Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-06-2025 Agenda PacketMayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SAN BERNARDINO JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 06, 2025 3:30 PM ­ CLOSED SESSION 5:00 PM ­ OPEN SESSION NORMAN F. FELDHEYM CENTRAL LIBRARY • 555 WEST 6TH STREET • SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410 • WWW.SBCITY.ORG Theodore Sanchez Helen Tran Dr. Treasure Ortiz COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 1 COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 7 MAYOR Sandra Ibarra Eric Levitt COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 2 CITY MANAGER Juan Figueroa Sonia Carvalho MAYOR PRO TEM, WARD 3 CITY ATTORNEY Fred Shorett Telicia Lopez COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 4 ACTING CITY CLERK Kim Knaus COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 5 Mario Flores COUNCIL MEMBER, WARD 6 Welcome to a meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino PLEASE VIEW THE LAST PAGES OF THE AGENDA FOR PUBLIC COMMENT OPTIONS, OR CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK: TINYURL.COM/MCCPUBLICCOMMENTS PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (909) 384­5002 TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING FOR ANY REQUESTS FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS To view PowerPoint presentations, written comments, or any revised documents for this meeting date, use this link: tinyurl.com/agendabackup. Select the corresponding year and meeting date folders to view documents. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 2 CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Council Member, Ward 1 Theodore Sanchez Council Member, Ward 2 Sandra Ibarra Mayor Pro Tem, Ward 3 Juan Figueroa Council Member, Ward 4 Fred Shorett Council Member, Ward 5 Kim Knaus Council Member, Ward 6 Mario Flores Council Member, Ward 7 Dr. Treasure Ortiz Mayor Helen Tran City Manager Eric Levitt City Attorney Sonia Carvalho Acting City Clerk Telicia Lopez 3:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED SESSION p. 14 A) C O N F E R E N C E W I T H L E G A C O U N S E L -E X I S T I N G LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and (d)(1): i. Pepe’s Inc., a California corporation dba Pepe’s Towing v. City of San Bernardino, United States District Court Case No. 5:21­cv­01646­JWH­SPx B) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL with Legal Counsel ­ Significant Exposure to Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)): 1 Case. C) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6): i. Agency Designated Representative: City Manager or Designee Employee Organization: San Bernardino Police Civilian Association – AFSCME Local 4710, Police Management Unit – PMA, and Police Safety Unit – SBPOA 5:00 P.M. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CLOSED SESSION REPORT Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 3 PRESENTATIONS 1. San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Measure I Presentation (All Wards) p. 15 2. Citizen(s) of the Month ­ p. 23 CJ Eastwood/Teacher/Civic Engagement/Pacific High School Dejsiab Yang/Senior/Civic Engagement/Pacific High School Hailey Barahona/Senior/Civic Engagement/Pacific High School APPOINTMENTS 3. Arts and Historical Preservation Commission Appointment of Robert A. Porter (Mayor’s Appointment) p. 27 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the appointment of Robert A. Porter to the Arts and Historical Preservation Commission representing all wards (Mayor’s Appointment) with the term ending December 2026. Robert A. Porter will replace Simeone Miller. Council Staff has verified that appointee is a registered voter within the city. PUBLIC HEARING 4. Public Hearing on the Issuance of Tax­Exempt Bonds for the Village Green Apartments Project (Ward 3) p. 36 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino California: 1. Conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Public Hearing in consideration of the issuance of tax­exempt revenue bonds financing by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the benefit of Village Green Preservation LP, to provide financing for the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvements, and equipping of a 184­unit multifamily affordable rental housing project generally known as Village Green; and 2. Adopt Resolution 2025­343 approving the issuance of the Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority, a joint exercise of powers authority and public entity of the State of California, in an amount not to exceed $46,000,000, (forty­six million dollars) to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of Village Green, a multifamily rental housing project located at 2122 West Chestnut Street in the City of San Bernardino, California; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to take any further actions and execute any additional documents necessary to effectuate the Tax­Exempt bond issuance for Village Green. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 4 5. Public Hearing on Fiscal Year 2025­26 Assessment Levies for Previously Formed Assessment Districts (All Wards) p. 47 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California hold public hearings and: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025­344 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District No. 1022 and Zones 1, 2 and 3 thereof for Fiscal Year 2025­26; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025­345 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1017, 1019, 1020, 1023 and 1024 for Fiscal Year 2025­26; and 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2025­346 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1035 (ZONE 1), 1035 (ZONE 2), 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043 (ZONE 1), 1043 (ZONE 2), 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1059, 1060, 1063, 1064 and 1068 for Fiscal Year 2025­26; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2025­347 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 951 (ZONE 1), 951 (ZONE 2), 952 (ZONES 1, 2 AND 2A), 952 (ZONE 3), 953, 956, 959 (ZONE 1), 962, 963, 968, 974, 975, 976, 981, 982, 986, 989, 991, 993, 997, 1001, 1002, 1005, 1007, 1012 and 1016 for Fiscal Year 2025­26; and 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2025­348 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1025 and 1027 for Fiscal Year 2025­26. CITY MANAGER UPDATE PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS LISTED AND NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA If you wish to address the Mayor and City Council please be sure to submit a speaker slip. If you speak out of turn or disrupt the meeting a warning may be given and/or you will be asked to leave the meeting pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.9 and Penal Code 403. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 5 CONSENT CALENDAR 6. Approval of Various Mayor and City Council Meeting Minutes p. 530 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the meeting minutes for the following dates: 1. February 5, 2025 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes 2. February 19, 2025 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes 3. May 17, 2023 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes 7. Campaign Law Enforcement Agreement with the Fair Political Practices Commission (All Wards) p. 572 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025­349 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California Fair Political Practice Commission for campaign law enforcement. 8. Adoption of Ordinance No. MC – 1654 Foothill and Macy Route 66 Residential Development Project (Ward 6) p. 592 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Adopt Ordinance No. MC – 1654 approving Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24­01 to change the Zoning District Classification from Commercial General (CG­1) to Residential Medium (RM) of fourteen (14) parcels (APNs: 0142­041­09, ­10, ­11, 17, ­18, ­20, ­21, ­32, ­33, ­34, ­44; and 0142­521­01, ­02, and ­03) containing approximately 15.71 acres, pursuant to a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment 1). 9. Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funded Sub­Recipient Agreement with El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center for the Development of the El Sol Recreational and Wellness Center (Ward 1) p. 602 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded sub­ recipient agreement with El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center for the development of the El Sol Recreational and Wellness Center; 2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the sub­recipient agreement, along with any subsequent amendments, extensions, and other necessary documents to implement the project. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 6 10. Approve Memorandum of Understanding with Bargaining Groups (All Wards) p. 648 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Police Officers’ Association (SBPOA) for Police Safety Employees; and 2. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Police Management Association (SBPMA) for Police Management Employees; and 3. Amend the City­wide salary schedule for full­time, part­time, temporary, and seasonal positions. 11. Approve Agreements for Temporary Employee Staffing Services for an Aggregate Amount Not­to­Exceed $1,9730,000 (All Wards) p. 736 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with temporary staffing agencies in an aggregate amount not­to­exceed $1,973,000 (includes a 10% contingency), for the provision of temporary staffing services on an as­needed basis across City departments, for a term beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027, with an option to extend for two (2) additional years. 12. Approve Transfer and Appropriation of $25,000 from Library Memorial Books Trust Fund into FY 2025/26 Expenditure Budget (All Wards) p. 755 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025­350 authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to transfer and appropriate $25,000 from the Library Memorial Books Trust Fund into the FY 2025/26 Expenditure Budget to purchase books. 13. Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Design Services of Sierra Way Storm Drain to JMA Engineering Inc. p 761 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, 1. Approve Amendment No.1 to the Design Services Agreement with JMA Engineering Inc. for a contract amount increase of $3,722.70 for Sierra Way Storm Drain (“Project”), for a total contract amount of $34,570 to complete the design phase, and will extend the term of the agreement through the anticipated completion date of December 30, 2026; and 2. Authorize project contingencies in the total amount of $3,457.00 for additional services for the Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or his or her designee to execute all necessary documents with JMA Engineering Inc. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 7 14. Approve Amendment No. 5 to Agreement with Engineering Resources of Southern California Inc. for University Parkway Median for Design Services in the amount of $34,982.00 (Ward 6) p. 807 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC), for additional design services and construction support services, including surveying in the amount of $29,982.00 for University Parkway Median Improvements, increasing the not to exceed amount of $384,977.00 (Project); and 2. Authorizing additional construction contingencies in the total amount of $5,000, for construction support services of the Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents with Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC); and 4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to expand the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the Project. 15. Accept SBCTA – Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street (Ward 1, 2, 6) p.844 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution No. 2025­351: 1. Accept SBCTA – Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street in the amount of $372,376.00; and 2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to approve matching funds in the amount of $93,094.00 from the Traffic Safety Fund; and 3. Designate the City Manager, or designee, as a responsible agency official authorized to sign project agreements and certifications for the preparation of the SBCTA ­ Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street Project; and 4. Authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2025/26 CIP budget (CIP ID: TC26­006) with $100,000.00 (FY 2025/26) plus $372,376.00 (FY 2026/27) from the Traffic Safety Fund to bring the total project budget to $472,376.00 (FY 2025/26); and 5. Authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2025/26 CIP budget (CIP ID: TC26­006) with an additional $372,376.00 in SBCTA ­ Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street (Valley Measure I TMS funds). Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 8 DISCUSSION 16. Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, October 8­10, 2025, Long Beach Convention Center (All Wards) p. 858 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the selection of one voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates to the 2025 Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo on October 8­10, 2025, in Long Beach, California Convention Center. ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FUTURE MEETINGS 17. Catalytic Converter Unlawful Possession Ordinance (All Wards) ­ (Council Member Flores) p. 866 18. Status Update to be Presented to the City Council at a Regularly Scheduled Meeting to be Held Within 60 days on the Progress of Lutheran Social Services Campus and San Bernardino Navigation Center (All Wards) – (Council Member Sanchez) p. 867 19. Status Update on Implementation and Discussion of MC­1619; Ordinance Requiring Inspections on All Multi­family Residential Properties and the Associated Fees for Inspections (All Wards) ­ (Council Member Ortiz) p. 868 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL UPDATES/REPORTS ON CONFERENCES & MEETINGS ADJOURNMENT The next joint regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on August 20, 2025 at the Feldheym Central Library located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California 92410. Closed Session will begin at 4:00 p.m. and Open Session will begin at 5:00 p.m. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 9 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING AGENDA I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk for the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby certify that the agenda for the August 6, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency was posted on the City's bulletin board located at 201 North "E" Street, San Bernardino, California, 92401 at the Feldheym Central Library located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California, 92410 and on the City's website sbcity.org on Friday, August 1, 2025 I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. _______________________________ Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 10 NOTICE: Any member of the public desiring to speak to the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency concerning any matter on the agenda, which is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency may address the body during the period reserved for public comments. In accordance with Resolution No. 2018­89 adopted by the Mayor and City Council on March 21, 2018, the following are the rules set forth for Public Comments and Testimony: Public Comments and Testimony: Rule 1. Public comment shall be received on a first come, first served basis. If the presiding officer determines that the meeting or hearing may be lengthy or complicated, the presiding officer may, in his or her discretion, modify these rules, including the time limits stated below. Rule 2. All members of the public who wish to speak shall fill out a speaker' s reservation card and turn in the speaker reservation card to the City Clerk prior to the time designated on the agenda. Comments will be received in the order the cards are turned in to the City Clerk. Failure of a person to promptly respond when their time to speak is called shall result in the person forfeiting their right to address the Mayor and City Council. Rule 3. The presiding officer may request that a member of the public providing comment audibly state into the microphone, if one is present, his or her name and address before beginning comment. If that person is representing a group or organization the presiding officer may request that the speaker identify that group or organization, including that group or organization' s Address. Rule 4. Notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 2 and 3 above, a person shall not be required to provide their name or address as a condition of speaking. Rule 5. Time Limits: 5.01 Each member of the public shall have a reasonable time, not to exceed three ( 3) minutes per meeting, to address items on the agenda and items not on the agenda but within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Mayor and City Council. 5.02 Notwithstanding the time limits set forth in subsection 5. 01 above, any member of the public desiring to provide public testimony at a public hearing shall have a reasonable time, not to exceed ( 3) minutes, to provide testimony during each public hearing. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 11 Any member of the public desiring to speak to the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency concerning any matter not on the agenda but which is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency may address the body at the end of the meeting, during the period reserved for public comments. Said total period for public comments shall not exceed 60 minutes, unless such time limit is extended by the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. A three­minute limitation shall apply to each member of the public, unless such time limit is extended by the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. No member of the public shall be permitted to "share" his/her three minutes with any other member of the public. Speakers who wish to present documents to the governing body may hand the documents to the City Clerk at the time the request to speak is made. The Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency may refer any item raised by the public to staff, or to any commission, board, bureau, or committee for appropriate action or have the item placed on the next agenda of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. However, no other action shall be taken nor discussion held by the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency on any item which does not appear on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 54954.2 of the Government Code. Public comments will not be received on any item on the agenda when a public hearing has been conducted and closed. Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 12 ALTERNATE MEETING VIEWING METHOD: If there are any technical issues with the live stream or recording from the main agenda portal or if you require an option with Closed Captioning, you may view the meeting from the following location (TV3). https://reflectsanbernardino.cablecast.tv/CablecastPublicSite/watch/1?channel=6 PUBLIC COMMENT OPTIONS Please use ONE of the following options to provide a public comment: Written comments can be emailed to publiccomments@sbcity.org. Written public comments received up to 2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting (or otherwise indicated on the agenda) will be provided to the Mayor and City council and made part of the meeting record. Written public comments will not be read aloud by city staff. Written correspondence can be accessed bythe public online at tinyurl.com/agendabackup . Attend the meeting in person and fill out a speaker slip. Please note that the meeting Chair decides the cutoff time for public comment, and the time may vary per meeting. If you wish to submit your speaker slip in advance of the meeting, please submit your request to speak using the form on the following page: tinyurl.com/mccpubliccomments. Any requests to speak submitted electronically after the 2:00 p.m. deadline will not be accepted. Please note: messages submitted via email and this page are only monitored from the publication of the final agenda until the deadline to submit public comments. Please contact the City Clerk at 909­384­5002 or SBCityClerk@sbcity.org for assistance outside of this timeframe. Written correspondence submitted after the deadline will be provided to the Mayor and City Council at the following regular meeting. MEETING TIME NOTE: Pursuant to Resolution No. 2024­029, adopted by the Mayor and City Council on February 21, 2024: “Section 3. All meetings are scheduled to terminate at 10:00 P.M. on the same day it began. At 9:00 P.M., the Mayor and City Council shall determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and will continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future Mayor and City Council meeting. A majority vote of the Council is required to extend a meeting beyond 10:00 P.M. to discuss specified items.” Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 13 This Page Intentionally Left Blank CLOSED SESSION August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney City Attorney (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and (d)(1): i. Pepe’s Inc., a California corporation dba Pepe’s Towing v. City of San Bernardino, United States District Court Case No. 5:21-cv-01646-JWH-SPx with Legal Counsel - Significant Exposure to Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)): 1 Case. (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6): i. Agency Designated Representative: City Manager or Designee Employee Organization: San Bernardino Police Civilian Association – AFSCME Local 4710, Police Management Unit – PMA, and Police Safety Unit – SBPOA        Packet Page. 14 PRESENTATIONS August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager; Lynn Merrill, Director of Public Works Public Works        Packet Page. 15 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority SAN BERNARDINO, CA        Packet Page. 16 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority 1990-2010 | 2010-2040 Passed in 1989 Passed in 2004 HISTORY of the MEASURE        Packet Page. 17 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority        Packet Page. 18 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority MEASURE I | REGIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS •State Route 210 Extension •State Route 210 / Baseline Interchange Project •Interstate 215 / Barton Road Interchange •Interstate 10 Truck Climbing Lane •Interstate 10 / Alabama Street Interchange •Interstate 10 / University Street Interchange •Redlands Passenger Rail Project        Packet Page. 19 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority MEASURE I | LOCAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed and Current Projects •Interstate 215 Widening •Mt Vernon Avenue Bridge Replacement •Interstate 10 / Tippecanoe Avenue •State Street Grade Separation •Muscoy Bridge Retrofit •State Route 210 / Waterman Avenue Interchange •Interstate 215 / University Parkway Interchange •Downtown San Bernardino Transit Center Future Projects •H Street Widening – Kendall Drive to 40th Street •State Route 210 / Del Rosa Avenue Interchange Improvements •Interstate 215 Interchange Improvement Projects - Little League Drive - Palm Avenue - Campus Parkway •40th Street Widening – Johnson Street to Mountain View Street •University Parkway – Baseline Street to Foothill Boulevard Past, Present & Future Measure I Supported Projects        Packet Page. 20 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority •An Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to provide for citizen review to ensure that all Measure I funds are appropriately spent. •Only one percent (1%) of Measure I can be used for administrative overhead. •New transportation funds will not supplant existing general revenue spending on streets and roads. •Private developments will be required to contribute a fair share toward the transportation improvements around their projects. •Measure I funds are regionally allocated based on a “return to source” model. KEY PRINCIPLES        Packet Page. 21 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Give us your thoughts… Visit goSBCTA.com        Packet Page. 22 2 8 6 7 PRESENTATIONS August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, 1st Ward Council Office        Packet Page. 23 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION FROM THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL PROUDLY PRESENTED TO CJ EASTWOOD TEACHER PACIFIC HIGH SCHOOL CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AUGUST 2025 Citizen of the Month In recognition of your outstanding service, steadfast dedication, and unwavering commitment to improving the quality of life for the residents of San Bernardino, your leadership, compassion, and civic engagement embody the spirit of community and serve as an inspiration to others. We honor the meaningful difference you continue to make in our city. PRESENTED ON AUGUST 6, 2025        Packet Page. 24 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION FROM THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL PROUDLY PRESENTED TO DEJSIAB YANG SENIOR PACIFIC HIGH SCHOOL CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AUGUST 2025 Citizen of the Month In recognition of your outstanding service, steadfast dedication, and unwavering commitment to improving the quality of life for the residents of San Bernardino, your leadership, compassion, and civic engagement embody the spirit of community and serve as an inspiration to others. We honor the meaningful difference you continue to make in our city. PRESENTED ON AUGUST 6, 2025        Packet Page. 25 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION FROM THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL PROUDLY PRESENTED TO HAILEY BARAHONA SENIOR PACIFIC HIGH SCHOOL CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AUGUST 2025 Citizen of the Month In recognition of your outstanding service, steadfast dedication, and unwavering commitment to improving the quality of life for the residents of San Bernardino, your leadership, compassion, and civic engagement embody the spirit of community and serve as an inspiration to others. We honor the meaningful difference you continue to make in our city. PRESENTED ON AUGUST 6, 2025        Packet Page. 26 2 5 3 9 APPOINTMENTS August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Helen Tran, Mayor Mayor’s Office It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the appointment of Robert A. Porter to the Arts and Historical Preservation Commission representing all wards (Mayor’s Appointment) with the term ending December 2026. Robert A. Porter will replace Simeone Miller. Council Staff has verified that appointee is a registered voter within the city. It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the appointment of Robert A. Porter to the Arts and Historical Preservation Commission representing all wards (Mayor’s Appointment) with the term ending December 2026. The Arts and Historical Preservation Commission was established by Resolution No. 2018-97 on April 4, 2018 and is charged with advising the Mayor, City Council and City Staff on matters pertaining to the arts, culture, and historic preservation and heritage in the city. The commission is also charged with serving in an advisory capacity to the Planning Commission in making recommendations relating to the designation, preservation and protection of historical properties. Appointees to the commission must have relevant experience or knowledge of visual, performing, literary, and multi- media arts, cultural and architectural heritage or other areas which relate to the mission and purpose of the commission.        Packet Page. 27 2 5 3 9 Discussion The Arts and Historical Preservation Commission is composed of nine (9) members who serve at the pleasure of the Mayor and City Council. Pursuant to Chapter 2.17 of the Municipal Code, each City Council Member shall nominate one (1) member who shall serve during and for the term of the nominating Council Member, and the Mayor shall nominate two (2) members who shall serve during and for the term of the Mayor. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The proposed commission appointment aligns with Key Target No. 2: Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community by building a culture that attracts, retains, and motivates the highest quality talent. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact to the city. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the appointment of Robert A. Porter to the Arts and Historical Preservation Commission representing all wards (Mayor’s Appointment) with the term ending December 2026. Robert A. Porter will replace Simeone Miller. Council Staff has verified that appointee is a registered voter within the city. Attachments Attachment 1 – Commission Application Robert A. Porter (REDACTED) Attachment 2 – Resolution No. 2018-97 Ward: All Wards Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: April 4, 2018 Resolution No. 2018-97 establishing the Arts and Historical Preservation Commission was adopted.        Packet Page. 28        Packet Page. 29        Packet Page. 30        Packet Page. 31        Packet Page. 32        Packet Page. 33        Packet Page. 34        Packet Page. 35 2 8 1 0 PUBLIC HEARING August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager Gabriel Elliott, Director of Community Development & Housing Community Development & Housing It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Public Hearing in consideration of the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds financing by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the benefit of Village Green Preservation LP, to provide financing for the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvements, and equipping of a 184-unit multifamily affordable rental housing project generally known as Village Green; and 2. Adopt Resolution 2025-343 approving the issuance of the Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority, a joint exercise of powers authority and public entity of the State of California, in an amount not to exceed $46,000,000, (forty-six million dollars) to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of Village Green, a multifamily rental housing project located at 2122 West Chestnut Street in the City of San Bernardino, California; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to take any further actions and execute any additional documents necessary to effectuate the Tax-Exempt bond issuance for Village Green. Village Green Preservation LP (“Borrower”) has requested the City conduct a public hearing under the Tax and Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act (“TEFRA”) in connection        Packet Page. 36 2 8 1 0 with the proposed issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “CMFA”), a joint exercise of powers authority and public entity of the State of California, in an amount not to exceed $46,000,000, [forty-six million dollars] (the “Bonds”), to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, for improvement and equipping of Village Green, a 184-unit, affordable multifamily rental housing project located at 2122 West Chestnut Street (the “Project”) in the City of San Bernardino, California (the “City”). The CMFA bonds will be solely the Borrower’s responsibility, with no financial or legal obligation on the City. Background Village Green is a 184-unit affordable housing community located at 2122 W Chestnut Street in San Bernardino. The property serves low-income families and is supported by a Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract that provides project-based subsidy for 65 residential units. Village Green was developed in 1969 and rehabilitated in 2000 under the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. At that time, a 30-year use restriction was placed on 100% of the units, restricting them to no more than 60% of the Area Median Income ((AMI). That use agreement will expire in 2029, at which time a majority of the units at Village Green could be subject to loss of affordability. The existing County Bond Regulatory Agreement and HAP contract will remain beyond 2029, but both agreements only cover a minority of units. The CMFA was created on January 1, 2004, pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement to promote economic, cultural, and community development by financing economic growth and charitable activities throughout California. To date, over 350 municipalities have become members of CMFA. The CMFA was formed to assist local governments, non-profit organizations, and businesses with the issuance of taxable and tax-exempt bonds aimed at improving the standard of living in California. The CMFA’s representatives and Board of Directors have considerable experience in bond financing. Discussion Village Green offers 104 two-bedroom and 80 three-bedroom apartment units in thirty- eight (38) garden-style residential buildings. Community amenities include barbeque and picnic areas, a community building, two swimming pools, a leasing office, on-site laundry, a computer learning center, a playground, a dog park, and a sports court. A resident Service Coordinator organizes various programs and events, from after- school programming to holiday parties. The Service Coordinator also assists with securing utility assistance, social security, food stamps, and similar resources. All project units serve low-income families at or below 60% AMI, but effective set-asides are substantially lower due to the HAP subsidy The proposed 4% LIHTC preservation transaction will extend project affordability and support broad rehabilitation of the property with an anticipated construction budget of        Packet Page. 37 2 8 1 0 approximately $12,000,000 (twelve million dollars). In conjunction with the recapitalization, the HAP contract will be extended for the maximum allowable term of 20 years, which ensures ongoing rental subsidies for eligible tenants and prevents the units from converting to market-rate housing during this period. In connection with the proposed tax-credit preservation transaction, affordability levels will be deepened to the levels below for a minimum term of 55 years. 30% AMI (Extremely Low Income) 19 units 10% of total 50% AMI (Very Low Income) 18 units 10% of total 60% AMI (Low Income) 145 units 80% of total. This long-term affordability period is a standard requirement for projects using LIHTC in California. This layered approach ensures deep, durable affordability. The proposed rehabilitation will modernize aging building systems, expand accessibility, and enhance site functionality and efficiency. The scope of work will address all items identified in the Physical Needs Assessment, with areas of focus including windows, siding, stairways, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, water heaters, appliances, countertops, cabinets, flooring, bathtubs, bathroom vanities, lighting, cameras/security, life safety, parking lots and walkways, as well as common area amenities. Construction will be completed on a rolling schedule. No households will be permanently relocated, and the development budget will cover any temporary relocation costs. A dedicated Relocation Coordinator will host resident meetings, meet one-on-one with households to identify unique needs/concerns, issue required notices, coordinate professional movers, and generally serve as a point of contact for all parties. For the Bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of San Bernardino must conduct a public TEFRA Hearing, providing the community members with an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds to finance the Project. Before such a TEFRA Hearing, reasonable notice must be provided to the community members. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, an “applicable elected representative” of the governmental unit hosting the Project must approve the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. The City’s Housing Division is evaluating the proposed rehabilitation project for potential support through housing grant funds. This evaluation will include an analysis of the project’s eligibility, alignment with the City’s affordable housing goals, and funding availability. Should the project qualify, staff will return to the City Council at a future date to seek formal approval for any proposed allocation of housing grant funds in support of the Village Green Apartments project. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Continuing to provide accessibility to housing will improve the quality of life for low- income residents. The Project aligns with Strategic Target No. 3: Improved Quality of        Packet Page. 38 2 8 1 0 Life. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. The CMFA bonds will be solely the Borrower’s responsibility, with no financial or legal obligation to the City. All financing documents will clearly state that the bonds are not obligations of the City or the State and will be repaid entirely by the Borrower. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Public Hearing in consideration of the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds financing by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the benefit of Village Green Preservation LP, to provide financing for the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvements, and equipping of a 184-unit multifamily affordable rental housing project generally known as Village Green; and 2. Adopt Resolution 2025-343 approving the issuance of the Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority, a joint exercise of powers authority and public entity of the State of California, in an amount not to exceed $46,000,000, (forty-six million dollars) to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of Village Green, a multifamily rental housing project located at 2122 West Chestnut Street in the City of San Bernardino, California; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to take any further actions and execute any further documents as necessary to effectuate the issuance of the Tax- Exempt bond for Village Green. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2025-343-Village Green TEFRA Attachment 2 TEFRA Public Notice-Village Green Ward: Ward 3 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: None.        Packet Page. 39 Resolution No. 2025-343 Resolution No. 2025-343 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-343 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY EXEMPT FACILITY BONDS IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $46,000,000 (FORTY-SIX MILLION DOLLARS) FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING OR REFINANCING THE ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION, IMPROVEMENT AND EQUIPPING OF VILLAGE GREEN A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING PROJECT LOCATED AT 2122 W. CHESTNUT STREET, AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, Village Green Preservation LP (the “Borrower”) a partnership of which Security Properties (the “Developer”) or a related person to the Developer is the general partner, has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) adopt a plan of financing providing for the issuance of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such exempt facility bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $46,000,000 (Forty-six million dollars) in aggregate principal amount (the “Bonds”), to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of a multifamily rental housing project located at 2122 W Chestnut Street, San Bernardino, California (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the issuance of the Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority must be approved by the City of San Bernardino (the “City”) because the Project is located within the territorial limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City and is one of the “applicable elected representatives” required to approve the issuance of the Bonds under Section 147(f) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the California Municipal Finance Authority has requested that the City Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by said Authority in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies, including the City; and WHEREAS, there has been published, at least 7 days prior to the date hereof, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds would be held on a date specified in such notice; and        Packet Page. 40 Resolution No. 2025-343 Resolution No. 2025-343 WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on such date, at which time an opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds. BE IT THEN RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitute approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section 147(f) and (b) Section 4 of the Agreement. SECTION 3. The issuance of the Bonds shall be subject to the approval of the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party. The City shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to the Bonds. SECTION 4. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing to acquire or construct the Project or any refinancing of the Project; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, installation or operation of the Project; (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority; or (iv) take any further action with respect to the Authority or its membership therein. SECTION 5. The City Manager and or designee are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to, and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing approved hereby. SECTION 6.Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August 2025.        Packet Page. 41 Resolution No. 2025-343 Resolution No. 2025-343 Attest: Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 42 Resolution No. 2025-343 Resolution No. 2025-343 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-343, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of August 2025 by the following vote: SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2025. Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 43        Packet Page. 44        Packet Page. 45        Packet Page. 46 PUBLIC HEARING August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager; C. Jeannie Fortune, Interim Director of Finance and Management Services Finance & Management Services It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California hold public hearings and: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-344 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District No. 1022 and Zones 1, 2 and 3 thereof for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-345 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1017, 1019, 1020, 1023 and 1024 for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-346 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1035 (ZONE 1), 1035 (ZONE 2), 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043 (ZONE 1), 1043 (ZONE 2), 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1059, 1060, 1063, 1064 and 1068 for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-347 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 951 (ZONE 1), 951 (ZONE 2), 952 (ZONES 1, 2 AND 2A), 952 (ZONE 3), 953, 956, 959 (ZONE 1), 962, 963, 968, 974, 975, 976, 981, 982, 986, 989, 991, 993, 997, 1001, 1002, 1005, 1007, 1012 and 1016 for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and        Packet Page. 47 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-348 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1025 and 1027 for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Executive Summary The assessment of an annual fee upon properties within each assessment district provides the revenue to offset the cost of maintenance of the public improvements within each assessment district. The amount of the assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within each assessment district has been determined pursuant the methodology in each engineer’s report and is based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance, servicing and operation of the public improvements. Background On May 21, 2025, the Mayor and City Council adopted resolutions declaring intention to levy and collect assessments on assessable lots and parcels of property within each of the assessment districts previously established by the City of San Bernardino for Fiscal Year 2025-26 pursuant to engineer’s reports prepared by Spicer Consulting Group., LLC, the Engineer of Record, and called a public hearing on the proposed assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels within each assessment district for August 6, 2025. The notice of said hearing was duly published as required by law. Discussion On August 6, 2025, the Mayor and City Council will conduct public hearings on the assessments proposed to be levied and collected from the owners of property within each assessment district for fiscal year 2025-26 to pay the costs of the maintenance, servicing and operating of public landscaping, landscaping and lighting, sewer lift stations, landscaping and sewer lift stations, and landscaping, detention basin and storm drains and appurtenant facilities. The assessment of an annual fee upon properties within each assessment district provides the revenue to offset the cost of maintenance of the public improvements within each assessment district. The amount of the assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within each assessment district has been determined pursuant the methodology in each engineer’s report and is based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance, servicing and operation of the public improvements. At its August 6, 2025 meeting the Mayor and City Council will consider adoption of resolutions confirming the diagram and assessment within the various assessment districts. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals        Packet Page. 48 This project is consistent with Key Target No. 1: Improved Operational & Financial Capacity and Key Target No. 3d: Improve the City’s appearance, cleanliness and attractiveness. This project will contribute to ensure that the City is clean and attractive and provide infrastructure designed for long term economic growth. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact to the City. The assessments on properties within the various assessment districts provide revenues to offset the costs of maintenance and public improvements that serve the development project. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California hold public hearings and: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-344 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District No. 1022 and Zones 1, 2 and 3 thereof for Fiscal Year 2025- 26; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-345 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1017, 1019, 1020, 1023 and 1024 for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-346 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1035 (ZONE 1), 1035 (ZONE 2), 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043 (ZONE 1), 1043 (ZONE 2), 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1059, 1060, 1063, 1064 and 1068 for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-347 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 951 (ZONE 1), 951 (ZONE 2), 952 (ZONES 1, 2 AND 2A), 952 (ZONE 3), 953, 956, 959 (ZONE 1), 962, 963, 968, 974, 975, 976, 981, 982, 986, 989, 991, 993, 997, 1001, 1002, 1005, 1007, 1012 and 1016 for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-348 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos. 1025 and 1027 for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Attachments Attachment 1 - Resolution 2025-344 - Diagram and Assessments 1022 and Zones 1, 2, and 3 Attachment 2 - Resolution 2025-345 - Diagram and Assessments 1017, 1019, 1020,1023, and 1024 Attachment 3 - Resolution 2025-346 - Diagram and Assessments 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1035 (Zone 1), 1035 (Zone 2),        Packet Page. 49 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043 (Zone 1), 1043 (Zone 2), 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1059, 1060, 1063, 1064 and 1068 Attachment 4 - Resolution 2025-347 - Diagram and Assessments 951 (Zone 1), 951 (Zone 2), 952 (Zones 1, 2 and 2A), 952 (Zone 3), 953, 956, 959 (Zone 1), 962, 963, 968, 974, 975, 976, 981, 982, 986, 989, 991, 993, 997, 1001, 1002, 1005, 1007, 1012 and 1016 Attachment 5 - Resolution 2025-348 - Diagram and Assessments 1025 and 1027 Attachment 6 - 2025-26 Engineer’s Report – Volume 1 Attachment 7 - 2025-26 Engineer’s Report – Volume 2 Attachment 8 - 2025-26 Engineer’s Report – Volume 3 Attachment 9 - 2025-26 Engineer’s Report – Volume 4 Attachment 10 - 2025-26 Engineer’s Report – Volume 5 Attachment 11 – Proof of Publication Ward: All Wards Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: April 16, 2025 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution Initiating Proceedings to Levy and Collect Assessments for Fiscal Year 2025-26 in various assessment districts pursuant to the California Constitution and the City Charter, appointing the Engineer of Record and ordering preparation of engineer’s reports. May 21, 2025 Mayor and City Council adopted resolutions declaring intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2025-26 within the various assessment districts within the City of San Bernardino, approved engineer’s reports for each assessment district and provided notice of the time and place of hearing on proposed assessments in each assessment district. July 16, 2025 Mayor and City Council continued the Public Hearing regarding Public Hearing on Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Levies for Previously Formed Assessment Districts to August 6, 2025.        Packet Page. 50 Resolution No. 2025-344 Resolution 2025-344 August 6, 2025 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-344 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1022 AND ZONES 1, 2 AND 3 THEREOF FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino, California (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-292, a resolution of intention pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), which, among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of assessable property within Assessment District No. 1022 and Zones 1, 2 and 3 thereof, of the City of San Bernardino (the “Assessment District”) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 pursuant to the Assessment Law for 5:00 o’clock p.m. on August 6, 2025, in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was duly published as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, at the time and place of said hearing, as set forth in said resolution of intention, the City Council held the hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons, and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest, to wit: written protests filed and not withdrawn by property owners owning more than 50 percent of the area of assessable land within the Assessment District, had not been received; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that: (a) the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b) compliance has been had with all of the applicable requirements of the Assessment Law; (c) a majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed; (d) the City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the assessment for the Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and order the levy and collection of the assessment; and        Packet Page. 51 Resolution No. 2025-344 Resolution 2025-344 August 6, 2025 Page 2 of 3 (e) the assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within the Assessment District for the maintenance, servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the report of Spicer Consulting Group, LLC. on file with the City Clerk (the “Report”), are determined pursuant to the methodology in the engineer’s report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance, servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting and appurtenant facilities. SECTION 2. Levy of Assessment. Pursuant to the Assessment Law, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance, servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting and appurtenant facilities within the Assessment District during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the Report, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of San Bernardino, who, pursuant to the Assessment Law, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment. SECTION 3. CEQA. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August, 2025. ____________________________________ Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 52 Resolution No. 2025-344 Resolution 2025-344 August 6, 2025 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-344, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August, 2025 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of August, 2025. __________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 53 Resolution No. 2025-345 Resolution 2025-345 August 6, 2025 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-345 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 1017, 1019, 1020, 1023 AND 1024 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino, California (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-291, a resolution of intention pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), which, among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of assessable property within Assessment Districts Nos. 1017, 1019, 1020, 1023 and 1024 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively, the “Assessment Districts”) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 pursuant to the Assessment Law for 5:00 o’clock p.m. on August 6, 2025, in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was duly published as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, at the time and place of said hearing, as set forth in said resolution of intention, the City Council held the hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons, and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest, to wit: written protests filed and not withdrawn by property owners owning more than 50 percent of the area of assessable land within the Assessment Districts, had not been received; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that: (a) the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b) compliance has been had with all of the applicable requirements of the Assessment Law; (c) a majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed; (d) the City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the assessment for the Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and order the levy and collection of the assessment; and        Packet Page. 54 Resolution No. 2025-345 Resolution 2025-345 August 6, 2025 Page 2 of 3 (e) the assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within the Assessment Districts for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities and sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2025- 26, as contained in the report of Spicer Consulting Group, LLC. on file with the City Clerk (the “Report”) for each of the Assessment Districts, are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer’s report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel. SECTION 2. Levy of Assessment. Pursuant to the Assessment Law, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities and sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities within the Assessment Districts during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the Report, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of San Bernardino, who, pursuant to the Assessment Law, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment. SECTION 3. CEQA. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August, 2025. ____________________________________ Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 55 Resolution No. 2025-345 Resolution 2025-345 August 6, 2025 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-345, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August, 2025 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of August, 2025. __________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 56 Resolution No. 2025-346 Resolution 2025-346 August 6, 2025 Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-346 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1035 (ZONE 1), 1035 (ZONE 2), 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043 (ZONE 1), 1043 (ZONE 2), 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1059, 1060, 1063, 1064 AND 1068 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino, California (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-294, a resolution of intention pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), which, among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of assessable property within Assessment Districts Nos. 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1035 (Zone 1), 1035 (Zone 2), 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043 (Zone 1), 1043 (Zone 2), 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1059, 1060, 1063, 1064 and 1068 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively, the “Assessment Districts”) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 pursuant to the Assessment Law for 5:00 o’clock p.m. on August 6, 2025, in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was duly published as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, at the time and place of said hearing, as set forth in said resolution of intention, the City Council held the hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons, and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest, to wit: written protests filed and not withdrawn by property owners owning more than 50 percent of the area of assessable land within the Assessment Districts, had not been received; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that: (a) the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b) compliance has been had with all of the applicable requirements of the Assessment Law; (c) a majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed;        Packet Page. 57 Resolution No. 2025-346 Resolution 2025-346 August 6, 2025 Page 2 of 4 (d) the City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the assessment for the Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and order the levy and collection of the assessment; and (e) the assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within the Assessment Districts for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities, the maintenance, servicing and operation of seven lift stations and appurtenant facilities, and the maintenance, servicing and operation of detention basins and storm drains and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the report of Spicer Consulting Group, LLC on file with the City Clerk (the “Report”) for each Assessment District, are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer’s report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel. SECTION 2. Levy of Assessment. Pursuant to the Assessment Law, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities, the maintenance, servicing and operation of seven lift stations and appurtenant facilities, and the maintenance, servicing and operation of detention basins and storm drains and appurtenant facilities within the Assessment Districts during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the Report for each Assessment District, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of San Bernardino, who, pursuant to the Assessment Law, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment. SECTION 3. CEQA. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.        Packet Page. 58 Resolution No. 2025-346 Resolution 2025-346 August 6, 2025 Page 3 of 4 APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August, 2025. ____________________________________ Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 59 Resolution No. 2025-346 Resolution 2025-346 August 6, 2025 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-346, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August, 2025 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of August, 2025. ___________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 60 Resolution No. 2025-347 Resolution 2025-347 August 6, 2025 Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-347 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 951 (ZONE 1), 951 (ZONE 2), 952 (ZONES 1, 2 AND 2A), 952 (ZONE 3), 953, 956, 959 (ZONE 1), 962, 963, 968, 974, 975, 976, 981, 982, 986, 989, 991, 993, 997, 1001, 1002, 1005, 1007, 1012 AND 1016 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino, California (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-290, a resolution of intention pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), which, among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of assessable property within Assessment Districts Nos. 951 (Zone 1), 951 (Zone 2), 952 (Zones 1, 2 and 2A), 952 (Zone 3), 953, 956, 959 (Zone 1), 962, 963, 968, 974, 975, 976, 981, 982, 986, 989, 991, 993, 997, 1001, 1002, 1005, 1007, 1012 and 1016 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively, the “Assessment Districts”) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 pursuant to the Assessment Law for 5:00 o’clock p.m. on August 6, 2025, in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was duly published as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, at the time and place of said hearing, as set forth in said resolution of intention, the City Council held the hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons, and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest, to wit: written protests filed and not withdrawn by property owners owning more than 50 percent of the area of assessable land within the Assessment Districts, had not been received; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that: (a) the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b) compliance has been had with all of the applicable requirements of the Assessment Law; (c) a majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed;        Packet Page. 61 Resolution No. 2025-347 Resolution 2025-347 August 6, 2025 Page 2 of 4 (d) the City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the assessment for the Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and order the levy and collection of the assessment; (e) the assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within the Assessment Districts for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities for those designated Assessment Districts, landscaping and lighting for those designated Assessment Districts and for maintenance, servicing and operation of sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the report of Spicer Consulting Group, LLC on file with the City Clerk (the “Report”) for each of the Assessment Districts, are determined pursuant to the methodology in the engineer’s report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel; and (f) such assessments do not exceed the amounts of the assessments which were levied for Fiscal Year 2024-25. SECTION 2. Levy of Assessment. Pursuant to the Assessment Law, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities for those designated Assessment Districts, landscaping and lighting for those designated Assessment Districts and for maintenance, servicing and operation of sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities within the Assessment Districts during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the Report for each of the Assessment Districts, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of San Bernardino, who, pursuant to the Assessment Law, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment. SECTION 3. CEQA. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.        Packet Page. 62 Resolution No. 2025-347 Resolution 2025-347 August 6, 2025 Page 3 of 4 APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August, 2025. ____________________________________ Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 63 Resolution No. 2025-347 Resolution 2025-347 August 6, 2025 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-347 adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August, 2025 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of August, 2025. ___________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 64 Resolution No. 2025-348 Resolution 2025-348 August 6, 2025 Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-348 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 1025 AND 1027 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino, California (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-293, a resolution of intention pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), which, among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of assessable property within Assessment Districts Nos. 1025 and 1027 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively, the “Assessment Districts”) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 pursuant to the Assessment Law for 5:00 o’clock p.m. on August 6, 2025, in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library at 555 W. 6th Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was duly published as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, at the time and place of said hearing, as set forth in said resolution of intention, the City Council held the hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons, and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest, to wit: written protests filed and not withdrawn by property owners owning more than 50 percent of the area of assessable land within the Assessment Districts, had not been received; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that: (a) the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b) compliance has been had with all of the applicable requirements of the Assessment Law; (c) a majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed; (d) the City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the assessment for the Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and order the levy and collection of the assessment; and        Packet Page. 65 Resolution No. 2025-348 Resolution 2025-348 August 6, 2025 Page 2 of 4 (e) the assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within the Assessment Districts for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2025-26, as contained in the report of Spicer Consulting Group, LLC. on file with the City Clerk (the “Report”) for each of the Assessment Districts, are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer’s report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel. SECTION 2. Levy of Assessment. Pursuant to the Assessment Law, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities within the Assessment Districts during Fiscal Year 2025-26 as contained in the Report for each of the Assessment Districts, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of San Bernardino, who, pursuant to the Assessment Law, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment. SECTION 3. CEQA. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August, 2025. ____________________________________ Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: __________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________________ Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 66 Resolution No. 2025-348 Resolution 2025-348 August 6, 2025 Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-348, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August, 2025 by the following vote: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ____ day of August, 2025. ___________________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 67 Final Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Maintenance Assessment Districts Volume 1        Packet Page. 68 Table of Contents City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Sections i. Executive Summary i ii. Introduction iii iii. Engineer’s Signature ix 1. MAD No. 951 Zone 1 1 2. MAD No. 951 Zone 2 2 3. MAD No. 952 Zone 1, 2 and 2A 3 4. MAD No. 952 Zone 3 5 5. MAD No. 953 6 6. MAD No. 956 7 7. MAD No. 959 Zone 1 9 8. MAD No. 962 10 9. MAD No. 963 11 10. MAD No. 968 12 11. MAD No. 974 13 12. MAD No. 975 14 13. MAD No. 976 16 14. MAD No. 981 18 15. MAD No. 982 19 16. MAD No. 986 20 17. MAD No. 989 22 18. MAD No. 991 23 19. MAD No. 993 24 20. MAD No. 997 25 21. MAD No. 1001 26 22. MAD No. 1002 27 23. MAD No. 1005 28 24. MAD No. 1007 30        Packet Page. 69 Table of Contents City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 25. MAD No. 1012 32 26. MAD No. 1016 33 27. Assessment Diagrams 34 28. Assessment Rolls 35 Appendices Appendix A – Assessment Rolls Appendix B – Assessment Diagrams Appendix C – MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 70 i. Executive Summary Page | i City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 AGENCY: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER’S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE "ASSESSMENT LAW" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for Maintenance Assessment Districts, consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2025-274 adopted by the City of San Bernardino City Council, San Bernardino County, California ordering preparation of this Report. This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. Section ii PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS including a general description of the maintenance and plans of the landscaping and irrigation systems proposed to be funded. Section ii A COST ESTIMATE of maintaining the landscaping and irrigation systems including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section ii The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT contains the method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon several lots and parcels of land within the Districts, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. Section 27 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS showing the Districts, the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within said Districts, as the same exists on the maps of the County of San Bernardino Assessor for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is filed in the offices of the City of San Bernardino. An Assessment Diagram of the Districts can be found in Appendix B. Section 28 ASSESSMENT ROLLS showing the actual assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s Office can be found in Appendix A.        Packet Page. 71 i. Executive Summary Page | ii City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Maintenance Actual Assessment Maximum Assessment AD No. 951 Zone 1 Wagonwheel Road Area $75.02 $75.02 AD No. 951 Zone 2 Wagonwheel Road Area $29.53 $29.53 AD No. 952 Zone 1 State College Area $298.38 $298.38 AD No. 952 Zone 2 State College Area $783.35 $783.35 AD No. 952 Zone 2A State College Area $100.06 $100.06 AD No. 952 Zone 3 State College Area $122.91 $161.75 AD No. 953 16th Street $35.79 $35.79 AD No. 956 Carnegie Drive Area $99.34 $99.34 AD No. 959 Zone 1 Shandin Hills $139.31 $196.18 AD No. 962 Pine Avenue Area $31.64 $41.97 AD No. 963 Allen Street $130.12 $130.12 AD No. 968 Airport Drive $85.70 $85.70 AD No. 974 Rialto Avenue between Eucalyptus and Pepper $68.57 $68.57 AD No. 975 Pepper and Mill Area $70.96 $70.96 AD No. 976 Pine and Belmont $82.40 $146.43 AD No. 981 Meridian and Randall Avenue $61.03 $61.03 AD No. 982 Piedmont Drive Area $102.36 $102.36 AD No. 986 Rialto and Macy Area $96.91 $114.00 AD No. 989 Mill and Macy Area $56.30 $56.30 AD No. 991 Verdemont and Olive Area $191.80 $192.76 AD No. 993 Cajon and June Are $100.06 $100.06 AD No. 997 Chestnut Area $24.42 $80.33 AD No. 1001 Pennsylvania and Birch Area $272.36 $624.00 AD No. 1002 North "H" Street Area $20.08 $22.00 AD No. 1005 Cajon and Pepper Linden Area $248.00 $248.00 AD No. 1007 Pepper and Randall Area $71.65 $91.00 AD No. 1012 Mill/Burney Area $602.30 $691.00 AD No. 1016 Coulston Area $82.79 $119.58        Packet Page. 72 ii. Introduction Page | iii City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background The City administers and maintains 71 Maintenance Assessment Districts (the “MADs”) and associated zones that have been established. The MADs provide a financing mechanism to maintain the public maintenance areas associated with each particular development, ensuring the continued maintenance, operations, servicing, and administration of various improvements located within the public right- of-way and dedicated easements; all within the boundaries of each MAD. There is one MAD which has no improvements and is, therefore, not yet maintained. This report has been prepared to support the annual assessment of the MADs within the City’s boundaries. The following information is presented to provide general information about the MADs. Additional details specific to each MAD are listed in each MAD’s dedicated section of this Engineer’s Report. Designation of Maintenance Assessment District/Zones: For your reference, you can find the following Maintenance Assessment Districts within the corresponding Volumes listed below: Volume 1: MAD 951 (Zone 1), MAD 951 (Zone 2), MAD 952 (Zone 1, 2 and 2A), MAD 952 (Zone 3), MAD 953, MAD 956, MAD 959 (Zone 1), MAD 962, MAD 963, MAD 968, MAD 974, MAD 975, MAD 976, MAD 981, MAD 982, MAD 986, MAD 989, MAD 991, MAD 993, MAD 997, MAD 1001, MAD 1002, MAD 1005, MAD 1007, MAD 1012, and MAD 1016. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 1 and does not contain an annual escalator. Volume 2: MAD 1017, MAD 1019, MAD 1020, MAD 1023 and MAD 1024. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 2 and does contain an annual CPI escalator only. Volume 3: MAD 1025 and MAD 1027. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 3 and has a 25% general benefit of major arterial streets, 20% general benefit of secondary arterial streets, 15% general benefit of collector streets, and 100% special benefit of the local streets. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained in Volume 3 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts. Volume 4: MAD 1028, MAD 1029, MAD 1030, MAD 1031, MAD 1032, MAD 1035 (Zone 1), MAD 1035 (Zone 2), MAD 1036, MAD 1037, MAD 1038, MAD 1039, MAD 1040, MAD 1041, MAD 1042, MAD 1043 (Zone 1), MAD 1043 (Zone 2), MAD 1045, MAD 1046, MAD 1047, MAD 1048, MAD 1049, MAD 1050, MAD 1051, MAD 1052, MAD 1054, MAD 1055, MAD 1056, MAD 1057, MAD 1059, MAD 1060, MAD 1063, MAD 1064, and MAD 1068. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 4 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less. Volume 5: MAD 1022 (Zone 1), MAD 1022 (Zone 2) and MAD 1022 (Zone 3). These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 5 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts. Current Annual Administration As required by the Assessment Law, the Report includes: (1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the Districts. The City of San Bernardino will hold a Public Hearing on July 16, 2025, regarding the District which will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified. Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report.        Packet Page. 73 ii. Introduction Page | iv City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cost Estimate The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in the Assessment Law. The Assessment Law provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire Fiscal Year 2025-26, including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves. The Assessment Law also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the District is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions. Changes in Organization There are no changes in organization for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Proposition 218 Compliance On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures. Some of these exceptions include: 1. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets. 2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase). Proposition 218 does not define this term “streets”, however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers, and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street right-of- way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting. Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property”, California Constitution, Article XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment. Distinguishing General and Special Benefit Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” By its nature most every public improvement financed through an assessment district contains an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally, to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties. Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”: “Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”. The actual assessment and the amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.        Packet Page. 74 ii. Introduction Page | v City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Direct and Special Benefit The maintenance of improvements provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within each of the Districts. Each and every lot or parcel within the Districts, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities. In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the Districts because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the Districts by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the Districts. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the Districts during the nighttime hours, and to assign rights-of-way for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day. Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the Districts. Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed. Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility. The system of streets within the Districts are established to provide access to each parcel in the Districts. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the Districts, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District. The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets. Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the Districts. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the Districts. Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are apportioned on a per acre, per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit), or per parcel basis. Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the Districts. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels. Government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.        Packet Page. 75 ii. Introduction Page | vi City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 General Benefit The Benefit received by the parcels within the boundaries of the Districts is determined to be of more than ordinary public benefit, thus each parcel within the Districts being assessed receives special benefit from the improvements. If the property not within the boundaries of a District also receives some benefit from the improvements, consideration must then be given to a general benefit given by the improvements, which may not be assessed to the parcels within the Districts. Since the installation and maintenance of the landscaping and establishment of an assessment district for the maintenance of the landscaping is specific and incidental to this development, it is further determined that the improvements to be maintained by the assessment district are of special benefit to the district only and are 100% assessable to the parcels within the boundaries of the assessment district, except as follows: 1. Areas of maintenance that front on major arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 15% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 2. Areas of maintenance that front on secondary arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 10% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 3. Areas of maintenance that front on collector streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 5% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 4. Areas that front on local streets are determined to be 100% special benefit and are 100% assessable to the District. These percentages are based on the traffic circulation for the various street classifications.        Packet Page. 76 ii. Introduction Page | vii City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Method of Apportionment The Assessment Law permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The Assessment Law further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (the “Article”) requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the District. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit. Whereas, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, adopted resolutions to initiate proceedings to form special assessment districts. Whereas, the City Council, did direct the appointed engineer to prepare and file an annual report, in accordance with the Assessment Law. Whereas, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following; a. Maintenance plans for the improvements b. An estimate of the costs of the improvements c. A diagram for the assessment districts d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements Now, Therefore, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of San Bernardino, pursuant to the Assessment Law, do hereby submit the following: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of law the costs and expenses of the districts have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the districts benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcel, reference is made to the Assessment Diagrams, a reduced copy of which is included herein. 2. As required by law, the Diagrams are filed herewith, showing the districts, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said districts as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagrams and in the Assessment Rolls contained herein. 3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagrams and Assessment Rolls, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the San Bernardino County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels. 4. There are no parcels or lots within the assessment districts that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.        Packet Page. 77 ii. Introduction Page | viii City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The City requested Spicer Consulting Group, LLC., to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for the assessment districts pursuant to the Assessment Law presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the assessment districts for the referenced Fiscal Year, diagrams for the districts showing the areas and properties to be assessed, and assessments of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and-or parcels within the districts in proportion to the special benefit received.        Packet Page. 78 iii. Engineer ’s Signature Page | ix City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 FRANCISCO MARTINEZ JR PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 84640 ENGINEER OF WORK CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _______ day of ____________, 2025. By Adoption of Resolution No. _______ by the City Council. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, on the _____day of ___________, 2025. 12th June        Packet Page. 79 1. MAD No. 951 Zone 1 Page | 1 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 951 Zone 1 was formed in 1981 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 951 Zone 1 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Kendall Drive on the northeast, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District’s Devil Canyon Diversion Channel to the Southeast, The 215 Interstate Highway to the southwest and Buckboard Drive to the northwest. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 951 Zone 1. The improvements to be maintained includes 18,729 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances and 22 trees along the existing parkway of Kendall Way and the southwesterly parkway of Kendall Drive all within the boundaries of Zone 1. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the improvements, incidentals and maintenance within the area of each zone in relation to the number of single family residential lots, either actual or computed in each zone. This portion of Kendall Drive is designated as a major arterial street and represents 100% of the total area to be maintained; thus 15% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be general benefit and will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit in the District and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit in the District is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of General Benefit area in each Zone is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $75.02 per unit.        Packet Page. 80 2. MAD No. 951 Zone 2 Page | 2 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 951 Zone 2 was formed in 1981 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 951 Zone 2 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Kendall Drive to the northeast, Buckboard Drive to the southeast, the 215 Interstate Highway to the southwest and southwesterly line of the Kendall Plaza to the northwest. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 951 Zone 2. The improvements to be maintained includes 63,860 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances and 51 trees along the existing parkway of Kendall Way and the southwesterly parkway of Kendall Drive all within the boundaries of Zone 2. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the improvements, incidentals and maintenance within the area of each zone in relation to the number of single family residential lots, either actual or computed in each zone. This portion of Kendall Drive is designated as a major arterial street and represents 100% of the total area to be maintained; thus 15% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be general benefit and will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit in the District and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit in the District is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of General Benefit area in each Zone is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $5,994.59 Assessment Units 203 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $29.53 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $29.53 per unit.        Packet Page. 81 3. MAD No. 952 Zone 1, 2, and 2A Page | 3 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 952 Zone 1,2, and 2A was formed in 1981 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of AD No. 952 Zone 1 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Kendall Drive to the northeast, the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel on the northwest, the 215 Interstate Highway to the southwest and State Street to the east. The boundaries of AD No. 952 Zone 2 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: University Parkway to the west; Northpark Boulevard to the north; Western Avenue to the east and Kendall Drive and the San Bernardino County Flood Control channel to the south. The boundaries of AD No. 952 Zone 2A are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Lake Placid Drive and 48th Street to the south; Laette Court and Shrine Court to the east; the northerly line of Tract No. 14388 to the north and Sun Valley Drive and the westerly line of Tract No. 14388 to the west. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 952 Zones 1, 2 and 2A. The improvements to be maintained include 784,040 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances and related facilities along both sides and median strip of University Parkway between Northpark Boulevard and Interstate Highway 15E; west side of State Street between Kendall Drive and University Parkway; both sides of College Drive between State Street, west to its westerly terminus; southerly side of Kendall Drive between State College Parkway, northerly to the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel; Southerly side and median strip of Northpark Boulevard between University Parkway and Mountain Drive; both sides of Little Mountain Drive between Northpark Boulevard and the Flood Control Channel north of Kendall Drive; west to the Flood Control Channel north of Kendall Drive; 48th Street between Western Avenue, west to the Flood Control Channel north of Kendall Drive, portions of both sides of Sun Valley Drive, north of 48th Street lying within the boundaries of Tract No. 14388. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the improvements and incidentals within the area of the total District in relation to the area of each parcel of land therein. Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Northpark Boulevard, University Parkway and Kendall Drive are designated as major arterial streets and represents 85% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 85% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Little Mountain Drive and 48th Street are        Packet Page. 82 3. MAD No. 952 Zone 1, 2, and 2A Page | 4 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 designated as secondary arterial streets and represents 15% of the total maintenance area; thus 10% of 15% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15% and 10%). The result is the General Benefit of 14.25% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Zone 1 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $298.38 per unit. Zone 2 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $783.35 per unit. Zone 2A The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $100.06 per unit.        Packet Page. 83 4 . MAD No. 952 Zone 3 Page | 5 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 952 Zone 3 was formed in 1995 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 952 Zone 3 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Northpark Boulevard to the south, the westerly line of Tract No 10352-1 to the west, the northerly line of Tract No. 10352, 10352-1 and 10352-3 to the north and the easterly line of Tract No. 10352 to the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 952 Zone 3. The improvements to be maintained include 20,945 sq. ft. of turf, 28,300 sq. ft. of ground cover, shrubs, trees and all appurtenant irrigation along portions of the north side of Northpark Boulevard and the median strip between Little Mountain Drive and Mountain Avenue. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Northpark Boulevard is designated as a major arterial street and represents 57% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 57% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $161.75 per unit.        Packet Page. 84 5 . MAD No. 953 Page | 6 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 953 was formed in 1982 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 953 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of 19th Street to the north, the centerline of California Street to the west, the southerly line of Tract No. 11058 and 11059 to the south and the easterly line of Tract No. 11058, 11260 and 11261 to the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 953. The improvements to be maintained include 25,969 sq. ft. strip of ground cover along portions of 16th Street between California Street and the easterly line of Tract No. 11058 all within the District boundary. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the maintenance of the landscaping within the area of the total District in relation to the number of parcels therein. Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, 16th Street is designated as a collector street and represents 100% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $35.79 per unit.        Packet Page. 85 6 . MAD No. 956 Page | 7 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 956 was formed in 1985 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 956 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Bounded by Waterman Avenue on the west; on the east by Tippecanoe Avenue; on the south generally by Interstate Highway 10; on the north generally by the Santa Ana River and by Brier Drive. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 956. The improvements to be maintained include 309,636 sq. ft. of landscaping along portions of Waterman Avenue, Carnegie Drive, Vanderbilt Way, Hospitality Lane, Harriman Place, Brier Drive and Tippecanoe Street all within the boundaries of the District. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the maintenance and incidentals within the area in relation to the area of each parcel of land therein. Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Waterman Avenue, Tippecanoe Avenue, Carnegie Drive, Brier Drive and Hospitality Lane are designated as major arterial streets and represents 77% (rounded) of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 77% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Harriman Place is designated as a secondary arterial street and represents 12% of the total maintenance area, thus 10% of 12% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the District. Vanderbilt Way is designated as a collector street and represents 11% of the total maintenance area, thus 5% of 11% the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%, 10% and 5%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments.        Packet Page. 86 6 . MAD No. 956 Page | 8 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $99.34 per unit.        Packet Page. 87 7 . MAD No. 959 Zone 1 Page | 9 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 959 Zone 1 was formed in 1995 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 959 Zone 1 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Reports and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Kendal Drive to the north, the westerly lines of Tract No. 11323, 14254, 12958 and 12959 to the west, the southerly line of Tract No. 12958 and 12955 to the south and the easterly lines of Tract No. 12955 to the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 959 Zone 1. The improvements to be maintained include 952,386 sq. ft. of landscaping along portions of Kendal Drive and along portions of Shandin Hills Drive. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the maintenance and incidentals within the area of each Zone within the District in relation to the area of each parcel of land therein as they relate to a single family residential lot. Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Kendall Drive is designated as a major arterial street and represents 44% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 44% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $196.18 per unit.        Packet Page. 88 8 . MAD No. 962 Page | 10 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 962 was formed in 1984 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 962 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Maintenance Assessment District 962 consists of two noncontiguous areas. The area to the south’s boundary is the centerline of Belmont Avenue to the northwest, the westerly line of the City of San Bernardino’s Devil Canyon Water Reserve on the southeast the southwesterly line of Tract No. 13036 and 10600 on the southwest and the centerline of Pine Avenue to the northwest. The area to the north’s boundary is the northwesterly and southerly line of Tract No. 13436 to the northwest and south, the westerly line of the City of San Bernardino’s Devil Canyon Water Reserve on the east and southeast. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 962. The improvements to be maintained include a sewer lift station located at the easterly terminus of Christine Street in Tract No. 10600. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the maintenance and the incidentals within the District in relation to the area of each parcel of land therein as the relate to a single family residential lot. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $41.97 per unit.        Packet Page. 89 9 . MAD No. 963 Page | 11 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 963 was formed in 1995 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 963 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Reports and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Waterman Avenue on the east, the easterly line of the A.T. & S.F. Railroad right of way on the west, the southerly line of the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel to the north and the southerly line of Parcel Map 7124 and 16379 on the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 963. The improvements to be maintained include a sewer lift station located in Allen Street approximately 400 feet north of the centerline of Central Avenue. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the maintenance and incidentals within the District in relation to the area of each parcel of land therein as they relate to an average commercial lot. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The City of San Bernardino Housing Authority (APN 0136-401-50-00 and 0136-401-49-00) receives no benefit thus, is not assessable to the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $130.12 per unit.        Packet Page. 90 10. MAD No. 968 Page | 12 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 968 was formed in 1985 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 968 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Commercenter Drive West on the west, the centerline of Commercenter Court on the east, the northerly and southerly line of Tract No. 9418 on the north and south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 968. The improvements to be maintained include 10,962 sq. ft. of grass turf and 12 ornamental lights in the median strip of Airport Drive between Commercenter Drive West and Commercenter Court. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the maintenance and incidentals within the area in relation to the area of each parcel of land therein. Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Airport Drive is designated as a collector street and represents 100% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $85.70 per unit.        Packet Page. 91 11 . MAD No. 974 Page | 13 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 974 was formed in 1986 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 974 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Rialto Avenue to the north, the westerly, southerly and easterly lines of Tract No.13124 on the west, south and east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 974. The improvements to be maintained include a 4,500 sq. ft. strip of turf with shrub sections on the south side of Rialto Avenue for entire distance of the Subdivision. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Rialto Avenue is designated as a major arterial street and represents 100% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $68.57 per unit.        Packet Page. 92 12 . MAD No. 975 Page | 14 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 975 was formed in 1987 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 975 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The westerly line of Tract No. 13953 and 14938 to the west; the northerly line of Tract No. 14938 and 13490 to the north; the easterly line of Tract No. 13490, 13160 and Rialto High School to the east and the southerly line of Rialto High School and Tract No. 13953 to the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 975. The improvements to be maintained include a 12,250 sq. ft. strip of ground cover on the north side of Mill Street along the boundaries of Tract No. 13160, on the south side of Mill Street between Pepper Avenue and Eucalyptus Avenue, 15,120 sq. ft. of ground cover along the west side of Pepper Avenue between Mill Street from a point Approximately 250 feet north of Mill Street and a point approximately 1,900 feet south of Mill Street, 13,300 sq. ft. of ground cover along the east side of Eucalyptus Avenue between Mill Street and a point approximately 1,900 feet south thereof. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Mill Street and Pepper Avenue are designated as a major arterial streets and represents 67% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 67% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Eucalyptus is designated as a collector street and represents 33% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of 33% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15% and 5%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments.        Packet Page. 93 12 . MAD No. 975 Page | 15 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $70.96 per unit.        Packet Page. 94 13 . MAD No. 976 Page | 16 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 976 was formed in 1986 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 976 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Walnut Avenue to the west; the centerline of Ohio Avenue and the northwesterly line of Tract No. 13436 to the north; the Metropolitan Water District Property to the east and the southerly line of Tract No. 13036, 13029, 13355, 11843 and 11845 to the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 976. The improvements to be maintained include 21,360 sq. ft. strip of ground cover with shrubs and trees on the south side of Belmont Avenue, easterly of Pine Avenue, on both sides of Irvington Avenue, easterly of Pine Avenue, on the west side of Pine Avenue, southerly of Belmont Avenue, on the east side of Pine Avenue, south of Irvington Avenue, 94,400 sq. ft. strip of turf and trees over the M.W.D. property lying adjacent to and easterly of Pine Avenue, south of Belmont Avenue. 7,200 sq. ft. of turf in the common area south of Christine Street, east of Tract No. 13036. 2,200 sq. ft. strip of land behind the parcels of Tract No. 13036 and 13029 south of Christine Street. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Pine Avenue is designated as a secondary arterial street and represents 85% of the total maintenance area; thus 10% of 85% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Irvington Avenue and Belmont Avenue is designated as collector streets and represents 7% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of 7% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10% and 5%). The result is the General Benefit of 8.85% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments.        Packet Page. 95 13 . MAD No. 976 Page | 17 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $146.43 per unit.        Packet Page. 96 14 . MAD No. 981 Page | 18 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 981 was formed in 1987 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 981 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Meridian Avenue to the west; the northerly line of Tract Nos. 13656 to the north; the easterly line of Tract Nos. 13389, 13390, 14390 and 13331 to the east and the centerline of Randal Avenue to the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 981. The improvements to be maintained include 5,940 sq. ft. strip of turf on the east side of Meridian Avenue which adjoins Tract No. 13390 and Tract No. 12974 together with 19,760 sq. ft. of ground cover in the drainage area north of and adjacent to Pleasant Way and 900 sq. ft. of bushes along the north side of Randall Avenue. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Meridian Avenue and Randall Avenue are both classified as local streets. Therefore, the maintenance areas are deemed 100% special benefit and assessable to the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $61.03 per unit.        Packet Page. 97 15 . MAD No. 982 Page | 19 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 982 was formed in 1987 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 982 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Citrus Street to the south; the westerly line of Tract. Nos. 13329 and 13470 to the west, the northerly line of Tract No. 13470 to the north, the easterly line of Tract Nos. 13470 and 13329 the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 982. The improvements to be maintained include 11,326 sq. ft. strip of ground cover on the south side of Piedmont Drive between the east and west boundaries of Tract No. 13329, and on the north side of Citrus Street, between the east and west boundaries of Tract No. 13329. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Piedmont Drive is designated as a secondary arterial street and represents 70% of the total maintenance area; thus 10% of 70% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10%). The result is the General Benefit of 7% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $102.36 per unit.        Packet Page. 98 16 . MAD No. 986 Page | 20 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 986 was formed in 1989 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 986 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Rialto Avenue on the north, the easterly line of Tract No. 14235 on the east, the southerly line of Tract Nos. 13532 and 14235 to the south and the westerly line of Tract No. 13532 to the west. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 986. The improvements to be maintained include 19,200 sq. ft. strip of ground cover on the south side of Rialto Avenue for the entire distance within the boundaries of the District together with the maintenance of the required 40,000 sq. ft. of grass turf “retention basin” in Tract No. 14235. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Rialto Avenue is designated as a major arterial street and represents 32% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 32% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit of 4.8% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Flood Control property (APN 0142-721-38) is non-buildable, thus receives no benefit and is not assessable to the District. The property that makes up the Retention Basin (APN 0142-731-41, APN 0142-731-42, APN 0142-731-43, APN 0142-731-44 and APN 0142-731-45) receives no benefit therefore may not be assessed to the District.        Packet Page. 99 16 . MAD No. 986 Page | 21 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $114.00 per unit.        Packet Page. 100 17. MAD No. 989 Page | 22 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 989 was formed in 1989 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 989 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Mill Street on the north, the westerly, easterly, and southerly line of Tract No. 13457 on the west, east and south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 989. The improvements to be maintained include 7,600 sq. ft. strip of ground cover on the south side of Mill Street for the entire length of Tract No. 13457 together with the maintenance of the sewer lift station located near the south boundary at Macy Street. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. In the case of the sewer lift station, all lots will be served thereby and will benefit equally in the cost of maintenance thereof. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each single family residence will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance. (1 residential unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Mill Street is designated as a major arterial street and represents 100% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $56.30 per unit.        Packet Page. 101 18. MAD No. 991 Page | 23 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 991 was formed in 1989 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 991 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue and Verdemont Drive to the north; the centerlines of Olive Avenue and Palm Avenue to the east; the centerline of Ohio Avenue and the southerly line of Tract No. 13530 to the south and the centerline of Palm Avenue and the westerly line of Tract No. 13530 to the west. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of MAD No. 991. The improvements to be maintained include 36,600 sq. ft. strip of ground cover on the south side of Verdemont Drive, the north and south sides of Garfield Street, between Palm Avenue and Olive Avenue, and the north sides of Ohio Avenue, all between Palm Avenue and Olive Avenue. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Ohio Avenue is designated as a collector street and represents 60% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of 60% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $192.76 per unit.        Packet Page. 102 19. MAD No. 993 Page | 24 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 993 was formed in 1991 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 993 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Rosarita Street and the northerly line of Tract No. 14185 to the north, the easterly line of Tract No. 14184 to the east, the southerly line of Tract Nos. 14185 and 14184 to the south and the easterly line of Tract No. 14185 and the westerly line of the Devil’s Canyon Diversion Channel to the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 993. The improvements to be maintained include 82,584 sq. ft. of grass turf inside three retention basins in various areas of the District. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). The maintenance areas are in retention basins which are of no benefit to parcels outside of the District. Therefore, the maintenance areas are deemed 100% special benefit and assessable to the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $100.06 per unit.        Packet Page. 103 20 . MAD No. 997 Page | 25 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 997 was formed in 1990 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 997 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue on the northeast, the southeasterly lines of Tract No. 13603 and 13307, the centerline of Irvington Avenue on the southwest and the centerline of Magnolia Avenue and the northwesterly line of Tract No. 13603 on the northwest. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 997. The improvements to be maintained include 103,122 sq. ft. of landscaping between Ohio Avenue and Irvington Avenue in the area of the vacant Chestnut Avenue. The area is covered with ground cover, trees and shrubs except for the walkway area which runs down the middle of the area which is dirt. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Chestnut Avenue is classified as local street. Therefore, the maintenance area is deemed 100% special benefit and assessable to the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $80.33 per unit.        Packet Page. 104 21 . MAD No. 1001 Page | 26 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1001 was formed in 1991 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1001 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Pennsylvania Avenue on the east, the southerly, westerly and northerly line of Tract No. 14118 on the south, west and north. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1001. The improvements to be maintained include 3,000 sq. ft. of groundcover on the west side of Pennsylvania Avenue for the entire distance within the boundaries of the District together with the maintenance of the 52,800 sq. ft. “open space” area (Edison Co. Right of Way) within Tract No. 14118. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Pennsylvania Avenue is classified as local street. Therefore, the maintenance area is deemed 100% special benefit and assessable to the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Edison Co. right of way (APN 0142-751-47), which is a part of the landscape area, receives no benefit and thus is exempt from assessments. The City of San Bernardino property (APN 0142-751-46) is vacant land and receives no benefit and therefore is exempt from assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $624.00 per unit.        Packet Page. 105 22 . MAD No. 1002 Page | 27 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1002 was formed in 1991 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1002 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The westerly lines of Tract Nos. 13554-6 and 13554-7 on the west, the Flood Control bank on the north, the easterly line of Tract Nos. 13554-1 and 13554-2 on the east, and the southerly line of Tract Nos. 13554-1, 13554-3 and 13554- 7 on the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1002. The improvements to be maintained include a 6,684 sq. ft. strip of ground cover, shrubs and trees along portions of the east and west sides of “H” Street and the maintenance of 70 trees only located on the bank of the Flood Control lying north of and adjacent to the north boundaries of the Tracts. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). “H” Street is classified as local street. Therefore, the maintenance area is deemed 100% special benefit and assessable to the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $22.00 per unit.        Packet Page. 106 23 . MAD No. 1005 Page | 28 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1005 was formed in 1991 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1005 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Cajon Boulevard on the northeast, the northwesterly lines of Tract No. 14503 and 14503-1 on the northwest and the southerly line of Tract No. 14503 and 14503-1 to the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1005. The improvements to be maintained include 30,113 sq. ft. of ground cover along the easterly side of Pepper Linden Drive, the southerly side of Cajon Boulevard and the southeasterly side of Tract No. 14503-1. 22,370 sq. ft. of turf area in the Retention Basin located in Tract No. 14503 and will be maintain by the District. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Cajon Boulevard is designated as a major arterial street and represents 46% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 46% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Retention Basin property (APN 0262-291-55) receives no benefit from the maintenance thus it is not assessable to the District        Packet Page. 107 23 . MAD No. 1005 Page | 29 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $25,048.00 Assessment Units 101 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $248.00 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $248.00 per unit.        Packet Page. 108 24 . MAD No. 1007 Page | 30 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1007 was formed in 1993 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1007 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Pepper Avenue on the west, the centerline of Meridian Avenue on the east, San Bernardino Flood Control District property on the south and the southerly lines of Tract No. 12775 and Tract No. 6869 on the north. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1007. The improvements to be maintained include 4,217 sq. ft. strips of ground cover and trees on the east side of Pepper Avenue and the west side of Meridian Avenue for the entire distance within the boundaries of the District. Also included is the 18,841 sq. ft. of ground cover and trees located within the Edison easement in the middle of the District. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Pepper Avenue is designated as a major arterial street and represents 2% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 2% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Meridian Avenue is designated as a collector street and represents 1% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of 1% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15% and 5%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The San Bernardino Flood Control District properties (APN 0142-181-19 and APN 0142-761-22) receives no benefit and thus exempted from assessment.        Packet Page. 109 24 . MAD No. 1007 Page | 31 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $91.00 per unit.        Packet Page. 110 25 . MAD No. 1012 Page | 32 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1012 was formed in 1993 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1012 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Poplar Street on the north, the westerly line of Tract No. 15093 to the west, the centerline of Mill Street to the south and the easterly line of Tract. No. 15093 to the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1012. The improvements to be maintained include 19,500 sq. ft. of ground cover along the south side of Poplar Street, along the north side of Mill Street, and the entire length of slope on the east side of the subdivision. The District also includes the maintenance of those areas of front yards where easements were granted to the City on the map of Tract No. 15093 in case of owner neglect. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Mill Street is designated as a major arterial street and represents 13% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 13% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit of 1.95% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $691.00 per unit.        Packet Page. 111 26 . MAD No. 1016 Page | 33 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1016 was formed in 1995 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1016 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Coulston Street on the south, the centerline of Curtis Street on the west, the northerly boundary of Tract No. 15573 on the north, and the centerline of Rosena Avenue on the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1016. The improvements to be maintained include 4,500 sq. ft. of ground cover, shrubbery and one tree along the north side of Coulston Street, the entire length of Tract No. 15573. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of “open areas”. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Hence, each residential unit, be it a single family residence, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential unit = 1 assessment unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Coulston Street is designated as a second arterial street and represents 100% of the total maintenance area; thus 10% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $119.58 per unit.        Packet Page. 112 27. Assessment Diagrams Page | 34 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagrams are filed herewith, are incorporated by reference in Appendix B herein, and made part of this Report. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment. Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of San Bernardino, and the San Bernardino County Assessor’s Office.        Packet Page. 113 28. Assessment Rolls Page | 35 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The actual amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.        Packet Page. 114 Appendix A: Assessment Rolls        Packet Page. 115 CC30 SP21 - AD 951 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-261-06 $75.02 0266-261-07 $75.02 0266-261-08 $75.02 0266-261-09 $75.02 0266-261-10 $75.02 0266-261-11 $75.02 0266-261-12 $75.02 0266-261-13 $75.02 0266-261-14 $75.02 0266-261-15 $75.02 0266-261-16 $75.02 0266-261-17 $75.02 0266-261-18 $75.02 0266-261-19 $75.02 0266-262-01 $75.02 0266-262-02 $75.02 0266-262-03 $75.02 0266-262-04 $75.02 0266-262-05 $75.02 0266-262-06 $75.02 0266-262-07 $75.02 0266-262-08 $75.02 0266-262-09 $75.02 0266-262-10 $75.02 0266-262-11 $75.02 0266-262-12 $75.02 0266-262-13 $75.02 0266-262-14 $75.02 0266-262-15 $75.02 0266-262-16 $75.02 0266-262-17 $75.02 0266-262-18 $75.02 0266-262-19 $75.02 0266-262-20 $75.02 0266-262-21 $75.02 0266-262-22 $75.02 0266-262-23 $75.02 0266-262-24 $75.02 0266-262-25 $75.02 0266-262-26 $75.02 0266-262-27 $75.02 0266-263-01 $75.02 0266-263-02 $75.02 0266-263-03 $75.02 0266-263-04 $75.02 0266-263-05 $75.02 0266-263-06 $75.02 0266-263-07 $75.02 0266-263-08 $75.02 0266-263-09 $75.02 0266-263-10 $75.02 0266-263-11 $75.02 0266-263-12 $75.02 0266-263-13 $75.02 0266-263-14 $75.02 0266-263-15 $75.02 0266-263-16 $75.02 0266-263-17 $75.02 0266-263-18 $75.02 0266-263-19 $75.02 0266-263-20 $75.02 0266-263-21 $75.02 0266-263-22 $75.02 0266-263-23 $75.02 0266-263-24 $75.02 Totals Parcels 65 Levy $4,876.30 Assessment Roll Page 1 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 116 CC30 SP22 - AD 951 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-031-14 $1,712.74 0266-041-01 $88.58 0266-761-01 $29.52 0266-761-02 $29.52 0266-761-03 $29.52 0266-761-04 $29.52 0266-761-06 $29.52 0266-761-07 $29.52 0266-761-08 $29.52 0266-761-09 $29.52 0266-761-10 $29.52 0266-761-11 $29.52 0266-761-12 $29.52 0266-761-13 $29.52 0266-761-14 $29.52 0266-761-15 $29.52 0266-761-16 $29.52 0266-761-17 $29.52 0266-761-18 $29.52 0266-761-19 $29.52 0266-761-20 $29.52 0266-761-21 $29.52 0266-761-22 $29.52 0266-761-23 $29.52 0266-761-25 $29.52 0266-761-26 $29.52 0266-761-27 $29.52 0266-761-28 $29.52 0266-761-29 $29.52 0266-761-30 $29.52 0266-761-31 $29.52 0266-761-32 $29.52 0266-761-33 $29.52 0266-761-34 $29.52 0266-761-35 $29.52 0266-761-36 $29.52 0266-761-37 $29.52 0266-761-38 $29.52 0266-761-39 $29.52 0266-761-40 $29.52 0266-761-41 $29.52 0266-761-42 $29.52 0266-761-43 $29.52 0266-761-44 $29.52 0266-761-45 $29.52 0266-761-46 $29.52 0266-761-47 $29.52 0266-761-48 $29.52 0266-761-49 $29.52 0266-761-50 $29.52 0266-761-51 $29.52 0266-761-52 $29.52 0266-761-53 $29.52 0266-761-54 $29.52 0266-761-55 $29.52 0266-761-56 $29.52 0266-761-57 $29.52 0266-771-02 $29.52 0266-771-03 $29.52 0266-771-04 $29.52 0266-771-05 $29.52 0266-771-06 $29.52 0266-771-07 $29.52 0266-771-08 $29.52 0266-771-09 $29.52 0266-771-10 $29.52 0266-771-11 $29.52 0266-771-12 $29.52 0266-771-14 $29.52 0266-771-15 $29.52 0266-771-16 $29.52 0266-771-17 $29.52 0266-771-18 $29.52 0266-771-19 $29.52 0266-771-20 $29.52 0266-771-21 $29.52 0266-771-22 $29.52 0266-771-23 $29.52 0266-771-24 $29.52 0266-771-25 $29.52 0266-771-26 $29.52 0266-771-27 $29.52 0266-771-28 $29.52 0266-771-29 $29.52 0266-771-30 $29.52 0266-771-31 $29.52 0266-771-32 $29.52 0266-771-33 $29.52 0266-771-34 $29.52 0266-771-35 $29.52 0266-771-36 $29.52 0266-771-37 $29.52 0266-771-38 $29.52 0266-771-39 $29.52 0266-771-40 $29.52 0266-771-41 $29.52 0266-771-42 $29.52 0266-771-43 $29.52 0266-771-44 $29.52 0266-771-45 $29.52 0266-781-01 $29.52 0266-781-02 $29.52 0266-781-03 $29.52 0266-781-04 $29.52 0266-781-05 $29.52 0266-781-06 $29.52 0266-781-07 $29.52 0266-781-08 $29.52 0266-781-09 $29.52 0266-781-10 $29.52 0266-781-11 $29.52 0266-781-12 $29.52 0266-781-13 $29.52 0266-781-14 $29.52 0266-781-15 $29.52 0266-781-16 $29.52 0266-781-17 $29.52 0266-781-18 $29.52 0266-781-19 $29.52 0266-781-20 $29.52 0266-781-21 $29.52 0266-781-22 $29.52 0266-781-23 $29.52 0266-781-24 $29.52 0266-781-25 $29.52 0266-781-26 $29.52 0266-781-27 $29.52 0266-781-28 $29.52 0266-781-29 $29.52 0266-781-30 $29.52 0266-781-31 $29.52 0266-781-32 $29.52 0266-781-33 $29.52 0266-781-34 $29.52 0266-781-35 $29.52 0266-781-36 $29.52 0266-781-37 $29.52 0266-781-38 $29.52 Assessment Roll Page 2 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 117 CC30 SP22 - AD 951 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-781-39 $29.52 0266-781-40 $29.52 0266-781-41 $29.52 0266-781-42 $29.52 0266-781-43 $29.52 0266-781-44 $29.52 Totals Parcels 144 Levy $5,993.16 Page 3 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 118 CC30 SP23 - AD 952 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-086-01 $35.36 0266-086-02 $35.36 0266-086-03 $35.36 0266-086-04 $35.36 0266-086-05 $35.36 0266-086-06 $35.36 0266-086-08 $35.36 0266-086-09 $35.36 0266-086-10 $35.36 0266-086-11 $35.36 0266-086-12 $35.36 0266-086-13 $35.36 0266-086-14 $35.36 0266-086-15 $35.36 0266-086-16 $35.36 0266-086-17 $35.36 0266-086-18 $35.36 0266-086-19 $35.36 0266-086-20 $35.36 0266-086-21 $35.36 0266-086-22 $35.36 0266-086-23 $35.36 0266-086-24 $35.36 0266-086-25 $35.36 0266-086-26 $35.36 0266-086-27 $35.36 0266-086-28 $35.36 0266-086-29 $35.36 0266-086-30 $35.36 0266-086-31 $35.36 0266-086-32 $35.36 0266-086-33 $35.36 0266-086-34 $35.36 0266-086-35 $35.36 0266-086-36 $35.36 0266-086-37 $35.36 0266-086-38 $35.36 0266-086-39 $35.36 0266-086-40 $35.36 0266-086-41 $35.36 0266-086-42 $35.36 0266-086-43 $35.36 0266-086-44 $35.36 0266-086-45 $35.36 0266-086-46 $35.36 0266-086-47 $35.36 0266-086-48 $35.36 0266-086-49 $35.36 0266-086-50 $35.36 0266-086-51 $35.36 0266-086-52 $35.36 0266-086-53 $35.36 0266-086-54 $35.36 0266-086-55 $35.36 0266-086-56 $35.36 0266-086-57 $35.36 0266-086-58 $35.36 0266-086-59 $35.36 0266-086-60 $35.36 0266-086-61 $35.36 0266-086-62 $35.36 0266-086-66 $35.36 0266-086-67 $35.36 0266-086-68 $35.36 0266-091-29 $5,379.84 0266-101-30 $2,979.60 0266-101-31 $342.80 0266-381-01 $35.36 0266-381-02 $35.36 0266-381-03 $35.36 0266-381-04 $35.36 0266-381-05 $35.36 0266-381-06 $35.36 0266-381-07 $35.36 0266-381-08 $35.36 0266-381-09 $35.36 0266-381-10 $35.36 0266-381-11 $35.36 0266-381-12 $35.36 0266-381-13 $35.36 0266-381-14 $35.36 0266-381-15 $35.36 0266-381-16 $35.36 0266-381-17 $35.36 0266-381-18 $35.36 0266-381-19 $35.36 0266-381-20 $35.36 0266-381-21 $35.36 0266-381-22 $35.36 0266-381-23 $35.36 0266-381-24 $35.36 0266-381-25 $35.36 0266-381-26 $35.36 0266-381-27 $35.36 0266-381-28 $35.36 0266-381-29 $35.36 0266-381-30 $35.36 0266-381-31 $35.36 0266-381-32 $35.36 0266-381-33 $35.36 0266-381-34 $35.36 0266-381-35 $35.36 0266-381-36 $35.36 0266-381-37 $35.36 0266-381-38 $35.36 0266-381-39 $35.36 0266-381-40 $35.36 0266-391-01 $35.36 0266-391-02 $35.36 0266-391-03 $35.36 0266-391-04 $35.36 0266-391-05 $35.36 0266-391-06 $35.36 0266-391-07 $35.36 0266-391-08 $35.36 0266-391-09 $35.36 0266-391-10 $35.36 0266-391-11 $35.36 0266-391-12 $35.36 0266-391-13 $35.36 0266-391-14 $35.36 0266-391-15 $35.36 0266-391-16 $35.36 0266-391-17 $35.36 0266-391-18 $35.36 0266-391-19 $35.36 0266-391-20 $35.36 0266-391-21 $35.36 0266-391-22 $35.36 0266-391-23 $35.36 0266-391-24 $35.36 0266-391-25 $35.36 0266-391-26 $35.36 0266-391-27 $35.36 0266-391-28 $35.36 0266-391-29 $35.36 0266-391-30 $35.36 0266-391-31 $35.36 Assessment Roll Page 4 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 119 CC30 SP23 - AD 952 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-391-32 $35.36 0266-391-33 $35.36 0266-391-34 $35.36 0266-391-35 $35.36 0266-391-36 $35.36 0266-391-37 $35.36 0266-391-38 $35.36 0266-391-39 $35.36 0266-391-40 $35.36 0266-391-41 $35.36 0266-391-42 $35.36 0266-391-43 $35.36 0266-391-44 $35.36 0266-391-45 $35.36 0266-421-01 $35.36 0266-421-02 $35.36 0266-421-03 $35.36 0266-421-04 $35.36 0266-421-05 $35.36 0266-421-06 $35.36 0266-421-07 $35.36 0266-421-08 $35.36 0266-421-09 $35.36 0266-421-10 $35.36 0266-421-11 $35.36 0266-421-12 $35.36 0266-421-13 $35.36 0266-421-14 $35.36 0266-421-15 $35.36 0266-421-16 $35.36 0266-421-17 $35.36 0266-421-18 $35.36 0266-421-19 $35.36 0266-421-20 $35.36 0266-421-21 $35.36 0266-421-22 $35.36 0266-421-23 $35.36 0266-421-24 $35.36 0266-421-25 $35.36 0266-421-26 $35.36 0266-421-27 $35.36 0266-421-28 $35.36 0266-421-29 $35.36 0266-421-30 $35.36 0266-421-31 $35.36 0266-421-32 $35.36 0266-421-33 $35.36 0266-421-34 $35.36 0266-421-35 $35.36 0266-421-36 $35.36 0266-421-37 $35.36 0266-421-38 $35.36 0266-421-39 $35.36 0266-421-40 $35.36 0266-421-41 $35.36 0266-421-42 $35.36 0266-421-43 $35.36 0266-421-44 $35.36 0266-441-01 $35.36 0266-441-02 $35.36 0266-441-03 $35.36 0266-441-04 $35.36 0266-441-05 $35.36 0266-441-06 $35.36 0266-441-07 $35.36 0266-441-08 $35.36 0266-441-09 $35.36 0266-441-10 $35.36 0266-441-11 $35.36 0266-441-12 $35.36 0266-441-13 $35.36 0266-441-14 $35.36 0266-441-15 $35.36 0266-441-16 $35.36 0266-441-17 $35.36 0266-441-18 $35.36 0266-441-19 $35.36 0266-441-20 $35.36 0266-441-21 $35.36 0266-441-22 $35.36 0266-441-23 $35.36 0266-441-24 $35.36 0266-441-25 $35.36 0266-441-26 $35.36 0266-441-27 $35.36 0266-441-28 $35.36 0266-441-29 $35.36 0266-441-30 $35.36 0266-441-31 $35.36 0266-441-32 $35.36 0266-441-33 $35.36 0266-441-34 $35.36 0266-441-35 $35.36 0266-441-36 $35.36 0266-441-37 $35.36 0266-441-38 $35.36 0266-441-39 $35.36 0266-441-40 $35.36 0266-441-41 $35.36 0266-441-42 $35.36 0266-441-43 $35.36 0266-441-44 $35.36 0266-441-45 $35.36 0266-441-46 $35.36 0266-441-47 $35.36 0266-441-48 $35.36 0266-441-49 $35.36 0266-441-50 $35.36 0266-441-51 $35.36 0266-441-52 $35.36 0266-441-53 $35.36 0266-441-54 $35.36 0266-441-55 $35.36 0266-441-56 $35.36 0266-441-57 $35.36 0266-441-58 $35.36 0266-441-59 $35.36 0266-441-60 $35.36 0266-451-01 $35.36 0266-451-14 $35.36 0266-451-15 $35.36 0266-451-16 $35.36 0266-451-17 $35.36 0266-451-18 $35.36 0266-451-19 $35.36 0266-452-01 $35.36 0266-452-02 $35.36 0266-452-03 $35.36 0266-452-04 $35.36 0266-452-05 $35.36 0266-452-06 $35.36 0266-452-07 $35.36 0266-452-08 $35.36 0266-452-09 $35.36 0266-452-10 $35.36 0266-452-11 $35.36 0266-452-12 $35.36 0266-452-13 $35.36 Page 5 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 120 CC30 SP23 - AD 952 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-452-14 $35.36 0266-452-15 $35.36 0266-452-16 $35.36 0266-452-17 $35.36 0266-452-18 $35.36 0266-452-19 $35.36 0266-452-20 $35.36 0266-453-01 $35.36 0266-453-02 $35.36 0266-453-03 $35.36 0266-453-04 $35.36 0266-453-05 $35.36 0266-453-06 $35.36 0266-453-07 $35.36 0266-453-08 $35.36 0266-453-09 $35.36 0266-453-10 $35.36 0266-453-11 $35.36 0266-453-12 $35.36 0266-453-13 $35.36 0266-453-14 $35.36 0266-453-15 $35.36 0266-461-01 $35.36 0266-461-03 $35.36 0266-461-04 $35.36 0266-461-05 $35.36 0266-461-06 $35.36 0266-461-07 $35.36 0266-461-08 $35.36 0266-461-09 $35.36 0266-461-10 $35.36 0266-461-11 $35.36 0266-461-12 $35.36 0266-461-13 $35.36 0266-461-14 $35.36 0266-461-15 $35.36 0266-461-16 $35.36 0266-461-17 $35.36 0266-461-18 $35.36 0266-461-19 $35.36 0266-461-20 $35.36 0266-461-21 $35.36 0266-461-22 $35.36 0266-461-23 $35.36 0266-461-24 $35.36 0266-461-25 $35.36 0266-461-26 $35.36 0266-461-27 $35.36 0266-461-28 $35.36 0266-461-29 $35.36 0266-461-30 $35.36 0266-461-31 $35.36 0266-461-32 $35.36 0266-461-33 $35.36 0266-461-34 $35.36 0266-461-35 $35.36 0266-461-36 $35.36 0266-461-37 $35.36 0266-461-38 $35.36 0266-461-39 $35.36 0266-461-40 $35.36 0266-461-41 $35.36 0266-461-42 $35.36 0266-461-43 $35.36 0266-461-44 $35.36 0266-461-45 $35.36 0266-461-46 $35.36 0266-461-47 $35.36 0266-461-48 $35.36 0266-461-49 $35.36 0266-461-50 $35.36 0266-461-51 $35.36 0266-461-52 $35.36 0266-461-53 $35.36 0266-461-54 $35.36 0266-461-55 $35.36 0266-461-56 $35.36 0266-461-57 $35.36 0266-461-58 $35.36 0266-461-59 $35.36 0266-461-60 $35.36 0266-461-61 $35.36 0266-461-62 $35.36 0266-461-63 $35.36 0266-461-64 $35.36 0266-461-65 $35.36 0266-461-66 $35.36 0266-461-67 $35.36 0266-461-68 $35.36 0266-461-69 $35.36 0266-461-70 $35.36 0266-461-71 $35.36 0266-461-72 $35.36 0266-461-73 $35.36 0266-461-74 $35.36 0266-461-75 $35.36 0266-461-76 $35.36 0266-461-77 $35.36 0266-471-01 $35.36 0266-471-02 $35.36 0266-471-03 $35.36 0266-471-04 $35.36 0266-471-05 $35.36 0266-471-06 $35.36 0266-471-07 $35.36 0266-471-08 $35.36 0266-471-09 $35.36 0266-471-10 $35.36 0266-471-11 $35.36 0266-471-12 $35.36 0266-471-13 $35.36 0266-471-14 $35.36 0266-471-15 $35.36 0266-471-16 $35.36 0266-471-17 $35.36 0266-471-18 $35.36 0266-471-19 $35.36 0266-471-20 $35.36 0266-471-21 $35.36 0266-471-22 $35.36 0266-471-23 $35.36 0266-471-24 $35.36 0266-471-25 $35.36 0266-471-26 $35.36 0266-471-27 $35.36 0266-471-28 $35.36 0266-471-29 $35.36 0266-471-30 $35.36 0266-471-31 $35.36 0266-471-32 $35.36 0266-471-33 $35.36 0266-471-34 $35.36 0266-471-35 $35.36 0266-471-36 $35.36 0266-471-37 $35.36 0266-471-38 $35.36 0266-471-39 $35.36 0266-471-40 $35.36 Page 6 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 121 CC30 SP23 - AD 952 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-471-41 $35.36 0266-471-42 $35.36 0266-471-43 $35.36 0266-471-44 $35.36 0266-471-45 $35.36 0266-471-46 $35.36 0266-471-47 $35.36 0266-471-48 $35.36 0266-471-49 $35.36 0266-471-50 $35.36 0266-471-51 $35.36 0266-471-52 $35.36 0266-471-53 $35.36 0266-471-54 $35.36 0266-471-55 $35.36 0266-471-56 $35.36 0266-471-57 $35.36 0266-471-58 $35.36 0266-471-59 $35.36 0266-471-62 $35.36 0266-471-63 $35.36 0266-471-64 $35.36 0266-471-65 $35.36 0266-471-66 $35.36 0266-471-67 $35.36 0266-471-68 $35.36 0266-471-69 $35.36 0266-471-70 $35.36 0266-471-71 $35.36 0266-471-72 $35.36 0266-471-73 $35.36 0266-471-74 $35.36 0266-471-75 $35.36 0266-471-76 $35.36 0266-471-77 $35.36 0266-471-78 $35.36 0266-471-79 $35.36 0266-471-80 $35.36 0266-471-81 $35.36 0266-471-82 $35.36 0266-471-83 $35.36 0266-471-84 $35.36 0266-471-85 $35.36 0266-481-01 $35.36 0266-481-02 $35.36 0266-481-03 $35.36 0266-481-04 $35.36 0266-481-05 $35.36 0266-481-06 $35.36 0266-481-07 $35.36 0266-481-08 $35.36 0266-481-09 $35.36 0266-481-10 $35.36 0266-481-11 $35.36 0266-481-12 $35.36 0266-481-13 $35.36 0266-481-14 $35.36 0266-481-15 $35.36 0266-481-16 $35.36 0266-481-17 $35.36 0266-481-18 $35.36 0266-481-19 $35.36 0266-481-20 $35.36 0266-481-21 $35.36 0266-481-22 $35.36 0266-481-23 $35.36 0266-481-24 $35.36 0266-481-25 $35.36 0266-481-26 $35.36 0266-481-27 $35.36 0266-481-28 $35.36 0266-481-29 $35.36 0266-481-30 $35.36 0266-481-31 $35.36 0266-481-32 $35.36 0266-481-33 $35.36 0266-481-34 $35.36 0266-491-01 $35.36 0266-491-02 $35.36 0266-491-03 $35.36 0266-491-04 $35.36 0266-491-05 $35.36 0266-491-06 $35.36 0266-491-07 $35.36 0266-491-08 $35.36 0266-491-09 $35.36 0266-491-10 $35.36 0266-491-11 $35.36 0266-491-12 $35.36 0266-491-13 $35.36 0266-491-14 $35.36 0266-491-15 $35.36 0266-491-16 $35.36 0266-491-17 $35.36 0266-491-18 $35.36 0266-491-19 $35.36 0266-491-20 $35.36 0266-491-21 $35.36 0266-491-22 $35.36 0266-491-23 $35.36 0266-491-24 $35.36 0266-491-25 $35.36 0266-491-26 $35.36 0266-491-27 $35.36 0266-491-28 $35.36 0266-491-29 $35.36 0266-491-30 $35.36 0266-491-31 $35.36 0266-491-32 $35.36 0266-491-33 $35.36 0266-491-34 $35.36 0266-491-35 $35.36 0266-491-36 $35.36 0266-491-37 $35.36 0266-491-38 $35.36 0266-491-39 $35.36 0266-491-40 $35.36 0266-491-41 $35.36 0266-491-42 $35.36 0266-491-43 $35.36 0266-491-44 $35.36 0266-511-01 $35.36 0266-511-02 $35.36 0266-511-03 $35.36 0266-511-04 $35.36 0266-511-05 $35.36 0266-511-06 $35.36 0266-511-07 $35.36 0266-511-08 $35.36 0266-511-09 $35.36 0266-511-10 $35.36 0266-511-11 $35.36 0266-511-12 $35.36 0266-511-13 $35.36 0266-511-14 $35.36 0266-511-15 $35.36 0266-511-16 $35.36 0266-511-17 $35.36 Page 7 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 122 CC30 SP23 - AD 952 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-511-18 $35.36 0266-511-19 $35.36 0266-511-20 $35.36 0266-511-21 $35.36 0266-511-22 $35.36 0266-511-23 $35.36 0266-511-24 $35.36 0266-511-25 $35.36 0266-511-26 $35.36 0266-511-27 $35.36 0266-511-28 $35.36 0266-511-29 $35.36 0266-511-30 $35.36 0266-511-31 $35.36 0266-511-32 $35.36 0266-511-33 $35.36 0266-511-34 $35.36 0266-511-35 $35.36 0266-511-36 $35.36 0266-511-37 $35.36 0266-511-38 $35.36 0266-511-39 $35.36 0266-511-40 $35.36 0266-511-41 $35.36 0266-511-42 $35.36 0266-511-43 $35.36 0266-511-44 $35.36 0266-511-45 $35.36 0266-511-46 $35.36 0266-511-47 $35.36 0266-511-48 $35.36 0266-511-49 $35.36 0266-511-50 $35.36 0266-511-51 $35.36 0266-511-52 $35.36 0266-511-53 $35.36 0266-511-54 $35.36 0266-511-55 $35.36 0266-511-56 $35.36 0266-511-57 $35.36 0266-511-58 $35.36 0266-511-59 $35.36 0266-511-60 $35.36 0266-511-61 $35.36 0266-511-62 $35.36 0266-511-63 $35.36 0266-511-64 $35.36 0266-511-65 $35.36 0266-511-66 $35.36 0266-511-67 $35.36 0266-511-68 $35.36 0266-511-69 $35.36 0266-511-70 $35.36 0266-511-71 $35.36 0266-511-72 $35.36 0266-511-73 $35.36 0266-511-74 $35.36 0266-511-75 $35.36 0266-511-76 $35.36 0266-511-77 $35.36 0266-511-78 $35.36 0266-511-79 $35.36 0266-511-80 $35.36 0266-511-81 $35.36 0266-511-82 $35.36 0266-511-83 $35.36 0266-511-84 $35.36 0266-511-85 $35.36 0266-511-86 $35.36 0266-511-87 $35.36 0266-511-88 $35.36 0266-511-89 $35.36 0266-511-90 $35.36 0266-511-91 $35.36 0266-551-01 $35.36 0266-551-02 $35.36 0266-551-03 $35.36 0266-551-04 $35.36 0266-551-05 $35.36 0266-551-06 $35.36 0266-551-07 $35.36 0266-551-08 $35.36 0266-551-09 $35.36 0266-551-10 $35.36 0266-551-11 $35.36 0266-551-12 $35.36 0266-551-13 $35.36 0266-551-14 $35.36 0266-551-15 $35.36 0266-551-16 $35.36 0266-551-17 $35.36 0266-551-18 $35.36 0266-551-19 $35.36 0266-551-20 $35.36 0266-551-21 $35.36 0266-551-22 $35.36 0266-551-23 $35.36 0266-551-24 $35.36 0266-551-25 $35.36 0266-551-26 $35.36 0266-551-27 $35.36 0266-551-28 $35.36 0266-551-29 $35.36 0266-551-30 $35.36 0266-551-31 $35.36 0266-551-32 $35.36 0266-551-33 $35.36 0266-551-34 $35.36 0266-551-35 $35.36 0266-551-36 $35.36 0266-551-37 $35.36 0266-551-38 $35.36 0266-551-39 $35.36 0266-551-40 $35.36 0266-551-41 $35.36 0266-551-42 $35.36 0266-551-43 $35.36 0266-551-44 $35.36 0266-551-45 $35.36 0266-551-46 $35.36 0266-551-47 $35.36 0266-561-19 $289.40 0266-561-20 $146.84 0266-561-21 $200.68 0266-561-22 $187.00 0266-561-23 $204.14 0266-561-24 $190.88 0266-561-25 $176.78 0266-561-26 $217.52 0266-561-27 $268.70 0266-591-01 $3,009.34 0266-591-02 $2,573.42 0266-591-03 $3,007.90 0266-591-05 $387.54 0266-591-09 $175.52 0266-591-10 $281.30 0266-591-11 $1,042.24 0266-591-12 $201.54 Page 8 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 123 CC30 SP23 - AD 952 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-591-13 $178.80 0266-591-16 $188.90 0266-591-17 $270.74 0266-591-18 $317.58 0266-591-20 $139.52 0266-591-21 $613.70 0266-591-25 $757.24 0266-591-26 $415.66 0266-591-27 $325.18 0266-591-28 $416.40 Totals Parcels 700 Levy $48,577.90 Page 9 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 124 CC30 SP24 - AD 952 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-115-17 $7,079.92 0266-123-05 $16.14 0266-123-06 $16.14 0266-123-07 $16.14 0266-123-08 $16.14 0266-123-09 $16.14 0266-123-10 $16.14 0266-123-11 $16.14 0266-123-12 $16.14 0266-123-13 $16.14 0266-123-14 $16.14 0266-123-15 $16.14 0266-123-16 $16.14 0266-123-17 $16.14 0266-123-18 $16.14 0266-123-19 $16.14 0266-123-20 $16.14 0266-123-21 $15.86 0266-123-22 $15.86 0266-123-23 $15.86 0266-123-24 $15.86 0266-123-25 $15.86 0266-123-26 $15.86 0266-123-27 $15.86 0266-123-28 $15.86 0266-123-29 $15.86 0266-123-30 $15.86 0266-123-31 $15.86 0266-123-32 $15.86 0266-123-33 $16.14 0266-123-34 $16.14 0266-123-35 $16.14 0266-123-36 $16.14 0266-123-37 $16.14 0266-123-38 $16.14 0266-123-39 $16.14 0266-123-40 $16.14 0266-123-41 $16.14 0266-123-42 $16.14 0266-123-43 $16.14 0266-123-44 $16.14 0266-123-45 $16.14 0266-123-46 $16.14 0266-123-47 $16.14 0266-123-48 $16.14 0266-123-49 $16.38 0266-123-50 $16.38 0266-123-51 $16.38 0266-123-52 $16.38 0266-123-53 $16.38 0266-123-54 $16.38 0266-123-55 $16.38 0266-123-56 $16.38 0266-123-57 $16.14 0266-123-58 $16.14 0266-123-59 $16.14 0266-123-60 $16.14 0266-123-61 $16.14 0266-123-62 $16.14 0266-123-63 $16.14 0266-123-64 $16.14 0266-123-65 $16.14 0266-123-66 $16.14 0266-123-67 $16.14 0266-123-68 $16.14 0266-123-69 $16.14 0266-123-70 $16.14 0266-123-71 $16.14 0266-123-72 $16.14 0266-124-01 $16.14 0266-124-02 $16.14 0266-124-03 $16.14 0266-124-04 $16.14 0266-124-05 $16.14 0266-124-06 $16.14 0266-124-07 $16.14 0266-124-08 $16.14 0266-124-09 $16.14 0266-124-10 $16.14 0266-124-11 $16.14 0266-124-12 $16.14 0266-124-13 $16.14 0266-124-14 $16.14 0266-124-15 $16.14 0266-124-16 $16.14 0266-124-17 $15.86 0266-124-18 $15.86 0266-124-19 $15.86 0266-124-20 $15.86 0266-124-21 $15.86 0266-124-22 $15.86 0266-124-23 $15.86 0266-124-24 $15.86 0266-124-25 $15.86 0266-124-26 $15.86 0266-124-27 $15.86 0266-124-28 $15.86 0266-124-29 $16.14 0266-124-30 $16.14 0266-124-31 $16.14 0266-124-32 $16.14 0266-124-33 $16.14 0266-124-34 $16.14 0266-124-35 $16.14 0266-124-36 $16.14 0266-124-37 $16.14 0266-124-38 $16.14 0266-124-39 $16.14 0266-124-40 $16.14 0266-124-41 $16.14 0266-124-42 $16.14 0266-124-43 $16.14 0266-124-44 $16.14 0266-124-45 $15.80 0266-124-46 $15.80 0266-124-47 $15.80 0266-124-48 $15.80 0266-124-49 $15.80 0266-124-50 $15.80 0266-124-51 $15.80 0266-124-52 $15.80 0266-124-53 $15.80 0266-124-54 $15.80 0266-124-55 $15.80 0266-124-56 $15.80 0266-124-57 $15.80 0266-124-58 $15.80 0266-124-59 $15.80 0266-124-60 $15.80 Assessment Roll Page 10 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 125 CC30 SP24 - AD 952 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-124-61 $15.86 0266-124-62 $15.86 0266-124-63 $15.86 0266-124-64 $15.86 0266-124-65 $15.86 0266-124-66 $15.86 0266-124-67 $15.86 0266-124-68 $15.86 0266-124-69 $15.86 0266-124-70 $15.86 0266-124-71 $15.86 0266-124-72 $15.86 0266-125-01 $15.86 0266-125-02 $15.86 0266-125-03 $15.86 0266-125-04 $15.86 0266-125-05 $15.86 0266-125-06 $15.86 0266-125-07 $15.86 0266-125-08 $15.86 0266-125-09 $15.86 0266-125-10 $15.86 0266-125-11 $15.86 0266-125-12 $15.86 0266-125-13 $16.16 0266-125-14 $16.16 0266-125-15 $16.16 0266-125-16 $16.16 0266-125-17 $16.16 0266-125-18 $16.16 0266-125-19 $16.16 0266-125-20 $16.16 0266-125-21 $16.16 0266-125-22 $16.16 0266-125-23 $16.16 0266-125-24 $16.16 0266-125-25 $15.86 0266-125-26 $15.86 0266-125-27 $15.86 0266-125-28 $15.86 0266-125-29 $15.86 0266-125-30 $15.86 0266-125-31 $15.86 0266-125-32 $15.86 0266-125-33 $15.86 0266-125-34 $15.86 0266-125-35 $15.86 0266-125-36 $15.86 0266-125-37 $15.76 0266-125-38 $15.76 0266-125-39 $15.76 0266-125-40 $15.76 0266-125-41 $15.76 0266-125-42 $15.76 0266-125-43 $15.76 0266-125-44 $15.76 0266-125-45 $15.76 0266-125-46 $15.76 0266-125-47 $15.76 0266-125-48 $15.76 0266-125-49 $16.16 0266-125-50 $16.16 0266-125-51 $16.16 0266-125-52 $16.16 0266-125-53 $16.16 0266-125-54 $16.16 0266-125-55 $16.16 0266-125-56 $16.16 0266-125-57 $16.16 0266-125-58 $16.16 0266-125-59 $16.16 0266-125-60 $16.16 0266-125-61 $16.16 0266-125-62 $16.16 0266-125-63 $16.16 0266-125-64 $16.16 0266-125-65 $16.16 0266-125-66 $16.16 0266-125-67 $16.16 0266-125-68 $16.16 0266-125-69 $16.16 0266-125-70 $16.16 0266-125-71 $16.16 0266-125-72 $16.16 0266-131-23 $3,955.92 0266-281-01 $56.74 0266-281-02 $56.74 0266-281-03 $56.74 0266-281-04 $56.74 0266-281-05 $56.74 0266-281-06 $56.74 0266-281-07 $56.74 0266-281-08 $56.74 0266-281-09 $56.74 0266-281-10 $56.74 0266-281-11 $56.74 0266-281-12 $56.74 0266-281-13 $56.74 0266-281-14 $56.74 0266-281-15 $56.74 0266-281-16 $56.74 0266-281-17 $56.74 0266-281-18 $56.74 0266-332-01 $56.74 0266-332-02 $56.74 0266-332-03 $56.74 0266-332-04 $56.74 0266-332-05 $56.74 0266-332-06 $56.74 0266-332-07 $56.74 0266-332-08 $56.74 0266-332-09 $56.74 0266-332-10 $56.74 0266-332-11 $56.74 0266-332-12 $56.74 0266-332-13 $56.74 0266-332-14 $56.74 0266-332-15 $56.74 0266-332-16 $56.74 0266-332-17 $56.74 0266-332-18 $56.74 0266-332-19 $56.74 0266-332-20 $56.74 0266-332-21 $56.74 0266-332-22 $56.74 0266-332-23 $56.74 0266-332-24 $56.74 0266-332-25 $56.74 0266-332-28 $56.74 Page 11 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 126 CC30 SP24 - AD 952 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-332-29 $56.74 0266-332-30 $56.74 0266-332-31 $56.74 0266-332-32 $56.74 0266-332-33 $56.74 0266-332-34 $56.74 0266-332-35 $56.74 0266-332-36 $56.74 0266-332-37 $56.74 0266-332-38 $56.74 0266-332-39 $56.74 0266-332-40 $56.74 0266-332-41 $56.74 0266-332-42 $56.74 0266-332-43 $56.74 0266-332-44 $56.74 0266-332-45 $56.74 0266-332-46 $56.74 0266-332-47 $56.74 0266-332-48 $56.74 0266-332-49 $56.74 0266-332-50 $56.74 0266-332-51 $56.74 0266-332-52 $56.74 0266-332-53 $56.74 0266-332-54 $56.74 0266-401-05 $25.16 0266-401-06 $25.16 0266-401-07 $25.16 0266-401-08 $26.50 0266-401-09 $26.50 0266-401-10 $26.50 0266-401-11 $26.50 0266-401-12 $29.78 0266-401-13 $29.78 0266-401-14 $29.78 0266-401-15 $29.78 0266-401-16 $25.86 0266-401-17 $25.86 0266-401-18 $25.86 0266-401-19 $25.86 0266-401-20 $25.86 0266-401-21 $25.86 0266-401-22 $30.36 0266-401-23 $30.38 0266-401-24 $30.38 0266-401-25 $30.36 0266-401-26 $28.86 0266-401-27 $28.86 0266-401-28 $28.86 0266-401-29 $28.86 0266-401-30 $28.86 0266-401-31 $29.02 0266-401-32 $29.02 0266-401-33 $29.02 0266-401-34 $28.04 0266-401-35 $28.04 0266-401-36 $28.04 0266-401-37 $28.04 0266-401-38 $28.04 0266-401-39 $28.04 0266-401-40 $28.62 0266-401-41 $28.62 0266-401-42 $28.62 0266-401-43 $28.86 0266-401-44 $28.86 0266-401-45 $28.86 0266-401-46 $28.86 0266-401-47 $28.86 0266-401-48 $28.04 0266-401-49 $28.04 0266-401-50 $28.04 0266-401-51 $28.04 0266-401-52 $28.04 0266-401-53 $28.04 0266-401-54 $27.58 0266-401-55 $27.36 0266-401-56 $27.46 0266-401-64 $22.64 0266-401-65 $22.64 0266-401-66 $22.64 0266-401-67 $22.70 0266-401-68 $22.70 0266-401-69 $22.70 0266-401-70 $25.32 0266-401-71 $25.32 0266-401-72 $25.32 0266-401-73 $25.32 0266-401-74 $25.32 0266-401-75 $25.32 0266-401-76 $25.32 0266-401-77 $25.32 0266-401-78 $25.32 0266-401-79 $25.32 0266-401-80 $25.32 0266-401-81 $25.32 0266-401-82 $22.22 0266-401-83 $22.22 0266-401-84 $22.22 0266-401-85 $22.22 0266-401-86 $22.22 0266-401-87 $22.22 0266-401-88 $22.36 0266-401-89 $22.36 0266-401-90 $22.36 0266-401-91 $22.36 0266-401-92 $22.36 0266-401-93 $22.36 0266-401-94 $22.82 0266-401-95 $22.80 0266-401-96 $22.80 0266-402-01 $23.12 0266-402-02 $23.12 0266-402-03 $23.12 0266-402-04 $23.12 0266-402-05 $23.12 0266-402-06 $23.12 0266-402-07 $23.12 0266-402-08 $23.12 0266-402-09 $23.12 0266-402-10 $23.12 0266-402-13 $23.12 0266-402-14 $23.12 0266-402-15 $23.12 0266-402-16 $23.12 0266-402-17 $23.12 0266-402-18 $23.12 0266-402-19 $23.12 0266-402-20 $23.12 Page 12 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 127 CC30 SP24 - AD 952 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-402-21 $23.12 0266-402-22 $23.12 0266-402-23 $23.12 0266-402-24 $23.12 0266-402-25 $23.12 0266-402-26 $23.12 0266-402-27 $23.12 0266-402-28 $22.78 0266-402-29 $22.78 0266-402-30 $22.78 0266-402-31 $23.62 0266-402-32 $23.62 0266-402-33 $23.62 0266-402-34 $23.62 0266-402-35 $23.62 0266-402-36 $23.62 0266-402-37 $23.62 0266-402-38 $23.62 0266-402-39 $56.74 0266-402-40 $56.74 0266-402-41 $56.74 0266-402-42 $56.74 0266-402-43 $56.74 0266-501-01 $56.74 0266-501-02 $56.74 0266-501-03 $56.74 0266-501-04 $56.74 0266-501-05 $56.74 0266-501-06 $56.74 0266-501-07 $56.74 0266-501-08 $56.74 0266-501-09 $56.74 0266-501-10 $56.74 0266-501-11 $56.74 0266-501-12 $56.74 0266-501-13 $56.74 0266-501-14 $56.74 0266-501-15 $56.74 0266-501-16 $56.74 0266-501-17 $56.74 0266-501-18 $56.74 0266-501-19 $56.74 0266-501-20 $56.74 0266-501-21 $56.74 0266-501-22 $56.74 0266-501-23 $56.74 0266-501-24 $56.74 0266-501-25 $56.74 0266-501-26 $56.74 0266-501-27 $56.74 0266-501-28 $56.74 0266-501-29 $56.74 0266-501-30 $56.74 0266-501-31 $56.74 0266-501-32 $56.74 0266-501-33 $56.74 0266-501-34 $56.74 0266-501-35 $56.74 0266-501-36 $56.74 0266-501-37 $56.74 0266-501-38 $56.74 0266-501-39 $56.74 0266-501-40 $56.74 0266-501-41 $56.74 0266-501-42 $56.74 0266-501-43 $56.74 0266-501-44 $56.74 0266-503-01 $56.74 0266-503-02 $56.74 0266-503-03 $56.74 0266-503-04 $56.74 0266-503-05 $56.74 0266-503-06 $56.74 0266-503-07 $56.74 0266-503-08 $56.74 0266-503-09 $56.74 0266-503-10 $56.74 0266-503-11 $56.74 0266-503-12 $56.74 0266-503-13 $56.74 0266-503-14 $56.74 0266-503-15 $56.74 0266-503-16 $56.74 0266-503-17 $56.74 0266-503-18 $56.74 0266-503-19 $56.74 0266-503-20 $56.74 0266-503-21 $56.74 0266-503-22 $56.74 0266-503-23 $56.74 0266-503-24 $56.74 0266-503-25 $56.74 0266-503-26 $56.74 0266-503-27 $56.74 0266-503-28 $56.74 0266-503-29 $56.74 0266-503-30 $56.74 0266-503-31 $56.74 0266-503-32 $56.74 0266-503-33 $56.74 0266-503-34 $56.74 0266-503-35 $56.74 0266-503-36 $56.74 0266-503-37 $56.74 0266-503-41 $56.74 0266-503-42 $56.74 0266-503-43 $56.74 0266-503-44 $56.74 0266-503-47 $56.74 0266-503-48 $56.74 0266-503-49 $56.74 0266-503-50 $56.74 0266-503-51 $56.74 0266-503-52 $56.74 0266-503-53 $56.74 0266-503-54 $56.74 0266-503-55 $56.74 0266-503-56 $56.74 0266-503-57 $56.74 0266-503-58 $56.74 0266-503-59 $56.74 0266-503-60 $56.74 0266-503-61 $56.74 0266-503-62 $56.74 0266-503-63 $56.74 0266-503-64 $56.74 0266-503-65 $56.74 0266-503-66 $56.74 0266-503-67 $56.74 Page 13 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 128 CC30 SP24 - AD 952 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-503-68 $56.74 0266-531-01 $36.24 0266-531-02 $42.10 0266-531-03 $35.08 0266-531-04 $39.24 0266-531-05 $40.96 0266-531-06 $35.12 0266-531-07 $39.82 0266-531-08 $35.14 0266-531-09 $35.14 0266-531-10 $39.82 0266-531-11 $35.14 0266-531-12 $42.44 0266-531-13 $34.02 0266-531-14 $36.28 0266-531-15 $45.92 0266-531-16 $42.82 0266-531-17 $36.32 0266-531-18 $44.12 0266-531-19 $44.30 0266-531-20 $48.28 0266-531-21 $47.00 0266-531-22 $44.40 0266-531-23 $39.16 0266-531-24 $47.00 0266-531-25 $44.40 0266-531-26 $39.18 0266-531-27 $44.40 0266-531-28 $39.18 0266-531-29 $49.62 0266-531-30 $41.78 0266-531-31 $39.16 0266-531-32 $47.04 0266-531-33 $51.78 0266-531-34 $47.30 0266-531-35 $51.34 0266-531-36 $46.44 0266-531-37 $45.02 0266-531-38 $45.86 0266-531-39 $45.30 0266-531-40 $42.70 0266-531-41 $56.74 0266-531-44 $56.74 0266-531-45 $56.74 0266-531-46 $56.74 0266-531-47 $56.74 0266-531-48 $56.74 0266-531-49 $56.74 0266-531-50 $56.74 0266-531-51 $56.74 0266-531-52 $56.74 0266-531-53 $56.74 0266-531-54 $56.74 0266-541-17 $56.74 0266-541-18 $56.74 0266-541-19 $56.74 0266-541-20 $56.74 0266-541-21 $56.74 0266-541-22 $56.74 0266-541-23 $56.74 0266-541-24 $56.74 0266-541-25 $56.74 0266-541-26 $56.74 0266-541-27 $56.74 0266-541-28 $56.74 0266-541-29 $56.74 0266-541-30 $56.74 0266-541-31 $56.74 0266-541-32 $56.74 0266-541-33 $56.74 0266-541-34 $56.74 0266-541-35 $56.74 0266-541-36 $56.74 0266-541-37 $56.74 0266-541-38 $56.74 0266-541-39 $56.74 0266-541-40 $56.74 0266-541-41 $56.74 0266-541-42 $56.74 0266-541-43 $56.74 0266-541-44 $56.74 0266-541-45 $56.74 0266-541-46 $56.74 0266-541-47 $56.74 0266-541-48 $56.74 0266-541-49 $56.74 0266-541-50 $56.74 0266-541-51 $56.74 0266-541-52 $56.74 0266-541-53 $56.74 0266-541-54 $56.74 0266-541-55 $56.74 0266-541-56 $56.74 0266-541-57 $56.74 0266-541-58 $56.74 0266-541-59 $56.74 0266-541-60 $56.74 0266-541-61 $56.74 0266-541-62 $56.74 0266-541-63 $56.74 0266-541-64 $56.74 0266-541-65 $56.74 0266-541-66 $56.74 0266-571-01 $9,948.20 0266-581-01 $56.74 0266-581-02 $56.74 0266-581-03 $56.74 0266-581-04 $56.74 0266-581-05 $56.74 0266-581-06 $56.74 0266-581-07 $56.74 0266-581-08 $56.74 0266-581-09 $56.74 0266-581-10 $56.74 0266-581-11 $56.74 0266-581-12 $56.74 0266-581-13 $56.74 0266-581-14 $56.74 0266-581-15 $56.74 0266-581-16 $56.74 0266-581-17 $56.74 0266-581-18 $56.74 0266-581-19 $56.74 0266-581-20 $56.74 0266-581-21 $56.74 0266-581-22 $56.74 0266-581-23 $56.74 0266-581-24 $56.74 0266-581-25 $56.74 Page 14 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 129 CC30 SP24 - AD 952 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-581-26 $56.74 0266-581-27 $56.74 0266-581-28 $56.74 0266-581-30 $56.74 0266-581-31 $56.74 0266-581-32 $56.74 0266-581-33 $56.74 0266-581-34 $56.74 0266-581-35 $56.74 0266-581-36 $56.74 0266-581-37 $56.74 0266-581-38 $56.74 0266-581-39 $56.74 0266-581-40 $56.74 0266-581-41 $56.74 0266-581-42 $56.74 0266-581-43 $56.74 0266-581-44 $56.74 0266-581-45 $56.74 0266-581-46 $56.74 0266-581-47 $56.74 0266-581-48 $56.74 0266-581-49 $56.74 0266-581-50 $56.74 0266-581-51 $56.74 0266-581-52 $56.74 0266-581-53 $56.74 0266-601-01 $3,799.30 0266-601-02 $2,651.70 0266-611-01 $3,251.18 Totals Parcels 675 Levy $55,633.84 Page 15 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 130 CC30 SP43 - AD 952 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-503-01 $100.06 0266-503-02 $100.06 0266-503-03 $100.06 0266-503-04 $100.06 0266-503-05 $100.06 0266-503-06 $100.06 0266-503-07 $100.06 0266-503-08 $100.06 0266-503-09 $100.06 0266-503-10 $100.06 0266-503-11 $100.06 0266-503-12 $100.06 0266-503-13 $100.06 0266-503-14 $100.06 0266-503-15 $100.06 0266-503-16 $100.06 0266-503-17 $100.06 0266-503-18 $100.06 0266-503-19 $100.06 0266-503-20 $100.06 0266-503-21 $100.06 0266-503-22 $100.06 0266-503-23 $100.06 0266-503-24 $100.06 0266-503-25 $100.06 0266-503-26 $100.06 0266-503-27 $100.06 0266-503-28 $100.06 0266-503-29 $100.06 0266-503-30 $100.06 0266-503-31 $100.06 0266-503-32 $100.06 0266-503-33 $100.06 0266-503-34 $100.06 0266-503-35 $100.06 0266-503-36 $100.06 0266-503-37 $100.06 0266-503-41 $100.06 0266-503-42 $100.06 0266-503-43 $100.06 0266-503-44 $100.06 0266-503-47 $100.06 0266-503-48 $100.06 0266-503-49 $100.06 0266-541-17 $100.06 0266-541-18 $100.06 0266-541-19 $100.06 0266-541-20 $100.06 0266-541-21 $100.06 0266-541-22 $100.06 0266-541-23 $100.06 0266-541-24 $100.06 0266-541-25 $100.06 0266-541-26 $100.06 0266-541-27 $100.06 0266-541-28 $100.06 0266-541-29 $100.06 0266-541-30 $100.06 0266-541-31 $100.06 0266-541-32 $100.06 0266-541-33 $100.06 0266-541-34 $100.06 0266-541-35 $100.06 0266-541-36 $100.06 0266-541-37 $100.06 0266-541-38 $100.06 0266-541-39 $100.06 0266-541-40 $100.06 0266-541-41 $100.06 0266-541-42 $100.06 0266-541-43 $100.06 0266-541-44 $100.06 0266-541-45 $100.06 0266-541-46 $100.06 0266-541-47 $100.06 0266-541-48 $100.06 0266-541-49 $100.06 0266-541-50 $100.06 0266-541-51 $100.06 0266-541-52 $100.06 0266-541-53 $100.06 0266-541-54 $100.06 0266-541-55 $100.06 0266-541-56 $100.06 0266-541-57 $100.06 0266-541-58 $100.06 0266-541-59 $100.06 0266-541-60 $100.06 0266-541-61 $100.06 0266-541-62 $100.06 0266-541-63 $100.06 0266-541-64 $100.06 0266-541-65 $100.06 0266-541-66 $100.06 Totals Parcels 94 Levy $9,405.64 Assessment Roll Page 16 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 131 CC30 SP25 - AD 952 Zone 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0154-532-01 $122.90 0154-532-02 $122.90 0154-532-03 $122.90 0154-532-04 $122.90 0154-532-05 $122.90 0154-532-06 $122.90 0154-532-07 $122.90 0154-532-08 $122.90 0154-532-09 $122.90 0154-532-10 $122.90 0154-532-11 $122.90 0154-532-12 $122.90 0154-532-13 $122.90 0154-532-14 $122.90 0154-532-15 $122.90 0154-532-16 $122.90 0154-532-17 $122.90 0154-532-18 $122.90 0154-532-19 $122.90 0154-532-20 $122.90 0154-532-21 $122.90 0154-532-22 $122.90 0154-532-23 $122.90 0154-532-24 $122.90 0154-532-25 $122.90 0154-532-26 $122.90 0154-532-27 $122.90 0154-532-28 $122.90 0154-532-29 $122.90 0154-532-30 $122.90 0154-532-31 $122.90 0154-532-32 $122.90 0154-532-33 $122.90 0154-532-34 $122.90 0154-532-35 $122.90 0154-532-36 $122.90 0154-532-37 $122.90 0154-532-38 $122.90 0154-532-39 $122.90 0154-532-40 $122.90 0154-532-41 $122.90 0154-532-42 $122.90 0154-532-43 $122.90 0154-532-44 $122.90 0154-532-45 $122.90 0154-532-46 $122.90 0154-532-47 $122.90 0154-532-48 $122.90 0154-532-49 $122.90 0154-532-50 $122.90 0154-532-51 $122.90 0154-532-52 $122.90 0154-532-53 $122.90 0154-532-54 $122.90 0154-532-55 $122.90 0154-532-56 $122.90 0154-532-57 $122.90 0154-532-58 $122.90 0154-532-59 $122.90 0154-532-60 $122.90 0154-532-61 $122.90 0154-532-62 $122.90 0154-532-63 $122.90 0154-532-64 $122.90 0154-532-65 $122.90 0154-532-66 $122.90 0154-532-67 $122.90 0154-532-68 $122.90 0154-532-69 $122.90 0154-532-70 $122.90 0154-532-71 $122.90 0154-532-72 $122.90 0154-532-73 $122.90 0154-532-74 $122.90 0154-532-75 $122.90 0154-532-76 $122.90 0154-532-77 $122.90 0154-532-78 $122.90 0154-532-79 $122.90 0154-532-80 $122.90 0154-532-81 $122.90 0154-532-82 $122.90 0154-532-83 $122.90 0154-532-84 $122.90 0154-532-85 $122.90 0154-532-86 $122.90 0154-751-14 $122.90 0154-751-15 $122.90 0154-751-16 $122.90 0154-751-17 $122.90 0154-751-18 $122.90 0154-751-19 $122.90 0154-751-20 $122.90 0154-751-21 $122.90 0154-751-22 $122.90 0154-751-23 $122.90 0154-751-24 $122.90 0154-751-25 $122.90 0154-751-26 $122.90 0154-751-27 $122.90 0154-751-28 $122.90 0154-751-29 $122.90 0154-751-30 $122.90 0154-751-31 $122.90 0154-751-32 $122.90 0154-751-33 $122.90 0154-751-34 $122.90 0154-751-35 $122.90 0154-751-36 $122.90 0154-751-37 $122.90 0154-751-38 $122.90 0154-751-39 $122.90 0154-751-40 $122.90 0154-751-41 $122.90 0154-751-42 $122.90 0154-751-43 $122.90 0154-751-44 $122.90 0154-751-45 $122.90 0154-751-46 $122.90 0154-751-47 $122.90 0154-751-48 $122.90 0154-751-49 $122.90 0154-751-50 $122.90 0154-751-51 $122.90 0154-751-52 $122.90 0154-751-53 $122.90 0154-751-54 $122.90 0154-751-55 $122.90 0154-751-56 $122.90 0154-751-57 $122.90 0154-751-58 $122.90 0154-751-59 $122.90 0154-751-60 $122.90 0154-751-61 $122.90 0154-751-62 $122.90 0154-751-63 $122.90 0154-751-64 $122.90 0154-751-65 $122.90 Assessment Roll Page 17 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 132 CC30 SP25 - AD 952 Zone 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0154-751-66 $122.90 0154-751-67 $122.90 0154-751-68 $122.90 0154-751-69 $122.90 0154-751-70 $122.90 0154-751-71 $122.90 0154-751-72 $122.90 0154-751-73 $122.90 0154-751-74 $122.90 0154-751-75 $122.90 0154-751-76 $122.90 0154-751-77 $122.90 0154-751-78 $122.90 0154-751-79 $122.90 0154-751-80 $122.90 0154-751-81 $122.90 0154-751-82 $122.90 0154-751-83 $122.90 0154-751-84 $122.90 0154-751-85 $122.90 Totals Parcels 158 Levy $19,418.20 Page 18 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 133 CC30 SP06 - AD 953 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0269-162-01 $35.78 0269-162-02 $35.78 0269-162-03 $35.78 0269-162-04 $35.78 0269-162-05 $35.78 0269-162-06 $35.78 0269-162-07 $35.78 0269-162-08 $35.78 0269-162-09 $35.78 0269-162-10 $35.78 0269-162-11 $35.78 0269-162-12 $35.78 0269-162-13 $35.78 0269-162-14 $35.78 0269-162-15 $35.78 0269-162-16 $35.78 0269-162-17 $35.78 0269-162-18 $35.78 0269-162-19 $35.78 0269-162-20 $35.78 0269-162-21 $35.78 0269-162-22 $35.78 0269-162-23 $35.78 0269-162-24 $35.78 0269-162-25 $35.78 0269-162-26 $35.78 0269-162-27 $35.78 0269-162-28 $35.78 0269-162-29 $35.78 0269-162-30 $35.78 0269-162-31 $35.78 0269-162-32 $35.78 0269-162-33 $35.78 0269-162-34 $35.78 0269-162-35 $35.78 0269-162-36 $35.78 0269-162-37 $35.78 0269-162-38 $35.78 0269-162-39 $35.78 0269-162-40 $35.78 0269-162-41 $35.78 0269-162-42 $35.78 0269-162-43 $35.78 0269-162-44 $35.78 0269-162-45 $35.78 0269-162-46 $35.78 0269-162-47 $35.78 0269-162-48 $35.78 0269-162-49 $35.78 0269-162-50 $35.78 0269-162-51 $35.78 0269-162-55 $35.78 0269-162-56 $35.78 0269-162-57 $35.78 0269-162-58 $35.78 0269-351-05 $35.78 0269-351-06 $35.78 0269-351-07 $35.78 0269-351-08 $35.78 0269-351-09 $35.78 0269-351-10 $35.78 0269-351-11 $35.78 0269-351-12 $35.78 0269-351-13 $35.78 0269-351-14 $35.78 0269-351-15 $35.78 0269-351-16 $35.78 0269-351-17 $35.78 0269-351-18 $35.78 0269-351-19 $35.78 0269-351-20 $35.78 0269-351-21 $35.78 0269-351-22 $35.78 0269-351-23 $35.78 0269-351-24 $35.78 0269-351-25 $35.78 0269-351-26 $35.78 0269-351-27 $35.78 0269-351-28 $35.78 0269-351-29 $35.78 0269-351-30 $35.78 0269-351-31 $35.78 0269-351-32 $35.78 0269-351-33 $35.78 0269-351-34 $35.78 0269-351-35 $35.78 0269-351-36 $35.78 0269-351-37 $35.78 0269-351-38 $35.78 0269-351-39 $35.78 0269-351-40 $35.78 0269-351-41 $35.78 0269-351-42 $35.78 0269-351-43 $35.78 0269-351-44 $35.78 0269-351-45 $35.78 0269-351-46 $35.78 0269-351-47 $35.78 0269-351-48 $35.78 0269-351-49 $35.78 0269-351-50 $35.78 0269-351-51 $35.78 0269-351-52 $35.78 0269-351-53 $35.78 0269-351-54 $35.78 0269-351-55 $35.78 0269-351-56 $35.78 0269-351-57 $35.78 0269-351-58 $35.78 0269-351-59 $35.78 0269-351-60 $35.78 0269-351-61 $35.78 0269-351-62 $35.78 0269-351-63 $35.78 0269-351-64 $35.78 0269-351-65 $35.78 0269-351-66 $35.78 0269-351-67 $35.78 0269-351-68 $35.78 0269-351-69 $35.78 0269-361-01 $35.78 0269-361-02 $35.78 0269-361-03 $35.78 0269-361-04 $35.78 0269-361-05 $35.78 0269-361-06 $35.78 0269-361-07 $35.78 0269-361-09 $35.78 0269-361-10 $35.78 0269-361-11 $35.78 0269-361-12 $35.78 0269-361-13 $35.78 0269-361-14 $35.78 0269-361-15 $35.78 0269-361-16 $35.78 0269-361-17 $35.78 0269-361-18 $35.78 0269-361-19 $35.78 Assessment Roll Page 19 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 134 CC30 SP06 - AD 953 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0269-361-20 $35.78 0269-361-21 $35.78 0269-361-22 $35.78 0269-361-23 $35.78 0269-361-24 $35.78 0269-361-25 $35.78 0269-361-26 $35.78 0269-361-27 $35.78 0269-361-28 $35.78 0269-361-29 $35.78 0269-361-30 $35.78 0269-361-31 $35.78 0269-361-32 $35.78 0269-361-33 $35.78 0269-361-34 $35.78 0269-361-35 $35.78 0269-361-36 $35.78 0269-361-37 $35.78 0269-361-38 $35.78 0269-361-39 $35.78 0269-361-40 $35.78 0269-371-01 $35.78 0269-371-02 $35.78 0269-371-03 $35.78 0269-371-04 $35.78 0269-371-05 $35.78 0269-371-06 $35.78 0269-371-07 $35.78 0269-371-08 $35.78 0269-371-09 $35.78 0269-371-10 $35.78 0269-371-11 $35.78 0269-371-12 $35.78 0269-371-13 $35.78 0269-371-14 $35.78 0269-371-15 $35.78 0269-371-17 $35.78 0269-371-18 $35.78 0269-371-19 $35.78 0269-371-20 $35.78 0269-371-21 $35.78 0269-371-22 $35.78 0269-371-23 $35.78 0269-371-24 $35.78 0269-371-25 $35.78 0269-371-26 $35.78 0269-371-27 $35.78 0269-371-28 $35.78 0269-371-29 $35.78 0269-371-30 $35.78 0269-371-31 $35.78 0269-371-32 $35.78 0269-371-33 $35.78 0269-371-34 $35.78 0269-371-35 $35.78 0269-371-36 $35.78 0269-371-37 $35.78 0269-371-38 $35.78 0269-371-39 $35.78 0269-371-40 $35.78 Totals Parcels 198 Levy $7,084.44 Page 20 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 135 CC30 SP13 - AD 956 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0281-351-27 $646.70 0281-351-28 $665.56 0281-351-29 $617.88 0281-351-30 $443.04 0281-351-31 $757.96 0281-351-32 $461.92 0281-351-33 $375.50 0281-351-34 $423.18 0281-351-35 $6,542.52 0281-361-16 $5,609.72 0281-361-18 $2,472.56 0281-361-20 $6,436.22 0281-361-21 $1,815.92 0281-361-22 $689.40 0281-361-23 $572.18 0281-361-24 $1,090.74 0281-361-25 $896.04 0281-361-27 $463.90 0281-361-28 $774.84 Totals Parcels 19 Levy $31,755.78 Assessment Roll Page 21 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 136 CC30 SP28 - AD 959 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-211-22 $5,005.30 0266-521-06 $1,852.78 0266-521-07 $1,312.26 0266-521-08 $859.52 0266-521-09 $245.18 0266-521-10 $289.74 0266-521-11 $306.46 0266-521-12 $273.04 0266-521-13 $273.04 0266-521-14 $748.08 0266-521-15 $305.08 0266-521-16 $423.48 0266-521-21 $610.30 0266-521-23 $1,009.44 0266-651-01 $139.30 0266-651-02 $139.30 0266-651-03 $139.30 0266-651-04 $139.30 0266-651-05 $139.30 0266-651-06 $139.30 0266-651-07 $139.30 0266-651-08 $139.30 0266-651-09 $139.30 0266-651-10 $139.30 0266-651-11 $139.30 0266-651-12 $139.30 0266-651-13 $139.30 0266-651-18 $139.30 0266-651-19 $139.30 0266-651-20 $139.30 0266-651-21 $139.30 0266-651-22 $139.30 0266-651-23 $139.30 0266-651-24 $139.30 0266-651-25 $139.30 0266-651-26 $139.30 0266-651-27 $139.30 0266-651-28 $139.30 0266-651-29 $139.30 0266-651-30 $139.30 0266-651-31 $139.30 0266-651-37 $139.30 0266-651-38 $139.30 0266-651-39 $139.30 0266-651-40 $139.30 0266-661-01 $139.30 0266-661-02 $139.30 0266-661-03 $139.30 0266-661-04 $139.30 0266-661-05 $139.30 0266-661-06 $139.30 0266-661-07 $139.30 0266-661-11 $139.30 0266-661-12 $139.30 0266-661-13 $139.30 0266-661-14 $139.30 0266-661-15 $139.30 0266-661-16 $139.30 0266-661-17 $139.30 0266-661-18 $139.30 0266-661-19 $139.30 0266-661-20 $139.30 0266-661-21 $139.30 0266-661-22 $139.30 0266-661-23 $139.30 0266-661-24 $139.30 0266-661-25 $139.30 0266-661-26 $139.30 0266-661-27 $139.30 0266-661-28 $139.30 0266-661-29 $139.30 0266-661-30 $139.30 0266-661-31 $139.30 0266-661-32 $139.30 0266-661-33 $139.30 0266-661-34 $139.30 0266-661-35 $139.30 0266-661-36 $139.30 0266-671-01 $139.30 0266-671-02 $139.30 0266-671-03 $139.30 0266-671-04 $139.30 0266-671-05 $139.30 0266-671-06 $139.30 0266-671-07 $139.30 0266-671-08 $139.30 0266-671-09 $139.30 0266-671-10 $139.30 0266-671-11 $139.30 0266-671-12 $139.30 0266-671-13 $139.30 0266-671-14 $139.30 0266-671-15 $139.30 0266-671-16 $139.30 0266-671-17 $139.30 0266-671-18 $139.30 0266-671-19 $139.30 0266-671-20 $139.30 0266-671-21 $139.30 0266-671-22 $139.30 0266-671-23 $139.30 0266-671-24 $139.30 0266-671-25 $139.30 0266-671-26 $139.30 0266-671-27 $139.30 0266-671-28 $139.30 0266-671-29 $139.30 0266-671-30 $139.30 0266-671-31 $139.30 0266-671-32 $139.30 0266-671-33 $139.30 0266-671-34 $139.30 0266-671-35 $139.30 0266-671-36 $139.30 0266-671-37 $139.30 0266-671-38 $139.30 0266-671-39 $139.30 0266-671-40 $139.30 0266-671-41 $139.30 0266-671-42 $139.30 0266-671-43 $139.30 0266-671-44 $139.30 0266-671-45 $139.30 0266-671-46 $139.30 0266-671-47 $139.30 0266-671-48 $139.30 0266-681-01 $139.30 0266-681-02 $139.30 0266-681-03 $139.30 0266-681-04 $139.30 0266-681-05 $139.30 0266-681-06 $139.30 0266-681-07 $139.30 0266-681-08 $139.30 0266-681-09 $139.30 0266-681-10 $139.30 0266-681-11 $139.30 0266-681-12 $139.30 Assessment Roll Page 22 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 137 CC30 SP28 - AD 959 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-681-13 $139.30 0266-681-14 $139.30 0266-681-15 $139.30 0266-681-16 $139.30 0266-681-17 $139.30 0266-681-18 $139.30 0266-681-19 $139.30 0266-681-20 $139.30 0266-681-21 $139.30 0266-681-22 $139.30 0266-681-23 $139.30 0266-681-24 $139.30 0266-681-25 $139.30 0266-681-26 $139.30 0266-681-27 $139.30 0266-681-28 $139.30 0266-681-29 $139.30 0266-681-30 $139.30 0266-681-31 $139.30 0266-681-32 $139.30 0266-681-33 $139.30 0266-681-34 $139.30 0266-681-35 $139.30 0266-681-36 $139.30 0266-681-37 $139.30 0266-681-38 $139.30 0266-681-39 $139.30 0266-681-40 $139.30 0266-681-41 $139.30 0266-681-42 $139.30 0266-681-43 $139.30 0266-681-44 $139.30 0266-691-01 $139.30 0266-691-02 $139.30 0266-691-03 $139.30 0266-691-04 $139.30 0266-691-05 $139.30 0266-691-06 $139.30 0266-691-07 $139.30 0266-691-08 $139.30 0266-691-09 $139.30 0266-691-10 $139.30 0266-701-01 $139.30 0266-701-02 $139.30 0266-701-03 $139.30 0266-701-04 $139.30 0266-701-05 $139.30 0266-701-06 $139.30 0266-701-07 $139.30 0266-701-08 $139.30 0266-701-09 $139.30 0266-701-10 $139.30 0266-701-11 $139.30 0266-701-12 $139.30 0266-711-01 $139.30 0266-711-02 $139.30 0266-711-03 $139.30 0266-711-04 $139.30 0266-711-05 $139.30 0266-711-06 $139.30 0266-711-07 $139.30 0266-711-08 $139.30 0266-711-09 $139.30 0266-711-10 $139.30 0266-711-11 $139.30 0266-711-12 $139.30 0266-711-13 $139.30 0266-711-14 $139.30 0266-711-15 $139.30 0266-711-16 $139.30 0266-711-17 $139.30 0266-711-18 $139.30 0266-711-19 $139.30 0266-731-01 $139.30 0266-731-02 $139.30 0266-731-03 $139.30 0266-731-04 $139.30 0266-731-05 $139.30 0266-731-06 $139.30 0266-731-07 $139.30 0266-731-08 $139.30 0266-731-09 $139.30 0266-731-10 $139.30 0266-731-11 $139.30 0266-731-12 $139.30 0266-731-13 $139.30 0266-731-14 $139.30 0266-731-15 $139.30 0266-731-16 $139.30 0266-731-17 $139.30 0266-731-18 $139.30 0266-731-19 $139.30 0266-731-20 $139.30 0266-731-21 $139.30 0266-731-22 $139.30 0266-731-23 $139.30 0266-731-24 $139.30 0266-731-25 $139.30 0266-731-26 $139.30 0266-731-27 $139.30 0266-731-28 $139.30 0266-731-29 $139.30 0266-731-30 $139.30 0266-731-31 $139.30 0266-731-32 $139.30 0266-731-33 $139.30 0266-731-34 $139.30 0266-731-35 $139.30 0266-731-36 $139.30 0266-731-37 $139.30 0266-731-38 $139.30 0266-731-39 $139.30 0266-731-40 $139.30 0266-731-41 $139.30 0266-731-42 $139.30 0266-731-43 $139.30 0266-731-44 $139.30 0266-741-01 $139.30 0266-741-02 $139.30 0266-741-03 $139.30 0266-741-04 $139.30 0266-741-05 $139.30 0266-741-06 $139.30 0266-741-07 $139.30 0266-741-08 $139.30 0266-741-09 $139.30 0266-741-10 $139.30 0266-741-11 $139.30 0266-741-12 $139.30 0266-741-13 $139.30 0266-741-14 $139.30 0266-741-15 $139.30 0266-741-16 $139.30 0266-741-17 $139.30 0266-741-18 $139.30 0266-741-19 $139.30 0266-741-20 $139.30 0266-741-21 $139.30 Page 23 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 138 CC30 SP28 - AD 959 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-741-22 $139.30 0266-741-23 $139.30 0266-741-24 $139.30 0266-741-25 $139.30 0266-741-26 $139.30 0266-741-27 $139.30 0266-741-28 $139.30 0266-741-29 $139.30 0266-741-30 $139.30 0266-741-31 $139.30 0266-741-32 $139.30 0266-741-33 $139.30 0266-791-01 $139.30 0266-791-02 $139.30 0266-791-03 $139.30 0266-791-04 $139.30 0266-791-05 $139.30 0266-791-06 $139.30 0266-791-07 $139.30 0266-791-08 $139.30 0266-791-09 $139.30 0266-791-10 $139.30 0266-791-11 $139.30 0266-791-12 $139.30 0266-791-13 $139.30 0266-791-14 $139.30 0266-791-15 $139.30 0266-791-16 $139.30 0266-791-17 $139.30 0266-801-01 $139.30 0266-801-02 $139.30 0266-801-03 $139.30 0266-801-04 $139.30 0266-801-05 $139.30 0266-801-06 $139.30 0266-801-07 $139.30 0266-801-08 $139.30 0266-801-09 $139.30 0266-801-10 $139.30 0266-801-11 $139.30 0266-801-12 $139.30 0266-801-13 $139.30 0266-801-14 $139.30 0266-801-15 $139.30 0266-801-16 $139.30 0266-801-17 $139.30 0266-801-18 $139.30 0266-801-19 $139.30 0266-801-20 $139.30 0266-801-21 $139.30 0266-801-22 $139.30 0266-801-23 $139.30 0266-801-24 $139.30 0266-801-25 $139.30 0266-801-26 $139.30 0266-801-27 $139.30 0266-801-28 $139.30 0266-801-29 $139.30 0266-801-30 $139.30 0266-801-31 $139.30 0266-801-32 $139.30 0266-801-33 $139.30 0266-801-34 $139.30 0266-801-35 $139.30 0266-801-36 $139.30 0266-801-37 $139.30 0266-801-38 $139.30 0266-801-39 $139.30 0266-801-40 $139.30 0266-801-41 $139.30 0266-801-42 $139.30 0266-801-43 $139.30 0266-801-44 $139.30 0266-811-01 $139.30 0266-811-02 $139.30 0266-811-03 $139.30 0266-811-04 $139.30 0266-811-05 $139.30 0266-811-06 $139.30 0266-811-07 $139.30 0266-811-08 $139.30 0266-811-09 $139.30 0266-811-10 $139.30 0266-811-11 $139.30 0266-821-01 $139.30 0266-821-02 $139.30 0266-821-03 $139.30 0266-821-04 $139.30 0266-821-05 $139.30 0266-821-06 $139.30 0266-821-07 $139.30 0266-821-08 $139.30 0266-821-09 $139.30 0266-821-10 $139.30 0266-821-11 $139.30 0266-821-12 $139.30 0266-821-13 $139.30 0266-821-14 $139.30 0266-821-15 $139.30 0266-821-16 $139.30 0266-821-17 $139.30 0266-821-18 $139.30 0266-821-19 $139.30 0266-821-20 $139.30 0266-821-21 $139.30 0266-821-22 $139.30 0266-821-23 $139.30 0266-821-24 $139.30 0266-821-25 $139.30 0266-821-26 $139.30 0266-821-27 $139.30 0266-821-28 $139.30 0266-821-29 $139.30 0266-821-30 $139.30 0266-821-31 $139.30 0266-821-32 $139.30 0266-821-33 $139.30 0266-821-34 $139.30 0266-821-35 $139.30 0266-821-36 $139.30 0266-821-37 $139.30 0266-821-38 $139.30 0266-821-39 $139.30 0266-821-40 $139.30 0266-821-41 $139.30 0266-821-42 $139.30 0266-821-43 $139.30 0266-821-44 $139.30 0266-821-45 $139.30 0266-821-46 $139.30 0266-821-47 $139.30 0266-821-48 $139.30 0266-821-49 $139.30 0266-821-50 $139.30 0266-821-51 $139.30 0266-821-52 $139.30 0266-821-53 $139.30 0266-821-54 $139.30 Page 24 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 139 CC30 SP28 - AD 959 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-821-55 $139.30 0266-821-56 $139.30 0266-821-57 $139.30 0266-821-58 $139.30 0266-821-59 $139.30 0266-821-60 $139.30 0266-821-61 $139.30 0266-821-62 $139.30 0266-821-63 $139.30 0266-821-64 $139.30 0266-821-65 $139.30 0266-821-66 $139.30 0266-821-67 $139.30 0266-821-68 $139.30 0266-821-69 $139.30 0266-821-70 $139.30 0266-821-71 $139.30 0266-821-72 $139.30 0266-821-73 $139.30 0266-821-74 $139.30 0266-821-75 $139.30 0266-821-76 $139.30 0266-821-77 $139.30 0266-821-78 $139.30 0266-821-79 $139.30 0266-821-80 $139.30 0266-821-81 $139.30 0266-821-82 $139.30 0266-821-83 $139.30 0266-821-84 $139.30 0266-821-85 $139.30 0266-821-86 $139.30 0266-821-87 $139.30 0266-821-88 $139.30 0266-822-01 $139.30 0266-822-02 $139.30 0266-822-03 $139.30 0266-822-04 $139.30 0266-822-05 $139.30 0266-822-06 $139.30 0266-822-07 $139.30 0266-822-08 $139.30 0266-822-09 $139.30 0266-822-10 $139.30 0266-822-11 $139.30 0266-822-12 $139.30 0266-822-13 $139.30 0266-822-14 $139.30 0266-822-15 $139.30 0266-822-16 $139.30 0266-822-17 $139.30 0266-822-18 $139.30 0266-822-19 $139.30 0266-822-20 $139.30 0266-822-21 $139.30 0266-822-22 $139.30 0266-822-23 $139.30 0266-822-24 $139.30 0266-822-25 $139.30 0266-822-26 $139.30 0266-822-27 $139.30 0266-822-28 $139.30 0266-822-29 $139.30 0266-822-30 $139.30 0266-822-31 $139.30 0266-822-32 $139.30 0266-822-33 $139.30 0266-822-34 $139.30 0266-822-35 $139.30 0266-822-36 $139.30 0266-822-37 $139.30 0266-822-38 $139.30 0266-822-39 $139.30 0266-822-40 $139.30 0266-822-41 $139.30 0266-822-42 $139.30 0266-822-43 $139.30 0266-822-44 $139.30 0266-822-45 $139.30 0266-822-46 $139.30 0266-822-47 $139.30 0266-822-48 $139.30 0266-822-49 $139.30 0266-822-50 $139.30 0266-822-51 $139.30 0266-822-52 $139.30 0266-822-53 $139.30 0266-822-54 $139.30 0266-822-55 $139.30 0266-822-56 $139.30 0266-822-57 $139.30 0266-822-58 $139.30 0266-822-59 $139.30 0266-822-60 $139.30 0266-822-61 $139.30 0266-822-62 $139.30 0266-822-63 $139.30 0266-822-64 $139.30 0266-822-65 $139.30 0266-822-66 $139.30 0266-822-67 $139.30 0266-822-68 $139.30 0266-822-69 $139.30 0266-822-70 $139.30 0266-822-71 $139.30 0266-822-72 $139.30 0266-822-73 $139.30 0266-822-74 $139.30 0266-822-75 $139.30 0266-822-76 $139.30 0266-822-77 $139.30 0266-822-78 $139.30 0266-822-79 $139.30 0266-822-80 $139.30 0266-822-81 $139.30 0266-822-82 $139.30 0266-822-83 $139.30 0266-822-84 $139.30 0266-822-85 $139.30 0266-822-86 $139.30 0266-822-87 $139.30 0266-822-88 $139.30 0266-822-89 $139.30 0266-822-90 $139.30 0266-822-91 $139.30 0266-822-92 $139.30 0266-822-93 $139.30 0266-822-94 $139.30 0266-822-95 $139.30 0266-822-96 $139.30 0266-823-01 $139.30 0266-823-02 $139.30 0266-823-03 $139.30 0266-823-04 $139.30 0266-823-05 $139.30 0266-823-06 $139.30 0266-823-07 $139.30 0266-823-08 $139.30 Page 25 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 140 CC30 SP28 - AD 959 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-823-09 $139.30 0266-823-10 $139.30 0266-823-11 $139.30 0266-823-12 $139.30 0266-823-13 $139.30 0266-823-14 $139.30 0266-823-15 $139.30 0266-823-16 $139.30 0266-823-17 $139.30 0266-823-18 $139.30 0266-823-19 $139.30 0266-823-20 $139.30 0266-823-21 $139.30 0266-823-22 $139.30 0266-823-23 $139.30 0266-823-24 $139.30 0266-823-25 $139.30 0266-823-26 $139.30 0266-823-27 $139.30 0266-823-28 $139.30 0266-823-29 $139.30 0266-823-30 $139.30 0266-823-31 $139.30 0266-823-32 $139.30 0266-823-33 $139.30 0266-823-34 $139.30 0266-823-35 $139.30 0266-823-36 $139.30 0266-824-01 $139.30 0266-824-02 $139.30 0266-824-03 $139.30 0266-824-04 $139.30 0266-824-05 $139.30 0266-824-06 $139.30 0266-824-07 $139.30 0266-824-08 $139.30 0266-824-09 $139.30 0266-824-10 $139.30 0266-824-11 $139.30 0266-824-12 $139.30 0266-824-13 $139.30 0266-824-14 $139.30 0266-824-15 $139.30 0266-824-16 $139.30 0266-824-17 $139.30 0266-824-18 $139.30 0266-824-19 $139.30 0266-824-20 $139.30 0266-824-21 $139.30 0266-824-22 $139.30 0266-824-23 $139.30 0266-824-24 $139.30 0266-824-25 $139.30 0266-824-26 $139.30 0266-824-27 $139.30 0266-824-28 $139.30 0266-824-29 $139.30 0266-824-30 $139.30 0266-824-31 $139.30 0266-824-32 $139.30 0266-824-33 $139.30 0266-824-34 $139.30 0266-824-35 $139.30 0266-824-36 $139.30 0266-824-37 $139.30 0266-824-38 $139.30 0266-824-39 $139.30 0266-824-40 $139.30 0266-824-41 $139.30 0266-824-42 $139.30 0266-824-43 $139.30 0266-824-44 $139.30 0266-824-45 $139.30 0266-824-46 $139.30 0266-824-47 $139.30 0266-824-48 $139.30 0266-824-49 $139.30 0266-824-50 $139.30 0266-824-51 $139.30 0266-824-52 $139.30 0266-824-53 $139.30 0266-824-54 $139.30 0266-824-55 $139.30 0266-824-56 $139.30 0266-824-57 $139.30 0266-824-58 $139.30 0266-824-59 $139.30 0266-824-60 $139.30 0266-824-61 $139.30 0266-824-62 $139.30 0266-824-63 $139.30 0266-824-64 $139.30 0266-824-65 $139.30 0266-824-66 $139.30 0266-824-67 $139.30 0266-824-68 $139.30 0266-824-69 $139.30 0266-824-70 $139.30 0266-824-71 $139.30 0266-824-72 $139.30 0266-824-73 $139.30 0266-824-74 $139.30 0266-824-75 $139.30 0266-824-76 $139.30 0266-824-77 $139.30 0266-824-78 $139.30 0266-824-79 $139.30 0266-824-80 $139.30 0266-824-81 $139.30 0266-824-82 $139.30 0266-824-83 $139.30 0266-824-84 $139.30 0266-824-85 $139.30 0266-824-86 $139.30 0266-824-87 $139.30 0266-824-88 $139.30 0266-824-89 $139.30 0266-824-90 $139.30 0266-824-91 $139.30 0266-824-92 $139.30 0266-825-01 $139.30 0266-825-02 $139.30 0266-825-03 $139.30 0266-825-04 $139.30 0266-825-05 $139.30 0266-825-06 $139.30 0266-825-07 $139.30 0266-825-08 $139.30 0266-825-09 $139.30 0266-825-10 $139.30 0266-825-11 $139.30 0266-825-12 $139.30 0266-825-13 $139.30 0266-825-14 $139.30 0266-825-15 $139.30 0266-825-16 $139.30 0266-825-17 $139.30 0266-825-18 $139.30 Page 26 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 141 CC30 SP28 - AD 959 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-825-19 $139.30 0266-825-20 $139.30 0266-825-21 $139.30 0266-825-22 $139.30 0266-825-23 $139.30 0266-825-24 $139.30 0266-825-25 $139.30 0266-825-26 $139.30 0266-825-27 $139.30 0266-825-28 $139.30 0266-825-29 $139.30 0266-825-30 $139.30 0266-825-31 $139.30 0266-825-32 $139.30 0266-825-33 $139.30 0266-825-34 $139.30 0266-825-35 $139.30 0266-825-36 $139.30 0266-825-37 $139.30 0266-825-38 $139.30 0266-825-39 $139.30 0266-825-40 $139.30 0266-831-01 $139.30 0266-831-02 $139.30 0266-831-03 $139.30 0266-831-04 $139.30 0266-831-05 $139.30 0266-831-06 $139.30 0266-831-07 $139.30 0266-831-08 $139.30 0266-831-09 $139.30 0266-831-10 $139.30 0266-831-11 $139.30 0266-831-12 $139.30 0266-831-13 $139.30 0266-831-14 $139.30 0266-831-15 $139.30 0266-831-16 $139.30 0266-831-17 $139.30 0266-831-18 $139.30 0266-831-19 $139.30 0266-831-20 $139.30 0266-831-21 $139.30 0266-831-22 $139.30 0266-831-23 $139.30 0266-831-24 $139.30 0266-831-25 $139.30 0266-831-26 $139.30 0266-831-27 $139.30 0266-831-28 $139.30 0266-831-29 $139.30 0266-831-30 $139.30 0266-831-31 $139.30 0266-831-32 $139.30 0266-831-33 $139.30 0266-831-34 $139.30 0266-831-35 $139.30 0266-831-36 $139.30 0266-831-37 $139.30 0266-831-38 $139.30 0266-831-39 $139.30 0266-831-40 $139.30 0266-831-41 $139.30 0266-831-42 $139.30 0266-831-43 $139.30 0266-831-44 $139.30 0266-831-45 $139.30 0266-831-46 $139.30 0266-831-47 $139.30 0266-831-48 $139.30 0266-832-01 $139.30 0266-832-02 $139.30 0266-832-03 $139.30 0266-832-04 $139.30 0266-832-05 $139.30 0266-832-06 $139.30 0266-832-07 $139.30 0266-832-08 $139.30 0266-832-09 $139.30 0266-832-10 $139.30 0266-832-11 $139.30 0266-832-12 $139.30 0266-832-13 $139.30 0266-832-14 $139.30 0266-832-15 $139.30 0266-832-16 $139.30 0266-832-17 $139.30 0266-832-18 $139.30 0266-832-19 $139.30 0266-832-20 $139.30 0266-832-21 $139.30 0266-832-22 $139.30 0266-832-23 $139.30 0266-832-24 $139.30 0266-832-25 $139.30 0266-832-26 $139.30 0266-832-27 $139.30 0266-832-28 $139.30 0266-832-29 $139.30 0266-832-30 $139.30 0266-832-31 $139.30 0266-832-32 $139.30 0266-832-33 $139.30 0266-832-34 $139.30 0266-832-35 $139.30 0266-832-36 $139.30 0266-832-37 $139.30 0266-832-38 $139.30 0266-832-39 $139.30 0266-832-40 $139.30 0266-832-41 $139.30 0266-832-42 $139.30 0266-832-43 $139.30 0266-832-44 $139.30 0266-832-45 $139.30 0266-832-46 $139.30 0266-832-47 $139.30 0266-832-48 $139.30 0266-832-49 $139.30 0266-832-50 $139.30 0266-832-51 $139.30 0266-832-52 $139.30 0266-832-53 $139.30 0266-832-54 $139.30 0266-832-55 $139.30 0266-832-56 $139.30 0266-832-57 $139.30 0266-832-58 $139.30 0266-832-59 $139.30 0266-832-60 $139.30 0266-832-61 $139.30 0266-832-62 $139.30 0266-832-63 $139.30 0266-832-64 $139.30 0266-841-01 $139.30 0266-841-02 $139.30 0266-841-03 $139.30 0266-841-04 $139.30 Page 27 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 142 CC30 SP28 - AD 959 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0266-841-05 $139.30 0266-841-06 $139.30 0266-841-07 $139.30 0266-841-08 $139.30 0266-841-09 $139.30 0266-841-10 $139.30 0266-841-11 $139.30 0266-841-12 $139.30 0266-841-13 $139.30 0266-841-14 $139.30 0266-841-15 $139.30 0266-841-16 $139.30 0266-841-17 $139.30 0266-841-18 $139.30 0266-841-19 $139.30 0266-841-20 $139.30 0266-841-21 $139.30 0266-841-22 $139.30 0266-841-23 $139.30 0266-841-24 $139.30 0266-841-25 $139.30 0266-841-26 $139.30 0266-841-27 $139.30 0266-841-28 $139.30 0266-841-29 $139.30 0266-841-30 $139.30 0266-841-31 $139.30 0266-841-32 $139.30 0266-841-33 $139.30 0266-841-34 $139.30 0266-841-35 $139.30 0266-841-36 $139.30 0266-841-37 $139.30 0266-841-38 $139.30 0266-841-39 $139.30 0266-841-40 $139.30 0266-841-41 $139.30 0266-841-42 $139.30 0266-841-43 $139.30 0266-841-44 $139.30 0266-841-45 $139.30 0266-841-46 $139.30 0266-841-47 $139.30 0266-841-48 $139.30 0266-841-49 $139.30 0266-841-50 $139.30 0266-841-51 $139.30 0266-841-52 $139.30 0266-841-53 $139.30 0266-841-54 $139.30 0266-841-55 $139.30 0266-841-56 $139.30 0266-841-57 $139.30 0266-841-58 $139.30 0266-841-59 $139.30 0266-841-60 $139.30 0266-841-61 $139.30 0266-841-62 $139.30 0266-841-63 $139.30 0266-841-64 $139.30 0266-841-65 $139.30 0266-841-66 $139.30 0266-841-67 $139.30 0266-841-68 $139.30 0266-841-69 $139.30 0266-841-70 $139.30 0266-841-71 $139.30 0266-841-72 $139.30 0266-841-73 $139.30 0266-841-74 $139.30 0266-841-75 $139.30 0266-841-76 $139.30 Totals Parcels 900 Levy $136,933.50 Page 28 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 143 CC30 SP14 - AD 962 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-331-01 $31.64 0261-331-02 $31.64 0261-331-03 $31.64 0261-331-04 $31.64 0261-331-05 $31.64 0261-331-06 $31.64 0261-331-07 $31.64 0261-331-08 $31.64 0261-331-09 $31.64 0261-331-10 $31.64 0261-331-11 $31.64 0261-331-12 $31.64 0261-331-13 $31.64 0261-331-14 $31.64 0261-331-15 $31.64 0261-331-16 $31.64 0261-331-17 $31.64 0261-331-18 $31.64 0261-331-19 $31.64 0261-331-20 $31.64 0261-331-21 $31.64 0261-331-22 $31.64 0261-331-23 $31.64 0261-331-24 $31.64 0261-331-25 $31.64 0261-331-26 $31.64 0261-331-27 $31.64 0261-331-28 $31.64 0261-331-29 $31.64 0261-331-30 $31.64 0261-331-31 $31.64 0261-331-32 $31.64 0261-331-33 $31.64 0261-331-34 $31.64 0261-331-35 $31.64 0261-331-36 $31.64 0261-331-37 $31.64 0261-331-38 $31.64 0261-331-39 $31.64 0261-341-01 $31.64 0261-341-02 $31.64 0261-341-03 $31.64 0261-341-04 $31.64 0261-341-05 $31.64 0261-341-06 $31.64 0261-341-07 $31.64 0261-341-08 $31.64 0261-341-09 $31.64 0261-341-10 $31.64 0261-341-11 $31.64 0261-341-12 $31.64 0261-341-13 $31.64 0261-341-14 $31.64 0261-341-15 $31.64 0261-341-16 $31.64 0261-341-17 $31.64 0261-341-18 $31.64 0261-341-19 $31.64 0261-341-20 $31.64 0261-341-21 $31.64 0261-341-22 $31.64 0261-341-23 $31.64 0261-341-24 $31.64 0261-341-25 $31.64 0261-341-26 $31.64 0261-341-27 $31.64 0261-341-28 $31.64 0261-341-29 $31.64 0261-341-30 $31.64 0261-341-31 $31.64 0261-341-32 $31.64 0261-341-33 $31.64 0261-341-34 $31.64 0261-341-35 $31.64 0261-341-36 $31.64 0261-341-37 $31.64 0261-341-38 $31.64 0261-341-39 $31.64 0261-341-40 $31.64 0261-341-41 $31.64 0261-341-42 $31.64 0261-341-43 $31.64 0261-341-44 $31.64 0261-341-45 $31.64 0261-341-46 $31.64 0261-341-47 $31.64 0261-361-01 $31.64 0261-361-02 $31.64 0261-361-03 $31.64 0261-361-04 $31.64 0261-361-05 $31.64 0261-361-06 $31.64 0261-361-07 $31.64 0261-361-08 $31.64 0261-361-09 $31.64 0261-361-10 $31.64 0261-361-11 $31.64 0261-361-12 $31.64 0261-361-13 $31.64 0261-361-14 $31.64 0261-361-15 $31.64 0261-361-16 $31.64 0261-361-17 $31.64 0261-361-18 $31.64 0261-361-19 $31.64 0261-361-20 $31.64 0261-361-21 $31.64 0261-361-22 $31.64 0261-361-23 $31.64 0261-361-24 $31.64 0261-361-25 $31.64 0261-361-26 $31.64 0261-361-27 $31.64 0261-361-28 $31.64 0261-361-29 $31.64 0261-361-30 $31.64 0261-361-31 $31.64 0261-361-32 $31.64 0261-361-33 $31.64 0261-361-34 $31.64 0261-361-37 $31.64 0261-361-38 $31.64 0261-361-39 $31.64 0261-361-40 $31.64 0261-361-41 $31.64 0261-361-42 $31.64 0261-361-43 $31.64 0261-361-44 $31.64 0261-361-45 $31.64 0261-361-46 $31.64 0261-361-47 $31.64 0261-361-48 $31.64 0261-361-49 $31.64 0261-361-50 $31.64 0261-361-51 $31.64 0261-361-52 $31.64 0261-361-53 $31.64 0261-361-54 $31.64 Assessment Roll Page 29 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 144 CC30 SP14 - AD 962 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0261-361-55 $31.64 0261-361-56 $31.64 0261-361-57 $31.64 0261-361-58 $31.64 0261-361-59 $31.64 0261-361-60 $31.64 0261-361-61 $31.64 0261-361-62 $31.64 0261-361-63 $31.64 0261-361-64 $31.64 0261-361-65 $31.64 0261-361-66 $31.64 0261-361-67 $31.64 0261-361-68 $31.64 0261-361-69 $31.64 0261-361-70 $31.64 0261-361-71 $31.64 0261-361-72 $31.64 0261-361-73 $31.64 0261-361-74 $31.64 0261-361-75 $31.64 0261-411-01 $31.64 0261-411-02 $31.64 0261-411-03 $31.64 0261-411-04 $31.64 0261-411-05 $31.64 0261-411-06 $31.64 0261-411-07 $31.64 0261-411-08 $31.64 0261-411-09 $31.64 0261-411-10 $31.64 0261-411-11 $31.64 0261-411-12 $31.64 0261-411-13 $31.64 0261-411-14 $31.64 0261-411-15 $31.64 0261-411-16 $31.64 0261-411-17 $31.64 0261-411-18 $31.64 0261-411-19 $31.64 0261-411-20 $31.64 0261-411-21 $31.64 0261-411-22 $31.64 0261-411-23 $31.64 0261-411-24 $31.64 0261-411-25 $31.64 0261-411-26 $31.64 0261-411-27 $31.64 0261-411-28 $31.64 0261-411-29 $31.64 0261-411-30 $31.64 0261-411-31 $31.64 0261-411-32 $31.64 0261-411-33 $31.64 0261-411-34 $31.64 0261-411-35 $31.64 0261-411-36 $31.64 0261-411-37 $31.64 0261-411-38 $31.64 0261-411-39 $31.64 0261-411-40 $31.64 0261-411-41 $31.64 0261-411-42 $31.64 0261-411-43 $31.64 0261-411-44 $31.64 0261-411-45 $31.64 0261-411-46 $31.64 0261-411-47 $31.64 0261-411-48 $31.64 0261-411-49 $31.64 0261-411-50 $31.64 0261-411-51 $31.64 0261-411-52 $31.64 0261-411-53 $31.64 0261-411-54 $31.64 0261-411-55 $31.64 0261-411-56 $31.64 0261-411-57 $31.64 0261-411-58 $31.64 0261-411-59 $31.64 0261-411-60 $31.64 0261-411-61 $31.64 0261-411-62 $31.64 0261-411-63 $31.64 0261-411-64 $31.64 0261-411-65 $31.64 0261-411-66 $31.64 0261-411-67 $31.64 0261-411-68 $31.64 0261-411-69 $31.64 0261-411-70 $31.64 0261-411-71 $31.64 0261-411-72 $31.64 0261-411-73 $31.64 0261-421-01 $31.64 0261-421-02 $31.64 0261-421-03 $31.64 0261-421-04 $31.64 0261-421-05 $31.64 0261-421-06 $31.64 0261-421-07 $31.64 0261-421-08 $31.64 0261-421-09 $31.64 0261-421-10 $31.64 0261-421-11 $31.64 0261-421-12 $31.64 0261-421-13 $31.64 0261-421-14 $31.64 0261-421-15 $31.64 0261-421-16 $31.64 0261-421-17 $31.64 0261-421-18 $31.64 0261-421-19 $31.64 0261-421-20 $31.64 0261-421-21 $31.64 0261-421-22 $31.64 0261-421-23 $31.64 0261-431-01 $31.64 0261-431-02 $31.64 0261-431-03 $31.64 0261-431-04 $31.64 0261-431-05 $31.64 0261-431-06 $31.64 0261-431-07 $31.64 0261-431-08 $31.64 0261-431-09 $31.64 0261-431-10 $31.64 0261-431-11 $31.64 0261-431-12 $31.64 0261-431-13 $31.64 0261-431-14 $31.64 0261-431-15 $31.64 0261-431-16 $31.64 0261-431-17 $31.64 0261-431-18 $31.64 0261-431-19 $31.64 0261-431-20 $31.64 0261-431-21 $31.64 Page 30 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 145 CC30 SP14 - AD 962 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0261-431-22 $31.64 0261-431-23 $31.64 0261-431-24 $31.64 0261-431-25 $31.64 0261-431-26 $31.64 0261-431-27 $31.64 0261-431-28 $31.64 0261-431-29 $31.64 0261-431-30 $31.64 0261-431-31 $31.64 0261-431-32 $31.64 0261-431-33 $31.64 0261-431-34 $31.64 0261-431-35 $31.64 0261-431-36 $31.64 0261-431-37 $31.64 0261-441-01 $31.64 0261-441-02 $31.64 0261-441-03 $31.64 0261-441-04 $31.64 0261-441-05 $31.64 0261-441-06 $31.64 0261-441-07 $31.64 0261-441-09 $31.64 0261-441-10 $31.64 0261-441-11 $31.64 0261-441-12 $31.64 0261-441-13 $31.64 0261-441-14 $31.64 0261-441-15 $31.64 0261-441-16 $31.64 0261-441-17 $31.64 0261-441-18 $31.64 0261-441-19 $31.64 0261-441-20 $31.64 0261-441-21 $31.64 0261-441-22 $31.64 0261-441-23 $31.64 0261-441-24 $31.64 0261-441-25 $31.64 0261-441-26 $31.64 0261-441-27 $31.64 0261-441-28 $31.64 0261-441-29 $31.64 0261-441-30 $31.64 0261-441-31 $31.64 0261-441-32 $31.64 0261-441-33 $31.64 0261-441-34 $31.64 0261-441-35 $31.64 0261-441-36 $31.64 0261-441-37 $31.64 0261-441-38 $31.64 0261-441-39 $31.64 0261-441-40 $31.64 0261-441-41 $31.64 0261-441-42 $31.64 0261-441-43 $31.64 0261-441-45 $31.64 Totals Parcels 335 Levy $10,599.40 Page 31 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 146 CC30 SP15 - AD 963 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0136-401-18 $130.12 0136-401-19 $130.12 0136-401-38 $130.12 0136-401-41 $130.12 0136-401-51 $130.12 0136-401-52 $130.12 0136-401-54 $130.12 0136-401-55 $130.12 0136-401-56 $130.12 0136-401-57 $130.12 0136-401-58 $130.12 0136-401-61 $130.12 0136-401-63 $130.12 0136-401-67 $130.12 0136-401-68 $130.12 0136-401-69 $130.12 0136-401-70 $130.12 0136-401-71 $130.12 0136-401-73 $130.12 0136-401-74 $130.12 0136-401-75 $130.12 0136-401-76 $130.12 0136-401-77 $130.12 0136-401-78 $130.12 0136-401-79 $130.12 Totals Parcels 25 Levy $3,253.00 Assessment Roll Page 32 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 147 CC30 SP17 - AD 968 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0141-412-25 $489.34 0141-412-26 $489.34 0141-412-27 $407.92 0141-412-29 $435.34 0141-412-31 $369.36 0141-412-32 $458.48 0141-412-36 $950.40 0141-412-37 $454.20 Totals Parcels 8 Levy $4,054.38 Assessment Roll Page 33 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 148 CC30 SP32 - AD 974 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-242-11 $68.56 0142-242-12 $68.56 0142-242-13 $68.56 0142-242-14 $68.56 0142-242-15 $68.56 0142-242-16 $68.56 0142-242-17 $68.56 0142-242-18 $68.56 0142-242-19 $68.56 0142-242-20 $68.56 0142-242-21 $68.56 0142-242-22 $68.56 0142-242-23 $68.56 0142-242-24 $68.56 0142-242-25 $68.56 0142-242-26 $68.56 0142-242-27 $68.56 0142-242-28 $68.56 0142-242-29 $68.56 0142-242-30 $68.56 0142-242-31 $68.56 0142-242-32 $68.56 0142-242-33 $68.56 0142-242-34 $68.56 0142-243-10 $68.56 0142-243-11 $68.56 0142-243-12 $68.56 0142-243-13 $68.56 0142-243-14 $68.56 0142-243-15 $68.56 0142-243-16 $68.56 0142-243-17 $68.56 0142-243-18 $68.56 0142-243-19 $68.56 0142-243-20 $68.56 0142-243-21 $68.56 0142-243-22 $68.56 0142-243-23 $68.56 0142-243-24 $68.56 0142-243-25 $68.56 Totals Parcels 40 Levy $2,742.40 Assessment Roll Page 34 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 149 CC30 SP34 - AD 975 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-553-06 $70.94 0142-553-07 $70.94 0142-553-08 $70.94 0142-553-09 $70.94 0142-553-10 $70.94 0142-553-11 $70.94 0142-553-12 $70.94 0142-553-13 $70.94 0142-553-14 $70.94 0142-553-15 $70.94 0142-553-16 $70.94 0142-553-17 $70.94 0142-554-01 $70.94 0142-554-02 $70.94 0142-554-03 $70.94 0142-554-04 $70.94 0142-641-21 $70.94 0142-641-22 $70.94 0142-641-23 $70.94 0142-641-24 $70.94 0142-641-25 $70.94 0142-641-26 $70.94 0142-641-27 $70.94 0142-641-28 $70.94 0142-641-29 $70.94 0142-641-30 $70.94 0142-641-31 $70.94 0142-641-32 $70.94 0142-641-33 $70.94 0142-641-34 $70.94 0142-641-35 $70.94 0142-641-36 $70.94 0142-641-37 $70.94 0142-641-38 $70.94 0142-641-39 $70.94 0142-641-40 $70.94 0142-641-41 $70.94 0142-641-42 $70.94 0142-641-43 $70.94 0142-641-44 $70.94 0142-641-45 $70.94 0142-641-46 $70.94 0142-641-47 $70.94 0142-641-48 $70.94 0142-641-49 $70.94 0142-641-50 $70.94 0142-641-51 $70.94 0142-641-52 $70.94 0142-641-53 $70.94 0142-641-54 $70.94 0142-641-56 $70.94 0142-641-57 $70.94 0142-641-58 $70.94 0142-641-59 $70.94 0142-641-60 $70.94 0142-641-61 $70.94 0142-641-62 $70.94 0142-641-63 $70.94 0142-641-64 $70.94 0142-641-65 $70.94 0142-641-66 $70.94 0142-641-67 $70.94 0142-641-68 $70.94 0142-641-69 $70.94 0142-641-70 $70.94 0142-641-71 $70.94 0142-641-72 $70.94 0142-741-01 $70.94 0142-741-02 $70.94 0142-741-03 $70.94 0142-741-04 $70.94 0142-741-05 $70.94 0142-741-06 $70.94 0142-741-07 $70.94 0142-741-08 $70.94 0142-741-09 $70.94 0142-741-10 $70.94 0142-741-11 $70.94 0142-741-12 $70.94 0142-741-13 $70.94 0142-741-14 $70.94 0142-741-15 $70.94 0142-741-16 $70.94 0142-741-17 $70.94 0142-741-18 $70.94 0142-741-19 $70.94 0142-741-20 $70.94 0142-741-21 $70.94 0142-741-22 $70.94 0142-741-23 $70.94 0142-741-24 $70.94 0142-741-25 $70.94 0142-741-26 $70.94 0142-741-27 $70.94 0142-741-28 $70.94 0142-741-29 $70.94 0142-741-30 $70.94 0142-741-31 $70.94 0142-741-32 $70.94 0142-741-33 $70.94 0142-741-34 $70.94 0142-741-35 $70.94 0142-741-36 $70.94 0142-741-37 $70.94 0142-741-38 $70.94 0142-741-39 $70.94 0142-741-40 $70.94 0142-741-41 $70.94 0142-741-42 $70.94 0142-741-43 $70.94 0142-741-44 $70.94 0142-741-45 $70.94 0142-741-46 $70.94 0142-741-47 $70.94 0142-741-48 $70.94 Totals Parcels 115 Levy $8,158.10 Assessment Roll Page 35 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 150 CC30 SP33 - AD 976 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-271-01 $82.40 0261-271-02 $82.40 0261-271-03 $82.40 0261-271-05 $82.40 0261-271-06 $82.40 0261-271-07 $82.40 0261-271-08 $82.40 0261-271-09 $82.40 0261-271-10 $82.40 0261-271-11 $82.40 0261-271-12 $82.40 0261-271-13 $82.40 0261-271-14 $82.40 0261-271-15 $82.40 0261-271-16 $82.40 0261-271-17 $82.40 0261-271-18 $82.40 0261-271-19 $82.40 0261-271-20 $82.40 0261-271-21 $82.40 0261-271-22 $82.40 0261-271-23 $82.40 0261-271-24 $82.40 0261-271-25 $82.40 0261-271-26 $82.40 0261-271-27 $82.40 0261-271-28 $82.40 0261-271-29 $82.40 0261-271-30 $82.40 0261-271-31 $82.40 0261-271-32 $82.40 0261-271-33 $82.40 0261-271-34 $82.40 0261-271-35 $82.40 0261-271-36 $82.40 0261-271-37 $82.40 0261-271-38 $82.40 0261-271-39 $82.40 0261-271-40 $82.40 0261-271-41 $82.40 0261-271-42 $82.40 0261-271-43 $82.40 0261-271-44 $82.40 0261-271-45 $82.40 0261-271-46 $82.40 0261-271-47 $82.40 0261-271-48 $82.40 0261-271-49 $82.40 0261-271-50 $82.40 0261-271-51 $82.40 0261-271-52 $82.40 0261-271-53 $82.40 0261-271-54 $82.40 0261-271-55 $82.40 0261-271-56 $82.40 0261-271-57 $82.40 0261-271-58 $82.40 0261-271-59 $82.40 0261-271-60 $82.40 0261-271-61 $82.40 0261-271-62 $82.40 0261-271-63 $82.40 0261-271-64 $82.40 0261-271-65 $82.40 0261-271-66 $82.40 0261-271-67 $82.40 0261-271-68 $82.40 0261-271-69 $82.40 0261-271-70 $82.40 0261-271-71 $82.40 0261-271-72 $82.40 0261-271-73 $82.40 0261-271-74 $82.40 0261-271-75 $82.40 0261-271-76 $82.40 0261-271-77 $82.40 0261-271-78 $82.40 0261-271-79 $82.40 0261-271-80 $82.40 0261-271-81 $82.40 0261-271-82 $82.40 0261-271-83 $82.40 0261-271-84 $82.40 0261-271-85 $82.40 0261-271-86 $82.40 0261-271-87 $82.40 0261-271-88 $82.40 0261-271-89 $82.40 0261-271-90 $82.40 0261-271-91 $82.40 0261-271-92 $82.40 0261-271-93 $82.40 0261-271-94 $82.40 0261-281-01 $82.40 0261-281-02 $82.40 0261-281-03 $82.40 0261-281-04 $82.40 0261-281-05 $82.40 0261-281-06 $82.40 0261-281-07 $82.40 0261-281-08 $82.40 0261-281-09 $82.40 0261-281-10 $82.40 0261-281-11 $82.40 0261-281-12 $82.40 0261-281-13 $82.40 0261-281-14 $82.40 0261-281-15 $82.40 0261-281-16 $82.40 0261-281-17 $82.40 0261-281-18 $82.40 0261-281-19 $82.40 0261-281-20 $82.40 0261-281-21 $82.40 0261-281-22 $82.40 0261-281-23 $82.40 0261-281-24 $82.40 0261-281-25 $82.40 0261-281-26 $82.40 0261-281-27 $82.40 0261-281-28 $82.40 0261-281-29 $82.40 0261-281-30 $82.40 0261-281-31 $82.40 0261-281-32 $82.40 0261-281-33 $82.40 0261-281-34 $82.40 0261-281-35 $82.40 0261-281-36 $82.40 0261-281-37 $82.40 0261-281-38 $82.40 0261-281-39 $82.40 0261-281-40 $82.40 0261-281-41 $82.40 0261-281-42 $82.40 0261-281-43 $82.40 0261-281-44 $82.40 0261-281-45 $82.40 Assessment Roll Page 36 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 151 CC30 SP33 - AD 976 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0261-281-46 $82.40 0261-281-47 $82.40 0261-281-48 $82.40 0261-281-49 $82.40 0261-281-50 $82.40 0261-281-51 $82.40 0261-281-52 $82.40 0261-281-53 $82.40 0261-281-54 $82.40 0261-281-55 $82.40 0261-281-56 $82.40 0261-281-57 $82.40 0261-281-58 $82.40 0261-281-59 $82.40 0261-281-60 $82.40 0261-281-61 $82.40 0261-281-62 $82.40 0261-281-63 $82.40 0261-281-64 $82.40 0261-281-65 $82.40 0261-281-66 $82.40 0261-281-67 $82.40 0261-281-68 $82.40 0261-281-69 $82.40 0261-281-70 $82.40 0261-281-71 $82.40 0261-281-72 $82.40 0261-281-73 $82.40 0261-281-74 $82.40 0261-281-75 $82.40 0261-281-76 $82.40 0261-281-77 $82.40 0261-281-78 $82.40 0261-281-79 $82.40 0261-281-80 $82.40 0261-281-81 $82.40 0261-321-31 $82.40 0261-321-32 $82.40 0261-321-33 $82.40 0261-321-34 $82.40 0261-321-35 $82.40 0261-321-36 $82.40 0261-321-37 $82.40 0261-321-38 $82.40 0261-321-39 $82.40 0261-321-40 $82.40 0261-321-41 $82.40 0261-321-42 $82.40 0261-321-43 $82.40 0261-321-44 $82.40 0261-321-45 $82.40 0261-321-46 $82.40 0261-321-47 $82.40 0261-331-01 $82.40 0261-331-02 $82.40 0261-331-03 $82.40 0261-331-04 $82.40 0261-331-05 $82.40 0261-331-06 $82.40 0261-331-07 $82.40 0261-331-08 $82.40 0261-331-09 $82.40 0261-331-10 $82.40 0261-331-11 $82.40 0261-331-12 $82.40 0261-331-13 $82.40 0261-331-14 $82.40 0261-331-15 $82.40 0261-331-16 $82.40 0261-331-17 $82.40 0261-331-18 $82.40 0261-331-19 $82.40 0261-331-20 $82.40 0261-331-21 $82.40 0261-331-22 $82.40 0261-331-23 $82.40 0261-331-24 $82.40 0261-331-25 $82.40 0261-331-26 $82.40 0261-331-27 $82.40 0261-331-28 $82.40 0261-331-29 $82.40 0261-331-30 $82.40 0261-331-31 $82.40 0261-331-32 $82.40 0261-331-33 $82.40 0261-331-34 $82.40 0261-331-35 $82.40 0261-331-36 $82.40 0261-331-37 $82.40 0261-331-38 $82.40 0261-331-39 $82.40 0261-341-01 $82.40 0261-341-02 $82.40 0261-341-03 $82.40 0261-341-04 $82.40 0261-341-05 $82.40 0261-341-06 $82.40 0261-341-07 $82.40 0261-341-08 $82.40 0261-341-09 $82.40 0261-341-10 $82.40 0261-341-11 $82.40 0261-341-12 $82.40 0261-341-13 $82.40 0261-341-14 $82.40 0261-341-15 $82.40 0261-341-16 $82.40 0261-341-17 $82.40 0261-341-18 $82.40 0261-341-19 $82.40 0261-341-20 $82.40 0261-341-21 $82.40 0261-341-22 $82.40 0261-341-23 $82.40 0261-341-24 $82.40 0261-341-25 $82.40 0261-341-26 $82.40 0261-341-27 $82.40 0261-341-28 $82.40 0261-341-29 $82.40 0261-341-30 $82.40 0261-341-31 $82.40 0261-341-32 $82.40 0261-341-33 $82.40 0261-341-34 $82.40 0261-341-35 $82.40 0261-341-36 $82.40 0261-341-37 $82.40 0261-341-38 $82.40 0261-341-39 $82.40 0261-341-40 $82.40 0261-341-41 $82.40 0261-341-42 $82.40 0261-341-43 $82.40 0261-341-44 $82.40 0261-341-45 $82.40 0261-341-46 $82.40 Page 37 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 152 CC30 SP33 - AD 976 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0261-341-47 $82.40 0261-361-37 $82.40 0261-361-38 $82.40 0261-361-39 $82.40 0261-361-40 $82.40 0261-361-41 $82.40 0261-361-42 $82.40 0261-361-43 $82.40 0261-361-44 $82.40 0261-361-45 $82.40 0261-361-46 $82.40 0261-361-47 $82.40 0261-361-48 $82.40 0261-361-49 $82.40 0261-361-50 $82.40 0261-361-51 $82.40 0261-361-52 $82.40 0261-361-53 $82.40 0261-361-54 $82.40 0261-361-55 $82.40 0261-361-56 $82.40 0261-361-57 $82.40 0261-361-58 $82.40 0261-361-59 $82.40 0261-361-60 $82.40 0261-361-61 $82.40 0261-361-62 $82.40 0261-361-63 $82.40 0261-361-64 $82.40 0261-361-65 $82.40 0261-361-66 $82.40 0261-361-67 $82.40 0261-361-68 $82.40 0261-361-69 $82.40 0261-361-70 $82.40 0261-361-71 $82.40 0261-361-72 $82.40 0261-361-73 $82.40 0261-361-74 $82.40 0261-361-75 $82.40 0261-401-01 $82.40 0261-401-02 $82.40 0261-401-03 $82.40 0261-401-04 $82.40 0261-401-05 $82.40 0261-401-06 $82.40 0261-401-07 $82.40 0261-401-08 $82.40 0261-401-09 $82.40 0261-401-10 $82.40 0261-401-11 $82.40 0261-401-12 $82.40 0261-401-13 $82.40 0261-401-14 $82.40 0261-401-15 $82.40 0261-401-16 $82.40 0261-401-17 $82.40 0261-401-18 $82.40 0261-401-19 $82.40 0261-401-20 $82.40 0261-401-21 $82.40 0261-401-22 $82.40 0261-401-23 $82.40 0261-401-24 $82.40 0261-401-25 $82.40 0261-401-26 $82.40 0261-401-27 $82.40 0261-401-28 $82.40 0261-402-01 $82.40 0261-402-02 $82.40 0261-402-03 $82.40 0261-402-04 $82.40 0261-402-05 $82.40 0261-402-06 $82.40 0261-402-07 $82.40 0261-402-08 $82.40 0261-402-09 $82.40 0261-402-10 $82.40 0261-402-11 $82.40 0261-402-12 $82.40 0261-402-13 $82.40 0261-402-14 $82.40 0261-402-15 $82.40 0261-402-16 $82.40 0261-402-17 $82.40 0261-402-18 $82.40 0261-402-19 $82.40 0261-402-20 $82.40 0261-402-21 $82.40 0261-402-22 $82.40 0261-402-23 $82.40 0261-402-24 $82.40 0261-402-25 $82.40 0261-402-26 $82.40 0261-402-27 $82.40 0261-402-28 $82.40 0261-402-29 $82.40 0261-402-30 $82.40 0261-402-31 $82.40 0261-402-32 $82.40 0261-402-33 $82.40 0261-402-34 $82.40 0261-402-35 $82.40 0261-402-36 $82.40 0261-403-01 $82.40 0261-403-02 $82.40 0261-403-03 $82.40 0261-403-04 $82.40 0261-403-05 $82.40 0261-403-06 $82.40 0261-403-07 $82.40 0261-403-08 $82.40 0261-403-09 $82.40 0261-403-10 $82.40 0261-403-11 $82.40 0261-403-12 $82.40 0261-403-13 $82.40 0261-403-14 $82.40 0261-403-15 $82.40 0261-403-16 $82.40 0261-403-17 $82.40 0261-403-18 $82.40 0261-403-19 $82.40 0261-403-20 $82.40 0261-403-21 $82.40 0261-403-22 $82.40 0261-403-23 $82.40 0261-403-24 $82.40 0261-403-25 $82.40 0261-403-26 $82.40 0261-403-27 $82.40 0261-403-28 $82.40 0261-403-29 $82.40 0261-403-30 $82.40 0261-403-31 $82.40 0261-403-32 $82.40 0261-403-33 $82.40 0261-403-34 $82.40 Page 38 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 153 CC30 SP33 - AD 976 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0261-403-35 $82.40 0261-411-01 $82.40 0261-411-02 $82.40 0261-411-03 $82.40 0261-411-04 $82.40 0261-411-05 $82.40 0261-411-06 $82.40 0261-411-07 $82.40 0261-411-08 $82.40 0261-411-09 $82.40 0261-411-10 $82.40 0261-411-11 $82.40 0261-411-12 $82.40 0261-411-13 $82.40 0261-411-14 $82.40 0261-411-15 $82.40 0261-411-16 $82.40 0261-411-17 $82.40 0261-411-18 $82.40 0261-411-19 $82.40 0261-411-20 $82.40 0261-411-21 $82.40 0261-411-22 $82.40 0261-411-23 $82.40 0261-411-24 $82.40 0261-411-25 $82.40 0261-411-26 $82.40 0261-411-27 $82.40 0261-411-28 $82.40 0261-411-29 $82.40 0261-411-30 $82.40 0261-411-31 $82.40 0261-411-32 $82.40 0261-411-33 $82.40 0261-411-34 $82.40 0261-411-35 $82.40 0261-411-36 $82.40 0261-411-37 $82.40 0261-411-38 $82.40 0261-411-39 $82.40 0261-411-40 $82.40 0261-411-41 $82.40 0261-411-42 $82.40 0261-411-43 $82.40 0261-411-44 $82.40 0261-411-45 $82.40 0261-411-46 $82.40 0261-411-47 $82.40 0261-411-48 $82.40 0261-411-49 $82.40 0261-411-50 $82.40 0261-411-51 $82.40 0261-411-52 $82.40 0261-411-53 $82.40 0261-411-54 $82.40 0261-411-55 $82.40 0261-411-56 $82.40 0261-411-57 $82.40 0261-411-58 $82.40 0261-411-59 $82.40 0261-411-60 $82.40 0261-411-61 $82.40 0261-411-62 $82.40 0261-411-63 $82.40 0261-411-64 $82.40 0261-411-65 $82.40 0261-411-66 $82.40 0261-411-67 $82.40 0261-411-68 $82.40 0261-411-69 $82.40 0261-411-70 $82.40 0261-411-71 $82.40 0261-411-72 $82.40 0261-411-73 $82.40 0261-421-01 $82.40 0261-421-02 $82.40 0261-421-03 $82.40 0261-421-04 $82.40 0261-421-05 $82.40 0261-421-06 $82.40 0261-421-07 $82.40 0261-421-08 $82.40 0261-421-09 $82.40 0261-421-10 $82.40 0261-421-11 $82.40 0261-421-12 $82.40 0261-421-13 $82.40 0261-421-14 $82.40 0261-421-15 $82.40 0261-421-16 $82.40 0261-421-17 $82.40 0261-421-18 $82.40 0261-421-19 $82.40 0261-421-20 $82.40 0261-421-21 $82.40 0261-421-22 $82.40 0261-421-23 $82.40 0261-431-01 $82.40 0261-431-02 $82.40 0261-431-03 $82.40 0261-431-04 $82.40 0261-431-05 $82.40 0261-431-06 $82.40 0261-431-07 $82.40 0261-431-08 $82.40 0261-431-09 $82.40 0261-431-10 $82.40 0261-431-11 $82.40 0261-431-12 $82.40 0261-431-13 $82.40 0261-431-14 $82.40 0261-431-15 $82.40 0261-431-16 $82.40 0261-431-17 $82.40 0261-431-18 $82.40 0261-431-19 $82.40 0261-431-20 $82.40 0261-431-21 $82.40 0261-431-22 $82.40 0261-431-23 $82.40 0261-431-24 $82.40 0261-431-25 $82.40 0261-431-26 $82.40 0261-431-27 $82.40 0261-431-28 $82.40 0261-431-29 $82.40 0261-431-30 $82.40 0261-431-31 $82.40 0261-431-32 $82.40 0261-431-33 $82.40 0261-431-34 $82.40 0261-431-35 $82.40 0261-431-36 $82.40 0261-431-37 $82.40 0261-441-01 $82.40 0261-441-02 $82.40 0261-441-03 $82.40 0261-441-04 $82.40 Page 39 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 154 CC30 SP33 - AD 976 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0261-441-05 $82.40 0261-441-06 $82.40 0261-441-07 $82.40 0261-441-09 $82.40 0261-441-10 $82.40 0261-441-11 $82.40 0261-441-12 $82.40 0261-441-13 $82.40 0261-441-14 $82.40 0261-441-15 $82.40 0261-441-16 $82.40 0261-441-17 $82.40 0261-441-18 $82.40 0261-441-19 $82.40 0261-441-20 $82.40 0261-441-21 $82.40 0261-441-22 $82.40 0261-441-23 $82.40 0261-441-24 $82.40 0261-441-25 $82.40 0261-441-26 $82.40 0261-441-27 $82.40 0261-441-28 $82.40 0261-441-29 $82.40 0261-441-30 $82.40 0261-441-31 $82.40 0261-441-32 $82.40 0261-441-33 $82.40 0261-441-34 $82.40 0261-441-35 $82.40 0261-441-36 $82.40 0261-441-37 $82.40 0261-441-38 $82.40 0261-441-39 $82.40 0261-441-40 $82.40 0261-441-41 $82.40 0261-441-42 $82.40 0261-441-43 $82.40 0261-441-45 $82.40 Totals Parcels 591 Levy $48,698.40 Page 40 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 155 CC30 SP35 - AD 981 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-651-01 $61.02 0142-651-02 $61.02 0142-651-03 $61.02 0142-651-04 $61.02 0142-651-05 $61.02 0142-651-06 $61.02 0142-651-07 $61.02 0142-651-08 $61.02 0142-651-09 $61.02 0142-651-10 $61.02 0142-651-11 $61.02 0142-651-12 $61.02 0142-651-13 $61.02 0142-651-14 $61.02 0142-651-15 $61.02 0142-651-16 $61.02 0142-651-17 $61.02 0142-651-18 $61.02 0142-651-19 $61.02 0142-651-20 $61.02 0142-651-21 $61.02 0142-651-22 $61.02 0142-651-23 $61.02 0142-651-24 $61.02 0142-651-25 $61.02 0142-651-26 $61.02 0142-651-27 $61.02 0142-651-28 $61.02 0142-651-29 $61.02 0142-651-30 $61.02 0142-651-31 $61.02 0142-651-32 $61.02 0142-651-33 $61.02 0142-651-34 $61.02 0142-651-35 $61.02 0142-651-36 $61.02 0142-651-37 $61.02 0142-651-38 $61.02 0142-651-39 $61.02 0142-651-40 $61.02 0142-651-41 $61.02 0142-651-42 $61.02 0142-651-43 $61.02 0142-651-44 $61.02 0142-651-45 $61.02 0142-651-46 $61.02 0142-651-47 $61.02 0142-651-48 $61.02 0142-651-49 $61.02 0142-651-50 $61.02 0142-651-51 $61.02 0142-651-52 $61.02 0142-651-53 $61.02 0142-651-54 $61.02 0142-651-55 $61.02 0142-651-56 $61.02 0142-651-57 $61.02 0142-661-01 $61.02 0142-661-02 $61.02 0142-661-03 $61.02 0142-661-04 $61.02 0142-661-05 $61.02 0142-661-06 $61.02 0142-661-07 $61.02 0142-661-08 $61.02 0142-661-09 $61.02 0142-661-10 $61.02 0142-661-11 $61.02 0142-661-12 $61.02 0142-661-13 $61.02 0142-661-14 $61.02 0142-661-15 $61.02 0142-661-16 $61.02 0142-661-17 $61.02 0142-661-18 $61.02 0142-661-19 $61.02 0142-661-20 $61.02 0142-661-21 $61.02 0142-661-22 $61.02 0142-661-23 $61.02 0142-661-24 $61.02 0142-661-25 $61.02 0142-661-26 $61.02 0142-661-27 $61.02 0142-661-28 $61.02 0142-661-29 $61.02 0142-661-30 $61.02 0142-661-31 $61.02 0142-661-32 $61.02 0142-661-33 $61.02 0142-661-34 $61.02 0142-661-35 $61.02 0142-661-36 $61.02 0142-661-37 $61.02 0142-661-38 $61.02 0142-661-40 $61.02 0142-661-41 $61.02 0142-661-42 $61.02 0142-661-43 $61.02 0142-661-44 $61.02 0142-661-45 $61.02 0142-661-46 $61.02 0142-661-47 $61.02 0142-661-48 $61.02 0142-661-49 $61.02 0142-661-50 $61.02 0142-661-51 $61.02 0142-661-52 $61.02 0142-661-53 $61.02 0142-661-54 $61.02 0142-661-55 $61.02 0142-661-56 $61.02 0142-661-57 $61.02 0142-661-58 $61.02 0142-661-59 $61.02 0142-661-60 $61.02 0142-661-61 $61.02 0142-661-62 $61.02 0142-661-63 $61.02 0142-661-64 $61.02 0142-661-65 $61.02 0142-661-66 $61.02 0142-661-67 $61.02 0142-661-68 $61.02 0142-661-69 $61.02 0142-661-70 $61.02 0142-661-71 $61.02 0142-661-72 $61.02 0142-661-73 $61.02 0142-661-74 $61.02 0142-661-75 $61.02 0142-661-76 $61.02 0142-661-77 $61.02 0142-671-01 $61.02 0142-671-02 $61.02 0142-671-03 $61.02 0142-671-04 $61.02 0142-671-05 $61.02 Assessment Roll Page 41 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 156 CC30 SP35 - AD 981 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0142-671-06 $61.02 0142-671-07 $61.02 0142-671-08 $61.02 0142-671-09 $61.02 0142-671-10 $61.02 0142-671-11 $61.02 0142-671-12 $61.02 0142-671-13 $61.02 0142-671-14 $61.02 0142-671-15 $61.02 0142-671-16 $61.02 0142-671-17 $61.02 0142-671-18 $61.02 0142-671-19 $61.02 0142-671-20 $61.02 0142-671-21 $61.02 0142-671-22 $61.02 0142-671-23 $61.02 0142-671-24 $61.02 0142-671-25 $61.02 0142-671-26 $61.02 0142-671-27 $61.02 0142-671-28 $61.02 0142-671-29 $61.02 0142-671-30 $61.02 0142-671-31 $61.02 0142-671-32 $61.02 0142-671-33 $61.02 0142-671-34 $61.02 0142-671-35 $61.02 0142-671-36 $61.02 0142-671-37 $61.02 0142-671-38 $61.02 0142-671-39 $61.02 0142-671-40 $61.02 0142-671-41 $61.02 0142-671-42 $61.02 0142-671-43 $61.02 0142-671-44 $61.02 0142-671-45 $61.02 0142-671-46 $61.02 0142-671-47 $61.02 0142-671-48 $61.02 0142-671-49 $61.02 0142-671-50 $61.02 0142-671-51 $61.02 0142-671-52 $61.02 0142-671-53 $61.02 0142-671-54 $61.02 0142-671-55 $61.02 0142-671-56 $61.02 0142-671-57 $61.02 0142-671-58 $61.02 0142-671-59 $61.02 0142-671-60 $61.02 0142-671-61 $61.02 0142-671-62 $61.02 0142-671-63 $61.02 0142-671-64 $61.02 0142-671-65 $61.02 0142-671-66 $61.02 0142-671-67 $61.02 0142-671-68 $61.02 0142-671-69 $61.02 0142-671-70 $61.02 0142-671-71 $61.02 0142-671-72 $61.02 0142-671-73 $61.02 0142-671-74 $61.02 0142-671-75 $61.02 0142-671-76 $61.02 0142-671-77 $61.02 0142-781-01 $61.02 0142-781-02 $61.02 0142-781-03 $61.02 0142-781-04 $61.02 0142-781-05 $61.02 0142-781-06 $61.02 0142-781-07 $61.02 0142-781-08 $61.02 0142-781-09 $61.02 0142-781-10 $61.02 0142-781-11 $61.02 0142-781-12 $61.02 0142-781-13 $61.02 0142-781-14 $61.02 0142-781-15 $61.02 0142-781-16 $61.02 0142-781-17 $61.02 0142-781-18 $61.02 0142-781-19 $61.02 0142-781-20 $61.02 0142-781-21 $61.02 0142-781-22 $61.02 0142-781-23 $61.02 0142-781-24 $61.02 0142-781-25 $61.02 0142-781-26 $61.02 0142-781-27 $61.02 0142-781-28 $61.02 0142-781-29 $61.02 0142-781-30 $61.02 0142-781-31 $61.02 0142-781-32 $61.02 0142-781-33 $61.02 0142-781-34 $61.02 0142-781-35 $61.02 0142-781-36 $61.02 Totals Parcels 246 Levy $15,010.92 Page 42 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 157 CC30 SP36 - AD 982 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0285-325-37 $102.36 0285-325-38 $102.36 0285-325-39 $102.36 0285-325-40 $102.36 0285-325-41 $102.36 0285-325-42 $102.36 0285-325-43 $102.36 0285-325-44 $102.36 0285-325-45 $102.36 0285-325-46 $102.36 0285-325-47 $102.36 0285-325-48 $102.36 0285-325-49 $102.36 0285-325-50 $102.36 0285-325-51 $102.36 0285-325-52 $102.36 0285-325-53 $102.36 0285-325-54 $102.36 0285-325-55 $102.36 0285-325-56 $102.36 0285-325-57 $102.36 0285-325-58 $102.36 0285-325-59 $102.36 0285-325-60 $102.36 0285-325-61 $102.36 0285-325-62 $102.36 0285-325-63 $102.36 0285-325-64 $102.36 0285-325-65 $102.36 0285-325-66 $102.36 0285-325-67 $102.36 0285-325-68 $102.36 0285-325-69 $102.36 0285-325-70 $102.36 0285-325-71 $102.36 0285-325-72 $102.36 0285-325-73 $102.36 0285-325-74 $102.36 0285-325-75 $102.36 0285-325-76 $102.36 0285-325-77 $102.36 0285-325-78 $102.36 0285-325-79 $102.36 0285-325-80 $102.36 0285-325-81 $102.36 0285-325-82 $102.36 0285-781-49 $102.36 0285-781-50 $102.36 0285-781-51 $102.36 0285-781-52 $102.36 0285-781-53 $102.36 0285-781-54 $102.36 0285-781-55 $102.36 0285-992-01 $102.36 0285-992-02 $102.36 0285-992-03 $102.36 0285-992-04 $102.36 0285-992-05 $102.36 0285-992-06 $102.36 0285-992-07 $102.36 0285-992-10 $102.36 0285-992-11 $102.36 0285-992-12 $102.36 0285-992-13 $102.36 0285-992-14 $102.36 0285-992-15 $102.36 0285-992-16 $102.36 0285-992-17 $102.36 0285-992-20 $102.36 0285-992-21 $102.36 0285-992-22 $102.36 0285-992-23 $102.36 0285-992-24 $102.36 0285-992-25 $102.36 0285-992-26 $102.36 0285-992-27 $102.36 0285-992-28 $102.36 0285-992-29 $102.36 0285-992-30 $102.36 0285-992-31 $102.36 0285-992-32 $102.36 0285-992-33 $102.36 0285-992-34 $102.36 0285-992-35 $102.36 0285-992-36 $102.36 0285-992-37 $102.36 0285-992-38 $102.36 0285-992-39 $102.36 0285-992-40 $102.36 0285-992-41 $102.36 0285-992-42 $102.36 0285-992-43 $102.36 0285-992-44 $102.36 0285-992-47 $102.36 0285-992-48 $102.36 0285-992-49 $102.36 Totals Parcels 96 Levy $9,826.56 Assessment Roll Page 43 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 158 CC30 SP42 - AD 986 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-681-01 $96.90 0142-681-02 $96.90 0142-681-03 $96.90 0142-681-04 $96.90 0142-681-05 $96.90 0142-681-06 $96.90 0142-681-07 $96.90 0142-681-08 $96.90 0142-681-09 $96.90 0142-681-10 $96.90 0142-681-11 $96.90 0142-681-12 $96.90 0142-681-13 $96.90 0142-681-14 $96.90 0142-681-15 $96.90 0142-681-16 $96.90 0142-681-17 $96.90 0142-681-18 $96.90 0142-681-19 $96.90 0142-681-20 $96.90 0142-681-21 $96.90 0142-681-22 $96.90 0142-681-23 $96.90 0142-681-24 $96.90 0142-681-25 $96.90 0142-681-26 $96.90 0142-681-27 $96.90 0142-681-28 $96.90 0142-681-29 $96.90 0142-681-30 $96.90 0142-681-31 $96.90 0142-681-32 $96.90 0142-681-33 $96.90 0142-681-34 $96.90 0142-681-35 $96.90 0142-681-36 $96.90 0142-681-37 $96.90 0142-681-38 $96.90 0142-681-39 $96.90 0142-681-40 $96.90 0142-681-41 $96.90 0142-681-42 $96.90 0142-681-43 $96.90 0142-681-44 $96.90 0142-681-45 $96.90 0142-681-46 $96.90 0142-681-47 $96.90 0142-681-48 $96.90 0142-681-49 $96.90 0142-681-50 $96.90 0142-681-51 $96.90 0142-681-52 $96.90 0142-681-53 $96.90 0142-681-54 $96.90 0142-681-55 $96.90 0142-681-56 $96.90 0142-681-57 $96.90 0142-681-58 $96.90 0142-681-59 $96.90 0142-681-60 $96.90 0142-681-61 $96.90 0142-681-62 $96.90 0142-681-63 $96.90 0142-681-64 $96.90 0142-681-65 $96.90 0142-681-66 $96.90 0142-681-67 $96.90 0142-681-68 $96.90 0142-681-69 $96.90 0142-681-70 $96.90 0142-681-71 $96.90 0142-681-72 $96.90 0142-681-73 $96.90 0142-681-74 $96.90 0142-681-75 $96.90 0142-681-76 $96.90 0142-681-77 $96.90 0142-681-78 $96.90 0142-681-79 $96.90 0142-681-80 $96.90 0142-681-81 $96.90 0142-681-82 $96.90 0142-681-83 $96.90 0142-681-84 $96.90 0142-681-85 $96.90 0142-681-86 $96.90 0142-681-87 $96.90 0142-681-88 $96.90 0142-681-89 $96.90 0142-681-90 $96.90 0142-681-91 $96.90 0142-681-92 $96.90 0142-681-93 $96.90 0142-681-94 $96.90 0142-681-95 $96.90 0142-681-96 $96.90 0142-721-01 $96.90 0142-721-02 $96.90 0142-721-03 $96.90 0142-721-04 $96.90 0142-721-05 $96.90 0142-721-06 $96.90 0142-721-07 $96.90 0142-721-08 $96.90 0142-721-09 $96.90 0142-721-10 $96.90 0142-721-11 $96.90 0142-721-12 $96.90 0142-721-13 $96.90 0142-721-14 $96.90 0142-721-15 $96.90 0142-721-16 $96.90 0142-721-17 $96.90 0142-721-18 $96.90 0142-721-19 $96.90 0142-721-20 $96.90 0142-721-21 $96.90 0142-721-22 $96.90 0142-721-23 $96.90 0142-721-24 $96.90 0142-721-25 $96.90 0142-721-26 $96.90 0142-721-27 $96.90 0142-721-28 $96.90 0142-721-29 $96.90 0142-721-30 $96.90 0142-721-31 $96.90 0142-721-32 $96.90 0142-721-33 $96.90 0142-721-34 $96.90 0142-721-35 $96.90 0142-721-36 $96.90 0142-721-37 $96.90 0142-731-01 $96.90 0142-731-02 $96.90 0142-731-03 $96.90 0142-731-04 $96.90 0142-731-05 $96.90 Assessment Roll Page 44 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 159 CC30 SP42 - AD 986 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0142-731-06 $96.90 0142-731-07 $96.90 0142-731-08 $96.90 0142-731-09 $96.90 0142-731-10 $96.90 0142-731-11 $96.90 0142-731-12 $96.90 0142-731-13 $96.90 0142-731-14 $96.90 0142-731-15 $96.90 0142-731-16 $96.90 0142-731-17 $96.90 0142-731-18 $96.90 0142-731-19 $96.90 0142-731-20 $96.90 0142-731-21 $96.90 0142-731-22 $96.90 0142-731-23 $96.90 0142-731-24 $96.90 0142-731-25 $96.90 0142-731-26 $96.90 0142-731-27 $96.90 0142-731-28 $96.90 0142-731-29 $96.90 0142-731-30 $96.90 0142-731-31 $96.90 0142-731-32 $96.90 0142-731-33 $96.90 0142-731-34 $96.90 0142-731-35 $96.90 0142-731-36 $96.90 0142-731-37 $96.90 0142-731-38 $96.90 0142-731-39 $96.90 0142-731-40 $96.90 Totals Parcels 173 Levy $16,763.70 Page 45 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 160 CC30 SP45 - AD 989 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-691-01 $56.30 0142-691-02 $56.30 0142-691-03 $56.30 0142-691-04 $56.30 0142-691-05 $56.30 0142-691-06 $56.30 0142-691-07 $56.30 0142-691-08 $56.30 0142-691-09 $56.30 0142-691-10 $56.30 0142-691-11 $56.30 0142-691-12 $56.30 0142-691-13 $56.30 0142-691-14 $56.30 0142-691-15 $56.30 0142-691-16 $56.30 0142-691-17 $56.30 0142-691-18 $56.30 0142-691-19 $56.30 0142-691-20 $56.30 0142-691-21 $56.30 0142-691-22 $56.30 0142-691-23 $56.30 0142-691-24 $56.30 0142-691-25 $56.30 0142-691-26 $56.30 0142-691-27 $56.30 0142-691-28 $56.30 0142-691-29 $56.30 0142-691-30 $56.30 0142-691-31 $56.30 0142-691-32 $56.30 0142-691-33 $56.30 0142-691-34 $56.30 0142-691-35 $56.30 0142-691-36 $56.30 0142-691-37 $56.30 0142-691-38 $56.30 0142-691-39 $56.30 0142-691-40 $56.30 0142-691-41 $56.30 0142-691-42 $56.30 0142-691-43 $56.30 0142-691-44 $56.30 0142-691-45 $56.30 0142-691-46 $56.30 0142-691-47 $56.30 0142-691-48 $56.30 0142-691-49 $56.30 0142-691-50 $56.30 0142-691-51 $56.30 0142-691-52 $56.30 0142-691-53 $56.30 0142-691-54 $56.30 0142-691-55 $56.30 0142-691-56 $56.30 0142-691-57 $56.30 0142-691-58 $56.30 0142-691-59 $56.30 0142-691-60 $56.30 0142-691-61 $56.30 0142-691-62 $56.30 0142-691-63 $56.30 0142-691-64 $56.30 0142-691-65 $56.30 0142-691-66 $56.30 0142-691-67 $56.30 0142-691-68 $56.30 0142-701-01 $56.30 0142-701-02 $56.30 0142-701-03 $56.30 0142-701-04 $56.30 0142-701-05 $56.30 0142-701-06 $56.30 0142-701-07 $56.30 0142-701-08 $56.30 0142-701-09 $56.30 0142-701-10 $56.30 0142-701-11 $56.30 0142-701-12 $56.30 0142-701-13 $56.30 0142-701-14 $56.30 0142-701-15 $56.30 0142-701-16 $56.30 0142-701-17 $56.30 0142-701-18 $56.30 0142-701-19 $56.30 0142-701-20 $56.30 0142-701-21 $56.30 0142-701-22 $56.30 0142-701-23 $56.30 0142-701-24 $56.30 0142-701-25 $56.30 0142-701-26 $56.30 0142-701-27 $56.30 0142-701-28 $56.30 0142-701-29 $56.30 0142-701-30 $56.30 0142-701-31 $56.30 0142-701-32 $56.30 0142-701-33 $56.30 0142-701-34 $56.30 0142-701-35 $56.30 0142-701-36 $56.30 0142-701-37 $56.30 0142-701-38 $56.30 0142-701-39 $56.30 0142-701-40 $56.30 0142-701-41 $56.30 0142-701-42 $56.30 0142-701-43 $56.30 0142-701-44 $56.30 0142-701-45 $56.30 0142-701-46 $56.30 0142-701-47 $56.30 0142-701-48 $56.30 0142-701-49 $56.30 0142-701-50 $56.30 0142-701-51 $56.30 0142-701-52 $56.30 0142-701-53 $56.30 0142-701-54 $56.30 0142-701-55 $56.30 0142-701-56 $56.30 0142-701-57 $56.30 0142-701-58 $56.30 0142-701-59 $56.30 0142-701-60 $56.30 0142-701-61 $56.30 0142-701-62 $56.30 0142-701-63 $56.30 0142-701-64 $56.30 0142-701-65 $56.30 0142-701-66 $56.30 0142-701-67 $56.30 0142-701-68 $56.30 0142-701-69 $56.30 0142-701-70 $56.30 Assessment Roll Page 46 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 161 CC30 SP45 - AD 989 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0142-701-71 $56.30 0142-701-72 $56.30 0142-701-73 $56.30 0142-701-74 $56.30 0142-701-75 $56.30 0142-701-76 $56.30 0142-701-77 $56.30 0142-701-78 $56.30 0142-701-79 $56.30 0142-701-80 $56.30 0142-711-01 $56.30 0142-711-02 $56.30 0142-711-03 $56.30 0142-711-04 $56.30 0142-711-05 $56.30 0142-711-06 $56.30 0142-711-07 $56.30 0142-711-08 $56.30 0142-711-09 $56.30 0142-711-10 $56.30 0142-711-11 $56.30 0142-711-12 $56.30 0142-711-13 $56.30 0142-711-14 $56.30 0142-711-15 $56.30 0142-711-16 $56.30 0142-711-17 $56.30 0142-711-18 $56.30 0142-711-19 $56.30 0142-711-20 $56.30 0142-711-21 $56.30 0142-711-22 $56.30 0142-711-23 $56.30 0142-711-24 $56.30 0142-711-25 $56.30 0142-711-26 $56.30 0142-711-27 $56.30 0142-711-28 $56.30 0142-711-29 $56.30 0142-711-30 $56.30 0142-711-31 $56.30 0142-711-32 $56.30 0142-711-33 $56.30 0142-711-34 $56.30 0142-711-35 $56.30 0142-711-36 $56.30 0142-711-37 $56.30 0142-711-38 $56.30 0142-711-39 $56.30 0142-711-40 $56.30 0142-711-41 $56.30 0142-711-42 $56.30 0142-711-43 $56.30 0142-711-44 $56.30 0142-711-45 $56.30 0142-711-46 $56.30 0142-711-47 $56.30 0142-711-48 $56.30 0142-711-49 $56.30 0142-711-50 $56.30 0142-711-51 $56.30 0142-711-52 $56.30 0142-711-53 $56.30 0142-711-54 $56.30 0142-711-55 $56.30 0142-711-56 $56.30 0142-711-57 $56.30 0142-711-58 $56.30 0142-711-59 $56.30 0142-711-60 $56.30 Totals Parcels 208 Levy $11,710.40 Page 47 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 162 CC30 SP47 - AD 991 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261--.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. --.--.--.--.--.--. Totals Parcels 138 Levy $26,468.40 Assessment Roll Page 48 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 163 CC30 SP72 - AD 993 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0262-251-01 $100.06 0262-251-02 $100.06 0262-251-03 $100.06 0262-251-04 $100.06 0262-251-05 $100.06 0262-251-06 $100.06 0262-251-07 $100.06 0262-251-08 $100.06 0262-251-09 $100.06 0262-251-10 $100.06 0262-251-11 $100.06 0262-251-12 $100.06 0262-251-13 $100.06 0262-251-14 $100.06 0262-251-15 $100.06 0262-251-16 $100.06 0262-251-17 $100.06 0262-251-18 $100.06 0262-251-19 $100.06 0262-251-20 $100.06 0262-251-21 $100.06 0262-251-22 $100.06 0262-251-23 $100.06 0262-251-24 $100.06 0262-251-25 $100.06 0262-251-26 $100.06 0262-251-27 $100.06 0262-251-28 $100.06 0262-251-30 $100.06 0262-251-31 $100.06 0262-251-32 $100.06 0262-251-33 $100.06 0262-251-34 $100.06 0262-251-35 $100.06 0262-251-36 $100.06 0262-251-37 $100.06 0262-251-38 $100.06 0262-251-39 $100.06 0262-251-40 $100.06 0262-251-41 $100.06 0262-251-42 $100.06 0262-251-43 $100.06 0262-251-44 $100.06 0262-251-45 $100.06 0262-251-46 $100.06 0262-251-47 $100.06 0262-251-48 $100.06 0262-251-49 $100.06 0262-251-50 $100.06 0262-251-51 $100.06 0262-251-52 $100.06 0262-251-53 $100.06 0262-251-54 $100.06 0262-251-55 $100.06 0262-251-56 $100.06 0262-251-57 $100.06 0262-251-58 $100.06 0262-251-59 $100.06 0262-251-60 $100.06 0262-251-61 $100.06 0262-251-62 $100.06 0262-261-01 $100.06 0262-261-02 $100.06 0262-261-03 $100.06 0262-261-04 $100.06 0262-261-05 $100.06 0262-261-06 $100.06 0262-261-07 $100.06 0262-261-08 $100.06 0262-261-09 $100.06 0262-261-10 $100.06 0262-261-11 $100.06 0262-261-12 $100.06 0262-261-13 $100.06 0262-261-14 $100.06 0262-261-15 $100.06 0262-261-16 $100.06 0262-261-17 $100.06 0262-261-18 $100.06 0262-261-19 $100.06 0262-261-20 $100.06 0262-261-21 $100.06 0262-261-22 $100.06 0262-261-23 $100.06 0262-261-24 $100.06 0262-261-25 $100.06 0262-261-26 $100.06 0262-261-27 $100.06 0262-261-28 $100.06 0262-261-29 $100.06 0262-261-30 $100.06 0262-261-31 $100.06 0262-261-32 $100.06 0262-261-33 $100.06 0262-261-34 $100.06 0262-261-35 $100.06 0262-261-36 $100.06 0262-261-37 $100.06 0262-261-38 $100.06 0262-261-39 $100.06 0262-261-40 $100.06 0262-261-41 $100.06 0262-261-42 $100.06 0262-261-43 $100.06 0262-261-44 $100.06 0262-261-45 $100.06 0262-261-46 $100.06 0262-261-47 $100.06 0262-261-48 $100.06 0262-261-49 $100.06 0262-261-50 $100.06 0262-261-51 $100.06 0262-261-52 $100.06 0262-261-53 $100.06 0262-261-54 $100.06 0262-261-55 $100.06 0262-261-56 $100.06 0262-261-57 $100.06 0262-261-58 $100.06 0262-261-59 $100.06 0262-261-60 $100.06 0262-261-61 $100.06 0262-261-62 $100.06 0262-261-63 $100.06 0262-261-64 $100.06 0262-271-01 $100.06 0262-271-02 $100.06 0262-271-03 $100.06 0262-271-04 $100.06 0262-271-05 $100.06 0262-271-06 $100.06 0262-271-07 $100.06 0262-271-08 $100.06 0262-271-09 $100.06 0262-271-10 $100.06 0262-271-11 $100.06 0262-271-12 $100.06 0262-271-13 $100.06 Assessment Roll Page 49 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 164 CC30 SP72 - AD 993 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0262-271-14 $100.06 0262-271-15 $100.06 0262-271-16 $100.06 0262-271-17 $100.06 0262-271-18 $100.06 0262-271-19 $100.06 0262-271-20 $100.06 0262-271-21 $100.06 0262-271-22 $100.06 0262-271-23 $100.06 0262-271-24 $100.06 0262-271-25 $100.06 0262-271-26 $100.06 0262-271-27 $100.06 0262-271-28 $100.06 0262-271-29 $100.06 0262-271-30 $100.06 0262-271-31 $100.06 0262-271-32 $100.06 0262-271-33 $100.06 0262-271-34 $100.06 0262-271-35 $100.06 0262-271-36 $100.06 0262-271-37 $100.06 0262-271-38 $100.06 0262-271-39 $100.06 0262-271-40 $100.06 0262-271-41 $100.06 0262-271-42 $100.06 0262-271-43 $100.06 0262-271-44 $100.06 0262-271-45 $100.06 0262-271-46 $100.06 0262-271-47 $100.06 0262-271-48 $100.06 0262-271-49 $100.06 0262-271-50 $100.06 0262-271-51 $100.06 0262-271-52 $100.06 0262-271-53 $100.06 0262-271-54 $100.06 0262-271-55 $100.06 0262-271-56 $100.06 0262-271-57 $100.06 0262-271-58 $100.06 0262-271-59 $100.06 0262-271-60 $100.06 0262-271-61 $100.06 0262-271-62 $100.06 0262-271-63 $100.06 0262-271-64 $100.06 0262-271-65 $100.06 0262-281-01 $100.06 0262-281-02 $100.06 0262-281-03 $100.06 0262-281-04 $100.06 0262-281-05 $100.06 0262-281-06 $100.06 0262-281-07 $100.06 0262-281-08 $100.06 0262-281-09 $100.06 0262-281-10 $100.06 0262-281-11 $100.06 0262-281-12 $100.06 0262-281-13 $100.06 0262-281-14 $100.06 0262-281-15 $100.06 0262-281-16 $100.06 0262-281-17 $100.06 0262-281-18 $100.06 0262-281-19 $100.06 0262-281-20 $100.06 0262-281-21 $100.06 0262-281-22 $100.06 0262-281-23 $100.06 0262-281-24 $100.06 0262-281-25 $100.06 0262-281-26 $100.06 0262-281-27 $100.06 0262-281-28 $100.06 0262-281-29 $100.06 0262-281-30 $100.06 0262-281-31 $100.06 0262-281-32 $100.06 0262-281-33 $100.06 0262-281-34 $100.06 0262-281-35 $100.06 0262-281-36 $100.06 0262-281-37 $100.06 0262-281-38 $100.06 0262-281-39 $100.06 0262-281-40 $100.06 0262-281-41 $100.06 0262-281-42 $100.06 0262-281-43 $100.06 0262-281-44 $100.06 0262-281-45 $100.06 0262-281-46 $100.06 0262-281-47 $100.06 0262-281-48 $100.06 0262-281-49 $100.06 0262-281-50 $100.06 0262-281-51 $100.06 0262-281-52 $100.06 0262-281-53 $100.06 0262-281-54 $100.06 0262-281-55 $100.06 0262-281-56 $100.06 0262-281-57 $100.06 0262-281-58 $100.06 0262-281-59 $100.06 0262-281-60 $100.06 0262-281-61 $100.06 0262-281-62 $100.06 0262-281-63 $100.06 0262-281-64 $100.06 0262-281-65 $100.06 0262-281-66 $100.06 0262-281-67 $100.06 0262-281-68 $100.06 0262-281-69 $100.06 0262-281-70 $100.06 0262-281-71 $100.06 0262-281-72 $100.06 0262-281-73 $100.06 0262-281-74 $100.06 0262-281-75 $100.06 0262-281-76 $100.06 0262-281-77 $100.06 0262-281-78 $100.06 0262-281-79 $100.06 0262-281-80 $100.06 0262-281-81 $100.06 0262-281-82 $100.06 0262-281-83 $100.06 0262-281-84 $100.06 0262-281-85 $100.06 Page 50 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 165 CC30 SP72 - AD 993 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0262-281-86 $100.06 0262-281-87 $100.06 Totals Parcels 277 Levy $27,716.62 Page 51 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 166 CC30 SP53 - AD 997 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-481-01 $24.42 0261-481-02 $24.42 0261-481-03 $24.42 0261-481-04 $24.42 0261-481-05 $24.42 0261-481-06 $24.42 0261-481-07 $24.42 0261-481-08 $24.42 0261-481-09 $24.42 0261-481-10 $24.42 0261-481-11 $24.42 0261-481-12 $24.42 0261-481-13 $24.42 0261-481-14 $24.42 0261-481-15 $24.42 0261-481-16 $24.42 0261-481-17 $24.42 0261-481-18 $24.42 0261-481-19 $24.42 0261-481-20 $24.42 0261-481-21 $24.42 0261-481-22 $24.42 0261-481-23 $24.42 0261-481-24 $24.42 0261-481-25 $24.42 0261-481-26 $24.42 0261-481-27 $24.42 0261-481-28 $24.42 0261-481-29 $24.42 0261-481-30 $24.42 0261-481-31 $24.42 0261-481-32 $24.42 0261-481-33 $24.42 0261-501-01 $24.42 0261-501-02 $24.42 0261-501-03 $24.42 0261-501-04 $24.42 0261-501-05 $24.42 0261-501-06 $24.42 0261-501-07 $24.42 0261-501-08 $24.42 0261-501-09 $24.42 0261-501-10 $24.42 0261-501-11 $24.42 0261-501-12 $24.42 0261-501-13 $24.42 0261-501-14 $24.42 0261-501-15 $24.42 0261-501-16 $24.42 0261-501-17 $24.42 0261-501-18 $24.42 0261-501-19 $24.42 0261-501-20 $24.42 0261-501-21 $24.42 0261-501-22 $24.42 0261-501-23 $24.42 0261-501-24 $24.42 0261-501-25 $24.42 0261-501-26 $24.42 0261-501-27 $24.42 0261-501-28 $24.42 0261-501-29 $24.42 0261-501-30 $24.42 0261-501-31 $24.42 0261-501-32 $24.42 0261-501-33 $24.42 0261-501-34 $24.42 0261-501-35 $24.42 0261-501-36 $24.42 0261-501-37 $24.42 0261-501-38 $24.42 0261-501-39 $24.42 0261-501-40 $24.42 0261-501-41 $24.42 0261-501-42 $24.42 0261-501-43 $24.42 0261-501-44 $24.42 0261-501-45 $24.42 0261-501-46 $24.42 0261-501-47 $24.42 0261-501-48 $24.42 0261-501-49 $24.42 0261-501-50 $24.42 0261-501-51 $24.42 0261-501-52 $24.42 0261-501-53 $24.42 0261-501-54 $24.42 0261-501-55 $24.42 0261-501-56 $24.42 0261-501-57 $24.42 0261-501-58 $24.42 0261-501-59 $24.42 0261-501-60 $24.42 0261-501-61 $24.42 0261-501-62 $24.42 0261-501-63 $24.42 0261-501-64 $24.42 0261-501-65 $24.42 0261-501-66 $24.42 0261-501-67 $24.42 0261-501-68 $24.42 0261-501-69 $24.42 0261-501-70 $24.42 0261-661-01 $24.42 0261-661-02 $24.42 0261-661-03 $24.42 0261-661-04 $24.42 0261-661-05 $24.42 0261-661-06 $24.42 0261-661-07 $24.42 0261-661-08 $24.42 0261-661-09 $24.42 0261-661-10 $24.42 0261-661-11 $24.42 0261-661-12 $24.42 0261-661-13 $24.42 0261-661-14 $24.42 0261-661-15 $24.42 0261-661-16 $24.42 0261-661-17 $24.42 0261-661-18 $24.42 0261-661-19 $24.42 0261-661-20 $24.42 0261-661-21 $24.42 0261-661-22 $24.42 0261-661-23 $24.42 0261-661-24 $24.42 0261-661-25 $24.42 0261-661-26 $24.42 0261-661-27 $24.42 0261-661-28 $24.42 0261-661-29 $24.42 0261-661-30 $24.42 0261-661-31 $24.42 0261-661-32 $24.42 0261-661-33 $24.42 0261-661-34 $24.42 0261-661-35 $24.42 Assessment Roll Page 52 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 167 CC30 SP53 - AD 997 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0261-661-36 $24.42 0261-661-37 $24.42 0261-661-38 $24.42 0261-661-39 $24.42 0261-661-40 $24.42 0261-661-41 $24.42 0261-661-42 $24.42 0261-661-43 $24.42 0261-661-44 $24.42 0261-661-45 $24.42 0261-661-46 $24.42 0261-661-47 $24.42 0261-661-48 $24.42 0261-661-49 $24.42 0261-661-50 $24.42 0261-661-51 $24.42 0261-661-52 $24.42 0261-661-53 $24.42 0261-661-54 $24.42 0261-661-55 $24.42 0261-661-56 $24.42 0261-661-57 $24.42 0261-661-58 $24.42 0261-661-59 $24.42 0261-661-60 $24.42 0261-661-61 $24.42 0261-661-62 $24.42 0261-661-63 $24.42 0261-661-64 $24.42 0261-671-01 $24.42 0261-671-02 $24.42 0261-671-03 $24.42 0261-671-04 $24.42 0261-671-05 $24.42 0261-671-06 $24.42 0261-671-07 $24.42 0261-671-08 $24.42 0261-671-09 $24.42 0261-671-10 $24.42 0261-671-11 $24.42 0261-671-12 $24.42 0261-671-13 $24.42 0261-671-14 $24.42 0261-671-15 $24.42 0261-671-16 $24.42 0261-671-17 $24.42 0261-671-18 $24.42 0261-671-19 $24.42 0261-671-20 $24.42 0261-671-21 $24.42 0261-671-22 $24.42 0261-671-23 $24.42 0261-671-24 $24.42 0261-671-25 $24.42 0261-671-26 $24.42 0261-671-27 $24.42 0261-671-28 $24.42 0261-671-29 $24.42 0261-671-30 $24.42 0261-671-31 $24.42 0261-671-32 $24.42 0261-671-33 $24.42 0261-671-34 $24.42 0261-671-35 $24.42 0261-671-36 $24.42 0261-671-37 $24.42 0261-671-38 $24.42 0261-671-39 $24.42 0261-671-40 $24.42 0261-671-41 $24.42 0261-671-42 $24.42 0261-671-43 $24.42 0261-671-44 $24.42 0261-671-45 $24.42 0261-671-46 $24.42 0261-671-47 $24.42 0261-671-48 $24.42 0261-671-49 $24.42 0261-671-50 $24.42 0261-671-51 $24.42 0261-671-52 $24.42 0261-671-53 $24.42 0261-671-54 $24.42 0261-671-55 $24.42 0261-671-56 $24.42 0261-671-57 $24.42 0261-671-58 $24.42 0261-671-59 $24.42 0261-671-60 $24.42 0261-671-61 $24.42 0261-671-62 $24.42 0261-671-63 $24.42 0261-711-27 $24.42 0261-712-01 $24.42 0261-712-02 $24.42 0261-712-03 $24.42 0261-712-04 $24.42 0261-712-05 $24.42 0261-712-06 $24.42 0261-712-07 $24.42 0261-712-08 $24.42 0261-712-09 $24.42 0261-712-10 $24.42 0261-712-11 $24.42 0261-712-12 $24.42 0261-712-13 $24.42 0261-712-14 $24.42 0261-712-15 $24.42 0261-712-16 $24.42 Totals Parcels 247 Levy $6,031.74 Page 53 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 168 CC30 SP73 - AD 1001 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-751-01 $272.36 0142-751-02 $272.36 0142-751-03 $272.36 0142-751-04 $272.36 0142-751-05 $272.36 0142-751-06 $272.36 0142-751-07 $272.36 0142-751-08 $272.36 0142-751-09 $272.36 0142-751-10 $272.36 0142-751-11 $272.36 0142-751-12 $272.36 0142-751-13 $272.36 0142-751-14 $272.36 0142-751-15 $272.36 0142-751-16 $272.36 0142-751-17 $272.36 0142-751-18 $272.36 0142-751-19 $272.36 0142-751-20 $272.36 0142-751-21 $272.36 0142-751-22 $272.36 0142-751-23 $272.36 0142-751-24 $272.36 0142-751-25 $272.36 0142-751-26 $272.36 0142-751-27 $272.36 0142-751-28 $272.36 0142-751-29 $272.36 0142-751-30 $272.36 0142-751-32 $272.36 0142-751-33 $272.36 0142-751-34 $272.36 0142-751-35 $272.36 0142-751-36 $272.36 0142-751-37 $272.36 0142-751-38 $272.36 0142-751-39 $272.36 0142-751-40 $272.36 0142-751-41 $272.36 0142-751-42 $272.36 0142-751-43 $272.36 0142-751-44 $272.36 0142-751-45 $272.36 0142-751-48 $272.36 0142-751-49 $272.36 Totals Parcels 46 Levy $12,528.56 Assessment Roll Page 54 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 169 CC30 SP74 - AD 1002 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0265-301-30 $20.08 0265-301-31 $20.08 0265-301-32 $20.08 0265-301-33 $20.08 0265-301-34 $20.08 0265-301-35 $20.08 0265-301-36 $20.08 0265-301-37 $20.08 0265-301-38 $20.08 0265-301-39 $20.08 0265-301-40 $20.08 0265-301-41 $20.08 0265-301-42 $20.08 0265-301-43 $20.08 0265-301-44 $20.08 0265-301-45 $20.08 0265-301-46 $20.08 0265-301-47 $20.08 0265-301-48 $20.08 0265-301-49 $20.08 0265-301-50 $20.08 0265-301-51 $20.08 0265-301-52 $20.08 0265-301-53 $20.08 0265-301-54 $20.08 0265-301-55 $20.08 0265-301-56 $20.08 0265-301-57 $20.08 0265-301-58 $20.08 0265-301-59 $20.08 0265-301-60 $20.08 0265-301-61 $20.08 0265-301-62 $20.08 0265-301-63 $20.08 0265-301-64 $20.08 0265-301-65 $20.08 0265-301-66 $20.08 0265-301-67 $20.08 0265-301-68 $20.08 0265-301-69 $20.08 0265-301-70 $20.08 0265-301-71 $20.08 0265-301-72 $20.08 0265-301-73 $20.08 0265-301-74 $20.08 0265-301-75 $20.08 0265-301-76 $20.08 0265-301-77 $20.08 0265-301-78 $20.08 0265-301-79 $20.08 0265-301-80 $20.08 0265-301-81 $20.08 0265-301-82 $20.08 0265-301-83 $20.08 0265-301-84 $20.08 0265-301-85 $20.08 0265-301-86 $20.08 0265-301-87 $20.08 0265-311-19 $20.08 0265-311-20 $20.08 0265-311-21 $20.08 0265-311-22 $20.08 0265-311-23 $20.08 0265-311-24 $20.08 0265-311-25 $20.08 0265-311-26 $20.08 0265-311-27 $20.08 0265-311-28 $20.08 0265-311-29 $20.08 0265-311-30 $20.08 0265-311-31 $20.08 0265-311-32 $20.08 0265-311-33 $20.08 0265-311-34 $20.08 0265-311-35 $20.08 0265-311-36 $20.08 0265-311-37 $20.08 0265-311-38 $20.08 0265-311-39 $20.08 0265-311-40 $20.08 0265-311-41 $20.08 0265-311-42 $20.08 0265-311-43 $20.08 0265-311-44 $20.08 0265-311-45 $20.08 0265-311-46 $20.08 0265-311-47 $20.08 0265-311-48 $20.08 0265-311-49 $20.08 0265-311-50 $20.08 0265-311-51 $20.08 0265-311-52 $20.08 0265-311-53 $20.08 0265-321-01 $20.08 0265-321-02 $20.08 0265-321-03 $20.08 0265-321-04 $20.08 0265-321-05 $20.08 0265-321-06 $20.08 0265-321-07 $20.08 0265-321-08 $20.08 0265-321-09 $20.08 0265-321-10 $20.08 0265-321-11 $20.08 0265-321-12 $20.08 0265-321-13 $20.08 0265-321-14 $20.08 0265-321-15 $20.08 0265-321-16 $20.08 0265-321-17 $20.08 0265-321-18 $20.08 0265-321-19 $20.08 0265-321-20 $20.08 0265-321-21 $20.08 0265-321-22 $20.08 0265-321-23 $20.08 0265-321-24 $20.08 0265-321-25 $20.08 0265-321-26 $20.08 0265-321-27 $20.08 0265-321-28 $20.08 0265-321-29 $20.08 0265-321-30 $20.08 0265-321-31 $20.08 0265-321-32 $20.08 0265-321-33 $20.08 0265-321-34 $20.08 0265-321-35 $20.08 0265-321-36 $20.08 0265-321-37 $20.08 0265-321-38 $20.08 0265-321-39 $20.08 0265-321-40 $20.08 0265-321-41 $20.08 0265-321-42 $20.08 0265-321-43 $20.08 0265-321-44 $20.08 0265-321-45 $20.08 Assessment Roll Page 55 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 170 CC30 SP74 - AD 1002 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0265-321-46 $20.08 0265-321-47 $20.08 0265-321-48 $20.08 0265-321-49 $20.08 0265-321-50 $20.08 0265-321-51 $20.08 0265-321-52 $20.08 0265-321-53 $20.08 0265-321-54 $20.08 0265-321-55 $20.08 0265-321-56 $20.08 0265-321-57 $20.08 0265-321-58 $20.08 0265-321-59 $20.08 0265-321-60 $20.08 0265-321-61 $20.08 0265-321-62 $20.08 0265-321-63 $20.08 0265-321-64 $20.08 0265-321-65 $20.08 0265-321-66 $20.08 0265-321-67 $20.08 0265-321-68 $20.08 0265-321-69 $20.08 0265-321-70 $20.08 0265-321-71 $20.08 0265-321-72 $20.08 0265-321-73 $20.08 0265-321-74 $20.08 0265-321-75 $20.08 0265-321-76 $20.08 0265-321-77 $20.08 0265-321-78 $20.08 0265-321-79 $20.08 0265-321-80 $20.08 0265-321-81 $20.08 0265-321-82 $20.08 0265-321-83 $20.08 0265-321-84 $20.08 0265-321-85 $20.08 0265-321-86 $20.08 0265-321-87 $20.08 0265-321-88 $20.08 0265-321-89 $20.08 0265-321-90 $20.08 0265-321-91 $20.08 0265-331-01 $20.08 0265-331-02 $20.08 0265-331-03 $20.08 0265-331-04 $20.08 0265-331-05 $20.08 0265-331-06 $20.08 0265-331-07 $20.08 0265-331-08 $20.08 0265-331-09 $20.08 0265-331-10 $20.08 0265-331-11 $20.08 0265-331-12 $20.08 0265-331-13 $20.08 0265-331-14 $20.08 0265-331-15 $20.08 0265-331-16 $20.08 0265-331-17 $20.08 0265-331-18 $20.08 0265-331-19 $20.08 0265-331-20 $20.08 0265-331-21 $20.08 0265-331-22 $20.08 0265-331-23 $20.08 0265-331-24 $20.08 0265-331-25 $20.08 0265-331-26 $20.08 0265-331-27 $20.08 0265-331-28 $20.08 0265-331-29 $20.08 0265-331-30 $20.08 0265-331-31 $20.08 0265-331-32 $20.08 0265-331-33 $20.08 0265-331-34 $20.08 0265-331-35 $20.08 0265-331-36 $20.08 0265-331-37 $20.08 0265-331-38 $20.08 0265-331-39 $20.08 0265-331-40 $20.08 0265-331-41 $20.08 0265-331-42 $20.08 0265-331-43 $20.08 0265-331-44 $20.08 0265-331-45 $20.08 0265-331-46 $20.08 0265-331-47 $20.08 0265-331-48 $20.08 0265-331-49 $20.08 0265-331-50 $20.08 0265-331-51 $20.08 0265-331-52 $20.08 0265-331-53 $20.08 0265-331-54 $20.08 0265-331-55 $20.08 0265-331-56 $20.08 0265-331-57 $20.08 0265-331-58 $20.08 0265-331-59 $20.08 0265-331-60 $20.08 0265-331-61 $20.08 0265-331-62 $20.08 0265-331-63 $20.08 0265-331-64 $20.08 0265-331-65 $20.08 0265-331-66 $20.08 0265-331-67 $20.08 0265-331-68 $20.08 0265-331-69 $20.08 0265-331-70 $20.08 0265-341-01 $20.08 0265-341-02 $20.08 0265-341-03 $20.08 0265-341-04 $20.08 0265-341-05 $20.08 0265-341-06 $20.08 0265-341-07 $20.08 0265-341-08 $20.08 0265-341-09 $20.08 0265-341-10 $20.08 0265-341-11 $20.08 0265-341-12 $20.08 0265-341-13 $20.08 0265-341-14 $20.08 0265-341-15 $20.08 0265-341-16 $20.08 0265-341-17 $20.08 0265-341-18 $20.08 0265-341-19 $20.08 0265-341-20 $20.08 0265-341-21 $20.08 0265-341-22 $20.08 Page 56 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 171 CC30 SP74 - AD 1002 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0265-341-23 $20.08 0265-341-24 $20.08 0265-341-25 $20.08 0265-341-26 $20.08 0265-341-27 $20.08 0265-341-28 $20.08 0265-341-29 $20.08 0265-341-30 $20.08 0265-341-31 $20.08 0265-341-32 $20.08 Totals Parcels 286 Levy $5,742.88 Page 57 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 172 CC30 SP69 - AD 1005 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0262-291-01 $248.00 0262-291-02 $248.00 0262-291-03 $248.00 0262-291-04 $248.00 0262-291-05 $248.00 0262-291-06 $248.00 0262-291-07 $248.00 0262-291-08 $248.00 0262-291-09 $248.00 0262-291-10 $248.00 0262-291-11 $248.00 0262-291-12 $248.00 0262-291-13 $248.00 0262-291-14 $248.00 0262-291-15 $248.00 0262-291-16 $248.00 0262-291-17 $248.00 0262-291-18 $248.00 0262-291-19 $248.00 0262-291-20 $248.00 0262-291-21 $248.00 0262-291-22 $248.00 0262-291-23 $248.00 0262-291-24 $248.00 0262-291-25 $248.00 0262-291-26 $248.00 0262-291-27 $248.00 0262-291-28 $248.00 0262-291-29 $248.00 0262-291-30 $248.00 0262-291-31 $248.00 0262-291-32 $248.00 0262-291-33 $248.00 0262-291-34 $248.00 0262-291-35 $248.00 0262-291-36 $248.00 0262-291-37 $248.00 0262-291-38 $248.00 0262-291-39 $248.00 0262-291-40 $248.00 0262-291-41 $248.00 0262-291-42 $248.00 0262-291-43 $248.00 0262-291-44 $248.00 0262-291-45 $248.00 0262-291-46 $248.00 0262-291-47 $248.00 0262-291-48 $248.00 0262-291-49 $248.00 0262-291-50 $248.00 0262-291-51 $248.00 0262-291-52 $248.00 0262-291-53 $248.00 0262-291-54 $248.00 0262-301-01 $248.00 0262-301-02 $248.00 0262-301-03 $248.00 0262-301-04 $248.00 0262-301-05 $248.00 0262-301-06 $248.00 0262-301-07 $248.00 0262-301-08 $248.00 0262-301-09 $248.00 0262-301-10 $248.00 0262-301-11 $248.00 0262-301-12 $248.00 0262-301-13 $248.00 0262-301-14 $248.00 0262-301-15 $248.00 0262-301-16 $248.00 0262-301-17 $248.00 0262-301-18 $248.00 0262-301-19 $248.00 0262-301-20 $248.00 0262-301-21 $248.00 0262-301-22 $248.00 0262-301-23 $248.00 0262-301-24 $248.00 0262-301-25 $248.00 0262-301-26 $248.00 0262-301-27 $248.00 0262-301-28 $248.00 0262-301-29 $248.00 0262-301-30 $248.00 0262-301-31 $248.00 0262-301-32 $248.00 0262-301-33 $248.00 0262-301-34 $248.00 0262-301-35 $248.00 0262-301-36 $248.00 0262-301-37 $248.00 0262-301-38 $248.00 0262-301-39 $248.00 0262-301-40 $248.00 0262-301-41 $248.00 0262-301-42 $248.00 0262-301-43 $248.00 0262-301-44 $248.00 0262-301-45 $248.00 0262-301-46 $248.00 0262-301-47 $248.00 Totals Parcels 101 Levy $25,048.00 Assessment Roll Page 58 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 173 CC30 SP79 - AD 1007 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-761-01 $71.64 0142-761-02 $71.64 0142-761-03 $71.64 0142-761-04 $71.64 0142-761-05 $71.64 0142-761-06 $71.64 0142-761-07 $71.64 0142-761-08 $71.64 0142-761-09 $71.64 0142-761-10 $71.64 0142-761-11 $71.64 0142-761-12 $71.64 0142-771-01 $71.64 0142-771-02 $71.64 0142-771-03 $71.64 0142-771-04 $71.64 0142-771-05 $71.64 0142-771-06 $71.64 0142-771-07 $71.64 0142-771-08 $71.64 0142-771-09 $71.64 0142-771-10 $71.64 0142-771-11 $71.64 0142-771-12 $71.64 0142-771-13 $71.64 0142-771-14 $71.64 0142-771-15 $71.64 0142-771-16 $71.64 0142-771-17 $71.64 0142-771-18 $71.64 0142-771-19 $71.64 0142-771-20 $71.64 0142-771-21 $71.64 0142-771-22 $71.64 0142-771-23 $71.64 0142-771-24 $71.64 0142-771-25 $71.64 0142-771-26 $71.64 0142-771-27 $71.64 0142-771-28 $71.64 0142-771-29 $71.64 0142-771-30 $71.64 0142-771-31 $71.64 0142-771-32 $71.64 0142-771-33 $71.64 0142-771-34 $71.64 0142-771-35 $71.64 0142-771-36 $71.64 0142-771-37 $71.64 0142-771-38 $71.64 0142-771-39 $71.64 0142-771-40 $71.64 0142-771-41 $71.64 0142-771-42 $71.64 0142-771-43 $71.64 0142-771-44 $71.64 0142-771-45 $71.64 0142-771-46 $71.64 Totals Parcels 58 Levy $4,155.12 Assessment Roll Page 59 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 174 CC30 SP77 - AD 1012 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-511-27 $602.28 0142-511-28 $602.28 0142-511-29 $602.28 0142-511-30 $602.28 0142-511-31 $602.28 0142-511-32 $602.28 0142-511-33 $602.28 0142-511-34 $602.28 0142-511-35 $602.28 0142-511-36 $602.28 0142-511-37 $602.28 0142-511-38 $602.28 0142-511-39 $602.28 0142-511-40 $602.28 0142-511-41 $602.28 0142-511-42 $602.28 Totals Parcels 16 Levy $9,636.48 Assessment Roll Page 60 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 175 CC30 SP81 - AD 1016 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0281-221-16 $82.78 0281-221-17 $82.78 0281-221-18 $82.78 0281-221-19 $82.78 0281-221-20 $82.78 0281-221-21 $82.78 0281-221-22 $82.78 0281-221-23 $82.78 0281-221-24 $82.78 0281-221-25 $82.78 0281-221-26 $82.78 0281-221-27 $82.78 0281-261-47 $82.78 0281-261-48 $82.78 0281-261-49 $82.78 0281-261-50 $82.78 0281-261-51 $82.78 0281-261-52 $82.78 0281-261-53 $82.78 0281-261-54 $82.78 0281-261-55 $82.78 0281-261-56 $82.78 0281-261-57 $82.78 0281-261-58 $82.78 0281-261-59 $82.78 0281-261-60 $82.78 0281-261-61 $82.78 0281-261-62 $82.78 0281-261-63 $82.78 0281-261-64 $82.78 0281-261-65 $82.78 0281-261-66 $82.78 0281-261-67 $82.78 0281-261-68 $82.78 0281-261-69 $82.78 0281-261-70 $82.78 Totals Parcels 36 Levy $2,980.08 Assessment Roll Page 61 of 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 176 Appendix B: Assessment Diagrams        Packet Page. 177 §¨¦215 SU N S E T L N KEND A L L D R BUCKBOARD DR WAGONWHEEL RD KENDALL WAY OR A N G E A V E SURREY LN PEPPER LINDEN DR 0CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 951 ZONE 1 Ê        Packet Page. 178 §¨¦215 CAJON A V E SUNSET LN NEW PINE AVE MAS O N D R SHERIDAN RD AUT U M N S T JUS T I N C T IRVING T O N A V E KEND A L L D R S.B.C.F.C.D. STDR ORA N G E A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 951ZONE 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 179 COLLEGE AVE CITADELAVE ASTERST JASMI N E S T CAMBRIDGE AVE AUBURN AVE REVER E A V E KENDA L L D R LA SA L L E A V E 48TH CT CLEMSON STUNIVERSALAVE HUMBOLT AVE NORTH PARK BLVD LASALLE AVE TWIN PEAKS DR VA R S I T Y A V E UNIVERSITY PKWY PEPPER LINDEN DR §¨¦215 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 952 ZONE 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 180 ALTA DR LITTLE MOUNTAIN DR KEYS T O N E D R VAIL LN SUN DAN CE DR SUN VALLEYDR Northstar Stre SILVER CREEK RD LAKE PLACID DR KENDA L L D R ASH ST NORTH PARK BLVD VILLAGE GREEN WAY TA M A R R O W C T UNIVERSITY PKWY 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 952ZONE 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 181 48TH ST KEYS T O N E D R MAMMOTH DR SUN VALLEY DR STEA M B O A T C I R LAKE P L A C I D D R WRIGT WOOD DR TA M A R R O W C T BRECKENRIDGE CT 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 952ZONE 2A CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 182 MA G N O L I A A V E DOVER DR HILL DR CE D A R D R WE S T W I N D D R DOVER DR 56TH ST WE S T E R N A V E OS B O R N E C T CY P R E S S D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 952ZONE 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 183 SUSIE LN 16TH ST MASS A R O L N FL O R E S S T PENNSYLVANIA ST PENNSYLVANIA ST GILBERT ST 17TH ST LINCOLN ST GILBERT ST MA D I S O N S T EL L S W O R T H W A Y GUMMINGS WAY CL Y D E S T GL E N V I E W S T HA N C O C K S T 19TH ST CA L F O R N I A S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 953 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 184 SAN TIMOTEO CRK TI P P E C A N O E A V E HOSPITALITY LN HARRIMAN PL CARNEGIE DR VANDERBILT WAY GAG E C L BRIER DR §¨¦10 0 500 1,000250 Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 956 Landscaping 309,636 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 185 GLENWOOD CT SHANDIN HILLS CIR SIERRA VIEW ST AMBERWOOD CT MONTECITO STSHADYCREEKDR SHANDIN HILLS DR CANYON TERRACE DR OR A N G E D R G ST SHERI D A N R D RIDGE LINE DR SHANDIN DR KENDA L L D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 959ZONE 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 186 IRVING T O N A V E CAJON A V E OHIO A V E LETA LN NEW PINEAVE DEANNA DR SHEPHERD DR SUNFLOWER AVE HYATT R D CASSANDRA DR SYCA M O R E S T REDWO O D S T CH R I S T O P H E R S T VE N T U R A A V E BR E N D A L N JAMES P L PIN E A V E CHERY L E C T KENDA L L D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 962 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 187 WA T E R M A N A V E LI N C O L N A V E AL L E N S T DRAKE DR 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 963 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 188 HOSPITALITY LN CO M M E R C E N T E R A L Y CO M M E R C E N T E R C I R AIRPORT DR CO M M E R C E N T E R R D 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 968 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 189 OREGON ST RIALTO AVE AT & SF PE P P E R A V 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 974 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 190 TA M A R I S K A V E JAMES ST PE P P E R A V E JEF F ERSON AVE EU C A L Y P T U S A V E CHESTNUT ST PO P L A R C I R BU R N E Y S T PARK VISTA. DR PA M P A S A V E MERRILL AVE 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 975 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 191 IRVING T O N A V E CAJON A V E OHIO A V E LETA LN PINE AVE NEW PINE AVE DEANNA DR SHEPHERD DR SUNFLOWER AVE HYATT R D CASSANDRA DR SYCA M O R E S T REDWO O D S T CH R I S T O P H E R S T VE N T U R A A V E BR E N D A L N SHEPA R D L N JAMES P L PIN E A V E CHERY L E C T KENDA L L D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 976 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 192 ME R I D I A N A V E DA L L A S A V E MA R V I N D R LASSEN AVE ESPERANZA ST DALLAS AVE MILL ST LOS R OBLES AVE MA R V I N D R SU T T E R A V E PLEASANT WAY LA S S E N A V E SU T T E R A V E LA S S E N A V E MA R V I N D R COLLEGE DR RANDALL AVE SU T T E R A V E CARDAMON ST 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 981 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 193 CITRUS ST PIEDMON T D R INDIAN CANYON CT MO J A V E C T BANGOR AVE SHAUNA DR CARRIAGE HILLS CT OL E T A L N YUMA DR RO A D R U N N E R C T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 982 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 194 IR I S S T CHATKA LN WALNUT ST WALNUT ST OREGON ST ATCHISON ST OREGON ST TE R R A C E R D SA N A N S E L M O A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 986 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 195 MA C Y S T ELLEN ST VOLYA CT ISABELLA DR DUNLOP CT SAN ANSELMO AVE CON NER ST MILL ST JO P L O N C T SAN CARLO AVE SAN BENTO AVE HUFF ST 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 989 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 196 PAL M A V E OHIO A V E VERDEM O N T D R OLI V E A V E UNNAM E D R D HUNTINGTON DR BLU E S K Y C T GARFIE L D S T STE V E N W A Y VEN T U R A C T VEN T U R A A V E STE V E N W A Y BRIARW O O D D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 991 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 197 BRO N S O N S T RAQUEL CT JUNE PL PORTOLA AVE JUNE S T ROSARITA ST SAN BENIT O ST CRISTY AVE CARMELINA ST DON DIEGO ST ACAPULCO ST DO N P A B L O C T CAJ O N B L V D 3RD AVE 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 993 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 198 MAG N O L I A A V E BELMO N T A V E OFE L I A D R CABLE CREEK CHANNEL ASH L Y N N W A Y MEYER S R D ESC E N A S T SPLIT M O U N T A I N L N CHESTNUT AVE LANDO N C T MIR N A A V E ROSEM A R Y L N SUNFL O W E R A V E HYATT R D SHEPA R D L N SHA N O N L N ESC E N A S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 997 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 199 POPLAR ST PEN SYLVANIA AVE RO B E R T A C T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1001 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 200 55TH S T H S T 58TH ST I ST NORTHPARK BLVD 59TH ST CARLETON ST VAL E R I E W A Y 54TH ST 56TH ST CR E S C E N T S T G S T BE R K E L E Y S T 57TH ST YO S E M I T E D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1002 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 201 BRO N S O N S T CRIS T Y A V E A.T.& S . F . R R ROSARITA ST MAJESTIC AVE SAN MIGUEL AVE CAJ O N B L V D JAD E S T O N E A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1005 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 202 PE P P E R A V E BELDEN ST LOS ROBLES AVE LOS ROBLES CT PLEASANT CT PLEASANT CT JEFFERSON AVE RANDALL AVE 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1007 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 203 BU R N E Y S T POPLAR ST MILL ST OAK ST 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1012 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 204 CU R T I S S T COULSTON ST RO S E N A A V E ELM AVE 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1016 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 205 Appendix C: MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 206 MAD No. 951 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget Estimated through June 30 Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Landscaping/Irrigation/Water/Energy $5,801.42 $5,917.45 Total Direct Costs $5,801.42 $5,917.45 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $400.52 $424.91 City Administration $498.27 $498.27 Auditor-Controller $19.50 $19.50 Total Indirect Costs $918.29 $942.68 Total Costs $6,719.71 $6,860.13 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($835.45)($954.81) General Benefit Contribution ($1,007.96)($1,029.02) Total Adjustments ($1,843.41)($1,983.83) Total Assessment $4,876.30 $4,876.30        Packet Page. 207 MAD No. 951 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Landscaping/Irrigation/Water/Energy $6,931.47 $7,070.10 Total Direct Costs $6,931.47 $7,070.10 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $492.37 $522.35 City Administration $593.31 $593.31 Auditor-Controller $43.20 $43.20 Total Indirect Costs $1,128.88 $1,158.86 Total Costs $8,060.35 $8,228.96 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($856.71)($1,000.03) General Benefit Contribution ($1,209.05)($1,234.34) Total Adjustments ($2,065.76)($2,234.37) Total Assessment $5,994.59 $5,994.59 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 208 MAD No. 952 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Landscaping/Irrigation/Energy $57,709.81 $58,864.01 Total Direct Costs $57,709.81 $58,864.01 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $3,836.20 $4,069.82 City Administration $4,749.14 $4,749.14 Auditor-Controller $209.10 $210.00 Total Indirect Costs $8,794.44 $9,028.96 Total Costs $66,504.25 $67,892.97 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($10,321.65)($9,640.32) General Benefit Contribution ($9,476.86)($9,674.75) Total Adjustments ($19,798.50)($19,315.07) Total Assessment $46,705.75 $48,577.90 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 209 MAD No. 952 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Landscaping/Irrigation/Energy $66,822.80 $68,159.26 Total Direct Costs $66,822.80 $68,159.26 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $4,569.74 $4,848.04 City Administration $7,695.40 $7,695.40 Auditor-Controller $202.50 $202.50 Total Indirect Costs $12,467.64 $12,745.94 Total Costs $79,290.44 $80,905.20 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($12,354.90)($13,739.56) General Benefit Contribution ($11,298.89)($11,528.99) Total Adjustments ($23,653.79)($25,268.55) Total Assessment $55,636.65 $55,636.65 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 210 MAD No. 952 Zone 2A FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Landscaping/Irrigation/Energy $10,324.00 $10,530.48 Total Direct Costs $10,324.00 $10,530.48 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $772.54 $819.58 City Administration $970.51 $970.51 Auditor-Controller $28.20 $28.20 Total Indirect Costs $1,771.25 $1,818.29 Total Costs $12,095.25 $12,348.78 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($966.04)($1,183.44) General Benefit Contribution ($1,723.57)($1,759.70) Total Adjustments ($2,689.61)($2,943.14) Total Assessment $9,405.64 $9,405.64 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 211 MAD No. 952 Zone 3 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $8,333.36 $8,500.03 Utilities Costs $10,607.59 $10,819.74 Total Direct Costs $18,940.95 $19,319.77 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,055.84 $1,120.14 City Administration $722.87 $722.87 Auditor-Controller $47.40 $47.40 Total Indirect Costs $1,826.11 $1,890.41 Total Costs $20,767.06 $21,210.18 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $47.52 $23.07 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($1,775.58)($1,813.47) Total Adjustments ($1,728.06)($1,790.40) Total Assessment $19,039.00 $19,419.78 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 212 MAD No. 953 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance/ Water/Energy $7,645.33 $7,798.24 Total Direct Costs $7,645.33 $7,798.24 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $582.05 $617.49 City Administration $693.04 $693.04 Auditor-Controller $59.40 $59.40 Total Indirect Costs $1,334.49 $1,369.93 Total Costs $8,979.82 $9,168.17 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($1,444.41)($1,623.34) General Benefit Contribution ($448.99)($458.41) Total Adjustments ($1,893.40)($2,081.75) Total Assessment $7,086.42 $7,086.42 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 213 MAD No. 956 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Landscaping/Irrigation $22,328.06 $22,774.62 Irrigation Costs (water and energy)$10,649.21 $10,862.19 Total Direct Costs $32,977.26 $33,636.81 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,608.29 $2,767.14 City Administration $3,366.20 $3,366.20 Auditor-Controller $5.70 $5.70 Total Indirect Costs $5,980.19 $6,139.04 Total Costs $38,957.45 $39,775.85 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($2,020.09)($2,729.64) General Benefit Contribution ($5,181.34)($5,290.19) Total Adjustments ($7,201.44)($8,019.83) Total Assessment $31,756.02 $31,756.02 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 214 MAD No. 959 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $53,305.20 $54,371.30 Utilities Costs $69,352.04 $70,739.08 Total Direct Costs $122,657.24 $125,110.38 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $10,024.07 $10,634.53 City Administration $9,373.30 $9,373.30 Auditor-Controller $270.30 $270.30 Total Indirect Costs $19,667.67 $20,278.13 Total Costs $142,324.91 $145,388.52 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $20.27 $1,147.41 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($9,393.44)($9,595.64) Total Adjustments ($9,373.17)($8,448.23) Total Assessment $132,951.73 $136,940.29 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 215 MAD No. 962 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Sewer Lift Station $2,038.19 $2,078.95 Utilities Costs $1,019.09 $1,039.47 Total Direct Costs $3,057.28 $3,118.42 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $870.59 $923.60 City Administration $862.94 $862.94 Auditor-Controller $100.50 $100.50 Total Indirect Costs $1,834.03 $1,887.04 Total Costs $4,891.30 $5,005.46 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $5,708.10 $5,593.94 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments $5,708.10 $5,593.94 Total Assessment $10,599.40 $10,599.40 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 216 MAD No. 963 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Sewer Lift Ztation $1,060.05 $1,081.25 Utilities Costs $508.82 $519.00 Total Direct Costs $1,568.87 $1,600.25 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $267.19 $283.46 City Administration $337.91 $337.91 Auditor-Controller $7.50 $7.50 Total Indirect Costs $612.60 $628.87 Total Costs $2,181.47 $2,229.12 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,071.53 $1,023.88 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments $1,071.53 $1,023.88 Total Assessment $3,253.00 $3,253.00 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 217 MAD No. 968 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $2,364.69 $2,411.99 Maintenance of Lighting/Energy $880.67 $898.28 Total Direct Costs $3,245.36 $3,310.27 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $333.02 $353.30 City Administration $428.11 $428.11 Auditor-Controller $2.40 $2.40 Total Indirect Costs $763.53 $783.81 Total Costs $4,008.89 $4,094.08 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $246.02 $165.09 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($200.44)($204.70) Total Adjustments $45.58 ($39.62) Total Assessment $4,054.47 $4,054.47 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 218 MAD No. 974 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,563.83 $3,635.11 Irrigation Costs (water and energy)$928.86 $947.44 Total Direct Costs $4,492.70 $4,582.55 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $225.28 $239.00 City Administration $279.17 $279.17 Auditor-Controller $12.00 $12.00 Total Indirect Costs $516.45 $530.17 Total Costs $5,009.15 $5,112.72 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($1,514.97)($1,603.01) General Benefit Contribution ($751.37)($766.91) Total Adjustments ($2,266.35)($2,369.92) Total Assessment $2,742.80 $2,742.80 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 219 MAD No. 975 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,501.49 $3,571.52 Irrigation Costs (water and energy) $2,311.12 $2,357.34 Total Direct Costs $5,812.61 $5,928.86 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $670.26 $711.08 City Administration $831.98 $831.98 Auditor-Controller $34.50 $34.50 Total Indirect Costs $1,536.74 $1,577.56 Total Costs $7,349.35 $7,506.42 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,670.92 $1,532.23 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($859.87)($878.25) Total Adjustments $811.05 $653.98 Total Assessment $8,160.40 $8,160.40 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 220 MAD No. 976 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $20,035.78 $20,436.50 Utilities Costs $26,536.69 $27,067.42 Total Direct Costs $46,572.47 $47,503.92 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $3,251.35 $3,449.35 City Administration $1,828.45 $1,828.45 Auditor-Controller $177.30 $177.30 Total Indirect Costs $5,257.09 $5,455.10 Total Costs $51,829.56 $52,959.02 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $37.35 $426.26 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($4,586.92)($4,686.87) Total Adjustments ($4,549.56)($4,260.62) Total Assessment $47,280.00 $48,698.40 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 221 MAD No. 981 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $2,591.28 $2,643.10 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $7,837.25 $7,994.00 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$3,057.33 $3,118.48 Total Direct Costs $13,485.86 $13,755.58 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,233.13 $1,308.23 City Administration $1,520.35 $1,520.35 Auditor-Controller $73.80 $73.80 Total Indirect Costs $2,827.28 $2,902.38 Total Costs $16,313.14 $16,657.96 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($1,299.76)($1,644.58) General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments ($1,299.76)($1,644.58) Total Assessment $15,013.38 $15,013.38 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 222 MAD No. 982 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $8,478.17 $8,647.74 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$2,543.21 $2,594.07 Total Direct Costs $11,021.38 $11,241.81 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $807.11 $856.26 City Administration $1,014.60 $1,014.60 Auditor-Controller $28.80 $28.80 Total Indirect Costs $1,850.51 $1,899.66 Total Costs $12,871.89 $13,141.47 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($2,144.30)($2,395.00) General Benefit Contribution ($901.03)($919.90) Total Adjustments ($3,045.33)($3,314.91) Total Assessment $9,826.56 $9,826.56 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 223 MAD No. 986 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation (Retention Basin)$10,024.66 $10,225.16 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,783.69 $3,859.37 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$4,045.72 $4,126.63 Total Direct Costs $17,854.08 $18,211.16 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,299.03 $1,378.14 City Administration $1,444.54 $1,444.54 Auditor-Controller $51.90 $51.90 Total Indirect Costs $2,795.47 $2,874.58 Total Costs $20,649.55 $21,085.74 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($3,842.71)($3,309.03) General Benefit Contribution ($991.18)($1,012.12) Total Adjustments ($4,833.89)($4,321.14) Total Assessment $15,815.66 $16,764.60 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 224 MAD No. 989 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $1,738.11 $1,772.87 Maintenance of Lift Station $617.21 $629.56 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $521.50 $531.93 Electrical Costs (Lift Station) $1,234.44 $1,259.13 Total Direct Costs $4,111.26 $4,193.49 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $961.84 $1,020.41 City Administration $1,181.03 $1,181.03 Auditor-Controller $62.40 $62.40 Total Indirect Costs $2,205.27 $2,263.84 Total Costs $6,316.53 $6,457.33 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $6,341.35 $6,221.67 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($947.48)($968.60) Total Adjustments $5,393.87 $5,253.07 Total Assessment $11,710.40 $11,710.40 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 225 MAD No. 991 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $16,434.48 $16,763.17 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$4,930.25 $5,028.85 Total Direct Costs $21,364.73 $21,792.02 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,173.99 $2,306.39 City Administration $2,763.06 $2,763.06 Auditor-Controller $41.40 $41.40 Total Indirect Costs $4,978.45 $5,110.85 Total Costs $26,343.18 $26,902.87 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $915.51 $372.61 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($790.30)($807.09) Total Adjustments $125.22 ($434.47) Total Assessment $26,468.40 $26,468.40 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 226 MAD No. 993 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $16,704.91 $17,039.01 Utilities Costs $18,378.68 $18,746.25 Total Direct Costs $35,083.59 $35,785.26 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,030.80 $2,154.48 City Administration $2,402.60 $2,402.60 Auditor-Controller $83.10 $83.10 Total Indirect Costs $4,516.50 $4,640.18 Total Costs $39,600.09 $40,425.44 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($11,883.47)($12,708.82) General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments ($11,883.47)($12,708.82) Total Assessment $27,716.62 $27,716.62 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 227 MAD No. 997 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $4,510.80 $4,601.01 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$1,230.14 $1,254.75 Total Direct Costs $5,740.94 $5,855.76 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $467.42 $495.89 City Administration $0.00 $0.00 Auditor-Controller $74.10 $74.10 Total Indirect Costs $541.52 $569.99 Total Costs $6,282.46 $6,425.75 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($591.58)($393.42) General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments ($591.58)($393.42) Total Assessment $5,690.88 $6,032.33 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 228 MAD No. 1001 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $8,360.44 $8,527.64 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $475.02 $484.52 Irrigation Costs (water and energy) $1,325.32 $1,351.82 Total Direct Costs $10,160.77 $10,363.99 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $864.08 $916.70 City Administration $0.00 $0.00 Auditor-Controller $13.50 $13.80 Total Indirect Costs $877.58 $930.50 Total Costs $11,038.35 $11,294.49 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $780.81 $1,234.14 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments $780.81 $1,234.14 Total Assessment $11,819.16 $12,528.63 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 229 MAD No. 1002 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,768.89 $3,844.27 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation (Flood Control Area)$986.99 $1,006.73 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$624.63 $637.12 Total Direct Costs $5,380.51 $5,488.12 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $396.17 $420.29 City Administration $239.22 $239.22 Auditor-Controller $85.80 $85.80 Total Indirect Costs $721.19 $745.31 Total Costs $6,101.70 $6,233.44 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($684.86)($490.40) General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments ($684.86)($490.40) Total Assessment $5,416.84 $5,743.03 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 230 MAD No. 1005 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $15,965.00 $16,284.30 Utilities Costs $10,402.98 $10,611.04 Total Direct Costs $26,367.98 $26,895.34 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,666.93 $1,768.45 City Administration $1,902.11 $1,902.11 Auditor-Controller $30.30 $30.30 Total Indirect Costs $3,599.34 $3,700.86 Total Costs $29,967.32 $30,596.20 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($2,851.58)($3,437.06) General Benefit Contribution ($2,067.75)($2,111.14) Total Adjustments ($4,919.32)($5,548.20) Total Assessment $25,048.00 $25,048.00 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 231 MAD No. 1007 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $4,859.14 $4,956.33 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$582.90 $594.56 Total Direct Costs $5,442.04 $5,550.89 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $286.64 $304.10 City Administration $183.90 $183.90 Auditor-Controller $17.40 $17.40 Total Indirect Costs $487.94 $505.40 Total Costs $5,929.98 $6,056.28 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($1,989.59)($1,879.30) General Benefit Contribution ($20.75)($21.20) Total Adjustments ($2,010.34)($1,900.49) Total Assessment $3,919.64 $4,155.79 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 232 MAD No. 1012 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $5,133.16 $5,235.82 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $769.98 $785.38 Total Direct Costs $5,903.14 $6,021.20 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $664.58 $705.05 City Administration $516.99 $516.99 Auditor-Controller $4.80 $4.80 Total Indirect Costs $1,186.37 $1,226.84 Total Costs $7,089.51 $7,248.04 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $2,139.93 $2,530.04 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($138.25)($141.34) Total Adjustments $2,001.69 $2,388.70 Total Assessment $9,091.20 $9,636.75 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 233 MAD No. 1016 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $1,836.00 $1,872.72 Utilities Costs $850.60 $867.61 Total Direct Costs $2,686.60 $2,740.33 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $230.22 $244.24 City Administration $216.50 $216.50 Auditor-Controller $10.80 $10.80 Total Indirect Costs $457.52 $471.54 Total Costs $3,144.12 $3,211.87 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $92.38 $89.85 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($314.41)($321.19) Total Adjustments ($222.03)($231.34) Total Assessment $2,922.09 $2,980.53 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 234          Packet Page. 235 Final Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Maintenance Assessment Districts Volume 2        Packet Page. 236 Table of Contents City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Sections i. Executive Summary i ii. Introduction ii iii. Engineer’s Signature vii 1. MAD No. 1017 1 2. MAD No. 1019 3 3. MAD No. 1020 5 4. MAD No. 1023 7 5. MAD No. 1024 9 6. Assessment Diagrams 11 7. Assessment Rolls 12 Appendices Appendix A – Assessment Rolls Appendix B – Assessment Diagrams Appendix C – MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 237 i . Executive Summary Page | i City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 AGENCY: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER’S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE "ASSESSMENT LAW" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for Maintenance Assessment Districts, consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2025-274 adopted by the City of San Bernardino City Council, San Bernardino County, California ordering preparation of this Report. This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026. Section ii PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS including a general description of the maintenance and plans of the landscaping and irrigation systems proposed to be funded. Section ii A COST ESTIMATE of maintaining the landscaping and irrigation systems including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section ii The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT contains the method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon several lots and parcels of land within the Districts, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. Section 6 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS showing the Districts, the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within said Districts, as the same exists on the maps of the County of San Bernardino Assessor for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is filed in the offices of the City of San Bernardino. An Assessment Diagram of the Districts can be found in Appendix B. Section 7 ASSESSMENT ROLLS showing the actual assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s Office can be found in Appendix A. Maintenance Actual Assessment Maximum Assessment MAD No. 1017 Kendall and Pine Area $304.90 $304.90 MAD No. 1019 Northpark and Mountain Area $169.26 $253.69 MAD No. 1020 Mill Street and Dallas Avenue Area $268.63 $320.91 MAD No. 1023 Elm Avenue and Coulston Street Area $66.39 $196.09 MAD No. 1024 Inland Center Drive and Riverwalk Drive Area $205.04 $464.93        Packet Page. 238 ii . Introduction Page | ii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background The City administers and maintains 71 Maintenance Assessment Districts (the “MADs”) and associated zones that have been established. The MADs provide a financing mechanism to maintain the public maintenance areas associated with each particular development, ensuring the continued maintenance, operations, servicing, and administration of various improvements located within the public right- of-way and dedicated easements; all within the boundaries of each MADs. There is one MAD which has no improvements and is, therefore, not yet maintained. This report has been prepared to support the annual assessment of the MADs within the City’s boundaries. The following information is presented to provide general information about the MADs. Additional details specific to each MAD are listed in each MAD’s dedicated section of this Engineer’s Report. Designation of Maintenance Assessment District/Zones: For your reference, you can find the following Maintenance Assessment Districts within the corresponding Volumes listed below: Volume 1: MAD 951 (Zone 1), MAD 951 (Zone 2), MAD 952 (Zone 1, 2 and 2A), MAD 952 (Zone 3), MAD 953, MAD 956, MAD 959 (Zone 1), MAD 962, MAD 963, MAD 968, MAD 974, MAD 975, MAD 976, MAD 981, MAD 982, MAD 986, MAD 989, MAD 991, MAD 993, MAD 997, MAD 1001, MAD 1002, MAD 1005, MAD 1007, MAD 1012, and MAD 1016. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 1 and does not contain an annual escalator. Volume 2: MAD 1017, MAD 1019, MAD 1020, MAD 1023 and MAD 1024. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 2 and does contain an annual CPI escalator only. Volume 3: MAD 1025 and MAD 1027. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 3 and has a 25% general benefit of major arterial streets, 20% general benefit of secondary arterial streets, 15% general benefit of collector streets, and 100% special benefit of the local streets. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained in Volume 3 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts. Volume 4: MAD 1028, MAD 1029, MAD 1030, MAD 1031, MAD 1032, MAD 1035 (Zone 1), MAD 1035 (Zone 2), MAD 1036, MAD 1037, MAD 1038, MAD 1039, MAD 1040, MAD 1041, MAD 1042, MAD 1043 (Zone 1), MAD 1043 (Zone 2), MAD 1045, MAD 1046, MAD 1047, MAD 1048, MAD 1049, MAD 1050, MAD 1051, MAD 1052, MAD 1054, MAD 1055, MAD 1056, MAD 1057, MAD 1059, MAD 1060, MAD 1063, MAD 1064, and MAD 1068. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 4 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less. Volume 5: MAD 1022 (Zone 1), MAD 1022 (Zone 2) and MAD 1022 (Zone 3). These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 5 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts. Current Annual Administration As required by the Assessment Law, the Report includes: (1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the Districts. The City of San Bernardino will hold a Public Hearing on July 16, 2025, regarding the District which will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified. Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report. Cost Estimate The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in the Assessment Law.        Packet Page. 239 i i. Introduction Page | iii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Assessment Law provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire Fiscal Year 2025-26, including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves. The Assessment Law also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the District is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions. The District includes an annual inflation factor for future increases in assessments by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year. There is a 2.52% proposed inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable over the assessment levied for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is consistent with the ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said District. Changes in Organization There are no changes in organization for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Proposition 218 Compliance On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures. Some of these exceptions include: 1. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets. 2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase). Proposition 218 does not define this term “streets”, however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers, and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street right-of- way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting. Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property”, California Constitution, Article XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment. Distinguishing General and Special Benefit Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” By its nature most every public improvement financed through an assessment district contains an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally, to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties. Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:        Packet Page. 240 i i. Introduction Page | iv City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 “Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”. The actual assessment and the amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report. Direct and Special Benefit The maintenance of improvements provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within each of the Districts. Each and every lot or parcel within the Districts, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities. In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the Districts because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the Districts by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the Districts. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the Districts during the nighttime hours, and to assign rights-of-way for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day. Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the Districts. Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed. Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility. The system of streets within the Districts are established to provide access to each parcel in the Districts. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the Districts, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District. The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets. Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the Districts. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the Districts. Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are apportioned on a per acre, per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit), or per parcel basis.        Packet Page. 241 i i. Introduction Page | v City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the Districts. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels. Government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed. General Benefit The Benefit received by the parcels within the boundaries of the Districts is determined to be of more than ordinary public benefit, thus each parcel within the Districts being assessed receives special benefit from the improvements. If the property not within the boundaries of a District also receives some benefit from the improvements, consideration must then be given to a general benefit given by the improvements, which may not be assessed to the parcels within the Districts. Since the installation and maintenance of the landscaping and establishment of an assessment district for the maintenance of the landscaping is specific and incidental to this development, it is further determined that the improvements to be maintained by the assessment district are of special benefit to the District only and are 100% assessable to the parcels within the boundaries of the assessment district, except as follows: 1. Areas of maintenance that front on major arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 15% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 2. Areas of maintenance that front on secondary arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 10% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 3. Areas of maintenance that front on collector streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 5% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 4. Areas that front on local streets are determined to be 100% special benefit and are 100% assessable to the District. These percentages are based on the traffic circulation for the various street classifications. Method of Apportionment The Assessment Law permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The Assessment Law further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (the “Article”) requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the District. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit. Whereas, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, adopted resolutions to initiate proceedings to form special assessment districts.        Packet Page. 242 i i. Introduction Page | vi City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Whereas, the City Council, did direct the appointed engineer to prepare and file an annual report, in accordance with the Assessment Law. Whereas, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following; a. Maintenance plans for the improvements b. An estimate of the costs of the improvements c. A diagram for the assessment districts d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements Now, Therefore, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of San Bernardino, pursuant to the Assessment Law, do hereby submit the following: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of law the costs and expenses of the districts have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the districts benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcel, reference is made to the Assessment Diagrams, a reduced copy of which is included herein. 2. As required by law, the Diagrams are filed herewith, showing the districts, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said districts as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagrams and in the Assessment Rolls contained herein. 3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagrams and Assessment Rolls, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the San Bernardino County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels. 4. There are no parcels or lots within the assessment districts that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected. The City requested Spicer Consulting Group, LLC., to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for the assessment districts pursuant to the Assessment Law presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the assessment districts for the referenced Fiscal Year, diagrams for the districts showing the areas and properties to be assessed, and assessments of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and-or parcels within the districts in proportion to the special benefit received.        Packet Page. 243 iii . Engineer’s Signature Page | vii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 FRANCISCO MARTINEZ JR PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 84640 ENGINEER OF WORK CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _______ day of ____________, 2025. By Adoption of Resolution No. _______ by the City Council. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, on the _____day of ___________, 2025. 12th June        Packet Page. 244 1. MAD No. 1017 Page | 1 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1017 was formed on 1996 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1017 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Kendall Drive within the boundaries of Tract No.15642 on the south, the centerline of Irvington Avenue on the north, the centerline of Old Pine Avenue and the east line of Tract No. 15642 on the east, and the west line of Tract No. 15642. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1017. The improvements to be maintained include 58,025 sq. ft. of landscaping (including 36 trees) along portions along the northside of Kendall Drive and the east and west sides of Pine Avenue and areas of turf within Metropolitan Water District property within Tract No. 15642. The areas along the east and west sides of New Pine Avenue lying north of Tract No. 15642, the south side of Irvington Avenue and portions of the north and south sides of Washington Avenue, all within the boundaries of the District. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 Residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Kendall Drive is designated as a major arterial street and represents 7% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 7% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. New Pine Avenue is designated as a secondary arterial street and represents 86% of the total maintenance area, thus 10% of 86% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Irvington Avenue is designated as a collector street and represents 1% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of 1% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%, 10% and 5%). The result is the General Benefit of 9.7% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Metropolitan Water District property (APN 0261-521-79), which is part of landscape area, receives no benefit and thus exempt from assessments. The parcel owned by the City of San Bernardino (APN 0261- 521-78), which is part of landscape area, receives no benefit and thus exempt from assessments.        Packet Page. 245 1. MAD No. 1017 Page | 2 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $304.90 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. Increases may also occur, without notice or hearing, if the increase is due to a change in land use or density for any parcels within the boundaries of the District, so long as the formula under “Method of Assessment” is applied.        Packet Page. 246 2. MAD No. 1019 Page | 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1019 was formed on 1996 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1019 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Northpark Boulevard on the north, the centerline of Mountain Drive on the west, the centerline of “H” Street and the east line of Tract No. 14448 on the east and the centerline of Hill Drive and the southerly line of Tract No. 14448 on the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1019. The improvements to be maintained include 29,290 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) along portions of the south side of Northpark Boulevard, the east side of Mountain Drive, the north side of Hill Drive, and the west side of “H” Street, all within Tract No. 14448. Rear yard slopes within Lots 86 through 98 of said Tract, inclusive, have been dedicated to the City for landscape maintenance also. These areas are to be maintained by the homeowners but may be maintained by the City in the event of homeowner neglect. In the event that the City must maintain the homeowner areas, the actual costs of maintenance will be assessed to the respective properties. Homeowners will be given a notice giving them 30 days to cure deficiencies prior to the City assuming maintenance. Release of maintenance of the homeowner area back to the property owner will be done at the sole discretion of the City and only upon satisfactory evidence to the City, that said property owner will have the capacity and willingness to continue said maintenance. Neglect shall include improper irrigation, lack of proper weed or pest control or any other conditions resulting in landscaping not being maintained to the minimum standards as established for the Assessment District as stated in the most current revision of the specifications on file at that time in the office of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 Residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Northpark Boulevard is designated as a major arterial street and represents 11% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 11% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Mountain Drive is designated as a secondary arterial street and represents 27% of the total maintenance area, thus 10% of 27% of the total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. “H” Street is designated as a collector street and represents 10% of the total maintenance area; thus 5% of 10% of the        Packet Page. 247 2. MAD No. 1019 Page | 4 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 total costs of maintenance is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%, 10% and 5%). The result is the General Benefit of 4.85% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $253.69 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. Increases may also occur, without notice or hearing, if the increase is due to a change in land use or density for any parcels within the boundaries of the District, so long as the formula under “Method of Assessment” is applied.        Packet Page. 248 3. MAD No. 1020 Page | 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1020 was formed in 1997 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1020 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Mill Street on the north, the southerly, easterly, and westerly lines of Tract No. 15652 on the south, east and west, respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1020. The improvements to be maintained include 2,640 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including one tree) along portions of the south side of Mill Street, adjacent to Lots 8, 9 and 10 of Tract No. 15652. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, this portion of Mill Street is designated as a major arterial street. Thus 15% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Mill Street, is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the parcels within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $320.91 per unit.        Packet Page. 249 3. MAD No. 1020 Page | 6 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. Increases may also occur, without notice or hearing, if the increase is due to a change in land use or density for any parcels within the boundaries of the District, so long as the formula under “Method of Assessment” is applied.        Packet Page. 250 4. MAD No. 1023 Page | 7 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1023 was formed in 1997 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1023 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Coulston Street on the north, the centerline of Richardson Street on the west, and the southerly and easterly boundaries of Tract No. 15777 on the south and east, respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1023. The improvements to be maintained include 14,200 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances and one tree along portions of the east side of Elm Street south of Coulston Street and the south side of Coulston Street, between Elm Avenue and Richardson Street, within Tract No. 15777. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, this portion of Coulston Street is designated as a secondary arterial street. Thus 10% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Coulston Street, is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the parcels within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned.        Packet Page. 251 4. MAD No. 1023 Page | 8 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $196.09 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. Increases may also occur, without notice or hearing, if the increase is due to a change in land use or density for any parcels within the boundaries of the District, so long as the formula under “Method of Assessment” is applied.        Packet Page. 252 5 . MAD No. 10 24 Page | 9 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1024 was formed in 1998 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1024 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Inland Center Drive on the west, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District on the east, the northerly and southerly boundaries of Tract No. 14706 on the north and south, respectively, and the southerly line of Lot 38, Coburn Lots. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1024. The improvements to be maintained include 16,500 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances along portions of the northerly side of Riverwalk Drive, the easterly side of Inland Center Drive, the easterly side of Scenic Drive and Sewer Lift Station on Lot A, Tract No. 14706. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, this portion of Inland Center Drive is designated as a major arterial street. The landscape maintenance area within Inland Center Drive represents 10% of the total maintenance area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of costs of maintenance for this street (i.e. 15% of 10% of the total landscaping maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit of 0.26% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned. The City has an easement across Lots A and B for a Sewer Lift Station (APN 0141-541-61) and Landscape Maintenance (APN 0141-541-62) respectively. Since the City’s interest is only an easement, these lots will be nil assessed.        Packet Page. 253 5 . MAD No. 10 24 Page | 10 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $464.93 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance: it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. Increases may also occur, without notice or hearing, if the increase is due to a change in land use or density for any parcels within the boundaries of the District, so long as the formula under “Method of Assessment” is applied.        Packet Page. 254 6 . Assessment Diagram s Page | 11 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagrams are filed herewith, are incorporated by reference in Appendix B herein, and made part of this Report. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment. Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of San Bernardino, and the San Bernardino County Assessor’s Office.        Packet Page. 255 7 . Assessment Rolls Page | 12 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The actual amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.        Packet Page. 256 Appendix A: Assessment Rolls        Packet Page. 257 CC30 SP82 - AD 1017 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-241-45 $304.88 0261-241-46 $304.88 0261-241-47 $304.88 0261-241-48 $304.88 0261-241-49 $304.88 0261-241-50 $304.88 0261-241-51 $304.88 0261-241-52 $304.88 0261-241-53 $304.88 0261-241-54 $304.88 0261-241-55 $304.88 0261-241-56 $304.88 0261-241-57 $304.88 0261-241-58 $304.88 0261-241-59 $304.88 0261-241-60 $304.88 0261-241-61 $304.88 0261-241-62 $304.88 0261-241-63 $304.88 0261-241-64 $304.88 0261-241-65 $304.88 0261-241-66 $304.88 0261-241-67 $304.88 0261-241-68 $304.88 0261-241-69 $304.88 0261-241-70 $304.88 0261-241-71 $304.88 0261-241-72 $304.88 0261-241-73 $304.88 0261-241-74 $304.88 0261-241-75 $304.88 0261-241-76 $304.88 0261-241-77 $304.88 0261-521-01 $304.88 0261-521-02 $304.88 0261-521-03 $304.88 0261-521-04 $304.88 0261-521-05 $304.88 0261-521-06 $304.88 0261-521-07 $304.88 0261-521-08 $304.88 0261-521-09 $304.88 0261-521-10 $304.88 0261-521-11 $304.88 0261-521-12 $304.88 0261-521-13 $304.88 0261-521-14 $304.88 0261-521-15 $304.88 0261-521-16 $304.88 0261-521-17 $304.88 0261-521-18 $304.88 0261-521-19 $304.88 0261-521-20 $304.88 0261-521-21 $304.88 0261-521-22 $304.88 0261-521-23 $304.88 0261-521-24 $304.88 0261-521-25 $304.88 0261-521-26 $304.88 0261-521-27 $304.88 0261-521-28 $304.88 0261-521-29 $304.88 0261-521-30 $304.88 0261-521-31 $304.88 0261-521-32 $304.88 0261-521-33 $304.88 0261-521-34 $304.88 0261-521-35 $304.88 0261-521-36 $304.88 0261-521-37 $304.88 0261-521-38 $304.88 0261-521-39 $304.88 0261-521-40 $304.88 0261-521-41 $304.88 0261-521-42 $304.88 0261-571-01 $304.88 0261-571-02 $304.88 0261-571-03 $304.88 0261-571-04 $304.88 0261-571-05 $304.88 0261-571-06 $304.88 0261-571-07 $304.88 0261-571-08 $304.88 0261-571-09 $304.88 0261-571-10 $304.88 0261-571-11 $304.88 0261-571-12 $304.88 0261-571-13 $304.88 0261-571-14 $304.88 0261-571-15 $304.88 0261-571-16 $304.88 0261-571-17 $304.88 0261-571-18 $304.88 0261-571-19 $304.88 0261-571-20 $304.88 0261-571-21 $304.88 0261-571-22 $304.88 0261-571-23 $304.88 0261-571-24 $304.88 0261-571-25 $304.88 0261-571-26 $304.88 0261-571-27 $304.88 0261-571-28 $304.88 0261-571-29 $304.88 0261-571-30 $304.88 0261-571-31 $304.88 0261-571-32 $304.88 0261-571-33 $304.88 0261-571-34 $304.88 0261-571-35 $304.88 0261-571-36 $304.88 Totals Parcels 111 Levy $33,841.68 Assessment Roll Page 1 of 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 258 CC30 SP83 - AD 1019 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0154-761-01 $169.26 0154-761-02 $169.26 0154-761-03 $169.26 0154-761-04 $169.26 0154-761-05 $169.26 0154-761-06 $169.26 0154-761-07 $169.26 0154-761-08 $169.26 0154-761-09 $169.26 0154-761-10 $169.26 0154-761-11 $169.26 0154-761-12 $169.26 0154-761-13 $169.26 0154-761-14 $169.26 0154-761-15 $169.26 0154-761-16 $169.26 0154-761-17 $169.26 0154-761-18 $169.26 0154-761-19 $169.26 0154-761-20 $169.26 0154-761-21 $169.26 0154-761-22 $169.26 0154-761-23 $169.26 0154-761-24 $169.26 0154-761-25 $169.26 0154-761-26 $169.26 0154-761-27 $169.26 0154-761-28 $169.26 0154-761-29 $169.26 0154-761-30 $169.26 0154-761-31 $169.26 0154-761-32 $169.26 0154-761-33 $169.26 0154-761-34 $169.26 0154-761-35 $169.26 0154-761-36 $169.26 0154-761-37 $169.26 0154-761-38 $169.26 0154-761-39 $169.26 0154-761-40 $169.26 0154-761-41 $169.26 0154-761-42 $169.26 0154-761-43 $169.26 0154-761-44 $169.26 0154-761-45 $169.26 0154-761-46 $169.26 0154-761-47 $169.26 0154-761-48 $169.26 0154-761-49 $169.26 0154-761-50 $169.26 0154-761-51 $169.26 0154-761-52 $169.26 0154-761-53 $169.26 0154-761-54 $169.26 0154-761-55 $169.26 0154-761-56 $169.26 0154-761-57 $169.26 0154-761-58 $169.26 0154-761-59 $169.26 0154-761-60 $169.26 0154-761-61 $169.26 0154-761-62 $169.26 0154-761-63 $169.26 0154-761-64 $169.26 0154-761-65 $169.26 0154-761-66 $169.26 0154-761-67 $169.26 0154-761-68 $169.26 0154-761-69 $169.26 0154-761-70 $169.26 0154-761-71 $169.26 0154-761-72 $169.26 0154-761-73 $169.26 0154-761-74 $169.26 0154-761-75 $169.26 0154-761-76 $169.26 0154-761-77 $169.26 0154-761-78 $169.26 0154-761-79 $169.26 0154-761-80 $169.26 0154-761-81 $169.26 0154-761-82 $169.26 0154-761-83 $169.26 0154-761-84 $169.26 0154-761-85 $169.26 0154-771-01 $169.26 0154-771-02 $169.26 0154-771-03 $169.26 0154-771-04 $169.26 0154-771-05 $169.26 0154-771-06 $169.26 0154-771-07 $169.26 0154-771-08 $169.26 0154-771-09 $169.26 0154-771-10 $169.26 0154-771-11 $169.26 0154-771-12 $169.26 0154-771-13 $169.26 Totals Parcels 98 Levy $16,587.48 Assessment Roll Page 2 of 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 259 CC30 SP85 - AD 1020 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-661-79 $268.62 0142-661-80 $268.62 0142-661-81 $268.62 0142-661-82 $268.62 0142-661-83 $268.62 0142-661-84 $268.62 0142-791-01 $268.62 0142-791-02 $268.62 0142-791-03 $268.62 0142-791-04 $268.62 0142-791-05 $268.62 0142-791-06 $268.62 0142-791-07 $268.62 Totals Parcels 13 Levy $3,492.06 Assessment Roll Page 3 of 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 260 CC30 SP84 - AD 1023 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0281-292-01 $66.38 0281-292-02 $66.38 0281-292-03 $66.38 0281-292-04 $66.38 0281-292-05 $66.38 0281-292-06 $66.38 0281-292-07 $66.38 0281-292-08 $66.38 0281-292-09 $66.38 0281-292-10 $66.38 0281-292-11 $66.38 0281-292-12 $66.38 0281-292-13 $66.38 0281-292-14 $66.38 0281-292-15 $66.38 0281-292-16 $66.38 0281-292-17 $66.38 0281-292-18 $66.38 0281-292-19 $66.38 0281-292-20 $66.38 0281-292-21 $66.38 0281-391-01 $66.38 0281-391-02 $66.38 0281-391-03 $66.38 0281-391-04 $66.38 0281-391-05 $66.38 0281-391-06 $66.38 0281-391-07 $66.38 0281-391-08 $66.38 0281-391-09 $66.38 0281-391-10 $66.38 0281-391-11 $66.38 0281-391-12 $66.38 0281-391-13 $66.38 0281-391-14 $66.38 0281-391-15 $66.38 0281-391-19 $66.38 0281-391-20 $66.38 0281-391-21 $66.38 0281-391-22 $66.38 0281-391-23 $66.38 0281-391-24 $66.38 0281-391-25 $66.38 0281-391-26 $66.38 0281-391-27 $66.38 0281-391-28 $66.38 0281-391-29 $66.38 0281-391-30 $66.38 0281-391-31 $66.38 0281-391-32 $66.38 0281-391-33 $66.38 0281-391-34 $66.38 0281-391-35 $66.38 0281-391-36 $66.38 0281-391-37 $66.38 0281-391-38 $66.38 0281-391-39 $66.38 0281-391-40 $66.38 0281-391-41 $66.38 0281-391-42 $66.38 0281-391-43 $66.38 0281-391-44 $66.38 0281-391-45 $66.38 0281-391-46 $66.38 0281-391-47 $66.38 0281-391-48 $66.38 0281-391-49 $66.38 0281-391-50 $66.38 0281-391-51 $66.38 0281-391-52 $66.38 0281-391-53 $66.38 0281-391-54 $66.38 0281-391-55 $66.38 0281-391-56 $66.38 0281-391-57 $66.38 0281-391-58 $66.38 0281-391-59 $66.38 0281-391-60 $66.38 0281-391-61 $66.38 0281-391-62 $66.38 0281-391-63 $66.38 0281-391-64 $66.38 0281-391-65 $66.38 0281-391-66 $66.38 Totals Parcels 84 Levy $5,575.92 Assessment Roll Page 4 of 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 261 CC30 SP86 - AD 1024 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0141-541-01 $205.02 0141-541-02 $205.02 0141-541-03 $205.02 0141-541-04 $205.02 0141-541-05 $205.02 0141-541-06 $205.02 0141-541-07 $205.02 0141-541-08 $205.02 0141-541-09 $205.02 0141-541-10 $205.02 0141-541-11 $205.02 0141-541-12 $205.02 0141-541-13 $205.02 0141-541-14 $205.02 0141-541-15 $205.02 0141-541-16 $205.02 0141-541-17 $205.02 0141-541-18 $205.02 0141-541-19 $205.02 0141-541-20 $205.02 0141-541-21 $205.02 0141-541-22 $205.02 0141-541-23 $205.02 0141-541-24 $205.02 0141-541-25 $205.02 0141-541-26 $205.02 0141-541-27 $205.02 0141-541-28 $205.02 0141-541-29 $205.02 0141-541-30 $205.02 0141-541-31 $205.02 0141-541-32 $205.02 0141-541-33 $205.02 0141-541-34 $205.02 0141-541-35 $205.02 0141-541-36 $205.02 0141-541-37 $205.02 0141-541-38 $205.02 0141-541-39 $205.02 0141-541-40 $205.02 0141-541-41 $205.02 0141-541-42 $205.02 0141-541-43 $205.02 0141-541-44 $205.02 0141-541-45 $205.02 0141-541-46 $205.02 0141-541-47 $205.02 0141-541-48 $205.02 0141-541-49 $205.02 0141-541-50 $205.02 0141-541-51 $205.02 0141-541-52 $205.02 0141-541-53 $205.02 0141-541-54 $205.02 0141-541-55 $205.02 0141-541-56 $205.02 0141-541-57 $205.02 0141-541-58 $205.02 0141-541-59 $205.02 0141-541-60 $205.02 0141-541-65 $205.02 0141-541-66 $205.02 0141-541-67 $205.02 0141-541-68 $205.02 0141-541-69 $205.02 0141-541-70 $205.02 Totals Parcels 66 Levy $13,531.32 Assessment Roll Page 5 of 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 262 Appendix B: Assessment Diagrams        Packet Page. 263 PINE A V E BAI L E Y C T KENDA L L D R WASHIN G T O N S T WHITE PINE AVE TORR E Y P I N E R D §¨¦215 0 200 400100Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1017 Landscaping 58,025 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 264 H S T NORTHPARK BLVD LANTER N CREST DR 51ST ST HILL DR SI E R R A M E S A R D SEQUOIA ST SUNBROOK DR MO U N T I A N D R SUNCREST CIR MOUNTAIN CREST DR 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1019 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 265 DALLAS AVE 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1020 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 266 EL M A V E COULSTON ST RI C H A R O S O N S T CU R T I S S T SH E D D E N D R CO L O M A S T JA S M I N C T LI L A C C T §¨¦10 0 150 30075Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1023 Landscaping 14,200 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 267 MONICA AVE RIVERWALK DR RIVE R W A L K D R VALL E Y V I E W D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1024 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 268 Appendix C: MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 269 MAD No. 1017 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $18,005.89 $18,366.01 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $5,170.36 $5,273.76 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $3,862.08 $3,939.32 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$9,959.88 $10,159.08 Total Direct Costs $36,998.20 $37,738.17 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,487.47 $2,638.96 City Administration $2,787.91 $2,787.91 Auditor-Controller $33.30 $33.30 Total Indirect Costs $5,308.68 $5,460.17 Total Costs $42,306.88 $43,198.34 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($5,191.30)($5,164.38) General Benefit Contribution ($4,103.77)($4,190.24) Total Adjustments ($9,295.06)($9,354.62) Total Assessment $33,011.82 $33,843.72 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 270 MAD No. 1019 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $6,578.77 $6,710.35 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $449.22 $458.21 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,631.51 $2,684.14 Total Direct Costs $9,659.51 $9,852.70 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,219.17 $1,293.42 City Administration $1,206.10 $1,206.10 Auditor-Controller $29.40 $29.40 Total Indirect Costs $2,454.66 $2,528.92 Total Costs $12,114.17 $12,381.61 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $4,653.24 $4,806.50 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($587.54)($600.51) Total Adjustments $4,065.70 $4,205.99 Total Assessment $16,179.88 $16,587.61 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 271 MAD No. 1020 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $911.23 $929.45 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $172.58 $176.03 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $455.62 $464.73 Total Direct Costs $1,539.43 $1,570.22 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $240.86 $255.52 City Administration $212.57 $212.57 Auditor-Controller $3.90 $3.90 Total Indirect Costs $457.33 $471.99 Total Costs $1,996.76 $2,042.21 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,597.22 $1,756.31 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($299.51)($306.33) Total Adjustments $1,297.70 $1,449.98 Total Assessment $3,294.46 $3,492.19 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 272 MAD No. 1023 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,057.67 $2,098.82 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $543.40 $554.26 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,028.84 $1,049.41 Total Direct Costs $3,629.90 $3,702.50 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $409.88 $434.84 City Administration $38.94 $38.94 Auditor-Controller $25.20 $25.20 Total Indirect Costs $474.02 $498.98 Total Costs $4,103.92 $4,201.47 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,746.10 $1,795.38 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($410.39)($420.15) Total Adjustments $1,335.71 $1,375.23 Total Assessment $5,439.62 $5,576.70 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 273 MAD No. 1024 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance Cost of Landscaping, Water and Energy $4,957.75 $5,056.91 Lift Station Maintenance (Includes Water and Energy) $5,539.45 $5,650.24 Total Direct Costs $10,497.20 $10,707.14 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $994.61 $1,055.18 City Administration $477.55 $477.55 Auditor-Controller $19.80 $19.80 Total Indirect Costs $1,491.96 $1,552.53 Total Costs $11,989.17 $12,259.68 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,241.31 $1,304.13 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($30.75)($31.44) Total Adjustments $1,210.56 $1,272.68 Total Assessment $13,199.73 $13,532.36 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 274          Packet Page. 275 Final Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Maintenance Assessment Districts Volume 3        Packet Page. 276 Table of Contents City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Sections i. Executive Summary i ii. Introduction ii iii. Engineer’s Signature vii 1. MAD No. 1025 1 2. MAD No. 1027 3 3. Assessment Diagrams 5 4. Assessment Rolls 6 Appendices Appendix A – Assessment Rolls Appendix B – Assessment Diagrams Appendix C – MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 277 i . Executive Summary Page | i City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 AGENCY: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER’S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE "ASSESSMENT LAW" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for Maintenance Assessment Districts, consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2025-274 adopted by the City of San Bernardino City Council, San Bernardino County, California ordering preparation of this Report. This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. Section ii PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS including a general description of the maintenance and plans of the landscaping and irrigation systems proposed to be funded. Section ii A COST ESTIMATE of maintaining the landscaping and irrigation systems including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section ii The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT contains the method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon several lots and parcels of land within the Districts, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. Section 3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS showing the Districts, the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within said Districts, as the same exists on the maps of the County of San Bernardino Assessor for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is filed in the offices of the City of San Bernardino. An Assessment Diagram of the Districts can be found in Appendix B. Section 4 ASSESSMENT ROLLS showing the actual assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s Office can be found in Appendix A. Maintenance Actual Assessment Maximum Assessment MAD No. 1025 Palm Avenue and Washington Avenue Area $250.71 $250.71 MAD No. 1027 Waterman Avenue and Washington Street Area $189.82 $271.57        Packet Page. 278 ii. Introduction Page | ii City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background The City administers and maintains 71 Maintenance Assessment Districts (the “MADs”) and associated zones that have been established. The MADs provide a financing mechanism to maintain the public maintenance areas associated with each particular development, ensuring the continued maintenance, operations, servicing, and administration of various improvements located within the public right- of-way and dedicated easements; all within the boundaries of each MAD. There is one MAD which has no improvements and is, therefore, not yet maintained. This report has been prepared to support the annual assessment of the MADs within the City’s boundaries. The following information is presented to provide general information about the MADs. Additional details specific to each MAD are listed in each MAD’s dedicated section of this Engineer’s Report. Current Annual Administration As required by the Assessment Law, the Report includes: (1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the Districts. The City of San Bernardino will hold a Public Hearing on July 16, 2025, regarding the District which will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified. Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report. Designation of Maintenance Assessment District/Zones: For your reference, you can find the following Maintenance Assessment Districts within the corresponding Volumes listed below: Volume 1: MAD 951 (Zone 1), MAD 951 (Zone 2), MAD 952 (Zone 1, 2 and 2A), MAD 952 (Zone 3), MAD 953, MAD 956, MAD 959 (Zone 1), MAD 962, MAD 963, MAD 968, MAD 974, MAD 975, MAD 976, MAD 981, MAD 982, MAD 986, MAD 989, MAD 991, MAD 993, MAD 997, MAD 1001, MAD 1002, MAD 1005, MAD 1007, MAD 1012, and MAD 1016. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 1 and does not contain an annual escalator. Volume 2: MAD 1017, MAD 1019, MAD 1020, MAD 1023 and MAD 1024. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 2 and does contain an annual CPI escalator only. Volume 3: MAD 1025 and MAD 1027. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 3 and has a 25% general benefit of major arterial streets, 20% general benefit of secondary arterial streets, 15% general benefit of collector streets, and 100% special benefit of the local streets. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained in Volume 3 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts. Volume 4: MAD 1028, MAD 1029, MAD 1030, MAD 1031, MAD 1032, MAD 1035 (Zone 1), MAD 1035 (Zone 2), MAD 1036, MAD 1037, MAD 1038, MAD 1039, MAD 1040, MAD 1041, MAD 1042, MAD 1043 (Zone 1), MAD 1043 (Zone 2), MAD 1045, MAD 1046, MAD 1047, MAD 1048, MAD 1049, MAD 1050, MAD 1051, MAD 1052, MAD 1054, MAD 1055, MAD 1056, MAD 1057, MAD 1059, MAD 1060, MAD 1063, MAD 1064, and MAD 1068. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 4 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less. Volume 5: MAD 1022 (Zone 1), MAD 1022 (Zone 2) and MAD 1022 (Zone 3). These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 5 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts.        Packet Page. 279 ii. Introduction Page | iii City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cost Estimate The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in the Assessment Law. The Assessment Law provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire Fiscal Year 2025-26, including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves. The Assessment Law also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the District is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions. The District includes an annual inflation factor for future increases in assessments by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. There is a 2.52% proposed inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable over the assessment levied for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is consistent with the ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said District. Changes in Organization There are no changes in organization for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Proposition 218 Compliance On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures. Some of these exceptions include: 1. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets. 2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase). Proposition 218 does not define this term “streets”, however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers, and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street right-of- way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting. Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property”, California Constitution, Article XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment. Distinguishing General and Special Benefit Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”        Packet Page. 280 ii. Introduction Page | iv City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 By its nature most every public improvement financed through an assessment district contains an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally, to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties. Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”: “Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”. The actual assessment and the amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report. Direct and Special Benefit The maintenance of improvements provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within each of the Districts. Each and every lot or parcel within the Districts, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities. In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the Districts because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the Districts by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the Districts. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the Districts during the nighttime hours, and to assign rights-of-way for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day. Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the Districts. Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed. Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility. The system of streets within the Districts are established to provide access to each parcel in the Districts. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the Districts, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District. The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets. Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the Districts. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the Districts. Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of        Packet Page. 281 ii. Introduction Page | v City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are apportioned on a per acre, per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit), or per parcel basis. Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the Districts. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels. Government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio- swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed. General Benefit The Benefit received by the parcels within the boundaries of the Districts is determined to be of more than ordinary public benefit, thus each parcel within the Districts being assessed receives special benefit from the improvements. If the property not within the boundaries of a District also receives some benefit from the improvements, consideration must then be given to a general benefit given by the improvements, which may not be assessed to the parcels within the Districts. Since the installation and maintenance of the landscaping and establishment of an assessment district for the maintenance of the landscaping is specific and incidental to this development, it is further determined that the improvements to be maintained by the assessment district are of special benefit to the district only and are 100% assessable to the parcels within the boundaries of the assessment district, except as follows: 1. Areas of maintenance that front on major arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 25% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 2. Areas of maintenance that front on secondary arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 20% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 3. Areas of maintenance that front on collector streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 15% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 4. Areas that front on local streets are determined to be 100% special benefit and are 100% assessable to the District. These percentages are based on the traffic circulation for the various street classifications. Method of Apportionment The Assessment Law permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The Assessment Law further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (the “Article”) requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.        Packet Page. 282 ii. Introduction Page | vi City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Whereas, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, adopted resolutions to initiate proceedings to form special assessment districts. Whereas, the City Council, did direct the appointed engineer to prepare and file an annual report, in accordance with the Assessment Law. Whereas, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following; a. Maintenance plans for the improvements b. An estimate of the costs of the improvements c. A diagram for the assessment districts d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements Now, Therefore, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of San Bernardino, pursuant to the Assessment Law, do hereby submit the following: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of law the costs and expenses of the districts have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the districts benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcel, reference is made to the Assessment Diagrams, a reduced copy of which is included herein. 2. As required by law, the Diagrams are filed herewith, showing the districts, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said districts as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagrams and in the Assessment Rolls contained herein. 3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagrams and Assessment Rolls, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the San Bernardino County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels. 4. There are no parcels or lots within the assessment districts that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected. The City requested Spicer Consulting Group, LLC., to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for the assessment districts pursuant to the Assessment Law presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the assessment districts for the referenced Fiscal Year, diagrams for the districts showing the areas and properties to be assessed, and assessments of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and-or parcels within the districts in proportion to the special benefit received.        Packet Page. 283 i ii. Engineer ’s Signature Page | vii City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 FRANCISCO MARTINEZ JR PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 84640 ENGINEER OF WORK CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _______ day of ____________, 2025. By Adoption of Resolution No. _______ by the City Council. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, on the _____day of ___________, 2025. 12th June        Packet Page. 284 1. MAD No. 10 25 Page | 1 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1025 was formed in 2000 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1025 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Washington Avenue on the north, Palm Avenue on the east, and the southwesterly line of Tract No. 15743 on the southwest. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1025. The improvements to be maintained include 18,150 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including one tree) along portions of the west side of Palm Avenue, south of Washington Avenue, portions of Washington Avenue adjacent to Lot 1 of Tract No. 15743 and along portions of the south side of Red Sky Avenue, all within Tract No. 15743. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Palm Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial street and represents 65.84% of the total area of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 20% of 65.84% of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to the District. The remaining area of maintenance along the southwesterly side of Red Sky Avenue, which is classified as a local street, is 100% special benefit and assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (20%). The result is the General Benefit of 13.17% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned        Packet Page. 285 1. MAD No. 10 25 Page | 2 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $250.71 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 286 2. MAD No. 1027 Page | 3 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1027 was formed in 2001 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1027 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerlines of Commercial Road on the north, Watermen Avenue on the east, Washington Street on the south, and Wier Road, Heritage Lane, and Foxcroft Way on the west, all within the boundaries of Tract Nos. 15826 and 15991, and within a certain easement granted to the City of San Bernardino by the City of Colton. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1027. The improvements to be maintained include 97,749 sq. ft. landscaping and all appurtenances (including one tree) along portions of Waterman Avenue, Washington Street, Wier Road, Heritage Lane, Foxcroft Way, Commercial Road, Carol Way, and Beverly Drive within Tract Nos. 15826 and 15991, and within a certain easement granted to the City of San Bernardino by the City of Colton. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Waterman Avenue and Washington Street are both classified as major arterial streets and represent 39.13% of the total area of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 25% of 39.13% of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to the District The remaining area of maintenance along the easterly side of Wier Road, Heritage Lane, Foxcroft Way, and the south side of Commercial Road, the north and south side of Beverly Drive and the north side of Carol Way are classified as local streets, and are 100% special benefit assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (25%). The result is the General Benefit of 9.8% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned.        Packet Page. 287 2. MAD No. 1027 Page | 4 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $28,663.24 Assessment Units 151 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $189.82 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $271.57 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 288 3 . Assessment Diagram s Page | 5 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagrams are filed herewith, are incorporated by reference in Appendix B herein, and made part of this Report. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment. Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of San Bernardino, and the San Bernardino County Assessor’s Office.        Packet Page. 289 4 . Assessment Rolls Page | 6 City of San Bernardino MAD’s Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 The actual amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.        Packet Page. 290 Appendix A: Assessment Rolls        Packet Page. 291 CC30 SP87 - AD 1025 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-551-01 $250.70 0261-551-02 $250.70 0261-551-03 $250.70 0261-551-04 $250.70 0261-551-05 $250.70 0261-551-06 $250.70 0261-551-07 $250.70 0261-551-08 $250.70 0261-551-09 $250.70 0261-551-10 $250.70 0261-551-11 $250.70 0261-551-12 $250.70 0261-551-13 $250.70 0261-551-14 $250.70 0261-551-15 $250.70 0261-551-16 $250.70 0261-551-17 $250.70 0261-551-18 $250.70 0261-551-19 $250.70 0261-551-20 $250.70 0261-551-21 $250.70 0261-551-22 $250.70 0261-551-23 $250.70 0261-551-24 $250.70 0261-551-25 $250.70 0261-551-26 $250.70 0261-551-27 $250.70 0261-551-28 $250.70 0261-551-29 $250.70 0261-551-30 $250.70 0261-551-31 $250.70 0261-551-32 $250.70 0261-551-33 $250.70 0261-551-34 $250.70 0261-551-35 $250.70 0261-551-36 $250.70 0261-551-37 $250.70 0261-551-38 $250.70 Totals Parcels 38 Levy $9,526.60 Assessment Roll Page 1 of 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 292 CC30 SP89 - AD 1027 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0141-511-54 $189.82 0141-511-55 $189.82 0141-511-56 $189.82 0141-511-57 $189.82 0141-511-58 $189.82 0141-511-59 $189.82 0141-511-60 $189.82 0141-511-61 $189.82 0141-511-62 $189.82 0141-511-63 $189.82 0141-511-64 $189.82 0141-511-65 $189.82 0141-531-21 $189.82 0141-531-22 $189.82 0141-531-23 $189.82 0141-531-24 $189.82 0141-531-25 $189.82 0141-531-26 $189.82 0141-531-27 $189.82 0141-531-28 $189.82 0141-531-29 $189.82 0141-531-30 $189.82 0141-531-31 $189.82 0141-531-32 $189.82 0141-531-33 $189.82 0141-531-34 $189.82 0141-531-35 $189.82 0141-531-36 $189.82 0141-531-37 $189.82 0141-531-38 $189.82 0141-531-39 $189.82 0141-531-40 $189.82 0141-531-41 $189.82 0141-531-42 $189.82 0141-531-43 $189.82 0141-531-44 $189.82 0141-531-45 $189.82 0141-551-01 $189.82 0141-551-02 $189.82 0141-551-03 $189.82 0141-551-04 $189.82 0141-551-05 $189.82 0141-551-06 $189.82 0141-551-07 $189.82 0141-551-08 $189.82 0141-551-09 $189.82 0141-551-10 $189.82 0141-551-11 $189.82 0141-551-12 $189.82 0141-551-13 $189.82 0141-551-14 $189.82 0141-551-15 $189.82 0141-551-16 $189.82 0141-551-17 $189.82 0141-551-18 $189.82 0141-551-19 $189.82 0141-551-20 $189.82 0141-551-21 $189.82 0141-551-22 $189.82 0141-551-23 $189.82 0141-551-24 $189.82 0141-551-25 $189.82 0141-551-26 $189.82 0141-551-27 $189.82 0141-551-28 $189.82 0141-551-29 $189.82 0141-551-30 $189.82 0141-551-31 $189.82 0141-551-32 $189.82 0141-551-33 $189.82 0141-551-34 $189.82 0141-551-35 $189.82 0141-551-36 $189.82 0141-551-37 $189.82 0141-551-38 $189.82 0141-551-39 $189.82 0141-551-40 $189.82 0141-551-41 $189.82 0141-551-42 $189.82 0141-551-43 $189.82 0141-551-44 $189.82 0141-551-45 $189.82 0141-551-46 $189.82 0141-551-47 $189.82 0141-551-48 $189.82 0141-551-49 $189.82 0141-551-50 $189.82 0141-551-51 $189.82 0141-551-52 $189.82 0141-551-53 $189.82 0141-551-54 $189.82 0141-551-55 $189.82 0141-551-56 $189.82 0141-551-57 $189.82 0141-551-58 $189.82 0141-551-59 $189.82 0141-551-60 $189.82 0141-551-61 $189.82 0141-561-01 $189.82 0141-561-02 $189.82 0141-561-03 $189.82 0141-561-04 $189.82 0141-561-05 $189.82 0141-561-06 $189.82 0141-561-07 $189.82 0141-561-08 $189.82 0141-561-09 $189.82 0141-561-10 $189.82 0141-561-11 $189.82 0141-561-12 $189.82 0141-561-13 $189.82 0141-561-14 $189.82 0141-561-15 $189.82 0141-561-16 $189.82 0141-561-17 $189.82 0141-561-18 $189.82 0141-561-19 $189.82 0141-561-20 $189.82 0141-561-21 $189.82 0141-561-22 $189.82 0141-561-23 $189.82 0141-561-24 $189.82 0141-561-25 $189.82 0141-561-26 $189.82 0141-561-27 $189.82 0141-561-28 $189.82 0141-561-29 $189.82 0141-561-30 $189.82 0141-561-31 $189.82 Assessment Roll Page 2 of 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 293 CC30 SP89 - AD 1027 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0141-561-32 $189.82 0141-561-33 $189.82 0141-571-01 $189.82 0141-571-02 $189.82 0141-571-03 $189.82 0141-571-04 $189.82 0141-571-05 $189.82 0141-571-06 $189.82 0141-571-07 $189.82 0141-571-08 $189.82 0141-571-09 $189.82 0141-571-10 $189.82 0141-571-11 $189.82 0141-571-12 $189.82 0141-571-13 $189.82 0141-571-14 $189.82 0141-571-15 $189.82 0141-571-16 $189.82 0141-571-17 $189.82 0141-571-18 $189.82 0141-571-19 $189.82 0141-571-20 $189.82 Totals Parcels 151 Levy $28,662.82 Page 3 of 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 294 Appendix B: Assessment Diagrams        Packet Page. 295 IRVING T O N A V E RED SKY AVE PAL M A V E WASHIN G T O N S T CABLE CREEK CHANNEL APP A L O O S A A V E ESC E N A S T KENDA L L D R VER D E M O N T R A N C H R D §¨¦215 0 90 18045 Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1025 Landscaping 18,150 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 296 YOUNG CT ERIN WAYWEIR RD WA T E R M A N A V E CAROL WAY MELINDA LN KIMBERL Y C T MOLLY DR MANCHESTER LN AN D R E W L N FOXCROTT WAY HERITAGE LN COMMERCIAL DR BEVERLY D R ME L I S S A W A Y WASHING T O N S T CA R L P L 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1027 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 297 Appendix C: MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 298 MAD No. 1025 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $5,093.23 $5,195.10 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $133.63 $136.30 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,425.35 $2,473.85 Total Direct Costs $7,652.20 $7,805.25 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $700.21 $742.86 City Administration $820.85 $820.85 Auditor-Controller $11.40 $11.40 Total Indirect Costs $1,532.46 $1,575.11 Total Costs $9,184.67 $9,380.36 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,317.48 $1,381.73 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($1,209.44)($1,235.21) Total Adjustments $108.04 $146.52 Total Assessment $9,292.71 $9,526.88 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 299 MAD No. 1027 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $17,330.59 $17,677.20 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $443.25 $452.11 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$8,665.30 $8,838.60 Total Direct Costs $26,439.14 $26,967.92 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,106.71 $2,235.01 City Administration $1,983.06 $1,983.06 Auditor-Controller $45.30 $45.30 Total Indirect Costs $4,135.08 $4,263.37 Total Costs $30,574.21 $31,231.29 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $375.30 $487.06 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($2,990.83)($3,055.11) Total Adjustments ($2,615.53)($2,568.05) Total Assessment $27,958.68 $28,663.24 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 300          Packet Page. 301 Final Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Maintenance Assessment Districts Volume 4        Packet Page. 302 Table of Contents City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Sections i. Executive Summary i ii. Introduction iii iii. Engineer’s Signature viii 1. MAD No. 1028 1 2. MAD No. 1029 3 3. MAD No. 1030 5 4. MAD No. 1031 7 5. MAD No. 1032 8 6. MAD No. 1035 Zone 1 10 7. MAD No. 1035 Zone 2 12 8. MAD No. 1036 14 9. MAD No. 1037 16 10. MAD No. 1038 18 11. MAD No. 1039 20 12. MAD No. 1040 22 13. MAD No. 1041 24 14. MAD No. 1042 26 15. MAD No. 1043 Zone 1 28 16. MAD No. 1043 Zone 2 30 17. MAD No. 1045 32 18. MAD No. 1046 34 19. MAD No. 1047 36 20. MAD No. 1048 38 21. MAD No. 1049 40 22. MAD No. 1050 42 23. MAD No. 1051 44 24. MAD No. 1052 46        Packet Page. 303 Table of Contents City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 25. MAD No. 1054 48 26. MAD No. 1055 50 27. MAD No. 1056 52 28. MAD No. 1057 54 29. MAD No. 1059 56 30. MAD No. 1060 58 31. MAD No. 1063 60 32. MAD No. 1064 62 33. MAD No. 1068 64 34. Assessment Diagrams 66 35. Assessment Rolls 67 Appendices Appendix A – Assessment Rolls Appendix B – Assessment Diagrams Appendix C – MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 304 i. Executive Summary Page | i City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 AGENCY: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER’S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE "ASSESSMENT LAW" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for Maintenance Assessment Districts, consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2025-274 adopted by the City of San Bernardino City Council, San Bernardino County, California ordering preparation of this Report. This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. Section ii PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS including a general description of the maintenance and plans of the landscaping and irrigation systems proposed to be funded. Section ii A COST ESTIMATE of maintaining the landscaping and irrigation systems including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section ii The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT contains the method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon several lots and parcels of land within the Districts, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. Section 34 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS showing the Districts, the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within said Districts, as the same exists on the maps of the County of San Bernardino Assessor for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is filed in the offices of the City of San Bernardino. An Assessment Diagram of the Districts can be found in Appendix B. Section 35 ASSESSMENT ROLLS showing the actual assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s Office can be found in Appendix A.        Packet Page. 305 i. Executive Summary Page | ii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Maintenance Actual Assessment Maximum Assessment MAD No. 1028 Ohio Avenue and Walnut Avenue Area $182.37 $182.37 MAD No. 1029 California Street and 16th Street Area $188.67 $235.07 MAD No. 1030 Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue Area $173.63 $272.56 MAD No. 1031 Irvington Avenue and Olive Avenue Area $267.84 $393.46 MAD No. 1032 Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive $123.39 $179.63 MAD No. 1035 Zone 1 Palm Avenue and Meyers Road $464.13 $503.83 MAD No. 1035 Zone 2 Palm Avenue and Meyers Road $160.32 $160.32 MAD No. 1036 Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway $749.78 $1,523.20 MAD No. 1037 Belmont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue $197.28 $437.26 MAD No. 1038 Orange Show Road and Arrowhead Avenue $65.61 $317.78 MAD No. 1039 Irvington Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area $132.99 $250.36 MAD No. 1040 Acacia Avenue and Hill Drive Area $389.30 $986.43 MAD No. 1041 Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue Area $791.78 $1,111.89 MAD No. 1042 Shandin Hills Drive and Shady Creek Drive $1,098.61 $1,098.61 MAD No. 1043 Zone 1 Palm Avenue and Irvington Avenue Area $215.22 $303.13 MAD No. 1043 Zone 2 Palm Avenue and Irvington Avenue Area $352.80 $501.64 MAD No. 1045 Waterman Avenue and Orange Show Road Area $87.63 $87.63 MAD No. 1046 Northpark Boulevard and Northstar Avenue Area $372.80 $372.80 MAD No. 1047 Ohio Avenue and Pine Avenue Area $948.72 $1,123.43 MAD No. 1048 Eucalyptus Avenue and Randall Avenue Area $426.61 $565.41 MAD N0. 1049 Ohio Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area $491.08 $491.08 MAD No. 1050 Pepper Avenue and Rialto Avenue Area $372.80 $415.12 MAD No. 1051 Olive Avenue and Belmont Avenue Area $0.00 $139.52 MAD No. 1052 Belmont Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area $316.83 $554.91 MAD No. 1054 Campus Parkway and Valles Drive Area $459.89 $606.28 MAD No. 1055 Pine Avenue and Redwood Street Area $715.44 $1,206.03 MAD No. 1056 Magnolia Avenue and Garfield Street Area $565.38 $607.12 MAD No. 1057 Cajon Boulevard and University Parkway Area $52.00 $130.00 MAD No. 1059 Orange Show Road and Tippecanoe Avenue $16.00 $34.79 MAD No. 1060 Chiquita Lane and Date Street Area $1,145.97 $1,145.97 MAD No. 1063 Central Avenue and Lena Road Area $26.57 $226.55 MAD No. 1064 Cajon Boulevard and Glen Helen Parkway Area $61.92 $204.29 MAD No. 1068 Tippecanoe Avenue and Central Avenue Area $16.71 $49.37        Packet Page. 306 ii. Introduction Page | iii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background The City administers and maintains 71 Maintenance Assessment Districts (the “MADs”) and associated zones that have been established. The MADs provide a financing mechanism to maintain the public maintenance areas associated with each particular development, ensuring the continued maintenance, operations, servicing, and administration of various improvements located within the public right- of-way and dedicated easements; all within the boundaries of each MAD. There is one MAD which has no improvements and is, therefore, not yet maintained. This report has been prepared to support the annual assessment of the MADs within the City’s boundaries. The following information is presented to provide general information about the MADs. Additional details specific to each MAD are listed in each MAD’s dedicated section of this Engineer’s Report. Current Annual Administration As required by the Assessment Law, the Report includes: (1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the Districts. The City of San Bernardino will hold a Public Hearing on July 16, 2025, regarding the District which will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified. Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report. Designation of Maintenance Assessment District/Zones: For your reference, you can find the following Maintenance Assessment Districts within the corresponding Volumes listed below: Volume 1: MAD 951 (Zone 1), MAD 951 (Zone 2), MAD 952 (Zone 1, 2 and 2A), MAD 952 (Zone 3), MAD 953, MAD 956, MAD 959 (Zone 1), MAD 962, MAD 963, MAD 968, MAD 974, MAD 975, MAD 976, MAD 981, MAD 982, MAD 986, MAD 989, MAD 991, MAD 993, MAD 997, MAD 1001, MAD 1002, MAD 1005, MAD 1007, MAD 1012, and MAD 1016. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 1 and does not contain an annual escalator. Volume 2: MAD 1017, MAD 1019, MAD 1020, MAD 1023 and MAD 1024. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 2 and does contain an annual CPI escalator only. Volume 3: MAD 1025 and MAD 1027. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 3 and has a 25% general benefit of major arterial streets, 20% general benefit of secondary arterial streets, 15% general benefit of collector streets, and 100% special benefit of the local streets. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained in Volume 3 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts. Volume 4: MAD 1028, MAD 1029, MAD 1030, MAD 1031, MAD 1032, MAD 1035 (Zone 1), MAD 1035 (Zone 2), MAD 1036, MAD 1037, MAD 1038, MAD 1039, MAD 1040, MAD 1041, MAD 1042, MAD 1043 (Zone 1), MAD 1043 (Zone 2), MAD 1045, MAD 1046, MAD 1047, MAD 1048, MAD 1049, MAD 1050, MAD 1051, MAD 1052, MAD 1054, MAD 1055, MAD 1056, MAD 1057, MAD 1059, MAD 1060, MAD 1063, MAD 1064, and MAD 1068. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 4 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less. Volume 5: MAD 1022 (Zone 1), MAD 1022 (Zone 2) and MAD 1022 (Zone 3). These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 5 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts.        Packet Page. 307 ii. Introduction Page | iv City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cost Estimate The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in the Assessment Law. The Assessment Law provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire Fiscal Year 2025-26, including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves. The Assessment Law also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the District is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions. The District includes an annual inflation factor for future increases in assessments by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. There is a 2.52% proposed inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable over the assessment levied for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is consistent with the ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said District. Changes in Organization There are no changes in organization for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Proposition 218 Compliance On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures. Some of these exceptions include: 1. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets. 2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase). Proposition 218 does not define this term “streets”, however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers, and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street right-of- way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting. Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property”, California Constitution, Article XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment. Distinguishing General and Special Benefit Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” By its nature most every public improvement financed through an assessment district contains an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally, to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially        Packet Page. 308 ii. Introduction Page | v City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 benefits assessed properties. Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”: “Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”. The actual assessment and the amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report. Direct and Special Benefit The maintenance of improvements provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within each of the Districts. Each and every lot or parcel within the Districts, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities. In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the Districts because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the Districts by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the Districts. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the Districts during the nighttime hours, and to assign rights-of-way for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day. Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the Districts. Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed. Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility. The system of streets within the Districts are established to provide access to each parcel in the Districts. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the Districts, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District. The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets. Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the Districts. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the Districts. Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are apportioned on a per acre, per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit), or per parcel basis.        Packet Page. 309 ii. Introduction Page | vi City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the Districts. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels. Government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed. General Benefit The Benefit received by the parcels within the boundaries of the Districts is determined to be of more than ordinary public benefit, thus each parcel within the Districts being assessed receives special benefit from the improvements. If the property not within the boundaries of a District also receives some benefit from the improvements, consideration must then be given to a general benefit given by the improvements, which may not be assessed to the parcels within the Districts. Since the installation and maintenance of the landscaping and establishment of an assessment district for the maintenance of the landscaping is specific and incidental to this development, it is further determined that the improvements to be maintained by the assessment district are of special benefit to the District only and are 100% assessable to the parcels within the boundaries of the assessment district, except as follows: 1. Areas of maintenance that front on major arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 15% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 2. Areas of maintenance that front on secondary arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 10% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 3. Areas of maintenance that front on collector streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 5% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 4. Areas that front on local streets are determined to be 100% special benefit and are 100% assessable to the District. These percentages are based on the traffic circulation for the various street classifications. Method of Apportionment The Assessment Law permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The Assessment Law further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (the “Article”) requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the District. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit. Whereas, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, adopted resolutions to initiate proceedings to form special assessment districts.        Packet Page. 310 ii. Introduction Page | vii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Whereas, the City Council, did direct the appointed engineer to prepare and file an annual report, in accordance with the Assessment Law. Whereas, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following; a. Maintenance plans for the improvements b. An estimate of the costs of the improvements c. A diagram for the assessment districts d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements Now, Therefore, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of San Bernardino, pursuant to the Assessment Law, do hereby submit the following: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of law the costs and expenses of the districts have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the districts benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcel, reference is made to the Assessment Diagrams, a reduced copy of which is included herein. 2. As required by law, the Diagrams are filed herewith, showing the districts, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said districts as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagrams and in the Assessment Rolls contained herein. 3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagrams and Assessment Rolls, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the San Bernardino County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels. 4. There are no parcels or lots within the assessment districts that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected. The City requested Spicer Consulting Group, LLC., to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for the assessment districts pursuant to the Assessment Law presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the assessment districts for the referenced Fiscal Year, diagrams for the districts showing the areas and properties to be assessed, and assessments of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and-or parcels within the districts in proportion to the special benefit received.        Packet Page. 311 iii. Engineer ’s Signature Page | viii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 FRANCISCO MARTINEZ JR PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 84640 ENGINEER OF WORK CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _______ day of ____________, 2025. By Adoption of Resolution No. _______ by the City Council. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, on the _____day of ___________, 2025. 12th June        Packet Page. 312 1. MAD No. 1028 Page | 1 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1028 was formed in 2002 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1028 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue on the north; the centerline of Walnut Avenue on the east; the centerline of Olive Avenue on the west; and the southerly line of Tract No. 14193 on the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1028. The improvements to be maintained include 28,190 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including one tree) along portions of Ohio Avenue, Walnut Avenue, Meyers Road and Olive Avenue, all within Tract No. 14193. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). All of the streets along which maintenance is proposed are local streets with the exception of Ohio Avenue, which is classified as a collector street. Ohio Avenue represents 18.30% of the total areas of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 5% of 18.30% of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 0.92% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Bailey Creek Channel (APN 0261-581-77), which runs through the tract, is publicly owned, but receives no benefit from the maintenance and thus will not be assessed.        Packet Page. 313 1. MAD No. 1028 Page | 2 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $182.37 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 314 2. MAD No. 1029 Page | 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1029 was formed in 2003 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1029 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The north line of Tract No. 13822 on the north, the east line of Tract No. 13822 on the east; the centerline of California Street on the west; and the centerline of 16th Street on the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1029. The improvements to be maintained include 12,074 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) along portions of the east side of California Street, north of 16th Street and along portions of the north side of 16th street, east of California Street, all within the boundaries of Tract No. 13822. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Of the streets along which maintenance is proposed, California Street is classified as a collector street, and represents 6,554 square feet of maintenance, or 54% of the total area. 16th Street is classified a secondary arterial street and represents 5,520 square feet of maintenance, or 46% of the total area. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 7.3% (5% of 54% + 10% of 46%) of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5% and 10%). The result is the General Benefit of 7.3% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned lands within the boundaries of the District.        Packet Page. 315 2. MAD No. 1029 Page | 4 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $235.07 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 316 3. MAD No. 1030 Page | 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1030 was formed in 2004 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1030 are shown on the Assessment District located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue on the south, the centerline of Magnolia Avenue on the west, the northerly boundary of Tract No. 14604 on the north, and the easterly boundary of Tract No. 14604 on the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1030. The improvements to be maintained include 22,425 Sq. Ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) along portions of the north side of Ohio Avenue, east of Magnolia Avenue, and the east side of Magnolia Avenue, north of Ohio Avenue. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Ohio Avenue is classified as a collector street and represents 70.61% of the total are to be maintained; thus 5% of 70.61% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be general benefit and will not be assessed to the District. Magnolia Avenue is a local street in this area, and 100% of the cost for maintenance along this area are assessable to the District as described above. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 3.5% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $272.56 per unit.        Packet Page. 317 3. MAD No. 1030 Page | 6 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 318 4. MAD No. 1031 Page | 7 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1031 was formed in 2003 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1031 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Irvington Avenue on the north; the east line of Tract No. 15407 on the east; the west line of Tract No. 15407 on the west; and the south line of Lot “A” of Tract No. 15407 on the south. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1031. The improvements to be maintained includes 80,000 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including one tree) within portions of Lot “A” of Tract No. 15407. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Lot “A” is located along the south side of Brenda Drive, which is classified as a local street, and represents 100% of the total area to be maintained; thus 100% of the total cost of maintenance will be assessed to the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $393.46 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 319 5. MAD No. 1032 Page | 8 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1032 was formed in 2004 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1032 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Palm Avenue on the west, the centerline of Verdemont Drive on the south, the northerly boundary of Tract No. 14352 on the north, and the easterly boundary of Tract No. 14352 on the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1032. The improvements to be maintained include 21,280 sq. ft. of landscaping and one tree along portions of the north side of Verdemont Drive, easterly of Palm Avenue, within Tract No. 14352. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Verdemont Drive is classified as a local street and represents 100% of the total area to be maintained; thus 100% of the total cost of maintenance will be assessed to the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $179.63 per unit.        Packet Page. 320 5. MAD No. 1032 Page | 9 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 321 6. MAD No. 1035 Zone 1 Page | 10 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1035 Zone 1 was formed in 2004 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1035 Zone 1 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerlines of Ohio Avenue to the north and Palm Avenue to the west, both within the boundaries of Tract No. 13572; and the southerly and easterly lines of Tract No. 13572. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1035. The improvements to be maintained include 30,475 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) along portions of the east side of Palm Avenue, the south side of Ohio Avenue, the north side of Myers Road and the slope along the southerly boundary of Tract No. 13572, all within Tract No. 13572 for Zone 1. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). These portions of Palm Avenue and Ohio Avenue are classified as collector streets, and represent 25.6% of the total area to be maintained; thus 5% of 25.6% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be general benefit and will not be assessed by the District. Meyers Road is classified as a local street and the Slope along the southerly line of Tract No. 13572 are deemed to be special benefit; thus 100% of the costs of maintenance for those areas will be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 1.28% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District.        Packet Page. 322 6. MAD No. 1035 Zone 1 Page | 11 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $503.83 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 323 7. MAD No. 1035 Zone 2 Page | 12 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1035 Zone 2 was formed in 2004 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1035 Zone 2 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerlines of Palm Avenue to the east and Belmont Avenue to the south, both within the boundaries of Tract No. 15538; and the northerly, southerly and westerly lines of Tract No. 15538. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1035. The improvements to be maintained include 1,650 sq. ft. of landscaping (including 1 tree) on the west side of Palm Avenue at Akron Street within Tract No. 15538. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). This portion of Palm Avenue is classified as a collector street and represents 100% of the total area to be maintained; thus 5% of 100% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be general benefit and will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 5% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $160.32 per unit.        Packet Page. 324 7. MAD No. 1035 Zone 2 Page | 13 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance, it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 325 8. MAD No. 1036 Page | 14 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1036 was formed in 2005 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1036 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The boundaries of Tract No. 16509 together with all of Campus Parkway right of way lying between Kendall Drive and Northpark Boulevard; Northpark Boulevard right of way lying between Campus Parkway and University Parkway, including the unimproved portion of Northpark Boulevard directly south of Campus Parkway; and that area lying between the easterly line of improved Northpark Boulevard and the easterly line of said Tract No. 16509, between the Campus Parkway and University Parkway, and Lot 14 of Tract No. 2404. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1036. The improvements to be maintained include landscaping and all appurtenances (including hardscaped areas) within portions of: 1,615,182 sq. ft. of median and parkway landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) within Campus Parkway, from Kendall Drive to Northpark Boulevard; within Northpark Boulevard from Campus Parkway to University Parkway; Valles Drive, between Campus Parkway and Sycamore Street; and Ash Street between Northpark Boulevard and Sycamore Street. Slope and Open Space areas within Lots, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “H”, “I”, “J”, “L”, “M”, “N” and the rear slope within Lots 152 through 156 of Tract No. 16509, and as said Lots may be re-designated and/or reapportioned under future phases of said Tract No. 16509; and Lots “A” and “B” of Tract No. 16509-1, as said lots are delineated on the map of said Tract. Open space passive park at the corner of Campus Parkway and Northpark Boulevard (area includes unimproved Northpark Boulevard right of way and within landscape easement on State University property). Open space park area located on the northeast corner of Kendall Drive and University Parkway (landscaping and hardscaping only); Park amenities, including “tot-lot” equipment, to be maintained by the City and the costs thereof are not assessable to the District. Entry monuments and lighting, and 31,846 sq. ft. of hardscape and all appurtenances at Campus Parkway and Valles Drive and at Ash Street and Northpark Boulevard. Walking/Hiking/Bicycle trails in various locations within portions of the slope and open space areas. 2 concrete structure gazebos located at various locations. 23 benches at various locations along trails and open space areas. Drainage facilities including concrete “v” ditches. 35 de-silting dry-wells (“Maxwell Drains”) at various locations throughout Tract No. 16509. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received.        Packet Page. 326 8. MAD No. 1036 Page | 15 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Campus Parkway and Northpark Boulevard are both classified as major arterial streets within which maintenance is proposed. The landscape maintenance area within these streets represents 12% (rounded) of the total landscape maintenance area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of costs of maintenance for these streets (i.e. 15% of 12% of total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit of 1.80% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The various publicly owned lands within the District, including City owned open space lots, State of California open space lots portions of County of San Bernardino owned parcels will not be assessed, since these parcels are either landscaped or within right of way and will not be developed for either residential or commercial use and thus receive no special benefit from the maintenance. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $1,523.20 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 327 9. MAD No. 1037 Page | 16 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1037 was formed in 2004 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1037 are shown on the Boundary Map located in Appendix B of this Reports and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Belmont Avenue to the south; the centerline of Magnolia Avenue to the west; the centerline of Meyers Road to the north; and the easterly line of Tract No. 13630 to the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1037. The improvements to be maintained include 29,207 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) along portions of the north side of Belmont Avenue east of Magnolia Avenue, the east side of Magnolia Avenue, north of Belmont Avenue and Lot 34, located at the southeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Meyers Road, all within Tract No. 13630. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). This portion of Belmont Avenue is classified as a collector street and represents 61% of the total area to be maintained; thus 5% of 61% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be general benefit and will not be assessed by the District. This portion of Magnolia Avenue is currently classified as a local street and 100% of the maintenance along this street is assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 3.05% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Lot 34 (APN 0261-651-34), which is part of landscape area, is non-buildable and receives no benefit and thus exempt from assessments. There are no other publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District.        Packet Page. 328 9. MAD No. 1037 Page | 17 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $6,510.24 Assessment Units 33 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $197.28 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $437.26 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 329 10. MAD No. 1038 Page | 18 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1038 was formed in 2005 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1038 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Orange Show Road to the south; the centerline of Arrowhead Avenue to the west; and the north and east line of Parcel Map No. 16222 to the north and to the east respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1038. The improvements to be maintained include 75,380 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including1 tree) along portions of the north side of Orange Show Road, east of Arrowhead Avenue, the east side of Arrowhead Avenue, north of Orange Show Road, the north and south sides of Orange Show Lane, east of Arrowhead Avenue and the west side of Sierra Way, north of Orange Show Lane, all within Parcel Map No. 16222. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the area of each lot or parcel that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. The benefit received by each lot or parcel is proportional to the area of each lot or parcel in relation to the total area within the District boundaries. Since the development for this area is commercial use, assessment units are assigned to each lot or parcel based on the number of single family residential units that could be built if the area were developed for residential use, based on the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet as set forth in the City’s General Plan. Thus, each lot or parcel area (in square feet) is divided by 7,200 to determine its assigned assessment unit or portion thereof. (7,200 Square Feet = 1 Assessment Unit). These portions of Orange Show Lane and Sierra Way are currently classified as local streets and 100% of the maintenance cost along these streets are assessable to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%) The result is the General Benefit of 7.2% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned lands within the boundaries of the District.        Packet Page. 330 10. MAD No. 1038 Page | 19 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $5,270.02 Assessment Units 80.32 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $65.61 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $317.78 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 331 11. MAD No. 1039 Page | 20 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1039 was formed in 2005 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1039 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Belmont Avenue on the northeast; the centerline of Magnolia Avenue on the northwest; the centerline of Irvington Avenue on the southwest; the easterly line of that certain 45 foot easement to the City of San Bernardino for recreational trails, being a portion of vacated Chestnut Avenue, together with the full right of way boundaries at the intersection of Belmont Avenue and vacated Chestnut Avenue and the intersection of Irvington Avenue and Chestnut Avenue; and also together with that certain landscape easement dedicated to the City of San Bernardino for landscape maintenance across the most northwesterly corner of Lot 44 of Tract No 13307; and also together within easements granted to the City of San Bernardino for landscape maintenance across the most northwesterly 15 feet of Lot 30 and Lots 66 through 70 of said Tract No. 13307. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1039. The improvements to be maintained include 40,425 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including one tree) within portions of Belmont Avenue, east of Magnolia Avenue, portions of Magnolia Avenue, south of Belmont Avenue and along the trail system along Los Robles Way described herein. Entry monuments and lighting, and hardscapes and all appurtenance at Irvington Avenue and Belmont Avenue. 39,975 sq. ft. of Walking/Bicycle/Equestrian trails and appurtenances: meandering trails located along Los Robles Way, between Irvington Avenue and Belmont Avenue; equestrian trail (15 foot in width) is decomposed granite; walking/bicycle trail (15 foot in width) is asphalt- concrete. Trails are separated by 700 linear feet of rail vinyl fence. Two exercise stations along the trail system. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Belmont Avenue is classified as a collector street within which maintenance is proposed. The trail system and appurtenant landscaping for this tract is a part of a regional trail system that extends northwesterly and is deemed to have the same general benefit as a collector street. The landscape maintenance area within Belmont Avenue and the trail system represents 87% (rounded) of the total maintenance        Packet Page. 332 11. MAD No. 1039 Page | 21 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 5% of costs of maintenance for these streets (i.e. 5% of 87% of the total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. These general benefit portion of these costs will need to be funded from the City’s General Fund or other non-district source of funding. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 4.34% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The various publicly owned lands within the District, including City owned open space lots, State of California open space lots, and portions of County of San Bernardino owned parcels will not be assessed, since these parcels are either landscaped or within right of way and will not be developed for either residential or commercial use and thus receives no benefit from the maintenance. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $250.36 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 333 12. MAD No. 1040 Page | 22 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1040 was formed in 2005 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1040 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The southerly, eastern, and westerly lines of Tract No. 10260, and along the northerly line of the fuel modification are lying San Bernardino County Flood Control District property on the north, as described in San Bernardino County Permit No. P-22005070 to the City of San Bernardino, dated September 2, 2005, and future extension of said permit, as may be granted by the County of San Bernardino. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1040. The District will maintain 170,145 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree) within slopes along the southerly sides of Lot 23 through 29, the westerly side of Lots 20 through 23, the easterly and westerly sides of Acacia Avenue, all within Tract No. 10260; and the fuel modification area within San Bernardino County Flood Control Property located adjacent to and northerly of Lots 10 through 19 of Tract No. 10260. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Acacia Avenue is designated as a local street. All other landscaping is within easements or permit areas not located along any public street, thus 100% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances, is deemed to be of special benefit and assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. It has been determined the San Bernardino County Flood Control property (APN 0270-051-19) will not receive any benefit from the maintenance under the Assessment District and will not be assessed.        Packet Page. 334 12. MAD No. 1040 Page | 23 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $17,907.58 Assessment Units 46 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $389.30 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $986.43 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 335 13. MAD No. 1041 Page | 24 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1041 was formed in 2006 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1041 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Magnolia Avenue on the northwest, the centerline of Ohio Avenue on the northeast, and the southeasterly and southwesterly line of Tract No. 15228 on the southeast and southwest. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1041. The improvements to be maintained include 46,771 sq. ft. of parkway and slope landscaping (including one tree) on the easterly side of Magnolia Avenue, parkway and slope landscaping on the south side of Ohio Avenue, landscaping and drainage swales on slopes along the southerly side of Lots 10 through 17, inclusive, and the easterly side of Lot 10, and the landscaping of the drainage swale/access area between the side yards of Lots 10 and 11. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Magnolia Avenue is designated as a collector street and this portion of Ohio Avenue is also a collector street. All other landscaping is within easements or permit areas not located along any public street, thus 95% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances fronting on Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue (that is, 5% of the cost of is general benefit) is deemed to be of Special benefit, and 100% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances of the remainder of the public landscaping within Tract No. 15228 is deemed to be of special benefit and assessed to the lots within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 1.01% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. It has been determined the City of San Bernardino property will not receive any benefit from the maintenance under the Assessment District and will not be assessed.        Packet Page. 336 13. MAD No. 1041 Page | 25 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $1,111.89 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 337 14. MAD No. 1042 Page | 26 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1042 was formed in 2006 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1042 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Shandin Hills Drive and the easterly, northerly, westerly, and southerly boundary lines of Tract No. 14254, including the fuel modification area lying within City of San Bernardino property on the north, west, and south of the proposed residential lots Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1042. The improvements to be maintained include 417,130 sq. ft. of landscaping (including 1 tree) within slopes along Shandin Hills Drive including the easterly sides of Lots 1 through 3, the easterly side of Lots 52 through 57, and the easterly side of Lot 72, all within Tract No. 14254; and the fuel modification area and detention basins within City of San Bernardino property shown as Lot “A” on the map of Tract No. 14254. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Shandin Hills Drive is designated as a local street. All other landscaping is within easements or permit areas not located along any public street, thus 100% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances, is deemed to be of special benefit and assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. It has been determined that the City of San Bernardino property will not receive any benefit from the maintenance under the Assessment District and will not be assessed.        Packet Page. 338 14. MAD No. 1042 Page | 27 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $79,100.04 Assessment Units 72 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $1,098.61 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $1,098.61 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 339 15. MAD No. 1043 Zone 1 Page | 28 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1043 Zone 1 was formed in 2005 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1043 Zone 1 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Palm Avenue to the east; the centerline of Irvington Avenue to the south; the north and west lines of Tract No. 15940 to the north and to the west, respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1043 Zone 1. The improvements to be maintained includes 22,770 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including one tree) along portions of the west side of Palm Avenue, the north side of Irvington Avenue and along portions of the north and south side of Blue Mountain Street all within the boundaries of Tract No. 15940. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). This portion of Palm Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial street and represents 68% of the total area to be maintained; thus 10% of 68% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be general benefit and will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10%). The result is the General Benefit of 6.81% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $303.13 per unit.        Packet Page. 340 15. MAD No. 1043 Zone 1 Page | 29 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 341 16. MAD No. 1043 Zone 2 Page | 30 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1043 Zone 2 was formed in 2005 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1043 Zone 2 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Palm Avenue to the west; the centerline of Irvington Avenue to the south; the centerline of Olive Avenue to the east; the north line of Tract No. 16457 to the north. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1043 Zone 2. The improvements to be maintained includes 46,495 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) along portions of the north side of Irvington Avenue; The east side of Mount Carmela Lane, the west side of Olive Avenue, the west side of Eagles Glen Street, the north side of Muir Mountain Way, and the east and west sides of Mt. McKinley Way, all within the boundaries of Tract No. 16457. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). All of the streets within Zone 2 are classified as local streets and represents 100% of the total area to be maintained and 100% of the total cost of maintenance is deemed to be special benefit and will be assessed to Zone 2. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $501.64 per unit.        Packet Page. 342 16. MAD No. 1043 Zone 2 Page | 31 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 343 17. MAD No. 1045 Page | 32 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1045 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1045 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The westerly line of Waterman Avenue on the west; and the northerly, easterly, and southerly boundary of Tract No. 17972 on the north, east and south respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1045. The improvements to be maintained include 30,899 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree) along portions of the easterly side of Waterman Avenue and the median in Waterman Avenue adjacent to Tract No. 17972. The maintenance of 2,684 sq. ft. of hardscape areas, monument signs and appurtenant lighting. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the area of each parcel or lot that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. The benefit received by each lot or parcel is proportional to the area of each lot or parcel in relation to the total area within the District boundaries. Since the development for this area is commercial use, assessment units are assigned to each lot or parcel based on the number of single family residential units that could be built if the area were developed for residential use, based on the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet as set forth in the City’s General Plan. Thus, each lot or parcel area (in square feet) is divided by 7,200 to determine its assigned assessment unit or portion thereof. (7,200 Square Feet = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, this portion of Waterman Avenue is designated as a major arterial street, thus 15% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Waterman Avenue, and the center median on Waterman Avenue adjacent to site, is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments.        Packet Page. 344 17. MAD No. 1045 Page | 33 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $11,805.16 Assessment Units 134.72 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $87.63 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $87.63 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 345 18. MAD No. 1046 Page | 34 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1046 was formed in 2006 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1046 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Northpark Boulevard on the north and the westerly and the easterly lines of Tract No. 16865. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1046. The improvements to be maintained include 9,560 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree) along portions of the south side of Northpark Boulevard and along portions of Northstar Avenue within the westerly slopes of Lots 15 and 19, all within Tract No. 16865. The District will apportion the annual costs of the maintenance of the authorized improvements and the administration of the District to each property according to the special benefit to be conferred on each such property by such improvements. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Northpark Boulevard is designated as a major arterial street and represent 26% of the total maintenance area; thus 15% of 26% of the total costs of maintenance and is deemed to be of general benefit, and not assessable to the District. Northstar Boulevard is deemed to be a local street, thus 100% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along this portion of the District is deemed to be of special benefit and assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit of 3.90% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. No publicly owned lands are located within the boundaries of the Assessment District. All public streets and rights of way are exempt from assessments.        Packet Page. 346 18. MAD No. 1046 Page | 35 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $372.80 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 347 19. MAD No. 1047 Page | 36 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1047 was formed in 2006 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1047 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue to the south and the westerly, northerly and easterly lines of Tract No. 16547 to the west, north and east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1047. The improvements to be maintained includes 30,975 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 1 tree) along portions of the north side of Ohio Avenue east of Pine Avenue and landscaping, hardscape and local trail within a strip of land, being the San Gabriel Municipal Water District easement, along the northwesterly portion of Lots 1 through 5, all within Tract No’ 16547. A 10 foot wide thinning area along the westerly portion of said Water District easement will also be maintained under the Assessment District. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). This portion of Ohio Avenue is currently classified as a local street and 100% of the maintenance along this street is assessable to the District Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $1,123.43 per unit.        Packet Page. 348 19. MAD No. 1047 Page | 37 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 349 20. MAD No. 1048 Page | 38 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1048 was formed in 2006 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1048 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Eucalyptus Avenue, Randall Avenue, and westerly and northerly boundary lines of Tract No. 17273. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1048. The improvements to be maintained include 13,953 sq. ft. of parkway and slope landscaping (including one tree) along the west side of Eucalyptus Avenue and along the north side of Randall Avenue. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Eucalyptus Avenue is designated as a collector street and this portion of Randall Avenue is designated as a local street. Therefore, 77.4% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances fronting on Eucalyptus Avenue is deemed to be of special benefit (that is, 22.6% of the cost is deemed to be general benefit). All other landscaping is within easements or permit areas not located along any public street, thus 100% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances of said easements or permit areas is deemed to be special benefit and assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 1.13% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. It has been determined that the City of San Bernardino property will not receive any benefit from the maintenance under the Assessment District and will not be assessed.        Packet Page. 350 20. MAD No. 1048 Page | 39 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $8,532.15 Assessment Units 20 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $426.61 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $565.41 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 351 21 . MAD No. 104 9 Page | 40 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1049 was formed in 2006 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1049 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue on the south; the westerly boundary of Tract No. 14881 on the west; the northerly line of the drainage channel north of Tract No. 14881 on the north, and the centerline of Chestnut Avenue on the east. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1049. The improvements to be maintained include 7,788 sq. ft. of parkway and slope landscaping (including one tree) along the north side of Ohio Avenue and the west side of Chestnut Avenue, also including a drainage channel north of Tract No. 14881. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Ohio Avenue is designated as a collector street and this portion of Chestnut Avenue is designated as a local street. Therefore, 33.6% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances fronting on Chestnut Avenue is deemed to be of special benefit (that is, 66.4% of the cost is deemed to be general benefit). All other landscaping is within easements or permit areas not located along any public street, thus 100% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances of said easements or permit areas is deemed to be special benefit and assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 3.32% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. It has been determined that the City of San Bernardino property will not receive any benefit from the maintenance under the Assessment District and will not be assessed.        Packet Page. 352 21. MAD No. 1049 Page | 41 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $7,366.22 Assessment Units 15 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $491.08 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $491.08 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 353 22 . MAD No. 105 0 Page | 42 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1050 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1050 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Rialto Avenue on the north; the centerline of Pepper Avenue on the east; and the southerly and westerly lines of Tract No. 17076 on the south and west respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1050. The improvements to be maintained include 5,155 sq. ft of landscaping (including one tree) along portions of the westerly side of Pepper Avenue, along portions of the southerly side of Rialto Avenue west of Pepper Avenue, and the northerly side of Machala Place of Tract No. 17076. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Pepper Avenue and Rialto Avenue are designated as major arterial streets and this portion of Machala Place is designated as a local street. Thus 15% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Pepper and Rialto Avenues, is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned.        Packet Page. 354 22 . MAD No. 105 0 Page | 43 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $5,219.23 Assessment Units 14 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $372.80 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $415.12 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 355 23 . MAD No. 105 1 Page | 44 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1051 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1051 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Olive Avenue to the west and the northerly; easterly and southerly boundary lines of said Tract No. 17396 to the north, east and south respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1051. The improvements to be maintained include 690 sq. ft of landscaping (including one tree) along portions of the east side of Olive Avenue, and adjacent to Lots 13 and 14, all within Tract No. 17396. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). This portion of Olive Avenue is currently classified as a local street and 100% of the maintenance along this street is assessable to the District Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. There are no publicly owned parcels within the boundaries of the District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $0.00 Assessment Units 0 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $0.00 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $139.52 per unit. MAD No. 1051 was not levied in the current Fiscal Year or in any Prior Fiscal Years        Packet Page. 356 23 . MAD No. 105 1 Page | 45 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 357 24 . MAD No. 1052 Page | 46 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1052 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1052 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The center line of Ohio Avenue to the northeast; the northwesterly line of Tract No. 16795 to the northwest; the centerline of Belmont Avenue to the southwest; the southeasterly line of Lot “A” to the southeast, together with those certain landscape easements dedicated to the City of San Bernardino for landscaping maintenance purposes across the northwesterly 15 feet of Lots 26 through 33 of Tract No. 13603, adjoining Lot “A”. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1052. The improvements to be maintained include 32,519 sq. ft. of landscaping (including 132 trees) along portions of Belmont Avenue, westerly of vacated Chestnut Avenue; portions of vacated Chestnut Avenue, between Belmont Avenue and Ohio Avenue, including portions of Lot “AS” as shown on the map of Tract No. 16795; portions of Ohio Avenue, westerly of vacated Chestnut Avenue; and portions of Ofelia Drive southwesterly of Landon Drive. 21,313 sq. ft. of Walking/Equestrian trails and appurtenances located within vacated Chestnut Avenue and Lot “A” referenced above, between Belmont Avenue and Ohio Avenue. Equestrian trail (width varies with an average of 15 feet in width) is decomposed granite; walking/bicycle trail (width varies with an average of 10 feet in width) is asphalt-concrete. Trails are separated by 1,350 linear feet of rail vinyl fence and appurtenances. One monument entry sign, tubular fencing and hardscape including concrete bollards, pilasters, landscaping walls and all appurtenances. Portions of the landscaping along the southeasterly line of the trail system are proposed to be within easements across Lots 26 through 33 of Tract No. 13603. In the event that easements are not obtained across any or all of these lots in the future, those areas will be excluded from maintenance under the District, and maintenance costs will be reduced accordingly. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit).        Packet Page. 358 24 . MAD No. 1052 Page | 47 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Belmont Avenue and Ohio Avenue are classified as collector streets within which maintenance is proposed. Although the trail system and appurtenant landscaping and hardscaping is part of a regional trail system, there is a proportional special benefit to the adjacent tract due to its proximity and immediate access. However, it is deemed to have the same general benefit characteristics as a secondary arterial street. Ofelia Drive is classified as a local street. The landscape maintenance areas within Belmont Avenue and Ohio Avenue represent 12% of the total maintenance areas within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 5% of costs of maintenance for these areas (i.e. 5% of 12% of total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. The Trail system and appurtenant landscaping and hardscaping represents 86% of the total maintenance areas within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 10% of costs of maintenance for these areas (i.e. 10% of 86% of total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. Landscaping within Ofelia Drive represents 2% of the total maintenance area in the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, all of this area is assessable to the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10% and 5%). The result is the General Benefit of 9.2% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The only publicly owned parcel is Lot “A”, which is owned by the City of San Bernardino and contains portions of the trail system and appurtenant landscaping and hardscaping. Since this parcel is not developable, it receives no benefit and thus will not be assessed. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $554.91 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 359 25 . MAD No. 1054 Page | 48 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1054 was formed in 2006 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1054 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Campus Parkway on the south; the northerly and westerly line of Tract No. 17699 on the north and west respectively; together with City owned parcel, identified as Assessors Parcel Number 0151-311-05 to the northeast of the Tract. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1054. The improvements to be maintained include 26,583 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree) and 1,682 sq. ft. of hardscape areas (including monument signs and appurtenant lighting) along portions of the northerly side of Campus Parkway; portions of the open space located along the southwesterly side of Tract No. 17699, and portions of the Water Department property northeasterly of the Tract. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Campus Parkway is designated as a secondary arterial street and represents 94% of the total maintenance area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 10% of the costs of maintenance this area (i.e. 10% of 94% of total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. All other landscaping is within easements. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10%). The result is the General Benefit of 9.40% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The San Bernardino City owned property (APN 0151-311-05) and the common area parcel (APN 0151-411-23) receive no benefit from the landscaping and hardscape maintenance. Thus, these properties are not assessable to the District.        Packet Page. 360 25 . MAD No. 1054 Page | 49 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $10,117.59 Assessment Units 22 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $459.89 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $606.28 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 361 26 . MAD No. 1055 Page | 50 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1055 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1055 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Reports and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue to the north, the centerline of Belmont Avenue to the south, the centerline of Pine Avenue to the west and the easterly boundaries of Tract No. 17716 to the east, together with Lot A-A of Tract No. 13036, which contains the sewer lift station. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1055. The improvements to be maintained include 120,680 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree) within portions of Lot A and Lot B of Tract No. 17716 and within property leased by the City on behalf of the Assessment District. Lots A and B of Tract No. 17716 are encumbered by an easement to San Gabriel Municipal Water District, which does not adversely affect the City’s ability to carry out landscape maintenance operations. San Gabriel Valley Water District has given their written consent to carry out the maintenance of landscaping across these lots. The 60 foot strip of land adjacent to and westerly of Lots A and B are owned in fee by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (“MWD”). MWD has agreed to lease the property to the City for the purpose of landscape maintenance. The initial lease rate was $2,325 per year and subjected to an increase every two years based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), but not to exceed 5%. In the event of a reduction in the CPI, the lease rate shall not be less than the initial rate stated herein. In the event the lease is terminated by MWD, no further maintenance will be carried out by the Assessment District within MWD’s property and future assessments will be adjusted accordingly. The pro rata share of maintenance cost for an existing sewer lift station located at the corner of Christine Street and Christopher Street, which will also serve the 39 parcels within this tract. The maintenance costs of the lift station are currently being paid for by an existing Assessment District consisting of 335 parcels that is being served adjacent to this tract. The rate to be paid by the additional 39 parcels will be proportional to the total number of parcels being served by the lift station, Thus the District will pay 39/374ths, or 10.43%, of the total costs of maintenance, which will then be spread across the 39 parcels. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit).        Packet Page. 362 26 . MAD No. 1055 Page | 51 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, Pine Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial street. The landscape maintenance area along Pine Avenue is 100% of the total landscape maintenance area within the District. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 10% of total costs of maintenance will not be assessed to the District. This general benefit portion of these costs will need to be funded from the City’s General Fund or other non-district source of funding. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The various publicly owned lands within the District, including City owned lots and property owned by MWD will not be assessed (APN 0261-731-40-00, APN 0261-731-41-00 and APN 0261-731-42-00), since these parcels will not be developed and thus receive no benefit from the maintenance. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $1,206.03 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 363 27 . MAD No. 1056 Page | 52 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1056 was formed in 2018 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1056 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Ohio Avenue on the south; the westerly boundary of Tentative Tract No. 16502 on the west; the centerline of Verdemont Drive on the north, and the centerline of Magnolia Avenue on the east, in perpetuity; together with the temporary fuel modification easement area granted to the City of San Bernardino in Document No. 2007- 0443229, recorded 7/30/2007 in Official Records of the County of San Bernardino, until such time that the said easement has been extinguished. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1056. The improvements to be maintained include 18,212 sq. ft. of landscaping (including 79 trees) within slopes along portions of the northerly side of Ohio Avenue, landscaping within slopes along portions of the westerly side of Magnolia Avenue and landscaping within a 23,113 sq. ft. detention basin situated on lots “A” and “B”, all within Tract No. 16502, as well as a 150’ wide temporary fuel modification area located outside of Tract 16502 along the northwesterly boundary of Tract No. 16502. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Vacant lots will be assessed a prorated share of the cost of maintenance equivalent to the number of residential lots that could be built, based on the minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet as set forth in the City’s General Plan for Residential Low Zone. Thus, each vacant lot or parcel area (in square feet) is divided by 10,800 to determine its assigned assessment unit or portion thereof. (10,800 Square Feet = 1 Assessment Unit)        Packet Page. 364 27 . MAD No. 1056 Page | 53 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, the portions of Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue are designated as collector streets. Thus 5% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, are deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the lots with the Assessment District. The landscape maintenance areas within Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue represent 44% of the total maintenance areas within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 5% of costs of maintenance for these areas (i.e. 5% of 44% of total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%). The result is the General Benefit of 2.20% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $607.12 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 365 28 . MAD No. 1057 Page | 54 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1057 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1057 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The northeasterly line of the B.N.S.F. Railroad on the southwest, the centerline of University Parkway on the northwest and the northeasterly and southeasterly lines of Parcel Map No. 17375 on the northeast and southeast respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1057. The improvements to be maintained include the 102,810 sq. ft. detention basin along the southeasterly side of Parcel Map No. 17375, also known as Lot “D”. Maintenance in the detention basin will consist of periodic cutting of native vegetation and removal of debris and silt as needed. The 85,451 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 61 trees) within slopes along portions on the easterly and westerly sides of University Parkway. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the area of lots or parcels that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. The benefit received by each lot or parcel is proportional to the area of each lot or parcel in relation to the total area within the District boundaries. Since the development for this area is commercial use, assessment units are assigned to each lot or parcel based on the number of single family residential units that could be built if the area were developed for residential use, based on the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet as set forth in the City’s General Plan. Thus, each lot or parcel area (in square feet) is divided by 7,200 to determine its assigned assessment unit or portion thereof. (7,200 Square Feet = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, this portion of University Parkway is designated as a major arterial street. Thus, 15% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along University Parkway, is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the parcels within the Assessment District. The landscape maintenance area within University Parkway represent 45.39% of the total maintenance area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of costs of maintenance for this area (i.e. 5% of 45.39% of total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit of 6.81% needed for the District.        Packet Page. 366 28 . MAD No. 1057 Page | 55 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Detention Basin (APN 0148-011-70) receives no benefit from the maintenance thus is not assessable to the District. The City of San Bernardino right of way (APN 0148-011-61) receives no benefit therefore exempt from assessment. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $130.00 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 367 29 . MAD No. 1059 Page | 56 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1059 was formed in 2008 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1059 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: Orange Show Road, Tippecanoe Avenue, and the northerly, westerly, and southerly boundary lines of Parcel Map No.17132. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1059. The improvements to be maintained include 7,073 sq. ft. of median landscaping within Orange Show Road adjacent to the development. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). The parcels of land within the District are all zoned commercial. To determine the number of equivalent residential Assessment Units per commercial parcel, the square footage of each such parcel is divided by 7,200 square feet. Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Orange Show Road is designated as a major arterial street. Thus 100% of the landscaping maintenance and appurtenances in the Orange Show Road median fronting Parcel Map No. 17132 is deemed to be Area of General Benefit, and there is no other landscaping maintenance assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit of 15% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. It has been determined that the City of San Bernardino property will not receive any benefit from the maintenance under the Assessment District and will not be assessed.        Packet Page. 368 29 . MAD No. 1059 Page | 57 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $2,203.68 Assessment Units 137.73 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $16.00 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $34.79 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 369 30. MAD No. 1060 Page | 58 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1060 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1060 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Date Street on the south; the centerline of Chiquita Lane on the west; and the northerly and easterly lines of Tract No. 17576 on the north and west respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1060. The improvements to be maintained include 6,747 sq. ft. of landscaping and one tree along portions of the easterly side of Chiquita Lane north of Date Street, within the right of way adjacent to Tract No. 17576. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind, and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single-family lot, condominium, or an apartment will be assessed equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or unit = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation element of its General Plan, this portion of Chiquita Lane is designated as a local street. Thus 100% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Chiquita Lane, is deemed to be special benefit and assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Presently, no parcels within the District are publicly owned. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $1,145.97 per unit.        Packet Page. 370 30. MAD No. 1060 Page | 59 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 371 31. MAD No. 1063 Page | 60 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1063 was formed in 2007 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1063 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Valley View Road on the west, the centerline of Central Avenue on the north, the centerline of Clevenger Road on the east, the centerline of Norman Road on the south, ant the southerly and westerly boundary of Parcel Map 17721. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1063. The improvements to be maintained include 160,173 sq. ft. of landscaping and 262 trees along portions of the easterly side of Lena Road, the southerly side of Central Avenue, the westerly side of Clevenger Road, and portions of the northerly side of Norman Road, all within Parcel Map 17721 boundaries. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. The benefit received by each lot or parcel is proportional to the area of each lot or parcel in relation to the total area within the District boundaries. Since the development for this area is commercial use, assessment units are assigned to each lot or parcel based on the number of single family residential units that could be built if the area were developed for residential use, based on the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet as set forth in the City’s General Plan. Thus, each lot or parcel area (in square feet) is divided by 7,200 to determine its assigned assessment unit or portion thereof. (7,200 Square Feet = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, these portions of Central Avenue and Lena Road are designated as a secondary arterial street, thus 10% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Central Avenue and Lena Road, is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. These portions of Clevenger Drive and Norman Road are both designated as local streets based on the current circulation element. The landscape maintenance areas within Central Avenue and Lena Road represent 22% of the total maintenance areas within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 10% of costs of maintenance for these areas (i.e. 10% of 22% of total maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District.        Packet Page. 372 31. MAD No. 1063 Page | 61 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (10%). The result is the General Benefit of 2.2% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $226.55 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 373 32 . MAD No. 1064 Page | 62 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1064 was formed in 2008 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1064 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Cajon Boulevard on the northeast, the B.N.S.F. Railroad on the southwest, the northwest line of Parcel 1 and the southeast line of Parcel 2 on the northwest and southeast respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1068. The improvements to be maintained include 304,508 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 455 trees) within slopes along portions of the southerly side of Cajon Boulevard, southeasterly of Glen Helen Parkway. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the area of each lot or parcel that utilizes the landscaped areas either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. The benefit received by each lot or parcel is proportional to the area of each lot or parcel in relation to the total area within the District boundaries. Since the development for this area is commercial use, assessment units are assigned to each lot or parcel based on the number of single family residential units that could be built if the area were developed for residential use, based on the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet as set forth in the City’s General Plan. Thus, each lot or parcel area (in square feet) is divided by 7,200 to determine its assigned assessment unit or portion thereof. (7,200 Square Feet = 1 Assessment Unit). Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, this portion of Cajon Boulevard is designated as a major arterial street. Thus 15% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Cajon Boulevard, is deemed to be of general benefit and not assessable to the parcels within the Assessment District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15%). The result is the General Benefit needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments.        Packet Page. 374 32 . MAD No. 1064 Page | 63 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. Total Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget $46,434.13 Assessment Units 749.88 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Collectible per Unit $61.92 The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $204.29 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance; it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 375 33 . MAD No. 1068 Page | 64 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background Maintenance Assessment District No. 1068 was formed in 2012 to fund the maintenance of various improvements and services within the boundaries of the District. Description of District Boundaries The boundaries of MAD No. 1068 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Tippecanoe Avenue on the west, and the northerly, easterly, and southerly boundary lines of Parcel Map No. 17887 on the north, east and south respectively. Description of Improvements and Services This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1068. The improvements to be maintained include 37,981 sq. ft. of landscaping and all appurtenances (including 164 trees) along portions of the north and south side of Central Avenue; and, The detention basin and all appurtenances south of Central Avenue, located within Parcel 8 of Parcel Map No. 17887; and, Two catch basins located within Central Avenue east of the detention basin, the storm drain and all appurtenances connecting to the catch basins along the north side of Central Avenue, which travels west toward Tippecanoe Avenue and crosses south under Central Avenue and terminates at the detention basin; and, The storm drain and all appurtenances connecting to the detention basin and terminating at the Santa Ana River, all within the District boundaries. Estimate of Costs Please see Appendix C of this report for the MAD District Cost Summary that outlines the estimated cost of operating, maintaining, servicing and administering the improvements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 costs are also provided for comparison purposes. Method of Apportionment Pursuant to the Assessment Law, all parcels within the boundaries of the District that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel has been determined in relationship to the entire cost of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Only parcels that receive direct and special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. Landscaping and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the area is determined to be equal to the area of each lot or parcel that utilizes the landscaped area either as ingress and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the District are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance, which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. The benefit received by each lot or parcel is proportional to the area of each lot or parcel in relation to the total area within the District boundaries. Since the development for this area is commercial use, assessment units are assigned to each lot or parcel based on the number of single family residential units that could be built if the area were developed for residential use, based on the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet as set forth in the City’s General Plan. Thus, each lot or parcel area (in square feet) is divided by 7,200 to determine its assigned assessment unit or portion thereof. (7,200 Square Feet = 1 Assessment Unit).        Packet Page. 376 33 . MAD No. 1068 Page | 65 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Based on the City of San Bernardino’s current circulation of its General Plan, this portion of Tippecanoe Avenue is designated as a major arterial street, and this portion of Central Avenue is designated as a secondary arterial street. Thus, 15% of the cost of landscaping maintenance and appurtenances along Tippecanoe Avenue and 10% of the cost of Landscaping Maintenance and appurtenances along Central Avenue, is deemed to be of general of General Benefit and not assessable to the lots within the Assessment District. The landscape maintenance areas within Tippecanoe Avenue represent 13.2% of the total Landscaping Maintenance Area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of costs of maintenance for this area (i.e. 15% of 13.2% of total Landscaping Maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. The landscape maintenance areas within Central Avenue represent 86.8% of the total Landscaping Maintenance Area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 10% of costs of maintenance for this area (i.e. 10% of 86.8% of total Landscaping Maintenance costs) will not be assessed to the District. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the Area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The then percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (15% and 10%). The result is the General Benefit of 9.95% needed for the District. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The City of San Bernardino owned property (APN 0280-251-66) is used for drainage purposes and receives no benefit from the maintenance therefor is not assessable to the lots or parcels of the Assessment District. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Assessment Spread. The Maximum allowable Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $49.37 per unit. Due to the nature of landscape maintenance, it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.        Packet Page. 377 34 . Assessment Diagrams Page | 66 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagrams are filed herewith, are incorporated by reference in Appendix B herein, and made part of this Report. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment. Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of San Bernardino, and the San Bernardino County Assessor’s Office.        Packet Page. 378 35 . Assessment Rolls Page | 67 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The actual amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.        Packet Page. 379 Appendix A: Assessment Rolls        Packet Page. 380 CC30 SP90 - AD 1028 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-581-01 $182.36 0261-581-02 $182.36 0261-581-03 $182.36 0261-581-04 $182.36 0261-581-05 $182.36 0261-581-06 $182.36 0261-581-07 $182.36 0261-581-08 $182.36 0261-581-09 $182.36 0261-581-10 $182.36 0261-581-11 $182.36 0261-581-12 $182.36 0261-581-13 $182.36 0261-581-14 $182.36 0261-581-15 $182.36 0261-581-16 $182.36 0261-581-17 $182.36 0261-581-18 $182.36 0261-581-19 $182.36 0261-581-20 $182.36 0261-581-21 $182.36 0261-581-22 $182.36 0261-581-23 $182.36 0261-581-24 $182.36 0261-581-25 $182.36 0261-581-26 $182.36 0261-581-27 $182.36 0261-581-28 $182.36 0261-581-29 $182.36 0261-581-30 $182.36 0261-581-31 $182.36 0261-581-32 $182.36 0261-581-33 $182.36 0261-581-34 $182.36 0261-581-35 $182.36 0261-581-36 $182.36 0261-581-37 $182.36 0261-581-38 $182.36 0261-581-39 $182.36 0261-581-40 $182.36 0261-581-41 $182.36 0261-581-42 $182.36 0261-581-43 $182.36 0261-581-44 $182.36 0261-581-45 $182.36 0261-581-46 $182.36 0261-581-47 $182.36 0261-581-48 $182.36 0261-581-49 $182.36 0261-581-50 $182.36 0261-581-51 $182.36 0261-581-52 $182.36 0261-581-53 $182.36 0261-581-54 $182.36 0261-581-55 $182.36 0261-581-56 $182.36 0261-581-57 $182.36 0261-581-58 $182.36 0261-581-59 $182.36 0261-581-60 $182.36 0261-581-61 $182.36 0261-581-62 $182.36 0261-581-63 $182.36 0261-581-64 $182.36 0261-581-65 $182.36 0261-581-66 $182.36 0261-581-67 $182.36 0261-581-68 $182.36 0261-581-69 $182.36 0261-581-70 $182.36 0261-581-71 $182.36 0261-581-72 $182.36 0261-581-73 $182.36 0261-581-74 $182.36 0261-581-75 $182.36 0261-581-76 $182.36 Totals Parcels 76 Levy $13,859.36 Page 1 of 33        Packet Page. 381 CC30 SP91 - AD 1029 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0269-371-43 $188.66 0269-371-44 $188.66 0269-371-45 $188.66 0269-371-46 $188.66 0269-371-47 $188.66 0269-371-48 $188.66 0269-371-49 $188.66 0269-371-50 $188.66 0269-371-51 $188.66 0269-371-52 $188.66 0269-371-53 $188.66 0269-371-54 $188.66 0269-371-55 $188.66 0269-371-56 $188.66 0269-371-57 $188.66 0269-371-58 $188.66 0269-371-59 $188.66 0269-371-60 $188.66 0269-371-61 $188.66 0269-371-62 $188.66 0269-371-63 $188.66 0269-371-64 $188.66 0269-371-65 $188.66 0269-371-66 $188.66 0269-371-67 $188.66 0269-371-68 $188.66 0269-371-69 $188.66 0269-371-70 $188.66 0269-371-71 $188.66 0269-371-72 $188.66 0269-371-73 $188.66 0269-371-74 $188.66 0269-371-75 $188.66 0269-371-76 $188.66 0269-371-77 $188.66 0269-371-78 $188.66 0269-371-79 $188.66 0269-371-80 $188.66 Totals Page 2 of 33        Packet Page. 382 CC30 SP93 - AD 1030 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-611-01 $173.62 0261-611-02 $173.62 0261-611-03 $173.62 0261-611-04 $173.62 0261-611-05 $173.62 0261-611-06 $173.62 0261-611-07 $173.62 0261-611-08 $173.62 0261-611-09 $173.62 0261-611-10 $173.62 0261-611-11 $173.62 0261-611-12 $173.62 0261-611-13 $173.62 0261-611-14 $173.62 0261-611-15 $173.62 0261-611-16 $173.62 0261-611-17 $173.62 0261-611-18 $173.62 0261-611-19 $173.62 0261-611-20 $173.62 0261-611-21 $173.62 0261-611-22 $173.62 0261-611-23 $173.62 0261-611-24 $173.62 0261-611-25 $173.62 0261-611-26 $173.62 0261-611-27 $173.62 0261-611-28 $173.62 0261-611-29 $173.62 0261-611-30 $173.62 0261-611-31 $173.62 0261-611-32 $173.62 0261-611-33 $173.62 0261-611-34 $173.62 0261-611-35 $173.62 0261-611-36 $173.62 0261-611-37 $173.62 0261-611-38 $173.62 0261-611-39 $173.62 0261-611-40 $173.62 0261-611-41 $173.62 0261-611-42 $173.62 0261-611-43 $173.62 0261-611-44 $173.62 0261-611-45 $173.62 0261-611-46 $173.62 0261-611-47 $173.62 Totals Page 3 of 33        Packet Page. 383 CC30 SP92 - AD 1031 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-591-01 $267.82 0261-591-02 $267.82 0261-591-03 $267.82 0261-591-04 $267.82 0261-591-05 $267.82 0261-591-06 $267.82 0261-591-07 $267.82 0261-591-08 $267.82 0261-591-09 $267.82 0261-591-10 $267.82 0261-591-11 $267.82 0261-591-12 $267.82 0261-591-13 $267.82 0261-591-14 $267.82 0261-591-15 $267.82 0261-591-16 $267.82 0261-591-17 $267.82 0261-591-18 $267.82 0261-591-19 $267.82 0261-591-20 $267.82 0261-591-21 $267.82 0261-591-22 $267.82 0261-591-23 $267.82 0261-591-24 $267.82 0261-591-25 $267.82 0261-591-26 $267.82 0261-591-27 $267.82 0261-591-28 $267.82 0261-591-29 $267.82 0261-591-30 $267.82 0261-591-31 $267.82 0261-591-32 $267.82 0261-591-33 $267.82 0261-591-34 $267.82 0261-591-35 $267.82 0261-591-36 $267.82 0261-591-37 $267.82 0261-591-38 $267.82 0261-591-39 $267.82 0261-591-40 $267.82 0261-591-41 $267.82 0261-591-42 $267.82 0261-591-43 $267.82 0261-591-44 $267.82 0261-591-45 $267.82 0261-591-46 $267.82 0261-591-47 $267.82 0261-591-48 $267.82 0261-591-49 $267.82 0261-591-50 $267.82 0261-591-51 $267.82 0261-591-52 $267.82 0261-591-53 $267.82 0261-591-54 $267.82 0261-591-55 $267.82 0261-591-56 $267.82 0261-591-57 $267.82 0261-591-58 $267.82 0261-591-59 $267.82 0261-591-60 $267.82 0261-591-61 $267.82 0261-591-62 $267.82 0261-591-63 $267.82 0261-591-64 $267.82 0261-591-65 $267.82 0261-591-66 $267.82 0261-591-67 $267.82 0261-591-68 $267.82 0261-591-69 $267.82 0261-591-70 $267.82 0261-591-71 $267.82 0261-601-01 $267.82 0261-601-02 $267.82 0261-601-03 $267.82 0261-601-04 $267.82 0261-601-05 $267.82 0261-601-06 $267.82 0261-601-07 $267.82 0261-601-08 $267.82 0261-601-09 $267.82 0261-601-10 $267.82 0261-601-11 $267.82 0261-601-12 $267.82 0261-601-13 $267.82 0261-601-14 $267.82 0261-601-15 $267.82 0261-601-16 $267.82 0261-601-17 $267.82 0261-601-18 $267.82 0261-601-19 $267.82 0261-601-20 $267.82 0261-601-21 $267.82 0261-601-22 $267.82 0261-601-23 $267.82 0261-601-24 $267.82 0261-601-25 $267.82 0261-601-26 $267.82 0261-601-27 $267.82 0261-601-28 $267.82 0261-601-29 $267.82 0261-601-30 $267.82 0261-601-31 $267.82 0261-601-32 $267.82 0261-601-33 $267.82 0261-601-34 $267.82 0261-601-35 $267.82 0261-601-36 $267.82 Totals Parcels 107 Levy $28,656.74 Page 4 of 33        Packet Page. 384 CC30 SP94 - AD 1032 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-621-01 $123.38 0261-621-02 $123.38 0261-621-03 $123.38 0261-621-04 $123.38 0261-621-05 $123.38 0261-621-07 $123.38 0261-621-08 $123.38 0261-621-09 $123.38 0261-621-10 $123.38 0261-621-11 $123.38 0261-621-12 $123.38 0261-621-13 $123.38 0261-621-14 $123.38 0261-621-15 $123.38 0261-621-16 $123.38 0261-621-17 $123.38 0261-621-18 $123.38 0261-621-19 $123.38 0261-621-20 $123.38 0261-621-21 $123.38 0261-621-22 $123.38 0261-621-23 $123.38 0261-621-24 $123.38 0261-621-25 $123.38 0261-621-26 $123.38 0261-621-27 $123.38 0261-621-28 $123.38 0261-621-29 $123.38 0261-621-30 $123.38 0261-621-31 $123.38 0261-621-32 $123.38 0261-621-33 $123.38 0261-621-34 $123.38 0261-621-35 $123.38 0261-621-36 $123.38 0261-621-37 $123.38 0261-621-38 $123.38 0261-621-39 $123.38 0261-621-40 $123.38 0261-621-41 $123.38 0261-621-42 $123.38 0261-621-43 $123.38 0261-621-44 $123.38 0261-621-45 $123.38 0261-621-46 $123.38 0261-621-47 $123.38 0261-621-48 $123.38 0261-621-49 $123.38 0261-621-50 $123.38 0261-621-51 $123.38 0261-621-52 $123.38 0261-621-53 $123.38 0261-621-54 $123.38 0261-621-55 $123.38 0261-621-56 $123.38 0261-621-58 $123.38 0261-631-01 $123.38 0261-631-02 $123.38 0261-631-03 $123.38 0261-631-04 $123.38 0261-631-05 $123.38 0261-631-06 $123.38 0261-631-07 $123.38 0261-631-08 $123.38 0261-631-09 $123.38 Totals Parcels 65 Levy $8,019.70 Page 5 of 33        Packet Page. 385 CC30 SP95 - AD 1035 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-641-01 $464.12 0261-641-02 $464.12 0261-641-03 $464.12 0261-641-04 $464.12 0261-641-05 $464.12 0261-641-06 $464.12 0261-641-07 $464.12 0261-641-08 $464.12 0261-641-09 $464.12 0261-641-10 $464.12 0261-641-11 $464.12 0261-641-12 $464.12 0261-641-13 $464.12 0261-641-14 $464.12 0261-641-15 $464.12 0261-641-16 $464.12 0261-641-17 $464.12 0261-641-18 $464.12 0261-641-19 $464.12 0261-641-20 $464.12 0261-641-21 $464.12 0261-641-22 $464.12 0261-641-23 $464.12 0261-641-24 $464.12 0261-641-25 $464.12 0261-641-26 $464.12 0261-641-27 $464.12 0261-641-28 $464.12 0261-641-29 $464.12 0261-641-30 $464.12 Totals Parcels 30 Levy $13,923.60 Page 6 of 33        Packet Page. 386 CC30 SP96 - AD 1035 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-541-17 $160.30 0261-541-18 $160.30 0261-541-19 $160.30 0261-541-20 $160.30 0261-541-21 $160.30 0261-541-22 $160.30 0261-541-23 $160.30 0261-541-24 $160.30 0261-541-25 $160.30 0261-541-26 $160.30 0261-541-27 $160.30 0261-541-28 $160.30 0261-541-29 $160.30 Totals Page 7 of 33        Packet Page. 387 CC30 SP97 - AD 1036 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0151-321-01 $749.76 0151-321-02 $749.76 0151-321-03 $749.76 0151-321-04 $749.76 0151-321-05 $749.76 0151-321-06 $749.76 0151-321-07 $749.76 0151-321-08 $749.76 0151-321-09 $749.76 0151-321-10 $749.76 0151-321-11 $749.76 0151-321-12 $749.76 0151-321-13 $749.76 0151-321-14 $749.76 0151-321-15 $749.76 0151-321-16 $749.76 0151-321-17 $749.76 0151-321-18 $749.76 0151-321-21 $749.76 0151-321-22 $749.76 0151-321-23 $749.76 0151-321-24 $749.76 0151-321-25 $749.76 0151-321-26 $749.76 0151-321-27 $749.76 0151-321-28 $749.76 0151-321-29 $749.76 0151-321-30 $749.76 0151-321-31 $749.76 0151-321-32 $749.76 0151-321-33 $749.76 0151-321-34 $749.76 0151-321-35 $749.76 0151-321-36 $749.76 0151-331-01 $749.76 0151-331-02 $749.76 0151-331-03 $749.76 0151-331-04 $749.76 0151-331-05 $749.76 0151-331-06 $749.76 0151-331-07 $749.76 0151-331-08 $749.76 0151-331-09 $749.76 0151-331-10 $749.76 0151-331-11 $749.76 0151-331-12 $749.76 0151-331-13 $749.76 0151-341-01 $749.76 0151-341-02 $749.76 0151-341-03 $749.76 0151-341-04 $749.76 0151-341-05 $749.76 0151-341-06 $749.76 0151-341-07 $749.76 0151-341-08 $749.76 0151-341-09 $749.76 0151-341-10 $749.76 0151-341-11 $749.76 0151-341-12 $749.76 0151-342-01 $749.76 0151-342-02 $749.76 0151-342-03 $749.76 0151-342-04 $749.76 0151-342-05 $749.76 0151-342-06 $749.76 0151-342-07 $749.76 0151-342-08 $749.76 0151-342-09 $749.76 0151-342-10 $749.76 0151-342-11 $749.76 0151-342-12 $749.76 0151-342-13 $749.76 0151-342-14 $749.76 0151-342-15 $749.76 0151-342-24 $749.76 0151-342-25 $749.76 0151-342-26 $749.76 0151-342-27 $749.76 0151-342-29 $749.76 0151-342-30 $749.76 0151-342-31 $749.76 0151-342-32 $749.76 0151-342-33 $749.76 0151-342-34 $749.76 0151-342-35 $749.76 0151-342-36 $749.76 0151-342-37 $749.76 0151-342-38 $749.76 0151-342-39 $749.76 0151-342-40 $749.76 0151-342-41 $749.76 0151-342-42 $749.76 0151-342-43 $749.76 0151-342-44 $749.76 0151-342-45 $749.76 0151-342-46 $749.76 0151-342-47 $749.76 0151-342-48 $749.76 0151-342-49 $749.76 0151-342-50 $749.76 0151-342-51 $749.76 0151-351-01 $749.76 0151-351-02 $749.76 0151-351-03 $749.76 0151-351-04 $749.76 0151-351-05 $749.76 0151-351-06 $749.76 0151-351-07 $749.76 0151-351-08 $749.76 0151-351-09 $749.76 0151-351-10 $749.76 0151-351-11 $749.76 0151-351-12 $749.76 0151-351-13 $749.76 0151-351-14 $749.76 0151-352-01 $749.76 0151-352-02 $749.76 0151-361-01 $749.76 0151-361-02 $749.76 0151-361-03 $749.76 0151-361-04 $749.76 0151-361-05 $749.76 0151-361-06 $749.76 0151-361-07 $749.76 0151-361-08 $749.76 0151-361-09 $749.76 0151-361-10 $749.76 0151-361-11 $749.76 0151-361-12 $749.76 0151-361-13 $749.76 0151-361-14 $749.76 0151-361-15 $749.76 0151-361-29 $749.76 0151-361-30 $749.76 0151-361-31 $749.76 0151-361-32 $749.76 0151-361-33 $749.76 0151-361-34 $749.76 0151-361-35 $749.76 0151-361-42 $4,498.66 0151-361-43 $49,485.32 Assessment Roll Page 8 of 33        Packet Page. 388 CC30 SP97 - AD 1036 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy Assessment Roll 0151-361-44 $14,245.76 0151-361-45 $749.76 0151-361-46 $749.76 0151-361-47 $749.76 0151-361-48 $749.76 0151-361-49 $749.76 0151-361-50 $749.76 0151-361-51 $749.76 0151-361-52 $749.76 0151-361-53 $749.76 0151-361-54 $749.76 0151-361-55 $749.76 0151-361-56 $749.76 0151-361-57 $749.76 0151-361-58 $749.76 0151-361-59 $749.76 0151-361-60 $749.76 0151-361-61 $749.76 0151-361-62 $749.76 0151-361-63 $749.76 0151-361-64 $749.76 0151-361-65 $749.76 0151-361-66 $749.76 0151-361-67 $749.76 0151-361-68 $749.76 0151-361-69 $749.76 0151-361-70 $749.76 0151-361-71 $749.76 0151-361-72 $749.76 0151-361-73 $749.76 0151-361-74 $749.76 0151-361-75 $749.76 0151-361-76 $749.76 0151-361-77 $749.76 0151-361-78 $749.76 0151-361-79 $749.76 0151-361-80 $749.76 0151-372-01 $749.76 0151-372-02 $749.76 0151-372-03 $749.76 0151-372-04 $749.76 0151-372-05 $749.76 0151-372-06 $749.76 0151-372-07 $749.76 0151-372-08 $749.76 0151-372-09 $749.76 0151-372-10 $749.76 0151-372-11 $749.76 0151-372-12 $749.76 0151-372-13 $749.76 0151-372-14 $749.76 0151-372-15 $749.76 0151-372-16 $749.76 0151-372-17 $749.76 0151-372-18 $749.76 0151-372-25 $9,747.10 0151-372-27 $4,314.34 0151-372-28 $2,912.12 0151-382-01 $749.76 0151-382-02 $749.76 0151-382-03 $749.76 0151-382-04 $749.76 0151-382-05 $749.76 0151-382-06 $749.76 0151-382-07 $749.76 0151-382-08 $749.76 0151-382-09 $749.76 0151-382-10 $749.76 0151-382-11 $749.76 0151-382-12 $749.76 0151-382-13 $749.76 0151-382-14 $749.76 0151-382-15 $749.76 0151-382-16 $749.76 0151-382-17 $749.76 0151-382-18 $749.76 0151-382-19 $749.76 0151-392-01 $749.76 0151-392-02 $749.76 0151-392-03 $749.76 0151-392-04 $749.76 0151-392-05 $749.76 0151-392-06 $749.76 0151-392-07 $749.76 0151-392-08 $749.76 0151-402-01 $749.76 0151-402-02 $749.76 0151-411-01 $749.76 0151-411-02 $749.76 0151-411-03 $749.76 0151-411-04 $749.76 0151-411-05 $749.76 0151-411-06 $749.76 0151-411-07 $749.76 0151-411-08 $749.76 0151-411-09 $749.76 0151-411-10 $749.76 0151-411-11 $749.76 0151-411-12 $749.76 0151-411-13 $749.76 0151-411-14 $749.76 0151-411-15 $749.76 0151-411-16 $749.76 0151-411-17 $749.76 0151-411-18 $749.76 0151-411-19 $749.76 0151-411-20 $749.76 0151-411-21 $749.76 0151-411-22 $749.76 Totals Parcels 250 Levy $268,144.74 Page 9 of 33        Packet Page. 389 CC30 SP98 - AD 1037 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-651-01 $197.26 0261-651-02 $197.26 0261-651-03 $197.26 0261-651-04 $197.26 0261-651-05 $197.26 0261-651-06 $197.26 0261-651-07 $197.26 0261-651-08 $197.26 0261-651-09 $197.26 0261-651-10 $197.26 0261-651-11 $197.26 0261-651-12 $197.26 0261-651-13 $197.26 0261-651-14 $197.26 0261-651-15 $197.26 0261-651-16 $197.26 0261-651-17 $197.26 0261-651-18 $197.26 0261-651-19 $197.26 0261-651-20 $197.26 0261-651-21 $197.26 0261-651-22 $197.26 0261-651-23 $197.26 0261-651-24 $197.26 0261-651-25 $197.26 0261-651-26 $197.26 0261-651-27 $197.26 0261-651-28 $197.26 0261-651-29 $197.26 0261-651-30 $197.26 0261-651-31 $197.26 0261-651-32 $197.26 0261-651-33 $197.26 Totals Page 10 of 33        Packet Page. 390 CC30 SP99 - AD 1038 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0141-281-20 $295.90 0141-281-21 $278.84 0141-281-22 $301.80 0141-281-23 $349.06 0141-281-25 $550.48 0141-281-26 $404.82 0141-281-27 $291.32 0141-281-28 $183.70 0141-281-29 $274.90 0141-281-31 $82.00 0141-281-32 $82.00 0141-281-33 $82.00 0141-281-34 $82.00 0141-281-35 $82.00 0141-281-36 $82.00 0141-281-37 $82.00 0141-281-38 $82.00 0141-281-39 $82.00 0141-281-40 $82.00 0141-281-43 $241.44 0141-281-44 $253.92 0141-281-46 $68.22 0141-281-47 $68.22 0141-281-48 $68.22 0141-281-49 $68.22 0141-281-50 $68.22 0141-281-51 $68.22 0141-281-52 $68.22 0141-281-53 $68.22 0141-281-54 $68.22 0141-281-55 $68.22 0141-281-56 $68.22 0141-281-57 $68.22 0141-281-58 $68.22 0141-281-59 $68.22 0141-281-60 $68.22 Totals Parcels 36 Levy $5,269.48 Page 11 of 33        Packet Page. 391 CC30 SP10 - AD 1039 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-661-01 $132.98 0261-661-02 $132.98 0261-661-03 $132.98 0261-661-04 $132.98 0261-661-05 $132.98 0261-661-06 $132.98 0261-661-07 $132.98 0261-661-08 $132.98 0261-661-09 $132.98 0261-661-10 $132.98 0261-661-11 $132.98 0261-661-12 $132.98 0261-661-13 $132.98 0261-661-14 $132.98 0261-661-15 $132.98 0261-661-16 $132.98 0261-661-17 $132.98 0261-661-18 $132.98 0261-661-19 $132.98 0261-661-20 $132.98 0261-661-21 $132.98 0261-661-22 $132.98 0261-661-23 $132.98 0261-661-24 $132.98 0261-661-25 $132.98 0261-661-26 $132.98 0261-661-27 $132.98 0261-661-28 $132.98 0261-661-29 $132.98 0261-661-30 $132.98 0261-661-31 $132.98 0261-661-32 $132.98 0261-661-33 $132.98 0261-661-34 $132.98 0261-661-35 $132.98 0261-661-36 $132.98 0261-661-37 $132.98 0261-661-38 $132.98 0261-661-39 $132.98 0261-661-40 $132.98 0261-661-41 $132.98 0261-661-42 $132.98 0261-661-43 $132.98 0261-661-44 $132.98 0261-661-45 $132.98 0261-661-46 $132.98 0261-661-47 $132.98 0261-661-48 $132.98 0261-661-49 $132.98 0261-661-50 $132.98 0261-661-51 $132.98 0261-661-52 $132.98 0261-661-53 $132.98 0261-661-54 $132.98 0261-661-55 $132.98 0261-661-56 $132.98 0261-661-57 $132.98 0261-661-58 $132.98 0261-661-59 $132.98 0261-661-60 $132.98 0261-661-61 $132.98 0261-661-62 $132.98 0261-661-63 $132.98 0261-661-64 $132.98 0261-671-01 $132.98 0261-671-02 $132.98 0261-671-03 $132.98 0261-671-04 $132.98 0261-671-05 $132.98 0261-671-06 $132.98 0261-671-07 $132.98 0261-671-08 $132.98 0261-671-09 $132.98 0261-671-10 $132.98 0261-671-11 $132.98 0261-671-12 $132.98 0261-671-13 $132.98 0261-671-14 $132.98 0261-671-15 $132.98 0261-671-16 $132.98 0261-671-17 $132.98 0261-671-18 $132.98 0261-671-19 $132.98 0261-671-20 $132.98 0261-671-21 $132.98 0261-671-22 $132.98 0261-671-23 $132.98 0261-671-24 $132.98 0261-671-25 $132.98 0261-671-26 $132.98 0261-671-27 $132.98 0261-671-28 $132.98 0261-671-29 $132.98 0261-671-30 $132.98 0261-671-31 $132.98 0261-671-32 $132.98 0261-671-33 $132.98 0261-671-34 $132.98 0261-671-35 $132.98 0261-671-36 $132.98 0261-671-37 $132.98 0261-671-38 $132.98 0261-671-39 $132.98 0261-671-40 $132.98 0261-671-41 $132.98 0261-671-42 $132.98 0261-671-43 $132.98 0261-671-44 $132.98 0261-671-45 $132.98 0261-671-46 $132.98 0261-671-47 $132.98 0261-671-48 $132.98 0261-671-49 $132.98 0261-671-50 $132.98 0261-671-51 $132.98 0261-671-52 $132.98 0261-671-53 $132.98 0261-671-54 $132.98 0261-671-55 $132.98 0261-671-56 $132.98 0261-671-57 $132.98 0261-671-58 $132.98 0261-671-59 $132.98 0261-671-60 $132.98 0261-671-61 $132.98 0261-671-62 $132.98 0261-671-63 $132.98 Totals Page 12 of 33        Packet Page. 392 CC30 SP11 - AD 1040 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0270-241-01 $389.28 0270-241-02 $389.28 0270-241-03 $389.28 0270-241-04 $389.28 0270-241-05 $389.28 0270-241-06 $389.28 0270-241-07 $389.28 0270-241-08 $389.28 0270-241-09 $389.28 0270-241-10 $389.28 0270-241-11 $389.28 0270-241-12 $389.28 0270-241-13 $389.28 0270-241-14 $389.28 0270-241-15 $389.28 0270-241-16 $389.28 0270-241-17 $389.28 0270-241-18 $389.28 0270-241-19 $389.28 0270-241-20 $389.28 0270-241-21 $389.28 0270-251-03 $389.28 0270-251-04 $389.28 0270-251-05 $389.28 0270-251-06 $389.28 0270-251-07 $389.28 0270-251-08 $389.28 0270-251-09 $389.28 0270-251-10 $389.28 0270-251-11 $389.28 0270-251-12 $389.28 0270-251-13 $389.28 0270-251-14 $389.28 0270-251-15 $389.28 0270-251-16 $389.28 0270-251-17 $389.28 0270-251-18 $389.28 0270-251-19 $389.28 0270-251-20 $389.28 0270-251-21 $389.28 0270-251-22 $389.28 0270-251-23 $389.28 0270-251-24 $389.28 0270-251-25 $389.28 0270-251-26 $389.28 0270-251-27 $389.28 Totals Page 13 of 33        Packet Page. 393 CC30 SP44 - AD 1041 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-721-01 $791.78 0261-721-02 $791.78 0261-721-03 $791.78 0261-721-04 $791.78 0261-721-05 $791.78 0261-721-06 $791.78 0261-721-07 $791.78 0261-721-08 $791.78 0261-721-09 $791.78 0261-721-10 $791.78 0261-721-11 $791.78 0261-721-12 $791.78 0261-721-13 $791.78 0261-721-14 $791.78 0261-721-15 $791.78 0261-721-16 $791.78 0261-721-17 $791.78 Totals Page 14 of 33        Packet Page. 394 CC30 SP12 - AD 1042 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-791-01 $1,098.60 0266-791-02 $1,098.60 0266-791-03 $1,098.60 0266-791-04 $1,098.60 0266-791-05 $1,098.60 0266-791-06 $1,098.60 0266-791-07 $1,098.60 0266-791-08 $1,098.60 0266-791-09 $1,098.60 0266-791-10 $1,098.60 0266-791-11 $1,098.60 0266-791-12 $1,098.60 0266-791-13 $1,098.60 0266-791-14 $1,098.60 0266-791-15 $1,098.60 0266-791-16 $1,098.60 0266-791-17 $1,098.60 0266-801-01 $1,098.60 0266-801-02 $1,098.60 0266-801-03 $1,098.60 0266-801-04 $1,098.60 0266-801-05 $1,098.60 0266-801-06 $1,098.60 0266-801-07 $1,098.60 0266-801-08 $1,098.60 0266-801-09 $1,098.60 0266-801-10 $1,098.60 0266-801-11 $1,098.60 0266-801-12 $1,098.60 0266-801-13 $1,098.60 0266-801-14 $1,098.60 0266-801-15 $1,098.60 0266-801-16 $1,098.60 0266-801-17 $1,098.60 0266-801-18 $1,098.60 0266-801-19 $1,098.60 0266-801-20 $1,098.60 0266-801-21 $1,098.60 0266-801-22 $1,098.60 0266-801-23 $1,098.60 0266-801-24 $1,098.60 0266-801-25 $1,098.60 0266-801-26 $1,098.60 0266-801-27 $1,098.60 0266-801-28 $1,098.60 0266-801-29 $1,098.60 0266-801-30 $1,098.60 0266-801-31 $1,098.60 0266-801-32 $1,098.60 0266-801-33 $1,098.60 0266-801-34 $1,098.60 0266-801-35 $1,098.60 0266-801-36 $1,098.60 0266-801-37 $1,098.60 0266-801-38 $1,098.60 0266-801-39 $1,098.60 0266-801-40 $1,098.60 0266-801-41 $1,098.60 0266-801-42 $1,098.60 0266-801-43 $1,098.60 0266-801-44 $1,098.60 0266-811-01 $1,098.60 0266-811-02 $1,098.60 0266-811-03 $1,098.60 0266-811-04 $1,098.60 0266-811-05 $1,098.60 0266-811-06 $1,098.60 0266-811-07 $1,098.60 0266-811-08 $1,098.60 0266-811-09 $1,098.60 0266-811-10 $1,098.60 0266-811-11 $1,098.60 Totals Parcels 72 Levy $79,099.20 Assessment Roll Page 15 of 33        Packet Page. 395 CC30 SP26 - AD 1043 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-681-01 $215.20 0261-681-02 $215.20 0261-681-03 $215.20 0261-681-04 $215.20 0261-681-05 $215.20 0261-681-06 $215.20 0261-681-07 $215.20 0261-681-08 $215.20 0261-681-09 $215.20 0261-681-10 $215.20 0261-681-11 $215.20 0261-681-12 $215.20 0261-681-13 $215.20 0261-681-14 $215.20 0261-681-15 $215.20 0261-681-16 $215.20 0261-681-17 $215.20 0261-681-18 $215.20 0261-681-19 $215.20 0261-681-20 $215.20 0261-681-21 $215.20 0261-681-22 $215.20 0261-681-23 $215.20 0261-681-24 $215.20 0261-681-25 $215.20 0261-681-26 $215.20 0261-681-27 $215.20 0261-681-28 $215.20 0261-681-29 $215.20 0261-681-30 $215.20 0261-681-31 $215.20 0261-681-32 $215.20 0261-681-33 $215.20 0261-681-34 $215.20 0261-681-35 $215.20 0261-681-36 $215.20 0261-681-37 $215.20 0261-681-38 $215.20 0261-681-39 $215.20 0261-681-40 $215.20 0261-681-41 $215.20 Totals Parcels 41 Levy $8,823.20 Page 16 of 33        Packet Page. 396 CC30 SP27 - AD 1043 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-691-01 $352.80 0261-691-02 $352.80 0261-691-03 $352.80 0261-691-04 $352.80 0261-691-05 $352.80 0261-691-06 $352.80 0261-691-07 $352.80 0261-691-08 $352.80 0261-691-09 $352.80 0261-691-10 $352.80 0261-691-11 $352.80 0261-691-12 $352.80 0261-691-13 $352.80 0261-691-14 $352.80 0261-691-15 $352.80 0261-691-16 $352.80 0261-691-17 $352.80 0261-691-18 $352.80 0261-691-19 $352.80 0261-691-20 $352.80 0261-691-21 $352.80 0261-691-22 $352.80 0261-691-23 $352.80 0261-691-24 $352.80 0261-691-25 $352.80 0261-691-26 $352.80 0261-691-27 $352.80 0261-691-28 $352.80 0261-691-29 $352.80 0261-691-30 $352.80 0261-691-31 $352.80 0261-691-32 $352.80 0261-691-33 $352.80 0261-691-34 $352.80 0261-691-35 $352.80 0261-691-36 $352.80 0261-691-37 $352.80 0261-691-38 $352.80 0261-691-39 $352.80 0261-691-40 $352.80 0261-691-41 $352.80 0261-691-42 $352.80 0261-691-43 $352.80 0261-691-44 $352.80 0261-691-45 $352.80 0261-691-46 $352.80 0261-691-47 $352.80 Totals Parcels 47 Levy $16,581.60 Page 17 of 33        Packet Page. 397 CC30 SP51 - AD 1045 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0281-411-01 $1,149.66 0281-411-04 $561.68 0281-411-05 $800.02 0281-411-06 $182.26 0281-411-10 $1,319.66 0281-421-01 $630.04 0281-421-02 $556.42 0281-421-03 $937.60 0281-421-14 $3,822.30 0281-421-15 $374.16 0281-421-16 $466.16 0281-421-17 $471.42 0281-421-18 $533.64 Totals Page 18 of 33        Packet Page. 398 CC30 SP20 - AD 1046 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0266-503-50 $372.78 0266-503-51 $372.78 0266-503-52 $372.78 0266-503-53 $372.78 0266-503-54 $372.78 0266-503-55 $372.78 0266-503-56 $372.78 0266-503-57 $372.78 0266-503-58 $372.78 0266-503-59 $372.78 0266-503-60 $372.78 0266-503-61 $372.78 0266-503-62 $372.78 0266-503-63 $372.78 0266-503-64 $372.78 0266-503-65 $372.78 0266-503-66 $372.78 0266-503-67 $372.78 0266-503-68 $372.78 Totals Page 19 of 33        Packet Page. 399 CC30 SP52 - AD 1047 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-432-01 $948.70 0261-432-02 $948.70 0261-432-03 $948.70 0261-432-04 $948.70 0261-432-05 $948.70 0261-432-06 $948.70 0261-432-07 $948.70 0261-432-08 $948.70 Totals Page 20 of 33        Packet Page. 400 CC30 SP54 - AD 1048 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-014-01 $426.60 0142-014-02 $426.60 0142-014-03 $426.60 0142-014-04 $426.60 0142-014-05 $426.60 0142-014-06 $426.60 0142-014-07 $426.60 0142-014-10 $426.60 0142-014-11 $426.60 0142-014-14 $426.60 0142-014-15 $426.60 0142-014-16 $426.60 0142-014-17 $426.60 0142-014-18 $426.60 0142-014-19 $426.60 0142-014-20 $426.60 0142-014-21 $426.60 0142-014-22 $426.60 0142-014-23 $426.60 0142-014-24 $426.60 Totals Page 21 of 33        Packet Page. 401 CC30 SP55 - AD 1049 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-611-48 $491.08 0261-611-49 $491.08 0261-611-50 $491.08 0261-611-51 $491.08 0261-611-52 $491.08 0261-611-53 $491.08 0261-611-54 $491.08 0261-611-55 $491.08 0261-611-56 $491.08 0261-611-57 $491.08 0261-611-58 $491.08 0261-611-59 $491.08 0261-611-60 $491.08 0261-611-61 $491.08 0261-611-62 $491.08 Totals Parcels 15 Levy $7,366.20 Page 22 of 33        Packet Page. 402 CC30 SP56 - AD 1050 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0142-243-26 $372.80 0142-243-27 $372.80 0142-243-28 $372.80 0142-243-29 $372.80 0142-243-30 $372.80 0142-243-31 $372.80 0142-243-32 $372.80 0142-243-33 $372.80 0142-243-34 $372.80 0142-243-35 $372.80 0142-243-36 $372.80 0142-243-37 $372.80 0142-243-38 $372.80 0142-243-39 $372.80 Totals Page 23 of 33        Packet Page. 403 CC30 SP57 - AD 1052 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-701-01 $316.82 0261-701-02 $316.82 0261-701-03 $316.82 0261-701-04 $316.82 0261-701-05 $316.82 0261-701-06 $316.82 0261-701-07 $316.82 0261-701-08 $316.82 0261-701-09 $316.82 0261-701-10 $316.82 0261-701-11 $316.82 0261-701-12 $316.82 0261-701-13 $316.82 0261-701-14 $316.82 0261-701-15 $316.82 0261-701-16 $316.82 0261-701-17 $316.82 0261-701-18 $316.82 0261-701-19 $316.82 0261-701-20 $316.82 0261-701-21 $316.82 0261-701-22 $316.82 0261-701-23 $316.82 0261-701-24 $316.82 0261-701-25 $316.82 0261-701-26 $316.82 0261-701-27 $316.82 0261-701-28 $316.82 0261-701-29 $316.82 0261-711-01 $316.82 0261-711-02 $316.82 0261-711-03 $316.82 0261-711-04 $316.82 0261-711-05 $316.82 0261-711-06 $316.82 0261-711-07 $316.82 0261-711-08 $316.82 0261-711-09 $316.82 0261-711-10 $316.82 0261-711-11 $316.82 0261-711-12 $316.82 0261-711-13 $316.82 0261-711-14 $316.82 0261-711-15 $316.82 0261-711-16 $316.82 0261-711-17 $316.82 0261-711-18 $316.82 0261-711-19 $316.82 0261-711-20 $316.82 0261-711-21 $316.82 0261-711-22 $316.82 0261-711-23 $316.82 0261-711-24 $316.82 0261-711-25 $316.82 Totals Parcels 54 Levy $17,108.28 Page 24 of 33        Packet Page. 404 CC30 SP59 - AD 1054 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0151-411-01 $459.88 0151-411-02 $459.88 0151-411-03 $459.88 0151-411-04 $459.88 0151-411-05 $459.88 0151-411-06 $459.88 0151-411-07 $459.88 0151-411-08 $459.88 0151-411-09 $459.88 0151-411-10 $459.88 0151-411-11 $459.88 0151-411-12 $459.88 0151-411-13 $459.88 0151-411-14 $459.88 0151-411-15 $459.88 0151-411-16 $459.88 0151-411-17 $459.88 0151-411-18 $459.88 0151-411-19 $459.88 0151-411-20 $459.88 0151-411-21 $459.88 0151-411-22 $459.88 Totals Parcels 22 Levy $10,117.36 Page 25 of 33        Packet Page. 405 CC30 SP63 - AD 1055 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-731-01 $715.44 0261-731-02 $715.44 0261-731-03 $715.44 0261-731-04 $715.44 0261-731-05 $715.44 0261-731-06 $715.44 0261-731-07 $715.44 0261-731-08 $715.44 0261-731-09 $715.44 0261-731-10 $715.44 0261-731-11 $715.44 0261-731-12 $715.44 0261-731-13 $715.44 0261-731-14 $715.44 0261-731-15 $715.44 0261-731-16 $715.44 0261-731-17 $715.44 0261-731-18 $715.44 0261-731-19 $715.44 0261-731-20 $715.44 0261-731-21 $715.44 0261-731-22 $715.44 0261-731-23 $715.44 0261-731-24 $715.44 0261-731-25 $715.44 0261-731-26 $715.44 0261-731-27 $715.44 0261-731-28 $715.44 0261-731-29 $715.44 0261-731-30 $715.44 0261-731-31 $715.44 0261-731-32 $715.44 0261-731-33 $715.44 0261-731-34 $715.44 0261-731-35 $715.44 0261-731-36 $715.44 0261-731-37 $715.44 0261-731-38 $715.44 0261-731-39 $715.44 Totals Page 26 of 33        Packet Page. 406 CC30 SL10 - AD 1056 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0261-741-01 $565.38 0261-741-02 $565.38 0261-741-03 $565.38 0261-741-04 $565.38 0261-741-05 $565.38 0261-741-06 $565.38 0261-741-07 $565.38 0261-741-08 $565.38 0261-741-09 $565.38 0261-741-10 $565.38 0261-741-11 $565.38 0261-741-12 $565.38 0261-741-13 $565.38 0261-741-14 $565.38 0261-741-15 $565.38 0261-741-16 $565.38 0261-741-17 $565.38 0261-741-18 $565.38 0261-741-19 $565.38 0261-741-20 $565.38 0261-741-21 $565.38 0261-741-22 $565.38 0261-741-23 $565.38 0261-741-24 $565.38 0261-741-25 $565.38 0261-741-26 $565.38 0261-741-27 $565.38 0261-741-28 $565.38 0261-741-29 $565.38 0261-741-30 $565.38 0261-741-31 $565.38 0261-741-32 $565.38 0261-741-33 $565.38 0261-741-34 $565.38 0261-741-35 $565.38 0261-741-36 $565.38 0261-741-37 $565.38 0261-741-38 $565.38 Totals Page 27 of 33        Packet Page. 407 CC30 SL01 - AD 1057 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0148-011-49 $726.44 0148-011-50 $2,343.62 0148-011-53 $2,551.12 0148-011-54 $7,578.48 0148-011-55 $471.62 0148-011-65 $6,546.80 0148-011-66 $5,492.74 0148-011-68 $5,325.82 0148-011-69 $1,975.48 Totals Page 28 of 33        Packet Page. 408 CC30 SL02 - AD 1059 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0280-241-08 $240.96 0280-241-09 $39.68 0281-041-64 $149.90 0281-041-65 $209.90 0281-041-66 $968.00 0281-041-67 $595.20 Totals Page 29 of 33        Packet Page. 409 CC30 SP60 - AD 1060 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0272-311-11 $1,145.96 0272-311-12 $1,145.96 0272-311-13 $1,145.96 0272-311-14 $1,145.96 0272-311-15 $1,145.96 Totals Page 30 of 33        Packet Page. 410 CC30 SL03 - AD 1063 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0280-181-48 $1,139.74 0280-181-49 $549.80 0280-181-50 $1,302.12 0280-181-51 $1,980.56 0280-181-52 $124.62 0280-181-53 $53.40 0280-181-54 $226.66 0280-181-55 $3,422.72 Totals Page 31 of 33        Packet Page. 411 CC30 SL04 - AD 1064 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0262-011-48 $7,304.94 0262-011-49 $3,663.92 0262-011-50 $629.12 0262-011-51 $12,021.54 0348-151-25 $22,814.56 Totals Page 32 of 33        Packet Page. 412 CC30 SL08 - AD 1068 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0136-361-36 $4,842.60 0136-361-37 $490.28 0136-361-39 $2,720.50 0136-361-40 $941.64 0136-371-39 $4,065.22 0280-251-65 $1,544.74 0280-251-67 $224.42 Totals Page 33 of 33        Packet Page. 413 Appendix B: Assessment Diagrams        Packet Page. 414 OHIO A V E WAL N U T A V E REDWO O D C T ALE X I S C T SPE N C E R C T BE E C H W O O D A V E BAILEY CREEK CHANNEL CH MEYER S R D YO U N G S T O W N L N BET H A N Y W A Y 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1028 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 415 16TH ST PE N N S Y L V A N I A S T AR I Z O N A S T 17TH ST CL Y D E S T GL E N V I E W S T CA L F O R N I A S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1029 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 416 GARFIE L D S T CHE S T N U T A V E CAI T L I N S T OHIO S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1030 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 417 BREND A L N STEP H A N I E A V E S.B.C.F.C.D. STDR NO R M A L N LO R I L N LIN D A L N 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1031 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 418 VERDE M O N T D R ZACHARY CT HUN T I N G T O N D R ME L V I N A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1032 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 419 OHIO A V E MEYER S R D 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1035ZONE 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 420 PAL M A V E COMST O C K R D AKRON S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1035ZONE 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 421 STA T E 1 5 H W Y KENDA L L D R ASH ST NORTHPARK BLVD SYCAMORE STRESYCA M O R E S T VALLES DR GINKGO ST UNIVERSITY PARK WAY CAMPUSPKWY 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 422 BELMO N T A V E C0L E E N L N CHRISA N N C I R MEYER S R D DAR L I N G L N 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1037 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 423 S. B . C . F . C . D . C H A N N E L C H ORANGE SHOW RD AR R O W H E A D A V E SI E R R A W A Y ORANGE SHOW LN 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1038 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 424 IRVING T O N A V E BELMO N T A V E WAD E C T CABLE CREEK CHANNEL MEYER S R D CHESTNUT AVE 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1039 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê MAG N O L I A A V E        Packet Page. 425 ACACIA CT 59TH ST ACA C I A A V E MA Y F I E L D A V E ARIES L N 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1040 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 426 MAG N O L I A A V E MEYER S R D CAI T L I N S T OHIO S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1041 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 427 GLENWOOD C T PINEWOOD WAY AMBER W O O D C T SHADY CREEK DR SHANDIN HILLS DR MULECREEKCT HUR D C R E E K W A Y KENDA L L D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1042 Landscaping 187,800 sq. ft.Fuel Mod 229,330 sq. ft.Detention Basin CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 428 IRVING T O N A V E COL D M O U N T A I N W A Y ANG E L S P E A K D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1043ZONE 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê PAL M A V E        Packet Page. 429 OLI V E A V E MOUNT CARMELA LN SPLIT M O U N T A I N L N MUIR M O U N T A I N W A Y EAG L E S G L E N S T AKRON S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1043ZONE 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 430 WA T E R M A N A V E AT & S F R R PARKCENTER CIR 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1045 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 431 SUN VALLEY DR Norths t a r S t r e NORTH PARK BLVD Brig h t o n C o u r 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1046 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 432 ASH L E Y C T PIN E A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1047 Landscaping 14,205 sq. ft.Trail 14,668 sq. ft.Fuel Mod. 2,102 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 433 RANDALL AVE EU C A L Y P T U S A V E PENNY LN 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1048 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 434 0 100 20050 Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1049 Landscaping 7,788 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê OHIO A V E CH E S T N U T A V E N S H E L B Y C T        Packet Page. 435 RIALTO AVE AT & SF PE P P E R A V 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1050 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 436 0 100 20050 Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1051 Landscaping 690 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê OHIO A V E BELM O N T A V E OL I V E A V E N U E        Packet Page. 437 BELMO N T A V E MEYER S R D CHE S T N U T A V E SHA N O N L N 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1052 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 438 NORTH COLONY WAY VAL L E S D R I V CAMPUS PKWY 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1054 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 439 OHIO A V E ASHTON CT NORTH COLONY WAY CHRISTINE ST AUBRE Y BELMO N T A V E REDWO O D S T CH R I S T O P H E R S T PIN E A V E AKRON S T KENDA L L D R 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1055 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 440 MAG N O L I A A V E ANTIQUE ST CATHE D R A L C T VERDEM O N T D R GARFIE L D S T BAR O Q U E C T OHIO S T 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1056 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 441 INTERCHANGE DR MI K E D A L E Y D R CAJ O N B L V D §¨¦215 0 290 580145 Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1057 Landscaping 188,261 sq. ft.Detention Basin CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 442 TIPPECANOE (ORIG)AVE SANTA ANA RIV TI P P E C A N O E A V E COOLEY AVE GAGE C L ORANGE SHOW RD TI P P E C A N O E A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1059 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 443 DATE S T CH I Q U I T A L N 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1060 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 444 CENTRAL AVE SANTA ANA RIV NORMAN RD CL E V E N G E R D R LE N A R D VALLEY VIEW AVE ORANGE SHOW RD 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1063 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 445 SBC F C D A.T.&S.F. RR GLEN HELEN PKWY CAJO N B L V D §¨¦215 0 400 800200Feet MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1064 Landscaping 304,508 sq. ft. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 446 SAN BERNARDINO AVE MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE RIVERVIEW DR SANTA ANA RIV ST E R L I N G A V E TI P P E C A N O E A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1068 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 447 Appendix C: MAD District Cost Summary        Packet Page. 448 MAD No. 1028 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $9,309.94 $9,496.13 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $330.26 $336.86 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$2,997.08 $3,057.02 Total Direct Costs $12,637.27 $12,890.02 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,018.68 $1,080.72 City Administration $1,187.84 $1,187.84 Auditor-Controller $22.80 $22.80 Total Indirect Costs $2,229.32 $2,291.36 Total Costs $14,866.59 $15,181.38 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $70.30 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($1,211.43)($1,252.96) General Benefit Contribution ($136.01)($138.89) Total Adjustments ($1,347.44)($1,321.55) Total Assessment $13,519.15 $13,859.83 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 449 MAD No. 1029 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $4,333.00 $4,419.66 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $287.10 $292.84 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$1,733.20 $1,767.86 Total Direct Costs $6,353.30 $6,480.36 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $494.48 $524.59 City Administration $432.71 $432.71 Auditor-Controller $11.40 $11.40 Total Indirect Costs $938.59 $968.70 Total Costs $7,291.88 $7,449.06 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $4.24 $264.37 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($532.31)($543.78) Total Adjustments ($528.07)($279.41) Total Assessment $6,763.82 $7,169.65 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 450 MAD No. 1030 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $4,324.88 $4,411.38 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $96.43 $98.36 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,162.44 $2,205.69 Total Direct Costs $6,583.75 $6,715.43 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $562.77 $597.04 City Administration $389.37 $389.37 Auditor-Controller $14.10 $14.10 Total Indirect Costs $966.24 $1,000.51 Total Costs $7,549.99 $7,715.94 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $414.24 $716.92 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($266.56)($272.42) Total Adjustments $147.67 $444.50 Total Assessment $7,697.66 $8,160.44 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 451 MAD No. 1031 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $15,741.88 $16,056.71 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $393.55 $401.42 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $6,296.74 $6,422.68 Total Direct Costs $22,432.16 $22,880.81 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,106.38 $2,234.66 City Administration $1,953.86 $1,953.86 Auditor-Controller $32.10 $32.10 Total Indirect Costs $4,092.34 $4,220.62 Total Costs $26,524.50 $27,101.43 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,429.71 $1,557.23 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments $1,429.71 $1,557.23 Total Assessment $27,954.21 $28,658.66 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 452 MAD No. 1032 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,993.16 $3,053.03 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $351.64 $358.68 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,496.58 $1,526.51 Total Direct Costs $4,841.39 $4,938.22 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $544.69 $577.86 City Administration $405.99 $405.99 Auditor-Controller $19.20 $19.50 Total Indirect Costs $969.87 $1,003.35 Total Costs $5,811.26 $5,941.56 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,638.34 $2,078.74 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments $1,638.34 $2,078.74 Total Assessment $7,449.60 $8,020.30 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 453 MAD No. 1035 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $7,596.14 $7,748.06 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $623.15 $635.61 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$3,798.06 $3,874.03 Total Direct Costs $12,017.35 $12,257.70 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $989.79 $1,050.07 City Administration $1,104.09 $1,104.09 Auditor-Controller $9.00 $9.00 Total Indirect Costs $2,102.87 $2,163.16 Total Costs $14,120.22 $14,420.85 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($799.19)($307.73) General Benefit Contribution ($185.34)($189.28) Total Adjustments ($984.52)($497.01) Total Assessment $13,135.70 $13,923.84 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 454 MAD No. 1035 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $662.90 $676.16 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $100.44 $102.45 Irrigation Costs (water and energy) $331.45 $338.08 Total Direct Costs $1,094.79 $1,116.69 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $153.18 $162.51 City Administration $178.14 $178.14 Auditor-Controller $3.90 $3.90 Total Indirect Costs $335.22 $344.55 Total Costs $1,430.02 $1,461.24 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $674.41 $695.98 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($71.50)($73.06) Total Adjustments $602.91 $622.91 Total Assessment $2,032.92 $2,084.15 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 455 MAD No. 1036 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $5,336.49 $5,443.22 Maint. of Groundcover/Shrubs/Irrigation/Slope/DG Trails $58,493.13 $59,663.00 Maint. of Fuel-Mod Slope/Irrigation/Drain. Ditches/DG Trails $15,751.59 $16,066.62 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,770.56 $1,805.97 Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument Signs and Lighting $1,627.87 $1,660.42 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $76,266.96 $77,792.30 Maintenance of Maxwell Drains $10,555.64 $10,766.75 Maintenance of Exercise Stations/Gazebos/Benches $3,067.02 $3,128.36 Total Direct Costs $172,869.26 $176,326.65 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $19,708.74 $20,909.00 City Administration $12,697.66 $12,697.66 Auditor-Controller $75.00 $75.00 Total Indirect Costs $32,481.40 $33,681.66 Total Costs $205,350.66 $210,008.30 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $59,658.30 $61,670.85 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($3,451.10)($3,530.04) Total Adjustments $56,207.20 $58,140.81 Total Assessment $261,557.86 $268,149.11 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 456 MAD No. 1037 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $1,500.19 $1,530.20 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,844.04 $2,900.92 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $371.85 $379.28 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$2,172.12 $2,215.56 Total Direct Costs $6,888.20 $7,025.96 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $448.98 $476.32 City Administration $149.82 $149.82 Auditor-Controller $9.90 $9.90 Total Indirect Costs $608.70 $636.04 Total Costs $7,496.90 $7,662.01 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($1,126.51)($918.08) General Benefit Contribution ($228.66)($233.69) Total Adjustments ($1,355.17)($1,151.77) Total Assessment $6,141.73 $6,510.24 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 457 MAD No. 1038 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $5,202.00 $5,306.04 Total Direct Costs $5,202.00 $5,306.04 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $272.52 $289.12 City Administration $0.00 $0.00 Auditor-Controller $10.80 $10.80 Total Indirect Costs $283.32 $299.92 Total Costs $5,485.32 $5,605.96 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $50.10 $67.69 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($394.94)($403.63) Total Adjustments ($344.84)($335.94) Total Assessment $5,140.48 $5,270.02 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 458 MAD No. 1039 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $1,053.52 $1,074.59 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $6,044.54 $6,165.43 Maintenance of 3 Rail Trail Separation Vinyl Fence $209.19 $213.37 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $877.93 $895.48 Maintenance of Hardscape/Monument Signs/Trail/Lighting $2,389.18 $2,436.96 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $3,549.02 $3,620.00 Total Direct Costs $14,123.38 $14,405.85 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,164.85 $1,235.79 City Administration $593.39 $593.39 Auditor-Controller $38.10 $38.10 Total Indirect Costs $1,796.34 $1,867.28 Total Costs $15,919.72 $16,273.13 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $704.87 $1,322.81 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($691.17)($706.51) Total Adjustments $13.70 $616.30 Total Assessment $15,933.42 $16,889.43 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 459 MAD No. 1040 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $5,476.79 $5,586.33 Maintenance of SBFCD Fuel-Mod Thinning Area $3,673.44 $3,746.91 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $376.69 $384.23 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,190.52 $2,234.33 Total Direct Costs $11,717.44 $11,951.79 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,316.19 $1,396.34 City Administration $492.42 $492.42 Auditor-Controller $13.80 $13.80 Total Indirect Costs $1,822.40 $1,902.56 Total Costs $13,539.85 $13,854.35 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $3,927.56 $4,053.23 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments $3,927.56 $4,053.23 Total Assessment $17,467.40 $17,907.58 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 460 MAD No. 1041 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $1,398.48 $1,426.45 Maintenance of Slope Area $3,695.72 $3,769.64 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $989.50 $1,009.30 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $3,702.44 $3,776.49 Total Direct Costs $9,786.15 $9,981.87 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $928.26 $984.79 City Administration $746.56 $746.56 Auditor-Controller $5.10 $5.10 Total Indirect Costs $1,679.92 $1,736.45 Total Costs $11,466.07 $11,718.32 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,348.06 $1,860.25 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($115.81)($118.36) Total Adjustments $1,232.25 $1,741.90 Total Assessment $12,698.32 $13,460.22 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 461 MAD No. 1042 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $34,406.16 $35,094.28 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,221.38 $1,245.81 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$18,349.94 $18,716.94 Maintenance of City Fuel-Mod Thinning Area $11,203.92 $11,428.00 Total Direct Costs $65,181.40 $66,485.03 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $5,813.76 $6,167.82 City Administration $6,889.83 $6,889.83 Auditor-Controller $21.60 $21.60 Total Indirect Costs $12,725.19 $13,079.25 Total Costs $77,906.59 $79,564.28 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($750.88)($464.24) General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments ($750.88)($464.24) Total Assessment $77,155.71 $79,100.04 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 462 MAD No. 1043 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $4,603.56 $4,695.63 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $404.36 $412.45 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,841.43 $1,878.25 Total Direct Costs $6,849.34 $6,986.33 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $648.55 $688.04 City Administration $619.73 $619.73 Auditor-Controller $12.30 $12.30 Total Indirect Costs $1,280.58 $1,320.07 Total Costs $8,129.92 $8,306.40 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,030.85 $1,083.28 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($553.78)($565.80) Total Adjustments $477.07 $517.48 Total Assessment $8,606.99 $8,823.89 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 463 MAD No. 1043 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $9,541.89 $9,732.73 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $41.04 $41.86 Irrigation Costs (water and energy)$3,816.75 $3,893.08 Total Direct Costs $13,399.67 $13,667.67 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,178.73 $1,250.51 City Administration $1,096.58 $1,096.58 Auditor-Controller $14.10 $14.10 Total Indirect Costs $2,289.40 $2,361.19 Total Costs $15,689.08 $16,028.85 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $552.88 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($45.93)$0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments ($45.93)$552.88 Total Assessment $15,643.14 $16,581.73 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 464 MAD No. 1045 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $7,475.12 $7,624.63 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $1,286.61 $1,312.34 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,843.15 $1,880.01 Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument Signs and Lighting $347.29 $354.24 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$4,380.87 $4,468.49 Total Direct Costs $15,333.05 $15,639.71 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $867.67 $920.51 City Administration $1,027.26 $1,027.26 Auditor-Controller $3.90 $3.90 Total Indirect Costs $1,898.83 $1,951.67 Total Costs $17,231.88 $17,591.39 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($3,132.12)($3,147.52) General Benefit Contribution ($2,584.78)($2,638.71) Total Adjustments ($5,716.90)($5,786.23) Total Assessment $11,514.98 $11,805.16 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 465 MAD No. 1046 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,249.25 $3,314.23 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $849.70 $866.69 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,299.69 $1,325.68 Total Direct Costs $5,398.63 $5,506.61 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $520.60 $552.31 City Administration $613.12 $613.12 Auditor-Controller $5.70 $5.70 Total Indirect Costs $1,139.43 $1,171.13 Total Costs $6,538.06 $6,677.74 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $625.98 $665.85 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($254.98)($260.43) Total Adjustments $370.99 $405.42 Total Assessment $6,909.05 $7,083.16 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 466 MAD No. 1047 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,457.22 $2,506.36 Maintenance of Thinning Area $121.20 $123.62 Maintenance of Hardscape and Trail $468.12 $477.49 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $576.61 $588.14 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,638.15 $1,670.91 Total Direct Costs $5,261.30 $5,366.53 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $523.42 $555.29 City Administration $485.79 $485.79 Auditor-Controller $2.40 $2.40 Total Indirect Costs $1,011.61 $1,043.48 Total Costs $6,272.91 $6,410.01 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $887.21 $1,179.72 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments $887.21 $1,179.72 Total Assessment $7,160.12 $7,589.73 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 467 MAD No. 1048 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,342.99 $2,389.85 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,119.47 $1,141.85 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,249.59 $1,274.58 Total Direct Costs $4,712.05 $4,806.29 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $588.43 $624.27 City Administration $496.39 $496.39 Auditor-Controller $6.00 $6.00 Total Indirect Costs $1,090.83 $1,126.66 Total Costs $5,802.87 $5,932.95 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $2,312.00 $2,666.34 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($65.67)($67.14) Total Adjustments $2,246.33 $2,599.20 Total Assessment $8,049.20 $8,532.15 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 468 MAD No. 1049 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $0.00 $2,439.15 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $0.00 $1,564.09 Maintenance of Drainage Easement $0.00 $2,278.09 Total Direct Costs $0.00 $6,281.33 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $0.00 $500.00 City Administration $0.00 $744.60 Auditor-Controller $0.00 $4.50 Total Indirect Costs $0.00 $1,249.10 Total Costs $0.00 $7,530.43 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $85.83 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution $0.00 ($250.05) Total Adjustments $0.00 ($164.21) Total Assessment $0.00 $7,366.22 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 469 MAD No. 1050 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $1,057.01 $1,078.15 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $209.81 $214.00 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $2,088.98 $2,130.76 Irrigation Costs (water and energy) $633.42 $646.08 Total Direct Costs $3,989.22 $4,069.00 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $359.94 $381.86 City Administration $345.68 $345.68 Auditor-Controller $4.20 $4.20 Total Indirect Costs $709.82 $731.74 Total Costs $4,699.04 $4,800.74 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $890.51 $1,098.64 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($665.75)($680.16) Total Adjustments $224.76 $418.48 Total Assessment $4,923.80 $5,219.23 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 470 MAD No. 1052 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $4,999.74 $5,099.74 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $5,073.70 $5,175.17 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$2,499.88 $2,549.88 Maintenance of AC/DG Trail System $1,319.81 $1,346.20 Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument, Trail, Lighting, Wall, Fence $743.11 $757.97 Maintenance of Vinyl Trail Separation Fence $417.99 $426.35 Total Direct Costs $15,054.23 $15,355.31 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,179.91 $1,251.76 City Administration $710.19 $710.19 Auditor-Controller $16.20 $16.20 Total Indirect Costs $1,906.30 $1,978.15 Total Costs $16,960.53 $17,333.46 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $743.01 $1,372.88 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($1,562.94)($1,597.30) Total Adjustments ($819.93)($224.43) Total Assessment $16,140.60 $17,109.04 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 471 MAD No. 1054 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $848.57 $865.54 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,204.79 $3,268.89 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $762.41 $777.66 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,026.68 $2,067.22 Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument Signs and Lighting $227.89 $232.44 Total Direct Costs $7,070.34 $7,211.75 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $743.63 $788.92 City Administration $753.30 $753.30 Auditor-Controller $6.60 $6.60 Total Indirect Costs $1,503.53 $1,548.82 Total Costs $8,573.87 $8,760.57 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $2,101.38 $2,180.94 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($806.37)($823.92) Total Adjustments $1,295.02 $1,357.02 Total Assessment $9,868.89 $10,117.59 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 472 MAD No. 1055 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $10,059.91 $10,261.11 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation/ DG Trail $5,230.75 $5,335.37 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $2,117.28 $2,159.62 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$5,110.27 $5,212.47 Annual Lease Costs for Maintenance of MWD Property $1,409.25 $1,437.44 Total Direct Costs $23,927.46 $24,406.00 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,924.21 $2,041.40 City Administration $1,243.81 $1,243.81 Auditor-Controller $11.70 $11.70 Total Indirect Costs $3,179.72 $3,296.91 Total Costs $27,107.18 $27,702.91 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,926.20 $2,969.54 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($2,710.72)($2,770.29) Total Adjustments ($784.52)$199.25 Total Assessment $26,322.66 $27,902.16 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 473 MAD No. 1056 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $319.07 $325.45 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $346.00 $352.92 Maintenance of Detention Basin $858.76 $875.94 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $335.48 $342.19 Total Direct Costs $1,859.32 $1,896.51 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,579.08 $1,675.25 City Administration $1,804.66 $1,804.66 Auditor-Controller $11.40 $11.40 Total Indirect Costs $3,395.14 $3,491.31 Total Costs $5,254.46 $5,387.81 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $15,817.68 $16,215.37 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($115.78)($118.72) Total Adjustments $15,701.90 $16,096.65 Total Assessment $20,956.36 $21,484.46 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 474 MAD No. 1057 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $9,041.75 $9,222.59 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,613.64 $1,645.91 Detention Basin Vegetation Abatement $2,115.74 $2,158.05 Detentioin Basin Maintenance $3,772.84 $3,848.30 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $4,520.87 $4,611.29 Total Direct Costs $21,064.84 $21,486.13 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,711.47 $2,876.60 City Administration $0.00 $0.00 Auditor-Controller $2.70 $2.70 Total Indirect Costs $2,714.17 $2,879.30 Total Costs $23,779.01 $24,365.43 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $10,852.17 $10,305.67 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($1,618.98)($1,658.91) Total Adjustments $9,233.19 $8,646.77 Total Assessment $33,012.20 $33,012.20 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 475 MAD No. 1059 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $1,489.36 $1,519.15 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy)$794.33 $810.21 Total Direct Costs $2,283.69 $2,329.36 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $181.00 $192.02 City Administration $36.78 $36.78 Auditor-Controller $1.80 $1.80 Total Indirect Costs $219.58 $230.60 Total Costs $2,503.26 $2,559.96 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $75.91 $27.72 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($375.49)($383.99) Total Adjustments ($299.58)($356.28) Total Assessment $2,203.68 $2,203.68 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 476 MAD No. 1060 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $4,100.40 $4,182.41 Utilities Costs $1,764.70 $1,799.99 Total Direct Costs $5,865.10 $5,982.40 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $211.27 $224.14 City Administration $114.56 $114.56 Auditor-Controller $1.50 $1.50 Total Indirect Costs $327.33 $340.20 Total Costs $6,192.43 $6,322.60 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $0.00 $29.06 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution ($603.40)($621.79) General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00 Total Adjustments ($603.40)($592.72) Total Assessment $5,589.03 $5,729.87 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 477 MAD No. 1063 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $8,323.20 $8,489.66 Total Direct Costs $8,323.20 $8,489.66 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $404.98 $429.65 City Administration $0.00 $0.00 Auditor-Controller $2.40 $2.40 Total Indirect Costs $407.38 $432.05 Total Costs $8,730.58 $8,921.71 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $4.31 $85.43 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 ($11.76) General Benefit Contribution ($191.48)($195.68) Total Adjustments ($187.17)($122.00) Total Assessment $8,543.41 $8,799.71 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 478 MAD No. 1064 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $52,572.02 $53,623.46 Utilities Costs $7.69 $7.84 Total Direct Costs $52,579.71 $53,631.30 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $667.04 $707.66 City Administration $0.00 $0.00 Auditor-Controller $1.50 $1.50 Total Indirect Costs $668.54 $709.16 Total Costs $53,248.25 $54,340.46 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $31.74 $244.74 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($7,987.24)($8,151.07) Total Adjustments ($7,955.49)($7,906.33) Total Assessment $45,292.75 $46,434.13 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 479 MAD No. 1068 FY 2025-26 Budget Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Landscape Maintenance $15,912.00 $16,230.24 Detention Basin Vegetation Abatement/Slope Repair $1.60 $1.63 Detention Basin Maintenance Cost - 25 Cubic Yards $6.03 $6.15 Storm Drain Maintenance Cost $7.23 $7.38 Total Direct Costs $15,926.86 $16,245.40 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $88.92 $94.34 City Administration $0.00 $0.00 Auditor-Controller $2.10 $2.10 Total Indirect Costs $91.02 $96.44 Total Costs $16,017.89 $16,341.84 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $40.66 $113.46 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($1,593.61)($1,625.84) Total Adjustments ($1,552.94)($1,512.38) Total Assessment $14,464.94 $14,829.46 Estimated through June 30        Packet Page. 480          Packet Page. 481 Final Engineer’s Report Fiscal Year 2025-26 Maintenance Assessment Districts Volume 5        Packet Page. 482 Table of Contents City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Sections i. Introduction i 1. Plans and Specifications 1 2. Cost Estimates 2 3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment 6 4. Engineer’s Signature 12 5. Assessment Diagram 13 6. Assessment Rolls 14 Tables Table 2-1 MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget 3 Table 2-2 MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget 4 Table 2-3 MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 FY 2025-26 Budget 5 Table 3-1 Maximum Assessment Rates 10 Appendices Appendix A – Assessment Rolls Appendix B – Assessment Diagram        Packet Page. 483 i. Introduction Page | i City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 AGENCY: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER’S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE "ASSESSMENT LAW" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022 (the “District”), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2025-274 adopted by the City of San Bernardino City Council, San Bernardino County, California ordering preparation of this Report. This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. Section 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS including a general description of the maintenance and plans of the landscaping, irrigation systems and street lighting proposed to be funded. Section 2 A COST ESTIMATE of maintaining the landscaping, irrigation systems and street lighting including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT contains the method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon several lots and parcels of land within the District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. Section 5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM showing the District, the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within said District, as the same exists on the maps of the County of San Bernardino Assessor for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is filed in the offices of the City of San Bernardino. An Assessment Diagram of each zone can be found in Appendix B. Section 6 ASSESSMENT ROLLS showing the actual assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s Office can be found in Appendix A. Maintenance Assessment Maximum Assessment MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance-California $118.58 $217.10 MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance-California $132.83 $132.83 MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance-California $107.31 $127.14        Packet Page. 484 i. Introduction Page | ii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Background The City Council of the City of San Bernardino approved the formation of MAD No. 1022 in 2006. The District was formed pursuant to the requirements of the Assessment Law. The District was formed to provide a source of funds for the improvements which may include, but are not limited to: landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, turf, irrigation and drainage systems, trails, hardscapes, walls, site lighting and appurtenant facilities. The Report sets forth the methodology to be used in apportioning the assessment to the different land use types within the City based upon the benefit they receive. There are 13 commercial parcels within Zone 1. There are 10 commercial parcels within Zone 2. There are 17 commercial parcels within Zone 3. No further subdivision of the parcels is anticipated. The boundaries of MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Tippecanoe Avenue on the west, the centerline of 3rd Street to the north, the centerline of Leland Norton Way to the east and the San Bernardino International Airport to the south. The boundaries of MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Lena Road to the west, the centerline of Mill Street to the south and the centerline of Tippecanoe Avenue to the east. The boundaries of MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows: The centerline of Mill Street to the north, the centerline of Tippecanoe Avenue to the east and the centerline of Central Avenue to the south. Parcels within this District are assessed their proportionate share of the cost for the maintenance of local improvements including, but not limited to, landscaping facilities. These improvements provide a special benefit to those parcels due to their nature and location. Designation of Maintenance Assessment District/Zones: For your reference, you can find the following Maintenance Assessment Districts within the corresponding Volumes listed below: Volume 1: MAD 951 (Zone 1), MAD 951 (Zone 2), MAD 952 (Zone 1, 2 and 2A), MAD 952 (Zone 3), MAD 953, MAD 956, MAD 959 (Zone 1), MAD 962, MAD 963, MAD 968, MAD 974, MAD 975, MAD 976, MAD 981, MAD 982, MAD 986, MAD 989, MAD 991, MAD 993, MAD 997, MAD 1001, MAD 1002, MAD 1005, MAD 1007, MAD 1012, and MAD 1016. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 1 and does not contain an annual escalator. Volume 2: MAD 1017, MAD 1019, MAD 1020, MAD 1023 and MAD 1024. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 2 and does contain an annual CPI escalator only. Volume 3: MAD 1025 and MAD 1027. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 3 and has a 25% general benefit of major arterial streets, 20% general benefit of secondary arterial streets, 15% general benefit of collector streets, and 100% special benefit of the local streets. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained in Volume 3 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts. Volume 4: MAD 1028, MAD 1029, MAD 1030, MAD 1031, MAD 1032, MAD 1035 (Zone 1), MAD 1035 (Zone 2), MAD 1036, MAD 1037, MAD 1038, MAD 1039, MAD 1040, MAD 1041, MAD 1042, MAD 1043 (Zone 1), MAD 1043 (Zone 2), MAD 1045, MAD 1046, MAD 1047, MAD 1048, , MAD 1049, MAD 1050, MAD 1051, MAD 1052, MAD 1054, MAD 1055, MAD 1056, MAD 1057, MAD 1059, MAD 1060, MAD 1063, MAD 1064, and MAD 1068. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 4 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less.        Packet Page. 485 i. Introduction Page | iii City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Volume 5: MAD 1022 (Zone 1), MAD 1022 (Zone 2) and MAD 1022 (Zone 3). These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 5 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts.        Packet Page. 486 i. Introduction Page | iv City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Current Annual Administration As required by the Assessment Law, the Report includes: (1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District. The City of San Bernardino will hold a Public Hearing on July 16, 2025, regarding the District which will provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified. Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report.        Packet Page. 487 1. Plans and Specifications Page | 1 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Description of Improvements This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022 Zone 1. The improvements to be maintained include 89,550 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree), streetlighting and all appurtenances along portions of Tippecanoe Avenue, Harry Shepard Boulevard, Del Rosa Drive, Third Street and Leland Norton Way. Street lighting shall also include traffic signals and all appurtenances thereto. In Zone 2 the improvements to be maintained include 22,200 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree), streetlighting and all appurtenances along portions of Lena Road Mill Street and Tippecanoe Avenue. Street lighting shall also include traffic signals and all appurtenances thereto. In Zone 3 the improvements to be maintained include 5,657 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree), streetlighting and all appurtenances along portions of Mill Street, Tippecanoe Avenue and Central Avenue. Street lighting shall also include traffic signals and all appurtenances thereto. An Assessment Diagram showing the maintained area is provided in Appendix B of this Report.        Packet Page. 488 2. Cost Estimates Page | 2 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in the Assessment Law. The Assessment Law provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire Fiscal Year 2025-26, including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves. The Assessment Law also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the District is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions. The District includes an annual inflation factor for future increases in assessments by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. There is a 2.52% proposed inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable over the assessment levied for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is consistent with the ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said District.        Packet Page. 489 2. Cost Estimates Page | 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Table 2-1 MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget Estimated through June 30 Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Total EDU's 297.28 Common Area Maintenance $33,954.85 $34,633.95 Percent of Zone 1 Common Area Maintenance -10.00% -10.00% Prorated Zone 1 Amount ($3,349.80) ($3,422.20) Percent of Timber Creek 63.00% 63.00% Prorated Timber Creek Amount $1,781.04 $1,816.66 Total Direct Costs $32,386.09 $33,028.41 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $2,599.36 $2,757.66 City Administration $2,187.47 $2,187.47 Auditor-Controller $4.50 $4.50 Total Indirect Costs $4,791.33 $4,949.63 Total Costs $37,177.42 $37,978.05 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $2,455.06 $2,634.43 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($5,248.17) ($5,361.60) Total Adjustments ($2,793.11) ($2,727.17) Total Assessment $34,384.31 $35,250.88        Packet Page. 490 2. Cost Estimates Page | 4 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Table 2-2 MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget Estimated through June 30 Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Total EDU's 153.59 Common Area Maintenance $14,900.34 $15,198.35 Percent of Zone 1 Common Area Maintenance 5.00% 5.00% Prorated Zone 1 Amount $1,435.33 $1,463.62 Percent of Timber Creek 37.42% 37.42% Prorated Timber Creek Amount $1,057.79 $1,078.95 Total Direct Costs $17,393.47 $17,740.92 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $1,499.41 $1,590.73 City Administration $1,773.76 $1,773.76 Auditor-Controller $2.40 $2.40 Total Indirect Costs $3,275.57 $3,366.89 Total Costs $20,669.04 $21,107.80 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $1,517.03 $1,628.28 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($2,287.03) ($2,335.58) Total Adjustments ($770.00) ($707.30) Total Assessment $19,899.04 $20,400.51        Packet Page. 491 2. Cost Estimates Page | 5 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Table 2-3 MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 FY 2025-26 Budget Estimated through June 30 Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 Total EDU's 100.20 Common Area Maintenance $7,699.58 $7,853.58 Percent of Zone 1 Common Area Maintenance 5.00% 5.00% Prorated Zone 1 Amount $1,435.33 $1,463.62 Total Direct Costs $9,134.92 $9,317.19 Indirect Costs Assessment Engineer $790.31 $838.43 City Administration $896.88 $896.88 Auditor-Controller $4.50 $4.50 Total Indirect Costs $1,691.68 $1,739.81 Total Costs $10,826.60 $11,057.00 Collection/(Contribution) Operating Reserve $602.92 $656.75 Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00 City Contribution $0.00 $0.00 General Benefit Contribution ($951.34) ($971.81) Total Adjustments ($348.41) ($315.06) Total Assessment $10,478.18 $10,741.94        Packet Page. 492 3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 6 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Changes in Organization There are no changes in organization for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Proposition 218 Compliance On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures. Some of these exceptions include: 1. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets. 2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase). Proposition 218 does not define this term “streets”, however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers, and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street right-of- way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting. Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property”, California Constitution, Article XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment. Distinguishing General and Special Benefit Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” By its nature most every public improvement financed through an assessment district contains an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally, to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties. Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”: “Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”. The actual assessment and the amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.        Packet Page. 493 3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 7 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Direct and Special Benefit The maintenance of landscaping, groundcover, shrubs, trees, irrigation and detention basin provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within MAD No. 1022. Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities. In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the District by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the District. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign rights-of-way for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day. Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District. Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed. Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility. The system of streets within the District is established to provide access to each parcel in the District. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District. The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets. Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the District. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the District. Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are apportioned on a per acre, per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit), or per parcel basis.        Packet Page. 494 3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 8 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels. Government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed. General Benefit The Benefit received by the parcels within the boundaries of the District is determined to be of more than ordinary public benefit, thus each parcel within the District being assessed receives special benefit from the improvements. If the property not within the boundaries of a District also receives some benefit from the improvements, consideration must then be given to a general benefit given by the improvements, which may not be assessed to the parcels within the District. Since the installation and maintenance of the landscaping and establishment of an assessment district for the maintenance of the landscaping is specific and incidental to this development, it is further determined that the improvements to be maintained by the assessment district are of special benefit to the District only and are 100% assessable to the parcels within the boundaries of the assessment district, except as follows: 1. Areas of maintenance that front on major arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 15% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 2. Areas of maintenance that front on secondary arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 10% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 3. Areas of maintenance that front on collector streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 5% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District. 4. Areas that front on local streets are determined to be 100% special benefit and are 100% assessable to the District. These percentages are based on the traffic circulation for the various street classifications. Tippecanoe Avenue, Third Street, and Del Rosa Drive between Harry Sheppard Boulevard and Third Street are classified as major arterial streets. Lena Road, Mill Street, and Harry Shepard Boulevard between Tippecanoe Avenue and Del Rosa Drive are classified as secondary arterial streets. Rialto Avenue, Mountain View Avenue, Leland Norton Way, Harry Sheppard Boulevard between Del Rosa Drive and Leland Norton Way are classified as collector streets. Within Zone 1 the major arterial streets comprise 75.6%, the secondary arterial streets comprise 19.7%, and the collector streets comprise 4.7% of the total areas of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of 75.6% plus 10% of 19.7% plus 5% of 4.7% of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to Zone 1. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%, 10% and 15%). The result is the General Benefit of 13.55% needed for Zone 1. Within Zone 2 the major arterial streets comprise 21.3%, the secondary arterial streets comprise 78.7%, and the collector streets comprise 0.0% of the total areas of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of 21.3% plus 10% of 78.7% of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to Zone 2. The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%, 10% and 15%). The result is the General Benefit of 11.07% needed for Zone 2. Within Zone 3 the major arterial streets comprise 35.9%, the secondary arterial streets comprise 30.8%, and the collector streets comprise 33.3% of the total areas of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of 35.9% plus 10% of 30.8% plus 5% of 33.3 of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to Zone 3.        Packet Page. 495 3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 9 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%, 10% and 15%). The result is the General Benefit of 10.13% needed for Zone 3. Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. Method of Apportionment The Assessment Law permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The Assessment Law further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (the “Article”) requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the District. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit. Landscaping and streetlighting and its proper maintenance enhances the esthetics of any given area. The benefit received by the owners of properties in the area varies depending on which zone the property is located. The Assessment District is divided into three zones. The San Bernardino International Airport provided special benefit to all three zones. Thus all three zones shall share a portion of the maintenance cost for improvements located on such Airport properties. Timber Creek provides a special benefit to Zone 1 and 2 but provides no benefit to Zone 3. The maintenance cost for Timber Creek shall be shared proportionately by area between Zone 1 and Zone 2 whereas Zone 3 shall not participate in any of the maintenance costs for Timber Creek. Part I – Applicable to All Properties within the Assessment District: Apportionment of assessments across the individual parcels is based on the area of each parcel in relation to the total area within each respective zone or combination of zones as follows: Where: Area “I” is the area of any of the individual parcels shown as an assessment number. Area 1 is the summation of the areas of the participating parcels within Zone 1. Area 2 is the summation of the areas of the participating parcels within Zone 2. Area 3 is the summation of the areas of the participating parcels within Zone 3. Zone 1 Owners: 0.9 (net cost Zone 1) * (Area “I” / Area 1) + (total cost Timber Creek) * {Area “I” / (Area 1 + Area 2)} Zone 2 Owners: 0.05 (net cost Zone) * (Area “I” / (Area 2) + (net cost Zone 2) * (Area “I”/Area 2) + (total cost Timber Creek) * {Area “I” / (Area 1 + Area 2)} Zone 3 Owners: 0.05 (net cost Zone 1) * (Area “I”/Area 3) + (total cost Zone 3) + (Area “I” / Area 3) Part II – Applicable to Properties without a Default Assessment Agreement: Within each Zone of the Assessment District the City shall undertake a separate accounting and calculation to be maintained as to those properties which then have a Default Assessment Agreement in effect. On a Zone by Zone basis within the Assessment District, the dollar amount of the City incurred costs for the maintenance of adjacent landscaping, exclusive of common area landscaping at intersections and median strips and other monument sign areas, shall be calculated and spread on an acreage basis against all        Packet Page. 496 3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 10 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 properties within each Zone that do not have then have a Default Assessment Agreement in effect. Such amount as calculated pursuant to this Part II shall then be added to the amount calculated for all properties pursuant to Part I above placed on the tax bill only for those properties that do not have a Default Assessment Agreement then in effect. Only properties having either a minimum street frontage of 400 feet or a minimum area of 2.25 acres are eligible to petition the City for a Default Assessment Agreement. The Part II formula is below for Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 3 Owners: (Cost of Adjacent Landscaping by Zone) / Acreage of Maintenance Areas properties without Default Assessment Agreement = Part II assessment amount per Acre of Maintenance Areas Benefit by Zone Each of the assessable parcels within the District has been deemed to receive proportional special benefit from the maintenance and operation of the improvements. The percentage change in allowable Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessment from the allowable Fiscal Year 2024-25 assessment is as follows: Table 3-1 Maximum Assessment Rates Zone Estimated Cost Allowable Assessment 1 $37,983.53 $211.76 $4.38 $217.10 $4.38 2.52% $118.83 $0.00 2 $21,107.80 $129.56 $0.38 $132.83 $0.38 2.52% $132.83 $0.00 3 $11,057.00 $124.02 $0.38 $127.14 $0.38 2.52% $107.31 $0.00 Due to the nature of landscape maintenance, it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District. Whereas, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, adopted Resolution No. 2006-91 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as: Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022; and, Whereas, the City Council, did direct the appointed engineer to prepare and file an annual report, in accordance with the Assessment Law. Whereas, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following; a. Maintenance plans for the improvements b. An estimate of the costs of the improvements c. A diagram for the assessment district d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements        Packet Page. 497 3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 11 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Now, Therefore, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of San Bernardino, pursuant to the Assessment Law, do hereby submit the following: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of law the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcel, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein. 2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein. 3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the San Bernardino County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels. 4. There are no parcels or lots within MAD No. 1022 that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected. The City requested Spicer Consulting Group, LLC., to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022 pursuant to the Assessment Law presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for MAD No. 1022 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and-or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received.        Packet Page. 498 4 . Engineer ’s Signature Page | 12 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 FRANCISCO MARTINEZ JR PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 84640 ENGINEER OF WORK CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _______ day of ____________, 2025. By Adoption of Resolution No. _______ by the City Council. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, on the _____day of ___________, 2025. 12th June        Packet Page. 499 5 . Assessment Diagram Page | 13 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith, are incorporated by reference in Appendix B herein, and made part of this Report. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment. Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of San Bernardino, and the San Bernardino County Assessor’s Office.        Packet Page. 500 6 . Assessment Rolls Page | 14 City of San Bernardino Engineer’s Report MAD’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 The actual amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.        Packet Page. 501 Appendix A: Assessment Rolls        Packet Page. 502 CC30 SP04 - AD 1022 Zone 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0136-341-11 $166.48 0136-341-13 $731.80 0136-341-21 $257.62 0136-341-42 $2,425.40 0136-341-43 $1,030.74 0136-341-50 $387.62 0136-341-65 $6,897.60 0136-341-68 $189.72 0136-341-72 $18,251.32 0136-341-82 $947.30 0136-341-89 $3,129.78 0136-341-90 $309.58 0136-341-91 $9.64 0136-341-92 $246.10 0136-541-01 $270.04 Totals Parcels 15 Levy $35,250.74 Assessment Roll Page 1 of 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 503 CC30 SP05 - AD 1022 Zone 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0136-341-84 $6,583.20 0136-341-85 $1,357.50 0136-341-86 $1,197.28 0136-341-87 $3,125.20 0136-341-88 $7,444.44 0136-391-10 $331.22 0136-391-29 $183.08 0136-391-30 $178.54 Totals Parcels 8 Levy $20,400.46 Assessment Roll Page 2 of 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 504 CC30 SP08 - AD 1022 Zone 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy 0136-351-01 $2,146.26 0136-351-12 $2,175.24 0136-351-16 $2,070.06 0136-351-17 $658.90 0136-351-18 $521.54 0136-351-19 $1,078.50 0280-091-27 $715.06 0280-091-28 $302.94 0280-091-29 $18.48 0280-091-66 $388.46 0280-091-67 $64.38 0280-091-68 $53.64 0280-091-69 $75.10 0280-091-70 $191.00 0280-091-71 $282.22 Totals Parcels 15 Levy $10,741.78 Assessment Roll Page 3 of 3 City of San Bernardino Engineer's Report        Packet Page. 505 Appendix B: Assessment Diagram        Packet Page. 506 LENA RD 3 R D S T CENTRAL AVE COUNTY RD RIALTO AVE D EL R OSA DR MILL ST TI P P E C A N O E A V E 0 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1022 Landscaping 117,407 sq. ft.Adjacent 182,146 sq. ft.Timber Creek Zone 1 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ê        Packet Page. 507          Packet Page. 508 This space for filing stamp only OR#: O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R ~ SINCE 1921 ~ 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of Calif ornia ) County of Orange ) ss Notice Type: Ad Description: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Executed on: 10/10/2004 At Riverside, California I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN 473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 (909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536 SB 3948896 Perla Lopez CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 201 N. E ST. BUILDING A SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401 GATT - GOVT NOT. W/ATTACHMENT Fiscal Year 25-26 Assessment Levies I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 07/22/2025 07/22/2025 SAN BERNARDINO !A000007159587! Email NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of San Bernardino Mayor and City Council will hold a public meeting on August 6,2025 at 5:00 PM in the City Council Chambers in the Norman F.Feldheym Central Library at 555 West 6th Street,San Bernardino,California.Visit the City's agenda portal at www.sbcity.org to access more meeting information. The purpose of the hearing is to consider the following: Resolution No.2025-290 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,California,Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos.951 (ZONE 1),951 (ZONE 2),952 (ZONES 1,2 AND 2A),952 (ZONE 3),953,956,959 (ZONE 1),962,963,968,974,975,976, 981,982,986,989,991,993,997,1001, 1002,1005,1007,1012 and 1016 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Resolution No.2025-291 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,California,Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos.1017,1019, 1020,1023 and 1024 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Resolution No.2025-292 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,California,Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District No.1022 and Zones 1,2 and 3 thereof for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Resolution No.2025-293 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,California,Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos.1025 and 1027 for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Resolution No.2025-294 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino,California,Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Assessment District Nos.1028,1029, 1030,1031,1032,1035 (ZONE 1),1035 (ZONE 2),1036,1037,1038,1039,1040, 1041,1042,1043 (ZONE 1),1043 (ZONE 2),1045,1046,1047,1048,1049, 1050,1051,1052,1054,1055,1056,1057, 1059,1060,1063,1064 and 1068 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Notice is further given that members of the public who wish to comment on the public hearing you may participate in the following ways:1)comments and contact information can be emailed to publiccomments@SBCity.Org by 2:30 P.M.the day of the scheduled meeting;2)attending the meeting in person and providing your public comment in person,not to exceed three minutes.        Packet Page. 509 If you challenge the matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public meeting described in this notice or written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public meeting. The City endeavors to be in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.If you require assistance or auxiliary aids to participate in the meeting,please contact the City Clerk's Office as far in advance of the meeting as possible. Additional information concerning the above matter may be obtained from,and written comments should be addressed to,San Bernardino City Clerk,290 North "D"Street,San Bernardino,California 92401. Telicia Lopez,CMC Acting City Clerk DATED:July 15,2025 7/22/25 SBS-3948896#        Packet Page. 510 Type Description Amount DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION LEGAL ADVERTISING P.O. Box 54026 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90054-0026 PHONE: (213) 229-5300 FAX (213) 229-5481 FEDERAL TAX ID:95-4133299 Date Customer Account Number Customer Payment Reference Special Project Order No Page 1 of 1 Invoice NumberCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU Ordered by: For payment processing, please forward to: DUE UPON RECEIPT. INVOICE B3948899 7/22/2025 PERLA LOPEZ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 1,365.80 07/22/202589900 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE RESO 2025-290InvoiceB3948899 1,305.56$ 1.27 * 257 AgateLines * 4 Cols * 1 Ins 60.24ONLINE Download invoices/proof or pay online at: adtech.dailyjournal.com/payment Invoice Date Government Advertising - Division 1124 Invoice Number Customer Number Amount Due DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PO BOX 54026 LOS ANGELES, CA 90054-0026 1,365.80 Payment:0.00 Total: Please Pay: PLEASE PROCESS FOR PAYMENT IMMEDIATELY. DUE UPON RECEIPT. CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU 1,365.80 1,365.80 1124119954B39488997/22/2025 Please make check payable to: Daily Journal Corporation !A000007159588!invoice with your payment. For account support, 2132295584.or call: anthony_gutierrez@dailyjournal.complease email: To ensure proper credit please write your account number        Packet Page. 511 This space for filing stamp only OR#: O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R ~ SINCE 1921 ~ 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of Calif ornia ) County of Orange ) ss Notice Type: Ad Description: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Executed on: 10/10/2004 At Riverside, California I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN 473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 (909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536 SB 3948899 Perla Lopez CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 201 N. E ST. BUILDING A SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401 GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Reso 2025-290 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 07/22/2025 07/22/2025 SAN BERNARDINO !A000007159589! Email        Packet Page. 512 RESOL UTION no.2025-290 RESOLU TION OF T HE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,C A LIFORNIA,DECLA RING INTENTION TO L EV Y AND COLLECT ASS ESSMEN TS WIT HIN ASS ESSMEN T DISTRICTS NO S.9 51 (ZONE 1),951 (ZONE 2),952 (ZONES 1,2 A ND 2A),952 (ZONE 3),953,956,9 59 (Z ON E 1 ),9 62,963,968,974,975,976, 981,982,986,989,991,993,997,1001,1002,1005,1007,1012 AND 1016 FOR FISCAL YEA R 2025-26,APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REP ORT AND PROVIDING NOTICE OF THE TIME AN D P LAC E OF HEARING O N PROPOSE D AS SESSMENT S WHEREA S,the City Council of the City of San Bernardino (the ‘‘City Council’’)has established Assessment Districts Nos.951 (Zone 1),951 (Zone 2),952 (Zones 1,2 and 2A),952 (Zone 3),953,956,959 (Zone 1),962, 963,968,974,975,976,981,982,986,989,991,993,997,1001,1002,1005,1007, 1012 and 1016 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively,the ‘‘Assessment Districts’’)pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the ‘‘Assessment Law’’);and WHEREA S,on April 16,2025,the City Council adopted a resolution initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 2025- 26 within the Assessment Districts and ordering the preparation of a report regarding assessments to be levied and collected within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 to pay the costs of the maintenance,servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities authorized by the Assessment Law;and WHEREA S,Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,the engineer designated by the City Council to prepare such report,has filed its report with the City Clerk and such report has been presented to and considered by the City Council;and WHEREA S,it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to the Assessment Law and,among other things,fixing and giving notice of the time and place of a public hearing on said report and the proposed assessments for said fiscal year. BE IT RESOLV ED BY THE MAYOR AN D CITY COUNCIL OF T HE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.Findings.The City Council finds that: (a)The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b)The report of Spicer Consulting Group,LLC (the ‘‘Report’’)contains all matters required by the Assessment Law and may,therefore,be approved by the City Council; (c)The assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer's report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance,servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities for those designated Assessment Districts, landscaping and lighting for those designated Assessment Districts,and sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities for those designated Assessment Districts;and (d)The amount of the assessment which is proposed to be assessed on each such parcel is not proposed to be increased over the amount of the assessment which was levied on the parcel for fiscal year 2024-25. SECTION 2.Intention.The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26,as set forth in the Report. Those assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes are collected,and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of county taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SE CTIO N 3.Improvements.(i)The improvements authorized for Assessment Districts Nos.951 (Zone 1),951 (Zone 2),952 (Zones 1,2,2A and 3),953,956,959 (Zone 1),968,974,975,976,981,982,986,989,991,993, 997,1001,1002,1005,1007,1012 and 1016 are: (a)The installation or planting of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance,servicing and operation thereof,including water,irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities;and        Packet Page. 513 (c)The maintenance or servicing,or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. (ii)The improvements authorized for the Assessment Districts Nos.962 and 963 are: (a)The installation or planting of sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof,and (c)The maintenance or servicing,or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. SECTION 4.Maintenance.(i)For Assessment Districts Nos.951 (Zone 1), 951 (Zone 2),952 (Zones 1,2,2A and 3),953,956,959 (Zone 1),968,974,975, 976,981,982,986,989,991,993,997,1001,1002,1005,1007,1012 and 1016,the maintenance to be performed consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,operation,and servicing of public landscape,including: (a)Repair,removal,or replacement of all,or any part of,the improvements thereon,including incidental drainage facilities. (b)Operation,maintenance,repair,and replacement of irrigation systems. (c)Servicing and maintenance of plantings and landscaping. (d)Repair and maintenance of incidental drainage facilities. (ii)For Assessment Districts Nos.962 and 963 the maintenance to be performed consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,operation,and servicing of sewer lift stations including: (a)Repair,removal,or replacement of all,or any part of,the improvements thereon,including incidental drainage facilities. (b)Repair and maintenance of incidental wastewater facilities. SECTION 5.Assessment Districts.The distinctive designation of each of the Assessment Districts is as follows:‘‘Assessment District No.951 (Zones 1 and 2)(Wagonwheel Road Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.952 (Zones 1,2,2A)(State College Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.952 (Zone 3)(State College Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.953 (16th Street)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.956 (Carnegie Drive Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.959 (Zone 1)(Shandin Hills)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.962 (Pine Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.963 (Allen Street)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.968 (Airport Drive)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.974 (Rialto Avenue Between Eucalyptus and Pepper)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.975 (Pepper and Mill Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.976 (Pine and Belmont)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.981 (Meridian and Randall Avenue)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.982 (Piedmont Drive Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.986 (Rialto and Macy Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.989 (Mill and Macy Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.991 (Verdemont and Olive Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.993 (Cajon and June Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.997 (Chestnut Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No. 1001 (Pennsylvania and Birch Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1002 (North ‘‘H’’Street Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1005 (Cajon and Pepper Linden Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1007 (Pepper and Randall Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1012 (Mill/Burney Area)of the City of San Bernardino’’and ‘‘Assessment District No.1016 (Coulston Area)of the City of San Bernardino.’’The boundaries of each of the Assessment Districts are described and shown in the Report. SECTION 6.Report and Assessments.The Report,which is on file with the City Clerk,and which has been presented to the City Council at the meeting in which this resolution is adopted,is approved.Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements,the boundaries of the Assessment District,the zones        Packet Page. 514 therein,and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land therein for the 2025-26 fiscal year. SECTION 7.Hearing.The time and place of the hearing required by the Assessment Law is set for 5:00 o'clock p.m.on July 16,2025 in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F.Feldheym Public Library at 555 W.6th Street,San Bernardino,California. SECTION 8.Notice of Hearing.NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV EN that on the date and at the time and place specified in Section 7 hereof,the City Council will conduct the public hearing on the Report and the assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of property in the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26.Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing,which protest must state all grounds of objection and describe the property within the Assessment Districts owned by any such person. SECTION 9.Publication.The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this resolution to be published once in The San Bernardino Sun as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code.Upon completion of such publication,the City Clerk shall file in her office a proof of publication demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section. SECTION 10.Designated Person.The City Council designates Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,telephone number (866)504-2067,as the person to answer inquiries regarding the levying and collection of the assessments for fiscal year 2025-26. SECTION 11.CEQA.That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.Where it can be seen with certainty,as in this case,that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 12.Severability.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid,such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications,and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 13.Effective Date.This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and A DOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21st day of May 2025. Resolution 2025-290 was adopted on May 21,2025,at the Regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council by the following votes: AYES:Sanchez,Ibarra,Figueroa,Shorett,Knaus,Flores,Ortiz NOES:None /s/Telicia Lopez Telicia Lopez,CMC,Acting City Clerk 7/22/25 SBS-3948899#        Packet Page. 515 Type Description Amount DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION LEGAL ADVERTISING P.O. Box 54026 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90054-0026 PHONE: (213) 229-5300 FAX (213) 229-5481 FEDERAL TAX ID:95-4133299 Date Customer Account Number Customer Payment Reference Special Project Order No Page 1 of 1 Invoice NumberCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU Ordered by: For payment processing, please forward to: DUE UPON RECEIPT. INVOICE B3948912 7/22/2025 PERLA LOPEZ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 1,111.80 07/22/202589900 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE RESO 2025-291InvoiceB3948912 1,051.56$ 1.27 * 414 AgateLines * 2 Cols * 1 Ins 60.24ONLINE Download invoices/proof or pay online at: adtech.dailyjournal.com/payment Invoice Date Government Advertising - Division 1124 Invoice Number Customer Number Amount Due DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PO BOX 54026 LOS ANGELES, CA 90054-0026 1,111.80 Payment:0.00 Total: Please Pay: PLEASE PROCESS FOR PAYMENT IMMEDIATELY. DUE UPON RECEIPT. CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU 1,111.80 1,111.80 1124119954B39489127/22/2025 Please make check payable to: Daily Journal Corporation !A000007159590!invoice with your payment. For account support, 2132295584.or call: anthony_gutierrez@dailyjournal.complease email: To ensure proper credit please write your account number        Packet Page. 516 This space for filing stamp only OR#: O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R ~ SINCE 1921 ~ 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of Calif ornia ) County of Orange ) ss Notice Type: Ad Description: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Executed on: 10/10/2004 At Riverside, California I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN 473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 (909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536 SB 3948912 Perla Lopez CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 201 N. E ST. BUILDING A SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401 GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Reso 2025-291 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 07/22/2025 07/22/2025 SAN BERNARDINO !A000007159591! Email RESOLUTION nO.2025-291 RESOLUTION OF THE MA YOR AND CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA N BERNARDINO, CALIFO RNIA,DECLARING INTENTIO N TO LEV Y AND COL LECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSM ENT DISTRICTS NO S.1017,1019,1020, 1023 AND 1024 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26,APP ROVING THE ENGI NEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDI NG NO TICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING ON P ROPO SED ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of San Bernardino (the ‘‘City Council’’)has established Assessment District No.1017,1019, 1020,1023 and 1024 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively,the ‘‘Assessment Districts’’)pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the ‘‘Assessment Law’’);and WHEREAS,on April 16,2025,the City Council adopted a resolution initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 2025-26 within the Assessment Districts and ordering the preparation of a report regarding assessments to be levied and collected within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 to pay the costs of the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities authorized by the Assessment Law;and WHEREAS,Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,the engineer designated by the City Council to prepare such report,has filed its report with the City Clerk and such report has been presented to and considered by the City Council;and WHEREAS,it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to the Assessment Law and,among other things,fixing and giving notice of the time and place of a public hearing on said report and the proposed assessments for said fiscal year. BE IT RESO LVED BY THE MAYO R AND CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNA RDINO AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1.Findings.The City Council finds that: (a)The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b)The report of Spicer Consulting Group,LLC (the ‘‘Report’’)contains all matters required by the Assessment Law and may,        Packet Page. 517 therefore,be approved by the City Council;and (c)The assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer's report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance,servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities. SE CTION 2.Intention.The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26,as set forth in the Report. Those assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes are collected,and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of county taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SE CTION 3.Improvements.(i)The improvements authorized for Assessment Districts Nos.1017,1019, 1020 and 1023 are: (a)The installation or planting of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance, servicing and operation thereof, including water,irrigation,drainage or electrical facilities;and (c)The maintenance or servicing, or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. (ii)The improvements authorized for Assessment District No.1024 are: (a)The installation or planting of landscaping and sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof,and (c)The maintenance or servicing, or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. SECTION 4.Maintenance.(i)The maintenance to be performed for Assessment Districts Nos.1017,1019, 1020 and 1023 consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,operation,and servicing of public landscape, including: (a)Repair,removal,or replacement of all,or any part of, the improvements thereon, including incidental drainage facilities. (b)Operation,maintenance,repair, and replacement of irrigation systems. (c)Servicing and maintenance of plantings and landscaping. (d)Repair and maintenance of incidental drainage facilities. (ii)The maintenance to be performed for Assessment District No.1024 consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation,and servicing of landscaping and sewer lift stations, including: (a)Repair,removal,or replacement of all,or any part of, the improvements thereon, including incidental drainage facilities. (b)Operation,maintenance,repair, and replacement of irrigation systems. (c)Servicing and maintenance of plantings and landscaping. (d)Repair and maintenance of incidental drainage and wastewater facilities. SECTIO N 5.Assessment Districts. The distinctive designation of each of the Assessment Districts is as follows:‘‘Assessment District No. 1017 (Kendall and Pine Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1019 (Northpark and Mountain Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1020 (Mill Street and Dallas Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1023 (Elm Avenue and Coulston Street Area)of the City of San Bernardino’’and ‘‘Assessment District No.1024 (Inland Center Drive and Riverwalk Drive Area)of the City of San Bernardino.’’The boundaries of the Assessment Districts are described and shown in the Report. SECTIO N 6.Report and Assessments.The Report,which is on file with the City Clerk,and which has been presented to the City Council at the meeting in which this resolution is adopted,is approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements,the boundaries of the Assessment Districts,and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land therein for the 2025-26 fiscal year. SECTION 7.Hearing.The time and place of the hearing required by the Assessment Law is set for 5:00 o'clock p.m.on July 16,2025 in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F.Feldheym Public Library at 555 W.6th Street,San Bernardino,California. SECTION 8.Notice of Hearing. NOTICE IS HEREB Y GIVEN that on the date and at the time and place specified in Section 7 hereof,the City Council will conduct the public hearing on the Report and the assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of property in the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26.Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing,which protest must state all grounds of objection and describe the property within the Assessment Districts owned by any such person. SECTION 9.Publication.The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this resolution to be published once in The San Bernardino Sun as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code.Upon completion of such publication,the City Clerk shall file in her office a proof of publication demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section. SECTION 10.Designated Person. The City Council designates Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,telephone number (866)504-2067,as the person to answer inquiries regarding the levying and collection of the assessments for fiscal year 2025-26. SECTION 11.CEQA.The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.Where it can be seen with certainty,as in this case,that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 12.Severability.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid,such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications,and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 13.Effective Date.This Resolution shall become effective immediately.        Packet Page. 518 APPROVED and A DOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21st day of May 2025. Resolution 2025-291 was adopted on May 21,2025,at the Regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council by the following votes: AYES:Sanchez,Ibarra,Figueroa, Shorett,Knaus,Flores,Ortiz NOES:None /s/Telicia Lopez Telicia Lopez,CMC,Acting City Clerk 7/22/25 SBS-3948912#        Packet Page. 519 Type Description Amount DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION LEGAL ADVERTISING P.O. Box 54026 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90054-0026 PHONE: (213) 229-5300 FAX (213) 229-5481 FEDERAL TAX ID:95-4133299 Date Customer Account Number Customer Payment Reference Special Project Order No Page 1 of 1 Invoice NumberCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU Ordered by: For payment processing, please forward to: DUE UPON RECEIPT. INVOICE B3948916 7/22/2025 PERLA LOPEZ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 921.30 07/22/202589900 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE RESO 2025-292InvoiceB3948916 861.06$ 1.27 * 339 AgateLines * 2 Cols * 1 Ins 60.24ONLINE Download invoices/proof or pay online at: adtech.dailyjournal.com/payment Invoice Date Government Advertising - Division 1124 Invoice Number Customer Number Amount Due DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PO BOX 54026 LOS ANGELES, CA 90054-0026 921.30 Payment:0.00 Total: Please Pay: PLEASE PROCESS FOR PAYMENT IMMEDIATELY. DUE UPON RECEIPT. CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU 921.30 921.30 1124119954B39489167/22/2025 Please make check payable to: Daily Journal Corporation !A000007159592!invoice with your payment. For account support, 2132295584.or call: anthony_gutierrez@dailyjournal.complease email: To ensure proper credit please write your account number        Packet Page. 520 This space for filing stamp only OR#: O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R ~ SINCE 1921 ~ 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of Calif ornia ) County of Orange ) ss Notice Type: Ad Description: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Executed on: 10/10/2004 At Riverside, California I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN 473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 (909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536 SB 3948916 Perla Lopez CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 201 N. E ST. BUILDING A SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401 GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Reso 2025-292 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 07/22/2025 07/22/2025 SAN BERNARDINO !A000007159593! Email RESOLUTION NO.2025-292 RESOLUTION OF THE MA YOR AND CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA N BERNARDINO, CALIFO RNIA,DECLARING INTENTIO N TO LEV Y AND COL LECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSM ENT DISTRICT NO.1022 AND ZONES 1,2 AND 3 THEREOF FOR FISCA L YEAR 2025-26, APPROVI NG THE ENGINEER'S REP ORT AND PROVIDING NOTICE OF the TIM E AND PLACE OF HEA RING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of San Bernardino (the ‘‘City Council’’)has established Assessment District No.1022 and Zones 1,2 and 3 thereof of the City of San Bernardino (the ‘‘Assessment District’’)pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the ‘‘Assessment Law’’); and WHEREAS,on April 16,2025,the City Council adopted a resolution initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 2025-26 within the Assessment District and ordering the preparation of a report regarding assessments to be levied and collected within the Assessment District for fiscal year 2025-26 to pay the costs of the maintenance, servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting and appurtenant facilities authorized by the Assessment Law;and WHEREAS,Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,the engineer designated by the City Council to prepare such report,has filed its report with the City Clerk and such report has been presented to and considered by the City Council;and WHEREAS,it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to the Assessment Law,and,among other things,fixing and giving notice of the time and place of a public hearing on said report and the proposed assessments for said fiscal year. BE IT RESO LVED BY THE MAYO R AND CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNA RDINO AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1.Findings.The City Council finds that: (a)The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b)The report of Spicer Consulting Group,LLC (the ‘‘Report’’)contains all matters required by the        Packet Page. 521 Assessment Law and may, therefore,be approved by the City Council;and (c)The assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within the Assessment District for fiscal year 2025-26 are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer's report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance,servicing and operation of landscaping and lighting and appurtenant facilities. SE CTION 2.Intention.The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within the Assessment District for fiscal year 2025-26,as set forth in the Report. Those assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes are collected,and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of county taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SE CTION 3.Improvements.The improvements authorized for the Assessment District are: (a)The installation or planting of landscaping and lighting and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof,and (c)The maintenance or servicing, or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. SE CTION 4.Maintenance.The maintenance to be performed consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,operation,and servicing of landscaping and lighting,including: (a)Repair,removal,or replacement of all,or any part of, the improvements thereon, including incidental drainage facilities. (b)Operation,maintenance,repair, and replacement of irrigation systems. (c)Servicing and maintenance of plantings and landscaping. (d)Repair and maintenance of incidental drainage facilities. SE CTION 5.Assessment District. The distinctive designation of the Assessment District is ‘‘Assessment District No.1022 (Zone 1,Zone 2 and Zone 3)(San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance- California)of the City of San Bernardino.’’The boundaries of the Assessment District are described and shown in the Report. SECTIO N 6.Report and Assessments.The Report,which is on file with the City Clerk,and which has been presented to the City Council at the meeting in which this resolution is adopted,is approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements,the boundaries of the Assessment District,the zones therein,and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land therein for the 2025-26 fiscal year. SECTIO N 7.Hearing.The time and place of the hearing required by the Assessment Law is set for 5:00 o'clock p.m.on July 16,2025 in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F.Feldheym Public Library at 555 W.6th Street,San Bernardino,California. SECTIO N 8.Notice of Hearing. NOTI CE IS HEREBY GIV EN that on the date and at the time and place specified in Section 7 hereof,the City Council will conduct the public hearing on the Report and the assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of property in the Assessment District for fiscal year 2025-26.Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing,which protest must state all grounds of objection and describe the property within the Assessment District owned by any such person. SECTIO N 9.Publication.The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this resolution to be published once in The San Bernardino Sun as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code.Upon completion of such publication,the City Clerk shall file in her office a proof of publication demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section. SECTIO N 10.Designated Person. The City Council designates Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,telephone number (866)504-2067,as the person to answer inquiries regarding the levying and collection of the assessments for fiscal year 2025-26. SECTIO N 11.CEQA.The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.Where it can be seen with certainty,as in this case,that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 12.Severability.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid,such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications,and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 13.Effective Date.This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROV ED and ADOP TED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21st day of May,2025. Resolution 2025-292 was adopted on May 21,2025,at the Regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council by the following votes: AYES:Sanchez,Ibarra,Figueroa, Shorett,Knaus,Flores,Ortiz NOES:None /s/Telicia Lopez Telicia Lopez,CMC,Acting City Clerk 7/22/25 SBS-3948916#        Packet Page. 522 Type Description Amount DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION LEGAL ADVERTISING P.O. Box 54026 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90054-0026 PHONE: (213) 229-5300 FAX (213) 229-5481 FEDERAL TAX ID:95-4133299 Date Customer Account Number Customer Payment Reference Special Project Order No Page 1 of 1 Invoice NumberCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU Ordered by: For payment processing, please forward to: DUE UPON RECEIPT. INVOICE B3948993 7/22/2025 PERLA LOPEZ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 871.22 07/22/202589900 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN GATT GOVT NOT. W/ATTACHMENT RESO 2025-293InvoiceB3948993 871.22$ 1.27 * 343 AgateLines * 2 Cols * 1 Ins Download invoices/proof or pay online at: adtech.dailyjournal.com/payment Invoice Date Government Advertising - Division 1124 Invoice Number Customer Number Amount Due DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PO BOX 54026 LOS ANGELES, CA 90054-0026 871.22 Payment:0.00 Total: Please Pay: PLEASE PROCESS FOR PAYMENT IMMEDIATELY. DUE UPON RECEIPT. CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU 871.22 871.22 1124119954B39489937/22/2025 Please make check payable to: Daily Journal Corporation !A000007159594!invoice with your payment. For account support, 2132295584.or call: anthony_gutierrez@dailyjournal.complease email: To ensure proper credit please write your account number        Packet Page. 523 This space for filing stamp only OR#: O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R ~ SINCE 1921 ~ 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of Calif ornia ) County of Orange ) ss Notice Type: Ad Description: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Executed on: 10/10/2004 At Riverside, California I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN 473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 (909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536 SB 3948993 Perla Lopez CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 201 N. E ST. BUILDING A SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401 GATT - GOVT NOT. W/ATTACHMENT Reso 2025-293 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 07/22/2025 07/22/2025 SAN BERNARDINO !A000007159595! Email RESOLUTION NO.2025-293 RESOLUTION OF THE MA YOR AND CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA N BERNARDINO, CALIFO RNIA,DECLARING INTENTIO N TO LEV Y AND COL LECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSM ENT DISTRICTS NOS.1025 AND 1027 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26, APPROVI NG THE ENGINEER'S REP ORT AND PROVIDING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE OF HEA RING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of San Bernardino (the ‘‘City Council’’)has established Assessment Districts Nos.1025 and 1027 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively,the ‘‘Assessment Districts’’)pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the ‘‘Assessment Law’’); and WHEREAS,on April 16,2025,the City Council adopted a resolution initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 2025-26 within the Assessment Districts and ordering the preparation of a report regarding assessments to be levied and collected within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 to pay the costs of the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities authorized by the Assessment Law;and WHEREAS,Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,the engineer designated by the City Council to prepare such report,has filed its report with the City Clerk and such report has been presented to and considered by the City Council;and WHEREAS,it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to the Assessment Law and,among other things,fixing and giving notice of the time and place of a public hearing on said report and the proposed assessments for said fiscal year. BE IT RESO LVED BY THE MAYO R AND CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNA RDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.Findings.The City Council finds that: (a)The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b)The report of Spicer Consulting Group,LLC (the ‘‘Report’’)contains all matters required by the Assessment Law and may,        Packet Page. 524 therefore,be approved by the City Council;and (c)The assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer's report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance,servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities. SE CTION 2.Intention.The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26,as set forth in the Report. Those assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes are collected,and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of county taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SE CTION 3.Improvements.The improvements authorized for the Assessment Districts are: (a)The installation or planting of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance, servicing and operation thereof, including water,irrigation,drainage or electrical facilities;and (c)The maintenance or servicing, or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. SE CTION 4.Maintenance.The maintenance to be performed consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,operation,and servicing of public landscape, including: (a)Repair,removal,or replacement of all,or any part of, the improvements thereon, including incidental drainage facilities. (b)Operation,maintenance,repair, and replacement of irrigation systems. (c)Servicing and maintenance of plantings and landscaping. (d)Repair and maintenance of incidental drainage facilities. SE CTIO N 5.Assessment Districts. The distinctive designation of the Assessment Districts are ‘‘Assessment District No.1025 (Palm Avenue and Washington Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino’’and ‘‘Assessment District No.1027 (Waterman Avenue and Washington Street Area)of the City of San Bernardino.’’The boundaries of the Assessment Districts are described and shown in the Report. SECTIO N 6.Report and Assessments.The Report,which is on file with the City Clerk,and which has been presented to the City Council at the meeting in which this resolution is adopted,is approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements,the boundaries of the Assessment Districts,and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land therein for the 2025-26 fiscal year. SECTIO N 7.Hearing.The time and place of the hearing required by the Assessment Law is set for 5:00 o'clock p.m.on July 21,2025 in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F.Feldheym Public Library at 555 W.6th Street,San Bernardino,California. SECTIO N 8.Notice of Hearing. NOTI CE IS HEREBY GIV EN that on the date and at the time and place specified in Section 7 hereof,the City Council will conduct the public hearing on the Report and the assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of property in the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26.Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing,which protest must state all grounds of objection and describe the property within the Assessment Districts owned by any such person. SECTIO N 9.Publication.The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this resolution to be published once in The San Bernardino Sun as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code.Upon completion of such publication,the City Clerk shall file in her office a proof of publication demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section. SECTIO N 10.Designated Person. The City Council designates Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,telephone number (866)504-2067,as the person to answer inquiries regarding the levying and collection of the assessments for fiscal year 2025-26. SECTIO N 11.CEQA.The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.Where it can be seen with certainty,as in this case,that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 12.Severability.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid,such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications,and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 13.Effective Date.This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROV ED and ADOP TED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21st day of May 2025. Resolution 2025-293 was adopted on May 21,2025,at the Regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council by the following votes: AYES:Sanchez,Ibarra,Figueroa, Shorett,Knaus,Flores,Ortiz NOES:None /s/Telicia Lopez Telicia Lopez,CMC,Acting City Clerk 7/22/25 SBS-3948993#        Packet Page. 525 Type Description Amount DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION LEGAL ADVERTISING P.O. Box 54026 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90054-0026 PHONE: (213) 229-5300 FAX (213) 229-5481 FEDERAL TAX ID:95-4133299 Date Customer Account Number Customer Payment Reference Special Project Order No Page 1 of 1 Invoice NumberCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU Ordered by: For payment processing, please forward to: DUE UPON RECEIPT. INVOICE B3948995 7/22/2025 PERLA LOPEZ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 1,429.30 07/22/202589900 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE RESO 2025-294InvoiceB3948995 1,369.06$ 1.27 * 539 AgateLines * 2 Cols * 1 Ins 60.24ONLINE Download invoices/proof or pay online at: adtech.dailyjournal.com/payment Invoice Date Government Advertising - Division 1124 Invoice Number Customer Number Amount Due DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PO BOX 54026 LOS ANGELES, CA 90054-0026 1,429.30 Payment:0.00 Total: Please Pay: PLEASE PROCESS FOR PAYMENT IMMEDIATELY. DUE UPON RECEIPT. CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU 1,429.30 1,429.30 1124119954B39489957/22/2025 Please make check payable to: Daily Journal Corporation !A000007159596!invoice with your payment. For account support, 2132295584.or call: anthony_gutierrez@dailyjournal.complease email: To ensure proper credit please write your account number        Packet Page. 526 This space for filing stamp only OR#: O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R ~ SINCE 1921 ~ 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of Calif ornia ) County of Orange ) ss Notice Type: Ad Description: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Executed on: 10/10/2004 At Riverside, California I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN 473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 (909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536 SB 3948995 Perla Lopez CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD 201 N. E ST. BUILDING A SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401 GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Reso 2025-294 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 07/22/2025 07/22/2025 SAN BERNARDINO !A000007159597! Email RESOLUTION NO.2025-294 RESOLUTION OF THE MA YOR AND CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA N BERNARDINO, CALIFO RNIA,DECLARING INTENTIO N TO LEV Y AND COL LECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSM ENT DISTRICTS NO S.1028,1029,1030, 1031,1032,1035 (Z ONE 1),1035 (ZONE 2),1036,1037,1038,1039, 1040,1041,1042,1043 (ZO NE 1), 1043 (ZO NE 2),1045,1046, 1047,1048,104 9,1050,1051,1052, 1054,1055,1056,1057,1059,1060, 1063,106 4,AND 1068 FOR FIS CAL YEA R 2025-26,APPROVI NG THE ENGI NEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDI NG NO TICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING ON P ROPO SED ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of San Bernardino (the ‘‘City Council’’)has established Assessment Districts Nos.1028,1029, 1030,1031,1032,1035 (Zone 1),1035 (Zone 2),1036,1037,1038,1039,1040, 1041,1042,1043 (Zone 1),1043 (Zone 2),1045,1046,1047,1048,1049,1050, 1052,1054,1055,1056,1057,1059,1060, 1063,1064 and 1068 of the City of San Bernardino (collectively,the ‘‘Assessment Districts’’)pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Section 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the ‘‘Assessment Law’’);and WHEREAS,on April 16,2025,the City Council adopted a resolution initiating proceedings to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 2025-26 within the Assessment Districts and ordering the preparation of a report regarding assessments to be levied and collected within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 to pay the costs of the maintenance, servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities authorized by the Assessment Law;and WHEREAS,Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,the engineer designated by the City Council to prepare such report,has filed its report with the City Clerk and such report has been presented to and considered by the City Council;and WHEREAS,it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to the Assessment Law and,among other things,fixing and giving notice of the time and place of a public hearing on said report and the proposed assessments for said fiscal year. BE IT RESO LVED BY THE MAYO R AND CITY COUNCI L OF        Packet Page. 527 THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SE CTION 1.Findings.The City Council finds that: (a)The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; (b)The report of Spicer Consulting Group,LLC (the ‘‘Report’’)contains all matters required by the Assessment Law and may, therefore,be approved by the City Council;and (c)The assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26 are determined pursuant the methodology in the engineer's report based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance,servicing and operation of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities. SE CTION 2.Intention.The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26,as set forth in the Report. Those assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes are collected,and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of county taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SE CTION 3.Improvements.(i)The improvements authorized for the listed Assessment Districts (except Assessment Districts Nos.1055 and 1068)are: (a)The installation or planting of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance, servicing and operation thereof, including water,irrigation,drainage or electrical facilities;and (c)The maintenance or servicing, or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. (ii)The improvements authorized for the Assessment District No.1055 are: (a)The installation or planting of landscaping and sewer lift stations and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof,and (c)The maintenance or servicing, or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. (iii)The improvements authorized for the Assessment District No.1068 are: (a)The installation or planting of landscape,detention basin and storm drains and appurtenant facilities; (b)The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof,and (c)The maintenance or servicing, or both,of any of the foregoing, including all matters specified in the Assessment Law and the original engineer's report which are applicable thereto. SECTIO N 4.Maintenance.The maintenance to be performed consists of the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,operation,and servicing of public landscape, including: (a)Repair,removal,or replacement of all,or any part of, the improvements thereon, including incidental drainage facilities. (b)Operation,maintenance,repair, and replacement of irrigation systems. (c)Servicing and maintenance of plantings and landscaping. (d)Repair and maintenance of incidental drainage facilities. SECTIO N 5.Assessment Districts. The distinctive designation of each of the Assessment Districts is as follows:‘‘Assessment District No. 1028 (Ohio Avenue and Walnut Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1029 (California Street and 16th Street Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1030 (Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1031 (Irvington Avenue and Olive Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1032 (Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1035 (Zone 1 and Zone 2)(Palm Avenue and Meyers Road)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1036 (Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1037 (Belmont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1038 (Orange Show Road and Arrowhead Avenue)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1039 (Irvington Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1040 (Acacia Avenue and Hill Drive Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1041 (Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1042 (Shandin Hills Drive and Shady Creek Drive)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1043 (Zone 1 and Zone 2) (Palm Avenue and Irvington Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1045 (Waterman Avenue and Orange Show Road Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1046 (Northpark Boulevard and Northstar Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1047 (Ohio Avenue and Pine Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1048 (Eucalyptus Avenue and Randall Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1049 (Ohio Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1051 (Ohio Avenue and Belmont Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1050 (Pepper Avenue and Rialto Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1052 (Belmont Avenue and Chestnut Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1054 (Campus Parkway and Valles Drive Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1055 (Pine Avenue and Redwood Street Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1056 (Magnolia Avenue and Garfield Street Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1057 (Cajon Boulevard and University Parkway Area)of the City of San Bernardino’’ ‘‘Assessment District No.1059 (Orange Show Road and Tippecanoe Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1060 (Chiquita Lane and Date Street Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1063 (Central Avenue and Lena Road Area)of the City of San Bernardino,’’‘‘Assessment District No.1064 (Cajon Boulevard and Glen        Packet Page. 528 Helen Parkway Area)of the City of San Bernardino’’and ‘‘Assessment District No.1068 (Tippecanoe Avenue and Central Avenue Area)of the City of San Bernardino.’’The boundaries of the Assessment Districts are described and shown in the Report. SE CTION 6.Report and Assessments.The Report,which is on file with the City Clerk,and which has been presented to the City Council at the meeting in which this resolution is adopted,is approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements,the boundaries of the Assessment Districts,and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land therein for the 2025-26 fiscal year. SE CTION 7.Hearing.The time and place of the hearing required by the Assessment Law is set for 5:00 o'clock p.m.on July 16,2025 in the Bing Wong Auditorium of the Norman F.Feldheym Public Library at 555 W.6th Street,San Bernardino,California. SE CTION 8.Notice of Hearing. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV EN that on the date and at the time and place specified in Section 7 hereof,the City Council will conduct the public hearing on the Report and the assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of property in the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2025-26.Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing,which protest must state all grounds of objection and describe the property within the Assessment Districts owned by any such person. SE CTION 9.Publication.The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this resolution to be published once in The San Bernardino Sun as required by the Assessment Law and Section 6061 of the Government Code.Upon completion of such publication,the City Clerk shall file in her office a proof of publication demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section. SE CTION 10.Designated Person. The City Council designates Spicer Consulting Group,LLC,telephone number (866)504-2067,as the person to answer inquiries regarding the levying and collection of the assessments for fiscal year 2025-26. SE CTIO N 11.CEQA.The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.Where it can be seen with certainty,as in this case,that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTIO N 12.Severability.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid,such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications,and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTIO N 13.Effective Date.This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and A DOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21st day of May 2025. Resolution 2025-294 was adopted on May 21,2025,at the Regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council by the following votes: AYES:Sanchez,Ibarra,Figueroa, Shorett,Knaus,Flores,Ortiz NOES:None /s/Telicia Lopez Telicia Lopez,CMC,Acting City Clerk 7/22/25 SBS-3948995#        Packet Page. 529 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk City Clerk It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the meeting minutes for the following dates: 1. February 5, 2025 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes 2. February 19, 2025 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes 3. May 17, 2023 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text.        Packet Page. 530 City of San Bernardino 201 North E Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 http://www.sbcity.org DRAFT MINUTES For The Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the Housing Authority, and Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the San Bernardino Joint Powers Financing Authority WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2025 3:30 PM Closed Session was called to order at 3:33 p.m. by Mayor Helen Tran on Wednesday, February 5, 2025, at Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, CA. CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Title Status Theodore Sanchez Council Member, Ward 1 Present Sandra Ibarra Council Member, Ward 2 Present Juan Figueroa Mayor Pro-Tem, Ward 3 Absent Fred Shorett Council Member, Ward 4 Present Kim Knaus Council Member, Ward 5 Late Mario Flores Council Member, Ward 6 Present Dr. Treasure Ortiz Council Member, Ward 7 Present Helen Tran Mayor Present Rochelle Clayton Acting City Manager Present Sonia Carvalho City Attorney Present Genoveva Rocha City Clerk Present Courtney Bowen Deputy City Clerk Present Mayor Helen Tran Council Members Theodore Sanchez Sandra Ibarra Juan Figueroa Fred Shorett Kim Knaus Mario Flores Dr. Treasure Ortiz        Packet Page. 531 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 2 3:30 P.M. There were no public comments or requests to speak for Closed Session A)- EXISTING LITIGATION (Pursuant to i. Cesar Marroquin v. City of San Bernardino, et al., United States District Court Case No. 5:23cv-1074-SSS-KK ii. Platinum Security Inc. v. City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2424508 iii. Maria Segura, as Successor in interest to Nicholas Segura, et al. v. City of S.B., United States District Court Case No. 5:22-cv-00277-JGB-SP. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Docket No. 24-244508 B) (Criteria, Timing, Goal Setting, and Other Preliminary Matters) Titles: City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager C) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6): Agency Designated Representative: City Manager Employee Organization: General Unit (Teamsters Local 1932), Management Confidential Group (SBCMA), Mid Management Unit (Teamsters Local 1932), Police Dispatch Unit (SBPDA), Police General Unit (AFSCME District Council 36), Police Management Unit (PMA), and Police Safety Unit (SBPOA) Open Session was called to order at 5:46 PM by Mayor Helen Tran on Wednesday, February 5, 2025, at Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, CA. Theodore Sanchez Council Member, Ward 1 Present Sandra Ibarra Council Member, Ward 2 Present Juan Figueroa Mayor Pro-Tem, Ward 3 Absent Fred Shorett Council Member, Ward 4 Present Kim Knaus Council Member, Ward 5 Present Mario Flores Council Member, Ward 6 Present Dr. Treasure Ortiz Council Member, Ward 7 Present Helen Tran Mayor Present Rochelle Clayton Acting City Manager Present Albert Maldonado Assistant City Attorney Present Genoveva Rocha City Clerk Present Courtney Bowen Deputy City Clerk Present        Packet Page. 532 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 3 INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chaplain Joseph Paul Lujan from Victory Outreach Church led the invocation. Ismael Abdulzahir from Highland Pacific Elementary School led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Assistant City Attorney Albert Maldonado advised that there was no reportable action from Closed Session. The Mayor and City Council presented the proclamation to Mr. Carl Dameron, Black Culture Foundation; Pastor Josh Beckley, Ecclesia Christian Fellowship Church and the IEAACC (Inland Empire African American Chamber of Commerce); Marcus Funchess, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources, San Bernardino City Unified School District; Rich Wallace, President, So Cal Black Chambers of Commerce; Robert J. Nava, J.D., CFRE, Vice President, University Advancement, Executive Director, CSUSB (Cal State University San Bernardino) Philanthropic Foundation. Mr. Carl Dameron accepted the proclamation and thanked the Mayor and City Council. Council Member Ortiz requested to remove items 4 and 7 from consideration. She stated she would re-appoint at a later date because one of her appointees was ineligible. There was a consensus among the Mayor and City Council to vote on the remaining appointments in one vote. Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Juan Figueroa Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Juan Figueroa        Packet Page. 533 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 4 4. Charter Review Committee Appointment of Victoria Sanchez (Ward 7) Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Juan Figueroa Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Juan Figueroa Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Juan Figueroa Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Juan Figueroa        Packet Page. 534 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 5 10. Planning Commission Appointment of Dan R. Carlone (Ward 7) RESULT: APPROVED APPOINTMENT OF DAN R. CARLONE [6-0] MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 11. Public Safety and Human Relations Commission Appointment of Michael G. Hartley (Ward 7) RESULT: APPROVED APPOINTMENT OF MICHAEL G. HARTLEY [6-0] MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa Assistant City Attorney Albert Maldonado made a statement about the items that were pulled by Council Member Ortiz; He clarified that a Charter Review Committee appointee must reside in the Ward represented by the appointing Council Member. City Clerk Genoveva Rocha administered the Oaths of Office. Mayor Tran and Council Member Ortiz presented the appointment certificates. CITY MANAGER UPDATE Public Information Officer Jeff Kraus provided citywide updates. Highlights included the Animal Services department assisting animals in the Palisades fires, Lunar New Year celebrations, and homeless encampment cleanups. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS LISTED AND NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Al Palazzo shared a personal story about overcoming challenges and expressed his passion for European architecture and social justice, asking to join the City team to advocate for immigrants and community resilience. Mike Hartley thanked Council Member Ortiz for appointing him to the Public Safety and Human Relations Commission. He appreciates that this commission includes Code Enforcement. Kevin Mahany, Family Assistance Program, expressed support for the “Symba Center”, a wellness center in Victorville. Julia Stauder spoke about expanding her arts consignment business into San Bernardino but noted barriers like deteriorating downtown buildings and lack of community involvement, urging improvements to boost jobs and arts. Tiana Lopez spoke about Downtown’s unsafe conditions, especially in parking        Packet Page. 535 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 6 structures, calling for public restrooms and better facilities for homeless individuals. City Clerk Rocha announced that written comments were also received. Copies were provided to the Mayor and City Council and available online.        Packet Page. 536 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 7 CONSENT CALENDAR Items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are voted on in a single motion unless a council or staff member has pulled the item for more discussion. RESULT: APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND PULLED ITEMS 14 AND 15 FOR A SEPARATE VOTE [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 12. Ratification of Lease Agreement with Mobile Modular for Modular Buildings at the Animal Shelter (Ward 3) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino California, ratify the agreements with Mobile Modular for the lease and extension of use of two modular buildings at the current animal shelter site, with a monthly rental cost of $3,996.56 which is budgeted. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 13. Accept Grant Funding in the Amount of $8,650 from UC Davis for Volunteer and Foster Care Supplies (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-025: 1. Authorizing the Department of Animal Services to accept grant funding in the amount of $8,650 from UC Davis for animal sheltering programs; and 2. Ratifying the first amendment to the grant agreement with UC Davis; and 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2024/25 Budget to appropriate $8,650 of the grant funding in both revenues and expenditures for animal shelter programs and services. RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-025 [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa        Packet Page. 537 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 8 14. Award Professional Services Agreement with Miller Cespedes and Associates LLC, in an amount not to exceed $125,000 for State Legislative Advocacy Services (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Miller Cespedes and Associates LLC for State Legislative Advocacy Services. Council Member Ortiz pulled this item for further discussion. She asked staff why a consultant was being retained for State Legislative Advocacy Services. Legislative and Governmental Affairs Manager Luis Marquez advised that the reason for the service is to make sure the City’s interests are well represented in State legislative activities. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 15. Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Land Designation of APN 0278-181-20 & a Portion of APN 0278-191-30, Also Known as Palm Field and the Antil Plant Site (Ward 1) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025 -026 of the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California, approving the redesignation of real property owned by the San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, generally located on the north side of East 6th Street, west of Pedley Road, also known as APN 0278-181-20 and a portion of 0278-191-30 as defined in Exhibit A attached hereto; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Council Member Ibarra pulled this item to ask staff if redesignation of the property meant that the City was purchasing it. Acting City Manager Clayton stated that the property is owned by the Water Department, and the City is entering into an agreement with the Water Department to regain ownership and use of the land. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa        Packet Page. 538 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 9 16. Purchasing Card Report for FY 2022/23 & FY 2023/24 (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, review and approve the Purchasing Card Report for FY 2022/23 & FY 2023/24. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 17. Amendment No. 1 to Q3 Consulting Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $48,548 to expand the scope and add an alternative along North Little League Drive, Belmont Avenue, and W. Meyers Road in the Focused Drainage Study of Meyers Creek Drainage System, for a total contract not-to- exceed $315,319 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Q3 Consulting in the amount of $48,548.00, for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of $315,319.00 to prepare for Focused Drainage Study for Meyers Creek Drainage System; and 2. Authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to adopt Resolution 2025-027 to amend the FY 2024/25 Capital Improvement Plan by re-allocating $48,548.00 from the Storm Drain Upgrade project to the Focused Drainage Study for Meyers Creek System; and 3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign and execute all documents necessary for the Amendment. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION; ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-027 [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 18. Approve Stop Sign Installation at Various Locations under an Existing Contract with Calstripe, Inc., at a Cost of Approximately $4,000 per location, which is Budgeted (Wards 1,3,4,7)        Packet Page. 539 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 10 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-028, authorizing the City Manager and/or designee to amend the City’s Master List of certain streets or portions therefor as through highways and authoring the establishments of Stop control at the following locations: a. Hill Dr & Mountain Dr (Ward 4) b. Holly Vista Blvd & Garrilee Dr (Ward 7) c. Holly Vista Blvd and Conejo Dr (Ward7) d. Holly Vista Blvd & Garden Dr (Ward 7) e. Esperanza St & K St (Ward 3) f. Mountain View Ave & 33rd St (Ward 7) g. Mountain View Ave & 36th St (Ward 7) h. 40th St & Golden Ave (Ward 4) i. 46th St & Genevieve St (Ward 4) j. Rialto Ave and J St (Ward 1,3) k. Valencia Ave & Marshall Blvd (Ward 7) RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-028 [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 19. Award of Construction Agreement for Improvements at Ruben Campos Community Center to Perfection Painting Corp in the amount of $327,100.00 (Ward 1) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution 2025-029: 1. Approving the award of a Construction Agreement with Perfection Painting Corp in the amount of $327,100.00 for the Improvements at Ruben Campos Community Center (Project); and 2. Authorizing the construction contingencies, construction management, and administrative costs in the total amount of $65,420.00 for construction of the project. 3. Authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2024/25 CIP budget with an additional $178,084.00 from the AB 1600 Parkland and Op Fund to bring the total project budget to $392,520.00. 4. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all documents with Perfection Painting Corp; and 5. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. 6. Finding the Project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines § 15302 (“Replacement or        Packet Page. 540 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 11 Reconstruction”). RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-029 [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 20. Award Professional Services Agreement for Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) for Baseline Street Study Analysis to KOA Corporation, for the total project budget amount of $301,000 (Wards 1,2,6,7) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a design services contract with KOA Corporation for the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Baseline Street Study Analysis, Strategy Design, and Local Roadway Safety Plan. The contract includes $105,700 for community engagement and $174,800 for all other tasks, totaling $280,500. 2. Authorize the Director of Finance & Management Services to allocate a contingency amount of $20,500, ensuring the total project budget for the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Baseline Street Study remains within the grant award amount of $301,000. 3. Authorize the Director of Finance & Management Services to approve the use of the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Baseline Street Study grant award and match funding, ensuring all expenditures, including the contingency, remain within the total project budget of $301,000. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa 21. Receive and File San Bernardino Municipal Water Department’s Audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, receive and file the San Bernardino Municipal Water Department’s audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for water and sewer utilities for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2024.        Packet Page. 541 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 5, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 12 RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa DISCUSSION 22. Authorization to Initiate Reorganization Proceedings with the City of Highland for a .56-acre Parcel Located at the Southeast Corner of Victoria Avenue and 5th Street (APN: 1192-551-01) (Ward 1) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize staff to initiate reorganization proceedings with the City of Highland regarding APN: 1192-551-01, consisting of a .56-acre parcel, located at the southeast corner of Victoria Avenue and 5th Street, within the sphere of influence and boundary of the City of San Bernardino. The Mayor and City Council waived any presentation or discussion for this item. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Dr. Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ABSENT:Juan Figueroa MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL UPDATES/REPORTS ON CONFERENCES & MEETINGS At this time, the Mayor and City Council provided updates to the community. Highlights included Council Member Ibarra attending the Central Valley Homeless Provider Network Regional Steering Committee; Ibarra and Ortiz attending the Homeless Partnership Continuum of Care meeting with San Bernardino County; and Knaus, Flores, Ortiz, and Mayor Tran attending the California League of Cities New Mayor and Council Members Academy. Mayor Tran also attended the U.S Council of Mayors’ Annual Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting of the Mayor and City Council was adjourned on Wednesday, February 5, 2025 at 7:24 p.m. The Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will adjourn to the Regular Meeting on February 19, 2025, at the Feldheym Central Library located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California 92401. Closed Session will begin at 4:00 p.m. and the Open Session will begin at 5:00 p.m. Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 542 City of San Bernardino 201 North E Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 http://www.sbcity.org DRAFT MINUTES For The Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the Housing Authority, and Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Acting as the San Bernardino Joint Powers Financing Authority WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2025 3:00 PM Closed Session was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Helen Tran on Wednesday, February 19, 2025, at Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, CA. CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Title Status Theodore Sanchez Council Member, Ward 1 Present Sandra Ibarra Council Member, Ward 2 Present Juan Figueroa Mayor Pro-Tem, Ward 3 Present Fred Shorett Council Member, Ward 4 Present Kim Knaus Council Member, Ward 5 Late Mario Flores Council Member, Ward 6 Present Dr. Treasure Ortiz Council Member, Ward 7 Present Helen Tran Mayor Present Rochelle Clayton Acting City Manager Present Sonia Carvalho City Attorney Present Genoveva Rocha City Clerk Present Courtney Bowen Deputy City Clerk Present Mayor Helen Tran Council Members Theodore Sanchez Sandra Ibarra Juan Figueroa Fred Shorett Kim Knaus Mario Flores Dr. Treasure Ortiz        Packet Page. 543 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 2 3:00 P.M. Prior to convening to Closed Session, Acting City Manager Tanya Romo announced that a last-minute item was being added to Closed Session regarding a personnel matter, due to it coming up after the posting of the agenda and requiring immediate attention. A 2/3 majority vote to approve including the item on the agenda was required by GC 54954.2(b)(2) (the Brown Act). Assistant City Attorney Albert Maldonado stated that since the posting of the agenda, an employee had revoked an employment severance agreement and had then resigned. There was an urgent need for the Mayor and City Council to discuss any payments owed to the employee. A motion was made by Council Member Ortiz to add the item to the Closed Session agenda. Council Member Sanchez seconded the motion. Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Christian Shaughnessy requested an update on when the Homeless Navigation Center might be complete, and/or any updates that could be provided about the Center. - EXISTING LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and (d)(1): i) Maria Segura, as Successor in interest to Nicholas Segura, et al. v. City of S.B., United States District Court Case No. 5:22-cv-00277-JGB-SP. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Docket No. 24-2445 Titles: City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager Agency Designated Representative: City Manager Employee Organization: General Unit – Teamsters Local 1932, Management Confidential Group – SBCMA, Mid Management Unit – Teamsters Local 1932, Police Dispatch Unit – SBPDA, Police General Unit – AFSCME District Council 36, Police Management Unit – PMA and Police Safety Unit – SBPOA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT Title: Interim City Manager        Packet Page. 544 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 3 ADDED ITEM: E) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION (Pursuant To Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(2)): One Case Open Session was called to order at 5:07 PM by Mayor Helen Tran on Wednesday, February 19, 2025, at Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, CA. Theodore Sanchez Council Member, Ward 1 Present Sandra Ibarra Council Member, Ward 2 Present Juan Figueroa Mayor Pro-Tem, Ward 3 Present Fred Shorett Council Member, Ward 4 Present Kim Knaus Council Member, Ward 5 Present Mario Flores Council Member, Ward 6 Present Dr. Treasure Ortiz Council Member, Ward 7 Present Helen Tran Mayor Present Tanya Romo Acting City Manager Present Albert Maldonado Assistant City Attorney Present Telicia Lopez Chief Deputy City Clerk Present Courtney Bowen Deputy City Clerk Present Assistant City Attorney Maldonado stated that the Mayor and City Council voted unanimously to appoint a new Interim City Manager, Bill Gallardo. There would be a Special Meeting on Friday, February 21, 2025 to consider the associated Resolutions for the legal approval of the appointment. Tanya Romo would continue to serve as Acting City Manager until that time. He also advised that Ralph Anderson and Associates had been retained to conduct the search for a new permanent City Manager. Pastor August Smith from Truelight Community Fellowship led the invocation, and Vivienne Aparicio from Hillside Elementary School led the Pledge of Allegiance. Public Works Director Lynn Merrill recognized the Public Works Engineering Team. - (All Wards) The Mayor and City Council presented certificates to the California Culture Festival, DAO Real Estate Group, Inland Chinese Association, and Creative Enterprise LP.        Packet Page. 545 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS 3.Development Code Amendment 24-06 (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Introduce for first reading, read by title only, and waive further reading of Ordinance No. MC-1648 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approving Development Code Amendment 24-06 amending Chapter 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions-Definitions) to update the City of San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) definitions for Neighborhood Grocery Stores/Supermarkets to align with state and industry standards; and finding such action statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 (Attachment 1); and 2.Schedule the adoption of Ordinance No. MC -1648 to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Mayor and City Council on March 5, 2025. Mayor Tran opened the Public Hearing at 5:18 p.m. Community Development and Housing Director Gabriel Elliott introduced the item, and Senior Planner Mike Rosales provided a presentation. There was one Public Comment: “Less” asked the Mayor and City Council to not build any “Dollar General” stores in the 7th Ward. Mayor Tran closed the Public Hearing at 5:25 p.m. Council Member Sanchez asked Director Elliott to confirm the State Law requirements versus the City’s requirements regarding square feet. Council Member Ortiz asked to confirm if residents and local business owners were being made aware of the changes. Planner Rosales confirmed that they had. Chief Deputy City Clerk Telicia Lopez read the title of the Ordinance into the record. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION; INTRODUCED ORDINANCE NO. MC-1648 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Kim Knaus, Council Member, Ward 5 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz        Packet Page. 546 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 5 4.Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the Rapid Rehousing Program under the Encampment Resolution Fund (ERF) (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Conduct a Public Hearing to obtain citizens’ comments on the proposed Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the Rapid Rehousing Program under the Encampment Resolution Fund (ERF) initiative. 2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to take any further actions and execute any further documents as necessary to effectuate the administration of the ERF3 program. Mayor Tran opened the Public Hearing at 5:28 p.m. Director Elliott introduced Deputy Director of Housing and Homelessness Cassandra Searcy to present the item. There were three Public Comments: Phillip Garcia expressed concern over the lack of solar energy usage in San Bernardino’s county and state buildings, suggesting the city consider solar power to reduce costs and improve efficiency; he also raised the need to address housing issues. Christian Shaughnessy commended city staff for progress on rapid rehousing efforts and urged increased attention to the growing homeless presence near Seccombe Lake and a nearby vacant lot. “Less” emphasized the need for stricter oversight of landlords involved in city programs, discouraged participation by problematic landlords, and advocated for innovative homelessness solutions such as tiny home villages, referencing successful examples and potential funding sources. Mayor Tran closed the Public Hearing at 5:45 p.m. Council Member Ortiz asked about reporting mechanisms, monitoring, and accountability for the program. Deputy Director Searcy confirmed that participants must attend meetings and report to the consultant administering the program. She also stated that the Mayor and City Council would be receiving quarterly status reports for the program. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Kim Knaus, Council Member, Ward 5 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz        Packet Page. 547 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 6 5.Public Hearing on Annexation No. 49 to Community Facilities District 2019 -1 (Maintenance Services) – Watt EV (Ward 3) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Hold a Public Hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025 -232 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified electors the question of levying a special tax within the area proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 49); and 3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2025 -233 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Facilities District No. 2019- 1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 49); and 5. Introduce, read by title only, and waive further reading of Ordinance No. MC-1650 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2024-2025 to pay annual costs of the maintenance and servicing of lighting, street, and trail maintenance, and a reserve fund for capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services); and 6. Schedule the adoption of Ordinance No. MC-1650 for March 5, 2025. Mayor Tran opened the Public Hearing at 5:47 p.m. The Mayor and City Council opted out of hearing staff’s presentation. There was one Public Comment: “Less” asked about who was responsible for the Facilities District special taxes. Staff confirmed that the property owner was responsible for the taxes, not the public. Mayor Tran closed the Public Hearing at 5:49 p.m.        Packet Page. 548 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 7 RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION; RESOLUTION NO. 2025-232 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-233 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz RESULT: INTRODUCED ORDINANCE NO. MC-1650 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz Chief Deputy City Clerk Telicia Lopez read the title of the Ordinance into the record. 6.Public Hearing on Annexation No. 50 to Community Facilities District 2019 -1 (Maintenance Services) – Chipotle (Ward 1) p. 173 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Hold a Public Hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-230 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, calling an election to submit to the qualified electors the question of levying a special tax within the area proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 50); and 3. Hold a special landowner election and canvass the election; and 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-231 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring election results for Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services) (Annexation No. 50); and 5. Introduce, read by title only, and waive further reading of Ordinance No. MC-1649 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2024-2025 to pay annual costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting, streets, drainage, and a reserve fund for capital replacement, and administrative expenses with        Packet Page. 549 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 8 respect to City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services); and -1649 for March 5, 2025. RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-230 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Kim Knaus, Council Member, Ward 5 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-231 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Mario Flores, Council Member, Ward 6 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz RESULT: INTRODUCED ORDINANCE NO. MC-1649 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz CITY MANAGER UPDATE PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS LISTED AND NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA        Packet Page. 550 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 9 Georgia L. asked for clarification about a vote against the City Manager and raised concerns about a grant to attend an animal services conference. She also attempted to serve Council Member Sanchez with recall papers. Christian Shaughnessy urged the council to protect the navigation center and requested community involvement before deadlines pass. He also asked about maintaining security at Seccombe Lake Park during renovations. Angela Wilkinson promoted the Colton Museum and encouraged San Bernardino residents to visit and learn about local history. She also shared information about upcoming educational programs through KVCR. Junior Carrillo encouraged residents to get involved positively, such as becoming commissioners. He praised city departments and asked to close the meeting in honor of Jessica Torres. Selina spoke about ongoing issues at the animal shelter. She called on the council to investigate and work together to restore public trust. Erick Marquez shared his personal battle with depression and likened it to the city's current state. He encouraged people to find joy in community and support one another through difficult times. Arthur Anderson criticized Council Member Sanchez for being disconnected from his constituents and supported his recall. He urged him to support public infrastructure, community benefits agreements, and to be more transparent. David Friedman thanked the council for their efforts and shared his work on improving downtown properties. He defended the recall effort, comparing it to treating an illness rather than ignoring it. Sharon Negrete condemned the shelter for animal cruelty. She accused the council of ignoring repeated reports and failing to act. Lydia Savala supported shelter whistleblowers and raised concerns about suspicious data manipulation. Travis Townsy described his struggle with maintaining inherited property overrun by squatters. He said city processes have made it harder to resolve the situation despite his efforts and financial investment. Tammy Valdivia accused the city shelter of violating state law by not spaying or neutering animals before release. She said no one is enforcing the law. Tiana Lopez asked Council Member Sanchez for help launching an art initiative involving 100 local artists. She said the space she wants to use is in poor condition and requested support to make it a safe, usable community hub.        Packet Page. 551 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 10 Stephanie Lenfestey spoke in support of the Pina family and their dog Potato, stating the wrong dog is being held. She emphasized that Banana, not Potato, was responsible for the alleged incident. CONSENT CALENDAR Items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are voted on in a single motion unless a council or staff member has pulled the item for more discussion. RESULT: APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR, AND PULLED ITEM 8 FOR A SEPARATE VOTE [7-0] MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 7. Accept a $5,000 One-Time Scholarship from Best Friends Animal Society (All Wards) Recommendation: -234: -time scholarship in the amount of $5,000 from Best Friends Animal Society to subsidize the cost of registration and allow staff to attend the 2025 Best Friends National Conference; and RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-234 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz        Packet Page. 552 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 11 8. HOME Investment Partnership Program – Owner Occupied Rehabilitation Program Subrecipient Agreement with Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services, Inc. (All Wards) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the HOME Investment Partnership Agreement Owner Occupied Rehabilitation Program Subrecipient Agreement between the City and Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services, Inc. for $920,000; and 2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to take further actions and execute any additional documents, including future amendments, to effectuate the agreements. This item was pulled by Council Member Ortiz for further discussion. She inquired with staff as to whether the Mayor and City council would receive updates regarding how the subrecipient funds would be spent. Acting City Manager Tanya Romo stated that yes, staff planned on providing regular updates. Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz -1646 (Annexation No. 47 - Dutch Bros) (Ward 3) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Ordinance No. MC-1646 amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2024-2025 to pay the annual costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting, streets, and a reserve fund for capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services). Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz        Packet Page. 553 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 12 It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, review and file all listed administrative budget transfers from October 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 11.Approval of Commercial and Payroll Disbursements and Purchase Card Transactions for November 2024 (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California review and file all listed administrative budget transfers from October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 12.Investment Portfolio Report for November 2024 (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, accept and file the Monthly Investment Portfolio Report for November 2024. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 13.Resolutions updating the Bank and Investment Account Signature Authority (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, and the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California acting in its capacity as the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino adopt the attached Resolutions updating the City’s and Successor Agency’s bank and investment account signature authority.        Packet Page. 554 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 13 RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION; ADOPTED RESOLUTION NOS. 2025-235, 2025-236, 2025-237, 2025-238, 2025-239, 2025-240, 2025-241, 2025-242, 2025-243, AND 2025-244 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 14. Award of Task Order with Rick Engineering for a Raised Median Installation on Rialto Ave at Metrolink Railroad Crossing in the amount of $59,590 (Ward 3 & 6) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the award of a Task Order with Rick Engineering in the amount of $59,590 for the Raised Median Installation on Rialto Ave at Metrolink Railroad Crossing (Project); and 2. Authorize the project design cost and contingency cost for unforeseen conditions costs for a potential agreement in the total amount of $5,959. 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents with Rick Engineering; and 4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 15.Recommendation to Increase the Project Budget for the Police Building Management System in the amount of $42,398.00 (Ward 1) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution 2025-246: 1. Authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2024/25 CIP Budget with an additional $42,398.00 for        Packet Page. 555 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 14 the Police Building Management System Project using the Law Enforcement Facilities Fund balance; and 2. Authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to increase the construction contingency and construction management budget from $39,450.00 to the total amount of $43,304.00; and 3. Authorizing the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-246 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 16. Award a Design Services Agreement to Bell Design Group for the Norman F. Feldheym Public Library Improvement Project in the amount of $319,000 (Ward 1) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the award of a Design Services Agreement with Bell Design Group in the amount of $319,000.00 for Norman F. Feldheym Public Library Improvement (Project); and 2. Authorize the project design cost and contingency cost for unforeseen conditions costs for a potential agreement in the total amount of $31,900.00. 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents with Bell Design Group; and 4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 17.Award Task Order with Willdan Engineering for the Traffic Calming Measures on 28th Street in the amount of $59,500 (Ward 7) Recommendation:        Packet Page. 556 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 15 It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the award of a Task Order with Willdan Engineering in the amount of $59,500 for the Traffic Calming Measures on 28th Street (Project); and 2. Authorize the project design cost and contingency cost for unforeseen conditions costs for a potential agreement in the total amount of $5,950. 3. Authorize the City Manager, Public Works Director or City Engineer to execute all documents with Willdan Engineering; and 4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the project. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 18.Adoption of Ordinance No. MC-1647 (Annexation 48 - Piedmont Park Estates) (Ward 4) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Ordinance No. MC-1647 amending Ordinance No. MC-1522 and levying special taxes to be collected during Fiscal Year 2024-2025 to pay the annual costs of the maintenance and servicing of lighting, streets, parks, graffiti abatement and a reserve fund for capital replacement, and administrative expenses with respect to City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Maintenance Services). RESULT: ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. MC-1647 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 19.Acceptance of FY 2024 Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-245 authorizing: 1. The City Manager to accept the 2024 Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant; and        Packet Page. 557 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 16 2. The Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY24/25 Adopted Budget by $181,099.00 in both revenue and expenditure of grant funds. RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-245 (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz 20. Amendments to Professional Services Agreements for Legal Services (All Wards) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute: 1. Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Graves & King for representation in the Mark Detinne, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al. San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS 2016739 increasing the not-to-exceed amount from $150,000 to $350,000. 2. Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo for the provision of legal services in connection with the case entitled Brian Pellis, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al US District Court Case No. CIVSB 2226731 increasing the not-to-exceed amount from $450,000 to $950,000. 3. Fifth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Lynberg and Watkins for the representation in the Gary Saenz, et al. v. City of San Bernardino et al., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS2003802 increasing the not-to-exceed amount from $225,000 to $241,859.69. 4. Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Lawrence, Beach, Allen & Choi, for representation in the Maria Segura, as successor in interest to Nicholas Segura, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, US District Court Case No. 8:23-cv-00786-HDV-DFM increasing the not-to-exceed amount from $100,000 to $200,000. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION (7-0) MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FUTURE MEETINGS        Packet Page. 558 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes February 19, 2025 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 17 21. Presentation of Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) (All Wards) – Mayor Pro Tempore Figueroa Mayor Pro Tem Figueroa asked if staff could provide a presentation or report about the status of the CCA with the City, for the public’s benefit. RESULT: APPROVED TO INCLUDE A PRESENTATION AT A FUTURE MEETING (7-0) MOVER:Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, Ward 7 SECONDER:Kim Knaus, Council Member, Ward 5 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Knaus, Flores, Ortiz MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL UPDATES/REPORTS ON CONFERENCES & MEETINGS At this time, the Mayor and City Council provided updates to the community. Highlights included recent neighborhood association meetings, Council Member Ward Townhall Meetings, new small businesses in the City, and an upcoming boxing match with local celebrity Terry Washington. ADJOURNMENT The meeting of the Mayor and City Council was adjourned on Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 7:24 p.m. The Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will adjourn to the next Regular Meeting on Wednesday, March 5, 2025, at the Feldheym Central Library located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California 92401. Closed Session will begin at 4:00 p.m., and Open Session will begin at 5:00 p.m. Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 559 City of San Bernardino 201 North E Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 http://www.sbcity.org DRAFT MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ACTING AS THE SAN BERNARDINO JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, MAY 17, 2023 5:30 PM Closed Session was called to order at 5:30 PM by Mayor Helen Tran on Wednesday, May 17, 2023, at Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, CA. CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Theodore Sanchez Council Member, Ward 1 Late 5:33 p.m. Sandra Ibarra Council Member, Ward 2 Present Juan Figueroa Council Member, Ward 3 Present Fred Shorett Mayor Pro-Tem, Ward 4 Present Ben Reynoso Council Member, Ward 5 Late 5:38 p.m. Kimberly Calvin Council Member, Ward 6 Late 5:49 p.m. Damon L. Alexander Council Member, Ward 7 Present Helen Tran Mayor Present Charles E. McNeely Interim City Manager Present Sonia Carvalho City Attorney Present Genoveva Rocha City Clerk Present Telicia Lopez Chief Deputy City Clerk Present Mayor Helen Tran Council Members Theodore Sanchez Sandra Ibarra Juan Figueroa Fred Shorett Ben Reynoso Kimberly Calvin Damon L. Alexander        Packet Page. 560 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 2 5:30 P.M. There were no requests to speak, or written comments received for Closed Session. City Manager (Recruitment Process) The Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino was called to order at 7:11 PM by Mayor Helen Tran on Wednesday, May 17, 2023, at Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, CA. Pastor Byron Sims of New Kingdom Culture Worship Centre led the Invocation and Girl Scout Troop #446 led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. City Attorney Sonia Carvalho stated there was one closed session item regarding the recruitment of the city manager, however there was no reportable action. Todd Hoose, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) representative spoke on the services and assistance being offered by FEMA. For assistance call 800-621- 3362. Carmen Gallegos spoke about unlicensed contractors operating, blight, building fires downtown and fireworks enforcement. The following students and staff from Akoma Unity Center spoke regarding the “Drip’d Squad” Water Resource Program. Sponsored by the University of California, Riverside, Peoples Collective for Environmental Justice, Caps Expanded Learning, and San Bernardino Water Department: Jennifer Xicara Emily Valdez Caleb Alaihni Chapman Alan Campo Lilianna Wilson Kianna Wilson Abiyo Manalli Nicholas Nelson Darcel Canada Georgia Lykouretzos spoke on the homeless who need to shelter animals.        Packet Page. 561 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 3 Barbara Nitis, U.S. Small Business Administration – Disaster Relief, spoke on the assistance that is available for homeowners, renters, churches and businesses due to disasters. th Ward. He acknowledged the efforts of Council Member Calvin.        Packet Page. 562 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 4 Mayor Tran re-ordered the agenda during Public Comments and opened the Public Hearing for Item No. 15 on the agenda. It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California execute the following actions: 1.Conduct a Public Hearing to receive comments on the proposed rate increases and Third Amendment to the City’s Exclusive Franchise Agreement for Integrated Solid Waste Collection, Processing and Disposal Services with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. (“Burrtec”); and 2.Close the Public Hearing after all public comments have been heard; and 3.Determine if written protests have been received from the owners and tenants from parcels which are subject to the solid waste service rate increases, and, if a majority protest is not received; and 4.Adopt Resolution No. 2023-074, a Resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Approving Third Amendment to the Exclusive Franchise Agreement for Integrated Solid Waste Collection, Processing, and Disposal Services with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., Adopting Maximum Permitted Service Rates, and Finding this Action Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. City Attorney Sonia Carvalho explained the requirements of Proposition 218, governing the public hearing and the proposed adoption of the rates and charges. Mayor Tran opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. Prior to the staff presentation, Council Member Sanchez made a motion to re-enter negotiations on the rates with Burrtec and continue the public hearing to June 21, 2023. In addition, he requested a survey on the Senate Bill (SB) 1383 rate increase implementation with other trash haulers. Council Member Alexander requested to include an option for Senior Citizen reduced rates. Mayor Tran requested addressing blight clean up and illegal dumping. Mayor Pro Tem Shorett requested a survey of what other agencies are doing to implement SB 1383 requirements Council Member Sanchez asked staff to seek the option of a smaller trash bin.        Packet Page. 563 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 5 RESULT: THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 21, 2023. COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO ENTER SHORT- TERM NEGOTIATIONS WITH BURRTEC FOR LOWER RATE OPTIONS, LOWER RATES FOR SENIORS, SMALLER BIN OPTIONS, BLIGHT/ILLEGAL DUMPING CLEAN UP. INCLUDE SENATE BILL 1383 RATE INCREASE SURVEY IN THE STAFF REPORT. MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Juan Figueroa, Council Member, Ward 3 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander ABSENT:Ben Reynoso Mayor Tran re-ordered the agenda and called the Presentations prior to the conclusion of public comments, after continuing the Public Hearing. PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation for National Public Works Week in the City of San Bernardino – May 21st –27th, 2023 (All Wards) Mayor Tran presented the Proclamation to Agency Director of Public Works Daniel Hernandez and various Public Works staff. 2.Proclamation for National Salvation Army Week in the City of San Bernardino – May 15th – 21st, 2023 (All Wards) Mayor Tran and Mayor Pro Tem Shorett presented the Proclamation to Salvation Army Major Isaias Beck Braga and Major Adelma Braga, Corps Officer At this time, public comments resumed. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS LISTED AND NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA The following speakers spoke in support of street vending operations and day laborers and requested that the city cease all enforcement efforts. Julieta Fuentes Yeni Linares Jesus Ontiveros Olga Flores Jessica Alcocer Russel Jaregui Jesus Gaxiola Jesus Cruz Joaquin Castellanos Luis Valentan Martha Bautista Miguel Rodriguez Esmerelda Negrete spoke on an agreement with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and former City Manager Robert Field. She spoke on a need for checks and balances in the City Manager role. She also spoke in opposition to the salary of the mayor’s assistant. Junior Carrillo forfeited his time to expedite the meeting. Daniel Jivanjee spoke on the homeless crisis and the Inland Valley Development Airport Gateway Specific Plans potential to displace around 2,300 residents.        Packet Page. 564 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 6 Dolores Armstead spoke on Item No. 5 and requested the workshop be open to the public to allow the community to have input. At this time Zoom Public Comments Were heard: Lessy Philpot spoke in opposition to Item No. 20, from the May 3, 2023, Mayor and City Council Meeting. He expressed opposition to the Police Department hiring officers that were under investigation from other agencies. Hardy Brown spoke about his displeasure of Mayor Pro Tem Shorett not supporting Mayor Tran as the Chair for the Inland Valley Development Agency Board. Tina requested to meet with the Mayor and Council Member Alexander. CITY MANAGER UPDATE At this time, Jeff Kraus provided city-wide updates. Highlights included the Draft Housing Element release, American Planning Association Award, acknowledged Officer Dave Rosa for 40 years of service, California State University Baseball team selected for NCAA Tournament, Sizzlin’ Summer Nights and Memorial Day Ceremony for Fallen Heroes. Interim City Manager Charles McNeely responded to topics of concern from Public Comments which included advising the Mayor and City Council that he has met with labor representatives that spoke, addressed concerns on the temporary closure of Perris Hill Park and Meadowbrook Park for maintenance, and agenda items addressing homeless issues. At this time, Mayor Tran announced the Mayor and City Council Updates would be heard at the conclusion of City business. APPOINTMENTS 3.Public Safety and Human Relations Commission Reappointment (Ward 2) RESULT: APPROVED REAPPOINTMENT OF SEAN KELLEY [6-0] MOVER:Juan Figueroa, Council Member, Ward 3 SECONDER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander ABSENT:Ben Reynoso        Packet Page. 565 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 7 CONSENT CALENDAR Items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are voted on in a single motion unless a council or staff member has pulled the item for more discussion. Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander Ben Reynoso 4.Management Agreement with Local Golf Management LLC It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2023-063, approving a Management Agreement with Local Golf Management LLC. Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander Ben Reynoso 5.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment Levies for Previously Formed Assessment Districts. (All Wards) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council adopt Resolution Nos. 2023-064, 2023- 065, 2023-066, 2023-067, and 2023-068 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, declaring intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2023-24 within various assessment districts within the City of San Bernardino, approving engineer’s reports for each assessment district and providing notice of the time and place of hearing on proposed assessments in each assessment district. Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander Ben Reynoso        Packet Page. 566 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 8 6.Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont Companies for Economic Development Advisory Services (All Wards) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont Companies for Economic Development Advisory Services; and 2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Kosmont Companies; and 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-069 authorizing the Agency Director of Administrative Services to amend the Adopted FY 2022/2023 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $75,000; and 4. Authorize the Agency Director of Administrative Services to issue a Purchase Order in an amount not to exceed $75,000 to Kosmont Companies. Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander Ben Reynoso 7. Approval of Commercial and Payroll Disbursements (All Wards) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California approve the commercial and payroll disbursements for April 2023. Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander Ben Reynoso 8.Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-070 Appointing an Interim Agency Director of Community, Housing, and Economic Development (All Wards) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-070 appointing Mary E. Lanier as Agency Director of Community, Housing, and Economic Development on an interim basis Approve a Retired Annuitant Employment Agreement.        Packet Page. 567 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 9 RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2023-070 [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander ABSENT:Ben Reynoso 9.Approve Final Tract Map No. 20494 for the Warmington Residential Project (Ward 6) Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-071 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approving Final Tract Map No. 20494 (Subdivision 21- 12) involving the subdivision of one parcel (APN 0143 -191 -59) containing approximately 9.9 acres into ninety-five (95) single-family residential lots and nine (9) lettered lots for common facility improvements, located on the south side of W. Highland Avenue, approximately 600 feet west of N. Medical Center Drive; and 2. Accepting the public dedications as set forth on said map; and 3. Authorizing execution of the standard form of agreement for the subdivision improvements. RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2023-071 [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander ABSENT:Ben Reynoso 10.Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with Anser Advisory Management, LLC (All Wards) Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize the execution of Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement with Anser Advisory Management, LLC for construction management and inspection services extending the agreement until May 17, 2024. RESULT: APPROVED STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander ABSENT:Ben Reynoso        Packet Page. 568 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 10 11.Concept Plan Approval for Eastside Skate Park Improvements at Speicher Park (Ward 2) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2023-072: Authorizing the Agency Director of Administrative Services to amend the FY 2022/23 Capital Improvement Plan to record a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $230,000.00 from the AB 1600 Parkland and Op (Fund 268) for the Skate Park Improvements at Speicher Park (“Project”). Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander Ben Reynoso 12.Pre-Approval of Mayor Travel for FY 2022/2023 (All Wards) It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, pre-approve the Mayor’s specified travel for Fiscal Year 2022/23. Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 Sandra Ibarra, Council Member, Ward 2 Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander Ben Reynoso It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff or approve Resolution No. 2023-073 adopting the policy designating a meeting minute taker and procedures for the taking and storing of minutes pertaining to closed session meetings of the Mayor and City Council. City Clerk Genoveva Rocha gave a presentation to the Mayor and City Council. Council Member Ibarra asked when the Closed Session Minutes would be reported to the public. City Attorney Carvalho advised that reportable action is provided in compliance with the Brown Act. Council Member Shorett spoke in opposition to the item. Council Member Calvin spoke in favor of the item to allow the council to recount what has taken place in Closed Session.        Packet Page. 569 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 11 RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2023-073 [4-2] MOVER:Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, Ward 1 SECONDER:Damon Alexander, Council Member, Ward 7 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Calvin, Alexander NOES:Juan Figueroa, Fred Shorett ABSENT:Ben Reynoso 14. Responding to the City’s Urgent Homeless Crisis Recommendation It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-075 authorizing the City of San Bernardino to submit a joint application with Hope the Mission to apply for Homekey 3.0 grant funding for the development SB HOPE Campus and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign any documents that may be required to apply for funding, including making minor and non-substantive changes; 2. Approve the Professional Service Agreement with Hope the Mission to oversee the City’s Homeless Outreach Project; 3. Authorize staff to negotiate and bring back a contract with Hope the Mission to act as developer and lead operator of the Navigation Center (SB HOPE Campus); 4. Approve the Mobile Shower Pilot Agreement between the City of San Bernardino (City) and Community Action Partnership of San Bernardino County (CAPSBC), from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024, in a total amount not to exceed $150,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding; 5. Approve the reallocation of $973,500 in ARPA funds from San Bernardino Valley College and the City’s Relocation Assistance Program to provide interim housing for unhoused individuals during the development of the SB HOPE Campus; and 6. Adopt Resolution No.2023-076, the City of San Bernardino Homelessness State of Emergency Implementation Plan. Deputy Director of Housing, Cassandra Searcy gave a presentation with assistance from Agency Director of Public Works, Daniel Hernandez, and Director of Parks and Recreation, Lydie Gutfeld. Discussion ensued on this item. The City Council collectively offered support of the item presented by staff. Council Member Ibarra requested that an employment aspect be added to the project to assist with job training and placement.        Packet Page. 570 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino Page 12 RESULT: ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2023-075 AND NO. 2023-076 [6-0] MOVER:Fred Shorett, Council Member, Ward 4 SECONDER:Juan Figueroa, Council Member, Ward 3 AYES:Sanchez, Ibarra, Figueroa, Shorett, Calvin, Alexander ABSENT:Ben Reynoso PUBLIC HEARINGS 15. Public Hearing Regarding Solid Waste Rate Increases and Resolution Adopting Rates for Solid Waste Services, Approving Third Amendment to the City’s Exclusive Franchise Agreement for Integrated Solid Waste Collection,Processing and Disposal Services with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., and Finding the Action Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (All Wards) Mayor Tran re-ordered the agenda and called Item No. 15 prior to presentations. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL UPDATES/REPORTS ON CONFERENCES/MEETINGS At this time, the Mayor and City Council provided updates to the community. Highlights included a meeting of the Perris Hill Park/Valencia Neighborhood Association, Muscupiabe Neighborhood Association, Community Clean-Up hosted by Calvary Chapel 1499 East Baseline, San Bernardino Food Fest, Habitat for Humanity, The Wildwood Neighborhood Association Plant Sale, Coffee with a cop May 16th, Pacific High School groundbreaking for Biomedical Technology Center, Salvation Army Homeless Pray in front of City Hall, Community Dump Day at Seccombe Lake, San Bernardino won a sustainability award from the Southern California Association of Governments. San Bernardino Valley College Chapter of the Lynx 45th Annual Scholarship Breakfast. Muscupiabe and Blair Park 1st Family Gala, and The Water Safety Challenge at Jerry Lewis Center. ADJOURNMENT The meeting of the Mayor and City Council was adjourned on Wednesday, May 17, 2023, at 10:27 p.m. The next joint regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council and the Mayor and City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on Wednesday, June 7, 2023, in the Council Chamber located at 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino, California 92410. Closed Session will begin at 5:30 p.m. and Open Session will begin at 7:00 p.m. By:_________________________ Telicia Lopez, CMC        Packet Page. 571 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk City Clerk It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-349 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California Fair Political Practice Commission for campaign law enforcement. This action supports the City’s ongoing compliance with Assembly Bill 571 (AB 571), which established default state campaign contribution limits for local electives. The city previously adopted local campaign finance regulations and entered into an agreement with the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) for enforcement of these provisions. On January 1, 2021, Assembly Bill (AB) 571 went into effect, setting default contribution limits for elective county and city offices aligning with contributions limits set for elected officers of the state Assembly and Senate. Under AB 571, the FPPC will have administration and enforcement authority regarding the default contribution limits for cities and counties without their own local contribution limits, and make violations of default contribution limits within the FPPC’s purview punishable as a misdemeanor. These contribution limits may be adjusted by the FPPC in January of odd-numbered years. Under the new law, cities were permitted to adopt local campaign ordinances that contain additional restrictions and requirements that are more precisely tailored to the needs of their communities. On September 16, 2020, after consideration of the matter, the City Council decided to defer to the state’s limit, which is presently set at $5,900        Packet Page. 572 from an individual per election, enforced by the FPPC. On June 2, 2021, the Mayor and City Council adopted Ordinance No. MC-1558. Adding Chapter 2.55 of the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code relating to local campaign finance regulations, including restrictions for contracts pending approval by the Mayor and City Council and members of the City. Also on June 2, 2021, Mayor and City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with the FPPC for Campaign Law Enforcement services as established under Chapter 2.55 of the Municipal Code. On February 21, 2024, an Amendment No. 1 agreement with the FPPC for Campaign Law Enforcement services. Discussion To ensure appropriate enforcement of these regulations, the city entered into an agreement with the FPPC for campaign law enforcement services. The agreement authorized the FPPC to investigate and, if necessary, prosecute violations of the campaign contribution rules applicable to local elections in the City of San Bernardino. The proposed new agreement with the FPPC will maintain the enforcement relationship and continue to promote transparency and accountability in the city’s process. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The action aligns with Strategic Goal No.2: Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified and Community. To foster transparency and accountability with the citizens and stakeholders. Fiscal Impact The cost for the FPPC to enforce the City’s local campaign contribution ordinance is based on the actual cost of services provided, with a maximum amount not to exceed $200,000 over a two-year contract period. This includes a base annual fee of $55,000. The proposed FY 2025–2026 operating budget includes funding to support this agreement. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-349 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California Fair Political Practice Commission for campaign law enforcement. Attachments Attachment 1 – Ordinance No. MC-1558 Attachment 2 – Resolution 2025-349 Attachment 3 – FPPC Local and Municipal Contract 2025-2027        Packet Page. 573 Ward: All Wards Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: June 2, 2021 Agreement with the State of California Fair Political Practices Commission February 21, 2024 Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with the State of California Fair Political Practices Commission        Packet Page. 574 Resolution No. 2025-349 Resolution No. 2025-349 7 4 8 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-349 in an effort to increase transparency and eliminate any appearance of quid pro quo, thereby increasing trust in the City’s government, the City seeks to establish a limit on campaign contributions by persons, or persons acting on their behalf, with active applications with the City; and Government Code section 81013 provides that a local agency may impose additional laws regulating political practices on any person as long as it does not prevent that person from complying with the Political Reform Act; and Government Code section 84308 already imposes limits on the solicitation and receipt of contributions for appointed officials from active or recent participants in the entitlement process and the City’s elected officials are required to comply with such rules when they are appointed to other legislative bodies; and , it is the City Council’s intent to address the perception that unregulated campaign contributions lead to improper influence over elected officials and to establish realistic, narrowly tailored and enforceable limits on the amounts which may be contributed to City political campaigns by persons with active applications in the City consistent with the rights of political expression protected under the United States Constitution; and on May 19, 2021, the City Council accepted for first reading Ordinance No. MC-1558 adding Chapter 2.55 to the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code Relating to Local Campaign Finance Regulations; and the purpose of this Ordinance is to establish limits on the amounts of money that may be directly contributed to political campaigns by persons with active applications in the City’s elections; and Ordinance No. MC-1558 designates the California Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”) as the enforcement agency for Chapter 2.55 of the Municipal Code; and under Chapter 2.55 of the Municipal Code the City provide access to the FPPC for all licenses data, permits, contracts or entitlements for use, as defined in Section 2.55.010 and the FPPC will cross-reference the data received from the City against the most recent FPPC Form 460 Filing (Recipient Committee Campaign Statement) of each Elected Official who has received Contributions equal to or exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000) as shown on the most recent FPPC Form 460 Filing; and        Packet Page. 575 Resolution No. 2025-349 Resolution No. 2025-349 7 4 8 9 WHEREAS, as set forth in Government Code section 83116, the FPPC shall have prosecutorial discretion to enforce and may discipline an Elected Official for violating Chapter 2.55 of the Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, requiring the Elected Official to pay a monetary fine. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Professional Services Agreement with the California Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”), in an amount not to exceed $200,000. SECTION 3.That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4.Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August 2025. Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino        Packet Page. 576 Resolution No. 2025-349 Resolution No. 2025-349 7 4 8 9 Attest:        Packet Page. 577 Resolution No. 2025-349 Resolution No. 2025-349 7 4 8 9 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-349, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August, 2025 by the following vote: SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this __ day of August, 2025. Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 578        Packet Page. 579        Packet Page. 580        Packet Page. 581        Packet Page. 582        Packet Page. 583 STATE OF CALIFORNIA This agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ___________ 2025, by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Fair Political Practices Commission, (“FPPC”) and the City of San Bernardino (“Local Agency”). The Local Agency determined it is in its best interest to retain the services of the FPPC to provide for the enforcement and interpretation of campaign laws under the provisions of the Local Agency campaign ordinance (“Local Ordinance”), governing the elective Local Agency offices, as set forth with specificity in Exhibit D, Items 1 and 2. The FPPC has the special skills, knowledge, experience, and expertise in the enforcement and interpretation of campaign laws necessary to effectively advise, investigate, audit, and otherwise assist the Local Agency on such matters. The FPPC’s enforcement and interpretation of campaign laws under the provisions of the Local Ordinance is expressly authorized by California Government Code Section 83123.6. The parties agree as follows: 1.The FPPC agrees to provide the Local Agency with campaign law services for the impartial, effective administration, implementation, and enforcement of the Local Ordinance as dictated in paragraph 2. 2.Campaign Law Enforcement Services. Auditing i. The FPPC will perform audits and investigations for each candidate, and his or her controlled committee, for elective Local Agency office for whom $2,000 or more in contributions were received or $2,000 in expenditures were made, whether by the candidate, a committee(s) controlled by the candidate, or committee primarily supporting the candidate.        Packet Page. 584 2 ii. The audit or investigation will cover all required campaign statements and for the primary and general election, or runoff, or special election for the following election time periods: January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026. The audits may extend to include any transaction in connection with the election being audited or investigated. It will not include any statements or reports previously audited under Title 9 of the Government Code, Chapter 10, Sections 90001 or 90003, 83123.5, or 83123.6. iii. The FPPC will follow audit guidelines and standards as required under Government Code Section 90007. Enforcement The FPPC agrees to serve as the civil and administrative prosecutor for violations of the Local Ordinance. The FPPC, at its sole discretion, may investigate possible violations and may commence civil and/or administrative actions in accordance with Title 9 of the Government Code, and Title 2, Division 3, Part 1, Chapter 5 (Administrative Adjudication), Sections 11500, et seq., of the Government Code. Campaign Compliance Assistance The FPPC agrees to provide written and/or verbal assistance to candidates for elected Local Agency offices, and potential contributors in a Local Agency election, regarding the Local Ordinance upon the request of the candidate or potential contributor. Campaign Compliance Training At least once per election cycle, the FPPC will provide an in-person seminar to review the relevant process, procedures and rules for Local Agency electoral candidates. The FPPC will provide outreach to Local Agency electoral candidates. The Local Agency will provide the FPPC with filed Form 501 campaign intention statements by the Local Agency electoral candidates to facilitate this outreach. Legal Review Upon notification and request by the Local Agency, the FPPC will review any proposed changes to the Local Ordinance for compliance with the Political Reform Act prior to adoption by the Local Agency. (Required under Government Code Section 83123.6. subdivisions (b) and (c).)        Packet Page. 585 3 Education and Training The FPPC will provide an initial training workshop to the Local Agency regarding the conflict of interest provisions and/or Form 700 requirements under the Political Reform Act, as it applies to the Local Agency and its officials, employees, candidates for elected Local Agency offices, and/or lobbyists. (The Political Reform Act initial training workshop is not a charged service.) 3.The term of this Agreement is the two-year election cycle period: July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027. Services will commence on the beginning of this term, and for the elections held during this term, as indicated in paragraph (2)(A), above. Due to the nature of audits and investigations, some services may necessarily occur on dates after the stated election cycles. Services from prior contract will continue as previously determined until completed. 4.The Local Agency agrees to provide the FPPC with a resolution, motion, order, or ordinance of the governing body, which authorizes execution of this Agreement, and indicating the individual who is authorized to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Local Agency. 5.The Local Agency must consult with the FPPC prior to adopting or amending the Local Ordinance. The Local Ordinance must comply with Title 9 of the Government Code. (Government Code Section 83123.6, subdivision (b) and (c).) 6.The Contract Coordinators for this Agreement are: Fair Political Practices Commission Galena West, Executive Director 1102 Q Street, Suite 3050 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-322-5660 gwest@fppc.ca.gov Agency: City of San Bernardino Communications regarding this Agreement will be addressed to the Contract Coordinators unless otherwise indicated in the Agreement. Each party will update the contact information for the Contract Coordinator within 30 days of any changes. Exhibit B: Budget Details and Payment Provisions 1. Full Cost Recovery Agreement. In accordance with the state full cost recovery policy, the Local Agency agrees to reimburse the FPPC for its full direct and its indirect costs incurred in performing the        Packet Page. 586 4 services. The full cost of goods or services includes all costs attributable directly to the activity plus a fair share of indirect costs which can be ascribed reasonably to the good or service provided. (State Administrative Manual, Section 8752.). If the Local Agency terminates the agreement, it agrees to pay the FPPC for any other expenditures reasonably made by the FPPC in anticipation of services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement (Gov. Code Section 83123.6 (d)(2)) 2. Invoicing and Payment. The FPPC will provide the Local Agency with an itemized quarterly invoice detailing all FPPC service hours and costs for the administration, implementation, and enforcement of the Local Ordinance under this Agreement, along with any billing statement for payments due under the Agreement. Quarterly itemized invoices and billing statements will be submitted to: Agency: City of San Bernardino Office:City Clerk Name/Title: Telicia Lopez, City Clerk Address: The Local Agency agrees to pay the FPPC within thirty (30) days of the date of each quarterly invoice and billing statement. 3. Advance Payment. A. The Local Agency agrees to pay an advance payment of $55,000 to the FPPC for costs to be incurred in performance of this Agreement. The Local Agency agrees to make this advance payment at the beginning of each year of the contract term. B. Except for extraordinary costs and expenses, no advance notification is necessary for services provided for each year of the contract. The FPPC will track its expenditures made in anticipation of services to be rendered, and its services provided, and will bill first to the advance payment. Upon depletion of the advance payment, the Local Agency will pay additional reimbursement sums, if any, upon receipt of a billing statement from the FPPC. 4. Rates and Costs for Services. A. Budget Detail. The FPPC will bill for its services at the rates set forth below. These rates include the FPPC’s direct and indirect costs related to these positions.        Packet Page. 587 5 Classification Rate per hour Attorney $228.00 Paralegal $213.00 Investigator $202.00 Program Specialist (Auditor) $202.00 Political Reform Consultant (Research Analyst) $202.00 Executive/Supervisory Staff $228.00 Administrative Staff $202.00 The rates reflect the Attorney General’s Office, legal services billing rates stated in Budget Letter 24-26 and the Department of General Services Price Book, 2024-25. The Executive/Supervisory Staff and Administrative Staff rates are calculated using comparable rates from the Price Book and internal calculations in compliance with the state full cost recovery policy. B. Necessary Changes to Rates. In the event that the state hourly rates increase, or the state reimbursement rates increase, the Local Agency agrees to pay the appropriate increased rate applied as of the effective date of the rate increase. It is understood by both parties that no advance written notification is necessary prior to implementing the increased rates. In the event that the FPPC determines that the above hourly rates do not result in a full cost recovery for services provided in accordance with state policy, it will notify the Contract Coordinator for the Local Agency and retroactively apply the appropriate rates, after consultation with the Local Agency, to ensure the FPPC maintains the required full cost recovery. C. Ordinary and Extraordinary Costs and Expenses. The FPPC will bill its actual costs for ordinary costs and expenses directly related to the services provided. Ordinary costs and expenses are limited to: 1.Court fees, including filing fees, judicial officer fees, deposition fees, transcript fees, and process serving fees. 2.Administrative fees, including administrative officer fees, administrative law judge fees, hearing fees, transcript fees, and process serving fees. 3.Travel, lodging, and meals pursuant to state reimbursement rates as necessary for FPPC officers, employees, contractors, agents, and volunteers. 4.Telephone charges, postage, photocopying/document reproduction costs, and damage to property repaired or replaced at state expense.        Packet Page. 588 7 5.Research service fees necessary to perform services. Prior Approval Required. The FPPC will bill its actual costs for extraordinary costs and expenses only upon prior approval by the Local Agency Counsel. Extraordinary costs and expenses include, but are not limited to: 1.Fees for third-party consultants, investigators, and experts including their travel, lodging, and meals. 2.Travel, lodging, and meals for witnesses. 5. Total Cost of the Agreement. The parties anticipate that the total amount of this Agreement will not exceed $200,000 per year. In the event this contract is canceled or is not renewed, the FPPC will provide an estimate of remaining hours necessary to complete the services already in progress, or required by this Agreement, to be billed at the hourly rate, and the services may be completed upon mutual agreement. Exhibit C: General Terms and Conditions 1. APPROVAL. This Agreement is of no force or effect until signed by both parties. In addition, pursuant to Government Code Section 83123.6, subdivision (d), the FPPC may approve this Agreement at the earliest of 90 days after its submission to the Department of General Services (“DGS”), or after receiving DGS’s written review, whichever occurs first. 2. STATE AUDIT OF THIS AGREEMENT. The Local Agency agrees that the State of California, including but not limited to, the Department of General Services, the Bureau of State Audits, or their designated representative, shall have the right to review and to copy all records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. The Local Agency agrees to maintain records and supporting documentation for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated by the parties or required by the Bureau of State Audits. The Local Agency agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to records and supporting documentation during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to the records. Furthermore, the Local Agency agrees that the State of California has the same right to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to the performance of this Agreement. (Government Code Section 8546.7.) The FPPC will not bill the Local Agency for its time or costs related to a State Audit by the Department of General Services, Bureau of State Audits. 3. DISPUTES. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under the terms of this Agreement that is not disposed within a reasonable period of time (ten days) by the        Packet Page. 589 8 parties normally responsible for the administration of this Agreement shall be brought to the attention of the Contract Coordinators for joint resolution. The parties shall continue their responsibilities during any dispute. 4. INDEMNIFICATION. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4 and except as provided below, the Local Agency agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by the FPPC General Counsel), and hold harmless the FPPC and its authorized officers, employees, contractors, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and liability arising out of the performance of this Agreement, or from the enforcement or interpretation of any provision of the Local Ordinance, from any cause whatsoever, including the acts, errors, or omissions of any person and for any costs or expenses incurred by the FPPC on account of any claim except where such indemnification is prohibited by law. The FPPC shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the Local Agency and its authorized officers, employees, contractors, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and liability arising from the FPPC’s sole negligence or willful misconduct relating to obligations under this Agreement. 5. AMENDMENT. This Agreement may be amended by written mutual consent of the parties. No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties, and approved as required. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated in the Agreement is binding on any of the parties. 6. CANCELLATION. This Agreement may by canceled by either party, at any time, by ordinance or resolution and with an effective date of 90 days after notice is provided by the cancelling party, or other mutually agreed upon date. Notice of the cancellation shall be provided to the Contract Coordinators. In the event this Agreement is canceled by the Local Agency, the FPPC may require the Local Agency to pay for services rendered and any other expenditures reasonably made by the FPPC in anticipation of services to be rendered pursuant to the Agreement. 7. REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE. Within thirty (30) of receipt of a written request by the FPPC, the Local Agency will provide the FPPC with items necessary for its report to the Legislature pursuant to Section 83213.6, subdivision (h), including its estimated annual cost savings, annual performance metrics, and relevant public comments submitted to the Local Agency. Exhibit D: Special Terms 1. Local Ordinance. The Local Ordinance subject to this Agreement consists of the following, with any noticed subsequent amendments pursuant to Exhibit A, item 5: Ordinance Bernardino, No. California, MC-1558: Adding Ordinance Chapter of the 2.55        Packet Page. 590 9 to Mayor the and City City of San Council Bernardino of the City Municipal of San Code Relating To Local Campaign Finance Regulations, Title 2, Chapter 2.55 Urgency Ordinance No. MC-1573: Urgency Ordinance of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Adding Section 2.55.030 Establishing Mandatory Campaign Contribution Limit Requirements For Elected Officials Within the City of San Bernardino 2. Local Agency Elective Offices. The Local Agency elective offices subject to the Local Ordinance and this Agreement are: City Council, Mayor Fair Political Practices Commission City of San Bernardino Galena West, Executive Director [Name], City Manager _____________________________ _____________________________ Date: Date:        Packet Page. 591 2 8 3 3 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager Gabriel Elliott, Director of Community Development & Housing Community Development & Housing It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, Adopt Ordinance No. MC – 1654 approving Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01 to change the Zoning District Classification from Commercial General (CG-1) to Residential Medium (RM) of fourteen (14) parcels (APNs: 0142-041-09, -10, -11, 17, -18, -20, -21, -32, -33, -34, - 44; and 0142-521-01, -02, and -03) containing approximately 15.71 acres, pursuant to a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment 1). To implement the Project, the Project Applicant submitted applications to the City of San Bernardino for a General Plan Amendment 24-01, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01, Subdivision 24-04 (Tentative Tract Map No. 20695), and Development Permit Type-P 24-04. Pursuant to Section 19.74.040 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, Zoning Map Amendments shall be adopted by ordinance. The first reading for Ordinance No. MC – 1654 was introduced to the Mayor and City Council at the July 16, 2025 hearing. On May 28, 2025, the City of San Bernardino Development and Environmental Review Committee (DERC) made the motion to move the aforementioned project to the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission for consideration. On June 10, 2025, the Planning Commission unanimously made the motion to recommend the project to the San Bernardino Mayor and City Council. On July 16, 2025, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2025-325 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and        Packet Page. 592 2 8 3 3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approving General Plan. Amendment 24-01 to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Commercial to Multiple-Family Residential, introduced Ordinance No. MC – 1654 approving Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01 to change the Zoning District Classification from Commercial General (CG-1) to Residential Medium (RM) and adopted Resolution No. 2025-326 approving Subdivision 24-04 (Tentative Tract Map 20695) to subdivide fourteen (14) parcels containing approximately 15.71 acres into 138 single-family residential lots and Development Permit Type-P 24-04 to allow site and architectural review of a planned unit development comprised of 138 detached single-family residences. Discussion On July 16, 2025, the Mayor and City Council introduced and approved Ordinance No. MC – 1654 to update the Zoning District Classification of the project site to Residential Medium (RM). Pursuant to Section 19.74.040 Council Action on Amendments, amendments to the Zoning Map shall be adopted by ordinance and therefore become effective thirty (30) days after the second reading. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01 aligns with Key Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life. The one hundred thirty-eight (138) single-family residences will help the City meet its State-mandated housing requirements, be consistent with the surrounding single-family residential land uses, and provide additional market rate housing to the City’s housing stock. Fiscal Impact Development impact fees associated with the project will be approximately $2,400,000. These fees are calculated based on square feet and quantity of units. The funds will be allocated as follows: Local Circulation, Regional Circulation, Sewer Capacity Fees, Storm Drain fees, Law Enforcement fees, Library Facility fees, Aquatic Facility Fees, Parkland fees and Public Facility fees. Development Impact fees are due when the plans are approved and construction permits are ready to be pulled. These fees are one-time fees whereas property taxes revenue is ongoing on an annual basis. City services will be provided to this project similar to other single-family residential developments within the City and surrounding area. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of San Bernardino, California, adopt Ordinance No. MC – 1654 approving Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01 to change the Zoning District Classification from Commercial General (CG-1) to Residential Medium (RM) of fourteen (14) parcels (APNs: 0142-041- 09, -10, -11, 17, -18, -20, -21, -32, -33, -34, -44; and 0142-521-01, -02, and -03) containing approximately 15.71 acres, pursuant to a Mitigated Negative Declaration.        Packet Page. 593 2 8 3 3 Attachments Attachment 1 Ordinance No. MC – 1654 (Approving DCA 24-01) Attachment 2 Ordinance No. MC – 1654 (Approving DCA 24-01) – Exhibit A Zoning Map Amendment Ward: Sixth Ward Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: July 16, 2025 Mayor and City Council introduced Ordinance No. MC – 1654 (Approving Development Code Amendment [Zoning Map Amendment] 24-01)        Packet Page. 594 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1654 1 7 3 7 3 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1654 together, General Plan Amendment 24-01, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01, Subdivision 24-04 (Tentative Tract Map 20695), and Development Permit Type-P 24-04 constitute the Foothill and Macy Route 66 Residential Development Project ("Project"); and Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01 is a request to allow the change of the Zoning District Classification from Commercial General (CG- 1) to Residential Medium (RM) of fourteen (14) parcels containing approximately 15.71 acres; and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”; Public Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), Section 21067, and State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et seq.), Section 15367, the City of San Bernardino is the lead agency for the Project; and City staff determined that pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration was the appropriate environmental review procedure under CEQA, because all potential significant impacts of the Project can be mitigated to a level of less than significant; and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) were prepared for the Project; and on June 10, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino held a duly-noticed public hearing to consider public testimony and the staff report, and adopted Resolution No. 2025-030 recommending the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the approval of General Plan Amendment 24-01, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01, Subdivision 24-04 (Tentative Tract Map 20695), and Development Permit Type-P 24-04 to the Mayor and City Council; and notice of the July 16, 2025 public hearing for the Mayor and City Council's consideration of this proposed Resolution was published in The Sun newspaper on July 5, 2025, and was mailed to the owners and tenants of property located within 1,000 feet of the subject property in accordance with Development Code Chapter 19.52 (Hearing and Appeals); and        Packet Page. 595 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1654 2 7 3 7 3 WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearing conducted by the Mayor and City Council, and no additional information submitted to the City Council, has produced substantial new information requiring substantial revisions that would trigger recirculation of the MND or additional environmental review under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 19.52 (Hearing and Appeals) and Chapter 19.74 (Zoning Map Amendments) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Mayor and City Council have the authority to take action on Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01; and NOW THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2.Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council having independently reviewed and analyzed the record before it, including the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and written and oral testimony, and having exercised their independent judgment, finds that there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that approval of the Project will result in a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3.Finding of Facts – Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01 Finding No. 1:The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. Finding of Fact:The proposed amendment will change the Zoning District Classification from Commercial General (CG-1) to Residential Medium (RM) for the entirety of the project site containing approximately 15.71 acres. The Residential Medium (RM) Zoning District Classification is intended to provide for residential development with a maximum of twelve (12) residences per acre. The proposed amendment will allow for the development and establishment of a Planned Residential Development comprised of one hundred thirty-eight (138) detached single-family residences which provide a density of nine (9) residences per acre and is consistent with the surrounding single-family residential developments within the project area. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies: General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.1: Ensure compatibility between land uses and quality design through adherence to standards and regulations in the Development Code and policies and guidelines in the Community Design Element. General Plan Land Use Element Goal 2.4: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in San Bernardino by strategic in-        Packet Page. 596 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1654 4 7 3 7 3 fill of new development and revitalization of existing development. General Plan Community Design Element Goal 5.4: Ensure individual projects are well designed and maintained. Finding No. 2:The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Finding of Fact:The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed amendment to change the Zoning District Classification of the entirety of the project site from Commercial General (CG-1) to Residential Medium (RM) will facilitate the development and establishment of a Planned Residential Development comprised of one hundred thirty-eight (138) detached single-family residences which is consistent with the surrounding single-family residential developments. The project site is generally flat, with access from N. Dallas Avenue and N. Macy Street, fully served by utility providers, and will not result in the need for the excessive provision of services. Additionally, any potential impacts created by the proposed amendment have been addressed in the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and appropriate mitigation measures have been included within the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Finding No. 3:The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. Finding of Fact:The proposed amendment would result in the entirety of the project site having the Residential Medium (RM) Zoning District Classification to allow for the development and establishment of a Planned Residential Development comprised of one hundred thirty-eight (138) detached single- family residences. The subject property is located adjacent to an existing single-family residential neighborhood. Therefore, the proposed change from Commercial General (CG-1) to Residential Medium (RM) for the project site would allow the proposed project to be harmonious to existing residential uses, thereby providing for an appropriate balance of land uses within the City. Finding No. 4:The subject parcels are physically suitable (including, but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development. Finding of Fact:The project site is currently comprised of fourteen (14) parcels that is proposed to be subdivided into one hundred thirty-eight (138) single-family residential lots and common open spaces to correspond to the proposed        Packet Page. 597 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1654 4 7 3 7 3 Planned Residential Development. Utilities are available directly from Foothill Boulevard. There are no physical constraints on the site, such as steep slopes or watercourses. SECTION 4.Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 24-01 to change the Zoning District Classification from Commercial General (CG-1) to Residential Medium (RM) of fourteen (14) parcels (APNs: 0142-041-09, -10, -11, 17, -18, -20, -21, -32, -33, -34, -44; and 0142-521-01, -02, and -03), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, is hereby approved. SECTION 5.Notice of Determination: The Planning Division of the Community and Development and Housing Department is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino within five (5) working days of final project approval certifying the City’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act in approving the Project. SECTION 6.Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. SECTION 7.Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 8.Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this ___ day of _________, 2025.        Packet Page. 598 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1654 6 7 3 7 3 Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Ordinance No. MC-1654, introduce by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California at a regular meeting held on 16th day of July 2025. Ordinance No. MC-1654 was approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting held the ___ day of _________, 2025 by the following vote: SANCHEZ IBARRA FIGUEROA SHORETT KNAUS FLORES ORTIZ        Packet Page. 599 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1654 7 7 3 7 3 WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of _________, 2025.        Packet Page. 600 Commercial Commercial CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTH ATTACHMENT D – LOCATION/ZONING MAP PROJECT SITE        Packet Page. 601 2 8 2 1 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager Gabriel Elliott, Director of Community Development & Housing Community Development & Housing It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded sub- recipient agreement with El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center for the development of the El Sol Recreational and Wellness Center; 2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the sub-recipient agreement, along with any subsequent amendments, extensions, and other necessary documents to implement the project. This item seeks approval of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded sub-recipient agreement with El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center to develop the El Sol Recreational and Wellness Center at 766 North Waterman Avenue. The Mayor and City Council allocated $250,000 in CDBG fund on May 15, 2024.. El Sol, leveraging an additional $4.75 million in external funding, will transform a 1.9-acre site into a holistic campus featuring health education, wellness programs, recreational facilities, and community spaces. The project will serve over 5,000 residents annually, particularly Latinx, Black, Asian, LGBTQIA+, and immigrant populations, fostering equity, inclusivity, and community empowerment. There is no General Fund impact with this item as it is fully funded by CDBG grant funds.        Packet Page. 602 2 8 2 1 Background On May 1, 2024, staff presented the recommended sub-recipient awards outlined in the Fiscal Year 2024–25 Annual Action Plan (AAP) to the City Council, supported by a detailed PowerPoint presentation. During the City Council meeting, both Council Members and members of the public provided input on the allocation of HUD grant funds. Staff incorporated this feedback into the Annual Action Plan and made adjustments based on the final allocations received from HUD. On May 15, 2024, the Mayor and City Council adopted the FY 2024-25 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG). The approved Annual Action Plan allocated $250,000 of CDBG funding to El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center, a California non-profit public benefit corporation, for the development of the El Sol Recreation and Wellness Center. Discussion El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1991. Its mission is to empower vulnerable communities, particularly mono-lingual Spanish speakers, immigrants, and residents with limited English proficiency in the Inland Empire, California, to lead healthy lives. They aim to achieve this by providing access to healthcare, safe and affordable housing, education, and leadership skills to eliminate disparities. El Sol is a pioneer in Community Health Worker (CHW) and Promotores de Salud (Health Promotes) programs in the region. These highly trained lay workers, chosen from community members, serve as trusted health advocates and provide culturally and linguistically responsive health promotion and community education. They work to achieve positive, measurable changes in individual knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and skills, and also engage, organize, and mobilize community residents to advocate for policies and programs that support healthy lifestyles. El Sol operates two primary sites within the City of San Bernardino, located at 766 North Waterman Avenue and 1535 S D St, San Bernardino. Their centers offer a variety of programs and services at no cost, including health education, parenting classes, English as a Second Language (ESL) classes, and leadership programs. Some of their program areas include: Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Addressing topics like mental health, postpartum depression, obesity, nutrition, and asthma. Strengthening Families: Through initiatives like home visitation programs (e.g., Parent-Child Home Program, Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters) that focus on reducing child abuse and neglect, improving child development, and enhancing parenting skills. Advancing to Prosperity: Providing support and resources for self-sufficiency.        Packet Page. 603 2 8 2 1 Emotional Health Outreach and Connections: Working to dispel stigma and connect individuals to mental health support and services. Community Engagement and Policy: Building the capacity of CHWs to advocate for policies and programs that improve community health outcomes. El Sol will leverage approximately $4.75 million in external funding, including a $4.2 million grant from the California Department of Parks and Recreation, to renovate and expand the site at 766 North Waterman Avenue. The City will provide $250,000 in CDBG funding to support the project. This project includes the development of the El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center Holistic Campus, also known as the ESNEC Holistic Park, on a 1.9-acre parcel northeast of Seccombe Lake. The expansion will significantly enhance the capacity of this established transformation hub to serve vulnerable San Bernardino residents, particularly Latinx, Black, Asian, LGBTQIA+, and immigrant communities. The ESNEC Holistic Park, integrated in the San Bernardino Investment Playbook, is a community-led initiative developed with input from the Community Advisory Committee and local residents. It aims to address persistent health, educational, and cultural disparities in underserved communities, fostering equity, inclusivity, and holistic well- being. The expanded campus will offer culturally specific health education, basic health screenings, wellness classes, peer-to-peer counseling, and tailored educational services. It will feature healing and food gardens, a playground, a children’s amphitheater, a basketball court, a turf play area, and a new two-story Learning and Community Center. This facility will include flexible spaces for recreational and cultural activities, a children’s playroom, a library, an art gallery, a cafeteria, and a commercial kitchen for on-site food preparation. Multipurpose rooms will be available for community events, workshops, and meetings, with sliding-scale rental fees to ensure affordability and access for all. Combined with ongoing programs such as bilingual counseling, free mental health support, chronic disease prevention, youth sports, Zumba, and family and senior wellness activities, the El Sol Holistic Campus will serve over 5,000 adults and children annually. This initiative is not just about providing services; it’s about cultivating social connection, cultural pride, and community empowerment. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Approval of the sub-recipient agreement with El Sol supports Key Strategic Target and Goal No. 2, Improved Quality of Life. Through this partnership, El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center will develop the El Sol Recreation and Wellness Center, providing essential facilities and services to low-income communities. The project aims to reduce social, economic, and health disparities by offering accessible resources and support. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund with this item. The sub-recipient agreement will be funded using previously allocated CDBG funding.        Packet Page. 604 2 8 2 1 Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded sub- recipient agreement with El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center for the development of the El Sol Recreational and Wellness Center; 2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the sub-recipient agreement, along with any subsequent amendments, extensions, and other necessary documents to implement the project. Attachments Attachment 1 CDBG sub-recipient agreement between the City of San Bernardino and El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center Ward: First Ward Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: May 1, 2025 Proposed Annual Action Plan was taken to the City Council for public comment and for City Council to review proposed subrecipients. May 15, 2024 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-094, approving and adopting the FY 2024-25 Annual Action Plan        Packet Page. 605 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT By and Between the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO and EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER (A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation)        Packet Page. 606 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT THIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated for purposes of identification as of August 6, 2025 (the “Date of Agreement”), is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a municipal corporation and charter city (the “City”), and EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the “Subrecipient”). RECITALS A. The City is the recipient of funds (the “CDBG Funds”) from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) under the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) Program for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. B. Subrecipient is eligible to receive, and has submitted an application to receive, a subgrant of CDBG Funds for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 to reimburse Subrecipient for certain costs of its services related to the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or installation of public facilities and improvements to provide services to the community (hereinafter defined as “Subrecipient’s Services” or the “Services”). C. Subrecipient’s application for a subgrant of CDBG Funds in an amount not to exceed $250,000.00 (the “Subgrant”) was approved by the City Council of the City, subject to and contingent upon (i) approval by HUD of the City’s CDBG Application for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025, and (ii) the allocation and receipt by City of such funds and HUD’s issuance of Authority to Use Grant Funds. D. Subsequent to the City’s approval of Subrecipient’s application, HUD approved the City’s CDBG Application for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. E. The City and the Subrecipient (each, a “Party” and jointly, the “Parties”) desire to enter into this Agreement so that Subrecipient may receive a grant of a portion of the CDBG Funds in consideration for the provision of Subrecipient’s Services to the City and the community. NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE CITY AND THE SUBRECIPIENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS:        Packet Page. 607 2 CONTACT INFORMATION City of San Bernardino: Community Development and Housing Department Cassandra Searcy Title: Deputy Director of Housing and Homelessness Division Address: 201 North E Street City: San Bernardino State, CA Zip: 92401 El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center Alex Fajardo Title: Director Address: 1535 S D St City: San Bernardino State: CA Zip: 92408 Telephone: 909-714-5003 CFDA Number and Name: 14.218 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN): B-24-MC-06-0539 Federal Award Date: August 6, 2025 (The date when the federal award is signed by the authorized official of the federal awarding agency.) CDBG Funds Obligated IDIS Activity: #____ Program Year: 2024-2025 Amount: $250,000.00 Total Amount of CDBG Funds Obligated: $250,000.00        Packet Page. 608 3 Definitions. The following capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the following meanings: “Agreement” means this Community Development Block Grant Subrecipient Agreement by and between the City and the Subrecipient. “Budget” means the budget supplied by Subrecipient which (i) specifies how Subrecipient proposes that the Subgrant Proceeds be allocated among the following permitted uses, as applicable: Rehabilitation Construction Costs, Construction Soft Costs and Administrative Costs, and (ii) is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. “CDBG” is defined in Recital A hereof. “CDBG Funds” is defined in Recital A hereof. “CFR” means the Code of Federal Regulations. “City” is defined in the initial paragraph of this Agreement and includes any assignee of or successor to the rights, powers and responsibilities of the City. The Director of the Department of Community and Economic Development of the City of San Bernardino, or such person’s designee (hereinafter defined as the “City’s Representative”) shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to this Agreement. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by the City, the City’s Representative is authorized to act on behalf of the City unless this Agreement specifically provides otherwise or the context should otherwise require. “City’s Representative” means the Director of the City’s Community Development Department, or such person’s designee. “Costs” means the supplies and materials necessary to provide Subrecipient’s Services, including, without limitation, mileage and telephone costs. “Covenants Re: Use of Federal Funds” means those additional covenants of Subrecipient required due to the federal source of the Subgrant proceeds which are attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. “Default” is defined in Section 6.1 hereof. “HUD” is defined in Recital A hereof. “Maximum Amount of Subgrant” means $250,000.00. “Parties” is defined in Recital E hereof. “Program Income” means gross income received by Subrecipient directly generated from the use of CDBG Funds. When such income is generated by an activity that is only partially assisted with CDBG Funds, the income shall be prorated to reflect the percentage of CDBG Funds        Packet Page. 609 4 used. See Exhibit D attached hereto and 24 CFR § 570.500(a) for a more detailed description of Program Income. “Scope of Services” means the description of the Subrecipient’s Services that is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. “Staff” means each of the persons, individually, and all of the persons, collectively, hired by the Subrecipient to provide Subrecipient’s Services under this Agreement. “Subrecipient” is defined in the initial paragraph of this Agreement. The Subrecipient’s Representative shall represent Subrecipient in all matters pertaining to this Agreement. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by Subrecipient, the Subrecipient’s Representative is authorized to act on behalf of Subrecipient unless this Agreement specifically provides otherwise or the context should otherwise require. “Subrecipient’s Representative” means {Entity Representative} “Subrecipient’s Services” or “Services” means the services provided by Subrecipient pursuant to this Agreement and includes, but is not limited to, the provision of the services set forth in the Scope of Services. “Term” is defined in Section 3 hereof. “Term Expiration Date” means June 30, 2026 Section 1. Section 1. HUD Award. 1.1 Maximum Award Amount. It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the City under this agreement shall not exceed $250,000. The dollar amount stated in the preceding sentence may be increased or modified, at the sole discretion of the City’s Representative, by written amendment of the Agreement, signed by an authorized representative of Subrecipient and the City’s Representative. 1.2 Budget. Subrecipient has submitted a budget (based upon estimated costs per Section 1.3 hereof) to the City for approval which sets forth the estimated use of the Subgrant contributed by the City pursuant to this agreement. The Budget is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Any amendments to an approved budget for the Services must be approved by the City’s Representative or his authorized designee. The City may require a more detailed line-item breakdown of the Budget than the one contained herein, and the Subrecipient shall provide such supplementary information about the Budget in a timely fashion in the form and content prescribed by the City. 1.3 Method of Payment. City shall reimburse Subrecipient for Costs actually incurred pursuant to this Agreement and in accordance with the approved Scope of Services and the approved Budget. City’s payment obligations are subject to the receipt by and approval of City of requests for payment.        Packet Page. 610 5 1.4 Requests for Payment. To receive each payment under this Agreement, Subrecipient shall submit to the City, not more frequently than quarterly, a written reimbursement request or invoice in a form specified and approved by the City, along with such supporting documentation as may be requested by the City to verify Subrecipient’s performance of the Services for which payment is requested. Failure to provide any of the required or requested documentation may cause the City to withhold all or a portion of a request for payment until such documentation has been received and approved by the City. Payments will be adjusted by the City in accordance with fund advances, if any, and Program Income balances available in Subrecipient accounts. 1.5 Fiscal Limitations. The United States of America, through HUD, may in the future place programmatic or fiscal limitations on CDBG Funds not presently anticipated. Accordingly, the City reserves the right to revise this Agreement in order to take account of such actions. In the event of funding reduction, the City may reduce the budget for this Agreement as a whole or may limit the rate by which Subrecipient receives the Subgrant for providing Subrecipient’s Services. If HUD directs the City to implement a reduction in funding, the City’s Representative may act for the City in implementing and effecting such a reduction and in revising the Agreement for such purpose. The Subrecipient acknowledges that the obligation of the City to provide the Subgrant is contingent upon the availability of CDBG Funds, which are appropriated or allocated for the payment of such an obligation. If funding levels are significantly affected by federal budgeting or if funds are not allocated and available for the continuance of the function performed by the Subrecipient, this Agreement may be terminated by the City at the end of the period for which funds are available. Where the City’s Representative has reasonable grounds to question the fiscal accountability, financial soundness, or compliance with this Agreement of Subrecipient, the City’s Representative may act for the City in suspending the operation of this Agreement upon three (3) days’ notice to Subrecipient of the City’s intention to so act for the longer of (i) sixty (60) days or (ii) pending an audit or other resolution of such questions. 1.6 Programs Utilizing Multiple Funding Sources. If there are sources of funds in addition to the Subgrant, Subrecipient shall provide proof satisfactory to City of such funding. The City shall not pay for any services provided by Subrecipient which are funded by other sources. All restrictions and/or requirements provided for in this Agreement relative to accounting, budgeting and reporting apply to the total program regardless of funding sources. 1.7 Use of Federal Funds. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees the funding for the Subgrant is provided as a pass-through of CDBG Funds allocated to the City by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Accordingly, Subrecipient hereby provides to the City those covenants set forth in the Covenants Re: Use of Federal Funds and comply with all requirements for a subrecipient of CDBG Funds in accordance with the terms and conditions of the CDBG award from HUD to the City and all applicable federal regulations, including 24 CFR Part 570 and 2 CFR Part 200 (as modified by 24 CFR 570.502) (collectively, the “CDBG Requirements”). Subrecipient agrees to use the Subgrant in compliance with all CDBG Requirements and only for eligible activities to meet the national objective of benefitting benefiting low- and moderate-income persons in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570, Subpart C, as described in Exhibit A. Only costs allowable under 24 CFR 570.200(a)(5) and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, and incurred in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, including the Budget and Scope of Services, will be eligible for payment or reimbursement from the Subgrant.        Packet Page. 611 6 Section 2. Subrecipient’s Services. 2.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Subrecipient shall provide the Subrecipient’s Services, as more fully set forth in the Scope of Services, attached hereto as Exhibit A, in compliance with all applicable CDBG Requirements. Subrecipient represents and warrants that all Subrecipient’s Services to be provided hereunder shall be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. 2.2 Agreement and Provision of Services Nonexclusive. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement and the provision of services hereunder are nonexclusive and that the City may enter into similar agreements with other entities for the provision of similar services. 2.3 Time for Performance. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. Subrecipient shall perform and complete all of Subrecipient’s Services in a timely and expeditious manner. Subrecipient shall not be responsible for delays caused by circumstances beyond its reasonable control, provided that Subrecipient has delivered to the City written notice of the cause of any such delay as soon as practicable, but in any event within ten (10) days of the occurrence of such cause, and Subrecipient immediately resumes performance as soon as possible. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, in the event such delay in Subrecipient’s performance continues for more than one hundred twenty (120) days, City shall have no further obligation to make further disbursements and shall have the right to terminate this Agreement with no liability to City or further obligation to Subrecipient, in addition to any other rights and remedies of City under this Agreement, at law, or in equity. 2.4 Subrecipient’s Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the Subrecipient’s proposal, if any, which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 2.5 Compliance with Law. Subrecipient’s Services shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 2.6 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Subrecipient shall obtain, at Subrecipient’s sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of Subrecipient’s Services. Subrecipient shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. 2.7 Nondiscrimination. Subrecipient agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of sex, color, race, creed, religion, marital status, handicap, ancestry or national origin in its provision of Subrecipient’s Services in compliance with 24 CFR 570.602. To the extent this Agreement provides that Subrecipient offer accommodations or services to the public, such accommodations or services shall be offered by Subrecipient to the public on fair and reasonable terms.        Packet Page. 612 7 2.8 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Subrecipient represents and warrants that Subrecipient (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered Subrecipient’s Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how Subrecipient’s Services should be provided and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending the provision of Subrecipient’s Services under this Agreement. Should the Subrecipient discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those anticipated in the provision of Subrecipient’s Services, Subrecipient shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Subrecipient’s risk until written instructions are received from the City. 2.9 Inspection. The City and HUD and their agents and representatives shall have the right at any reasonable time to observe the provision of and inspect facilities related to Subrecipient’s Services. The City is under no duty to supervise the provision of Subrecipient’s Services. Any inspection or examination by the City is for the sole purpose of protecting and preserving the City’s rights under this Agreement. No default of Subrecipient shall be waived by any inspection by the City. In no event shall any inspection by the City be a representation that there has been or will be compliance by Subrecipient with this Agreement or that Subrecipient is in compliance with any federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations and directives applicable to the performance of this Agreement or the provision of Subrecipient’s Services. Subrecipient shall make or cause to be made such other independent inspections as Subrecipient may desire for Subrecipient’s own protection. Section 3. Term. 3.1 This Agreement shall be for a term (the “Term”) commencing on August 6, 2025 and terminating on June 30, 2026, subject to earlier termination as expressly provided in this Agreement. Section 4. Coordination of Services. 4.1 City’s Representative. The City’s Representative shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to this Agreement. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by the City, the City’s Representative is authorized to act unless this Agreement specifically provides otherwise or the context should otherwise require. 4.2 Subrecipient’s Representative. Subrecipient’s Representative shall represent the Subrecipient in all matters pertaining to this Agreement. Subrecipient’s Representative is authorized to act on Subrecipient’s behalf with respect to the services and work to be provided hereunder and make all decisions in connection therewith. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principal are a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principal shall be responsible during the Term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Subrecipient and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the provision of Subrecipient’s Services hereunder. The foregoing principal may not be changed by Subrecipient and no other personnel may be assigned to supervise the Subrecipient’s Services to be provided hereunder without the express written consent of the City.        Packet Page. 613 8 4.3 Independent Contractor. Subrecipient and any agent or employee of Subrecipient shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees of City. City assumes no liability for Subrecipient’s actions and performance, nor assumes responsibility for taxes, bonds, payments, or other commitments, implied, or explicit, by or for Subrecipient. Subrecipient shall not have authority to act as an agent on behalf of City unless specifically authorized to do so in writing. Subrecipient acknowledges that it is aware that because it is an independent contractor, City is making no deduction from any amount paid to Subrecipient and is not contributing to any fund on its behalf. Subrecipient disclaims the right to any fee or benefits except as expressly provided for in this Agreement. (a) As respects all acts or omissions of Subrecipient relating to Subrecipient’s responsibility for taxes, bonds, payments, or other commitments, implied, or explicit, by or for Subrecipient, the Subrecipient agrees to indemnify, defend (at the City’s option), and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, managers, consultants, contractors, agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, defense costs, liability, or consequential damages of any kind or nature arising out of or in connection with the Subrecipient’s performance or failure to perform under this Section. Sections 5. Insurance and Indemnification. 5.1 Insurance. Without limiting City’s right to indemnification, it is agreed that Subrecipient shall secure prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain during the Term of this Agreement while also naming City as an additional insured, insurance coverage as set forth in this Section 5.1. 5.1.1 Required Insurance Coverage. Subrecipient shall secure and maintain the following insurance coverage and minimum insurance limits: (i) Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by California statutes; (ii) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, or Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage for Premises and Operations, Contractual Liability, Personal Injury Liability, Products/Completed Operations Liability, Broad-Form Property Damage, Independent Contractor’s Liability and Fire Damage Legal Liability, in an amount of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit, written on an occurrence form and Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000.00) aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage; and (iii) Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including - as applicable - owned, non-owned and hired autos, in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit, written on an occurrence form for bodily injury and property damage; and (iv) Comprehensive Employer’s Liability coverage, in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit, written on an occurrence form; and        Packet Page. 614 9 (v) Comprehensive Professional Liability coverage, in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit, written on an occurrence form, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) aggregate, for errors and omissions. The City’s Representative, with the consent of the City’s Risk Manager, is hereby authorized to reduce the requirements set forth above in the event they determine that such reduction is in City’s best interest. 5.1.2 Required Clauses in Policies. Each policy of general liability and automobile insurance required by this Agreement shall contain the following clauses: “Written notice of cancellation shall be delivered to the Economic and Housing Development Department of the City of San Bernardino, 290 North D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401-1734 in accordance with the policy provisions.” “It is agreed that any insurance maintained by the City of San Bernardino shall apply in excess of and not contribute with insurance provided by this policy.” “The City of San Bernardino, its officials, agents, employees, representative, and volunteers are added as additional insureds as respects operations and activities of, or on behalf of the named insured, performed under contract with the City of San Bernardino.” Subrecipient hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of the Subrecipient may acquire from the Subrecipient by virtue of the payment of any loss. If requested by City, Subrecipient agrees to obtain and deliver to City an endorsement from Subrecipient’s general liability and automobile insurance insurer(s) to effect this waiver of subrogation. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City for all work performed by the subrecipient, its employees and subcontractors. 5.1.2 Required Certificates and Endorsements. Prior to commencement of any work under this Agreement, the Subrecipient shall deliver to City (i) insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required by this Agreement, and including the applicable clauses referenced above and (ii) endorsements to the above-required policies, which add to these policies the applicable clauses referenced above. Such endorsements shall be signed by an authorized representative of the insurance company and shall include the signatory’s company affiliation and title. Should it be deemed necessary by City, it shall be the Subrecipient’s responsibility to see that City receives documentation, acceptable to City, which evidences that the individual signing such endorsements is indeed authorized to do so by the insurance company. Also, City reserves the right at any time to demand, and to receive within a reasonable time period, certified copies of any        Packet Page. 615 10 insurance policies required under this Agreement, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 5.1.3 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Subconsultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by subconsultant, City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 5.1.4 Remedies for Defaults Re: Insurance. In addition to any other remedies City may have if the Subrecipient fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: (i) Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premium for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement; (ii) Order the Subrecipient to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to the Subrecipient hereunder until the Subrecipient demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; or (iii) Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is cumulative with other remedies City may have and is not the exclusive remedy for the Subrecipient’s failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Subrecipient may be held responsible for payment of damages to persons or property resulting from the Subrecipient’s or its contractor’s or subcontractor’s performance of Subrecipient’s Services under this Agreement. 5.2 Indemnification. As respects acts, errors or omissions in the performance of Subrecipient’s Services under this Agreement, the Subrecipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, managers, consultants, contractors, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, defense costs, liability or consequential damages of any kind or nature arising directly or indirectly out of the Subrecipient’s acts, errors or omissions in the performance of Subrecipient’s Services under the terms of this Agreement. Section 6 Enforcement of Agreement. 6.1 Events of Default. For purposes of this Section 6, the word “Default” shall mean the failure of Subrecipient to perform any of Subrecipient’s duties or obligations or the breach by Subrecipient of any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. In addition, Subrecipient shall be deemed to be in Default upon Subrecipient’s (i) application for, consent to,        Packet Page. 616 11 or suffering of, the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator for all or a substantial portion of its assets, (ii) making a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, (iii) being adjudged bankrupt, (iv) filing a voluntary petition or suffering an involuntary petition under any bankruptcy, arrangement, reorganization or insolvency law (unless in the case of an involuntary petition, the same is dismissed within thirty (30) days of such filing), or (v) suffering or permitting to continue unstayed and in effect for fifteen (15) consecutive days any attachment, levy, execution, or seizure of all or a substantial portion of Subrecipient’s assets or of Subrecipient’s interests hereunder. City shall not be deemed to be in Default in the performance of any obligation required to be performed by City hereunder unless and until City has failed to perform such obligation for a period of forty-five (45) days after receipt of written notice from Subrecipient specifying in reasonable detail the nature and extent of any such failure; provided, however, that if the nature of City’s obligation is such that more than forty-five (45) days are required for its performance, then City shall not be deemed to be in Default if City shall commence to cure such performance within such forty-five (45) day period and thereafter diligently prosecute the same to completion. 6.2 Termination and Remedies. The City, in addition to any other rights and remedies it may have under this Agreement, at law, or in equity, may terminate this Agreement at any time after the occurrence of a Default by Subrecipient immediately upon written notice of such termination to Subrecipient. Additionally, as per HUD regulation 2 CFR 200.340, the Federal award may be terminated in whole or in part as follows: (a) By the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, if a non-Federal (Subrecipient) entity fails to comply with the terms and conditions of a Federal award; (b) By the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, to the greatest extent authorized by law, if an award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities; (c) By the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity with the consent of the non- Federal entity, in which case the two parties must agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated; (d) By the non-Federal entity upon sending to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity written notification setting forth the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. However, if the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines in the case of partial termination that the reduced or modified portion of the Federal award or subaward will not accomplish the purposes for which the Federal award was made, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may terminate the Federal award in its entirety; (e) By the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity pursuant to termination provisions included in the Federal award In accordance with 2 CFR 200.339, in addition to any remedies for a Default provided by this Agreement, at law, or in equity, City may elect to pursue the following:        Packet Page. 617 12 (a) Repayment from Subrecipient to City of any amount which the State or Federal government determines to have been misused or are subject to repayment; (b) Modify any plans, budget, compensation terms, schedules, manner of providing services or other activities in connection with this Agreement, or take other actions directed or recommended by the State or Federal government; (c) Elect to have Subrecipient re-perform or cause to be re-performed, at Subrecipient’s sole expense, any work which failed to meet the requirements of this Agreement; (d) In the case of goods, reject the goods and require Subrecipient to provide replacement goods that meet the needs of City and the terms of this Agreement; or (e) Hire another contractor, subcontractor, or vendor to perform the work and deduct any additional costs incurred by City as a result of substituting contractors, subcontractors, or vendors from any amounts due to Subrecipient. 6.2.1 Reversion of Assets. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Subrecipient shall transfer to City any amounts of the Subgrant on hand and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of the Subgrant. If at the time of the expiration or termination of this Agreement there is under the control of Subrecipient any real property that was acquired or improved in whole or in part with the Subgrant in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), then, in accordance with 24 CFR 570.505, such real property shall, at the election of the City, either be: (A) used to meet one (1) or more of the national objectives set forth in 24 CFR 570.208 for not less than five (5) years after the date of expiration or termination of this Agreement, or such longer period of time as determined appropriate by City; or (B) disposed of, within five (5) years after the date of expiration or termination of this Agreement, in a manner which results in City being reimbursed in the amount of the then current fair market value of said real property less any portion thereof attributable to expenditure of non-CDBG funds for said acquisition or improvement. 6.3 Attorneys’ Fees. City and Subrecipient agree that in the event of litigation to enforce this Agreement or terms, provisions and conditions contained herein, to terminate this Agreement, or to collect damages for a Default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred in connection with such litigation. Section 7. Use and Ownership of Documents and Data 7.1 Documents and Data. City may use all reports, records, plans, and other documents related to this Agreement and the Services for any purpose, including but not limited to inspections and completion of the Services. City shall furnish to Subrecipient such documents        Packet Page. 618 13 and materials as City may determine to be relevant and pertinent to the provision of services hereunder as City may possess or acquire. Section 8. Records, Reports and Audits. 8.1 Records. Each Subrecipient shall establish and maintain sufficient records, including, without limitation, financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to the Subgrant, to enable the City to determine whether the Subrecipient has met the requirements of this Agreement and the CDBG Requirements. Subrecipient shall establish, and maintain on a current basis, an adequate accrual and accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and standards in compliance with 2 CFR Part 200. At a minimum, records shall be retained as follows: (a) The retention period for individual CDBG activities shall be the longer of 3 years after the expiration or termination of this Agreement under 24 CFR 570.503, or 3 years after the submission of the annual performance and evaluation report, as prescribed in 24 CFR 91.520, in which the specific activity is reported on for the final time; (b) Records for individual activities subject to the reversion of assets provisions at 24 CFR 570.503(b)(7) or change of use provisions at 24 CFR 570.505 must be maintained for as long as those provisions continue to apply to the activity; and (c) Records for individual activities for which there are outstanding loan balances, other receivables, or contingent liabilities must be retained until such receivables or liabilities have been satisfied. 8.2 Reports. Subrecipient shall prepare and submit financial, program progress, monitoring, evaluation, personnel, property and financial records and other reports as required by City and in the format acceptable to City to assure proper accounting of all Federal and non-Federal project funds. Subrecipient shall furnish such information which, in the judgment of City’s Representative, may be relevant to questions of compliance with contractual conditions hereunder or granting agency directives, or with the effectiveness, legality and goals of the program. Subrecipient will establish a record keeping system which is consistent with the requirements for the City under 24 CFR 570.506. Such records shall be maintained and available to City for at least three (3) years following the completion of the Services, at a minimum, and in the event of litigation, claim, or audit, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, and audit findings involving the records have been fully resolved. Subrecipient will submit monthly reports to City specifying Program Income earned and expenses incurred. Each report shall contain, or be accompanied by, an itemized statement showing all information required by City, including, without limitation: (a) The amount expended or incurred by Subrecipient and due and payable for the Subrecipient’s Services for such reporting quarter including any and all supporting documentation. (b) A statement showing for each reporting month:        Packet Page. 619 14 (i) a description of each of the Clients serviced, (ii) the number of the Clients receiving shelter at the Shelters, (iii) the type of counseling session conducted, the number of each type of counseling sessions conducted, and the number of the Clients attending each such counseling session, (iv) the type of educational sessions conducted, the number of each type of educational session conducted, and the number of the Clients attending each such educational session, and (v) a quarterly narrative which specifies any additional services provided. The quarterly report for the last quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30 shall also include Subrecipient’s financial statement for the immediately preceding year, accompanied by an annual audit report of Subrecipient’s financial statement for the immediately preceding year. Each report shall be certified as complete and correct by the executive director, or similar officer, of Subrecipient. 8.3 Monitoring. City will conduct periodic CDBG program monitoring reviews. These reviews will focus on the Services and the extent to which the planned program has been implemented and measurable goals achieved, effectiveness of program management, and impact of the program. Authorized representatives of City and HUD shall have the right of access to all activities of and facilities operated by Subrecipient under this Agreement. Facilities include all files, records, and other documents related to the performance of the Services and this Agreement. Activities include attendance at Staff, officers, board of directors, advisory committee, and advisory board meetings and inspection by City and HUD representatives. Subrecipient shall ensure that its employees, managers. officers, or board members furnish such information as, in the judgment of City and HUD representatives, may be relevant to the question of compliance with contractual conditions and HUD directives, or the effectiveness, legality, and achievements of the CDBG program. 8.4 Audits. Subrecipient is required to arrange for an independent financial and compliance audit annually for each fiscal year Federal funds are received under this Agreement where federal award is $750,000 or more in a year. Audits must be in compliance with 2 CFR Part 200. An audit may be conducted by Federal, State, or local funding source agencies as part of City’s audit responsibilities. The results of the independent audit must be submitted to City within thirty (30) days of completion. Within thirty (30) days of the submittal of said audit report, Subrecipient shall provide a written response to all conditions of findings reported in said audit report. The response must examine each condition or finding and explain a proposed resolution, including a schedule for correcting any deficiency. All conditions or finding corrective actions shall take place within six (6) months after receipt of the audit report. City and its authorized representatives shall at all times have access for the purpose of audit or inspection to any and all books, documents, papers, records, property, and premises of Subrecipient. Subrecipient Staff will cooperate fully with authorized auditors when they conduct audits and examinations of Subrecipient’s program.        Packet Page. 620 15 If indications of misappropriation or misapplication of the funds granted under this Agreement cause City to require a special audit, the cost of the audit will be encumbered and deducted from the Subgrant. Should City subsequently determine that the special audit was not warranted, the amount encumbered will be restored to the Subgrant. Should the special audit confirm misappropriation or misapplication of funds, Subrecipient shall promptly reimburse City the amount of misappropriation or misapplication. In the event City uses the judicial system to recover misappropriated or misapplied funds, Subrecipient shall reimburse City for legal fees and court costs incurred in obtaining the recovery. Subrecipient agrees that in the event its performance hereunder is subjected to audit exceptions by appropriate federal audit agencies, it shall be responsible for complying with such exceptions and paying City the full amount of City’s liability to the funding agency resulting from such audit exceptions. 8.5 Confidentiality of Records. Subrecipient shall adhere to the requirement of the National Affordable Housing Act (Pub. L.101-625, November 28, 1990) contained in Section 832(e)(2)(c) that grantees of federal funds (i) develop and implement procedures to ensure the confidentiality of records pertaining to any individual provided family violence prevention or treatment services under any project assisted” under the CDBG Program and (ii) that the address or location of any family violence shelter project assisted under the CDBG Program will, except with written authorization of the person or persons responsible for the operation of such shelter, not be made public. Section 9. Miscellaneous Provisions. 9.1 Waiver. Inaction by City or Subrecipient with respect to a Default hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such Default. The waiver by either City or Subrecipient of any Default hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent Default. 9.2 Notices. All notices, demands or other writings to be made, given or sent hereunder, or which may be so given or made or sent by either City or Subrecipient to the other shall be deemed to have been given when in writing and personally delivered or if mailed on the third (3rd) day after being deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective Parties at the following addresses: If to City: Community Development and Housing Department City of San Bernardino 290 North D Street San Bernardino, California 92401 Attention: Cassandra Searcy, Deputy Director of Housing & Homelessness To Subrecipient: El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center 1535 S D St San Bernardino, CA 92408 Attn: Alexander Fajardo, Director        Packet Page. 621 16 9.3 Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed by the Parties, nor by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture between the Parties, it being understood and agreed that Subrecipient is and will be at all times an independent contractor pursuant to this Agreement and shall not, in any way, be considered to be an officer, representative, agent or employee of the City. 9.4 No Third Party Rights. The Parties intend that no rights nor remedies be granted to any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement or of any covenant, duty, obligation or undertaking established herein. 9.5 Non-Liability of Members, Officials and Employees of the City. No member, official, officer, agent, representative, or employee of the City shall be personally liable to Subrecipient, or any successor in interest or assigns, in the event of any Default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to Subrecipient or Subrecipient’s successors or assigns, or on any obligation under the terms of this Agreement. Subrecipient hereby waives and releases any claim Subrecipient may have against the members, officials, officers, agents, representatives, or employees of the City with respect to any Default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Subrecipient or Subrecipient’s successors or assigns, or any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. Subrecipient makes such release with the full knowledge of Civil Code Section 1542 and hereby waives any and all rights thereunder to the extent of this release, if such Section 1542 is applicable. Section 1542 of the Civil Code provides as follows: “A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY.” __________ Subrecipient 9.6 Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 9.7 Time of the Essence. Time is hereby expressly declared to be the essence of this Agreement and of each covenant and condition hereof which relates to a date or a period of time. 9.8 Remedies Cumulative. The remedies given to City and Subrecipient herein shall be cumulative and are given without impairing any other rights given City or Subrecipient by statute or law now existing or hereafter enacted and the exercise of any one (1) remedy by City or Subrecipient shall not exclude the exercise of any other remedy. 9.9 Effect of Invalidity. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of its terms and provisions to persons and circumstances other than those to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable shall not be        Packet Page. 622 17 affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 9.10 Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the exhibits hereto, which are incorporated herein for all purposes by this reference, contain the entire agreement of the City and the Subrecipient with respect to the matters covered hereby, and no agreement, statement or promise made by either City or Subrecipient which is not contained herein, shall be valid or binding. No prior agreement, understanding or representation pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose. No provision of this Agreement may be amended, modified or added except by an agreement in writing signed by City and Subrecipient. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the exhibits and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control unless otherwise required by federal law. 9.11 Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of a corporation, nonprofit corporation, partnership or other entity or organization, represents and warrants he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of such entity or organization and that this Agreement is binding upon the same in accordance with its terms. Subrecipient shall, at City’s request, deliver a certified copy of its governing body’s resolution or certificate authorizing or evidencing such execution. 9.12 Conflicts of Interest. No employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of the City, Subrecipient or of its subrecipients that are receiving funds under this paragraph who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to the CDBG Funds, or who are in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a financial interest or benefit from an activity assisted with the CDBG Funds, or have a financial interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect to an activity assisted with the CDBG Funds, or with respect to the proceeds of the activity assisted with the CDBG Funds, either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter, except pursuant to an exception granted by HUD in accordance with 24 CFR 570.611(d). In connection with any procurement of goods or services related to the Services or under this Agreement, Subrecipient shall comply with the conflict of interest provisions of 2 CFR 200.317-.318. 9.13 Time for Acceptance of Agreement by City. This Agreement, when executed by Subrecipient and delivered to City, must be authorized, executed and delivered by the City on or before forty-five (45) days after the execution and delivery by Subrecipient or this Agreement shall be void, except to the extent that Subrecipient and City shall consent in writing to a further extension of time for the authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement. Section 10. Construction Articles 10.1 SCOPE OF WORK. Subrecipient shall procure a general contractor (the “Contractor”) for performance of the Services (the “Work”). Subrecipient shall establish procurement procedures to ensure that materials and services are obtained in a cost-effective manner. When procuring property or services to be provided under this Agreement, Subrecipient shall comply at a minimum with the procurement standards at 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327.        Packet Page. 623 18 The Subrecipient shall cause Contractor to perform all Work within the time stipulated in the construction contract to be entered into by Subrecipient and Contractor, and Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified below, for the following project (the “Project”): El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center First Phase: Building Rehabilitation. Contractor is an independent contractor and not an agent of the City. The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to the City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with the Contract Documents. The requirements of this Section 10 and the applicable requirements of the CDBG Requirements must be included in any Construction Contract. 10.2 TIME FOR COMPLETION. Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work. The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in the City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within 260 calendar days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work. 10.3 CONTRACT PRICE. The Subrecipient shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum, not to exceed, of two-hundred and fifty thousand dollars and zero cents ($250,000.00). Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions. The Subrecipient will pay to Contractor compensation based upon the prices set forth in the Bid Schedule. 10.4 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. Contractor acknowledges that the City will sustain actual damages for each and every day completion of the Project is delayed beyond the time specified in the Contract. Because of the nature of the Project, it would be impracticable or extremely difficult to determine the City’s actual damages. Accordingly, in accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay the City the sum of $1,500 for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as liquidated damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event this is not paid, the Contractor agrees the Subrecipient or City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Section does not exclude recovery of other damages specified in the Contract Documents. Liquidated damages may be deducted from progress payments due Contractor, Project retention or may be collected directly from Contractor, or from Contractor's surety. These provisions for liquidated damages shall not prevent the Subrecipient or City, in cases of Contractor’s default, from terminating the Construction Contract. 10.5 COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT. The “Contract Documents” include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Instructions to Bidders        Packet Page. 624 19 • Bid Forms • Bid Acknowledgement • Bid Schedule • Bid Guarantee • Designation of Subcontractors • Information Required of Bidders • Non-Collusion Declaration Form • Iran Contracting Act Certification • Public Works Contractor DIR Registration Certification • Performance Bond • Payment (Labor and Materials) Bond • Contract for Construction • General Conditions • Special Conditions • Specifications • Addenda Construction Plans and Drawings and Addenda • Applicable Local Agency Standards and Specifications, as last revised • Reference Specifications • Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contractor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents. All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. In the event of conflict, the various Contract Documents will be given effect in the order set forth in the General Conditions. The Construction Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties, except that in the event of conflict between the Contract Documents and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. 10.6 PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW AND CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE. Every provision of law required to be included in the Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to the Work. 10.7 INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall provide indemnification and defense as set forth in the General Conditions. 10.8 PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at the City’s Office or may be obtained online at http://www.dir.ca.gov and which must be posted at the job site. 10.9 FALSE CLAIMS AND MANDATORY DISCLOSURES. Contractor acknowledges and agrees all information and documentation submitted to Subrecipient may be relied upon by City. Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted to the Subrecipient        Packet Page. 625 20 or City, it may be considered fraud and Contractor may be subject to civil or criminal prosecution, including, without limitation, under 31 U.S.C. Chapter 38 (Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements), 18 U.S.C. § 287, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and 31 U.S.C. § 3729. Contractor acknowledges that the False Claims Act, California Government Code sections 12650, et seq., provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false claim to a public entity. These provisions include within their scope false claims made with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. In the event the City seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation costs, including attorneys’ fees. Contractor hereby acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may subject the Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding wherein Contractor may be prevented from further bidding on public contracts for a period of up to five (5) years. Subrecipient must disclose, in a timely manner, in writing to the City and HUD all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting this Agreement as provided in 2 CFR 200.113. Failure to make required disclosures constitutes a Default of this Agreement. (Remainder of page intentionally left bank; signatures on next page)        Packet Page. 626 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY AND THE SUBRECIPIENT HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE RESPECTIVE DATES SET FORTH BELOW. “CITY” CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a municipal corporation and charter city Dated: By: Eric Levitt, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney “SUBRECIPIENT” EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER Dated: By: Alexander Fajardo, Director 07/17/2025        Packet Page. 627 A-1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Subrecipient: El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center CDBG Activity: Public Facility Project Description of activity to be undertaken: The project spearheaded by El Sol aims to significantly enhance community engagement and well- being. The following outcomes are expected to be achieved through this initiative, providing measurable and tangible benefits to the community. Importantly, the project is included in the San Bernardino Investment Playbook (see https://www.sbinvestmentplaybook.com/home ). Outcomes of the El Sol Neighborhood Recreational and Wellness Center include: 1) Daily Usage: Approximately 100 residents using the center daily, totaling around 36,500 visits annually. 2) Youth Engagement: Engage at least 500 unique youths per year in after-school programs and activities. 3) Recreational Activities: Offer five different recreational activities weekly, attracting diverse age groups. 4) Referral Center Utilization: Serve as a referral center with at least 2000 referrals per year for various community services. 5) Prevention Programs: Implement 5 different prevention programs annually, focusing on health, safety, and social issues. 6) Increase in Physical Activity: Achieve a 25% increase in reported physical activity levels among center participants. 7) Arts and Cultural Programs: Host at least 10 arts and cultural events each year, drawing in additional community members. Eligible activity citation and regulatory language: 24 CFR 570.201(c) – Public Facilities and Improvements. Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of public facilities and improvements, except as provided in § 570.207(a), carried out by the recipient or other public or private nonprofit entities. (However, activities under this paragraph may be directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly or severely disabled persons to public facilities and improvements, including those provided for in § 570.207(a)(1).) In undertaking such activities, design features and improvements which promote energy efficiency may be included. Such activities may also include the execution of architectural design features, and similar treatments intended to enhance the aesthetic quality of facilities and improvements receiving CDBG assistance, such as decorative pavements, railings, sculptures, pools of water and fountains, and other works of art. Facilities designed for use in providing shelter for persons having special needs are considered public facilities and not subject to the prohibition of new housing construction described in § 570.207(b)(3). Such facilities include shelters for the homeless; convalescent homes; hospitals, nursing homes; battered spouse shelters; halfway houses for run-away children, drug offenders or parolees; group homes for mentally retarded persons and temporary housing for disaster victims. In certain cases, nonprofit entities and subrecipients including those specified in § 570.204 may acquire title to public facilities. When such facilities are owned by nonprofit entities or subrecipients, they shall be operated so as to be open for use by the general public during all normal hours of operation. Public facilities and improvements eligible for assistance under this paragraph are subject to the policies in § 570.200(b).        Packet Page. 628 A-2 National Objective: Activities benefiting low-moderate-income persons (24 CFR 570.208(a)). [Area benefit activities / Citation: § 570.208 (a)(1); Low-Mod Limited Clientele (LMC) / Citation: § 570.208 (a)(2)] Performance Goal: To provide community engagement through various resources to ultimately benefit low to moderate-income persons. Timeframe for Completion of Performance Goal: June 30, 2025 CDBG-funded Improvements Depicted on Following Page.        Packet Page. 629 A-3 CDBG FUNDED IMPROVEMENTS Recipient: _______________        Packet Page. 630 C-1 EXHIBIT B BUDGET [attached] Budget Phase One - Construction 250,000 Total $ 250,000        Packet Page. 631 C-2 EXHIBIT C COVENANTS RE: USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that the Subgrant described in the agreement to which this exhibit is attached (“Agreement”) is funded from CDBG Funds allocated to City by the United States of America. Accordingly, Subrecipient covenants and agrees as follows: Section 1. Compliance With Law. Subrecipient hereby covenants and agrees that it has complied and will continue to comply with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (the “Housing and Community Development Act”), and all applicable Federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted program. It is Subrecipient’s responsibility to keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all such requirements and to provide all notices as required by law. This Agreement is subject to all such laws, ordinances, regulations, policies, and guidelines, including, without limitation, the Housing and Community Development Act; 24 CFR Part 85; 24 CFR Part 570; and 2 CFR Part 200. Subrecipient agrees to comply with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 570, subpart K, except that (1) Subrecipient does not assume the City’s environmental responsibilities described in 24 CFR 570.604 and (2) Subrecipient does not assume the City’s responsibility for initiating the review process under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 52. Subrecipient also agrees to comply with all other applicable Federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and policies governing the funds provided under the Agreement and to utilize funds available under the Agreement to supplement rather than supplant funds otherwise available. Subrecipient agrees to cause its contractors and subcontractors to comply, to the extent applicable, with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 570 and 2 CFR Part 200. Subrecipient further agrees to insert in any contracts and subcontracts, to the extent applicable, the indicated provisions set forth in this exhibit or required to be included in contractors or subcontracts under 24 CFR Part 570 and 2 CFR Part 200 and a clause requiring the contractors (and subcontractors when indicated) to include these provisions in any lower tier contracts or subcontracts. Failure to comply by Subrecipient or by any contractor or subcontractor may be grounds for termination of the applicable contract and for debarment as a contractor or subcontractor. Subrecipient acknowledges that the Federal Government is not a party to the Agreement and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the City, Subrecipient, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the Agreement. Section 2. Civil Rights Act. Subrecipient shall comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and all regulations applicable thereto, which provides that no person shall be excluded from participation, denied program benefits, or subject to discrimination based on race, color, and/or national origin under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Section 3. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity. Subrecipient shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, national origin, or ancestry. Subrecipient shall comply with the following:        Packet Page. 632 C-3 (A) The requirements of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 100; Executive Order 11063 and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 107; and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR Part 1, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin and require actions which affirmatively promote fair housing. Subrecipient shall also comply with the requirements for Equal Access in Accordance with Gender Identity (24 CFR 5.106) and any other requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 5. (B) The prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of age under the Age discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101et seq.) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 146. (C) The prohibitions against discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with disabilities under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 8. For purposes of the CDBG program, the term “dwelling units” in 24 CFR Part 8 shall include sleeping accommodations. (D) The Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972; the requirements of Executive Order 11246; and the regulations issued under the Order at 41 CFR chapter 60, for the equal opportunity for all persons, without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin, employed or seeking employment with government contractors or with contractors. (E) The requirements of Executive Orders 11625, 12432, and 12138 and the requirements of 2 CFR 200.321 and 2 CFR 200.509. Consistent with HUD’s responsibilities under these requirements, Subrecipient must make efforts to encourage minority and women’s business enterprises in connection with activities funded under this Agreement. (F) The requirement that Subrecipient make known that use of the facilities and services is available to all on a nondiscriminatory basis. Where the procedures that Subrecipient intends to use to make known the availability of such facilities and services are unlikely to reach persons with disabilities or persons of any particular race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin within Subrecipient’s service area who may qualify for them, Subrecipient must establish additional procedures that will ensure that these persons are made aware of the facilities and services. Subrecipient must also adopt and implement procedures designed to make available to interested persons information concerning the existence and location of services and facilities that are accessible to persons with a disability.        Packet Page. 633 C-4 Section 4. Americans with Disabilities. Subrecipient shall not discriminate against handicapped persons in the provision of the Services and shall provide accessibility for handicapped persons to the Services provided under this Agreement. Subrecipient shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and implementing regulations (28 CFR Parts 35-36), in order to provide handicapped accessibility to the extent readily achievable. Section 6. Conflicts of Interest. In addition to the conflict of interest requirements in 2 CFR Part 200, under 24 CFR 570.611 1 no person: (A) who (i) is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of City, Subrecipient, a State recipient, or a nonprofit recipient (or of any designated public agency) that receives CDBG Subgrant amounts and (ii) exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to assisted activities, or (B) who is in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, shall obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for him or herself or for those with whom he or she has family or business ties, during his or her tenure, or for one year thereafter. HUD may grant an exception to this exclusion as provided in 24 CFR Section 570.611(d). Subrecipient also agrees to abide by the provisions of 24 CFR 570.611, which include but are not limited to the following: Subrecipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that shall govern the performance of its officers, employees, or agents engaged in the award and administration of contracts supported by Federal funds. No employee, officer, or agent of the Subrecipient shall participate in the selection, or in the award, or administration of, a contract supported by Federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. No covered persons who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG-assisted activities, or who are in a position to participate in a decision- making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a financial interest in any contract, or have a financial interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect to the CDBG-assisted activity, or with respect to the proceeds from the CDBG-assisted activity, either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for a period of one (1) year thereafter. For purposes of this paragraph, a “covered person” includes any person who is 1 24 CFR 570.611 requires compliance with 2 CFR 200.317-.318 for recipients and subrecipients and compliance with 24 CFR 570.611 otherwise.        Packet Page. 634 C-5 an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of the City, Subrecipient, or any designated public agency. Section 7. Certification Regarding Lobbying. Subrecipient shall comply with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. § 1352, 2 CFR § 200.450, and 24 CFR 87. Subrecipient certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that: (A) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (B) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, Subrecipient shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. (C) Subrecipient shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards and contracts at all tiers (including subcontractors, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements), and that all subrecipients, contractors, and subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly. Section 8. Drug Free Workplace. 8.1 Certification. Subrecipient hereby certifies to City that Subrecipient will comply with the applicable provisions of the Drug-Free Work Place Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690, title v, subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) and implementing regulations at 2 CFR part 2429 and 2 CFR part 182 (incorporated herein by reference) and provide a drug- free workplace by: (A) publishing a statement notifying its employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in Subrecipient’s workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition; (B) establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about: (i) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;        Packet Page. 635 C-6 (ii) Subrecipient’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (iii) any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance program; and (iv) the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations; (C) making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of Services under this Agreement be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph (A); (D) notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph (A), that as a condition of employment, the employee will: (i) abide by the terms of this statement; and (ii) notify Subrecipient of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction; (E) notifying City within ten (10) days after receiving notice of a conviction under subparagraph (D)(ii) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; (F) imposing a sanction on, or requiring the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program by, any employee who is so convicted, as required by 41 U.S.C. 703; and (G) making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F). 8.2 Suspension. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that the Agreement shall be subject to suspension of payment or termination, or both, and Subrecipient shall be subject to suspension or debarment if the Director of City or her/his official designee determines, in writing, that: (A) Subrecipient has made false certification under Section 8.1; (B) Subrecipient violates such certification by failing to carry out the requirements of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F) OR (G) of Section 8.1, or (C) such a number of Subrecipient’s employees have been convicted of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring in the workplace as to indicate that Subrecipient has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace as required by Section 8.        Packet Page. 636 C-7 Section 9. Use of Debarred, Suspended or Ineligible Contractors. Subrecipient shall comply with the provisions of 24 CFR Part 2424 and 2 CFR Part 180 relating to the prohibition on employment, engagement of services, awarding of contracts, or funding of any contractors or subcontractors during any period of debarment, suspension, or placement in ineligibility status. (i) The Agreement is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 CFR Part 180. As such Subrecipient is required to verify that none of the Subrecipient’s principals (defined at 2 CFR 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 CFR 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 CFR 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 CFR 180.935). (ii) Subrecipient must comply with 2 CFR Part 180, Subpart C and 2 CFR Part 2424 and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into. (iii) Subrecipient certifies and warrants that it is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in any federal programs. Subrecipient also agrees to verify that all contractors and subcontractors performing work under the Agreement are not debarred, disqualified, or otherwise prohibited from participation in accordance with the requirements above. Subrecipient further agrees to notify the City in writing immediately if Subrecipient or its contractors or subcontractors are not in compliance during the term of the Agreement. This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by City. If it is later determined that Subrecipient did not comply with 2 CFR Part 180, Subpart C and 2 CFR Part 2424, in addition to remedies available to the City, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. Section 10. Lead-Based Paint. Subrecipient shall comply with the requirements, as applicable, of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (43 U.S.C. 4821-4846) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 35. In addition, Subrecipient must also meet the following requirements relating to inspection and abatement of defective lead-based paint surfaces: (A) Treatment of defective paint surfaces must be performed before final inspection and approval of the renovation, rehabilitation or conversion activity under this Agreement. (B) Appropriate action must be taken to protect shelter occupants from the hazards associated with lead-based paint abatement procedures. Section 11. Beneficiary Qualification. Subrecipient covenants and agrees the purpose of the Subgrant is to meet one or more of the “National Objectives” and other requirements set forth in 24 CFR 570.208 and certifies all activities carried out under the Agreement shall be in furtherance of at least one such National Objective. Subrecipient further covenants and agrees that one hundred percent (100%) of the beneficiaries of the Services (as defined in the Agreement) will be low income (or moderate income, if applicable and permitted under the Agreement) persons or households. Under CDBG regulations, the following clientele categories are presumed to be low income persons and can qualify for service regardless of income: abused children, battered spouses, elderly persons, adults meeting the Bureau of the Census’ Current Population Reports        Packet Page. 637 C-8 definition of “severely disabled,” homeless persons, illiterate adults, persons living with AIDS, and migrant farm workers. Beneficiaries qualifying on the basis of income shall have an annual income equal to or less than HUD Section 8 (of the United States Housing Act of 1937) Income Limits. HUD Section 8 Income Limits for the City PMSA define the maximum family income for low income households. Subrecipient is responsible for obtaining from City current applicable HUD Section 8 Income Limits for the Term of this Agreement. Section 12. Flood Insurance. No site proposed on which renovation, major rehabilitation, or conversion of a building is to be assisted under the Agreement shall be located in an area that has been identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having special flood hazards, unless: (A) either (i) the community in which the area is situated is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and the regulations thereunder (44 CFR parts 59 through 79) or (ii) less than a year has passed since FEMA notification regarding such hazards. (B) Subrecipient will ensure that flood insurance on the structure is obtained in compliance with Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001, et seq.). Section 13. Coastal Barriers. Subrecipient shall comply with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, 16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., which provides that no financial assistance under this Agreement may be made available within the Coastal Barrier Resources System. Section 14. Religious and Political Activities. Subrecipient agrees that funds provided under this agreement shall be used exclusively for performance of the services or work required under this Agreement, and that no funds made available under this Agreement shall be used to promote religious or political activities, lobbying, political patronage, and nepotism activities. Further, Subrecipient agrees that it will not perform, nor permit to be performed, any religious or political activities in connection with the performance of this Agreement in accordance with 24 CFR 570.200(j), 570.207, and 570.607 and 24 CFR 5.109. Subrecipient shall perform under the Agreement in a manner that does not discriminate against an organization on the basis of the organization’s religious character, affiliation, or lack thereof, or on the basis of the organization’s religious exercise and, to the extent applicable, shall comply with Executive Order 13279 (Equal Protection of Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations) and the implementing regulations at 41 CFR chapter 60. Section 15. Reversion of Assets. Upon the expiration or termination of the Agreement, Subrecipient shall transfer to City any CDBG Funds on hand and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of CDBG Funds. If at the time of the expiration or termination of the Agreement there is under the control of Subrecipient any real property that was acquired or improved in whole or in part with CDBG Funds in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), then, in accordance with 24 CFR 570.505, such real property shall either be:        Packet Page. 638 C-9 (A) used to meet one (1) or more of the national objectives set forth in 24 CFR §570.208 for not less than five (5) years after the date of expiration or termination of the Agreement, or such longer period of time as determined appropriate by City; or (B) disposed of, within five (5) years after the date of expiration or termination of this Agreement, in a manner which results in City being reimbursed in the amount of the then current fair market value of said real property less any portion thereof attributable to expenditure of non-CDBG funds for said acquisition or improvement. Section 16. Program Income. Any Program Income received by Subrecipient shall be promptly remitted to City. Any Program Income on hand when this Agreement expires or received after the expiration of this Agreement shall be paid to City as required by 24 CFR 570.503(b)(3). Section 17. No Disability. Subrecipient certifies and agrees that it is under no contractual or other disability which would prevent it from complying with all pertinent laws and regulations. Section 18. Patents and Copyrights (2 CFR 200.315). Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that HUD reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for Federal Government purposes: (A) The copyright in any work developed under the Agreement; (B) Any rights of copyright to which Subrecipient purchases ownership with Subgrant proceeds; (C) The patent for any invention developed under the Agreement; and (D) Any rights in any patent to which Subrecipient purchases ownership with Subgrant proceeds. Section 19. Procurement and Disposition During Term. Subrecipient shall procure and dispose of all materials, property, and services in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 (including particularly 2 CFR 200.318-.327) and 24 CFR 570.502, 570.503, and 570.504. During the term of the Agreement, Subrecipient may not change the use or planned use of any real property acquired or improved in whole or in part using funds provided under the Agreement without written approval from the City. The requirements of 24 CFR 5.109 apply to the Agreement, including the requirements regarding disposition and change in use of real property by a faith- based organization. 19.1 Non-Expendable Property. A record shall be maintained by Subrecipient for each item of non-expendable property acquired for this program with Subgrant Proceeds. This record shall be provided to City as well as being available for inspection and audit upon the request of City. Non-expendable property means tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one (1) year and an acquisition cost of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) or more per unit. Subrecipient shall not purchase or agree to purchase non-expendable property without the prior written approval of City. Upon        Packet Page. 639 C-10 completion or early termination of this Agreement, City reserves the right to determine the final disposition of such non-expendable property in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Such disposition may include, but is not limited to, City taking possession of such non-expendable property in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including, without limitation, 2 CFR 200.311-316. 19.2 Expendable Property. Expendable property refers to all tangible personal property other than non-expendable personal property. Subrecipient shall not purchase or agree to purchase expendable personal property at a cost of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) or more per unit without the prior written approval of City. 19.3 Purchase or Lease of Non-Expendable Property or Equipment. Subrecipient shall obtain three documented bids prior to purchasing or leasing any non- expendable property or equipment over Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) in unit value. Subrecipient shall purchase or lease from the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. All equipment that has a purchase or lease price of over Fifty Dollars ($50.00) in unit-value and life expectancy of more than one (1) year shall be properly identified and inventoried and shall be charged at its actual price. Such inventory shall be provided to City as well as being available for inspection and audit upon the request of City. 19.4 Procurement of Recovered Materials (2 CFR 200.323). (i) Subrecipient shall comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement. (ii) In the performance of the Agreement, Subrecipient shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired: (1) Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the Agreement performance schedule; (2) Meeting Agreement performance requirements; or (3) At a reasonable price. (iii) Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA- designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site, https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg- program.        Packet Page. 640 C-11 (iv) Subrecipient also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. 19.5 Domestic Preferences for Procurement (2 CFR 200.322). (i) Subrecipient shall, to the greatest extent practicable, purchase, acquire, or use goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subcontracts. (ii) For purposes of this section: (1) “Produced in the United States’’ means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. (2) ‘‘Manufactured products’’ means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of nonferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber Section 20. Travel and Conference Restrictions. Subrecipient covenants and agrees that travel and conference will adhere to 2 CFR 200.404 and 2 CFR 200.407. Reimbursement is at the sole discretion of the City as an allowable expense. Section 21. Privacy. Subrecipient agrees and shall ensure that no information about or obtained from any person receiving services hereunder shall be voluntarily disclosed in any form identifiable with such person without first obtaining the written consent of such person. Subrecipient shall take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information considered to be sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, and local laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. Subrecipient shall provide citizens with reasonable access to records regarding the use of CDBG funds in connection with the Agreement, consistent with applicable State and local laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality and with 24 CFR 570.508 and 2 CFR 200.303. Section 22. Eligibility restrictions for certain resident aliens and noncitizens. Subrecipient shall comply with the restrictions on the provision of benefits to newly legalized aliens if applicable under 24 CFR 570.613 and to noncitizens under 24 CFR Part 5, Subpart E. Section 23. Displacement, Relocation, Acquisition, and Replacement of Housing (24 CFR 570.606). If any work provided in accordance with the Agreement will result in the displacement of persons, Subrecipient covenants and agrees to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655) and implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 24.        Packet Page. 641 C-12 Section 24. Protections for Whistleblowers. Subrecipient may not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against an employee in reprisal for disclosing, in accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 4712, information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a federal contract or grant, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a federal contract or grant, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant, as provided in 2 CFR 200.300(b). Section 25. Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. Subrecipient acknowledges that the services or work to be performed under the Agreement is on a project assisted under a program providing direct federal financial assistance from HUD and is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 1701u (“Section 3”), 24 C.F.R. §§ 135.3(a)(2) and (a)(3). Section 3 requires that, to the greatest extent feasible, opportunities for training and employment be given to lower income residents and that contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to business concerns that are located in, or owned in substantial part by, persons residing in the area of the project. Subrecipient shall comply with the provisions of Section 3 and the implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 75. Subrecipient shall include a Section 3 clause in every contract and subcontract for services or work in connection with the Agreement and shall, at the direction of the City, take appropriate action pursuant to the contract or subcontract upon a finding that the contractor or subcontractor is in violation of regulations issued at 24 CFR Part 75. Subrecipient shall not contract or subcontract with any party where Subrecipient has notice or knowledge that such party has been found in violation of regulations under 24 CFR Part 75 and shall not let any contract or subcontract unless the contractor or subcontractor has first provided it with a preliminary statement of ability to comply with the requirements of said regulations. Compliance with the provisions of Section 3, the regulations set forth in 24 CFR Part 75, and all applicable rules and orders of HUD issued thereunder prior to the execution of the Agreement shall be a condition of the federal financial assistance provided to the Project, binding upon the Subrecipient, its successors, and assigns. Failure to fulfill these requirements shall subject Subrecipient, its contractors and subcontractors, successors, and assigns to those sanctions as are specified by 24 CFR Part 75.2 Section 26. Environmental Laws. Subrecipient must comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988 as interpreted in HUD regulations at 24 C.F.R. Part 55; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity to State (Clean Air) implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2 Per 24 CFR 75.33(c), remedies and sanctions may be imposed by HUD “in accordance with the laws and regulations for the program under which the violation was found.”        Packet Page. 642 C-13 §§7401 et seq.), 40 C.F.R. Parts 6, 51, and 93; (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523); (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93-205); (i) Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq.); (j) Sole Source Aquifers (Environmental Protection Agency-40 C.F.R. part 149; (k) Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 (7 U.S.C. § 4201, et seq.); (l) Farmland Protection Policy (Department of Agriculture-7 C.F.R. part 658); (m) applicable criteria and standards specified in HUD environmental regulations (24 C.F.R. Part 51) (other than the runway clear zone and clear zone notification requirement in 24 C.F.R. § 51.303(a)(3); (n) HUD Notice 79-33, Policy Guidance to Address the Problems Posed by Toxic Chemicals and Radioactive Materials, September 10, 1979; (o) Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994—Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low- Income Populations, (59 FR 7629), 3 C.F.R., 1994 Comp. p. 859. Subrecipient shall include this requirement in all subcontracts under the Agreement. In addition to generally applicable environmental laws, the Subrecipient shall comply with the following: (i) Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, (1) Subrecipient agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., (2) Subrecipient agrees to report each violation to the City and understands and agrees that the City will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Agency and the appropriate Environmental Protection District Regional Office, and (3) Subrecipient agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000. (ii) Pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, (1) Subrecipient agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., (2) Subrecipient agrees to report each violation to the City and understands and agrees that the City will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Agency and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office, and (3) Subrecipient agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000. Section 27. Labor Standards (24 CFR § 570.603). Subrecipient agrees that, except with respect to the rehabilitation or construction of residential property containing fewer than eight (8) units, all contractors engaged under contracts in excess of $2,000.00 for construction, renovation, or repair work financed in whole or in part with assistance provided under the Agreement, shall comply with the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 USC, Chapter 3, Section 276a-276a-5) adopted by the Federal Agency pertaining to such contracts and with the applicable requirements of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act and Copeland Anti- Kickback Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148 and 40 U.S.C. 3701-3708) and regulations of the Department of Labor under 29 CFR parts 1, 3, 5, and 7, governing the payment of wages and ratio of apprentices and trainees to journey workers; provided that, if wage rates higher than those required under the regulations are imposed by state or local law, nothing hereunder is intended to relieve the Subrecipient of its obligation, if any, to require payment of the higher wage. Subrecipient shall comply with 24 CFR Part 70 with regard to the use of volunteers. The Subrecipient shall cause or        Packet Page. 643 C-14 require to be inserted in full, in all such contracts subject to such regulations, provisions meeting the requirements of this paragraph. Section 28. Minimum Bonding Requirements (2 CFR § 200.326). If the Agreement involves construction or facility improvements in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, as that term is defined in 2 CFR 200 subpart A, Subrecipient shall maintain a performance bond for 100 percent (100%) of the contract price to secure fulfillment of all the Agreement’s requirements. Section 29. Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking and Trafficking. Subrecipient shall comply with the protections provided to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking set forth in Title 24, Part 5, subpart L, as applicable. Subrecipient shall comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104) which prohibits Subrecipient from (1) Engaging in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect (2) Procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect or (3) Using forced labor in the performance of the Agreement. Section 30. Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment (2 CFR 200.216). (i) Subrecipient shall not contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system funded under the Agreement. As described in Public Law 115–232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (1) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (2) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment. (3) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. (ii) See Public Law 115-232, section 889 for additional information.        Packet Page. 644 C-15 (iii) Subcontracts. Subrecipient shall include the substance of this section, including this paragraph, in all subcontracts and other contractual instruments        Packet Page. 645 C-16 EXHIBIT D DEFINITION OF PROGRAM INCOME “Program Income” means gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly generated from the use of CDBG Funds. When such income is generated by an activity that is only partially assisted with CDBG Funds, the income shall be prorated to reflect the percentage of CDBG Funds used. Program Income includes, but is not limited to the following: (a) Proceeds from the disposition by sale or long-term lease of real property purchased or improved with CDBG funds; (b) Proceeds from the disposition of equipment purchased with CDBG funds; (c) Gross income from the use or rental of real or personal property acquired by the recipient or by a subrecipient with CDBG funds, less costs incidental to generation of the income; (d) Gross income from the use or rental of real property, owned by the recipient or by a subrecipient, that was constructed or improved with CDBG funds, less costs incidental to generation of the income; (e) Payments of principal and interest on loans made using CDBG funds, excluding payments made by subrecipients of principal and/or interest on CDBG-funded loans received from grantees if such payments are made using Program Income received by the subrecipient, as provided in 24 CFR 570.500(a)(3); (f) Proceeds from the sale of loans made with CDBG funds; (g) Proceeds from sale of obligations secured by loans made with CDBG funds; (h) Interest earned on Program Income pending its disposition; and (i) Funds collected through special assessments made against properties owned and occupied by households not of low- and moderate-income, where the assessments are used to recover all or part of the CDBG portion of a public improvement. Program Income does not include income earned (except for interest described in 24 CFR 570.513) on grant advances from the U.S. Treasury. The following items of income earned on grant advances must be remitted to HUD for transmittal to the U.S. Treasury, and will not be reallocated under Section 106(c) or (d) of the Act:        Packet Page. 646 C-17 (a) Interest earned from the investment of the initial proceeds of a grant advance by the U.S. Treasury; (b) Interest earned on loans or other forms of assistance provided with CDBG funds that are used for activities determined by HUD either to be ineligible or to fail to meet a national objective in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 570, Subpart C, or that fail substantially to meet any other requirement of this part; and (c) Interest earned on the investment of amounts reimbursed to the CDBG program account prior to the use of the reimbursed funds for eligible purposes. Program Income also does not include: (a) Any income received in a single program year by the recipient and all its subrecipients if the total amount of such income does not exceed $25,000; and (b) Amounts generated by activities that are financed by a loan guaranteed under Section 108 of the Act and meet one or more of the public benefit criteria specified at 24 CFR 570.209(b)(2)(v) or are carried out in conjunction with a grant under Section 108(q) in an area determined by HUD to meet the eligibility requirements for designation as an Urban Empowerment Zone pursuant to 24 CFR part 597, subpart B, except as provided in 24 CFR 570.500(a)(4)(ii). Examples of other receipts that are not considered Program Income are proceeds from fund raising activities carried out by subrecipients receiving CDBG assistance (the costs of fundraising are generally unallowable under the applicable OMB circulars referenced in 24 CFR 84.27 3), funds collected through special assessments used to recover the non-CDBG portion of a public improvement, and proceeds from the disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG funds when the disposition occurs after the applicable time period specified in 24 CFR 570.503(b)(8) for subrecipient-controlled property, or in 24 CFR 570.505 for recipient-controlled property. 3 24 CFR Parts 84 and 85 were superseded and replaced by 2 CFR Part 200, effective as of December 26, 2014.        Packet Page. 647 2 8 6 5 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager; Andrea Russell, Director of Human Resources Human Resources It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Police Officers’ Association (SBPOA) for Police Safety Employees; and 2. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Police Management Association (SBPMA) for Police Management Employees; and 3. Amend the City-wide salary schedule for full-time, part-time, temporary, and seasonal positions. Approval of the Memorandum of Understanding will finalize employment agreements between the City and the SBPOA for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2029, and between the City and the SBPMA for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028. The California Meyers-Millias-Brown-Act (MMBA) requires the City to meet and confer, in good faith, with its bargaining groups on all matters relating to employment conditions and employer-employee relations including but not limited to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. The City has long recognized the San Bernardino Police Officers Association (SBPOA), and the San Bernardino Police Management Association (SBPMA), for        Packet Page. 648 2 8 6 5 purposes of meeting and conferring related to conditions of employment of Police Safety, Police Management employees, respectively. The prior Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) covering such terms and conditions of employment expired on June 30, 2025. Since then, the parties have been negotiating terms for successor MOUs. The parties have now reached tentative agreements. Those agreements were ratified, and are currently before the City Council for approval. Discussion SBPOA – Police Safety The San Bernardino Police Officers Association (SBPOA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) new agreement term, if approved, will be July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2029, inclusive of the deal points noted below. 3% cost of living adjustment (COLA) effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2025, 2.2% COLA effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, 3% COLA effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2026, 3% COLA the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, 3% COLA effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, 3.5% COLA the first full pay period following July 1, 2028. Employee contribution towards health insurance of up to $30 per month for Employee + 1 coverage and up to $55 per month for Family coverage in each year of the MOU. Increase monthly Peace Officers Standards & Training (POST) Certificates Compensation by $50/month effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, increase by $25/month effective July 1, 2027, increase by $50/month effective January 1, 2028, increase by $50/month effective January 1, 2029. Increase Uniform Allowance by $100/month effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, January 1, 2027, and January 1, 2028. Eliminate sick leave cashout for non-retiring employees at separation and increase hours to 320 to be eligible for sick leave sell back. Increase of Specialized Pay by $20/month effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, and January 1, 2027; by $30/month January 1, 2028; and by $20/month January 1, 2029. Establish $75/month of Longevity Pay at 15 years; Increase 20 years to $325/month; establish 25 years at $425/month effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026. Increase longevity Pay by $25/month effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2029; any employee who reaches 15 years after January 2028 will receive non- pensionable match to a deferred compensation account. Add Motors to receive On-Call Pay and clarify Call Back provisions. Provide 300 hours of Release Time per year for POA business. Increase Shift Differential pay by $10/month effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, January 1, 2027, January 1, 2028 and January 1, 2029. At the time of an employee’s subsequent separation from service, payments for unused sick leave (upon retirement only), vacation and holiday in the amounts,        Packet Page. 649 2 8 6 5 percentages, and schedules specified in the MOU shall be contributed to the employee’s 401(a) account. Updated various language to clarify existing terms and to eliminate obsolete language. SBPMA – Police Management The San Bernardino Police Management Association (SBPMA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) new agreement term, if approved, will be July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028, inclusive of the deal points noted below. 3% cost of living adjustment (COLA) effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2025, 2% COLA effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, 3% COLA effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2026, and 3% COLA the first full pay period following July 1, 2027. Employee contribution towards health insurance of up to $10 per month for Employee Only coverage, $30 per month for Employee + 1 coverage, and up to $55 per month for Family coverage in each year of the MOU. Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2026, increase Education pay by $50 per month for each Lieutenant who has obtained a Bachelor’s degree; and an additional $100 per month for a Graduate degree or higher. Each Captain and Assistant Chief who has a Graduate degree or higher shall receive an additional $100 per month. Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, increase pay by $50 per month for each Lieutenant who has obtained a Bachelor’s degree; and an additional $100 per month for a Graduate degree or higher. Each Captain and Assistant Chief who has a Graduate degree or higher shall receive an additional $100 per month. Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2025, establish a Longevity 25- year level at $300 per month higher than the 20-year level. Increase both levels by $50 per month following July 1, 2026, and July 1, 2027. Eliminate sick leave cashout for non-retiring employees at separation except for those who leave with 20 years of service. Increase annual Administrative Leave banks by 40 hours. Establish bilingual pay at $250 per month for up to 2 employees. Establish Physical Fitness Program in the amount of $250 per month provided to employees who pass required testing. Updated various language to clarify existing terms and to eliminate obsolete language As changes are made to salaries or classifications, the City is required to adopt a revised salary schedule in a public meeting. The attached salary schedule meets the California Public Employees Retirement Systems (CalPERS) pay rate reporting requirements in accordance with Government Code Section 20636 defining “Compensation Earnable” and the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 570.5.        Packet Page. 650 2 8 6 5 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Authorization of these agreements aligns with Key Target No. 2a: Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community by building a culture that attracts, retains, and motivates the highest quality talent. Fiscal Impact The Compensation and Benefits Plan with all Bargaining Groups will be funded by extending the approved hiring deferral for an additional five (5) months. Effective July 1, 2025, City Council approved a six-month hiring deferral estimated to realize $8m in salary and benefit savings. An additional five-month hiring deferral is expected to achieve an additional $6.8m in salary and benefit savings to cover the increased costs in compensation. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Police Officers’ Association (SBPOA) for Police Safety Employees; and 2. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Bernardino Police Management Association (SBPMA) for Police Management Employees; and 3. Amend the City-wide salary schedule for full-time, part-time, temporary, and seasonal positions. Attachments Attachment 1 – SBPOA MOU Attachment 2 – SBPMA MOU Attachment 3 – City-wide Salary Schedule Ward: All Wards Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: July 16, 2025 The Mayor and City Council approved amending the City-wide salary schedule for General Unit, Middle Management, Police Dispatch and Management/Confidential classifications. June 18, 2025 The Mayor and City Council Adopted Resolution No. 2025-309 amending the City-wide salary schedule for full-time, part-time, temporary, and seasonal positions. February 1, 2023, The Mayor and City Council approved the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Bernardino and the San Bernardino Police Management Association        Packet Page. 651 2 8 6 5 November 16, 2022, The Mayor and City Council Adopted Resolution No. 2022-237, adopting the Compensation and Benefits Plan between the City of San Bernardino and the San Bernardino Police Management Association. October 20, 2021, The Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-251, Approving the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the City of San Bernardino and Employees in the Police Safety group represented by SBPOA.        Packet Page. 652 POLICE SAFETY EMPLOYEES MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Made and Entered Into Between The City of San Bernardino And The San Bernardino Police Officers’ Association July 01, 2025, to June 30, 2029        Packet Page. 653 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Article/Section Title ___ NO. Definition of Terms ..........................................................................................4 ARTICLE I Administration ............................................................................................. 6 Section 1 – Parties to MOU .............................................................................................. 6 Section 2 – Management Rights ...................................................................................... 6 Section 3 – Mutual Aid …………....................................................................................... 7 Section 4 – Employee Rights ........................................................................................... 7 Section 5 – Agency Personnel Rules & Uniform Policies ................................................. 7 ARTICLE II Employer-Employee Relations ................................................................... 8 Section 1 – Recognition/ Union Security .......................................................................... 8 Section 2 – No Strike ………............................................................................................. 8 Section 3 – Payroll Deduction ……………........................................................................ 9 Section 4 – Grievance Procedure ..................................................................................... 9 Section 5 – Employee Representatives ………............................................................... 12 Section 6 – Investigation Rights ……………...…………………....................................... 13 Section 7 – Non-Discrimination ...................................................................................... 14 Section 8 – Personnel Files ............................................................................................ 14 Section 9 – Political Activities ..........................................................................................14 Section 10 – Use of City Resources ................................................................................. 14 Section 11 – Prospective Lawsuits ................................................................................... 15 Section 12 – Notice of Administrative leave …………….................................................... 15 ARTICLE III Compensation ………………….................................................................. 15 Section 1 – Salaries........................................................................................................ 15 Section 2 – PERS/ Retirement ....................................................................................... 16 Section 3 – Overtime …………....................................................................................... 17 Section 4 – Assignment to Higher Position ..................................................................... 18 Section 5 – On-Call/ Call-Back/ Standby ........................................................................ 19 Section 6 – Educational Incentive .................................................................................. 20 Section 7 – Court Fines ………………………………....................................................... 21 Section 8 – Special Skills Pay ..…………….................................................................... 21 Section 9 – Longevity Pay ……………………………………............................................ 23 Section 10 – Assistant Watch Commander ...................................................................... 24 Section 11 – Release Time ……………............................................................................ 24 ARTICLE IV Fringe Benefits …………………................................................................. 25 Section 1 – Health/ Life Insurance – Active Employees .................................................. 25 Section 2 – Uniform Allowance ……………………………............................................... 27 Section 3 – Deferred Compensation …………………..................................................... 27 Section 4 – Safety Equipment ………………………………………………....................... 27        Packet Page. 654 3 ARTICLE V Leaves …………………............................................................................... 28 Section 1 – Pre-Petition Leave Banks ............................................................................ 28 Section 2 – Vacation ……............................................................................................... 28 Section 3 – Holidays ………............................................................................................ 30 Section 4 – Sick Leave ................................................................................................... 31 Section 5 – Payment for Unused Sick Leave .................................................................. 32 Section 6 – Retiring Members ........................................................................................ 33 Section 7 – Injury Leave …............................................................................................. 33 Section 8 – Military Leave …........................................................................................... 33 ARTICLE VI Working Conditions …………………......................................................... 34 Section 1 – Work Schedules ………................................................................................ 34 Section 2 – Shift Change ……......................................................................................... 35 Section 3 – Probationary Period ……….......................................................................... 36 Section 4 – Seniority ...................................................................................................... 36 Section 5 – Reemployment ............................................................................................ 36 Section 6 – Physical Examinations ................................................................................. 36 ARTICLE VII General Provisions …………………........................................................... 36 Section 1 – Term ………………………........................................................................... 36 Section 2 – Notice of Intent to Reopen ........................................................................... 37 Section 3 – Recruitment Obligations .............................................................................. 37 Section 4 – Severability ………………………………..……….......................................... 37 Section 5 – Entire Agreement and Waiver Clause ……………….…................................ 37 Section 6 – Prevailing Benefits ....................................................................................... 38 SIGNATURE PAGE ………………………………………….…………………………………. 39        Packet Page. 655 4 DEFINITION OF TERMS Administration: Any elected or appointed official of the City and any employee of the City whose job classification is Management or Confidential employee. Appointing Authority: The Chief of the San Bernardino Police Department. In the Chiefs absence, the Assistant Chief will be the appointing authority. Appropriate Unit: Those positions recognized as belonging to the unit covered by the terms of this MOU. Association: The San Bernardino Police Officers' Association (SBPOA). Break in Service: Refers to a voluntary or involuntary separation from employment with the City or Department, as applicable. An authorized leave of absence does not constitute a break in service. Chief: The Chief of Police of the City of San Bernardino. City: The City of San Bernardino. Continuous Service: Five-sixths (5/6) of the available compensable days within the 12-month period immediately preceding the date of the employee’s return to service. 217 days for employees working 8-hour shifts and 173 days for employees working 10-hour shifts. Department: The San Bernardino Police Department. Division: Any one of the major Divisions of the Department.        Packet Page. 656 5 Employee: All Safety Personnel within the classifications in this appropriate unit.        Packet Page. 657 6 ARTICLE I ADMINISTRATION Section 1 – Parties to Memorandum of Understanding The Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into by and between the City of San Bernardino ("City") and the San Bernardino Police Officers Association (“Association”), in accordance with Government Code Sections 3500 et seq. Section 2 – Management Rights This MOU shall not be deemed to limit or curtail the City in any way in the exercise of the inherent and express rights, powers and authority which the City has prior to entering into this MOU, except to the extent that the provisions of the MOU specifically curtail or limit such rights, powers and authority. Furthermore, the City retains all rights, powers and authority under City Charter, Ordinances, Resolutions, State and Federal law, and expressly and exclusively to: determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; set standards of selection for employment and promotion; direct its employees; establish and enforce dress and grooming standards; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the methods, means, numbers and kinds of personnel by which government operations are to be conducted; determine the content and intent of job classifications; determine methods of financing; determine style and/or types of City issued wearing apparel, equipment or technology to be used, provided that no such measures which threaten the safety of employees shall be adopted; determine and change the facilities, methods, technology, means, organizational structure, size and composition of the work force and allocate and assign work by which the City operations are to be conducted, provided however, that no such measures which threaten the safety of employees shall be adopted; determine and change the number of work locations, relocations and types of operations, processes and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions, including but not limited to, the right to contract for or subcontract any work or operations of the City subject to all applicable meet and confer obligations; assign work to and schedule employees in accordance with requirements as determined by the City; and establish and change work schedules and assignments as set forth in the MOU; establish and modify productivity and performance programs and standards; layoff, discharge, suspend, demote, reprimand, withhold salary increases and benefits, except such as are mandated by City Charter, or otherwise discipline        Packet Page. 658 7 employees in accordance with the applicable law; establish employee performance standards, including but not limited to, quality and quantity standards; take necessary actions and carry out its mission in emergencies; and, exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work. The City shall be free to exercise its rights under this provision without negotiation or challenge from the Association or employees except where it can be demonstrated that such exercise is contrary to law or a specific limitation placed upon the City in another Article of this Agreement. The City’s failure to exercise any right, prerogative, or function reserved to it or the exercise of any such right, prerogative, or function in a particular manner, shall not be considered a waiver of the City’s ability to exercise such rights, prerogatives, or functions or preclude the City from exercising the same in some other manner. Section 3 – Mutual Aid Nothing herein shall in any way be construed to limit the use of any public safety agency or any member in the fulfilling of mutual aid agreements with other jurisdictions or agencies, nor shall this article be construed in any way to limit any jurisdictional or interagency cooperation under any circumstances where such activity is indeed necessary or desirable by the jurisdictions or the agencies involved. Section 4 – Employee Rights Employees shall have all the rights, which may be exercised in accordance with state law, federal law, the Charter and applicable ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations. A. The right to form, join and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer- employee relations. B. The right to refuse to join or participate in the activities of employee organizations and the right to represent themselves individually in their employment relations with the City. C. The right to be free from interference, intimidation, restraint, coercion, discrimination or reprisal by other employees, employee organizations, management or supervisors as a result of their exercise of rights indicated in (A) and (B) above. Section 5 – Agency Personnel Rules and Uniform Policies It is understood and agreed that there exists within the City the “Civil Service Rules and Regulations for the Classified Service”; Resolution No. 10584, Establishing Uniform and Orderly methods of Communications Between the City and its Employees for the Purpose of        Packet Page. 659 8 Promoting Improved Employer-Employee Relations, as amended, and Resolution No. 10585, Adopting Rules and Regulations Relating to Employer Employee Relations, as amended. These documents will continue in effect, except for those provisions modified by the City Council in accordance with any applicable state or federal laws, orders, regulations, official instructions or policies. In the case of proposed changes by other than agreement, the City shall consult with the Association or meet and confer when required by statute. In cases of emergency, the Association and City will meet as soon as possible after the changes. In addition, the Association shall have the right to meet and consult with the City on any relevant employment Uniform Policies the City proposes to implement. ARTICLE II EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS Section 1 – Recognition/ Union Security Section 2 – No Strike        Packet Page. 660 9 Section 3 – Payroll Deduction It is agreed that the Association membership dues, insurance and premiums for plans sponsored by the Association shall be deducted by the City from the pay warrant of each employee covered hereby who files with the City a written authorization requesting that such deduction be made. Remittance of the aggregate amount of all membership dues and insurance premiums deducted from the pay warrants of employees covered hereby shall be made to the Association within 30 days after the conclusion of the month in which said membership dues and insurance premiums were deducted. The Association acknowledges that it has and will continue to comply with all applicable requirements and laws pertaining to dues and other deductions. The City shall not be liable to the Association, employees or any other persons, financial or otherwise, by reason of the requirements of this section for the remittance of any sum other than that constituting actual deductions made from employee wages earned. The Association shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgments or other forms of liability that may arise out of, or by reason of, action taken by the City under this section. Section 4 – Grievance Procedure Purpose. The City of San Bernardino and the Association realize the importance of a viable grievance procedure to aid in the resolution of disputes among employees, supervisors and management. It is recognized that to maintain high employee morale and harmonious relations, an orderly method of processing grievances is necessary. This procedure is intended to establish a systematic means to process a grievance and to obtain fair and proper answers and decisions regarding employee complaints. The representative of employees and management at all levels will make continuing efforts to secure prompt disposition of grievances. Every effort should be made to resolve grievances in the informal process. The initiation of a grievance in good faith by an employee shall not cast any adverse reflection on their standing with their supervisors or their loyalty as a City employee, nor be a reflection on the employee’s supervisor or the department involved, unless it is determined that such department or supervisor has grossly abused management discretion or the employee has grossly abused the grievance process. A. Definition. A grievance is an alleged violation of the terms of this MOU or of the application of any laws, ordinances, practices, resolutions or regulations concerning or affecting wages, hours or other conditions of employment except as excluded in the following paragraph. The remedy selected by the employee shall be the sole and exclusive remedy pursued, either through the grievance procedure or through appeals to the Personnel Commission, as may be applicable. However, nothing herein shall        Packet Page. 661 10 be interpreted as relinquishment of the rights set forth in City of San Bernardino Charter Sections 253, 254, and 255. Additionally, allegations of discrimination and harassment shall be submitted to the Equal Employment Officer. Alleged violations of the Employer-Employee Relations Ordinance shall be processed through the procedure contained therein. B. Representation. The aggrieved employee shall have the right to be represented. This representation may commence at any step in the grievance procedure. Legal counsel and/or official representatives of the recognized employee organization only can represent the employee. No person hearing a grievance need recognize more than one representative for any employee at any one time, unless they so desire. If the employee’s legal counsel is not from the formally recognized employee organization, a representative of that formally recognized organization may attend the grievance hearing to insure that the solution reached does not violate the terms of the MOU. C. Consolidation of Grievances. In order to avoid the necessity of processing numerous similar grievances at one time, a single grievance may be filed or multiple grievances may be consolidated into a single grievance. D. Time Limits. Time limitations are established to settle a grievance quickly. Time limits may be modified by agreements of the parties. If at any stage of the grievance procedures the grievant is dissatisfied with the decision rendered, it shall be the grievant’s responsibility to initiate the action, which submits the grievance to the next level of review. The grievant may proceed to the next step if a reviewing official does not respond within the time limits specified. A formal grievance may be entertained in or advanced to any step if the parties jointly so agree. E. Steps in the Grievance Procedure. The procedures outlined herein constitute the informal and formal steps necessary to resolve an employee’s grievance. An attempt to settle the grievance in the informal structure at the employee-supervisor level is required. The grievance must be submitted to the informal step as soon as possible but in no event later than within thirty (30) working days of the incident causing the grievance or the grievant becoming aware of the event or act giving rise to the grievance. When a grievance is filed by (1) the Association (as opposed to an individual), or (2) the matter complained of originated at the Police Chief’s level, the initial grievance shall be filed at Step 3, directly with the Chief of Police. If the grievance alleges a violation of law, a City uniform policy, ordinance, or resolution, the grievance shall be filed with the Human Resources Director. Note. If the employee chooses to appeal disciplinary action to the Personnel Commission, they shall be precluded from filing a grievance or any other parallel appeal. The filing of a lawsuit during the grievance process shall automatically terminate the further processing of the grievance.        Packet Page. 662 11 The date and the subject of the incident should be provided with the request for the informal meeting. 1. Informal. Initially, the grieving employee shall on a personal face-to-face basis discuss their complaint with their immediate supervisor informally. Within fifteen (15) calendar days, the supervisor shall give their decision to the employee orally. 2. Formal. Step 1. Written Grievance to Supervisor. If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached in the informal process, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing to their immediate supervisor. This must be accomplished within fifteen (15) calendar days of being informed of the supervisor’s informal decision. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the written notification of the employee’s grievance, the supervisor may meet with the employee and thoroughly discuss the grievance. The employee may appear personally and may be represented by a representative of their choice. In any event, the supervisor shall give a written decision to the employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the written grievance. Step 2. Meet with Division Head. If the grievance has not been satisfactorily resolved at this level, it may be appealed within fifteen (15) calendar days to the division head, who may follow the steps outlined in Step 1 above. In any event, the division head shall give a written decision to the employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the grievance. Step 3. Meet with Chief. If the grievance has not been satisfactorily resolved at this level, it may be appealed fifteen (15) calendar days to the Chief, who may follow the steps outlined in Step 2 above. In any event, the Chief shall give a written decision to the employee within ten (10) working days after receipt of the grievance. If the grievance has not been satisfactorily resolved at this level, it may be appealed within fifteen (15) calendar days to the Director of Human Resources. Step 4. Review by the Director of Human Resources. If the grievance is still not adjusted, the aggrieved party may file a written appeal with the Director of Human Resources within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of delivery of said answer. The Director of Human Resources or their designee shall meet with the employee, and if the employee desires, the designated union representative within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the appeal. The designated City representative shall deliver their answer in writing to the employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after the meeting.        Packet Page. 663 12 Step 5. Final Step. a. If the grievance is still not adjusted, the aggrieved party, with the agreement of the Association, may file a written appeal with the City Manager or their designated representative within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of delivery of said answer stating in writing the facts and basis of the complaint and the desired result. b. The grievance shall then be heard by a neutral hearing officer selected by the Parties from a list provided by the State Mediation and Conciliation Service whose decision shall be advisory to the City Manager. Grievances shall only be advanced to advisory arbitration with the agreement of the Association. The cost for hearing all grievances advanced to an advisory arbitration hearing shall be split equally between the City and Association, including any cancellation fee if both parties are mutually responsible, otherwise the party responsible shall pay the entire cancellation fee c. The City Manager or their designated representative shall deliver their answer in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the hearing officer’s advisory decision. d. The decision of the City Manager or their designated representative is final and binding on all parties, unless reversed by a court decision. e. All grievances shall be treated as confidential, and no publicity will be given the final resolution of the grievances. Section 5 – Employee Representatives When requested by an employee, a Job Representative (Job Rep) may investigate any alleged grievance in the department and assist in its presentation. The representative shall be allowed reasonable time therefore during working hours without loss of time or pay, upon notification and approval of their immediate supervisor, with the concurrence of the division or department head. The privilege of a Job Rep to leave work during work hours without loss of time or pay is subject to the understanding that the time will be devoted to the proper handling of grievances and will not be abused. Such time shall be excluded in any computation of overtime. Job Reps will perform their regularly assigned work at all times, except when necessary to leave their work to handle grievances as provided herein. A Job Rep will not be granted time off or compensation for the purpose of handling grievances outside this unit. The Association shall notify the City of the names of each Job Rep each January. The City shall recognize a ratio of one (1) Job Rep for every 50 permanent        Packet Page. 664 13 employees in the unit, but not less than five (5). Job Reps shall include: One (1) from Detective Bureau; three (3) from Patrol; one (1) from MET/Traffic; and, one (1) from Narcotics. Section 6 – Investigation Rights        Packet Page. 665 14 B. No punitive action, nor denial of promotion on grounds other than merit, shall be undertaken by any public agency without providing the employee with an opportunity for administrative appeal. Section 7 – Non-Discrimination Neither the City nor the Association shall unlawfully discriminate against any employee because of race, color, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, age, physical or mental disability, medical condition, national origin, political, religion, or any other basis as required by federal, state, or local law. Section 8 – Personnel Files No member shall have any comment adverse to their interest entered in their personnel file as described in PC 832.8, or any other files used for any personnel purposes by the employer, without the member having first read and signed the instrument containing the adverse comment indicating they are aware of such comment, except that such entry may be made if after reading such instrument, the member refuses to sign it. Should a member refuse to sign, that fact shall be noted on the document and signed or initialed by such officer. A member shall have 30 days within which to file a written response to any adverse comment entered in their personnel file. Such written response shall be attached to and accompany the adverse comment. In all instances other than a written warning or commendation, the consultation reports will be purged from the supervisor’s file in compliance with departmental standard operating procedures. Citizen/internal complaints will be purged from the Internal Affairs files in compliance with the departmental Standard Operating Procedures. Section 9 – Political Activities Except as otherwise provided by law or whenever on duty or in uniform, no employee shall be prohibited from engaging in or be coerced or required to engage in political activity. Section 10 – Use of City Resources The Association may be granted permission to use department facilities for the purpose of meeting with employees to conduct its internal affairs provided space for such meetings can be made available without interfering with City needs. Permission to use facilities must be obtained by the Association from the Chief or a designated representative. The Association shall be held fully responsible for any damages to and the security of any facility that is used by the Association. The department will furnish adequate bulletin board space where currently available. Only areas designated by the appointing authority may be used for posting of notices. Bulletin boards may be used for the following notices.        Packet Page. 666 15 A. Scheduled Association meetings, agenda and minutes; B. Information on Association elections and results; C. Information regarding Association special, recreational and related bulletins; D. Reports of official business of the Association, including reports of committees or the Board of Directors; E. MOU, pay scales, job announcements, promotion lists, etc. Such other items as may be approved by the department management upon request of the department. Posted notices shall not be obscene or defamatory, nor shall they advocate election or defeat of candidates for public office. All notices to be posted may be dated and signed by an authorized representative of the Association and should have prior written approval of the Chief or an authorized representative. Denial of approval shall not be arbitrary or capricious or discriminatory. Section 11 – Prospective Lawsuits The Association and City agree that prior to filing a lawsuit, they shall notify the other party of their intent and shall meet within thirty (30) days to attempt resolution of the matter in question with the intent of reaching a mutually acceptable solution. Section 12 – Notice of Administrative Leave The Association and City agree that notice shall be given to the POA by the Police Department the same day that an Association member is placed on administrative leave, or as soon as reasonably possible thereafter. ARTICLE III COMPENSATION Section 1 – Salaries Effective the first full pay period following August 1, 2025, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by three percent (3%) to reflect a cost-of-living increase (COLA). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by two and twenty hundredths of a percent (2.2%). Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2026, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by three percent (3%).        Packet Page. 667 16 Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by three percent (3%). Section 2 – PERS/ Retirement Tier I: Employees hired prior to September 1, 2011 shall receive a 3% @ 50 retirement Tier II: CalPERS "Classic Members": hired on or after September 1, 2011 shall receive Tier Ill: CalPERS "New Members" hired on or after January 1, 2013 and December Tier IV: CalPERS “New Members” hired on or after January 1, 2016 shall receive a Section 3 – Overtime        Packet Page. 668 17 assignments. B. Definition. Overtime is defined as all compensable hours in excess of the regularly scheduled workday or 40 hours per week. All overtime shall be reported in increments of 15 minutes and is non-accumulative and non-payable when incurred in units of less than 15 minutes. Notwithstanding the above, for those employees assigned to work a 3/12.5 weekly work schedule, overtime shall be defined as: All compensable hours in excess of 160 hours in a 28-day period, hereby adopted in accordance with Section 7(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, or All compensable hours in excess of an employee’s regularly scheduled workday except that in those weeks in which the employee is scheduled to work the 10- hour shift, overtime shall be paid for compensable hours in excess of 47.5 hours. For payroll purposes, employees assigned to work a 3/12.5 weekly work schedule will be paid bi-weekly, with the 28-day work period being divided into two 14-calendar day pay periods: one pay period shall include 75 scheduled hours and the other 14- day calendar day pay period shall include 85 scheduled hours. C. Compensation. An employee who works overtime authorized by the department shall be compensated at time-and-a-half. Payment for overtime shall be made on the first regular payday following the pay period in which overtime is worked, unless overtime compensation cannot be computed until some later date, in which case, overtime will be paid on the next regular payday after such computation can be made. The employee may decide that they be paid for the overtime or accumulate such overtime at time-and-a-half. Such determination must be made at the time the employee submits the overtime slip. Overtime compensation for details or assignments outside the normal budgetary process or that are funded through grant funds shall be compensated in cash. Payment for unused accumulated overtime shall be made upon termination, retirement or paid to the survivor upon death of the employee. Accumulated overtime, placed in a compensatory time bank, shall not exceed 240 hours. D. All accumulated compensatory time shall be paid to a unit member upon promotion of the member. Requests for use of accumulated overtime made fourteen (14) days in advance of the time requested, will be granted unless a public safety issue or serious deployment issue arises. E. Daylight Savings Time. Employees required to work during daylight savings time when their shift is extended by one (1) hour (clocks are turned back one (1) hour) will not be        Packet Page. 669 18 compensated for that hour. Employees required to work when their shift is reduced by one (1) hour (clocks are turned forward one (1) hour) will not be deducted one (1) hour of compensation time. If employees are required to work beyond their standard end of shift, employees will be compensated at their normal overtime rate. F. SBPOA members who work special events where the City has contracts with third parties to provide public safety services and where the third parties pay for the cost of such labor services shall be entitled to be paid an overtime rate of two times the member’s regular rate of pay provided the third party agrees. Such costs may include costs associated with workers’ compensation coverage, Medicare, CalPERS contributions and other expenses required by the SBPOA Memorandum of Understanding. The City and the SBPOA acknowledge that under no circumstance shall this provision result in any additional cost to the City. G. To be eligible for double time for work performed under such third-party contracts, the third party must agree in writing to indemnify the City against all liabilities and injuries incurred solely from the event, event management, or as a result of actions of event staff. H. Special Event shall mean any short-term event of less than 30 days where the services provided are outside of the normal scope of duties of the SBPOA as to providing routine police services to the City of San Bernardino. Special Events shall not include long-term contracts with third parties to provide services for more than 30 days. Special Events shall not include contracts with third parties who are non-profit organizations. I. Section 4 – Assignment to Higher Position An employee of the department temporarily acting in a position in a higher rank during periods of absence of the incumbent or during a vacancy in the position for more than ten (10) consecutive days shall receive the same step for the higher classification (e,g., 5th step detective would be paid 5th step sergeant) or 5% above their current compensation, whichever is greater. In no event shall the base salary exceed the top step of the higher classification in which the employee is acting. The Chief shall certify monthly as to the assignment and the period of time worked in the higher rank to validate entitlement to the higher salary.        Packet Page. 670 19 Substantive addition of duties of a higher-level classification to an employee’s budgeted position should be considered for a classification study. Section 5 – On-Call/Call-Back/Standbv        Packet Page. 671 20 employee will receive three (3) hours' standby pay. If the employee is called to court and does not go beyond 1200 hours in that day, it will be considered part of the three (3) hours' standby. If the employee has to appear after the noon recess, any additional time will be added to the three (3) hours' standby. In cases where the subpoena is for 1330 hours or another time, the standby will start with the time stated on the subpoena. In those cases where the subpoena is for 1330 or later, the employee's time will be computed at the amount of time between the time of the subpoena and 1700. Employees will receive a half-hour (1/2) travel time for going to court. If an employee works graveyard shift and has an 8. 00 a.m. court appearance; the employee will receive overtime pay for a minimum of one (1) hour. For all hours worked in excess of the one (1) hour, employees will receive overtime pay for actual time worked. In the event the employee is required to pay parking fees, the employee will be reimbursed. If employees are required to stay through noon recess, they will be paid for the actual time worked. Section 6 – Educational Incentive All police officers shall be entitled to receive in addition to their regular salary and as may be appropriate, one of the levels of incentive payment as outlined below. A. Two hundred dollars ($200) additional compensation per month shall be paid each police officer who has obtained a Peace Officer Standards Training (POST) Intermediate Certificate. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, the amount will be increased to two hundred and fifty dollars ($250). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, the amount will be increased to two hundred and seventy-five dollars ($275). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, the amount will be increased to three hundred and twenty-five dollars ($325). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2029, the amount will be increased to three hundred and seventy-five dollars ($375); or, B. Seven hundred dollars ( $700) additional compensation per month shall be paid each employee who has obtained a POST Advanced Certificate. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, the amount will be increased to seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, the amount will be increased to seven hundred and seventy-five dollars ($775). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, the amount will be increased to eight hundred and twenty-five dollars ($825). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2029, the amount will be increased to eight hundred and seventy-five dollars ($875); or, C. Seven hundred and twenty-five dollars ( $725) additional compensation per month shall be paid to each employee who has obtained a POST Supervisory Certificate. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, the amount will be        Packet Page. 672 21 increased to seven hundred and seventy-five dollars ($775). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, the amount will be increased to eight hundred dollars ($800). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, the amount will be increased to eight hundred and fifty dollars ($850). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2029, the amount will be increased to nine hundred dollars ($900). Section 7 – Court Fines The City shall pay for court fines imposed upon each member as a result of their conviction of a traffic violation when such employee was directed to operate any faulty vehicle or vehicular equipment, which was the proximate cause of the mechanical or other traffic violation, provided that such violation did not result from improper or negligent operation of the vehicle on the part of the member. Section 8 – Special Skills Pay A. Bilingual Pay. Effective the first full pay period following each full-time employee who passes the City's bilingual proficiency exam shall be compensated as follows: $171/month for police officers, $213/month for detectives/corporals and $241/month for sergeants. The City shall reserve the right to determine languages for which testing will be conducted. B. Canine Pay. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, those assigned to Canine (Handlers and Coordinator) shall be paid a special assignment pay of $362/month for police officers, $446/month for corporals/detectives and $506/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, Canine Handlers and Coordinator shall be paid a special assignment pay of $382/month for police officers, $466/month for corporals/detectives and $526/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, Canine Handlers and Coordinator shall be paid a special assignment pay of $412/month for police officers, $496/month for corporals/detectives and $556/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2029, Canine Coordinators shall be paid a special assignment pay of $432/month for police officers, $516/month for corporals/detectives and $576/month for sergeants. C. Motors Pay. Motors shall be paid a special assignment pay of $342/month for police officers, $426/month for detectives/corporals and $486/month for sergeants. D. SWAT Pay. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, members of the SWAT team shall be paid a special assignment pay of $191/month for police officers, $233/month for detectives/corporals and $261/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, members of the SWAT team shall be paid a special assignment pay of $211/month for police officers, $253/month for detectives/corporals and $281/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, members of the SWAT team shall be paid a special assignment pay of $241/month for police officers, $283/month for detectives/corporals        Packet Page. 673 22 and $311/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2029, members of the SWAT team shall be paid a special assignment pay of $261/month for police officers, $303/month for detectives/corporals and $331/month for sergeants. E. Mounted Unit Pay. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, employees in the Mounted Unit shall be paid a special assignment pay of $191/month for police officers, $233/month for detectives/corporals and $261/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, employees in the Mounted Unit shall be paid a special assignment pay of $211/month for police officers, $253/month for detectives/corporals and $281/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, employees in the Mounted Unit shall be paid a special assignment pay of $241/month for police officers, $283/month for detectives/corporals and $311/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2029, employees in the Mounted Unit shall be paid a special assignment pay of $261/month for police officers, $303/month for detectives/corporals and $331/month for sergeants. Members of the Mounted Unit participating in special events (e.g. raves) shall be paid four (4) hours per deployment for horse maintenance, transportation, and readiness. This time shall be accounted for as two (2) hours at the beginning of each deployment and two (2) hours at the conclusion of each deployment. F. Drone Pay. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, employees assigned to Drone operations shall be paid a special assignment pay of $100/month for police officers, detectives/corporals and sergeants. G. Shift Differential Pay. Effective the first full period following January 1, 2026, employees whose regularly assigned work shift starts at 5 p.m. or later, shall be paid shift differential pay of $181/month for police officers, $223/month for detectives/corporals and $251/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, the amount will increase to $191/month for police officers, $233/month for detectives/corporals and $261/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, the amount will increase to $201/month for police officers, $243/month for detectives/corporals and $271/month for sergeants. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2029, the amount will increase to $211/month for police officers, $253/month for detectives/corporals and $281/month for sergeants. Section 9 – Longevity Pay Effective July 1, 2024, each employee with twenty (20) or more years of service to the City shall receive longevity pay of two hundred sixty-eight dollars ($268) per month. Classic Members. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, each member with fifteen (15) years of completed service will receive $75 per month; each member with        Packet Page. 674 23 twenty years of completed service will receive $325 per month; and each member with twenty-five years of completed service will receive $425 per month. This provision is to be phased out upon the retirement or separation from service of the last remaining eligible classic (Pre-PEPRA) member. fifteen years of completed service will receive up to $125 per month; or twenty years of completed service will receive up to $375 per month; or twenty-five years of completed service will receive up to $475 per month. fifteen years of completed service will receive up to $150 per month; or twenty years of completed service will receive up to $400 per month; or twenty-five years of completed service will receive up to $500 per month. Section 10 – Assistant Watch Commander        Packet Page. 675 24 Commander will serve under the discretion of the Assistant Chief. Compensation shall be $500 a month. Section 11 – Release Time ARTICLE IV FRINGE BENEFITS Section 1 – Health/Life Insurance - Active Employees        Packet Page. 676 25 the “employee only” allowance is given to the employee. Any contribution not utilized by the employee shall revert to the City. The City’s monthly contributions towards employees’ cafeteria benefits shall be as follows: $738.00 for employee only, $1,450.00 for employee plus one and $1,939 for Family coverage. Employee Only Coverage. Effective at the beginning of the next health insurance premium adjustment following July 1, 2025, and each premium adjustment annually thereafter, the City shall continue to pay up to 100% of the cost of Employee Only coverage for the lowest cost plan (currently Kaiser) for the duration of the MOU. The City shall continue to contribute the amount of the lowest cost plan towards health premiums for employees who choose a higher cost plan for Employee Only coverage. The employee shall continue to be responsible for paying the difference in premium costs for the higher cost plan. Employee Plus One Coverage. Effective at the beginning of the next health insurance premium adjustment following July 1, 2025, and each premium adjustment annually thereafter, employees enrolled in Employee Plus One coverage shall pay up to the first $30 per month in premium increase of the lowest cost plan (currently Kaiser) each year that this Resolution is in effect. The same amount of increase shall apply each year to employees who choose the higher cost plan. That is, employees who choose the higher cost plan for Employee +1 coverage shall also pay the same amount of increase, up to the maximum $30 per year increase, as employees in the lowest cost plan, in addition to any difference in cost between the higher cost plan and the lowest cost plan they are currently contributing. Employee Plus Family Coverage. Effective at the beginning of the next health insurance premium adjustment following July 1, 2025, and each premium adjustment annually thereafter, employees enrolled in Employee Plus Family coverage shall pay up to the first $55 per month in premium increases of the lowest cost plan each year that this Agreement is in effect. The same amount of increase each year shall apply to employees who choose the higher cost plan. That is, employees who choose the higher cost plan for Employee +1 coverage shall also pay the same amount of increase, up to the maximum $55 per year increase, as employees in the lowest cost plan in addition to any difference in cost between the higher cost plan and the lowest cost plan they are currently contributing. B. Insurance benefits available for purchase by employees include: medical, dental, vision, supplemental life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance. However, City contributions cannot be used for any voluntary benefits offered to members through Colonial Life. C. An employee must purchase insurance offered through the City in order to utilize the contributions described in Section A above.        Packet Page. 677 26 D. Employees may use any of the amounts described in Section A to purchase any/all of the insurance benefits described in Section B. E. The City shall provide each employee with $25,000 term life insurance and $25,000 Accidental Disability and Dismemberment (AD&D). F. The City shall pay funeral expenses of up to $10,000 for a police officer killed in the line of duty. G. Enrollment in City insurance plans is subject to the regulations availability established by each plan’s provider. H. An employee who does not want to enroll in any health care plan offered by the City must provide evidence of health care insurance coverage and execute a “Waiver of Benefits and Release Agreement” releasing the City from any responsibility or liability to provide health care insurance coverage on an annual basis. Employees who elect to waive the City’s health care insurance may receive a stipend of $2,500 on the first pay period in December. Employees must be employed through the end of the last payroll period in November to qualify for this benefit. Unless hired during the benefit year, employees must participate in the program for the full 12 months to receive the full stipend. Employees on payroll on November 30th who were hired during the benefit year and did not work the entire 12-month period shall earn the stipend on a pro-rata basis. Employees who waived insurance benefits during Open Enrollment, but later requested to enroll in benefits prior to November 30th, will not be eligible for any portion of the stipend. Employees who elect to drop coverage mid-year are not eligible to participate in the stipend program. I. The SBPOA agrees to participate in the City’s Joint Labor-Management Health Benefits Committee (“Committee”) to evaluate, on an annual basis, City-wide plan designs for health care. All plan designs and City contributions shall be effective on January 1st annually. J. Employees must be in a paid status for fifteen (15) consecutive days, in any given month, to receive the benefits of this Article, unless the employee is on a qualifying approved leave, such as Family Medical Leave, and is eligible for benefit continuation under applicable State or Federal law. Members who have been suspended or discharged pending an administrative appeal shall be eligible for continuation of benefits pending final disposition of the disciplinary matter by the Personnel Commission. Section 2 – Uniform Allowance Uniform Allowance. Each employee in the bargaining unit shall receive an annual uniform allowance of $950. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, each employee in the bargaining unit shall receive an annual uniform allowance of $1,050. Effective the first        Packet Page. 678 27 full pay period following January 1, 2027, each employee in the bargaining unit shall receive an annual uniform allowance of $1,150. Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, each employee in the bargaining unit shall receive an annual uniform allowance of $1,250. Such uniform allowance shall be paid on a bi-weekly basis. New employees must wait until the completion of their first full year of service to begin receiving their annual uniform allowance. Section 3 – Deferred Compensation Section 4 – Safety Equipment ARTICLE V LEAVES Section 1 – Pre-Petition Leave Banks        Packet Page. 679 28 City's Recovery Plan, all City employees are subject to these restrictions on pre-petition leaves. With the exception of post-petition vacation accrual, all post-petition leave accruals will be deferred pending the final approval and effective date of a Plan of Adjustment by the Bankruptcy Court. Any agreement reached by the parties as to the implementation of this section will be memorialized in a side letter. Section 2 – Vacation        Packet Page. 680 29 D. Whenever the terms “years or years of employment” appear herein, it shall be deemed to include all services for the City of San Bernardino. E. If an employee leaves the City service prior to the completion of the year in which they used such leave, a deduction will be made from such employee’s final paycheck for the unearned portion of such vacation. Employees shall not be allowed to use unearned vacation time. F. Vacation credits may accrue and accumulate for a maximum of two (2) years’ total accumulated vacation credits on a carryover basis from year to year. Vacations or portions thereof from any one year so accrued may run consecutively with vacations or portions thereof of the next succeeding year, subject to approval of the Chief. G. Compensation for vacation other than for earned vacation at the time of termination of employment shall be limited to the amount normally earned during regularly assigned working time. H. Once per year, members of the bargaining unit will be granted the option of selling up to one-quarter (1/4) of their post-petition vacation and holidays to the City. The Chief will approve or disapprove a member's request for sellback. An eligible employee shall notify the City by July 1 of their request for sell back for the prior fiscal year ending June 30. The City shall compensate eligible employees on the first payday in September. I. In the event that an employee is compensated for less than 50 percent of the total number of work hours in the pay period, they shall not accrue vacation hours for that period. J. Approved vacation, sick leave, holiday or compensatory time off shall be considered as time worked for the purpose of Article V, Section (2) I. Section 3 – Holidays A. Employees shall be entitled to 11 City-designated holidays, the equivalent of 110 holiday hours each year, as listed below. New Year's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Juneteenth Labor Day Veteran's Day (November 11) Thanksgiving Day Day after Thanksgiving Christmas Eve Christmas Day        Packet Page. 681 30 New Year's Eve Additionally, employees shall be entitled to one ten (10) hour floating holiday effective January 1 of each year. Only unit employees who have satisfactorily served in the employ of the City continuously for at least six (6) months in a full-time position shall be eligible to take floating holidays. Employees shall not be allowed to use unearned holiday time. New hire employees who are hired by the City after January 1 of the calendar year shall receive a prorated number of floating holiday leave hours, at the rate of .8333 hours per month, based on their hire date. For example, a new employee hired on July 1 of a calendar year shall receive five (5) hours of floating holiday leave. B. The Chief shall consider any request of any employee as to preference for taking floating holidays, provided however, the final right to allot the day to be observed is exclusively reserved to the Chief. C. All full-time employees with the exception of those employees shown in the following paragraphs shall be allowed the above holidays at full pay when such holidays occur within the regular assigned working period, provided they are in a paid status during any portion of the working day immediately preceding or succeeding the holiday. If it becomes necessary for employees to work on any of the City-designated holidays, ten (10) hours shall be placed in their holiday account. D. Upon separation from the City, employees shall be paid for 80% of their current holiday account balance. E. Holidays as listed above shall be allowed on Monday, if any such holiday falls on Sunday, and shall be allowed on the preceding Friday, if any such holiday falls on Saturday, for all employees except those covered by other provisions herein. If the Christmas and New Year holidays occur on Mondays, these holidays and the holiday eves will be observed on Mondays and Tuesdays. F. Employees may accrue a maximum of 120 hours in their holiday bank. Section 4 – Sick Leave A. Sick leave means absence from duty of an officer or employee because of illness or injury, exposure to contagious disease, attendance upon a member of their immediate family who is seriously ill or requires the care or attendance of an officer or employee, or death in the immediate family of the officer or employee. Immediate family means: husband; wife; domestic partner; grandmother; grandfather; mother; father; sister; brother; son; daughter; mother-in-law; father-in-law; sister-in-law; brother-in-law; daughter-in-law; or son-in-law. B. Not more than one-half (1/2) of an employee's annual sick leave accrual within any calendar year may be granted to an officer or employee for the care of or attendance upon members of their immediate family. Not more than 40 hours of sick leave may        Packet Page. 682 31 be granted to an officer or employee for each absence due to death of a member of their immediate family as defined above. No absence due to illness or injury in excess of 40 hours shall be approved except after the presentation of satisfactory evidence of illness or injury; and, a certificate from a practicing physician or an authorized practicing chiropractor. C. In order to receive compensation while absent on sick leave, the employee shall notify their immediate superior or the station commander prior to the time set for beginning their daily duties, or as may be specified by the Chief. When the absence is for more than one workday, the employee may be required to file a physician's certificate or a personal affidavit with the Director of Human Resources stating the cause of the absence. D. Sick leave with pay shall be granted to all regular employees. Sick leave shall not be considered as a right, which an employee may use at their discretion, but shall be allowed only in case of necessity and actual personal sickness or disability, except as otherwise provided herein. E. Whenever an employee is compensated hereunder for sick leave and has not had a vacation at the end of the current calendar year, they shall be allowed to take their vacation in the calendar year they return to duty. F. Whenever the term "service of City" appears herein, it shall be deemed to include all service of the City of San Bernardino. G. All full-time officers and employees of the City who are actively on duty, have been in the service of said City for six (6) months or more continuously, and who are compelled to be absent from their work on account of illness or injury other than that which is compensable under Article V, Section 6, Injury Leave, of this MOU, shall receive their full salary, wages or compensation for a period of one ( 1) day for each month of continuous service, provided that such salary, wages or compensation shall cease upon the exhaustion of all accumulated sick leave. H. Sick leave accruals and payouts (Section 5 below) shall only include post-petition sick leave accrued after August 1, 2012. An employee may only accrue a maximum of 1040 hours of sick leave. Time off with pay for sick leave shall be considered as time worked for purposes of the accrual of sick leave only. Sick leave shall not accumulate during periods of leave of absence without pay. Employees will not be allowed to use unearned sick leave. I. The 48 hours of sick leave granted after six (6) calendar months of continuous service as herein provided for all full-time employees shall be computed at the rate of approximately 4.0 hours per pay period. In the event that an employee works less than 50 percent of the total normal work hours in the pay period, they shall receive no sick leave benefit for such pay period and shall not be credited with the 4.0 hours of sick leave.        Packet Page. 683 32 J. Approved vacation, sick leave, holiday or compensatory time off shall be considered as time worked for the purpose of computing sick leave benefits only. Section 5 – Payment for Unused Sick Leave A. For the purpose of this section, the “retirement” shall have the meaning ascribed to it and the definition therefore as set forth in Section 20060 of the Government Code. B. Any conversion of sick leave resulting from industrial disability will be provided to an employee in accordance with applicable provisions of the Labor Code. Sick Leave Sell Back: On or before February 15th of each year this MOU is in effect, eligible employees will be allowed to cash out up to forty (40) hours of sick leave per year, providing the employee has at least three hundred and twenty (320) hours in their sick leave account after the sell back. Employees must complete a sell back form, which must include the Department Head’s signature. Forms must be submitted to the Finance Department on or before February 15th each year. Payment for sick leave sell back will be paid (using the current City Council approved salary rates in the salary resolution) to employees in their March payroll check. 1. An employee receiving such pay shall receive at the then current salary rate pay for one-fourth (1/4) of the number of hours of post-petition sick leave accrued, less those hours used for the fiscal year period. The employee's accrued post-petition sick leave shall be reduced by the number of post petition sick leave hours for which pay is provided. C. At the time of retirement, disability retirement or industrial disability retirement only, any employee having fifteen (15) years of continuous service with the City of San Bernardino, may cash out up to 50% of unused post-petition sick leave; any employee having 20 years of continuous service with the City of San Bernardino, may cash out up to 75% of unused post-petition sick leave. Section 6 – Retiring Members At the time of an employee’s subsequent separation from service, payments for unused sick leave (upon retirement only), vacation and holiday in the amounts, percentages, and schedules specified in the MOU shall be contributed to the employee’s 401(a) account, up to the legal allowable limit. Any cash outs exceeding the 401 (a) annual contribution limit shall be paid to the employee as taxable wages, subject to customary withholdings. This provision is subject to plan requirements and applicable law.        Packet Page. 684 33 Section 7 – Injury Leave Employees who are receiving payments under Labor Code Section 4850 shall accrue vacation, sick leave and holiday credits during such absence from duty. When employees are off duty on injury leave and have not had a vacation at the end of the current year, they shall be allowed to take this vacation in the calendar year they return to duty. An employee having a reserve status in any of the regular branches of the Armed Services of the United States or National Guard, upon request to serve under orders or official notification of required military duty shall be relieved from their City duties, upon request, to serve under those training orders without loss of pay for a period not to exceed 30 calendar days in any one fiscal year. The employee shall file with the City a copy of such orders or notification of training indicating Theron the date that said duty is to commence and the date duty is to cease. The employee shall receive their regular compensation in addition to their military pay. It is understood that this provision is in accordance with NRS 281.145 and USERRA of 1994. The standard workday represents the tour of duty for which an employee is regularly scheduled for work during a 24-hour period commencing from the start of the employee's assigned shift. A regularly scheduled tour of duty, which commences before midnight and ends the following day, shall be reported for payroll purposes as time worked for the day in which the tour of duty began. Work schedules shall be as defined herein, except as otherwise provided for: A. 5/40 Work Schedule. The 5/40 work schedule shall consist of a 40-hour workweek consisting of five (5), eight- (8) hour workdays, exclusive of any meal periods assigned by management. B. 9/80 Work Schedule. The 9/80 work schedule shall consist of 80 work hours in a two (2) week period, consisting of eight (8), nine- (9) hour workdays and one (1), eight (8) hour workday, exclusive of any meal periods assigned by management. C. 3/12.5 and 4/10 Work Schedules: The Parties have agreed to implement a "blended schedule" for employees assigned to patrol whereby some employees will work a 3/12.5 weekly work schedule and others will work a 4/10 weekly work schedule.        Packet Page. 685 34 Those employees assigned to work a 3/12.5 weekly work schedule shall work three consecutive days of 12.5 hours each, inclusive of rest breaks and a paid 30- minute meal period. During each 28-day work period, employees assigned to work the 3/12.5 weekly work schedule shall also be scheduled to work one 10-hour work shift, inclusive of rest breaks and a paid 30-minute meal period. The 12.5- hour shifts shall generally be scheduled for three (3) consecutive days. The 10- hour shift will generally be scheduled so that it will be adjacent to a 12.5-hour shift, but exceptions may be made to schedule the 10-hour shift for other days in order to accomplish Department-wide training or due to special assignments. The Parties agree to develop policies governing the interaction between the 3/12.5 weekly work schedule and extended training of three days or more, and other issues that may arise. Those employees assigned to work a 4/10 weekly work schedule will work four consecutive days of 10 hours each, inclusive of rest breaks and a paid 30-minute meal period. The weekly schedule for employees assigned to work this shift shall be either Monday through Thursday or Tuesday through Friday. D. Work Schedule Adjustment. It is recognized that during the term of this agreement, it may be necessary for management to make changes in the work schedule to meet the needs of the service, based on the results of a management audit and/or other circumstances that may arise. Any shift schedule changes are subject to the meet and confer process. Except for emergencies or in case of special needs where management finds it necessary to make such changes, it shall notify the Association indicating the proposed change prior to its implementation. Where such change would significantly affect the working conditions of a significantly large number of employees in the unit and where the Association requests to meet with management, the parties shall expeditiously undertake to consult, as provided by Section 350 et. Seq., of the California Government Code regarding the impact the change would have on the employees of the unit. In cases of special needs where it would be advantageous to make temporary changes to the regularly assigned shift of some personnel, the Department will make a good faith attempt to give one (1) week advance notice to the affected employee(s). The Department will not make special needs changes that result in the disruption of consecutive workdays. It is recognized that it may be necessary for management to make unscheduled temporary changes to regularly assigned shifts based on emergencies or matters of public safety. E. Lunch Hours. Only officers in Patrol will be allowed to take paid meal breaks. Section 2 – Shift Change        Packet Page. 686 35 Subject to authorization of the Chief, Assistant Chief, Captain, Area Commander or Station Commander, employees in the unit should be allowed to exchange time with other employees of equal rank on the following basis. Section 3 – Probationary Period Section 4 – Seniority Section 5 – Reemployment Section 6 – Physical Examinations        Packet Page. 687 36 The City shall pay medical fees for the physical examination of any police officer when such examination is required and directed by the City. ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1 – Term Section 2 – Notice of Intent to Reopen Section 3 – Recruitment Obligations Section 4 – Severability        Packet Page. 688 37 Section 5 - Entire Agreement and Waiver Clause The parties acknowledge that during the meet and confer process which resulted in this MOU, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any subject or matter not removed by law, City Charter, ordinance, resolution, personnel and departmental rules and regulations, within the scope of negotiable issues and that the understandings arrived at by the parties after the exercise of that right and opportunity are set forth herein. Therefore: The express provisions of this Agreement for its duration constitute the complete and total contract between the City and Association with respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment, Any prior or existing Agreement between the parties, whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters are hereby superseded and terminated in their entirety, and The City and the Association, for the life of this MOU, each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and confer and each agrees that the other shall not be obligated to meet and confer with respect to any subject or matter referred to or covered in this MOU or with respect to any subject or matter not specifically referred to or covered in this MOU, even though such subject or matter may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the parties at the time they negotiated or signed this MOU. All benefits, privileges and working conditions authorized for the employees at the present time, which are not included in this MOU and within the scope of representation shall remain in full force during the term of this MOU, unless changed by mutual consent. It is also agreed and understood that nothing in this article shall diminish the rights of the City to exercise its rights under the Management Rights article nor diminish the rights of the Association to meet and confer/consult on proposed changes in accordance with applicable law.        Packet Page. 689 38 SAN BERNARDINO POLICE SAFETY EMPLOYEES’ (“SBPOA”) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 2025 – 2029 Executed this _______ day of ____________________, 2025 ___________________________ ___________________________ Eric Levitt, City Manager Jose Loera, President San Bernardino Police Officer’s Association ___________________________ Araceli Mata, Vice President San Bernardino Police Officer’s Association ATTEST: ___________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 690 39 ___________________________        Packet Page. 691 POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Made and Entered Into Between The City of San Bernardino And The San Bernardino Police Management Association July 01, 2025, to June 30, 2028        Packet Page. 692 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Article/Section Title NO. Definition of Terms ..........................................................................................4 ARTICLE I Administration ............................................................................................. 6 Section 1 – Parties to MOU .............................................................................................. 6 Section 2 – Management Rights ...................................................................................... 6 Section 3 – Mutual Aid …………....................................................................................... 7 Section 4 – Employee Rights ........................................................................................... 7 Section 5 – Agency Personnel Rules & Uniform Policies ................................................. 7 ARTICLE II Employer-Employee Relations ................................................................... 8 Section 1 – Recognition/ Union Security .......................................................................... 8 Section 2 – No Strike ………............................................................................................. 8 Section 3 – Payroll Deduction ……………........................................................................ 9 Section 4 – Grievance Procedure ..................................................................................... 9 Section 5 – Employee Representatives ………............................................................... 12 Section 6 – Investigation Rights ……………...…………………....................................... 13 Section 7 – Non-Discrimination ...................................................................................... 14 Section 8 – Personnel Files ............................................................................................ 14 Section 9 – Political Activities ..........................................................................................14 Section 10 – Use of City Resources ................................................................................. 14 Section 11 – Prospective Lawsuits ................................................................................... 15 ARTICLE III Compensation ………………….................................................................. 15 Section 1 – Salaries........................................................................................................ 15 Section 2 – PERS/ Retirement Plan ............................................................................... 16 Section 3 – Compensation Reimbursable Overtime for Working Contractual Events ..... 16 Section 4 – Assignment to Higher Position ..................................................................... 17 Section 5 – Optional Cell Phone Allowance ................................................................... 17 Section 6 – POST Incentive ........................................................................................... 17 Section 7 – Court Fines ………………………………....................................................... 18 Section 8 – Bilingual Pay ..…………………..................................................................... 18 Section 9 – Physical Fitness Program …………………………………….......................... 18 Section 10 – Technology Allowance ………...................................................................... 19 Section 11 – Longevity Pay ……………............................................................................ 19 Section 12 – Education Pay ……………........................................................................... 19 ARTICLE IV Fringe Benefits …………………................................................................. 20 Section 1 – Health/ Life Insurance – Active Employees .................................................. 20 Section 2 – Uniform Allowance ……………………………............................................... 22 Section 3 – Professional Development………………….................................................. 22 Section 4 – Deferred Compensation …………………………………………..................... 22        Packet Page. 693 3 Section 5 – Safety Equipment ………………………………………………....................... 23 ARTICLE V Leaves …………………............................................................................... 23 Section 1 – Pre-Petition Leave Banks ............................................................................ 23 Section 2 – Vacation ……............................................................................................... 23 Section 3 – Holidays ………............................................................................................ 25 Section 4 – Sick Leave ................................................................................................... 26 Section 5 – Payment for Unused Sick Leave .................................................................. 27 Section 6 – Injury Leave …….......................................................................................... 28 Section 7 – Administrative Leave …................................................................................ 28 ARTICLE VI Working Conditions …………………......................................................... 29 Section 1 – Work Schedules ………................................................................................ 29 Section 2 – Probationary Period …….............................................................................. 29 Section 3 – Seniority …………...……….......................................................................... 29 Section 4 – Reemployment ............................................................................................ 29 Section 5 – Physical Examinations ................................................................................. 30 ARTICLE VII General Provisions …………………........................................................... 30 Section 1 – Term ………………………........................................................................... 30 Section 2 – Notice of Intent to Reopen ........................................................................... 30 Section 3 – Severability ……………................................................................................ 30 Section 4 – Entire Agreement and Waiver Clause ……….….......................................... 30 Section 5 – Prevailing Benefits …………………………………….…................................ 31 SIGNATURE PAGE ………………………………………….…………………………………. 32        Packet Page. 694 4 DEFINITION OF TERMS Appointing Authority: The Chief of the San Bernardino Police Department. In the Chiefs absence, the Assistant Chief will be the appointing authority. Appropriate Unit: Those positions recognized as belonging to the unit covered by the terms of this MOU. Association: The San Bernardino Police Management Association (SBPMA). Break in Service: Refers to a voluntary or involuntary separation from employment with the City or Department, as applicable. An authorized leave of absence does not constitute a break in service. Chief: The Chief of Police of the City of San Bernardino. City: The City of San Bernardino. Continuous Service: Five-sixths (5/6) of the available compensable days within the 12 month period immediately preceding the date of the employee’s return to service. 217 days for employees working 8-hour shifts and 173 days for employees working 10-hour shifts. Department: The San Bernardino Police Department. Division: Any one of the major Divisions of the Department. Employee: All Management Personnel within the classifications in this appropriate unit.        Packet Page. 695 5 Employee        Packet Page. 696 6 ARTICLE I ADMINISTRATION Section 1 – Parties to Memorandum of Understanding The Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into by and between the City of San Bernardino ("City") and the San Bernardino Police Management Association (“Association”), in accordance with Government Code Sections 3500 et seq. Section 2 – Management Rights This MOU shall not be deemed to limit or curtail the City in any way in the exercise of the inherent and express rights, powers and authority which the City has prior to entering into this MOU, except to the extent that the provisions of the MOU specifically curtail or limit such rights, powers and authority. Furthermore, the City retains all rights, powers and authority under City Charter, Ordinances, Resolutions, State and Federal law, and expressly and exclusively to: determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; set standards of selection for employment and promotion; direct its employees; establish and enforce dress and grooming standards; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the methods, means, numbers and kinds of personnel by which government operations are to be conducted; determine the content and intent of job classifications; determine methods of financing; determine style and/or types of City issued wearing apparel, equipment or technology to be used, provided that no such measures which threaten the safety of employees shall be adopted; determine and change the facilities, methods, technology, means, organizational structure, size and composition of the work force and allocate and assign work by which the City operations are to be conducted, provided however, that no such measures which threaten the safety of employees shall be adopted; determine and change the number of work locations, relocations and types of operations, processes and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions, including but not limited to, the right to contract for or subcontract any work or operations of the City subject to all applicable meet and confer obligations; assign work to and schedule employees in accordance with requirements as determined by the City; and establish and change work schedules and assignments as set forth in the MOU; establish and modify productivity and performance programs and standards; layoff, discharge, suspend, demote, reprimand, withhold salary increases and benefits, except such as are mandated by City Charter, or otherwise discipline        Packet Page. 697 7 employees in accordance with the applicable law; establish employee performance standards, including but not limited to, quality and quantity standards; take necessary actions and carry out its mission in emergencies; and, exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work. The City shall be free to exercise its rights under this provision without negotiation or challenge from the Association or employees except where it can be demonstrated that such exercise is contrary to law or a specific limitation placed upon the City in another Article of this Agreement. The City’s failure to exercise any right, prerogative, or function reserved to it or the exercise of any such right, prerogative, or function in a particular manner, shall not be considered a waiver of the City’s ability to exercise such rights, prerogatives, or functions or preclude the City from exercising the same in some other manner. Section 3 – Mutual Aid Nothing herein shall in any way be construed to limit the use of any public safety agency or any member in the fulfilling of mutual aid agreements with other jurisdictions or agencies, nor shall this article be construed in any way to limit any jurisdictional or interagency cooperation under any circumstances where such activity is indeed necessary or desirable by the jurisdictions or the agencies involved. Section 4 – Employee Rights Employees shall have all the rights, which may be exercised in accordance with state law, federal law, the Charter and applicable ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations, including: A. The right to form, join and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer- employee relations. B. The right to refuse to join or participate in the activities of employee organizations and the right to represent themselves individually in their employment relations with the City. C. The right to be free from interference, intimidation, restraint, coercion, discrimination or reprisal by other employees, employee organizations, management or supervisors as a result of their exercise of rights indicated in (A) and (B) above. Section 5 – Agency Personnel Rules and Uniform Policies It is understood and agreed that there exists within the City the “Civil Service Rules and Regulations for the Classified Service”; Resolution No. 10584, Establishing Uniform and        Packet Page. 698 8 Orderly methods of Communications Between the City and its Employees for the Purpose of Promoting Improved Employer-Employee Relations, as amended, and Resolution No. 10585, Adopting Rules and Regulations Relating to Employer Employee Relations, as amended. These documents will continue in effect, except for those provisions modified by the City Council in accordance with any applicable state or federal laws, orders, regulations, official instructions or policies. In the case of proposed changes by other than agreement, the City shall consult with the Association or meet and confer when required by statute. In cases of emergency, the Association and City will meet as soon as possible after the changes. In addition, the Association shall have the right to meet and consult with the City on any relevant employment Uniform Policies the City proposes to implement. ARTICLE II EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS Section 1 – Recognition/ Union Security Section 2 – No Strike        Packet Page. 699 9 Section 3 – Payroll Deduction It is agreed that the Association membership dues, insurance and premiums for plans sponsored by the Association shall be deducted by the City from the pay warrant of each employee covered hereby who files with the City a written authorization requesting that such deduction be made. Remittance of the aggregate amount of all membership dues and insurance premiums deducted from the pay warrants of employees covered hereby shall be made to the Association within 30 days after the conclusion of the month in which said membership dues and insurance premiums were deducted. The Association acknowledges that it has and will continue to comply with all applicable requirements and laws pertaining to dues and other deductions. The City shall not be liable to the Association, employees or any other persons, financial or otherwise, by reason of the requirements of this section for the remittance of any sum other than that constituting actual deductions made from employee wages earned. The Association shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgments or other forms of liability that may arise out of, or by reason of, action taken by the City under this section. A. Purpose. The City of San Bernardino and the Association realize the importance of a viable grievance procedure to aid in the resolution of disputes among employees, supervisors and management. It is recognized that to maintain high employee morale and harmonious relations, an orderly method of processing grievances is necessary. This procedure is intended to establish a systematic means to process a grievance and to obtain fair and proper answers and decisions regarding employee complaints. The representative of employees and management at all levels will make continuing efforts to secure prompt disposition of grievances. Every effort should be made to resolve grievances in the informal process. The initiation of a grievance in good faith by an employee shall not cast any adverse reflection on their standing with their supervisors or their loyalty as a City employee, nor be a reflection on the employee’s supervisor or the department involved, unless it is determined that such department or supervisor has grossly abused management discretion or the employee has grossly abused the grievance process. B. Definition. A grievance is an alleged violation of the terms of this MOU or of the application of any laws, ordinances, practices, resolutions or regulations concerning or affecting wages, hours or other conditions of employment except as excluded in the following paragraph. The remedy selected by the employee shall be the sole and exclusive remedy pursued, either through the grievance procedure or through appeals to the Personnel Commission, as may be applicable. However, nothing herein shall be interpreted as relinquishment of the rights set forth in City of San Bernardino Charter Sections 253, 254, and 255.        Packet Page. 700 10 Additionally, allegations of discrimination and harassment shall be submitted to the Equal Employment Officer. Alleged violations of the Employer-Employee Relations Ordinance shall be processed through the procedure contained therein. C. Representation. The aggrieved employee shall have the right to be represented. This representation may commence at any step in the grievance procedure. Legal counsel and/or official representatives of the recognized employee organization only can represent the employee. No person hearing a grievance need recognize more than one representative for any employee at any one time, unless they so desire. If the employee’s legal counsel is not from the formally recognized employee organization, a representative of that formally recognized organization may attend the grievance hearing to insure that the solution reached does not violate the terms of the MOU. D. Consolidation of Grievances. In order to avoid the necessity of processing numerous similar grievances at one time, a single grievance may be filed or multiple grievances may be consolidated into a single grievance. E. Time Limits. Time limitations are established to settle a grievance quickly. Time limits may be modified by agreements of the parties. If at any stage of the grievance procedures the grievant is dissatisfied with the decision rendered, it shall be the grievant’s responsibility to initiate the action, which submits the grievance to the next level of review. The grievant may proceed to the next step if a reviewing official does not respond within the time limits specified. A formal grievance may be entertained in or advanced to any step if the parties jointly so agree. F. Steps in the Grievance Procedure. The procedures outlined herein constitute the informal and formal steps necessary to resolve an employee’s grievance. An attempt to settle the grievance in the informal structure at the employee-supervisor level is required. The grievance must be submitted to the informal step as soon as possible but in no event later than within thirty (30) working days of the incident causing the grievance or the grievant becoming aware of the event or act giving rise to the grievance. When a grievance is filed by (1) the Association (as opposed to an individual), or (2) the matter complained of originated at the Police Chief’s level, the initial grievance shall be filed at Step 3, directly with the Chief of Police. If the grievance alleges a violation of law, a City uniform policy, ordinance, or resolution, the grievance shall be filed with the Human Resources Director. Note. If the employee chooses to appeal disciplinary action to the Personnel Commission, they shall be precluded from filing a grievance or any other parallel appeal. The filing of a lawsuit during the grievance process shall automatically terminate the further processing of the grievance. The date and the subject of the incident should be provided with the request for the informal meeting.        Packet Page. 701 11 1. Informal. Initially, the grieving employee shall on a personal face-to-face basis discuss their complaint with their immediate supervisor informally. Within fifteen (15) calendar days, the supervisor shall give their decision to the employee orally. 2. Formal. Step 1. Written Grievance to Supervisor. If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached in the informal process, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing to their immediate supervisor. This must be accomplished within fifteen (15) calendar days of being informed of the supervisor’s informal decision. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the written notification of the employee’s grievance, the supervisor may meet with the employee and thoroughly discuss the grievance. The employee may appear personally and may be represented by a representative of their choice. In any event, the supervisor shall give a written decision to the employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the written grievance. Step 2. Meet with the Assistant Chief. If the grievance has not been satisfactorily resolved at this level, it may be appealed within fifteen (15) calendar days to the Assistant Chief, who may follow the steps outlined in Step 1 above. In any event, the assistant chief shall give a written decision to the employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the grievance. Step 3. Meet with Chief. If the grievance has not been satisfactorily resolved at this level, it may be appealed fifteen (15) calendar days to the Chief, who may follow the steps outlined in Step 2 above. In any event, the Chief shall give a written decision to the employee within ten (10) working days after receipt of the grievance. If the grievance has not been satisfactorily resolved at this level, it may be appealed within fifteen (15) calendar days to the Director of Human Resources. Step 4. Review by the Director of Human Resources. If the grievance is still not adjusted, the aggrieved party may file a written appeal with the Director of Human Resources within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of delivery of said answer. The Director of Human Resources or their designee shall meet with the employee, and if the employee desires, the designated union representative within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the appeal. The designated City representative shall deliver their answer in writing to the employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after the meeting. Step 5. Final Step.        Packet Page. 702 12 a. If the grievance is still not adjusted, the aggrieved party, with the agreement of the Association, may file a written appeal with the City Manager or their designated representative within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of delivery of said answer, stating in writing the facts and basis of the complaint and the desired result. b. The grievance shall then be heard by a neutral hearing officer selected by the Parties from a list provided by the State Mediation and Conciliation Service, whose decision shall be advisory to the City Manager. Grievances shall only be advanced to advisory arbitration with the agreement of the Association. The cost for hearing all grievances advanced to an advisory arbitration hearing shall be split equally between the City and Association, including any cancellation fee if both parties are mutually responsible, otherwise the party responsible shall pay the entire cancellation fee. c. The City Manager or their designated representative shall deliver their answer in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the hearing officer’s advisory decision. d. The decision of the City Manager or their designated representative is final and binding on all parties, unless reversed by a court decision. e. All grievances shall be treated as confidential, and no publicity will be given the final resolution of the grievances. Section 5 – Employee Representatives When requested by an employee, a Job Representative (Job Rep) may investigate any alleged grievance in the department and assist in its presentation. The representative shall be allowed reasonable time therefore during working hours without loss of time or pay, upon notification and approval of their immediate supervisor, with the concurrence of the division or department head. The privilege of a Job Rep to leave work during work hours without loss of time or pay is subject to the understanding that the time will be devoted to the proper handling of grievances and will not be abused. Such time shall be excluded in any computation of overtime. Job Reps will perform their regularly assigned work at all times, except when necessary to leave their work to handle grievances as provided herein. A Job Rep will not be granted time off or compensation for the purpose of handling grievances outside this unit. Section 6 – Investigation Rights        Packet Page. 703 13 When an employee is under investigation and subjected to interrogation by their commanding officer or any other member of the department, which could lead to punitive action, such interrogation shall be conducted under the following conditions. For the purpose of this chapter, punitive action is defined as any action which may lead to dismissal, demotion, suspension, reduction in salary, written reprimand or transfer for purposes of punishment. Section 7 – Non-Discrimination        Packet Page. 704 14 Neither the City nor the Association shall unlawfully discriminate against any employee because of race, color, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, age, physical or mental disability, medical condition, national origin, political, religion, or any other basis as required by federal, state, or local law. Section 8 – Personnel Files Section 9 – Political Activities Section 10 – Use of City Resources        Packet Page. 705 15 C. Information regarding Association special, recreational and related bulletins; D. Reports of official business of the Association, including reports of committees or the Board of Directors; E. MOU, pay scales, job announcements, promotion lists, etc. Posted notices shall not be obscene or defamatory, nor shall they advocate election or defeat of candidates for public office. All notices to be posted may be dated and signed by an authorized representative of the Association and should have prior written approval of the Chief or an authorized representative. Denial of approval shall not be arbitrary or capricious or discriminatory. Section 11 – Prospective Lawsuits The Association and City agree that prior to filing a lawsuit, they shall notify the other party of their intent and shall meet within thirty (30) days to attempt resolution of the matter in question with the intent of reaching a mutually acceptable solution. ARTICLE III COMPENSATION Section 1 – Salaries Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2025, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by three percent (3%) to reflect a cost-of-living increase (COLA). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by two percent (2%). Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2026, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by three percent (3%). Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, the salary ranges for all unit members shall be increased by three percent (3%). Section 2 – PERS/ Retirement Plan A. Retirement Benefits. SBPMA members are provided retirement benefits under the Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) as follows. Tier I: Employees hired prior to September 1, 2011 shall receive a 3% @ 50 retirement benefit;        Packet Page. 706 16 Tier II: CalPERS "Classic Members" hired on or after September 1, 2011 shall receive a 3% @ 55 retirement benefit; Tier Ill: CalPERS "New Members" hired on or after January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015 shall receive a 2.7% @ 57 retirement benefit in accordance with the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA); Tier IV: CalPERS “New Members” hired on or after January 1, 2016 shall receive a 2.5% @ 57 retirement benefit in accordance with PEPRA. B. Required Bargaining Unit Member Contributions. CalPERS classic members shall contribute 12% of compensation earnable as member contributions toward their retirements. CalPERS “new members” shall contribute member contributions of 50% of the normal costs in accordance with Government Code § 7522.30. C. In accordance with Government Code § 21624 and § 21635, the “post survivors’ retirement” benefit provided under the City’s contract with CalPERS shall be provided to all employees. D. For Tier I and Tier II employees, the final compensation period will be single highest year as provided under the City’s contract with CalPERS. Section 3 – Compensation Reimbursable Overtime for Working Contractual Events Association members who are required to work special events where the City has contracts with third parties to provide public safety services and where the third parties pay for the cost of such labor services, shall be entitled to be paid overtime, (either straight time or premium overtime) in accordance with the contract between the City and the third party. The City and the SBPMA acknowledge that this provision shall not result in any additional cost to the City. Section 4 – Assignment to Higher Position An employee of the department temporarily acting in a position in a higher rank during periods of absence of the incumbent or during a vacancy in the position for more than ten (10) consecutive days shall receive the pay for the higher classification (e,g., lieutenant would be paid captain pay) or 5% above their current compensation, whichever is greater. In no event shall the base salary exceed the top step (if a top step is defined) of the higher classification in which the employee is acting. The Chief shall certify monthly as to the assignment and the period of time worked in the higher rank to validate entitlement to the higher salary.        Packet Page. 707 17 The determination as to whether higher acting pay (also referred to as Temporary Upgrade Pay by CalPERS) is pensionable shall be determined by CalPERS. However, such pay is currently generally considered pensionable compensation only under the following conditions: 1) the employee is fully relieved of the duties of their regular position during the acting assignment and is performing the full scope of duties associated with the higher classification; and 2) the employee is a Classic Member as defined by the CalPERS system. Section 5 – Optional Cell Phone Allowance Section 6 – POST Incentive        Packet Page. 708 18 seven hundred and seventy-five dollars ($775). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2027, the amount will be increased to eight hundred dollars ($800). Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2028, the amount will be increased to eight hundred and fifty dollars ($850);or, D. One thousand four hundred and eighty-five dollars ($1,485) additional compensation per month shall be paid each employee who has obtained a POST Management Certificate. Section 7 – Court Fines The City shall pay for court fines imposed upon each member as a result of their conviction of a traffic violation when such employee was directed to operate any faulty vehicle or vehicular equipment, which was the proximate cause of the mechanical or other traffic violation, provided that such violation did not result from improper or negligent operation of the vehicle on the part of the member. Section 8 – Bilingual Pay Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2025, up to two (2) employees from SBPMA who pass the City's bilingual proficiency exam shall be compensated at $250 per month. Additional employees may be eligible based on consideration of such factors as critical need and financial resources or constraints. The City Manager or designee shall retain the right to select and determine the total number of eligible employees. The City shall reserve the right to determine languages for which testing will be conducted. Such incentive shall be paid on a bi-weekly basis. Section 9 – Physical Fitness Program Effective the first full pay period following October 1, 2025, SBPMA members who pass the required testing shall receive $250 per month. In order to qualify to obtain and maintain this incentive pay in subsequent fiscal years, an employee must pass the required testing prior to the following fiscal year (e.g. May/June for FY 26/27. Such incentive shall be paid on a bi- weekly basis. Those employees who are unable to test during this period (i.e. those newly promoted) may test outside this testing schedule to receive this incentive pay beginning the pay period after the qualification is obtained. Section 10 – Technology Allowance SBPMA members require up to date technology to efficiently manage Department operations. In lieu of receiving city issued technology, such as desktop computers, laptops, tablets, printers, scanners, and software employees may elect to utilize their own        Packet Page. 709 19 technological equipment. SBPMA members shall receive an annual technology allowance of $500 to be paid on a bi-weekly basis. Section 11 – Longevity Pay Section 12 – Education Pay ARTICLE IV FRINGE BENEFITS Section 1 – Health/Life Insurance - Active Employees        Packet Page. 710 20 A. During the term of this agreement the City’s Contributions for Healthcare benefits shall be as follows: The amount of the City’s contribution is based on the selection of the “medical” enrollment category. If an employee elects “employee only” medical coverage, then the “employee only” allowance is given to the employee. Any contribution not utilized by the employee shall revert to the City. The City’s monthly contributions towards employees’ cafeteria benefits shall be as follows: $1008.00 for employee only, $1,450.00 for employee plus one and $1,939.00 for Family coverage. Employee Only Coverage. Effective at the beginning of the next health insurance premium adjustment following July 1, 2025, and each premium adjustment annually thereafter, employees enrolled in Employee Only coverage shall pay up to the first $10 per month in premium increases of the lowest cost plan (currently Kaiser) each year that this Agreement is in effect. The same amount of increase shall apply each year to employees who choose the higher cost plan. That is, employees who choose the higher cost plan for Employee Only coverage shall also pay the same amount of increase, up to the maximum $10 per year increase, as employees in the lowest cost plan, in addition to any difference in cost between the higher cost plan and the lowest cost plan they are currently contributing. Employee Plus One Coverage. Effective at the beginning of the next health insurance premium adjustment following July 1, 2025, and each premium adjustment annually thereafter, employees enrolled in Employee Plus One coverage shall pay up to the first $30 per month in premium increase of the lowest cost plan (currently Kaiser) each year that this Agreement is in effect. The same amount of increase shall apply each year to employees who choose the higher cost plan. That is, employees who choose the higher cost plan for Employee +1 coverage shall also pay the same amount of increase, up to the maximum $30 per year increase, as employees in the lowest cost plan, in addition to any difference in cost between the higher cost plan and the lowest cost plan they are currently contributing. Employee Plus Family Coverage. Effective at the beginning of the next health insurance premium adjustment following July 1, 2025, and each premium adjustment annually thereafter, employees enrolled in Employee Plus Family coverage shall pay up to the first $55 per month in premium increases of the lowest cost plan (currently Kaiser) each year that this Agreement is in effect. The same amount of increase each year shall apply to employees who choose the higher cost plan. That is, employees who choose the higher cost plan for Employee Plus Family coverage shall also pay the same amount of increase, up to the maximum $55 per year increase, as employees in the lowest cost plan in addition to any difference in cost between the higher cost plan and the lowest cost plan they are currently contributing.        Packet Page. 711 21 B. Insurance benefits available for purchase by employees include: medical, dental, vision, supplemental life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance. However, City contributions cannot be used for any voluntary benefits offered to members through Colonial Life. C. An employee must purchase insurance offered through the City in order to utilize the contributions described in Section A above. D. Employees may use any of the amounts described in Section A to purchase any/all of the insurance benefits described in Section B. E. The City shall provide each employee with $50,000 term life insurance and $50,000 Accidental Disability and Dismemberment (AD&D). F. The City shall pay funeral expenses of up to $10,000 for a police officer killed in the line of duty. G. Enrollment in City insurance plans is subject to the regulations availability established by each plan’s provider. H. An employee who does not want to enroll in any health care plan offered by the City must provide evidence of health care insurance coverage and execute a “Waiver of Benefits and Release Agreement” releasing the City from any responsibility or liability to provide health care insurance coverage on an annual basis. Employees who elect to waive the City’s health care insurance may receive a stipend of $2,500 on the first pay period in December. Employees must be employed through the end of the last payroll period in November to qualify for this benefit. Unless hired during the benefit year, employees must participate in the program for the full 12 months to receive the full stipend. Employees on payroll on November 30th who were hired during the benefit year and did not work the entire 12-month period shall earn the stipend on a pro-rata basis. Employees who waived insurance benefits during Open Enrollment, but later requested to enroll in benefits prior to November 30th, will not be eligible for any portion of the stipend. Employees who elect to drop coverage mid-year are not eligible to participate in the stipend program. I. The SBPMA agrees to participate in the City’s Joint Labor-Management Health Benefits Committee (“Committee”) to evaluate, on an annual basis, City-wide plan designs for health care. All plan designs and City contributions shall be effective on January 1st annually. J. Employees must be in a paid status for fifteen (15) consecutive days, in any given month, to receive the benefits of this Article, unless the employee is on a qualifying approved leave, such as Family Medical Leave, and is eligible for benefit continuation under applicable State or Federal law. Members who have been suspended or discharged pending an administrative appeal shall be eligible for continuation of        Packet Page. 712 22 benefits pending final disposition of the disciplinary matter by the Personnel Commission. Section 2 – Uniform Allowance A. Rain Gear. The City shall continue its current method to provide appropriate duty rain gear for personnel. B. Utility Uniforms. Each employee of the bargaining unit shall be furnished one utility uniform. Said uniform shall be maintained in assigned lockers or in the vehicle available for use at all times. C. Uniform Allowance. Each employee in the bargaining unit shall receive an annual uniform allowance of $950. Such uniform allowance shall be paid on a bi-weekly basis. New employees must wait until the completion of their first full year of service to begin receiving their annual uniform allowance. Section 3 – Professional Development Professional Development is essential for SBPMA members. Job related training, seminars, conferences, classes, and membership in professional organizations/subscriptions facilitate this development. Each SBPMA member will be provided with seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750) each year to pay for membership dues, subscriptions, fees for attendance and/or materials for professional development. Such allowance shall be paid on a bi-weekly basis. Section 4 – Deferred Compensation The City shall sponsor a 401 (a) Deferred Compensation Plan. The City shall contribute to each SBPMA member’s 401 (a) account in the following amounts: Lieutenants: two hundred and twenty-five dollars ($225) per month; Captains: three hundred dollars ($300) per month; Assistant Chief three hundred and seventy-five dollars ($375) per month. Any payment exceeding the 401 (a) annual contribution limit for defined contribution plans shall be paid to the employee as taxable wages, subject to customary withholdings. The City shall continue to sponsor a 457 (b) Deferred Compensation Plan, which shall be available to employees on a voluntary basis. Unspent “cafeteria” contributions may not be diverted into a deferred compensation or like plan. Section 5 – Safety Equipment A. New employees who are required to have safety equipment will be furnished same on a one-time basis, including safety equipment hardware, leather and safety vests. B. Replacements will be issued upon return of worn-out items. It shall be the duty of each        Packet Page. 713 23 employee to use normal diligence in their use and any willful damage or loss shall obligate the employee to replace the item at their expense. Upon reassignment or separation from the department, these items shall be returned to the City. The City Director of Finance shall have direct control over the purchase, issue, and replacement of the above-described items. The Chief shall certify in writing to the Director of Finance as to an individual’s entitlement. ARTICLE V LEAVES Section 1 – Pre-Petition Leave Banks The monetary value of all pre-petition leave bank accruals, including without limitation, vacation, sick leave, concession leave, and holiday leave, will be the subject of distribution as part of the bankruptcy unsecured creditors' pool. All leave balances accrued on or before August 1, 2012 (Pre-Petition Leave) shall be placed in the unsecured creditor pool and will not be available for cash-out (or the cash equivalent) by the SBPMA members. This position is consistent with the Recovery Plan adopted by the City Council on May 18, 2015. Under the City's Recovery Plan, all City employees are subject to these restrictions on pre-petition leaves. Upon separation from employment with the City, employees will receive payment for any post-petition leave balances according to the terms and conditions outlined in their existing MOU. Section 2 – Vacation A. All employees within the bargaining unit covered by this MOU shall be entitled to annual paid vacations as follows: Completed Years of Continuous Service Rate of Accrual Per Pay Period Equivalent Hours Per Year 1 Year**3.0769 hours 80 hours 5 Years 4.6153 hours 120 hours 15 Years 6.1538 hours 160 hours 20 Years 7.6923 hours 200 hours *Service year begins on initial date of employment in a full-time, regular status. ** No vacation granted or accrued if service is less than 1,040 paid hours.        Packet Page. 714 24 B. When an employee resigns or otherwise leaves the service of the City and has not used their earned post-petition vacation, payment shall be made for the benefit of the employee into the City’s 401 (a) plan for the earned portion of their vacation. Any payment exceeding the 401 (a) annual contribution limit for defined contribution plans shall be paid to the employee as taxable wages, subject to customary withholdings. Calculation of the payment for earned vacation or deduction for unearned vacation upon separation to determine the amount to be contributed to the 401(a) plan shall be made in accordance with the wage rate in effect on the final day of employment. C. When an employee returns to work after a break in “continuous service,” and when such break in continuous service shall have been by leave of absence with approval of the Mayor and Common Council, vacation time shall not accrue during such break in continuous service but shall accrue monthly from the date of return to service from such approved leave of absence, based upon the total length of service of the employee. D. Whenever the terms “years or years of employment” appear herein, it shall be deemed to include all services for the City of San Bernardino. E. If an employee leaves the City service prior to the completion of the year in which they used such leave, a deduction will be made from such employee’s final paycheck for the unearned portion of such vacation. Employees shall not be allowed to use unearned vacation time. F. Vacation credits may accrue and accumulate for a maximum of two (2) years’ total accumulated vacation credits on a carryover basis from year to year. Vacations or portions thereof from any one year so accrued may run consecutively with vacations or portions thereof of the next succeeding year. Vacation credits accrued during an industrial disability are not subject to this term. G. Compensation for vacation other than for earned vacation at the time of termination of employment shall be limited to the amount normally earned during regularly assigned working time. H. Once per year, members of the bargaining unit will convert one-quarter (1/4) of their unused post-petition vacation leave into a contribution to the City’s 401(a) plan. The value shall be calculated using the then current wage rate. The City shall make the contribution on the first payday in September. Any contribution exceeding the 401 (a) annual contribution limit shall be paid to the employee as wages, subject to customary withholding. In addition, once per year, members of the bargaining unit will be granted the option of selling up to one-quarter (1/4) of their post-petition holiday leave to the City. An eligible employee shall notify the City by August 1 of their request for sellback for the prior fiscal year ending June 30. The City shall compensate eligible employees on the first payday in September.        Packet Page. 715 25 I. In the event that an employee is compensated for less than 50 percent of the total number of work hours in the pay period, they shall not accrue vacation hours for that period. J. Approved vacation, sick leave, holiday or compensatory time off shall be considered as time worked for the purpose of Article V, Section (2) I. Section 3 – Holidays A. Employees shall be entitled to thirteen (13) City-designated holidays and two (2) floating holidays, the equivalent of 150 holiday hours each year, as listed below. New Year's Day Martin Luther King, Jr. Day President’s Day Memorial Day Juneteenth Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day (November 11) Thanksgiving Day Day after Thanksgiving Christmas Eve Day Christmas Day New Year's Eve Employees shall accrue 20 hours from floating holidays effective January 1 of each year. Only unit employees who have satisfactorily served in the employ of the City continuously for at least six (6) months in a full-time position shall be eligible to take floating holidays. Employees shall not be allowed to use unearned holiday time. New hire employees who are hired by the City after January 1 of the calendar year shall receive a prorated number of floating holiday leave hours, at the rate of 1.6666 hours per month, based on their hire date. For example, a new employee hired on July 1 of a calendar year shall receive ten (10) hours of floating holiday leave. Demands of work permitting, employees of this unit may utilize holiday leave on the holidays designated above. If the demands of work are such that the employee cannot take off on a designated holiday, the employee shall bank the time for cash-out at the end of the calendar year. When a holiday falls on an employee’s regularly scheduled day off, the employee shall bank 10 hours of holiday leave for cash-out at the end of the calendar year. SBPMA members shall be paid for their unused holiday account balance, at the end of each calendar year at the employee’s wage rate of pay in effect at the time of the payoff. The regular rate of pay, for purposes of holiday pay, includes base pay plus the hourly equivalent of the following eligible special compensation for the employee,        Packet Page. 716 26 Education Incentive, Temporary Upgrade Pay (if meets requirements under Article III, Section 4), Longevity Pay, POST, Technology Allowance, Professional Development, and Uniform Allowance. Employees who separate from employment with a holiday leave balance shall be paid at the wage rate on the final day of their employment. B. Holiday earned in any twelve-month period are not cumulative beyond the total number of holidays allowed each year by this pay plan. Employees may not exceed a balance of 150 hours at any time. Holiday hours accrued as a result of on industrial disability are not subject to this cap. Section 4 – Sick Leave A. Sick leave means absence from duty of an officer or employee because of illness or injury, exposure to contagious disease, attendance upon a member of their immediate family who is seriously ill or requires the care or attendance of an officer or employee, or death in the immediate family of the officer or employee. Immediate family is defined as husband; wife; domestic partner; grandmother; grandfather; mother; father; sister; brother; son; daughter; mother-in-law; father-in-law; sister-in-law; brother-in-law; daughter-in-law; or son-in-law. SBPMA members may use unlimited sick leave for the care of an immediate family member. B. No absence due to illness or injury in excess of 40 hours shall be approved except after the presentation of satisfactory evidence of illness or injury; and, the Chief shall have the right to require the presentation of a certificate from a practicing physician or the County Health Officer stating that an officer or employee is physically able to perform their work and duties satisfactorily before permitting an officer or employee who has been on sick leave to return to work. C. In order to receive compensation while absent on sick leave, the employee shall notify their immediate superior or the station commander prior to the time set for beginning their daily duties, or as may be specified by the Chief. When the absence is for more than one workday, the employee may be required to file a physician’s certificate or a personal affidavit with the Director of Human Resources stating the cause of the absence. D. Sick leave with pay shall be granted to all regular employees. Sick leave shall not be considered as a right, which an employee may use at their discretion, but shall be allowed only in case of necessity and actual personal sickness or disability, except as otherwise provided herein. E. Whenever an employee is compensated hereunder for sick leave and has not had a vacation at the end of the current calendar year, they shall be allowed to take their vacation in the calendar year they return to duty. F. Whenever the term “service of City” appears herein, it shall be deemed to include all service of the City of San Bernardino. G. All full-time officers and employees of the City who are actively on duty, have been in        Packet Page. 717 27 the service of said City for six (6) months or more continuously, and who are compelled to be absent from their work on account of illness or injury other than that which is compensable under Article V, Section 6, Injury Leave, of this MOU, shall receive their full salary, wages or compensation for a period of one (1) day for each month of continuous service, provided that such salary, wages or compensation shall cease upon the exhaustion of all accumulated sick leave. H. Sick leave accruals and payouts (Section 5 below) shall only include post-petition sick leave accrued after August 1, 2012. An employee may only accrue a maximum of 1040 hours of sick leave. Time off with pay for sick leave shall be considered as time worked for purposes of the accrual of sick leave only. Sick leave shall not accumulate during periods of leave of absence without pay. Employees will not be allowed to use unearned sick leave. I. The 48 hours of sick leave granted after six (6) calendar months of continuous service as herein provided for all full-time employees shall be computed at the rate of approximately 4.0 hours per pay period. In the event that an employee works less than 50 percent of the total normal work hours in the pay period, they shall receive no sick leave benefit for such pay period and shall not be credited with the 4.0 hours of sick leave. J. Approved vacation, sick leave, holiday or compensatory time off shall be considered as time worked for the purpose of computing sick leave benefits only. Section 5 – Payment for Unused Sick Leave A. For the purpose of this section, the “retirement” shall have the meaning ascribed to it and the definition therefore as set forth in Section 20060 of the Government Code. B. Sick leave accrued as a result of an industrial disability will not be subject to the accrual maximums and will be paid out in full if the disability results in an industrial retirement with the payout being deposited for the benefit of the employee into the City’s 401(a) plan. Any payout exceeding the 401 (a) annual contribution limit shall be paid to the employee as taxable wages, subject to customary withholdings. C. Each fiscal year an employee will receive a contribution in lieu of pay for accrued post- petition sick leave to the City’s 401 (a) plan pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. The City shall make the contribution on the first payday in September. Any contribution exceeding the 401 (a) annual contribution limit shall be paid to the employee as taxable wages, subject to customary withholding. 2. The contribution shall be equal to the value of one-fourth (1/4) of the number of hours of post-petition sick leave accrued as of the date of the contribution. The value shall be calculated using the then current wage rate. The employee’s accrued post-petition sick leave shall be reduced by the number of post-petition sick leave hours converted to a contribution on        Packet Page. 718 28 behalf of the employee to the City’s 401(a) plan. D. At the time of retirement only, any employee having fifteen (15) years of continuous service with the City of San Bernardino, shall cash out up to 50% of unused post- petition sick leave. At the time of any separation from service, any employee having 20 years of continuous service with the City of San Bernardino or more, shall cash out 75% of unused post-petition sick leave. Cash outs shall be deposited into the members 401 (a) plan. Any cash outs exceeding the 401 (a) annual contribution limit shall be paid to the employee as taxable wages, subject to customary withholdings. E. Besides scenarios listed in Section D above, no sick leave shall be paid out to any SBPMA Member. Section 6 – Injury Leave Employees who are receiving payments under Labor Code Section 4850 shall accrue vacation, sick leave and holiday credits during such absence from duty and are not subject to accrual maximums. When employees are off duty on injury leave and have not had a vacation at the end of the current year, they shall be allowed to take this vacation in the calendar year they return to duty. Section 7 – Administrative Leave In lieu of monetary compensation, all forty (40) hour/week SBPMA employees shall be assigned one hundred and twenty (120) hours of Administrative Leave per year each July 1st. Administrative Leave shall not be carried beyond the end of any fiscal year and shall not be paid for at any time. ARTICLE VI WORKING CONDITIONS Section 1 – Work Schedules All employees of this unit shall be assigned to a 4/10 work schedule. The 4/10 work schedule shall consist of four (4) consecutive workdays of ten (10) consecutive hours each, inclusive of a paid meal period and breaks. Each week, it is understood that, as managers, the employees of this unit shall occasionally be required to modify their daily schedule to meet the demands of the position, and thus are provided the flexibility to adjust their working hours to accomplish their necessary duties.        Packet Page. 719 29 Section 2 – Probationary Period The probationary period for newly hired and promoted employees into positions in this unit shall be 2080 paid hours from the date of hire. “Paid hours” shall include hours actually worked (excluding overtime) and paid leaves such as vacation, holiday, sick leave and compensatory time but shall not include time spent on any leave of absence, including 4850 time, modified/light duty and military leave. In addition, the probationary period of new hires may be extended at the discretion of the Police Chief for a period not to exceed 1040 hours. Seniority is herein defined to be an employee’s length of service with no break in service of longer than 30 days within the Police Department and/or classification in which the employee is presently assigned. The department may consider seniority in vacation scheduling, shift assignments and transfers within classification. An employee who has terminated City employment and who is subsequently rehired in the same classification in a regular position within a 90-day period may receive restoration of salary step. Seniority shall begin anew as of the rehire date. All other authorized benefits shall accrue as of the date of rehire. The City shall pay medical fees for the physical examination of any member of the PMA when such examination is required and directed by the City. The Term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years, commencing on July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028. Commencing on January 1, 2027, either Party may submit to the other, a written request to bargain for a successor agreement, including a list of proposals on economic or non- economic issues.        Packet Page. 720 30 Section 3 – Severability If any provision of the MOU is held by the proper legislative or judicial authority to be unlawful, unenforceable, unconstitutional or not in accordance with applicable statutes or not applicable to Charter cities, all other provisions of the MOU shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of this MOU. If there is any conflict between the provisions of this MOU and the provisions of federal, state, or local government regulations, the provisions of the federal, state or local government regulations shall be controlling. Upon the issuance of a decision declaring any article, section or portion of this MOU to be unlawful, unenforceable, unconstitutional or not applicable to Charter cities, the parties agree to meet and confer immediately concerning only those articles, sections, and portions. The parties acknowledge that during the meet and confer process which resulted in this MOU, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any subject or matter not removed by law, City Charter, ordinance, resolution, personnel and departmental rules and regulations, within the scope of negotiable issues and that the understandings arrived at by the parties after the exercise of that right and opportunity are set forth herein. Therefore: The express provisions of this Agreement for its duration constitute the complete and total contract between the City and Association with respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment, Any prior or existing Agreement between the parties, whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters are hereby superseded and terminated in their entirety, and The City and the Association, for the life of this MOU, each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and confer and each agrees that the other shall not be obligated to meet and confer with respect to any subject or matter referred to or covered in this MOU. All benefits, privileges and working conditions authorized for the employees at the present time, which are not included in this MOU and within the scope of representation shall remain in full force during the term of this MOU, unless changed by mutual consent. It is also agreed and understood that nothing in this article shall diminish the rights of the City to exercise its rights under the Management Rights article nor diminish the rights of the Association to meet and confer/consult on proposed changes in accordance with applicable law.        Packet Page. 721 31 SAN BERNARDINO POLICE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES (“SBPMA”) Executed this _______ day of ____________________, 2025 ___________________________ ___________________________ Eric Levitt, City Manager Adam Affrunti, President San Bernardino Police Management Association ___________________________ Jose Castro, Vice President San Bernardino Police Management Association ATTEST: ___________________________ Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney ___________________________        Packet Page. 722 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE UNIT RANGE Step 1 50141 ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE *PMA P6 $25,371.72 50283 POLICE CAPTAIN (U) *PMA P5 $20,724.25 50402 POLICE LIEUTENANT PMA P4 $17,609.22 (U) DENOTES UNCLASSIFIED CITY WIDE SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE 08.06.2025 POLICE MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 723 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE UNIT SALARY RANGE Step 1 First 6 Months of Service Step 2 Follwing 18 Months of Service Step 3 Third Year of Service Step 4 Fourth Year of Service Fifth & Subsequesnt Years of 40466 DETECTIVE/CORPORAL POA P2 $9,252.56 $9,973.28 $10,693.99 $11,413.59 $12,134.31 40751 POLICE OFFICER POA P1 $7,968.08 $8,636.10 $9,305.27 $9,973.28 $10,641.29 POLICE SAFETY SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 724 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE UNIT SALARY RANGE BOTTOM STEP (Step 1) MID POINT (Step 10) TOP STEP (Step 21) 10399 CITY CLERK (U) #NA NA $10,278.00 $11,527.05 $12,493.00 00601 CITY COUNCIL NA NA $3,394.91 $3,394.91 00502 MAYOR NA NA $4,291.67 $4,291.67 09280 CHIEF OF POLICE #EXEC NA $29,336.84 $29,336.84 09370 CITY MANAGER (U) #NA NA $27,750.00 # Denotes classification is apart of an employment contract ELECTED & APPOINTED OFFICIALS SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 725 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE UNIT SALARY RANGE BOTTOM STEP (Step 1) MID POINT (Step 10)STEP 09644 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER (U)EXEC 705 $16,621.17 $18,146.34 $20,201.04 09372 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER (U)EXEC 700 $16,211.78 $17,702.47 $19,704.88 10685 DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL SERVICES (U)EXEC 662 $13,279.36 $14,500.83 $16,140.59 09526 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING (U)EXEC 662 $13,412.85 $14,646.56 $16,303.00 09527 DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (U)EXEC 662 $13,412.85 $14,646.56 $16,303.00 10701 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES (U)EXEC 692 $15,577.68 $17,010.52 $18,933.96 09665 DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT (U)EXEC 660 $13,279.36 $14,500.84 $16,140.58 10625 DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (U)EXEC 660 $13,279.36 $14,500.84 $16,140.58 10731 DIRECTOR OF PARKS/REC/COMMUNITY SERVICES (U)EXEC 662 $13,412.86 $14,646.56 $16,303.01 09753 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (U)EXEC 692 $15,577.68 $17,010.52 $18,933.96 (U) DENOTES UNCLASSIFIED EXECUTIVE SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 726 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE UNIT SALARY RANGE BOTTOM STEP (Step 1) MID POINT (Step 10) TOP STEP (Step 21) 10012 10860 10508 10510 10081 10094 10092 10093 10534 10979 10492 10216 10104 10105 10106 10107 10042 10043 10060 10062 10500 10870 10398 10801 10495 10273 10135 10100 10072 10650 10654 10675 10124 10066 10720 10610 10638 10830 10732 10803 10802 10400 10140 10125 10119 10127 10120 10367 10180 10200 10707 10982 10978 10976 10951 10939 10512 10624 10623 10730 10778 10698 10700 MANAGEMENT/CONFIDENTIAL SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 727 10699 HOMELESS SOLUTIONS MANAGER (U) *MGT 601 $10,190.98 $11,128.27 $12,387.53 10121 10129 10683 10684 10682 10672 10673 10627 10626 10637 10388 10389 10159 10319 10233 10401 10530 10531 10533 10532 10516 10503 10190 10528 10122 10868 10064 10068 10713 10765 574 $8,906.51 $9,726.92 $10,826.92 10761 574 $8,906.51 $9,726.92 $10,826.92 10509 10182 10243 10132 10212 10900 10863 10440 10259 10690 10538 10511 10154 10222 10118 10632 10656 10622 10385 10514 10513 10529 10223 10300 10689 10443 10740 (U) DENOTES UNCLASSIFIED        Packet Page. 728 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE Unit SALARY RANGE STEP (Step MID POINT (Step 10)STEP 20013 ACCOUNTANT III MID MGT 520 $6,976.20 $7,617.66 $8,479.99 20457 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 484 $5,829.55 $6,366.46 $7,085.46 20320 ANIMAL SERVICES MANAGER *MID MGT 526 $7,187.67 $7,849.10 $8,737.28 20319 ANIMAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 478 $5,658.03 $6,178.48 $6,877.51 20620 AQUATICS SUPERVISOR MID MGT 468 $5,381.94 $5,877.72 $6,542.68 20169 ASSOCIATE PLANNER *MID MGT 530 $7,333.35 $8,007.71 $8,913.51 20250 BUILDING INSPECTION SUPERVISOR MID MGT 542 $7,785.66 $8,501.14 $9,463.33 20263 BUSINESS REGISTRATION MANAGER *MID MGT 530 $7,333.35 $8,007.71 $8,913.51 20271 BUYER MID MGT 460 $5,171.64 $5,647.45 $6,286.57 20923 COMMUNITY RECREATION MANAGER *MID MGT 556 $8,348.41 $9,116.76 $10,147.09 20925 COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 488 $5,947.04 $6,494.51 $7,228.79 20504 COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 458 $5,121.13 $5,592.24 $6,224.30 20781 COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER SUPERVISOR MID MGT 480 $5,714.42 $6,240.75 $6,945.65 20424 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER MID MGT 585 $9,647.78 $10,534.79 $11,726.08 20600 CRIME FREE PROGRAM COORDINATOR *MID MGT 490 $6,006.96 $6,559.13 $7,301.63 20616 CUSTODIAL SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 477 $5,629.83 $6,147.94 $6,842.27 20200 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) SPECIALIST MID MGT 560 $8,516.41 $9,300.03 $10,351.51 20441 ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE MID MGT 532 $7,406.19 $8,087.60 $9,002.80 20444 ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER MID MGT 560 $8,516.41 $9,300.03 $10,351.51 20024 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGER *MID MGT 551 $8,142.81 $8,892.36 $9,898.02 20025 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 523 $7,081.93 $7,732.80 $8,608.05 20092 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR MID MGT 515 $6,804.67 $7,430.86 $8,270.87 20060 FOOD SERVICE SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 478 $5,658.03 $6,178.48 $6,877.51 20160 FORENSICS SUPERVISOR MID MGT 543 $7,824.43 $8,544.61 $9,510.33 20490 FORESTRY SUPERVISOR MID MGT 542 $7,785.66 $8,501.14 $9,463.33 20100 GRANTS MANAGER (U) *MID MGT 506 $6,506.26 $7,104.26 $7,907.85 20170 LEAD FORENSICS SPECIALIST MID MGT 516 $6,838.74 $7,467.28 $8,311.99 20388 LIBRARY CIRCULATION SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 460 $5,171.64 $5,647.45 $6,286.57 20385 LIBRARY NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR *MID MGT 492 $6,066.87 $6,624.92 $7,374.47 20387 LIBRARY PROGRAM COORDINATOR *MID MGT 450 $4,920.23 $5,372.54 $5,981.11 20484 MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR MID MGT 522 $7,046.69 $7,694.03 $8,564.58 20555 NPDES MANAGER MID MGT 525 $7,152.42 $7,810.33 $8,693.81 20178 PARK RANGER SUPERVISOR MID MGT 480 $5,714.42 $6,240.75 $6,945.65 20603 PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR MID MGT 534 $7,480.20 $8,168.66 $9,093.26 20400 PERMIT SERVICES SUPERVISOR MID MGT 494 $6,127.96 $6,691.89 $7,448.48 20772 POLICE DISPATCH SUPERVISOR MID MGT 514 $6,770.60 $7,393.27 $8,229.75 20765 POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR MID MGT 464 $5,276.21 $5,761.41 $6,413.45 20019 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT *MID MGT 550 $8,101.69 $8,847.72 $9,848.68 20864 PROCUREMENT CONTRACT SPECIALIST *MID MGT 520 $6,976.20 $7,617.66 $8,479.99 20949 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE SUPERVISOR *MID MGT 494 $6,127.96 $6,691.89 $7,448.48 20243 SENIOR PLANNER *MID MGT 567 $8,819.52 $9,630.16 $10,719.24 20995 STATION MANAGER *MID MGT 490 $6,006.96 $6,559.13 $7,301.63 20336 TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN *MID MGT 502 $6,377.03 $6,964.45 $7,751.59 20437 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE *MID MGT 532 $7,406.19 $8,087.60 $9,002.80 20438 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SYSTEMS ANALYST *MID MGT 552 $8,183.93 $8,935.83 $9,947.37 20370 TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND LIGHTING SUPERVISOR MID MGT 533 $7,443.78 $8,128.72 $9,047.44 (U) DENOTES UNCLASSIFIED MIDDLE MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 729 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE UNIT SALARY RANGE STEP (Step MID POINT (Step 10)STEP 00300 APPRENTICE (PT)NA 381 $17.13 $18.70 $20.82 00194 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATOR (PT)NA 493 $29.94 $32.69 $36.39 00605 CRIME DATA TECHNICIAN (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00054 CUSTODIAL AIDE (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00083 EXTRA RELIEF HEAVY LABORER (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00259 FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM SPECIALIST (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00308 LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINEE NA NA $34.77 $34.77 00361 LIBRARY PAGE (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00133 LIFEGUARD (PT)NA 377 $16.79 $18.33 $20.41 00192 POLICE CADET (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00520 POLICE CALL TAKER (PT)NA 396 $19.85 $24.14 00331 POOL MANAGER I (PT)NA 421 $20.91 $22.83 $25.41 00333 POOL MANAGER II (PT)NA 443 $23.33 $25.48 $28.36 00222 RECREATION AIDE (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00244 RECREATION LEADER (PT)NA 375 $16.62 $18.15 $20.20 00230 RECREATION SPECIALIST (PT)NA 400 $18.83 $20.56 $22.89 00256 RECREATION SUPERVISOR (AQUATICS) (PT)NA 481 $28.20 $30.80 $34.28 00266 SECURITY OFFICER I (PT)NA 378 $16.88 $18.43 $20.51 00265 SECURITY OFFICER II (PT)NA 402 $19.02 $20.77 $23.12 00283 SENIOR LIFEGUARD (PT)NA 396 $18.46 $20.16 $22.44 00294 SENIOR RECREATION LEADER (PT)NA 382 $17.22 $18.80 $20.93 00019 STUDENT INTERN (PT)NA 368 $16.05 $17.53 $19.51 00301 VETERINARIAN - PER DIEM NA NA $187.50 $187.50 PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 730 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE Unit SALARY RANGE STEP MID POINT (Step 10)STEP 32767 POLICE DISPATCHER I (FLEX)SBPDA 433 $4,727.77 $5,162.57 $5,746.98 Police Dispatch Salary Schedule        Packet Page. 731 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE Unit SALARY RANGE BOTTOM STEP (Step 1) MID POINT (Step 10)STEP 33017 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) - POLICE SBPCA 399 $3,707.91 $4,048.11 $4,505.88 33018 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN II - POLICE SBPCA 419 $4,096.06 $4,472.79 $4,978.51 33709 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT - POLICE SBPCA 400 $3,726.18 $4,068.65 $4,528.71 33758 COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER SBPCA 427 $4,262.73 $4,655.44 $5,181.71 33603 CRIME ANALYST SBPCA 493 $5,924.90 $6,469.44 $7,201.20 33602 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OFFICER SBPCA 493 $5,924.90 $6,469.44 $7,201.20 33707 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT - POLICE SBPCA 430 $4,327.80 $4,725.07 $5,259.34 33165 FORENSICS SPECIALIST I (FLEX)SBPCA 448 $4,734.21 $5,118.92 $5,698.87 33166 FORENSICS SPECIALIST II SBPCA 478 $5,497.94 $6,003.66 $6,682.92 33515 MARKETING & PUBLIC RELATIONS SPECIALIST SBPCA 461 $5,050.43 $5,515.06 $6,139.52 30178 PARK RANGER SBPCA 397 $3,670.24 $4,008.15 $4,461.37 33581 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SBPCA 380 $3,372.28 $3,682.80 $4,099.48 33848 POLICE FLEET MAINTENANCE EXPEDITOR SBPCA 398 $3,688.50 $4,028.70 $4,484.20 33218 POLICE PERSONNEL AND TRAINING TECHNICIAN SBPCA 457 $4,951.12 $5,406.61 $6,018.51 33219 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN I (FLEX)SBPCA 369 $3,191.91 $3,485.30 $3,880.30 33220 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN II SBPCA 390 $3,544.66 $3,871.16 $4,308.40 33947 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN I (FLEX)SBPCA 411 $3,936.24 $4,298.12 $4,784.44 33948 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN II SBPCA 472 $5,335.83 $5,826.72 $6,485.42 33770 RANGEMASTER SBPCA 465 $5,152.04 $5,626.94 $6,262.81 33710 SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT - POLICE SBPCA 375 $3,288.94 $3,591.47 $3,997.88 POLICE GENERAL SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 732 CLASS CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE Unit SALARY RANGE STEP (Step MID POINT (Step 10)STEP 30011 ACCOUNTANT I (FLEX)GEN 465 $5,383.88 $5,880.15 $6,544.64 30012 ACCOUNTANT II GEN 485 $5,949.35 $6,496.92 $7,231.79 30017 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I (FLEX)GEN 399 $3,874.77 $4,230.27 $4,708.66 30018 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN II GEN 419 $4,280.38 $4,674.06 $5,202.55 30030 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN III *GEN 437 $4,682.41 $5,113.07 $5,691.66 30709 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT GEN 400 $3,893.86 $4,251.75 $4,732.52 30140 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER I (FLEX)GEN 411 $4,113.36 $4,491.54 $4,999.74 30141 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER II GEN 424 $4,388.94 $4,792.16 $5,334.97 30092 ANIMAL LICENSE INSPECTOR GEN 370 $3,352.25 $3,661.23 $4,075.19 30130 ANIMAL SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE GEN 370 $3,352.25 $3,661.23 $4,075.19 30119 ANIMAL SHELTER ATTENDANT GEN 370 $3,352.25 $3,661.23 $4,075.19 30400 ARBORIST GEN 452 $5,046.27 $5,510.33 $6,134.26 30894 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT/REAL PROP SPECIALIST GEN 500 $6,411.03 $7,001.55 $7,792.49 30271 ASSISTANT BUYER GEN 430 $4,522.55 $4,937.71 $5,496.02 30312 ASSISTANT LITERACY PROGRAM COORDINATOR GEN 365 $3,269.93 $3,570.56 $3,974.98 30168 ASSISTANT PLANNER (FLEX)GEN 502 $6,475.45 $7,071.93 $7,871.22 30072 BUILDING INSPECTOR I (FLEX)GEN 460 $5,251.46 $5,734.61 $6,383.59 30073 BUILDING INSPECTOR II GEN 487 $6,008.99 $6,561.34 $7,303.37 30074 BUILDING INSPECTOR III GEN 511 $6,772.50 $7,396.42 $8,232.69 30502 BUSINESS REGISTRATION INSPECTOR GEN 459 $5,225.21 $5,705.98 $6,351.38 30650 BUSINESS REGISTRATION REPRESENTATIVE I GEN 419 $4,280.38 $4,674.06 $5,202.55 30651 BUSINESS REGISTRATION REPRESENTATIVE II GEN 429 $4,499.89 $4,913.85 $5,468.58 30292 CEMETERY CARETAKER GEN 395 $3,797.23 $4,146.77 $4,615.60 30450 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I (FLEX)GEN 441 $4,776.66 $5,216.86 $5,806.19 30455 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II GEN 472 $5,575.95 $6,088.92 $6,777.27 30135 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)/HOUSING PROGRAM ASSISTANT GEN 420 $4,301.85 $4,697.92 $5,228.79 30890 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN GEN 446 $4,897.15 $5,348.09 $5,952.92 30120 COMMUNITY INTERVENTION PROGRAM COORDINATOR GEN 438 $4,706.27 $5,139.32 $5,720.29 30754 COMMUNITY POLICING SPECIALIST GEN 470 $5,519.88 $6,028.08 $6,710.46 30821 COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR GEN 388 $3,667.19 $4,004.80 $4,458.13 30990 COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM COORDINATOR GEN 438 $4,706.27 $5,139.32 $5,720.29 30621 CUSTODIAN GEN 368 $3,318.84 $3,624.25 $4,034.63 30222 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE GEN 386 $3,631.40 $3,965.43 $4,413.99 30226 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL)GEN 396 $3,816.31 $4,168.24 $4,639.46 30227 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL) (U)GEN 396 $3,816.31 $4,168.24 $4,639.46 30224 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (U)GEN 386 $3,631.40 $3,965.43 $4,413.99 30100 DATA ANALYST GEN 444 $4,849.43 $5,295.60 $5,894.47 30831 ELECTRICIAN I (FLEX)GEN 445 $4,873.29 $5,321.84 $5,923.10 30841 ELECTRICIAN II GEN 465 $5,383.88 $5,880.15 $6,544.64 30432 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I (FLEX)GEN 450 $4,996.16 $5,455.46 $6,073.41 30434 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT II GEN 475 $5,659.45 $6,180.78 $6,879.86 30436 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT III GEN 511 $6,772.50 $7,396.42 $8,232.69 30445 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN GEN 446 $4,897.15 $5,348.09 $5,952.92 30420 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS COORDINATOR GEN 464 $5,357.63 $5,850.33 $6,512.43 30921 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I (FLEX)GEN 431 $4,544.03 $4,962.76 $5,523.45 30902 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC II GEN 450 $4,996.16 $5,455.46 $6,073.41 30943 EQUIPMENT SERVICE WORKER GEN 408 $4,052.52 $4,424.73 $4,925.78 30707 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT GEN 430 $4,522.55 $4,937.71 $5,496.02 30623 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE MECHANIC GEN 420 $4,301.85 $4,697.92 $5,228.79 30506 FLEET PARTS STOREKEEPER GEN 398 $3,854.49 $4,209.99 $4,685.99 30944 FLEET PARTS TECHNICIAN GEN 438 $4,706.27 $5,139.32 $5,720.29 30133 GRANTS ANALYST GEN 476 $5,688.08 $6,211.80 $6,914.46 30136 GRANTS ASSISTANT GEN 390 $3,704.17 $4,045.36 $4,502.27 30098 GROUNDWORKER ARBORIST GEN 392 $3,741.16 $4,085.92 $4,547.60 30516 HAZMAT TECHNICIAN GEN 452 $5,046.27 $5,510.33 $6,134.26 30698 HOMELESS OUTREACH SPECIALIST GEN 464 $5,357.63 $5,850.33 $6,512.43 30699 HOMELESS SERVICES ASSISTANT GEN 420 $4,301.85 $4,697.92 $5,228.79 30207 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN GEN 418 $4,258.91 $4,651.39 $5,177.49 30101 HVAC MECHANIC GEN 460 $5,251.46 $5,734.61 $6,383.59 30638 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION INSPECTOR I (FLEX)GEN 447 $4,922.20 $5,375.53 $5,982.75 30639 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION INSPECTOR II GEN 467 $5,438.75 $5,938.61 $6,610.25 30113 LEAD ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER GEN 437 $4,682.41 $5,113.07 $5,691.66 GENERAL UNIT SALARY SCHEDULE        Packet Page. 733 30080 LEAD BUILDING INSPECTOR GEN 526 $7,298.60 $7,970.24 $8,872.12 30463 LEAD CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER GEN 498 $6,347.80 $6,931.16 $7,716.14 30311 LEAD CUSTODIAN GEN 397 $3,835.40 $4,188.52 $4,662.13 30932 LEAD EQUIPMENT MECHANIC GEN 470 $5,519.88 $6,028.08 $6,710.46 30490 LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER GEN 452 $5,046.27 $5,510.33 $6,134.26 30593 LEAD PARKS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE WORKER GEN 471 $5,548.51 $6,057.91 $6,743.86 30335 LIBRARIAN I (FLEX)GEN 450 $4,996.16 $5,455.46 $6,073.41 30366 LIBRARIAN II GEN 479 $5,773.98 $6,304.85 $7,018.25 30341 LIBRARY ASSISTANT GEN 370 $3,352.25 $3,661.23 $4,075.19 30380 LIBRARY NETWORK TECHNICIAN GEN 422 $4,344.80 $4,744.44 $5,281.28 30391 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN I (FLEX)GEN 380 $3,524.04 $3,848.52 $4,283.96 30392 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN II GEN 402 $3,932.03 $4,294.69 $4,780.23 30215 LITERACY PROGRAM COORDINATOR GEN 470 $5,519.88 $6,028.08 $6,710.46 30486 MAINTENANCE WORKER I (FLEX)GEN 393 $3,760.24 $4,106.21 $4,570.27 30487 MAINTENANCE WORKER II GEN 415 $4,195.68 $4,582.20 $5,099.95 30488 MAINTENANCE WORKER III GEN 425 $4,410.41 $4,816.02 $5,361.21 30425 NPDES INSPECTOR I (FLEX)GEN 461 $5,277.70 $5,763.24 $6,415.80 30426 NPDES INSPECTOR II GEN 485 $5,949.35 $6,496.92 $7,231.79 30611 PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER I (FLEX)GEN 390 $3,704.17 $4,045.36 $4,502.27 30622 PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER II GEN 421 $4,323.33 $4,721.78 $5,255.04 30691 PLANNING AIDE GEN 456 $5,147.67 $5,621.28 $6,257.13 30680 PLANS EXAMINER I (FLEX)GEN 499 $6,380.01 $6,966.95 $7,754.31 30682 PLANS EXAMINER II GEN 534 $7,595.65 $8,294.73 $9,233.59 30481 PLUMBER GEN 450 $4,996.16 $5,455.46 $6,073.41 30585 POOL MAINTENANCE COORDINATOR GEN 421 $4,323.33 $4,721.78 $5,255.04 10360 PROGRAMMING/TRAFFIC ASSISTANT GEN 400 $3,893.86 $4,251.75 $4,732.52 30580 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR I (FLEX)GEN 476 $5,688.08 $6,211.80 $6,914.46 30583 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR II GEN 499 $6,380.01 $6,966.95 $7,754.31 30584 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR III GEN 529 $7,409.54 $8,090.73 $9,005.74 30825 RECREATION THERAPIST GEN 468 $5,465.00 $5,968.43 $6,643.65 30115 REGISTERED VETERINARY TECHNICIAN GEN 450 $4,996.16 $5,455.46 $6,073.41 30708 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT GEN 420 $4,301.85 $4,697.92 $5,228.79 30229 SENIOR ANIMAL SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE GEN 390 $3,704.17 $4,045.36 $4,502.27 30410 SENIOR ARBORIST GEN 502 $6,475.45 $7,071.93 $7,871.22 30228 SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE GEN 435 $4,635.88 $5,062.97 $5,635.59 30230 SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL)GEN 445 $4,873.29 $5,321.84 $5,923.10 30232 SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL)(U)GEN 445 $4,873.29 $5,321.84 $5,923.10 30710 SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT GEN 375 $3,436.95 $3,753.09 $4,177.78 30978 SOLID WASTE FIELD INSPECTOR GEN 450 $4,996.16 $5,455.46 $6,073.41 30447 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN I (FLEX)GEN 450 $4,996.16 $5,455.46 $6,073.41 30448 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN II GEN 484 $5,919.52 $6,464.71 $7,194.81 30449 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN III GEN 513 $6,840.49 $7,470.38 $8,315.01 30667 TREASURY ASSISTANT GEN 399 $3,874.77 $4,230.27 $4,708.66 30125 VETERINARY ASSISTANT GEN 400 $3,893.86 $4,251.75 $4,732.52 30620 VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR GEN 358 $3,157.79 $3,447.69 $3,837.79 30000 WEED ABATEMENT COORDINATOR GEN 462 $5,303.95 $5,791.87 $6,448.01 (U) DENOTES UNCLASSIFIED *SIGNIFIES EXEMPT STATUS REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 6/19/17 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 7/20/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 6/20/18 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 8/17/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 06/19/19 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 9/21/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 8/21/19 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 10/19/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 1/15/20 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 11/2/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 6/24/20 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 11/16/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 9/2/20 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 12/7/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 12/16/20 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 1/18/23 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 2/17/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 6/21/23 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 7/21/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 8/16/23 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 6/16/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 10/4/23 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 7/21/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 10/18/23 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 8/4/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 12/6/23 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 9/15/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 3/6/24 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 10/20/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 4/17/24 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 11/3/21 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 6/26/24 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 2/2/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 1/15/25 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 2/16/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 2/19/25        Packet Page. 734 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 3/16/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 4/2/25 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 4/6/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 6/18/25 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 5/18/22 REVISION ADOPTED BY MCC 07/16/25        Packet Page. 735 2 7 8 4 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager C. Jeannie Fortune, Interim Director of Finance & Management Services Finance & Management Services It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with temporary staffing agencies in an aggregate amount not-to-exceed $1,973,000 (includes a 10% contingency), for the provision of temporary staffing services on an as-needed basis across City departments, for a term beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027, with an option to extend for two (2) additional years. To support the City’s transition to a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, a portion of permanent staff have been reassigned to focus exclusively on ERP implementation activities, creating temporary gaps in essential operational functions. To maintain service continuity and organizational performance during this period, previously appropriated funds for temporary staffing will be used to engage a pool of qualified vendors for temporary staffing services. This effort aims to secure flexible, cost-effective agreements with vendors who can provide skilled personnel across key areas such as finance, HR, IT, and administration. Negotiations will prioritize rapid deployment, competitive pricing, quality assurance, and the ability to scale staffing levels based on evolving needs, ensuring a smooth ERP transition without compromising day-to-day operations. On November 20, 2024, Mayor and City Council approved the ERP Migration Plan, associated agreements, and supplemental staffing services to ensure a successful        Packet Page. 736 2 7 8 4 implementation process. This project is essential to modernize and integrate core functions including finance, budgeting, human resources, and procurement, for improving efficiency, data accuracy, and service delivery. ERP implementation is a resource-intensive process that demands full or partial dedication of internal subject matter experts for planning, testing, system design, training, and cutover activities. As key employees are temporarily reassigned and involved in ERP project duties, temporary staff are needed to maintain service levels and minimize disruption to daily operations. Discussion To ensure the City can continue to meet service delivery expectations during the ERP migration, the Finance Department issued RFQual (F-24-6003) on January 24, 2025 to prequalify temporary staffing firms. The RFQual closed on February 21, 2025 with 98 qualification proposals received. Proposals were reviewed and evaluated on several criteria, including: Number of years in service Experience in supporting public sector clients Breadth of available positions Cost competitiveness Responsiveness and flexibility Performance History Based on this evaluation, staff recommend entering into agreements with the following firms: Vendor Name Location 1. 22nd Century Technologies, Inc.Los Angeles, CA 2. Adil Business Systems, Inc.San Bernardino, CA 3. AppleOne Inc.San Bernardino, CA 4. AtWork Personnel Services Riverside, CA 5. CathyJon Enterprises Inc.Redlands, CA 6. MV Cheng and Associates Upland, CA 7. Partners in Diversity, Inc.Santa Fe Springs, CA 8. Sierra Cybernetics Anaheim Hills, CA 9. Tomorrow’s Talent San Bernardino, CA 10. Zion Cloud Solutions LLC San Bernardino, CA        Packet Page. 737 2 7 8 4 The selected staffing agencies will be treated as a qualified vendor pool from which City departments can request temporary personnel as needed, based on availability, job requirements, and cost-effectiveness. This pool approach provides flexibility and reduces the administrative burden of procuring services on a case- by-case basis. These agreements will be structured as master services agreements, enabling departments to request temporary support as needed (on-call) and within approved budget limits. A copy of the agreement template is attached to this report. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Investments that support efficient services to the community support Key Strategic Goal 2b: Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community - Evaluate operations and performance, investment in resources, technology, and tools to continually improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness; and Goal 3. Improved Quality of Life. Fiscal Impact There is sufficient funds in the FY25/26 budget for these agreements. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with temporary staffing agencies in an aggregate amount not-to-exceed $1,973,000 (includes a 10% contingency), for the provision of temporary staffing services on an as-needed basis across City departments, for a term beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027, with an option to extend for two (2) additional years. Attachments Attachment 1- Master Professional Services Agreement Template Ward: All Wards Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: No previous actions.        Packet Page. 738 1 7 1 7 5 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into as of [***INSERT MONTH***] [***INSERT DATE***], 2025 by and between the City of San Bernardino, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at Vanir Tower, 290 North D Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401 (“City”), and [***INSERT NAME***], a [***INSERT TYPE OF ENTITY AND STATE - CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY***] with its principal place of business at [***INSERT ADDRESS***] (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of professional services for the following project: (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”). B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services. C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein. 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 3. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel identified in their proposal. Consultant warrants that Consultant is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. Consultant further represents that no City employee will provide any services under this Agreement. 4. Compensation. a. Subject to paragraph 4(b) below, the City shall pay for such services in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit “A.” [***Alternatively,        Packet Page. 739 2 7 1 7 5 the compensation schedule may be described here***] b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of $[***INSERT NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT***]. This amount is to cover all related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Consultant may submit invoices to City for approval. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. The invoice shall describe in detail the services performed and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices. 5. Additional Work. If changes in the work seem merited by Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed in the following manner: a letter outlining the changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant with a statement of estimated changes in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement. a. Adjustments. No retroactive price adjustments will be considered and no price increases will be permitted during the first year of this Agreement, unless agreed to by City and Consultant in writing. 6. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue through [***INSERT DATE***], unless the Agreement is previously terminated as provided for herein (“Term”). 7. Maintenance of Records; Audits. a. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for a period of four (4) years from the Effective Date. b. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City. 8. Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed. Consultant shall complete the services required hereunder within Term.        Packet Page. 740 3 7 1 7 5 9. Delays in Performance. a. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects the Consultant’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters occurring at the project site; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); and (4) pandemics, epidemics or quarantine restrictions. For purposes of this section, “orders of governmental authorities,” includes ordinances, emergency proclamations and orders, rules to protect the public health, welfare and safety. b. Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non-performing Party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. Delays shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation regardless of the Party responsible for the delay. c. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may still terminate this Agreement in accordance with the termination provisions of this Agreement. 10. Compliance with Law. a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements. b. If required, Consultant shall assist the City, as requested, in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and/ or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. 11. Standard of Care. Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Consultant’s performance shall conform in all material respects to the requirements of the Scope of Work. 12. Conflicts of Interest. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall at        Packet Page. 741 4 7 1 7 5 all times maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty to the City and shall not accept payment from or employment with any person or entity which will constitute a conflict of interest with the City.        Packet Page. 742 5 7 1 7 5 performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City.        Packet Page. 743 6 7 1 7 5 (ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto). (iii) The policy shall give City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles, provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention. d. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement, at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement, all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act,” Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain, for the period required by this Agreement, workers’ compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section. e. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement the Consultant shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. f. Privacy/Network Security (Cyber) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain privacy/network security insurance for: (1) privacy breaches, (2) system breaches, (3) denial or loss of service, and the (4) introduction, implantation        Packet Page. 744 7 7 1 7 5 or spread of malicious software code, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. – NOT APPLICABLE        Packet Page. 745 8 7 1 7 5 evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds, where appropriate, the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance. j. Policy Provisions Required (i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of the premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss. (iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (iv) All required insurance coverages, except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to provide waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law. k. Qualifying Insurers        Packet Page. 746 9 7 1 7 5 (i) All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies, as determined by the City, which satisfy the following minimum requirements: (1) Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law. l Additional Insurance Provisions (i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) Neither the City nor the City Council, nor any member of the City Council, nor any of the officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. m. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 17. Indemnification. a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), indemnify and hold the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and authorized volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings,        Packet Page. 747 10 7 1 7 5 costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, (collectively, “Claims”) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project, or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees, attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses. This indemnification clause excludes Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, the City Council, members of the City Council, its employees, or authorized volunteers. Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.        Packet Page. 748 11 7 1 7 5 Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. 19. Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subconsultants and sub-subconsultants to comply with the same. 20. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 21. Termination or Abandonment a. City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days’ written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services, based on an amount mutually agreed to by City and Consultant of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. 22. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that litigation is brought by any Party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing Party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the prevailing Party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof. The costs, salary, and expenses of the City Attorney’s Office in enforcing this Agreement on behalf of the City shall be considered as “attorneys’ fees” for the purposes of this Agreement. 23. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification        Packet Page. 749 12 7 1 7 5 and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant’s professional services occurs, Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all other services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of the City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. [***INSERT NAME***] as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City. CITY: [***INSERT DEPARTMENT HEAD TITLE OR “City Manager”***] CONSULTANT: [***INSERT NAME, ADDRESS & CONTACT PERSON***]        Packet Page. 750 13 7 1 7 5 30. Third Party Rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. 31. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 32. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including Exhibit “A,” represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This is an integrated Agreement. 33. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 34. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators and assigns of each Party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 35. Non-Waiver. The delay or failure of either Party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other Party of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 36. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 37. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain, or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.        Packet Page. 751 14 7 1 7 5 38. Amendments. Only a writing executed by all of the Parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. 39. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects. 40. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has neither employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 41. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one single Agreement. 42. Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Parties and that by doing so, the Parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 43. Electronic Signature. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement may be executed by electronic or digital signature, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]        Packet Page. 752 15 7 1 7 5 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. APPROVED BY: Eric Levitt City Manager ATTESTED BY: Telicia Lopez, CMC Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Best Best & Krieger LLP City Attorney Signature Name Title        Packet Page. 753 16 7 1 7 5 EXHIBIT A        Packet Page. 754 2 8 1 1 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager; Ed Erjavek, Library Director Library It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-350 authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to transfer and appropriate $25,000 from the Library Memorial Books Trust Fund into the FY 2025/26 Expenditure Budget to purchase books. The Library was the beneficiary of a $25,000 bequest from the estate of Irving Hiller that was deposited into Library Memorial Books Trust Fund. The Library Director requests the Mayor and City Council authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to transfer and appropriate $25,000 from the Library Memorial Books Trust Fund into the FY 2025/26 Expenditure Budget for the purchase of library materials. Appropriated funds will be utilized for programmatic purposes such as book purchases for children and young adults. The Library periodically receives monetary donations from the public. Funds are deposited into the Library Memorial Books Trust Fund but the Library Director needs the Mayor and City Council to approve authorizing the Interim Director of Finance and Management to appropriate the funds to the Library Expenditure Budget to purchase items.        Packet Page. 755 2 8 1 1 Discussion The Library received a $25,000 bequest from the Irving Hiller Living Trust in 2022 after he passed in 2020. Irving Hiller owned an electrical engineering business in the city of San Bernardino named Irving Hiller Engineering. Feldheym Central Library was named as a beneficiary in the Hiller Trust since Irving Hiller was a member of Congregation Emanu El, which was in San Bernardino before later moving to Redlands. Norman F. Feldheym, for whom the Central Library was named when it opened in 1985, served as rabbi of Congregation Emanu El from 1937 to 1971 and as rabbi emeritus until his death in 1985. Rabbi Feldheym had served on the Library Board of Trustees, which provides administrative direction for the library and was involved in various civic activities. San Bernardino Public Library is celebrating Feldheym Central Library’s 40th anniversary on Monday, September 29, 2025 from 4 to 7 p.m. with various activities kicking off a year-long celebration. The Library Director had waited to utilize the $25,000 bequest for a special project, and he decided Feldheym’s 40th anniversary would be a suitable time to utilize that bequest to purchase books for children and young adults and Hiller’s son Clifford, who served as trustee for the trust, agreed. Clifford said his dad worked really well with the late Jack H. Brown, who served as Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of Stater Bros. Markets. Clifford said his dad’s company did electrical work for 20 to 30 Stater Bros. Markets’ new stores that opened during 20 years from approximately 1990 to 2010. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals The request to purchase library books for the educational, cultural, and recreational interests of our patrons aligns with Key Target No. 3: Improved Quality of Life. Fiscal Impact There is not a fiscal impact to the Library’s General Fund budget for FY 2025/26 since the funds of $25,000 are coming from the Library Memorial Books Trust Fund. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-350 authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to transfer and appropriate $25,000 from the Library Memorial Books Trust Fund into the FY 2025/26 Expenditure Budget to purchase books. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2025-350 Ward: All All Wards        Packet Page. 756 2 8 1 1 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: N/A.        Packet Page. 757 Resolution No. 2025-350 Resolution No. 2025-350 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-350 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INTERIM DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO TRANSFER AND APPROPRIATE $25,000 FROM THE LIBRARY’S MEMORIAL BOOKS TRUST FUND INTO THE LIBRARY’S FY 2025/26 EXPENDITURE BUDGET TO PURCHASE BOOKS WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino accepted a $25,000 bequest from the Irving Hiller Trust in 2022 that was deposited into the Memorial Books Trust Fund until the Library Director requests it be added to the Library’s expenditure budget; and WHEREAS, the Library Director and Trustee Clifford Hiller agree they would like to purchase $25,000 of children’s and young adult books as part of the Fedheym Central Library’s 40th anniversary celebration; and. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby authorize the Interim Director of Finance & Management Services to transfer and appropriate $25,000 from the Library Memorial Books Trust Fund into the Library’s FY 2025/26 Expenditure Budget. SECTION 3.The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 4.Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. PROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August 2025.        Packet Page. 758 Resolution No. 2025-350 Resolution No. 2025-350 Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 759 Resolution No. 2025-350 Resolution No. 2025-350 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-350, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August 2025 by the following vote: SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2025. Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 760 CONSENT CALENDAR Date:August 6, 2025 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From:Eric Levitt, City Manager; Lynn Merrill, Director of Public Works Department:Public Works Subject: It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Design Services Agreement with JMA Engineering Inc. for a contract amount increase of $3,722.70 for Sierra Way Storm Drain (“Project”), for a total contract amount of $183,542.70 to complete the design phase, and will extend the term of the agreement through the anticipated completion date of December 30, 2026; and 2. Authorize project contingencies in the total amount of $3,457.00 for additional services for the Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all necessary documents with JMA Engineering Inc. Approving Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $3,722.70, which revises the Contractor’s name from Ludwig Engineering Associates Inc. to JMA Engineering Inc. will facilitate the Contractor’s ability to secure the required insurance bonds to proceed with the Project. The proposed project aligns with the City’s commitment to maintaining and upgrading essential infrastructure, ensuring the safety and well-being of residents, will capture surface runoff from the street, reduce potential sludging and improve traffic safety during rainy weather.        Packet Page. 761 Background The Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining the citywide storm drain system. The existing drainage conditions for Sierra Way from 31st Street to 40th Street reflect a general flow of southerly surface water with four existing catch basins on Sierra Way at 31st Street. On June 1, 2022, the Mayor and City Council approved Resolution No. 2022-102 adopting the City’s Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/23. The budget included CIP Project for Sierra Way Storm Drain (“Project”). Funding to support the Project has been established in the amount of $3,965,209.00. On August 16, 2023, the Mayor and City Council approved the award of the Design Services Agreement to Ludwig Engineering Associates, Inc. for the Sierra Way Storm Drain Improvements project in the amount of $179,820.00. The proposed project will improve traffic safety during rainy weather. Approving Amendment No. 1 will also allow JMA Engineering Inc. to secure the necessary bonding and insurance required to move forward with the Project without delay. By ensuring that the Contractor’s name is consistent with their registered corporate identity, the City can facilitate the continuation of work in compliance with all legal and contractual obligations. This update is essential to maintain the project’s timeline and minimize disruptions to the work schedule. Amendment No. 1 to the Design Services Agreement will update the Contractor’s name from Ludwig Engineering Associates Inc. to JMA Engineering Inc. This name change is a formal update, reflecting the passing of Glen Ludwig, Principal of Ludwig Engineering Associates Inc. As a result, JMA Engineering Inc. will continue to provide services as part of its organizational structure. The Amendment will ensure that the Contractor’s legal identity aligns with their official business records, which is required for the completion of the necessary documentation and formalities tied to the Project. JMA Engineering Inc. provided a proposal for an amendment to the contract in the amount of $34,570.00 to complete the design phase of the project. Approving this Amendment No. 1 will also extend the original term of the agreement through the anticipated completion date of December 2026. Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 & Expenditures Approved Budget for Storm Drain $3,965,209.00 Contract Amount $179,820.00 Salaries $13,879.00 County Flood Control Plan Check $12,168.00 Z & K Service Management $720.00 Total Remaining Budget $3,758,622.00        Packet Page. 762 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Authorizing the execution of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement aligns with Key Target No. 4: Economic Growth & Development. Completion of Sierra Way Storm Drain project will result in public improvements, being constructed that minimize risk and litigation exposure through improving the City’s infrastructure. Fiscal Impact There is no General Fund impact associated with this action. Project budget for the proposed work was previously established through approved Storm Drain Construction Fund in FY 2022/23. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Design Services Agreement with JMA Engineering Inc. for a contract amount increase of $3,722.70 for Sierra Way Storm Drain (“Project”), for a total contract amount of $183,542.70 to complete the design phase, and will extend the term of the agreement through the anticipated completion date of December 30, 2026; and 2. Authorize project contingencies in the total amount of $3,457.00 for additional services for the Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all necessary documents with JMA Engineering Inc. Attachments Attachment 1 Amendment No. 1 Attachment 2 JMA Engineering Inc. Fees Proposal Attachment 3 Harrington & Associates Letter Attachment 4 Original Agreement with Ludwig Engineering Associates Inc. Attachment 5 Location Map Orginal Construction Contract Amount $179,820.00 Expended Amount $148,972.70 Total Remaining Amount on Contract $30,847.30 Ludwig Engineering Associates, Inc. Bid: Proposal Fees Amount $34,570.00 Remaining Amount on Contract $30,847.30 Total Increase Amount on Contract $3,722.70 JMA Engineering, Inc. Proposal:        Packet Page. 763 Ward Seventh Ward June 1, 2022 The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino adopted Resolution No. 2022-102 approving Capital Improvement Program FY 2022/23. The budget included CIP Project for Sierra Way Storm Drain (“Project”). August 16, 2023 The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino authorized the City Manager to approve the award of an Agreement with Ludwig Engineering Associates Inc. in the amount of $179,820.00 for the Improvements of Sierra Way Storm Drain.        Packet Page. 764        Packet Page. 765        Packet Page. 766        Packet Page. 767        Packet Page. 768        Packet Page. 769        Packet Page. 770        Packet Page. 771        Packet Page. 772        Packet Page. 773        Packet Page. 774        Packet Page. 775        Packet Page. 776        Packet Page. 777        Packet Page. 778        Packet Page. 779        Packet Page. 780        Packet Page. 781        Packet Page. 782        Packet Page. 783        Packet Page. 784        Packet Page. 785        Packet Page. 786        Packet Page. 787        Packet Page. 788        Packet Page. 789        Packet Page. 790        Packet Page. 791        Packet Page. 792        Packet Page. 793        Packet Page. 794        Packet Page. 795        Packet Page. 796        Packet Page. 797        Packet Page. 798        Packet Page. 799        Packet Page. 800        Packet Page. 801        Packet Page. 802        Packet Page. 803        Packet Page. 804        Packet Page. 805        Packet Page. 806 1 3 8 4 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager; Lynn Merrill, Director of Public Works Public Works It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC), for additional design services and construction support services, including surveying in the amount of $29,982.00 for University Parkway Median Improvements, increasing the not to exceed amount of $384,977.00 (Project); and 2. Authorizing additional construction contingencies in the total amount of $5,000, for construction support services of the Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents with Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC); and 4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to expand the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the Project. The University Parkway Median Improvement Project requires design and construction support services due to unforeseen complexities involving a Department of Water Resources (DWR) easement and a 108-inch water line beneath the roadway.        Packet Page. 807 1 3 8 4 Extensive review comments from DWR over multiple submittals have necessitated revisions to the landscaping design. To address these requirements and complete the second phase of the project, Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC) has requested additional compensation for work beyond the original scope. Amendment No. 5 provides the necessary funding to incorporate these changes and ensure compliance with DWR standards. The cost of this amendment, in the amount of $34,982.00, will be funded through the Regional Circulation Fund. Background University Parkway is identified as a major arterial roadway in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Previously terminating at 16th Street, it has recently been extended south to Baseline Street as part of the first phase of a larger, four-phase project. The goal is to extend University Parkway further south to connect with Foothill Boulevard. However, the total cost of completing all phases exceeds the City’s available resources, and future grant funding will be essential to fully implement the project. On December 5, 2018, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018- 310 approving an agreement with ERSC to provide Environmental Clearance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) for University Parkway extension between Baseline Street and 16th Street in the amount of $204,533. On December 4, 2019, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2019-347 approving the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC to increase compensation by $24,681 for University Parkway extension. This first amendment provided $24,681 in additional compensation for out-of-scope work related to the modification of the traffic signal at Baseline Street and State Street, which required alterations to the Lytle Creek Levee. The amendment covered ERSC’s efforts to coordinate with the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) for a Section 408 permit, including preparation of NEPA documentation, structural and geotechnical reports, and related submittals. On September 2, 2020, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2020-214 approving the Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC to increase compensation by $6,048 for University Parkway extension. Amendment No. 2 added $6,048 to the agreement to conduct a presence-absence survey for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), as required by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife despite prior surveys showing no presence. The amendment allowed ERSC to retain a qualified biologist to perform a five-night trapping survey in compliance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocol. On June 1, 2022, the Mayor and City Council Approved Resolution 2020-214 approved the Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC to increase compensation by $31,248 for University Parkway extension. Amendment No. 3 increased the contract amount by $31,248 and extended the        Packet Page. 808 1 3 8 4 agreement to December 31, 2024, to address additional design services required by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) as part of their encroachment permit process. The added scope included potholing, surveying, hydrology analysis, and design modifications to meet DWR’s clearance and infrastructure requirements. On August 16, 2023 the Mayor and City Council authorized the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC, adding engineering and construction support services in the amount of $83,485 to the agreement to cover additional design and construction support services requested by the City to prevent project delays and incorporate new project features. The scope included further DWR permit-related design modifications, SCE pole shoring designs, construction support, intersection improvements at State Street and Hanford Street, and expanded landscape and irrigation design. Discussion Due to an existing easement for a 108-inch Department of Water Resources (DWR) waterline along State Street, an encroachment permit is required prior to any street construction. During the permitting process, DWR imposed several conditions, including additional potholing, surveying, hydrology analysis, storm drain lateral coordination, cover requirements, and clearance from an existing retaining wall. These requirements necessitated further studies and design modifications. Additionally, DWR issued extensive comments on the landscaping design during three consecutive reviews, requiring plan revisions to address their concerns. ERSC has incorporated these changes and will also provide construction support services throughout the project to respond to construction-related inquiries. As a result, ERSC is requesting additional compensation of $29,982 for the added design, construction support, and surveying services with an additional $5,000 for contingency. This brings the total not-to-exceed amount to $384,977. Proposed Amendment Item Amount Amendment No. 5 $29,982.00 Contingency $5,000.00 Total $34,982.00        Packet Page. 809 1 3 8 4 As a result of the new Amendment No. 5 for additional design services and construction support total reflecting the original agreement, Amendment No. 5 and contingencies is $384,977.00. The available Regional Circulation project budget after Amendments No. 1 – 4 is $1,182,039.92. The remaining project budget after the new Amendment No. 5 is $1,147,057.92, which will be available for construction. Budget Regional Circulation Fund $1,532,034.92 Amendments No. 1 - 4 $349,995.00 Regional Circulation Fund After Amendments No. 1-4 $1,182,039.92 Amendment No. 5 $34,982.00 Remianing Regional Circulation After Amendment No. 5 $1,147,057.92 Design Services Cost Description Amount Purpose/Category Orginal Agreement $204,533.00 CEQA clearance and PS&E preparation for segment from Baseline St to 16th St Amendment No. 1 $24,681.00 Traffic signal modification & coordination with ACOE for levee (Section 408 permit) Amendment No. 2 $6,048.00 Biological survey for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) per CDFW/USFWS requirements Amendment No. 3 $31,248.00 Additional design services for DWR permit (surveying, hydrology, and design adjustments) Amendment No. 4 $83,485.00 Construction support, intersection improvements, utility coordination, and landscape design Amendment No. 5 $34,982.00 Median design refinements and final engineering support services Total Contract Amount $384,977.00        Packet Page. 810 1 3 8 4 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Authorization of this Amendment aligns with Key Target No. 1e: Improved Operational & Financial Capacity – Minimize risk and litigation exposure. This Project will construct public infrastructure in the City that will minimize the risk and ligation exposure upon completion of the street improvements. Fiscal Impact There is no General Fund Impact associated with this action. Funding for additional design services will be provided through previously allocated funds for the project in the Regional Circulation DIF Fund which has approximately $1,182,039.92 available funds remaining. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California: 1. Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC), for additional design services and construction support services, including surveying in the amount of $29,982 for University Parkway Median Improvements, increasing the not to exceed amount of $384,977.00 (Project); and 2. Authorizing additional construction contingencies in the total amount of $5,000, for construction support services of the Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents with Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC); and 4. Authorize the City Manager or designee to expend the contingency fund, if necessary, to complete the Project. Attachments Attachment 1 Amendment No. 5 with Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC) Attachment 2 Amendment No. 4 with ERSC Attachment 3 Amendment No. 3 with ERSC Attachment 4 Amendment No. 2 with ERSC Attachment 5 Amendment No. 1 with ERSC Attachment 6 Professional Services Agreement with ERSC Attachment 7 Location Map Ward: Sixth Ward        Packet Page. 811 1 3 8 4 Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: June 20, 2018 Resolution No. 2018-189 adopted the City’s final budget document for Fiscal Year 2018/2019. December 5, 2018 Resolution 2018-310 adopted agreement with ERSC to provide Environmental Clearance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) for State Street Extension between Baseline Street and 16th Street. December 4, 2019 Resolution 2019-347 adopted First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC. September 2, 2020 Resolution 2020-214 adopted Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC. June 1, 2022 Approved Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Engineering Services Agreement with ERSC August 16, 2023 Approved Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Engineering Services Agreement with ERSC        Packet Page. 812 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (ERSC) This Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement is made and entered into as of this 6th day of August, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of San Bernardino, a California charter city and municipal corporation (“City”) and Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC) (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” RECITALS A. WHEREAS, City and Contractor entered into a Professional Services Agreement, dated December 5, 2018, for the purpose of providing design services for the preparation of plans, specification and estimate for University Parkway Extension between 16th Street and Baseline Street (“Master Agreement”); and B. WHEREAS, on December 4, 2019, the Mayor and City Coun cil adopted Resolution 2019-347 approving the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC to increase compensation by $24,681 for State Street extension. The amendment addressed requirements set by the Army Corps of Engineers regarding the Lytle Creek Levee, which was not part of the original scope of work. C. WHEREAS, on September 2, 2020, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2020-214 approving the Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC to increase compensation by $6,048 for State Street extension. The amendment addressed the request by the Department of Fish and Wildlife to complete a presence-absence survey for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat . D. WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022, the Mayor and City Council approved the Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with ERSC to increase compensation by $31,248 for State Street extension. The amendment addressed additional work that was required to receive a permit due to an existing DWR waterline along State Street. E. WHEREAS, On August 16, 2023, the Mayor and City Council authorized the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Engineering Services Agreement with ERSC, adding engineering and construction support services in the amount of $83,485 and increasing the purchase order to a total amount not to - exceed of $349,995 for the University Parkway extension from Baseline Street to 16th Street. F. WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order to extend the term of the Master Agreement, and to include additional funds for the continued performance of the services in accordance with the compensation provisions of the Master Agreement.        Packet Page. 813 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants, conditions, and promises contained in this Amendment No. 5 and the Master Agreement, as previously amended, the Parties mutually agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Services. The Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, are hereby amended to include additional services related to the University parkway Landscape Median Improvements Project. The additional services are more fully described in Exhibit “A-1”, attached hereto to this Amendment No. 5 and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Amendment to Section 6 of the Master Agreement. Section 6 of the Master Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: “6 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through July 31, 2026 or to the end of construction whichever comes first , unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.” 4. Compensation. The total not to exceed compensation amount shall be increased by Thirty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Two ($34,982.00) increasing the total not to exceed compensation amount from Three Hundred Forty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-Five ($349,995.00) to Three Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy Seven ($379,977.00). 5. Full Force. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 5, all provisions of the Master Agreement as previously amended, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No. 5. 6. Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this Amendment No. 5 which is transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Amendment No. 5 for all purposes. This Amendment No. 5 may be signed using an electronic signature. 7. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 5 may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]        Packet Page. 814 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (ERSC) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 5 on the Effective Date first herein above written. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVED BY: Eric Levitt City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Best Best & Krieger LLP City Attorney ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (ERSC) CONTRACTOR Signature Name Title Signature Name Title        Packet Page. 815 EXHIBIT A-1 SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES [ATTACHED]        Packet Page. 816 Page | 1 REDLANDS | TEMECULA | PALM DESERT 1861 W. Redlands Blvd., Redlands, CA 92373 T: (909) 890-1255 | F: (909) 890-0995 | erscinc.com April 2, 2025 Revised May 9, 2025 2nd Revision: May 12, 2025 David Marghezi, Project Manager City of San Bernardino Department of Public Works 201 N. “E” Street, 2nd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92401 RE: Request for Additional Services for the University Parkway Extension from Baseline Street to 16th Street – DWR Permit Processing Dear Mr. Marghezi, ERSC is respectfully requesting additional funds for providing Professional Services to cover work already performed at the request of the City of San Bernardino (City). The service request and associated costs are detailed below. DWR Permit Plan Review for Landscape and Irrigation Plans and Specifications ERSC prepared a 100% PS&E for University Parkway Extension Project and submitted to the City on 8/15/2024. Prior to advertising the project, the City submitted an encroachment permit application to the Department of Water Resources (DWR). DWR responded back to the City with plan review comments on 11/8/2024. The City forwarded these comments to ERSC on 11/12/2024 and requested ERSC to address the plan review comments. Because plan revisions for DWR permit processing was not included in ERSC’s contract, ERSC began addressing plan review comments during the preparation of an extra services request in order to meet DWR’s 60-day resubmittal period. As directed by the City, ERSC billed against Phase 12.3: Construction Phase Services of ERSC’s approved contract during the interim. Deliverables: DWR PC #2 submittal package with comments addressed, up to three (3) rounds of comments from DWR, and a Final Revised PS&E for the City to bid once a DWR permit is secured. DWR PC #2 submittal deliverables include: 1. Updated and signed landscape/irrigation and civil plan set 2. Updated specifications 3. Traffic control plan 4. Response to DWR PC #1 comments. 5. Utility purveyor contact list 6. Updated encroachment permit application (assumed the City will provide per DWR comment No. 20a)        Packet Page. 817 Page | 2 1861 W. Redlands Blvd., Redlands, CA 92373 T: (909) 890-1255 | F: (909) 890-0995 | erscinc.com DWR Permit Processing – Monument Preservation Acknowledgement As part of DWR’s permit plan check process, DWR requires the applicant to sign and certify an “Acknowledgement of Control and Monument Responsibility” form, in which certified that a licensed land surveyor is accepting responsibility for the survey control and monument preservation within the bounds of the Project. The last Corner Record file that was recorded for the monuments within the project area is over 30 years old. The City requested ERSC to provide the survey services needed to complete the monument restoration work and sign DWR’s monument preservation form. ERSC’s survey crew visited the site on May 1st, 2025 and located some monuments that where recently reset and others tied out but not yet reset. On May 12th, the City notified ERSC that Hunsaker and Associates is the responsible surveyor for re-setting the monuments and their surveyor of record provided the City with a signed DWR acknowledgement form. Therefore, the City no longer requires ERSC’s aforementioned survey services for the project. This additional services proposal reflects ERSC’s time spent on survey services to-date, which includes survey research, establishing control, and survey field work on May 1st. Fee Estimate: DWR Permit Plan Review Processing $ 25,657 DWR Monument Preservation Survey Services $ 4,325 Total $ 29,982 ERSC is respectfully requesting that the above amounts be authorized to cover the extra services and work already completed. Should you have any questions on the above requested fees, do not hesitate to contact me at bbooth@erscinc.com or at (909) 890-1255. Respectfully, Ben Booth, PE Engineer V        Packet Page. 818 DocuSign Envelope ID: 22A9F6A5-148A-4AA4-979A-95B701163E46 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR THE STATE STREET EXTENSION PROJEСT This Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement is made and entered into as of August 16, 2023 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of San Bernardino, a charter city and municipal corporation ("City") and Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes referred to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties." RECITALS A. WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have entered into an agreement, dated, December 5, 2018, for the purpose of providing professional environmental and civil design services for the State Street Extension Project (the "Original Agreement"). B. WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 1 to the Original Agreement, dated December 4, 2019, for the purpose of including additional funds for the performance of services under the Original Agreement. C. WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 2, dated September 2, 2020, for the purpose of including additional funds for the performance of services under the Original Agreement. D. WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 3, dated June 1, 2022, for the purpose of extending the term of the Original Agreement, adding additional services, and increasing the not- to-exceed amount to provide compensation for those additional services. E. WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Original Agreement in to include additional services and to provide compensation for the additional services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants, conditions, and promises contained in this Amendment No. 4 and the Original Agreement, as previously amended, the Parties mutually agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and -1-        Packet Page. 819 DocuSign Envelope ID: 22A9F6A5-148A-4AA4-979A-95B701163E46 correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Services. The Scope of Services for the Original Agreement is hereby amended to include additional services as more particularly described in Exhibit "A-1", attached hereto to this Amendment No. 4 and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Compensation. The total not to exceed compensation amount shall be increased by Eighty-Three Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Five Dollars ($83,485) increasing the total not to exceed compensation amount from Two Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Ten Dollars ($266,510) to Three Hundred Forty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-Five Dollars ($349,995). 4. Full Force. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 4, all provisions of the Original Agreement, as previously amended, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No. 4. 5. Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this Amendment No. 4 which is transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Amendment No. 4 for all purposes. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed using an electronic signature. 6. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] -2-        Packet Page. 820 DocuSign Envelope ID: 22A9F6A5-148A-4AA4-979A-95B701163E46 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 4 on the Effective Date first herein above written. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONSULTANT APPROVED BY: Charles E. Meлу Charles E McNeely, Interim City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: homas Kice Best Best & Krieger LLP City Attorney ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Jlin M. Brudin Signature John M. Brudin Name President Title -3-        Packet Page. 821        Packet Page. 822        Packet Page. 823        Packet Page. 824        Packet Page. 825        Packet Page. 826        Packet Page. 827        Packet Page. 828        Packet Page. 829        Packet Page. 830        Packet Page. 831        Packet Page. 832        Packet Page. 833        Packet Page. 834        Packet Page. 835        Packet Page. 836        Packet Page. 837        Packet Page. 838        Packet Page. 839        Packet Page. 840        Packet Page. 841        Packet Page. 842        Packet Page. 843 2 7 9 5 CONSENT CALENDAR August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager; Lynn Merrill, Director of Public Works Public Works It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution No. 2025-351: 1. Accept SBCTA – Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street in the amount of $372,376.00; and 2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to approve matching funds in the amount of $93,094.00 from the Traffic Safety Fund; and 3. Designate the City Manager, or designee, as a responsible agency official authorized to sign project agreements and certifications for the preparation of the SBCTA - Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street Project; and 4. Authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2025/26 CIP budget (CIP ID: TC26-006) with $100,000.00 (FY 2025/26) plus $372,376.00 (FY 2026/27) from the Traffic Safety Fund to bring the total project budget to $472,376.00 (FY 2025/26); and 5. Authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2025/26 CIP budget (CIP ID: TC26-006) with an additional $372,376.00 in SBCTA - Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street (Valley Measure I TMS funds).        Packet Page. 844 2 7 9 5 Executive Summary The Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street Project will consist of installing wireless cell modems and hardware to Optimize Traffic Signal Timing at traffic signals along Baseline Street from western city limits to eastern city limits and will provide real-time connectivity to the City of San Bernardino’s Traffic Management Center consistent with the goals of the San Bernardino County Council of Governments (SBCOG) Smart County Master Plan (SCMP). One of the early action items in the SCMP is to move forward with a set of “smart corridors” which will focus on controller technology and communications upgrades to improve traffic flow, with the additional consideration of incorporating technology to reduce delays for buses on the Omnitrans network. The City has been awarded Valley Measure I TMS funds in the amount of $372,376 to support both the material procurement and construction phase. These funds will cover 80% of the total estimated project cost, with the remaining money coming from the Traffic Safety Fund. Background The San Bernardino County Council of Governments (SBCOG) completed the Smart County Master Plan (SCMP) in December 2024, with input from a full range of stakeholders, including local jurisdictions. One of the early action items in the SCMP is to move forward with a set of “smart corridors” which will focus on controller technology and communications upgrades to improve traffic flow, with the additional consideration of incorporating technology to reduce delays for buses on the Omnitrans network. It is noted in the SCMP that the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Board of Directors (Board) previously set aside $5,000,000 in Measure I Valley Traffic Management System (TMS) funds for investment in traffic signal coordination upgrades for five different corridors in the Valley, in addition to the Haven Avenue corridor already completed. Recommendation C of Agenda Item 8 in the July 2021 Board agenda stated: C. Allocate $3,000,000 and $2,000,000 of Measure I Valley TMS program funds to be made available to East Valley and West Valley jurisdictions, respectively, through a competitive grant process to be developed by staff for implementation of a regional coordinated approach to San Bernardino Valley Coordinated Traffic Signal System (SBVCTSS) program improvements upon future Board of Directors approval. Discussion The City decided to apply for the SBCTA Smart Corridor RFI as the SCMP and the City goals are commonly aligned. The RFI established a $1,000,000 per project proposal maximum award and established a minimum match of 20%. Public Works Traffic Division submitted “San Bernardino A – Baseline St.” in response to the RFI.        Packet Page. 845 2 7 9 5 After review of the proposals by the SBCTA evaluation panel, the SBCTA approved the award for the Baseline St. Project. A breakdown of the awarded funds and local match requirements are outlined below: Project Total Cost Measure Award Local Match San Bernardino A – Baseline St. $465,470 $372,376 $93,094 The staff report reflects the revised estimated total cost for the Project is $465,470, which includes Preparing of Plans and Specifications, construction management service, and construction. The cost of the local match in $93,094 with the remaining balance covered by cost-reimbursement. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals This project is consistent with Goal No. 3(c): Improved Quality of Life – evaluate and enhance the quality of public safety services. The corridor of Baseline Street will be enhanced by constantly monitoring intersections to enhance the intersection quality of service for both the buses and the vehicles. Fiscal Impact There is no General Fund impact associated with this item. There is grant match funding in the amount of $93,094 from the Traffic Safety Fund. Valley Measure I TMS funds in the amount of $372,376 has been approved for “San Bernardino A – Baseline St” for this project. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution No. 2025-351: 1. Accept SBCTA – Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street in the amount of $372,376.00; and 2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to approve matching funds in the amount of $93,094.00 from the Traffic Safety Fund; and 3. Designate the City Manager, or designee, as a responsible agency official authorized to sign project agreements and certifications for the preparation of the SBCTA – Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street Project; and 4. Authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2025/26 CIP budget (CIP ID: TC26-006) with an additional $93,094.00 from the Traffic Safety Fund to bring the total project budget to $465,470.00; and 5. Authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2025/26 CIP budget (CIP ID: TC26-006) with an additional $372,376.00 in        Packet Page. 846 2 7 9 5 SBCTA – Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street (Valley Measure I TMS funds). Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution No. 2025-351 Attachment 2 Baseline Street Intersections Attachment 3 SBCTA Award Ward: First, Second, and Sixth Ward Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: None        Packet Page. 847 Resolution No. 2025-351 Resolution 2025-351 1 of 4 7 3 3 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-351 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO , CALIFORNIA ACCEPT THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SBCTA) - SMART CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BASELINE STREET (VALLEY MEASURE I TMS FUNDS) IN THE AMOUNT OF $372,376, AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO APPROVE GRANT MATCHING FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $93,094 FROM THE TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND, DESIGNATE THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE AS A RESPONSIBLE AGENCY OFFICIAL AUTHROZED TO SIGN PROJECT AGREEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE SBCTA - SMART CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BASELINE STREET PROJECT, AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO AMEND THE FY 2025/26 CIP BUDGET (CIP ID: TC26-006) WITH AN ADDITIONAL $93,094 FROM THE TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND TO BRING THE TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET TO $465,470, AND AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO AMEND THE FY 2025/26 CIP BUDGET (CIP ID: TC26-006) WITH AN ADDITIONAL $372,376 IN SBCTA - SMART CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BASELINE STREET (VALLEY MEASURE I TMS FUNDS). WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (“SBCTA”) is legislated under Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C. 148) and regulated under Part 924 of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR Part 924); and WHEREAS, under the San Bernardino County Council of Governments (“SBCOG”) completed the Smart County Master Plan (“SCMP”) in December 2024; and WHEREAS, an early action item on the SCMP is the installation of smart corridors which utilize controller technology and communications upgrades to improve traffic flow and reduce delays for public transportation; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino (“City”) staff submitted an application to SBCTA for the installation of a smart corridor along Baseline Street; and        Packet Page. 848 Resolution No. 2025-351 Resolution 2025-351 2 of 4 7 3 3 1 WHEREAS, on April 10, 2025, City received SBCTA Smart Corridor Grant approval advising that the City’s Project has been awarded the SBCTA - Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street (Valley Measure I TMS funds). BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City of San Bernardino hereby accepts the SBCTA - Smart Corridor Grant for Improvements to Baseline Street in the amount of $372,376.00. SECTION 3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to approve matching funds in the amount of $93,094.00 from the Traffic Safety Fund. The City Manager, or his designee as the signatory authority to execute all agreements and certifications in support of the SBCTA - Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street Project. SECTION 4. The Agency Director of Finance and Management Services Administrative Service is hereby authorized to establish a project budget in total amount of $465,470 in the Federal Fund Program 123 in which $372,376 is reimbursable through the grant funding program and appropriate $93,094 from the Traffic Safety fund. SECTION 5. The Agency Director of Finance and Management Services is hereby authorized to amend the FY 2025/26 CIP budget (CIP ID: TC26-006) with an additional $372,376.00 in SBCTA - Smart Corridor Improvements to Baseline Street (Valley Measure I TMS funds) SECTION 6. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 7. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.        Packet Page. 849 Resolution No. 2025-351 Resolution 2025-351 3 of 4 7 3 3 1 APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 6th day of August, 2025. Helen Tran, Mayor City of San Bernardino Attest: Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk Approved as to form: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney        Packet Page. 850 Resolution No. 2025-351 Resolution 2025-351 4 of 4 7 3 3 1 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-351, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of August 2025 by the following vote: SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______ IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______ FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______ SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______ KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______ FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______ ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______ WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2025. Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk        Packet Page. 851 P a g e 1 | 1 List of Baseline Street Intersections City of San Bernardino shall be the lead local agency for the list of intersections below: SBVCTSS Corridor Cross Street Agency Responsible for Maintenance Baseline State St City of San Bernardino Baseline California St City of San Bernardino Baseline Medical Center City of San Bernardino Baseline Mount Vernon Ave City of San Bernardino Baseline Massachusetts Ave City of San Bernardino Baseline Perris St City of San Bernardino Baseline H St City of San Bernardino Baseline G St City of San Bernardino Baseline F St City of San Bernardino Baseline E St City of San Bernardino Baseline D St City of San Bernardino Baseline Arrowhead Ave City of San Bernardino Baseline Mountain View Ave City of San Bernardino Baseline Sierra Way City of San Bernardino Baseline Waterman Ave City of San Bernardino Baseline Crestview Ave City of San Bernardino Baseline Windsor Dr City of San Bernardino Baseline Tippecanoe City of San Bernardino Baseline Del Rosa Dr City of San Bernardino Baseline Del Rosa Ave City of San Bernardino        Packet Page. 852 Entity: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Minute Action AGENDA ITEM: Date: April 10, 2025 Subject: Request for Information Smart Corridors Recommendation: That the following be reviewed and recommended for final approval by the Board of Directors, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), at a regularly scheduled Board meeting: A. Allocate $660,400 of Valley Measure I Traffic Management System (TMS) funds to the City of Colton for smart corridor improvements to Pepper Avenue and Valley Boulevard. B. Allocate $1,000,000 of Valley Measure I TMS funds to the City of Highland for smart corridor improvements to Base Line Street and Greenspot Road. C. Allocate $943,000 of Valley Measure I TMS funds to the City of Ontario for smart corridor improvements to Euclid Avenue. D. Allocate $1,000,000 of Valley Measure I TMS funds to the City of Montclair for smart corridor improvements to Central Avenue. E. Allocate $976,750 of Valley Measure I TMS funds to the City of Rialto for smart corridor improvements to Riverside Avenue. F. Allocate $372,376 of Valley Measure I TMS funds to the City of San Bernardino for smart corridor improvements to Baseline Street. G. Authorize the Executive Director, or his designee, to finalize and execute funding agreements for the projects awarded under this action, subject to approval as to form by SBCTA General Counsel. Background: The San Bernardino County Council of Governments (SBCOG) completed the Smart County Master Plan (SCMP) in December 2024, with input from a full range of stakeholders, including local jurisdictions. One of the early action items in the SCMP is to move forward with a set of “smart corridors” on which to focus controller technology and communications upgrades to improve traffic flow, with the additional consideration of incorporating technology to reduce delays for buses on the Omnitrans network. It is noted in the SCMP that the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Board of Directors (Board) previously set aside $5,000,000 in Measure I Valley Traffic Management System (TMS) funds for investment in traffic signal coordination upgrades for five different corridors in the Valley, in addition to the Haven Avenue corridor already completed. Recommendation C of Agenda Item 8 in the July 2021 Board agenda stated: C. Allocate $3,000,000 and $2,000,000 of Measure I Valley TMS program funds to be made available to East Valley and West Valley jurisdictions, respectively, through a competitive grant process to be developed by staff for implementation of a regional coordinated approach to San Bernardino Valley Coordinated Traffic Signal System (SBVCTSS) program improvements upon future Board of Directors approval.        Packet Page. 853 Board of Directors Metro Valley Study Session Agenda Item April 10, 2025 Page 2 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority When funds were committed to the SCMP, the Board directed staff to put the additional $5,000,000 in TMS allocation on hold until the SCMP was completed. The SCMP left open the final designation of smart corridors pending further outreach to treatments in those corridors. In parallel with the SCMP, SBCTA staff recently completed the Long-Range Multimodal Transportation Plan (LRMTP). As part of the effort, two Board actions were taken that are connected to this Smart Corridor Request for Information (RFI) and recommended allocation of Valley TMS funding. 1. On December 4, 2024, the Board directed staff to conduct an evaluation of the Transit Signal Priority (TSP) application and other strategies to enhance local bus service, in conjunction with the development of smart corridors in the Valley, with an investment plan to be brought back to the Board by spring 2025. This effort is currently in process. SBCTA has been engaged with Omnitrans and the Orange County Transportation Authority to better understand the capabilities and potential application of TSP technology in San Bernardino County. The investments anticipated under this recommendation would promote SBCTA, Omnitrans, and local jurisdiction opportunities to implement TSP in the future as many signals continue to use outdated technology that at this time would not be TSP-ready. 2. On March 5, 2025, the Board approved the LRMTP. The LRMTP reaffirmed the Priority Transit Corridors for future consideration of express bus and bus rapid transit (BRT) improvements. The action also included the creation of the Top Tier of Priority Transit Corridors in the San Bernardino Valley. The Top Tier corridors (listed in alphabetical order, not priority) are: • Baseline/Highland Avenue, San Bernardino Transit Center to Greenspot Road • Foothill Boulevard, Victoria Gardens to San Bernardino Transit Center • San Bernardino Avenue, Ontario Mills to San Bernardino Transit Center The recommended allocations included consideration of the Priority Transit Corridors and Top Tier corridors when conducting the evaluation. Consistent with directions from the SBCTA Board, staff prepared a Smart Corridor RFI that was circulated to member jurisdictions on January 15, 2025. The RFI process included the schedule below: Committee (TTAC) meeting        Packet Page. 854 Board of Directors Metro Valley Study Session Agenda Item April 10, 2025 Page 3 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Outreach efforts were made to the TTAC and City/County Managers’ Technical Advisory Committee. Staff executed the RFI consistent with the schedule. The only deviations to the schedule were extending the window for submitting questions to SBCTA about the RFI, as well as providing responses to questions as they were received rather than waiting until February 27, 2025. Staff made these modifications to allow for maximum opportunity to ask questions and to minimize the delay in response time to member jurisdictions. To execute the geographical equity included in the July 2021 allocation of Valley TMS funds by the Board, project nominations were grouped into East and West Valley application pools. The East Valley was defined as Rialto and cities to the east. The West Valley was defined as Fontana and cities to the west. The County of San Bernardino was also eligible, and Bloomington will be considered as part of the East Valley. The RFI generated strong interest from jurisdictions in both the West and East Valley. By March 17, 2025 the following proposals were received by SBCTA for a total request of $8,593,042: East Valley Proposals Received – Total Valley TMS Requested - $3,850,042 • Colton – Pepper Avenue & Valley Boulevard • Highland – Base Line Street & Greenspot Road • Rialto – Riverside Avenue • San Bernardino – Baseline Street • San Bernardino – Highland Avenue • San Bernardino – sbX • Yucaipa – Oak Glen Road & Yucaipa Boulevard West Valley Proposals Received – Total Valley TMS Requested - $4,743,000 • Chino – Philadelphia Avenue • Ontario – Euclid Avenue • Montclair (with Chino and County) – Central Avenue • Montclair (with County) – Holt Boulevard & Mission Boulevard • Rancho Cucamonga – Base Line Road, Archibald Avenue, Carnelian Avenue & Etiwanda Avenue Following receipt of the proposals, SBCTA convened a panel to review and evaluate the proposals on March 19, 2025. The proposals were evaluated on the criteria included in the RFI and included below: Total Possible Score 100        Packet Page. 855 Board of Directors Metro Valley Study Session Agenda Item April 10, 2025 Page 4 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority The RFI established a $1,000,000 per project proposal maximum award and established a minimum match of 20%. After review of the proposals by the evaluation panel, the following are recommended for award by the SBCTA Board (listed in alphabetical order, not by priority). Colton - Pepper Ave. & Valley Blvd. Highland - Base Line St. & Greenspot Rd. $1,339,484 $1,000,000 $339,484 $1,201,750 $976,750 $225,000 $465,470 $372,376 $93,094 Subtotal $3,832,204 $3,009,526 $822,678 West Valley $1,314,341 $1,000,000 $314,341 $1,179,900 $943,000 $236,900 Subtotal $2,494,241 $1,943,000 $551,241 Grand Total $6,326,445 $4,952,526 $1,373,919 The RFI did not receive smart corridor proposals for the higher level, more sophisticated smart corridors anticipated by the SCMP. However, a stated goal at the outset of this RFI was to provide funding to local jurisdictions for signal technology and communications upgrades that will be needed for future TSP projects intended to improve the average speed for buses on the Omnitrans system. A majority of the project investments provide enhancements to the north-south corridors feeding into the largely east-west transit system, both established and under construction. While not directly providing immediate premium transit improvements, the investments lay the foundation for further TSP investments that will improve speed and reliability on the Omnitrans routes, making them more appealing options when commuters look to connect to the Metrolink and BRT systems. SBCTA staff advocated for local jurisdictions to collaborate with each other on smart corridor improvements that would provide for multijurisdictional benefit. The applications received demonstrated consideration of cross-jurisdictional collaboration. But it is worth noting that the City of Montclair ’s application for Central Avenue provides for direct project benefits for three jurisdictions, including the City of Chino and the County of San Bernardino. Financial Impact: This item has no financial impact on the adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.        Packet Page. 856 Board of Directors Metro Valley Study Session Agenda Item April 10, 2025 Page 5 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Reviewed By: This item is not scheduled for review by any other policy committee or technical advisory committee. Staff presented the Request for Information opportunity to the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee on January 6, 2025 and February 3, 2025 as well as to the City/County Managers’ Technical Advisory Committee on March 6, 2025. Responsible Staff: Ryan Graham, Planning Manager Board of Directors Metro Valley Study Session Date: April 10, 2025 Witnessed By:        Packet Page. 857 DISCUSSION August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Eric Levitt, City Manager; Cheryl Weeks, Council Administrative Supervisor Council Office It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the selection of one voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates to the 2025 Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo on October 8-10, 2025, in Long Beach, California Convention Center. In order to participate in the voting for the General Assembly Meeting at the League of California Cities Annual Expo, each city must designate a voting representative and up to two alternates. To ensure the city has representation at this annual expo, the designation of the delegate and alternates must be submitted to the League of California Cities no later than September 24, 2025. The 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo will be held on October 8-10, 2025. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the General Assembly Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions that establish Cal Cities policy. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the Cal Cities in efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. To expedite the conduct of business at the 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo, Cal Cities has requested that each City designate a voting representative and up to two alternate voting delegates. At least one must be        Packet Page. 858 present during the General Assembly Meeting on Friday, October 10, 2025, and in possession of the voting card in order to cast a vote. The General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. The appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing their city and voting on resolutions. To cast a vote during the General Assembly, the City must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting Delegates may either be an elected or appointed official. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the Mayor or City Manager alone. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website Voting delegates must be designated as soon as possible so that proper records can be established for the conference. The City of San Bernardino must return the Voting Delegate/Alternate form to the Cal Cities Office no later than Wednesday, September 24, 2025. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals Selecting a Voting Delegate and attending the General Assembly meeting at the 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo aligns with Key Target No. 2: Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community. Fiscal Impact Conference costs are covered under the 2025/2026 adopted budget. Estimated cost to attend per person including registration and lodging is approximately $2,000. The League of California Cities (Cal Cities) Annual Conference & Expo is part of the pre- approved travel for the Mayor and City Council. Conclusion It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, approve the designation of one Voting Delegate and two Alternate Voting Delegates to the 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo on October 8-10, 2025, in Sacramento, California.        Packet Page. 859 Attachments Attachment 1 – 2025 Cal Cities Voting Delegate Packet Attachment 2 – 2024 Designated Voting Delegate and Alternates Ward: All Wards Synopsis of Previous Council Actions: On August 21, 2024 The Mayor and City Council approved one voting delegate and two alternates for the 2024 League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo in October 2024.        Packet Page. 860 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org DATE: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Oct. 8-10, 2025 Long Beach Convention Center Every year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. Taking place on Oct. 10, the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions. To cast a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official. Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. Following council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Wed., Sept. 24. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form. Submitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website. Council Action Advised by September 24, 2025        Packet Page. 861 For a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly. Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference. Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate. The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Oct. 8, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Oct. 9, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Oct. 10, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Wednesday, Sept. 24. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at zseals@calcities.org. Attachments: •General Assembly Voting Guidelines •Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly        Packet Page. 862 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate. 6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.        Packet Page. 863 Sixty days before the Annual Conference and Expo, Cal Cities members may submit policy proposals on issues of importance to cities. The resolution must have the concurrence of at least five additional member cities or individual members. How it works: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly General Assembly General Resolutions Policy Committees Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control. The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work. The petitioned resolution is an alternate method to introduce policy proposals during the annual conference. The petition must be signed by voting delegates from 10% of member cities, and submitted to the Cal Cities President at least 24 hours before the beginning of the General Assembly. Petitioned Resolutions The Cal Cities President assigns general resolutions to policy committees where members review, debate, and recommend positions for each policy proposal. Recommendations are forwarded to the Resolutions Committee. Who’s who The Resolutions Committee includes representatives from each Cal Cities diversity caucus, regional division, municipal department, and policy committee, as well as individuals appointed by the Cal Cities president. Voting delegates are appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. The General Assembly is a meeting of the collective body of all voting delegates —one from every member city. Seven policy committees meet throughout the year to review and recommend positions to take on bills and regulatory proposals. Policy committees include members from each Cal Cities diversity caucus, regional division, and municipal department, as well as individuals appointed by the Cal Cities president. During the General Assembly, voting delegates debate and consider general and petitioned resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws amendments are also considered at this meeting. Cal Cities policy development is a member- informed process, grounded in the voices and experiences of city officials throughout the state. For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo Resolutions Committee The Resolutions Committee considers all resolutions. General Resolutions approved1 by either a policy committee or the Resolutions Committee are next considered by the General Assembly. General resolutions not approved, or referred for further study by both a policy committee and the Resolutions Committee do not go to the General Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions are considered by the General Assembly, unless disqualified.2 During the Annual Conference and Expo 1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f).        Packet Page. 864        Packet Page. 865 ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FUTURE MEETINGS August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Mario Flores, Council Member, 6th Ward Council Office        Packet Page. 866 2 8 4 8 ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FUTURE MEETINGS August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Theodore Sanchez, Council Member, 1st Ward Council Office        Packet Page. 867 ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FUTURE MEETINGS August 6, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Dr. Treasure Ortiz, Council Member, 7th Ward Council Office Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text.        Packet Page. 868