be connected with a case manager through one of our current HEAP or Homeless Partnership homeless service providers. On site food and security will be engaged to ensure comfort during the duration of their stay. Clients will be notified to not allow access to their rooms by others during their stay. 2.b Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 5 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020 Persons meeting the requirements of the hotel/motel use, may contact CES through Inland Empire United Way at 2-1-1 or the Sheriff’s HOPE team at 1-844-811- HOPE(4673). 6. Admission Agreement Unsheltered homeless persons referred to the hotel/motel will be told to remain in their rooms during the duration of the COVID-19 stay in place order from the State. Each person will sign an admission agreement noting the following:  They will take care of their room (no damages)  Alcohol, substance use, weapons, or other illegal activity on the property is not permitted  Unregistered guests in the room are not allowed  They acknowledge that they will be a good neighbor and avoid upsetting their neighbors by engaging in loud or disruptive activities (loud TV/music, late night loud noise, etc.)  They will maintain a clean room and allow housekeeping staff access as needed  They will allow the County of San Bernardino and partnering homeless services provider staff and partners to meet them onsite or in their room  They will remove all their personal items from their room prior to check out and agree to vacate the premises voluntarily upon the ending of the stay period or upon the rescinding of the Governor’s Executive Order 7. Case Management Plan Homeless individuals in lodging may have access to or may receive assistance in the following service areas: • Checking in / out of lodging; aid in completing necessary paper work • Resource packets that may contain the following information: o Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Instructions on preventing the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19), o Contact information for a case manager, and others, e.g., security o Instructions on how to access medical services from their managed care plan o How to access mental health services o A crisis and support line • When appropriate, linkages to benefits as needed • Daily wellness telephone checks by health care or other industry professionals, 2.b Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 6 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020 • Regularly scheduled onsite visits by participating providers • When appropriate, assistance in storing, organizing, disposing of personal belongings • Assistance in arranging for onsite, offsite, fostering of personal pets • If not provided with lodging, assistance with procuring, ordering, or arranging for delivery of food items, meals, or other nutrition • Some managed care plans may offer/coordinate pharmacy services; assistance in procuring, ordering, or arranging for delivery of prescription medications • Homeless requiring treatment for mental health issues or substance abuse will be assessed to determine specialized offsite services and housing • Hygiene kits and/or supplies needed to maintain stability 8. Outreach Plan The Sheriff’s HOPE Team received comprehensive training on best practices to keep themselves safe and to ensure that people they encounter with flu-like symptoms get the right medical care. The County of San Bernardino Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) Homeless Outreach Support Team (HOST) has also received similar training. Outreach teams that are currently working with the HOPE and HOST teams will continue to support those teams. In addition, they will pass along information regarding COVID- 19 and how to reduce the chances of contracting the virus to the unsheltered homeless they encounter. Other homeless service providers outside of HOPE and HOST are referring unsheltered homeless they engage through the Coordinated Entry System to ensure they receive information about COVID-19 and how to reduce their chances of catching the virus 9. Staffing Plan • Off-site homeless services providers and DBH staff will call each person placed in the hotel/motel rooms for daily wellness checks • Rotating staff will be on site 1-2 times per week to follow-up on client needs, such as access to mainstream services • The Sheriff HOPE team will screen and transport homeless individual to lodging location • DBH staff will assist in the transport of homeless individuals requiring medical isolation or quarantine services 2.b Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 7 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020 • Homeless services providers and/or DBH staff will meet individuals and assist them in checking in, completing paperwork and settling in their rooms • Staff will follow CDC safety guidelines 10. Food Plan Meal services are being organized through County of San Bernardino Human Services in conjunction with Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP) and Molina Healthcare. IEHP and Molina Healthcare will provide meals for persons identified as members and the County of San Bernardino will cover the cost for non-members. Provision of Food Services:  Up to a 14 day food package can be sent out in two separate deliveries (7 days of food in each delivery)  Food order for each client may be able to be extended past 14 days or cancelled upon request as needed  Food packages come in two forms: o Packages needing refrigeration (if the hotel/motel has a refrigerator this option will be utilized) o Packages of non-perishables (it is anticipated that these will be utilized at a faster rate than the refrigeration packages)  Food packages may be customized if needed: o Diabetic o Low sodium o Vegetarian 11. Decommission Plan The use of this facility for the unsheltered homeless and medically stable COVID-19 patients will be secured for three (3) months and will terminate upon the rescinding of the order. Once the State order has been lifted, those homeless individuals that have not been connected to permanent housing will be diverted to the appropriate homeless services provider and returned to where they were originally staying as identified by the outreach team. Homeless Relocation Plan: • The Sheriff’s HOPE team will coordinate transportation services with the HOST team • Transportation will be provided through groups or cohorts to the appropriate destinations 2.b Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 8 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020 • It is anticipated that up to 50 persons will be transported per day with a scaling back of hotel/motel services The rooms will be professionally cleaned prior to assuming regular business use and the hotel property will be returned to its previous condition at the end of the occupancy agreement term. Tenancy rights will be waived by the client upon the admission agreement and language will be entered into the occupancy agreement noting weekly stays for tenants that will be renewable on an as needed basis. In addition, it will be expected that the hotel/motel in conjunction with County services and support will meet the following criteria which affords exception to the 30 day rule: • The hotel/motel keeps a right of access and control of the room; and • The hotel/motel has facilities to safeguard personal property; and • The hotel/motel provides central telephone service; and • The hotel/motel provides maid, mail, and room services; and • Food service is in or adjacent to the premises of the hotel/motel. 12. Security Plan Security will be provided 24/7 at the hotel/motel and on premises of the facility. Security will be designated to the lobby and will be continuously roaming the grounds of the facility. All food will be brought into the hotel/motel regularly and personnel will be isolated. The temporary residents will be encouraged to remain in their room and avoid accessing any of the residential or commercial service areas. 13. Informing Providers and Community The Department of Public Health (DPH), has notified all its employees, partners, and providers about best practices to prevent and prepare for a COVID-19 outbreak. The County of San Bernardino has worked with DPH to develop and administer training specifically for support providers providing housekeeping services at these isolation locations. DPH has launched a robust, comprehensive COVID-19 web portal (sbcovid19.com) aimed at providing key guidance for the residents of the county. It includes program guidance and tools from DPH and CDC, as well as infectious disease preparedness guidance for different communities/agencies. 2.b Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency San Bernardino County COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Hotel/Motel Response Planning Current Version: 1 Page #: Page 9 of 9 Last Review Date: 4/7/2020 14. Roles and Responsibilities Roles and Responsibilities for the COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response include: I. Preparing Housing Inventory – Economic Development Department primary point of contact (POC) a) Develop an inventory of motel/hotel providers i) Locations, number of rooms, cost, etc. ii) Communicate intent to cities iii) Engage the motel/hotel providers for potential leasing/contract development iv) Develop motel/hotel provider messaging II. COVID-19 Education – HS and OHS a) Prepare educational materials for motel/hotel providers i) Information and precautionary measures needed for employees in engaging the homeless ii) Appropriate sanitation iii) Development of materials and printing III. Communication with Local Jurisdictions – DEO and Government and Legislative Affairs a) Develop messaging plan b) Determine main POC c) Provide CEO and AEO with details of city/town concerns IV. Public Health Response a) Actions needed to secure the health and safety of the homeless population and/or priority populations b) Personal Protective Equipment V. Provider Care Coordination – KEYS, DBH, and OHS a) Develop strategy for public health response with homeless services VI. Engaging in an Immediate Response a) Engage a motel/hotel provider to acquire at minimum 50 rooms to start moving unsheltered individuals or families into rooms to shelter in place b) Engage a homeless service provider to provide case management for each client and provide access to mainstream resources, if available, food, hygiene products, etc. 2.b Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Response Planning (002) (6712 : San Bernardino County's COVID-19 Homeless Emergency Page 1 Staff Report City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. 2020-87 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring its intention to annex a 26-acre area containing six parcels in the unincorporated County that is totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino, and direct the City Manager to submit the Resolution to the Executive Officer of LAFCO. Background In March 2013, the City of San Bernardino approved the Spring Tr ails Specific Plan (SP10-01), which included a variety of underlying entitlements. The Specific Plan approvals included the adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -34 that certified the Final Environmental Impact Report, the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring an d Reporting Plan, the adoption of a General Plan Amendment No. GPA-02-09 (including the pre- annexation of the Specific Plan area), the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15576, and the approval of a Development Agreement. In March 2015, Montecito Equities, Ltd., (Developer) filed a Landowner Petition for annexation with the San Bernardino County Local Area Formation Commission (“LAFCO”). Since that time, the Applicant has been working with LAFCO seeking approval of the annexation of the area known as S pring Trails into the City of San Bernardino (Note: Additional details of the annexation proceedings are provided in both Attachments 1 and 2). At the January 15, 2020 meeting, the Mayor and City Council considered the annexation of the remaining unincorporated island of land abutting the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project area. Subsequent to discussion on the matter, the City Council tabled the item to an unspecified date. On March 18, 2020, the Mayor and City Council discussed this item in Closed Session centered on a threat of litigation. Based on City Council direction, this item is now back before the Mayor and City Council for consideration. 3 Packet Pg. 34 6695 Page 2 Discussion On October 16, 2019, LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 3091 approving the annexation of the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area (LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the City of San Bernardino, subject to certain conditions of approval. During the processing of the annexation, there was a 26 -acre area including 6 parcels that was removed from the annexation that created an unincorporated island surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. This area was removed because the registered voters occupying the six single-family residences located within the Project area had vocally opposed the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project, and it was unlikely that the annexation of the entire area including the island would be successful. As a result, the annexation continued without the unincorporated island area (See Attachment 2, Location Map - Remaining Unincorporated Island). With respect to the above mentioned conditions of approval, LAFCO imposed the Condition of Approval No. 4 that states the following: The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of the totally-surrounded island within one year of the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B). A resolution by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall be submitted to the Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the City’s commitment to fulfilling this requirement prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion for LAFCO 3188A. A status report shall be provided to the Commission at the six month date outlining the progress of the City of San Bernardino in fulfilling its obligation. Failure on the part of the City of San Bernardino to fulfill its commitment to annex the totally-surrounded island shall require that the next annexation proposed to the City of San Bernardino, either by the City through resolution or by property owner/registered voter petition to include a condition requiring the initiation of annexation of the totally - surrounded island. Said condition of approval shall be deemed completed upon the issuance of the Certificate of Filing for said island. The above Condition of Approval No. 4 imposed by LAFCO holds the Certificate of Completion for LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A (Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area) on hold until (a) the City of San Bernardino Mayor and City Council adopts a resolution identifying its commitment to annex the 26-acre unincorporated island area at some time in the future, and (b) the City of San Bernardino submits a copy of the adopted resolution to the Executive Officer of LAFCO. In essence, Condition of Approval No. 4 places a hold of Montecito Equities, Ltd., (Developer) the ability to proceed with the construction of the project until after the City Council adopts a resolution confirming its intent to annex the unincorporated island area into the City a sometime in the future. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals The adoption of a Resolution committing to the annexation of the remaining unincorporated island area is consistent with Key Target No 1: Secure a long-term revenue source. Specifically, the area considered for annexa tion is within the City’s sphere of influence and has been anticipated for development as identified in the City’s 3 Packet Pg. 35 6695 Page 3 comprehensive General Plan. Future in-fill development, such as that proposed as part of the Spring Trails project, will be a catalyst to en courage new development in the city that will generate additional revenue. Fiscal Impact The adoption of the Resolution committing to the future annexation of the remaining unincorporated island does not require the expenditure of any General Fund reve nue at this time. Conclusion On October 16, 2019, LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 3091 approving the annexation of the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project Area (LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the City of San Bernardino, subject to certain conditions of approval. A condition of approval was included as part of Resolution No. 3091, which requires that the Mayor and the City Council of the City of San Bernardino adopt a resolution confirming its intent to annex the unincorporated island area into the City a sometime in the future. It is, therefore, staff’s recommendation that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020 -87, declaring its intention to annex a 26-acre area containing six parcels in the unincorporated County that is totally- surrounded by the City of San Bernardino, and direct the City Manager to submit the Resolution to the Executive Officer of LAFCO. Attachments Attachment 1 November 18, 2019 Letter from Gresham Savage Attachment 2 Location Map - Remaining Unincorporated Island Attachment 3 August 21, 2019, LAFCO Agenda Packet Attachment 4 October 16, 2019, LAFCO Agenda Packet Ward: 5 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: March 2013 The Mayor and Common Council approved the Spring T rails Specific Plan and all other underlying entitlement for the project. 3 Packet Pg. 36 Resolution No. 2020-87 RESOLUTION 2020-87 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REGARDING THE SPRING TRAILS SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, in March 2013, the City of San Bernardino (“City”) approved the Spring Trails Specific Plan Project (SP10-01) that included a variety of underlying entitlements, including the adoption of Resolution No. 2013-34 that certified the Final Environmental Impact Report, the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the adoption of a General Plan Amendment No. GPA-02-09 (including the pre-annexation of the Specific Plan area), the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15576, and the approval of a Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, in March 2015, the applicant, Montecito Equities, Ltd., filed a Landowner Petition for annexation with the San Bernardino County Local Area Formation Commission (“LAFCO”). Since that time, the applicant has been working with LAFCO seeking approval of the annexation of the area known as the Spring Trails into the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2019, LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 3291 approving the annexation of the Project (LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the City, subject to certain conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the annexation resulted in the creation of a twenty-six (26)-acre totally- surrounded island area comprised of six (6) parcels (“Island Territory”), depicted in that map entitled “Location Map – Remaining Unincorporated Island,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval in LAFCO’s Resolution No. 3291 was that the City initiate annexation of the Island Territory within one (1) year of LAFCO’s approval of LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A; and WHEREAS, presently the six (6) parcels of the Island Territory remain a part of unincorporated County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to proceed to adopt this Resolution of Intention to initiate the annexation of the Island Territory to the City and to describe the Island Territory proposed to be annexed. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 3.a Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Resolution 5.6.20AA (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Resolution No. 2020-87 SECTION 2. The proceedings for annexation are initiated by this City Council pursuant to the authorization provisions contained in the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Gov. Code § 56000 et seq.). SECTION 3. The City Council hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Island Territory be added to the City and it declares its intention to annex the Island Territory to the City. A description of the Island Territory is as follows: All that property within the Island Territory proposed to be annexed to the City, as such property is shown on the map entitled “Location Map – Remaining Unincorporated Island,” attached hereto and a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this day of , 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 3.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Resolution 5.6.20AA (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Resolution No. 2020-87 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-XXX, adopted at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this day of , 2020. ______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 3.a Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Resolution 5.6.20AA (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) SAN BERNARDINO 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300  San Bernardino, California 92408 SAN DIEGO 401 West A Street, Suite 925  San Diego, California 92101 RIVERSIDE Mission Inn Plaza  Riverside, California 92501 (By Appointment Only) GreshamSavage.com M681-000 -- 3770661.1 Mark.Ostoich@GreshamSavage.com  ∙  San Bernardino Office  (909) 890‐4499  ∙  fax (909) 890‐9690  November 18, 2019  VIA E‐MAIL ‐ Ledoux_Te@sbcity.org  AND HAND DELIVERED  Teri Ledoux, City Manager  City of San Bernardino  290 North D Street  San Bernardino, CA 92401  Re: Spring Trails Specific Plan Project (SP10‐01)  Dear Teri:  As you know, we represent Montecito Equities, Ltd., the owner and developer of the  Spring Trails Specific Plan Project (SP10‐01), approved by the City of San Bernardino  in March 2013.  The Specific Plan approvals, which are final and fully‐vested, include  adoption of Resolution No. 2013‐34; certification of the Final Environmental Impact  Report; adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan; adoption of  General Plan Amendment No. GPA 02‐09 (including pre‐annexation of the Specific  Plan area); approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15576; and approval of a  Development Agreement (collectively, the “Specific Plan Approvals”).   On October 16, 2019, the San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation  Commission adopted Resolution No. 3091 approving the annexation of the Project  (LAFCO Annexation No. 3188A) into the City, subject to certain conditions of  approval.  The annexation resulted in the creation of a 26‐acre totally‐surrounded  island area comprised of six parcels.  Although the six parcels receive the bulk of these  municipal services from the City (except for fire), they will remain a part of  unincorporated County of San Bernardino (the “Island Area”), until eventually  annexed into the City.  With respect to the Island Area, the conditions of approval imposed by LAFCO in  Resolution No. 3091 included Condition No. 4, which provides as follows:  The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of  the totally‐surrounded island within one year of the Commissionʹs  approval of LAFCO 3188A (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B).   3.b Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Teri Ledoux, City Manager  City of San Bernardino  November 18, 2019  Page 2  M681-000 -- 3770661.1 A resolution by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall  be submitted to the Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the Cityʹs  commitment to fulfilling this requirement prior to the issuance of the  Certificate of Completion for LAFCO 3188A. A status report shall be  provided to the Commission at the six month date outlining the  progress of the City of San Bernardino in fulfilling its obligation.  Failure on the part of the City of San Bernardino to fulfill its  commitment to annex the totally‐surrounded island shall require that  the next annexation proposed to the City of San Bernardino, either by  the City through resolution or by property owner/registered voter  petition, to include a condition requiring the initiation of annexation  of the totally‐surrounded island. Said condition of approval shall be  deemed completed upon the issuance of the Certificate of Filing for  said island.  In effect, LAFCO Condition No. 4 holds the Certificate of Completion for annexation  of the Project in abeyance unless and until (i) the City Council adopts a resolution  “outlining the City’s commitment” to annex the Island Area at some point in the  future and (ii) provides the adopted resolution to LAFCO’s Executive Officer.    Therefore, the annexation will not be complete and Montecito will not be permitted to  move forward with construction of the Project in accordance with the Specific Plan  Approvals until after the City Council adopts a resolution confirming its intent to  annex the Island Area into the City at some future date.  The purpose of this letter is to formally request that the City Council consider the  future annexation of the Island Area and adoption of a resolution evidencing its  commitment to do so, as required under Condition No. 4, at a future hearing.  Brief Project and Annexation History  As noted above, the Project has long been included as part of the City’s Sphere of  Influence, and was originally entitled by the City in March 2013.  Following the  March 4, 2013 approval of the Project, the Mayor and Common Council considered a  resolution to initiate the annexation of the Project, including the Island Area; however,  the Common Council ultimately voted not to initiate annexation at its hearing held on  November 3, 2014.  The Common Council did so despite the fact that the Specific Plan  Approvals, including Resolution 2013‐34 and the Project Development Agreement,  expressly require the City to initiate annexation of the Project territory and that failure  to initiate annexation would constitute a breach of these approvals.  3.b Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Teri Ledoux, City Manager  City of San Bernardino  November 18, 2019  Page 3  M681-000 -- 3770661.1 As a result of the City’s failure to comply with its obligations under the Development  Agreement and Resolution No. 2013‐34 to initiate annexation of the Project territory,  Montecito filed a Landowner Petition for annexation with LAFCO in March 2015.  The  application was based on an analysis that concluded that the annexation territory,  with less than 12 registered voters, was considered “uninhabited” under the LAFCO  regulations.  Because the land owned by Montecito, the petitioning landowner,  comprised most of the assessed value within the annexation territory, the proposed  annexation of the Project territory as an “uninhabited” territory was assured of  success.  After the City’s approval of the Project, the voter registration within the Project area  suspiciously increased from eight registered voters to sixteen registered voters  between April 2013 and June 2015.1  The result of this increase was to convert the  annexation from an “uninhabited” territory to an “inhabited” territory.  The voter  registration increase was significant, because when inhabited territory is annexed, an  election must be held and votes are cast on a per voter basis.  Because the registered  voters allegedly occupying the six single‐family residences located within the Project  territory had vocally opposed the Project, it was unlikely that annexation of the Project  and surrounding area would be successful.  For this reason and in order to further the  Project consistent with the Specific Plan Approvals, Montecito was forced to reduce  the annexation territory to include solely the Specific Plan Area.  Accordingly, the six  non‐Project parcels comprising the Island Area were removed from the Project  annexation territory.2    As a result of the removal of the Island Area from the Project, the reorganization  before LAFCO is considered an “island” annexation.  Section 56744 of the Cortese‐ Knox‐Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (“Act”) provides that  territory cannot be annexed if, as a result of the annexation, unincorporated territory is  1 Based upon our analysis of the voter registration activity, three of the newly registered voters  reside at an address assigned to vacant land; one of the newly registered voters has listed an  address that is outside the annexation area (however, it is depicted by the Registrar of Voters as  being within the annexation territory); and the voter registration count doubled for one  residence, thereby increasing the registered voters for the particular residence from two to four.   These suspicious activities were promptly reported to the Registrar of Voters; however, the  Registrar declined to investigate and deferred the matter to the District Attorney’s Office.   Ultimately, no action was taken to address these voter registration changes within the Project  territory. 2 As noted above, the parcels comprising the Island Area receive all municipal services from the  City, except for fire which is provided by the County Fire Department to all areas of the City.  3.b Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.b Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 1 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) 3.c Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 2 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1170 West Third Street, Unit 150, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 (909) 388-0480  Fax (909) 388-0481 lafco@lafco.sbcounty.gov www.sbclafco.org DATE: AUGUST 14, 2019 FROM: SAMUEL MARTINEZ, Executive Officer MICHAEL TUERPE, Project Manager JEFFERY LUM, LAFCO GIS/Database Analyst ROBERT ALDRICH, Consultant TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION SUBJECT: Agenda Item #8: LAFCO 3188A -- Reorganization to include Annexation to the City of San Bernardino and to the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Zone FP-5 San Bernardino, and Detachment from County Service Area 70 (Spring Trails Specific Plan) INITIATED BY: Property Owner Petition – Montecito Equities, Ltd., landowner BACKGROUND: The reorganization proposal is an annexation to the City of San Bernardino (hereafter the “City”) and to Zone FP-5 San Bernardino1 of the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, and detachment from County Service Area 70. The proposal encompasses approximately 350 acres and is generally located north of the Verdemont neighborhood, east of the community of Devore and northeasterly of the I-215 Freeway. The area is bordered by parcel lines on the north and east, a combination of parcel lines and the centerline of West Meyers Road (existing City of San Bernardino boundary) on the south, and parcel lines (portion of existing City boundary) on the west, within the City’s existing sphere of influence. A vicinity map is included as Attachment #1 to this report. The map below (Figure 1) provides a general location of the area to be annexed into the City. For over 20 years, the Local Agency Formation Commission and its staff have been involved in discussions with the City and/or the landowner regarding the delivery of services for a development proposal within the annexation area known as the Spring Trails Specific Plan , or its predecessor—Martin Ranch. 1 The proposal area is already within the San Bernardino County Protection District and its Zone FP -5. The annexation into “Zone FP-5 San Bernardino” would isolate the special tax revenues of Zone FP-5 to the service area of the City. 3.d Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 2 Fig. 1 – Vicinity Map Sphere of Influence Expansion (LAFCO 2808) In 1996, the Commission reviewed and considered a sphere of influence expansion proposal, LAFCO 2808, which was initiated by the property owner to include the proposal area (known then as Martin Ranch) into the City’s sphere of influence (see Figure 2). The Commission approved the sphere expansion proposal noting that future development would logically be served by the City and that the City should assume the primary role in developing the land use and service plans for the area. It was outlined at that time that the approval of the sphere expansion was simply to allow the landowner and the City to move forward in completing the pre- zoning, general plan amendment, and a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report for the project. Fig. 2 – LAFCO 2808 3.d Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 3 Project History This primer box provides a history of the project since its inception in 1996. The Spring Trails Specific Plan (or Martin Ranch) is a project that the City of San Bernardino has extensively reviewed, evaluated, and ultimately approved (and/or adopted) after years of processing. The Martin Ranch project was first submitted to the City in 1996. In 1998, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was issued for the project; however, the ensuing Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was rejected by the City’s Planning Department. In December 2002, the application for the General Plan Amendment (GPA 02-09) and Tentative Tract Map (15576) was filed with the City. A revised Draft EIR was released in 2002. In October 2003, a major fire burned through the project site requiring preparation of a new Draft EIR. In 2004, a new NOP reflecting the revised project was issued by the City. It included a general plan amendment and pre-zoning for the project site and the adjacent unincorporated (island) area which designated the area as Planned Residential Development, the establishment of a Hillside Management Overlay District to allow lot size averaging, and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the project site into approximately 359 lots. However, the 2004 Draft EIR, which addressed traffic, access, as well as other issues, was never circulated for public review. In 2005, the project was again revised to pre-zone the project site to Residential Low and the adjacent unincorporated (island) area to Residential Estate. A new Draft EIR was not released until 2006 when the City released a completed Draft EIR. Significant issues were again raised, and the City opted to prepare a revised Draft EIR to address concerns related to noise, air quality, biological resources, geotechnical issues and fire safety. In 2007, another fire on the site required further changes to the project. A new NOP was released for public review in 2009 along with an Initial Study. In March 2010, the application for the Specific Plan (SP 10-01) was filed with the City. Due to significant technical issues , the revised Draft EIR was not released until July 2011. Applications for a Development Agreement (DA 11-01) and a Development Code Amendment (DCA 12-10) were filed with the City in October 2011 and October 2012, respectively. In November 2012, the City’s Planning Commission hel d a public hearing to consider the component actions for the Spring Trails Specific Plan (except for the Development Agreement portion of the project which was continued at the request of the property owner) but recommended denial of all the actions. In January 2013, the City’s Planning Commission held another public hearing to consider the Development Agreement, and it also recommended denial of the proposed Development Agreement. Finally, on February 19, 2013, the City Council reviewed and considered the Final EIR, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and the recommendations of the City’s Planning Commission related to the Spring Trails Specific Plan, the General Plan Amendment, the Development Code Amendment, Tentative Tract Map 15576 to subdivide the project site into 304 single -family residential lots and the project’s Development Agreement. The City Council reversed the Planning Commission’s recommendations and approved and/or adopted all actions related to the Spring Trails Specific Plan. 3.d Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 4 Prior Proposal (LAFCO 3188) In March 2015, the property owner—Montecito Equities, Ltd—submitted a property owner petition including the application materials for the proposed reorganization to the City (see Attachment #2). The applicant not only requested the annexation of its properties but also included the adjacent unincorporated area totaling approximately 376 acres (see Figure 3). It should be noted that the City (and the applicant) included the adjacent unincorporated area as part of its proposal to prevent the creation of a totally- surrounded unincorporated island territory within the City. This is why the adjacent 26-acre unincorporated area was included in the City’s environmental assessment for the project. However, during the circulation of the Notice of Filing for LAFCO 3188, the Registrar of Voters (ROV) certified on July 2, 2015 that there were 16 registered voters within the reorganization area (see Attachment #3). That changed the annexation proposal from being (initially) an “uninhabited” annexation (less than 12 registered voters) to an “inhabited” annexation which allows for registered voter protest. This also meant likely termination due to registered voter protest—primarily from within the unincorporated island area. As a result, the applicant requested that LAFCO suspend the processing of its application proposal pending the outcome of the voter registration verification process by the ROV. Current Proposal (LAFCO 3188A) After almost a year, there still was no resolution from the ROV on the applicant’s request for verification of registered voters within the annexation area. This prompted the applicant to submit a revised application proposal that removed the adjacent unincorporated area from its proposal boundary (see Attachment #4). Figure 4 illustrates the applicant’s revised boundary that excludes the adjacent unincorporated area. Hence, the current proposal, LAFCO 3188A, creates a totally-surrounded island territory within the City. The reason for the delay in processing this proposal since the time it was re-initiated by the applicant was Fig. 3 – LAFCO 3188 LAFCO 3188 Fig. 4 – LAFCO 3188A LAFCO 3188A 3.d Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 5 due to the modifications that had to be incorporated into the Plan for Service and Fiscal Impact Analysis to reflect the change in fire service between the City and County Fire, as well as the property tax transfer process between the County and the City. Property Tax Transfer Process In May 2017, both the County and the City were scheduled to approve their respective property tax transfer resolutions; however, the City ended up not agreeing to the exchange and took no action on its property tax transfer resolution at that time. This prompted the dispute resolution process outlined in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(e) that requires mediation and/or arbitration. As the Commission is fully aware, the tax sharing formula in San Bernardino County (between the County and cities) is calculated in the same manner as all other annexations. However, because of the City’s unique property tax exchange process with County Fire through its fire reorganization, the City raised questions on whether an alternative formula was appropriate. The County and the City jointly retained a third-party consultant (David Taussig and Associates) to perform an independent financial analysis of the property tax revenues. That process took several months to get underway and was finally completed in June 2018. Negotiations continued until all parties agreed. The City adopted its property tax resolution on March 20, 2019, and the County, likewise, adopted its property tax resolution on May 21, 2019, determining the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged among the County, the City, and County Fire. BOUNDARIES: The proposal, as submitted by the applicant, includes the annexation of properties solely associated with the Spring Trails Specific Plan and does not include the adjacent unincorporated area that, should LAFCO 3188A be approved by the Commission, will become a totally-surrounded island within the City of San Bernardino. In staff’s view, the Commission has the following options to address the island area: 3.d Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 6 Option 1 Option 1 is to approve the proposal, LAFCO 3188A, as submitted by the applicant. This would leave an unincorporated area totally surrounded by the City. Clearly, it would be LAFCO staff’s preference not to create an island. Therefore, if the Commission chooses option 1, LAFCO staff would recommend that the Commission make certain determinations related to the creation of the island, and as a condition of approval require the City to initiate a new reorganization to annex the island area as a separate proposal (see Figure 5). Option 2 The Commission could modify the proposal by expanding LAFCO 3188A to include the unincorporated (island) area adjacent to the proposal area, which would be the exact same area as the prior proposal – LAFCO 3188 (see Figure 6). As outlined in the earlier discussion related to the prior proposal (LAFCO 3188) on pages 4 and 5, the inclusion of the island area would change the annexation proposal from being an uninhabited annexation to an inhabited annexation since there would be at least 12 registered voters within the modified proposal. From the beginning of the City’s consideration of the Spring Trails project, many have expressed opposition to the project. Since most of the registered voters are from within the island portion of the modified area, the probability of termination of the expanded proposal would be highly likely. Based on the options outlined above, LAFCO staff recommends the Commission choose Option 1. Although not an ideal boundary, it is LAFCO staff’s position that the imposition of the Condition of Approval related to the island area as well as the Determination related to the creation of the island, allows a mechanism for the Spring Trails Specific Plan, which is an easily identifiable boundary for service delivery, to be annexed into the City of San Bernardino for the services it requires. A detailed comparison of the two options follows on the next two pages. Fig. 6 – Option 2 Fig. 5 – Option 1 3.d Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 7 Option 1 Applicant’s Proposal Boundary, as Submitted to LAFCO Proposal Boundary and Description: A reorganization of 350 acres to include annexation of only the Spring Trails Specific Plan (shown in red). Pros:  The Commission identified the City as the logical service provider for the area by expanding the City’s sphere of influence in 1996.  Reorganization area will benefit from the extension of City services.  No other agency can logically provide municipal-level services to this area.  Proposal has 100% landowner consent, allowing for the waiver of protest and eliminating the possibility of termination. Cons:  Applicant’s proposal boundary creates an unincorporated island (completely surrounded by the City, shown in yellow) which is prohibited under Government Code §56744, unless certain determinations can be made (see Discussion below).  The landowners and registered voters of the island (being outside the reorganization area) would lack a process to overturn the Commission’s action. Discussion:  Although an island of unincorporated area is being created, the Commission has the statutory ability to waive the restrictions of creating an island (§56744) if it finds that the restrictions would be detrimental to the orderly development of the community and that the areas enclosed by the annexation cannot be reasonably annexed to another city or incorporate as a city. A determination pursuant to §56375 has been included in the Commission’s draft resolution and in the Recommendation portion of this report.  A condition of approval is being recommended that would require the City to initiate a separate reorganization to annex the island within one year of completion of LAFCO 3188A, and undergo standard protest proceedings on said island. The condition is included in the Commission’s draft resolution and in the Recommendation portion of this report. Fig. 7 – Option 1 3.d Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 8 Option 2 Expanded Proposal Boundary Expanded Boundary and Description: An expanded reorganization area of 376 acres to include annexation of the Spring Trails Specific Plan (350 acres) and adjacent 26-acre unincorporated area. Pros:  The Commission identified the City as the logical service provider to the area by expanding the City’s sphere of influence in 1996.  Environmental Assessment already includes the adjacent 26-acre unincorporated area.  Spring Trails Specific Plan area will benefit from the extension of City services.  No other agency can logically provide municipal-level services to this area.  Expanded boundary will not create an island.  The proposal would include a protest proceeding whereby island landowners and registered voters could submit a protest to oppose the reorganization in order to overturn the Commission’s action. Cons:  Registered voter opposition within the expanded boundary would likely result in sufficient protest to terminate the reorganization.  Without annexation to the City, the project—which requires municipal services—most likely would not be able to develop. Discussion:  This option is available to the Commission should it choose not to make a determination to waive the restrictions of creating an island.  The Commission would have to continue the item in order to provide proper noticing.  The Spring Trails project and reorganization would be decided by the registered voters within the reorganization area (not the landowners). Fig. 8 – Option 2 3.d Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 9 The remainder of this report contains the following information:  Land Use o County designations and City land use/pre-zone designations o Spring Trails Specific Plan o Constraints: fire hazard, fault zone, circulation, high wind areas, flood and drainage  Service Issues and Effects on Other Local Governments  Environmental Considerations  Waiver of Protest Proceedings  Conclusion  Recommendations  Determinations  Attachment Listing LAND USE: The reorganization area is predominantly vacant with the exception of an existing single- family residence on one of the parcels (see Figure 9). The area is surrounded by a combination of National Forest boundary and vacant lands to the east; a combination of residential development including Meyers Road to the south; a combination of residential development, vacant lands, and the National Forest boundary to the west; and the National Forest boundary to the north. Fig. 9 – Aerial Map 3.d Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 10 County Land Use Designations: The County’s current land use designations for the reorganization area are: RL-5 (Rural Living, 5 acres minimum), which provides sites for rural residential uses and incidental agricultural uses; and RC (Resource Conservation), which provides sites for open space and recreational activities, and single-family homes on large parcels. City’s Land Use/Pre-zone Designation(s): The City of San Bernardino has assigned the reorganization area as Spring Trails Specific Plan District and has been pre-zoned the area as “Specific Plan No. 10-01, Spring Trails” under its Special Purpose Zones through the City’s consideration of Ordinance No. MC- 1386, which was adopted on March 5, 2013. The underlying Spring Trails Specific Plan zoning designations within the reorganization area are Residential (Estate), Open Space, and Parks, which will take effect upon completion of the annexation process. The Spring Trails Specific Plan zone designations are the pre-zoning for the proposal area as required by Government Code §56375(a)(7). Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code §56375(e), these zoning designations shall remain in effect for a period of two (2) years following annexation unless specific actions are taken by the City Council at a public hearing. The Spring Trails Specific Plan The Spring Trails Specific Plan (Included as Attachment #5), is a proposed development within the 350-acre annexation area that was approved by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino in February 2013. At that time the Specific Plan was approved by the City, it contemplated development of 307 new single-family residential lots on approximately 242 acres and the remainder area for open space, parks, slopes, and other uses (see Figure 10). 3.d Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 11 Fig. 10 – Original Development Plan Fig. 11 – Current Development Plan However, since the City’s approval of the Specific Plan, the land area to be developed and the total number of residential lots have been reduced. Through subsequent analysis of the geology and soils within the Specific Plan area, it has been determined by the landowner that it is only feasible to construct 215 residential lots, and the land area to be developed has been significantly reduced from 242 acres to 199 acres (see Figure 11). The Current Development Plan configuration is also included as part of Attachment #1. Constraints Development of the Spring Trails Specific Plan includes a number of challenges that the Commission should be aware of given the location of the project. Below is a summary of some, but not all, of the constraints associated with the Spring Trails Specific Plan. The Spring Trails is on the northern edge of the City in the foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains. The area is generally bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest on three sides and the elevation of the site ranges from approximately 2,010 feet above sea level at its southern boundary to approximately 3,540 feet at the northern boundary. The topography of the site varies from steep (over 30% slopes) in the north and southeast portions of the site to gentle (0–15% slopes) in the central portion of the site. The site slopes to the southwest at approximately 10 to 15%. 3.d Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 12  Fire Hazard Because the San Bernardino National Forest is adjacent to the project site, with steep slopes and high winds, the Spring Trails Specific Plan area is at risk from wildland fires (see Figure 12). The Foothill Fire Zone Overlay District identifies three fire zones with different degrees of hazard based on slope, type of fuel, and natural barriers. Approximately one third of the site is in Fire Zone A (Extreme Hazard with slopes 30% or greater), one third of the site is in Fire Zone B (High Hazard with slopes of 15–30%), and the remaining third is in Fire Zone C (Moderate Hazard with slopes of 0–15%). As noted in the Spring Trails Specific Plan, areas in the Foothill Fire Zones are required to be developed with proper building separation, landscaping, and building materials; adequate emergency access and evacuation routes; and sufficient water resources. The recommended preventative measures are incorporated in the Specific Plan as standards for fuel modification zones, setbacks, landscaping methods/materials, construction materials/methods, and building protection systems. The Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Specific Plan also outlines mitigation measures on fire safety.  Fault Zone The site includes three traces of the San Andreas Fault zone, which runs in a general east–west direction (see Figure 13). As noted in the Spring Trails Specific Plan, the southern portion of the site is traversed by two faults: the main trace of the San Andreas Fault and a secondary trace just north of the main trace. The fault zone of the main trace ranges from approximately 50 feet to 150 feet wide and the fault zone of the secondary trace is approximately 40 feet wide. The Spring Trails Specific Plan has been designed to comply with the requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, which prevents the construction of buildings within 50 feet of active faults. Setbacks and additional fault studies are included as mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Spring Trails Specific Plan. Fig. 13 – Earthquake Faults Fig. 12 – Topography (Fire Zones) 3.d Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 13  Circulation Spring Trails require two points of access that directly connect to collector roads and avoid existing neighborhoods. The primary access road to Spring Trails will be through the southeast corner of the project site via a street extending from Little League Drive to the project site. Secondary access to Spring Trails will be via a street extending from the western edge of the project site to a frontage road along the I-215 Freeway. The secondary access road is designed to restrict non-resident access onto Meyers Road. The Mitigation Monitoring Program outlines mitigation measures to address wildlife corridors.  High Wind Areas The City of San Bernardino experiences periods of high velocity winds, especially in the Cajon Pass and at the bottoms of canyons. Spring Trails is included in the City’s designated High Wind Area, which has certain building standards. Development will be required to comply with the building standards for this area. The Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Specific Plan outlines development guidelines for high wind areas.  Flooding and Drainage Because Spring Trails sits on an alluvial plain on the slopes of the San Bernardino Mountains, flooding and drainage are also critical factors. Spring Trails is designed to avoid grading or construction of residences in the flood plains. These are just some of the constraints associated with the Spring Trails Specific Plan. LAFCO staff emphasizes the importance of the mitigation measures being implemented to minimize or reduce the impacts. These mitigation measures must be implemented by the City to allow development of the project. However, the Commission has no direct responsibility in implementing these mitigation measures. 3.d Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 14 SERVICE ISSUES AND EFFECTS ON OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: In every consideration for jurisdictional change, the Commission is required to look at the existing and proposed service providers within an area. Due to the vacant nature of the lands currently, government service requirements are minimal – primarily law enforcement and fire protection. The current service providers within the reorganization area include the California Highway Patrol for law enforcement along existing roadways in unincorporated areas, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, its Valley Service Zone, and its Zone FP-5, and County Service Area 70 (unincorporated, multi- function entity). In addition, the regional independent special districts, Inland Empire Resource Conservation District and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (State Water Contractor), overlay the reorganization area. Plan for Service: The City of San Bernardino has provided a “Plan for Service” for this proposal as required by law and Commission policy. The Plan includes a Fiscal Impact Analysis outlining its ability to provide its range of services and ongoing maintenance and operation to the area given the anticipated revenues and expenditures associated with the project. Also included with the materials for review is the Development Agreement approved by the City and the applicant, outlining land use assumptions, financing and service requirements for the reorganization area. The City of San Bernardino’s certified Plan for Service and Fiscal Impact Analysis and its Municipal Water Department’s certification of the Plan for Service are included as Attachment #6 to this report. In general, the Plan identifies the following:  Water Service: Water service will be provided by the City’s Municipal Water Department, as outlined in its Plan for Service. Current storage facilities nearest to Spring Trails is the Meyers Canyon Reservoir, but is not adequate for buildout of Spring Trails. Therefore, water will be supplied to Spring Trails by a combination of expanding and improving the offsite water systems and the provision of onsite reservoirs and transmission lines. The City’s Municipal Water Department outlines the need for the developer to enter into an agreement with Department and provide its share of funding to construct the infrastructure necessary to serve the new pressure zones. In addition, the developer must enter into a developer-installed agreement and provide a performance bond to install the required transmission and distribution mains for construction.  Sewer Service: There is no sewage collection system within the area at the present time. The Sewer Capacity Study concludes that the City’s existing sewer system has the capacity to accommodate the project. The City’s wastewater collection system has transferred from the City’s Public Works to the City’s Municipal Water Department. 3.d Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 15 Spring Trails would connect to the existing 10-inch main located on Little League Drive. The only offsite improvement that may be required is in North Little League Drive, which may be upgraded from an 8-inch to a 10-inch main.  Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Response: In 2016, the City of San Bernardino was annexed into the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District (County Fire), its Valley Service Zone, and its Zone FP -5 for fire protection and emergency medical response services. The area being annexed is already within the boundaries of County Fire; therefore, fire protection and emergency medical response services will continue to be provided by County Fire and its Valley Service Zone. No change in actual service provider will occur upon completion of the annexation. The entire LAFCO 3188A is currently designated as State Responsibility Area (SRA) lands. This designation would be removed upon annexation to the City and the financial burden for fire protection becomes a responsibility of the City. Fire stations and equipment of the City have since been transferred to County Fire through the City’s fire reorganization. The closest fire station is Station 232 (6065 Palm Avenue) located approximately two miles away from the project site. Water facilities for fire protection will meet water flow demands for the project. As a result of the County Fire reorganizations, one of the conditions that was agreed upon was to account for the special tax generated from within the different areas being annexed into County Fire by creating subzones of County Fire’s Service Zone FP-5. In the case for the City, Zone FP-5 San Bernardino was created to isolate said funding generated from the City. Therefore, LAFCO 3188A includes annexation to Zone FP-5 San Bernardino as part of the overall reorganization in order to isolate the funding generated from reorganization area within the City of San Bernardino.  Law Enforcement: Law enforcement responsibilities will shift from the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department to the City of San Bernardino Police Department. The area is served by a main police station located at 710 North D Street, and four designated geographical patrol districts. The project area is within the City’s patrol beat B1 in the Northwest Patrol District.  Park and Recreation: Regional park and recreation services are currently provided by the County Regional Parks system. The closest regional park is Glen Helen Regional Park, which has various recreation activities. Due to the primarily vacant nature of the reorganization area, local park amenities are not currently provided. The City of San Bernardino has a variety of parks and recreation facilities. The closest City park is the Al Guhin Park located approximately 1.3 miles from the 3.d Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 16 proposal area. The Spring Trails project plans to develop neighborhood parks, natural open space, as well as pedestrian/equestrian trails.  Solid Waste Solid waste services are currently provided by Burrtec Industries within the reorganization area and within the City of San Bernardino (by contract). No change in service provider will occur through the annexation.  Schools The area is within the San Bernardino City Unified School District (SBCUSD). Upon annexation, SBCUSD will continue to be the school district with North Verdemont Elementary School, Chavez Middle School, and Cajon High School. As required by Commission policy and State law, the Plan for Service submitted by the City of San Bernardino and its Municipal Water Department show that the extension of the City’s services to the reorganization area are required to provide the level of service anticipated by the Spring Trails Specific Plan. Such service extensions will exceed current service levels provided through the County as the area is primarily vacant at the present time. 3.d Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The City’s processing of the Spring Trails Specific Plan project included the preparation and certification of an Environmental Impact Report that was finalized by the City in 2013. LAFCO’s Environmental Consultant, Tom Dodson and Associates, has reviewed the City’s Complete Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which includes the Draft EIR and the Final EIR, and indicated that the City’s environmental documents are adequate for the Commission’s use as a responsible agency for LAFCO 3188A. Copies of the City’s Complete Final EIR and all associated documents, were provided to Commissioners on July 22, 2019. Mr. Dodson has indicated in his letter to the Commission, included as Attachment #9 to this report, the actions that are appropriate for the review of LAFCO 3188A, which are:  Certify that the Commission, its staff, and its Environmental Consultant have individually reviewed and considered the environmental assessment for the Spring Trails Specific Plan prepared by the City of San Bernardino;  Determine that the Complete Final EIR is adequate for the Commission’s use in making its decision related to LAFCO 3188A;  Determine that the Commission does not intend to adopt alternatives or additional mitigation measures for the project; that the mitigation measures identified in the City’s environmental documents for the Spring Trails project are the responsibility of the City and others, not the Commission;  Adopt the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations as presented by Mr. Dodson, which are the conclusions made regarding the significance of a project in light of the impacts and mitigation measures that have been identified . A copy of this Statement is included as a part of Attachment #9 to this report; and,  Direct the Executive Officer to file the Notice of Determination within five days and find that no further Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees are required by the Commission’s approval since the City, as lead agency, has paid said fees. WAIVER OF PROTEST PROCEEDINGS: The reorganization area is legally uninhabited (as determined by the Registrar of Voters office) and LAFCO staff verified that the study area possesses 100% landowner consent to the annexation. Therefore, if the Commission approves LAFCO 3188A and none of the affected agencies have submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest proceedings, staff is recommending that protest proceedings be waived. The actions would include direction to the Executive Officer to complete the reorganization following completion of the mandatory reconsideration period of 30-days. 3.d Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 18 CONCLUSION: In the mid-90s, the applicant already began planning the development of its landholdings that encompass the Spring Trails Specific Plan area. This began by a request to LAFCO for expansion of the City’s sphere of influence in 1996. The first development project was originally called “Martin Ranch”. As noted in the History Section of this report, the prior Martin Ranch and the current Spring Trails Specific Plan has been in the making for more than 20 years with numerous changes to the project description and multiple Draft EIRs prepared and revised since its inception. The final project approved and/or adopted by the City of San Bernardino, which is the Spring Trails Specific Plan, requires a broad range and level of municipal services that are only available through the City of San Bernardino. The reorganization area will benefit from the extension of the City’s services as well as the continuation of fire protection and emergency medical response services from the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District and its Valley Service Zone based upon the anticipated development of 215 (current configuration) single-family residences, open space, parks, and other public facilities. The Spring Trails Specific Plan was approved and adopted by the City with certain guidelines, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures. Therefore, the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A assumes that the City will adhere to the parameters that have been imposed on the Spring Trails Specific Plan and the mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Spring Trails Specific Plan. However, approval of this proposal calls into question the issue related to the adjacent unincorporated area that will become totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. This report provides for options for addressing the creation of said island territory. Staff recommendations are to:  Include a determination required by Government Code Section 56375(m), which can be applied to this proposal; and,  Include a condition that requires the City to initiate the totally-surrounded island area within one year of the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A. For all these reasons, and those outlined throughout the staff report , staff recommends approval of LAFCO 3188A. However, should the Commission choose Option 2 (to expand the proposal) then the Commission would have to continue the item in order to provide proper noticing. 3.d Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 19 RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Commission approve LAFCO 3188A by taking the following actions: 1. With respect to the environmental review: a. Certify that the Complete Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and other related environmental documents prepared by the City of San Bernardino for the Spring Trails Specific Plan have been independently reviewed and considered by the Commission, its staff and its Environmental Consultant; b. Determine that the Complete Final EIR for the project prepared by the City is adequate for the Commission’s use as a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Responsible Agency for its determination related to LAFCO 3188A. c. Determine that the Commission does not intend to adopt alternatives or additional mitigation measures for the Spring Trails Specific Plan, and that the mitigation measures identified for the project are the responsibility of the City and others, not the Commission; d. Adopt the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations as presented by the Commission’s Environmental Consultant and attached to the staff report; and, e. Direct the Executive Officer to file the Notice of Determination within five days , and find that no further Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees are required by the Commission’s approval since the City, as CEQA Lead Agency, has paid said fees. 2. Approve LAFCO 3188A, with the following determination: The Commission determines that approval of LAFCO 3188A will create an unincorporated island completely surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. Since the inclusion of the island area would likely terminate the annexation proposal due to the number of registered voters within said island, the Commission determines, pursuant to the provision of Government Code Section 56375(m), to waive the restrictions on the creation of a totally-surrounded island contained within Government Code Section 56744 because it would be detrimental to the orderly development of the community, and it further determines that the area to be surrounded by the City of San Bernardino cannot reasonably be annexed to another city or incorporated as a new city. 3. Approve LAFCO 3188A with the following conditions: a. The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of the totally-surrounded island within one year of the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A and process under standard protest proceedings. A resolution by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall be submitted to the Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the City’s commitment to fulfilling this 3.d Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 20 requirement prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion for LAFCO 3188A. A status report shall be provided to the Commission at the six month date outlining the progress of the City of San Bernardino in fulfilling its obligation. Failure on the part of the City of San Bernardino to fulfill its commitment to annex the totally-surrounded island shall require that the next annexation proposed to the City of San Bernardino, either by the City through resolution or by property owner/registered voter petition, include a condition requiring the initiation of annexation of the totally-surrounded island. Said condition of approval shall be deemed completed upon the issuance of the Certificate of Filing for said island. b. The standard LAFCO terms and conditions that include, but are not limited to, the “hold harmless” clause for potential litigation costs by the applicant and the continuation of fees, charges, and/or assessments currently authorized by the annexing agency, and the identification that the transfer of utility accounts will occur within 90 days of the recording of the Certificate of Completion. 3. Waive protest proceedings, as permitted by Government Code Section 56662(d), with 100% landowner consent to the reorganization; and, 4. Adopt LAFCO Resolution No. 3291 setting forth the Commission’s determinations, terms, and conditions of approval concerning LAFCO 3188A. 3.d Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 21 DETERMINATIONS: The following determinations are required to be provided by Commission policy and Government Code Section 56668 for any changes of organization/reorganization proposal: 1. The reorganization proposal is legally uninhabited containing four (4) registered voters within the reorganization area as certified by the Registrar of Voters as of July 22, 2019. 2. The County Assessor’s Office has determined that the total assessed value of land and improvements within the reorganization area is $1,978,576 (land--$1,876,890; improvements--$101,686) as of August 9, 2019. 3. The reorganization area is within the sphere of influence of the City of San Bernardino. 4. Legal advertisement of the Commission’s consideration has been provided through publication in The Sun, a newspaper of general circulation within the reorganization area. As required by State law, individual notice was provided to affected and interested agencies, County departments, and those individual and agencies having requested such notice. 5. In accordance with State law and adopted Commission policies, LAFCO has provided individual notice to:  landowners (2) and registered voters (4) within the reorganization area (totaling 6 notices); and,  landowners (84) and registered voters (96) surrounding the reorganization area (totaling 180 notices). Included as Attachment #7 to this report is a comment letter received by LAFCO staff from an area resident prior to the publication of the report. The letter outlines concerns related to the project such as fire safety (e.g. housing densities, slope issues, and previous fires in the area, etc.), issues regarding the access roads (e.g. roads built on fault lines, vehicle trips per day, etc.), and issues related to services from the City as well as utilities across fault lines. Comments from landowners and registered voters and any affected local agency in support or opposition will be reviewed and considered by the Commission in making its determination. 6. The City of San Bernardino adopted the Spring Trails Specific Plan (SP #10-01) along with a General Plan Amendment (GPA #02-09) and a Development Code Amendment (DCA #12-10), which pre-zoned the reorganization area as Spring Trails Specific Plan with the following underlying specific plan zone designations: Residential (Estate), Open Space, and Parks. These pre-zone/specific plan zone 3.d Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 22 designations are consistent with the City’s General Plan and are generally compatible with surrounding land uses within the City and in the County. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 56375(e), these pre-zone designations shall remain in effect for two years following annexation unless specific actions are taken by the City Council. 7. The Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG) adopted its 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP-SCS) pursuant to Government Code Section 65080. LAFCO 3188A is in close proximity with the I-215 Freeway, which is part of the RTP-SCS’s highway improvement (expansion/rehabilitation) program adding high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes between the I-210 and the I-15 Freeways for completion by 2035. 8. The City of San Bernardino adopted an updated Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) in October 2016 (Resolution No. 2016-209), which was developed by County Fire, the City’s fire service provider. Said LHMP includes the Spring Trails project as one its potential residential development. County Fire also has its Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan that was approved by FEMA in July 2017. Information contained in the Safety Element of the City’s General Plan related to Urban and Wildland Fires is included as Attachment #8. 9. As a CEQA responsible agency, the Commission’s Environmental Consultant, Tom Dodson of Tom Dodson and Associates, has reviewed the City’s environmental documents for the reorganization proposal and has indicated that the City’s environmental assessment for the Spring Trails Specific Plan are adequate for the Commission’s use as CEQA responsible agency. Copies of the City’s Complete Final EIR and all associated documents were provided to Commission members on July 22, 2019 and are also included (as web links) as part of Attachment #9 to this report (Environmental Documents Related to the City of San Bernardino’s Approval of the Spring Trails Specific Plan). Mr. Dodson has prepared his recommended actions for LAFCO 3188A, which are outlined in the narrative portion of the Environmental Considerations section (page 17 of the staff report). Attachment #9 also includes the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations that has been prepared for the Commission’s use in addressing this project. 10. The reorganization area is presently served by the following public agencies: County of San Bernardino Inland Empire Resource Conservation District San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, its Valley Service Zone, and its Zone FP-5 (fire protection and emergency medical response) County Service Area 70 (multi-function unincorporated County-wide) 3.d Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 23 The area will be detached from County Service Area 70 and its sphere of influence reduced as a function of the reorganization. None of the other agencies are affected by this proposal as they are regional in nature. 11. A plan was prepared for the extension of services to the reorganization area, as required by law. The Plan for Service and the Fiscal Impact Analysis, as certified by the City and its Municipal Water Department, indicates that the City can maintain and/or improve the level and range of services currently available in the area. A copy of this plan is included as a part of Attachment #6 to this report. The Plan for Service and Fiscal Impact Analysis have been reviewed and compared with the standards established by the Commission and the factors contained within Government Code Section 56668. The Commission finds that the Plan for Service and the Fiscal Impact Analysis conform to those adopted standards and requirements. The Plan indicates that the revenues to be provided through the transfer of property tax revenues and existing and potential financing mechanisms are anticipated to be sufficient to provide for the infrastructure and ongoing maintenance and operation of the services to be provided from the City of San Bernardino and its Municipal Water Department as well as the services from the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District and its Valley Service Zone. A copy of the Plan for Service is included as a part of Attachment #6 to this report. 12. The reorganization proposal complies with Commission policies and directives and State law that indicate the preference for areas proposed for urban intensity development to be included within a City so that the full range of municipal services can be planned, funded, extended, and maintained. However, approval of this proposal will create an island of unincorporated territory that will be totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. 13. The reorganization area can benefit from the availability and extension of municipal- level services from the City of San Bernardino and its Municipal Water Department, as evidenced by the Plan for Service certified by the City. 14. This proposal will have an effect on the City of San Bernardino’s ability to achieve its fair share of the regional housing needs as it proposes to build the addition of 215 single-family residential units. 15. With respect to environmental justice, which is the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the location of public facilities and the provision of public services, the following demographic and income profile was generated using ESRI’s Community Analyst for the City of San Bernardino and the reorganization and adjacent unincorporated areas (2019 data): 3.d Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #8 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) August 14, 2019 24 Demographic and Income Comparison City of San Bernardino (%) Reorganization Area and Adjacent Unincorporated Area (%) Race and Ethnicity •African American Alone 13.5 % 7.0 % •American Indian Alone 1.3 % 0.9 % •Asian Alone 4.2 % 4.3 % •Pacific Islander Alone 0.4 % 0.3 % •Hispanic Origin (Any Race)68.3 % 37.9 % Median Household Income $43,515 $104,564 Through future development, the reorganization area will benefit from the extension of services and facilities from the City and, at the same time, the approval of the reorganization proposal will not result in the unfair treatment of any person based on race, culture or income. 16. The County of San Bernardino (for itself and acting on behalf of the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District) and the City of San Bernardino have successfully negotiated a transfer of property tax revenues that will be implemented upon completion of this reorganization. This fulfills the requirements of Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 17. The maps and legal descriptions, as revised, are in substantial compliance with LAFCO and State standards through certification by the County Surveyor's Office. SM/ Attachments: 1.Vicinity Map, Reorganization Map, and Current Development Plan Configuration 2.Applicant’s Landowner Petition and Application Documents 3.ROV Certification of Registered Voters within LAFCO 3188 Dated July 2, 2015 4.Letter from Applicant Dated June 22, 2016 Regarding Resubmittal of Application 5.Spring Trails Specific Plan and Recorded Development Agreement 6.City of San Bernardino’s Certified Plan for Service/Fiscal Impact Analysis, Certification from the City’s Municipal Water Department 7.Comment Letter Received Prior to Staff Report Publication 8.Safety Element Portion of the City’s General Plan related to Urban and Wildland Fires 9.Letter from Tom Dodson and Associates and Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Environmental Documents Related to the City of San Bernardino’s Approval of the Spring Trails Specific Plan 10.Draft Resolution No. 3291 for LAFCO 3188A 3.d Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 3 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1170 West Third Street, Unit 150, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 (909) 388-0480 • Fax (909) 388-0481 lafco@lafco.sbcounty.gov www.sbclafco.org DATE: OCTOBER 8, 2019 FROM: SAMUEL MARTINEZ, Executive Officer TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #9: LAFCO 3188A -- Reorganization to include Annexation to the City of San Bernardino and to the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Zone FP-5 San Bernardino, and Detachment from County Service Area 70 (Spring Trails Specific Plan) BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This item was continued from the Commission’s August 21, 2019 hearing at the request of the property owner (with concurrence from the City) to allow the property owner and the City enough time to evaluate and consider the proposed condition(s) that LAFCO staff is recommending. No change has occurred since then; therefore, staff’s recommendations remain the same for LAFCO 3188A. For reference, the original staff report for LAFCO 3188A, dated August 14, 2019, is included as Attachment #1 and includes the links to each attachment. However, the Commission—as part of its motion at the August Hearing—requested that staff provide a discussion regarding access to and from the project site in order to provide for a better understanding of the issues related to traffic (circulation) as well as fire safety. Circulation The Spring Trails project will have two main access points. The primary access road (dash line with pink highlight), which provides the main access to and from Spring Trails project, is a 2-way undivided road that extends from North Little League Drive to the Spring Trails project at the southeastern section of the project site. From North Little League Drive (also a 2-way undivided road), access to the I-215 Freeway can be 3.e Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) October 8, 2019 2 reached from either Palm Avenue (via West Little League Drive or Kendall Avenue) or Devore Road/Glen Helen Parkway (via Kendall Avenue and Cajon Boulevard). The secondary access road (dash line with orange highlight), which is intended as an alternative street for local traffic to access arterial streets outside the project, is also a 2-way undivided road that runs along the western boundary of the Spring Trails project. It will connect to North Little League Drive via Frontage Road. From North Little League Drive, access to the freeway is the same as the primary access road. Fig. 1 – Circulation Map 3.e Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) October 8, 2019 3 It should be noted that the intersection of Meyers Road and the secondary access road will be constructed in such a way that either prevents or discourages access to Meyers Road. All necessary public streets, both on-site and off-site (including the extension of North Little League Drive), will be improved by the developer. Other necessary off-site improvements, such as the Palm Avenue/I-215 Freeway and Glen Helen Parkway improvements, are part of the City’s Master Facility Plan and will be funded through developer impact fees. Fire Safety (Hazards) As identified in the original staff report, no change in actual service provider will occur upon completion of the annexation since the City of San Bernardino was annexed into the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District (County Fire) and its Valley Service Zone. The area proposed for annexation is already within the boundaries of County Fire. The closest fire station is Station #232 located on 6065 Palm Avenue, which is approximately 2.1 miles away from the project site. The next closest fire station is Station #2 located in Devore (1511 Devore Road), which is approximately 4.2 miles away from the project site. The Spring Trails project evaluated response times for a number of stations using time/distance calculations from the different fire stations to the project site via Meyers Road. Below are the drive times for the two stations nearest the project site: Station MPH Miles Time 1.Station #232 45 0.78 01:02 25 0.16 00:23 35 0.43 00:44 35 0.70 01:12 Meyers 2.07 03.21 Ranch 3.31 05:29 Farthest 3.74 06:13 2. Station #2 45 2.35 03:08 35 1.38 02:22 Meyers 3.75 05:30 Ranch 4.97 07:38 Farthest 5.40 08:22 Based on the calculations identified in the Spring Trails Fire Protection Plan, Station #232 can reach the farthest portion of the site in 6m 13s and Station #2 can get to the farthest portion of the site in 8m 22s. 3.e Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) October 8, 2019 4 LAFCO staff also prepared its own analysis of the drive times from both stations to the farthest portion of the project site using the primary access road and based on actual speed limits. Staff’s analysis indicates that Station #232 can reach the farthest portion of the site in 7m 12s, and Station #2 can get to the farthest portion of the site in 11m 42s. Fig. 2 – Drive Times 3.e Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) October 8, 2019 5 The Spring Trails Fire Protection Plan outlines a number of mitigation measures including fuel modification zones, vegetation management guidelines, planting maintenance and spacing guidelines, as well as infrastructure/structural construction features and requirements. COMMENTS RECEIVED: At the August 21, 2019 hearing, the Commission received oral comments. All written comments received prior to and at the August 21 hearing can be accessed on the LAFCO website: •Comments received prior to the August 21, 2019 hearing: http://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/LAFCO/AgendaNotices/20190821/Item_08_Att1.pdf •Comments received at the August 21, 2019 hearing: http://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/LAFCO/AgendaNotices/20190821/Item_08_Att3.pdf Since then, additional comments have been received, which are included as Attachment #2 to the staff report. Overall, approximately 80 written comments have been received from landowners, registered voters, and other individuals, including one from a council member of the City of San Bernardino, Mr. Henry Nickel, and one from a non-profit organization. Most of the comments came from residents who live in the Verdemont area within the City of San Bernardino as well as residents from the unincorporated Devore community. Approximately 10 (unverified) letters opposing the project came from the island area itself. Most of the comments relate to fire, high wind, and earthquake issues including limited accessibility during an emergency. School traffic was also cited in some of the letters. Other comments relate to the City’s inability to provide code inspections/enforcement, reduced services and slow response times, and issues related to road repair and maintenance. CONCLUSION: As outlined in the original staff report, the Spring Trails Specific Plan requires a broad range and level of municipal services that are only available through the City of San Bernardino. The project would benefit from the extension of the City’s services as well as the continuation of fire protection and emergency medical response services from County Fire and its Valley Service Zone based upon the anticipated development of 215 (current configuration) single-family residences, open space, parks, and other public facilities. The Spring Trails Specific Plan was approved and adopted by the City with certain guidelines, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures. Therefore, the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A assumes that the City will adhere to the parameters that have been imposed on the Spring Trails Specific Plan and the 3.e Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) October 8, 2019 6 mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Spring Trails Specific Plan. However, as noted in the August 14, 2019 staff report, approval of this proposal calls into question the issue related to the adjacent unincorporated area that will become totally-surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. This report provides for options for addressing the creation of said island territory. Staff recommendations are to: •Include a determination required by Government Code Section 56375(m), which can be applied to this proposal; and, •Include a condition that requires the City to initiate the totally-surrounded island area within one year of the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A. For all these reasons, and those outlined throughout this staff report and the original staff report dated August 14, 2019, staff recommends approval of LAFCO 3188A. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Commission approve LAFCO 3188A by taking the following actions: 1.With respect to the environmental review: a.Certify that the Complete Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and other related environmental documents prepared by the City of San Bernardino for the Spring Trails Specific Plan have been independently reviewed and considered by the Commission, its staff and its Environmental Consultant; b.Determine that the Complete Final EIR for the project prepared by the City is adequate for the Commission’s use as a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Responsible Agency for its determination related to LAFCO 3188A. c.Determine that the Commission does not intend to adopt alternatives or additional mitigation measures for the Spring Trails Specific Plan, and that the mitigation measures identified for the project are the responsibility of the City and others, not the Commission; d.Adopt the Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations as presented by the Commission’s Environmental Consultant and attached to the staff report (Attachment #3); and, 3.e Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) October 8, 2019 7 e.Direct the Executive Officer to file the Notice of Determination within five days, and find that no further Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees are required by the Commission’s approval since the City, as CEQA Lead Agency, has paid said fees. 2.Approve LAFCO 3188A, with the following determination: The Commission determines that approval of LAFCO 3188A will create an unincorporated island completely surrounded by the City of San Bernardino. Since the inclusion of the island area would likely terminate the annexation proposal due to the number of registered voters within said island, the Commission determines, pursuant to the provision of Government Code Section 56375(m), to waive the restrictions on the creation of a totally-surrounded island contained within Government Code Section 56744 because it would be detrimental to the orderly development of the community, and it further determines that the area to be surrounded by the City of San Bernardino cannot reasonably be annexed to another city or incorporated as a new city. 3.Approve LAFCO 3188A with the following conditions: a.The City of San Bernardino shall be required to initiate annexation of the totally-surrounded island within one year of the Commission’s approval of LAFCO 3188A and process under standard protest proceedings. A resolution by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino shall be submitted to the Executive Officer of LAFCO outlining the City’s commitment to fulfilling this requirement prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion for LAFCO 3188A. A status report shall be provided to the Commission at the six-month date outlining the progress of the City of San Bernardino in fulfilling its obligation. Failure on the part of the City of San Bernardino to fulfill its commitment to annex the totally- surrounded island shall require that the next annexation proposed to the City of San Bernardino, either by the City through resolution or by property owner/registered voter petition, include a condition requiring the initiation of annexation of the totally-surrounded island. Said condition of approval shall be deemed completed upon the issuance of the Certificate of Filing for said island. b.The standard LAFCO terms and conditions that include, but are not limited to, the “hold harmless” clause for potential litigation costs by the applicant and the continuation of fees, charges, and/or assessments currently authorized by the annexing agency, and the identification that the transfer of utility accounts will occur within 90 days of the recording of the Certificate of Completion. 4.Waive protest proceedings, as permitted by Government Code Section 56662(d), with 100% landowner consent to the reorganization; and, 3.e Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Agenda Item #9 – LAFCO 3188A City of San Bernardino Reorganization (Spring Trails SP) October 8, 2019 8 5.Adopt LAFCO Resolution No. 3291 (Attachment #4) setting forth the Commission’s determinations, terms, and conditions of approval concerning LAFCO 3188A. Attachments: 1.Original Staff Report for LAFCO 3188A Dated August 14, 2019 2.Letters Received After the August 21, 2019 Hearing 3.Letter from Tom Dodson and Associates and Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Environmental Documents Related to the City of San Bernardino’s Approval of the Spring Trails Specific Plan 4.Draft Resolution No. 3291 3.e Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: CED.Spring Trails.Attachment 4 5.6.20 (6695 : Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex a 26 Acre Area Containing 6 Parcels) Page 1 Public Hearing City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities District 2019-1 Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Hold a Public Hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-89 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified electors the question of levying a special tax within the are proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and 3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-90 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and 5. Introduce Ordinance No. MC-1536 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2020 -21 to pay the annual costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, a reserve fund for capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services); and 6. Schedule the final reading and adoption of Ordinance No MC -1536 for May 20, 2020. Background On April 1, 2020, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -57, a Resolution of Intention to annex territory into Community Facilities District No. 2019 -1 4 Packet Pg. 86 6688 Page 2 (Maintenance Services) of the City of San Bernardino (the “Resolution of Intention”), pursuant to the provisions of the “Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”. A public hearing was set for May 6, 2020 on the proposed annexation of the said territ ory into the community facilities district. As required by the Resolution of Intention, a boundary map was recorded on October 29, 2019, at 2:47 p.m. in Book 89 Page 4, Document No. 2019-0389012 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts with the San Bernardino County Recorder. The Resolution of Intention was adopted by the Mayor and City Council in response to a petition filed by the property owner of approximately 56 gross acres of vacant industrial property within the City, requesting that the City assist them in annexing their properties into CFD No. 2019-1 under the Mello-Roos Act. The State legislature enacted the Mello- Roos Act in 1982 to assist public agencies in financing certain public improvements by either issuing tax exempt securities that are repaid by annual levy of special taxes, or to provide for the financing of on-going public services. The landowner requested the City annex into CFD No. 2019-1 to levy a special tax to cover the costs associated with the maintenance of public improvements. The public facilities and services proposed to be financed within the territory to be annexed to the District are the following: 1. Maintenance of median landscaping and other public improvements installed within the public rights-of-way; and 2. City and County costs associated with the setting, levying and collection of the special tax, and in the administration of the District including the contract administration and for the collection of reserve funds. The area proposed within Annexation No. 2 is approximately 56 gross acres of vacant industrial property within PM 19814. The proposed area to be annexed into the CFD will be included in Tax Zone 3 and is located south of East Orange Show Road bordered by Waterman Avenue to the east. The proposed development is approximately 1,065,000 square feet of industrial high cube logistics warehouse building. The proposed total maximum tax rate for Tax Zone 3 is $608 per acre for FY 2020/21. Public Property and homeowner’s association property are exempt from the special tax. The maximum annual tax rate is proposed to escalate each year at the greater of Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 2%. The property owners have agreed to initiate and conduct the CFD annexation proceedings pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act of 1982. The property owners have submitted a “Consent and Waiver” form on file in the City Clerk’s Office to initiate and conduct proceedings pursuant to the Mello -Roos Act in 1982, for the annexation into the CFD and consenting to the s hortening of election time requirements, waiving analysis and arguments, and waiving all notice requirements relating to the conduct of the election. On April 1, 2020, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -57, a Resolution of Intention to annex territory into Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) of the City of San Bernardino (the “Resolution of Intention”), 4 Packet Pg. 87 6688 Page 3 pursuant to the provisions of the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”. In order to annex property to CFD No. 2019-1 pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 53311 et seq., the City must adopt a series of three statutorily required Resolutions and an Ordinance which are summarized below: Resolution declaring City intent to annex territory to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 including the boundary of the area to be annexed and the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes within the annexation area (the special tax applies only to properties within the annexation area), adopted October 16, 2019. Resolution calling an election to submit to the qualified electors the question of levying a special tax within the area proposed to be annexed to the District. Resolution declaring the results of the election and directing the recording of the notice of special tax lien. Amend the Ordinance and order the levy and collection of special taxes in the District. With the adoption of the Resolutions and the first reading of the amended Ordinance, the second reading of the amended Ordinance would be scheduled for May 20, 2020. Discussion The Resolution of Intention called for a public hearing is to be held on May 6, 2020 on the issue of the annexation of territory into CFD No. 2019-1. Under the Mello-Roos Act, the Mayor and City Council must hold a public hearing and consider any protests against the formation of the CFD. If the owners of one half or more of the land within the proposed boundaries of the CFD file written protests against the establishment of the CFD, the Mayor and City Council may not create the CFD. If a majority protest is not filed, the Mayor and City Council may adopt the resolution establishing the CFD. Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-178 on July 17, 2019 established CFD 2019-1, pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 53325.1. After a CFD is formed, the Mello-Roos Act requires that for any annexations into the CFD an election be held on the question of whether the proposed special taxes should be levied. The election requires a two-thirds vote in favor of levying the special tax. The landowners filed waivers with respect to the conduct of the election pursuant to Government Code Sections 53326(a) and 53327(b), meaning that the time limits and procedural requirements for conducting an election under the Mello-Roos Act do not have to be followed. Accordingly, City staff has already mailed the election ballots to the landowners and required the ballots to be returned by the close of the public hearing . If the Mayor and City Council adopt Resolution No. 2020-89, it may immediately proceed to the opening of the ballots and adopt Resolution No. 2020 -90, declaring the results of the election. 4 Packet Pg. 88 6688 Page 4 2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals Formation of this CFD is consistent with Key Target No 4a: Secure a long-term revenue source. Funding from district assessments will create sustainable financial support for ongoing maintenance of landscape and infrastructure associated with the district location. Fiscal Impact No General Fund impact. The individual property owners in the CFD will be responsible for annual payments of special taxes. It is estimated, upon full completion of the development, there will be an annual collection of special tax revenues of approximately $33,789 to be used to pay for maintenance costs within the development. On June 1 of each year, every taxable unit for which a building permit has been issued within the boundaries of the CFD, will be subject to the special tax for the ensuing Fiscal Year. If the anticipated costs of maintaining the facilities in any given Fiscal Year, prior to build-out of the project, exceeds the special tax revenues available from parcels for which building permits have been issued, then the special tax may also be applied to property within recorded final subdivision maps, as well as other undeveloped property within the boundaries of the CFD. All costs associated with annexation into the CFD have been borne by the Developer. By annexing into the CFD, the costs of maintaining improvements located within the development will be financed through special taxes levied on the parcels within CFD No. 2019-1 and not through the City’s General Fund. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Hold a Public Hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-89 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified electors the question of levying a special tax within the are proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and 3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-90 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 2); and 5. Introduce Ordinance No. MC-1536 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2020 -21 to pay the annual costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, a reserve fund for capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San 4 Packet Pg. 89 6688 Page 5 Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services); and 6. Schedule the final reading and adoption of Ordinance No MC -1536 for May 20, 2020. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2020-89; Exhibit A - Description of Services; Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment Attachment 2 Project Map Attachment 3 Resolution No. 2020-90; Exhibit A - Description of Services; Exhibit B - Parcel List Attachment 4 Certificate of Election Results Attachment 5 Ordinance No. MC-1536 Attachment 6 Ordinance MC-1522 Attachment 7 Petition Attachment 8 Recorded Map Attachment 9 PowerPoint Ward: ALL Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: June 5, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-81, a Resolution of Intention to form Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) of the City of San Bernardino (the “Resolution of Intention”), pursuant to the provisions of the “Mello - Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”. July 17, 2019 Resolution No. 2019-178 was adopted establishing Community Facilities District No. 2019-1; Resolution No. 2019-179 was adopted declaring election results for Community Facilities District No. 2019-1; and first reading of Ordinance No. MC-1522 levying special taxes to be collected during FY 2019-20 to pay annual costs of maintenance, services and expenses with respect to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1. August 7, 2019 Final reading of Ordinance No. MC-1522 levying special taxes to be collected during FY 2019-20 to pay annual costs of maintenance, services and expenses with respect to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1. April 1, 2020 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-57, a Resolution of Intention to annex territory into Community Facil ities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) of the City of San Bernardino (the “Resolution of Intention”), pursuant to the provisions of the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”. 4 Packet Pg. 90 Resolution No. 2020-89 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AN ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THE QUESTION OF LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) (ANNEXATION NO. 2) WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”), adopted its Resolution No. 2019-081, (the “Resolution of Intention”) (i) declaring its intention to establish Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (the “CFD No. 2019-1”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the “Government Code”), (ii) proposing to levy a special taxes within CFD No. 2019-1 pursuant to the terms of the Act to fund the cost of providing maintenance services (the “Services”) described in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council set a public hearing for July 17, 2019 after which the Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-081 forming the CFD No. 2019-1 and calling a special election at which the questions of levying a special tax and establishing an appropriations limit with respect to the CFD No. 2019-1 were submitted to the qualified electors within the CFD No. 2019-1; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-081 declaring the results of the special election and finding that more than two-thirds (2/3) of all votes cast at the special election were cast in favor of the proposition presented, and such proposition passed; and WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 53339) of Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code as amended (the "Act"), to annex territory into an existing community facilities district by complying with the procedures set forth in said Article 3.5; and WHEREAS, the City Council on April 1, 2020 duly adopted Resolution No. 2020-57 (the “Resolution of Intention”) declaring its intention to annex certain territory to CFD No. 2019- 1 (Maintenance Services) and to levy a special tax within that territory to pay for certain services and setting a time and place for the public hearing on the proposed annexation for May 6, 2020; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is identified in a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 2 Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services)" a copy of which was recorded, on April 8, 2020, in Book 89 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 14, in the office of the San Bernardino County Recorder; and 4.a Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Resolution No. 2020-89 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act and the Resolution of Intention, a noticed public hearing was convened by the City Council on May 6, 2020, not earlier than the hour of 7:00 p.m. at the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California, 92418, relative to the proposed annexation of said territory to CFD No. 2019-1. At the hearing, the testimony of all interested persons for or against the annexation of the territory or the levying of the special taxes will be heard. If and to the extent participation in the May 6, 2020 meeting must occur by teleconference, videoconference, or other electronic means authorized by the Ralph M. Brown Act or an Executive Order of the Governor of California, the means and methods for participating the meeting shall be posted on the Agenda for said meeting, which shall be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting on the City of San Bernardino (www.sbcity.org), and outside of the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California, 92418. A copy of the Agenda will be made available upon request to the San Bernardino City Clerk's office at 909- 384-5002; and WHEREAS, written protests have not been filed by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the CFD No 2019-1, or by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory to be annexed, or by the owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the area within the CFD No. 2019-1, or by the owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that there are fewer than twelve registered voters residing in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD No. 2019-1 and that the qualified electors in such territory are the landowners; and WHEREAS, on the basis of all of the foregoing, the City Council has determined at this time to call an election to authorize the annexation of territory to the CFD No. 2019-1 and the levying of a special tax as described in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a written instrument from each landowner in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD No. 2019-1 consenting to the shortening of election time requirements, waiving analysis and arguments, and waiving all notice requirements relating to the conduct of the election; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has concurred in the election date set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ACTING EX OFFICIO AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) OF THE CITY OF SAN BERANRDINO, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. Conformation of Finding in Resolution of Intention. The City Council reconfirms all of its findings and determinations as set forth in the Resolution of Intention. 4.a Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Resolution No. 2020-89 SECTION 3. Findings Regarding Protests. The City Council finds and determines that written protests to the proposed annexation of territory to the CFD No. 2019-1 and the levy of the special tax within such territory are insufficient in number and in amount under the Act, and the City Council hereby further orders and determines that all such protests are hereby overruled. SECTION 4. Findings Regarding Prior Proceedings. The City Council finds and determines that all prior proceedings had and taken by the City Council with respect to the annexation of territory to CFD No. 2019-1 are valid and in conformity with the requirements of the Act. SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 6. Levy of Special Tax. As stated in the Resolution of Intention, except where funds are otherwise available, subject to the approval of the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs of the Services (including incidental expenses as described in the Resolution of Intention), secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all nonexempt real property in CFD No. 2019-1, will be levied annually in CFD No. 2019-1. The rate and method of apportionment, and manner of collection of the special tax are specified in Exhibit A hereto. SECTION 7. Apportionment of Tax. The special tax as apportioned to each parcel is based on the cost of making the Services available to each parcel, or other reasonable basis, and is not based on or upon the ownership of real property. SECTION 8. Tax Roll Preparation. The office of the Public Works Director, 201 North “E” Street, San Bernardino, California 92418, is hereby designated as the office that will be responsible for annually preparing a current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor’s parcel number and that will be responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to Government Code section 53340.2. The Public Works Director may cause these functions to be performed by his or her deputies, assistants, or other designated agents. SECTION 9. Accountability Measures. Pursuant to Section 50075.1 of the California Government Code, the City shall create a separate account into which tax proceeds will be deposited; and the Public Works Director annually shall file a report with the City Council that will state (a) the amount of funds collected and expended and (b) the status of the Services financed in CFD No. 2019-1. SECTION 10. Special Election; Voting Procedures. The City Council hereby submits the questions of levying the special tax within the territory proposed to be annexed to the qualified electors, in accordance with and subject to the Act. The special election shall be held on May 6, 2020, and shall be conducted as follows: 4.a Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Resolution No. 2020-89 (a) Qualified Electors. The City Council hereby determines that the Services are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of development occurring within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1. Because fewer than twelve registered voters resided within the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1 on April 7, 2020 (a date within the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing on the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1), the qualified electors shall be the landowners within territory proposed to be annexed, and each landowner who was the owner of record at the close of the hearing shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that such landowner owns within the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1. (b) Consolidation of Elections; Combination of Propositions on Ballot. The election on the question of levying the special tax and establishing an appropriations limit for CFD No. 2019-1 shall be consolidated, and the two proportions shall be combined into a single ballot proposition for submission to the voters, as authorized by Government Code Section 53353.5. (c) Mail Ballot Election. Pursuant to Government Code section 53327.5, the election shall be conducted as a mail ballot election. The City Council hereby ratifies the City Clerk’s delivery of a ballot to each landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1. The City Council hereby ratifies the form of the ballot, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. (d) Return of Ballots. The City Clerk shall accept the ballots of the landowners up to 7:00 p.m. on May 6, 2020. The City Clerk shall have available ballots that may be marked at the City Clerk’s office on the election day by voters. Once all qualified electors have voted, the City Clerk may close the election. (e) Canvass of Election. The City Clerk shall commence the canvass of the returns of the special election as soon as the election is closed (on May 6, 2020, or when all qualified electors have voted) at the City Clerk’s office. At the conclusion of the canvass, the City Clerk shall declare the results of the election. (f) Declaration of Results. The City Council shall declare the results of the special election following the completion of the canvass of the returns and shall cause to be inserted into its minutes a statement of the results of the special election as ascertained by the canvass of the returns. SECTION 11. Filing of Resolution and Map with City Clerk. The City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to file a copy of this resolution and the annexation map of the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1 in her office. SECTION 12. Effect. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. 4.a Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Resolution No. 2020-89 APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, this 6th day of May 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 4.a Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Resolution No. 2020-89 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-____, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of May 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of __________, 2020. ____________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 4.a Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2 - Reso Calling an Election v3 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019-1, as provided by Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing and/or replacing landscaped areas (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right-of-ways, public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar landscaped areas officially dedicated for public use. These services including the following: (a) maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street lights and traffic signals; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and standards; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities; maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and (b) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, infiltration basins, flood control channels, fossil fuel filters, and similar facilities. Maintenance services may include but is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality improvements, fossil fuel filters within the public right-of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and outlets; erosion repairs; and cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance, servicing; or both of the water quality basin improvements within flood control channel improvements; and (c) public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD No. 2019-1; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD No. 2019-1. In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in Exhibit B to this resolution of intention. The above services shall be limited to those provided within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1 or for the benefit of the properties within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1, as the boundary is expanded from time to time by anticipated annexations, and said services may be financed by proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019-1 only to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of CFD No. 2019-1 before CFD No. 2019-1 was created. 4.b Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2A Exhibit A - Description of Services (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to EXHIBIT B    RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR   COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)  OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO    A Special Tax (the “Special Tax”) shall be levied on and collected from each Assessor’s Parcel (defined  below) in Community Facilities District No. 2019‐1 (Maintenance Services) (the “CFD No. 2019‐1” or  “CFD”; defined below), in each Fiscal Year, (defined below), commencing in the Fiscal Year beginning July  1, 2019, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, acting in its capacity  as the legislative body of CFD No. 2019‐1, by applying the rate and method of apportionment set forth  below.  All of the real property in CFD No. 2019‐1, unless exempted by law or by the provisions herein,  shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided herein.    A. DEFINITIONS    “Acre” or “Acreage” means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on any Assessor’s Parcel  Map, or if the land area is not shown on the Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area as shown on the  applicable Final Map, or if the area is not shown on the applicable Final Map, the land area shall be  calculated by the Administrator.    “Administrative Expenses” means the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the  formation, annexation, and administration of CFD No. 2019‐1 including, but not limited to: the costs  of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether  by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs to the City, CFD No. 2019‐1, or any designee thereof  associated with fulfilling the CFD No. 2019‐1 disclosure requirements; the costs associated with  responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2019‐1 or  any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; and the City's annual administration fees  including payment of a proportional share of salaries and benefits of any City employees and City  overhead whose duties are related to the administration and third party expenses.  Administrative  Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2019‐1 for any  other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2019‐1, including attorney's fees and other costs related to  commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes.    “Administrator” means the City Manager of the City of San Bernardino, or his or her designee.    “Approved Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property that are included in a Final  Map that was recorded prior to the March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being  levied, and that have not been issued a building permit on or prior to the March 1 preceding the Fiscal  year in which the special tax is being levied.    “Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel of land that is identifiable by an Assessor’s Parcel Number  by the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino.    “Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by  Assessor’s Parcel Number.    “Assessor’s Parcel Number” means that identification number assigned to a parcel by the County  Assessor of the County.  4.c Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on “Building Square Footage” or “BSF” means the floor area square footage reflected on the original  construction building permit issued for construction of a building of Non‐Residential Property and any  Building Square Footage subsequently added to a building of such Taxable Property after issuance of  a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building.    “Calendar Year” means the period commencing January 1 of any year and ending the following  December 31.     “CFD” or “CFD No. 2019‐1” means the City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019‐ 1 (Maintenance Services).    “City” means the City of San Bernardino.     “Contingent Special Tax B Requirement” means that amount required in any Fiscal Year, if the POA  is unable to maintain the Service(s) to: (i) pay the costs of Services incurred or otherwise payable in  the Calendar Year commencing in such  Fiscal  Year;  (ii)  fund  an  operating  reserve  for  the  costs   of  Services  as determined by the Administrator; less a credit for funds available to reduce the annual  Special Tax B (Contingent) levy as determined by the Administrator.    “County” means the County of San Bernardino.    “Developed Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property for which a building permit  for new construction has been issued on or prior to March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the  Special Tax is being levied.    “Exempt Property” means all Assessors’ Parcels designated as being exempt from the Special Tax as  provided for in Section G.     “Final Map” means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map, or lot line  adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.)  or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual  lots for which building permits may be issued without further subdivision.      “Fiscal Year” means the period from and including July 1st of any year to and including the following  June 30th.    “Land Use Category” or “LUC” means any of the categories contained in Section B hereof to which an  Assessor’s Parcel is assigned consistent with the land use approvals that have been received or  proposed for the Assessor’s Parcel as of March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is  being levied.    “Maximum Special Tax” means either Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B  (Contingent), as applicable.    “Maximum Special Tax A” means the Maximum Special Tax A, as determined in accordance with  Section C below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property  within CFD No. 2019‐1.    4.c Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on “Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)” means the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent), as  determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's  Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2019‐1.    “Multi‐Family Residential Property” means any Assessor’s Parcel of residential property that consists  of a building or buildings comprised of attached Residential Units sharing at least one common wall  with another unit.   “Non‐Residential Property” or “NR” means all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property for which a  building permit(s) was issued for a non‐residential use.  The Administrator shall make the  determination if an Assessor’s Parcel is Non‐Residential Property.   “Property Owner’s Association” or “POA” means the property owner’s association or homeowner’s   association established to maintain certain landscaping within a Tax Zone.    “Proportionately” means for Taxable Property that is: (i) Developed Property, that the ratio of the  actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Developed Property  with the same Tax Zone, (ii) Approved Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the  Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Approved Property with the same Tax Zone, and  (iii) Undeveloped Property that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy per acre to the Maximum  Special Tax per acre is the same for all Parcels of Undeveloped Property with the same Tax Zone.    “Residential Unit” or "RU" means a residential unit that is used or intended to be used as a domicile  by one or more persons, as determined by the Administrator.    “Residential Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property upon which completed  Residential Units have been constructed or for which building permits have been or may be issued for  purposes of constructing one or more Residential Units.    “Service(s)” means services permitted under the Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982  including, without limitation, those services authorized to be funded by CFD No. 2019‐1 as set forth  in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time the CFD was formed.     “Single Family Residential Property” means any residential property other than Multi‐Family  Residential Property on an Assessor’s Parcel.  “Special Tax(es)” means the Special Tax A and/or Special Tax B (Contingent) to be levied in each Fiscal  Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property.    “Special Tax A” means the annual special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel  of Taxable Property to fund the Special Tax A Requirement.    "Special Tax A Requirement" means for each Tax Zone, that amount to be collected in any Fiscal Year  to pay for certain costs as required to meet the needs for such Tax Zone of CFD No. 2019‐1 in both  the current Fiscal Year and the next Fiscal Year. The costs to be covered shall be the direct costs for  maintenance services including but not limited to (i) maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways,  streets, roads and open space, (ii) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements, (iii)  public street sweeping, (iv) fund an operating reserve for the costs of Services as determined by the  Administrator, and (v) Administrative Expenses. Under no circumstances shall the Special Tax A  Requirement include funds for Bonds.  4.c Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on “Special Tax B (Contingent)” means the Special Tax B (Contingent) to be levied in each Fiscal Year on  each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property to fund the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement, if  required.    "Taxable Property" means all Assessor’s Parcels within CFD No. 2019‐1, which are not Exempt  Property.    “Taxable Unit” means a Residential Unit, Building Square Footage, or an Acre. "Tax Zone" means a mutually exclusive geographic area, within which particular Special Tax rates may  be levied pursuant to this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.  Appendix C identifies  the Tax Zone in CFD No. 2019‐1 at formation; additional Tax Zones may be created when property is  annexed into the CFD.    "Tax Zone 1" means the specific geographic area identified on the CFD Boundary Map as Tax Zone 1.    "Tract(s)" means an area of land; i) within a subdivision identified by a particular tract number on a  Final Map, ii) identified within a Parcel Map; or iii) identified within lot line adjustment approved for  subdivision.    “Undeveloped Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed  Property or Approved Property.    B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES  For each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2019‐1 shall be classified  as Developed Property, Approved Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy  of Special Taxes as determined pursuant to Sections C and D below. Assessor’s Parcels of Developed  Property and Approved Property shall be classified as either Residential Property or Non‐Residential  Property.  Residential Property shall be further classified as Single Family Residential Property or  Multi‐Family Residential Property and the number of Residential Units shall be determined by the  Administrator.    C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES  For purposes of determining the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Assessor’s Parcels of Developed  Property and Approved Property which are classified as Residential Property, all such Assessor’s  Parcels shall be assigned the number of Residential Unit(s) constructed or to be constructed thereon  as specified in or shown on the building permit(s) issued or Final Map as determined by the  Administrator.  For Parcels of undeveloped property zoned for development of single family attached  or multi‐family units, the number of Residential Units shall be determined by referencing the  condominium plan, apartment plan, site plan or other development plan, or by assigning the  maximum allowable units permitted based on the underlying zoning for the Parcel.  Once a single  family attached or multi‐family building or buildings have been built on an Assessor's Parcel, the  Administrator shall determine the actual number of Residential Units contained within the building  or buildings, and the Special Tax A levied against the Parcel in the next Fiscal Year shall be calculated  by multiplying the actual number of Residential Units by the Maximum Special Tax per Residential  Unit identified for the Tract below or as included in Appendix A as each Annexation occurs.  For purposes of determining the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Assessor’s Parcels of Developed  Property and Approved Property which are classified as Non‐Residential Property, all such Assessor’s  4.c Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Parcels shall be assigned the number of Building Square Footage or Acres as shown on the Final Map  as determined by the Administrator.  Once the Administrator determines the actual number of  Building Square Footage or Acres for the Assessor’s Parcels, the Special Tax A levied against the  Assessor’s Parcel in the next Fiscal Year shall be calculated by multiplying the number of Building  Square Footage or Acres by the Maximum Special Tax per Taxable Unit identified for the Tax Zone  below or as included in Appendix A as each Annexation occurs.  1.  Special Tax A  a. Developed Property  (i) Maximum Special Tax A   The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property shall be specific  to each Tax Zone within the CFD.  When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1,  the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax  A for the Tax Zones annexed and included in Appendix A.  The Maximum Special Tax A for  Developed Property for Fiscal Year 2019‐2020 within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 1 below:  TABLE 1  MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A RATES  DEVELOPED PROPERTY    Tax  Zone  Tract Land Use Category  Taxable  Unit  Maximum  Special Tax A  1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential Property RU $961    (ii) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A   On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax A for Developed  Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items)  for Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the  preceding Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.    (iii) Multiple Land Use Categories   In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one  Land Use Category.  The Maximum Special Tax A that can be levied on an Assessor's Parcel  shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax A that can be levied for each Land Use Category  located on that Assessor's Parcel.  For an Assessor's Parcel that contains more than one land  use, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based  on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the  site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel.  The Administrator's allocation to each type of  property shall be final.    b.  Approved Property  The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor’s Parcel of Approved  Property shall be specific to  each Tax Zone within the CFD.  When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate  and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax A for the  Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.  The Maximum Special Tax A for Approved property  Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 2 below:  4.c Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on TABLE 2  MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A RATES  APPROVED PROPERTY    Tax  Zone  Tract Land Use Category  Taxable  Unit  Maximum  Special Tax A  1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential RU $961    On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax A for Approved Property  shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los Angeles  ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii)  by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.    c.  Undeveloped Property  The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor’s Parcel of Undeveloped Property shall be specific  to each Tax Zone within the CFD.  When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the  rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax A for  the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.  The Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped  Property for Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 3 below:  TABLE 3  MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A RATES  UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY    Tax Zone Tracts Taxable Unit Maximum Special Tax A  1 TR 17170 Acre $4,338    On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property  shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los Angeles  ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii)  by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.    2. Special Tax B (Contingent)  The City Council shall levy Special Tax B (Contingent) only in the event the POA defaults in its bligation  to maintain the Contingent Services, which default shall be deemed to have occurred, as determined  by the Administrator, in each of the following circumstances:    (a) The POA files for bankruptcy;  (b) The POA is dissolved;  (c) The POA ceases to levy annual assessments for the Contingent Services; or  (d) The POA fails to provide the Contingent Services at the same level as the City provides similar  services and maintains similar improvements throughout the City and within ninety (90) days  after written notice from the City, or such longer period permitted by the City Manager, fails  to remedy the deficiency to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Council.    a. Developed Property     (i) Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)  4.c Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on  The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property is  shown in Table 4 and shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD.  When additional  property is annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate and method adopted for the annexed  property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Tax Zones annexed  and included in Appendix A.  The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Fiscal Year 2019‐20  within Tax Zone 1 is identified in Table 4 below:  TABLE 4  MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B (CONTINGENT) RATES  DEVELOPED PROPERTY    Tax  Zone  Tract Land Use Category  Taxable  Unit  Maximum Special   Tax B (Contingent)  1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential Property RU $0    (ii) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)   On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for  Developed Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index  (All Items) for Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of  the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.    (iii) Multiple Land Use Categories   In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one  Land Use Category.  The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) that can be levied on an  Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) that can be  levied for each Land Use Category located on that Assessor's Parcel.  For an Assessor's Parcel  that contains more than one land use, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated  to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as  determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel.  The  Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final.    b.  Approved Property  The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property is shown  in Table 5 and shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD.  When additional property is  annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect  the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.   The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within the Tax Zone is identified  in Table 5 below:  TABLE 5  MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B (CONTINGENT) RATES  APPROVED PROPERTY    Tax  Zone  Tract Land Use Category  Taxable  Unit  Maximum Special   Tax B (Contingent)  1 TR 17170 Single Family Residential Property RU $0    On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Approved  Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for  4.c Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding  Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.    c.  Undeveloped Property  The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property is shown  in Table 6 and shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD.  When additional property is  annexed into CFD No. 2019‐1, the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect  the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.   The Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Fiscal Year 2019‐20 within the Tax Zone is identified  in Table 6 below:  TABLE 6  MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B (CONTINGENT) RATES  UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY    Tax Zone  Tracts Taxable Unit  Maximum Special   Tax B (Contingent)  1 TR 17170 Acre $0    On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2020 the Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) for Undeveloped  Property shall increase by i) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los  Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year,  or ii) by two percent (2.0%), whichever is greater.    D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX  1.  Special Tax A  Commencing with Fiscal Year 2019‐20 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine  the Special Tax A Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax A on all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable  Property until the aggregate amount of Special Tax A equals the Special Tax A Requirement for each  Tax Zone.  The Special Tax A shall be levied for each Fiscal Year as follows:    First: The Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed  Property within each Tax Zone up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax to satisfy the Special  Tax A Requirement for such Tax Zone;    Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement for a Tax Zone  after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each  Parcel of Approved Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax A for  Approved Property;    Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement for a Tax Zone  after the first two steps has been completed, the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on all  Assessor’s Parcels of Undeveloped Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum Special  Tax A for Undeveloped Property.  2.  Special Tax B (Contingent)  Commencing with Fiscal Year in which Special Tax B (Contingent) is authorized to be levied and for  each following Fiscal Year, the City Council shall determine the Contingent Special Tax B (Contingent)  Requirement for each Tax Zone, if any, and shall levy the Special Tax on all Assessor’s Parcels of  4.c Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Taxable Property within such Tax Zone until the aggregate amount of Special Tax B (Contingent) equals  the Special Tax B ( Contingent) Requirement for such Tax Zone.  The Special Tax B (Contingent) Shall  be levied for each Fiscal Year as follows:    First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed  Property for a Tax Zone up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent) to satisfy  the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement;    Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement after  the first step has been completed, the Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied Proportionately on  each Parcel of Approved Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B  (Contingent) for Approved Property;    Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Contingent Special Tax B Requirement after  the first two steps has been completed, the Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied Proportionately  on all Assessor’s Parcels of Undeveloped Property within such Tax Zone up to 100% of the Maximum  Special Tax B (Contingent) for Undeveloped Property.      E. FUTURE ANNEXATIONS  It is anticipated that additional properties will be annexed to CFD No. 2019‐1 from time to time.  As  each annexation is proposed, an analysis will be prepared to determine the annual cost for providing  Services.  Based on this analysis, the property to be annexed, pursuant to California Government Code  section 53339 et seq. will be assigned to the appropriate Maximum Special Tax rate for the Tax Zone  when annexed and included in Appendix A.    F. DURATION OF SPECIAL TAX   For each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax A shall be levied as long as the Services are being provided.  For each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied as long as the Contingent Services  are being provided.    G. EXEMPTIONS    The City shall classify as Exempt Property within CFD No. 2019‐1, any Assessor’s Parcels; (i) which are  owned by, irrevocably offered for dedication, encumbered by or restricted in use by any public entity;  (ii) with public or utility easements making impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set  forth in the easement; (iii) which are privately owned but are encumbered by or restricted solely for  public uses; or (iv) which is in use in the performance of a public function as determined by the  Administrator.     H. APPEALS   Any property owner claiming that the amount or application of the Special Taxes are not correct may  file a written notice of appeal with the City not later than twelve months after having paid the first  installment of the Special Tax that is disputed.  A representative(s) of CFD No. 2019‐1 shall promptly  review the appeal, and if necessary, meet with the property owner, consider written and oral evidence  regarding the amount of the Special Tax, and rule on the appeal.  If the representative’s decision  requires that the Special Tax for an Assessor’s Parcel be modified or changed in favor of the property  owner, a cash refund shall not be made, but an adjustment shall be made to the Special Tax on that  Assessor’s Parcel in the subsequent Fiscal Year(s).    4.c Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on    I. MANNER OF COLLECTION   The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem  property taxes, provided, however, that CFD No. 2019‐1 may collect the Special Tax at a different time  or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations.     4.c Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on APPENDIX A    CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO  COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)                  COST ESTIMATE  Special Tax A Services ‐ The estimate breaks down the costs of providing one year's maintenance  services for Fiscal Year 2019‐20.  These services are being funded by the levy of Special Tax A for  Community Facilities District No. 2019‐1.  TAX ZONE 3   PM 19814    Item Description Estimated Cost  1 Landscaping $27,031  2 Reserves $4,055  3 Admin $2,703  Total  $33,789.25    Special Tax B Contingent Services – There are no services being funded by the levy of Special Tax  B (Contingent) for Community Facilities District No. 2019‐1.  However, additional Tax Zones may  have Special Tax B Contingent Services being provided.     MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAXES ASSIGNED TO EACH TAX ZONE    Tax  Zone  Fiscal  Year  Included   Tract/  APN  No. of   Taxable  Units  Land Use   Category   Taxable   Unit   Maximum   Special Tax  A   Maximum   Special Tax B   (Contingent) Subdivider  3 2019‐20 PM 19814 56  Commercial  Acre $608 $0 GSW #4 Development  APPROVED AND UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY     The Maximum Special Tax for Tax Zone 3 for Approved Property and Undeveloped Property for  Fiscal Year 2020‐21 is $608 per acre.  4.c Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on TAX ZONE SUMMARY      Annexation  Tax  Zone  Tract  APN  Fiscal  Year  Maximum  Special Tax A  Maximum  Special Tax B    Subdivider  Original 1 17170 2019‐20 $961 / RU $0 / RU Santiago Communities, Inc.  1 2 17329 2019‐20 $473 / RU $0 / RU JEC Enterprises, Inc.  2 3 PM 19814 2020‐21 $608 / Acre $0 / Acre GWS #4 Development, LLC  3 4 0266‐041‐39 2019‐20 $1,136/ Acre $0/ Acre  Devore Storage Facility,  LLC      ESCALATION OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAXES  On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2021 the Maximum Special Tax shall increase by i) the  percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) for Los Angeles ‐ Riverside ‐ Orange  County (1982‐84 = 100) since the beginning of the preceding Fiscal Year, or ii) by two percent  (2.0%), whichever is greater.  4.c Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on APPENDIX B    CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO  COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)           DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES    The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019‐1, as provided by  Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing  and/or replacing landscaped areas (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right‐of‐ways,  public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar landscaped areas officially dedicated for public  use. These services including the following:  (a)    maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which  maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street  lights and traffic signals; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and  standards; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or  adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities;  maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures  situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or  recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and    (b)  maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage  and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, infiltration  basins, flood control channels, fossil fuel filters, and similar facilities.  Maintenance services may include  but is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality  improvements, fossil fuel filters within the public right‐of‐way including the removal of petroleum  hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and  outlets; erosion repairs; and cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance,  servicing; or both of the water quality basin improvements within flood control channel improvements;  and    (c)  public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD No.  2019‐1; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD No. 2019‐1; and any  portions adjacent to the properties within CFD No. 2019‐1; and    In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may  be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in the Rate and Method of  Apportionment.   The above services shall be limited to those provided within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019‐1 or for the  benefit of the properties within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019‐1, as the boundary is expanded from time  to time by anticipated annexations, and said services may be financed by proceeds of the special tax of  CFD No. 2019‐1 only to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of CFD No.  2019‐1 before CFD No. 2019‐1 was created.                4.c Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on   APPENDIX C    CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO  COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019‐1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES)  PROPOSED BOUNDARIES AND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA BOUNDARIES    4.c Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 2B Exhibit B - Rate and Method of Apportionment [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on PROJECT MAP CFD NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 2 - TAX ZONE 3   4.dPacket Pg. 112Attachment: PW. Annexation No. 2- Attachment 1 - Project Map (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ELECTION RESULTS FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) (ANNEXATION NO. 2) WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council (the "City Council") of the City of San Bernardino (the "City") has heretofore conducted proceedings for the area proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (the "CFD No. 2019-1") of the City of San Bernardino, including conducting a public hearing pursuant to Section 53339.5 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said public hearing, the City Council adopted a resolution calling a special election for May 6, 2020, and submitting to the qualified electors of the territory to be annexed to the CFD No. 2019-1 the question of levying special taxes on parcels of taxable property therein for the purpose of providing certain services which are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of the development of said real property as provided in the form of special election ballot; and WHEREAS, a Certificate of Election Results, attached thereto as Exhibit A, dated May 6, 2020, executed by the City Clerk (or, in the absence of the City Clerk, the Acting City Clerk – in either case, the “Clerk”), has been filed with this Council, certifying that a completed ballot has been returned to the Clerk for each landowner-voter(s) eligible to cast a ballot in said special election, with all votes cast as “Yes” votes in favor of the ballot measure, and further certifying on said basis that the special mailed-ballot election was closed; and WHEREAS, this Council has received, reviewed and hereby accepts the Clerk’s Certificate of Election Results and wishes by this resolution to declare the results of the special mailed-ballot election; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: SECTION 1. Recitals. This Council finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. Ballot Measure. This Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the ballot measure submitted to the qualified electors of the territory to be annexed to CFD No. 2019-1 has been passed and approved by those qualified electors in accordance with Sections 53328 and 53329 of the Government Code. SECTION 3. Annexation. This Council hereby finds, determines and declares that pursuant to Section 53339.8 of the Government Code, the City Council is authorized to determine that the territory to be annexed has been added to and become a part of the CFD No. 4.e Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 3 - Reso Election Results [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Resolution 2020-90 2019-1 with full legal effect, and the City Council is also authorized, pursuant to said Section 53339.8, to annually levy special taxes within the territory to be annexed to pay the costs of the services to be provided by the CFD No. 2019-1 as specified in Resolution No. 2020-57 adopted by the City Council on April 1, 2020. The boundaries of the territory annexed are shown on the map entitled, "Annexation Map No. 2 Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services)" a copy of which was recorded, on April 8, 2020, in Book 89 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 14, in the office of the San Bernardino County Recorder. SECTION 4. Notice of Special Tax Lien. Pursuant to Section 53339.8 of the Government Code and Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Clerk shall cause to be filed with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino an amendment of the notice of special tax lien and a map of the amended boundaries of the CFD No. 2019-1 including the annexed territory. SECTION 5. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 6. Effect. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, this 6th day of May 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 4.e Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 3 - Reso Election Results [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Resolution 2020-90 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-____, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of May 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUERO _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of __________, 2020. ______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 4.e Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 3 - Reso Election Results [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019-1, as provided by Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing and/or replacing landscaped areas (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right-of-ways, public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar landscaped areas officially dedicated for public use. These services including the following: (a) maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street lights and traffic signals; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and standards; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities; maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and (b) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, infiltration basins, flood control channels, fossil fuel filters, and similar facilities. Maintenance services may include but is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality improvements, fossil fuel filters within the public right-of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and outlets; erosion repairs; and cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance, servicing; or both of the water quality basin improvements within flood control channel improvements; and (c) public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD No. 2019-1; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD No. 2019-1. In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in Exhibit B to this resolution of intention. The above services shall be limited to those provided within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1 or for the benefit of the properties within the boundaries of CFD No. 2019-1, as the boundary is expanded from time to time by anticipated annexations, and said services may be financed by proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2019-1 only to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of CFD No. 2019-1 before CFD No. 2019-1 was created. 4.f Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5A Exhibit A - Description of Services (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to EXHIBIT B COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 (Effective as of May 6, 2020) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS Annexation Owner Assessor's Parcel Numbers Original Formation Cauffman Family Trust 4/20/98 0142-041-43 Cauffman Family Trust 5/4/11 0142-041-46 1 17329, LLC 0348-111-52, 0261-031-10, -11, and 0261-062-11 thru -14 2 GWS #4 Development, LLC 0141-431-24 3 Devore Storage Facility, LLC 0266-041-39 4.g Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5B Exhibit B - Parcel List (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 2 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION RESULTS I, the undersigned, being the City Clerk or the Acting City Clerk, as the case may be, hereby certify: In connection with the special mailed-ballot election called by the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”) on this same date in the proceedings of the City Council for the annexation of territory to the above-entitled community facilities district, I personally received (a) a signed and dated waiver and consent form and (b) a signed, dated and marked election ballot(s) on behalf of the owner(s) listed below, the entity named as the sole landowner of the land within the boundary of the above-entitled community facilities district in the Certificate Regarding Registered Voters and Landowners, dated October 22, 2019, and on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City in connection with the City Council actions on that date. Copies of the completed waiver and consent form and the completed ballot received by me and on file in my office are attached hereto. Following such receipt, I have personally, and in the presence of all persons present, reviewed the ballot to confirm that it is properly marked and signed, and I hereby certify the result of that count to be that the ballot was cast in favor of the measure. Based upon the foregoing, all votes that were cast having been cast “Yes”, in favor of the ballot measure, the measure has therefore passed. Landowner Qualified Landowner Votes Votes Cast YES NO GSW #4 Development, LLC 61.74 62 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on ____________, 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC Acting City Clerk City of San Bernardino By: (Attach completed copies of Waiver/Consent and Ballot) 4.h Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 4 - Certificate [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Ordinance No. MC-1536 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1536 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. MC-1522 AND LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES TO BE COLLECTED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 TO PAY THE ANNUAL COSTS OF THE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, GRAFFITI, STREETS, STREET SWEEPING, PARKS AND TRAIL MAINTENANCE, A RESERVE FUND FOR CAPITAL REPLACEMENT, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES WITH RESPECT TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino has heretofore adopted Resolution No. 2019-81, stating that a community facilities district to be known as "City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services), County of San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Community Facilities District"), is proposed to be established under the provisions of Chapter 2,5 (commencing with Section 53311) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, commonly known as the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"), and fixing the time and place for a public hearing on the formation of the Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, notice was published and mailed to the owners of the property in the Community Facilities District as required by law relative to the intention of the City Council to establish the Community Facilities District and the levy of the special taxes therein to provide certain services, and of the time and place of said public hearing; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2020, at the time and place specified in said published and mailed notice, the City Council opened and held a public hearing as required by law relative to the formation of the Community Facilities District, the levy of the special taxes therein and the provision of services by the Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the Community Facilities District, the levy of the special taxes and the provision of services therein were heard, and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, the City Council adopted resolutions entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Bernardino Establishing Calling An Election for the Purpose of Submitting the Question of the Levy of the Proposed Special Tax to the Qualified Electors of the Proposed Community Facilities District; Authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes; and Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the Proposed Community Facilities District" (the "Resolution of Formation") which resolution established the Community Facilities District, authorized the levy of a special tax within the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriat ions limit within the District; and 4.i Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Ordinance No. MC-1536 WHEREAS, an election was held within the Community Facilities District in which the sole eligible landowner elector approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. It is necessary that the City Council of the City of San Bernardino levy special taxes pursuant to Sections 53340 of the Government Code to provide and finance the costs of certain types of services, and related costs within the Community Facilities District, including (i) the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting, water quality improvements, graffiti, streets, street sweeping, and park maintenance, (ii) a reserve fund for capital replacement, and (iii) administrative expenses, all as more completely described in Exhibit "A" to Resolution No. 2019-81, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. Levy of Special Taxes. Special taxes shall be and are hereby levied for the Fiscal Year 2020-2021, and each Fiscal Year thereafter, on all parcels of real property within the District which are subject to taxation, which are identified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and in the amount set forth for each such parcel in said Exhibit "B." Pursuant to said Section 53340, such special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale, and Lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes. SECTION 3. Transmittal to County. The City Clerk shall immediately following adoption of this ordinance transmit a copy hereof to the Board of Supervisors and the County Auditor of the County of San Bernardino together with a request that the special taxes as levied hereby be collected on the tax bills for the parcels identified in Exhibit "B" hereto, along with the ordinary ad valorem property taxes to be levied on and collected from the owners of said parcels. SECTION 4. Authorization to Publish Ordinance. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest thereto and shall, within fifteen days of its adoption, cause it or a summary of it to be published in a newspaper circulated in the City of San Bernardino. SECTION 5. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days following its adoption. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 20th day of May, 2020. 4.i Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Ordinance No. MC-1536 ___________________________ John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney 4.i Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Ordinance No. MC-1536 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Ordinance No. MC-1536, introduced by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a regular meeting held the 6th day of May, 2020. Ordinance No. MC-1536 was approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting held the 20th day of May, 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of May, 2020. ______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 4.i Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: PW.Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 5 - Ordinance v2 [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community 4.j Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.j Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 6 - Petition [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities 4.kPacket Pg. 132Attachment: PW. Annexation No.2 CFD 2019-1.Att 7 - Recorded Map [Revision 1] (6688 : Public Hearing on Public Hearing CFD No. 2019-1 Annexation No. 2: PM 19814 Presented by Alex Qishta, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer 4.l Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1 Discussion •The Property Owner, GWS #4 Development, LLC, has requested the City assist them in annexing territory into CFD No. 2019 -1 to cover the costs associated with the maintenance of Public Improvements. •The area proposed within Annexation No. 2 includes one parcel APN 0141-431-24 within PM 19814. This proposed development is to include approximately 1,065,000 square feet of industrial high cube logistics warehouse building. •The proposed maximum annual tax of $608 per acre will be included in CFD No. 2019-1 as Tax Zone 3. The maximum annual tax is proposed to escalate at the greater of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 2%. 4.l Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1 Discussion (Cont.) •The services, which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax include: •All costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing and/or replacing landscaped areas in public street right-of-way’s, public landscaping, open spaces and other similar landscaped areas officially dedicated for public use. •In addition to the costs of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay administrative expenses and for the collection of reserve funds. 4.l Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx Project Location 4.l Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1 Fiscal Impact •It is anticipated that at build-out the total Special Tax revenues to pay for maintenance costs will be approximately $33,789. All costs associated with the annexation is borne by the Developer. There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. 4.l Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx Public Hearing on CFD 2019-1 Annexation No. 1 Recommended Action 1. CITY COUNCIL INITIATE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2019-1 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) ("CFD NO. 2019-1" OR "CFD") BY TAKING THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS: A. HOLD PUBLIC HEARING, B. ADOPT A RESOLUTION CALLING THE ELECTION, C. HOLD A SPECIAL LANDOWNER ELECTION AND CANVASS THE ELECTION, D. ADOPT A RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL LANDOWNER ELECTION; AND 2. UPON APPROVAL OF THE PRECEDING RESOLUTIONS, INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. MC- 1522 AND LEVYING AND APPORTIONING THE SPECIAL TAX IN CFD NO. 2019-1 (AS IT NOW EXISTS AND WILL EXIST IN THE FUTURE); AND 3. SCHEDULE THE FINAL READING AND ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED ORDINANCE FOR MAY 20, 2020. 4.l Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx Questions? 4.l Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: PW. Annexation No2. CFD 2019-1 PowerPoint.pptx Page 1 Public Hearing City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager Subject: Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments Recommendation That the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, conduct a Public Hearing regarding fee adjustments for various City Departments. Background In November 2014, as the City was drafting what would eventually b ecome the “Plan of Adjustment” to exit bankruptcy, the City simultaneously began a review of its User Fees. The last time User Fees were updated in a comprehensive manner was in 2008 (building and safety fees) and 2009 (other various departmental fees). User Fees are charges to customers that receive a specific benefit (for example: plan reviews, facility rentals, recreation classes, etc.) versus services that are of broad benefit to the entire community (for example: police services). As required by Article XIIIC, Section 1 of the State Constitution, User Fees charged cannot exceed the reasonable estimated cost to provide the services. Preparing a comprehensive review of the City’s User Fees required a specialized financial study to properly evaluate staff time and other costs required to perform the various city services. Accordingly, the City contracted with Revenue and Cost Specialists (RCS) in November 2014 to prepare a cost allocation plan and cost of services study to determine if the City was adequately covering its allowable costs. With a high level of turnover in the Finance Department during the years ensuing the bankruptcy filing (since 2014 there have been five (5) interim and/or permanent Finance Directors) the study unfortunately stalled. After a series of stops and starts, the contract with RCS was amended in November of 2016 and a draft study was completed in October 2018; however, staffing turnover within all City departments caused delays, resulting in an outdated study. In December 2019, the City amended the agreement with RCS to update the information and since that time city staff and RCS have worked diligently together to complete this study. If approved, the recommendations are conservatively expected to generate approximately $967,400 in additional revenue in Fiscal Year 2020/21. 5 Packet Pg. 140 6719 Page 2 Discussion The purpose of this study is to determine if the City is adequately covering its costs for specific government services or products provided directly to the payer and not provided to those not charged; these fees are categorized as “User Fees”. Over one -hundred and sixty (160) fees have been evaluated. Attachment 1, prepared by City staff , summarizes in one document the consultant’s findings as well as adjustments recommended by staff. A lso included on Attachment 1 is the consultant’s calculation of possible additional revenue and City staff’s revenue projections for FY 2020/21. Some things to keep in mind when reviewing the fee adjustment recommendations (Attachment 1): It is important to remember that the consultant’s primary responsibility is to determine the costs of providing specific services. But the City must determine the appropriate level of cost recovery. For certain programs, significant increases to achieve 100% cost recovery are not feasible, for example Animal Control, and Parks and Recreation programs. Determining the level of cost recovery in these areas is not strictly a mathematical calculation. Rather, cost recovery levels in these areas reflect a municipality’s specific situation: demographics, public safety, market conditions and community values and priorities. Within the departmental sections of this report, where applicable, this is discussed in greater detail. Staff strived to find a balance between c ost recovery and subsidization of programs however Council input on these decisions is encouraged. The study conducted by RCS utilized FY 2019/20 salary and benefit data in estimating costs. However, the consultant based revenue projections on levels of activity occurring in FY 2018/19. City staff has adjusted these projections in a conservative manner given the economic downturn that is currently occurring. The economic impacts of shutdowns related to COVID -19 are not fully known; with this in mind, and the fact that fees will not be effective until late July, staff has lowered the consultant’s projections in most cases by 20%. User Fees can only capture the City’s cost to provide specific services. Because of budget reductions through the years, operating costs in many areas are low and therefore close to 100% cost recovery. Should the City enhance services that are funded with fees, the improvements could be captured in a future fee update. For example, the addition of staffing in Community and Economic Development could improve service to the development community and in turn the costs could be captured in updated fees. Included with Attachment 1 is a comparison of select fees with surrounding or similar agencies. For development related fees, comparisons were made based on hypothetical projects. Caution should be used when comparisons are made to other agencies as only the cost to provide the service can be charged. There are many 5 Packet Pg. 141 6719 Page 3 reasons why comparisons can vary widely among agencies i ncluding: population, staffing levels, technology, operating budget, agency policy decisions, and age of an agency’s most current study. Within Attachment 1, the comparison is labeled as Exhibit “E”. Attachment 2 is the service cost study prepared by RCS to evaluate staff time and other costs required to perform the various services. Preparation of this study required the input of staff throughout all City departments. Staff provided RCS with estimates of time required to perform tasks, and numerous meetings and interviews between City staff and the consultants were conducted to get the most accurate information possible. RCS evaluated the cost of services and cost recovery at both the individual level and the program level. In most cases, staff time and materials dedicated to a specific individual service were reviewed. RCS developed a cost allocation plan to calculate the average fully burdened rate of all budget positions. The rate includes general city overhead as well as departmental overhead. In some instances, a programmatic approach to evaluate costs versus recovery was used. With this approach, the total program costs and the total program revenue from the aggregated related fees to a specific program are evaluated. This method of evaluating costs is particularly useful in areas such as building and safety, where there are a myriad of fees calculations based on valuation schedules and type of structure. While the majority of fees are recommended to be raised, there are also down ward adjustments to fees. This is a result of changes in process over the past ten years since the last study was completed. Changes in technology, laws, staffing levels and deployment, etc. over the years contribute to the realignment of costs. Penalties charged for parking violations set forth in the City of San Bernardino’s Municipal Code or in the California Vehicle Code are not included in this study and are covered under Resolution 2013-188. Development Impact Fees (DIF) are not considered User Fees and are established and administered under other legal requirements; therefore , they are not included in this study. Fees by Department: Extensive detail is provided in Attachments 1 & 2 for the User Fees that were reviewed. In the departmental sections below items that require additional explanation are discussed, for instance fees without a recommendation of 100% cost recovery. 5 Packet Pg. 142 6719 Page 4 Department Estimated Additional Revenue FY 2020-21 Library 500$ City Manager 6,000$ Finance 14,500$ City Attorney 16,800$ Parks & Recreation 23,600$ City Clerk 24,200$ Police 63,100$ Animal Control 80,000$ Public Works 355,100$ Community & Economic Development 383,600$ Total 967,400$ Estimated Additional Fee Revenue by Department Library Similar to Animal Control and Parks and Recreation, the Library cannot be fully sustained with fees. Current fees cover approximately 2.3% of operational costs. Operating a public library can be considered a service that provides economic, cultural “quality of life” benefits to the community and offers some residents an opportunity to have access to materials they otherwise could not afford. Raising fees too sharply may cause a decrease in participation. The Library Board recently approved a fee schedule that has been incorporated into this study. Parks and Recreation Included in Attachment 1 is Exhibit “C” which provides a detailed listing of various Parks and Recreation fees along with recommendations for increases. Similar to the Library, Parks and Recreation User Fees cover approximately 4% of total Parks and Recreation costs (not including grant funded programs). The current fee structure takes into account affordability for its citizenry and the general benefits for the City at large in having Parks and Recreation amenities and programs available to its residents. In some cases fees were doubled, which sounds extreme, but many of the fees are in the $1 to $3 range. Fees were adjusted with this same structure in mind, with the goal of keeping up with inflation rather than achieving 100% cost recovery and making participation in the programs cost prohibitive. Police Department Police Services are considered a public-benefit service. However, there are fees that cover services for specific customers. For example, providing a copy of a police report, or processing a 2nd hand dealer/pawnshop license. In those cases 100% cost recovery has been recommended. In the case of the Alarm Permit program, there is a balance between cost recovery and the desire to modify behavior. 100% cost recovery would have almost quadrupled the 5 Packet Pg. 143 6719 Page 5 annual residential alarm permit fee. Staff is recommending keeping the annual permit fee at a lower rate than recommended by RCS, and instead increasing fees for responses to false alarms. Permit holders will not be charged for false alarm fees until the 3rd incident within a 12 month period and fees after the 2nd offense are considerably lower for permit holders compared to non-permitted alarm owners. Attachment 1 details the specifics. The San Bernardino Police Department provides police services for various events and venues throughout the year. The department charges a straight overtime rate, plus a 4.95% benefit rate for police services. This rate recovers the labor costs but does not recover the overhead costs associated with the labor. Police department staff conducted a detailed analysis of costs related to proving this service as well as comparing practices with other law enforcement agencies in the area. Accordingly, a recommendation has also been included in the study to assess a 20% overhead rate to actual officer’s overtime rate. Animal Control Animal Control is considered a public safety function augmented by User Fees. Based on the FY 2019/20 adopted budget, fees pay for about 12% of the operation’s cost. 100% cost recovery would not be feasible. There is a balance to recovering costs but encouraging compliance and adoptions. Comparisons to surrounding agencies are useful when reviewing fees in this particular area because residents have many pet adoption options. Additionally, if fees are too prohibitive, then compliance may drop, and public safety could be impacted. The Police Department recently completed a comprehensive study of fees and comparisons to surrounding agencies. The study is included with Attachment 1 and is labeled as Exhibit “D”. Staff recommends implementing the results of the Police Departments study. Because the level to subsidize Animal Control operations is a policy decision, the consultants did not recommend specific fees but provided guidance in developing fee proposals. Public Works Public Works is a large operation with many divisions that serve the public at large (street maintenance, parks maintenance) as well as City departments (fleet and facilities management). Engineering and Cemetery are funded in part with User Fees. 100% cost recovery has been recommended for fees in both these areas. These fees have lagged behind costs over the past ten years since the last study was completed. Community and Economic Development (CED) Building and Safety Fees are based in part on the valuation of a project. It is common practice for cities to utilize the International Building Code’s (IBC) schedule of building construction values when calculating fees. While the City utilizes this schedule, it hasn’t updated the version in use since 2008. Staff recommendation is to update this schedule semi-annually when updated versions are released. Fully burdened hourly rates for staff were also updated. Because there are numerous combinations of fees in the Building and Safety division based on various schedules, both the current and 5 Packet Pg. 144 6719 Page 6 proposed fee tables have been included as separate Exhibits “A” & “B” to Attachment 1. RCS has also included these updated schedules in their report (appendices C & D). Recognizing their importance as stakeholders in the City’s economic development, the CED Director reached out to the Baldy View Chapter of the Building Industry Association for comment and input. The City has received some input from members of the development community that indicates fees higher than proposed would be acceptable in return for enhanced service. As discussed earlier in this report, the City can only capture its actual costs. Should the City make a determination to enhance service delivery within the Building and Safety division, the fee study should be updated to reflect these changes. Also included in the fee study is the creation of a General Plan Maintenance Fee of 2% to be assessed on all Community Development Fees. The purposed of the fee is to set aside funds for maintenance and updating of the General Plan. The revenue generated from this fee, estimated at $40,000 in FY 2020/21, is to be segregated from General Fund operating revenues. Fees collected from the existing Technology fee of 2% are to also be segregated from General Fund operating revenues. Next Steps Staff will return to the Mayor and City Council on May 20, 2020 with resolutions incorporating fee recommendations approved by the Mayor and Council at the May 6, 2020 meeting. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals Approving the recommended fee adjustments aligns with Key Target No.1 Financial Stability by covering, to the extent allowable and feasible, the City’s costs for providing various services. Fiscal Impact The financial impact to the City is an increase of $967,400 in revenue to the General Fund in FY 2020/21. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino California hold a public hearing to consider adjustments to various City fees, and direct staff to prepare the necessary resolutions to effectuate the approved recommendations of the fee study. Attachments Attachment 1 City Review and Summary of Consultant Study Attachment 2 RCS Cost of Service Study Ward: All Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: Resolution 2009-161 Amending Resolution 2009-122 (Master Fee Resolution) 5 Packet Pg. 145 6719 Page 7 Resolution 2009-122 Establishing a Master Fee Resolution Resolution 2008-277 Updating Building Permit and Plan Review Fees 5 Packet Pg. 146 City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0005CD‐BLDG+SAFETYBUILDING ISSUANCE FEE To process an application for a building permit. This is not a plan check or inspection.$40 ‐ 1st permit$10 ‐ each additional permit on the same applicaƟon$60 ‐ 1st permit$10 ‐ each additional permit on the same application↑64.8% 100.0% $        108,500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          86,800 Building Issuance Fee is a flat fee based on time, not valuation.  A large portion of these fees collected will be for residential projects which are expected to be impacted by COVID‐19 shutdown.  Lowered  estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation of August 1, 2020S‐0010CD‐BLDG+SAFETYBUILDING PLAN CHECK To review plans for construcƟon.75% of building fee for SFD and duplex buildings95% of building fee for commercial, industrial and multi‐family buildings$94.15 per hour for plan review of small projects75% of building fee for SFD and duplex buildings95% of building fee for commercial, industrial and mulƟ‐family buildings$122.37 per hour for plan review of small projects↑71.4% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   See Exhibit A for detail on current fees and Exhibit B for detail on proposed fees. Building Plan Check Fees are based on a percentage of the Building Permit Fee.  Building Permit Fees  are based in large part on project valuation.  Hourly rates have been updated.  Additionally, the ICC table used for building valuation data will be updated twice a year.  These two changes will increase fees but with project values varying widely, and the current economic situation, it would not be prudent to increase revenue A & BS‐0020CD‐BLDG+SAFETYBUILDING INSPECTION To inspect building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical construction to insure that it is in conformance with approved plans and the various construction codes.Various Fees per the Building Codes IBC valuation schedule from2006.  Hourly rate $94.45Updated IBC schedule to 2020 and update annually.  Hourly rate $118.33↑101.8% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   See Exhibit A for detail on current fees and Exhibit B for detail on proposed fees. Building Permit fees are based in large part on project valuation.  Hourly rates have been updated.  Additionally, the ICC table used for building valuation data will be updated twice a year.  These two changes will increase fees but with project values varying widely, and the current economic situation, it would not be prudent to  increase revenue projections at this point. A & B1 of 385.aPacket Pg. 147Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0022CD‐BLDG+SAFETYSPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTIONTo perform a special inspection at the request of the applicant.$380 Minimum for the 1st 4 hours plus $95 for each additional hour$595 for the 1st 4 hours plus $105 for each add'l hour↑63.6% 100.0% $             6,500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            5,800 Increased cost may offset some activity while still generating additional revenue.  Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0025CD‐BLDG+SAFETYCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYTo review a construction project to insure that it has received all required inspections and met all conditions of approval, including those conditions of other $475.08 ‐ as a separate application (of which $100 was for Fire Review)$133.62 ‐ if included on the building permit (Deleted as All Fire)$500↑74.7% 100.0% $             3,800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            3,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0030CD‐LAND DEV.TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYTo issue a Temporary C.of O. good for one (1) month.$467.34 $500↑93.1% 100.0% $                300  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0201CD‐PLANNINGAMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS‐ADM.REV.To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Development Services Director.$583 $575↓101.4% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Based on study, fee lowered; staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  Fee revenue from reduction is estimated to be less than $100S‐0203CD‐PLANNINGAMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS‐PLN.COMM.To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Planning Commission.$2,550 $4,070 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑62.6% 100.0% $             3,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            2,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.2 of 385.aPacket Pg. 148Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0205CD‐PLANNINGAMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS‐D/ERCTo review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Development/Environmental Review Committee.$822 $2,890↑28.5% 100.0% $             3,500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            2,800 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation.  Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0208CD‐PLANNINGANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT‐ADM.REV.To review an application for the placement of an antenna or other telecommunication device that requires Director Review according to the $2,938 Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using a CUP or a development permit.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐   DELETE $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using a CUP or a development permit.  No revenue being collected currently.S‐0211CD‐PLANNINGAPPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCILTo appeal a project to the Mayor and Council that was denied by the Planning Commission.$177 ‐ Non‐Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery)$1,766 ‐ All others$2,850 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $285 ‐Non Applicant, City Resident↑62.0% 100.0% $             1,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               900 Cost recovery didn't include overhead previously.  Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0213CD‐PLANNINGAPPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONTo appeal a project to the Planning Commission that was denied by the D/ERC or the Community Development Director.$278 ‐ Non‐Applicant, City Resident (10%)$2,772 ‐ All others$4,295 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $430 ‐Non‐Applicant City Staff↑64.5% 100.0% $             3,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            2,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0216CD‐PLANNINGCUP‐MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOLTo prepare a conditional use permit for a minor use or for the sale of alcohol in an existing building.$3,605 $4,625 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑78.0% 100.0% $           10,200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            8,100 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.3 of 385.aPacket Pg. 149Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0217CD‐PLANNINGCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To review a request for a conditional use permit for conditional uses.$7,133 ‐ CUP for Commercial/Industrial (#10; $71,330)$2,809 ‐ CUP for Condo, PRD, HMOD (#30; $84,270)$5,555 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑70.0% 100.0% $           66,600  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          53,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0219CD‐PLANNINGCUP REVISION To review a request to modify an existing conditional use permit.$2,113 $3,780 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑55.9% 100.0% $             8,300  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            6,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0222CD‐PLANNINGDESIGN REVIEW To review the design of a proposed development.Full Consultant Cost Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included with Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit or Temporary Use PermitDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included with Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit or Temporary Use Permit.  Not currently collecting this fee.S‐0224CD‐PLANNINGDEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENTTo prepare or amend a development agreement which sets out the City's and the developer's obligations for a proposed development. Typically used where a developer prefers to construct an improvement in‐lieu of paying development impact fees.Direct Cost Recovery Fee Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit as determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0227CD‐PLANNINGDEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND.To process a request to amend the development code or the zoning map at the request of, and for the benefit of, a developer.$6,960 plus full consultant cost$9,925 plus any consultant cost including 10% contract administrative overhead, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑70.1% 100.0% $           14,800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          11,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.4 of 385.aPacket Pg. 150Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0230CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐DIRECTOR REVIEWTo review a development that can be approved by the Community Development Director.$1,000 $                               1,965.00 ↑50.9% 100.0% $           48,300  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          38,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0233CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐D/ERC REVIEW To review a development that can be approved by the Development/Environmental Review Committee.$6,438 0 to 5 Acres ‐ $6,810 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as esƟmated by City Staff.> than 5 Acres ‐ $11,905 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.↑75.7% 100.0% $           31,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          24,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0235CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWTo review the following types of projects: 12 or more residential units, a cell tower taller than 75 feet, a conditional use permit, tentative tract map where the development requires a Planning Commission public hearing.$6,720 ‐ 0 to 5 Acres (#10; $67,200)$6,720 ‐ Greater than 5 Acres (#5, $33,600)0 to 5 Acres ‐ $8,040 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as esƟmated by City Staff.> than 5 Acres ‐ $15,455 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff.↑63.9% 100.0% $           56,800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          45,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0238CD‐PLANNINGDEV.PMT‐MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEWTo review a residential project in a commercial zone where a Public Hearing by the Mayor & Council is required for approval.$7,288 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is no longer used.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends fee be deleted as it is no longer used and revenue is not collectedS‐0241CD‐PLANNINGENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDYTo review a proposed development and determine that it has no impact on the environment or that the impact can be mitigated and the mitigation monitored.$3,273 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit ↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increased5 of 385.aPacket Pg. 151Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0244CD‐PLANNINGENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTTo prepare an environmental impact report on a proposed development to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant costActual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit ↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0246CD‐PLANNINGEXTENSION OF TIME To process a time extension for a permit that requires the review of the Development/Environmental Review Committee or Planning Commission or Mayor $3,922 ‐ CUP & Development Permit (#2; $7,844)$4,768 ‐ Tentative Tract Map (#10; $47,680)$1,860 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↓248.8% 100.0% $         (33,200) FULL COST RECOVERY  $        (33,200)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0251CD‐PLANNINGFENCE/WALL PERMIT To review plans and inspect a fence or wall that is not part of another application.$56 $60↑90.8% 100.0% $                700  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               500 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0257CD‐PLANNINGGENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP)To review and process an application to make an amendment to the City's General Plan text or map at the request of, and for the benefit of, a developer. Only additional costs as always done in conjunction with Dev.Code Amend. or other primary applicationDirect Cost Recovery Fee ($1,500 Deposit treated as actual cost)$3,570 plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑42.0% 100.0% $             8,300  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            6,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.6 of 385.aPacket Pg. 152Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0259CD‐PLANNINGHISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTTo prepare a report on whether an existing building has historic significance and, if so, how changes to the building can be made that preserve its historic significance.Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($815 deposit plus consultant cost)Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0262CD‐PLANNINGHOME OCCUPATION PERMITTo review a request to operate a business in a residential zone to insure that can be operated safely and that it will not impact neighbors.$268 $145↓186.5% 100.0% $         (37,300) FULL COST RECOVERY  $        (37,300)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0264CD‐PLANNINGLETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSISTTo prepare a letter at the request of a realtor or lender confirming that a particular use of a property is permitted by the Zoning Code and/or in conformance with the City's General Plan. Also known as a rebuild letter.$450 $245↓182.7% 100.0% $         (10,200) FULL COST RECOVERY  $        (10,200)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0266CD‐PLANNINGPLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTTo review a lot line application to check for building setbacks, zoning, general plan conformance and development standards. See S‐0454 for the Public Works Engineering review.$477 $1.255↑38.0% 100.0% $             7,800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            6,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.7 of 385.aPacket Pg. 153Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0268CD‐PLANNINGMINOR EXCEPTION Staff approval of a minor variance (exception) to the Zoning Ordinance based on criteria that establishes the minimal impact of the variance.$288 ‐ Concurrent with another applicaƟon$268 ‐ Owner‐Occupied single‐family residence$792 ‐ Other105↓280.0% 100.0% $              (700) FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0270CD‐PLANNINGMISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEWDirect Cost Recovery Fee ($245 Deposit) plus Full Consultant Cost ($327 Deposit)Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.S‐0271CD‐PLANNINGMINOR MODIFICATION/REVISIONTo review a request to make a minor change, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, in a development's use permit or conditions of approval where the change can be approved $561 $380 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↓148.1% 100.0% $           (1,800) FULL COST RECOVERY  $          (1,800)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0273CD‐PLANNINGPHASING PLAN REVIEW To review a phasing plan.$823 ‐ If not part of original project review$514 ‐ D/ERC review applicaƟon (DP)$536 ‐ Planning Comm.Application (CUP/DP/SUB)Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.S‐0275CD‐PLANNINGPLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATIONTo prepare an interpretation of the General Plan at the request of a developer where the interpretation is required for a particular $1,119 Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.8 of 385.aPacket Pg. 154Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0277CD‐PLANNINGPUBLIC CONVENIENCE/       NECESSITY LETTERTo make a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) determination as may be required by the State of California for the issuance of an Alcoholic Beverage Control License.$636 $2,740 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑23.2% 100.0% $           31,600  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          25,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0279CD‐PLANNINGPRE‐APPLICATION REVIEW‐D/ERC REVIEWTo review a proposed project by the Development/Environmental Review Committee at the request of a developer before he/she submits a formal application.$2,424 $3,440↑70.5% 100.0% $           25,400  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          20,300 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0280CD‐PLANNINGRECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM.To process a request for the Planning Commission to reconsider a previously denied development in‐lieu of appealing to the Mayor and Common Council.$506 $2,670 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑18.9% 100.0% $             2,200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            1,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0282CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PERMIT‐REGULAR To review a proposed sign for compliance with the Sign Ordinance.$182 $80↓221.2% 100.0% $         (10,000) FULL COST RECOVERY  $        (10,000)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0283CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PERMIT‐REQUIRING CUPTo review and approve a sign permit subject to a conditional use permit which restricts the use in perpetuity to the approved uses.$3,858 Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate processes.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate processes.9 of 385.aPacket Pg. 155Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0284CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PERMIT‐TEMPORARY To review a request to hang a temporary sign or banner to insure that it meets the requirements of the Sign Ordinance which limits its use to 60‐days.$111 $80↓134.9% 100.0% $           (1,400) FULL COST RECOVERY  $          (1,400)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0286CD‐PLANNINGSIGN PROGRAM To review a signage program for a commercial development.$610 10 or less tenant spaces ‐ $490Greater than 10 tenant spaces ‐ Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑124.5% 100.0% $           (1,200) FULL COST RECOVERY  $          (1,200)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0288CD‐PLANNINGSPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENTTo prepare or amend a specific plan which regulates land use in a specific area of the City in a more detailed manner that the City‐wide Zoning Ordinance at the request of a developer or as a condition to approving a development.Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant costActual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0291CD‐PLANNINGTEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMITTo review an application for a temporary use permit such as a pumpkin lot, parking lot sale, etc. or for a special event.$82.86 ‐ Temporary Use Permit (#55; $4,557)$420 ‐ Special Event Permit (Director Review) (#22; $9,240)$730 ‐ Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review)$315 Temporary Use Permit; $1,230‐ Special Events  Permit (Director Review)       $0 ‐ Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) ‐ Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not used.↑31.1% 100.0% $           30,500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          24,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.10 of 385.aPacket Pg. 156Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0293CD‐PLANNINGTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP To process an application for the subdivision of land into four or fewer lots for residential, commercial or industrial development.$4,262 plus $65 per parcel$5,170 plus the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff.↑86.2% 100.0% $             7,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            5,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0295CD‐PLANNINGTENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD)To process a proposed tract map (5 or more lots) to assure that it complies with City requirements and standards.$7,561 plus $65 per lot or dwelling unit$6,850 plus $25 per lot and the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff.↓118.4% 100.0% $           (6,600) FULL COST RECOVERY  $          (6,600)Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0297CD‐PLANNINGTENTATIVE MAP REVISION‐TRACT/PARCELTo process a request to revise a previously approved tentative parcel or tract map.$2,113 $4,125plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑51.2% 100.0% $             6,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0301CD‐PLANNINGTREE REMOVAL PERMIT To process an application for removing 5 or more, 3" or greater diameter trunk, mature trees.$506 $180↓227.3% 100.0% $              (600) FULL COST RECOVERY  $              (600)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0303CD‐PLANNINGVARIANCE‐REGULAR To process an application for a variance from the Zoning Code$322 ‐ Single‐family residence (12% Recovery)$2,724 ‐ All others$2,065 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $250 Single Family Residence↑131.9% 100.0% $              (700) FULL COST RECOVERY  $              (700)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0304CD‐PLANNINGVARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATIONTo process a variance that is submitted as part of another application. This represents the incremental cost of $910 $990 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff.↑91.8% 100.0% $                200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               200 No change to RCS estimate, increase minimal.11 of 385.aPacket Pg. 157Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0306CD‐PLANNINGVESTING TENTATIVE MAP To process an application for vesting rights in a tentative map.Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost"Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit ↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0308CD‐PLANNINGZONING FORM To prepare a written verification of zoning at the request of an applicant.$22 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S‐0264.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S‐0264.S‐0309CD‐PLANNINGZONING VERIFICATION REVIEWTo verify that an applicant for a City business license will be operating in the correct zone for that business.$37 $55↑68.0% 100.0% $           31,300  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          25,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0315CD‐PLANNINGGENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCETo recover a portion of the cost of the periodic update to the City's General Plan which benefits all development in the City.None 2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major general plan updates that are required every 10 to 15 years.NEW 0.0% 100.0% $           50,000 NEW/SURCHARGE $          40,000 To develop set‐aside fund for general plan update every 15 to 20 years/ Note: special purpose reserve, not for general budget useS‐0322CDTECHNOLOGY MAINTENANCE AND UPGRADESTo recover a portion of the cost of upgrading the permit system which is estimated at $700,0002% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major permit system upgrades and 2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major permit system upgrades and maintenance‐‐0.0% 100.0% $                   ‐   SURCHARGE $                   ‐   To develop set‐aside fund for upgrading and maintaining permit system.  Note:  special purpose reserve, not for general budget useS‐0326CDARCHIVE FEES To cover the cost of archiving current development materials*$1.00 per permit or application                           * $2.00/sheet for Plans     * $0.25 /page *$1.25 per permit or application                           * $3.15/sheet for Plans           * $0.35/page Documents‐‐70.0% 100.0% $             2,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            1,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.12 of 385.aPacket Pg. 158Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0441PW‐LAND DEV.FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEWTo perform a final map check on a development and record the documents. Includes a Reversion to Acreage as a single lot Final Map. Confirm conformity with State Subdivision Map Act & City Ordinances.$2,210 ‐ Base Fee     $55 ‐ Per Lot Fee   $135 ‐ Each additional Review   $404 ‐ Final Map ConƟnuance     $97 ‐ Certificate of Correction per Hour$5,195 ‐ Base Fee   $275 ‐ Per Lot Fee   $270 ‐ Each additional Review       $0 ‐ Final Map Continuance ‐ Staff recommends deleting as not used.   $185 ‐ Certificate of Correction per Hour↑42.1% 100.0% $             3,400  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            2,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0445PW‐LAND DEV.ON‐SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKPlan check on‐site precise site plans for conformance with City Ordinances for paved parking areas, ADA accessibility, drainage, NPDES stds, sewer utilities, on‐site lighting, wall locations/elevations, trash enclosures and accessible paths of travel.2% of engineer's cost estimate for on‐site improvements$3,585 ‐ 1st Sheet, plus$1,515‐ Each Additional Sheet, plus   $265 ‐ if the project is over $25K in estimated cost   $605 ‐ Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)↑100.6% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Change in methodology should not impact overall revenue, just more equitable distribution of charges13 of 385.aPacket Pg. 159Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0447PW‐LAND DEV.GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE To review a grading plan for compliance with City Ordinances and State Codes. Review grading bonds if required. Review drainage and erosion control measures to be used.Cubic Yards:  <= 50 ‐   No Fee                 51 to 100 ‐   $15.00            101 to 1,000 ‐   $22.50       1,001 to 10,000 ‐   $30.00   10,001 to 100,000 ‐   $30.00 plus $15.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 ‐ $165.00 plus $9.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000       200,001 and up ‐ $255.00 plus $4.50 for each 10K CY > 200,000$390 for all plans with more than 50 Cubic Yards↑41.5% 100.0% $             1,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0452CD‐LAND DEV.REVIEW‐CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCETo review a lot to determine if it is in conformity with the State Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinances, If it is, issue a Certificate of Compliance which allows future construction permits on $828 $1,370↑60.3% 100.0% $                500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0453PW‐LAND DEV.REVIEW‐LOT MERGER To process an application to merge multiple lots into one new lot.$828 $1,300↑63.6% 100.0% $             8,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            6,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0454PW‐LAND DEV.REVIEW‐LOT LINE ADJSTMTTo review the adjustment of the lot line between two parcels.$414 ‐ SFR Occupancy (#3; $1,242)$828 ‐ Com'l/Ind'l (#3; $2,484)$1,590↑39.1% 100.0% $             5,800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.14 of 385.aPacket Pg. 160Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0463PW‐LAND DEV.ON‐SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONTo provide field inspection of on‐site improvements including sewers, storm drains, parking areas, accessibility per ADA requirements, curbs, planters, Water Quality Control Plan features, erosion controls and finish grade.3% of Estimated Construction CostFee Based on Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost:            $0 to $1 Million ‐ 3.4% of estimated cost with a $1,045 minimumGreater than $1 Million ‐ $34,000 plus 1.7% of the estimated cost over $1 Million↑93.1% 100.0% $           14,900  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          11,900 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0467PW‐LAND DEV.ON‐SITE GRADING INSPECTIONTo perform field inspection of on‐site grading, erosion control devices and drainage/storm drain features of stand alone rough grading.Cubic Yards:  <= 50 ‐ No Fee51 to 100 ‐ $150.00101 to 1,000 ‐ $225.001,001 to 10,000 ‐ $300.0010,001 to 100,000 ‐ $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY >   10,000100,001 to 200,000 ‐ $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000200,001 and up ‐ $300.00 plus $100.00 for Cubic Yards:                 1 to 1,000 ‐ $225       1,001 to 10,000 ‐ $340   10,001 to 100,000 ‐ $340 plus $115 for each 10K CY >   10,000 100,001 to 200,000 ‐ $1,375 plus $55 for each 10K CY > 100,000       200,001 and up ‐ $1,870 plus $10 for each 10K CY > 200,000↑82.6% 100.0% $             3,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            2,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0471PW‐LAND DEV.HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEWTo review a hydraulic/hydrology study prepared by a developer's engineer to determine the impact of a development on the ground water and the storm drainage Actual Time:$487 ‐ for the first 3 hours$100 ‐ for each add'l hour$825↑71.0% 100.0% $           12,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            9,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0472PW‐LAND DEV.ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG.To make a finding that a proposed development is not on or near a known fault line.None $940NEW 0.0% 100.0% $                900  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.15 of 385.aPacket Pg. 161Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0480PW‐STORMWATER MGTFEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEWTo perform a FEMA plan review of a project located within floodplain designations Zone "A", "AE", or "shaded X".None $940  plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.NEW 0.0% 100.0% $             3,800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            3,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0481PW‐STRMWTR MGMTREV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLNTo review the storm water run‐off pollution plan for a project over 1 acre in size to insure that the run‐off meets the requirements of NPDES. To inspect the site during construction to insure that the conditions of the plan are being met.$410 ‐ Commercial & Residential Projects (#57; $23,370)$265 ‐ Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects (#56; $14,840)$405 ‐ Commercial & ResidenƟal Projects$615 ‐ Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects↑66.3% 100.0% $           19,500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          15,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0488PW‐STRMWTR MGMTREVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANSTo review the Stormwater Pollution Plan for run‐off after a development is completed. This review occurs before the grading and/or building permits are issued. Includes three plan reviews.$80 ‐ Non‐Categorical (#450; $36,000)   $365 ‐ Categorical without Conditions of Concern (#75; $27,375)$1,130 ‐ Categorical with Conditions of Concern (#75; $84,750)     $99 ‐ per hour for reviews after the third review (#1; $99)$155 ‐ Non‐Categorical$1,440 ‐ Categorical   $120 ‐ per hour for reviews after the third review↑52.0% 100.0% $        137,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $        109,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0489CD‐WSTWTR MGMTREV‐EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLANTo review the erosion and waste management control plan for a construction site.$75 $180↑41.1% 100.0% $             5,900  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.16 of 385.aPacket Pg. 162Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0490CD‐STRMWTR MGTNPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONTo inspect a construction site to mitigate hazardous run‐off.$98 ‐ Less than 10 Acres$179 ‐ 10 Acres or More$140↑70.5% 100.0% $             8,500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            6,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0495PW‐STRMWTR MGMTNPDES BUSINESS INSPECTIONTo review a business for hazardous discharge into the sewer or storm drainage system.$143 $175↑81.7% 100.0% $             7,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            5,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0501PW‐ENGINEERINGBASIC PERMIT FEE See note in "Suggested Fee" below$45.00 ‐ Engineering Permit$53.00 ‐ Blanket Permit$43.00 ‐ Permit ExtensionEngineering Permit ‐ This fee is included with each permitBlanket Permit ‐ see S‐0523Permit Extension ‐ see S‐0560DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this fee, it is included with each permitBlanket Permit ‐ see S‐0523Permit Extension ‐ see S‐0560S‐0503PW‐ENGINEERINGPERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMITTo review a request for a permanent encroachment into the public right‐of‐way.$670.00 ‐ Initial Permit ($625 for the encroachment permit and $45 for the basic permit ‐ both to be combined into one fee.)$150.00 ‐ Annual $1,515 ‐ IniƟal Permit   $340 ‐ Annual Renewal↑44.2% 100.0% $             4,200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            3,200 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0505PW‐ENGINEERINGTEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMITTo process a request for a temporary encroachment into the public right‐of‐way.$25.00 ‐ No Lane Closure (#100; $2,500)$136.00 ‐ Lane Closure: First Day (#2,400; $326,400)  $60.00 ‐ Lane Closure: Each Additional Day (#9,600; $576,000)  $70.00 ‐ Trash Bin, 1st week  $28.00 ‐ Trash Bin, each add'l week$160 ‐ No Lane Closure ‐ Parking Only$175 ‐ Lane Closure: First Day  $25 ‐ Lane Closure: Each AddiƟonal Day   $100 ‐ Trash Bin, 1st week  $25 ‐ Trash Bin, each add'l week↑130.6% 100.0% $        105,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          84,000 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation.  Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.17 of 385.aPacket Pg. 163Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0507PW‐ENGINEERINGLANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATIONSee note in "Suggested Fee" below$286.00 Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the excavation permit.DELETE 0.0% 100.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the excavation permit.S‐0509PW‐ENGINEERINGSPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENTTo process a request to hold a special event in the public right‐of‐way.$545.00 ‐ With a Lane Closure (#4; $2,180)$559.00 ‐ With a Street Closure (#8; $4,472)$347.00 ‐ With a Road Closure (1st day) **$302.00 ‐ Each Additional Day (#4, $1,208)(**Note: Staff recommends combining the fees for a street and a road as they take the same effort. Also, each of the above fees, except the "additional day" fee, include the $45 basic fee $925 ‐ Lane Closure$1,495 ‐ Street/Road Closure, 1st day   $1,040 ‐ Street/Road Closure, each add'l day↑39.7% 100.0% $           12,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            9,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0511PW‐ENGINEERINGOVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMITTo process a permit for an oversize/overload transport through the City. This fee is controlled by the State.$17.00 ‐ One Day (State‐Mandated Fee is $16) (#600; $10,200)$95.00 ‐ Annual Permit (State‐Mandated Fee is $90) (#3; $285)$16 ‐ One Day Permit$90 ‐ Annual Permit(Note: City may only charge the State‐Mandated fee. There is no provision for a technology surcharge.)‐‐54.1% 100.0% $                   ‐     LEGAL LIMITS  $                   ‐   Limited by State and/or Federal regulations/lawS‐0513PW‐ENGINEERINGHAULING PERMIT To process a request to haul construction supplies/debris either into or out of the City.$438.00 ‐ First Day (#6; $2,628) (Includes S‐501 Basic Fee)$100.00 ‐ Each Additional Day (#24; $2,400)$650 ‐ First Day$285 ‐ Each Additional Day↑46.9% 100.0% $             7,600  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            5,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.18 of 385.aPacket Pg. 164Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0515PW‐ENGINEERINGEXCAVATION PERMIT See note in "Suggested Fee" below$150.00 ‐ Per day Staff Recommends Deleting This ServiceDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff Recommends Deleting This ServiceS‐0517PW‐ENGINEERINGTRAFFIC STUDY REPORT To review a developer's traffic study to ensure compliance with City standards.$719.00 ‐ Basic Review (#12; $8,628)  $80.00 ‐ Extended Review per Hour (#0; $0)Actual Consultant charge (currently $1,440 for a basic review) plus 10% overhead for City contract administration and review.↑53.2% 100.0% $             8,700  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            6,900 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0518PW‐ENGINEERINGOFF‐SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKTo review grading plans for off‐site improvements. Three plan checks are included with the original off‐site improvement plan check. Fourth and subsequent plan checks are charged an additional plan check fee.$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost with a $50 minimum$3,585 ‐ 1st Sheet, plus$1,515‐ Each Additional Sheet, plus   $265 ‐ if the project is over $25K in estimated cost   $605 ‐ Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four(Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.)↑93.9% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Methodology Change won't impact revenues significantlyS‐0520PW‐ENGINEERINGREVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANSTo review changes to approved plans due to changes to conditions or other reasons.$137.00 $210 for the 1st hour plus $150 for each additional hour↑64.9% 100.0% $                400  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               400 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.19 of 385.aPacket Pg. 165Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0521PW‐ENGINEERINGOFF‐SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTIONTo inspect off‐site construction to insure that it complies with the City's standards & conditions as well as the approved plans, if applicable.$45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost$240 ‐ Driveway & Sidewalk ReplacementOther Fees based on Estimated Construction Cost:            $0 to $175,000 ‐ $630 plus 12.4% of the Cost over $15,000 $175,001 to $750,000 ‐ $20,470 plus   3.4% of the Cost over $175,000Greater than $750,000 ‐ $40,020 plus   1.1% of the ↑97.0% 100.0% $             4,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            3,200 Change in methodology should not impact overall revenue, just more equitable distribution of charges.  Because based on project valuation, % of recovery varies year to year but on average is 100%S‐0523PW‐ENGINEERINGANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMITTo issue an annual blanket permit to utilities in advance of emergency work to avoid delaying the work. To inspect the work as it occurs. The cost of the permit and inspection are deducted from an initial deposit as required.$53.00 ‐ Permit Issuance$73.00 ‐ Inspection Per Location$130 for the initial blanket permit annually plus $105 per day for inspection per location after the first day/location deducted from an initial annual deposit of $5,500. Deposit balance can be carried forward to a new year but a new initial blanket permit is required and the deposit balance must be restored to $5,500.↑53.4% 100.0% $                800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               800 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0529PW‐ENGINEERINGBOND RELEASE INSPECTION ‐ PWTo perform an inspection to confirm that all issues covered by the bond are satisfied so that the City can release the bond.$45.00 ‐ Issuance$59.00 ‐ Inspection$230↑45.1% 100.0% $                600  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               600 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.20 of 385.aPacket Pg. 166Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0531PW‐REAL PROPERYSTREET NAME CHANGE To change the name of a street at the request of a private party or group.$1,345.00 Plus the Cost of Street SignsActual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including new street signage, charged against an initial deposit determined ↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0533PW‐REAL PROPERTYSTREET/ALLEY VACATION To process a request to terminate the City's interest (easement) in an alley or street.$1,000.00 ‐ Deposit$1,000.00 ‐ Balance Due Prior to Processing$1,840 plus initial deposit for noticing and publishing as determined by staff↑54.3% 100.0% $             1,700  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            1,300 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0535PW‐REAL PROPERTYDEDICATION OF RIGHT‐OF‐WAYTo legally accept the ownership of property (right‐of‐way) at the request of a private party.$315.00 ‐ If Legal and Map are Provided$800.00 ‐ If City Prepares Legal & MapIf Legal and Map are Provided ‐ $920   If City Prepares Legal & Map ‐ Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑34.2% 100.0% $             6,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0537PW‐REAL PROPERTYPRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUESTTo process the request of a private party to annex their property to the City.$14,750.00 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $17,000.↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increased21 of 385.aPacket Pg. 167Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0539PW‐REAL PROPERTYCITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSINGTo process a City property lease.$2,100.00 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $5,500.↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0542PW‐ENGINEERINGENGINEERING LETTER See note in "Suggested Fee" below$100.00 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided.DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided.S‐0560PW‐ENGINEERINGPERMIT EXTENSION To review a request for a permit extension to determine if there are reasons to deny it.$43.00 $80 each↑52.7% 100.0% $             7,700  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            6,000 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0565PW‐ENGINEERINGRE‐INSPECTION To re‐inspect due to failure to have work ready on the initial inspection or because more inspections were required than covered by the initial permit. This inspection is during normal working hours.$59.00 $105 per hour with a one‐hour minimum↑84.9% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0567PW‐ENGINEERINGAFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTIONTo perform an inspection at the request of a developer outside of normal working hours.$369.00 ‐ 4 hr. minimum  $92.45 ‐ each additional hourEmployee's current hourly rated at time and 1/2 (overtime rate) plus 20% overhead with a four hour minimum↑57.9% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $          40,000 City estimate based on past level of inspections22 of 385.aPacket Pg. 168Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0571PW‐ENGINEERINGASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST.To perform the legal requirements to establish an assessment district or a Community Facilities District usually in a new development at the request of the developer.$5,900 Actual Cost based on the "Fully‐Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff.↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐0602POLICECONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITTo process a request to authorize carrying a concealed weapon.$400 ‐ IniƟal$325 ‐ RenewalThe general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only issues permits to retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff recommends deleting this DELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   The general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only issues permits to retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is not being used.S‐0609POLICERECORDS CHECK LETTER To prepare a one‐page document on departmental letterhead that gives the result of researching local $25 ‐ With Record$20 ‐ Without Record$40↑59.5% 100.0% $                200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               200 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0611POLICE2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP LICENSETo license a second‐hand dealer or pawnshop.$475 ‐ IniƟal$126 ‐ Renewal$480 ‐Initial   $135 renewal‐‐95.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0613POLICELIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSINGTo roll a set of fingerprints using the digital "Live Scan" equipment instead of the "old" ink on cards. Service is provided to the public on Wednesday from 1 to 5 PM.$2 ‐ Live Scan Processing Fee (Note: Staff is charging $15 plus the DOJ fee.)$15 ‐ Fingerprint card(Note: Applicants for City jobs are not charged the Live Scan fee or the DOJ fee.)$20 plus applicable DOJ/FBI fee (currently $33)↑74.1% 100.0% $             1,200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               900 Minimal revenue increase, no increase in revenue projections23 of 385.aPacket Pg. 169Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0616POLICEFIX‐IT TICKET SIGN‐OFF To review vehicle repairs when a ticket has been issued to the vehicle owner for a problem such as $20 $25↑83.1% 100.0% $                400  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               400 Council in 2009 stopped collection of fee.  Suggest reinstatement‐need estimate from PD of what revenue would be generated with reinstatementS‐0618POLICEPOLICE SERVICES FOR SPECIAL EVENTSWhen the Police Department is asked to provide law enforcement services at special eventsOvertime rate of police personnel providing service per number of hours plus overhead rate of 4.95%Officer's current hourly rate at times & 1/2 (overtime rate) plus 20% overhead with four (4) hour minimum↑85.0% 100.0% $                500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          51,600 City estimate based on past events, reduced  by 60% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.CITY ANALYSISPOLICECASSETTE TAPE REPRODUCTIONCassette Tape Reproduction $                              60.00 Staff recommends deletion; no longer usedDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     $                   ‐   CITY ANALYSISPOLICETRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTPhoto copies of traffic accident reports $0.15 per copy  $0.25 per copy ↑0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   100% cost recovery not possible with copies for public, would be out of line with City Clerk fees for photo copies.CITY ANALYSISPOLICECAD INCIDENT PRINTOUT Printout from CAD system $                              30.00  $                                    30.00 ‐‐0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     $                   ‐   No change recommendedCITY ANALYSISPOLICEDISPATCH TAPE REPRODUCTIONRequests for copies of dispatch recordings $                              80.00  $                                    80.00 ‐‐0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     $                   ‐   No change recommendedCITY ANALYSISPOLICERECORDED INVESTIGATIVE EVIDENCErequests for copies of audio recordings $                              19.00  $                                    19.00 ‐‐0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     $                   ‐   No change recommended24 of 385.aPacket Pg. 170Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleCITY ANALYSISPOLICEPHOTOGRAPHS Copies of investigation photos 5x7 $29.25;      8x10 $33; Photos on CD $47; Photos requiring lab assistance $53 $52 for CD, $0.25/per copy from laserfiche.  Any special requests will be actual costs plus 10% administrative fee.‐‐100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐     $                   ‐   Restructuring of fees should not impact overall revenue, just updated to reflect changes with technologyCITY ANALYSISPOLICEVIDEO TAPE REPRODUCTIONVideo Tape reproductionsStaff recommends deletion; no longer usedDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     $                   ‐   CITY ANALYSISPOLICECOMPUTER LOCATION ACTIVITY PRINTOUTComputer Location Activity Printout$75 $75 ‐‐100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐     $                   ‐   No change recommendedALARM SYSTEMS‐0621POLICETo encourage the proper maintenance of alarm systems by charging the alarm owner for wasted police time spent responding to false alarms.$25/$50/$10 ‐ Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income Resident)              $25 ‐ Alarm Sys.Installation              $10 ‐ Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarms in 12‐month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or panic: Reg./LIR]:  [$75/$10]/[$200/$20] ‐ 1st thru 4th Non‐Permitted  [$90/$10]/[$250/$20] ‐ 5th & 6th  [$90/$20]/[$300/$40] ‐ 7th thru 9th[$175/$20]/[$350/$40] ‐ 10th & SubsequentConsultant Recommendation:    $96 ‐ Annual Alarm Permit ($75‐City plus $21‐Alarm Vendor)$25 ‐ Alarm Sys.Installation$10 ‐ Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:$256 ‐ All False Alarms without a Permit ($200‐City plus $56‐Alarm Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12 month period with a Permit. (Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial response or between intrusion and panic/robbery response.)    $          10,000 Conservatively estimated revenue, unknown how changes will affect behaviourCity Staff Recommendation:               $30 ‐ Annual Alarm Permit $15 Annual Alarm Permit Low Income;                 $25 ‐ Alarm Sys.Installation$10 ‐ Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:With Permit:  $0 charge 1st and 2nd; $100 3rd, $200 4th, $300 5th and above.  Without Permit:  $200 1st, $250 2nd; $350 3rd, $400 4th and above.25 of 385.aPacket Pg. 171Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0655CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTBIENNEAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTIONTo perform an exterior property maintenance inspection every two years of all single family rental properties to insure that the property is properly maintained.$100 per owner of SFR rentals$180 per SFR rentalStaff recommends increasing the inspections to every year and including an interior inspection.↑55.2% 100.0% $           83,500  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          20,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 75% due to  expected implementation date of August 1, 2020, economic downturn and sufficient staffingS‐0657CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTNOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASETo process the release of a Notice of Pendency that was previously filed with the property's deed to guarantee payment of a judgement against the property. The Notice makes it impossible to sell the property or get $180 for the first four units$160 base fee plus $7.45 for each unit inspected (over four)$165 plus $8.50 for any unit over four‐‐109.3% 100.0% $           (1,500) FULL COST RECOVERY  $          (1,500)Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0640ANIMAL CONTROLANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESTo protect public health by requiring rabies vaccinations of dogs. To remove dead animals that could be infected. To care for animals that are brought to the animal shelter until adopted or reclaimed.Various Fees to cover licensing, boarding and miscellaneous servicesSee Exhibit D. City Recommendation.    Animal Control services are considered a public safety function. Fees, rather than attempting for full cost recovery, are to encourage compliance.  Only 20% to 30% of dogs are licensed.  Increasing these fees by an unreasonable amount discourages compliance.  The Police Department completed an analysis that looked at cost and comparable fees from surrounding agencies.  It is recommended that the fees in the study be adopted.↑17.5% 20.0% $        100,000  PUBLIC SAFETY/LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $          80,000 See Exhibit D. City Recommendation.    Animal Control services are considered a public safety function. Fees, rather than attempting for full cost recovery, are to encourage compliance.  Only 20% to 30% of dogs are licensed.  Increasing these fees by an unreasonable amount discourages compliance.  The Police Department completed an analysis that looked at cost and comparable fees from surrounding agencies.  It is recommended that the fees in the study be adopted.D26 of 385.aPacket Pg. 172Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐0659CD‐CODE ENFORCMENTABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGETo include the cost to initially process a lien against property that has failed to comply with a demand to abate a code violation and the cost to release the lien. This charge would be payable before release.$115 per lien $130 per lien↑87.0% 100.0% $                800  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               800 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐0662CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTLIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGETo respond to a request for a demand letter regarding the status or release of a lien and/or abatement costs imposed.$95 $185↑51.2% 100.0% $           51,100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          40,800 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐0664CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTDUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE To prepare a duplicate release of a lien at the request of the property owner due to the loss of the original release.$28 $15↓169.4% 100.0% $              (300) FULL COST RECOVERY  $              (300)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐0666CD‐CODE ENFORCEMENTWEED ABATEMENT CHARGESTo recover the full cost of weed abatement on lots and partial lots where the owner has failed to abate the weeds prior to the City's deadline. Process involves multiple inspections & noticing. Preparation of Lien Resolution and the discing of lot.$375 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing$515 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing↑73.1% 100.0% $                100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Currently contract with County Fire, updated fee if City resumes27 of 385.aPacket Pg. 173Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6000RECREATIONAQUATICS SERVICES Providing a 10 week summer session to the community at the various community pools.  Pools are also available for rental by the schools for 3 weeks before that.See Appendix CIn addition, the City has received $39,750 from a Kaiser Grant.See appendix C Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in dff↑13.4% 25.0% $           14,000  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $          11,200 See Exhibit C.  Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  CS‐6060RECREATIONYOUTH SPORTS Providing youth sports to the community.Resident ‐ $30 per childNon‐Resident ‐ $33 per child  Resident ‐ $45 per child  Non‐Resident ‐ $50 per child↑30.2% 75.0% $             1,500  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $            1,200 Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  S‐6070RECREATIONADULT SPORTS Providing adult sports programs to the community.Soccer:  Resident ‐ $300 per team  Non‐Resident Team ‐ $350 per teamBasketball ‐ Charging direct staff and program costSoccer:  Resident ‐ $375 per team  Non‐Resident Team ‐ $425 per teamBasketball ‐ Charging direct staff and program cost‐‐24.1% 45.0% $             4,000  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $            3,200 Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  S‐6100RECREATIONCOMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALSProviding Community Center programs and rental of Community Center facilities.See Appendix CSee Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering ↑0.3% 2.0% $             4,000  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $            3,200 See Exhibit C.  Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  See C28 of 385.aPacket Pg. 174Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6130RECREATIONBALLFIELD RENTAL/USE Maintenance and rentals of ballfields to the community.Reservation ‐ $10 per hour for first hour and $5 per hour thereafterTournament Use:  $120 per field per day without lights  $180 per field per day with lightsPreparation ‐ $25 per field upon requestLighting ‐ $20 per hour for first hour and $10 per hour thereafterLocal Sports Groups do not pay for use of the fields or lights.Reservation ‐ $10 per hourTournament Use ‐ $120 per field per dayLighting ‐ $20 per hour for first hour and $15 per hour thereafterPreparation ‐ determined by the needs of the eventLocal Sports Groups:  Field Use ‐ No Charge  Lighting ‐ No Charge↑3.6% 10.0% $             2,000  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $            1,600 Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  S‐6700LIBRARYLIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENTProcessing the replacement of a lost library card.$1 per card $1 per card‐‐21.3% 21.3% $                500  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $                   ‐   Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council.  Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board 29 of 385.aPacket Pg. 175Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6710LIBRARYINTER‐LIBRARY LOAN REQUESTProcessing a  request to borrow a library item from another library.$3 per item $3 per item‐‐0.3% 0.3% $                200  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $                   ‐   Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council.  Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board S‐6720LIBRARYLIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICEProviding library research services, primarily obituaries, on request$20 per hour $20 per hour‐‐20.2% 22.0% $                  10  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $                   ‐   Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council.  Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board 30 of 385.aPacket Pg. 176Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐6730LIBRARYREPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LSProcessing and replacing lost and damaged library materials.Lost Items:  Magazines ‐ $1 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost  Other items ‐ $5 processing fee plus $40 replacement costDamaged Items ‐ $3‐$5Missing Barcode ‐ $1Missing or Damaged Book cover ‐ $5Lost Items:  Magazines ‐ $5 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost  Other items ‐ $10 processing fee plus $40 replacement costDamaged Items ‐ $3‐$5Missing Barcode ‐ $10Missing or Damaged Book cover ‐ $10↑17.7% 35.0% $                  25  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $                   ‐   Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council.  Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board S‐6740LIBRARYLIBRARY ROOM RENTAL Rental of meetings rooms at the Library.Bing Wong Auditorium ‐ $25 per hour (4 hour minimum)Kellogg Room A or B ‐ $25 per hour for eachStudy Room ‐ $15 per hour (waived with student ID)Projector ‐ $5 per dayVCR and Monitor ‐ $10 per dayDigital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium ‐ $30Computer/Internet Technical Support ‐ $20 per hourPortable Public Address S$5d($50Bing Wong Auditorium: Non‐Profit ‐ $25/hr  For Profit ‐ $50/hr (4 hr min)Kellogg Room A or B ‐ Non‐Profit ‐ $25/hr for each  For Profit ‐ $50/hr for eachStudy Room ‐ $15 per hour (waived with student ID)Projector ‐ $5 per dayVCR and Monitor ‐ $10 per dayDigital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium ‐ $30Computer/Internet Technical Support ‐ $20 per hourPortable Public Address S$5d($50↑14.5% 100.0% $                700  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $               500 Fees for Library programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  The Library Board has adopted fees without going to Council.  Recommendation is to adopt Library Board's recommendations but future increases cannot be implemented with Board approval, must go to Council. Reduced RCS estimate for downturn in economy and il idfA131 of 385.aPacket Pg. 177Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐7000CEMETERYCEMETERY INTERMENT Interment of a casket or urn at the Cemetery.Adult: Single ‐ $600    Double ‐ $850Child: Single ‐ $350    Double ‐ $650Baby ‐ $150CremaƟon ‐ $200For many sites, the City has a contractual obligation to provide the interment at the fee that was in place when the contract was signed.Single ‐ $2,295Double ‐ $2,590CremaƟon ‐ $915↑27.5% 100.0% $           14,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          11,200 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation.  Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐7010PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY DISINTERMENT Disinterment of a casket or urn on request.Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) ‐$1,500Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) ‐ $1,200Baby/Child Disinterment (Shipped Out) ‐ $800Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) ‐$5,545Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) ‐ $3,820↑31.4% 100.0% $                  50  FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. .S‐7020PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY MARKER SETTINGSInstallation of grave marker settings.Single ‐ $140Double ‐ $200Marker InscripƟon:  4 digits ‐ $50  Month, Day, Year ‐ $100  Name and years ‐ $130Single ‐ $595Double ‐ $565Marker Inscription ‐ Actual costs↑40.9% 100.0% $                100  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               100 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. S‐7030PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATIONInstallation of a flower vase at a grave site.$30 per vase.  No installation fee$95 per installation and vase↑30.9% 100.0% $                  30  FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall minor additional revenue generation. S‐7040PW‐CEMETERYREMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKERRemove or replace a cemetery marker on request.None Single ‐ $420 per markerDouble ‐ $735 per marker↑0.0% 100.0% $                230  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               200 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. 32 of 385.aPacket Pg. 178Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐7050PW‐CEMETERYGRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFERProcessing a request to transfer ownership of a grave site.$50 per transfer $125 per transfer↑39.4% 100.0% $                200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               200 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation. S‐7100PW‐CEMETERYCEMETERY SERVICES Maintenance and operation of the Cemetery.Grave Spaces:  Adult ‐ $1,200  Public Guardian ‐ $800  Child ‐ $800  Baby ‐ $200  CremaƟon ‐ $400Burial Vault ‐ $445plus fees for Concrete Bell Liners and re‐sale of concrete vaults to mortuaries.Grave Spaces:  Adult ‐ $1,950  Public Guardian ‐ $1,950  Child ‐ $1,950  Baby ‐ $1,000  CremaƟon ‐ $1,300Burial Vault/Bell Liners ‐ Actual cost plus 10%↑0.0% 100.0% $             5,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,000 Demand may decrease when full cost recovery is implemented, but overall additional revenue generation.  Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐7250PW‐PARK MAINTENANCEREPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGERepair of damage to City property by a member of the public.Actual Costs Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increased.  Additionally, finding responsible parties is difficultS‐7260RECREATIONPARK RENTAL/RESERVATIONRental of a City Park See Appendix CSee Appendix C↑77.8% 100.0% $                   ‐    PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $                   ‐   See Exhibit C.  Fees for recreation programs, if based on 100% cost recovery, would actually reduce revenue because they would be cost prohibitive to the community. Determining fees is finding a balance in cost recovery and offering programs to its residents that are affordable.  Demand may decrease with higher fees so no new net C33 of 385.aPacket Pg. 179Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐7270RECREATIONFISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCEMaintenance of the Fiscallini baseball field for use by the CSUSB Baseball team and SB Youth Baseball.Field ‐ $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lightsClub House ‐ $88.60 per dayCSUSB pays $17,000 per year.  They also provide in‐kind maintenance services.SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field.Field ‐ $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lightsClub House ‐ $200 per dayCSUSB pays $17,000 per year.  They also provide in‐kind maintenance services.SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field.↑84.0% 100.0% $             3,200  PUBLIC SERVICE/  COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT/ LEVEL OF SUBSIDIZATION  $            3,200 Major source of revenue is contract with Cal State San BernardinoS‐8000CITY CLERKDOCUMENT REPRODUCTIONProviding copies of public documents under the terms of the State Public Records First Page ‐ $0.35Each additional page ‐ $0.15First five copies ‐ No ChargeEach additional copy ‐ $0.25 per copyFPPC Copies ‐ $0.10 per ‐30.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Change in structure but no net change in revenue.S‐8020CITY CLERKELECTRONIC FILE COPY Providing copies of public records in an electronic format under the terms of the State Public Records Act.None $10 per disk if a disk is requestedNEW 0.0% 100.0% $             1,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            1,000 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.S‐8040CITY ATTORNEYADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSINGProcessing of administrative penalties for municipal code violations.None Recover the fully allocated actual costs at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.↑0.0% 100.0% $             5,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,000 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8050CITY ATTORNEYACP DEMAND LETTER Processing an Administrative Civil Penalty demand letter.$31.84 per letter $65 per letter↑48.0% 100.0% $             5,900  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,700 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.34 of 385.aPacket Pg. 180Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8060CITY ATTORNEYLIEN RELEASE Processing the release of a lien.None $65 plus any County feesNEW 48.6% 100.0% $           10,200  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            8,100 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8300FINANCENEW BUSINESS REGISTRATIONProcessing the registration information for a new business in the City.None $40 per applicationDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deletion, fee hasn't been collected since it was determined not allowable in 2012S‐8310FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION RENEWALProcessing the renewal of a business registration. This is not for the processing of the business tax renewal but rather for the updating of business registration None $15 per renewalDELETE 0.0% 0.0% $                   ‐     DELETE  $                   ‐   Staff recommends deletion, fee hasn't been collected since it was determined not allowable in 2012S‐8320FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESSProcessing of a lien on a property due to non‐payment of business registration fees and taxes.$125 per lien (City receives $104 of the fee and the County receives $21)$90 per lien plus any County processing fees↑0.0% 100.0% $         (18,300) FULL COST RECOVERY  $        (18,300)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐8330FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTERProcessing a demand letter for a business registration lien.$11 per letter $10 per letter↓117.1% 100.0% $              (100) FULL COST RECOVERY  $              (100)Based on study, fee lowered;  staff time increased in other areas and was reduced here.  S‐8340FINANCEBUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASEProcessing the release of a business registration lien.None $35 per release plus any County processing feesNEW 104.7% 100.0% $           39,400  FULL COST RECOVERY  $          31,500 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8350FINANCEDUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATEProviding a duplicate of a business registration certificate on request.$0.50 per certificate $10 per certificate↑4.8% 100.0% $                400  FULL COST RECOVERY  $               400 Minimal revenue increase, no change to RCS projection.35 of 385.aPacket Pg. 181Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8360CITY CLERKPASSPORT PROCESSING Processing passport applications for the public.$25 per application plus $15 per photograph$35 per application plus $15 per photographThe application fee is set by the federal government.↑39.0% 100.0% $           29,100  LEGAL LIMITS  $          23,200 Limited by State and/or Federal regulations/law.  Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8370CITY CLERKNOTARY PUBLIC Providing Notary Public fees to the public.$10 per document $15 per document.This fee is set by the State.↑30.3% 100.0% $                   ‐     LEGAL LIMITS  $                   ‐   Limited by State and/or Federal regulations/lawS‐8380CITY CLERKRECORDS COMPILATION Creating or compiling records that do not currently exist as a public record on request.Actual Costs Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel needed plus any outside costs.↑67.3% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   Cost recovery is based on hourly rates for actual time incurred.  Fee did not previously include overhead.   Without a consistent pattern and in light of economic downturn, revenue estimates will not be increasedS‐8390CITY CLERKCANDIDATE FILING Processing a filing for a candidate for a local office.$25 per candidateThis is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228)No change‐‐n/a n/a $                   ‐     LEGAL LIMIT  $                   ‐   No change, legal limit for fee36 of 385.aPacket Pg. 182Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8400CITY CLERKINITIATIVE FILING Processing a local initiative.$200 per applicationFee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition.This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)).No change‐‐n/a n/a $                   ‐     LEGAL LIMIT  $                   ‐   No change, legal limit for feeS‐8410CITY CLERKWEDDING CEREMONY Providing a wedding ceremony on request.$65 per ceremony $70 per ceremony↑90.9% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   ALMOST AT FULL RECOVERY, ADDITIONAL REVENUE IS NEGLIGIBLES‐8500CITY MANAGERFILM PERMIT Processing a film permit for filming within the City.$63 per permit $250 per permit↑25.3% 100.0% $             5,600  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            4,400 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.S‐8500CITY MANAGER/&  PUBLIC WORKSSTREET BANNER INSTALL Review request for street banner, if approved install and remove$200 per banner $410 per permit↑48.7% 100.0% $             2,000  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            1,600 Reduced RCS estimate by 20% for economic downturn and expected implementation date of August 1, 2020.37 of 385.aPacket Pg. 183Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public City Review of Consultant "Service Cost Study" and Recommended Fee AdjustmentsMay 6, 2020Attachment 1STUDY REF #DEPARTMENT/       DIVISIONFEE TITLE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEEIncrease (↑) Decrease (↓)  No Change (‐‐)CURRENT   RECOVERY %RECOMMENDED     RECOVERY %RCS PROJECTION INCREASE/     (DECREASE) IN REVENUECATEGORYCITY  PROJECTION INCREASE/  (DECREASE) IN REVENUEFINANCE NOTES/COMMENTSExhibit at end of this scheduleS‐8600FINANCENSF CHECK PROCESSING Processing a check returned due to insufficient funds.$26 per NSF Check Consultant recommendation: $65 per NSF check.                           City recommendation $30 first returned check; $65 each subsequent returned check in 12 month period↑40.2% 100.0% $             3,600  FULL COST RECOVERY  $            1,000 Compared to surrounding jurisdiction's (and what is allowed for business/non‐government agencies to charge) staff has lowered recommendation but added a higher tier for repeat offendersS‐9000FINANCEOTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICESTo cover the cost for services requested for which there is no fee establishedHourly rate of city staff involved in providing servicesFully burdened hourly rate of staff involved in providing service plus any materials cost↑100.0% 100.0% $                   ‐    FULL COST RECOVERY  $                   ‐   No revenue projection included because of nature of fee, unable to determine $     1,325,045  $    1,007,400  $         (50,000) $        (40,000) $     1,275,045  $       967,400 Net Revenue Increase:Reserved for General Plan Maintenance38 of 385.aPacket Pg. 184Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public SCHEDULE OF FEES Building & Safety Division, Community Development Department 300 North D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418 Ph: (909) 384-5071 Fax: (909) 384-5080 Website: www.sbcity.org I. Plan Review and Building Permits Fees The plan review and building permit fees applicable to building construction projects in the City of San Bernardino are provided in the following tables. These fees are collected to cover the costs of the plan review and building inspection services provided as part of the building permit process. These fees do not include Development Impact Fees, School Fees, Engineering Division Fees, Planning Division Fees, Water Department Fees, Health Department Fees, or other fees collected for other purposes, unless noted otherwise. A. Determining Plan Review Fees In order to determine the Plan Review Fee for a project the following procedure should be followed: 1.Plan Review Deposit (all except 1 and 2 family dwellings): a.) Identify the Construction Cost Factor in Table 2 based on the building’s occupancy group (use) and type of construction, then multiply this factor by the square footage of the use. The result is the valuation of the construction. If the building contains mixed uses, compute the valuation of each distinct use and add the valuations together to get the total valuation of the building. b.) Find the appropriate valuation range in the left-hand column of Table 3 that corresponds to the total valuation. Select the appropriate column (residential or commercial) to determine the plan review deposit fee. 2.Total Plan Review Fees: The Total Plan Review Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable: Total = Plan Review Deposit + Expeditious Plan Review + E/P/M Plan Review + Energy Plan Review + Fire Plan Review + Accessibility Plan Review + Zoning Review 3.Hourly Plan Review Rate The hourly rate for in-house plan review is $94.15. When expeditious review is requested by the applicant and performed by an outside vendor, any plan review billed hourly shall be at the vendor’s prevailing hourly rate, which is typically higher than the City rate. 4.One & Two Family Residential Construction – Plan Review Plan reviews of new single-family and duplex residential construction, additions or alteration thereto, will be performed at the hourly rate. Repetitive tract housing units will be billed at one hour. The plan review deposit for new 1 & 2 family dwellings is equal to 5 hours. The deposit for additions is equal to 3 hours. CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 2 B. Determining Building Permit Fees 1. Single-family Residential Construction A. Additions - Additions without a bath or kitchen: $1.39 per sq. ft. - Additions with a bath or kitchen: $1.54 per sq. ft. - Minimum fee for additions: $300 - Maximum fee for additions up to 1200 sq. ft.: $1166 - The fee for additions over 1200 sq. ft. is as indicated in Table 1B B. New Single-family Tract Homes (constructed in phases of five or more homes) - Refer to Table 1A C. New Single-family Infill or Custom Homes - Refer to Table 1B 2. Commercial, Industrial, and Multifamily Basic Building Permit Fee: The basic building permit fee is listed in the 2nd column of Table 3. Total Building Permit Fee: The Total Building Permit Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable: Total = Basic Building Permit Fee + Issuance Fees + Elec/Plbg/Mech Permit Fees + Certificate of Occupancy Fee + SMIP Fee* + Cultural Development Impact Fee + Archive Fee + Technology Fee (*SMIP = Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Fees) BUILDING VALUATION DATA The Community Development Department uses the following cost factors (dollars per square foot) to determine project valuation under Section 304.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted by the City of San Bernardino. Plan check and building permit fees for occupancies other than single-family residences are based on value of the project per Section 304. Valuation of a project is determined by the Building Official. The cost factors contained in Table 2 are used to calculate building valuation, which in turn is used to determine permit and plan check fees in Table 3. Valuation may or may not have a resemblance to actual square foot cost of a project. In most cases the costs indicated are below market rates compared to a bid, contract price, assessed value or sales price. The use of these cost factors by the City simply assures consistency and uniformity in the amount of fees collected for projects of similar size, construction, and occupancy. CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 3 Table 1A                 Building Permit Fees ‐Tract Homes    Square Feet  Insp. Time(hr) Permit Fee   Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.) Permit Fee  to 1200 4.77 $451  1300 4.94 $467  1400 5.11 $483  1500 5.28 $499  1600 5.45 $515 4600 10.51 $   993  1700 5.62 $531 4700 10.68 $1,009  1800 5.78 $546 4800 10.85 $1,025  1900 5.95 $562 4900 11.02 $1,041  2000 6.12 $578 5000 11.18 $1,056  2100 6.29 $594 5100 11.35 $1,072  2200 6.46 $610 5200 11.52 $1,088  2300 6.63 $626 5300 11.69 $1,104  2400 6.80 $642 5400 11.86 $1,120  2500 6.97 $658 5500 12.03 $1,136  2600 7.13 $673 5600 12.2 $1,152  2700 7.30 $689 5700 12.37 $1,168  2800 7.47 $706 5800 12.53 $1,183  2900 7.64 $722 5900 12.7 $1,200  3000 7.81 $738 6000 12.87 $1,216  3100 7.98 $754 6100 13.04 $1,232  3200 8.15 $770 6200 13.21 $1,248  3300 8.32 $786 6300 13.38 $1,264  3400 8.48 $801 6400 13.55 $1,280  3500 8.65 $817 6500 13.71 $1,295  3600 8.82 $833 6600 13.88 $1,311  3700 8.99 $849 6700 14.05 $1,327  3800 9.16 $865 6800 14.22 $1,343  3900 9.33 $881 6900 14.39 $1,359  4000 9.50 $897 7000 14.56 $1,375  4100 9.66 $912 7100 14.73 $1,391  4200 9.83 $928 7200 14.9 $1,407  4300 10.00 $945 7300 15.06 $1,422  4400 10.17 $961 7400 15.23 $1,438  4500 10.34 $977 7500 15.4 $1,455  Notes:   1. The indicated fees include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees.                2. The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees.                3. The indicated fees include a standard 2‐car garage.                4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula:  $1455 + (size‐7500)/100 X 15.94 .                5. This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more.  CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 4 Table 1B                      Building Permit Fees ‐Infill Homes    Square Feet  Insp. Time(hr) Permit Fee   Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.) Permit Fee.  to 1200 12.35 $1,166  1300 12.65 $1,195  1400 12.95 $1,223  1500 13.25 $1,251  1600 13.55 $1,280 4600 22.50 $2,125  1700 13.84 $1,307 4700 22.80 $2,153  1800 14.14 $1,336 4800 23.10 $2,182  1900 14.44 $1,364 4900 23.40 $2,210  2000 14.74 $1,392 5000 23.69 $2,238  2100 15.04 $1,421 5100 23.99 $2,266  2200 15.34 $1,449 5200 24.29 $2,294  2300 15.64 $1,477 5300 24.59 $2,323  2400 15.93 $1,505 5400 24.89 $2,351  2500 16.23 $1,533 5500 25.19 $2,379  2600 16.53 $1,561 5600 25.49 $2,408  2700 16.83 $1,590 5700 25.78 $2,435  2800 17.13 $1,618 5800 26.08 $2,463  2900 17.43 $1,646 5900 26.38 $2,492  3000 17.72 $1,674 6000 26.68 $2,520  3100 18.02 $1,702 6100 26.98 $2,548  3200 18.32 $1,730 6200 27.28 $2,577  3300 18.62 $1,759 6300 27.58 $2,605  3400 18.92 $1,787 6400 27.87 $2,632  3500 19.22 $1,815 6500 28.17 $2,661  3600 19.52 $1,844 6600 28.47 $2,689  3700 19.81 $1,871 6700 28.77 $2,717  3800 20.11 $1,899 6800 29.07 $2,746  3900 20.41 $1,928 6900 29.37 $2,774  4000 20.71 $1,956 7000 29.66 $2,801  4100 21.01 $1,984 7100 29.96 $2,830  4200 21.31 $2,013 7200 30.26 $2,858  4300 21.61 $2,041 7300 30.56 $2,886  4400 21.90 $2,068 7400 30.86 $2,915  4500 22.20 $2,097 7500 31.16 $2,943  Notes:  1. The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees.               2. The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees.               3. The indicated fees include a standard 2‐car garage.               4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula:  $2943 + (size‐7500)/100 X 28.19 .               5. This table applies to infill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less.  CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Table 2 Building Construction Valuations (Construction costs per square foot ($)) Occupancy Classification (2006 IBC)   Type of Construction    IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB   A-1 Assembly, theaters, with stage   196.11 189.78 185.37 177.60 167.20 162.27 171.92 152.56 146.94 A   -1 Assembly, theaters, w thout stage i 177.62 171.29 166.88 159.10 148.75 143.82 153.43 134.10 128.49 A-2 Assembly, nightclubs  149.94 145.74 142.04 136.49 128.53 124.91 131.71 116.50 112.58   A-2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet halls  148.94 144.74 140.04 135.49 126.53 123.91 130.71 114.50 111.58   A-3 Assembly, churches  180.72 174.39 169.98 162.21 151.82 146.89 156.54 137.18 131.57   A m   -3 Assembly, general, community halls, libraries, useums 1   52.81 146.48 141.07 134.30 122.33 118.97 128.63 108.26 103.65 A-4 Assembly, arenas  176.62 170.29 164.88 158.10 146.75 142.82 152.43 132.10 127.49   B Business  154.16 148.70 144.00 137.27 125.07 120.41 131.97 109.81 105.37   E Educational  166.52 160.91 156.34 149.52 140.14 132.98 144.59 123.34 118.69   F-1 Factory and industrial, moderate hazard   92.68 88.42 83.70 80.93 72.45 69.29 77.68 59.67 56.50   F-2 Factory and industrial, low hazard   91.68 87.42 83.70 79.93 72.45 68.29 76.68 59.67 55.50   H-1 High Hazard, explosives    86.84 82.58 78.86 75.09 67.79 63.63 71.84 55.02 N.P. H234 High Hazard   86.84 82.58 78.86 75.09 67.79 63.63 71.84 55.02 50.85 H-5 HPM  154.16 148.70 144.00 137.27 125.07 120.41 131.97 109.81 105.37   I-1 Institutional, supervised environment  152.30 147.08 143.14 137.34 128.24 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54   I-2 Institutional, hospitals  256.26 250.80 246.11 239.38 226.55 N.P. 234.08 211.31 N.P.   I-2 Institutional, nursing homes  179.18 173.72 169.02 162.30 150.51 N.P. 157.00 135.27 N.P.   I-3 Institutional, restrained  1   74.99 169.52 164.83 158.10 147.16 141.52 152.80 131.92 125.48 I   -4 Institutional, day care facilities 152.30 147.08 143.14 137.34 128.24 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54 M Mercantile  111.44 107.24 102.53 97.99 89.62 87.00 93.21 77.59 74.67   R-1 Residential, hotels  154.24 149.02 145.08 139.28 129.95 126.44 140.32 117.80 113.25   R-2 Residential, multiple family  129.33 124.11 120.17 114.37 105.16 101.65 115.53 93.01 88.46   R-3 Residential, one- and two-family  122.11 118.76 115.86 112.68 108.62 105.77 110.77 101.74 95.91   R-4 Residential, care/assisted l ving facilities  i 152.30 147.08 143.14 137.34 128.24 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54   S-1 Storage, moderate hazard   85.84 81.58 76.86 74.09 65.79 62.63 70.84 53.02 49.85   S-2 Storage, low hazard   84.84 80.58 76.86 73.09 65.79 61.63 69.84 53.02 48.85   U Utility, miscellaneous   65.15 61.60 57.92 55.03 49.70 46.33 51.94 39.23 37   s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 5 .34 Notes:        (Source: Building Safety Journal Jan‐Feb 2008) a. Private Garages use Utility, miscellaneous b. Unfinished basements (all use group) = $15.00 per sq. ft. c. For shell only buildings deduct 20 percent. d. N.P. = not permitted CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Table 2 (continued) Other Costs UNIT CONSTRUCTION COST BLOCK WALLS: - 4’ high - 5’ high - 6’ high - other $30.00 /ln. ft. $37.00 /ln. ft. $44.00 /ln. ft. $7.35 /sq. ft. DEMOLITION: (valuation = contract price) (valuation = contract price) DRYWALL $18.00 / sheet FIREPLACE $3000.00 ea. PATIOS, PORCHES $19.55 /sq. ft. PATIO SLAB ONLY WITH FOOTING $6.45 /sq. ft PATIO COVER ONLY $13.10 /sq. ft. REROOFING (1 square = 100 sq. ft.) - Built-up - Composition Shingles - Shake or Tile - Resheathing $210.00 /square $165.00 /square $320.00 /square $ 96.00/square SIGNS: (by valuation) SIDING, EXTERIOR $3.00/sq. ft. STUCCO : $4.44 /sq. ft. SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS – GUNITE (valuation = contract price) - MANUFACTURED ABOVE-GROUND POOL/SPA $125/$75 TENANT IMPROVEMENT (Use 30% of cost per square foot ) 30% WINDOW CHANGE OUTS (per window) $370.00 ea. * Deduct 20 % for shell only buildings. ** Use 30% for tenant improvements. s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 6 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 7 TABLE 3 Plan Review and Building Permit Fees Commercial, Industrial, and Multifamily Residential Occupancies Note: The following table provides basic permit and plan review fees based on valuation for commercial, industrial, and multifamily residential occupancies. Additional fees for permit issuance, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, development impacts, sewer capacity, schools, etc may apply. TOTAL VALUATION ($) Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total TOTAL VALUATION ($) Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total 1.00 - 500 60.00 14.25 74.25 501 - 600 60.00 16.15 76.15 601 - 700 60.00 18.05 78.05 701 - 800 60.00 19.95 79.95 801 - 900 60.00 21.85 81.85 901 - 1,000 60.00 23.75 83.75 1,001 - 1,100 60.00 25.65 85.65 30,001 – 31,000 291.00 276.45 567.45 1,101 - 1,200 60.00 27.55 87.55 31,001 – 32,000 297.50 282.63 580.13 1,201 - 1,300 60.00 29.45 89.45 32,001 – 33,000 304.00 288.80 592.80 1,301 - 1,400 60.00 31.35 91.35 33,001 – 34,000 310.50 294.98 605.48 1,401 - 1,500 60.00 33.25 93.25 34,001 – 35,000 317.00 301.15 618.15 1,501 - 1,600 60.00 35.15 95.15 35,001 – 36,000 323.50 307.33 630.83 1,601 - 1,700 60.00 37.05 97.05 36,001 – 37,000 330.00 313.50 643.50 1,701 - 1,800 60.00 38.95 98.95 37,001 – 38,000 336.50 319.68 656.18 1,801 - 1,900 60.00 40.85 100.85 38,001 – 39,000 343.00 325.85 668.85 1,901 - 2,000 60.00 42.75 102.75 39,001 – 40,000 349.50 332.50 682.00 40,001 – 41,000 356.00 338.20 694.20 41,001 – 42,000 362.50 344.38 706.88 2,001 - 3,000 60.00 51.30 111.30 42,001 – 43,000 369.00 350.55 719.55 3,001 – 4,000 63.00 59.85 122.85 43,001 – 44,000 375.50 356.73 732.23 4,001 – 5,000 72.00 68.40 140.40 44,001 – 45,000 382.00 362.90 744.90 5,001 – 6,000 81.00 76.95 157.95 45,001 – 46,000 388.50 369.08 757.58 6,001 – 7,000 90.00 85.50 175.50 46,001 – 47,000 395.00 375.25 770.25 7,001 – 8,000 99.00 94.05 193.05 47,001 – 48,000 401.50 381.43 782.93 8,001 – 9,000 108.00 102.60 210.60 48,001 – 49,000 408.50 387.60 796.10 9,001 – 10,000 117.00 111.15 228.15 49,001 – 50,000 414.50 393.78 808.28 10,001 – 11,000 126.00 119.70 245.70 50,001 – 51,000 419.50 398.05 817.55 11,001 – 12,000 135.00 128.25 263.25 51,001 – 52,000 423.00 402.33 825.33 12,001 – 13,000 144.00 136.80 280.80 52,001 – 53,000 428.00 406.60 834.60 13,001 – 14,000 153.00 145.35 298.35 53,001 – 54,000 432.50 410.88 843.38 14,001 – 15,000 162.00 153.90 315.90 54,001 – 55,000 437.00 415.15 852.15 15,001 – 16,000 171.00 162.45 333.45 55,001 – 56,000 441.50 419.43 860.93 16,001 – 17,000 180.00 171.00 351.00 56,001 – 57,000 446.00 423.70 869.70 17,001 – 18,000 189.00 179.55 368.55 57,001 – 58,000 450.50 427.98 878.48 18,001 – 19,000 198.00 188.10 386.10 58,001 – 59,000 455.00 432.25 887.25 19,001 – 20,000 207.00 196.65 403.65 59,001 – 60,000 459.50 436.53 896.03 20,001 – 21,000 216.00 205.20 421.20 60,001 – 61,000 464.00 440.80 904.80 21,001 – 22,000 225.00 213.75 438.75 61,001 – 62,000 468.50 445.08 913.58 22,001 – 23,000 234.00 222.30 456.30 62,001 – 63,000 473.00 449.35 922.35 23,001 – 24,000 243.00 230.85 473.85 63,001 – 64,000 477.50 453.63 931.13 24,001 – 25,000 252.00 239.45 491.45 64,001 – 65,000 482.00 457.90 939.90 25,001 – 26,000 258.00 245.10 503.10 65,001 – 66,000 486.50 462.18 948.68 26,001 – 27,000 265.00 251.75 516.75 66,001 – 67,000 491.00 466.45 957.45 27,001 – 28,000 271.00 257.45 528.45 67,001 – 68,000 495.50 470.73 966.23 28,001 – 29,000 278.00 264.10 542.10 68,001 – 69,000 500.00 475.00 975.00 29,001 – 30,000 284.00 269.80 553.80 69,001 – 70,000 504.50 479.28 983.78 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 8 TOTAL VALUATION ($) Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total TOTAL VALUATION ($) Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total 70,001 – 71,000 509.00 483.55 992.55 120,001 – 121,000 713.00 677.35 1390.35 71,001 – 72,000 513.50 487.83 1001.33 121,001 – 122,000 716.50 680.68 1397.18 72,001 – 73,000 518.00 492.10 1010.10 122,001 – 123,000 720.00 684.00 1404.00 73,001 – 74,000 522.40 496.38 1018.78 123,001 – 124,000 723.50 687.33 1410.83 74,001 – 75,000 527.00 500.65 1027.65 124,001 – 125,000 727.00 690.65 1417.65 75,001 – 76,000 531.50 504.93 1036.43 125,001 – 126,000 730.50 693.98 1424.48 76,001 – 77,000 536.00 509.20 1045.20 126,001 – 127,000 734.00 697.30 1431.30 77,001 – 78,000 540.40 513.38 1053.78 127.001 – 128,000 737.50 700.63 1438.13 78,001 – 79,000 545.00 517.75 1062.75 128,001 – 129,000 741.00 703.95 1444.95 79,001 – 80,000 549.50 522.03 1071.53 129,001 – 130,000 744.50 707.28 1451.78 80,001 – 81,000 554.00 526.50 1080.50 130,001 – 131,000 748.00 710.60 1458.60 81,001 – 82,000 558.50 530.58 1089.08 131,001 – 132,000 751.50 713.93 1465.43 82,001 – 83,000 563.00 534.85 1097.85 132,001 – 133,000 755.00 717.25 1472.25 83,001 – 84,000 567.50 539.13 1106.63 133,001 – 134,000 758.50 720.58 1479.08 84,001 – 85,000 572.00 543.40 1115.40 134,001 – 135,000 762.00 723.90 1485.90 85,001 – 86,000 576.00 547.68 1123.68 135,001 – 136,000 765.50 727.23 1492.73 86,001 – 87,000 581.00 551.95 1132.95 136,001 – 137,000 769.00 730.55 1499.55 87,001 – 88,000 585.00 556.23 1141.23 137,001 – 138,000 772.50 733.88 1506.38 88,001 – 89,000 590.00 560.50 1150.50 138,001 – 139,000 776.00 737.20 1513.20 89,001 – 90,000 594.50 564.78 1159.28 139,001 – 140,000 779.50 740.53 1520.03 90,001 – 91,000 599.00 569.05 1168.05 140,001 – 141,000 783.00 743.85 1526.85 91,001 – 92,000 603.50 573.33 1176.83 141,001 – 142,000 786.50 747.18 1533.68 92,001 – 93,000 608.50 577.60 1186.10 142,001 – 143,000 790.00 750.50 1540.50 93,001 – 94,000 612.50 581.88 1194.38 143,001 – 144,000 793.50 753.83 1547.33 94,001 – 95,000 617.00 586.15 1203.15 144,001 – 145,000 797.00 757.15 1554.15 95,001 – 96,000 621.50 590.43 1211.93 145,001 – 146,000 800.50 760.98 1560.98 96,001 – 97,000 626.00 594.70 1220.70 146,001 – 147,000 804.00 763.80 1567.80 97,001 – 98,000 630.50 598.98 1229.48 147,001 – 148,000 807.50 767.13 1574.63 98,001 – 99,000 635.00 603.25 1238.25 148,001 - 149,000 811.00 770.45 1581.45 99,001 – 100,000 639.50 607.53 1247.03 149,001 – 150,000 814.50 773.78 1588.28 100,001 – 101,000 643.00 610.85 1253.85 150,001 – 151,000 818.00 777.10 1595.10 101,001 – 102,000 646.50 614.18 1260.68 151,001 –152.,000 821.50 780.43 1601.93 102,001 – 102,000 650.00 617.50 1267.50 152,001 – 153,000 825.00 783.75 1608.75 103,001 – 104,000 653.50 620.83 1274.33 153,001 – 154,000 828.50 787.08 1615.58 104,001 – 105,000 657.00 624.15 1281.15 154,001 – 155,000 832.00 790.40 1622.40 105,001 – 106,000 660.50 627.48 1287.98 155,001 – 156,000 835.50 793.73 1629.23 106,001 – 107,000 664.00 630.80 1294.80 156,001 – 157,000 839.00 797.05 1636.05 107,001 – 108,000 667.50 634.11 1301.61 157,001 – 158,000 842.50 800.38 1642.88 108,001 – 109,000 671.00 637.45 1308.45 158,001 – 159,000 846.00 803.70 1649.70 109,001 – 110,000 674.50 640.78 1315.28 159,001 – 160,000 849.50 807.03 1656.53 110,001 – 111,000 678.00 644.10 1322.10 160,001 – 161,000 853.00 810.35 1663.35 111,001 – 112,000 681.50 647.43 1328.93 161,001 – 162,000 856.50 813.68 1670.18 112,001 – 113,000 685.00 650.75 1335.75 162,001 – 163,000 860.00 817.00 1677.00 113,001 – 114,000 688.50 654.08 1342.58 163,001 – 164,000 863.50 820.33 1683.83 114,001 – 115,000 692.00 657.40 1349.40 164,001 – 165,000 867.00 823.65 1690.65 115,001 – 116,000 695.50 660.73 1356.23 165,001 – 166,000 870.50 826.98 1697.48 116,001 – 117,000 699.00 664.05 1363.05 166,001 – 167,000 874.00 830.30 1704.30 117,001 – 118,000 702.50 667.38 1369.88 167,001 – 168,000 877.50 833.63 1711.13 118,001 – 119,000 706.00 670.70 1376.70 168,001 – 169,000 881.00 836.95 1717.95 119,001 – 120,000 709.50 674.03 1383.53 169,001 – 170,000 884.50 840.28 1774.78 For higher valuations use the formulas below. CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Building Permit Fees: For valuation ranges beyond the scope of the above table the following formulas can be used to determine the basic building permit fee : Where the valuation (V) is between $100,000.00 and $500,000.00 -- $639.50 for first $100,000.00 and $3.50 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or Building Permit Fee = $639.50 + ( )( 3.50 ) _V-100,000_ 1000 Where the valuation (V) is between $500,000.00 thru $1,000,000.00 – $2,039.50 for first $500,000.00 and $3.00 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or Building Permit Fee = $2039.50 + ( )( 3.00 ) _V-500,000_ 1000 Where the valuation (V) is $1,000,000,00 or greater – $3,539.50 for first $1,000,000.00 and $2.00 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or Building Permit Fee = $3539.50 + ( )( 2.00 ) _V-1,000,000_ 1000 Plan Review Fees: For valuation ranges beyond the scope of this table the Plan Review Fee shall be as follows: Commercial/Industrial and Multifamily Residential: 95% of the calculated building permit fee s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 9 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 10 Table 4 ELECTRICAL FEES Single-family Residential Rewire (plus service) Apartments, condominiums per sq. ft. (plus service) Commercial buildings per sq. ft. (plus service) Electrical Service : Up to 200 amps 200 amps to 1000 amps 1000 amps and over Subpanels Temporary Power Poles Meter pole Each extension pole (no meter) Unit Schedule Receptacles, lights, switches-first 20, each After 20, each Range/oven, washer/dryer, a/c unit, evaporative cooler, each Electrical Signs (for electrical work – does not include the sign structure) Additional branch circuit within same sign Meter Reset When issued in conjunction with other work Each additional meter on same building or lot Minimum Fee Solar Energy Systems Private Swimming Pools Power Apparatus (motors, generators, transformer, industrial heating, cooling or cooking equipment, etc.) - Up to 1 hp - Over 1 to 10 hp - Over 10 to 50 hp - Over 50 to 100 hp - Over 100 hp Carnivals and Circuses - Generators and Electrically Driven Rides - Mechanically Driven Rides, Walk-thru attractions w/elec. lighting - System of area booth lighting $.056 $.050 $.015 $30.50 $62.15 $124.30 18.20 $23.50 $ 12.30 $ 1.10 $ .73 $ 4.75 $24.60 $ 4.75 $40.00 $11.00 $10.00 $60.00 No Charge $49.50 $ 4.75 $12.30 $24.60 $49.50 $74.50 $23.50 $ 7.25 $ 7.25 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 11 Table 5 Plumbing Fees Plumbing fixture, each Gas meter reset (gauge test required) Gas meter reset (when issued in conjunction w/other work) Gas meter-each additional meter on same building or lot House sewer, each Cesspool Private Sewage Disposal System Demo Septic/Pit Water heater, each Repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping Gas piping system of 1 to 5 outlets Each additional outlet over 5, per outlet Industrial Waste, pretreatment interceptor, except kitchen type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps. Water Piping installation, alteration or repair Drainage/vent Piping Lawn Sprinkler System on any one meter Rainwater systems-per drain (inside building) Minimum Fee Solar Energy Systems $ 9.80 $40.00 $11.00 $10.00 $24.65 $37.25 $74.50 $22.00 $12.30 $ 4.75 $ 6.15 $ 1.10 $19.90 $ 4.75 $4.75 $ 14.80 $9.80 $60.00 No Charge Table 6 Mechanical Fees FAU to 100,000 BTU FAU over 100,000 BTU A/C unit up to 3 tons A/C unit over 3 tons up to 15 tons Twin-pack (new or replacement, includes gas or electric) Wall heater, floor furnace, suspended heater Evaporative cooler Bath exhaust fan Grease hood and duct systems Duct alter Air-handling unit HVAC $14.80 $18.20 $14.80 $27.15 $29.60 $14.80 $10.65 $ 7.25 $10.65 $10.65 $10.65 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 12 Table 7 Mobile Home Park Fees Installation/Set-up Earthquake Bracing Systems Accessory Buildings (Cabanas, Ramadas, Patios, Blockwalls, Garages, Awnings, Carports, Porches, etc.) - Without Standard Plans - With Standard Plans Fees For Constr./Alteration of Mobilehome Park Facilities - For Each Lot - Electrical Fee: Park Service - Street Lights - Unit Substation/Secondary Distribution Transformer - Alter/Replace Service or Transformer - Mobilehome Lot Service - Alter/repair/replace lot service Plan Review Fees (not charged to HCD Standard Plans) Plumbing Fees Park Drain System Private Sewage Disposal or Water Treatment System Lot Drain Inlet Alter/Repair of Drainage/Vent Piping Park Water System Water Service Outlets (water meters) Fire Hydrant or Riser Water Conditioner Plumbing Fixtures/Equipment (alter/repair/replace) Park Gas Piping System LPG or Natural Gas Tank of 60 gal. or more Mobilehome Lot Gas Outlet Riser Gas Distribution Equipment (alter/repair/replace) Miscellaneous Equipment (each installation) $196 $196 Based on valuation $196 $ 5.75 $14.00 $ 3.00 $10.50 $10.50 $7.00 $7.00 Based on valuation $14.00 $14.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 7.00 Table 8 Miscellaneous Fees Permit Issuance Fees (to be included on all permits) Supplemental Issuance Fee Minimum Permit Fee Inspections – Hourly Reinspection Fee Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours Zoning Consistency Review Fee (Bldg. Permits, Demo, etc) Certificate of Occupancy (if included on building permit) Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) Fees: Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fees are imposed by the State of California and provide funding for seismic monitoring and instrumentation throughout the State. Technology Fee Archive Fees - Per Permit or Application - Plans - Documents $40.00 $10.00 $60.00 $94.45 $94.45 $188.90 + $94.45/hr. beyond 2 hr $54.00 $475.08 $133.62 Residential = .0001 x Valuation Com/Ind. = .00021 x Valuation (including hotels) 2% of plan review & permit fees $1.00 $2.00/sheet $ .25/page CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments s:/fees/schedule of fees (revised Sept. 8, 2008) Page 13 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE B&SExhibit A 5.a Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 1 04/2020 Community & Economic Development Department • Building & Safety Division Office: 201 North E Street, 3rd Floor Mail: 290 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 P: (909) 384-5357 F: (909) 384-5155 www.sbcity.org SCHEDULE OF FEES – BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION Plan Review and Building Permit Fees The plan review and building permit fees applicable to building construction projects in the City of San Bernardino are provided in the following tables. These fees are collected to cover the costs of the plan review and building inspection services provided as part of the building process. These fees do not include Development Impact Fees, School Fees, Engineering Division Fees, Planning Division Fees, Water Department Fees, Health Department Fees, or other fees collected for other purposes unless noted otherwise. A.Determining Plan Review Fees In order to determine the Plan Review Fee for a project the following procedure should be followed: 1.Plan Review Fee (all except 1 and 2 family dwellings): a.Identify the Construction Cost Factor in Table 2 based on the building’s occupancy group (use) and type of construction, then multiply this factor by the square footage of the use. The result is the valuation of the construction. If the building contains mixed uses, compute the valuation of each distinct use and add the valuations together to get the total valuation of the building. b.Find the appropriate valuation range in the column of Table 3 that corresponds to the total valuation. Select the appropriate column to determine the plan review fee. 2.Total Plan Review Fees: The Total Plan Review Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable: Total = Plan Review Fee + Expeditious Plan Review + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Plan Review + Energy Plan Review + Fire Plan Review + Accessibility Plan Review + Zoning Review 3.Hourly Plan Review Rate The hourly rate for in-house plan review is $122.37. When expeditious review is requested by the applicant and performed by an outside vendor, any plan review billed hourly shall be at the vendor’s prevailing hourly rate, which is typically higher than the City rate. 4.One and Two-Family Residential Construction – Plan Review Plan reviews of new single-family and duplex residential construction, additions or alteration thereto, will be performed at the hourly rate. Repetitive tract housing units will be billed at one hour. The plan review fee for new 1 & 2 family dwellings and for each model of a tract is equal to 5 hours. The fee for additions is equal to 3 hours. PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 2 04/2020 B.Determining Building Permit Fees 1.Single-Family Residential Construction a.Additions -Additions without a bath or kitchen:$1.74 per sq. ft. -Additions with a bath or kitchen:$1.92 per sq. ft. -Minimum fee for additions:$375.00 -Maximum fee for additions up to 1,200 square feet: $1,459.00 -Fees for additions over 1,200 square feet:As indicated in Table 1B b.New Single-Family Tract Homes (constructed in phases of five or more homes) -Refer to Table 1A c.New Single-Family In-Fill or Custom Homes -Refer to Table 1B 2.Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Family Basic Building Permit Fee: -The basic building permit fee is listed in the 2nd column of Table 3 Total Building Permit Fee: -The Total Building Permit Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable: Total = Basic Building Permit Fee + Issuance Fees + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Permit Fees + Certificate of Occupancy Fee + SMIP Fee* + Cultural Development Impact Fee + Archive Fee + Technology Fee + General Plan Update Surcharge (*SMIP = Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Fees) BUILDING VALUATION DATA The Community & Economic Development Department uses the following cost factors (dollars per square foot) to determine project valuation under Section 304.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted by the City of San Bernardino. Plan check and building permit fees for occupancies other than single-family residences are based on value of the project per Section 304. Valuation of a project is determined by the Building Official. The cost factors contained in Table 2 are used to calculate building valuation, which in turn is used to determine permit and plan check fees in Table 3. Valuation may or may not have a resemblance to actual square foot cost of a project. In most cases the costs indicated are below market rates compared to a bid, contract price, assessed value or sales price. The use of these cost factors by the City simply assures consistency and uniformity in the amount of fees collected for projects of similar size, construction, and occupancy. PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 3 04/2020 Table 1A Building Permit Fees (Tract Homes) Square Feet Inspector Time (hou r) Permit Fee Square Feet Inspector Time (hour) Permit Fee to 1,200 4.77 $564 4,400 10.21 $1,208 1,300 4.94 $585 4,500 10.38 $1,228 1,400 5.11 $605 4,600 10.55 $1,248 1,500 5.28 $625 4,700 10.72 $1,268 1,600 5.45 $645 4,800 10.89 $1,289 1,700 5.62 $665 4,900 11.06 $1,309 1,800 5.79 $685 5,000 11.23 $1,329 1,900 5.96 $705 5,100 11.40 $1,349 2,000 6.13 $725 5,200 11.57 $1,369 2,100 6.30 $745 5,300 11.74 $1,389 2,200 6.47 $766 5,400 11.91 $1,409 2,300 6.64 $786 5,500 12.08 $1,429 2,400 6.81 $806 5,600 12.25 $1,450 2,500 6.98 $826 5,700 12.42 $1,470 2,600 7.15 $846 5,800 12.59 $1,490 2,700 7.32 $866 5,900 12.76 $1,510 2,800 7.49 $886 6,000 12.93 $1,530 2,900 7.66 $906 6,100 13.10 $1,550 3,000 7.83 $927 6,200 13.27 $1,570 3,100 8.00 $947 6,300 13.44 $1,590 3,200 8.17 $967 6,400 13.61 $1,610 3,300 8.34 $987 6,500 13.78 $1,631 3,400 8.51 $1,007 6,600 13.95 $1,651 3,500 8.68 $1,027 6,700 14.12 $1,671 3,600 8.85 $1,047 6,800 14.29 $1,691 3,700 9.02 $1,067 6,900 14.46 $1,711 3,800 9.19 $1,087 7,000 14.63 $1,731 3,900 9.36 $1,108 7,100 14.80 $1,751 4,000 9.53 $1,128 7,200 14.97 $1,771 4,100 9.70 $1,148 7,300 15.14 $1,792 4,200 9.87 $1,168 7,400 15.31 $1,812 4,300 10.04 $1,188 7,500 15.48 $1,832 Notes: 1. The indicated fees include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees 2.The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees 3.The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage 4.For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $1,832.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X 19.72 5.This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more. PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 4 04/2020 Table 1B Building Permit Fees (In-Fill Homes) Square Feet Inspector Time (hou r) Permit Fee Square Feet Inspector Time (hour) Permit Fee. to 1,200 12.35 $1,461 4,400 21.95 $2,597 1,300 12.65 $1,497 4,500 22.25 $2,633 1,400 12.95 $1,532 4,600 22.55 $2,668 1,500 13.25 $1,568 4,700 22.85 $2,704 1,600 13.55 $1,603 4,800 23.15 $2,739 1,700 13.85 $1,639 4,900 23.45 $2,775 1,800 14.15 $1,674 5,000 23.75 $2,810 1,900 14.45 $1,710 5,100 24.05 $2,846 2,000 14.75 $1,745 5,200 24.35 $2,881 2,100 15.05 $1,781 5,300 24.65 $2,917 2,200 15.35 $1,816 5,400 24.95 $2,952 2,300 15.65 $1,852 5,500 25.25 $2,998 2,400 15.95 $1,887 5,600 25.55 $3,023 2,500 16.25 $1,923 5,700 25.85 $3,059 2,600 16.55 $1,958 5,800 26.15 $3,094 2,700 16.85 $1,994 5,900 26.45 $3,130 2,800 17.15 $2,029 6,000 26.75 $3,165 2,900 17.45 $2,065 6,100 27.05 $3,201 3,000 17.75 $2,100 6,200 27.35 $3,236 3,100 18.05 $2,136 6,300 27.65 $3,272 3,200 18.35 $2,171 6,400 27.95 $3,307 3,300 18.65 $2,207 6,500 28.25 $3,343 3,400 18.95 $2,242 6,600 28.55 $3,378 3,500 19.25 $2,278 6,700 28.85 $3,414 3,600 19.55 $2,313 6,800 29.15 $3,449 3,700 19.85 $2,349 6,900 29.45 $3,485 3,800 20.15 $2,384 7,000 29.75 $3,520 3,900 20.45 $2,420 7,100 30.05 $3,556 4,000 20.75 $2,455 7,200 30.35 $3,591 4,100 21.05 $2,491 7,300 30.65 $3,627 4,200 21.35 $2,526 7,400 30.95 $3,662 4,300 21.65 $2,562 7,500 31.25 $3,698 Notes: 1. The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees 2.The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees 3.The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage 4.For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $3,698.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X $35.50 5.This table applies to in-fill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less. PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 5 04/2020 Table 2: Building Construction Valuations ( Construction costs per square foot [$] ) Occupancy Classification (2006 IBC) Type of Construction IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB A-1 Assembly, Theaters, with Stage 247.86 239.47 233.25 223.81 210.17 204.10 216.62 195.46 188.40 A-1 Assembly, Theaters, without Stage 227.10 218.71 212.49 203.05 189.41 183.34 195.86 174.70 167.65 A-2 Assembly, Nightclubs 191.96 186.56 182.12 174.70 164.94 160.39 168.64 149.29 144.33 A-2 Assembly, Restaurants, Bars, Banquet Halls 190.96 185.56 180.12 173.70 162.94 159.39 167.64 147.29 143.33 A-3 Assembly, Churches 229.69 221.30 215.08 205.64 192.37 187.27 198.45 177.66 170.60 A-3 Assembly, General, Community Halls, Libraries, Museums 192.20 183.81 176.59 168.15 153.51 148.44 160.96 138.80 132.75 A-4 Assembly, Arenas 226.10 217.71 210.49 202.05 187.41 182.34 194.86 172.70 166.65 B Business 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08 E Educational 209.90 202.64 196.82 188.34 175.49 166.60 181.86 153.45 148.75 F-1 Factory and Industrial, Moderate Hazard 117.60 112.19 105.97 101.84 91.54 87.26 97.61 75.29 70.95 F-2 Factory and Industrial, Low Hazard 116.60 111.19 105.97 100.84 91.54 86.26 96.61 75.29 69.95 H-1 High Hazard, Explosives 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 N.P. H-2/3/4 High Hazard 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 63.56 H-5 HPM 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08 I-1 Institutional, Supervised Environment 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 I-2 Institutional, Hospitals 335.53 328.23 321.81 312.65 296.45 N.P. 305.67 276.99 N.P. I-2 Institutional, Nursing Homes 233.12 225.82 219.40 210.24 195.51 N.P. 203.26 176.05 N.P. I-3 Institutional, Restrained 227.71 220.41 213.99 204.83 190.84 183.78 197.85 171.37 163.02 I-4 Institutional, Day Care Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 M Mercantile 142.95 137.54 132.11 125.68 115.38 111.83 119.62 99.73 95.77 R-1 Residential, Hotels 199.70 192.92 186.99 179.78 164.90 160.43 179.93 148.60 143.96 R-2 Residential, Multiple-Family 167.27 160.49 154.56 147.35 133.71 129.23 147.50 117.40 112.76 R-3 Residential, One and Two-Family 155.84 151.61 147.83 144.09 138.94 135.27 141.72 130.04 122.46 R-4 Residential, Care/Assisted Living Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 S-1 Storage, Moderate Hazard 108.99 103.58 97.35 93.22 83.14 78.87 88.99 66.89 62.56 S-2 Storage, Low Hazard 107.99 102.58 97.35 92.22 83.14 77.87 87.99 66.89 61.56 U Utility, Miscellaneous 84.66 79.81 74.65 71.30 64.01 59.80 68.04 50.69 48.30 Notes: 1. Private Garages use Utility, Miscellaneous 2.Unfinished basements (Group R-3) = $22.45 per square foot 3.For shell only buildings deduct 20% 4.N.P. = Not Permitted PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 6 04/2020 Table 2: Building Construction Costs (Continued) Other Costs ( Unit Construction Cost ) Block Walls: -4’ high $33.00 (per Lineal Foot) -5’ high $40.70 (per Lineal Foot) -6’ high $48.40 (per Lineal Foot) -Other $8.10 (per Square Foot) Demolition (Valuation = Contract Price) (Valuation = Contract Price) Drywall $19.80 (per Sheet) Fireplace $3,300.00 (Each) Patios/Porches $21.50 (per Square Foot) Patio Slab Only with Footing $7.10 (per Square Foot) Patio Cover Only $14.40 (per Square Foot) Reroofing (1 Square = 100 Square Foot): -Built-up $230.00 (per Square) -Composition Shingles $180.00 (per Square) -Shake or Tile $350 (per Square) -Resheathing $107.00 (per Square) Signs (by Valuation) Siding, Exterior $3.30 (per Square Foot) Stucco $4.88 (per Square Foot) Swimming Pools and Spas – Gunite (Valuation = Contract Price) Manufactured Above-Ground Pool $140 Spa $85 Tenant Improvement (Use 30% of Cost per Square Foot) 30% Window Change-Outs $405.00 (per Window) Notes: 1. Deduct 20% for shell only buildings. PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 7 04/2020 Table 3 Plan Review and Building Permit Fees Commercial, Industrial, and Multifamily Residential Occupancies Note: The following table provides basic permit and plan review fees based on valuation for commercial, industrial, and multifamily residential occupancies. Additional fees for permit issuance, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, development impacts, sewer capac ity, schools, etc. may apply. TOTAL VALUATION ($) Building Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total TOTAL VALUATION ($) Building Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total 1 – 500 60.00 30.00 90.00 501 – 600 60.00 30.00 90.00 601 – 700 60.00 30.00 90.00 701 – 800 60.00 30.00 90.00 801 – 900 60.00 30.00 90.00 901 – 1,000 60.00 30.00 90.00 1,001 – 1,100 60.00 60.00 120.00 20,001 – 21,000 270.61 266.71 537.32 1,101 – 1,200 60.00 60.00 120.00 21,001 – 22,000 281.89 277.82 559.71 1,201 – 1,300 60.00 60.00 120.00 22,001 – 23,000 293.16 288.93 582.09 1,301 – 1,400 60.00 60.00 120.00 23,001 – 24,000 304.44 300.04 604.48 1,401 – 1,500 60.00 60.00 120.00 24,001 – 25,000 315.71 311.22 626.93 1,501 – 1,600 60.00 60.00 120.00 25,001 – 26,000 323.23 318.56 641.79 1,601 – 1,700 60.00 60.00 120.00 26,001 – 27,000 332.00 327.21 659.21 1,701 – 1,800 60.00 60.00 120.00 27,001 – 28,000 339.52 334.62 674.14 1,801 – 1,900 60.00 60.00 120.00 28,001 – 29,000 348.29 343.26 691.55 1,901 – 2,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 29,001 – 30,000 355.80 350.67 706.47 30,001 – 31,000 364.57 359.31 723.88 31,001 – 32,000 372.72 367.34 740.06 2,001 – 3,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 32,001 – 33,000 380.86 375.36 756.22 3,001 – 4,000 78.93 77.79 156.72 33,001 – 34,000 389.00 383.40 772.40 4,001 – 5,000 90.20 88.90 179.10 34,001 – 35,000 397.15 391.42 788.57 5,001 – 6,000 101.48 100.01 201.49 35,001 – 36,000 405.29 399.45 804.74 6,001 – 7,000 112.75 111.13 223.88 36,001 – 37,000 413.43 407.47 820.90 7,001 – 8,000 124.03 122.24 246.27 37,001 – 38,000 421.58 415.50 837.08 8,001 – 9,000 135.31 133.35 268.66 38,001 – 39,000 429.72 423.52 853.24 9,001 – 10,000 146.58 144.47 291.05 39,001 – 40,000 437.86 432.16 870.02 10,001 – 11,000 157.86 155.58 313.44 40,001 – 41,000 446.01 439.54 885.58 11,001 – 12,000 169.13 166.69 335.82 41,001 – 42,000 454.15 447.60 901.75 12,001 – 13,000 180.41 177.80 358.21 42,001 – 43,000 462.30 455.62 917.92 13,001 – 14,000 191.68 188.92 380.60 43,001 – 44,000 470.44 463.65 934.09 14,001 – 15,000 202.96 200.03 402.99 44,001 – 45,000 478.58 471.67 950.25 15,001 – 16,000 214.23 211.14 425.37 45,001 – 46,000 486.73 479.71 966.44 16,001 – 17,000 225.51 222.25 447.76 46,001 – 47,000 494.87 487.73 982.60 17,001 – 18,000 236.79 233.37 470.16 47,001 – 48,000 503.01 495.76 998.77 18,001 – 19,000 248.06 244.48 492.54 48,001 – 49,000 511.78 503.78 1015.56 19,001 – 20,000 259.34 255.59 514.93 49,001 – 50,000 519.30 511.81 1031.11 PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 8 04/2020 TOTAL VALUATION ($) Building Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total TOTAL VALUATION ($) Building Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total 50,001 – 51,000 525.56 517.36 1042.92 90,001 – 91,000 750.45 739.61 1490.06 51,001 – 52,000 529.95 522.92 1052.87 91,001 – 92,000 756.08 745.18 1501.26 52,001 – 53,000 536.21 528.47 1064.68 92,001 – 93,000 762.35 750.73 1513.08 53,001 – 54,000 541.85 534.03 1075.88 93,001 – 94,000 767.36 756.29 1523.65 54,001 – 55,000 547.49 539.58 1087.07 94,001 – 95,000 773.00 761.84 1534.84 55,001 – 56,000 553.13 545.15 1098.28 95,001 – 96,000 778.64 767.40 1546.04 56,001 – 57,000 558.76 550.70 1109.46 96,001 – 97,000 784.27 772.95 1557.22 57,001 – 58,000 564.40 556.26 1120.66 97,001 – 98,000 789.91 778.51 1568.42 58,001 – 59,000 570.04 561.81 1131.85 98,001 – 99,000 795.55 784.06 1579.61 59,001 – 60,000 575.68 567.37 1143.05 99,001 – 100,000 801.19 789.63 1590.82 60,001 – 61,000 581.31 572.92 1154.23 100,001 – 101,000 805.57 793.94 1599.51 61,001 – 62,000 586.95 578.49 1165.44 101,001 – 102,000 809.96 798.27 1608.23 62,001 – 63,000 592.59 584.04 1176.63 102,001 – 103,000 814.34 802.59 1616.93 63,001 – 64,000 598.23 589.60 1187.83 103,001 – 104,000 818.73 806.91 1625.64 64,001 – 65,000 603.87 595.15 1199.02 104,001 – 105,000 823.11 811.23 1634.34 65,001 – 66,000 609.50 600.71 1210.21 105,001 – 106,000 827.50 815.56 1643.06 66,001 – 67,000 615.14 606.26 1221.40 106,001 – 107,000 831.88 819.87 1651.75 67,001 – 68,000 620.78 611.82 1232.60 107,001 – 108,000 836.27 824.17 1660.44 68,001 – 69,000 626.42 617.37 1243.79 108,001 – 109,000 840.65 828.52 1669.17 69,001 – 70,000 632.05 622.94 1254.99 109,001 – 110,000 845.04 832.84 1677.88 70,001 – 71,000 637.69 628.49 1266.18 110,001 – 111,000 849.42 837.16 1686.58 71,001 – 72,000 643.33 634.05 1277.38 111,001 – 112,000 853.81 841.49 1695.30 72,001 – 73,000 648.97 639.60 1288.57 112,001 – 113,000 858.19 845.80 1703.99 73,001 – 74,000 654.48 645.16 1299.64 113,001 – 114,000 862.57 850.13 1712.70 74,001 – 75,000 660.24 650.71 1310.95 114,001 – 115,000 866.96 854.45 1721.41 75,001 – 76,000 665.88 656.27 1322.15 115,001 – 116,000 871.34 858.77 1730.11 76,001 – 77,000 671.52 661.82 1333.34 116,001 – 117,000 875.73 863.09 1738.82 77,001 – 78,000 677.03 667.26 1344.29 117,001 – 118,000 880.11 867.42 1747.53 78,001 – 79,000 682.79 672.94 1355.73 118,001 – 119,000 884.50 871.73 1756.23 79,001 – 80,000 688.43 678.50 1366.93 119,001 – 120,000 888.88 876.06 1764.94 80,001 – 81,000 694.07 684.31 1378.38 120,001 – 121,000 893.27 880.38 1773.65 81,001 – 82,000 699.71 689.61 1389.32 121,001 – 122,000 897.65 884.70 1782.35 82,001 – 83,000 705.34 695.16 1400.50 122,001 – 123,000 902.04 889.02 1791.06 83,001 – 84,000 710.98 700.73 1411.71 123,001 – 124,000 906.42 893.35 1799.77 84,001 – 85,000 716.62 706.28 1422.90 124,001 – 125,000 910.81 897.66 1808.47 85,001 – 86,000 721.63 711.84 1433.47 125,001 – 126,000 915.19 901.99 1817.18 86,001 – 87,000 727.90 717.39 1445.29 126,001 – 127,000 919.58 906.30 1825.88 87,001 – 88,000 732.91 722.95 1455.86 127.001 – 128,000 923.96 910.63 1834.59 88,001 – 89,000 739.17 728.50 1467.67 128,001 – 129,000 928.35 914.95 1843.30 89,001 – 90,000 744.81 734.06 1478.87 129,001 – 130,000 932.73 919.28 1852.01 PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 9 04/2020 TOTAL VALUATION ($) Building Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total TOTAL VALUATION ($) Building Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Sub Total 130,001 – 131,000 937.12 923.59 1860.71 150,001 – 151,000 1024.82 1010.02 2034.84 131,001 – 132,000 941.50 927.92 1869.42 151,001 – 152,000 1029.20 1014.35 2043.55 132,001 – 133,000 945.89 932.23 1878.12 152,001 – 153,000 1033.59 1018.67 2052.26 133,001 – 134,000 950.27 936.56 1886.83 153,001 – 154,000 1037.97 1023.00 2060.97 134,001 – 135,000 954.66 940.88 1895.54 154,001 – 155,000 1042.36 1027.31 2069.67 135,001 – 136,000 959.04 945.21 1904.25 155,001 – 156,000 1046.74 1031.64 2078.38 136,001 – 137,000 963.43 949.52 1912.95 156,001 – 157,000 1051.13 1035.95 2087.08 137,001 – 138,000 967.81 953.85 1921.66 157,001 – 158,000 1055.51 1040.28 2095.79 138,001 – 139,000 972.20 958.16 1930.36 158,001 – 159,000 1059.90 1044.60 2104.50 139,001 – 140,000 976.58 962.49 1939.07 159,001 – 160,000 1064.28 1048.92 2113.20 140,001 – 141,000 980.97 966.81 1947.78 160,001 – 161,000 1068.27 1053.24 2121.91 141,001 – 142,000 985.35 971.14 1956.49 161,001 – 162,000 1073.05 1057.57 2130.62 142,001 – 143,000 989.74 975.45 1965.19 162,001 – 163,000 1077.44 1061.88 2139.32 143,001 – 144,000 994.12 979.78 1973.90 163,001 – 164,000 1081.82 1066.21 2148.03 144,001 – 145,000 998.51 984.09 1982.60 164,001 – 165,000 1086.21 1070.53 2156.74 145,001 – 146,000 1002.89 989.07 1991.96 165,001 – 166,000 1090.59 1074.85 2165.44 146,001 – 147,000 1007.28 992.74 2000.02 166,001 – 167,000 1094.98 1079.17 2174.15 147,001 – 148,000 1011.66 997.07 2008.73 167,001 – 168,000 1099.36 1083.50 2182.86 148,001 – 149,000 1016.05 1001.38 2017.43 168,001 – 169,000 1103.75 1087.81 2191.56 149,001 – 150,000 1020.43 1005.71 2026.14 169,001 – 170,000 1108.13 1092.14 2200.27 BUILDING PERMIT FEES For valuation ranges beyond the scope of the above table the following formulas can be used to determine the basic building permit fee: Where the valuation (V) is between $170,001.00 and $500,000.00 – $1108.13 for first $170,000.00 and $4.40 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or Building Permit Fee = $1108.13 + ( V-170,000 )( 4.40 ) 1000 Where the valuation (V) is between $500,000.00 and $1,000,000.00 – $2,560.13 for first $500,000.00 and $3.75 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or Building Permit Fee = $2560.13 + ( V-500,000 )( 3.75 ) 1000 Where the valuation (V) is $1,000,000,00 or greater – $4,435.13 for first $1,000,000.00 and $2.50 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or Building Permit Fee = $4435.13 + ( V-1,000,000 )( 2.50 ) 1000 PLAN REVIEW FEES For valuation ranges beyond the scope of this table the Plan Review Fee shall be as follows: Commercial/Industrial and Multiple-Family Residential: 95% of the calculated Building Permit Fee PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 10 04/2020 Table 4: Electrical Fees Single-family Residential Rewire (Plus Service) $0.070 Apartments, Condominiums per Square Foot (Plus Service) $0.063 Commercial Buildings per Square Foot (Plus Service) $0.019 Electrical Service: -Up to 200 amps $38.21 -200 Amps to 1000 Amps $77.86 -1000 Amps and Over $155.73 Subpanels $22.80 Temporary Power Poles: -Meter Pole $29.44 -Each Extension Pole (no Meter)$15.79 Unit Schedule: -Receptacles, Lights, Switches - First 20 (Each)$1.38 -After 20 (Each)$0.91 Range/Oven, Washer/Dryer, A/C Unit, Evaporative Cooler $5.95 (Each) Electrical Signs (for Electrical Work – Does not Include the Sign Structure) $30.82 -Additional Branch Circuit within Same Sign $5.95 Meter Reset $51.11 -When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work $13.78 -Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot $12.53 Minimum Fee $60.00 Solar Energy Systems No Charge Private Swimming Pools $62.00 Power Apparatus (Motors, Generators, Transformer, Industrial Heating, Cooling, or Cooking Equipment, etc.) -Up to 1 hp $5.95 -Over 1 to 10 hp $15.40 -Over 10 to 50 hp $30.10 -Over 50 to 100 hp $62.00 -Over 100 hp $93.25 Carnivals and Circuses: -Generators and Electrically Driven Rides $29.50 -Mechanically Driven Rides, Walk-Thru Attractions with Electrical Lighting $9.00 -System of Area Booth Lighting $9.00 PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 11 04/2020 Table 5: Plumbing Fees Plumbing Fixture $12.25 (Each) Gas Meter Reset (Gauge Test Required) $50.00 Gas Meter Reset (When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work) $14.00 Gas Meter - Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot $12.50 House Sewer $30.90 (Each) Cesspool $46.65 Private Sewage Disposal System $93.35 Demo Septic/Pit $27.55 Water Heater $15.40 (Each) Repair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping $5.95 Gas Piping System: -1 to 5 Outlets $7.70 -Each Additional Outlet Over 5 $1.40 (per Outlet) Industrial Waste, Pretreatment Interceptor, Except Kitchen Type Grease Interceptors Functioning as Fixture Traps. $24.95 Water Piping Installation, Alteration or Repair $5.95 Drainage/Vent Piping $5.95 Lawn Sprinkler System on any one Meter $18.55 Rainwater Systems - per Drain (Inside Building) $12.30 Minimum Fee $60.00 Solar Energy Systems No Charge Table 6: Mechanical Fees FAU: -Up to 100,000 BTU $18.55 -Over 100,000 BTU $22.80 A/C Unit: -Up to 3 Tons $18.55 -Between 3 - 15 Tons $34.00 Twin-Pack (New or Replacement, Includes Gas or Electric) $37.10 Wall Heater, Floor Furnace, or Suspended Heater $18.55 Evaporative Cooler $13.35 Bath Exhaust Fan $9.10 Grease Hood and Duct Systems $13.35 Duct Alteration $13.35 Air-Handling Unit HVAC $13.35 PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 12 04/2020 Table 7: Mobile Home Park Fees Installation/Set-up $245.00 Earthquake Bracing Systems $245.00 Accessory Buildings (Cabanas, Ramadas, Patios, Block Walls, Garages, Awnings, Carports, Porches, etc.): -Without Standard Plans (Based on Valuation) -With Standard Plans $245.00 Fees for Construction/Alteration of Mobile Home Park Facilities: -For Each Lot $7.20 -Electrical Fee: Park Service $17.50 -Street Lights $3.75 -Unit Substation/Secondary Distribution Transformer $13.15 -Alter/Replace Service or Transformer $13.15 -Mobile Home Lot Service $8.75 -Alter/Repair/Replace lot service $8.75 Plan Review Fees (not Charged to HCD Standard Plans) (Based on Valuation) Plumbing Fees: Park Drain System $17.50 -Private Sewage Disposal or Water Treatment System $17.50 -Lot Drain Inlet $8.75 -Alter/Repair of Drainage/Vent Piping $8.75 -Park Water System $8.75 -Water Service Outlets (Water Meters)$5.30 -Fire Hydrant or Riser $5.30 -Water Conditioner $5.30 -Plumbing Fixtures/Equipment (Alter/Repair/Replace)$5.30 Park Gas Piping System $8.75 LPG or Natural Gas Tank of 60 Gallon or More $8.75 Mobile Home Lot Gas Outlet Riser $5.30 Gas Distribution Equipment (Alter/Repair/Replace) $5.30 Miscellaneous Equipment (Each Installation) $8.75 PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 13 04/2020 Table 8: Miscellaneous Fees Permit Issuance Fees (to be Included on all Permits) $60.00 Supplemental Issuance Fee $15.00 Minimum Permit Fee $60.00 Inspections $118.35 (per Hour) Reinspection Fee $118.35 Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours $236.70 + 118.35 (per Hour) Beyond 2 Hours Zoning Consistency Review Fee (Build ing Permits, Demo, etc.) $55.00 Certificate of Occupancy $500.00 (if Included on Building Permit) $167.40 Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) Fees: Residential = .0001 x Valuation Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fees are imposed by the State of California and provide funding for seismic monitoring and instrumentation throughout the State. Commercial/Industrial = .00021 x Valuation (Including Hotels) Technology Fee 2% of Plan Review & Permit Fees Archive Fees: -Per Permit or Application $1.25 -Plans $3.15 (per Sheet) -Documents $0.35 (per Page) PROPOSEDExhibit B 5.a Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments PROPOSED Detail of Recreation Fees 1 Aquatics Fees Current Fee Proposed Fee Jerry Lewis Swim Center Daily Admission Ages 2-7 $1 $2 Ages 8-17 $1.50 $3.00 Adults $3 $5 Ages 60 or older $1.50 $3.00 Family Season Swim Pass 1-6 members $55 7-12 members $75 1-6 people – Year 1 $60 1-6 people – Year 2 $65 1-6 people – Year 3 $70 Commercial Season Swim Pass 15-25 employees $200 $300 26-50 employees $300 $400 15-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $10 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $12 Delete Fee Adults $30 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $12 Delete Fee 25-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $15 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $20 Delete Fee Adults $45 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $20 Delete Fee Swim Classes $40 $40 Exhibit C 5.a Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments PROPOSED Detail of Recreation Fees 2 Current Fee Proposed Fee Community Pools Daily Admission Ages 2-7 $0.50 $1.00 Ages 8-17 $1 $2.00 Adults $2 $3.00 Ages 60 or older $1 $2 Family Season Swim Pass 1-6 members $45 7-12 members $65 1-6 people – Year 1 $60 1-6 people – Year 2 $65 1-6 people – Year 3 $70 Commercial Season Swim Pass 15-25 employees $175 $200 26-50 employees $250 $300 15-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $5 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $10 Delete Fee Adults $20 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $10 Delete Fee 25-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $7 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $15 Delete Fee Adults $30 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $15 Delete Fee Swim Pass Reissue $5 $5 Exhibit C 5.a Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments PROPOSED Detail of Recreation Fees 3 Current Fee Proposed Fee Facility/Park Rentals Community Center Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min) Two or more Rooms $100/first 2 hrs + $40/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min) Assembly Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min) Gymnasium $90.50/hr + $28/add’l hr $90/hr (2 hr min) Shower Room $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min) Kitchen $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min) FDR Bowl (2 hr min) $130/hr + $60/add’l hr $130/hr (2 hr min) Seccombe Lake Pavilion $55/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $55/hr (2 hr min) La Plaza Gazebo $40/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $40/hr (2 hr min) Wading Pools $36.50 per hour Delete Fee Concessions Stands $100 per use Delete Fee Perris Hill Crafter $75/month $75/month Perris Hill Park Stage $25/hr + $8/add’l hr $25/hr (2 hr min) Tennis Court Tournament $10/hr + $5/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min) (per court/day) Jerry Lewis Swim Center $92/hr + $46/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min) (2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards All Other Pools $25/hr $25/hr (2 hr min) (2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards Group Picnic Reservations (use fee per use) Size of Group Up to 50 $25 $35 51-99 $35 $35 100-199 $75 $75 200-399 $100 $100 Exhibit C 5.a Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments PROPOSED Detail of Recreation Fees 4 Current Fee Proposed Fee 400-699 $200 $200 700 and up $350 $350 Picnic Shelter $30 per day $40 per day Picnic Shelter Utility Access $25 per day $35 per day Parks/Parking Lots for Fundraising/ Special Events (not subject to resident or non-resident use cost adjustment) $200 per day $200 per day Fees for Equipment and/or Service: Bleacher (up to 4 sets) $465 per occasion $465 per occasion Trash Receptacles $2.50 each per occasion $2.50 each per occasion Picnic Tables $10 each per occasion $10 each per occasion Stage Trailer $250 per occasion $250 per occasion Folding Chairs $1.50 each per occasion $1.50 each per occasion Folding Tables $8 each per occasion $8 each per occasion Bunting $50 per day $50 per day Banners $40 each per week $40 each per week Curtain Dividers $15 each per occasion $15 each per occasion Kiosk Sign $25 each per occasion $25 each per occasion Choral Risers $100 set per occasion $100 set per occasion Adult Drop-In Basketball $2 per session $2 per session Ballfield base rental $25 per set $25 per set Exhibit C 5.a Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments PROPOSED Detail of Recreation Fees 5 Current Fee Proposed Fee Facilities/Parks Rental Refundable Damage Bond & Clean-Up Deposit Number of People Fewer than 50 $75 $75 50 – 100 $650 $650 101 – 200 $1,250 $1,050 201 - 500 $1,750 $1,750 501 - 1,000 $3,500 $3,500 1,001+ $8,000 $8,000 Exhibit C 5.a Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Fee Type Current Fee Recommended Fee $ Increase Reason for Change 1 Year Altered $20 $24 $4 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 2 Year Altered $30 $42 $12 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 3 Year Altered $40 $54 $14 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 1 Year Altered $10 $12 $12 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 2 Year Altered $15 $24 $9 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 3 Year Altered $20 $36 $16 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 1 Year $75 $96 $21 Adopt SBC License Fee/The increased cost encourages responsible pet ownership and is intended to reduce the stray population 2 Year City does not offer 2 year unaltered 3 Year City does not offer 3 year unaltered Aviary $50 $60 $10 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Cat Fancier $25 $30 $5 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Circus $150 $200 $50 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Grooming $100 $250 $150 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis Pet Shop $150 $236 $86 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis Petting Zoo $100 $263 $163 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis Field Service Charge $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $83.90. Owner Surrender $25 + 3 Days Boarding $30 + 3 Days Boarding $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40. Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $44.41 Livestock $50 $65 $15 Increase to meet inflation of cost for service Failure to renew within 30 days of expiration $20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis Failure to license a new dog within 30 days of ownership $20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis Failure to license a dog within 30 days of moving to SBC $20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis SENIOR CITIZEN 60+ UNALTERED DOG MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES & PERMITS GENERAL FINE ANIMAL LICENSE PENALTY Schedule of Proposed Animal Control Fees Exhibit D 5.a Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments) Fee Type Current Fee Recommended Fee $ Increase Reason for Change Dog or Cat $30 $35 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $86.81 Horse $250 $315 $65 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Rabbit $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Hamster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Guinea Pig $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Snake $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Goat $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Chicken $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Rooster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Duck $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Turtle $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Tortoise $20 $26 $6 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Pig $40 $52 $12 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services 1st $40 1st $60 1st $20 2nd $80 2nd $120 2nd $40 All Other Offenses $60 X Total # of Offenses 3rd and All Other Offenses $240 3rd $60 1st $80 1st $80 2nd $160 2nd $160 All Other Offenses $70 x Total # of All Other Offenses $70 x Total # of Offenses Small Animals $30 + $2 Daily Board $40 + $3 Daily Board $11 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $77.57 Medium Livestock $50 + $10 Daily Board $70 + $15 Daily Board $25 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $207.32 Large Livestock $150 + $20 Daily Board $250 $100 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $366.31 Dog/Cat $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $30.40 Quarantine Board $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $34.79 Small Animal $2 $3 $1 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Medium Animal $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $34.79 Large $20 $30 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $52.35 ANIMAL ADOPTION FEE APPREHENSION FEE BOARDING FEE Field Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $103.52 Unaltered No Change Schedule of Proposed Animal Control Fees Exhibit D 5.a Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments) Fee Type Current Fee Recommended Fee $ Increase Reason for Change Field Service Charge $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $83.90. Owner Surrender $55 $60 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40 Litters not weaned $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40 Litters weaned $30 $60 $30 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40 Euthanasia $25 $35 $10 Comparative Analysis Bordatell/Da2PPV $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.22 FVRCP $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.22 With Adoption $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $26.59 Public Walk-In $20 $25 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $26.59 Rabies Vac. Dep.$12 $12 No Change Cat Trap $50 Deposit with full refund Same deposit with $15 fee $15 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.41 Skunk Trap $100 Deposit with full refund Same deposit with $15 fee $15 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.41 Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $44.41 Vet Treatment $90 $120 $30 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $153.28 Spay/Neuter $55 $55 No Change MICROCHIP IDENTIFICATION FEE FIELD SERVICE FEE OWNER SURRENDER FEE VACCINATION FEE Schedule of Proposed Animal Control Fees Exhibit D 5.a Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO POLICE DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Teri Ledoux, City Manager FROM: Eric McBride, Interim Chief of Police Francisco Hernandez, Captain SUBJECT: Animal Control Fees DATE: April 14, 2020 COPIES: Rita Conrad, City Manager’s Office Recommendation Review and discuss raising fees related to animal licensing, animal field services, and animal shelter services. Background The San Bernardino City Animal Shelter has provided services to the citizens of San Bernardino for over 50 years. While the cost of goods, services, employee salaries, staffing needs, and investment in maintaining the shelter has continued to increase, animal license and service fees have not increased since May 18, 2009 (Resolution 2009-122). An increase in fees will help offset the rising cost of animal control operations. The last two years have produced an average intake of over 7,500 animals annually that require equipment, materials, and staff resources provided by the City. During the year 2018, the City sold 4,930 animal licenses. A comparative analysis of licensing fees between the City, the County of Riverside, and County of San Bernardino, shows that the City would see an increase in revenue generated from licensing by bringing current fees in line with San Bernardino County. Cost analysis of animal service fees also reveals that the City should increase numerous fees to assist in recovering some of the City’s cost for providing services. Discussion Traditionally fees for service have been determined by calculating the actual cost to provide a service and setting fees at a rate that attempts to recover the cost of those services. There are several reasons complete cost recovery is not an option when considering animal services. One factor is that a large portion of animal services provided may be unbillable. For example, there are no field service fees collected for picking up a stray dog if an owner does not respond to collect the dog. Additionally, Exhibit D 5.a Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 2 of 9 raising fees to cover actual costs would likely result in greater noncompliance, which could negate any benefit to revenue from fee increases. Many factors support the need to increase animal service fees from the last established fees in 2009. The animal control budget has increased from $1,167,700 in FY09/10 to the current budget of $2,563,200 for FY2019/2020. The increase reflects a 120% change. Revenue has also decreased significantly since FY09/210 from $1,189,939.62, to $678,300.00 in FY19/20 for a revenue decrease of 43%. This decrease was influenced by the loss of contract city revenue and a reduction in the number of animal licenses sold and fees collected. The number of employees budgeted for animal control has increased from 15 in FY09/10 to 24 full-time staff and seven part-time staff in FY19/20. Finally, the California Consumer Price Index has shown a 26% increase in the cost of goods and services between 2009 and 2019. Table 1 illustrates the above- mentioned factors. Table 1 ANIMAL CONTROL COST FACTORS FY09/10 Actual FY19/20 Adopted % Change Budget $1,167,700 $2,563,200 +120% Revenue $1,189,939.62 $678,300 -43% # of Staff 15 31 +106% California Consumer Price Index April 2009=222.896 April 2019=280.275 Inflation 26% Compounded to the annual expense to operate the shelter and provide animal services are the unfunded costs involved in much-needed shelter repair and upgrades required to bring the shelter closer to safe and modern standards. Staff compared city fees to Riverside and San Bernardino County to determine the impact increasing animal license fees would have on animal service-related revenue. Both counties have different titles and services offered under various fees, so only licensing fees were compared in the below table. Table 2 illustrates the costs of various license fees and the difference in revenue that would be generated by adopting either San Bernardino or Riverside County Animal licensing fees. Riverside County recently increased fees in 2016 and is currently reviewing its fees to achieve better cost recovery. Riverside determines fee increases based on cost analysis and comparative analysis. San Bernardino County reviews and considers fee adjustment annually and last increased fees in 2016-2017. San Bernardino County uses a cost analysis to determine fee increases. Only validated licensing information was used for the year 2018. 5.a Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 3 of 9 Table 2 2018 Lic Sold SB City Lic Fees Riv Lic Fees SB County (SBC) Lic Fees SB City Fee Revenue Riv County Fee Revenue SB County (SBC) Fee Revenue 1 Year Altered 1266 $20 $17 $24 $25,320 $21,522 $30,384 2 Year Altered 133 $30 $34 $42 $3,990 $4,522 $5,586 3 Year Altered 699 $40 $49 $54 $27,960 $34,251 $37,746 1 Year Senior Altered 676 $10 $12 $12 $6,760 $8,112 $8,112 2 Year Senior Altered 90 $15 $24 $24 $1,350 $2,160 $2,160 3 Year Senior Altered 788 $20 $36 $36 $15,760 $28,368 $28,368 1 Year Unaltered 265 $75 $100 $96 $56,925. 0 $75,900 $72,864 2 Year Unaltered 1 $150 $200 $192 $150.00 $20 $192 3 Year Unaltered 2 $225 $300 $288 $675.00 $900 $864 Total $138,890 $175,935 $186,276 % Increase $37,045 (27%) $47,386 (34%) Adopting Riverside’s licensing fees would have produced an increase in annual licensing revenue of $37,045 (27%), while San Bernardino County fees would have provided an increase of $47,386 (34%) during the year 2018. During FY18/19, the actual revenue generated by animal control was $391,033.49, which accounted for 18.7% of the animal control budget. The total expenditure for FY18/19 was $2,083,903.57, which left a gap of $1,692,870.80 to be covered by the City from the general fund. Raising fees will increase revenue and help reduce the gap between revenue and expenses to operate animal control and shelter services. 5.a Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 4 of 9 Methodology Staff’s recommendations are based on comparison with San Bernardino and Riverside County Fees, as well as cost analysis of the recommended fees involving an increase. Cost analysis, consistent to those used in 2009 for the previous fee increase, was used for many of the fees to determine the actual cost to the City for providing services. Animal service employees with a combined total of 34 years of experience working for the City providing animal control and shelter services were interviewed and helped to identify the amount of time and resources required for each service. Table 3 illustrates the current fees, recommended fees, and method used to suggest the recommended fees. Table 3 Recommended Fees Fee Type Current Fee Rec. Fee $ Increase Reason for Change 1 Year Altered $20 $24 $4 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 2 Year Altered $30 $42 $12 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 3 Year Altered $40 $54 $14 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis SENIOR CITIZEN 60+ Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 1 Year Altered $10 $12 $12 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 2 Year Altered $15 $24 $9 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis 3 Year Altered $20 $36 $16 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis UNALTERED DOG 1 Year $75 $96 $21 Adopt SBC License Fee/The increased cost encourages responsible pet ownership and is intended to reduce the stray population 2 Year City does not offer 2 year unaltered 3 Year City does not offer 3 year unaltered MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES & 5.a Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 5 of 9 PERMITS Aviary $50 $60 $10 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Cat Fancier $25 $30 $5 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Circus $150 $200 $50 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Grooming $100 $250 $150 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis Pet Shop $150 $236 $86 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis Petting Zoo $100 $263 $163 Adopt SBC License Fee/Comparative Analysis GENERAL FINE Field Service Charge $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $83.90. Owner Surrender $25 + 3 Days Boarding $30 + 3 Days Boarding $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40. Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $44.41 Livestock $50 $65 $15 Increase to meet inflation of cost for service ANIMAL LICENSE PENALTY Failure to renew within 30 days of expiration $20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis Failure to license a new dog within 30 days of ownership $20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis Failure to license a dog within 30 days of moving to SBC $20 $25 $5 Comparative Analysis ANIMAL ADOPTION FEE Dog or Cat $30 $35 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $86.81 Horse $250 $315 $65 Increase to meet inflation of 5.a Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 6 of 9 cost for services Rabbit $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Hamster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Guinea Pig $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Snake $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Goat $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Chicken $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Rooster $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Duck $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Turtle $5 $7 $2 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Tortoise $20 $26 $6 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Pig $40 $52 $12 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Apprehension Fee Field 1st $40 2nd $80 All Other Offenses $60 X Total # of Offenses 1st $60 2nd $120 3rd and All Other Offenses $240 1st $20 2nd $40 3rd $60 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $103.52 Unaltered 1st $80 2nd $160 All Other Offenses $70 x Total # of Offenses 1st $80 2nd $160 All Other Offenses $70 x Total # of Offenses No Change Small Animals $30 + $2 Daily Board $40 + $3 Daily Board $11 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $77.57 Medium Livestock $50 + $10 Daily Board $70 + $15 Daily $25 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $207.32 5.a Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 7 of 9 Board Large Livestock $150 + $20 Daily Board $250 $100 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $366.31 BOARDING FEE Dog/Cat $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $30.40 Quarantine Board $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $34.79 Small Animal $2 $3 $1 Increase to meet inflation of cost for services Medium Animal $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $34.79 Large $20 $30 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $52.35 FIELD SERVICE FEE Field Service Charge $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $83.90. OWNER SURRENDER FEE Owner Surrender $55 $60 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40 Litters not weaned $50 $60 $10 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40 Litters weaned $30 $60 $30 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $70.40 Euthanasia $25 $35 $10 Comparative Analysis VACCINATION FEE Bordatell/Da2PPV $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.22 FVRCP $10 $15 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.22 5.a Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 8 of 9 MICROCHIP IDENTIFICATION FEE With Adoption $15 $20 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $26.59 Public Walk-In $20 $25 $5 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $26.59 Rabies Vac. Dep. $12 $12 No Change Cat Trap $50 Deposit with full refund Same deposit with $15 fee $15 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.41 Skunk Trap $100 Deposit with full refund Same deposit with $15 fee $15 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $24.41 Disposal $10 $30 $20 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $44.41 Vet Treatment $90 $120 $30 Increase Based on Cost Analysis with a Total Service Cost to the City of $153.28 Spay/Neuter $55 $55 No Change Staff added the recommended fees to the revenue generated from FY 2018/19. A percentage rate of 34% was added to licensing fees based on information gained from table 2. Table 4 illustrates an increase in fee generated revenue by $104,645.66 with the addition of the recommended fees. Table 4 Fee Description FY2018/19 Actual Revenue With Recommended Fees Revenue Increase 4320 Animal Licenses $130,220.00 $174,494.80 $44,274.80 4352 Miscellaneous Licenses & Permits $1,710.00 Unknown 4410 General Fine $7,473.00 $8,967.60 $1,494.60 4430 Animal License Penalty $10,400.00 $13,000.00 $2,600.00 4756 Animal Adoption Fee $46,521.00 $54,276.05 $7,755.05 4757 Contracted Shelter $71,968.36 N/A 5.a Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Page 9 of 9 Fee 4758 Animal Alteration Fee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4759 Apprehension Fee $23,400.00 $35,100.00 $11,700.00 4760 Boarding Fee $29,803.00 $44,704.50 $14,901.50 4761 Field Service Fee $1,550.00 $1,860.00 $310.00 4763 Owner Release Fee $9,400.13 $10,340.14 $940.01 4764 Vaccination Fee $26,100.00 $39,150.00 $13,050.00 4765 Microchip Identification Fee $23,090.00 $30,709.70 $7,619.70 Total Revenue Increase $104,645.66 2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The request to increase animal control fees aligns with Goal No. 1: Financial Stability. Implement, maintain, and update a fiscal accountability plan. Fiscal Impact Adopting the recommended fees has the potential to generate approximately $100,000 in additional revenue based on the previous year’s budget report. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino raise current fees to increase revenue and offset the cost of animal control operations. 5.a Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments Comparisons of Fees to Other CitiesExhibit EFee Title DepartmentCurrent Proposed Riverside Ontario Fontana Redlands Rialto VictorvilleTemporary Enroachment Permit PW$25-$136 $25-$175 $163-$651 $700 $98 $330 NA NAOff‐Site Improvement Plan Check ($100K) PW$4,045 $3,850 $4,452 $4,650 $4,465 $1,391+$555/sht $1,570+$800/sht $4,900Off‐Site Improvement Inspection ($100K)PW$4,045 $11,170 $2,531+$108/hr $5,450 $4,290 $84+$126/cu.yd. NA $4,000NPDES Business InspectionPW$143 $175 NA NA NA $83 NA NANPDES Construction InspectionPW$98-$179 $140 NA $451 $1,500 $257 $4,964 NATraffic Study ReportPW$719 $1,320 $380-$1,519 VARIES $1,410 NA $3,465 $723Review of Water Quality Mgmt Plans PW$80-$1,130 $155-$1,440 $3,151 NA NA $806+$199/lot $3,545 $667Conditional Use Permit (Commercial) CED$7,133 $5,555 $8,615 $2,869 $1,220 $7,778 $3,109 $2,454Tentative Parcel Map CED$4,262+$65/pcl $5,170 $8,125 $3,544 $6,535+$100/ac $6,514 $2,706 $1,227Pre Application Review D/ERC Review CED$2,424 $3,440 $1,712 $1,356 $1,000 $332 NA $0Zoning Verification Review CED$450 $245 $219 $77 $300 $1,068 $182 NAAquatics Parks/Rec$1 $1 NA NA $0-$5 NA $1.20-$5.10 NAYouth Sports Parks/Rec$30 $45 $50 $30 $70 $55 tennis $52-$110 $63Adult Sports (per team) Parks/Rec$300 $300 $310=$370 $52-$305 $60-$350 $50 tennis $377-$520 $390Park Rental Reservation ‐shelter Parks/Rec$30 $40 $85 NA $50-$100 NA $15-$45/hr:field $45-$60/dayAlarm Systems PD$25/$50/$10 - Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income Resident) $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation $10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarms in 12-month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or panic: Reg./LIR]: [$75/$10]/[$200/$20] - 1st thru 4th Non-Permitted [$90/$10]/[$250/$20] - 5th & 6th [$90/$20]/[$300/$40] - 7th thru 9th[$175/$20]/[$350/$40] - 10th & SubsequentConsultant Recommendation: $96 - Annual Alarm Permit ($75-City plus $21-Alarm Vendor)$25 - Alarm Sys.Installation$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:$256 - All False Alarms without a Permit ($200-City plus $56-Alarm Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12 month period with a Permit. (Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial response or between intrusion and panic/robbery response.) City Staff Recommendation: $30 - Annual Alarm Permit $15 Annual Alarm Permit Low Income; $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation$10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr.False Alarm Charge:With Permit: $0 charge 1st and 2nd; $100 3rd, $200 4th, $300 %the and above. Without Permit: $200 1st, $250 2nd; $350 3rd, $400 4th and above.$16 - One-time Permit Fee Residential / Commercial 1st response No charge Warning2nd response No charge $3503rd response $100 $4004th response $150 $4505th response $200 $5006th+ response $250 $500 $50 - One-time Permit Fee (Commercial) $25 - One time Permit Fee (Residential) 1st response No fine, Alarm Card Issued2nd response No fine, Alarm Card Issued3rd response $75 / $504th response $100 / $755th response $150 / $1006th+ response $200 / $100 Alarm Permit and Response RevokedPermit Fee: N/A False Alarm Charge: Up to $350N/A $25.90 - One-time Permit Fee (Commercial) $19.40 - One time Permit Fee (Residential) 1st response No fine2nd response No fine3rd response $97.40/ $1304th response $130 / $1955th response $162.50 / $260.10N/ANSF Check Processing FIN$26 per NSF CheckConsultant recommendation: $65 per NSF check. City recommendation $30 first returned check; $65 each subsequent returned check in 12 month period$25 per NSF Check. $35 for additional $25 per NSF Check $25.00 per check/$35.00 second check w/in 6 month$43 per NSF Check$25 per NSF Check plus bank charges.N/ASan Bernardino5.aPacket Pg. 228Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public Comparisons of Fees to Other CitiesExhibit EComparison of Fees for Various ProjectsResidentialproject descriptionCurrent ProposedRiversideOntarioFontanaRedlandsRialto Victorville500 sq. ft. addition (new family room and bathroom) $71,000 Valuation :: V‐  Building Plan Check$282.45 $367.11 $225.00 $632.60 $402.00 included (R1) $357.18  Building Permit$810.00 $1,020.00 $594.50 $790.75 $706.00 $574.65 (R2) $549.50Total$1,092.45 $1,387.11 $819.50 $1,423.35 $1,108.00 $574.65 $0.00 $906.682,500 sq. ft. new Custom SFD (4 bd. 3 bath, 2‐car garage) $361,000 Valuation  Building Plan Check$470.75 $611.85 $375.00 $1,964.28 $1,072.00 included (R1) $1,041.30  Building Permit$1,573.00 $1,983.00 $1,629.50 $2,455.35 $1,317.00 $4,679.00 (R2) $1,602.00Total$2,043.75 $2,594.85 $2,004.50 $4,419.63 $2,389.00 $4,679.00 $0.00 $2,643.30Non‐residential1,000 sq. ft. office/retail tenant improvement $46,000 Valuation :: II‐B, M  Building Plan Check$598.98 $901.99 $552.83 $482.68 $1,206.00 included (R1) $269.43  Building Permit$670.50 $975.19 $492.00 $603.35 $429.00 $4,839.00 (R2) $414.50Total$1,269.48 $1,877.18 $1,044.83 $1,086.03 $1,635.00 $4,839.00 $0.00 $683.935,000 sq. ft. restaurant TI in existing building $420,000 Valuation  :: IIA‐B  Categorical Exemption$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350.00 $0.00 $325.10 $122.71  Precise Plan of Design ‐ Staff$1,000.00 $1,965.00 $3,560.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,367.60 $2,454.18  Building Plan Check$993.23 $1,513.24 $927.46 $2,228.60 $536.00 included (R1) $1,155.05  Building Permit$1,085.50 $1,652.88 $1,804.50 $2,785.75 $799.00 $9,574.00 (R2) $1,777.00Total$3,078.73 $5,131.12 $6,291.96 $5,014.35 $1,685.00 $9,574.00 $2,692.70$5,508.94100,000 sq. ft. new industrial warehouse/distribution building with a value of $8,584,000. :: I‐B, S  Negative Declaration$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,127.00 $2,400.00 actual cost $1,521.90 $1,227.08  Precise Plan of Design ‐ DRC$6,438.00 $6,810.00 $3,560.00 $5,611.00 $6,700.00 $0.00 $2,367.60 $2,454.18  Zone Change$0.00 $0.00 $6,868.00 $3,334.00 $6,075.00 $3,797.00 $4,410.00 $1,840.63  General Plan Amendment$1,500.00 $3,570.00 $9,933.00 $7,500.00 $6,600.00 $6,068.00 $3,920.50$1,840.63  Tentative Tract Map $7,626.00 $6,875.00 $10,516.00 $5,091.00 $1,800.00 $12,493.00 $5,684.90 $1,859.03  Master Sign Program $610.00 $490.00 $919.00 $1,225.00 $1,525.00 $1,542.00 $0.00 $613.54  Conditional Use Permit$7,133.00 $5,555.00 $8,615.00 $2,869.00 $4,710.00 $6,712.00 $3,109.10$2,454.18  Grading Plan Check/Inspection$0.00 $0.00 $2,197.00 $0.00 $96.00 $191.55 $195.00 $0.00  Building Plan Check$16,962.73 $26,439.34 $16,204.55 $26,632.28 $2,011.00 included (R1) $12,180.68  Building Permit$17,895.50 $27,890.88 $18,764.50 $33,290.35 $3,647.00 $22,453.00 (R2)$18,739.50Total$58,165.23 $77,630.22 $77,577.05 $86,679.63 $35,564.00 $53,256.55 $21,209.00 $43,209.45San Bernardino5.aPacket Pg. 229Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 1 Summary of Fee Recommendations City Staff Review (6719 : Public SERVICE COST UPDATE for the City of San Bernardino, CA As of April 29, 2020 Publication Date: April 29, 2020 Copyright, 2020 by Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means — graphic, electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording, taping or information storage and retrieval systems — without written permission of: Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC 1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C Fullerton, California 92831 (714) 992-9020 Attachment 2 5.b Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK 5.b Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 5.b Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK 5.b Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC (RCS) has prepared two reports for the City. The first report was a Total-Cost Cost Allocation Plan that allocated general City overhead and indirect services to the departments providing services to the public. The City has already received that report. This report uses the fully-burdened hourly rate of positions to identify the cost of services that those positions perform. In addition to staff cost, the cost of services also includes any required contractual or professional services. The cost of each service is compared to the revenue received for that service and the following is a summary of that match-up: RCS identified fee and potential fee services that currently generate a little over $6.1 Million in revenues but cost the City more than $16 Million. The Summary Schedule below, shows how the City is using $10 Million in tax dollars to cover the shortfall in fees. Some of the subsidies are for quality-of-life services such as recreation programs and library services. Charging the full-cost of these services would price them out of the market. RCS suggests about $1.3 Million in fee increases to eliminate or reduce the taxpayer subsidy for services that only benefit a few individuals. The suggested fee changes are listed in Appendix B and the detail for those changes are found in Appendix A. Several services require additional narrative which is found following the Summary Schedule below. 5.b Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Page 1 of 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY As of April 29, 2020 POSSIBLE TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE S-0005 BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE $200,000 $308,500 ($108,500) 64.8% 100.0% $108,500 S-0010 BUILDING PLAN CHECK $520,537 $729,304 ($208,767)71.4% 100.0% $0 * S-0020 BUILDING INSPECTION $872,800 $857,500 $15,300 101.8% 100.0% $0 * S-0022 SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION $22,800 $35,821 ($13,021) 63.7% 100.0% $6,500 & S-0025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY $11,252 $15,065 ($3,813) 74.7% 100.0% $3,800 S-0030 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY $3,739 $4,017 ($278) 93.1% 100.0% $300 S-0201 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV. $2,332 $2,300 $32 101.4% 100.0% $0 S-0203 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM. $5,100 $8,142 ($3,042) 62.6% 100.0% $3,000 S-0205 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC $2,466 $8,666 ($6,200) 28.5% 100.0% $3,500 & S-0208 ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV. $0 $0 $0 0.0%100.0% $0 X S-0211 APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL $1,766 $2,848 ($1,082)62.0% 100.0% $1,100 S-0213 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION $5,544 $8,592 ($3,048) 64.5% 100.0% $3,000 S-0216 CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL $36,050 $46,250 ($10,200) 78.0% 100.0% $10,200 S-0217 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $155,600 $222,164 ($66,564) 70.0% 100.0% $66,600 S-0219 CUP REVISION $10,565 $18,895 ($8,330) 55.9% 100.0% $8,300 S-0222 DESIGN REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0224 DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0%$0 HR S-0227 DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND. $34,800 $49,616 ($14,816) 70.1% 100.0% $14,800 S-0230 DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW $50,000 $98,276 ($48,276) 50.9% 100.0% $48,300 S-0233 DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW $96,570 $127,603 ($31,033) 75.7% 100.0% $31,000 S-0235 DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW $100,800 $157,643 ($56,843) 63.9% 100.0% $56,800 S-0238 DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0241 ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0%$0 HR S-0244 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR S-0246 EXTENSION OF TIME $55,524 $22,318 $33,206 248.8% 100.0% ($33,200) S-0251 FENCE/WALL PERMIT $6,720 $7,404 ($684) 90.8% 100.0% $700 S-0257 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP) $6,000 $14,290 ($8,290) 42.0% 100.0% $8,300 S-0259 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0%$0 HR S-0262 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $80,400 $43,107 $37,293 186.5% 100.0% ($37,300) S-0264 LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST $22,500 $12,313 $10,187 182.7% 100.0% ($10,200) S-0266 PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $4,770 $12,566 ($7,796) 38.0% 100.0% $7,800 S-0268 MINOR EXCEPTION $1,152 $410 $742 281.0% 100.0% ($700) X S-0270 MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0271 MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION $5,610 $3,787 $1,823 148.1% 100.0% ($1,800) S-0273 PHASING PLAN REVIEW $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0275 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0277 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER $9,540 $41,105 ($31,565) 23.2% 100.0% $31,600 S-0279 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW $60,600 $85,962 ($25,362) 70.5% 100.0% $25,400 S-0280 RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM. $506 $2,671 ($2,165) 18.9% 100.0% $2,200 S-0282 SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR $18,200 $8,226 $9,974 221.3% 100.0% ($10,000) S-0283 SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0284 SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY $5,550 $4,113 $1,437 134.9%100.0% ($1,400) S-0286 SIGN PROGRAM $6,100 $4,901 $1,199 124.5% 100.0% ($1,200) S-0288 SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR S-0291 TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $13,797 $44,316 ($30,519) 31.1% 100.0% $30,500 S-0293 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP $44,570 $51,719 ($7,149) 86.2% 100.0% $7,100 5.b Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Page 2 of 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY As of April 29, 2020 POSSIBLE TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE S-0295 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD) $42,680 $36,047 $6,633 118.4% 100.0% ($6,600) S-0297 TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL $6,339 $12,371 ($6,032) 51.2% 100.0% $6,000 S-0301 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT $1,012 $365 $647 277.3% 100.0%($600) S-0303 VARIANCE-REGULAR $2,724 $2,065 $659 131.9% 100.0% ($700) S-0304 VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION $1,820 $1,982 ($162) 91.8% 100.0% $200 S-0306 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR S-0308 ZONING FORM $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0309 ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW $66,600 $97,938 ($31,338) 68.0% 100.0% $31,300 S-0315 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $50,000 * S-0322 TECHNOLOGY FEE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 S-0326 ARCHIVE FEES $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $2,000 S-0441 FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW $2,497 $5,926 ($3,429) 42.1% 100.0% $3,400 S-0445 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK $134,733 $133,868 $865 100.7% 100.0% $0 S-0447 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE $804 $1,939 ($1,135) 41.5%100.0% $1,100 S-0452 REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE $828 $1,372 ($544) 60.4% 100.0% $500 S-0453 REVIEW-LOT MERGER $14,076 $22,138 ($8,062) 63.6% 100.0% $8,100 S-0454 REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT $3,726 $9,527 ($5,801) 39.1% 100.0% $5,800 S-0463 ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION $202,100 $216,999 ($14,899) 93.1% 100.0% $14,900 S-0467 ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION $14,853 $17,978 ($3,125) 82.6% 100.0% $3,100 S-0471 HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW $29,350 $41,350 ($12,000) 71.0% 100.0% $12,000 S-0472 ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG. $0 $939 ($939) 0.0% 100.0% $900 S-0480 FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW $0 $3,758 ($3,758) 0.0% 100.0% $3,800 S-0481 REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN $38,210 $57,664 ($19,454) 66.3% 100.0% $19,500 S-0488 REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS $148,224 $285,257 ($137,033) 52.0% 100.0% $137,000 S-0489 REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN $4,125 $10,028 ($5,903) 41.1% 100.0% $5,900 S-0490 NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION $20,316 $28,803 ($8,487) 70.5% 100.0% $8,500 S-0495 NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION $31,603 $38,699 ($7,096) 81.7% 100.0% $7,100 S-0501 BASIC PERMIT FEE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0503 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT $3,350 $7,574 ($4,224) 44.2% 100.0% $4,200 S-0505 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT $904,998 $693,133 $211,865 130.6% 100.0% $105,000 & S-0507 LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 S-0509 SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT $7,860 $19,812 ($11,952) 39.7% 100.0% $12,000 S-0511 OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT $17,234 $32,150 ($14,916) 53.6% 100.0% $0 ** S-0513 HAULING PERMIT $6,704 $14,292 ($7,588) 46.9% 100.0% $7,600 S-0515 EXCAVATION PERMIT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0517 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT $7,190 $15,912 ($8,722) 45.2% 100.0% $8,700 S-0518 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK $321,389 $342,265 ($20,876) 93.9% 100.0% $0 S-0520 REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS $685 $1,056 ($371) 64.9% 100.0% $400 S-0521 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION $188,000 $191,976 ($3,976) 97.9% 100.0% $4,000 S-0523 ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT $882 $1,654 ($772)53.3% 100.0% $800 S-0529 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW $520 $1,154 ($634) 45.1% 100.0% $600 S-0531 STREET NAME CHANGE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR S-0533 STREET/ALLEY VACATION $2,000 $3,685 ($1,685) 54.3% 100.0% $1,700 S-0535 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY $3,150 $9,212 ($6,062) 34.2% 100.0% $6,100 S-0537 PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR S-0539 CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR 5.b Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Page 3 of 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY As of April 29, 2020 POSSIBLE TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE S-0542 ENGINEERING LETTER $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0560 PERMIT EXTENSION $8,600 $16,306 ($7,706) 52.7% 100.0% $7,700 S-0565 RE-INSPECTION $90 $106 ($16) 84.9% 100.0% $0 S-0567 AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 S-0571 ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST. $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 HR S-0602 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0609 RECORDS CHECK LETTER $250 $420 ($170) 59.5% 100.0%$200 S-0611 2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION $853 $889 ($36) 0.0% 100.0% $0 X S-0613 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING $3,450 $4,653 ($1,203) 74.2% 100.0% $1,200 S-0616 FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF $2,000 $2,408 ($408) 83.1%100.0% $400 S-0618 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $500 S-0621 ALARM SYSTEM $238,890 $538,810 ($299,920) 44.3% 100.0% $100,000 * S-0640 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES $615,196 $3,519,650 ($2,904,454) 17.5% 50.0% $100,000 * S-0655 BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION $103,000 $186,533 ($83,533) 55.2% 100.0% $83,500 S-0657 NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE $18,037 $16,498 $1,539 109.3% 100.0% ($1,500) S-0659 ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE $5,520 $6,348 ($828) 87.0% 100.0% $800 S-0662 LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE $53,675 $104,802 ($51,127) 51.2% 100.0% $51,100 S-0664 DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE $840 $496 $344 169.4% 100.0% ($300) S-0666 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES $375 $513 ($138) 73.1% 100.0% $100 S-6000 AQUATICS SERVICES $94,350 $702,761 ($608,411) 13.4% 25.0% $14,000 * S-6060 YOUTH SPORTS $10,756 $35,599 ($24,843) 30.2% 75.0% $1,500 * S-6070 ADULT SPORTS $21,460 $89,215 ($67,755) 24.1% 45.0% $4,000 * S-6100 COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS $13,000 $3,819,489 ($3,806,489) 0.3% 2.0% $4,000 * S-6130 BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE $9,500 $261,502 ($252,002) 3.6% 10.0% $2,000 * S-6700 LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT $4,000 $18,800 ($14,800) 21.3% 50.0% $500 S-6710 INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST $135 $41,171 ($41,036) 0.3% 1.0% $200 S-6720 LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE $80 $396 ($316) 20.2% 22.0% $10 S-6730 REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS $125 $706 ($581) 17.7% 35.0% $25 S-6740 LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL $5,260 $36,160 ($30,900) 14.6% 100.0% $700 S-7000 CEMETERY INTERMENT $15,550 $56,615 ($41,065) 27.5% 100.0% $14,000 & S-7010 CEMETERY DISINTERMENT $1,200 $3,822 ($2,622) 31.4% 100.0% $50 & S-7020 CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS $2,440 $5,972 ($3,532) 40.9% 100.0% $100 & S-7030 CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION $210 $680 ($470) 30.9% 100.0% $30 & S-7040 REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER $0 $2,834 ($2,834) 0.0% 100.0% $230 & S-7050 GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER $150 $381 ($231) 39.4% 100.0% $200 S-7100 CEMETERY SERVICES $0 $182,961 ($182,961) 0.0% 100.0% $5,000 & S-7220 STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE $4,000 $8,219 ($4,219) 48.7% 100.0% $2,000 & S-7250 REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $0 $92,617 ($92,617) 0.0% 100.0% $0 S-7260 PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION $28,000 $35,983 ($7,983)77.8% 100.0% $0 S-7270 FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE $17,000 $20,243 ($3,243) 84.0% 100.0% $3,200 S-8000 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION $408 $141,105 ($140,697) 0.3% 100.0% $0 S-8020 ELECTRONIC FILE COPY $0 $3,344 ($3,344) 0.0% 100.0% $1,000 & S-8040 ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING $0 $591,843 ($591,843) 0.0% 100.0% $5,000 & S-8050 ACP DEMAND LETTER $5,604 $11,537 ($5,933) 48.6% 100.0% $5,900 & S-8060 LIEN RELEASE $0 $10,154 ($10,154) 0.0% 100.0% $10,200 & S-8320 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS $124,800 $106,548 $18,252 117.1% 100.0% ($18,300) 5.b Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY As of April 29, 2020 POSSIBLE TOTAL TOTAL PROFIT/ PCT.RECOVERY NEW REF# SERVICE TITLE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE S-8330 BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER $2,640 $2,522 $118 104.7% 100.0% ($100) S-8340 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE $0 $39,432 ($39,432) 0.0% 100.0% $39,400 S-8350 DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE $18 $378 ($360) 4.8% 100.0% $400 S-8360 PASSPORT PROCESSING $35,000 $64,110 ($29,110) 54.6% 55.0% $29,100 ** S-8370 NOTARY PUBLIC $15 $33 ($18) 45.5% 50.0% $0 ** S-8380 RECORDS COMPILATION $70 $104 ($34) 67.3% 100.0% $0 S-8390 CANDIDATE FILING $725 $21,333 ($20,608) 0.0% 5.0% $0 ** S-8400 INITIATIVE FILING $0 $1,525 ($1,525) 0.0% 15.0% $0 ** S-8410 WEDDING CEREMONY $260 $286 ($26) 90.9% 100.0% $0 S-8500 FILM PERMIT $1,890 $7,458 ($5,568) 25.3% 100.0% $5,600 S-8600 NSF CHECK PROCESSING $2,392 $5,957 ($3,565) 40.2%100.0% $3,600 ** S-9000 OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES $0 $0 $0 0.0% 100.0% $0 TOTALS $6,156,656 $16,243,525 ($10,086,869) 37.9% 46.1% $1,325,045 Key to Symbols: * - See text for discussion ** - Fee is limited by State/Federal Code & - Demand will decline as user is required to pay full cost. x - Staff recommends deleting the service as it is not used. HR - The service is charged based on the hourly rate of staff plus other costs. 5.b Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Service Narrative The above Summary Schedule indicated for several services that the reader should “See text for discussion.” That discussion follows: S-0010 :: Building Plan Check; and, S-0020 :: Building Inspection. RCS updated the fee schedule (Appendix D) based on the current staff salaries. The Building & Safety Division of Community Development has been understaffed for a number of years. The understaffing may have “balanced the books” for the Division but one has to wonder if the quality of work suffered as a result. The additional revenue from the new fees should be used by the City to restore staffing levels so that the development community can continue to receive excellent service on a timely basis. S-0315 :: General Plan Maintenance. California Law requires that cities periodically update their General Plan. Development can be challenged in a city where the General Plan is out of date. For this reason, RCS suggests that development services cover 50% of the cost. Residents also benefit from an updated General Plan, so there is logic in the balance of the cost being borne by the local taxpayers. The suggested 2% surcharge on all Community Development fees would begin the process of recovering development’s 50% share of the cost. Staff must insure that the monies collected are properly reserved for the intended purpose. S-0621 :: Alarm System. The “system” is comprised of alarm permits and Police response to false alarms. Ideally, the permit revenue would recover the cost of the “free” false alarms for permit holders and the false alarm charge would recover the rest of the Police response. Currently, the City’s mix of fees recovers only about 50% of the cost with the taxpayer footing the bill for the rest. The suggested fee changes would begin the process of reducing the taxpayers’ burden but the City uses a 3rd-party vendor that gets 22% of City revenues for permits and false alarms. Consequently, the City may wish to link fee increases to a reduction in the vendor’s fee. S-0640 :: Animal Control Services. Animal Control services are a public safety function and RCS generally recommends that taxpayers subsidize 50% of the cost to recognize this fact. At present, only 20% to 30% of dogs are licensed and the service is only recovering about 17% of the total cost or 35% of its share of costs. A significant increase in these fees would discourage compliance. Additional license checkers might improve compliance and generate additional revenue but that additional revenue would only pay their costs, not generate new revenue. Same with charges for dropping off stray or owner surrender animals, if fees are too high, compliance will go down and jeopardize public safety. The Police Department has completed an analysis that looked at cost and comparable fees from surrounding agencies. It is suggested that the City Council consider adopting the fees in that study. S-6000 to S-6740 :: Recreation & Library Services. We’re now in the area of services that improve the quality of life in the community. RCS strongly recommends that the department be responsible for setting program fees based on what the market will bear. The limiting factor for that policy should be the amount of tax monies that the City can afford for quality of life issues and the effectiveness of the department head getting the best program for those monies. Additional information on the nature of the costs and the suggested fees is found in Appendix E. 5.b Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City APPENDICES A - REVENUE & COST SHEET FOR EACH SERVICE B - COMPARISON OF CURRENT FEE TO SUGGESTED FEE C - CURRENT BUILDING & SAFETY FEES D - PROPOSED BUILDING & SAFETY FEES E - RECREATION DETAIL F - AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE 5.b Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK 5.b Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City APPENDIX A DETAIL REVENUE & COST SHEETS A - 1 5.b Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City INDEX REF# SERVICE PAGE S-0005 BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE A-6 S-0010 BUILDING PLAN CHECK A-8 S-0020 BUILDING INSPECTION A-10 S-0022 SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION A-12 S-0025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY A-14 S-0030 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY A-16 S-0201 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV. A-18 S-0203 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM. A-20 S-0205 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC A-22 S-0208 ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV. A-24 S-0211 APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL A-26 S-0213 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A-28 S-0216 CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL A-30 S-0217 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A-32 S-0219 CUP REVISION A-34 S-0222 DESIGN REVIEW A-36 S-0224 DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT A-38 S-0227 DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND. A-40 S-0230 DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW A-42 S-0233 DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW A-44 S-0235 DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW A-46 S-0238 DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW A-48 S-0241 ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY A-50 S-0244 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT A-52 S-0246 EXTENSION OF TIME A-54 S-0251 FENCE/WALL PERMIT A-56 S-0257 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP) A-58 S-0259 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT A-60 S-0262 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT A-62 S-0264 LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST A-64 S-0266 PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A-66 S-0268 MINOR EXCEPTION A-68 S-0270 MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW A-70 S-0271 MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION A-72 S-0273 PHASING PLAN REVIEW A-74 S-0275 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION A-76 S-0277 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER A-78 S-0279 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW A-80 A - 2 5.b Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City INDEX REF# SERVICE PAGE S-0280 RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM. A-82 S-0282 SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR A-84 S-0283 SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP A-86 S-0284 SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY A-88 S-0286 SIGN PROGRAM A-90 S-0288 SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT A-92 S-0291 TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT A-94 S-0293 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP A-96 S-0295 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD) A-98 S-0297 TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL A-100 S-0301 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT A-102 S-0303 VARIANCE-REGULAR A-104 S-0304 VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION A-106 S-0306 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP A-108 S-0308 ZONING FORM A-110 S-0309 ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW A-112 S-0315 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE A-114 S-0322 TECHNOLOGY FEE A-116 S-0326 ARCHIVE FEES A-118 S-0441 FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW A-120 S-0445 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK A-122 S-0447 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE A-124 S-0452 REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE A-126 S-0453 REVIEW-LOT MERGER A-128 S-0454 REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT A-130 S-0463 ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION A-132 S-0467 ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION A-134 S-0471 HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW A-136 S-0472 ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG. A-138 S-0480 FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW A-140 S-0481 REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN A-142 S-0488 REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS A-144 S-0489 REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN A-146 S-0490 NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION A-148 S-0495 NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION A-150 S-0501 BASIC PERMIT FEE A-152 S-0503 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT A-154 S-0505 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT A-156 A - 3 5.b Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City INDEX REF# SERVICE PAGE S-0507 LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION A-158 S-0509 SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT A-160 S-0511 OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT A-162 S-0513 HAULING PERMIT A-164 S-0515 EXCAVATION PERMIT A-166 S-0517 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT A-168 S-0518 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK A-170 S-0520 REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS A-172 S-0521 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION A-174 S-0523 ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT A-176 S-0529 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW A-178 S-0531 STREET NAME CHANGE A-180 S-0533 STREET/ALLEY VACATION A-182 S-0535 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY A-184 S-0537 PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST A-186 S-0539 CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING A-188 S-0542 ENGINEERING LETTER A-190 S-0560 PERMIT EXTENSION A-192 S-0565 RE-INSPECTION A-194 S-0567 AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION A-196 S-0571 ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST. A-198 S-0602 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT A-200 S-0609 RECORDS CHECK LETTER A-202 S-0611 2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION A-204 S-0613 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING A-206 S-0616 FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF A-208 S-0618 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE A-210 S-0621 ALARM SYSTEM A-212 S-0640 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES A-214 S-0655 BIENNEAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION A-216 S-0657 NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE A-218 S-0659 ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE A-220 S-0662 LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE A-222 S-0664 DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE A-224 S-0666 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES A-226 S-6000 AQUATICS SERVICES A-228 S-6060 YOUTH SPORTS A-230 S-6070 ADULT SPORTS A-232 A - 4 5.b Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City INDEX REF# SERVICE PAGE S-6100 COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS A-234 S-6130 BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE A-236 S-6700 LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT A-238 S-6710 INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST A-240 S-6720 LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE A-242 S-6730 REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS A-244 S-6740 LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL A-246 S-7000 CEMETERY INTERMENT A-248 S-7010 CEMETERY DISINTERMENT A-250 S-7020 CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS A-252 S-7030 CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION A-254 S-7040 REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER A-256 S-7050 GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER A-258 S-7100 CEMETERY SERVICES A-260 S-7220 STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE A-262 S-7250 REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE A-264 S-7260 PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION A-266 S-7270 FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE A-268 S-8000 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION A-270 S-8020 ELECTRONIC FILE COPY A-272 S-8040 ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING A-274 S-8050 ACP DEMAND LETTER A-276 S-8060 LIEN RELEASE A-278 S-8320 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS A-280 S-8330 BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER A-282 S-8340 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE A-284 S-8350 DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE A-286 S-8360 PASSPORT PROCESSING A-288 S-8370 NOTARY PUBLIC A-290 S-8380 RECORDS COMPILATION A-292 S-8390 CANDIDATE FILING A-294 S-8400 INITIATIVE FILING A-296 S-8410 WEDDING CEREMONY A-298 S-8500 FILM PERMIT A-300 S-8600 NSF CHECK PROCESSING A-302 S-9000 OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES A-304 A - 5 5.b Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0005BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE APPLICATIONCD-BLDG+SAFETY To process an application for a building permit. This is not a plan check or inspection. $40 - 1st permit $10 - each additional permit on the same application $60 - 1st permit $10 - each additional permit on the same application 100% $40.00 $61.70 $(21.70) 5,000 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 64.83% $(108,500) $308,500 $200,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 6 5.b Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUILDING ISSUANCE FEE S-0005 5,000 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.75 $61.70 5,000 $308,500 $308,500 $61.70 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $308,500 0.75TOTALS $61.70 A - 7 5.b Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0010BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPLICATIONCD-BLDG+SAFETY To review plans for construction. Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C Hourly Rate - $94.15 Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D Hourly Rate - $122.37 100% $897.48 $1,257.42 $(359.94) 580 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 71.37% $(208,767) $729,304 $520,537 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 8 5.b Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUILDING PLAN CHECK S-0010 580 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL 0.70 $130.13 580 $75,475 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY SR.PLANS EXAMINER 2.80 $342.85 580 $198,853 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 4.93 $405.13 580 $234,975 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY Contract Svcs 0.00 $379.31 580 $220,000 $729,304 $1,257.42 8.43TYPE SUBTOTAL $729,304 8.43TOTALS $1,257.42 A - 9 5.b Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0020BUILDING INSPECTION PERMITCD-BLDG+SAFETY To inspect building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical construction to insure that it is in conformance with approved plans and the various construction codes. Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C Hourly Rate - $94.45 Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D Hourly Rate - $118.33 100% $349.12 $343.00 $6.12 2,500 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 101.78% $15,300 $857,500 $872,800 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 10 5.b Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUILDING INSPECTION S-0020 2,500 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL 0.32 $60.38 2,500 $150,950 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 1.81 $191.04 2,500 $477,600 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CONST.INSP.II 0.49 $58.04 2,500 $145,100 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 50% Of 1 Position 0.33 $33.54 2,500 $83,850 $857,500 $343.00 2.95TYPE SUBTOTAL $857,500 2.95TOTALS $343.00 A - 11 5.b Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0022SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION INSPECTIONCD-BLDG+SAFETY To perform a special inspection at the request of the applicant. $380 Minimum for the 1st 4 hours plus $95 for each additional hour $595 for the 1st 4 hours plus $105 for each add'l hour 100% $380.00 $597.02 $(217.02) 60 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.65% $(13,021) $35,821 $22,800 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 12 5.b Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTION S-0022 60 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $39.43 60 $2,366 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL 0.50 $93.13 60 $5,588 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 4.00 $423.32 60 $25,399 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 60 $2,468 $35,821 $597.01 5.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $35,821 5.50TOTALS $597.02 A - 13 5.b Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0025CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITCD-BLDG+SAFETY To review a construction project to insure that it has received all required inspections and met all conditions of approval, including those conditions of other Divisions. $475.08 - as a separate application (of which $100 was for Fire Review) $133.62 - if included on the building permit (Deleted as All Fire) $500 100% $375.07 $502.17 $(127.10) 30 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 74.69% $(3,813) $15,065 $11,252 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 14 5.b Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY S-0025 30 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $78.85 30 $2,366 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 4.00 $423.32 30 $12,700 $15,065 $502.17 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $15,065 5.00TOTALS $502.17 A - 15 5.b Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0030TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY REQUESTCD-LAND DEV. To issue a Temporary C.of O. good for one (1) month. $467.34 $500 100% $467.38 $502.13 $(34.75) 8 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 93.08% $(278) $4,017 $3,739 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 16 5.b Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY S-0030 8 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $78.85 8 $631 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY BLDG INSPECT.II 4.00 $423.32 8 $3,387 $4,017 $502.17 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,017 5.00TOTALS $502.13 A - 17 5.b Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0201AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV. APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Development Services Director. $583 $575 100% $583.00 $575.00 $8.00 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 101.39% $32 $2,300 $2,332 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 18 5.b Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV.S-0201 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 4 $165 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 4 $155 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 1.00 $187.36 4 $749 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 3.00 $307.68 4 $1,231 $2,300 $574.89 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,300 5.00TOTALS $575.00 A - 19 5.b Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0203AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM. APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Planning Commission. $2,550 $4,070 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $2,550.00 $4,071.00 $(1,521.00) 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.64% $(3,042) $8,142 $5,100 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 20 5.b Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM.S-0203 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 2 $628 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 2 $620 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 2 $1,499 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 20.00 $2,051.20 2 $4,102 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 2 $734 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 2 $478 $8,142 $4,071.14 33.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $8,142 33.50TOTALS $4,071.00 A - 21 5.b Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0205AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request to amend the conditions of approval for a development that was originally approved by the Development/Environmental Review Committee. $822 $2,890 100% $822.00 $2,888.67 $(2,066.67) 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 28.46% $(6,200) $8,666 $2,466 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 22 5.b Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERC S-0205 3 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 3 $123 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 3 $471 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 3 $929 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 3 $2,248 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 3 $3,077 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 3 $1,101 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 3 $717 $8,666 $2,888.66 23.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $8,666 23.00TOTALS $2,888.67 A - 23 5.b Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0208ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV. APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review an application for the placement of an antenna or other telecommunication device that requires Director Review according to the municipal code. $2,938 Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using a CUP or a development permit. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 24 5.b Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV.S-0208 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 25 5.b Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0211APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To appeal a project to the Mayor and Council that was denied by the Planning Commission. $177 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery) $1,766 - All others $285 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery) $2,850 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $1,766.00 $2,848.00 $(1,082.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.01% $(1,082) $2,848 $1,766 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 26 5.b Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCIL S-0211 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 1 $628 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 2.00 $154.88 1 $155 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 1 $749 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 8.00 $820.48 1 $820 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.50 $275.22 1 $275 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.50 $179.16 1 $179 $2,848 $2,847.85 19.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,848 19.50TOTALS $2,848.00 A - 27 5.b Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0213APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To appeal a project to the Planning Commission that was denied by the D/ERC or the Community Development Director. $278 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%) $2,772 - All others $430 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%) $4,295 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $2,772.00 $4,296.00 $(1,524.00) 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 64.53% $(3,048) $8,592 $5,544 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 28 5.b Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION S-0213 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 4.00 $1,255.08 2 $2,510 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 2.00 $154.88 2 $310 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 2 $1,499 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 16.00 $1,640.96 2 $3,282 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.50 $275.22 2 $550 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.50 $179.16 2 $358 $8,592 $4,295.87 29.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $8,592 29.50TOTALS $4,296.00 A - 29 5.b Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0216CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare a conditional use permit for a minor use or for the sale of alcohol in an existing building. $3,605 $4,625 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $3,605.00 $4,625.00 $(1,020.00) 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 77.95% $(10,200) $46,250 $36,050 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 30 5.b Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOL S-0216 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 10 $3,138 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 10 $3,098 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 8.00 $1,498.88 10 $14,989 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 24.00 $2,461.44 10 $24,614 $46,250 $4,624.98 37.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $46,250 37.50TOTALS $4,625.00 A - 31 5.b Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0217CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request for a conditional use permit for conditional uses. $7,133 - CUP for Commercial/Industrial (#10; $71,330) $2,809 - CUP for Condo, PRD, HMOD (#30; $84,270) $5,555 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $3,890.00 $5,554.10 $(1,664.10) 40 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.04% $(66,564) $222,164 $155,600 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 32 5.b Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S-0217 40 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 40 $1,645 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 40 $25,102 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 40 $12,390 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 8.00 $1,498.88 40 $59,955 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 30.00 $3,076.80 40 $123,072 $222,164 $5,554.11 44.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $222,164 44.50TOTALS $5,554.10 A - 33 5.b Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0219CUP REVISION APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request to modify an existing conditional use permit. $2,113 $3,780 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $2,113.00 $3,779.00 $(1,666.00) 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.91% $(8,330) $18,895 $10,565 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 34 5.b Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CUP REVISION S-0219 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 5 $206 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 5 $3,138 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 5 $1,549 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 5 $3,747 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 20.00 $2,051.20 5 $10,256 $18,895 $3,779.07 30.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $18,895 30.50TOTALS $3,779.00 A - 35 5.b Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0222DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review the design of a proposed development. Full Consultant Cost Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included with Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit or Temporary Use Permit 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 36 5.b Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DESIGN REVIEW S-0222 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 37 5.b Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0224DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare or amend a development agreement which sets out the City's and the developer's obligations for a proposed development. Typically used where a developer prefers to construct an improvement in-lieu of paying development impact fees. Direct Cost Recovery Fee Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit as determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 38 5.b Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENT S-0224 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 39 5.b Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0227DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND. APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process a request to amend the development code or the zoning map at the request of, and for the benefit of, a developer. $6,960 plus full consultant cost $9,925 plus any consultant cost including 10% contract administrative overhead, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $6,960.00 $9,923.20 $(2,963.20) 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.14% $(14,816) $49,616 $34,800 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 40 5.b Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND.S-0227 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 5 $206 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 10.00 $3,137.70 5 $15,689 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 6.00 $464.64 5 $2,323 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 16.00 $2,997.76 5 $14,989 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 32.00 $3,281.92 5 $16,410 $49,616 $9,923.15 64.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $49,616 64.50TOTALS $9,923.20 A - 41 5.b Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0230DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a development that can be approved by the Community Development Director. $1,000 $1,965 100% $1,000.00 $1,965.52 $(965.52) 50 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 50.88% $(48,276) $98,276 $50,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 42 5.b Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEW S-0230 50 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 50 $2,057 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 50 $7,845 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $77.44 50 $3,872 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 50 $18,736 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 50 $51,280 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.00 $183.48 50 $9,174 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 0.50 $59.72 50 $2,986 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 0.50 $46.54 50 $2,327 $98,276 $1,965.52 16.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $98,276 16.00TOTALS $1,965.52 A - 43 5.b Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0233DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a development that can be approved by the Development/Environmental Review Committee. $6,438 0 to 5 Acres - $6,810 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. > than 5 Acres - $11,905 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. 100% $6,438.00 $8,506.87 $(2,068.87) 15 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 75.68% $(31,033) $127,603 $96,570 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 44 5.b Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEW S-0233 15 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.0 To 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 10 $411 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 10 $3,138 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 10 $3,098 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 10 $7,494 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 30.00 $3,076.80 10 $30,768 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 8.00 $1,467.84 10 $14,678 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 10 $4,778 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 4.00 $372.28 10 $3,723 $68,088 $6,808.78 55.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Greater Than 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 5 $206 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 5 $3,138 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 5 $1,549 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 10.00 $1,873.60 5 $9,368 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 60.00 $6,153.60 5 $30,768 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 5 $9,174 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 5 $2,986 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 5.00 $465.35 5 $2,327 $59,515 $11,902.98 96.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $127,603 152.00TOTALS $8,506.87 A - 45 5.b Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0235DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review the following types of projects: 12 or more residential units, a cell tower taller than 75 feet, a conditional use permit, tentative tract map where the development requires a Planning Commission public hearing. $6,720 - 0 to 5 Acres (#10; $67,200) $6,720 - Greater than 5 Acres (#5, $33,600) 0 to 5 Acres - $8,040 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. > than 5 Acres - $15,455 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. 100% $6,720.00 $10,509.53 $(3,789.53) 15 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.94% $(56,843) $157,643 $100,800 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 46 5.b Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW S-0235 15 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.0 To 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 10 $411 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 1.00 $77.44 10 $774 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 8.00 $1,498.88 10 $14,989 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 40.00 $4,102.40 10 $41,024 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 8.00 $1,467.84 10 $14,678 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 10 $4,778 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 4.00 $372.28 10 $3,723 $80,377 $8,037.73 65.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Greater Than 5 Acres 0.50 $41.13 5 $206 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 2.00 $627.54 5 $3,138 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 5 $1,549 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 18.00 $3,372.48 5 $16,862 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 80.00 $8,204.80 5 $41,024 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 5 $9,174 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 5 $2,986 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 5.00 $465.35 5 $2,327 $77,265 $15,453.06 124.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $157,643 190.00TOTALS $10,509.53 A - 47 5.b Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0238DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a residential project in a commercial zone where a Public Hearing by the Mayor & Council is required for approval. $7,288 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is no longer used. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 48 5.b Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEW S-0238 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 49 5.b Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0241ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a proposed development and determine that it has no impact on the environment or that the impact can be mitigated and the mitigation monitored. $3,273 Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 50 5.b Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDY S-0241 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 51 5.b Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0244ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare an environmental impact report on a proposed development to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 52 5.b Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT S-0244 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 53 5.b Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0246EXTENSION OF TIME APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process a time extension for a permit that requires the review of the Development/Environmental Review Committee or Planning Commission or Mayor and Council. $3,922 - CUP & Development Permit (#2; $7,844) $4,768 - Tentative Tract Map (#10; $47,680) $1,860 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $4,627.00 $1,859.83 $2,767.17 12 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 248.79% $33,206 $22,318 $55,524 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 54 5.b Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE EXTENSION OF TIME S-0246 12 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 12 $494 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 12 $3,765 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 12 $3,717 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 12 $4,497 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 8.00 $820.48 12 $9,846 $22,318 $1,859.86 15.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $22,318 15.50TOTALS $1,859.83 A - 55 5.b Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0251FENCE/WALL PERMIT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review plans and inspect a fence or wall that is not part of another application. $56 $60 100% $56.00 $61.70 $(5.70) 120 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 90.76% $(684) $7,404 $6,720 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 56 5.b Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FENCE/WALL PERMIT S-0251 120 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.75 $61.70 120 $7,404 $7,404 $61.70 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $7,404 0.75TOTALS $61.70 A - 57 5.b Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0257GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP) APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review and process an application to make an amendment to the City's General Plan text or map at the request of, and for the benefit of, a developer. Only additional costs as always done in conjunction with Dev.Code Amend. or other primary application. Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($1,500 Deposit treated as actual cost) $3,570 plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $1,500.00 $3,572.50 $(2,072.50) 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.99% $(8,290) $14,290 $6,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 58 5.b Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP)S-0257 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 4 $165 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 5.00 $1,568.85 4 $6,275 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 5.00 $936.80 4 $3,747 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 4 $4,102 $14,290 $3,572.38 20.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $14,290 20.50TOTALS $3,572.50 A - 59 5.b Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0259HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare a report on whether an existing building has historic significance and, if so, how changes to the building can be made that preserve its historic significance. Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($815 deposit plus consultant cost) Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 60 5.b Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT S-0259 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 61 5.b Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0262HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request to operate a business in a residential zone to insure that can be operated safely and that it will not impact neighbors. $268 $145 100% $268.00 $143.69 $124.31 300 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 186.51% $37,293 $43,107 $80,400 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 62 5.b Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT S-0262 300 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 300 $12,339 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.00 $102.56 300 $30,768 $43,107 $143.69 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $43,107 1.50TOTALS $143.69 A - 63 5.b Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0264LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare a letter at the request of a realtor or lender confirming that a particular use of a property is permitted by the Zoning Code and/or in conformance with the City's General Plan. Also known as a rebuild letter. $450 $245 100% $450.00 $246.26 $203.74 50 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 182.73% $10,187 $12,313 $22,500 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 64 5.b Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSIST S-0264 50 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 50 $2,057 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 2.00 $205.12 50 $10,256 $12,313 $246.25 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $12,313 2.50TOTALS $246.26 A - 65 5.b Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0266PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a lot line application to check for building setbacks, zoning, general plan conformance and development standards. See S-0454 for the Public Works Engineering review. $477 $1,255 100% $477.00 $1,256.60 $(779.60) 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 37.96% $(7,796) $12,566 $4,770 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 66 5.b Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT S-0266 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY SR.PLANS EXAMINER 1.00 $122.37 10 $1,224 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 0.50 $93.68 10 $937 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 10 $4,102 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 3.00 $550.44 10 $5,504 $12,566 $1,256.58 9.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $12,566 9.50TOTALS $1,256.60 A - 67 5.b Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0268MINOR EXCEPTION APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING Staff approval of a minor variance (exception) to the Zoning Ordinance based on criteria that establishes the minimal impact of the variance. $288 - Concurrent with another application $268 - Owner-Occupied single-family residence $792 - Other $105 100% $288.00 $102.50 $185.50 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 280.98% $742 $410 $1,152 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 68 5.b Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MINOR EXCEPTION S-0268 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.00 $102.56 4 $410 $410 $102.56 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $410 1.00TOTALS $102.50 A - 69 5.b Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0270MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($245 Deposit) plus Full Consultant Cost ($327 Deposit) Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 70 5.b Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEW S-0270 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 71 5.b Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0271MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request to make a minor change, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, in a development's use permit or conditions of approval where the change can be approved administratively. $561 $380 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $561.00 $378.70 $182.30 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 148.14% $1,823 $3,787 $5,610 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 72 5.b Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISION S-0271 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 0.50 $93.68 10 $937 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 2.00 $205.12 10 $2,051 $3,787 $378.65 3.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,787 3.50TOTALS $378.70 A - 73 5.b Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0273PHASING PLAN REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a phasing plan. $823 - If not part of original project review $514 - D/ERC review application (DP) $536 - Planning Comm.Application (CUP/DP/SUB) Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 74 5.b Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PHASING PLAN REVIEW S-0273 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 75 5.b Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0275PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare an interpretation of the General Plan at the request of a developer where the interpretation is required for a particular development. $1,119 Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 76 5.b Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION S-0275 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 77 5.b Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0277PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To make a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) determination as may be required by the State of California for the issuance of an Alcoholic Beverage Control License. $636 $2,740 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $636.00 $2,740.33 $(2,104.33) 15 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 23.21% $(31,565) $41,105 $9,540 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 78 5.b Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTER S-0277 15 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 15 $617 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 15 $2,353 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 15 $581 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 1.00 $187.36 15 $2,810 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 15 $6,154 POL-GEN.INVESTIG.SERGEANT 10.00 $1,906.00 15 $28,590 $41,105 $2,740.34 16.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $41,105 16.50TOTALS $2,740.33 A - 79 5.b Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0279PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a proposed project by the Development/Environmental Review Committee at the request of a developer before he/she submits a formal application. $2,424 $3,440 100% $2,424.00 $3,438.48 $(1,014.48) 25 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.50% $(25,362) $85,962 $60,600 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 80 5.b Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEW S-0279 25 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 25 $1,028 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 25 $968 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 25 $9,368 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 8.00 $820.48 25 $20,512 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 6.00 $1,100.88 25 $27,522 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 25 $14,930 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 5.00 $465.35 25 $11,634 $85,962 $3,438.48 27.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $85,962 27.00TOTALS $3,438.48 A - 81 5.b Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0280RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM. APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process a request for the Planning Commission to reconsider a previously denied development in-lieu of appealing to the Mayor and Common Council. $506 $2,670 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $506.00 $2,671.00 $(2,165.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 18.94% $(2,165) $2,671 $506 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 82 5.b Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM.S-0280 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 1 $314 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 1 $310 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 1 $375 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 1 $1,026 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 1 $367 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 1 $239 $2,671 $2,670.82 21.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,671 21.50TOTALS $2,671.00 A - 83 5.b Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0282SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a proposed sign for compliance with the Sign Ordinance. $182 $80 100% $182.00 $82.26 $99.74 100 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 221.25% $9,974 $8,226 $18,200 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 84 5.b Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SIGN PERMIT-REGULAR S-0282 100 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 1.00 $82.26 100 $8,226 $8,226 $82.26 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $8,226 1.00TOTALS $82.26 A - 85 5.b Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0283SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review and approve a sign permit subject to a conditional use permit which restricts the use in perpetuity to the approved uses. $3,858 Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate processes. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 86 5.b Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUP S-0283 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 87 5.b Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0284SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a request to hang a temporary sign or banner to insure that it meets the requirements of the Sign Ordinance which limits its use to 60-days. $111 $80 100% $111.00 $82.26 $28.74 50 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 134.94% $1,437 $4,113 $5,550 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 88 5.b Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARY S-0284 50 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 1.00 $82.26 50 $4,113 $4,113 $82.26 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,113 1.00TOTALS $82.26 A - 89 5.b Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0286SIGN PROGRAM APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review a signage program for a commercial development. $610 10 or less tenant spaces - $490 Greater than 10 tenant spaces - Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $610.00 $490.10 $119.90 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 124.46% $1,199 $4,901 $6,100 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 90 5.b Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SIGN PROGRAM S-0286 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 10 $4,102 $4,901 $490.09 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,901 5.00TOTALS $490.10 A - 91 5.b Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0288SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare or amend a specific plan which regulates land use in a specific area of the City in a more detailed manner that the City-wide Zoning Ordinance at the request of a developer or as a condition to approving a development. Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 92 5.b Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENT S-0288 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 93 5.b Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0291TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To review an application for a temporary use permit such as a pumpkin lot, parking lot sale, etc. or for a special event. $82.86 - Temporary Use Permit (#55; $4,557) $420 - Special Event Permit (Director Review) (#22; $9,240) $730 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) $315 - Temporary Use Permit $1,230 - Special Event Permit (Director Review) $0 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) - Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not used. 100% $179.18 $575.53 $(396.35) 77 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 31.13% $(30,519) $44,316 $13,797 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 94 5.b Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT S-0291 77 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Temporary 0.50 $41.13 55 $2,262 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.50 $153.84 55 $8,461 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.00 $119.44 55 $6,569 $17,293 $314.41 3.00TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Spcl.Event-Director 0.50 $41.13 22 $905 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 22 $3,452 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 22 $9,025 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 22 $5,255 POL-GEN.INVESTIG.SERGEANT 2.00 $381.20 22 $8,386 $27,023 $1,228.34 9.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $44,316 12.00TOTALS $575.53 A - 95 5.b Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0293TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process an application for the subdivision of land into four or fewer lots for residential, commercial or industrial development. $4,262 plus $65 per parcel (NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 3 parcels per Tentative Parcel Map.) $5,170 plus the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $4,457.00 $5,171.90 $(714.90) 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 86.18% $(7,149) $51,719 $44,570 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 96 5.b Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP S-0293 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 10 $411 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 10 $387 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 10 $7,494 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 6.00 $615.36 10 $6,154 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 10 $18,348 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 10.00 $1,194.40 10 $11,944 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 7.50 $698.03 10 $6,980 $51,719 $5,171.88 38.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $51,719 38.50TOTALS $5,171.90 A - 97 5.b Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0295TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD) APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process a proposed tract map (5 or more lots) to assure that it complies with City requirements and standards. $7,561 plus $65 per lot or dwelling unit (NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 15 lots per Tentative Tract Map.) $6,850 plus $25 per lot and the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $8,536.00 $7,209.40 $1,326.60 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 118.40% $6,633 $36,047 $42,680 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 98 5.b Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD)S-0295 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Base Fee 0.50 $41.13 5 $206 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 5 $784 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 5 $194 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 5.00 $936.80 5 $4,684 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 20.00 $2,051.20 5 $10,256 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 10.00 $1,834.80 5 $9,174 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 15.00 $1,791.60 5 $8,958 $34,256 $6,851.14 51.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III Per Lot 0.20 $23.89 75 $1,792 $1,792 $23.89 0.20TYPE SUBTOTAL $36,047 51.70TOTALS $7,209.40 A - 99 5.b Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0297TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process a request to revise a previously approved tentative parcel or tract map. $2,113 $4,125 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $2,113.00 $4,123.67 $(2,010.67) 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.24% $(6,032) $12,371 $6,339 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 100 5.b Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCEL S-0297 3 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 3 $123 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 0.50 $156.89 3 $471 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 3 $116 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 4.00 $749.44 3 $2,248 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 3 $3,077 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 5.00 $917.40 3 $2,752 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 10.00 $1,194.40 3 $3,583 $12,371 $4,123.58 30.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $12,371 30.50TOTALS $4,123.67 A - 101 5.b Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0301TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process an application for removing 5 or more, 3" or greater diameter trunk, mature trees. $506 $180 100% $506.00 $182.50 $323.50 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 277.26% $647 $365 $1,012 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 102 5.b Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TREE REMOVAL PERMIT S-0301 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 2 $77 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 1.00 $102.56 2 $205 $365 $182.41 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $365 2.00TOTALS $182.50 A - 103 5.b Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0303VARIANCE-REGULAR APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process an application for a variance from the Zoning Code $322 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery) $2,724 - All others $250 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery) $2,065 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $2,724.00 $2,065.00 $659.00 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 131.91% $659 $2,065 $2,724 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 104 5.b Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VARIANCE-REGULAR S-0303 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 1 $314 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 4.00 $309.76 1 $310 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 2.00 $374.72 1 $375 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 10.00 $1,025.60 1 $1,026 $2,065 $2,064.98 17.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,065 17.50TOTALS $2,065.00 A - 105 5.b Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0304VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process a variance that is submitted as part of another application. This represents the incremental cost of processing the variance. $910 $990 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. 100% $910.00 $991.00 $(81.00) 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 91.83% $(162) $1,982 $1,820 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 106 5.b Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION S-0304 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 2 $82 C.DEV-PLANNING DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL. 1.00 $313.77 2 $628 C.DEV-PLANNING EXEC.ASSISTANT 0.50 $38.72 2 $77 C.DEV-PLANNING PLANNING MGR 1.00 $187.36 2 $375 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 4.00 $410.24 2 $820 $1,982 $991.22 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,982 7.00TOTALS $991.00 A - 107 5.b Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0306VESTING TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To process an application for vesting rights in a tentative map. Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 108 5.b Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP S-0306 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 109 5.b Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0308ZONING FORM APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To prepare a written verification of zoning at the request of an applicant. $22 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S-0264. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 110 5.b Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ZONING FORM S-0308 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 111 5.b Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0309ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-PLANNING To verify that an applicant for a City business license will be operating in the correct zone for that business. $37 $55 100% $37.00 $54.41 $(17.41) 1,800 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 68.00% $(31,338) $97,938 $66,600 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 112 5.b Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEW S-0309 1,800 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.25 $20.57 1,800 $37,026 C.DEV-PLANNING ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR 0.33 $33.84 1,800 $60,912 $97,938 $54.41 0.58TYPE SUBTOTAL $97,938 0.58TOTALS $54.41 A - 113 5.b Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0315GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE NACD-PLANNING To recover a portion of the cost of the periodic update to the City's General Plan which benefits all development in the City. None 2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major general plan updates that are required every 10 to 15 years. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 114 5.b Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE S-0315 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 115 5.b Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0322TECHNOLOGY FEE DEVLMNT SVCSCD-PLANNING To recover the cost of upgrading the permit system which is estimated to cost $700,000. This fee will recover the cost in seven to ten years. 2% of Plan Review & Permit Fees 2% charged against all Development Department Fees 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 116 5.b Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TECHNOLOGY FEE S-0322 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 117 5.b Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0326ARCHIVE FEES VARIOUSCOMM.DEVELOPMENT To cover the cost of archiving current development materials. $1.00 - Per Permit or Application $2.00/sheet - Plans $0.25/page - Documents $1.25 - Per Permit or Application $3.15/sheet - Plans $0.35/page - Documents 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 118 5.b Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ARCHIVE FEES S-0326 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 119 5.b Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0441FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW MAPCD-LAND DEV. To perform a final map check on a development and record the documents. Includes a Reversion to Acreage as a single lot Final Map. Confirm conformity with State Subdivision Map Act & City Ordinances. $2,210 - Base Fee $55 - Per Lot Fee $135 - Each additional Review $404 - Final Map Continuance $97 - Certificate of Correction per Hour $5,195 - Base Fee $275 - Per Lot Fee $270 - Each additional Review $0 - Final Map Continuance - Staff recommends deleting as not used. $185 - Certificate of Correction per Hour 100% $2,497.00 $5,926.00 $(3,429.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.14% $(3,429) $5,926 $2,497 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 120 5.b Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEW S-0441 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Base 10.00 $1,834.80 1 $1,835 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 20.00 $2,388.80 1 $2,389 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 10.00 $930.70 1 $931 $5,195 $5,195.43 40.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Per Lot 1.00 $183.48 1 $183 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 1.00 $93.07 1 $93 $277 $276.55 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Per Add'l Review 0.50 $91.74 1 $92 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.50 $179.16 1 $179 $271 $270.90 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER Per Hour 1.00 $183.48 1 $183 $183 $183.48 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,926 45.50TOTALS $5,926.00 A - 121 5.b Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0445ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK PLAN SETCD-LAND DEV. Plan check on-site precise site plans for conformance with City Ordinances for paved parking areas, ADA accessibility, drainage, NPDES stds, sewer utilities, on-site lighting, wall locations/elevations, trash enclosures and accessible paths of travel. 2% of engineer's cost estimate for on-site improvements $3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus $1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus $265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost $605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four (Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.) 100% $134,733.00 $133,868.00 $865.00 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 100.65% $865 $133,868 $134,733 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 122 5.b Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK S-0445 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH.Minimum 1.00 $82.26 1 $82 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 1 $367 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 1 $478 $927 $926.98 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 405.25 $74,355.27 1 $74,355 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 490.50 $58,585.32 1 $58,585 $132,941 $132,940.59 895.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $133,868 902.75TOTALS $133,868.00 A - 123 5.b Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0447GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE CUBIC YARDSCD-LAND DEV. To review a grading plan for compliance with City Ordinances and State Codes. Review grading bonds if required. Review drainage and erosion control measures to be used. Cubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee 51 to 100 - $15.00 101 to 1,000 - $22.50 1,001 to 10,000 - $30.00 10,001 to 100,000 - $30.00 plus $15.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 - $165.00 plus $9.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up - $255.00 plus $4.50 for each 10K CY > 200,000 $390 for all plans with more than 50 Cubic Yards 100% $160.80 $387.80 $(227.00) 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.46% $(1,135) $1,939 $804 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 124 5.b Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE S-0447 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 5 $206 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 0.75 $137.61 5 $688 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.75 $209.02 5 $1,045 $1,939 $387.76 3.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,939 3.00TOTALS $387.80 A - 125 5.b Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0452REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATECD-LAND DEV. To review a lot to determine if it is in conformity with the State Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinances, If it is, issue a Certificate of Compliance which allows future construction permits on the lot. $828 $1,370 100% $828.00 $1,372.00 $(544.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 60.35% $(544) $1,372 $828 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 126 5.b Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE S-0452 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 4.00 $733.92 1 $734 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 5.00 $597.20 1 $597 $1,372 $1,372.25 9.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,372 9.50TOTALS $1,372.00 A - 127 5.b Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0453REVIEW-LOT MERGER APPLICATIONCD-LAND DEV. To process an application to merge multiple lots into one new lot. $828 $1,300 100% $828.00 $1,302.24 $(474.24) 17 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.58% $(8,062) $22,138 $14,076 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 128 5.b Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REVIEW-LOT MERGER S-0453 17 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 17 $699 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 17 $6,238 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 2.00 $186.14 17 $3,164 C.DEV-LAND DEV Consultant (6hrs) 0.00 $708.00 17 $12,036 $22,138 $1,302.23 4.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $22,138 4.50TOTALS $1,302.24 A - 129 5.b Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0454REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT APPLICATIONCD-LAND DEV. To review the adjustment of the lot line between two parcels. $414 - SFR Occupancy (#3; $1,242) $828 - Com'l/Ind'l (#3; $2,484) $1,590 100% $621.00 $1,587.83 $(966.83) 6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.11% $(5,801) $9,527 $3,726 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 130 5.b Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMT S-0454 6 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 6 $247 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 5.50 $1,009.14 6 $6,055 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.50 $537.48 6 $3,225 $9,527 $1,587.75 10.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,527 10.50TOTALS $1,587.83 A - 131 5.b Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0463ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROJECTCD-LAND DEV. To provide field inspecion of on-site improvements including sewers, storm drains, parking areas, accessibility per ADA requirements, curbs, planters, Water Quality Control Plan features, erosion controls and finish grade. 3% of Estimated Construction Cost Fee Based on Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost: $0 to $1 Million - 3.4% of estimated cost with a $1,045 minimum Greater than $1 MIllion - $34,000 plus 1.7% of the estimated cost over $1 Million 100% $202,100.00 $216,999.00 $(14,899.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 93.13% $(14,899) $216,999 $202,100 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 132 5.b Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION S-0463 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II Minimum 6.00 $531.90 1 $532 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.00 $183.48 1 $183 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 1 $239 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 1.00 $93.07 1 $93 $1,047 $1,047.33 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II 1,471.50 $130,448.48 1 $130,448 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 81.05 $14,871.05 1 $14,871 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 81.75 $9,764.22 1 $9,764 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 654.00 $60,867.78 1 $60,868 $215,952 $215,951.53 2,288.30TYPE SUBTOTAL $216,999 2,298.30TOTALS $216,999.00 A - 133 5.b Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0467ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION CD-LAND DEV. To perform field inspection of on-site grading, erosion control devices and drainage/storm drain features of stand alone rough grading. Cubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee 51 to 100 - $150.00 101 to 1,000 - $225.00 1,001 to 10,000 - $300.00 10,001 to 100,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 200,000 Cubic Yards: 1 to 1,000 - $225 1,001 to 10,000 - $340 10,001 to 100,000 - $340 plus $115.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 - $1,375 plus $55 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up - $1,870 plus $10 for each 10K CY > 200,000 100% $14,853.00 $17,978.00 $(3,125.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 82.62% $(3,125) $17,978 $14,853 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 134 5.b Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTION S-0467 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II Minimum 2.00 $177.30 1 $177 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 0.50 $46.54 1 $47 $224 $223.84 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV CONST.INSP.II 114.45 $10,145.99 1 $10,146 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 81.75 $7,608.47 1 $7,608 $17,754 $17,754.46 196.20TYPE SUBTOTAL $17,978 198.70TOTALS $17,978.00 A - 135 5.b Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0471HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW STUDYCD-LAND DEV. To review a hydraulic/hydrology study prepared by a developer's engineer to determine the impact of a development on the ground water and the storm drainage system. Actual Time: $487 - for the first 3 hours $100 - for each add'l hour $825 100% $587.00 $827.00 $(240.00) 50 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.98% $(12,000) $41,350 $29,350 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 136 5.b Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW S-0471 50 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 4.00 $733.92 50 $36,696 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 1.00 $93.07 50 $4,654 $41,350 $826.99 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $41,350 5.00TOTALS $827.00 A - 137 5.b Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0472ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG. STUDYCD-LAND DEV. To make a finding that a proposed development is not on or near a known fault line. None $940 100% $0.00 $939.00 $(939.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(939) $939 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 138 5.b Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG.S-0472 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ADMIN SR.MGMT.ANALYST 0.50 $53.60 1 $54 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 1 $41 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 1 $367 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 1 $478 $939 $939.45 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $939 7.00TOTALS $939.00 A - 139 5.b Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0480FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW APPLICATIONCD-STORMWATER MGT To perform a FEMA plan review of a project located within floodplain designations Zone "A", "AE", or "shaded X". None $940 plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $939.50 $(939.50) 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(3,758) $3,758 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 140 5.b Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEW S-0480 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ADMIN SR.MGMT.ANALYST 0.50 $53.60 4 $214 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 4 $165 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 2.00 $366.96 4 $1,468 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 4.00 $477.76 4 $1,911 $3,758 $939.45 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,758 7.00TOTALS $939.50 A - 141 5.b Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0481REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN PLANCD-STRMWTR MGMT To review the stormwater run-off pollution plan for a project over 1 acre in size to insure that the run-off meets the requirements of NPDES. To inspect the site during construction to insure that the conditions of the plan are being met. $410 - Commercial & Residential Projects (#57; $23,370) $265 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects (#56; $14,840) $405 - Commercial & Residential Projects $615 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects 100% $338.14 $510.30 $(172.16) 113 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 66.26% $(19,454) $57,664 $38,210 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 142 5.b Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLN S-0481 113 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ADMIN EXEC.ASSISTANT Com'l/Res'l 0.50 $27.22 57 $1,552 C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD 3.00 $338.37 57 $19,287 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 57 $2,344 $23,183 $406.72 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-ADMIN EXEC.ASSISTANT Industrial/Linear 0.50 $27.22 56 $1,524 C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD 3.00 $338.37 56 $18,949 C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 2.50 $250.15 56 $14,008 $34,481 $615.74 6.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $57,664 10.00TOTALS $510.30 A - 143 5.b Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0488REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS PLANCD-STRMWTR MGMT To review the Stormwater Pollution Plan for run-off after a development is completed. This review occurs before the grading and/or building permits are issued. Includes three plan reviews. $80 - Non-Categorical (#450; $36,000) $365 - Categorical without Conditions of Concern (#75; $27,375) $1,130 - Categorical with Conditions of Concern (#75; $84,750) $99 - per hour for reviews after the third review (#1; $99) $155 - Non-Categorical $1,440 - Categorical $120 - per hour for reviews after the third review 100% $246.63 $474.64 $(228.01) 601 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.96% $(137,033) $285,257 $148,224 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 144 5.b Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANS S-0488 601 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD Non-Categorical 1.00 $112.79 450 $50,756 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 450 $18,509 $69,264 $153.92 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES COORD Categorical 7.00 $789.53 150 $118,430 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 150 $6,170 C.DEV-LAND DEV SR.CIVIL ENGINEER 1.00 $183.48 150 $27,522 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 2.00 $238.88 150 $35,832 C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASST I/II 2.00 $186.14 150 $27,921 $215,874 $1,439.16 12.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-LAND DEV ENGIN'G ASSIST III 1.00 $119.44 1 $119 $119 $119.44 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $285,257 15.00TOTALS $474.64 A - 145 5.b Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0489REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN PLANCD-WSTWTR MGMT To review the erosion and waste management control plan for a construction site. $75 $180 100% $75.00 $182.33 $(107.33) 55 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.13% $(5,903) $10,028 $4,125 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 146 5.b Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLAN S-0489 55 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 1.00 $100.06 55 $5,503 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 1.00 $82.26 55 $4,524 $10,028 $182.32 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $10,028 2.00TOTALS $182.33 A - 147 5.b Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0490NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SITECD-STRMWTR MGT To inspect a construction site to mitigate hazardous run-off. $98 - Less than 10 Acres (#200; $19,600) $179 - 10 Acres or More (#4; $716) $140 100% $99.59 $141.19 $(41.60) 204 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.53% $(8,487) $28,803 $20,316 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 148 5.b Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION S-0490 204 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 1.00 $100.06 204 $20,412 C.DEV-BLDG+SAFETY COM.DEV.TECH. 0.50 $41.13 204 $8,391 $28,803 $141.19 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $28,803 1.50TOTALS $141.19 A - 149 5.b Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0495NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION BUSINESSCD-STRMWTR MGMT To review a business for hazardous discharge into the sewer or storm drainage system. $143 $175 100% $143.00 $175.11 $(32.11) 221 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 81.66% $(7,096) $38,699 $31,603 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 150 5.b Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION S-0495 221 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-STRMWTR MGT NPDES INSPECTOR 1.75 $175.11 221 $38,699 $38,699 $175.11 1.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $38,699 1.75TOTALS $175.11 A - 151 5.b Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0501BASIC PERMIT FEE PERMITPW-ENGINEERING See note in "Suggested Fee" below $45.00 - Engineering Permit $53.00 - Blanket Permit $43.00 - Permit Extension Engineering Permit - This fee is included with each permit so it does not need to be charged separately and should be deleted Blanket Permit - covered by S-0523, so this fee should be deleted Permit Extension - covered by S-0560, so this fee should be deleted 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 152 5.b Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BASIC PERMIT FEE S-0501 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 153 5.b Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0503PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMITPW-ENGINEERING To review a request for a permanent encroachment into the public right-of-way. $670.00 - Initial Permit ($625 for the encroachment permit and $45 for the basic permit - both to be combined into one fee.) $150.00 - Annual Renewal $1,515 - Initial Permit $340 - Annual Renewal 100% $670.00 $1,514.80 $(844.80) 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 44.23% $(4,224) $7,574 $3,350 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 154 5.b Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S-0503 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 3.00 $711.78 5 $3,559 PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 5 $531 PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 1.00 $131.28 5 $656 PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR 5.00 $565.65 5 $2,828 $7,574 $1,514.81 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $7,574 10.00TOTALS $1,514.80 A - 155 5.b Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0505TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMITPW-ENGINEERING To process a request for a temporary encroachment into the public right-of-way. $25.00 - No Lane Closure (#100; $2,500) $136.00 - Lane Closure: First Day (#2,400; $326,400) $60.00 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day (#9,600; $576,000) $70.00 - Trash Bin, 1st week $28.00 - Trash Bin, each add'l week $160 - No Lane Closure - Parking Only $175 - Lane Closure: First Day $25 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day $100 - Trash Bin, 1st week $25 - Trash Bin, each add'l week 100% $74.78 $57.27 $17.51 12,102 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 130.57% $211,865 $693,133 $904,998 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 156 5.b Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S-0505 12,102 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 0.50 $53.05 100 $5,305 PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 0.25 $32.82 100 $3,282 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Parking Only 0.75 $73.06 100 $7,306 $15,893 $158.93 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 0.50 $53.05 2,400 $127,320 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Lane Closure-1st Day 0.75 $73.06 2,400 $175,344 PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 0.33 $49.90 2,400 $119,760 $422,424 $176.01 1.58TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Closure-Ea.Add'l Day 0.25 $26.53 9,600 $254,688 $254,688 $26.53 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 0.50 $53.05 1 $53 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Trash Bin-1st Week 0.50 $48.71 1 $49 $102 $101.76 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Tr.Bin-Add'l Wk. 0.25 $26.53 1 $27 $27 $26.53 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $693,133 4.58TOTALS $57.27 A - 157 5.b Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0507LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION PERMITPW-ENGINEERING See note in "Suggested Fee" below $286.00 Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the excavation permit. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 158 5.b Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATION S-0507 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 159 5.b Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0509SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT PERMITPW-ENGINEERING To process a request to hold a special event in the public right-of-way. $545.00 - With a Lane Closure (#4; $2,180) $559.00 - With a Street Closure (#8; $4,472) $347.00 - With a Road Closure (1st day) ** $302.00 - Each Additional Day of a Street/Road Closure (#4, $1,208) (**Note: Staff recomends combining the fees for a street and a road as they take the same effort. Also, each of the above fees, except the "additional day" fee, include the $45 basic fee from S-0501.) $925 - Lane Closure $1,495 - Street/Road Closure, 1st day $1,040 - Street/Road Closure, each add''l day 100% $491.25 $1,238.25 $(747.00) 16 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.67% $(11,952) $19,812 $7,860 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 160 5.b Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENT S-0509 16 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Lane 0.75 $73.06 4 $292 PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC 6.00 $852.12 4 $3,408 $3,701 $925.18 6.75TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 0.10 $23.73 8 $190 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Street/Road 0.75 $73.06 8 $584 PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC 6.00 $852.12 8 $6,817 PW-GAS TX-ST.MTC MAINTENANCE WORKER I 8.00 $544.32 8 $4,355 $11,946 $1,493.23 14.85TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC Add'l Days 3.50 $497.07 4 $1,988 PW-GAS TX-ST.MTC MAINTENANCE WORKER I 8.00 $544.32 4 $2,177 $4,166 $1,041.39 11.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $19,812 33.10TOTALS $1,238.25 A - 161 5.b Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0511OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT PERMITPW-ENGINEERING To process a permit for an oversize/overload transport through the City. This fee is controlled by the State. $17.00 - One Day (State-Mandated Fee is $16) (#997; $16,949) $95.00 - Annual Permit (State-Mandated Fee is $90) (#3; $285) $16 - One Day Permit $90 - Annual Permit (Note: City may only charge the State-Mandated fee. There is no provision for a technology surcharge.) 100% $17.23 $32.15 $(14.92) 1,000 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 53.60% $(14,916) $32,150 $17,234 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 162 5.b Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMIT S-0511 1,000 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 0.33 $32.15 1,000 $32,150 $32,150 $32.15 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $32,150 0.33TOTALS $32.15 A - 163 5.b Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0513HAULING PERMIT PERMITPW-ENGINEERING To process a request to haul construction supplies/debris either into or out of the City. $438.00 - First Day (#8; $3,504) (Includes S-501 Basic Fee) $100.00 - Each Additional Day (#32; $3,200) $650 - First Day $285 - Each Additional Day 100% $167.60 $357.30 $(189.70) 40 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 46.91% $(7,588) $14,292 $6,704 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 164 5.b Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE HAULING PERMIT S-0513 40 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 1st Day 0.75 $73.06 8 $584 PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1.00 $151.20 8 $1,210 PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC 3.00 $426.06 8 $3,408 $5,203 $650.32 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC Add'l Day 2.00 $284.04 32 $9,089 $9,089 $284.04 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $14,292 6.75TOTALS $357.30 A - 165 5.b Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0515EXCAVATION PERMIT PERMITPW-ENGINEERING See note in "Suggested Fee" below $150.00 - Per day Staff Recommends Deleting This Service 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 166 5.b Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE EXCAVATION PERMIT S-0515 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 167 5.b Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0517TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT REPORTPW-ENGINEERING To review a developer's traffic study to ensure compliance with City standards. $719.00 - Basic Review (#10; $7,190) $80.00 - Extended Review per Hour (#0; $0) Actual Consultant charge (currently $1,440 for a basic review) plus 10% overhead for City contract administration and review. 100% $719.00 $1,591.20 $(872.20) 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.19% $(8,722) $15,912 $7,190 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 168 5.b Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT S-0517 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1.00 $151.20 10 $1,512 PW-TRAFFIC ENG Consultant 0.00 $1,440.00 10 $14,400 $15,912 $1,591.20 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $15,912 1.00TOTALS $1,591.20 A - 169 5.b Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0518OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK SHEETPW-ENGINEERING To review grading plans for off-site improvements. Three plan checks are included with the original off-site improvement plan check. Fourth and subsequent plan checks are charged an additional plan check fee. $45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost with a $50 minimum $3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus $1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus $265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost $605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four (Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.) 100% $2,114.40 $2,251.74 $(137.34) 152 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 93.90% $(20,876) $342,265 $321,389 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 170 5.b Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK S-0518 152 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1st Sheet 16.00 $2,429.28 50 $121,464 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 1.00 $97.41 50 $4,871 PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 7.00 $1,058.40 50 $52,920 $179,255 $3,585.09 24.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Add'l Sheet 7.00 $1,062.81 100 $106,281 PW-TRAFFIC ENG TRAFFIC ENGINEER 3.00 $453.60 100 $45,360 $151,641 $1,516.41 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Over $25K 2.50 $265.25 40 $10,610 $10,610 $265.25 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Add'l P.Ck.-Min. 4.00 $607.32 1 $607 $607 $607.32 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Ea.Add'l Hour 1.00 $151.83 1 $152 $152 $151.83 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $342,265 41.50TOTALS $2,251.74 A - 171 5.b Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0520REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS REVIEWPW-ENGINEERING To review changes to approved plans due to changes to conditions or other reasons. $137.00 $210 for the 1st hour plus $150 for each additional hour 100% $137.00 $211.20 $(74.20) 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 64.87% $(371) $1,056 $685 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 172 5.b Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS S-0520 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 0.25 $59.32 5 $297 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1.00 $151.83 5 $759 $1,056 $211.15 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,056 1.25TOTALS $211.20 A - 173 5.b Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0521OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION PROJECTPW-ENGINEERING To inspect off-site construction to insure that it complies with the City's standards & conditions as well as the approved plans, if applicable. $45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost $240 - Driveway & Sidewalk Replacement Other Fees based on Estimated Construction Cost: $0 to $175,000 - $630 plus 12.4% of the Cost over $15,000 $175,001 to $750,000 - $20,470 plus 3.4% of the Cost over $175,000 Greater than $750,000 - $40,020 plus 1.1% of the Cost over $750,000 100% $1,566.67 $1,599.80 $(33.13) 120 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 97.93% $(3,976) $191,976 $188,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 174 5.b Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION S-0521 120 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 20 $2,122 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 0.25 $37.96 20 $759 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Basic D/W, S/W Repl. 1.00 $97.41 20 $1,948 $4,829 $241.47 2.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 5.00 $530.50 60 $31,830 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I Base 1.00 $97.41 60 $5,845 $37,675 $627.91 6.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 20.41 $2,165.10 40 $86,604 PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 8.18 $1,073.21 40 $42,928 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 2.00 $303.66 40 $12,146 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 2.00 $194.82 40 $7,793 $149,472 $3,736.79 32.58TYPE SUBTOTAL $191,976 40.83TOTALS $1,599.80 A - 175 5.b Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0523ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT LOCATIONPW-ENGINEERING To issue an annual blanket permit to utilities in advance of emergency work to avoid delaying the work. To inspect the work as it occurs. The cost of the permit and inspection are deducted from an initial deposit as required. $53.00 - Permit Issuance (#7; $371) $73.00 - Inspection Per Location (#7; $511) $130 for the initial blanket permit annually plus $105 per day for inspection per location after the first day/location deducted from an initial annual deposit of $5,500. Deposit balance can be carried forward to a new year but a new initial blanket permit is required and the deposit balance must be restored to $5,500. 100% $63.00 $118.14 $(55.14) 14 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 53.33% $(772) $1,654 $882 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 176 5.b Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMIT S-0523 14 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Blanket Permit 0.25 $32.82 7 $230 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 1.00 $97.41 7 $682 $912 $130.23 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II Per Day Per Location 1.00 $106.10 7 $743 $743 $106.10 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,654 2.25TOTALS $118.14 A - 177 5.b Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0529BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW BONDPW-ENGINEERING To perform an inspection to confirm that all issues covered by the bond are satisfied so that the City can release the bond. $45.00 - Issuance $59.00 - Inspection $230 100% $104.00 $230.80 $(126.80) 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.06% $(634) $1,154 $520 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 178 5.b Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PW S-0529 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 5 $531 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 0.50 $75.92 5 $380 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 0.50 $48.71 5 $244 $1,154 $230.73 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,154 2.00TOTALS $230.80 A - 179 5.b Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0531STREET NAME CHANGE NAMEPW-REAL PROPERY To change the name of a street at the request of a private party or group. $1,345.00 Plus the Cost of Street Signs Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including new street signage, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 180 5.b Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE STREET NAME CHANGE S-0531 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 181 5.b Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0533STREET/ALLEY VACATION VACATIONPW-REAL PROPERTY To process a request to terminate the City's interest (easement) in an alley or street. $1,000.00 - Deposit $1,000.00 - Balance Due Prior to Processing $1,840 plus a deposit for noticing and publishing determined by staff 100% $1,000.00 $1,842.50 $(842.50) 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 54.27% $(1,685) $3,685 $2,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 182 5.b Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE STREET/ALLEY VACATION S-0533 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 3.00 $711.78 2 $1,424 PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR 4.00 $452.52 2 $905 PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP SPE 8.00 $678.00 2 $1,356 $3,685 $1,842.30 15.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,685 15.00TOTALS $1,842.50 A - 183 5.b Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0535DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EACHPW-REAL PROPERTY To legally accept the ownership of property (right-of-way) at the request of a private party. $315.00 - If Legal and Map are Provided (#10; $3,150) $800.00 - If City Prepares Legal & Map If Legal and Map are Provided - $920 If City Prepares Legal & Map - Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $315.00 $921.20 $(606.20) 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 34.19% $(6,062) $9,212 $3,150 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 184 5.b Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY S-0535 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW 1.50 $355.89 10 $3,559 PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR 2.00 $226.26 10 $2,263 PW-REAL PROP.ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP SPE 4.00 $339.00 10 $3,390 $9,212 $921.15 7.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,212 7.50TOTALS $921.20 A - 185 5.b Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0537PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST REQUESTPW-REAL PROPERTY To process the request of a private party to annex their property to the City. $14,750.00 Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $17,000. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 186 5.b Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUEST S-0537 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 187 5.b Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0539CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING LEASEPW-REAL PROPERTY To process a City property lease. $2,100.00 Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $5,500. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 188 5.b Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSING S-0539 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 189 5.b Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0542ENGINEERING LETTER LETTERPW-ENGINEERING See note in "Suggested Fee" below $100.00 Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 190 5.b Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ENGINEERING LETTER S-0542 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 191 5.b Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0560PERMIT EXTENSION REQUESTPW-ENGINEERING To review a request for a permit extension to determine if there are reasons to deny it. $43.00 $80 each 100% $43.00 $81.53 $(38.53) 200 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 52.74% $(7,706) $16,306 $8,600 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 192 5.b Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PERMIT EXTENSION S-0560 200 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 0.25 $32.82 200 $6,564 PW-ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/I 0.50 $48.71 200 $9,742 $16,306 $81.53 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $16,306 0.75TOTALS $81.53 A - 193 5.b Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0565RE-INSPECTION HOURPW-ENGINEERING To re-inspect due to failure to have work ready on the initial inspection or because more inspections were required than covered by the initial permit. This inspection is during normal working hours. $90 ($45 permit fee + $45 reinspection fee) $105 per hour with a one-hour minimum 100% $90.00 $106.00 $(16.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 84.91% $(16) $106 $90 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 194 5.b Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RE-INSPECTION S-0565 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PW-ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 1.00 $106.10 1 $106 $106 $106.10 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $106 1.00TOTALS $106.00 A - 195 5.b Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0567AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION INSPECTIONPW-ENGINEERING To perform an inspection at the request of a developer outside of normal working hours. $369.00 - 4 hr. minimum $92.45 - each additional hour Employee's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead with a four (4) hour minimum 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 196 5.b Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTION S-0567 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 197 5.b Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0571ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST. DISTRICTPW-ENGINEERING To perform the legal requirements to establish an assessment district or a Community Facilities District usually in a new development at the request of the developer. $5,900 Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 198 5.b Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST.S-0571 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 199 5.b Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0602CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT PERMITPOLICE To process a request to authorize carrying a concealed weapon. $400 - Initial $325 - Renewal The general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only issues permits to retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is not being used. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 200 5.b Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT S-0602 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 201 5.b Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0609RECORDS CHECK LETTER LETTERPOLICE To prepare a one-page document on departmental letterhead that gives the result of researching local records. $25 - With Record $20 - Without Record $40 100% $25.00 $42.00 $(17.00) 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 59.52% $(170) $420 $250 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 202 5.b Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RECORDS CHECK LETTER S-0609 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POL-RECORDS LIEUTENANT 0.08 $22.37 10 $224 POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS TECH .II 0.32 $19.62 10 $196 $420 $41.99 0.40TYPE SUBTOTAL $420 0.40TOTALS $42.00 A - 203 5.b Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-06112ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION LICENSEPOLICE To process an application for the DOJ Secondhand Dealer and Pawnbroker Unit which conducts a background check and provides the City with the background check results and a license number. A renewal updates the information. $475 - Initial (#1; $475) $126 - Renewal (#3; $378) $480 - Initial $135 - Renewal 100% $213.25 $222.25 $(9.00) 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 95.95% $(36) $889 $853 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 204 5.b Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE 2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATION S-0611 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POL-RECORDS LIEUTENANT 0.25 $69.90 1 $70 POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS SUPVSR Initial 1.25 $110.71 1 $111 POL-RECORDS Init.DOJ Bkgrnd,Ck 0.00 $300.00 1 $300 $481 $480.61 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL POL-RECORDS LIEUTENANT 0.17 $47.53 3 $143 POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS SUPVSR Renewal 1.00 $88.57 3 $266 $408 $136.10 1.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $889 2.67TOTALS $222.25 A - 205 5.b Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0613LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING PERSONPOLICE To roll a set of fingerprints using the digital "Live Scan" equipment instead of the "old" ink on cards. Service is provided to the public on Wednesday from 1 to 5 PM. $2 - Live Scan Processing Fee (Note: Staff is charging $15 plus the DOJ fee.) $15 - Fingerprint card (Note: Applicants for City jobs are not charged the Live Scan fee or the DOJ fee.) $20 plus applicable DOJ/FBI fee (currently $33) 100% $15.00 $20.23 $(5.23) 230 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 74.15% $(1,203) $4,653 $3,450 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 206 5.b Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSING S-0613 230 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POL-RECORDS PD RECORDS TECH .II 0.33 $20.23 230 $4,653 $4,653 $20.23 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,653 0.33TOTALS $20.23 A - 207 5.b Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0616FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF TICKETPOLICE To review vehicle repairs when a ticket has been issued to the vehicle owner for a problem such as defective lights. $20 $25 100% $20.00 $24.08 $(4.08) 100 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 83.06% $(408) $2,408 $2,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 208 5.b Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFF S-0616 100 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POL-TRAFFIC POLICE OFFICER 0.17 $24.08 100 $2,408 $2,408 $24.08 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,408 0.17TOTALS $24.08 A - 209 5.b Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0618SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE HOURPOLICE To provide City Police Officers on overtime at the request of a special event. Officer's hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus Medicare and Workers' Comp. Insurance Officer's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead with a four (4) hour minimum 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 210 5.b Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL POLICE SERVICE S-0618 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 211 5.b Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0621ALARM SYSTEM VARIOUSPOLICE To encourage the proper maintenance of alarm systems by charging the alarm owner for wasted police time spent responding to false alarms. $25/$50/$10 - Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income Resident) $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation $10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr. False Alarms in 12-month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or panic: Reg./LIR]: [$75/$10]/[$200/$20] - 1st thru 4th Non-Permitted [$90/$10]/[$250/$20] - 5th & 6th [$90/$20]/[$300/$40] - 7th thru 9th [$175/$20]/[$350/$40] - 10th & Subsequent $96 - Annual Alarm Permit ($75-City plus $21-Alarm Vendor) $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation $10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr. False Alarm Charge: $256 - All False Alarms without a Permit ($200-City plus $56-Alarm Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12 month period with a Permit. (Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial response or between intrusion and panic/robbery response.) 100% $52.24 $117.82 $(65.58) 4,573 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 44.34% $(299,920) $538,810 $238,890 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 212 5.b Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ALARM SYSTEM S-0621 4,573 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POL-ADMIN ADMIN ANALYST II 0.02 $1.84 4,573 $8,414 POL-ADMIN 3rd Party Admin. 0.00 $3.78 4,573 $17,286 POL-PTRL.FLD.SVCS POLICE OFFICER Two For 15 Min. Avg. 0.50 $76.36 4,573 $349,194 POL-DISPATCH PD DISPATCHER II 0.17 $15.27 4,573 $69,830 $444,724 $97.25 0.69TYPE SUBTOTAL POL-ADMIN ADMIN ANALYST II Administration 0.11 $11.59 5,072 $58,784 POL-ADMIN 3rd Party Admin. 0.00 $6.96 5,072 $35,301 $94,086 $18.55 0.11TYPE SUBTOTAL $538,810 0.80TOTALS $117.82 A - 213 5.b Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0640ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES VARIOUSPOLICE-ANIMAL CONT'L To protect public health by requiring rabies vaccinations of dogs. To remove dead animals that could be infected. To care for animals that are brought to the animal shelter until adopted or reclaimed. Various Fees to cover licensing, boarding and miscellaneous services To recognize the Public Health importance of animal control, we suggest that 50% of the cost should come from the general taxpayer. The Police Department has prepared a study that will move the City in that direction. 50% $123.04 $703.93 $(580.89) 5,000 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.48% $(2,904,454) $3,519,650 $615,196 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 214 5.b Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES S-0640 5,000 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POL-AN.CTRL-ADM A/S KENNEL SUPVSR 0.33 $29.62 5,000 $148,100 POL-AN.CTRL-ADM A/S OFFICE SUPVSR 0.33 $29.62 5,000 $148,100 POL-AN.CTRL-ADM SR.CUST.SVC.REP/DSPTCH 1.31 $121.04 5,000 $605,200 POL-AN.CTRL-ADM A/S ATTENDANT 2.62 $227.70 5,000 $1,138,500 POL-AN.CTRL-ADM SR.OFFICE ASSIST. 0.33 $26.92 5,000 $134,600 POL-AN.CTRL-ADM OVERTIME 0.05 $1.78 5,000 $8,900 POL-AN.CTRL-ADM PART TIME SALARIES 1.60 $45.94 5,000 $229,700 POL-AN.CTRL-FLD.SV.ANIMAL CTRL OFFICER 2.62 $192.85 5,000 $964,250 POL-AN.CTRL-FLD.SV.PART TIME SALARIES 1.60 $28.46 5,000 $142,300 $3,519,650 $703.93 10.77TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,519,650 10.77TOTALS $703.93 A - 215 5.b Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0655BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION SFD RENTALCD-CODE ENFORCEMENT To perform an exterior property maintenance inspection every two years of all single family rental properties to insure that the property is properly maintained. $100 per owner of SFR rentals $180 per SFR rental Staff recommends increasing the inspections to every year and including an interior inspection. 100% $100.00 $181.10 $(81.10) 1,030 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.22% $(83,533) $186,533 $103,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 216 5.b Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTION S-0655 1,030 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR 0.25 $42.24 1,030 $43,507 C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III Annualized Cost 1.00 $105.79 1,030 $108,964 C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.50 $33.07 1,030 $34,062 $186,533 $181.10 1.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $186,533 1.75TOTALS $181.10 A - 217 5.b Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0657NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE NOTICECD-CODE ENFORCEMENT To process the release of a Notice of Pendency that was previously filed with the property's deed to guarantee payment of a judgement against the property. The Notice makes it impossible to sell the property or get a mortgage on it. $180 for the first four units $180 base fee plus $7.45 for each unit inspected (over four) $165 plus $8.50 for any unit over four 100% $180.37 $164.98 $15.39 100 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 109.33% $1,539 $16,498 $18,037 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 218 5.b Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASE S-0657 100 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR Base 0.25 $42.24 100 $4,224 C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III 1.00 $105.79 100 $10,579 C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.25 $16.53 100 $1,653 $16,456 $164.56 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III Add'l Units 0.08 $8.46 5 $42 $42 $8.46 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL $16,498 1.58TOTALS $164.98 A - 219 5.b Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0659ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE LIENCD-CODE ENFORCMENT To include the cost to initially process a lien against property that has failed to comply with a demand to abate a code violation and the cost to release the lien. This charge would be payable before release. $115 per lien $130 per lien 100% $115.00 $132.25 $(17.25) 48 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 86.96% $(828) $6,348 $5,520 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 220 5.b Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGE S-0659 48 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 2.00 $132.26 48 $6,348 $6,348 $132.26 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $6,348 2.00TOTALS $132.25 A - 221 5.b Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0662LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE LETTERCD-CODE ENFORCEMENT To respond to a request for a demand letter regarding the status or release of a lien and/or abatement costs imposed. $95 $185 100% $95.00 $185.49 $(90.49) 565 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 51.22% $(51,127) $104,802 $53,675 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 222 5.b Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGE S-0662 565 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR 1.00 $168.96 565 $95,462 C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.25 $16.53 565 $9,339 $104,802 $185.49 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $104,802 1.25TOTALS $185.49 A - 223 5.b Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0664DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE LIEN RELEASECD-CODE ENFORCEMENT To prepare a duplicate release of a lien at the request of the property owner due to the loss of the original release. $28 $15 100% $28.00 $16.53 $11.47 30 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 169.35% $344 $496 $840 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 224 5.b Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASE S-0664 30 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CUSTOMER SVC REP 0.25 $16.53 30 $496 $496 $16.53 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $496 0.25TOTALS $16.53 A - 225 5.b Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-0666WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES LOTCD-CODE ENFORCEMENT To recover the full cost of weed abatement on lots and partial lots where the owner has failed to abate the weeds prior to the City's deadline. Process involves multiple inspections & noticing. Preparation of Lien Resolution and the discing of lot. $375 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing $515 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing 100% $375.00 $513.00 $(138.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 73.10% $(138) $513 $375 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 226 5.b Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES S-0666 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.DIV.MGR 0.50 $84.48 1 $84 C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF CODE ENF.OFF.II/III 2.00 $211.58 1 $212 C.DEV-ENF/BEAUTIF WEED ABATE.COORD 2.00 $216.80 1 $217 $513 $512.86 4.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $513 4.50TOTALS $513.00 A - 227 5.b Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6000AQUATICS SERVICES N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION Providing a 10 week summer session to the community at the various community pools. Pools are also available for rental by the schools for 3 weeks before that. See Appendix C In addition, the City has received $39,750 from a Kaiser Grant. See Appendix C 25% $94,350.00 $702,761.00 $(608,411.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 13.43% $(608,411) $702,761 $94,350 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 228 5.b Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AQUATICS SERVICES S-6000 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-ADMIN COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR 40% Of Mitch 654.00 $96,281.88 1 $96,282 PR+C-AQUATICS PART TIME SALARIES $181,866 18,000.00 $441,540.00 1 $441,540 PR+C-AQUATICS Supplies/Op Exp 0.00 $59,050.00 1 $59,050 PR+C-AQUATICS Prof Svcs 0.00 $35,800.00 1 $35,800 PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 70% 1,144.50 $70,089.18 1 $70,089 $702,761 $702,761.06 19,798.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $702,761 19,798.50TOTALS $702,761.00 A - 229 5.b Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6060YOUTH SPORTS PARTICIPANT Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION Providing youth sports to the community. Resident - $30 per child Non-Resident - $33 per child Resident - $45 per child Non-Resident - $50 per child 75% $29.63 $98.07 $(68.44) 363 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 30.21% $(24,843) $35,599 $10,756 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 230 5.b Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE YOUTH SPORTS S-6060 363 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-YOUTH SPORTS PART TIME SALARIES $23,912 5.27 $71.90 363 $26,100 PR+C-YOUTH SPORTS Supplies & Equipment 0.00 $26.17 363 $9,500 $35,599 $98.07 5.27TYPE SUBTOTAL $35,599 5.27TOTALS $98.07 A - 231 5.b Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6070ADULT SPORTS N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION Providing adult sports programs to the community. Soccer: Resident - $300 per team Non-Resident Team - $350 per team Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost Soccer: Resident - $375 per team Non-Resident Team - $425 per team Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost 45% $21,460.00 $89,215.00 $(67,755.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 24.05% $(67,755) $89,215 $21,460 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 232 5.b Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ADULT SPORTS S-6070 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-SPORTS PART TIME SALARIES $15,516 1,000.00 $49,990.00 1 $49,990 PR+C-SPORTS Suppl/Print/Prof Svc 0.00 $19,200.00 1 $19,200 PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 20% 327.00 $20,025.48 1 $20,025 $89,215 $89,215.48 1,327.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $89,215 1,327.00TOTALS $89,215.00 A - 233 5.b Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6100COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION Providing Community Center programs and rental of Community Center facilities. Se Appendix C See Appendix C 2% $13,000.00 $3,819,489.00 $(3,806,489.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.34% $(3,806,489) $3,819,489 $13,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 234 5.b Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALS S-6100 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-ADMIN COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR 45% Of Cynthia 735.75 $108,317.12 1 $108,317 PR+C-ADMIN Building Expenses 0.00 $1,764,000.00 1 $1,764,000 PR+C REC/CMTY PROG COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 100% Of 4 6,540.00 $417,448.20 1 $417,448 PR+C REC/CMTY PROG COMM SVCS CENTER SUPERVIS 100% 1,635.00 $155,063.40 1 $155,063 PR+C REC/CMTY PROG PART TIME SALARIES $265,565 22,000.00 $654,280.00 1 $654,280 PR+C REC/CMTY PROG Facility Maint/Repl 0.00 $709,879.86 1 $709,880 PR+C REC/CMTY PROG Prof/Contract Svcs 0.00 $10,500.00 1 $10,500 $3,819,489 $3,819,488.58 30,910.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,819,489 30,910.75TOTALS $3,819,489.00 A - 235 5.b Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6130BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE N/A Resident/Non-ResidentRECREATION Maintenance and rentals of ballfields to the community. Reservation - $10 per hour for first hour and $5 per hour thereafter Tournament Use: $120 per field per day without lights $180 per field per day with lights Preparation - $25 per field upon request Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $10 per hour thereafter Local Sports Groups do not pay for use of the fields or lights. Reservation - $10 per hour Tournament Use - $120 per field per day Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $15 per hour thereafter Preparation - determined by the needs of the event Local Sports Groups: Field Use - No Charge Lighting - No Charge 10% $9,500.00 $261,502.00 $(252,002.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 3.63% $(252,002) $261,502 $9,500 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 236 5.b Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BALLFIELD RENTAL/USE S-6130 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-ADMIN COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR 25% Of Mitch 408.75 $60,176.18 1 $60,176 PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR I 6 Wk/Yr Of 1 196.20 $20,952.20 1 $20,952 PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II 3 Wk/Yr Of 1 229.92 $25,518.82 1 $25,519 PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK MAINT SUPERVISO 2 Months/Year 272.55 $34,248.63 1 $34,249 PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 2 Mo/Yr Of 2 545.45 $31,843.37 1 $31,843 PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.COMM REC PROGRAM COORD 10% 163.50 $10,012.74 1 $10,013 PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.PART TIME SALARIES $15,515 1,000.00 $39,150.00 1 $39,150 PR+C-OUTDOOR FAC.Suppl/Rental/Prof 0.00 $39,600.00 1 $39,600 $261,502 $261,501.94 2,816.37TYPE SUBTOTAL $261,502 2,816.37TOTALS $261,502.00 A - 237 5.b Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6700LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT CARD Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY Processing the replacement of a lost library card. $1 per card $1 per card (Staff Recommendation) 50% $1.00 $4.70 $(3.70) 4,000 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 21.28% $(14,800) $18,800 $4,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 238 5.b Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENT S-6700 4,000 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS PART TIME SALARIES 0.08 $4.70 4,000 $18,800 $18,800 $4.70 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL $18,800 0.08TOTALS $4.70 A - 239 5.b Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6710INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST ITEM Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY Processinga request to borrow a library item from another library. $3 per item $3 per item 1% $0.77 $235.26 $(234.49) 175 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.33% $(41,036) $41,171 $135 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 240 5.b Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUEST S-6710 175 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS LIBRARIAN II Loaned Out 2.00 $235.26 130 $30,584 $30,584 $235.26 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS LIBRARIAN II Received In 2.00 $235.26 45 $10,587 $10,587 $235.26 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $41,171 4.00TOTALS $235.26 A - 241 5.b Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6720LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE REQUEST Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY Providing library research services, primarily obituaries, on request $20 per hour $20 per hour 22% $20.00 $99.00 $(79.00) 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 20.20% $(316) $396 $80 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 242 5.b Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE S-6720 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN 0.75 $98.90 4 $396 $396 $98.90 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $396 0.75TOTALS $99.00 A - 243 5.b Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6730REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS ITEM Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY Processing and prelacing lost and damaged library materials. Lost Items: Magazines - $1 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost Other items - $5 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost Damaged Items - $3-$5 Missing Barcode - $1 Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $5 Lost Items: Magazines - $5 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost Other items - $10 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost Damaged Items - $3-$5 Missing Barcode - $10 Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $10 35% $5.00 $28.24 $(23.24) 25 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.71% $(581) $706 $125 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 244 5.b Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LS S-6730 25 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST LIB-SUPPORT SERVICESLIBRARY TECHNICIAN II 0.17 $13.57 25 $339 LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS PART TIME SALARIES 0.25 $14.68 25 $367 $706 $28.25 0.42TYPE SUBTOTAL $706 0.42TOTALS $28.24 A - 245 5.b Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-6740LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL RENTAL Resident/Non-ResidentLIBRARY Rental of meetings rooms at the Library. Bing Wong Auditorium - $25 per hour (4 hour minimum) Kellogg Room A or B - $25 per hour for each Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID) Projector - $5 per day VCR and Monitor - $10 per day Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30 Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit) Bing Wong Auditorium: Non-Profit - $25/hr For Profit - $50/hr (4 hr min) Kellogg Room A or B - Non-Profit - $25/hr for each For Profit - $50/hr for each Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID) Projector - $5 per day VCR and Monitor - $10 per day Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30 Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit) 100% $21.74 $149.42 $(127.68) 242 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 14.55% $(30,900) $36,160 $5,260 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 246 5.b Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL S-6740 242 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST LIB-ADMINISTRATION LIBRARY ADMIN TECH/WEBMAS 0.17 $19.15 242 $4,634 LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS Facility Replacement 0.00 $84.42 242 $20,430 LIB-CENTRAL LIB SVCS Facility Maintenance 0.00 $45.85 242 $11,096 $36,160 $149.42 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $36,160 0.17TOTALS $149.42 A - 247 5.b Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7000CEMETERY INTERMENT INTERMENT Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY Interment of a casket or urn at the Cemetery. Adult: Single - $600 Double - $850 Child: Single - $350 Double - $650 Baby - $150 Cremation - $200 For many sites, the City has a contractual obligation to provide the interment at the fee that was in place when the contract was signed. Single - $2,295 Double - $2,590 Cremation - $915 100% $501.61 $1,826.29 $(1,324.68) 31 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 27.47% $(41,065) $56,615 $15,550 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 248 5.b Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CEMETERY INTERMENT S-7000 31 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II Single 4.00 $443.96 12 $5,328 PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR Single 7.00 $825.86 12 $9,910 PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Single 4.00 $233.52 12 $2,802 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 7.25 $614.15 12 $7,370 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Single 7.00 $174.72 12 $2,097 $27,507 $2,292.21 29.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II Double 4.50 $499.46 7 $3,496 PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR Double 8.50 $1,002.83 7 $7,020 PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Double 4.50 $262.71 7 $1,839 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 7.25 $614.15 7 $4,299 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Double 8.50 $212.16 7 $1,485 $18,139 $2,591.31 33.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Cremation 3.00 $175.14 12 $2,102 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 7.25 $614.15 12 $7,370 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Cremation 5.00 $124.80 12 $1,498 $10,969 $914.09 15.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $56,615 77.75TOTALS $1,826.29 A - 249 5.b Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7010CEMETERY DISINTERMENT DISNTERMENT Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY Disinterment of a casket or urn on request. Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) -$1,500 Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $1,200 Baby/Child Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $800 Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) - $5,545 Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $3,820 100% $1,200.00 $3,822.00 $(2,622.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 31.40% $(2,622) $3,822 $1,200 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 250 5.b Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CEMETERY DISINTERMENT S-7010 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-PARKS MTC LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II 6.00 $665.94 1 $666 PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR 6.00 $707.88 1 $708 PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 6.00 $350.28 1 $350 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 23.00 $1,948.33 1 $1,948 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES 6.00 $149.76 1 $150 $3,822 $3,822.19 47.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,822 47.00TOTALS $3,822.00 A - 251 5.b Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7020CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS MARKER Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY Installation of grave marker settings. Single - $140 Double - $200 Marker Inscription: 4 digits - $50 Month, Day, Year - $100 Name and years - $130 Single - $335 Double - $595 Marker Inscription - Actual costs 100% $143.53 $351.29 $(207.76) 17 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 40.86% $(3,532) $5,972 $2,440 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 252 5.b Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGS S-7020 17 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Single 2.00 $116.76 16 $1,868 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Single 2.00 $169.42 16 $2,711 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Single 2.00 $49.92 16 $799 $5,378 $336.10 6.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Double 6.00 $350.28 1 $350 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Double 2.00 $169.42 1 $169 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Double 3.00 $74.88 1 $75 $595 $594.58 11.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,972 17.00TOTALS $351.29 A - 253 5.b Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7030CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION INSTALLATION Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY Installation of a flower vase at a grave site. $30 per vase. No installation fee $95 per installation and vase 100% $30.00 $97.14 $(67.14) 7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 30.88% $(470) $680 $210 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 254 5.b Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATION S-7030 7 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $84.71 7 $593 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES 0.50 $12.48 7 $87 $680 $97.19 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $680 1.50TOTALS $97.14 A - 255 5.b Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7040REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER MARKER Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY Remove or replace a cemetery marker on request. None Single - $420 per marker Double - $735 per marker 100% $0.00 $472.33 $(472.33) 6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(2,834) $2,834 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 256 5.b Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKER S-7040 6 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Single 3.00 $175.14 5 $876 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Single 2.00 $169.42 5 $847 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Single 3.00 $74.88 5 $374 $2,097 $419.44 8.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES Double 8.00 $467.04 1 $467 PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Double 2.00 $169.42 1 $169 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Double 4.00 $99.84 1 $100 $736 $736.30 14.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,834 22.00TOTALS $472.33 A - 257 5.b Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7050GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER TRANSFER Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY Processing a request to transfer ownership of a grave site. $50 per transfer $125 per transfer 100% $50.00 $127.00 $(77.00) 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.37% $(231) $381 $150 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 258 5.b Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFER S-7050 3 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.50 $127.07 3 $381 $381 $127.07 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $381 1.50TOTALS $127.00 A - 259 5.b Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7100CEMETERY SERVICES N/A Resident/Non-ResidentCEMETERY Maintenance and operation of the Cemetery. Grave Spaces: Adult - $1,200 Public Guardian - $800 Child - $800 Baby - $200 Cremation - $400 Burial Vault - $445 plus fees for Concrete Bell Liners and re-sale of concrete vaults to mortuaries. Grave Spaces: Adult - $1,950 Public Guardian - $1,950 Child - $1,950 Baby - $1,000 Cremation - $1,300 Burial Vault/Bell Liners - Actual cost plus 10% 100% $0.00 $182,961.00 $(182,961.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(182,961) $182,961 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 260 5.b Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CEMETERY SERVICES S-7100 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-CEMETERY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Remainder Of Time 716.62 $60,704.88 1 $60,705 PR+C-CEMETERY PART TIME SALARIES Remainder Of $34,929 1,733.00 $43,255.68 1 $43,256 PR+C-CEMETERY Suppl/Prof/Contract 0.00 $79,000.00 1 $79,000 $182,961 $182,960.56 2,449.62TYPE SUBTOTAL $182,961 2,449.62TOTALS $182,961.00 A - 261 5.b Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7220STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE BANNERPW- To review a request for a street banner. If approved, install the banner and remove it when the time period has ended. $200 $410 100% $200.00 $410.95 $(210.95) 20 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 48.67% $(4,219) $8,219 $4,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 262 5.b Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVE S-7220 20 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.MGR-COMM+CMTY RELADMIN ASST TO THE CITY MG 1.50 $93.23 20 $1,865 PW-GAS TX-T/S MTC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN 2.50 $317.70 20 $6,354 $8,219 $410.93 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $8,219 4.00TOTALS $410.95 A - 263 5.b Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7250REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE N/A Resident/Non-ResidentPARK MAINTENANCE Repair of damage to City property by a member of the public. Actual Costs Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $92,617.00 $(92,617.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(92,617) $92,617 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 264 5.b Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGE S-7250 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR 10 Hr/Week 500.00 $58,990.00 1 $58,990 PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 24 Hr/Mo Of 2 576.00 $33,626.88 1 $33,627 $92,617 $92,616.88 1,076.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $92,617 1,076.00TOTALS $92,617.00 A - 265 5.b Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7260PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION N/A Resident/Non-ResidentPARK MAINTENANCE Rental of a City Park See Appendix C See Appendix C 100% $28,000.00 $35,983.00 $(7,983.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 77.81% $(7,983) $35,983 $28,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 266 5.b Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PARK RENTAL/RESERVATION S-7260 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-ADMIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 5% 81.75 $7,323.98 1 $7,324 PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 4.5 Hr/Weekend Of 2 490.91 $28,659.33 1 $28,659 $35,983 $35,983.31 572.66TYPE SUBTOTAL $35,983 572.66TOTALS $35,983.00 A - 267 5.b Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-7270FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE N/A Resident/Non-ResidentPARK MAINTENANCE Maintnenace of the Fiscallini baseball field for use by the CSUSB Baseball team and SB Youth Baseball. Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights Club House - $88.60 per day CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind maintenance services. SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field. Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights Club House - $200 per day CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind maintenance services. SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field. 100% $17,000.00 $20,243.00 $(3,243.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 83.98% $(3,243) $20,243 $17,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 268 5.b Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCE S-7270 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PR+C-PARKS MTC LEAD PARK MAINT SUPERVISO 10 Days/Year 80.00 $10,052.80 1 $10,053 PR+C-PARKS MTC PART TIME SALARIES 10 Day/Year Of 2 174.55 $10,190.23 1 $10,190 $20,243 $20,243.03 254.55TYPE SUBTOTAL $20,243 254.55TOTALS $20,243.00 A - 269 5.b Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8000DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION COPY Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY Providing copies of public documents under the terms of the State Public Records Act. First Page - $0.35 Each additional page - $0.15 First five copies - No Charge Each additional copy - $0.25 per copy FPPC Copies - $0.10 per copy 100% $0.35 $121.12 $(120.77) 1,165 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.29% $(140,697) $141,105 $408 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 270 5.b Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION S-8000 1,165 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-REC.MGMT RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST 0.01 $1.04 1,165 $1,212 CITY ATTORNEY DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY IV 17% Of 1 - PRA 0.24 $51.82 1,165 $60,370 CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL SECRETARY I 0.01 $0.83 1,165 $967 CITY ATTORNEY OFFICE ASSISTANT 3 Hr/Day - PRA 1.04 $67.43 1,165 $78,556 $141,105 $121.12 1.30TYPE SUBTOTAL $141,105 1.30TOTALS $121.12 A - 271 5.b Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8020ELECTRONIC FILE COPY DISK Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY Providig copies of public records in an electronic format under the terms of the State Public Records Act. None $10 per disk 100% $0.00 $22.29 $(22.29) 150 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(3,344) $3,344 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 272 5.b Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ELECTRONIC FILE COPY S-8020 150 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 0.17 $22.29 150 $3,344 $3,344 $22.29 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,344 0.17TOTALS $22.29 A - 273 5.b Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8040ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING VIOLATION Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY Processing of administrative penalties for municipal code violations. None Recover the fully allocated actual costs at the discretion of the Hearing Officer. 100% $0.00 $1,060.65 $(1,060.65) 558 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(591,843) $591,843 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 274 5.b Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSING S-8040 558 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST I 100% 2.91 $343.87 558 $191,879 CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II Remainder Of 2 5.47 $716.78 558 $399,963 $591,843 $1,060.65 8.37TYPE SUBTOTAL $591,843 8.37TOTALS $1,060.65 A - 275 5.b Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8050ACP DEMAND LETTER LETTER Resident/Non-ResidentCITY ATTORNEY Processing an Administrative Civil Penalty demand letter. $31.84 per letter $65 per letter 100% $31.84 $65.55 $(33.71) 176 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 48.57% $(5,933) $11,537 $5,604 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 276 5.b Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ACP DEMAND LETTER S-8050 176 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 0.50 $65.55 176 $11,537 $11,537 $65.55 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $11,537 0.50TOTALS $65.55 A - 277 5.b Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8060LIEN RELEASE RELEASE Resident/BusinessCITY ATTORNEY Processing the release of a lien. None $65 plus any County fees 100% $0.00 $63.46 $(63.46) 160 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(10,154) $10,154 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 278 5.b Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LIEN RELEASE S-8060 160 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 0.17 $22.29 160 $3,566 CITY ATTORNEY ADMIN ANALYST II 60 Min/Week 0.31 $41.17 160 $6,587 $10,154 $63.46 0.48TYPE SUBTOTAL $10,154 0.48TOTALS $63.46 A - 279 5.b Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8320BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS LIEN BusinessCITY CLERK Processing of a lien on a property due to non-payment of business registration fees and taxes. $125 per lien (City receives $104 of the fee and the County receives $21) $90 per lien plus any County processing fees 100% $104.00 $88.79 $15.21 1,200 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 117.13% $18,252 $106,548 $124,800 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 280 5.b Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESS S-8320 1,200 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 50% Of 1 0.68 $88.79 1,200 $106,548 $106,548 $88.79 0.68TYPE SUBTOTAL $106,548 0.68TOTALS $88.79 A - 281 5.b Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8330BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER LETTER BusinessCITY CLERK Processing a demand letter for a business registration lien. $11 per letter $10 per letter 100% $11.00 $10.51 $0.49 240 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 104.68% $118 $2,522 $2,640 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 282 5.b Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTER S-8330 240 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 0.08 $10.51 240 $2,522 $2,522 $10.51 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,522 0.08TOTALS $10.51 A - 283 5.b Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8340BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE RELEASE BusinessCITY CLERK Processing the release of a business registration lien. None $35 per release plus any County processing fees 100% $0.00 $32.86 $(32.86) 1,200 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(39,432) $39,432 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 284 5.b Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASE S-8340 1,200 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 0.25 $32.86 1,200 $39,432 $39,432 $32.86 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $39,432 0.25TOTALS $32.86 A - 285 5.b Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8350DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATE BusinessCITY CLERK Providing a duplicate of a business registration certificate on request. $0.50 per certificate $10 per certificate 100% $0.50 $10.50 $(10.00) 36 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 4.76% $(360) $378 $18 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 286 5.b Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATE S-8350 36 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-BUS.REG/TLT COLLBUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/R 0.08 $10.51 36 $378 $378 $10.51 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL $378 0.08TOTALS $10.50 A - 287 5.b Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8360PASSPORT PROCESSING APPLICATION Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK Processing passport applications for the public. $35 per application plus $15 per photograph $35 per application plus $15 per photograph The application fee is set by the federal government. 55% $35.00 $64.11 $(29.11) 1,000 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 54.59% $(29,110) $64,110 $35,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 288 5.b Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PASSPORT PROCESSING S-8360 1,000 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-PASSPORT Supplies 0.00 $1.50 1,000 $1,500 C.CLK-REC.MGMT SR CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 50% 0.81 $62.61 1,000 $62,610 $64,110 $64.11 0.81TYPE SUBTOTAL $64,110 0.81TOTALS $64.11 A - 289 5.b Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8370NOTARY PUBLIC DOCUMENT Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK Providing Notary Public fees to the public. $15 per document $15 per document. This fee is set by the State. 50% $15.00 $33.00 $(18.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.45% $(18) $33 $15 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 290 5.b Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NOTARY PUBLIC S-8370 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-ADMIN.DEPUTY CITY CLERK 0.33 $33.21 1 $33 $33 $33.21 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $33 0.33TOTALS $33.00 A - 291 5.b Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8380RECORDS COMPILATION REQUEST Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK Creating or compiling records that do not currently exist as a public record on request. Actual Costs Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel needed plus any outside costs. 100% $70.00 $104.00 $(34.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 67.31% $(34) $104 $70 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 292 5.b Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RECORDS COMPILATION S-8380 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-REC.MGMT RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST 1.00 $104.20 1 $104 $104 $104.20 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $104 1.00TOTALS $104.00 A - 293 5.b Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8390CANDIDATE FILING CANDIDATE ResidentCITY CLERK Processing a filing for a candidate for a local office. $25 per candidate This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228) $25 per candidate This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228) 5% $25.00 $735.62 $(710.62) 29 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 3.40% $(20,608) $21,333 $725 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 294 5.b Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CANDIDATE FILING S-8390 29 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-ADMIN.CITY CLERK 2.00 $433.74 29 $12,578 C.CLK-ADMIN.DEPUTY CITY CLERK 3.00 $301.89 29 $8,755 $21,333 $735.63 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $21,333 5.00TOTALS $735.62 A - 295 5.b Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8400INITIATIVE FILING INITIATIVE Resident/BusinessCITY CLERK Processing a local initiative. $200 per application Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). $200 per application Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). 15% $0.00 $1,525.00 $(1,525.00) 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(1,525) $1,525 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 296 5.b Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE INITIATIVE FILING S-8400 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-ADMIN.CITY CLERK 1.00 $216.87 1 $217 C.CLK-ADMIN.CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK 4.00 $489.20 1 $489 C.CLK-ADMIN.DEPUTY CITY CLERK 4.00 $402.52 1 $403 C.CLK-REC.MGMT RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST 4.00 $416.80 1 $417 $1,525 $1,525.39 13.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,525 13.00TOTALS $1,525.00 A - 297 5.b Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8410WEDDING CEREMONY CEREMONY Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK Providing a weddig a ceremony on request. $65 per ceremony $70 per ceremony 100% $65.00 $71.50 $(6.50) 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 90.91% $(26) $286 $260 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 298 5.b Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE WEDDING CEREMONY S-8410 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.CLK-ADMIN.CITY CLERK 0.33 $71.57 4 $286 $286 $71.57 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $286 0.33TOTALS $71.50 A - 299 5.b Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8500FILM PERMIT APPLICATION BusinessCITY MANAGER Processing a film permit for filming within the City. $63 per permit $250 per permit 100% $63.00 $248.60 $(185.60) 30 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 25.34% $(5,568) $7,458 $1,890 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 300 5.b Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FILM PERMIT S-8500 30 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST C.MGR-COMM+CMTY RELADMIN ASST TO THE CITY MG 4.00 $248.60 30 $7,458 $7,458 $248.60 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $7,458 4.00TOTALS $248.60 A - 301 5.b Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-8600NSF CHECK PROCESSING NSF CHECK Developer/Resident/BusinessFINANCE Processing a check returned due to insufficient funds. $26 per NSF Check $65 per NSF check (According to Government Code section 6157 (b), a city may charge a "reasonable charge for the returned check, not to exceed the actual costs incurred by the public agency" in order to recover its processing and collection costs.) 100% $26.00 $64.75 $(38.75) 92 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 40.15% $(3,565) $5,957 $2,392 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 302 5.b Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NSF CHECK PROCESSING S-8600 92 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIN-ADMIN EXEC ASST TO DIRECTOR 0.50 $51.63 92 $4,750 FIN-ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTANT III 0.08 $11.87 92 $1,092 FIN-ACCOUNTING Bank Charge 0.00 $1.25 92 $115 $5,957 $64.75 0.58TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,957 0.58TOTALS $64.75 A - 303 5.b Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City S-9000OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES VARIOUSALL This is a service charge for all services that should be charged for, but for which no fee was established. None Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 30, 2020 A - 304 5.b Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City April 29, 2020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICES S-9000 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 A - 305 5.b Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK A - 306 5.b Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City APPENDIX B CURRENT FEE COMPARED TO SUGGESTED FEE B - 1 5.b Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK B - 2 5.b Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0005 BUILDING ISSUANCE FEEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $60 - 1st permit $10 - each additional permit on the same application $40 - 1st permit $10 - each additional permit on the same application S-0010 BUILDING PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D Hourly Rate - $122.37 Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C Hourly Rate - $94.15 S-0020 BUILDING INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Various fees - see proposed Schedule of Fees - Apendix D Hourly Rate - $118.33 Various fees - see current Schedule of Fees - Appendix C Hourly Rate - $94.45 S-0022 SPECIAL BUILDING INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $595 for the 1st 4 hours plus $105 for each add'l hour$380 Minimum for the 1st 4 hours plus $95 for each additional hour S-0025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $500$475.08 - as a separate application (of which $100 was for Fire Review) $133.62 - if included on the building permit (Deleted as All Fire) S-0030 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $500$467.34 April 30, 2020 2 B - 3 5.b Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0201 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-ADM.REV.REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $575$583 S-0203 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-PLN.COMM.REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $4,070 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $2,550 S-0205 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS-D/ERCREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,890$822 S-0208 ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-ADM.REV.REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this fee as antennas are covered using a CUP or a development permit. $2,938 S-0211 APPEAL TO MAYOR & COUNCILREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $285 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery) $2,850 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $177 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10% Recovery) $1,766 - All others S-0213 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $430 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%) $4,295 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $278 - Non-Applicant, City Resident (10%) $2,772 - All others April 30, 2020 3 B - 4 5.b Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0216 CUP-MINOR USE PMT/ALCOHOLREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $4,625 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $3,605 S-0217 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $5,555 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $7,133 - CUP for Commercial/Industrial (#10; $71,330) $2,809 - CUP for Condo, PRD, HMOD (#30; $84,270) S-0219 CUP REVISIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,780 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $2,113 S-0222 DESIGN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this service as service time is included with Conditional Use Permit, Development Permit or Temporary Use Permit Full Consultant Cost S-0224 DEVELOPMENT AGMT OR AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit as determined by staff. Direct Cost Recovery Fee S-0227 DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING MAP AMEND.REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $9,925 plus any consultant cost including 10% contract administrative overhead, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $6,960 plus full consultant cost April 30, 2020 4 B - 5 5.b Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0230 DEV.PMT-DIRECTOR REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,965$1,000 S-0233 DEV.PMT-D/ERC REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 0 to 5 Acres - $6,810 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. > than 5 Acres - $11,905 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. $6,438 S-0235 DEV.PMT-PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 0 to 5 Acres - $8,040 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. > than 5 Acres - $15,455 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City Staff. $6,720 - 0 to 5 Acres (#10; $67,200) $6,720 - Greater than 5 Acres (#5, $33,600) S-0238 DEV.PMT-MAYOR/COUNCIL REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this service as it is no longer used.$7,288 S-0241 ENVIRONMENTAL (INITIAL) STUDYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. $3,273 S-0244 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost April 30, 2020 5 B - 6 5.b Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0246 EXTENSION OF TIMEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,860 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $3,922 - CUP & Development Permit (#2; $7,844) $4,768 - Tentative Tract Map (#10; $47,680) S-0251 FENCE/WALL PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $60$56 S-0257 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (TEXT/MAP)REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,570 plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($1,500 Deposit treated as actual cost) S-0259 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($815 deposit plus consultant cost) S-0262 HOME OCCUPATION PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $145$268 S-0264 LETTER OF ZONING & GEN.PLAN CONSISTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $245$450 April 30, 2020 6 B - 7 5.b Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0266 PLANNING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,255$477 S-0268 MINOR EXCEPTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $105$288 - Concurrent with another application $268 - Owner-Occupied single-family residence $792 - Other S-0270 MISC.ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not performed.Direct Cost Recovery Fee ($245 Deposit) plus Full Consultant Cost ($327 Deposit) S-0271 MINOR MODIFICATION/REVISIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $380 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $561 S-0273 PHASING PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed. $823 - If not part of original project review $514 - D/ERC review application (DP) $536 - Planning Comm.Application (CUP/DP/SUB) S-0275 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this fee as the service is not being performed. $1,119 April 30, 2020 7 B - 8 5.b Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0277 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE/NECESSITY LETTERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,740 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $636 S-0279 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-D/ERC REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,440$2,424 S-0280 RECONSIDERATION BY THE PLAN.COMM.REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,670 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $506 S-0282 SIGN PERMIT-REGULARREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $80$182 S-0283 SIGN PERMIT-REQUIRING CUPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is handled as two separate processes. $3,858 S-0284 SIGN PERMIT-TEMPORARYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $80$111 April 30, 2020 8 B - 9 5.b Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0286 SIGN PROGRAMREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 10 or less tenant spaces - $490 Greater than 10 tenant spaces - Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. $610 S-0288 SPECIFIC PLAN/AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost S-0291 TEMPORARY USE/SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $315 - Temporary Use Permit $1,230 - Special Event Permit (Director Review) $0 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) - Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not used. $82.86 - Temporary Use Permit (#55; $4,557) $420 - Special Event Permit (Director Review) (#22; $9,240) $730 - Special Event Permit (Planning Commission review) S-0293 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $5,170 plus the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff. $4,262 plus $65 per parcel (NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 3 parcels per Tentative Parcel Map.) S-0295 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SFR/CONDO/PRD)REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $6,850 plus $25 per lot and the estimated cost of noticing & publishing as estimated by City staff. $7,561 plus $65 per lot or dwelling unit (NOTE: Revenue is based on an average of 15 lots per Tentative Tract Map.) April 30, 2020 9 B - 10 5.b Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0297 TENTATIVE MAP REVISION-TRACT/PARCELREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $4,125 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $2,113 S-0301 TREE REMOVAL PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $180$506 S-0303 VARIANCE-REGULARREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $250 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery) $2,065 - All others, plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $322 - Single-family residence (12% Recovery) $2,724 - All others S-0304 VARIANCE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $990 plus the estimated cost of noticing and publishing as estimated by City staff. $910 S-0306 VESTING TENTATIVE MAPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead and all other costs, including noticing & publishing, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. Direct Cost Recovery Fee plus full consultant cost S-0308 ZONING FORMREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this service as it is handled by S-0264.$22 April 30, 2020 10 B - 11 5.b Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0309 ZONING VERIFICATION REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $55$37 S-0315 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 2% added to all Community Development fees. This would split the cost with the general taxpayer. This fee is to be reserved for the major general plan updates that are required every 10 to 15 years. None S-0322 TECHNOLOGY FEEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 2% charged against all Development Department Fees2% of Plan Review & Permit Fees S-0326 ARCHIVE FEESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1.25 - Per Permit or Application $3.15/sheet - Plans $0.35/page - Documents $1.00 - Per Permit or Application $2.00/sheet - Plans $0.25/page - Documents S-0441 FINAL/PARCEL MAP REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $5,195 - Base Fee $275 - Per Lot Fee $270 - Each additional Review $0 - Final Map Continuance - Staff recommends deleting as not used. $185 - Certificate of Correction per Hour $2,210 - Base Fee $55 - Per Lot Fee $135 - Each additional Review $404 - Final Map Continuance $97 - Certificate of Correction per Hour April 30, 2020 11 B - 12 5.b Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0445 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus $1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus $265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost $605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four (Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.) 2% of engineer's cost estimate for on-site improvements S-0447 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $390 for all plans with more than 50 Cubic YardsCubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee 51 to 100 - $15.00 101 to 1,000 - $22.50 1,001 to 10,000 - $30.00 10,001 to 100,000 - $30.00 plus $15.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 - $165.00 plus $9.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up - $255.00 plus $4.50 for each 10K CY > 200,000 S-0452 REVIEW-CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,370$828 S-0453 REVIEW-LOT MERGERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,300$828 S-0454 REVIEW-LOT LINE ADJSTMTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,590$414 - SFR Occupancy (#3; $1,242) $828 - Com'l/Ind'l (#3; $2,484) April 30, 2020 12 B - 13 5.b Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0463 ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Fee Based on Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost: $0 to $1 Million - 3.4% of estimated cost with a $1,045 minimum Greater than $1 MIllion - $34,000 plus 1.7% of the estimated cost over $1 Million 3% of Estimated Construction Cost S-0467 ON-SITE GRADING INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Cubic Yards: 1 to 1,000 - $225 1,001 to 10,000 - $340 10,001 to 100,000 - $340 plus $115.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 - $1,375 plus $55 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up - $1,870 plus $10 for each 10K CY > 200,000 Cubic Yards: <= 50 - No Fee 51 to 100 - $150.00 101 to 1,000 - $225.00 1,001 to 10,000 - $300.00 10,001 to 100,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 10,000 100,001 to 200,000 - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 100,000 200,001 and up - $300.00 plus $100.00 for each 10K CY > 200,000 S-0471 HYDRAULIC/HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $825Actual Time: $487 - for the first 3 hours $100 - for each add'l hour S-0472 ALQUIST PRIOLO FAULT LINE INVESTIG.REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $940None S-0480 FEMA FLOODPLAIN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $940 plus consultant costs including 10% City administrative overhead charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. None April 30, 2020 13 B - 14 5.b Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0481 REV.OF STORM WTR POLLUTION PREV.PLNREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $405 - Commercial & Residential Projects $615 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects $410 - Commercial & Residential Projects (#57; $23,370) $265 - Industrial and Linear (CIP/Utility) Projects (#56; $14,840) S-0488 REVIEW OF WTR QUALITY MGMT PLANSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $155 - Non-Categorical $1,440 - Categorical $120 - per hour for reviews after the third review $80 - Non-Categorical (#450; $36,000) $365 - Categorical without Conditions of Concern (#75; $27,375) $1,130 - Categorical with Conditions of Concern (#75; $84,750) $99 - per hour for reviews after the third review (#1; $99) S-0489 REV-EROSION/WSTE MGMT CONTROL PLANREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $180$75 S-0490 NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $140 $98 - Less than 10 Acres (#200; $19,600) $179 - 10 Acres or More (#4; $716) S-0495 NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $175$143 S-0501 BASIC PERMIT FEEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Engineering Permit - This fee is included with each permit so it does not need to be charged separately and should be deleted Blanket Permit - covered by S-0523, so this fee should be deleted Permit Extension - covered by S-0560, so this fee should be deleted $45.00 - Engineering Permit $53.00 - Blanket Permit $43.00 - Permit Extension April 30, 2020 14 B - 15 5.b Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0503 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,515 - Initial Permit $340 - Annual Renewal $670.00 - Initial Permit ($625 for the encroachment permit and $45 for the basic permit - both to be combined into one fee.) $150.00 - Annual Renewal S-0505 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $160 - No Lane Closure - Parking Only $175 - Lane Closure: First Day $25 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day $100 - Trash Bin, 1st week $25 - Trash Bin, each add'l week $25.00 - No Lane Closure (#100; $2,500) $136.00 - Lane Closure: First Day (#2,400; $326,400) $60.00 - Lane Closure: Each Additional Day (#9,600; $576,000) $70.00 - Trash Bin, 1st week $28.00 - Trash Bin, each add'l week S-0507 LANE CLOSURE WITH EXCAVATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this fee as the cost of reviewing/inspecting the lane closure is covered by the excavation permit. $286.00 S-0509 SPECIAL EVENT ENCROACHMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $925 - Lane Closure $1,495 - Street/Road Closure, 1st day $1,040 - Street/Road Closure, each add''l day $545.00 - With a Lane Closure (#4; $2,180) $559.00 - With a Street Closure (#8; $4,472) $347.00 - With a Road Closure (1st day) ** $302.00 - Each Additional Day of a Street/Road Closure (#4, $1,208) (**Note: Staff recomends combining the fees for a street and a road as they take the same effort. Also, each of the above fees, except the "additional day" fee, include the $45 basic fee from S-0501.) S-0511 OVERSIZE LOAD/BLDG.MOVE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $16 - One Day Permit $90 - Annual Permit (Note: City may only charge the State-Mandated fee. There is no provision for a technology surcharge.) $17.00 - One Day (State-Mandated Fee is $16) (#997; $16,949) $95.00 - Annual Permit (State-Mandated Fee is $90) (#3; $285) April 30, 2020 15 B - 16 5.b Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0513 HAULING PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $650 - First Day $285 - Each Additional Day $438.00 - First Day (#8; $3,504) (Includes S-501 Basic Fee) $100.00 - Each Additional Day (#32; $3,200) S-0515 EXCAVATION PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff Recommends Deleting This Service$150.00 - Per day S-0517 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Consultant charge (currently $1,440 for a basic review) plus 10% overhead for City contract administration and review. $719.00 - Basic Review (#10; $7,190) $80.00 - Extended Review per Hour (#0; $0) S-0518 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,585 - 1st Sheet, plus $1,515 - Each Additional Sheet, plus $265 - if the project is over $25K in estimated cost $605 - Additional Plan Check (minimum 4 hours) plus $150 for each hour over four (Note: Sheets with only standards & conditions are not counted.) $45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost with a $50 minimum S-0520 REVIEW REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $210 for the 1st hour plus $150 for each additional hour$137.00 April 30, 2020 16 B - 17 5.b Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0521 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $240 - Driveway & Sidewalk Replacement Other Fees based on Estimated Construction Cost: $0 to $175,000 - $630 plus 12.4% of the Cost over $15,000 $175,001 to $750,000 - $20,470 plus 3.4% of the Cost over $175,000 Greater than $750,000 - $40,020 plus 1.1% of the Cost over $750,000 $45 plus 4% of Estimated Construction Cost S-0523 ANNUAL UTILITY BLANKET PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $130 for the initial blanket permit annually plus $105 per day for inspection per location after the first day/location deducted from an initial annual deposit of $5,500. Deposit balance can be carried forward to a new year but a new initial blanket permit is required and the deposit balance must be restored to $5,500. $53.00 - Permit Issuance (#7; $371) $73.00 - Inspection Per Location (#7; $511) S-0529 BOND RELEASE INSPECTION - PWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $230$45.00 - Issuance $59.00 - Inspection S-0531 STREET NAME CHANGEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs, including new street signage, charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. $1,345.00 Plus the Cost of Street Signs S-0533 STREET/ALLEY VACATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,840 plus a deposit for noticing and publishing determined by staff $1,000.00 - Deposit $1,000.00 - Balance Due Prior to Processing April 30, 2020 17 B - 18 5.b Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0535 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE If Legal and Map are Provided - $920 If City Prepares Legal & Map - Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. $315.00 - If Legal and Map are Provided (#10; $3,150) $800.00 - If City Prepares Legal & Map S-0537 PRIVATE PARTY ANNEXATION REQUESTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $17,000. $14,750.00 S-0539 CITY PROPERTY LEASE PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit of $5,500. $2,100.00 S-0542 ENGINEERING LETTERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Staff recommends deleting this service as it is not being provided.$100.00 S-0560 PERMIT EXTENSIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $80 each$43.00 S-0565 RE-INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $105 per hour with a one-hour minimum$90 ($45 permit fee + $45 reinspection fee) April 30, 2020 18 B - 19 5.b Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0567 AFTER HOURS & HOLIDAY INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Employee's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead with a four (4) hour minimum $369.00 - 4 hr. minimum $92.45 - each additional hour S-0571 ASMT.DIST./COMM.FACILITIES DIST.REF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staff plus consultant costs including 10% contract administrative overhead and all other costs charged against an initial deposit determined by staff. $5,900 S-0602 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE The general public applies for Concealed Weapons Permits at the Sheriff's Office. The Police Department only issues permits to retired SBPD Officers who are not charged a fee. Staff recommends deleting this fee as it is not being used. $400 - Initial $325 - Renewal S-0609 RECORDS CHECK LETTERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $40$25 - With Record $20 - Without Record S-0611 2ND HAND DEALER/PAWNSHOP REGULATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $480 - Initial $135 - Renewal $475 - Initial (#1; $475) $126 - Renewal (#3; $378) April 30, 2020 19 B - 20 5.b Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0613 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINT PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $20 plus applicable DOJ/FBI fee (currently $33) $2 - Live Scan Processing Fee (Note: Staff is charging $15 plus the DOJ fee.) $15 - Fingerprint card (Note: Applicants for City jobs are not charged the Live Scan fee or the DOJ fee.) S-0616 FIX-IT TICKET SIGN-OFFREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $25$20 S-0618 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Officer's current hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus 20% overhead with a four (4) hour minimum Officer's hourly rate at time & 1/2 plus Medicare and Workers' Comp. Insurance S-0621 ALARM SYSTEMREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $96 - Annual Alarm Permit ($75-City plus $21-Alarm Vendor) $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation $10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr. False Alarm Charge: $256 - All False Alarms without a Permit ($200-City plus $56-Alarm Vendor) and after the 3rd False Alarm in a 12 month period with a Permit. (Note: No distinction found between residential and commercial response or between intrusion and panic/robbery response.) $25/$50/$10 - Ann.Res'l/Com'l/LIR Alarm Pmt. (LIR=Low Income Resident) $25 - Alarm Sys.Installation $10 - Alarm Sys.Monitoring Tsfr. False Alarms in 12-month period [Intrusion: Reg./LIR]/[Robbery or panic: Reg./LIR]: [$75/$10]/[$200/$20] - 1st thru 4th Non-Permitted [$90/$10]/[$250/$20] - 5th & 6th [$90/$20]/[$300/$40] - 7th thru 9th [$175/$20]/[$350/$40] - 10th & Subsequent S-0640 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE To recognize the Public Health importance of animal control, we suggest that 50% of the cost should come from the general taxpayer. The Police Department has prepared a study that will move the City in that direction. Various Fees to cover licensing, boarding and miscellaneous services April 30, 2020 20 B - 21 5.b Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-0655 BIENNIAL RENTAL PROPERTY INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $180 per SFR rental Staff recommends increasing the inspections to every year and including an interior inspection. $100 per owner of SFR rentals S-0657 NOTICE OF PENDENCY RELEASEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $165 plus $8.50 for any unit over four$180 for the first four units $180 base fee plus $7.45 for each unit inspected (over four) S-0659 ABATEMENT LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE CHGEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $130 per lien$115 per lien S-0662 LIEN DEMAND LETTER ADMIN.CHARGEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $185$95 S-0664 DUPLICATE LIEN RELEASEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $15$28 S-0666 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $515 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing$375 per lot or partial lot plus actual cost of discing April 30, 2020 21 B - 22 5.b Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-6000 AQUATICS SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE See Appendix CSee Appendix C In addition, the City has received $39,750 from a Kaiser Grant. S-6060 YOUTH SPORTSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Resident - $45 per child Non-Resident - $50 per child Resident - $30 per child Non-Resident - $33 per child S-6070 ADULT SPORTSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Soccer: Resident - $375 per team Non-Resident Team - $425 per team Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost Soccer: Resident - $300 per team Non-Resident Team - $350 per team Basketball - Charging direct staff and program cost S-6100 COMM. CENTER PROG/RENTALSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE See Appendix CSe Appendix C S-6130 BALLFIELD RENTAL/USEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Reservation - $10 per hour Tournament Use - $120 per field per day Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $15 per hour thereafter Preparation - determined by the needs of the event Local Sports Groups: Field Use - No Charge Lighting - No Charge Reservation - $10 per hour for first hour and $5 per hour thereafter Tournament Use: $120 per field per day without lights $180 per field per day with lights Preparation - $25 per field upon request Lighting - $20 per hour for first hour and $10 per hour thereafter Local Sports Groups do not pay for use of the fields or lights. April 30, 2020 22 B - 23 5.b Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-6700 LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1 per card (Staff Recommendation)$1 per card S-6710 INTER-LIBRARY LOAN REQUESTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3 per item$3 per item S-6720 LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $20 per hour$20 per hour S-6730 REPLACE LOST/DAMAGED LIBRARY MAT'LSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Lost Items: Magazines - $5 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost Other items - $10 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost Damaged Items - $3-$5 Missing Barcode - $10 Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $10 Lost Items: Magazines - $1 processing fee plus $10 replacement cost Other items - $5 processing fee plus $40 replacement cost Damaged Items - $3-$5 Missing Barcode - $1 Missing or Damaged Bookcover - $5 S-6740 LIBRARY ROOM RENTALREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Bing Wong Auditorium: Non-Profit - $25/hr For Profit - $50/hr (4 hr min) Kellogg Room A or B - Non-Profit - $25/hr for each For Profit - $50/hr for each Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID) Projector - $5 per day VCR and Monitor - $10 per day Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30 Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit) Bing Wong Auditorium - $25 per hour (4 hour minimum) Kellogg Room A or B - $25 per hour for each Study Room - $15 per hour (waived with student ID) Projector - $5 per day VCR and Monitor - $10 per day Digital Projector in Bing Wong Auditorium - $30 Computer/Internet Techincal Support - $20 per hour Portable Public Address System - $5 per day ($50 deposit) April 30, 2020 23 B - 24 5.b Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-7000 CEMETERY INTERMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Single - $2,295 Double - $2,590 Cremation - $915 Adult: Single - $600 Double - $850 Child: Single - $350 Double - $650 Baby - $150 Cremation - $200 For many sites, the City has a contractual obligation to provide the interment at the fee that was in place when the contract was signed. S-7010 CEMETERY DISINTERMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) - $5,545 Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $3,820 Disinterment/Reinterment (within Cemetery) -$1,500 Adult Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $1,200 Baby/Child Disinterment (Shipped Out) - $800 S-7020 CEMETERY MARKER SETTINGSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Single - $335 Double - $595 Marker Inscription - Actual costs Single - $140 Double - $200 Marker Inscription: 4 digits - $50 Month, Day, Year - $100 Name and years - $130 S-7030 CEMETERY FLOWER VASE INSTALLATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $95 per installation and vase$30 per vase. No installation fee S-7040 REMOVE/REPLACE CEMETERY MARKERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Single - $420 per marker Double - $735 per marker None April 30, 2020 24 B - 25 5.b Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-7050 GRAVE PROPERTY OWNER TRANSFERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $125 per transfer$50 per transfer S-7100 CEMETERY SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Grave Spaces: Adult - $1,950 Public Guardian - $1,950 Child - $1,950 Baby - $1,000 Cremation - $1,300 Burial Vault/Bell Liners - Actual cost plus 10% Grave Spaces: Adult - $1,200 Public Guardian - $800 Child - $800 Baby - $200 Cremation - $400 Burial Vault - $445 plus fees for Concrete Bell Liners and re-sale of concrete vaults to mortuaries. S-7220 STREET BANNER INSTALL/REMOVEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $410$200 S-7250 REPAIR TO CITY PROPERTY DAMAGEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Actual Costs S-7260 PARK RENTAL/RESERVATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE See Appendix CSee Appendix C April 30, 2020 25 B - 26 5.b Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-7270 FISCALLINI FIELD MAINTENANCEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights Club House - $200 per day CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind maintenance services. SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field. Field - $500 per use (6 hours) plus $40 per hour for lights Club House - $88.60 per day CSUSB pays $17,000 per year. They also provide in-kind maintenance services. SB Youth Baseball does not pay for use of the field. They are to pay $6,000 per year for capital improvements to the field. S-8000 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE First five copies - No Charge Each additional copy - $0.25 per copy FPPC Copies - $0.10 per copy First Page - $0.35 Each additional page - $0.15 S-8020 ELECTRONIC FILE COPYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $10 per diskNone S-8040 ADMIN CIVIL PENALTY PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Recover the fully allocated actual costs at the discretion of the Hearing Officer. None S-8050 ACP DEMAND LETTERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $65 per letter$31.84 per letter S-8060 LIEN RELEASEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $65 plus any County feesNone April 30, 2020 26 B - 27 5.b Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-8320 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN ASSESSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $90 per lien plus any County processing fees$125 per lien (City receives $104 of the fee and the County receives $21) S-8330 BUSINESS REGISTRATION DEMAND LETTERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $10 per letter$11 per letter S-8340 BUSINESS REGISTRATION LIEN RELEASEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $35 per release plus any County processing feesNone S-8350 DUPLICATE BUSINESS REG CERTIFICATEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $10 per certificate$0.50 per certificate S-8360 PASSPORT PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $35 per application plus $15 per photograph The application fee is set by the federal government. $35 per application plus $15 per photograph April 30, 2020 27 B - 28 5.b Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-8370 NOTARY PUBLICREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $15 per document. This fee is set by the State. $15 per document S-8380 RECORDS COMPILATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel needed plus any outside costs. Actual Costs S-8390 CANDIDATE FILINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $25 per candidate This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228) $25 per candidate This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 10228) S-8400 INITIATIVE FILINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $200 per application Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). $200 per application Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). April 30, 2020 28 B - 29 5.b Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA As of April 29, 2020 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-8410 WEDDING CEREMONYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $70 per ceremony$65 per ceremony S-8500 FILM PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $250 per permit$63 per permit S-8600 NSF CHECK PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $65 per NSF check (According to Government Code section 6157 (b), a city may charge a "reasonable charge for the returned check, not to exceed the actual costs incurred by the public agency" in order to recover its processing and collection costs.) $26 per NSF Check S-9000 OTHER CHARGEABLE SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual Cost based on the "Fully-Burdened" hourly rate of City staffNone April 30, 2020 29 B - 30 5.b Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City APPENDIX C CURRENT BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE C - 1 5.b Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK C - 2 5.b Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 1. valuation of the construction. 2. 3. 4. C - 3 5.b Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 2 1. 2. nd C - 4 5.b Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 3 Table 1A Building Permit Fees Tract Homes Square Feet Insp. Time(hr)Permit Fee Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.)Permit Fee to 1200 4.77 $451 1300 4.94 $467 1400 5.11 $483 1500 5.28 $499 1600 5.45 $515 4600 10.51 $ 993 1700 5.62 $531 4700 10.68 $1,009 1800 5.78 $546 4800 10.85 $1,025 1900 5.95 $562 4900 11.02 $1,041 2000 6.12 $578 5000 11.18 $1,056 2100 6.29 $594 5100 11.35 $1,072 2200 6.46 $610 5200 11.52 $1,088 2300 6.63 $626 5300 11.69 $1,104 2400 6.80 $642 5400 11.86 $1,120 2500 6.97 $658 5500 12.03 $1,136 2600 7.13 $673 5600 12.2 $1,152 2700 7.30 $689 5700 12.37 $1,168 2800 7.47 $706 5800 12.53 $1,183 2900 7.64 $722 5900 12.7 $1,200 3000 7.81 $738 6000 12.87 $1,216 3100 7.98 $754 6100 13.04 $1,232 3200 8.15 $770 6200 13.21 $1,248 3300 8.32 $786 6300 13.38 $1,264 3400 8.48 $801 6400 13.55 $1,280 3500 8.65 $817 6500 13.71 $1,295 3600 8.82 $833 6600 13.88 $1,311 3700 8.99 $849 6700 14.05 $1,327 3800 9.16 $865 6800 14.22 $1,343 3900 9.33 $881 6900 14.39 $1,359 4000 9.50 $897 7000 14.56 $1,375 4100 9.66 $912 7100 14.73 $1,391 4200 9.83 $928 7200 14.9 $1,407 4300 10.00 $945 7300 15.06 $1,422 4400 10.17 $961 7400 15.23 $1,438 4500 10.34 $977 7500 15.4 $1,455 Notes: 1. The indicated fees include building, electrical,plumbing and mechanical inspection fees. 2. The indicated fees do not includeplan review, issuance or other applicable fees. 3. The indicated fees include a standard 2 car garage. 4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula: $1455 + (size 7500)/100 X 15.94 . 5. This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more. C - 5 5.b Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 4 Table 1B Building Permit Fees Infill Homes Square Feet Insp. Time(hr)Permit Fee Square Feet Insp. Time(hr.)Permit Fee. to 1200 12.35 $1,166 1300 12.65 $1,195 1400 12.95 $1,223 1500 13.25 $1,251 1600 13.55 $1,280 4600 22.50 $2,125 1700 13.84 $1,307 4700 22.80 $2,153 1800 14.14 $1,336 4800 23.10 $2,182 1900 14.44 $1,364 4900 23.40 $2,210 2000 14.74 $1,392 5000 23.69 $2,238 2100 15.04 $1,421 5100 23.99 $2,266 2200 15.34 $1,449 5200 24.29 $2,294 2300 15.64 $1,477 5300 24.59 $2,323 2400 15.93 $1,505 5400 24.89 $2,351 2500 16.23 $1,533 5500 25.19 $2,379 2600 16.53 $1,561 5600 25.49 $2,408 2700 16.83 $1,590 5700 25.78 $2,435 2800 17.13 $1,618 5800 26.08 $2,463 2900 17.43 $1,646 5900 26.38 $2,492 3000 17.72 $1,674 6000 26.68 $2,520 3100 18.02 $1,702 6100 26.98 $2,548 3200 18.32 $1,730 6200 27.28 $2,577 3300 18.62 $1,759 6300 27.58 $2,605 3400 18.92 $1,787 6400 27.87 $2,632 3500 19.22 $1,815 6500 28.17 $2,661 3600 19.52 $1,844 6600 28.47 $2,689 3700 19.81 $1,871 6700 28.77 $2,717 3800 20.11 $1,899 6800 29.07 $2,746 3900 20.41 $1,928 6900 29.37 $2,774 4000 20.71 $1,956 7000 29.66 $2,801 4100 21.01 $1,984 7100 29.96 $2,830 4200 21.31 $2,013 7200 30.26 $2,858 4300 21.61 $2,041 7300 30.56 $2,886 4400 21.90 $2,068 7400 30.86 $2,915 4500 22.20 $2,097 7500 31.16 $2,943 Notes: 1. The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees. 2. The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees. 3. The indicated fees include a standard 2 cargarage. 4. For homes larger than 7500 sq. ft., use the following formula: $2943 + (size 7500)/100 X 28.19 . 5. This table applies to infill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less. C - 6 5.b Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Occupancy Classification (2006 IBC) 5C - 7 5.b Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City FIREPLACE 30% 6C - 8 5.b Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 7 Commercial, Industrial, and Mu 1.00 - 500 60.00 14.25 74.25 501 - 600 60.00 16.15 76.15 601 - 700 60.00 18.05 78.05 701 - 800 60.00 19.95 79.95 801 - 900 60.00 21.85 81.85 901 - 1,000 60.00 23.75 83.75 1,001 - 1,100 60.00 25.65 85.65 30,001 – 31,000 291.00 276.45 567.45 1,101 - 1,200 60.00 27.55 87.55 31,001 – 32,000 297.50 282.63 580.13 1,201 - 1,300 60.00 29.45 89.45 32,001 – 33,000 304.00 288.80 592.80 1,301 - 1,400 60.00 31.35 91.35 33,001 – 34,000 310.50 294.98 605.48 1,401 - 1,500 60.00 33.25 93.25 34,001 – 35,000 317.00 301.15 618.15 1,501 - 1,600 60.00 35.15 95.15 35,001 – 36,000 323.50 307.33 630.83 1,601 - 1,700 60.00 37.05 97.05 36,001 – 37,000 330.00 313.50 643.50 1,701 - 1,800 60.00 38.95 98.95 37,001 – 38,000 336.50 319.68 656.18 1,801 - 1,900 60.00 40.85 100.85 38,001 – 39,000 343.00 325.85 668.85 1,901 - 2,000 60.00 42.75 102.75 39,001 – 40,000 349.50 332.50 682.00 40,001 – 41,000 356.00 338.20 694.20 41,001 – 42,000 362.50 344.38 706.88 2,001 - 3,000 60.00 51.30 111.30 42,001 – 43,000 369.00 350.55 719.55 3,001 – 4,000 63.00 59.85 122.85 43,001 – 44,000 375.50 356.73 732.23 4,001 – 5,000 72.00 68.40 140.40 44,001 – 45,000 382.00 362.90 744.90 5,001 – 6,000 81.00 76.95 157.95 45,001 – 46,000 388.50 369.08 757.58 6,001 – 7,000 90.00 85.50 175.50 46,001 – 47,000 395.00 375.25 770.25 7,001 – 8,000 99.00 94.05 193.05 47,001 – 48,000 401.50 381.43 782.93 8,001 – 9,000 108.00 102.60 210.60 48,001 – 49,000 408.50 387.60 796.10 9,001 – 10,000 117.00 111.15 228.15 49,001 – 50,000 414.50 393.78 808.28 10,001 – 11,000 126.00 119.70 245.70 50,001 – 51,000 419.50 398.05 817.55 11,001 – 12,000 135.00 128.25 263.25 51,001 – 52,000 423.00 402.33 825.33 12,001 – 13,000 144.00 136.80 280.80 52,001 – 53,000 428.00 406.60 834.60 13,001 – 14,000 153.00 145.35 298.35 53,001 – 54,000 432.50 410.88 843.38 14,001 – 15,000 162.00 153.90 315.90 54,001 – 55,000 437.00 415.15 852.15 15,001 – 16,000 171.00 162.45 333.45 55,001 – 56,000 441.50 419.43 860.93 16,001 – 17,000 180.00 171.00 351.00 56,001 – 57,000 446.00 423.70 869.70 17,001 – 18,000 189.00 179.55 368.55 57,001 – 58,000 450.50 427.98 878.48 18,001 – 19,000 198.00 188.10 386.10 58,001 – 59,000 455.00 432.25 887.25 19,001 – 20,000 207.00 196.65 403.65 59,001 – 60,000 459.50 436.53 896.03 20,001 – 21,000 216.00 205.20 421.20 60,001 – 61,000 464.00 440.80 904.80 21,001 – 22,000 225.00 213.75 438.75 61,001 – 62,000 468.50 445.08 913.58 22,001 – 23,000 234.00 222.30 456.30 62,001 – 63,000 473.00 449.35 922.35 23,001 – 24,000 243.00 230.85 473.85 63,001 – 64,000 477.50 453.63 931.13 24,001 – 25,000 252.00 239.45 491.45 64,001 – 65,000 482.00 457.90 939.90 25,001 – 26,000 258.00 245.10 503.10 65,001 – 66,000 486.50 462.18 948.68 26,001 – 27,000 265.00 251.75 516.75 66,001 – 67,000 491.00 466.45 957.45 27,001 – 28,000 271.00 257.45 528.45 67,001 – 68,000 495.50 470.73 966.23 28,001 – 29,000 278.00 264.10 542.10 68,001 – 69,000 500.00 475.00 975.00 29,001 – 30,000 284.00 269.80 553.80 69,001 – 70,000 504.50 479.28 983.78 C - 9 5.b Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 8 70,001 – 71,000 509.00 483.55 992.55 120,001 – 121,000 713.00 677.35 1390.35 71,001 – 72,000 513.50 487.83 1001.33 121,001 – 122,000 716.50 680.68 1397.18 72,001 – 73,000 518.00 492.10 1010.10 122,001 – 123,000 720.00 684.00 1404.00 73,001 – 74,000 522.40 496.38 1018.78 123,001 – 124,000 723.50 687.33 1410.83 74,001 – 75,000 527.00 500.65 1027.65 124,001 – 125,000 727.00 690.65 1417.65 75,001 – 76,000 531.50 504.93 1036.43 125,001 – 126,000 730.50 693.98 1424.48 76,001 – 77,000 536.00 509.20 1045.20 126,001 – 127,000 734.00 697.30 1431.30 77,001 – 78,000 540.40 513.38 1053.78 127.001 – 128,000 737.50 700.63 1438.13 78,001 – 79,000 545.00 517.75 1062.75 128,001 – 129,000 741.00 703.95 1444.95 79,001 – 80,000 549.50 522.03 1071.53 129,001 – 130,000 744.50 707.28 1451.78 80,001 – 81,000 554.00 526.50 1080.50 130,001 – 131,000 748.00 710.60 1458.60 81,001 – 82,000 558.50 530.58 1089.08 131,001 – 132,000 751.50 713.93 1465.43 82,001 – 83,000 563.00 534.85 1097.85 132,001 – 133,000 755.00 717.25 1472.25 83,001 – 84,000 567.50 539.13 1106.63 133,001 – 134,000 758.50 720.58 1479.08 84,001 – 85,000 572.00 543.40 1115.40 134,001 – 135,000 762.00 723.90 1485.90 85,001 – 86,000 576.00 547.68 1123.68 135,001 – 136,000 765.50 727.23 1492.73 86,001 – 87,000 581.00 551.95 1132.95 136,001 – 137,000 769.00 730.55 1499.55 87,001 – 88,000 585.00 556.23 1141.23 137,001 – 138,000 772.50 733.88 1506.38 88,001 – 89,000 590.00 560.50 1150.50 138,001 – 139,000 776.00 737.20 1513.20 89,001 – 90,000 594.50 564.78 1159.28 139,001 – 140,000 779.50 740.53 1520.03 90,001 – 91,000 599.00 569.05 1168.05 140,001 – 141,000 783.00 743.85 1526.85 91,001 – 92,000 603.50 573.33 1176.83 141,001 – 142,000 786.50 747.18 1533.68 92,001 – 93,000 608.50 577.60 1186.10 142,001 – 143,000 790.00 750.50 1540.50 93,001 – 94,000 612.50 581.88 1194.38 143,001 – 144,000 793.50 753.83 1547.33 94,001 – 95,000 617.00 586.15 1203.15 144,001 – 145,000 797.00 757.15 1554.15 95,001 – 96,000 621.50 590.43 1211.93 145,001 – 146,000 800.50 760.98 1560.98 96,001 – 97,000 626.00 594.70 1220.70 146,001 – 147,000 804.00 763.80 1567.80 97,001 – 98,000 630.50 598.98 1229.48 147,001 – 148,000 807.50 767.13 1574.63 98,001 – 99,000 635.00 603.25 1238.25 148,001 - 149,000 811.00 770.45 1581.45 99,001 – 100,000 639.50 607.53 1247.03 149,001 – 150,000 814.50 773.78 1588.28 100,001 – 101,000 643.00 610.85 1253.85 150,001 – 151,000 818.00 777.10 1595.10 101,001 – 102,000 646.50 614.18 1260.68 151,001 –152.,000 821.50 780.43 1601.93 102,001 – 102,000 650.00 617.50 1267.50 152,001 – 153,000 825.00 783.75 1608.75 103,001 – 104,000 653.50 620.83 1274.33 153,001 – 154,000 828.50 787.08 1615.58 104,001 – 105,000 657.00 624.15 1281.15 154,001 – 155,000 832.00 790.40 1622.40 105,001 – 106,000 660.50 627.48 1287.98 155,001 – 156,000 835.50 793.73 1629.23 106,001 – 107,000 664.00 630.80 1294.80 156,001 – 157,000 839.00 797.05 1636.05 107,001 – 108,000 667.50 634.11 1301.61 157,001 – 158,000 842.50 800.38 1642.88 108,001 – 109,000 671.00 637.45 1308.45 158,001 – 159,000 846.00 803.70 1649.70 109,001 – 110,000 674.50 640.78 1315.28 159,001 – 160,000 849.50 807.03 1656.53 110,001 – 111,000 678.00 644.10 1322.10 160,001 – 161,000 853.00 810.35 1663.35 111,001 – 112,000 681.50 647.43 1328.93 161,001 – 162,000 856.50 813.68 1670.18 112,001 – 113,000 685.00 650.75 1335.75 162,001 – 163,000 860.00 817.00 1677.00 113,001 – 114,000 688.50 654.08 1342.58 163,001 – 164,000 863.50 820.33 1683.83 114,001 – 115,000 692.00 657.40 1349.40 164,001 – 165,000 867.00 823.65 1690.65 115,001 – 116,000 695.50 660.73 1356.23 165,001 – 166,000 870.50 826.98 1697.48 116,001 – 117,000 699.00 664.05 1363.05 166,001 – 167,000 874.00 830.30 1704.30 117,001 – 118,000 702.50 667.38 1369.88 167,001 – 168,000 877.50 833.63 1711.13 118,001 – 119,000 706.00 670.70 1376.70 168,001 – 169,000 881.00 836.95 1717.95 119,001 – 120,000 709.50 674.03 1383.53 169,001 – 170,000 884.50 840.28 1774.78 C - 10 5.b Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 3.50 _V-100,000_ 1000 $ 3.00 _V-500,000_ 1000 $ 2.00 _V-1,000,000_ 1000 9C - 11 5.b Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 10 Solar Energy Systems - Up to 1 hp - Over 100 hp $.056 $.050 $.015 $30.50 $62.15 $124.30 18.20 $23.50 $ 12.30 $ 1.10 $ .73 $ 4.75 $24.60 $ 4.75 $40.00 $11.00 $10.00 $60.00 $49.50 $ 4.75 $12.30 $24.60 $49.50 $74.50 $23.50 $ 7.25 $ 7.25 C - 12 5.b Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 11 Cesspool Solar Energy Systems $ 9.80 $40.00 $11.00 $10.00 $24.65 $37.25 $74.50 $22.00 $12.30 $ 4.75 $ 6.15 $ 1.10 $19.90 $ 4.75 $4.75 $ 14.80 $9.80 $60.00 $14.80 $18.20 $14.80 $27.15 $29.60 $14.80 $10.65 $ 7.25 $10.65 $10.65 $10.65 C - 13 5.b Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 12 Accessory Buildings $196 $196 $196 $ 5.75 $14.00 $ 3.00 $10.50 $10.50 $7.00 $7.00 $14.00 $14.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 4.25 $ 4.25 $ 7.00 Plans $40.00 $10.00 $60.00 $94.45 $94.45 $54.00 $475.08 $133.62 $1.00 C - 14 5.b Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City 13C - 15 5.b Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK C - 16 5.b Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City APPENDIX D PROPOSED BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE D - 1 5.b Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK D - 2 5.b Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 1 04/2020 Community & Economic Development Department •Building & Safety Division 201 North E Street, 3rd Floor 290 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 (909) 384-5357 (909) 384-5155 www.sbcity.org The plan review and building permit fees applicable to building construction projects in the City of San Bernardino are provided in the following tables. These fees are collected to cover the costs of the plan review and building inspection services provided as part of the building process. These fees Development Impact Fees, School Fees, Engineering Division Fees, Planning Division Fees, Water Department Fees, Health Department Fees, or other fees collected for other purposes unless noted otherwise. In order to determine the for a project the following procedure should be followed: (all except 1 and 2 family dwellings): Identify the Construction Cost Factor in Table 2 based on the building’s occupancy group (use) and type of construction, then multiply this factor by the square footage of the use. The result is the If the building contains , compute the valuation of each distinct use and add the valuations together to get the of the building. Find the appropriate valuation range in the column of Table 3 that corresponds to the Select the appropriate column to determine the plan review fee. The Total Plan Review Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable: = Plan Review Fee + Expeditious Plan Review + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Plan Review + Energy Plan Review + Fire Plan Review + Accessibility Plan Review + Zoning Review The hourly rate for in-house plan review is $122.37. When expeditious review is requested by the applicant and performed by an outside vendor, any plan review billed hourly shall be at the vendor’s prevailing hourly rate, which is typically higher than the City rate. Plan reviews of new single-family and duplex residential construction, additions or alteration thereto, will be performed at the hourly rate. Repetitive tract housing units will be billed at one hour. The plan review fee for new 1 & 2 family dwellings and for each model of a tract is equal to 5 hours. The fee for additions is equal to 3 hours. D - 3 5.b Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 2 04/2020 Additions without a bath or kitchen: $1.74 per sq. ft. Additions with a bath or kitchen: $1.92 per sq. ft. Minimum fee for additions: $375.00 Maximum fee for additions up to 1,200 square feet: $1,459.00 Fees for additions over 1,200 square feet: As indicated in Table 1B Refer to Table 1A Refer to Table 1B The basic building permit fee is listed in the 2nd column of Table 3 The Total Building Permit Fee is the sum of the following fee components, when applicable: = Basic Building Permit Fee + Issuance Fees + Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Permit Fees + Certificate of Occupancy Fee + SMIP Fee* + Cultural Development Impact Fee + Archive Fee + Technology Fee + General Plan Update Surcharge (*SMIP = Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Fees The Community & Economic Development Department uses the following cost factors (dollars per square foot) to determine project valuation under Section 304.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted by the City of San Bernardino. Plan check and building permit fees for occupancies other than single-family residences are based on value of the project per Section 304. Valuation of a project is determined by the Building Official. The cost factors contained in Table 2 are used to calculate building valuation, which in turn is used to determine permit and plan check fees in Table 3. Valuation may or may not have a resemblance to actual square foot cost of a project. In most cases the costs indicated are below market rates compared to a bid, contract price, assessed value or sales price. The use of these cost factors by the City simply assures consistency and uniformity in the amount of fees collected for projects of similar size, construction, and occupancy. D - 4 5.b Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 3 04/2020 to 1,200 4.77 $564 4,400 10.21 $1,208 1,300 4.94 $585 4,500 10.38 $1,228 1,400 5.11 $605 4,600 10.55 $1,248 1,500 5.28 $625 4,700 10.72 $1,268 1,600 5.45 $645 4,800 10.89 $1,289 1,700 5.62 $665 4,900 11.06 $1,309 1,800 5.79 $685 5,000 11.23 $1,329 1,900 5.96 $705 5,100 11.40 $1,349 2,000 6.13 $725 5,200 11.57 $1,369 2,100 6.30 $745 5,300 11.74 $1,389 2,200 6.47 $766 5,400 11.91 $1,409 2,300 6.64 $786 5,500 12.08 $1,429 2,400 6.81 $806 5,600 12.25 $1,450 2,500 6.98 $826 5,700 12.42 $1,470 2,600 7.15 $846 5,800 12.59 $1,490 2,700 7.32 $866 5,900 12.76 $1,510 2,800 7.49 $886 6,000 12.93 $1,530 2,900 7.66 $906 6,100 13.10 $1,550 3,000 7.83 $927 6,200 13.27 $1,570 3,100 8.00 $947 6,300 13.44 $1,590 3,200 8.17 $967 6,400 13.61 $1,610 3,300 8.34 $987 6,500 13.78 $1,631 3,400 8.51 $1,007 6,600 13.95 $1,651 3,500 8.68 $1,027 6,700 14.12 $1,671 3,600 8.85 $1,047 6,800 14.29 $1,691 3,700 9.02 $1,067 6,900 14.46 $1,711 3,800 9.19 $1,087 7,000 14.63 $1,731 3,900 9.36 $1,108 7,100 14.80 $1,751 4,000 9.53 $1,128 7,200 14.97 $1,771 4,100 9.70 $1,148 7,300 15.14 $1,792 4,200 9.87 $1,168 7,400 15.31 $1,812 4,300 10.04 $1,188 7,500 15.48 $1,832 The indicated fees include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $1,832.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X 19.72 This table applies to tract homes built in phases of 5 or more. D - 5 5.b Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 4 04/2020 to 1,200 12.35 $1,461 4,400 21.95 $2,597 1,300 12.65 $1,497 4,500 22.25 $2,633 1,400 12.95 $1,532 4,600 22.55 $2,668 1,500 13.25 $1,568 4,700 22.85 $2,704 1,600 13.55 $1,603 4,800 23.15 $2,739 1,700 13.85 $1,639 4,900 23.45 $2,775 1,800 14.15 $1,674 5,000 23.75 $2,810 1,900 14.45 $1,710 5,100 24.05 $2,846 2,000 14.75 $1,745 5,200 24.35 $2,881 2,100 15.05 $1,781 5,300 24.65 $2,917 2,200 15.35 $1,816 5,400 24.95 $2,952 2,300 15.65 $1,852 5,500 25.25 $2,998 2,400 15.95 $1,887 5,600 25.55 $3,023 2,500 16.25 $1,923 5,700 25.85 $3,059 2,600 16.55 $1,958 5,800 26.15 $3,094 2,700 16.85 $1,994 5,900 26.45 $3,130 2,800 17.15 $2,029 6,000 26.75 $3,165 2,900 17.45 $2,065 6,100 27.05 $3,201 3,000 17.75 $2,100 6,200 27.35 $3,236 3,100 18.05 $2,136 6,300 27.65 $3,272 3,200 18.35 $2,171 6,400 27.95 $3,307 3,300 18.65 $2,207 6,500 28.25 $3,343 3,400 18.95 $2,242 6,600 28.55 $3,378 3,500 19.25 $2,278 6,700 28.85 $3,414 3,600 19.55 $2,313 6,800 29.15 $3,449 3,700 19.85 $2,349 6,900 29.45 $3,485 3,800 20.15 $2,384 7,000 29.75 $3,520 3,900 20.45 $2,420 7,100 30.05 $3,556 4,000 20.75 $2,455 7,200 30.35 $3,591 4,100 21.05 $2,491 7,300 30.65 $3,627 4,200 21.35 $2,526 7,400 30.95 $3,662 4,300 21.65 $2,562 7,500 31.25 $3,698 The indicated fees, include building, electrical, plumbing and mechanical inspection fees The indicated fees do not include plan review, issuance or other applicable fees The indicated fees include a standard 2-car garage For homes larger than 7,500 square feet, use the following formula: $3,698.00 + (size-7,500)/100 X $35.50 This table applies to in-fill, custom, and tract homes built in phases of 4 or less. D - 6 5.b Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 5 04/2020 Construction costs per square foot [$] Assembly, Theaters, with Stage 247.86 239.47 233.25 223.81 210.17 204.10 216.62 195.46 188.40 Assembly, Theaters, without Stage 227.10 218.71 212.49 203.05 189.41 183.34 195.86 174.70 167.65 Assembly, Nightclubs 191.96 186.56 182.12 174.70 164.94 160.39 168.64 149.29 144.33 Assembly, Restaurants, Bars, Banquet Halls 190.96 185.56 180.12 173.70 162.94 159.39 167.64 147.29 143.33 Assembly, Churches 229.69 221.30 215.08 205.64 192.37 187.27 198.45 177.66 170.60 Assembly, General, Community Halls, Libraries, Museums 192.20 183.81 176.59 168.15 153.51 148.44 160.96 138.80 132.75 Assembly, Arenas 226.10 217.71 210.49 202.05 187.41 182.34 194.86 172.70 166.65 Business 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08 Educational 209.90 202.64 196.82 188.34 175.49 166.60 181.86 153.45 148.75 Factory and Industrial, Moderate Hazard 117.60 112.19 105.97 101.84 91.54 87.26 97.61 75.29 70.95 Factory and Industrial, Low Hazard 116.60 111.19 105.97 100.84 91.54 86.26 96.61 75.29 69.95 High Hazard, Explosives 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 N.P. High Hazard 109.99 104.58 99.35 94.22 85.14 79.87 89.99 68.89 63.56 HPM 200.26 192.96 186.54 177.38 161.90 155.84 170.40 142.43 136.08 Institutional, Supervised Environment 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 Institutional, Hospitals 335.53 328.23 321.81 312.65 296.45 N.P. 305.67 276.99 N.P. Institutional, Nursing Homes 233.12 225.82 219.40 210.24 195.51 N.P. 203.26 176.05 N.P. Institutional, Restrained 227.71 220.41 213.99 204.83 190.84 183.78 197.85 171.37 163.02 Institutional, Day Care Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 Mercantile 142.95 137.54 132.11 125.68 115.38 111.83 119.62 99.73 95.77 Residential, Hotels 199.70 192.92 186.99 179.78 164.90 160.43 179.93 148.60 143.96 Residential, Multiple-Family 167.27 160.49 154.56 147.35 133.71 129.23 147.50 117.40 112.76 Residential, One and Two-Family 155.84 151.61 147.83 144.09 138.94 135.27 141.72 130.04 122.46 Residential, Care/Assisted Living Facilities 197.83 191.05 185.12 177.91 163.28 158.81 178.06 146.98 142.33 Storage, Moderate Hazard 108.99 103.58 97.35 93.22 83.14 78.87 88.99 66.89 62.56 Storage, Low Hazard 107.99 102.58 97.35 92.22 83.14 77.87 87.99 66.89 61.56 Utility, Miscellaneous 84.66 79.81 74.65 71.30 64.01 59.80 68.04 50.69 48.30 Private Garages use Utility, Miscellaneous Unfinished basements (Group R-3) = $22.45 per square foot For shell only buildings deduct 20% N.P. = Not Permitted D - 7 5.b Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 6 04/2020 Unit Construction Cost Block Walls: 4’ high 5’ high 6’ high Other Demolition Valuation Contract Price Drywall Fireplace Patios/Porches Patio Slab Only with Footing Patio Cover Only Reroofing 1 Square 100 Square Foot : Built-up Composition Shingles Shake or Tile Resheathing Signs Siding, Exterior Stucco Swimming Pools and Spas –Gunite Manufactured Above-Ground Pool Spa Tenant Improvement Use 30% of Cost per Square Foot Window Change-Outs Deduct 20% for shell only buildings. D - 8 5.b Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 7 04/2020 The following table provides basic permit and plan review fees based on valuation for commercial, industrial, and multifamily residential occupancies. Additional fees for permit issuance, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, development impacts, sewer capacity, schools, etc. may apply. 1 –500 60.00 30.00 90.00 501 –600 60.00 30.00 90.00 601 –700 60.00 30.00 90.00 701 –800 60.00 30.00 90.00 801 –900 60.00 30.00 90.00 901 –1,000 60.00 30.00 90.00 1,001 –1,100 60.00 60.00 120.00 20,001 –21,000 270.61 266.71 537.32 1,101 –1,200 60.00 60.00 120.00 21,001 –22,000 281.89 277.82 559.71 1,201 –1,300 60.00 60.00 120.00 22,001 –23,000 293.16 288.93 582.09 1,301 –1,400 60.00 60.00 120.00 23,001 –24,000 304.44 300.04 604.48 1,401 –1,500 60.00 60.00 120.00 24,001 –25,000 315.71 311.22 626.93 1,501 –1,600 60.00 60.00 120.00 25,001 –26,000 323.23 318.56 641.79 1,601 –1,700 60.00 60.00 120.00 26,001 –27,000 332.00 327.21 659.21 1,701 –1,800 60.00 60.00 120.00 27,001 –28,000 339.52 334.62 674.14 1,801 –1,900 60.00 60.00 120.00 28,001 –29,000 348.29 343.26 691.55 1,901 –2,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 29,001 –30,000 355.80 350.67 706.47 30,001 –31,000 364.57 359.31 723.88 31,001 –32,000 372.72 367.34 740.06 2,001 –3,000 60.00 60.00 120.00 32,001 –33,000 380.86 375.36 756.22 3,001 –4,000 78.93 77.79 156.72 33,001 –34,000 389.00 383.40 772.40 4,001 –5,000 90.20 88.90 179.10 34,001 –35,000 397.15 391.42 788.57 5,001 –6,000 101.48 100.01 201.49 35,001 –36,000 405.29 399.45 804.74 6,001 –7,000 112.75 111.13 223.88 36,001 –37,000 413.43 407.47 820.90 7,001 –8,000 124.03 122.24 246.27 37,001 –38,000 421.58 415.50 837.08 8,001 –9,000 135.31 133.35 268.66 38,001 –39,000 429.72 423.52 853.24 9,001 –10,000 146.58 144.47 291.05 39,001 –40,000 437.86 432.16 870.02 10,001 –11,000 157.86 155.58 313.44 40,001 –41,000 446.01 439.54 885.58 11,001 –12,000 169.13 166.69 335.82 41,001 –42,000 454.15 447.60 901.75 12,001 –13,000 180.41 177.80 358.21 42,001 –43,000 462.30 455.62 917.92 13,001 –14,000 191.68 188.92 380.60 43,001 –44,000 470.44 463.65 934.09 14,001 –15,000 202.96 200.03 402.99 44,001 –45,000 478.58 471.67 950.25 15,001 –16,000 214.23 211.14 425.37 45,001 –46,000 486.73 479.71 966.44 16,001 –17,000 225.51 222.25 447.76 46,001 –47,000 494.87 487.73 982.60 17,001 –18,000 236.79 233.37 470.16 47,001 –48,000 503.01 495.76 998.77 18,001 –19,000 248.06 244.48 492.54 48,001 –49,000 511.78 503.78 1015.56 19,001 –20,000 259.34 255.59 514.93 49,001 –50,000 519.30 511.81 1031.11 D - 9 5.b Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 8 04/2020 50,001 –51,000 525.56 517.36 1042.92 90,001 –91,000 750.45 739.61 1490.06 51,001 –52,000 529.95 522.92 1052.87 91,001 –92,000 756.08 745.18 1501.26 52,001 –53,000 536.21 528.47 1064.68 92,001 –93,000 762.35 750.73 1513.08 53,001 –54,000 541.85 534.03 1075.88 93,001 –94,000 767.36 756.29 1523.65 54,001 –55,000 547.49 539.58 1087.07 94,001 –95,000 773.00 761.84 1534.84 55,001 –56,000 553.13 545.15 1098.28 95,001 –96,000 778.64 767.40 1546.04 56,001 –57,000 558.76 550.70 1109.46 96,001 –97,000 784.27 772.95 1557.22 57,001 –58,000 564.40 556.26 1120.66 97,001 –98,000 789.91 778.51 1568.42 58,001 –59,000 570.04 561.81 1131.85 98,001 –99,000 795.55 784.06 1579.61 59,001 –60,000 575.68 567.37 1143.05 99,001 –100,000 801.19 789.63 1590.82 60,001 –61,000 581.31 572.92 1154.23 100,001 –101,000 805.57 793.94 1599.51 61,001 –62,000 586.95 578.49 1165.44 101,001 –102,000 809.96 798.27 1608.23 62,001 –63,000 592.59 584.04 1176.63 102,001 –103,000 814.34 802.59 1616.93 63,001 –64,000 598.23 589.60 1187.83 103,001 –104,000 818.73 806.91 1625.64 64,001 –65,000 603.87 595.15 1199.02 104,001 –105,000 823.11 811.23 1634.34 65,001 –66,000 609.50 600.71 1210.21 105,001 –106,000 827.50 815.56 1643.06 66,001 –67,000 615.14 606.26 1221.40 106,001 –107,000 831.88 819.87 1651.75 67,001 –68,000 620.78 611.82 1232.60 107,001 –108,000 836.27 824.17 1660.44 68,001 –69,000 626.42 617.37 1243.79 108,001 –109,000 840.65 828.52 1669.17 69,001 –70,000 632.05 622.94 1254.99 109,001 –110,000 845.04 832.84 1677.88 70,001 –71,000 637.69 628.49 1266.18 110,001 –111,000 849.42 837.16 1686.58 71,001 –72,000 643.33 634.05 1277.38 111,001 –112,000 853.81 841.49 1695.30 72,001 –73,000 648.97 639.60 1288.57 112,001 –113,000 858.19 845.80 1703.99 73,001 –74,000 654.48 645.16 1299.64 113,001 –114,000 862.57 850.13 1712.70 74,001 –75,000 660.24 650.71 1310.95 114,001 –115,000 866.96 854.45 1721.41 75,001 –76,000 665.88 656.27 1322.15 115,001 –116,000 871.34 858.77 1730.11 76,001 –77,000 671.52 661.82 1333.34 116,001 –117,000 875.73 863.09 1738.82 77,001 –78,000 677.03 667.26 1344.29 117,001 –118,000 880.11 867.42 1747.53 78,001 –79,000 682.79 672.94 1355.73 118,001 –119,000 884.50 871.73 1756.23 79,001 –80,000 688.43 678.50 1366.93 119,001 –120,000 888.88 876.06 1764.94 80,001 –81,000 694.07 684.31 1378.38 120,001 –121,000 893.27 880.38 1773.65 81,001 –82,000 699.71 689.61 1389.32 121,001 –122,000 897.65 884.70 1782.35 82,001 –83,000 705.34 695.16 1400.50 122,001 –123,000 902.04 889.02 1791.06 83,001 –84,000 710.98 700.73 1411.71 123,001 –124,000 906.42 893.35 1799.77 84,001 –85,000 716.62 706.28 1422.90 124,001 –125,000 910.81 897.66 1808.47 85,001 –86,000 721.63 711.84 1433.47 125,001 –126,000 915.19 901.99 1817.18 86,001 –87,000 727.90 717.39 1445.29 126,001 –127,000 919.58 906.30 1825.88 87,001 –88,000 732.91 722.95 1455.86 127.001 –128,000 923.96 910.63 1834.59 88,001 –89,000 739.17 728.50 1467.67 128,001 –129,000 928.35 914.95 1843.30 89,001 –90,000 744.81 734.06 1478.87 129,001 –130,000 932.73 919.28 1852.01 D - 10 5.b Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 9 04/2020 130,001 –131,000 937.12 923.59 1860.71 150,001 –151,000 1024.82 1010.02 2034.84 131,001 –132,000 941.50 927.92 1869.42 151,001 –152,000 1029.20 1014.35 2043.55 132,001 –133,000 945.89 932.23 1878.12 152,001 –153,000 1033.59 1018.67 2052.26 133,001 –134,000 950.27 936.56 1886.83 153,001 –154,000 1037.97 1023.00 2060.97 134,001 –135,000 954.66 940.88 1895.54 154,001 –155,000 1042.36 1027.31 2069.67 135,001 –136,000 959.04 945.21 1904.25 155,001 –156,000 1046.74 1031.64 2078.38 136,001 –137,000 963.43 949.52 1912.95 156,001 –157,000 1051.13 1035.95 2087.08 137,001 –138,000 967.81 953.85 1921.66 157,001 –158,000 1055.51 1040.28 2095.79 138,001 –139,000 972.20 958.16 1930.36 158,001 –159,000 1059.90 1044.60 2104.50 139,001 –140,000 976.58 962.49 1939.07 159,001 –160,000 1064.28 1048.92 2113.20 140,001 –141,000 980.97 966.81 1947.78 160,001 –161,000 1068.27 1053.24 2121.91 141,001 –142,000 985.35 971.14 1956.49 161,001 –162,000 1073.05 1057.57 2130.62 142,001 –143,000 989.74 975.45 1965.19 162,001 –163,000 1077.44 1061.88 2139.32 143,001 –144,000 994.12 979.78 1973.90 163,001 –164,000 1081.82 1066.21 2148.03 144,001 –145,000 998.51 984.09 1982.60 164,001 –165,000 1086.21 1070.53 2156.74 145,001 –146,000 1002.89 989.07 1991.96 165,001 –166,000 1090.59 1074.85 2165.44 146,001 –147,000 1007.28 992.74 2000.02 166,001 –167,000 1094.98 1079.17 2174.15 147,001 –148,000 1011.66 997.07 2008.73 167,001 –168,000 1099.36 1083.50 2182.86 148,001 –149,000 1016.05 1001.38 2017.43 168,001 –169,000 1103.75 1087.81 2191.56 149,001 –150,000 1020.43 1005.71 2026.14 169,001 –170,000 1108.13 1092.14 2200.27 For valuation ranges beyond the scope of the above table the following formulas can be used to determine the basic building permit fee: – $1108.13 for first $170,000.00 and $4.40 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or V-170,000 1000 $– $2,560.13 for first $500,000.00 and $3.75 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or V-500,000 1000 $– $4,435.13 for first $1,000,000.00 and $2.50 per 1,000.00 thereafter, or V-1,000,000 1000 For valuation ranges beyond the scope of this table the Plan Review Fee shall be as follows: D - 11 5.b Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 10 04/2020 Single-family Residential Rewire Plus Service Apartments, Condominiums per Square Foot Plus Service Commercial Buildings per Square Foot Plus Service Electrical Service: Up to 200 amps 200 Amps to 1000 Amps 1000 Amps and Over Subpanels Temporary Power Poles: Meter Pole Each Extension Pole no Meter Unit Schedule: Receptacles, Lights, Switches - First 20 Each After 20 Each Range/Oven, Washer/Dryer, A/C Unit, Evaporative Cooler Electrical Signs for Electrical Work –Does not Include the Sign Structure Additional Branch Circuit within Same Sign Meter Reset When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot Minimum Fee Solar Energy Systems Private Swimming Pools Power Apparatus Motors,Generators, Transformer, Industrial Heating, Cooling,or Cooking Equipment, etc. Up to 1 hp Over 1 to 10 hp Over 10 to 50 hp Over 50 to 100 hp Over 100 hp Carnivals and Circuses: Generators and Electrically Driven Rides Mechanically Driven Rides, Walk-Thru Attractions with Electrical Lighting System of Area Booth Lighting D - 12 5.b Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 11 04/2020 Plumbing Fixture Gas Meter Reset Gauge Test Required Gas Meter Reset When Issued in Conjunction with Other Work Gas Meter - Each Additional Meter on Same Building or Lot House Sewer Cesspool Private Sewage Disposal System Demo Septic Pit Water Heater Repair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping Gas Piping System: 1 to 5 Outlets Each Additional Outlet Over 5 Industrial Waste, Pretreatment Interceptor, Except Kitchen Type Grease Interceptors Functioning as Fixture Traps. Water Piping Installation, Alteration or Repair Drainage Vent Piping Lawn Sprinkler System on any one Meter Rainwater Systems - per Drain Inside Building Minimum Fee Solar Energy Systems FAU: Up to 100,000 BTU Over 100,000 BTU A/C Unit: Up to 3 Tons Between 3 - 15 Tons Twin-Pack New or Replacement, Includes Gas or Electric Wall Heater, Floor Furnace, or Suspended Heater Evaporative Cooler Bath Exhaust Fan Grease Hood and Duct Systems Duct Alteration Air-Handling Unit HVAC D - 13 5.b Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 12 04/2020 Installation Set-up Earthquake Bracing Systems Accessory Buildings Cabanas, Ramadas, Patios, Block Walls, Garages, Awnings, Carports, Porches, etc.: Without Standard Plans With Standard Plans Fees for Construction Alteration of Mobile Home Park Facilities: For Each Lot Electrical Fee: Park Service Street Lights Unit Substation/Secondary Distribution Transformer Alter/Replace Service or Transformer Mobile Home Lot Service Alter/Repair Replace lot service Plan Review Fees not Charged to HCD Standard Plans Plumbing Fees: Park Drain System Private Sewage Disposal or Water Treatment System Lot Drain Inlet Alter Repair of Drainage Vent Piping Park Water System Water Service Outlets Water Meters Fire Hydrant or Riser Water Conditioner Plumbing Fixtures Equipment Alter Repair Replace Park Gas Piping System LPG or Natural Gas Tank of 60 Gallon or More Mobile Home Lot Gas Outlet Riser Gas Distribution Equipment Alter Repair Replace Miscellaneous Equipment Each Installation D - 14 5.b Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Schedule of Fees – Building & Safety Division 13 04/2020 Supplemental Issuance Fee Minimum Permit Fee Inspections Reinspection Fee Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours Zoning Consistency Review Fee Building Permits, Demo, etc. Certificate of Occupancy if Included on Building Permit Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fees are imposed by the State of California and provide funding for seismic monitoring and instrumentation throughout the State. Technology Fee Archive Fees: Per Permit or Application Plans Documents D - 15 5.b Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK D - 16 5.b Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City APPENDIX E DETAIL OF RECREATION SERVICES E - 1 5.b Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK E - 2 5.b Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City CITY OF SAN BERNARDINODETAIL OF RECREATION SERVICESAs of April 29, 2020DIRECT/DIRECT COSTSDIRECT FACIL/FIELD TOTALPROGRAM FULL TIME FACILITY/ INDIRECT TOTAL COST COST COSTREF # SERVICE COST COST TOTAL FIELD COST COSTS COSTS REVENUES RECOVERY RECOVERY RECOVERYT-600 Aquatics Services $293,266 $81,774 $375,040 $0 $300,763 $675,803 $94,350 25.2% 25.2% 14.0%T-606 Youth Sports $35,588 $11 $35,599 $0 $0 $35,599 $10,756 30.2% 30.2% 30.2%T-607 Adult Sports $36,128 $11,832 $47,960 $0 $37,700 $85,660 $21,460 44.7% 44.7% 25.1%T-610 Comm. Center Programs/Rentals $300,231 $331,594 $631,825 $2,473,880 $589,990 $3,695,695 $13,000 2.1% 0.4% 0.4%SUBTOTAL - PROGRAMS $665,213 $425,211 $1,090,424 $2,473,880 $928,453 $4,492,757 $139,566 12.8% 3.9% 3.1%T-613 Ballfield Rental/Use $56,527 $31,764 $88,291 $51,097 $103,125 $242,513 $9,500 10.8% 6.8% 3.9%T-726 Park Rental/Reservation $0 $3,258 $3,258 $12,980 $18,277 $34,515 $28,000 859.4% 172.4% 81.1%T-727 Fiscallini Field Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $9,182 $9,614 $18,796 $17,000 N/A 185.1% 90.4%SUBTOTAL - RENTALS $56,527 $35,022 $91,549 $73,259 $131,016 $295,824 $54,500 59.5% 33.1% 18.4%TAX-023 Center For Individual Development $126,371 $83,446 $209,817 $0 $176,596 $386,413 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%TAX-024 Senior Center Services $772,238 $360,273 $1,132,511 $0 $563,150 $1,695,661 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%TAX-025 City Special Events $87,861 $61,062 $148,923 $0 $178,065 $326,988 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%SUBTOTAL - TAX SUPPORTED $986,470 $504,781 $1,491,251 $0 $917,811 $2,409,062 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%GRAND TOTAL $1,708,210 $965,014 $2,673,224 $2,547,139 $1,977,280 $7,197,643 $194,066 7.3% 3.7% 2.7%PROGRAM COSTS ARE PART TIME COSTS (INCLUDING BENEFITS) AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSESFULL TIME COSTS ARE SALARIES, BENEFITS, AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSESINDIRECT COSTS INCLUDES CITY AND DEPT O/H, AND OTHER DEPARTMENTSE - 35.bPacket Pg. 612Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Detail of Recreation Fees Current Fee Proposed Fee Aquatics Fees Jerry Lewis Swim Center Daily Admission Ages 2-7 $1 $2 Ages 8-17 $1.50 $3.00 Adults $3 $5 Ages 60 or older $1.50 $3.00 Family Season Swim Pass 1-6 members $55 7-12 members $75 1-6 people – Year 1 $60 1-6 people – Year 2 $65 1-6 people – Year 3 $70 Commercial Season Swim Pass 15-25 employees $200 $300 26-50 employees $300 $400 15-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $10 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $12 Delete Fee Adults $30 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $12 Delete Fee 25-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $15 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $20 Delete Fee Adults $45 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $20 Delete Fee Swim Classes $40 $40 E - 4 5.b Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Detail of Recreation Fees Current Fee Proposed Fee Community Pools Daily Admission Ages 2-7 $0.50 $1.00 Ages 8-17 $1 $2.00 Adults $2 $3.00 Ages 60 or older $1 $2 Family Season Swim Pass 1-6 members $45 7-12 members $65 1-6 people – Year 1 $60 1-6 people – Year 2 $65 1-6 people – Year 3 $70 Commercial Season Swim Pass 15-25 employees $175 $200 26-50 employees $250 $300 15-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $5 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $10 Delete Fee Adults $20 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $10 Delete Fee 25-EntryPunch Card Ages 2-7 $7 Delete Fee Ages 8-17 $15 Delete Fee Adults $30 Delete Fee Ages 60 and older $15 Delete Fee Swim Pass Reissue $5 $5 E - 5 5.b Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Detail of Recreation Fees Current Fee Proposed Fee Facility/Park Rentals Community Center Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min) Two or more Rooms $100/first 2 hrs + $40/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min) Assembly Room $75/first 2 hrs + $25/add’l hr $75/hr (2 hr min) Gymnasium $90.50/hr + $28/add’l hr $90/hr (2 hr min) Shower Room $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min) Kitchen $29/hr + $9.30/add’l hr $30/hr (2 hr min) FDR Bowl (2 hr min) $130/hr + $60/add’l hr $130/hr (2 hr min) Seccombe Lake Pavilion $55/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $55/hr (2 hr min) La Plaza Gazebo $40/first 2 hrs + $8/add’l hr $40/hr (2 hr min) Wading Pools $36.50 per hour Delete Fee Concessions Stands $100 per use Delete Fee Perris Hill Crafter $75/month $75/month Perris Hill Park Stage $25/hr + $8/add’l hr $25/hr (2 hr min) Tennis Court Tournament $10/hr + $5/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min) (per court/day) Jerry Lewis Swim Center $92/hr + $46/add’l hr $100/hr (2 hr min) (2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards All Other Pools $25/hr $25/hr (2 hr min) (2 hour minimum) +$8/hr for lifeguards + actual cost for lifeguards Group Picnic Reservations (use fee per use) Size of Group Up to 50 $25 $35 51-99 $35 $35 100-199 $75 $75 200-399 $100 $100 E - 6 5.b Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Detail of Recreation Fees Current Fee Proposed Fee 400-699 $200 $200 700 and up $350 $350 Picnic Shelter $30 per day $40 per day Picnic Shelter Utility Access $25 per day $35 per day Parks/Parking Lots for Fundraising/ Special Events (not subject to resident or non-resident use cost adjustment) $200 per day $200 per day Fees for Equipment and/or Service: Bleacher (up to 4 sets) $465 per occasion $465 per occasion Trash Receptacles $2.50 each per occasion $2.50 each per occasion Picnic Tables $10 each per occasion $10 each per occasion Stage Trailer $250 per occasion $250 per occasion Folding Chairs $1.50 each per occasion $1.50 each per occasion Folding Tables $8 each per occasion $8 each per occasion Bunting $50 per day $50 per day Banners $40 each per week $40 each per week Curtain Dividers $15 each per occasion $15 each per occasion Kiosk Sign $25 each per occasion $25 each per occasion Choral Risers $100 set per occasion $100 set per occasion Adult Drop-In Basketball $2 per session $2 per session Ballfield base rental $25 per set $25 per set E - 7 5.b Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Detail of Recreation Fees Current Fee Proposed Fee Facilities/Parks Rental Refundable Damage Bond & Clean-Up Deposit Number of People Fewer than 50 $75 $75 50 – 100 $650 $650 101 – 200 $1,250 $1,050 201 - 500 $1,750 $1,750 501 - 1,000 $3,500 $3,500 1,001+ $8,000 $8,000 E - 8 5.b Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City APPENDIX F FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATES IMPORTANT INFORMATION: 1) The Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate (FBHR) includes the all of the employee’s fringe benefits plus a share of the accoun ng ac vity’s overheads and opera ng expenses. 2) Many City employees are assigned to mul ple accoun ng ac vi es. Because each ac vity will have its own overhead alloca on and opera ng expenses, the same posi on will have a different FBHR in the different ac vi es. The FBHRs in this appendix are an average of all their rates. 3) If a service in Appendix A refers to an hourly rate for an employee, that is the rate to use not the rate in this Appendix. 4) These FBHRs are based on a Full-Cost Cost Alloca on Plan and are, therefore, NOT the FBHRs to use for State and Federal Grant programs. F - 1 5.b Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City THIS PAGE IS BLANK F - 2 5.b Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE POSITION AVG.FBHR A/S ATTENDANT $87.04 A/S KENNEL SUPVSR $90.59 A/S OFFICE SUPVSR $90.59 ACCOUNTANT II $64.00 ACCOUNTANT III $148.32 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT $78.59 ACCOUNTING MANAGER $231.74 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $94.57 ADMIN ANALYST I $118.37 ADMIN ANALYST II $104.27 ADMIN ASST TO CITY COUNCIL $59.42 ADMIN ASST TO THE CITY MGR $53.46 ADMIN SVCS SUPVSR $84.41 ADMIN.ANALYST II $72.69 ADMIN.ASSIST.$65.31 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $77.51 ADMINSTRATIVE ANALYST $106.20 ANIMAL CTRL MGR $156.29 ANIMAL CTRL OFFICER $73.72 ASSET FORFEIT.ANALYST $77.08 ASSIST.CHIEF OF POLICE $339.73 ASSIST/ASSOC.PLNR $102.56 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER $277.73 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MGR $133.12 ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR $53.45 ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP MGR $113.13 ASSMNT DIST/REAL PROP SPEC $84.75 BLDG INSPECT.II $118.33 BLDG MAINT DIV MANAGER $98.85 BUDGET OFFICER $92.75 BUSINESS REG MGR/SR REP/REP $131.43 BUSINESS REGISTRATION INSP $120.75 CDBG COORDINATOR $71.65 CDBG PROGRAM ASSISTANT $43.89 CHIEF ASST CITY ATTORNEY $344.74 F - 3 5.b Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE POSITION AVG.FBHR CHIEF BLDG.OFFICIAL $186.25 CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK $115.59 CHIEF OF POLICE $421.01 CITY ATTORNEY $353.71 CITY ATTY INVESTIG. SUPV. $151.86 CITY CLERK $204.99 CITY ENG/DEP.DIR PW $237.26 CITY MANAGER $378.28 CITY TREASURER $42.90 CIVIL SVC BOARD CHIEF EXAMINER $125.03 CODE ENF.DIV.MGR $168.96 CODE ENF.OFF.II/III $104.58 COM.DEV.TECH.$82.26 COMM REC PROGRAM COORD $63.31 COMM SVCS CENTER SUPERVISOR $91.72 COMM.POLICING SPCLST $87.02 COMM.SVCS.OFF. I $66.50 COMM.SVCS.OFF. II $64.64 COMMUNITY RECREATION MGR $147.22 CONST.INSP.II $104.36 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER $131.28 COORDINATOR OF VOLUNTEERS $54.09 COUNCIL ADMIN SUPERVISOR $78.38 CRIM.OMVEST.OFF.$91.48 CRIME ANALY.SUP.ASST $56.01 CRIME ANALYST $88.97 CRIMINAL INV.OFF.$86.49 CUSTODIAN $36.09 CUSTOMER SVC REP $66.13 DEPT ACCOUNTING TECH $59.43 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY I $176.39 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY II $167.81 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY III $176.39 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY IV $219.07 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $99.80 F - 4 5.b Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE POSITION AVG.FBHR DEPUTY CITY TREASURER $68.24 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HOUSING $129.03 DETECTIVE/CORP'L $174.42 DIR.OF COMM.DEVEL.$297.59 DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES $190.25 DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION $326.49 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $180.64 ECON DEVELOP ANALYST $93.78 ECON DEVELOP MANAGER $162.15 ELECTRICIAN I $98.74 ENGIN'G ASSIST III $119.44 ENGIN'G ASST I/II $96.69 ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE $151.83 ENVIRON PROJECT SPECIALIST $66.09 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT $86.79 FACILITIES MAINT MECHANIC $53.57 FACILITIES MAINT SUPV $61.48 FINANCE DIRECTOR $271.15 FINANCIAL ANALYST $131.51 FOOD SERVICE SUPERVISOR II $99.02 FORENSICS SPEC II $97.15 FORENSICS SPEC III $107.17 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR $106.86 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST $84.24 HUMAN RESOURCES TECH $49.02 HVAC MECHANIC $65.41 IEMG BROADCAST ENG COORD $156.11 IT ANALYST II $98.60 IW FIELD INSPECTOR $91.35 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION SUPV $150.23 LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR I $106.79 LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II $110.99 LEAD CUSTODIAN $41.62 LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER $98.45 LEAD PARK CONST/MAINT WKR $117.98 F - 5 5.b Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE POSITION AVG.FBHR LEAD PARK MAINT SUPERVISOR $125.66 LEGAL ADMIN ASSISTANT $117.99 LEGAL SECRETARY I $83.47 LEGAL SECRETARY II $92.24 LIBRARIAN II $117.63 LIBRARY ADMIN TECH/WEBMASTER $114.41 LIBRARY CIRCULATION SUPV. $122.62 LIBRARY DIRECTOR $242.91 LIBRARY NETWORK ADMIN $136.60 LIBRARY NETWORK ASSISTANT $100.00 LIBRARY PROGRAM COORD $116.67 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN II $88.90 LIEUTENANT $252.22 LITERACY PROGRAM COORD. $129.87 MAINT SUPERVISOR $143.69 MAINTENANCE WORKER I $72.12 MAINTENANCE WORKER II $68.64 MANAGER OF COMMUNICATIONS $157.18 MAYOR'S CHIEF OF STAFF $130.39 NPDES COORD $112.79 NPDES INSPECTOR $100.06 OFFICE ASSISTANT $64.61 OPER & MAINT DIV MANAGER $178.31 PARK MAINT DIVISION MANAGER $191.31 PARKS MAINT WORKER II $91.95 PAYROLL MANAGER $91.04 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN $45.43 PD DISPATCH.SUPVSR $114.84 PD DISPATCHER I $75.79 PD DISPATCHER II $90.72 PD P+T TECH.$158.34 PD RECORDS SUPVSR $88.57 PD RECORDS TECH .II $61.30 PD RECORDS TECH.I $47.00 PD TRANSCRIBER $60.04 F - 6 5.b Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE POSITION AVG.FBHR PKG.ENFORCMT.OFF.$58.29 PLANNING MGR $187.36 PLUMBER $56.44 POL.FLT.MTC.EXPDITOR $63.40 POLICE CAPTAIN $298.94 POLICE OFFICER $153.80 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT $156.57 PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER $172.97 PROC/CONT SUPP SVCS DIR $84.28 PROGRAM MANAGER $84.44 PROP.EVID+SUPL.SUPV $96.22 PROP+EVID.TECH I $68.62 PROP+EVID.TECH II $92.27 RECORDS MGMT SPECIALIST $103.32 RECREATION THERAPIST $86.48 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ANALYST $111.52 SENIOR MGMT ANALYST $101.86 SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT $66.74 SERGEANT $201.96 SR CUSTOMER SERVICE REP $72.04 SR DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $212.85 SR FINANCIAL SPECIALIST $96.73 SR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST $95.26 SR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH $55.03 SR.ADMIN.ASSIST.$46.49 SR.CIVIL ENGINEER $183.48 SR.CUST.SVC.REP/DSPTCH $92.54 SR.MGMT.ANALYST $107.20 SR.OFF.ASSIST.$64.87 SR.PLANS EXAMINER $122.37 SR.WHSE/DEL.DRVR $32.10 STREET SIGNAL/LIGHT SUPV $169.03 SURVEY TECHNICIAN I $84.24 TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN $131.87 TRAFFIC ENGINEER $151.20 F - 7 5.b Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City AVERAGE FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATE POSITION AVG.FBHR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOC. $135.23 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN I $109.53 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN II $127.08 TRAFFIC SYS & OPER ANALYST $130.20 TREASURY ASSISTANT $52.94 TREE TRIMMER ASSISTANT $65.84 TREE TRIMMER I $60.37 TREE TRIMMER II $77.11 WEED ABATE.COORD $108.40 F - 8 5.b Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Fee Study.Attachment 2 RCS Service Cost Study May 6 2020 (6719 : Public Hearing Regarding Fee Adjustments for Various City Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Paul Espinoza, Finance Director Subject: Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the commercial and payroll disbursements for April 2020. Background Completed commercial and payroll disbursement registers are submitted to the Mayor and City Council for approval. This happens on a regular basis, typically every meeting for the most recently completed disbursement registers. The detailed warrant registers are available on the City Website, an d are updated weekly by the Finance Department. The registers may be accessed by copying the following link into an internet browser: <http://sbcity.org/cityhall/finance/warrant_register.asp> Discussion Gross Payroll Bi-Weekly for April 16, 2020 $2,342,828.22 Monthly for April 15, 2020 11,666.69 Total Payroll Demands: $2,354,494.91 The following check registers are being presented for approval: April 9, 2020 2019/20 (Register #42)$2,534,396.10 April 9, 2020 2019/20 (Register #43)18,000.00 Total commercial check demands:$2,552,396.10 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals Approval of the noted check and EFT registers for commercial and payroll disbursements align with Key Target No. 1: Financial Stability by creating a framework for spending decisions. Fiscal Impact Amounts noted in the disbursement registers have no further fiscal impact. Amounts were paid consistent with existing budget authorization and no further budgetary impact is required. 6 Packet Pg. 626 6696 Page 2 Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of th e City of San Bernardino, California, approve the commercial and payroll disbursements for April 2020. Attachments Attachment 1 Payroll checks for April 2020 Attachment 2 Commercial checks for Register #42 Attachment 3 Commercial checks for Register #43 Ward: All 6 Packet Pg. 627 6.a Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: FN. Payroll Summary Report ATTACHMENT#1 (6696 : Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements) 6.a Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: FN. Payroll Summary Report ATTACHMENT#1 (6696 : Approval of Commercial Checks and Payroll Disbursements) 6.b Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.b Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #42 ATTACHMENT#2 (6696 : Approval of 6.c Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #43 ATTACHMENT#3 (6696 : Approval of 6.c Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: FN. Commercial Checks & Payroll. Register #43 ATTACHMENT#3 (6696 : Approval of Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Paul Espinoza, Finance Director Subject: Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino , California accept and file the Monthly Investment Portfolio Reports for both February and March 2020. Background The City’s Statement of Investment Policy requires that a monthly Investment Portfolio Report be prepared and submitted to the Mayor and City Council. The Director of Finance will prepare, review, and present the City’s Investment Portfolio Report and confirm that the portfolio is in compliance with the City’s Investment Policy. Discussion The February Investment Portfolio Report provides a synopsis of investment activity for the City’s investment portfolio for the month ended February 29, 2020. The March Investment Portfolio Report provides a synopsis of investment activity for the City’s investment portfolio for the month ended March 31, 2020. As of November 6, 2019, the City’s Investment Portfolio is in full compliance with the California Government Code Section 53601, and there is sufficient cash flow from a combination of liquid and maturing securities, bank deposits, and income to meet the City’s expenditure requirements. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals The acceptance and filing of the attached Investment Portfolio R eport aligns with Key Target No. 1: Financial Stability by Implementing and maintaining and updating a fiscal accountability plan Fiscal Impact None Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, 7 Packet Pg. 646 6697 Page 2 California accept and file the Monthly Investment Portfolio Report for February and March 2020. Attachments Attachment 1 February 2020 Investment Portfolio Management Summary Report Attachment 2 March 2020 Investment Portfolio Management Summary Report Ward: All Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: None 7 Packet Pg. 647 7.a Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.a Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report February 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment 7.b Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: FN. Investment Portfolio Report March 2020. ATTACHMENT#2 (6697 : Monthly Investment Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager Subject: Independent Investigation Status Update Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, receive and file a status update requested by the City Council on the independent investigation into the allegations of harassment made by current and former City employees against Mayor John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino. Background The City retained an independent investigator on February 20, 2020, to investigate the allegations of harassment made by current and former City employees against Mayor John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino. When such allegations are made, conducting a thorough investigation is critical. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) imposes an affirmative legal obligation on employers to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent discrimination and harassment from occurring in the workplace (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (k)). Satisfying this obligation requires employers to investigate complaints of discrimination or harassment. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has also imposed a duty upon employers to investigate complaints of harassment. (EEOC: Policy Guidance on Sexual Harassment, 8 FEP Case. Manual (BNA), at 405:6685, n. 7, 405:6699, Section E (1990).) Discussion The independent investigator engaged by the City to handle this case has worked diligently to identify and interview witnesses and review the available evidence. The investigator has made significant progress with this investigation despite numerous challenges. To date, the investigator has only had the opportunity to interview one of the individuals who made complaints against Mayor Valdivia. While, the remaining complainants have been invited to participate in the investigation, they have refused to be interviewed by the investigator, even with their attorney present. Consequently, the investigator must rely on the claims themselves, news articles, statements made during press conferences, and verbal accounts by the complainants’ attorney to determine what the complainants are alleging. The investigator has interviewed other staff members in the Office of the Mayor, the Office of the City Council, the Office of the City Manager, and the Human Resources 8 Packet Pg. 668 6713 Page 2 Department. The investigator is currently working to schedule an interview of one remaining party. Based upon the information received in this interview and any additional claims that are filed, the investigator may request interviews with additional parties. Once these steps are complete, the investigator will prepare rep orts regarding the various claims. The City will continue to provide the investigator with any information required to complete the investigation as quickly as possible, but also afford the investigator the time reasonably needed to complete a thorough an d independent investigation. Once this process is completed, the findings will be published to the City Council. Fiscal Impact The cost incurred by the City in association with the engagement of an independent investigator and outside special counsel handling the investigation through April 30, 2020 is $51,762. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, receive and file a status update requested by the City Council on the independent investigation into the allegations of harassment made by current and former City employees against Mayor John Valdivia and the City of San Bernardino. Attachments None Ward: All 8 Packet Pg. 669 Page 1 Staff Report City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Paul Espinoza, Finance Director Subject: Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors for Beginning FY 2019/20 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2020-88 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott (RAMS) of San Bernardino, California, as the City’s external auditors, in an amount not-to exceed $283,500 for a three-year term with a two-year option to extend. Background Annually, the City issues various audited financial and compliance reports. They are published not only to meet various federal, state, and other regulatory requirements, but also to report to the Mayor and City Council and the public on the City’s annual financial status. The City’s auditors are required, by auditing standards, to perform the audit to obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements prepared by management are free from material misstatement and to report on the results of the audit in the Independent Auditor’s Report. In addition, Assembly Bill (AB) 1345 was introduced in 2013 to address the length of time that audit services can be provided by the same audit team. Beginning with FY 2013/14, local governments can only use the same audit team for six consecutive years, after which time a new audit team with the same firm, or a different audit firm, will be required to complete the audit. To ensure qualified audit services are reasonably priced, the Finance Department has historically issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for audit services every four to six years. The City’s current auditors, The Pun Group LLP, have performed six consecutive audits dating back to FY 2013/14. Although staff has been pleased with the services provided by the Pun Group, based on the length of time with the Pun Group and the requirements directed by Assembly Bill 1345 Local Government Audits, staff feels it is fiscally prudent to switch auditors at this time. Under AB -1345 section 12410.6(b) a local agency shall not employ a public accounting firm to provide audit services to a local agency for six consecutive fiscal years. 9 Packet Pg. 670 6701 Page 2 Discussion An RFP was issued on February 26, 2020 for auditing services beginning with the audit of FY 2019/20. Evaluation and Selection The City was fortunate to have six qualified firms respond to the City’s R FP. Proposals were received from the following firms: 1 Brown Armstrong Bakersfield, CA 2 Eadie and Payne LLP Riverside, CA 3 Lance, Soll and Lunghard, LLP Brea, CA 4 The Pun Group LLP Santa Ana, CA 5 Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP (RAMS) San Bernardino, CA 6 White Nelson Diehl Evans LLP (WNDE) Irvine, CA Proposals were reviewed by a team consisting of the Deputy Director of Finance, Accounting Manager, and Accountant III. Each firm was evaluated based on their proposed cost, the size of their firm, and experience with cities comparable to the City of San Bernardino in both size and services provided. Staff was unanimous in its selection of the top three firms consisting of RAMS, WNDE, and the Pun Group (consisting of a different audit team to comply with AB 1345). These firms were invited to participate in Zoom interviews on April 7, 2020. Staff also conducted reference checks of the top three firms, with all references coming back with positive marks. After a lengthy review and interview process, RAMS was selected based on their ability to provide professional guidance, qualified staff, price, and experience auditing comparable cities. The agreement is for an amount not -to-exceed $283,500 to cover required professional auditing services. A detail by fiscal year is shown below: 2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Entering into a new contract for auditing services at a reasonable price is consistent with Key Target No. 1: Financial Stability. The new audit contract will provide significant savings, which will allow the City to operate in a fiscally responsible and business -like manner. Fiscal Impact The current contract price for all services is $184,500. The approximately $93,000 of 9 Packet Pg. 671 6701 Page 3 savings will be included in the City’s budget beginning with the FY 2020/21 (for the FY 2019/20 audit). Conclusion Adopt Resolution 2020-88 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott (RAMS) of San Bernardino, California, as the City’s external auditors, in an amount not-to exceed $283,500 for a three-year term with a two-year option to extend. Attachments Attachment 1 Professional Services Agreement between the City of San Bernardino and Rogers, Anderson, Malody, & Scott LLP Ward: All 9 Packet Pg. 672 Resolution No. 2020-88 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-88 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY & SCOTT, LLP FOR THE PROVISION OF FINANCIAL AUDITING SERVICES WHEREAS, in compliance with AB 1345 and in the interests of being fiscally prudent, City staff released a request for proposals for audit services; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from six qualified firms; and WHEREAS, following a lengthy review and interview process, City staff recommended the selection of Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”. SECTION 2. The Finance department is hereby authorized to issue a Purchase Order to Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP for Financial Auditing Services for an amount not to exceed $90,800 for the Fiscal Year 2019-20 and Fiscal Year 2020-21 financial audits, and an amount not to exceed $101,900 for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 financial audit. SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor 9.a Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: FN Audit Services Reso (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors for Beginning FY 2019/20) Resolution No. 2020-88 City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 9.a Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: FN Audit Services Reso (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors for Beginning FY 2019/20) Resolution No. 2020-88 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 9.a Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: FN Audit Services Reso (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as External Auditors for Beginning FY 2019/20) 9.b Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as 9.b Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: FN. RAMS - Professional Services Agreement Contract 2020. ATTACHMENT#1 (6701 : Resolution Awarding a PSA to (RAMS) as Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Eric McBride, Acting Chief of Police Subject: Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Violations Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, conduct a final reading of and adopt Ordinance MC-1535, amending Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits. Background Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code regulate fireworks sales, designate certain restrictions on the possession and discharge of fireworks, and establish penalties for violations of fireworks regulations. Chapter 9.93 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code establishes the Administrative Civil Penalties program and sets a $1,000 maximum daily penalty per violation of the Municipal Code. During the July 17, 2019 Mayor and City Council meeting, it was directed that the Legislative Review Committee explore modifying the Municipal Code to increase fines and penalties for fireworks violations in the City of San Bernardino. Legislative Review Committee Action On September 11, 2019, the Legislative Review Committee convened to discuss fireworks violations and to provide direction to staff. Following public comment and Committee member discussion, a majority of the Committee voted to direct staff to place an item on the agenda for a future meeting of the Mayor and City Council Members to: Consider amending the Municipal Code to adopt an enhanced penalty structure for fireworks violations; and Consider establishing a fund consisting of fines collected from fireworks violations to be used to pay a reward in the amount of $250 to any individual providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil prosecution of any person violating the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks. 10 Packet Pg. 692 6700 Page 2 Council Direction During the November 6, 2019 meeting, the Mayor and City Council unanimously accepted the recommendations provided in the Fireworks Permitting and Penalties for Fireworks Violations staff report. That report outlined a proposed structure for increased administrative civil penalties for fireworks violations as well as the establishment of a reward fund for individuals providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil prosecution of any person violating any fireworks -related Municipal Code. City staff were directed to draft a proposed ordinance modifying Chapters 8.60, 8.61, and 9.93 of the Municipal Code according to the terms provided in the staff report and to bring the proposed ordinance back to the Mayor and City Council for further consideration. On April 15, 2020, staff returned to a meeting of the Mayor and City Council for the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Violations amending Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits. The item was unanimously approved by the Mayor and City Council. Discussion Existing Penalties for Fireworks Violations As currently established, Section 8.60.150 of the Municipal Code makes it an infraction or a misdemeanor to violate any provision of Chapter 8.60 of the Municipal Code relating to the sale, possession, and discharge of safe and sane fireworks. Section 8.61.030 of the Municipal Code makes it a misdemeanor to violate any provision of Chapter 8.61 of the Code relating to the possession and discharge of dangerous fireworks. Anyone convicted of an infraction is subject to a fine not to exceed $100 for a first violation, $200 for a second violation within one year, and $500 for any subsequent violation within one year (Municipal Code Section 1.12.010). Anyone convicted of a misdemeanor violation is subject to imprisonment in the County Jail for not more than six months and/or a fine not to exceed $1,000 (Municipal Code Section 1.12.010). In addition to criminal fines and the potential for imprisonment as o utlined above, fireworks violations are also currently subject to an Administrative Civil Penalty of $1,000 per violation (Municipal Code Sections 8.60.150, 8.61.030, and 9.93.020). Each fireworks violation may be subject to criminal penalties, civil penalties, or both. Comparison of Fireworks Violation Penalties Throughout the Region The proposed increase to administrative civil penalties fines for fireworks violations is premised upon staff research and analysis of various penalties for fireworks violati ons in the region. Staff evaluated current fireworks regulations and penalties in use by the County of San Bernardino, 23 incorporated cities within the County of San Bernardino, and the City of Riverside. Of the 25 jurisdictions evaluated, eight permit so me form of lawful possession and discharge of safe and sane fireworks (Adelanto, Barstow, Chino, Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Needles, and Rialto), and all impose some form of penalty structure for fireworks violations. 10 Packet Pg. 693 6700 Page 3 Most of the jurisdictions evaluated establish criminal penalties for fireworks violations as either an infraction punishable by a fine up to $500, or as a misdemeanor punishable by a fine up to $1,000 and/or six months in County Jail. These criminal penalties are on par with the criminal penalties authorized by the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code, as well as state provisions for infraction and misdemeanor crimes. Given the relative uniformity in criminal penalties among the jurisdictions researched and the determination that the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code is consistent with those penalties, staff recommends no changes to the criminal penalty structure. Most of the jurisdictions evaluated also allow for some form of civil penalty in addition to any criminal penalties assessed. For dangerous fireworks violations, civil penalties range from $100 for a first violation on the low end of the spectrum to $10,000 for a third violation within one year on the high end of the spectrum. The cities of Fontana and Grand Terrace impose the highest civil penalties for dangerous fireworks violations among the evaluated cities: $2,500 for a first offense, $5,000 for a second offense within one year, and $10,000 for each subsequent offense within one year. However, these same cities provide for a much lower penalty structure for violations related to safe and sane fireworks: $250 for the first offense, $500 for the second offense within one year, and $750 for each subsequent violation within one year. The City of Montclair imposes the highe st penalties for safe and sane fireworks violations: $1,000 for the first offense, $2,500 for the second offense within 36 months, and $5,000 for each subsequent offense within 36 months. There is no distinction in the Montclair penalty structure differentiating safe and sane fireworks violations and dangerous fireworks violations. In contrast to these three example cities, the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code provides for a $1,000 civil penalty for any fireworks-related violation, regardless of severity, type of fireworks involved, or number of occurrences within a given time frame. Proposed Municipal Code Modifications In the Fireworks Permitting and Penalties for Fireworks Violations staff report presented to the Mayor and City Council during the November 6, 2019 meeting, staff recommended: The adoption of the highest regional administrative civil penalty fines for dangerous fireworks violations currently in use by the Cities of Fontana and Grand Terrace; The adoption of the highest regional administrative civil penalty fines for safe and sane violations currently in use by the City of Montclair; The adoption of a 36-month time frame for escalating penalties in the case of repeat violations; and 10 Packet Pg. 694 6700 Page 4 The creation of a reward fund consisting of fines collected from fireworks violations to be used to pay a reward in the amount of $250 to any individual providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil prosecution of any person violating the City of San Bernardi no Municipal Code related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks. The Mayor and City Council accepted each of the foregoing recommendations as presented. In an effort to enhance public safety through the deterrence of unlawful sales , possession, and discharge of fireworks while remaining consistent with regional standards, and in accordance with the direction of the Mayor and City Council, Ordinance MC-1535 will: Amend Section 8.60.150(B) of the Municipal Code to reflect the follo wing civil penalties for violations of Chapter 8.60 regarding the sale and use of safe and sane fireworks: o $1,000 for the first offense, o $2,500 for the second offense within 36 months, and o $5,000 for each subsequent offense within 36 months. Amend Section 8.61.030(B) of the Municipal Code to reflect the following civil penalties for violations of Chapter 8.61 regarding dangerous fireworks: o $2,500 for the first offense, o $5,000 for the second offense within 36 months, and o $10,000 for each subsequent offense within 36 months. Amend Section 9.93.020(E) of the Municipal Code to allow for a civil penalty greater than $1,000 per violation of Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. Add Section 8.60.155 to the Municipal Cod e authorizing the City Manager to create a reward fund consisting of fines collected from fireworks violations to be used to pay a reward in the amount of $250 to any individual providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil prosecution of any person violating the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals The recommended action aligns with Key Target No. 3c: Improved Quality of Life: constantly evaluate public safety service delivery models to enhance the quality of service. Enhancing the penalties associated with the unlawful sales, possession, and discharge of fireworks and creating a reward fund to encourage the assistance of the public in the identification and successful prosecution of individuals who unlawfully sell, possess, and discharge fireworks will serve to deter unlawful fireworks activity and improve public safety. 10 Packet Pg. 695 6700 Page 5 Fiscal Impact Administrative Civil Penalties citations generate revenue in the form of fines. The total amount of fines varies and is dependent upon a variety of factors including the level of enforcement, the number of Administrative Civil Penalties citations issued, the type of violation, the number of violations committed, and the ability of the City to collect the fines. The amount of fines collected is anticipated to increase under the proposed enhanced penalty structure. The proposed ordinance authorizes the City Manager to establish a special reward fund consisting of fines collected from fireworks violations to pay rewards in the amount of up to $250 to individuals providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil prosecution of any person violating any Municipal Code provision related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks. The number of rewards paid from this fund will vary depending on a number of factors including: the number of violations, the willingness of members of the p ublic to report violations, and the ability of City staff to cite and successfully prosecute violators. However, staff anticipates that fines collected for fireworks violations will be in a sufficient amount to cover the cost of the reward program. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, conduct a final reading of and adopt MC-1535 amending Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits. Attachments Attachment 1 Proposed Ordinance MC-1535 Ward: All Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: 04-15-2020 Mayor and City Council approved the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Violations amending Chapters 8.60 and 8.61 of Title 8 and Chapter 9.93 of Title 9 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code pertaining to the use of fireworks within city limits. 11-06-2019 Mayor and City Council approved a motion to accept the recommendations provided in the Fireworks Permitting and Penalties for Fireworks Violations Staff Report. 10 Packet Pg. 696 Ordinance No. MC-1535 ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8.60 AND 8.61 OF TITLE 8 AND CHAPTER 9.93 OF TITLE 9 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE, PERTAINING TO THE USE OF FIREWORKS WITHIN CITY LIMITS WHEREAS, “safe and sane fireworks” are defined as any fireworks which do not come within the definition of “dangerous fireworks” or “exempt fireworks” by the California Health and Safety Code Section 12529; and WHEREAS, during the Fourth of July celebrations, the City of San Bernardino experiences numerous fires caused by both “safe and sane” fireworks and the use of illegal “dangerous” fireworks; and WHEREAS, the use of “safe and sane” fireworks outside the permitted firework zone has caused the ignition of multiple fires; and WHEREAS, the use of illegal “dangerous” fireworks has sparked fires throughout the City; and WHEREAS, fire crews respond to numerous fires caused by both “safe and sane” and illegal “dangerous” fireworks throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Police Department receives numerous calls related to the use of illegal fireworks in the days leading up to, including, and after July 4 each year; and WHEREAS, in the days leading up to and including July 4, 2019, an estimated 1,500 pounds of illegal fireworks were seized in the City by law enforcement personnel; and WHEREAS, in order to address this serious issue, City staff has sought ways to deter the possession and lighting of illegal fireworks in the City, including by increasing penalties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public health, safety, and welfare will be served by: (1) increasing the maximum penalties for the use and possession of safe and sane fireworks outside of the permitted zone; (2) increasing the penalties for the use and possession of dangerous fireworks; and (3) establishing a reward for the information leading to the identification and successful prosecution of violators. THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. This Ordinance is enacted in accordance with the City’s police powers and in accordance with the City’s powers as a charter city. 10.a Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Ordinance No. MC-1535 SECTION 2. Section 8.60.150 B. of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: “B. In addition to any other penalties provided by law, any person, organization, group association, etc. violating any provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to an Administrative Civil Penalty of: 1. One-thousand dollars ($1,000) for the first offense; and 2. Two-thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for the second offense within 36 months; and 3. Five-thousand dollars ($5,000) for each subsequent offense within 36 months.” SECTION 3. Section 8.61.030 B. of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: “B. In addition to any other penalties provided by law, any person, organization, group or association, etc. violating any provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to an Administrative Civil Penalty of: 1. Two-thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for the first offense; and 2. Five-thousand dollars ($5,000) for the second offense within 36 months; and 3. Ten-thousand dollars ($10,000) for each subsequent offense within 36 months.” SECTION 4. Amending section 9.93.020 E. of the San Bernardino Municipal Code to read as follows: “E. Administrative Civil Penalties for violations of any provision of the Municipal Code shall be assessed at a daily rate determined by the Enforcement Officer, or by the Administrative Hearing Officer pursuant to the criteria listed in Section 9.93.040 of this Chapter. The maximum rate shall be $1,000 per violation per day unless a different amount is set elsewhere in this Municipal Code. The maximum amount of Administrative Civil Penalties shall not exceed $100,000 per parcel or structure for any related series of violations.” SECTION 5. Adding Section 8.60.155 to the San Bernardino Municipal Code to read as follows: “8.60.155 Reward Fund The City Manager may establish a special fund consisting of fines collected from firework violations to pay rewards in the amount of no more than two-hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to individuals providing information leading to the identification and successful criminal or civil 10.a Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Ordinance No. MC-1535 prosecution of any person violating this Municipal Code related to the unlawful possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks.” SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance shall not be affected. SECTION 7. Certification. City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this _____th day of ________, 2020 John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: _________________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 10.a Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Ordinance No. MC-1535 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Roch, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Ordinance No. MC-________, introduced by the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a regular meeting held the ______ day of _________, 2020. Ordinance No. MC-________ was approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting held ____ day of __________, 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this _______ day of __________, 2020. ______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 10.a Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Penalties for Fireworks Violations Ordinance No. MC-1535 (6700 : Final Reading and Adoption of MC-1535 Penalties for Fireworks Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Eric McBride, Acting Chief of Police Subject: Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked Police Vehicles Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2020-74 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget and issue a Purchase Order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $90,000. Background On October 1, 2017, the City of San Bernardino entered into a Community Credit Fund Restricted Grant Agreement with San Manuel. Phase II of the grant agreement requires the grantee to use approximately 20-30% of the grant each year to purchase equipment intended to support the San Bernardino Police Department patrol and investigation functions affecting the defined area. The Department has recently re -established special investigative units with a mission to reduce violent crime, narcotics, and vice activity. These units require unmarked police vehicles to accomplish those missions. The Department historically purchased unmarked police vehicles from Carmax due to the trade-in value offered and a wide range of vehicles to choose from. Discussion The San Bernardino Police Department has recently re -established special investigative units. These teams are responsible for investigating narcotics activity, vice -related activity, and apprehending violent criminals with the intent to reduce crime throughout the City. The newly established Vice Team’s mission is to investigate and reduce the occurrence of illegal gambling, prostitution, and human trafficking. The special investigative teams have conducted numerous operations and have made arrests that impact the defined area in the San Manuel grant agreement. Additionally, the Vice Team will reduce the frequency of prostitution and human trafficking that affects the surrounding community. San Manuel Public Safety representatives have advised that a reduction in vice related crimes may have a significant impact considering the new hotel scheduled to open to accommodate San Manuel Casino guests. The Department's special investigative teams utilize used, unmarked police vehicles to 11 Packet Pg. 701 6693 Page 2 investigate and apprehend criminals. These vehicles must be non -uniform, indistinct, and have the appropriate emergency equipment installed. The Department has explored purchasing used vehicles from multiple vendors and has found Carmax to be the most responsive when it comes to inventory, certification, warranty, and cost. Carmax allows the Department to select from an inventory nationwide that is immediately available for purchase to be shipped to their Ontario, California location. The City currently has an open contract with West Coast Lights and Sirens and $25,000 will be used to install emergency equipment in the unmarked vehicles. Staff is requesting to use San Manuel Grant Agreement funds to purch ase four (4) used vehicles in an amount not to exceed $22,500, per vehicle, and install emergency equipment to be used by special investigative units. 2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The request to amend the FY 2019/20 budget and issue a purchase or der to Carmax aligns with Key Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life by constantly evaluating public safety service delivery models to enhance the quality of service. Fiscal Impact To fund the purchase of the unmarked patrol vehicles would entail a budg et amendment to the FY 2019-20 adopted budget by transferring $115,000 from account number 001 - 210-8652*5015 (over time) to account number 001 -210-8652*5701 (vehicles) to cover the total cost of all vehicles and equipment needed. FINANCIAL IMPACT Account Number Current Fiscal Year Next Fiscal Year Total Cost Ongoing Cost Account Balance 001-210-8652*5015 $278,229 0 $115,000 0 Cost 001-210-8652*5701 $115,000 0 $115,000 0 Budget Adjustment: Yes For Fiscal Year: 2019-2020 Conclusion Adopt Resolution 2020-74 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget and issue a Purchase Order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $90,000. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-74 Ward: All Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: 11 Packet Pg. 702 6693 Page 3 February 6, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2019 -20 authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Vendor Service Agreement with WCLS increasing the total to $528,280 for FY2018-2019 with one single-year renewal through 6/30/20. August 1, 2018 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2018 -221 authorizing the issuance of a Purchase Order to West Coast Lights & Sirens in the amount of $253,280 and the execution of a Vendor Service Agreement for the purchase and installation of safety equipment on new police vehicles. August 17, 2015 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-182, authorizing the transfer of funds and issuance of a purchase order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $55,000. May 19, 2014 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014-143, authorizing the transfer of funds and issuance of a purchase order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $55,000. 11 Packet Pg. 703 Resolution No. 2020-74 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-74 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO AMEND THE FY2019/20 ADOPTED BUDGET AND ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER TO CARMAX IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $90,000 WHEREAS, the City is required to spend 20 to 30% of the San Manuel Grant Agreement each year; and WHEREAS, the City requires unmarked police vehicles to investigate and reduce the occurrence of crimes related to violence, narcotics, prostitution, and illegal gambling; and WHEREAS, Carmax has proven to be the best source to purchase a variety of used vehicles for this purpose. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to amend the FY2019/20 Adopted Budget transferring $115,000 from account number 001-210-8652*5015 to account number 001-210-8652*5701 and to issue a purchase order to Carmax in an amount not to exceed $90,000 pursuant to San Bernardino Municipal Code 3.04.010.B.3. SECTION 3. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. 11.a Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: PD-PO for Unmarked Vehicles-Reso [Revision 1] (6693 : Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked Resolution No. 2020-74 APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 11.a Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: PD-PO for Unmarked Vehicles-Reso [Revision 1] (6693 : Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked Resolution No. 2020-74 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 11.a Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: PD-PO for Unmarked Vehicles-Reso [Revision 1] (6693 : Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Unmarked Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Jim Tickemyer, Parks, Recreation, & Community Services Director Subject: Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of RSVP Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2020-75 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year two of the Corporation for National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting the grant award in the amount of $54,809 and appropriating the grant funds for the period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. Background The City has participated in the federally funded Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) for 46 years. The second year of a three year grant cycle (2019 -2022) from the Corporation for National and Community Service will end March 31, 2021. During the most recent program year, 178 participants contributed over 70,000 volunteer hours. This grant will enable the City to continue providing services that enable individuals ages 55 years and older to put their skills and life experience to work for their communities. The RSVP volunteers contribute up to 40 hours per week providing services in supporting senior centers, senior lunch programs, local hospitals, and disaster preparedness with the California Highway Patrol and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department. Discussion The RSVP program provides funds for one full-time RSVP manager, and one part-time staff person who organize and direct the Work Plans of the volunteer program. The two RSVP staff members recruit volunteers, select work sites, make site visits, and prepare reports to meet grant requirements. RSVP volunteers perform service activities and provide transportation to seniors. They also participate with local law enforcement as Citizens on Patrol (COP) volunteers. RSVP volunteers do not receive pay, but they can request up to $30 per quarter as reimbursement for their transportation expenses, which is paid through grant funds. The RSVP grant program allows the City of San Bernardino to provide many volunteer service opportunities for the benefit of the community. 12 Packet Pg. 707 6694 Page 2 2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The Retired Senior and Volunteer Program (RSVP) aligns with the Key Target No. 2: Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community by building a culture that attracts, retains and motivates the highest quality of volunteers for the program and Key Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life, which allows volunteers to stay active and engaged in their communities through their services. Fiscal Impact The City provides matching funds for the RSVP program in the amount of $69,457 of reportable expenses (and up to $104,210 for non -cash in-kind services) for a portion of the salaries and fringe benefits for one full-time program manager and a part-time staff person, as well as some program costs including off ice supplies, telephone, printing and volunteer support. This grant match funding is budgeted in Account No. 001 -380-0502. The City also provides an in-kind contribution in the amount of $917 for the cost of utilities (phone included) for the program’s office space. Conclusion Adopt Resolution 2020-75 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year two of the Corporation for National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting the grant award in the amount of $54,809 and appropriating the grant funds for the period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-75; Exhibit “A” 2020-2021 2nd Year RSVP Grant Attachment 2 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application Attachment 3 2020-2021 RSVP Notification Letter of Grant Award Attachment 4 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Budget Attachment 5 Exhibit B - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Budget Narratives Ward: All Synopses of Previous Council Actions: March 20, 2019 Adopted: Resolution No. 2019-42 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year one of three of the National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting and appropriating the grant funds in the amount of $47,309 and allocating matching funds of $69,748 for the program for the period of April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020. June 20, 2018 Adopted: Resolution No. 2018-175 Resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year three of the National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting and appropriating the grant funds in the amount of 12 Packet Pg. 708 6694 Page 3 $47,310 and allocating matching funds for the program for the period of April 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. June 7, 2017 Adopted: Resolution No. 2017-102 of the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submission of a grant application for year two of the National and Community Service's Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, accepting and appropriating the grant funds in the amount of $47,310 and allocating matching funds for the program for the Period of April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. 12 Packet Pg. 709 Resolution No. 2020-75 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-75 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RATIFY THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR YEAR TWO OF THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE’S RETIRED AND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM, ACCEPT THE GRANT AWARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,809 AND APPROPRIATE THE GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1, 2020 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2021 WHEREAS, the City has participated in the federally funded Retired and Senior Volunteer Program for 46 years; and WHEREAS, individuals ages 55 years and older provide services at various locations and organizations; and WHEREAS, the 178 individual volunteers contributed over 70,000 hours of time at various locations and organizations in FY 2019-20. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby ratify the submission of a grant application for Year Two of the Corporation of National and Community Service’s Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) in the total amount of $124,556; and, SECTION 2. That the Mayor and City Council accept the grand award in the amount of $54,809 and authorize the Director of Finance or his/her designee to appropriate that amount for the continued operation of the RSVP; and, SECTION 3. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize the Director of Finance or his/her designee to appropriate $69,747 in matching funds (cash and in-kind) to the continued operation of the RSVP program; and SECTION 4. That the appropriation of the grant award and matching funds, together totaling $124,556, are for the operation of RSVP from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. SECTION 5. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. 12.a Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2.RESOLUTION (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of Resolution No. 2020-75 SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 12.a Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2.RESOLUTION (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of Resolution No. 2020-75 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 12.a Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2.RESOLUTION (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Application for Year Two of 12.b Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.b Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 2 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Application (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.c Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 3 - Notification Letter of Grant Award (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.c Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 3 - Notification Letter of Grant Award (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.d Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 4 - 2020-2021 RSVP Grant Budget (6694 : Resolution to Ratify 12.e Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 5.Budget Narrative (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant 12.e Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 5.Budget Narrative (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant 12.e Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: PR.RSVP Grant Application Year 2 FY2020-21.ATTACHMENT 5.Budget Narrative (6694 : Resolution to Ratify Submission of a Grant Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, accept for final reading and adopt Ordinance No. MC-1532 approving Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Residential to Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres located at 1066 N. Tippecanoe Avenue. Background On April 1, 2020, the Mayor and City Council conducted a public hearing on Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Residential to Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres. 2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 aligns with Key Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life. The proposed development will create an economic benefit to an otherwise vacant and underutilized parcel and has been designed to achieve visual interest and a clean, landscaped industrial site. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, accept for final reading and adopt Ordinance No. MC-1532 approving Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 changing the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Resi dential to Employment of three (3) parcels (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres located at 1066 N. Tippecanoe Avenue. Attachments Attachment 1 Ordinance MC-1532; Exhibit A - Zoning Map Amendment 13 Packet Pg. 738 6674 Page 2 Ward: 1 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: April 1, 2020 Mayor and City Council introduced Ordinance No. MC-1532. 13 Packet Pg. 739 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 1 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 19-01 CHANGING THE WATERMAN + BASELINE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE ZONE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL TO EMPLOYMENT OF THREE (3) PARCELS (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 AND 24) CONTAINING A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY 15.39 ACRES LOCATED AT 1066 N. TIPPECANOE AVENUE, PURSUANT TO AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPART REPORT WHEREAS, together, Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and Development Permit Type-P 19-06 constitute the I. E. Hub Center Project (“Project”); and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2016, the Mayor and City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2015081086), adopted the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approved the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 is a request to change the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone from Neighborhood Residential to Employment of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres; and WHEREAS, Development Permit Type-P 19-06 is a request to allow the development, establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility with an office/shop building containing approximately 7,000 square feet, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements, on a project site containing approximately 15.39 acres; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”; Public Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), Section 21067, and State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et seq.), Section 15367, the City of San Bernardino is the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of Section 15164(b) (Addendum to an EIR) of CEQA, the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department accepted the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared by Kimley-Horn on behalf of and submitted by the applicant for the Project; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino held a duly-noticed public hearing to consider public testimony and the staff report, and adopted Resolution No. 2020-013 recommending the adoption of the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report, and the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and Development Permit Type-P 19-06 to the Mayor and City Council; and WHEREAS, notice of the April 1, 2020 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of this proposed Ordinance was published in The Sun newspaper on March 21, 13.a Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 2 2020, and was mailed to property owners within a 500 foot radius of the project site in accordance with Development Code Chapter 19.52 (Hearings and Appeals); and WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearing conducted by the Mayor and City Council, and no additional information submitted to the City Council, has produced substantial new information requiring substantial revisions that would trigger recirculation of the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report or additional environmental review under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 19.52 (Hearing and Appeals) and Chapter 19.74 (Zoning Map Amendments) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Mayor and City Council have the authority to take action on Specific Plan Amendment 19-01. NOW THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. In accordance with Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR), as the decision-making body for the project, the Mayor and City Council have reviewed and considered the information contained in the administrative record for Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and Development Permit Type-P 19- 06, and the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2015081086) certified on December 19, 2016 in conjunction with the approval of the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan. Based upon the facts and information contained in the administrative record and the previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Mayor and City Council, the Mayor and City Council find as follows: (1) The environmental impacts of this project were previously analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Report certified on December 19, 2016 in conjunction with the approval of the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan and within the Addendum for the approval for Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 and Development Permit Type- P 19-06; and (2) The certified Final Environmental Impact Report and the Addendum contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the project; and (3) The certified Final Environmental Impact Report and the Addendum was completed in compliance with CEQA and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder; and (4) The certified Final Environmental Impact Report and the Addendum reflects the independent judgment of the Mayor and City Council; and (5) The proposed project will introduce no new significant environmental impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the certified Final Environmental Impact Report, and all 13.a Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 3 mitigation measures previously adopted with the Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program and the Addendum are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. Finding of Facts – Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 Finding No. 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan changed the General Plan Land Use Designations and the Zoning District Classifications of the properties contained within an area comprised of approximately 710 acres in order to establish the land use policies and development standards to facilitate the maximum build out of up to 4,341 residential units and approximately 3,570,448 square feet of non- residential uses, and the future construction of the associated transportation/mobility and infrastructure improvements. The primary purpose of the Specific Plan is to provide a vision and implementation program for the future development of vacant or underutilized properties within Specific Plan boundaries. This Specific Plan also contains a comprehensive set of goals, objectives, strategies and guidelines to be used by the City to support, attract and facilitate new development and revitalization projects. Additionally, the City of San Bernardino General Plan includes primary goals and policies to guide future development within the City. Accordingly, the Specific Plan provides a detailed explanation of the Specific Plan’s relationship to the City’s General Plan, including a comparison of goals, objectives and policies. Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to accommodate the development, establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility. The Neighborhood Residential Land Use Zone of the Specific Plan allows for single-family residential and multi-family residential developments which is consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Designations of Single-Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. The Employment Land Use Zone of the Specific Plan allows for multi-family residential and light industrial developments which is consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Designations of Multi-Family Residential and Industrial. With the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01, proposed Employment Land Use Zone for the subject 15.39 areas will be consistent with the City’s General Plan. Finding No. 2: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. 13.a Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 4 Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan established a land use and development framework, identified needed transportation and infrastructure improvements, and serves as a marketing tool for attracting developers to key sites and for boosting economic development. The Specific Plan is intended to encourage residential and neighborhood-serving commercial establishments on major corridors such as Baseline Avenue and Waterman Avenue, direct the creation of employment generating uses to the southern portion of the project area closer to the Civic Center and Downtown, and protect and enhance the existing residential neighborhoods. The Specific Plan is not detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the primary purpose of the Specific Plan is to provide a vision and implementation program for the future development of vacant or under- utilized properties within Specific Plan boundaries and contains a comprehensive set of goals, objectives, strategies and guidelines to be used by the City to support, attract and facilitate new development and revitalization projects and will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the project area thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood, while preserving the environmental environs. Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to transform a vacant and underutilized site with the development, establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility which would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Finding No. 3: The subject properties are physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.. Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan changed the General Plan Land Use Designations and the Zoning District Classifications of the properties contained within an area comprised of approximately 710 acres in order to establish the new Land Use Districts and Design Guidelines maintains an appropriate balance of land uses by providing for the revitalization of existing under-utilized properties. Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to transform a vacant and underutilized site with the development, establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility in which the project site is physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the proposed land use development with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01. 13.a Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 5 Finding No. 4: The proposed plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan is intended to encourage residential and neighborhood-serving commercial establishments on major corridors such as Baseline Avenue and Waterman Avenue, direct the creation of employment generating uses to the southern portion of the project area closer to the Civic Center and Downtown, and protect and enhance the existing residential neighborhoods. The land use plan accommodates an increase in existing residential uses from an estimated 2,049 units to approximately 4,341 units, an increase in commercial uses from approximately 2,366,385 square feet to approximately 3,570,448 square feet, and establishes six (6) distinct districts to guide future development of key parcels throughout the project area. Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to transform a vacant and underutilized site with the development, establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility which is a development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01. Finding No. 5: The proposed plan will contribute to a balance of land uses so that local residents may work and shop in the community in which they live. Finding of Fact: The Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan creates employment generating uses to the southern portion of the project area closer to the Civic Center and Downtown, and protects and enhances through the accommodation of increased residential uses from an estimated 2,049 units to approximately 4,341 units and increased commercial uses from approximately 2,366,385 square feet to approximately 3,570,448 square feet. Specific Plan Amendment 19-06 proposes to change the Land Use Zone of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres within the Specific Plan from Neighborhood Residential to Employment in order to transform a vacant and underutilized site with the development, establishment, and operation of a truck and trailer storage facility which contributes to a balance of land use with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment 19-01. SECTION 4. Specific Plan Amendment 19-01 to change of the Waterman + Baseline Neighborhood Transformation Specific Plan Land Use Zone of three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 15.39 acres (APN: 0278-051-08, 17 and 24) from Neighborhood 13.a Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 6 Residential to Employment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, is hereby approved. SECTION 5. Notice of Determination: The Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino within five (5) working days of final project approval certifying the City’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act in approving the Project. SECTION 6. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this ___ day of _________, 2020. 13.a Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. MC-1532 7 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino at a _______________________ meeting thereof, held on the _____ day of ______________, 2020, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ IBARRA FIGUEROA SHORETT NICKEL RICHARD MULVIHILL Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk The foregoing Ordinance is hereby approved this _____ day of __________________, 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney By:____________________ 13.a Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan Not to scale EXHIBIT 6: Proposed Specific Plan Land Use Plan I.E. Hub Center Project, City of San Bernardino Source: Waterman + Baseline Specific Plan “Figure 4.1 - Proposed Land Use Plan” 2016, Kimley-Horn 2019 13.b Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: CED.SPA19-01.I E Hub Center Project.A1.Ordinance.Exhibit A (6674 : 2ND Reading of Ordinance MC-1532 Approving Specific Plan Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust Related to 6803 N. Shannon Lane Recommendation Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-76 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Rede velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real property located at 6803 N. Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California. Background On October 17, 1994, the Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino (“Commission”) approved Resolution 5409, establishing the Mortgage Assistance Program, subsequently renamed the Homebuyer Assistance Program, which made available a limited number of deferred payment (principal and interest) second mortgages. This Program was designed to provide income -qualified families with down payment/closing cost monies necessary to secure financing towards the purchase of single-family detached homes in the City and provided an additional avenue for the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino (“Agency”) to ensure the availability of affordable housing to income -qualified home buyers in the community. On January 9, 2012, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2012-12 confirming that the City of San Bernardino would serve as the Successor Agency to the former Agency, in accordance with AB1X 26. On January 23, 2012, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2012-19 further confirming that the City would serve as the Successor Housing Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency and perform the housing functions previously performed by the Agency. Discussion The Homebuyer Assistance Program allows program participants to refinance th eir mortgage only to lower the interest rate and/or term. Should the homeowner request to “cash out” the property’s equity the subordination request would be denied and the Agency loan would become due. 14 Packet Pg. 748 6703 Page 2 The property owner for the property located at 68 03 N. Shannon Lane received down payment assistance and is now requesting to refinance their existing first mortgage. The property owner of the property listed above has submitted a subordination request to Successor Housing Agency staff and the application has been reviewed and approved. To proceed with the refinancing, the new lender and title company require the Agency’s deed of trust to be expressly subordinated to the new first deed of trust. Therefore, staff requests that the City Manager, or her designee, be authorized to sign and cause to be recorded the subordination agreement and associated documents which will allow the property owner to refinance their first mortgage. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals Adoption of the attached resolution aligns with Key Strategic Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life. Refinancing supports homeownership and sustains neighborhoods throughout the City. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund since the staff processing the request is funded by the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS). Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, adopt Resolution No. 2020-76, approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real property located at 6803 N. Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2020-76 Attachment 2 Subordination Agreement for 6803 N. Shannon Lane Ward 5 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: January 23, 2012 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2012 -19 further confirming that the City would serve as the “Succ essor Housing Agency” to the former Redevelopment Agency and perform the housing functions previously performed by the Agency. 14 Packet Pg. 749 Resolution No. 2020-76 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-76 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING THE SUBORDINATION OF A DEED OF TRUST IN CONNECTION WITH A REFINANCING OF THE SENIOR MORTGAGE RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6803 NORTH SHANNON LANE, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, on January 9, 2012, the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, (“Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2012-12 confirming that the City of San Bernardino would serve as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”) of the City of San Bernardino (“Successor Agency”) effective February 1, 2012, pursuant to AB1X 26 (The Redevelopment Agency Dissolution Act); and WHEREAS on January 23, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-19 providing for the City to serve as the Successor Housing Agency and perform the housing functions previously performed by the Agency; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34181(c) of AB1X26 the Oversight Board is to direct the transfer of housing responsibilities, including all rights, powers, duties, obligations and assets, to the Successor Housing Agency; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34176(e)(1) of AB1484 the restrictions on the use of real property such as affordability covenants entered into by the Agency are considered a housing asset; and WHEREAS, a Deed of Trust affecting real property located at 6803 North Shannon Lane, San Bernardino, California (“Property”) exists as of July 9, 2008, and recorded on September 8, 2008, as Instrument Number 2008-0408213 in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino (“Deed of Trust”); and WHEREAS, the terms of the Deed of Trust allow the Trustor to obtain the release of the security interest of the First Mortgage Lender in the Property for the purpose of a third -party lender which refinances the purchase money mortgage of the First Mortgage Lender; and WHEREAS, an escrow has been opened on the Property affected by the Deed of Trust on which owner(s) (Eryka Villegas Crossley) request the subordination so that they can proceed on a refinance and a clear lenders title policy can be provided to the new lender of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Successor Housing Agency desires to confirm that the Deed of Trust is a housing asset and/or housing function, and desires to authorize Successor Housing Agency 14.a Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Resolution No. 2020-76 staff to transfer all rights and interest in the Deed of Trust to the City in its capacity as the Successor Housing Agency; and WHEREAS, Successor Housing Agency staff desires to cause to be signed and recorded a subordination agreement for the purposes of causing the new third-party lender to have a security interest in the Property senior to that of the Successor Housing Agency; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34176, the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino does hereby find and determine that the Deed of Trust is a housing asset and hereby authorizes the City Manager or his/her designee, to execute the Subordination Agreement (attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”) and do all such acts and things necessary to cause it to be recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder. SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 14.a Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Resolution No. 2020-76 Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho , City Attorney 14.a Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Resolution No. 2020-76 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 14.a Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 6803 N Shannon Ln.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of 1 When recorded mail to: City of San Bernardino, acting in its capacity as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino 290 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 Owner Name: Eryka Villegas Crossley 6803 N Shannon Lane San Bernardino, CA 92407 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE. Form of SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND OF LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT. This AGREEMENT, made this day of March, 2020, by (Eryka Villegas Crossley), Owner of the land hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the City of San Bernardino, acting in its capacity as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino , present owner and holder of the Deed of Trust and Note; WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Owner(s) did on July 9, 2008, execute a Deed of Trust to Orange Coast Title Company, a California Corporation, as trustee, covering: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The land herein after referred to is situated in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows: LOT 25 OF TRACT NO. 16795, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 315 PAGES 43 THROUGH 46 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, AS RECORDED IN THE COUNTY RECORDERS OF SAID COUNTY. to secure a Note in the sum of $80,980 dated July 9, 2008 in favor of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino first hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Beneficiary", which Deed of Trust was recorded September 8, 2008, as Instrument No. 2008-0408213, Official Records of said county; WHEREAS, all rights and obligations of the Beneficiary have since been transferred to the City of San Bernardino as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino (“Successor Beneficiary”) pursuant to Mayor and Common Council Resolution No. 2012-19 dated January 23, 2012; WHEREAS, Owner has executed, or is about to execute, a Deed of Trust and Note in the sum of not to exceed $238,500, dated ________________________, in favor of loanDepot, LLC , hereinafter referred to as “Lender,” payable with interest and upon the terms and conditions described therein, which Deed of Trust is to be recorded concurrently herewith; and 14.b Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 6803 Shannon Ln.Attachment 2 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust 2 WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to obtaining said loan that said Deed of Trust last above mentioned shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge upon the land herein before described, prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned; and WHEREAS, lender is willing to make said loan provided the Deed of Trust securing the same is a lien or charge upon the above described property prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust f irst above mentioned and provided that Successor Beneficiary will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor of Lender; and WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender make such loan to Owner; and Successor Beneficiary is willing that the Deed of Trust securing the same shall, when recorded, constitute a lien or charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior a nd superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties hereto and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, and in order to induce Lender to make the loan above referred to, it is hereby declared, understood and agreed as follows: 1. That said Deed of Trust securing said Note in favor of Lender, and any renewals or extensions thereof, shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge on the property therein described, prior and superior to the lien or charge or the Deed of Trust first above mentioned. 2. That Lender would not make its loan above described without this Subordination Agreement. 3. That this Agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the subordination of the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor of the lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would affect the priority between the Deeds of Trust hereinbefore specifically described, any prior agreement as to such subordination including, but not limited to, those provisions, if any, contained in t he Deed of Trust first above mentioned, which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to another Deed or Deeds of Trust or to another mortgage or mortgages. Successor Beneficiary declares, agrees and acknowledges that: (a) Lender in making disbursements pursuant to any such agreement is under no obligation or duty to, nor has Lender represented that it will, see to the application of such proceeds by the person or persons to whom Lender disburses such proceeds and any application or use of such proceeds for purposes other than those provided for in such agreement or agreements shall not defeat the subordination herein made in whole or in part; (b) Successor Beneficiary intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned in favor of the lien or charge upon said land of the Deed of Trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands t hat in reliance upon, and in consideration of, this waiver, relinquishment and subordination specific loans and advances are being and will be make and, as part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subordination; and (c) An endorsement has been placed upon the Note secured by the Deed of Trust first above mentioned that said Deed of Trust has by this i nstrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor or Lender above referred to. 14.b Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 6803 Shannon Ln.Attachment 2 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust 3 NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND. City of San Bernardino, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino _____________________________________ ____________________________________ Teri Ledoux, City Manager Owner City of San Bernardino Owner (ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION OF THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES CONSULT WITH THEIR ATTORNEYS WITH RESPECT THERETO. 14.b Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 6803 Shannon Ln.Attachment 2 (6703 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of Deed of Trust Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Michael Huntley, Community & Economic Development Director Subject: Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of Senior Mortgage - 756 West 8TH Street Recommendation Adopt a Resolution No. 2020-77 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, to approve a Subordination of a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the Senior Mortgage relating to real property located at 756 West 8th Street, San Bernardino, California. Background The City of San Bernardino (“City”) is an entitlement jurisdiction that receives HOME Investment Partnerships Program Funds (“HOME”) from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). HOME funds are used to create a variety of affordable housing opportunities for eligible households whose income does not exceed 80% of Area Median Income. On September 19, 2016, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2016 -200, establishing the Infill Housing Development Program (“Program”) and ent ered into an agreement with Housing Partners I (“HPI”) for the development of three (3) affordable housing units to be sold to income eligible, first-time home buyers. On June 21, 2017, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2017 -116 authorizing the execution of a HOME Program Loan Agreement with Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services (“NPHS”) to implement the Modular Housing Component of the Program. Discussion The Program provides income eligible home buyers with acquisition financing to purchase a home constructed under the Program. The acquisition financing is a deferred loan at zero interest and has a program term of up to 15 years. The homeowner is required to occupy the home as their primary residence during the Program term, after which time the loan will be forgiven. Should the homeowner sell, transfer, or no longer occupy the home as their primary residence, the Program loan will become due and payable. The Program allows participants to refinance their mortgage 15 Packet Pg. 757 6704 Page 2 only to lower the interest rate and/or term. Should the homeowner request “cash out” of the property’s equity, the subordination request will be denied and the Program loan will become immediately due. The property owner for the property located at 756 W 8 th Street who received acquisition financing is now requesting to refinance their existing first mortgage. The property owner of the property listed above has submitted a subordination request to City and the application has been reviewed and approved. To proceed with the refinancing, the new lender and title company require the City’s deed of trust to be expressly subordinated to the new first deed of trust. Therefore, staff requests that the City Manager, or her designee, be authorized to sign and cause to be record ed the subordination agreement and associated documents which will allow the property owner to refinance their first mortgage. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals Adoption of the attached resolution aligns with Key Strategic Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life. Refinancing supports homeownership and sustains neighborhoods throughout the City. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund since the staff processing this request is funded by Federal grant funds. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino adopt the Resolution No. 2020-77, approving the Subordination of a Deed of Trust in connection with a refinancing of the senior mortgage relating to real property located at 756 West 8th Street, San Bernardino, California. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2020-77 Attachment 2 Subordination Agreement for 756 W 8th Street Ward: 1 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: September 19, 2016 Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2016-200, establishing the Infill Housing Development Program (“Program”) and entered into an agreement with Housing Partners I (“HPI”) for the development of three (3) affordable housing units to be sold to income eligible, first-time homebuyers. June 21, 2017 Mayor and City Council approved Resolution 2017-116 authorizing the execution of a HOME Program Loan Agreement with Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services (“NPHS”) to implement the Modular Housing Component of 15 Packet Pg. 758 6704 Page 3 the Program. 15 Packet Pg. 759 Resolution No. 2020-77 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-77 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBORDINATION OF A DEED OF TRUST IN CONNECTION WITH A REFINANCING OF THE SENIOR MORTGAGE RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 756 WEST 8TH STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the City has received HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) pursuant to the Cranston-Gonzales National Housing Act of 1990 (“HOME Funds”). The HOME funds must be used by the City in accordance with 24 C.F.R. Part 92; and WHEREAS, On September 19, 2016, the Mayor and Common Council approved Resolution 2016-200, establishing the Infill Housing Development Program (“Program”) and entered into an agreement with Housing Partners I (“HPI”) for the development of three (3) affordable housing units to be sold to income eligible, first-time homebuyers; and WHEREAS, On June 21, 2017, the Mayor and Common Council approved Resolution 2017-116 authorizing the execution of a HOME Program Loan Agreement with Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services (“NPHS”) to implement the Modular Housing Component of the Program; and WHEREAS, a Deed of Trust affecting real property located at 756 West 8th Street, San Bernardino, California (“Property”) exists as of February 26, 2019, and recorded on April 15, 2019, as Instrument Number 2019-0116256 in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino (“Deed of Trust”); and WHEREAS, the terms of the Deed of Trust allow the Trustor to obtain the release of the security interest of the First Mortgage Lender in the Property for the purpose of a third-party lender which refinances the purchase money mortgage of the First Mortgage Lender; and WHEREAS, an escrow has been opened on the Property affected by the Deed of Trust on which owner(s) (Linda Catalan) request the subordination so that they can proceed on a refinance and a clear lenders title policy can be provided to the new lender of the Property; and WHEREAS, City staff desires to cause to be signed and recorded a subordination agreement for the purposes of causing the new third-party lender to have a security interest in the Property senior to that of the City; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 15.a Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 756 W 8th Street.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust Resolution No. 2020-77 SECTION 2. The City does hereby find and determine that the Deed of Trust is a housing asset and hereby authorizes the City Manager or his/her designee, to execute the Subordination Agreement (attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”) and do all such acts and things necessary to cause it to be recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder. SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 15.a Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 756 W 8th Street.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust Resolution No. 2020-77 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 15.a Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: CED.Subordination for 756 W 8th Street.Resolution.Attachment 1 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust 1 When recorded mail to: City of San Bernardino, Attn: Housing Division 290 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 Owner Name: Linda Catalan 756 West 8th Street San Bernardino, CA 92404 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE. Form of SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND OF LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT. This AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of April, 2020, by (Linda Catalan), Owner of the land hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the City of San Bernardino, present owner and holder of the Deed of Trust and Note; WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Owner(s) did on February 26, 2019, execute a Deed of Trust to Lawyers Title Company, a California Corporation, as trustee, covering: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The land herein after referred to is situated in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows: THE EAST 49.72 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 58, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 7, PAGE 1 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY to secure a Note in the sum of $48,000 dated February 26, 2019 in favor of the City of San Bernardino first hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Beneficiary", whi ch Deed of Trust was recorded April 15, 2019, as Instrument No. 2019-0116256, Official Records of said county; WHEREAS, Owner has executed, or is about to execute, a Deed of Trust and Note in the sum of not to exceed $184,891, dated ________________________, in favor of Nationstar Mortgage LLC dba Mr. Cooper, hereinafter referred to as “Lender,” payable with interest and upon the terms and conditions described therein, which Deed of Trust is to be recorded concurrently herewith; and WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to obtaining said loan that said Deed of Trust last above mentioned shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge upon the land herein before de scribed, prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned; and WHEREAS, lender is willing to make said loan provided the Deed of Trust securing the same is a lien or charge upon the above described property prior and sup erior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned and provided that Successor Beneficiary will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor of Lender; and WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender make such loan to Owner; and Successor Beneficiary is willing that the Deed of Trust securing the same shall, when recorded, constitute a lien or 15.b Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 756 W 8th Street.Attachment 2 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of 2 charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties hereto and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, and in order to induce Lender to make the loan above referred to, it is hereby declared, understood and agreed as follows: 1. That said Deed of Trust securing said Note in favor of Le nder, and any renewals or extensions thereof, shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge on the property therein described, prior and superior to the lien or charge or the Deed of Trust first above mentioned. 2. That Lender would not make its loan above described without this Subordination Agreement. 3. That this Agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the subordination of the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the Dee d of Trust in favor of the lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would affect the priority between the Deeds of Trust hereinbefore specifically described, any prior agreement as to such subordination including, but not limited to, those provisions, if any, contained in the Deed of Trust first above mentioned, which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to another Deed or Deeds of Trust or to another mortgage or mortgages. Beneficiary declares, agrees and acknowledges that: (a) Lender in making disbursements pursuant to any such agreement is under no obligation or duty to, nor has Lender represented that it will, see to the application of such proceeds by the person or persons to whom Lender disburses such proceeds and any application or use of such proceeds for purposes other than those provided for in such agreement or agreements shall not defeat the subordination herein made in whole or in part; (b) Beneficiary intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust first above mentioned in favor of the lien or charge upon said land of the Deed of Trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance upon, and in consi deration of, this waiver, relinquishment and subordination specific loans and ad vances are being and will be made and, as part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subordination; and (c) An endorsement has been placed upon the Note secured by the Deed of Trust first above mentioned that said Deed of Trust has by this instrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust in favor or Lender above referred to. 15.b Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 756 W 8th Street.Attachment 2 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of 3 NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND. City of San Bernardino _____________________________________ ____________________________________ Teri Ledoux, City Manager Owner City of San Bernardino Owner (ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION OF THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES CONSULT WITH THEIR ATTORNEYS WITH RESPECT THERETO. 15.b Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: CED.Subordination Agmt for 756 W 8th Street.Attachment 2 (6704 : Resolution Approving a Subordination of a Deed of Trust of Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-72, initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in Assessment Districts pursuant to the Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, appointing the Engineer of Record, and ordering the preparation of Engineer’s Reports. Background The City Council previously formed Landscape & Lighting and Street & D rainage Maintenance Districts as a condition of approval for private development projects. The assessment engineer's report that establishes the amount of an annual assessment in each of the districts must be updated annually and approved by the Mayor and City Council, following a public hearing, in order to levy the annual assessment(s). The first step in processing annual assessments is for the Mayor and City Council to adopt a resolution assigning an Engineer of Record to perform the updates to the engineering reports and to initiate the proceedings for the annual assessment process. Discussion Development projects are approved subject to conditions of approval that require the formation of maintenance districts to recover the costs of annual maintenanc e of public improvements constructed as a result of the development project. The assessment of an annual fee upon properties within the District provides the revenue to offset the cost of maintenance of the public improvements necessary to serve the development. California Streets and Highways Code §22620 et. seq. with respect to Landscape and Lighting Districts and Government Code §53750 et. seq. with respect to Street and Drainage Maintenance Districts require that the assessment engineer's report for e ach of the districts be updated and approved by the legislative body prior to the levy of any annual assessment on properties within an assessment district. The engineering reports set forth the “Maximum Allowable Assessment” for each parcel. The City has formed 16 Packet Pg. 766 6671 Page 2 sixty nine (69) such assessment districts. The tentative schedule for the annual update of the assessment districts , which is prepared based on information provided by the San Bernardino County Auditor - Controller-Recorder’s office, is as follows: May 6, 2020: Mayor and City Council direction of preparation of an assessment engineer’s report describing any new improvements or any substantial changes in the existing improvements in the existing assessment districts. May 20, 2020: Mayor and City Council (1) preliminarily approving the engineering reports for the existing assessment districts and directing the filing of such reports with the City Clerk, and (2) setting the date for the public hearing at 7:00 PM on Wednesday, July 1, 2020, in the City of San Bernardino Council Chamber, 555 W 6th Street, San Bernardino, CA 92410 pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22552 and 22553 and Government Code Section 53753.5 to consider the levy of annual assessments upon real property. July 15, 2020: Mayor and City Council public hearing and approval of the levy of assessments upon real property within each of the Districts for fiscal year 2020 -2021. July 17, 2020: Deadline for submission of preliminary notice of assessments to San Bernardino County. August 10, 2020: Deadline for submission of final notice of assessments to San Bernardino County. August 31, 2020: Last day for submission of corrections to San Bernardino County. 2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1a: Financial Stability - Secure a long- term revenue source. Updating the assessment engineering reports and initiating the annual assessment levy process will ensure that special districts are levied and managed properly so that the ongoing costs of district maintenance are supported through FY 2020/21. Fiscal Impact No general fund fiscal impact associated with adoption of Resolution 2020 -72. The assessment on properties within the assessment districts provide revenue to off set the cost of maintenance of public improvements that serve the development projects , and also fund administrative costs related to the annual levy process. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-72, initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in Assessment Districts pursuant to the 16 Packet Pg. 767 6671 Page 3 Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, appointing the Engineer of Record and ordering the preparation of Engineer’s Reports. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-72 Ward: All Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: June 5, 2019 The Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2019 -87 through 2019-148 declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 2019/20 within various assessment districts within the City of San Bernardino, approving engineer’s reports for each assessment district and providing notice of the time and place of hearing on proposed assessments in each assessment district. August 7, 2019 The Mayor and City Council held Public Hearings and adopted 765Resolution Nos. 2019-190 through 2019-251 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, confirming the diagram and assessment for FY2019/20, within various assessment districts in the City of San Bernardino. 16 Packet Pg. 768 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-72 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, APPOINTING THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF ENGINEER’S REPORTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino (the “City Council”) has previously determined that the public interest, convenience, and necessity require the installation, construction, and maintenance of public landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention basin and storm drains and appurtenant facilities within the City of San Bernardino (the “City”) as authorized by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) and has established the following assessment districts (the “Assessment Districts”) within the City: Assessment District No. 951 Zone 1 and Zone 2 (Wagonwheel Road Area), Assessment District No. 952 Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 2A and Zone 3 (State College Area), Assessment District No. 953 (16th Street), Assessment District No. 956 (Carnegie Drive Area), Assessment District No. 959 Zone 1 (Shandin Hills), Assessment District No. 962 (Pine Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 963 (Allen Street), Assessment District No. 968 (Airport Drive), Assessment District No. 974 (Rialto Avenue between Eucalyptus and Pepper), Assessment District No. 975 (Pepper and Mill Area), Assessment District No. 976 (Pine and Belmont), Assessment District No. 981 (Meridian and Randall Avenue), Assessment District No. 982 (Piedmont Drive Area), Assessment District No. 986 (Rialto and Macy Area), Assessment District No. 989 (Mill and Macy Area), Assessment District No. 991 (Verdemont and Olive Area), Assessment District No. 993 (Cajon and June Area), Assessment District No. 997 (Chestnut Area), Assessment District No. 1001 (Pennsylvania and Birch Area), Assessment District No. 1002 (North “H” Street Area), Assessment District No. 1005 (Cajon and Pepper Linden Area), Assessment District No. 1007 (Pepper and Randall Area), Assessment District No. 1012 (Mill/Burney Area), Assessment District No. 1016 (Coulston Area), Assessment District No. 1017 (Kendall and Pine Area), Assessment District No. 1019 (Northpark and Mountain Area), Assessment District No. 1020 (Mill Street and Dallas Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1022 Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 3 (San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance-California), Assessment District No. 1023 (Elm Avenue and Coulston Street Area), Assessment District No. 1024 (Inland Center Drive and Riverwalk Drive Area), Assessment District No. 1025 (Palm Avenue and Washington Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1027 (Waterman Avenue and Washington Street Area), Assessment District No. 1028 (Ohio Avenue and Walnut Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1029 (California Street and 16th Street Area), Assessment District No. 1030 (Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1031 (Irvington Avenue and Olive Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1032 (Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive), Assessment District No. 1035, Zone 1 and Zone 2 (Palm Avenue and Meyers Road), Assessment District No. 1036 (Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway), Assessment District No. 1037 (Belmont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue), Assessment District No. 1038 (Orange Show Road and Arrowhead Avenue), Assessment District 16.a Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports) Resolution No. 2020-72 -2- No. 1039 (Irvington Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1040 (Arcacia Avenue and Hill Drive Area), Assessment District No. 1041 (Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1042 (Shandin Hills Drive and Shady Creek Drive), Assessment District No. 1043, Zone 1 and Zone 2 (Palm Avenue and Irvington Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1045 (Waterman Avenue and Orange Show Road Area), Assessment District No. 1046 (Northpark Boulevard and Northstar Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1047 (Ohio Avenue and Pine Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1048 (Eucalyptus Avenue and Randall Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1050 (Pepper Avenue and Rialto Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1052 (Belmont Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1054 (Campus Parkway and Valles Drive Area), Assessment District No. 1055 (Pine Avenue and Redwood Street Area), Assessment District No. 1056 (Magnolia Avenue and Garfield Street Area), Assessment District No. 1057 (Cajon Boulevard and University Parkway Area), Assessment District No. 1059 (Orange Show Road and Tippecanoe Avenue Area), Assessment District No. 1060 (Chiquita Lane and Date Street Area), Assessment District No. 1063 (Central Avenue and Lena Road Area), Assessment District No. 1064 (Cajon Boulevard and Glen Helen Parkway Area), and Assessment District No. 1068 (Tippecanoe Avenue and Central Avenue Area); and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public interest, convenience, and necessity require the continued levy of assessments within the Assessment Districts for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, and maintaining public landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention basin and storm drains and appurtenant facilities authorized by the Act. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby initiates proceedings pursuant to the Act to levy and collect annual assessments within the Assessment Districts for the maintenance, servicing and operating of public landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention basin and storm drains and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2020/21. SECTION 2. The maintenance to be performed consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of public landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention basin and storm drains. SECTION 3. The proceedings for the annual levy of the assessments are to be conducted pursuant to the Act. SECTION 4. Spicer Consulting Group, LLC is hereby appointed as Engineer of Record for the purpose of preparing the written report provided for in Section 22567 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 for each of the Assessment Districts, and is hereby directed to prepare and file such reports with the City Clerk. 16.a Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports) Resolution No. 2020-72 -3- SECTION 5. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 16.a Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports) Resolution No. 2020-72 -4- CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 16.a Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: PW. San Bernardino LMDs - Resolution Initiating Proceedings (6671 : Annual Update to Assessment Engineer's Reports) Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agree W/SBCTA for Mt. Vernon Viaduct Replacement Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution 2020-78 to approve Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for roles and responsibilities for the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project (“Project) to increase San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and City Developer Impact Fees (DIF) by a total of $10,127,219, for a new SBCTA share of $16,165,535 and DIF share funding of $9,747,979, to cover project funding shortfalls based on the final bid price for the Design Build contract and updated funding contributions from Federal and State sources; and to authorize the City Manager to sign and execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement. Background Replacement of the Mt. Vernon Bridge, which was built in 1934, has been a high priority for the City for more than 18 years. In 1997, Ca ltrans inspectors determined that the bridge has a sufficiency rating less than 50 out of a possible 100 and is considered to be structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. Over the last 16+ years a number of short-term remedies have been implemented to address the impacts of deterioration. Over the same time period, the City, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), BNSF Railroad (BNSF), and CalTrans, have been working in partnership to develop a replacement strategy for the bridge and secure funding to support the project. In June 2016, the Mayor and City Council entered into Cooperative Agreement No. 16 - 1001477 with SBCTA. The agreement establishes SBCTA as the lead agency on the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project (“Project”) and provides for project funding through Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds, public share funding through San Bernardino’s Measure I Arterial funds, and the City’s local share to be funded through Developer Impact Fees (DIF). This agreement was first amended on October 26, 2018, (Amendment No. 1) to address the project becoming a design -build project and to clarify roles and responsibilities for the Right-of-Way and design build phases. Amendment No. 1 also increased the project cost and funding, therefore i ncreasing the public and 17 Packet Pg. 773 6494 Page 2 City shared costs after project buy-downs to approximately $15.8 million, including a $29.5 million contribution from BNSF. Discussion The Project has now received proposals for the design-build contract and the costs from the lowest responsible, responsive proposer were significantly higher than the engineer’s estimate, creating a funding shortfall. SBCTA staff has been working with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to obtain additional project funding and options to address this shortfall of over $90 million. Through Caltrans delivering additional HBP funds and eliminating deferred reimbursement, the project funding shortfall was able to be reduced to just over $10 million. The $10 million Project funding shortfall was proposed to be funded through an increase in the public and local share contributions. The required public share is funded by the City’s equitable share of Measure I Valley Arterial Sub-program funds and the local share is funded through the City’s Regional Circulation Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds. The additional Project funding requirements from the public share and the local share are shown in the table below. Fund Total Updated Funding Required 2016 Commitment From City Additional Funding Needs DIF $ 9,747,979 $ 5,959,760 $ 3,788,219 Arterial Funs $ 16,165,535 $ 9,826,535 $ 6,339,000 Totals $ 25,913,514 $ 15,786,295 $ 10,127,219 The City and SBCTA have discussed the options for funding the public share shortfall through an advance of up to five years of the City’s allocation of Measure I Arterial Funds. Staff presented this option to the Mayor and City Council at a Special Meeting on April 8, 2020. At that time, the Mayor and City Council directed staff to submit a request to SBCTA to leverage up to five years of Measure I Arterial Funds to support the City’s full public share of the increased Project Costs, and return to a future meeting for consideration of an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement. SBCTA has provided Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 in response to that request. Amendment No. 2 revises the funding table in Attachment A to the Cooperative Agreement to reflect the increased project cost and the increased funding contributions from the various parties. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1d: Minimize Risk and Litigation Exposure. Replacement of the Mt. Vernon Bridge will eliminate a critically outdated asset and replace it with bridge infrastructure that meets current community needs and will be constructed with the latest safety features. The new bridge will provide a long - term transportation feature for the City and more effectively support the north and south bound travel of residents and businesses in the area. 17 Packet Pg. 774 6494 Page 3 Fiscal Impact There is no General Fund Impact. The additional public share of funding in the amount of $6,339,000 will be met by leveraging up to five years of Measure I Major - Street/Arterial Sub-program revenue in advance through SBCTA. Additional local share requirements of $3,788,219 will be programed through future fiscal year DIF funds. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution 2020-78 approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for roles and responsibilities for the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project (“Project) to increase San Bernardino County Transportation Auth ority (SBCTA) and City Developer Impact Fees (DIF) by a total of $10,127,219, for a new SBCTA share of $16,165,535 and DIF share funding of $9,747,979, to cover project funding shortfalls based on the final bid price for the Design Build contract and updated funding contributions from Federal and State sources; and authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-78; Exhibit “A” - Amendment No.2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 Attachment 2 Location Map Wards: 1 & 3 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: April 8, 2020 The Mayor and City Council directed staff to submit a request to the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to leverage up to five years of the City’s allocation of Measure I Major Street/Arterial Sub -program revenue, in advance, to support additional funding requirements of the Mt. Vernon Viaduct Project. September 18, 2018 Adopted Resolution No. 2018-257, approving Contract No. 16-1001477-01, Amended and Restated Cooperative Agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for the Development of the Mount Vernon Avenue Grade Separation over the BNSF Railway Intermodal Yard Project (SS04-12). June 20, 2018 Adopted Resolution No. 2018-164 approving Contract No. 16-1001477-01, Cooperative Agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for the development of the Mount Vernon Avenue Grade Separation over the BNSF Railway Intermodal Yard Project (SSO4-12). Note: Contract approved in error. Not executed by SBCTA. June 6, 2016 17 Packet Pg. 775 6494 Page 4 Adopted Resolution No. 2016-109 approving Contract No. 16-1001477, Cooperative Agreement with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) for the development of the Mount Vernon Avenue Grade Separation over the BNSF Railway Intermodal Yard Project (SSO4-12). May 16, 2016 Adopted Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) designating SANBAG as Lead Agency for environmental clearance, design, right-of-way acquisition and construction of the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad (SS04-12). February 16, 2016 Mayor and Common Council authorized staff to develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) designating SANBAG as Lead Agency for environmental clearance, design, right -of-way acquisition and construction of the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad (SS04-12). March 1, 2010 Resolution No. 2010-036 adopted approving Amendment No. 5 to Services Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad. October 20, 2008 Resolution No. 2008-405 adopted approving Amendment No. 4 to Services Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad. September 17, 2007 Resolution No. 2007-382 adopted approving Amendment No. 3 to Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Viaduct over BNSF Railroad. December 20, 2004 Resolution No. 2004-399 adopted approving Amendment No. 2 to Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation for Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Viaduct o ver BNSF Railroad and Resolution No. 2004-400 adopted approving Amendment No. 1 with Jones & Stokes for additional environmental services for the Mt. Vernon viaduct over the BNSF Railroad. March 15, 2004 Resolution No. 2004-73 authorizing execution of Professional Services Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation for the Project Management of the Mt. Vernon Ave. Viaduct over the BNSF railroad in the amount of $49,000. December 1, 2003 Adopted resolution approving Professional Environmental Services Agre ement with 17 Packet Pg. 776 6494 Page 5 Myra L. Frank and Associates for environmental services related to the Mt. Vernon Bridge Project. 17 Packet Pg. 777 Resolution No. 2020-78 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-78 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 16-1001477 (AGREEMENT) WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SBCTA) FOR ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE MT. VERNON AVENUE VIADUCT PROJECT (PROJECT) TO INCREASE SBCTA AND CITY DEVELOPER IMPACT FEES (DIF) BY A TOTAL OF $10,127,219 FOR A NEW SBCTA SHARE OF $16,165,535 AND DIF SHARE FUNDING OF $9,747,979 TO COVER PROJECT FUNDING SHORTFALLS BASED ON FINAL BID PROICE FOR THE DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT AND UPDATED FUNDING CONTRIBUTIONS FROM FEDERAL AND STATE SOURCES; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the replacement of the Mt Vernon Avenue bridge has been a high priority transportation project for the City for over 18 years; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2016, the Mayor and City Council entered into Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 (Agreement) with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), establishing SBCTA as the lead agency on the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct Project (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Agreement delineates roles, and provides for project funding through Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds, public share funding through San Bernardino’s Measure I Arterial funds, and the City’s local share funding through Developer Impact Fees (DIF); and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement, effective October 26, 2018, added in the design-build phase of work, clarified right of way activities, and revised the funding table in Attachment A to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Project has now received proposals for the design-build contract and the costs from the lowest responsible, responsive proposer were significantly higher than the engineer’s estimate, creating a funding shortfall; and WHEREAS, the City and SBCTA have worked with the California Department of Transportation, to obtain additional project funding, but there is still a shortfall of $10,127,219 to fully fund the project; and 17.a Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01Resolution [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment Resolution No. 2020-78 WHEREAS, the City and SBCTA agree to provide additional funding of $10,127,219 to fully fund the project and reflect these added funding contributions in a revised funding table as part of Amendment No. 2 to this Agreement. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sign and execute Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agreement No. 16-1001477 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to increase SBCTA and City developer impact fees (DIF) by a total of $10,127,219, a copy of which is attached as exhibit “A” and incorporated herein. SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule th at CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the by the Mayor and City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: _________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 17.a Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01Resolution [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment Resolution No. 2020-78 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______, 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. ______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 17.a Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01Resolution [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment 16-1001477-02 Page 1 of 4 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 16-1001477 BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE, PRELIMINARY DESIGN, RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW), AND DESIGN-BUILD PHASES FOR THE MOUNT VERNON AVENUE VIADUCT OVER BNSF RAILWAY INTERMODAL YARD IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO THIS Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment”) to COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 16-1001477 (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority ( “SBCTA”) and the City of SAN BERNARDINO (“CITY”). SBCTA and CITY may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties”. WHEREAS, the Parties consider the PROJECT to be a high priority and are willing to participate in funding the PROJECT pursuant to the provisions of Measure I 2010-2040 Expenditure Plan and the SBCTA Nexus Study (“Nexus Study”) prepared by the SBCTA and approved by the SBCTA Board of Directors on November 6, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Agreement in 2016 to delineate roles, responsibilities, and funding commitments relative to the Environmental Clearance, Design and Right-of-Way (ROW) phases of the PROJECT before delivery of the PROJECT through design- build method was contemplated or authorized; and WHEREAS, the Parties amended the Agreement on October 26, 2018, to add in the design-build phase of work, clarify right of way activities, and revise the funding table in Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the lowest responsible, responsive proposer’s costs significantly exceeded the engineer’s estimate and planned funding specified in Attachment A; and WHEREAS, Parties have worked with the California Department of Transportation, to obtain additional project funding, but there is still a shortfall of $10,127,219 to fully fund the project; and 17.b Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to 16-1001477-02 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, the Parties agree to provide additional funding of $10,127,219 to fully fund the project and reflect these added funding contributions in a revised funding table as part of an amendment to this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual promises herein, the Parties agree to amend Agreement as follows: 1. Section 1, item G shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: G. To contribute towards the cost of Environmental Clearance, Preliminary Design, ROW, and Design-Build phases of PROJECT and any financing costs associated with the delivery of these phases of PROJECT in an amount not to exceed $16,165,535 (the Public Share amount) as shown in Attachment A. The actual cost of a specific phase may ultimately vary from the estimates provided in Attachment A, however, under no circumstance is the total combined SBCTA contribution to exceed $16,165,535 without an amendment to this Agreement. 2. Section II, article A, is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: A. To reimburse SBCTA for its share of the actual costs incurred estimated at $9,747,979 towards the Environmental Clearance, Preliminary Design, ROW and Design-Build phases of the PROJECT and any financing costs associated with the delivery of these phases of the PROJECT, which includes $2,000,000 towards Project Management, as shown in Attachment A. If payment is not made within sixty (60) days of the invoice date, SBCTA will withhold CITY’s Measure I Local Street Program pass through funds in the invoice amount. As CITY makes payments toward the current amount due, the withheld pass through funds will be released to CITY. The actual cost of a specific phase may ultimately vary from the estimates provided in Attachment A, however, under no circumstance is the total combined CITY contribution to exceed $9,747,979 (the Development Share amount) without an amendment to this Agreement. 3. All other conditions of the Agreement and its Amendment 1 remain in full force and effect except as amended above. (Signature page to follow) 17.b Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to 16-1001477-02 Page 3 of 4 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 16-1001477 BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: ____________________________ By:___________________ Darcy McNaboe Teri Ledoux President, Board of Directors City Manager Date:___________________ Date:___________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST By:_____________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC By:_____________________ Acting City Clerk Julianna K. Tillquist General Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONCURRENCE: By:_____________________ By:_____________________ Jeffery Hill Sonia /R. Carvalho Procurement Manager City Attorney 17.b Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 16-1001477-02 Attachment A PROJECT DESCRIPTION The CITY of San Bernardino and SBCTA propose to remove and replace the existing Mount Vernon Avenue Viaduct Bridge over the BNSF Railway Intermodal Yard. It is intended that SBCTA serves as the lead for the Environmental Clearance, Preliminary Design, ROW and Design-Build phases of the work. PROJECT FUNDING TABLE Public Share: 67.6% Nexus Development Impact Fee Share (“DIF”, “Development Share” or “Local Share”): 32.4% PHASE TOTAL BEFORE PROJECT BUY DOWN INCLUDING PROJECT BUY DOWNS SBCTA SHARE (Public) CITY SHARE (DIF) Federal HBP BUY DOWN1 Prop 1B/BNSF Contribution2 SBCTA SHARE (Public)3 CITY SHARE (DIF)4 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN $7,819,638 $5,265,244 $2,523,579 $6,895,445 $893,378 $20,831 $9,984 RIGHT OF WAY $72,060,000 $48,712,560 $23,347,440 $58,571,448 $13,488,552 $0 $0 DESIGN-BUILD $147,865,353 $99,956,979 $47,908,374 $105,411,914 $18,570,740 $16,144,705 $7,737,994 PROJECT MANAGEMENT5 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 TOTAL $229,744,991 $153,955,614 $75,789,377 $170,878,807 $32,952,670 $16,165,535 $9,747,979 *Numbers may not add exactly due to rounding Notes 1 Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds are capped at $170,878,807. State Proposition 1B Bond funds in the amount of $3,452,670 will provide a portion of the required HBP match funds . 2 BNSF Contribution is estimated at $29.5 million. BNSF Contribution is expected to provide HBP match of 11.47% and, depending on the terms of agreements to be developed with the State on the use of HBP funds, may be used for Financing Costs and, lastly, Project Management costs. Any BNSF Contribution remaining after funding all other eligible costs will buy down the cost of the Design-Build Phase before application of the HBP Share. 3 Public Share is from the CITY share of Measure I Major Street Program – Arterial Subprogram funds. 4 A deposit of $905,891 from the CITY Development Share has been received to date under Agreement 16-1001477. 5 Depending on terms of agreements to be developed with the State on the use of HBP funds, BNSF contribution may be applied to Project Management costs after meeting all HBP match requirements for the PROJECT. 17.b Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: PW. SBCTA Mt Vernon Bridge Coop Agreement 16-1001477-01 Amendment 2 (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to PROJECT LOCATION MAP NTS MOUNT VERNON AVENU VIADUCT 17.c Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: 19169 [Revision 1] (6494 : Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to Cooperative Agree W/SBCTA for Mt. Vernon Viaduct Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-80, approving the Cooperative Agreement with the City of Rialto FOR Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project (SS20-010) (“Project”). Background The City of Rialto (“Rialto”) and the City of San Bernardino (“City”) share jurisdiction of several streets located where the cities border each other. The segment of Pepper Avenue between Baseline Road and Mill Street is an example of one of these areas of shared roadway jurisdiction. At this location the City owns the east half of the street and Rialto owns the west half. Rialto previously approached the City and proposed a joint project for FY 2019/20 to rehabilitate Pepper Avenue from Baseline Road to Mill Street . The Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation Project (“Project”) is included in the City’s approved FY 2019/20 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as CIP SS20-010. $200,000 in Measure I Pass Through funds was established to support the design of project in FY 2019/20 (Fund 129 -160-8713- 5504). This segment of Pepper Avenue was previously identified in the City’s approved Pavement Management Analysis as having a remaining service life of 2 years and in need of immediate rehabilitation. Discussion Staff negotiated the proposed Cooperative Agreement with Rialto to delineate the roles, responsibilities, and contributions of both Rialt o and the City with regard to the Project. The full project cost is estimated at $6,008,002. Full project cost estimates for each city are shown below. City of San Bernardino Share $3,389,503 City of Rialto Share $2,618,519 18 Packet Pg. 786 6665 Page 2 Total Estimated Project Costs $6,008,022 The City is the lead agency on this project and will invoice Rialto for the cost of the environmental clearance, design, utility relocation, construction engineering, construction, inspection, and City overhead. All work will be c ompleted within the existing street right -of-way. The City will approve the plans and issue a no fee permit for the work. Any changes (change orders) will be subject to review and approval by both cities. Conducting cooperative projects on streets of shared jurisdiction is more efficient for planning and construction timing, and more cost effective as the agencies share in the cost of design and expense of contractor mobilization. Cooperative projects also reduce the inconveniences experienced by the traveling public and adjacent businesses/residents. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals This project aligns with Key Target No. 1c: Create a framework for spending decisions, and Key Target 1d: Minimize risk and litigation exposure. By partnering with the City of Rialto in this Project, the City is able to take advantage of shared costs for design, inspection and construction mobilization costs. The completion of the Project will also minimize litigation exposure by addressing deferred maintenance issues and providing a safe and compliant path of travel for vehicles and pedestrians along this section of roadway. Fiscal Impact No General Fund impact. Measure I funding in the amount of $200,000 has been approved for Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street in the FY 2019/20 Project in #account 129-160-8713-5504 and is available for design. Funding for the construction portion of the project will be addressed in future fiscal year CIP planning documents. The City will perform the work and invoice Rialto for its fair share of the cost of the project within the City limits of Rialto. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-80, approving the Cooperative Agreement with the City of Rialto FOR Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project (SS20-010). Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-80; Exhibit ‘A’- Cooperative Agreement for Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project Attachment 2 Location Map Ward: 3, 6 18 Packet Pg. 787 6665 Page 3 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: June 19, 2019 Adopted Resolution No. 2019-168 approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2019/2020 18 Packet Pg. 788 Resolution No. 2020-80 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-80 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF RIALTO FOR PEPPER AVENUE REHABILITATION FROM BASELINE ROAD TO MILL STREET PROJECT (SS20-010) (“PROJECT”) WHEREAS, the City of Rialto and the City of San Bernardino share jurisdiction of several streets; and WHEREAS, conducting cooperative projects on streets of shared jurisdiction is more efficient and cost effective as compared to separate projects issued by each jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Pepper Avenue is a shared street between the City of San Bernardino and the City of Rialto and is was identified in the City’s approved Pavement Management Analysis (PMA) as having a remaining service life of 2 years and in need of immediate rehabilitation; and WHEREAS, the City limit line runs through the center of the roadway, with the westerly portion in the City of Rialto and easterly portion in the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, staff negotiated a cooperative agreement with the City of Rialto delineating the roles, responsibilities, and contributions of both the City of Rialto and the City of San Bernardino with regard to the Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation from Baseline Road to Mill Street Project. San Bernardino will contribute the entire share of funding, estimated to be $3,200,000, for the Pepper Avenue rehabilitation within San Bernardino jurisdictional areas. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Manager or her designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Rialto for Pepper Avenue Rehabilitation Project in accordance with Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. 18.a Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: PW.Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepperavenue-Attachment 1-Resolution [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Resolution No. 2020-80 SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho , City Attorney 18.a Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: PW.Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepperavenue-Attachment 1-Resolution [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Resolution No. 2020-80 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 18.a Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: PW.Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepperavenue-Attachment 1-Resolution [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 1 of 10 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND CITY OF RIALTO FOR THE PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT This AGREEMENT is entered into this _______ day of ___________, 2020, in the State of California, by and between the City of San Bernardino, hereinafter called SAN BERNARDINO, and the City of Rialto, hereinafter called RIALTO. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO (SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO are also each referred to herein as “Party” and collectively referred to herein as “Parties”) desire to cooperate and jointly participate in a pavement rehabilitation project on Pepper Avenue, from Baseline Road south to Mill Street (hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT”); and WHEREAS, the PROJECT is located at the boundary of the incorporated area of SAN BERNARDINO and the incorporated area of RIALTO; and WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code section 1807 authorizes two adjacent cities, if authorized by their governing bodies, to enter into a mutual agreement for the improvement and maintenance of the street which constitutes the boundary line between the two adjacent cities, and authorizes, pursuant to such agreement, the cities to expend funds available for the improvement and maintenance of that boundary street; and WHEREAS, the legislative bodies of SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO determine that the PROJECT is necessary for the more efficient maintenance, construction, or repair of the boundary street; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that SAN BERNARDINO’s share of PROJECT costs will be funded from SAN BERNARDINO’s local funds and RIALTO’s share of PROJECT costs will be funded from RIALTO’s local funds; and WHEREAS, the total PROJECT cost is estimated to be $ 6,008,022; and WHEREAS, SAN BERNARDINO’s share of PROJECT cost is estimated at $3,389,503 and RIALTO’s share of PROJECT cost is estimated to be $2,618,519, as more particularly set forth in Exhibit “B”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the above-described costs are proportioned based on the work to be performed in each PARTY’s jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO desire to set forth the responsibilities and obligations of each as they pertain to such participation, and to the design, construction, and funding of the PROJECT. 18.b Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 2 of 10 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED as follows: SECTION I SAN BERNARDINO AGREES TO: 1. Act as the Lead Agency in the design, construction, construction engineering, inspection, and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) of the PROJECT. Design work shall include traffic counts and analysis to determine the appropriate traffic index for Pepper Avenue; geotechnical analysis and pavement design recommendations; pavement rehabilitation design; evaluation and design of accessibility improvements; and evaluation and design of traffic striping, pavement markings, and traffic signs to improve safety and traffic flow. 2. Provide geotechnical analysis and recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bid documents for the PROJECT to RIALTO, for RIALTO’s review and approval. 3. Construct the PROJECT by contract in accordance with the plans and specifications of SAN BERNARDINO, which have been reviewed and approved by RIALTO, to the satisfaction of and subject to concurrence of RIALTO. 4. Arrange for relocation of all utilities which interfere with construction of the PROJECT within the entire PROJECT limits, subject to paragraph 3.9 below. 5. Obtain a no-cost permit from RIALTO for work performed within RIALTO’s right-of-way. 6. Advertise, award, and administer the construction of the PROJECT, in accordance with the provisions of the California Public Contract Code applicable to cities and require contractors to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including Labor Code sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq. that concern the payment of prevailing wages. San Bernardino shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably approved by RIALTO), and hold harmless RIALTO and its officers, employees, volunteers, and agents from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability arising out of SAN BERNARDINO’s obligations set forth in this paragraph. 7. SAN BERNARDINO shall require all contractors and vendors working on the PROJECT to have appropriate and adequate insurance coverage for the mutual protection and benefit of the Parties. Except for Workers’ Compensation, Errors and Omissions and Professional Liability policies, SAN BERNARDINO shall require and ensure that all SAN BERNARDINO contractors/subcontractors for the PROJECT shall have insurance policies that contain endorsements naming RIALTO and its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds with respect to liabilities arising out of the performance of services hereunder. The additional insured endorsements shall not limit the scope of coverage for RIALTO to vicarious liability but shall allow coverage for RIALTO to the full extent provided by the policy. Such additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as Additional Insured (Form B) endorsement form ISO, CG 2010.11 85. 8. Provide adequate inspection of all items of work performed under the construction contract(s) with SAN BERNARDINO’s contractors or subcontractors for the PROJECT and maintain adequate records of inspection and materials testing for review by RIALTO. SAN BERNARDINO shall provide copies of any records of inspection and materials testing to RIALTO within ten (10) days of 18.b Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 3 of 10 SAN BERNARDINO’s receipt of written demand from RIALTO for such records. This shall be included as a PROJECT cost. 9. Periodically submit to RIALTO invoices for Rialto’s proportionate share of PROJECT costs. Invoices shall include itemized accounting of actual Project costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO and a detailed statement of RIALTO’S proportionate share of those costs. 10. Upon PROJECT completion, calculate actual SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO PROJECT share percentages based on the final contract work and cost, which shall include any changes made within SAN BERNARDINO and/or RIALTO as provided in this Agreement. 11. Pay its proportionate share of the actual PROJECT cost. The actual PROJECT cost shall include the cost of PROJECT preliminary engineering, design, survey, CEQA compliance, utility relocation work, construction, construction engineering, inspection, and SAN BERNARDINO overhead costs which will be based on PROJECT related staff hours billed at the fully burdened rate. SAN BERNARDINO’s proportionate share of the PROJECT cost is estimated to be $3,389,503. SAN BERNARDINO shall be responsible for the sum of $3,389,503, plus its share of any PROJECT cost increases pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. San Bernardino will track staff charges and will use fully burdened rate to estimate in-house charges for overhead cost. 12. Upon PROJECT completion and the capture of all PROJECT expenses, submit to RIALTO an itemized accounting of actual PROJECT costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO and, if said costs exceed the amount paid by RIALTO pursuant to paragraph 9 and Section II paragraph 3, an invoice for the remainder of RIALTO’s share of the actual PROJECT costs, up to the amount set forth in Section II paragraph 4 hereof, as provided herein. Said invoice shall set forth all actual PROJECT costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO, together with adequate documentation of said expenditures and a copy of the overall SAN BERNARDINO/RIALTO percentage share calculation spreadsheet. If the actual PROJECT costs incurred by SAN BERNARDINO are less than the amount paid by RIALTO pursuant to paragraphs 9 and Section II paragraph 3, then SAN BERNARDINO shall refund RIALTO the difference within thirty (30) days after issuance of the itemized accounting. SECTION II RIALTO AGREES TO: 1. Review and approve the plans and specifications of the PROJECT. 2. Provide a no-cost permit to SAN BERNARDINO for its work in RIALTO’s right-of-way. 3. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the invoice from SAN BERNARDINO pursuant to Section I paragraph 9 above, pay to SAN BERNARDINO the invoiced amount. 4. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the itemized accounting and invoice from SAN BERNARDINO pursuant to Section I paragraph 12 above, pay to SAN BERNARDINO the remainder of its share of the actual PROJECT costs based on the RIALTO percentage calculated pursuant to Section I paragraph 10. The PROJECT costs shall include the cost of PROJECT design, CEQA compliance, utility relocation work, construction, construction engineering, inspection and SAN BERNARDINO overhead costs. RIALTO’s share of PROJECT costs is currently estimated to be $2,618,519 and shall not exceed $2,880,371 (10% increase over the PROJECT cost estimate) absent a written amendment to this Agreement. 18.b Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 4 of 10 SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. After SAN BERNARDINO’s and RIALTO’s acceptance of completed PROJECT, RIALTO shall be responsible for performing any and all work (including, but not limited to, maintenance) for the PROJECT limits that are in RIALTO’s incorporated area and SAN BERNARDINO shall be responsible for performing any and all work (including, but not limited to, maintenance) for the PROJECT limits that are in SAN BERNARDINO’s incorporated area. 2. Neither RIALTO nor any officer or employee of RIALTO shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of SAN BERNARDINO under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of SAN BERNARDINO under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, SAN BERNARDINO shall fully indemnify, defend and hold RIALTO harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of SAN BERNARDINO under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of SAN BERNARDINO under this Agreement. 3. Neither SAN BERNARDINO nor any officer or employee of SAN BERNARDINO shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of RIALTO under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of RIALTO under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, RIALTO shall fully indemnify, defend and hold SAN BERNARDINO harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of RIALTO under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of RIALTO under this Agreement. 4. RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO are authorized self-insured public entities for purposes of Professional Liability, Automobile Liability, General Liability and Worker’s Compensation, and warrant that through their respective programs of self-insurance they have adequate coverage or resources to protect against liabilities arising out of RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO’s performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this Agreement. 5. The Parties acknowledge that actual PROJECT costs may ultimately exceed current estimates of PROJECT costs. Any additional PROJECT costs resulting from increased bid prices, increased engineering costs, change orders, or arising from unforeseen site conditions, including utility relocation (but not from requested additional work by RIALTO or SAN BERNARDINO, which is addressed in paragraph 8 below) over the estimated total of the PROJECT’s cost of $6,008,022 (which is the sum of $2,618,519 from RIALTO and $3,389,503 from SAN BERNARDINO) shall be borne by each PARTY based upon where the work is required (i.e. whether the work is required in RIALTO’s or SAN BERNARDINO’s jurisdiction) up to the amounts set forth in Section I paragraph 11 and Section II paragraph 4, respectively. 6. If either RIALTO or SAN BERNARDINO requests additional work that is beyond the scope of the original PROJECT, and not considered by all Parties to be a necessary part of the PROJECT, said 18.b Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 5 of 10 work, if approved by both Parties pursuant to paragraph 17 will be paid solely by the agency requesting the work. 7. In the case wherein one of the Parties owns a utility that needs to be relocated for the PROJECT and that PARTY does not have prior rights for that utility, it will be the sole responsibility of that PARTY to relocate the utility at that PARTY’s cost. This shall not be included as a PROJECT cost. In the case that a utility relocation is determined to be a PROJECT cost based on that utility having prior rights, the relocation of the utility will be included as a PROJECT cost for which RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO will be responsible for funding the work located within their respective boundaries. 8. As design progresses, if it is found by SAN BERNARDINO’s Director of Public Works, or the Director’s designee, that a cost overrun of 10% or more of the estimated total of the PROJECT costs will occur, SAN BERNARDINO shall provide RIALTO notice of this fact and SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO shall endeavor to agree upon an alternative course of action, including amending the cost estimates. If, after thirty (30) days of SAN BERNARDINO’s notice, an alternative course of action is not mutually agreed upon in writing between RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO, this Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent. 9. SAN BERNARDINO shall notify RIALTO of the bids received and the amounts thereof. In the event that either PARTY intends to cancel this Agreement based upon the bids or amount thereof, said PARTY shall notify the other PARTY at a reasonable time prior to the awarding of a contract to construct the PROJECT to avoid any detrimental reliance by either PARTY, contractor or potential contractor. 10. If after opening bids for the PROJECT, it is found that the responsive and responsible low bid amount is 110% of or less than the construction cost shown in Exhibit B, SAN BERNARDINO may award the contract. 11. If, upon opening of bids, it is found that the responsive and responsible low bid amount is greater than 110% of the construction cost shown in Exhibit B or an Amended Exhibit B pursuant to paragraph 10 of the Agreement, SAN BERNARDINO shall not award the contract unless: 1) SAN BERNARDINO receives written permission from RIALTO’s City Engineer or designee, to proceed with the award; and 2) RIALTO’s City Council approves the award of the construction contract. If the above described conditions are not met, RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO shall endeavor to agree upon an alternative course of action, including re-bidding of the PROJECT. If, after thirty (30) days of the bid opening, an alternative course of action is not mutually agreed upon in writing, this Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent. 12. In the event that change orders are required during the course of the PROJECT, said change orders must be in form and substance as set forth in “Exhibit C”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and approved by both RIALTO and SAN BERNARDINO. Contract Change Order forms will be delivered by email and must be returned within five (5) business days. RIALTO shall not unreasonably withhold approval of change orders. If a RIALTO disapproved or modified change order is later found to cause an additional cost to the PROJECT, then RIALTO shall be responsible for any additional costs, awards, judgments or settlements associated with the disapproved or modified change order. 13. This Agreement may be cancelled upon thirty (30) days advance written notice of either PARTY, provided however, that neither PARTY may cancel this Agreement after SAN BERNARDINO awards a contract to construct the PROJECT. In the event of cancellation as provided herein, 18.b Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 6 of 10 including termination pursuant to paragraphs 10, 11 and 13 above, all PROJECT expenses occurred prior to the effective date of cancellation/termination shall be paid by the Parties in the same proportion to their contribution for the PROJECT. The PARTIES recognize and agree that the provisions governing utility relocation and construction are dependent upon the PARTIES first satisfying CEQA. As provided in this paragraph, the Agreement may be cancelled with or without cause, before, during and after CEQA review/approval. 14. Except as provided in paragraph 15, and except for the PARTIES’ operation, maintenance and indemnification obligations contained herein which shall survive termination, this Agreement shall terminate upon completion of the PROJECT and payment of final billing by RIALTO for its share of the PROJECT costs or refund by SAN BERNARDINO pursuant to Section I paragraph 12. 15. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the PARTIES with respect to subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both PARTIES. 16. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Any action or proceeding between SAN BERNARDINO and RIALTO concerning the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement, or which arises out of or is in any way connected with this Agreement or the PROJECT, shall be instituted and tried in the appropriate state court, located in the County of San Bernardino, California. 17. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 18. Since the PARTIES or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any PARTY. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed RIALTO business days. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 19. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a PARTY shall give the other PARTY any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 20. If a court of competent jurisdiction declares any portion of this Agreement invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect, unless the purpose of this Agreement is frustrated. 21. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 22. This Agreement will be effective on the date signed by both PARTIES and shall conclude upon satisfaction of the terms identified in paragraph 16 or June 30, 2021 (whichever occurs first). 23. The Recitals are incorporated into the body of this Agreement. 18.b Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 7 of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY OF RIALTO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: By: Deborah Robertson, Mayor John Valdivia, Mayor ATTEST: By: Barbara McGee, City Clerk By: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP By: By: Eric S. Vail, City Attorney Sonia Carvalho , City Attorney 18.b Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 8 of 10 EXHIBIT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project consists of pavement rehabilitation of Pepper Avenue from Baseline Road to Mill Street. Accessibility improvement will be installed or upgraded as part of the project. 18.b Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 9 of 10 EXHIBIT B ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COSTS FOR CITY OF RIALTO/CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PEPPER AVENUE REHABILIATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO SHARE CITY OF RIALTO SHARE Construction $5,224,367 $2,947,394 $2,276,973 All Other Costs such as design, survey, CEQA compliance, construction engineering, inspection and City overhead $ 783,655 442,109 $341,546 TOTAL $6,008,022 $3,389,503 $2,618,519 18.b Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT C CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER REVIEW/APPROVAL PEPPER AVENUE STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT : CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONTRACT NO. ______ Proposed Contract Change Order No. has been reviewed in accordance with the existing agreements with the City of San Bernardino and City of Rialto for the above project and the following shall apply: DATE OF CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTION: ____/____/____ APPROVED for Implementation with 100% Participation by CITY OF RIALTO APPROVED Subject to Comments/Revisions Accompanying This Document APPROVED With Limited Funding Participation by CITY OF RIALTO ______% of Actual Cost to be Funded by CITY OF RIALTO CITY OF RIALTO Participation Not to Exceed $ _________________________ DISAPPROVED -Not Acceptable to CITY OF RIALTO Note: Approval under any of the above conditions shall in no case be construed as agreement to increase the total financial participation beyond that prescribed in the existing CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO and CITY OF RIALTO agreement without a separate amendment to said agreement. Net increases in costs deriving from this and previously approved Contract Change Orders shall not cause the total construction costs to exceed the sum of the authorized contract total and contingency amounts. Comments, as follows and/or attached, are conditions of the above action? YES NO __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ SIGNED: _______________________________________________ TITLE: _________________________________________________ Distribution: Signed Original Returned to Resident Engineer Signed Original for CITY OF RIALTO File 18.b Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: PW. Co-op Agmt - Rialto for Pepper Ave. 1A-Agreement (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Agreement with City of Rialto for LOCATION MAP 18.c Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: PW.Pepper Ave Location Maps [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative 18.c Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: PW.Pepper Ave Location Maps [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative PEPPER AVENUE REHABILITATION FROM BASELINE ROAD TO MILL STREET NTS 18.c Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: PW.Pepper Ave Location Maps [Revision 1] (6665 : Resolution Adopting Cooperative Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement with SBCTA Metrolink Accessibility Phase II Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution 2020-81, approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20- 1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Phase II of the San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project. Background On September 26, 2013, former Governor Brown signed legislation creating the Active Transportation Program (ATP) in the Department of Transportation (Senate Bill 99, Chapter 359 and Assembly Bill 101, Chapter 354). The ATP provides federal and state funding for various categories of transportation improvement projects, and is administered by the Division of Local Assistance, Office of Active Transportation and Special Programs. The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) was awarded ATP funding for the Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project (“Project”). The City partnered with SBCTA in Phase I of the project by waiving permit fees associated with the project. SBCTA is ready to begin Phase II of the project and is requesting that the City enter into a Cooperative Agreement to waive permit fees for Phase II of the Project. Discussion The existing non-motorized network consists of a number of disconnected facilities. Barriers include, disconnected bike lanes, lack of way-finding signs, substandard sidewalks and pedestrian crossings, etc. The Project eliminates these gaps by providing an interconnected network of bike lanes, sidewalks, crossings, and improving existing highway railroad crossings and other related infrastructure which are safe, easy to navigate, convenient, and attractive. The Project plans to implement a well -connected network of active transportation facilities that foster a positive transit experience. It aims to build successful bicycle facilities with well-signed route-finding along the facility itself, and regional way-finding to nearby destinations. The stations are surrounded by commercial, residential and industrial uses, and serve as commuter stations and local bus transfer center for a large amount of users. 19 Packet Pg. 805 6667 Page 2 Approximately $192,000 was spent in San Bernardino in the first phase of the Project to improve access around the Metrolink Station at 3rd Street and Metrolink Way. Phase 1 was completed in March 2019. Approximately $181,500 will be spent in Phase II of the Project to improve access and mobility around the San Bernardino Metrolink Station as indicated on Attachment B to the cooperative agreement. SBCTA is requesting that the attached Cooperative Agreement No. 20 -1002318 establishing the responsibilities of the Commission and the City, be approved by the City. There will be no cost to the City except that the City agrees to waive permit fees (including street cut, encroachment and lane closure fees), plan check fees and staff cost for research, coordination and meeting attendance. The City will not be responsible for permits required from other agencies. Construction of the Project is expected to start in early late January 2021 and be completed by June 2021. 2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Key Target No 1d : Minimize risk and litigation exposure and 1e: Create an asset management plan. This project will enhance travel path safety for the non-motoring public and contribute to clean and attractive non -motorized infrastructure network designed to support long term economic growth. Fiscal Impact There is no additional fiscal impact associated with this agreement. Any staff time related to permit item inspection work will absorbed in FY 2020/21 operating budgets. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution 2020-81, approving Cooperative Agreement No. 20- 1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Phase II of the San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-81: Exhibit “A” - Cooperative Agreement No. 20- 1002318 Ward: 1 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: 12/21/2015 Resolution 2015-286 approved Cooperative Agreement No. 15 - 1001132 with SBCTA for Phase I of the San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project. 19 Packet Pg. 806 Resolution No. 2020-81 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-81 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 20- 1002318 WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (AUTHORITY) FOR PHASE II OF THE SAN BERNARDINO METROLINK STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, this Cooperative Agreement is made and entered into by and between the San Bernardino Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to enter into this agreement to delineate roles, responsibilities relative to project managements, planning, PS & E and construction activities of the project; and WHEREAS, San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvement Project Phase II is funded by Active Transportation Program Cycle 4; and WHEREAS, the project will install bike lanes from the end of the Mt. Vernon Bridge viaduct to Ramona – Alessandro Elementary School and Santa Fe Depot; and WHEREAS, the project will bear no cost to the City and will be completely funded by the Active Transportation Funded allocated to San Bernardino. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City, the Memorandum of Understanding No. 20-1002318 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for phase II of the San Bernardino Metrolink Station Accessibility Project, attached herein as Exhibit “A”. SECTION 3. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. 19.a Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement -20-1002318_Metrolink Phase II - Resolution [Revision 2] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Resolution No. 2020-81 SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________ 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 19.a Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement -20-1002318_Metrolink Phase II - Resolution [Revision 2] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Resolution No. 2020-81 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 19.a Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement -20-1002318_Metrolink Phase II - Resolution [Revision 2] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 1 of 10 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 20-1002318 BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL; PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE (PS&E); RIGHT OF WAY (ROW); AND CONSTRUCTION FOR PHASE-II OF THE SAN BERNARDINO METROLINK STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT I. PARTIES AND TERM A. THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) is made and entered into by and between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (“SBCTA”) and the City of San Bernardino (“CITY”). SBCTA and CITY may be referred to individually as a “PARTY” and collectively as “PARTIES”. B. On February 12, 2016, SBCTA and the City of San Bernardino executed Cooperative Agreement 15-1001132 for Phase I of the Metrolinlk Station Accessibility Improvement Project. Construction for Phase I was completed in March 2019. C. THIS AGREEMENT is for Phase II of the Metrolink Station Accessibility Improvements and shall terminate upon completion of SBCTA’s management of the planning, environmental, PS&E, ROW and construction phases, or December 31, 2026, whichever is earlier in time, except that the indemnification provisions shall remain in effect until terminated or modified, in writing, by mutual agreement. Should any claims arising out of this Agreement be asserted against one of the Parties, the Parties agree to extend the fixed termination date of this Agreement, until such time as the claims are settled, dismissed or paid. II. RECITALS A. WHEREAS, Phase I and Phase II improvements in the City of San Bernardino are depicted in Attachment B.“PHASE I” consists of the Active Transportation Program Cycle 1;”PHASE II” is the Active Transportation Program Cycle 4. ”; and B. WHEREAS, SBCTA has completed PHASE I and proposes to construct PHASE II, which includes location-specific improvements to various facilities within the City of San Bernardino (“PROJECT”); and C. WHEREAS, the Parties wish to enter into this Agreement to delineate roles, responsibilities, and funding commitments relative to the Project Management, Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW and Construction activities of the PROJECT; and 19.b Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 2 of 10 D. WHEREAS, the CITY has requested SBCTA to complete the implementation of the PROJECT, including project management, engineering design, construction, procurement and management of contractors, and coordination with other cities and agencies; and E. WHEREAS, the CITY is the PROJECT owner and this AGREEMENT does not transfer ownership; as such, the CITY retains all legal responsibilities associated with ownership, operation and maintenance of the existing and future improvements; and F. WHEREAS, SBCTA is the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency for the PROJECT and The State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Lead Agency for the PROJECT. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree to the following: III. SBCTA RESPONSIBILITIES: SBCTA agrees: A. To be the lead agency for Project Management, Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW, and Construction work and to diligently undertake and complete, the Planning, Environmental, ROW, PS&E, and Construction work on PROJECT, in cluding the selection and retention of consultants and contractors. SBCTA shall also serve as the lead agency for managing the PHASE II PROJECT budget and corresponding contracts. Performance of services under these consultant and/or contractor contracts shall be subject to the technical direction of SBCTA’s Director of Project Delivery, or his designee, with input and consultation from CITY. B. To contribute towards the Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW, and Construction phases of the PHASE II PROJECT, an estimated $6,131,664 for Phase II. The actual cost of a specific phase may ultimately vary and cause the total project cost to change from the estimate provided in Attachment A. The total project costs remaining after contributions other participating cities, exclusive of the CITY-provided services specified in Part IV of this AGREEMENT, is to be borne solely by SBCTA. C. To execute appropriate agreements with other cities and agencies to facilitate and coordinate the completion of the PROJECT. D. To certify the California Environmental Quality Act Notice of Exemption (CEQA NOE) and coordinate with Caltrans to certify the National Environmental Policy Act Categorical Exclusion (NEPA CE). E. To designate a Project Manager to represent SBCTA through whom all communications between the Parties shall be channeled. F. To provide CITY with a proposed project schedule to complete the PROJECT. G. To include CITY in Project Development Team (PDT) meetings and related communications on PROJECT progress as well as to provide CITY with copies of PDT meeting minutes and action items. H. To perform the design and construction in accordance with State and Federal standards and practices. 19.b Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 3 of 10 I. To include CITY in design decisions that could impact CITY’s general plans and aesthetic considerations. J. To make all PROJECT work performed by SBCTA available for review and comment by the CITY. The CITY shall transmit all review comments to SBCTA within 20 working days after the submittal is received by the CITY. If comments are not provided by the 20th working day, SBCTA will deem the submittals approved by the CITY and shall notify the CITY of its intention to move forward with PROJECT execution. The CITY agrees the submittals may be in the form of plans, specifications, estimates, reports, studies, environmental documents or other PROJECT-related submittals requiring the CITY to review and comment. SBCTA and CITY shall review all comments received regarding the PROJECT and mutually agree upon comments which shall be incorporated into the PROJECT. K. To apply for encroachment permits authorizing entry of SBCTA and its consultants and contractors onto CITY right of way to perform investigative activities, including surveying and geotechnical borings, and construction activities required by the PROJECT; and to receive encroachment permits from the CITY at no cost to SBCTA. L. To obtain, all necessary PROJECT permits, agreements and/or approvals from appropriate agencies; all necessary PROJECT permits, agreements, and/or approvals from the CITY shall be provided at no cost to SBCTA. All mitigation, monitoring, and/or remedial action required by said permits and/or agreements obtained from agencies other than the CITY shall constitute part of the PROJECT cost. M. To identify the utilities within the PROJECT area and coordinate with the utility companies to determine their location, and if necessary their relocation. N. To provide written notice to CITY upon SBCTA’s determination that the Project is substantially completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Agreement, “substantially completed” shall mean that the PROJECT can be reasonably used for its intended purposes, notwithstanding that certain nonmaterial work remains to be completed, it being understood that SBCTA shall promptly pursue the completion of such nonmaterial work. O. Upon completion of construction of PROJECT, SBCTA shall deliver to CITY a complete set of redline “as-built” plans of the PROJECT. IV. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: CITY agrees: A. To designate a responsible staff member that will be CITY’s representative in attending the PDT meetings, receiving day-to-day communication and reviewing the PROJECT documents. B. To distribute PROJECT submittals for review and comment the CITY’s Public Works Department. 19.b Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 4 of 10 C. To distribute PROJECT submittals for review and comment by CITY. D. To review and comment, at no cost to the PROJECT, on all PROJECT work performed by SBCTA. CITY shall transmit all review comments to SBCTA within 20 working days after the submittal is received by CITY. If comments are not provided by the 20th working day, SBCTA will deem the submittals approved by CITY and shall notify CITY of its intention to move forward with PROJECT execution. CITY agrees the submittals may be in the form of plans, specifications, estimates, reports, studies, environmental documents or other PROJECT-related submittals requiring CITY review and comment. SBCTA and CITY shall review all comments received regarding the PROJECT and mutually agree to which comments shall be incorporated into the PROJECT. E. To provide encroachment permits authorizing entry of SBCTA and its consultants and contractors onto CITY right of way to perform investigative activities, including surveying and geotechnical borings, and construction activities required by the PROJECT at no cost to the PROJECT. If encroachment permits are necessary, the CITY agrees to facilitate coordination with adjacent properties, residences, and businesses impacted. F. To provide all City permits and waive City fees required to construct the PROJECT. SBCTA/contractor(s) shall obtain and pay the fees for all other non-City permits required for the construction of the PROJECT. G. To prepare CITY staff reports for city council consideration and SBCTA agrees to provide supporting documentation for the staff reports. H. CITY agrees to exempt SBCTA from plan check fees for submittal reviews. I. CITY agrees it will issue zero fee encroachment, traffic control, and street cut permits or other permits required by the CITY to perform investigative activities required by the PROJECT. J. CITY agrees to provide at no cost to the PROJECT existing improvement plans, and standard plans and specifications. K. CITY agrees to provide SBCTA copies of the franchise/utility agreements for the utilities in the PROJECT area for the purposes of determining prior rights and estimating utility relocation costs. L. CITY agrees it will invoke its franchise/utility agreements and have its prior rights imposed on utilities if it is determined utilities are in conflict with the PROJECT and require relocation. CITY will formally inform the utilities of CITY’s prior rights and request the relocation of utilities pursuant to the franchise/utility agreements. 19.b Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 5 of 10 M. To accept in writing the PROJECT within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice from SBCTA that the PROJECT is substantially completed as described by Paragraph “N” in Section III, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Withholding or delaying acceptance because of nonmaterial work remaining to be completing shall be deemed unreasonable. V. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES: A. The scope of the PROJECT is depicted in Attachment B “Conceptual Layout”. The scope of Phase II improvements is an “estimate” of improvements and is subject to change. To adhere to available funding limits for Phase II, as shown in Attachment A, certain improvements in Phase II may be eliminated. B. CITY agrees SBCTA is completing project management, environmental, PS&E, ROW, construction management, procurement and oversight of a construction contractor to complete the PROJECT. SBCTA will complete these tasks using SBCTA staff or contracted services. C. Neither CITY nor any officer, director, employee or agent thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by SBCTA under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to SBCTA under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, SBCTA shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY its officers, directors, employees or agents from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by SBCTA under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to SBCTA under this AGREEMENT. D. Neither SBCTA nor any officer, director, employee or agent thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless SBCTA its officers, directors, employees or agents from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this AGREEMENT. E. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect through completion and closeout of the PROJECT or on December 31, 2026 whichever is earlier in time. Should any claims arising out of PROJECT be asserted against one of the PARTIES, the PARTIES agree to extend the fixed termination date of this Agreement, until such time as the claims are settled, dismissed or paid. F. CITY is an authorized self-insured public entity for purposes of Professional Liability, General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers’ Compensation and warrants that 19.b Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 6 of 10 through its program of self-insurance, it has adequate coverage or resources to protect against liabilities arising out of the performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this AGREEMENT. G. SBCTA is a public entity with Professional Liability, General Liability and Automobile Liability policies of $10,000,000 each and Workers’ Compensation insurance coverage in the statutory limits, to protect against liabilities arising out of the performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this AGREEMENT. H. All PARTIES hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of said PARTIES and that, by so executing this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES hereto are formally bound to this AGREEMENT. I. Except on subjects preempted by Federal law, this AGREEMENT shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. All PARTIES agree to follow all local, state, county and federal laws and ordinances with respect to performance under this AGREEMENT. J. The PARTIES agree that each PARTY and any authorized representative, designated in writing to the PARTIES, and upon reasonable notice, shall have the right during normal business hours to examine all PARTIES’ financial books and records with respect to this AGREEMENT. The PARTIES agree to retain their books and records for a period of five (5) years from the later of: (a) the date on which this AGREEMENT terminates; or (b) the date on which such book or record was created. K. If any clause or provision of this AGREEMENT is illegal, invalid or unenforceable under applicable present or future laws, then it is the intention of the PARTIES that the remainder of this AGREEMENT shall not be affected but shall remain in full force and effect. L. This AGREEMENT can be amended with a written amendment when agreed upon and duly authorized and executed by both PARTIES. M. In the event of litigation arising from this AGREEMENT, each PARTY to this AGREEMENT shall bear its own costs, including attorney(s) fees. This paragraph shall not apply to the costs or attorney(s) fees relative to paragraphs C and D of this Section. N. This AGREEMENT may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. O. Any notice required or authorized to be given hereunder or any other communications between the PARTIES provided for under the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be in writing, unless otherwise provided for herein, and shall be served personally or by reputable courier or by email addressed to the relevant party at the address/fax number stated below. P. Notice given under or regarding this AGREEMENT shall be deemed given (a) upon actual delivery, if delivery is personally made; or (b) upon delivery into the United States Mail if delivery is by postage paid certified mail (return receipt requested), email or private courier including overnight delivery services. Notice shall be sent to the 19.b Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 7 of 10 respective Party at the address indicated below or to any other address as a Party may designate from time to time by a notice given in accordance with this paragraph. a. If to CITY: City of San Bernardino 300 North “D” Street, 3rd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92418 Attention: Public Works Director Email: b. If to SBCTA: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority 1170 West 3rd Street, 2nd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410 Attention: Paula Beauchamp Director of Project Delivery and Toll Operations Email: pbeauchamp@gosbcta.com Q. The Recitals stated above are true and correct and are incorporated by this reference into the AGREEMENT. R. Attachments A and B are attached to and incorporated into this AGREEMENT. 19.b Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 8 of 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 20-1002318 BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: ____________________________ Raymond W. Wolfe Executive Director Date:___________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: By:_____________________ Julianna K. Tillquist General Counsel CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By:_____________________________ John Valdivia Mayor Date:___________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: By:_____________________ Sonia Carvalho City Attorney 19.b Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT A PROJECT FUNDING TABLE Table 1. Phase II Costs for San Bernardino Metrolink Station Fund Amount City of San Bernardino ATP Local Contribution for Design and Construction $0 Project Management Cost (and other City incurred cost) $0 Total City Contribution $0 ATP Phase II Project Funding allocated to San Bernardino $181,500 Total Cost $181,500 19.b Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Cooperative Agreement No. 20-1002318 Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT B CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT 19.b Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: PW.SBCTA Agreement Metrolink Accessibilty Phase II - Att 1A [Revision 1] (6667 : Resolution Approving Coopertive Agreement Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Award a Construction Contract for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-82: 1. Approving a total project budget for Al Guhin Park Playground E quipment Project (“Project”) in the amount of $241,000, to include construction contract in the amount of $209,500, project contingencies in the amount of $21,500 , and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $10,000; and 2. Approving the award of a construction contract with Pacific Play Systems, Inc. of Carlsbad, California, in the amount of $209,500 to perform the construction of the Project; and 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the Project; and 4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents, and expend contingency amounts, if necessary, in support of the Project. Background Al Guhin Park, located at 3664 Little League Drive, is a 28 acre open space park. The park amenities currently available include two basketball courts, picnic tables/shelters, an amphitheater and restrooms. Staff previously identified this park as a candidate for the addition of a play area to enhance the recreation options for families with children in the area. Addition of playground equipment to this location will provide new playground amenities to according to the park’s needs. On June 19, 2019, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution No. 2019-168 adopting the City’s Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/20. The budget 20 Packet Pg. 820 6683 Page 2 included Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) PR 19 -001 project for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment and established $134,700 in Parkland DIF (Fund 268) funds to support the project. Currently, there is $132,796.40 available in the Parkland DIF fund. Staff recently solicited construction bids, identified additional funding needs, and is recommending that the Mayor and City Council approve the award of a construction contract to Pacific Play Systems, Inc., of Carlbad, California. Additionally, staff is requesting that the Mayor and City Council authorize a total project budget of $241,000 , which includes construction, contingency, and staff time costs. If approved, construction work will commence in June 2020 and be completed by August 2020 Discussion Project 13381, to provide new playground equipment at Al Guhin Park, was advertised for public bidding on February 20, 2020 and February 27, 2020 in the San Bernardino County Sun Newspaper, F. W. Dodge, Construction Bid Board, High Desert Plan Room, San Diego Daily Transcript, Sub-Hub Online Plan Room, Reed Construction Data, Bid America Online, Construction Bid Source, Bid Ocean, the City’s websites, and the San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce. Sealed bids were received and opened on March 25, 2020. The City received four (4) bids as follows: Bidder City Base Bid Pacific Play Systems, Inc. Carlsbad $ 209,500.00 Micon Construction, Inc. Placentia $ 257,573.00 R.E. Schultz, Inc. Orange $ 293,300.00 ** BNC Construction, Inc. Artesia $ 207,800.00 ** BNC Construction bid is considered non-responsive as they did not follow direction provided in Addendum No. 2 The bid solicitation resulted in a construction bid amount for the project that is higher than staff had originally anticipated. The difference can be attributed to the increases in material costs that have occurred since the time staff submitted project estimates for budgeting purposes. Staff has reviewed all bid packages and confirmed that Pacific Play Systems, Inc. of Carlsbad, California, is the lowest most responsible and responsive bidder, with a total bid amount of $209,500. In addition to construction costs, staff anticipates the need fo r a construction contingency to provide for any unforeseen work that is related to the project, and estimated staff costs required to support engineering inspections of the project. At this time, the estimated full project cost is at $241,000, which includes the lowest responsive construction bid, project contingencies, and engineering inspections. The breakdown of the total project costs are as follows: 20 Packet Pg. 821 6683 Page 3 Estimated Project Cost Amount Construction Bid $ 209,500 Construction Contingency $ 21,500 Engineering and Inspections $ 10,000 Total Project Costs $ 241,000 The total project costs exceed the current Project budget amount of $133,539 appropriated in Parkland DIF Fund (268). Additional funding in the amount of $107,461 is needed to move forward with the project. Because this improvement project will expand the recreational facility options for the community, staff is recommending Quimby Act Parkland funds be used to support the remaining budget needs of the Project. If awarded by the Mayor and City Council, construction work to rehabilitate the parking lots is anticipated to begin in June 2020 and is anticipated to be completed by September 2020. 2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1c - Create a framework for spending decisions and 1e - Create an asset management plan. Use of Quimby Act Parkland DIF for this Project aligns with the intended use of the fees in serving to improve park facilities to meet growing community needs. Completion of this project will provide a new recreational feature, improving an existing neighborhood and community park, and enhancing the value of the Al Guhin Park as a City asset. Fiscal Impact No General Fund impact. Parkland DIF funding in the amount of $13 4,700 was previously approved by the Mayor and City Council for the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment (account 268-160-7899-5504) and $132,796.40 remains available for this project. An additional $108,203.60 to cover the full cost of the project is availa ble from Quimby Act Parkland DIF (Fund 269). Funding Source Amount Fund 268 CIP FY 19/20 Available Funds $132,796.40 Fund 269 Requested Allocation $108,203.60 Total Available Project Funding $241,000.00 Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-82: 1. Approving a total project budget for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project (“Project”) in the amount of $241,000, to include construction contract in the amount of $209,500, project contingencies in the amount of $21,500 , 20 Packet Pg. 822 6683 Page 4 and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $10,000; and 2. Approving the award of a construction contract with Pacific Play Systems, Inc. of Carlsbad, California, in the amount of $209,500 to perform the construction of the Project; and 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the Project; and 4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents, and expend contingency amounts, if necessary, in support of the Project. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-82; Exhibit “A” - Agreement Attachment 2 Bid Tabulation for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Attachment 3 Lowest Bid Form for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Attachment 4 Location Map Ward: 5 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: June 19, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-168, approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2019/2020. 20 Packet Pg. 823 Resolution No. 2020-82 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-82 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET FOR AL GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT PROJECT (“PROJECT”) IN THE AMOUNT OF $241,000, TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $209,500, PROJECT CONTINGENCIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,500, AND ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000; AND APPROVING THE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH PACIFIC PLAY SYSTEMS, INC. OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $209,500 TO PERFORM THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO AMEND THE FY 2019/20 ADOPTED BUDGET TO ALLOCATE $108,203.60 IN THE QUIMBY ACT PARKLAND FUND (FUND 269) TO THE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS, AND EXPEND CONTINGENCY AMOUNTS, IF NECESSARY, IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino owns, operates and is responsible for the maintenance of a number of municipal park facilities, including Al Guhin Park; and WHEREAS, Al Guhin Park, located at 3664 Little League Drive, does not currently have a playground area or playground equipment to meet the community’s needs; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution No. 2019 -168 adopting the City’s Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/20, which included Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) PR 19-001 project for Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment and established $134,700 in Parkland DIF (Fund 268) funds to support the project; and WHEREAS, staff has administered a competitive bid process to secure a construction contract to perform the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project No. 13381; and WHEREAS, the City received four (4) bids on March 25, 2020, Pacific Play Systems, Inc., 3288 Grey Hawk Ct, Carlsbad, California, 92010 has been determined to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder; and WHEREAS, the City now wishes to enter into a construction agreement with Pacific Play Systems, Inc. to provide playground equipment replacement at Al Guhin Park; and WHEREAS, the total project costs of $241,000 exceed the Parkland DIF funding allocated for the project; and 20.a Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction Resolution No. 2020-82 WHEREAS, the Project meets the criteria for use of Quimby Act Parkland DIF funds and there are adequate funds available, through this fund, to support the additional Project budget needs. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The Director of Finance is authorized to amend the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 CIP to reflect a total project amount of $241,000 for the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project. SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a construction agreement following the City’s standard terms approved by the City Attorney with Pacific Play Systems, Inc., in the amount of $209,500 with a contingency in the amount of $21,500 for the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project No. 13381. SECTION 4. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to execute all documents in support of the Al Guhin Park Playground Equipment Project No. 13381 on behalf of the City. SECTION 5. The Director of Finance is authorized to amend Program Year 2019/2020 Budget to allocate $108,203.60 in Quimby Act Parkland Funds (Fund 269) to the Project. SECTION 6. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 7. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino 20.a Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction Resolution No. 2020-82 Attest: __________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 20.a Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction Resolution No. 2020-82 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______, 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. ______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 20.a Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Pw.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 2] (6683 : Award a Construction A G R E EM E N T CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO THIS AGREEMENT is made and concluded this _____ day of _______________, 20___, between the City of San Bernardino (owner and hereinafter "CITY"), and Pacific Play Systems, Inc. _(hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). 1. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the CITY, and under the conditions expressed in the bond as deposited with the CITY, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CONTRACTOR agrees with the CITY, at the CONTRACTOR's own proper cost and expense in the Special Provisions to be furnished by the CITY, to furnish all materials, tools and equipment and perform all the work necessary to complete in good workmanlike and substantial manner the AL GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Project No. 13381 in strict conformity with Plans and Special Provisions No. 13381 , and also in accordance with Standard Specifications for Public Works/Construction, latest edition in effect on the first day of the advertised “Notice Inviting Sealed Bids” for this project, on file in the Office of the City Engineer, Public Works Department, City of San Bernardino, which said Plans and Special Provisions and Standard Specifications are hereby especially referred to and by such reference made a part hereof. 1. The CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices as set forth in the Bid Schedule as full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this agreement; also for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid or from any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work and for all risks of every description connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, and for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Plans and Special Provisions, and requirements of the Engineer under them. 2. The CONTRACTOR herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, or ancestry in the performance of this contract, nor shall the CONTRACTOR or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection of subcontractors, vendees, or employees in the performance of this A-1 20.b Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6683 : Award a Construction AGREEMENT: AL GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Project No. 13381 contract. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a material breach of This contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as recipient deems appropriate. 4. CITY hereby promises and agrees with the said CONTRACTOR to employ, and does hereby employ the said CONTRACTOR to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions above set forth; and the same parties for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained. 5. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the bid of said CONTRACTOR, then this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of said terms of said bid conflicting herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of these presents have executed this contract in four (4) counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original in the year and day first above mentioned. CONTRACTOR CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO NAME OF FIRM: Pacific Play Systems, Inc. . BY: ________________________________ TERI LEDOUX, City Manager BY: _______________________________ TITLE: ATTEST: MAILING ADDRESS: 3288 Grey Hawk Ct. _______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk __Carlsbad, California, 92010____________ PHONE NO.: ( 760) 599-7355_________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: _______________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney ____________________________________ Secretary NOTE: Secretary of the Owner should attest. If Contractor is a corporation, Secretary should attest. A-2 20.b Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6683 : Award a Construction 20.c Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.02 Attachmen 2.-Bid Tabulation (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for 20.d Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.03.Attachment 3.Low Bid Form (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for ATTACHMENT NO. 5 LOCATION MAP AL GUHIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Ward 5 – 3664 Little League Drive 20.e Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: PW.Pacific Play System Contract Award Al Guhin Park.04.Attachment 4.Location Map (6683 : Award a Construction Contract for Al Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Award Construction Contract for ATP Safe Route to Schools Project at Three Locations Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-83: 1. Approving Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to School Project (SS17-001) Project (“Project”) infrastructure component expenditures in a total amount of $1,671,000, which includes a construction contract in the amount of $1,469,645, project contingencies in the amount of $147,355, and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $54,000; and 2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with Hillcrest Contracting Inc. of Corona, California, in the amount of $1,469,645 to perform construction of the project; and 3. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project; and 4. Authorizing the Director of Finance to record any necessary budget adjustments to support the project. Background Cycle 2 of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) commenced on March 26, 2015, upon the adoption of the program guidelines by the California Transportation Commission (CTC). ATP is funded from various federal and state funds appropriated in the annual Budget Act. A total of $359 million in fundin g were available over three years (Fiscal Years 2016/17-2018/19) under MAP-21. In 2016, the City was awarded, and accepted, ATP Cycle 2 grant funding (Project ATPL-5033(053)) in the amount of $2,093,000 for Safe Route to School (SRTS) improvements. Following performance of a needs analysis, three locations were selected and approved for construction of improvements. These locations are described below and identified as Location 1, Location 2 and Location 3 (attached): 21 Packet Pg. 873 6684 Page 2 Location 1 - This location is in the general vicinity of 48th Street and Western Avenue. The work consists of widening 48th Street, Magnolia Avenue and Reservoir Drive and improving the streets with curb & gutter, sidewalk, and ADA ramps. Location 2 - This location is in the vicinity of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue. The work consists of widening Pepper Avenue, Randall Avenue and Meridian Avenue and improving the streets with curb & gutter, sidewalk, and ADA ramps. Location 3 - This location is in the vicinity of Pacific Street and Perris Hill Park Road. The work consists of removing an old, cracked asphalt sidewalk on the west side of Perris Hill Park Road and replacing it with new concrete sidewalk, curb & gutter and ADA ramp. The project is included in the current adopted FY 2019/20 Ca pital Improvement Plan (CIP) as CIP Project No. SS17-001 - ATP Cycle 2-Safe Routes to Schools (“Project”) with estimated project budgets in a total amount of $2,195,000 established. The funding awarded is allocated to two categories of work: non -infrastructure components and infrastructure components. Non -Infrastructure component consists of coordinating with the project schools and performing public outreach activities. The infrastructure component includes preparing a detailed need analysis and constru cting sidewalk, curb & gutter, ADA ramps and street lights in the vicinity of the school locations above. The City recently received authorization from CalTrans to move forward with the infrastructure components of the Project. Staff recently solicited construction bids for the project and evaluated the bid results. Staff is now recommending that the Mayor and City Council approve the award of a construction contract to Hillcrest Contracting Co., Int’l Inc. for the construction of Project No. 13288 and a pprove the expenditure of $1,671,000 for the infrastructure component of the project. If approved, construction work will commence in July 2020 and be completed by December 2020 . Discussion On December 5, 2019, Caltrans provided the City with form E76, authorizing the City to proceed with expenditure of $1,671,000 awarded for the infrastructure component of the project (see Attachments 4 and 5). Staff advertised Project 13288 to provide construction for sidewalk gap closure for public bidding on March 5, 2020 and March 12, 2020. Advertisements were published in the San Bernardino County Sun Newspaper, F. W. Dodge, Construction Bid Board, High Desert Plan Room, San Diego Daily Transcript, Sub-Hub Online Plan Room, Reed Construction Data, Bid America Online, Construction Bid Source, Bid Ocean, the City’s websites, and at the San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce. Plans and specifications were also posted on the City website. 21 Packet Pg. 874 6684 Page 3 Sealed bids were received and opened on April 26, 2020. The City received four bi ds as follows: Bidder City Base Bid Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Corona $1,469,645.00 All American Asphalt Corona $1,499,049.00 Horizon Construction, Inc. Orange $1,805,915.00 Leonida Builders, Inc. Santa Clarita $1,974,499.70 Staff has reviewed all bid packages and confirmed that Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. of Corona, California, is the lowest most responsible and responsive bidder, with a total base bid amount of $1,469,645. In addition to construction costs, staff anticipates the need for a construction contingency to provide for any unforeseen work that is related to the project, and estimated staff costs required to support engineering inspections of the project. At this time, the estimated infrastructure component of the project cost is at $1,671,000, which includes the lowest responsive construction bid, project contingencies, and engineering inspections. The breakdown of the total project costs are as follows: Amount Bid $ 1,469,645 Construction Contingency $ 147,355 Engineering and Inspection $ 54,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1,671,000 2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Key Target No 2d: Minimize risk and litigation exposure by constructing safe, contiguous and well planned paths of travel for students and pedestrians near school sites. Fiscal Impact There is no General Fund Impact. Funding in the amount of $2,195,000 was previously approved by the Mayor and City Council for the ATP Cycle 2 - Safe Routes to School Project in Federal Grant Programs account #123-160-8604-5504. The table below shows the funding sources allocated, expenditures to date, and available funding remaining for the project. Funding Source Amount Fund 123-ATP Grant Funding (A) $ 2,195,000 Project Expenses to Date PS&E & Project Management $ 187,840 Non-infrastructure Component $ 63,944 21 Packet Pg. 875 6684 Page 4 Total Expenses (B) $ 251,784 Total Project Funding (A) $ 2,195,000 Total Expenses (B) $ 251,784 Remaining Project Funding $ 1,943,216 The ATP funding requires no local match by the City. The City will be invoicing Caltrans for all costs relating to the design and construction of the project. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-83: 1. Approving Sidewalk Gap Closure - Safe Routes to School Project (SS17-001) Project (“Project”) infrastructure component expenditures in a total amount of $1,671,000, which includes a construction contract in the amoun t of $1,469,645, project contingencies in the amount of $147,355, and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $54,000; and 2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with Hillcrest Contracting Inc. of Corona, California, in the amount of $1,469,645 to perform construction of the project; and 3. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project; and 4. Authorizing the Director of Finance to record any necessary budget adjust ments to support the project. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-83; Exhibit “A” - Agreement Attachment 2 Bid Tabulation Attachment 3 Hillcrest Proposal Attachment 4 Caltrans Authorization (E76) Attachment 5 California Department of Transportation Approval Attachment 6 Location Map Wards: 2, 3, 4 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: September 6, 2016 Resolution Awarding Agreement for ATP Cycle 2 - Safe Routes to School Project at 3 Locations. June 19, 2019 The Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019- 168 approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2019/2020. 21 Packet Pg. 876 6684 Page 5 February 9, 2020 The Mayor and City Council Awarded Professional Service Agreement for ATP Cycle 2 - Safe Routes to School Project at 3 Locations- Non-Infrastructure Component. 21 Packet Pg. 877 Resolution No. 2020-83 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-83 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE-SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (SS17-001) PROJECT (“PROJECT”) INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT EXPENDITURES IN A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1,671,000, WHICH INCLUDES A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,469,645, PROJECT CONTINGENCIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $147,355, AND ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000; AND APPROVING THE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH HILLCREST CONTRACTING INC. OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,469,645 TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO EXPEND THE CONTINGENCY FUND, IF NECESSARY, TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO RECORD ANY NECESSARY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO SUPPORT THE PROJECT WHEREAS, On February 8, 2016 City received ATP Cycle 2 Grant approval from the California Department of Transportation in total amount of; and WHEREAS, On September 6, 2016, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2016-190 accepting the Active Transportation Program Cycle 2 Grant in the Amount of $2,093,00 for Project ATPL-5033(053) and directing that the project be added to the Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, On December 5, 2019, Caltrans issued their form E76, authorizing the City to proceed to the construction (infrastructure component) of the project; and WHEREAS, staff has administered a competitive bid process to secure a construction contract to perform the Sidewalk Gap Closure – Safe Route to School (Project); and WHEREAS, the City received 4 bids on March 26, 2020, and Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. of San Bernardino, California, has been determined to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder; and WHEREAS, the City now wishes to enter into a Construction Contract with Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. to complete the Project. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 21.a Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution (6684 : Resolution No. 2020-83 SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a construction agreement following the City’s standard terms approved by the City Attorney with Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. located at 1467 Circle City Drive, Corona, California 92879 in the amount of $1,469,645, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein. SECTION 3. The City Manager, or her designee, is hereby authorized to execute all documents in support of the Project on behalf of the City. SECTION 4. The Director of Finance is authorized to record any revenue or expenditure budget adjustments necessary to support the Project. SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020. ______________________________ John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 21.a Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution (6684 : Resolution No. 2020-83 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 21.a Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution (6684 : A G R E EM E N T CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO THIS AGREEMENT is made and concluded this _____ day of _______________, 20___, between the City of San Bernardino (owner and hereinafter "CITY"), and Hillcrest Contracting Inc. _(hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). 1. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the CITY, and under the conditions expressed in the bond as deposited with the CITY, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CONTRACTOR agrees with the CITY, at the CONTRACTOR's own proper cost and expense in the Special Provisions to be furnished by the CITY, to furnish all materials, tools and equipment and perform all the work necessary to complete in good workmanlike and substantial manner the SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE - SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL Project No. 13288 in strict conformity with Plans and Special Provisions No. 13288 , and also in accordance with Standard Specifications for Public Works/Construction, latest edition in effect on the first day of the advertised “Notice Inviting Sealed Bids” for this project, on file in the Office of the City Engineer, Public Works Department, City of San Bernardino, which said Plans and Special Provisions and Standard Specifications are hereby especially referred to and by such reference made a part hereof. 1. The CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices as set forth in the Bid Schedule as full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this agreement; also for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid or from any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work and for all risks of every description connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, and for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Plans and Special Provisions, and requirements of the Engineer under them. 2. The CONTRACTOR herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, or ancestry in the performance of this contract, nor shall the CONTRACTOR or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection of subcontractors, vendees, or employees in the performance of this A-1 21.b Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement AGREEMENT: SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE - SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL Project No. 13288 contract. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a material breach of This contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as recipient deems appropriate. 4. CITY hereby promises and agrees with the said CONTRACTOR to employ, and does hereby employ the said CONTRACTOR to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions above set forth; and the same parties for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained. 5. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the bid of said CONTRACTOR, then this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of said terms of said bid conflicting herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of these presents have executed this contract in four (4) counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original in the year and day first above mentioned. CONTRACTOR CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO NAME OF FIRM: Hillcrest Contracting Inc. . BY: ________________________________ TERI LEDOUX, City Manager BY: _______________________________ TITLE: ATTEST: MAILING ADDRESS: 1467 Circle City Drive _______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk __Corona, California, 92879____________ PHONE NO.: ( 951) 273-9600_________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: _______________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney ____________________________________ Secretary NOTE: Secretary of the Owner should attest. If Contractor is a corporation, Secretary should attest. A-2 21.b Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement 21.c Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure- Safe Route to School.02.Attachment 2-Bid Tabulation (6684 : 21.d Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award 21.d Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School.0.3.Attachment 3-Low Bid (6684 : Award AMENDMENT MODIFICATION SUMMARY - (E-76)FEDERAL AID PROGRAMCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDLA LOCATOR:08-SBD-0-SBDPROJECT LOCATION:PREFIX:ATPLINTERSECTIONS OF PEPPER AVENUE AND RANDALL AVENUE, 48TH STREET AAND WESTERN AVENUE, AND PACIFIC STREET AND PERRIS HILLPROJECT NO:5033(053)TYPE OF WORK:SEQ NO:3CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK, ADA-COMPLIANT CURB RAMPS,PREV AUTH / AGREE DATES:STATE PROJ NO:0816000185L-NFED RR NO'S:PE:AGENCY:SAN BERNARDINOPUC CODES:R/W:ROUTE:PROJ OVERSIGHT:ASSUMED/LOCAL ADMINCON:DISASTER NO:ENV STATUS / DT: 05/04/2018SPR:TIP DATARW STATUS / DT:1 10/04/2019MCS:MPO:SCAGINV RTE:OTH:FSTIP YR:19/20BEG MP:STIP REF:209-5000-4549END MP:FSTIP ID NO:20151502BRIDGE NO:PROG CODELINE NOIMPV TYPEFUNC SYSURBAN AREAURB/RURALDEMO IDZ3011015Z3011115Z3013028Z3013117FUNDING SUMMARYPHASEPROJECT COSTFEDERAL COSTAC COST PEPE PREV. OBLIGATION$358,000.00$358,000.00$0.00PE THIS REQUEST$0.00$0.00$0.00PE SUBTOTAL$358,000.00$358,000.00$0.00 R/WRW PREV. OBLIGATION$0.00$0.00$0.00RW THIS REQUEST$0.00$0.00$0.00RW SUBTOTAL$0.00$0.00$0.00 CONCON PREV. OBLIGATION$0.00$0.00$0.00CON THIS REQUEST$1,671,000.00$1,671,000.00$0.00CON SUBTOTAL$1,671,000.00$1,671,000.00$0.00 OTHOTH PREV. OBLIGATION$0.00$0.00$0.00OTH THIS REQUEST$0.00$0.00$0.00OTH SUBTOTAL$0.00$0.00$0.00TOTAL:$0.00$2,029,000.00$2,029,000.00STATE REMARKS07/12/2017This a request for preliminary engineering funding by applying toll credits to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping, Class II Bike lane on Meridian Ave. between BeldenSt. and Randall Ave., and outreach; scope change to include bike lane approved by CTC on 06-26-2017. Cycle 2 ATP Statewide component project awarded by the CTC on 10/22/15. ATP ID ATP02-08-094S.Programmed as an infrastructure and non-infrastructure project for $2,153,000 of ATP funding. $143,000 of FY 16-17 federal TAP funding allocated at the 12/08/16 CTC meeting for PA&ED.07/19/2017This a request for preliminary engineering funding to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping, Class II Bike lane on Meridian Ave. between Belden St. and RandallAvenue, and outreach in City of San Bernardino using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 12/8/2016 as part of the State'sAlternative Transportation Program (ATP) and programmed for FY 16-17 in amendment number 10 of SCAG's 2017 FTIP approved on 06/19/2017. Scope change to include bike lane was approved by CTC on06-26-2017. Federal funding is capped at $143,000 for preliminary engineering with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with M301 urbanTAP funds at 100% on a lump sum reimbursement basis up to the federal amounts shown for preliminary engineering. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.07/23/2017This is a request for preliminary engineering funding for project approval and environmental documents (PA&ED) for the San Bernardino City Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School projectto construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and PacificHill Park Road, and construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of San Bernardino using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated bythe California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 12/08/16 and programmed for FY 16-17 in Amendment #10 approved on21.ePacket Pg. 963Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to 6/19/17 to SCAG's 2017 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at $143,000 for preliminary engineering for PA&ED with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds.Reimburse with Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a pro rata reimbursement basis up to the federal amount shown for preliminary engineering for PA&ED. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.06/20/2018Sequence # 2 is a request for Preliminary Engineering to performed PS&E for the City of San Bernardino Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School project to construct curb and gutter,sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and constructClass II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of San Bernardino using ATP funds that will be allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for theJune meeting. Programmed for FY 17-18 in Amendment #16 approved on 01/23/2018 to SCAG's 2017 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at $358,000 for all phases of work with a maximum reimbursement ratio of100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a pro rata reimbursement basis up to the federal amount shown for preliminary engineering for PA&ED.Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.08/02/2018Sequence #2 is a request for additional preliminary engineering funding to prepare plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalkstriping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue and Randall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue fromBelden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of San Bernardino as the San Bernardino City Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School project using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)funds allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 6/28/18 and programmed for FY 17-18 in Amendment #16 approved on 3/07/18 to SCAG's 2017 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at$215,000 for preliminary engineering for PS&E with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with additional Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a prorata reimbursement basis up to the increased federal amount shown for preliminary engineering for PS&E. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.01/27/2020Sequence #3 is a request for construction and construction engineering funding to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue andRandall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City of SanBernardino as the San Bernardino City Sidewalk Gap Closure and Bike Lane Safe Routes to School project using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated by the California TransportationCommission (CTC) on 12/05/19 and programmed for FY 19-20 in Amendment #15 approved on 11/25/19 to SCAG's 2019 FTIP. Federal funding is capped at $1,671,000 for construction with a maximumreimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with additional Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a pro rata reimbursement basis up to the federal amounts shown forconstruction and construction. Cycle 2 ATP ID ATP02-08-094S, PPNO 08-1183A.01/29/2020Sequence #3 is a request for construction and construction engineering funding to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA-compliant curb ramps, crosswalk striping at the intersections of Pepper Avenue andRandall Avenue, 48th Street and Western Avenue, and Pacific Street and Pacific Hill Park Road, and to construct Class II bicycle lanes on Meridian Avenue from Belden Street to Randall Avenue in the City ofSan Bernardino using Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on 12/05/19 and programmed for FY 19-20 in Amendment #15 approved on11/25/19 to SCAG's 2019 FTIP. Funding for preliminary engineering was previously obligated. The original NEPA determination approved on 5/04/18 was re-validated on 9/13/19. Federal funding is limited to$1,671,000 for construction with a maximum reimbursement ratio of 100% using toll credits in lieu of non-federal matching funds. Reimburse with Z301 TAP funds at 100% on a lump sum reimbursement basis upthe federal amounts shown for construction and construction engineering. PPNO 08-1183A.FEDERAL REMARKSAUTHORIZATIONAUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH REQUEST:CONPREPARED IN FADS BY:HAGOS, ESAYASON2020-02-03123-4567FOR:CONSTRUCTION & CENG.REVIEWED IN FADS BY:LOUIE, PATRICKON2020-02-06653-7349DOCUMENT TYPE:AMODSUBMITTED IN FADS BY:LOUIE, PATRICKON2020-02-06FOR CALTRANSPROCESSED IN FADS BY:SIGNATURE, NOT_REQUIREDON2020-02-06FOR FHWAE-76 AUTHORIZED DATE IN FMIS BY:JIYOUNG AHNON2020-02-12 19:43:24.0SIGNATURE HISTORY FOR PROJECT NUMBER 5033(053) AS OF 02/24/2020FHWA FMIS SIGNATURE HISTORYMOD #SIGNED BYSIGNED ON2JERILYNN FOGLE02/10/2020JERILYNN FOGLE02/10/2020JIYOUNG AHN02/12/20201JERILYNN FOGLE08/07/2018ZYLKIA MARTIN-YAMBO08/08/2018JIYOUNG AHN08/11/20180JERILYNN FOGLE08/14/2017ZYLKIA MARTIN-YAMBO08/14/2017MARY CUNNINGHAM08/15/201721.ePacket Pg. 964Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to FHWA FMIS 3.0 SIGNATURE HISTORYCALTRANS SIGNATURE HISTORYDOCUMENT TYPESIGNED BYSIGNED ONAMEND/MODLOUIE, PATRICK02/06/202021.ePacket Pg. 965Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to 21.f Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 : 21.f Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 : 21.f Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 : 21.fPacket Pg. 969Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06- 21.f Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe route to School.06-.Attachment 5-CTC Approva (6684 : 21.g Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School..06.Attachment 6-Location Map (6684 : 21.g Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School..06.Attachment 6-Location Map (6684 : 21.g Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: PW.Hillcrest Construction Contract Award Sidewalk Gap Closure-Safe Route to School..06.Attachment 6-Location Map (6684 : Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for Storm Drain Upgrades Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution 2020-84: 1. Approving total project budgets in the amount of $1,060,000 for Stor m Drain Repairs at Various Locations (CIP Project SD04 -24 and CIP Project SD19-003) to include a construction contract in the amount $849,730, project contingencies in the amount of $170,270 and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $40,000 (collectively; and 2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with TRYCO General Engineering of Rimforest, California in the amount of $849,730; and 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to allocate $574,380 in Storm Drain Fund No. 248 to the Project; and 4. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. Background The Public Works Department is responsible for the repair and maintenance of th e City’s storm drain system. Due to the age of the system, and years of deferred maintenance, several areas of the system have been identified where repairs and improvements to the infrastructure are necessary to restore effective storm water conveyance. The Mayor and City Council previously approved two capital improvement plan (CIP) projects to begin addressing this work. These projects focused on improving the condition of storm water infrastructure at intersections that experience flooding during storm events. CIP Project No. SD19-003 (Storm Drain Annual Upgrades) was approved with an initial budget amount of $500,000 to address storm drain system improvements at 12 intersection locations throughout the City. CIP SD04 -24 (Waterman and Baseline) 22 Packet Pg. 974 6685 Page 2 was approved with an initial budget amount of $100,000 to address the storm drain infrastructure repair needs at the intersection of N. Waterman Avenue and E. Baseline Street. Both projects were funded through Storm Drain Fund No. 248. Discussion Staff advertised construction bid Project 13351 (to provide storm drain repairs at various locations) on March 2, 2020, and March 20, 2020 in the San Bernardino County Sun Newspaper, F. W. Dodge, Construction Bid Board, High Desert Plan Room, San Diego Daily Transcript, Sub-Hub Online Plan Room, Reed Construction Data, Bid America Online, Construction Bid Source, Bid Ocean, the City’s websites, and the San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce. The single bid solicitation included both of the previously approved CIP projects for a total of 13 locations as follows: CIP SD04-24 Intersection of N. Waterman Avenue and E. Baseline Street CIP SD19-003 Sierra Way between 2nd and 3rd Streets Lugo Avenue between 2nd and 3rd Streets Intersection of W. Marshall Boulevard and North “E” Street Intersection of North “G” Street and W. Highland Avenue Intersection of North “G” Street and W. 7th Street Intersection of E. Baseline Street and Bobbitt Drive (860 Baseline Street) Intersection of Pacific Street and Garden Drive Pacific Street between Perris Hill Park Road and Garden Drive Intersection of N. Rancho Avenue and W. Mill Street Intersection of Arden Avenue and E. Lynwood Drive Intersection of E. Jane Street and Rogers Lane Intersection of E. Citrus Street and Palm Ave Sealed bids were received and opened on March 26, 2020. The City received the following four (4) bids: Bidder City Base Bid TRYCO General Engineering Rimforest $ 849,730 Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. Baldwin Park $ 1,619,283 Wright Construction Engineering Corp San Marcos $ 1,634,960 Kirtley Construction, Inc. dba TK Construction San Bernardino $ 1,966,915 The bid solicitation resulted in a base bid amount for the construction work that is higher in price than staff had originally expected. The difference can be attributed to increases in material costs that have occurred since the time staff submitted project estimates for budgeting purposes. At this time, staff has reviewed all bid packages and confirmed that TRYCO General Engineering of Rimforest, California, is the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, with a total bid amount of $849,730. 22 Packet Pg. 975 6685 Page 3 In addition to construction costs, staff anticipates the need for a construction contingency to provide for any unforeseen work that is related to the project. The contingency amount of $170,270 is higher than would normally be requested due to the multiple project locations. An additional $40,000 is also required to support staff time for engineering inspections of the project. The estimated full project cost is at $1,060,000, which includes the lowest responsive construction bid, project contingencies, and engineering inspections. The breakdown of the total project costs are as follows: Amount Bid $ 849,730 Construction Contingency $ 170,270 Engineering and Inspections $ 40,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1,060,000 The total cost for these projects exceed the remaining project budgets available in each project. While initial budgets were established for both CIP SD04-24 and CIP SD19-003, a portion of those budgets have been expended to prepare plans and specs for bidding purposes. Additional funding in the amount of $574,380 is needed from Storm Drain Fund (248) to fully fund the projects. The table below shows th e current budget remaining and additional funding allocation required to fully fund each of the projects . Storm Drain Fund 248 Project Funds Remaining Project Funds Needed Total Project Cost CIP 19-003 - Storm Drain Annual Upgrades $ 390,000 $ 535,000 $ 925,000 CIP 04-24 Waterman and Baseline Box Culvert Repair $ 95,620 $ 39,380 $ 135,000 Totals $ 488,947 $ 574,380 $ 1,060,000 Staff is recommending that the Mayor and City Council award a bid to TRYCO General Engineering of Rimforest, California to perform storm drain system repairs, and authorize the use of Storm Drain Fund No. 248 fund balance to support the full cost of the projects. If approved, work is anticipated to begin in June , 2020, and be completed by October 2020. 2020-2025 Strategic Key Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1e: Create and asset management plan. Approval of these projects will allow staff to address issues caused by deferred maintenance in the City’s storm drain system, and will improve th e system’s long term functionality at the project locations. 22 Packet Pg. 976 6685 Page 4 Fiscal Impact There is no General Fund impact associated with this item . Additional project funding is available in amount of $574,380 through Storm Drain Fund No. 248 fund balance for budget adjustments as follows: CIP 04-24 Waterman and Baseline 248-160-8671-5504 $ 39,380 CIP 19-003 Storm Drain Annual Repairs 248-160-8672-5504 $ 535,000 Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution 2020-84: 1. Approving total project budgets in the amount of $1,060,000 for Storm Drain Repairs at Various Locations (CIP Project SD04 -24 and CIP Project SD19-003) to include a construction contract in the amount $849,730, project contingencies in the amount of $170,270 and engineering and inspection budgets in the amount of $40,000 (collectively; and 2. Approving the award of a Construction Contract with TRYCO General Engineering of Rimforest, California in the amount of $849,730; and 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2019/20 adopted budget to allocate an additional $574,380 in Storm Drain Fund No. 248 to the Project; and 4. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-84; Exhibit “A” - Agreement Attachment 2 Bid Tabulation for Storm Drain Repair Attachment 3 Lowest Bid Form for Storm Drain Repair Attachment 4 Location Map Ward: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: June 19, 2019 The Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2019-168 approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2019/20 , which included both CIP SD04-24 and SD19-003. 22 Packet Pg. 977 Resolution No. 2020-84 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-84 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TOTAL PROJECT BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,060,000 FOR STORM DRAIN REPAIRS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS (CIP PROJECT SD04-24 AND CIP PROJECT SD19-003) TO INCLUDE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT $849,730, PROJECT CONTINGENCIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $170,270 AND ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION BUDGETS IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000 COLLECTIVELY; APPROVING THE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH TRYCO GENERAL ENGINEERING OF LAKE ARROWHEAD, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $849,730; AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO AMEND THE FY 2019/20 ADOPTED BUDGET TO ALLOCATE $574,380 IN STORM DRAIN FUND NO. 248 TO THE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXPEND THE CONTINGENCY FUND, IF NECESSARY, TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino Public Works Department is responsible for the repair and maintenance of the citywide storm drain system; and WHEREAS, several locations have been identified where repairs and improvements to storm drain the infrastructure are necessary to restore effective storm water conveyance; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council previously approved Resolution No. 2019-168 adopting the City’s Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/20 which included CIP Project SD04-24 for Waterman and Baseline, and SD19-003 for Storm Drain Annual Upgrades to improve the condition of storm water infrastructure at various locations; and WHEREAS, staff has administered a competitive bid process to secure a construction contract to perform the Storm Drain Repairs at Various Locations (Project 13351); and WHEREAS, of the four bids received by the City, TRYCO General Engineering, 1025 Mecham Drive, Lake Arrowhead, California, 92352 has been determined to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder; and WHEREAS, the City now wishes to enter into a construction agreement with TRYCO General Engineering to provide storm drain repairs at various locations Citywide; and WHEREAS, the total project costs of $1,060,000 are well above the Storm Drain funding allocated for the project. 22.a Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a Resolution No. 2020-84 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a construction agreement following the City’s standard terms approved by the City Attorney with TRYCO General Engineering in the amount of $849,730 with a contingency in the amount of $170,270 for the Storm Drain Repair at Various Locations and attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. SECTION 3. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to execute all documents in support of the Storm Drain Repair at Various Locations Project 13351 on behalf of the City. SECTION 4. The Director of Finance is authorized to amend the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 CIP SD04-24 and CIP SC19-003 to fully fund the respective projects through Storm Drain Fund No. 248. SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 22.a Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a Resolution No. 2020-84 Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 22.a Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a Resolution No. 2020-84 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______, 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. ______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 22.a Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Pw.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01.Attachment 1.Resolution [Revision 1] (6685 : Resolution Approving a A G R E EM E N T CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO THIS AGREEMENT is made and concluded this _____ day of _______________, 20___, between the City of San Bernardino (owner and hereinafter "CITY"), and TRYCO General Engineering _(hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). 1. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the CITY, and under the conditions expressed in the bond as deposited with the CITY, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CONTRACTOR agrees with the CITY, at the CONTRACTOR's own proper cost and expense in the Special Provisions to be furnished by the CITY, to furnish all materials, tools and equipment and perform all the work necessary to complete in good workmanlike and substantial manner the STORM DRAIN REPAIR AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS Project No. 13351 in strict conformity with Plans and Special Provisions No. 13351 , and also in accordance with Standard Specifications for Public Works/Construction, latest edition in effect on the first day of the advertised “Notice Inviting Sealed Bids” for this project, on file in the Office of the City Engineer, Public Works Department, City of San Bernardino, which said Plans and Special Provisions and Standard Specifications are hereby especially referred to and by such reference made a part hereof. 1. The CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices as set forth in the Bid Schedule as full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this agreement; also for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid or from any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the work and for all risks of every description connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, and for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Plans and Special Provisions, and requirements of the Engineer under them. 2. The CONTRACTOR herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, or ancestry in the performance of this contract, nor shall the CONTRACTOR or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection of subcontractors, vendees, or employees in the performance of this A-1 22.b Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6685 : Resolution Approving a AGREEMENT: STORM DRAIN REPAIR AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS Project No. 13351 contract. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a material breach of This contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as recipient deems appropriate. 4. CITY hereby promises and agrees with the said CONTRACTOR to employ, and does hereby employ the said CONTRACTOR to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions above set forth; and the same parties for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained. 5. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the bid of said CONTRACTOR, then this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of said terms of said bid conflicting herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of these presents have executed this contract in four (4) counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original in the year and day first above mentioned. CONTRACTOR CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO NAME OF FIRM: TRYCO General Engineering. . BY: _______________ TERI LEDOUX, City Manager BY: _______________________________ TITLE: ATTEST: MAILING ADDRESS: PO Box 391. _______________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk _Rimforest, California, 92378____________ PHONE NO.: (909) 337-3336_________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: _______________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney ____________________________________ Secretary NOTE: Secretary of the Owner should attest. If Contractor is a corporation, Secretary should attest. A-2 22.b Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.01A- Attachment 1-Exhibit A.Agreement (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.c Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.c Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.02.Attachment 2. Bid Tabulation (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction 22.d Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.d Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain Repair.03.Attachment 3. Low Bid FormLow Bid Form (6685 : Resolution Approving a 22.e Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for 22.e Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: PW.TRYCO Contract Award Storm Drain.04.Attachment 4. Location Map (6685 : Resolution Approving a Construction Contract for Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH Street Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize staff to proceed with an investigation and analysis for the proposed street vacation of portions of 4th Street. Background Streets and Highways Code (SHC) section 8312, gives a city legislative body the power to vacate all or part of a street and sets forth the procedures by which the power to vacate may be executed. The requested street vacation would be conducted under the General Vacation Procedures outlined in SHC sections 8320 through 8325. First, a legislative body may initiate proceedings either on its own initiative or upon a petition or request of an interested person or persons. The initiation of proceedings starts with fixing the date, hour and place of the hearing, followed by publishing and posting of notices prior to the hearing. After the hearing, if the legislative body finds that the street described in the notice of hearing or petition is unnecessary for present or prospective public use, the legislative body may adopt a resolution vacating the street. The street vacation is then recorded with the County Recorder’s office. As part of the Mt. Vernon Bridge Replacement P roject, both the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway have requested the City initiate the vacation of 4th Street between the intersections of Cabrera Avenue and Mt. Vernon Avenue to assist with the comple tion of the Project and, in connection therewith, to facilitate the expansion of their maintenance yard and operation. Discussion If authorization is given to proceed, an investigation and analysis will begin and all City Departments, County Fire, utilities, and affected property owners will be notified of the proposal and will be provided an opportunity to comment on any conflicts and/or potential issues or concerns. Future actions by the City will consist of: 23 Packet Pg. 1041 6687 Page 2 Resolution of Intention by the Mayor and City Council setting a Public Hearing pursuant to Streets and Highway Code Section 8320 Publication of Notices of Vacation pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Sections 8322 & 8323 Public Hearing and Resolution of Vacation pursuant to Streets a nd Highways Code Section 8324 Recordation of the Resolution of Vacation pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8325 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1d: Minimize risk and litigation exposure. By performing a comprehensive property investigation and analysis for this vacation request, the City ensures all stakeholders with interest in the property to be vacated will be identified, notified, and allowed to provide comments through a Public H earing prior to any possible vacation of the street segment . The process also provides an important opportunity for utility agencies to acknowledge any existing infrastructure that may be impacted. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize staff to proceed with an investigation and analysis for the proposed street vacation of portions of 4th Street. Attachments Attachment 1 Legal Descriptions Attachment 2 Plat Maps Ward: 1 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: None 23 Packet Pg. 1042 4675 MacArthur Ct. Suite 400 Newport Beach California 92660 phone 949.526.8460 fax 949.526.8499 www.bkf.com April 2, 2020 BKF Job No: 20147089.10 Page 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A 4TH STREET ABANDONMENT Real property situate in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Being a portion of 4th Street as it currently exists and is partially shown on that “Plat of the Santa Fe Tract,” filed on July 19, 1902 in Book 15 of Maps at Page 49, being also an 82.50 foot wide strip centered on the southerly line of lots 10 through 30 of Block 24, Rancho San Bernardino as per map recorded in Book 7 of Maps at Page 2, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the easterly line of Cabrera Avenue and the northerly line of 4th Street; Thence along said northerly line, North 89°38'18" East, 1,366.62 feet to an angle point in the southerly line of the lands described in that certain Special Warranty Deed to BNSF Railway Company, filed on June 7, 2013 as Document No. 2013-0254474; Thence along said southerly line the following eight (8) courses: 1) North 0°18'37" West, 6.68 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave north, having a radius of 958.74 feet, from said point a radial line bears North 6°59'34" West; 2) Easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 8°35'42", an arc length of 143.82 feet; 3) North 74°44'46" East, 61.00 feet; 4) North 0°18'37" West, 0.39 feet; 5) North 89°41'04" East, 1.46 feet; 6) North 74°44'46" East, 91.74 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave Northwest, having a radius of 78.75 feet, from said point a radial line bears North 14°09'39" West; 7) Northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 76°04'37", an arc length of 104.56 feet to the westerly line of Mt. Vernon Avenue; Thence along the southerly extension of said westerly line South 0°18'37" East, 232.37 feet to the intersection with the southerly line of 4th Street; Thence along said southerly line South 89°38'18" West, 1,716.51 feet to the intersection with the southerly extension of the easterly line of Cabrera Avenue; Thence along said southerly extension North 0°23'29" West, 82.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 157,817 square feet or 3.623 acres, more or less. As shown on plat attached hereto and by this reference made part hereof. For: BKF Engineers _________________________ Davis Thresh, P.L.S. No. 6868 _________________________ Dated 23.a Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: PW. Authorization to Vacate 4th Street - Legal Description (6687 : Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH MT. VERNON AVE.KINGMAN ST. 4TH ST. 5TH ST.HARRINGTON AVE.ROBERDS AVE.WESTERN AVE.CABRERA AVE.1"=250'BASIS OF BEARINGS LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS S YEV R U RONAEDL CEN S LID AINROFIACFO E T T A LS 23.b Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: PW. Authorization to Vacate 4th Street - Plat (6687 : Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH Street) MT. VERNON AVE.KINGMAN ST. 4TH ST.1"=80'SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 2013-0254474 4TH S T. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 2013-0254474 23.b Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: PW. Authorization to Vacate 4th Street - Plat (6687 : Authorization to Proceed with Street Vacation of Portions of 4TH Street) Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Kris Jensen, Director of Public Works Subject: Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement 17-1001639 with SBCTA Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-85, approving Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement 17-1001639 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). Background The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) constructed the “First Mile” of the Redlands rail line extension between the existing San Bernardino Santa Fe Depot and “D” Street in the San Bernardino Associated Government (SANBAG) right-of-way. On December 19, 2005, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2005 -421 approving a license agreement between the City and SANBAG to operate and maintain drainage improvements within SANBAG right-of-way that was installed during the “First Mile” project. On January 1, 2017, SANBAG changed its name to San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). On July 19, 2017, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 17 -1001639 approving new agreement between City and SBCTA reflecting the City’s approved actual construction railroad track layout and implementation of SBCTA $1,200 annual administrative fee. Discussion License Agreement 17-1001639 with SBCTA needs to be amended to reflect follo wing changes: Updated Licensee’s (City) contact information under Basic License Provisions. Updated description of the Premises to reflect more accurate information regarding mile post location and affected area. nclusion of storm drain improvement plans as an exhibit to the Amendment. 24 Packet Pg. 1046 6702 Page 2 2020-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The request for the Amendment No. 1 to SBCTA Agreement aligns with Key Target No . 1e: Create an asset management plan. The storm drain construction project that the Amendment supports will be a valuable asset to the City. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of this item. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-85, approving Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement 17-1001639 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-85 Approving First Amendment; Exhibit “A”- Amendment No. 1 Ward: 1 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: 7/10/2000 Mayor and City Council allocated $150,000 for Metrolink at grade crossing at 2nd, 3rd, “E”, and “G” Streets, and $50,000 for “E” Street widening at Metrolink in the 2000/01 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). 11/20/2000 Resolution No. 2000-325 adopted approving Construction and Maintenance Agreement for the Redlands Subdivision “First Mile” Track Construction and Inland Empire Maintenance Facility. 12/06/2004 Resolution No. 2004-374 adopted authorizing the execution of Amendment No. 1 to Construction and Maintenance Agreement between the City of San Bernardino and the Southern California Regional Rail authority (SCRRA) to construct the Redlands Subdivision “First Mile” Improvements. 12/19/2005 Resolution No. 2005-421 adopted authorizing the execution of a License Agreement with SANBAG for the operation and maintenance for storm drain installed in the Redlands Subdivision “First Mile” railroad right-of- way. 7/19/2017 Resolution No. 17-1001639 adopted authorizing the execu tion of a License Agreement with SBCTA adopting new layout and SBCTA Administrative Fee. 24 Packet Pg. 1047 Resolution No. 2020-85 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-85 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LICENSE AGREEMENT 17-1001639 WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SBCTA) WHEREAS, The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) constructed the “First Mile” of the Redland rail line extension between the existing San Bernardino Santa Fe Depot and “D” Street in the San Bernardino Associated Government (SANBAG) right-of-way; and WHEREAS, On December 19, 2005, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2005-421 approving a license agreement between the CITY and SANBAG to operate and maintain drainage improvements within SANBAG right-of-way that was installed during “First Mile” project; and WHEREAS, On January 1, 2017, SANBAG changed its name to San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA); and WHEREAS, On July 19, 2017, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 17- 1001639 approving new agreement between City and SBCTA reflecting City approved actual construction railroad track layout and implementation of SBCTA $1,200 annual administrative fee; and WHEREAS, License Agreement 17-1001639 with SBCTA needs to be amended to update Licensee’s (City) contact information under Basic License Provisions, and Description of the Premises to reflect more accurate information regarding mile post location and affected area and to include storm drain improvement plans. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute First Amendment to License Agreement 17-1001639 with SBCTA, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein. SECTION 3. The City Manager, or her designee, is hereby authorized to execute all documents in support of the Project on behalf of the City. SECTION 4. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the 24.a Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution [Revision 1] (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to Resolution No. 2020-85 environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020. John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 24.a Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution [Revision 1] (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to Resolution No. 2020-85 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2020-___, adopted at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 24.a Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.01-Attachment 1 - Resolution [Revision 1] (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1127 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1129 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1132 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1133 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1134 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1135 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1136 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1137 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1138 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1139 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to 24.b Packet Pg. 1140 Attachment: PW.Amendment 1 SBCTA License Storm Drain Agreement.1A.Attachment 1.Exhibit A.Amendmnet (6702 : Amendment No. 1 to Page 1 Consent Calendar City of San Bernardino Request for Council Action Date: May 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Teri Ledoux, City Manager By:Jim Tickemyer, Parks, Recreation, & Community Services Director Subject: Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 - Budget of Senior Nutrition Program Grant Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. 2020-86 of the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California, ratifying the submittal of Amendment No. 1 budget of the Senior Nutrition Program Grant to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) pursuant to County Contract No. 19-372; accept the additional funding OTO (One-Time Only), amend the award in the amount of $47,213 for a tota l budget of $387,213; appropriate grant revenue expenditures, and issue change orders to purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American Meat Companies , dba Merit Day and Hollandia Dairy, Inc. for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Background The City of San Bernardino provides a senior nutrition program for seniors in the City, 60 years of age and older. During FY 2018/19, the Senior Nutrition Program served over 53,446 meals for a daily average of approximately 250 individual clients served at six (6) nutrition sites (5th Street Senior Center, Perris Hill Senior Center, Hernandez Community Center, Lytle Creek Community Center, New Hope Family Life Center, and Highland Senior Center). The Senior Nutrition Program is supported by funding received from the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) and is in the first year of a 3-Year Contract (No. 19-372) for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022 in the amount of $1,020,000. On January 30, 2020, the City was awarded additional funding in the amount of $47,213 and was required to submit an amended budget as a result of this Amendment No. 1 award. A signed copy of the amended budget (Amendment No. 1 OTO (One-Time-Only), totaling $387,213 in grant revenue, was recei ved from County officials on April 20, 2020. The Senior Nutrition Program is expected to serve 51,500 total meals at six nutrition sites at the approved rate of $7.22, per meal. The grant with the amendment requires a match of 11.11%, or a minimum of $43 ,020 from the Senior Nutrition - General Fund FY 2019/20 adopted budget. The additional amended funds from the County in the amount of $47,213 will be used to cover 25 Packet Pg. 1141 6711 Page 2 shortages in food and consumables, personnel increases due to the State Minimum Wage increase effective January 1, 2020, and the purchase of a food warmer as a result of the County’s mandate to provide meal services at three delivery sites on Fridays that were otherwise not receiving those services. The total amended budget is now $584,056. Staff is seeking Mayor and City Council authority to amend the FY 2019/20 budget by increasing the County Senior Nutrition Grant award by $47,213 (Personnel - 123-380-0513-5011-5034 = $34,303, Other Equipment - 123-380-0513- 5704 = $5,000; Raw Food - 123-380-0513-5114 = $6,510; Small Tools & Equip. - 123- 380-0513-5112 = $1,400). In conformance with the provisions of the grant, the proposed action is to accept the Grant Award Amendment No. 1 to the Senior Nutrition Program 2019 -2020 Grant for a total grant revenue budget of $387,213, issue change orders to the annual purchase orders for the food vendors, and approve the City’s total cash and in -kind contribution of $196,843. These proposed actions will allow the Senior Nutrition Program to continue to deliver nutritional services to the City’s senior population, especially during these challenging times of the Coronavirus Pandemic. 2020-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals This program aligns with the Key Target No. 2. Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community; and Key Target No. 3. Improved Quality of Life, by providing a resource that will allow for the well-being of participants through a planned and balanced program; which enables engagement, collaboration and alignment with other entities. Fiscal Impact The amount of grant funding available to the City from the County for FY 2019/20 will increase from $340,000 to $387,213. Acceptance of the grant would entail an amendment to the FY 2019/20 budget by increasing the County Senior Nutrition grant award by $47,213. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2020-86, ratifying the submittal of Amendment No. 1 budget of the Senior Nutrition Program Grant to the County of Sa n Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) pursuant to County Contract No. 19 - 372; accept the additional funding OTO (One-Time Only), amend the award in the amount of $47,213 for a total budget of $387,213; appropriate grant revenue expenditures, and issue change orders to purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American Meat Companies, dba Merit Day and Hollandia Dairy, Inc. for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution 2020-86; Exhibit “A”- County Contract 19-312 Attachment 2 County Contract No. 19-372 Attachment 3 Additional Funding Budget Submittal Request 25 Packet Pg. 1142 6711 Page 3 Attachment 4 Amendment No. 1 County Approved Budget and Award Attachment 5 FY 2019/20 Amended Program Budget Detail Sheet Ward: All Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: August 7, 2019 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-265, approving the execution of County Contract No. 19-372 including of accepting Year One of a Three-Year Grant Allocation in the amount of up to $340,000 with the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) for the Senior Nutrition Program. 25 Packet Pg. 1143 Resolution No. 2020-86 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-86 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING THE SUBMITTAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 BUDGET OF THE SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM GRANT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES (DAAS) PURSUANT TO COUNTY CONTRACT NO. 19-372; ACCEPTING THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING OTO (ONE- TIME ONLY) AMENDED AWARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,213 FOR A TOTAL BUDGET OF $387,213; APPROPRIATING GRANT REVENUE EXPENDITURES, AND ISSUING CHANGE ORDERS TO PURCHASE ORDERS TO SYSCO FOODS, AMERICAN MEAT COMPANIES DBA MERIT DAY, AND HOLLANDIA DAIRY, INC. FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2020 WHEREAS, on August 7, 2019, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-265, approving the execution of County Contract No. 19-372, for the three (3) year grant cycle in the amount of $1,020,000 for the contract term of July 1, 2019 through June 3 0, 2022; and WHEREAS, on January 30, 2020, the City of San Bernardino submitted a grant budget for County of San Bernardino Amendment No. 1 to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) for additional One-Time-Only (OTO) funding for Year One of the Senior Nutrition Program; and WHEREAS, on April 20, 2020, the Department of Parks, Recreation and Community Services received from County officials a signed copy of Amendment No. 1 budget, totaling $387,213 in grant revenue. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby ratify the submittal of Amendment No. 1 budget to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services for additional funding for Year One of the Senior Nutrition Program grant pursuant to County Contract No. 19-372. SECTION 2. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby accept County Amendment No. 1 additional OTO grant award of $47,213 for a total budget of $387,213 for the first year contract term of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, and authorize the Director of Finance, or designee, to appropriate that amount for the continued operation of the Senior Nutrition Program pursuant to the FY 2019/20 Amended Program Budget Detail Sheet; and to 25.a Packet Pg. 1144 Attachment: PR. Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No.1.RESOLUTION (6711 : Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 - Resolution No. 2020-86 issue change orders to annual purchase orders to Sysco Foods, American Meat Companies dba Merit Day, and Hollandia Diary, Inc. for food services and consumable supplies. SECTION 3. The appropriation of the grant award and matching funds, together totaling $584,056, are for the operation of the Senior Nutrition Program from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. SECTION 4. The Director of Finance, or designee, is directed to adjust the existing budget appropriations amongst the Parks and Recreation accounts to accurately reflect the grant match budget consistent with the adopted staff report. SECTION 5. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Acting City Clerk this ___ day of __________, 2020. ___________________________ John Valdivia, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney 25.a Packet Pg. 1145 Attachment: PR. Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No.1.RESOLUTION (6711 : Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 - Resolution No. 2020-86 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, adopted at a regular meeting held at the ___ day of _______, 2020 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ NICKEL _____ _____ _______ _______ RICHARD _____ _____ _______ _______ MULVIHILL _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2020. ___________________________________ Genoveva Rocha, CMC, Acting City Clerk 25.a Packet Pg. 1146 Attachment: PR. Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No.1.RESOLUTION (6711 : Resolution Ratifying the Submittal of Amendment 1 - 25.b Packet Pg. 1147 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1148 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1149 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1150 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1151 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1152 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1153 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1154 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1155 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1156 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1157 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1158 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1159 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1160 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1161 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1162 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1163 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1164 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1165 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1166 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1167 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1168 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1169 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1170 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1171 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1172 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1173 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1174 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1175 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1176 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1177 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1178 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1179 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1180 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1181 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1182 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1183 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1184 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1185 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1186 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1187 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1188 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1189 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1190 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1191 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1192 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1193 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1194 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1195 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1196 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1197 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1198 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1199 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1200 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1201 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1202 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1203 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1204 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1205 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1206 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1207 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1208 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1209 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1210 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1211 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1212 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1213 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1214 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1216 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1217 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1218 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1219 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1220 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1221 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1222 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1223 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1224 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1225 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1226 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.b Packet Pg. 1227 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 2 - EXHIBIT A County Contract 19-312 (6711 : Resolution 25.c Packet Pg. 1228 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 3 - Additional Funding Budget Submittal Request (6711 : 25.c Packet Pg. 1229 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 3 - Additional Funding Budget Submittal Request (6711 : 25.d Packet Pg. 1230 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 4 - Amendment No.1 County Approved Budget & Award (6711 25.d Packet Pg. 1231 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 4 - Amendment No.1 County Approved Budget & Award (6711 ATTACHMENT 5 Schedule "H" Account Number Description FY2020-21 BUDGET ESTIMATES MATCH TOTAL Grant Name:123-380-0513 001-380-0514 Salaries 5011 Salaries perm/fulltime 64,212 64,212 5013 Automobile allowance - 5014 Salaries temp/parttime 195,312 55,715 251,027 5015 Overtime - Total: Salaries 259,524 55,715 315,239 Benefits 5026 PERS retirement 4,334 4,334 5027 Health and life insurance 9,060 9,060 5028 Unemployment insurance 779 779 5029 Medicare 3,762 3,762 5034 CalPERS Unfunded Liability 18,900 18,900 Total: Benefits 17,935 18,900 36,835 Total: Salaries & benefits 277,459 74,615 352,074 Maintenance and Operations 5111 Material and supplies 5,000 5,000 5112 Small tools & equip (consumables)15,500 15,500 5114 Raw foods 68,629 74,146 142,775 5122 Dues and subscriptions - 5131 Mileage - 5132 Meetings and conferences - 5133 Education and training - 5150 Utilities 46,582 46,582 5172 Equipment maintenance 2,300 2,300 5174 Printing charges - 5175 Postage - 5176 Copy machine charges - 5181 Other operating expense 6,000 6,000 5186 Civic and promotional - 5193 Grant match - Total: Maintenance and Operations 97,429 120,728 218,157 Contract Services 5502 Professional/contractual services - 5505 Other professional services 12,325 1,500 13,825 Total: Contractual Services 12,325 1,500 13,825 Internal Service Charges 5601 Garage charges - - 5602 Workers compensation - - 5603 Liability - 5604 IT charges in-house - 5605 Telephone support - 5606 Electric - 5612 Fleet charges - fuel - Total: Internal Service Charges - - - Capital Outlay 5703 Communications equipment - Total: Capital Outlay - - - Credit/billables 5910 Credit - federal and state program funding - Total: Credit/billables - - - Total: Non-Personnel Expenses 109,754 122,228 231,982 Grant Total 387,213 196,843 584,056 Revised 2-3-20 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation PROJECT #: 0513 Sr. Nutrition Grant 2019-20 AMENDED 4/23/2020 25.e Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: PR.Senior Nutrition Program Grant Amendment No. 1.ATTACHMENT 5 - 2019-20 AMENDED-SNP Amended OTO